Hubbry Logo
Suction cupSuction cupMain
Open search
Suction cup
Community hub
Suction cup
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Suction cup
Suction cup
Suction cup
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A transparent suction cup
A figure showing that the pressure exerted outside the suction cup exceeds the pressure inside. This pressure difference holds the suction cup in contact with the surface.
The pressure on a suction cup, as exerted by collisions of gas molecules, holds the suction cup in contact with the surface.
One cup suction lifter.

A suction cup, also known as a sucker, is a device or object that uses the negative fluid pressure of air or water to adhere to nonporous surfaces, creating a partial vacuum.[1]

Suction cups occur in nature on the bodies of some animals such as octopuses and squid, and have been reproduced artificially for numerous purposes.[2]

Theory

[edit]

The working face of the suction cup is made of elastic, flexible material and has a curved surface.[3] When the center of the suction cup is pressed against a flat, non-porous surface, the volume of the space between the suction cup and the flat surface is reduced, which causes the air or water between the cup and the surface to be expelled past the rim of the circular cup. The cavity which develops between the cup and the flat surface has little to no air or water in it because most of the fluid has already been forced out of the inside of the cup, causing a lack of pressure. The pressure difference between the atmosphere on the outside of the cup and the low-pressure cavity on the inside of the cup keeps the cup adhered to the surface.

Suction cup pressed on a window

When the user ceases to apply physical pressure to the outside of the cup, the elastic substance of which the cup is made tends to resume its original, curved shape. The length of time for which the suction effect can be maintained depends mainly on how long it takes for air or water to leak back into the cavity between the cup and the surface, equalizing the pressure with the surrounding atmosphere. This depends on the porosity and flatness of the surface and the properties of the cup's rim. A small amount of mineral oil or vegetable oil is often employed to help maintain the seal.

Calculations

[edit]

The force required to detach an ideal suction cup by pulling it directly away from the surface is given by the formula:

where:

F is the force,
A is the area of the surface covered by the cup,
P is the pressure outside the cup (typically atmospheric pressure)

This is derived from the definition of pressure, which is:

For example, a suction cup of radius 2.0 cm has an area of (0.020 m)2 = 0.0013 square meters. Using the force formula (F = AP), the result is F = (0.0013 m2)(100,000 Pa) = about 130 newtons.

The above formula relies on several assumptions:

  1. The outer diameter of the cup does not change when the cup is pulled.
  2. No air leaks into the gap between the cup and the surface.
  3. The pulling force is applied perpendicular to the surface so that the cup does not slide sideways or peel off.
  4. The suction cup contains a perfect vacuum; in reality, a small partial pressure will remain on the interior, and P is the differential pressure.

Artificial use

[edit]
SatNav devices often ship with suction cup holders for mounting on windscreens.
GoPro camera attached to car with suction cup

Artificial suction cups are believed to have first been used in the third century, B.C., and were made out of gourds. They were used to suction "bad blood" from internal organs to the surface. Hippocrates is believed to have invented this procedure.[citation needed]

The first modern suction cup patents were issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office during the 1860s. TC Roche was awarded U.S. Patent No. 52,748 in 1866 for a "Photographic Developer Dipping Stick"; the patent discloses a primitive suction cup means for handling photographic plates during developing procedures. In 1868, Orwell Needham patented a more refined suction cup design, U.S. Patent No. 82,629, calling his invention an "Atmospheric Knob" purposed for general use as a handle and drawer opening means.[4][5]

Suction cups have a number of commercial and industrial applications:

  • To attach an object to a flat, nonporous surface, such as a refrigerator door or a tile on a wall. This is also used for mooring ships.[6][7]
  • To move an object, such as a pane of glass or a raised floor tile, by attaching the suction cup to a flat, nonporous part of the object and then sliding or lifting the object.
  • In some toys, such as Nerf darts.
  • As toilet plungers.[8]
  • To climb up almost or completely vertically up or down a flat, nonporous surface, such as the sides of some buildings. This is part of buildering, which is also known as urban climbing.[9]
  • To hold an object still while it is worked on, such as holding a piece of glass while performing edge grinding.

On May 25, 1981, Dan Goodwin, a.k.a. SpiderDan, scaled Sears Tower, the former world's tallest building, with a pair of suction cups. He went on to scale the Renaissance Center in Dallas, the Bonaventure Hotel in Los Angeles, the World Trade Center in New York City, Parque Central Tower in Caracas, the Nippon TV station in Tokyo, and the Millennium Tower in San Francisco.[10][11][12]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Suction cups.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Suction cup

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A suction cup, also known as a vacuum cup or suction pad, is a flexible, cup-shaped device typically constructed from rubber, silicone, or other elastomers that adheres to smooth, non-porous surfaces by generating a partial vacuum. When pressed against a surface, the cup deforms to expel air from its interior, creating a region of lower pressure inside compared to the surrounding atmospheric pressure, which then presses the cup firmly against the surface to maintain attachment. This mechanism relies on the pressure differential rather than true "suction" in the sense of active pumping, and the holding force is influenced by factors such as the cup's volume, stiffness, elastic modulus, surface roughness, and air leakage rates. The concept of suction cups traces back to ancient times, with early forms made from gourds or animal horns used in for as far back as 1500 B.C., though these were not mechanical devices in the modern sense. The first patented modern suction cup appeared in the ; in 1866, T.C. Roche received U.S. Patent No. 52,748 for a "Photographic Developer Dipping Stick" incorporating a primitive suction pad made of rubber for handling photographic plates. This was followed in 1868 by Orwell H. Needham's U.S. Patent No. 82,629 for an "Atmospheric Knob," a more refined rubber suction cup designed for general attachment purposes, marking the beginning of widespread industrial and consumer applications. Suction cups have evolved into essential components in various fields, particularly in and , where they serve as in systems for lifting, transporting, and positioning workpieces such as , metal sheets, and electronic components without damage. In everyday use, they appear in household items like bath toy holders, mounts for devices, and aids, while advanced variants draw inspiration from biological suction structures in cephalopods like octopuses for improved performance in and underwater applications. Their effectiveness is limited to clean, flat, and impermeable surfaces, with failure often due to air infiltration over time, but ongoing innovations in materials and designs continue to enhance durability and adaptability.

Physical Principles

Mechanism of Adhesion

A suction cup is a device or biological structure that adheres to a surface through the creation of a partial vacuum, resulting in negative fluid pressure within the sealed cavity that generates a pressure differential with the surrounding atmosphere. This adhesion relies on the imbalance between the lower internal pressure and the higher external atmospheric pressure, which presses the cup firmly against the surface without relying on chemical or intermolecular bonds. The process begins with the elastic deformation of the when it is pressed against a compatible surface, expelling air or fluid from the cavity between the and the surface. As the 's rim conforms and seals the interface, the cavity volume stabilizes at a reduced , preventing re-entry of air and maintaining the . then acts on the external side of the and surface, countering any separation force and sustaining the attachment until a leak disrupts the seal. Effective adhesion requires nonporous and smooth surfaces to ensure a tight seal, as porous or rough textures create micro-channels that allow air ingress and equalization. Leaks from such imperfections, contaminants like dust or grease, or temperature extremes—which can rigidify the material at low temperatures or soften it excessively at high temperatures—compromise seal integrity and reduce holding time. This formation qualitatively aligns with , where the inverse relationship between and volume during initial compression expels air efficiently, leaving a low-pressure state post-sealing. In some cases, applying a thin layer of oil or lubricant to the cup's rim enhances the seal by filling microscopic gaps, reducing friction during placement, and minimizing air leakage without introducing slip under load.

Mathematical Calculations

The adhesion strength of a suction cup is quantified by the primary equation for detachment force, F=A×PF = A \times P, where FF is the force required to detach the cup (in newtons), AA is the effective contact area (in square meters), and PP is the pressure differential across the seal (in pascals), typically equal to atmospheric pressure of approximately 101 kPa under full vacuum conditions. This equation arises from the force balance due to the difference acting uniformly over the contact area, where the external pushes the surfaces together while the internal reduces opposing , assuming ideal conditions of a perfect seal without leaks and a pull to the surface. In practice, real-world factors require adjustments to this model; for non- pulls, the effective detaching component is reduced by cos⁡θ\cos \theta, where θ\theta is the peel from , since the -induced acts orthogonally to the contact plane. The effective area AA also accounts for the cup rim width, defined as the enclosed by the sealing (often A=π(r−w)2A = \pi (r - w)^2, with rr as outer radius and ww as rim width), rather than the full geometric area, to reflect the actual vacuum-enclosed region. A numerical example illustrates this: for a flat suction cup with a 2 cm radius (r=0.02r = 0.02 m) and negligible rim adjustment, A=πr2≈0.00126A = \pi r^2 \approx 0.00126 m², yielding F≈101×0.00126=127F \approx 101 \times 0.00126 = 127 N (rounded to 130 N for typical values), sufficient to lift about 13 kg at standard gravity (g≈9.8g \approx 9.8 m/s²). Limitations of the ideal model include its reliance on assumptions of complete attainment and material elasticity for conformal sealing; deviations occur with , partial vacuums, or inelastic deformation, necessitating advanced approaches like finite element analysis to simulate non-ideal geometries and stress distributions without simple analytical solutions.

Natural Occurrences

In Marine Animals

In marine animals, suction cups, often referred to as suckers or acetabula, are prominent adaptations in cephalopods such as octopuses and squids, where they line the undersides of their arms and tentacles. These structures enable essential functions including prey capture, locomotion across substrates, and even by adhering to surfaces that match their skin patterns. In octopuses, for instance, suckers are arranged in two longitudinal rows along each arm, allowing precise manipulation in aquatic environments. The anatomy of a sucker consists of two main components: the infundibulum, a flexible outer rim that forms the initial seal with a surface, and the , an inner muscular chamber that creates the . This design is supported by a complex array of radial, circular, and meridional muscles functioning as a muscular hydrostat, which allows for dynamic control. is achieved through muscular contractions that expand the acetabulum's , reducing to generate a pulsatile , often enhanced by chemical secretions such as or acid from rim cells to improve grip on slippery or irregular surfaces. On wettable substrates, these suckers can produce negative hydrostatic pressures up to -65 kPa, corresponding to a pressure differential of approximately 65 kPa at , far surpassing simple atmospheric due to active hydrostatic reinforcement from blood vessels. Cephalopod suckers evolved around 300 million years ago in early coleoid lineages during the period, marking a key innovation for predation and escape in marine ecosystems, such as clinging to rocks during jet-propelled maneuvers. In squids, suckers on tentacles are typically armed with chitinous rings or teeth for tearing prey, differing from the smoother versions optimized for holding. A representative example is the (Enteroctopus dofleini), whose largest suckers reach diameters of about 6.4 cm and can each support up to 16 kg, enabling the animal to lift objects comparable to its own body weight of 10–50 kg during or relocation.

In Terrestrial and Other Organisms

Leeches, members of the annelid class Hirudinea, employ paired suckers for attachment in terrestrial, freshwater, and transitional environments, facilitating locomotion and host parasitism. The anterior sucker, formed by the first four ventral body segments, contains a central mouth armed with tripartite chitinous jaws featuring tiny teeth that enhance grip during blood feeding by incising host skin and maintaining adhesion. The posterior sucker, comprising the last seven segments, lacks an orifice but uses muscular contraction to generate negative pressure, expelling fluids through coordinated action of muscle fiber groups to create a vacuum seal enhanced by mucus secretions. This mechanism allows leeches to adhere to porous substrates like amphibian skin, with attachment forces reaching 548 mN for the anterior disc and 447 mN for the posterior, enabling inchworm-style crawling where the posterior sucker sustains contact longer (1.12 seconds) than detachment times. Sucker evolution traces to ancient annelid traits, with leech-like fossils indicating origins predating the Permian period; a 2025 discovery of a 430-million-year-old body fossil from the Silurian Waukesha biota in Wisconsin reveals early leeches lacked a forward sucker and likely consumed soft-bodied marine invertebrates whole rather than sucking blood, pushing definitive hirudinid origins back by over 200 million years from prior estimates. Remoras (family Echeneidae) utilize a specialized dorsal disc, evolved from fin elements, for on marine vertebrates in semi-pelagic settings, providing a non-marine contrast through host-mediated terrestrial proximity. The disc features pectinated lamellae with spinules that generate , while a fleshy epithelial lip and erector-depressor muscles rotate the lamellae to form sealed compartments, creating sub-ambient pressure for adaptable to irregular surfaces like shark skin. Muscle contractions adjust the disc's shape, equalizing pressure via an enlarged anterior cardinal sinus (2.8–3.3 mm diameter), allowing sustained attachment during host motion without constant expenditure. This system supports shear forces improved by increasing lamellar number, as seen in phylogenetic trends where modern outperform ancestors like †Opisthomyzon from the early (~33 million years ago), with divergence of echeneids estimated around 50 million years ago within percomorph fishes. The mutualistic benefits remoras through energy-saving transport to productive areas, access to food scraps from host meals, and incidental parasite removal from host skin, though can falter on highly uneven or fast-moving substrates. Certain terrestrial vines exhibit suction-like holdfasts for vertical attachment, representing plant adaptations for structural support in non-aquatic habitats. English ivy () deploys modified forming disc-shaped holdfasts that adhere to surfaces via a suction-cup mechanism, secreting substances to create a sealed contact and withstand wind forces on climbing stems. Similarly, Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) uses branched tendrils ending in flattened, cup-like tips that function as holdfasts, secreting for enhanced grip akin to , enabling attachment to trees or walls without twining. These structures prioritize secure anchorage over nutrient absorption, contrasting with fungal hyphae that rely on diffusive uptake rather than suction for terrestrial nutrient acquisition.

Artificial Applications

Everyday and Recreational Uses

Suction cups find widespread use in everyday household applications due to their simplicity and ability to adhere to smooth surfaces without leaving residue. Common examples include mounts for GPS devices and smartphones, which secure tools during drives, and caddies or hooks that organize toiletries on tiled walls. These applications rely on small-diameter s, typically providing holding forces of 5-20 N to support lightweight items like dispensers or loofahs weighing up to 1-2 kg per cup. In recreational contexts, suction cups enhance safe play and leisure activities, particularly in toys designed for children. Dart guns equipped with suction-tip darts, such as the Wyandotte Toy Gun from the late and early , allow for target practice without sharp projectiles, sticking harmlessly to walls or boards. Modern equivalents like Popdarts feature dual-ended darts for indoor and outdoor games, promoting hand-eye coordination and family competitions on smooth surfaces. Additionally, wall crawlers and toy climbing figures with suction bases entertain children by adhering to windows or tiles, while vibration-resistant phone holders using suction cups keep devices stable for cyclists tracking routes or music. The consumer adoption of surged in the , driven by advances in rubber manufacturing that made them affordable and durable for mass-market products. By the , they appeared in accessories like holders, praised for their sanitary adhesion to mirrors and basins. The post-1940s era saw further popularity in and home goods, with companies like Adams Manufacturing scaling production to millions of units by the . guidelines emphasize using them on non-porous, clean surfaces to avoid failure on textured materials, with maximum loads strictly limited to 1-2 kg per small cup to prevent detachment and potential . In contemporary , suction cup mounts have boomed since the alongside action sports, exemplified by GoPro's official suction cup attachment for cameras on surfboards, helmets, and vehicles. This mount, tested at speeds over 150 mph, enables hands-free filming during or biking, capturing dynamic footage securely on curved, smooth exteriors. Such innovations underscore suction cups' role in accessible, low-stakes , balancing reliability with ease of removal.

Industrial and Professional Uses

In industrial settings, suction cups are integral to systems, particularly vacuum lifters used for lifting and transporting heavy loads such as glass panels, metal sheets, and stone slabs in environments. These devices create a vacuum seal to securely grip non-porous surfaces, enabling safe and efficient movement of loads exceeding 100 kg, as seen in automotive assembly lines where multiple suction cups handle large body panels during production. For instance, electric vacuum lifters with capacities up to 500 kg are employed to position and metal components precisely, reducing manual labor and minimizing damage risks. In and operations, suction cups serve as anchors for high-altitude work and emergency access, providing temporary attachment points on smooth surfaces like building facades. High-rise window cleaners rely on pump-activated suction cups to maintain positioning during facade maintenance, ensuring stability at heights where traditional harnesses alone may be insufficient. Similarly, in scenarios, vacuum anchors offer fall protection for workers on metallic or glassy structures, such as . A notable example is climber Dan Goodwin's 1981 ascent of the Sears Tower, where he used custom suction cups attached to his hands and feet to scale the 1,454-foot structure without ropes, highlighting their potential in specialized climbing aids despite the risks involved. Medical applications leverage suction cups for precise tissue manipulation and device attachment, enhancing procedural accuracy and patient outcomes. In endoscopy, specialized caps like the Olympus eSuction fit onto endoscopes to aspirate fluids and stabilize views during gastrointestinal procedures, improving control in upper and lower GI interventions. Surgical retractors with integrated suction mechanisms hold tissues in place by creating localized vacuum seals, facilitating clear access during operations such as deep abdominal surgeries. In prosthetics, suction socket systems secure lower-limb devices to residual limbs via airtight seals, with elevated vacuum variants like the Össur Unity using active pumps to maintain suspension and distribute weight evenly, supporting ambulation for amputees. Post-2020 advancements in have integrated arrayed suction grippers into robotic systems for enhanced fulfillment, exemplified by Amazon's deployment of multi-tasking robots in . The 2025 Blue Jay system employs overhead robotic arms with suction-cup end effectors to pick, sort, and group diverse items, handling up to 75% of products and boosting by reducing repetitive human tasks. These grippers often feature integration for real-time monitoring, such as transducers detecting to prevent failures. Performance in industrial setups emphasizes through multiple suction cups—typically 4 to 12 per lifter—distributed for balanced load support, with sensors ensuring integrity above 90% thresholds during operations.

Design and Materials

Common Materials and Construction

Artificial suction cups are primarily constructed from elastomeric materials that provide the necessary flexibility and sealing properties for creating a vacuum. Natural rubber, derived from latex, offers high elasticity ideal for basic applications but is prone to degradation from ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, limiting its outdoor use. Synthetic alternatives, such as neoprene (chloroprene rubber) and silicone, address these limitations; neoprene provides weather resistance and moderate chemical tolerance, while silicone withstands a broader temperature range of -50°C to 200°C and resists environmental factors like ozone. These materials typically exhibit a Shore A hardness of 40-60, ensuring sufficient flexibility for conformal sealing without excessive rigidity that could reduce adhesion on uneven surfaces. Chemical resistance in neoprene and nitrile variants allows compatibility with industrial oils and cleaners, enhancing durability in demanding environments. The basic construction involves molding processes like injection or , where uncured rubber compounds are shaped in a heated mold and then vulcanized to cross-link the polymers, forming a durable, elastic structure. Attachment points, such as stems or hooks, are often integrated during for seamless bonding, enabling secure connections to handles or mechanisms without additional adhesives. This method ensures uniform thickness in the cup's lip and body, critical for consistent retention. Historically, suction cup prototypes date as early as 1500 B.C., utilizing materials like for rudimentary vacuum effects in medical cupping. The shift to rubber occurred in the , exemplified by T.C. Roche's 1866 U.S. Patent No. 52,748, which employed India rubber for a photographic developing tool, marking the transition to more reliable, elastic constructions. Modern production emphasizes through options like recycled , which reduces waste while maintaining performance comparable to virgin materials. Common failure modes include hardening and cracking over time due to repeated flexing or exposure, particularly in under UV conditions, necessitating material selection based on application longevity.

Variations and Innovations

Suction cup designs have evolved to address limitations in traditional flat cups, particularly for irregular or demanding environments. Bellows-style suction cups, featuring accordion-like folds, enable adaptation to uneven, curved, or slanted surfaces by compensating for height differences and providing flexible sealing. These designs maintain contact over contours, improving grip stability on workpieces like or bags with fragile contents. Multi-cup arrays, often arranged in modular configurations, distribute load across multiple points to handle larger or heavier objects, enhancing overall holding force and redundancy against individual cup failures. Bio-inspired innovations draw from natural mechanisms to create more versatile artificial systems. Researchers at developed pneumatic actuators in that mimic octopus suckers, using tapered, flexible structures for dexterous gripping of varied shapes and sizes through -assisted . These designs incorporate muscular hydrostats-like compliance for conformal contact, as demonstrated in 2020 prototypes capable of handling irregular objects. Hybrid approaches combining with gecko-inspired dry address porous surfaces, where traditional fails due to air permeability; fibrillar microstructures generate van der Waals forces alongside low-pressure sealing for enhanced attachment on rough or textured materials. Post-2020 advancements have leveraged additive manufacturing and robotics integration for specialized applications. 3D-printed customizable suction cups allow of tailored geometries, such as modular grippers for pipe inspection or harvesting, enabling adaptation to specific curvatures and diameters without extensive tooling. Vacuum-assisted drones for wall-climbing inspections employ arrayed suction units to navigate vertical surfaces like building facades, supporting tasks such as non-destructive testing with minimal energy draw. These systems often integrate spinning boundaries or zero-pressure difference mechanisms to conform to rough textures, extending operational reliability. Innovations continue to tackle key challenges in reliability. For porous or wet surfaces, electroadhesion hybrids combine electrostatic forces with to create seals on permeable or contaminated substrates, reducing leakage and maintaining grip without full dependency; recent prototypes achieve this with power consumption as low as 1.5 . Energy-efficient pneumatic systems minimize demands through passive designs or bioinspired compliance, such as stiffness-tunable suckers that adapt post-attachment for sustained hold on angular surfaces. Looking ahead, suction cup technologies are poised for integration with to enable adaptive gripping in . AI-driven systems could dynamically adjust cup arrays or pressure based on real-time surface detection, improving precision in unstructured environments like warehousing or . from 2023-2025 in further promises embedded sensors in soft suction materials for self-regulating adhesion, enhancing durability and responsiveness in robotic end-effectors.

References

  1. https://www.schmalz.com/en-us/support/know-how/glossary/suction-cup
  2. https://www.norgren.com/en-us/resources/blog/what-is-a-vacuum-cup
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31701113/
  4. https://easternmedicinecenter.org/cupping-therapy/
  5. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/186175a0-a05d-497c-a694-80973b8bfcc3
  6. https://patents.google.com/patent/US52748A/en
  7. https://patents.google.com/patent/US82629A/en
  8. https://eurotech-vacuum-technologies.com/about-vacuum-knowledge/what-are-suction-cups-for/
  9. https://www.automate.org/robotics/tech-papers/suction-cups-enable-the-vacuum-to-grip
  10. https://fluidpowerjournal.com/the-vacuum-cup-explained/
  11. https://www.energyvanguard.com/blog/how-do-suction-cups-work/
  12. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/199721/how-do-suction-cups-work
  13. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09042
  14. https://bookavacuum.com/how-to-optimize-adhesion-performance-of-custom-suction-cups/
  15. https://lifehacks.stackexchange.com/questions/3705/make-suction-cups-suck
  16. https://eurotech-vacuum-technologies.com/how-to-calculate-vacuum-suction-force-to-find-appropriate-suction-cups/
  17. https://www.schmalz.com/en/support/know-how/vacuum-knowledge/the-vacuum-system-and-its-components/vacuum-suction-cups/design-of-the-suction-cup
  18. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM01679A
  19. http://labs.bio.unc.edu/Kier/pdf/Kier_Smith_2002.pdf
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3869157/
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982223011727
  22. https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/animals/animals-a-to-z/giant-pacific-octopus
  23. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2016.0096
  24. https://peerj.com/articles/19962/
  25. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2013-07-17-fossil-shows-fish-had-sucker-its-back
  26. https://www.schmalz.com/en-us/support/know-how/vacuum-knowledge/the-vacuum-system-and-its-components/system-design-calculation-example/theoretical-holding-force-of-a-suction-cup/
  27. https://www.amazon.com/Yeumk-1-2Inch-Suction-Cup-Hooks/dp/B0FM8G6JJS
  28. https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/antique-wayandotte-toys-toy-gun-31979858
  29. https://popdartsgame.com/
  30. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/suction-cups-history
  31. https://suctioncups.com/pages/about-us
  32. https://gopro.com/en/us/shop/mounts-accessories/suction-cup/AUCMT-302.html
  33. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/gopro-hero-ready-capture-extreme-sports-video/story?id=14813409
  34. https://www.escotthandling.com/electric-glass-lifting-equipment-vacuum-tile-lifter.html
  35. https://www.wpg.com/lifter-types
  36. https://www.wpg.com/suction-cups-for-glass-handling
  37. https://www.fallprotect.com/fall-protection-solutions/single-point-anchors/vacuum-single-point-anchors/
  38. https://www.bangordailynews.com/2021/05/26/news/40-years-ago-a-mainer-dressed-as-spider-man-climbed-the-tallest-building-in-the-world/
  39. https://medical.olympusamerica.com/products/esuction
  40. https://www.conmed.com/en/products/patient-monitoring-and-ems/suction-instruments-and-tubing
  41. https://www.ossur.com/en-us/prosthetics/unity
  42. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/22/amazon-debuts-blue-jay-robot-that-performs-multiple-tasks-at-once.html
  43. https://www.pisco.co.jp/usa/vacuum-sensors-introduction/
  44. https://goldberg.berkeley.edu/pubs/2021-IROS-Smart-Suction-Gripper-Submitted.pdf
  45. https://anver.com/vacuum-components/vacuum-cups/cup-material/
  46. https://eurotech-vacuum-technologies.com/suction-cup-material-list/
  47. https://www.melon-rubber.com/custom-rubber-molding-suction-cupssilicone-vacuumsuctioncup-p-206.html
  48. https://suctioncups.org/the-next-step-after-vulcanization-of-rubber-suction-cups/
  49. https://www.suctioncupsdirect.co.uk/The-history-of-suction-cups/I19.htm
  50. https://www.airbest.com/eco-friendly-features-of-modern-suction-vacuum-cups.html
  51. https://www.piab.com/en-us/suction-cups-and-soft-grippers/round-suction-cups/bellows-suction-cups
  52. https://www.schmalz.com/en-us/products/vacuum-technology-for-automation-301607/vacuum-components-301608/vacuum-suction-cups-301609/suction-cups-for-handling-sheet-metal-303618/bellows-suction-cups-sab-15-folds-303676
  53. https://www.emicorp.com/vacuum-automation/vacuum-cups/vacuum-cups-for-bags-flowpack/gimatic-multi-bellow-silicone-vacuum-cups
  54. https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/bertoldi/files/soro_gus.pdf
  55. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IXncY4L_nc
  56. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11465-022-0699-x.pdf
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348054763_Fully_3D-Printed_Modular_Pipe-Climbing_Robot
  58. https://newatlas.com/science/zpd-suction-rough-surfaces/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40270302/
  60. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1080015/full
  61. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adma.202420231
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.