Hubbry Logo
Installation (computer programs)Installation (computer programs)Main
Open search
Installation (computer programs)
Community hub
Installation (computer programs)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Installation (computer programs)
Installation (computer programs)
Installation (computer programs)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Installation (or setup) of a computer program (including device drivers and plugins) is the act of making the program ready for execution.[1] Installation refers to the particular configuration of software or hardware with a view to making it usable with the computer. A soft or digital copy of the piece of software (program) is needed to install it. There are different processes of installing a piece of software (program). Because the process varies for each program and each computer, programs (including operating systems) often come with an installer, a specialised program responsible for doing whatever is needed (see below) for the installation. Installation may be part of a larger software deployment process.[2]

Installation typically involves files containing program code and data being copied/generated from the installation to new files on the local computer for easier access by the operating system, creating necessary directories, registering environment variables, providing a separate program for un-installation etc.[3] Because program files are generally copied/generated in multiple locations, uninstallation usually involves more than just erasing the program folder. For example, registry files and other system code may need to be modified or deleted for a complete uninstallation.

Overview

[edit]

Some computer programs can be executed by simply copying them into a folder stored on a computer and executing them.[4] Other programs are supplied in a form unsuitable for immediate execution and therefore need an installation procedure. Once installed, the program can be executed again and again, without the need to reinstall before each execution.

Common operations performed during software installations include:

Some installers may attempt to trick users into installing junkware such as various forms of adware, toolbars, trialware or software of partnering companies.[6] To prevent this, extra caution on what exactly is being asked to be installed is needed. The installation of additional software then can simply be skipped or unchecked (this may require the user to use the "custom", "detailed" or "expert" version of the installation procedure).[6]

Such malicious conduct is not necessarily a decision by the software developers or their company but can also be an issue of external installers such as the Download.com installer by CNET.[7]

Zero-install and portable applications

[edit]

Some computer programs need no installation. This was once the standard for 8-bit and 16-bit systems where software was run from floppy disc and only a single application could be loaded at once, such as on the Apple II, PET, MS-DOS, and Macintosh 128K. As computing environments grew more complex and fixed hard drives replaced floppy disks, the need for tangible installation presented itself. For example Commodore released the Installer for Amiga.

The modern applications that can be run without going through formal process of installation and, in particular, do not require modifications of the operating system, are sometimes referred to as zero-install.[8][9] Zero-install can be achieved through multiple means:

  • a standard solution is to collect the application and its components together, copy them to a fixed directory, and run from there.[10]
  • a browser-based approach.

The Linux distribution GoboLinux takes a similar approach (each applications gets its own directory structure), but still introduces the side-effects of the traditional Linux installation to maintain the backward compatibility with the standard Linux directory layout. Isolation of the OS from any changes required by the application can also be achieved through the application virtualization tools, like VMware ThinApp, Microsoft App-V, InstallFree Bridge.[11]

A class of modern applications that do not need installation and are located on a detachable storage device are known as portable applications, as they may be moved around onto different computers and run.[4] Similarly, there are live operating systems, which do not need installation and can be run directly from a bootable CD, DVD, USB flash drive or loaded over the network as with thin clients. Examples are AmigaOS 4.0, various Linux distributions, MorphOS or Mac OS versions 1.0 through 9.0. (See live CD and live USB.) Finally, web applications, which run inside a web browser, do not need installation.

Types

[edit]

Custom installation

[edit]

A custom installation allows the user to select which components of a software package to install. This is often preferred over a full installation when storage space is limited or when only certain features of the software are needed.

Attended installation

[edit]

On Windows systems, this is the most common form of installation. An installation process usually needs a user who attend it to make choices, such as accepting or declining an end-user license agreement (EULA), specifying preferences such as the installation location, supplying passwords or assisting in product activation.[12] In graphical environments, installers that offer a wizard-based interface are common. Attended installers may ask users to help mitigate the errors. For instance, if the disk in which the computer program is being installed was full, the installer may ask the user to specify another target path or clear enough space in the disk. A common misconception is unarchivation, which is not considered an installation action because it does not include user choices, such as accepting or declining EULA.

Silent installation

[edit]

A "silent installation" is an installation that does not display messages or windows during its progress.[13] "Silent installation" is not the same as "unattended installation" (see below): All silent installations are unattended but not all unattended installations are silent. The reason behind a silent installation may be convenience or subterfuge. Malware and viruses can be installed silently when a person clicks on a link while working at a business they think is real but is a hacker's program download.[14][15] For normal users silent installation is not of much use, but in bigger organizations where thousands of users work, deploying the applications becomes a typical task and for that reason silent installation is performed so that the application is installed in the background without affecting the work of the user. Silent parameters can vary from software to software; if a software/application has silent parameters, it can be checked by " <software.exe> /? " or " <software.exe> /help " or " <software.exe> -help ".

Silently installing a software program can be used to deploy a program on networks in educational institutions, including primary and secondary education and universities, in addition to business, government, and corporate networks. The person managing the silent installation can choose to add a desktop shortcut, for example, to silently install Google Drive with a desktop shortcut:[16]

GoogleDrive.exe --silent --desktop_shortcut=true

Unattended installation

[edit]

Installation that is performed without user interaction during its progress or with no user present at all.[17] One of the reasons to use this approach is to automate the installation of a large number of systems. An unattended installation either does not require the user to supply anything or has received all necessary input prior to the start of installation. Such input may be in the form of command line switches or an answer file, a file that contains all the necessary parameters. Windows XP and most Linux distributions are examples of operating systems that can be installed with an answer file. In unattended installation, it is assumed that there is no user to help mitigate errors. For instance, if the installation medium was faulty, the installer should fail the installation, as there is no user to fix the fault or replace the medium. Unattended installers may record errors in a computer log for later review.

Headless installation

[edit]

Installation performed without using a computer monitor connected. In attended forms of headless installation, another machine connects to the target machine (for instance, via a local area network) and takes over the display output. Since a headless installation does not need a user at the location of the target computer, unattended headless installers may be used to install a program on multiple machines at the same time.

Scheduled or automated installation

[edit]

An installation process that runs on a preset time or when a predefined condition transpires, as opposed to an installation process that starts explicitly on a user's command.[18] For instance, a system administrator willing to install a later version of a computer program that is being used can schedule that installation to occur when that program is not running. An operating system may automatically install a device driver for a device that the user connects. (See plug and play.) Malware may also be installed automatically. For example, the infamous Con ficker was installed when the user plugged an infected device to their computer.

OEM installation

[edit]

An installation performed by an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) where software is pre-installed on a hardware device before it is sold. This type of installation is typically performed without end-user interaction, though the device's first boot may require the user to perform an initial system setup.

Clean installation

[edit]

A clean installation is one that is done in the absence of any interfering elements such as old versions of the computer program being installed or leftovers from a previous installation.[19] In particular, the clean installation of an operating system is an installation in which the target disk partition is erased before installation. Since the interfering elements are absent, a clean installation may succeed where an unclean installation may fail or may take significantly longer.

Network installation

[edit]
Not to be confused with Network booting.

Network installation, shortened net install, is an installation of a program from a shared network resource that may be done by installing a minimal system before proceeding to download further packages over the network.[20] This may simply be a copy of the original media but software publishers which offer site licenses for institutional customers may provide a version intended for installation over a network.

Installer

[edit]
"Installer" redirects here. For the AmigaOS scripting language, see Installer (programming language).
Look up installer in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

An installation program or installer is a computer program that installs files, such as applications, drivers, or other software, onto a computer.[21] Some installers are specifically made to install the files they contain; other installers are general-purpose and work by reading the contents of the software package to be installed.

They exist both as "standalone installer" (or "offline installer") & "web installer" (or "online installer"), where the former allows for offline installation as it contains all installation files, whereas the latter needs to download files necessary for installation from the web at the time of installation.[21]

The differences between a package management system and an installer are:[21]

This box:
Criterion Package manager Installer
Shipped with Usually, the operating system Each computer program
Location of installation information One central installation database It is entirely at the discretion of the installer. It could be a file within the app's folder, or among the operating system's files and folders. At best, they may register themselves with an uninstallers list without exposing installation information.
Scope of maintenance Potentially all packages on the system Only the product with which it was bundled
Developed by One package manager vendor Multiple installer vendors
Package format A handful of well-known formats There could be as many formats as the number of apps
Package format compatibility Can be consumed as long as the package manager supports it. Either newer versions of the package manager keep supporting it or the user does not upgrade the package manager. The installer is always compatible with its archive format, if it uses any. However, installers, like all computer programs, may be affected by software rot.

Bootstrapper

[edit]

During an installation of a computer program, it is sometimes necessary to update the installer or package manager itself. To make this possible, a technique called bootstrapping is used. The common pattern for this is to use small executable files which update the installer and starts the real installation after the update. This small executable is called bootstrapper.[22] Sometimes the bootstrapper installs other prerequisites for the software during the bootstrapping process too.

Common types

[edit]
Main article: List of installation software

Cross-platform installer builders produce installers that run on Windows, macOS and Linux. An example is InstallAnywhere by Flexera Software, which is based on Java. An instance of native code is InstallAware Multi Platform by InstallAware Software, featuring build toolchains and a setup engine that runs without dependencies; it can also switch to console mode if a graphical user interface (GUI) cannot be displayed on Linux.[23]

Windows NT family includes an installation API and an associated service called Windows Installer. Microsoft provides a minimum level of tools required to create installers using Windows Installer in the freely available Windows SDK, instead focusing on the API to allow developers and third parties to leverage it in creating custom installers. Third-party tools may supporting create installers using this API to speed the process. Examples include InstallShield (Flexera Software) and WiX (Outercurve Foundation). Installation authoring tools that do not rely on Windows Installer include Wise Installation Studio (Wise Solutions, Inc.), Installer VISE (MindVision Software), Visual Installer (SamLogic), NSIS, Clickteam, InnoSetup and InstallSimple. InstallAware for Windows Installer features a hybrid installation engine, whereby a setup may be executed using either the Windows Installer APIs, or directly through InstallAware's native code setup engine. This hybrid engine also provides the capability to switch installation modes at runtime.[24][25]

macOS includes Installer, a native package manager. macOS also includes a separate software updating application, Software Update, that only supports Apple and system software. Included in the Dock as of 10.6.6, and also in the Apple menu, the Mac App Store shares many attributes with the successful App Store for iOS devices, such as a similar app approval process, the use of Apple ID for purchases, and automatic installation and updating. Although the App Store is Apple's preferred delivery method for macOS apps,[26] previously purchased licenses cannot be transferred to the Mac App Store for downloading or automatic updating. Instead of an installer, many macOS applications distributed outside the Mac App Store use an Apple Disk Image (.dmg file) that contains an application bundle to be dragged and dropped into the Applications folder; those applications are described as drag-install applications. These often feature prominent installation instructions and a shortcut to the Applications folder; that style of drag-install application was invented and published by Iris Artin (formerly Ben Artin) during the development of Fetch 5[27] and subsequently gained wide adoption. Commercial applications for macOS may also use a third-party installer, such as the Mac version of Installer VISE (MindVision Software) or InstallerMaker (StuffIt).

System installer

[edit]

A system installer is the software that is used to set up and install an operating system onto a device.[28]

Windows Setup is the system installer of Microsoft Windows.

Examples of Linux system installers:

Another example is found in the Haiku operating system, which uses a utility called Haiku Installer to install itself onto a device after booting from a live CD or live USB.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Installation (computer programs)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Installation of a , commonly referred to as software installation or setup, is the process of copying application files from a distribution medium—such as a , , or network package—to a computer's storage and configuring them to integrate with the operating system, enabling execution and user interaction. This typically involves creating necessary directories, registering components with the system, establishing shortcuts or launchers, and verifying dependencies to ensure compatibility and functionality. The installation process differs significantly across operating systems, reflecting their unique architectures and package management philosophies. On Windows, users commonly run executable installer files (.exe or .msi packages via ) that present a wizard interface to select options, place files in standardized locations like the Program Files directory, update the registry, and add entries to the or desktop. In contrast, macOS installations are often straightforward: downloaded .dmg or .pkg files are mounted or opened, allowing users to drag the application bundle to the Applications folder, with minimal system modifications beyond security checks. For Linux distributions such as , methods include graphical tools like the Software Center for browsing repositories, command-line package managers like APT (e.g., sudo apt install <package>) that handle dependencies automatically from centralized repositories, or manual compilation from for custom builds. Key aspects of software installation include prerequisite checks for hardware, operating system version, and required libraries to prevent failures; handling of dependencies, which may involve downloading additional components; and support for various deployment scenarios, such as silent or unattended installations in enterprise settings using tools like Group Policy or scripts. Uninstallation, the reverse process, removes files, restores configurations, and cleans registry entries or package databases to free resources, often initiated through control panels, package managers, or dedicated uninstallers. Challenges like permission requirements, compatibility issues, or security prompts underscore the importance of user privileges and trusted sources during installation.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Software installation refers to the process of deploying a onto a target system by copying its essential files, configuring operational settings, and integrating it with the operating system to render it and usable. This involves placing program binaries, data files, and supporting components into designated directories on the system's storage, often using an installer tool that automates the placement and initial setup. The result is a functional application that can be launched directly, typically through an or system shortcut, without requiring manual intervention for basic operation. The fundamental purpose of software installation is to prepare the program for seamless execution within the host environment, establishing key elements such as , shared libraries, registry entries (in systems like Windows), and environment variables that define paths and configurations. It ensures proper integration with system resources, including access to hardware via drivers, allowing the software to interact with peripherals like printers or graphics cards as needed. For instance, installing a copies its to a user-accessible directory, configures default file associations, and may install browser-specific libraries for rendering content. Similarly, installing a command-line tool updates environment variables like PATH to enable invocation from without specifying full paths. This process provides critical benefits by facilitating software customization during setup, enabling straightforward updates to newer versions, and supporting clean removal to prevent resource conflicts or clutter. Without installation, users would need to manually manage files and configurations, risking errors and system instability; instead, it promotes efficient management and reduces the overall cost of software ownership.

Historical Context

In the 1950s and , software installation primarily involved manual processes on mainframe computers, where programs were loaded using punched cards or paper tapes as input media. Punched cards served as the dominant method for entering both data and executable code, requiring users to physically feed stacks of cards into readers connected to systems like the or . Magnetic tapes began supplementing these methods in the early 1950s, offering higher capacity for larger programs but still demanding operator intervention for mounting and reading. By the , floppy disks emerged as a more accessible medium for , with 8-inch formats used in minicomputers and mainframes. The advent of personal computers in the late 1970s popularized 5.25-inch floppy disks, enabling users to insert disks into drives and copy files directly to storage. The 1980s marked a transition toward automated installers, with debuting in 1987 to streamline the deployment of Windows applications by automating file extraction and registry modifications. In the Unix ecosystem, package management systems emerged to handle dependencies and updates systematically; the RPM (Red Hat Package Manager) was released in 1997 by , providing a standardized format for binary packages on distributions. That same year, Nullsoft introduced the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (NSIS) as an open-source tool for creating customizable Windows installers, initially developed for distributing . Debian followed in 1998 with APT (Advanced Package Tool), which simplified repository-based installations and became a cornerstone for Debian-based systems. Microsoft contributed to standardization in the late 1990s with the (MSI) format, which encapsulated installation logic in a database-driven package for reliable deployment across Windows platforms. From the 2000s onward, installation practices evolved toward greater automation and centralization, driven by the proliferation of online distribution channels. Apple's launched on July 10, 2008, revolutionizing mobile software access by allowing seamless downloads and automatic updates for apps without manual file handling. Google introduced the Android Market—later rebranded as —later that year, offering a similar for Android devices that further normalized one-click installations. Concurrently, cloud-based approaches gained prominence through (SaaS) models, with pioneers like delivering applications via web browsers starting in 1999, thereby minimizing or eliminating local installations in favor of remote access. This shift was amplified by in 2006, enabling developers to deploy software in virtual environments without physical hardware setup.

Core Concepts

Installation Process Stages

The installation process for computer programs follows a structured sequence to integrate software safely and effectively into a environment. This linear flow typically begins with acquiring and verifying the installation package, progresses through modifications, and ends with verification and user enablement, potentially requiring a to finalize changes.

Pre-installation

The pre-installation phase focuses on preparing the and validating conditions to avoid failures later in the process. The installer first conducts compatibility checks, confirming that the target operating version, hardware architecture (e.g., 32-bit or 64-bit), and minimum resource requirements are met. User permissions are verified, often requiring administrative privileges to access protected areas, while disk availability is assessed—typically by calculating the total size needed for files, temporary storage, and potential expansions. Backups or restore points may be recommended or automated to safeguard existing data. These steps ensure a smooth transition; for instance, in Windows environments, the installer evaluates the "cost" of installation, including allocation across drives. Skipping these checks can lead to abrupt halts, such as when insufficient is detected during file staging.

Core Stages

Once pre-installation succeeds, the core stages execute the primary deployment actions in a scripted sequence, often divided into (UI) interactions for selections and an execution phase for system changes. File extraction begins by unpacking the installation archive—such as an MSI package on Windows or a DMG on macOS—followed by copying binaries, libraries, and assets to target directories like /Applications on macOS, /usr/local on systems, or Program Files on Windows. Registry or configuration database updates then register components, associating file extensions, types, and services with the software to enable OS integration. Shortcut creation follows, generating desktop icons, entries, or links for user accessibility, often using APIs like those in the Windows Shell namespace. Dependency resolution integrates here, installing or linking required runtime environments (e.g., .NET Framework), though complex cases are handled via prerequisite checks referenced in dedicated dependency management. This phase operates linearly: after UI-driven (e.g., custom vs. typical install), the execution sequence applies changes transactionally, with progress tracked via logs or progress bars. If errors occur, a mechanism reverts modifications to maintain .

Post-installation

The post-installation phase finalizes the setup and confirms operational readiness. occurs first, verifying licensing through key entry, online servers, or hardware binding to prevent unauthorized use. Initial configuration prompts guide users through options like default settings, user accounts, or integration with other tools, often via wizards. The installer then performs checks, such as validating file hashes or running self-tests, and may prompt for a to load drivers or apply global changes. In enterprise contexts, this stage includes registering the software for updates or logging installation details for auditing.

Common Interruptions

Interruptions frequently arise from environmental mismatches, disrupting the linear flow and potentially triggering rollbacks. Insufficient disk halts file extraction or , often detected early but sometimes mid-process if dynamic allocation fails. Conflicting software—such as outdated versions or incompatible libraries—can block registry updates or dependency resolution, leading to codes like those in Windows . Permission denials during core execution may stem from unprivileged user accounts, while verification failures in post-installation could indicate corrupted downloads. These issues underscore the importance of thorough pre-installation validation to minimize downtime.

Dependencies and Prerequisites

Dependencies and prerequisites in software installation encompass external components required for an application to operate correctly after deployment. These typically include shared libraries, runtime environments, and hardware specifications that the target software relies upon but does not include in its own package. For instance, runtime environments like the provide essential services such as and class libraries for .NET-based applications. Similarly, hardware prerequisites might specify minimum CPU architecture, memory, or disk space to ensure compatibility. Identification of dependencies often occurs through structured metadata embedded in the software package. Manifest files, such as application manifests in Windows environments, explicitly declare required assemblies, versions, and side-by-side configurations to avoid conflicts. Setup wizards in graphical installers may scan the target system at runtime, querying registry entries, file existence, or version information to detect missing prerequisites. In package management systems, online repositories maintain dependency databases that catalog required components, allowing installers to query and validate needs prior to proceeding. During the pre-installation stage of the overall installation process, these checks ensure prerequisites are met before core files are copied. Resolution strategies for dependencies vary by installer type and platform, aiming to fulfill requirements with minimal user disruption. Automatic downloads integrate dependency fetching directly into the setup process, where the installer retrieves and installs missing components from trusted repositories, as seen in modern package managers like those in distributions. Bundling involves packaging dependencies alongside the main application within the installer, reducing external fetches but increasing download size; this is common in standalone executables for cross-platform compatibility. Manual intervention requires users to separately obtain and install prerequisites, often guided by error messages or , which remains prevalent for complex runtimes. Prominent examples illustrate these concepts in practice. The Runtime Environment (JRE) serves as a prerequisite for Java-based applications, providing the and core libraries needed to execute ; installers typically prompt for JRE verification or download if absent. Likewise, Visual C++ Redistributable packages are dependencies for applications built with , supplying runtime DLLs for C++ standard libraries; these are identified via tools like and resolved by deploying version-specific executables during setup. A key risk associated with dependency management is version conflicts, particularly in shared library environments like older Windows systems, leading to "DLL Hell." This phenomenon arises when multiple applications require different versions of the same DLL, causing one installation to overwrite another's files and resulting in runtime failures or instability. Mitigation evolved through side-by-side assemblies in and later, allowing isolated versioning to prevent such overwrites.

Types of Installation

Attended Installation

Attended installation refers to a process that requires active user participation, guiding the individual through a series of interactive steps to configure and complete the setup. This method typically employs a step-by-step wizard interface, where users make decisions such as selecting installation directories, choosing specific components or plugins, and adjusting custom settings like file associations or startup options. Such ensures that the installation adapts to the user's preferences, making it the most common approach for desktop applications on platforms like Windows. Key user interface elements in attended installations include progress bars to indicate completion status, checkboxes for selecting optional features, and dedicated screens for reviewing and accepting license agreements. These components provide visual feedback and prompts, allowing users to navigate sequentially while receiving contextual explanations for each choice, which simplifies complex configurations into manageable tasks. The primary advantages of attended installation lie in its support for , enabling users to tailor the software to their needs, and immediate feedback, where issues like insufficient disk space or compatibility problems can be addressed on the spot through user-guided . Additionally, the guided nature of the wizard educates users on available features, such as optional modules or integration settings, fostering better long-term utilization of the software. In contrast to unattended modes, this approach prioritizes user control over automation for scenarios requiring customization. Representative examples include the installers for applications like , which prompt users to select plugins, language preferences, and installation paths during setup, or suites that allow choices for individual components like Word or Excel. The duration varies depending on the software size and the extent of user decisions.

Unattended Installation

Unattended installation enables the deployment of computer programs without any user interaction, relying on pre-defined parameters to automate the entire process from initiation to completion. This method contrasts with interactive setups by eliminating prompts, wizards, or decision points, allowing installations to proceed seamlessly in the background using command-line options or configuration files. Characteristics include the suppression of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and the use of flags like /S for or /quiet to ensure no visual feedback is provided to the user, making it ideal for scripted or automated environments. Subtypes of unattended installation include silent installations, which operate with no and minimal on-screen , and scripted installations, which utilize external files to provide automated responses to setup queries. Silent modes prioritize speed and non-intrusiveness, often invoked through simple command-line switches that bypass all dialogs. Scripted approaches, such as those employing answer files, offer greater customization by pre-specifying options like installation paths or features; for instance, Windows uses unattend.xml files to define settings across multiple configuration passes during program deployment. In enterprise settings, unattended installations facilitate large-scale deployments, such as software across numerous machines to maintain uniformity and reduce administrative overhead. This is particularly valuable for standardizing environments in corporate networks, where consistency in configurations minimizes support issues. For example, MSI-based packages can be installed silently using the msiexec command: msiexec /i package.msi /quiet, which executes the setup without user input. Similarly, on Windows, the package manager supports unattended operations via the -y flag to confirm all prompts automatically, as in choco install package -y, enabling efficient automation of application rollouts. Logging in unattended installations directs output to files rather than displays, supporting post-installation auditing and without interrupting the process. For MSI packages, verbose can be enabled alongside using the /L*V logfile.log option with msiexec, capturing detailed events like file copies and registry changes for review. This file-based approach ensures accountability in automated scenarios, where visual progress is absent, and allows administrators to verify success or diagnose failures after execution.

Network Installation

Network installation refers to the process of deploying computer programs across a network, where installation files or images are transferred from a remote server to target machines rather than from local media. This approach leverages to distribute software, enabling efficient of installations in distributed environments. It is particularly suited for scenarios requiring simultaneous deployment to multiple devices, reducing the need for physical distribution of installation media. Common methods for network installation include downloading executable installers directly from web URLs using protocols like HTTP or , which allows users or automated scripts to fetch and run setup files from a central repository. Another method involves (PXE) booting, where client machines boot over the network to access OS or software images hosted on a server, facilitating the installation of programs as part of the boot process. Server-based tools, such as (WSUS), enable administrators to deploy software updates and packages to Windows clients by configuring the server to host and push content via approved channels. Network installations rely on various protocols to transfer data efficiently. HTTP and are standard for secure downloads of installer files from web servers, ensuring compatibility with firewalls and proxies. For shared network drives, (SMB) or (NFS) protocols allow access to installation packages stored on file servers, commonly used in enterprise LANs. protocols support mass deployments by broadcasting data to multiple clients simultaneously, minimizing bandwidth usage during large-scale rollouts. In organizational settings, network installation is widely used for centralized IT management, allowing administrators to standardize software across fleets of devices without manual intervention on each machine. It is also essential for thin client setups, where resource-constrained endpoints rely on server-hosted applications and boot images delivered over the network to maintain functionality. For example, Linux distributions like Ubuntu support netboot installations via PXE, enabling the deployment of OS and associated software from a network server without local media. Similarly, macOS environments utilize Apple Remote Desktop to deploy software packages remotely to multiple Macs, streamlining updates in managed networks. Bandwidth considerations are critical in network installations, as large software packages can strain limited connections, leading to prolonged deployment times. To mitigate this, pre-caching techniques involve storing installation images on local proxies or edge servers, allowing clients to retrieve data from nearby sources and reducing latency for repeated downloads. Tools like Microsoft's Connected Cache optimize this by delivering cached content during bulk provisions, ensuring efficient use of available bandwidth in bandwidth-constrained environments.

Clean Installation

A clean installation involves setting up software on a computing system that lacks any prior versions of the program or operating system, typically after formatting the storage drive or reinstalling the base OS to erase existing files, registries, and configurations. This approach ensures a fresh starting point, free from remnants of previous installations, and is commonly applied to operating systems like Windows or individual applications where the old version is fully uninstalled before proceeding. Unlike upgrades that retain elements of the prior setup, a clean installation overwrites all content on the target disk, providing a baseline environment configured entirely from scratch. The process begins with backing up essential data to , followed by creating bootable installation media such as a USB drive containing the software's ISO image. The system is then booted from this media, often requiring entry into the / settings to prioritize the USB as the boot device. Once the installer loads, the target drive is formatted to wipe all old files, registry entries, and partitions, after which the software is installed and initial configurations—like user accounts, drivers, and basic settings—are established anew without carrying over legacy elements. This methodical erasure and reconfiguration distinguishes clean installations from partial or in-place methods. Key advantages include the complete removal of accumulated , legacy conflicts, and hidden issues that can degrade performance over time, resulting in a more stable and efficient system. It is especially valuable for , as it eliminates potential sources of errors without the complications of intertwined old and new components, often leading to faster operation on aging hardware. For instance, reinstalling Windows via USB media on a wiped drive restores optimal functionality, while a fresh application setup post-virus removal ensures no remnants survive in residual files. Supporting tools facilitate the process: bootable media creators like enable users to format USB drives and embed ISO files for OS deployment, supporting and legacy modes without requiring an existing OS. Prior to wiping, software such as captures full disk backups, allowing restoration of data or system states if needed after the clean install.

Installer Technologies

Bootstrapper Mechanisms

A bootstrapper in software installation is a lightweight program designed to initialize the installation environment by verifying and fulfilling prerequisites before invoking the primary installer. It typically consists of a collection of files, including manifest files that specify the detection, , and installation logic for required components such as runtime environments or system updates. The core functionality of a bootstrapper includes detecting the host operating system's version and architecture to ensure compatibility, installing necessary runtimes like the .NET Framework, and managing multi-architecture support for scenarios such as 32-bit applications on 64-bit systems. For instance, it may query the system registry or file paths to check for existing installations and, if absent, either embed the prerequisites or download them from a specified source. This preparatory role minimizes failures in the main installation by addressing dependencies upfront. Representative examples include the web installers for , where the bootstrapper (often named setup.exe) first assesses the system for prerequisites like Visual C++ redistributables and then streams additional components over the as needed. Similarly, tools like the WiX Toolset's Burn engine provide bootstrapper capabilities that handle prerequisite chaining for complex deployments. Inno Setup can also function as a bootstrapper by integrating prerequisite checks and installations, such as for .NET runtimes, within its script-based framework. Bootstrapper chaining enables the sequential execution of multiple preparatory steps, where one bootstrap action completes before the next launches, ensuring a layered approach to environment setup—for example, installing a runtime followed by a database component prior to the core application installer. This mechanism is particularly useful in bundled installations to maintain order and avoid conflicts. Error handling in bootstrappers often incorporates fallbacks, such as switching to offline modes when network downloads fail, by utilizing locally cached or embedded files to proceed with installation. If a prerequisite cannot be resolved, the bootstrapper may log the issue, prompt the user for manual intervention, or gracefully exit without attempting the main installer, thereby preventing partial or corrupted setups.

Common Installer Types

Common installer types encompass a variety of formats and tools designed to package and deploy software applications across different operating systems, enabling efficient distribution and setup. These installers handle tasks such as file extraction, registry modifications, and shortcut creation, tailored to platform-specific conventions. On Windows, the Microsoft Installer (MSI) format serves as a standard for creating robust installation packages that integrate deeply with the operating system's service for features like repair, uninstallation, and shared components management. MSI files, which are database-driven and use a relational structure to store installation logic, support cabinet (.cab) compression to reduce package size and external file storage for efficiency. EXE wrappers, such as those generated by InstallShield from Flexera, extend MSI capabilities by providing a user-friendly executable interface, often incorporating custom dialogs and build-time digital signing with SHA-256 certificates to verify integrity. For open-source projects, the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (NSIS) offers a lightweight, script-based alternative that compiles to small executables with unique compression methods like LZMA and support for multiple languages in a single installer. For macOS, disk image (DMG) files provide a simple, read-only container for applications, often used for drag-and-drop installations, while package (PKG) files enable more structured deployments via the Installer app, including payload compression and code signing requirements using Developer ID certificates to meet Gatekeeper security standards. On Linux distributions, Debian packages (DEB) utilize an ar archive format with tar and gzip compression for binaries and control data, supporting cryptographic signatures for repository verification. Red Hat Package Manager (RPM) files similarly employ cpio archives with gzip or xz compression, allowing GPG signing for package authenticity and dependency resolution during installation. Cross-platform solutions include Java-based tools like IzPack, which generates installers from XML specifications that run on any JVM-supported system, incorporating pack compression options such as and LZMA alongside built-in multi-language resource handling. Script-based installers, such as those using Bash for systems or for Windows, provide flexible, lightweight alternatives that can be bundled with archives and executed directly, often with custom compression via tools like . Key features across these installer types include compression to minimize sizes—such as MSI's cabinet files, NSIS's LZMA , and DEB/RPM's —digital signing for tamper detection and trust, as in PKG's Developer ID requirements and RPM's GPG integration, and multi-language support through locale detection and resource files, enabling installers like NSIS and IzPack to adapt UI elements dynamically. The evolution of these installers traces from early simple archive extractors like tarballs in the 1970s, which required manual setup, to modern full-featured suites in the and beyond, incorporating rollback capabilities, dependency automation, and security via formats like MSI (introduced in 1998) and RPM (1997), enhancing reliability and .

Package Management Systems

Package management systems are software tools designed to automate the installation, updating, removal, and querying of software packages from centralized repositories, ensuring consistent and reproducible environments across systems. These systems maintain a database of available packages, handle metadata such as versions and dependencies, and integrate with operating systems or runtime environments to streamline software lifecycle management. The typical workflow involves querying repositories to search for packages, automatically resolving dependencies to install required components without manual intervention, and supporting version pinning to lock specific package versions for stability. During installation, the system downloads packages, verifies integrity, and executes any necessary configuration scripts, often in atomic transactions that either complete fully or roll back to prevent partial states. Updates and removals follow similar processes, with tools scanning for available changes and handling conflicts. Prominent platforms include APT (Advanced Package Tool) for and distributions, which manages .deb packages from repositories like the official Debian archive. DNF (Dandified YUM), used in and , handles RPM-based packages with support for modular content and enhanced dependency solving over its predecessor YUM. serves with a focus on simplicity and rolling-release updates, using binary packages from official mirrors. For non-Linux environments, Homebrew provides package management on macOS and Linux by installing software into a user-defined prefix, avoiding root privileges. In development ecosystems, facilitates .NET package handling through hosts like nuget.org, while manages JavaScript modules for projects via the npm registry. Key advantages encompass automatic dependency resolution to prevent version mismatches, atomic transactions for reliable operations, and enhancements through GPG-signed packages that verify authenticity and integrity before installation. These features reduce administrative overhead, minimize errors in , and enable efficient updates across large-scale systems. Representative examples include using APT to install with the command sudo apt install firefox, which queries the repository, resolves dependencies, and configures the browser. On macOS, Homebrew installs via brew install wget, pulling from its formula repository and managing any linked libraries.

Alternatives to Traditional Installation

Portable Applications

Portable applications, also known as portable software or apps, are self-contained programs that operate without requiring traditional installation on a host computer. These applications are typically stored in a single folder or directory and run directly from removable media such as USB drives, external hard drives, or cloud-synced folders, without modifying the host system's registry, files, or settings. This design ensures that no traces are left on the host machine after execution, making them ideal for environments where administrative privileges are restricted or system integrity must be preserved. Portable applications are commonly distributed in formats like ZIP archives or self-extracting executables, which allow users to unpack and run them without an installer. Platforms such as standardize this process through their PortableApps.com Format, which defines a specific —including subfolders for the application binaries (App), user data (), and default settings (DefaultData)—to facilitate portability across devices. This format uses relative paths to handle variations in drive letters and locations, ensuring the app functions regardless of where it is launched from. For instance, the launcher executable (e.g., AppNamePortable.exe) manages the app's behavior, copying default data if needed and restoring any temporary system changes upon exit. The primary advantages of portable applications include high portability, enabling users to carry their software and configurations between multiple machines without reinstallation or uninstallation processes. They require reduced permissions compared to installed software, as they do not alter system-wide configurations, which minimizes security risks and simplifies deployment in shared or public computing environments. Additionally, these apps often lead to faster downloads and easier backups due to their self-contained nature and the absence of redundant installer components. Notable examples include Portable Firefox, a version of the Mozilla web adapted for portability, which maintains user profiles and extensions within its directory without registry integration, and Portable, an official full-featured suite from that includes word processing, spreadsheets, and presentations runnable from USB media. These examples demonstrate how open-source projects can be repackaged for portability while preserving core functionality. Implementation of portable applications involves bundling all necessary dependencies—such as libraries, runtimes, and resources—internally within the app's folder to avoid reliance on the host system's installations. Developers employ relative path usage in configuration files and code to ensure location independence, and techniques like registry virtualization (where any attempted changes are isolated and reverted) prevent system modifications. For creation, tools avoid hard-coded paths, system variables, or registry writes, often using scripts or wrappers to manage paths dynamically. Despite their benefits, portable applications have limitations, such as the lack of built-in automatic updates in many cases, requiring users to manually download new versions or use platform-specific updaters like the Platform Updater. They may also face challenges with applications that demand complex integrations or are restricted from archive-based distribution due to licensing. In contrast to zero-install solutions, portable apps necessitate ing and storing local files for execution.

Zero-Install and Web-Based Solutions

Zero-install solutions enable the on-demand execution of software without requiring a traditional local installation process, where components are fetched and cached as needed or executed remotely via the web. This approach contrasts with conventional installations by avoiding permanent modifications to the system registry or file structure, instead leveraging protocols for temporary or virtualized access. The concept originated with systems like Zero Install, a decentralized, cross-platform framework that identifies software by URIs and downloads implementations from multiple sources only when executed, supporting , Windows, and macOS environments. Key technologies include Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), which utilize , service workers, and the Web App Manifest to deliver app-like experiences directly in the browser, allowing users to "install" them to the without downloading native code or altering the device beyond caching assets for offline use. Microsoft's deployment facilitates zero-touch distribution of .NET applications from web servers, where apps self-update and run from a user-specific cache with minimal administrative privileges required. Application virtualization tools like Microsoft App-V stream packaged applications over networks, enabling execution without local installation by isolating the app in a , with the client and sequencer under fixed extended support as of 2025 (no end date announced), compatible with and later, while server support ends in April 2026. Earlier technologies such as , which allowed browser-launched apps without full installation, have been deprecated since Java 9 and removed in Java 11. For cloud-based streaming, services like Amazon AppStream 2.0 deliver full desktop applications to any device via browser or client, processing workloads remotely without local setup. These methods offer advantages such as instant accessibility from any compatible device, reduced local storage consumption since no persistent files are installed, and seamless automatic updates managed server-side without user intervention. For instance, PWAs and web-based tools ensure cross-platform compatibility and eliminate version conflicts by running in sandboxed browser contexts. Examples include browser-based productivity suites like , which operate entirely online without any download, and for the Web, providing a full code editor experience in the browser with zero local installation. In enterprise settings, App-V has been used for zero-touch delivery of legacy applications, while cloud streaming via supports remote access to resource-intensive software like CAD tools. However, limitations persist, including the necessity of a stable internet connection for operation and potential latency in interactive tasks due to network dependencies, which can degrade performance compared to locally installed alternatives.

Challenges and Best Practices

Security Considerations

Installing software presents several security risks, primarily due to the elevated privileges often required during the setup process and the potential for compromised distribution channels. Malware can be embedded directly within installers, allowing attackers to execute harmful code under the guise of legitimate software deployment. For instance, malicious installers have been used to deliver payloads like the RedLine stealer via tools such as Inno Setup, evading initial detection by mimicking trusted applications. Privilege escalation vulnerabilities in installers further exacerbate these threats, enabling low-privilege users or processes to gain administrative access during installation. Third-party Windows installers, in particular, have been exploited for local privilege escalation, as seen in vulnerabilities affecting MSI-based setups. Supply chain attacks represent another critical risk, where adversaries compromise upstream software components to inject malware into updates or installers distributed to end users. The 2020 SolarWinds incident exemplifies this, with attackers inserting the SUNBURST backdoor into Orion software updates, affecting over 18,000 organizations through trusted installation channels. A more recent example (as of 2024) is the XZ Utils backdoor, where a threat actor inserted malicious code into the open-source XZ compression library (versions 5.6.0 and 5.6.1), potentially enabling remote code execution in affected Linux systems via package managers before detection. To mitigate these risks, several safeguards are employed during the installation phase. Digital signatures, such as Microsoft's Authenticode, verify the authenticity and of software by chaining certificates to trusted root authorities, ensuring the installer has not been tampered with. Downloading installers over protects against man-in-the-middle attacks that could alter files in transit, a recommended practice for secure software acquisition. Sandboxed installers provide isolation by executing the setup process in a contained environment, limiting potential damage from malicious code; tools like Windows Sandbox or enable this by running installers without affecting the host system. Best practices for secure installation emphasize proactive verification and minimal privileges. Users should verify file integrity using checksums like SHA-256, which detect alterations more reliably than older methods like , by comparing computed hashes against publisher-provided values. Downloading from trusted sources reduces exposure to tampered files, as recommended in secure coding guidelines that classify and validate all inputs. Running installers with non-administrative privileges aligns with the principle of least privilege, restricting unnecessary access and preventing escalation; advises logging in with minimal permissions for routine tasks, elevating only when required. Operating systems incorporate built-in mechanisms to enforce these safeguards. On macOS, assesses apps for developer identity and notarization before allowing execution, blocking unsigned or malicious installers by default. Windows SmartScreen evaluates downloads against known threats, warning users about unrecognized or potentially harmful files during installation attempts. Following installation, scanning for introduced is essential to identify any overlooked risks, such as unpatched dependencies or residual . Tools for auditing installed packages, like those integrated in for .NET ecosystems, can detect security flaws in components added during setup. This post-install review, often using vulnerability scanners, ensures comprehensive protection beyond the initial deployment.

Compatibility and Troubleshooting

Compatibility in software installation refers to the ability of a program to operate correctly on a specific operating system (OS) version, processor architecture, and hardware configuration. Installers often perform initial checks to verify these factors before proceeding; for instance, they confirm the OS version to ensure support for required APIs and features, as mismatches can lead to runtime failures. Similarly, architecture compatibility—such as 32-bit versus 64-bit—must be validated, since 64-bit applications cannot install on 32-bit systems, while 32-bit applications can install on 64-bit systems using the built-in compatibility layer; 64-bit software also requires sufficient processor support. Hardware specifications, including minimum RAM, CPU cores, and storage space, are also assessed to prevent installations that could degrade system performance or fail due to resource constraints. Common installation issues often stem from environmental mismatches or file integrity problems. Driver conflicts arise when new software attempts to install or update drivers that interfere with existing ones, potentially causing system instability or installation halts. Insufficient user permissions, such as lacking administrator rights, frequently block installations that require system-level changes, resulting in access-denied errors. Corrupted downloads, often due to incomplete transfers or network interruptions, lead to faulty installer files that fail checks during execution. Troubleshooting installation failures typically begins with reviewing system logs to identify root causes. In Windows, the SetupAPI.dev.log file records device and installation events, allowing users to pinpoint errors like failed component registrations. options enable reversion to a pre-installation state; for example, Windows provides a 10-day window to revert OS upgrades via Settings > System > Recovery, preserving files but removing new applications. installations, which load minimal drivers and services, can isolate conflicts by booting into a restricted environment and enabling the Windows service through registry modifications. Dedicated tools facilitate compatibility verification and resolution. Windows' Program Compatibility Troubleshooter analyzes applications and suggests modes simulating older OS versions to bypass version-specific issues. Virtual machines (VMs), such as those provided by Parallels or , allow testing installations in isolated environments mimicking various OS and hardware setups without risking the host system. A notable example is resolving "side-by-side configuration" errors in Windows, which occur due to mismatched Microsoft Visual C++ runtime libraries. To fix this, users can run the (sfc /scannow) in an elevated Command Prompt to repair corrupted system files, followed by reinstalling the appropriate Visual C++ redistributables from Microsoft's official downloads. Occasionally, these errors may intersect with security-related failures, such as blocked executions from , requiring temporary exclusions during .

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/software-installation
  2. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/install-program
  3. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/overview-of-windows-installer
  4. https://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000561.htm
  5. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/windows-installer-portal
  6. https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/install-and-uninstall-other-apps-mh35835/mac
  7. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallingSoftware
  8. https://documentation.ubuntu.com/server/how-to/software/package-management/
  9. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/application-installing-and-servicing
  10. https://www.codecademy.com/article/basics-of-software-installation
  11. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/software-first-installation
  12. https://www.eetimes.com/how-it-was-paper-tapes-and-punched-cards/
  13. https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/memory-storage/8/326
  14. https://www.ibm.com/history/magnetic-tape
  15. https://www.ibm.com/history/floppy-disk
  16. https://www.revenera.com/blog/software-installation/happy-30th-installshield/
  17. https://rpm.org/timeline
  18. https://sourceforge.net/projects/nsis/
  19. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/detailed.en.html
  20. https://pacesuite.com/blog/types-of-packages-non-virtual-packages-microsoft-windows-installer-msi
  21. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/07/app-store-turns-10/
  22. https://appradar.com/blog/app-stores-history
  23. https://lemonlearning.com/blog/the-history-of-saas-evolution-and-challenges
  24. https://www.cloudzero.com/blog/history-of-the-cloud/
  25. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/installation-mechanism
  26. https://www.manifest.ly/use-cases/systems-administration/software-installation-checklist
  27. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.4.0?topic=installation-software-process
  28. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/windows-installer-best-practices
  29. https://www.revenera.com/install/products/installshield/installshield-tips-tricks/windows-installer
  30. https://www.revenera.com/install/products/installshield/installshield-tips-tricks/what-is-a-software-installer
  31. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/application-manifests
  32. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/windows/redistributing-visual-cpp-files?view=msvc-170
  33. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2002/june/windows-xp-escape-from-dll-hell-with-custom-debugging-and-instrumentation-tools-and-utilities
  34. https://testsigma.com/blog/installation-testing/
  35. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/uxguide/win-wizards
  36. https://prezi.com/p/5rfttazkmsba/understanding-software-installation-types-and-processes/
  37. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/an-installation-example
  38. https://qatts.com/blog/ultimate-guide-on-installation-testing-and-significance-in-software-field
  39. https://www.advancedinstaller.com/silent-install-exe-msi-applications.html
  40. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/standard-installer-command-line-options
  41. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/manufacture/desktop/update-windows-settings-and-scripts-create-your-own-answer-file-sxs?view=windows-11
  42. https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/choco/commands/install
  43. https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/installation_guide/chap-installation-server-setup
  44. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/plan/plan-your-wsus-deployment
  45. https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/bare-metal-provisioning-with-pxe-and-ipxe
  46. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/deploy/2-configure-wsus
  47. https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=sd00003785en_us&page=GUID-D7147C7F-2016-0901-0A6A-00000000054C.html&docLocale=en_US
  48. https://documentation.suse.com/suma/4.3/en/suse-manager/client-configuration/autoinst-pxeboot.html
  49. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Verticals/CPwE/5-1/IDC/DIG/CPwE-5-1-IDC-DIG2.pdf
  50. https://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/network/workspace/brochures/3825_wsod.pdf
  51. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/Netboot
  52. https://support.apple.com/guide/remote-desktop/deploy-files-apde9de574b/mac
  53. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windows-itpro-blog/optimize-windows-autopilot-bandwidth-use-with-connected-cache/4389056
  54. https://www.motadata.com/blog/techniques-for-network-bandwidth-maximization/
  55. https://www.techtarget.com/searchitchannel/definition/clean-install
  56. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/clean-install
  57. https://techterms.com/definition/clean_install
  58. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsinsider/cleaninstall
  59. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/4376893/%28article%29-how-to-perform-a-clean-install-or-reinst
  60. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/7204/is-making-a-clean-install-enough-to-remove-potential-malware
  61. https://rufus.ie/en/
  62. https://www.macrium.com/reflectfree
  63. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/deployment/creating-bootstrapper-packages?view=vs-2022
  64. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/deployment/application-deployment-prerequisites?view=vs-2022
  65. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/bootstrapping
  66. https://docs.firegiant.com/wix3/bundle/
  67. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/install/create-an-offline-installation-of-visual-studio?view=vs-2022
  68. https://nsis.sourceforge.io/Main_Page
  69. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/packaging-mac-software-for-distribution
  70. https://www.revenera.com/install/products/installshield
  71. https://docs.revenera.com/installshield28helplib/helplibrary/IHelpReleaseDigitalSignature.htm
  72. https://nsis.sourceforge.io/Features
  73. https://nsis.sourceforge.io/Docs/Chapter1.html
  74. https://simplemdm.com/blog/certificate-sign-macos-packages/
  75. https://linux.die.net/man/5/deb
  76. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/pkg-basics.en.html
  77. https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html-single/rpm_packaging_guide/index
  78. https://www.encryptionconsulting.com/how-to-sign-rpm-packages/
  79. https://izpack.org/
  80. https://izpack.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IZPACK/pages/491539/
  81. https://opensource.com/article/18/7/evolution-package-managers
  82. https://devopedia.org/package-manager
  83. https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/linux-package-management-overview/
  84. https://wiki.debian.org/Apt
  85. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman
  86. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/what-is-nuget
  87. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f40/system-administrators-guide/package-management/DNF/
  88. https://docs.brew.sh/
  89. https://docs.npmjs.com/about-npm
  90. https://portableapps.com/about/what_is_a_portable_app
  91. https://portableapps.com/development/portableapps.com_format
  92. https://www.libreoffice.org/download/portable-versions/
  93. https://ddg.wcroc.umn.edu/how-to-create-portable-software/
  94. https://portableapps.com/support/portable_app
  95. https://0install.net/
  96. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps/Guides/Making_PWAs_installable
  97. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/deployment/clickonce-security-and-deployment?view=vs-2022
  98. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-desktop-optimization-pack/app-v/appv-support-policy
  99. https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/9-deprecated-features.html
  100. https://aws.amazon.com/appstream2/
  101. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/setup/vscode-web
  102. https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/inno-setup-malware-redline-stealer-campaign.html
  103. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/privileges-third-party-windows-installers/
  104. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa20-352a
  105. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/lessons-xz-utils-achieving-more-sustainable-open-source-ecosystem
  106. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/authenticode
  107. https://owasp.org/www-project-secure-coding-practices-quick-reference-guide/stable-en/02-checklist/05-checklist
  108. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/application-security/application-isolation/windows-sandbox/
  109. https://github.com/sandboxie-plus/Sandboxie
  110. https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
  111. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/plan/security-best-practices/implementing-least-privilege-administrative-models
  112. https://support.apple.com/guide/security/gatekeeper-and-runtime-protection-sec5599b66df/web
  113. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/virus-and-threat-protection/microsoft-defender-smartscreen/
  114. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/concepts/auditing-packages
  115. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/specialpublications/nist.sp.800-218.pdf
  116. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/make-older-apps-or-programs-compatible-with-the-latest-version-of-windows-783d6dd7-b439-bdb0-0490-54eea0f45938
  117. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/setupapi-logging--windows-vista-and-later-
  118. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/glossary/compatibility/
  119. https://www.ninjaone.com/blog/how-to-update-drivers-on-pcs/
  120. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/get-help-with-windows-upgrade-and-installation-errors-ea144c24-513d-a60e-40df-31ff78b3158a
  121. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/setupapi-device-installation-log-entries
  122. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/go-back-to-the-previous-version-of-windows-4fdf8a9e-ddc9-4f65-971f-47e7debab6e1
  123. https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000129428/how-to-access-microsoft-windows-installer-in-safe-mode
  124. https://www.parallels.com/blogs/software-testing-using-vm/
  125. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/side-by-side-configuration-is-incorrect/5c6a015e-4162-491d-b7d9-f3b13612e304
  126. https://success.trendmicro.com/en-US/solution/KA-0004474
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.