Hubbry Logo
TeindTeindMain
Open search
Teind
Community hub
Teind
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Teind
Teind
Teind
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In Scotland a teind (Scottish Gaelic: deachamh) was a tithe derived from the produce of the land for the maintenance of the clergy.[1]

It is also an old lowland term for a tribute due to be paid by the fairies to the devil every seven years. Found in the story of Tam Lin as well as in the ballad of Thomas the Rhymer.

Teind is a Scots word for tithe, meaning a tenth part.

Scottish Reformation and the Thirds of Benefices

[edit]
The royal kitchen display at Stirling Castle

Teinds had been used to support the living expenses of clergy. On 15 February 1562 the Privy Council of Scotland regulated the collection of a third of the teinds for the stipends of ministers of the reformed church and the expenses of the royal household.[2][3] A survey was made of rentals and revenues received by clergy. The resulting "Books of Assumption" is a record of the wealth of the church of Scotland at the Reformation and reveals the names of many secular or laymen owners who then owned former ecclesiastic properties. The detailed record also reveals the variety of agricultural produce, fishing, and coal or lime produced on the lands.[4]

On 1 March 1562 John Wishart of Pitarrow was appointed comptroller and collector-general of teinds.[5] A "Collectory" was established to manage the Thirds of Benefices.[6][7] In this capacity, Wishart became paymaster of the reformed clergy, many of whom resented the scantiness of their stipends. According to John Knox, the saying was current, "The good laird of Pittarro was ane earnest professour of Christ; but the mekle Devill receave the comptrollar".[8] Wishart appointed a kinsman George Wishart of Drymme as a sub-collector of Thirds of Benefices from Forfar and Kincardine, and his account includes payments made by Mary, Queen of Scots, to Knox and his servants, and to David Rizzio.[9]

Extracts from the accounts of the Thirds of Benefices, the records of Collectory between 1561 and 1572 were published by Gordon Donaldson.[10] Much of the money or produce collected went towards the expenses of the royal household and guard. In 1563, John Knox complained that "the gaird and the effairis of the kytcheing wer so gryping that the mynisteris stipendis could nocht be payit". The accounts record wine, beef and mutton, and cheese bought for the royal household. Coal from Wallyford in East Lothian was sent to the Palace of Holyroodhouse for Mary, Queen of Scots, and some was shipped to Aberdeen when she visited.[11]

Collectors of the Thirds

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Teind

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A teind, in Scottish ecclesiastical law, denotes a consisting of one-tenth of the produce from land or its monetary equivalent, levied primarily for the sustenance of the in the Established Church. Originating from medieval practices akin to English , teinds were recognized as held in trust by titulars such as lay patrons, monasteries, or bishops, though often subject to appropriation that left many ministers underfunded. Following the in 1560, when teinds had largely been alienated from parochial use, legislative efforts initiated by the First Book of Discipline sought to redirect them toward stipends for reformed ministers, prompting valuations and augmentations amid resistance from heritors (landowners). A pivotal 1627 general valuation under Charles I established fixed rentals for teind assessments across , facilitating more systematic collection despite ongoing disputes over drawn versus valued portions. The Court of Teinds, formalized in 1707 from earlier commissioners, adjudicated valuations, sales, and stipend increases, addressing chronic underpayment that hampered rural ministry until 19th- and 20th-century commutations and the 1925 Act enabled their phased surrender. These reforms underscored teinds' role in sustaining Protestant ecclesiastical structures while highlighting tensions between agrarian interests and clerical provision.

Definition and Origins

The word teind derives from Middle English tend or teind, a variant of tenth or tithe, ultimately tracing to Old English teotha ("tenth") and cognate with Old High German zehanto. In the Scots language, it specifically denotes a tenth part of produce, rents, or goods, often in plural form as teinds. In Scottish law, a teind constitutes a tithe: the tenth part of the annual produce of land, livestock, or equivalent rents, originally allocated by statute for the maintenance of the clergy in accordance with biblical precedents from Mosaic Law. This obligation applied to both great and small teinds, distinguishing fixed monetary equivalents from variable in-kind portions of grain, wool, or lambs. Post-Reformation, teinds retained their legal status as heritable property rights separable from land ownership, enabling lay proprietors to hold or alienate them while remaining liable for assessment toward parochial stipends; the Court of Teinds, established in 1621, adjudicated valuations, augmentations, and modifications to ensure equitable clerical support from lay estates. Unlike English tithes, Scottish teinds emphasized liquid proportions of rents over strict produce shares, reflecting adaptations to feudal tenures and kirk polity.

Biblical and Pre-Reformation Roots

The practice of teinds, equivalent to tithes representing one-tenth of agricultural produce or income, originated in biblical precedents predating formalized law. In the , Abraham presented a tenth of his spoils to , the priest-king of Salem, following a military victory, as recorded in Genesis 14:18-20. Jacob similarly pledged a tenth of all his possessions to in gratitude for divine protection, according to Genesis 28:20-22. These acts established an early pattern of decimation as an offering, though not yet systematic. Under the Mosaic covenant, tithes became obligatory for the Israelites to sustain the Levitical priesthood and temple functions, given the Levites' exclusion from territorial inheritance. Leviticus 27:30-32 prescribed a tenth of seed, fruit, and livestock for sacred purposes, while Numbers 18:21-24 allocated it specifically to the Levites for their service; Deuteronomy 14:22-29 further outlined annual consumption tithes for festivals and triennial provisions for the poor, widows, and orphans. The New Testament references tithing incidentally, with Jesus critiquing Pharisees for meticulous observance without prioritizing justice and mercy (Matthew 23:23), but lacks explicit mandates for Christian practice, reflecting a shift toward voluntary giving in apostolic teachings (2 Corinthians 9:7). Early Christianity initially treated offerings as voluntary alms rather than fixed tithes, but by the late sixth century, ecclesiastical councils institutionalized compulsory payment to support clergy amid expanding church structures. The Council of Tours in 567 and the Third Council of Mâcon in 585 decreed tithing under threat of excommunication, framing it as a divine obligation derived from Old Testament precedent. Charlemagne's capitularies in the eighth century enforced it as civil law across Frankish territories, influencing broader European adoption. In pre-Reformation Scotland, teinds emerged within the Celtic and later Romanized church from the early medieval period, with records attesting to their collection by the twelfth century onward; for instance, charters from the bishopric of Moray document teinds as church property held by lay patrons or rectors for parochial maintenance. Medieval Scottish teinds divided into greater (from grain, hay, and wood) and lesser (from animals, dairy, and minor crops), allocated to rectors or vicars, and stored in tithe barns, underpinning the Catholic Church's economic base before the sixteenth-century upheavals.

Teinds in Pre-Reformation Scotland

Structure and Appropriation

In pre-Reformation , teinds constituted a tenth of the annual from , , and other resources, levied as dues. These were structurally divided into rectorial teinds—primarily the greater teinds encompassing , hay, and other principal crops—and vicarial teinds, known as small teinds, which included lesser items such as , lambs, fish, , and garden . The rectorial teinds were originally intended to support the rector responsible for the spiritual and temporal oversight of the , while vicarial teinds sustained the in performing day-to-day duties. This division reflected the dual nature of parochial benefices, where full rectors managed both, but in practice, it facilitated the separation of revenues from local ministry. Appropriation of teinds involved the annexation of rectorial revenues to external bodies, such as monasteries, cathedrals, collegiate churches, or bishoprics, often through papal bulls or royal charters dating from the onward. Under this system, the appropriating institution became the titular rector, collecting the great teinds while appointing a vicar-pensioner to handle services, compensated only by small teinds and a modest fixed . By the 15th and early 16th centuries, appropriation had affected a high proportion of parishes—potentially over 80% based on surviving records of parochial foundations—diverting substantial income to support larger religious houses at the expense of local . This process, exemplified in grants to Benedictine and Augustinian monasteries, amassed wealth for institutions like those at or Holyrood but frequently left vicars underfunded, as small teinds yielded insufficient support amid fluctuating agricultural output and occasional lay encroachments. Such imbalances fueled pre-Reformation grievances over clerical and , though appropriations were defended as necessary for maintaining cathedrals and monastic .

Economic Role in Medieval Society

Teinds, equivalent to tithes, constituted a fundamental economic mechanism in medieval , exacting one-tenth of agricultural produce and livestock as revenue primarily for the church. Great teinds, derived chiefly from and hay, represented the more valuable portion and were often appropriated to monasteries, cathedrals, or rectors, while small teinds—from sources like , , animals, and lesser crops—typically remained with vicars for parochial upkeep. This bifurcation mirrored the feudal agrarian economy's emphasis on arable output in lowland regions, where tithes could yield substantial volumes, such as the 115 chalders of annually valued at approximately £1,367 for the archbishopric of St Andrews in the early 16th century. As a variable tax on production rather than fixed land assessments, teinds tied ecclesiastical income directly to fluctuations, comprising up to two-thirds of revenues for institutions like the Priory and enabling the church—Scotland's preeminent landowner—to amass wealth exceeding £20,000 annually in aggregate for major sees. This system incentivized proprietors of appropriated teinds to oversee efficient farming on church estates, fostering localized agricultural management, but burdened tenants and smallholders with in-kind payments that reduced disposable surplus and complicated feudal obligations like base rents. Disputes over valuation and exemptions, adjudicated in courts, frequently disrupted local economies, as non-payment or commutation to money reflected broader pressures from subsistence crises or market shifts. Lay amplified teinds' integration into secular feudal structures, with nobles and holding hereditary rights to many rectorial teinds as alienable assets, often leased or feued for cash flows that supplemented estate incomes. Such control, rooted in medieval endowments where patrons founded churches and retained portions, positioned teinds as tradable commodities, funding aristocratic households while sustaining clerical stipends—though vicarial from small teinds alone underscored inefficiencies. Economically, this facilitated resource circulation, as produce entered markets or supported monastic industries, but entrenched inequalities, with the church's teind-derived funds reinforcing its dominance in and credit networks across medieval society.

Teinds in the Scottish Reformation

Policy of the Thirds of Benefices (1560s)

The Policy of the Thirds of Benefices was a fiscal arrangement introduced in the early 1560s to redistribute revenues from former Catholic ecclesiastical benefices following the of 1560, which had abolished papal jurisdiction and endorsed the Protestant . Under this policy, the annual rents, teinds (tithes of grain and other produce), and other incomes from benefices—ranging from archbishoprics and bishoprics to rectories, vicarages, and minor chaplainries—were divided into three equal portions. One third was assigned to for general governmental and expenses, a second third to fund stipends for newly appointed Protestant ministers, and the final third retained by the pre-Reformation patrons or titular holders, who often included lay landowners holding appropriated teinds. This tripartite division represented a pragmatic compromise amid competing demands: the , via the First Book of Discipline drafted by and others in 1560, had sought full redirection of church revenues to support a salaried ministry, , and , estimating needs at around 70,000–100,000 merks annually based on projected structures. However, Queen Mary I's return from in August 1561 and the ongoing civil unrest limited radical confiscation, while lay patrons resisted total loss of their appropriated teinds, which had long been integrated into secular estates. The Crown's share addressed immediate fiscal shortfalls, as traditional royal incomes were strained by regency debts and military costs from the 1559–1560 crisis; for instance, initial collections in 1561–1562 yielded sums like 10,000 merks from lowland dioceses to bolster the . Implementation began informally in late under agreements between the Protestant Lords of the Congregation and the queen's , with formal surveys ordered by mid-1562 to value benefices for equitable division. The resulting Books of Assumption, compiled between and 1563 under , provided a comprehensive rental of ecclesiastical properties across 25 sheriffdoms (excluding and the Isles due to jurisdictional issues), listing over 1,000 benefices with detailed valuations in merks, bolls of grain, and equivalents—such as the archbishopric of assessed at 28,000 merks annually. These books, preserved as administrative records, enabled collectors—typically local sheriffs or appointed commissioners—to levy the Crown's third, while ministers claimed theirs directly from teind-payers, often sparking disputes over whether valuations reflected true yields or inflated pre-Reformation figures. By 1563–1564, parliamentary ratification under Mary I's regime solidified the policy, appointing dedicated Collectors of Thirds with powers to enforce payments, though collection rates varied: lowland areas like achieved 60–80% compliance in early years, yielding 40,000–50,000 merks annually for , while Highland and regions lagged due to resistance from titulars and incomplete surveys. Challenges included undervaluation by patrons to minimize ministers' shares, legal appeals over teind ownership, and the policy's failure to fully meet the Book of Discipline's targets—many ministers received only 200–400 merks yearly, far below the proposed 500 merks for urban parishes. This framework persisted into the 1570s, funding the emerging structure but entrenching disputes that later fueled calls for further teind reform.

Books of Assumption and Valuation

The Books of Assumption of the Thirds of Benefices, compiled circa 1562, constituted a comprehensive survey of ecclesiastical revenues across Scotland, excluding Argyll and the Isles, undertaken by royal commissioners to facilitate the reallocation of church income under the post-Reformation policy of thirds. These documents detailed the "old extent" or assessed values of benefices, drawing on prior valuations while incorporating contemporary estimates of yields from lands, teinds (tithes of grain, livestock, and other produce), and other sources, thereby providing the basis for apportioning one-third of revenues to the crown and reformed ministry. The process involved local inquiries into parochial and superior teinds, often revealing discrepancies between nominal rentals and actual collections, with valuations typically expressed in merks (a Scottish silver currency unit) based on customary payments in kind converted to monetary equivalents. Structured by and type—from archbishoprics and bishoprics to rectories, vicarages, chaplainries, and altarages—the enumerated specific income streams, such as teind sheaves, fish teinds, and fermes from church lands, enabling precise calculations for the thirds' extraction. For instance, major sees like were valued at thousands of merks annually, reflecting teind-dominated incomes that underpinned the medieval church's wealth, while smaller rural parishes showed more modest figures tied to local agricultural output. This valuation mechanism addressed practical challenges in teind assessment, including feudal divisions where heritors (landowners) held parochial teinds and tacksmen managed collections, often leading to underreporting or disputes resolved through adjudications. The books' significance lay in their role as a transitional fiscal tool, capturing a snapshot of the church's economic structure amid upheaval, with two-thirds of revenues notionally retained by prebendaries or lay patrons, a division reformer lambasted as consigning the majority to "the devil" while inadequately funding Protestant stipends. Despite inaccuracies from incomplete data or resistance by clerical holders, they informed subsequent collections by the General Collectors of Thirds, established in 1562, and served as precedents for later teind valuations, though their focus on gross assumptions overlooked deductions for repairs and pensions. Modern editions, such as James Kirk's 1995 transcription for the , preserve these records as primary evidence of Reformation-era ecclesiastical finance, highlighting teinds' centrality—comprising up to 80% of many benefices' value—and the policy's aim to repurpose Catholic endowments without outright confiscation.

Collectors of the Thirds

The Collectors of the Thirds were civil officials tasked with gathering revenues from the one-third portion of teinds (tithes) allocated to and Protestant ministry under the post- policy of dividing benefices into thirds, implemented in the early 1560s. Appointed amid fiscal pressures following the 1560 Parliament, their role involved regional assessments of ecclesiastical , collection of cash equivalents and victuals like grain, and accounting to the or treasury, with initial regulations issued on 15 February 1562 to ensure payments supported ministers' stipends and royal needs. Sir John Wishart of Pitarrow served as the primary collector from his appointment on 1 March 1562 until 1565, concurrently holding the office of of to oversee fiscal integration with state finances; during this period, he managed compilations of diocesan accounts, such as those for 1561 revenues prepared in 1562, which quantified teind values in money and produce across sees like and . Successors included William Murray of Tullibardine and Adam Erskine from 1565, who continued collections amid shifting regency administrations under figures like the . The Accounts of the Collectors of the Thirds of Benefices, 1561-1572, preserved in the Scottish History Society edition, document these efforts, revealing assessments totaling thousands of pounds and bolls of but highlighting systemic shortfalls. Collection faced substantial obstacles, including resistance from titular benefice-holders who feu-fermed teinds to lay patrons, incomplete valuations in remote areas, and direct appropriations by nobles; for instance, 1560s ledgers show receiving under half the projected revenues, with significant portions "intromitted" (intercepted) by local lords like the Earl of Huntly. By 1572, as evolved toward direct augmentation and ministerial endowments via the Books of Assumption, the collectors' centralized role diminished, though disputes over unpaid thirds persisted into the 1580s, underscoring 's role in transitioning church wealth to secular control.

Post-Reformation Administration

Commissioners of Teinds

The Commissioners of Teinds constituted a specialized administrative body in post-Reformation tasked with overseeing the valuation, surrender, and allocation of teinds to support the Protestant church's ministry. Appointed through acts of the , such commissions emerged in the late 16th and early 17th centuries to address the fragmented management of teinds after the appropriation of church lands and the policy of thirds. Their operations facilitated the transition from temporary collectors of thirds to a more structured system for funding parochial stipends, amid ongoing disputes between heritors (landowners liable for teinds) and the . Key functions encompassed valuing unassessed teinds, adjudicating surrenders where heritors exchanged their teind obligations for augmented land rentals under auspices, and recommending modifications to ministers' stipends based on assessed teind values. Parliamentary commissions, such as that of 1627 for surrenders and teinds, empowered designated members—often including sheriffs, ministers, and nobles—to conduct valuations and resolve local claims, registering outcomes in dedicated books. By the mid-17th century, these bodies routinely handled petitions for teind relief, enabling heritors to secure perpetual leases or outright possession of teinds in exchange for fixed payments to the , which then allocated funds to the church. In practice, the commissioners mitigated economic burdens on by standardizing valuations, though litigation persisted over undervaluations or disputed extents; for example, reports from the 1620s cited land sales at nine years' purchase influenced by teind encumbrances assessed by the commission. They also supported expansion, as in commissions for "plantation of kirks," where new parishes required teind valuations to establish viable stipends. Membership varied by act, typically comprising 12–20 individuals from shires and burghs, with provisions for substitutes if members were unavailable. This ad hoc yet recurrent framework persisted until the Act of Union in , which transferred the commissioners' jurisdiction to a permanent Court of Teinds within the , comprising five Lords Ordinary rotating duties to centralize and judicialize teind administration. The shift reflected broader union-era reforms to rationalize finance, reducing reliance on intermittent parliamentary commissions while preserving the teind system's role in church endowment.

Establishment of the Court of Teinds (1707)

The Court of Teinds was established in through the and Teinds Act (6 Anne, c. 10), which formally transferred the regulatory functions over teinds from the longstanding Commissioners of Teinds to a dedicated judicial body integrated within the . This reform addressed persistent administrative inefficiencies and disputes arising from post-Reformation teind valuations, where heritors (landowners liable for payments) and the Presbyterian Church often clashed over modifications, localities, and adequacy amid evolving agricultural practices and . The act centralized authority to streamline processes that had previously relied on commissions dating back to the , aiming to secure ecclesiastical funding without overburdening secular estates. Composed exclusively of judges from the , the Court of Teinds operated as a specialized chamber, convening every alternate Wednesday during session terms in to adjudicate teind-related matters. Its jurisdiction encompassed the valuation and sale of teinds, augmentation and modification of ministerial stipends via decrees of locality (specifying payers and amounts), plantation of new kirks, and unions or disjunctions of to reflect demographic changes. Proceedings emphasized empirical assessments of parish revenues and land productivity, often requiring detailed valuations to balance church needs against heritor burdens, thereby reducing protracted litigation that had plagued earlier systems. The establishment marked a pivotal shift toward judicial in teind administration, reflecting Parliament's intent to perpetuate Presbyterian church governance post-Union while adapting medieval structures to modern fiscal realities. Initial operations focused on rectifying undervalued stipends from the Books of Assumption era, with the court's decrees providing binding resolutions enforceable across , though appeals could escalate to the full . Over time, this framework influenced broader church funding until later 19th-century reforms, but in it represented a pragmatic consolidation of and .

Ongoing Collection and Disputes

Following the transfer of teind administration to the Court of Teinds in , collection proceeded through court-decreed valuations of teinds, apportioning a portion to ministers' from "free teinds"—those not previously allocated or modified—while heritors (landowners) bore liability proportional to their holdings, often via tacksmen or direct payment to titulars. The court issued decrees of augmentation to raise when ministers demonstrated inadequate provision relative to resources, modification to cap heritors' payments, and locality to distribute the among liable parties, ensuring ongoing funding for the ministry amid agricultural fluctuations. These processes relied on historical valuations, such as those from the Books of Assumption, updated via subvaluations or general processes to reflect current yields, though enforcement often required further litigation to compel payment. Disputes proliferated in the 18th and 19th centuries, primarily between ministers seeking augmentation and heritors resisting increased burdens, with heritors arguing teinds were exhausted by prior modifications or subvaluations, as in the 1868 case of The Minister of Morven v. The Heritors, where heritors claimed a 1629 subvaluation and 1785 decree left no free teinds available. Augmentation processes demanded exhaustive proof of teind values, leading to protracted hearings; for instance, ministers had to show stipends fell below sustainable levels, often citing rising costs or , while heritors countered with evidence of modified teinds or economic hardship. Litigation extended to titulars versus heritors over valuation discrepancies, as seen in Duke of v. Scott of Horslie Hill, contesting teind assessments in united parishes. The system's complexity fostered chronic contention, with procedures deemed "cumbrous and expensive" by contemporaries; one augmentation of £56 in incurred £344 in agent's fees alone, equating to over six times the gain and deterring heritors from settlement. Appeals to the amplified delays, as in disputes over Old Machar ministers' claims against heritors, where interests of , titulars, and heritors clashed in teind valuations. The Teinds Act sought to streamline powers by clarifying the court's authority in augmentations and modifications, limiting heritors' liability to actual teind values and mandating fair hearings, yet failed to curb pervasive suits, which burdened rural economies and fueled 19th-century reform demands. By mid-century, thousands of processes clogged dockets, with average s augmented incrementally—rising from medieval lows to around £200-300 annually in many parishes by 1850—but at the cost of eroded goodwill between church and .

Economic and Social Impacts

Effects on Landholders and Agriculture

Teinds imposed a equivalent to one-tenth of agricultural on Scottish landholders, known as heritors, who were obligated to deliver this share—typically in , , or other yields—to teind-holders, often lay patrons or secular entities following the . This levy strained rural economies, as the remaining nine-tenths of output had to cover sustenance, rents, seed for replanting, and other expenses, exacerbating vulnerabilities during poor harvests or market fluctuations. In the post- era, with teinds frequently alienated from church control and held by third parties, heritors faced perpetual payments without reciprocal benefits, contributing to financial insecurity documented in and valuation disputes from the 1560s onward. The variable nature of teinds, which adjusted annually based on actual production rather than fixed sums like rents, created disincentives for agricultural and . Landholders hesitated to undertake improvements such as drainage, liming, or , as enhanced yields amplified the teind obligation, diverting gains to external holders rather than reinvestment or profit. This separation of land ownership from teind rights hindered the adoption of more productive farming practices, perpetuating low-yield, subsistence-oriented in many regions through the , as evidenced by stagnant output levels in pre-reform valuations like those in the Books of Assumption (1560s–1580s). Litigation over teind valuations further burdened heritors with legal costs, with the Court of Teinds handling thousands of cases by the 18th century, diverting resources from productive uses and fostering resentment among landowners. Teind reform, accelerating from the late 17th century, mitigated these effects by enabling heritors to purchase teind rights through processes like demanding updated valuations and negotiating buyouts, often converting proportional levies to fixed monetary payments integrated into estate rents. This shift, occurring roughly two centuries earlier than tithe commutation in , aligned incentives for landholders to invest in , as they retained full benefits from increased ; for instance, post-reform estates in the Lowlands saw accelerated adoption of enclosures and improved husbandry by the 1720s–1750s, correlating with broader yield gains during the . By securing teinds, heritors reduced uncertainty, lowered effective tax burdens relative to rising outputs, and facilitated for farming enhancements, though smaller holders often lagged due to the costs of buyouts.

Support for Ministry and Church Funding

Teinds served as the principal mechanism for funding the stipends of parish ministers following the , deriving from a tenth of the annual produce or rental value of lands allocated to ecclesiastical support. This system, rooted in pre- practices, was adapted to sustain the Protestant ministry, with ministers receiving fixed or modified portions of teind revenue, often supplemented by glebes (church lands) for additional sustenance. By the early , teinds underpinned stipends in rural parishes, where payments were typically drawn from heritors' (landowners') obligations, ensuring a baseline income tied to local agricultural output. The Commissioners of Teinds, and later the Court of Teinds established by the Act 1707, facilitated stipend augmentations through valuations of teind resources, enabling increases in ministers' incomes based on updated assessments of parish lands. Decrees of locality fixed amounts, while modifications allowed heritors to commute in-kind teinds (e.g., or ) into monetary payments, stabilizing funding amid economic fluctuations. The Teinds Act 1808 formalized these powers, empowering the Commission to regulate augmentations and modifications to address underfunding, with often augmented from central teind funds when local resources proved insufficient. For instance, in cases like the parish of Newburn, augmentations were allocated proportionally from teind valuations to bolster ministerial support. Beyond stipends, teinds contributed to broader church infrastructure, including the and of manses (ministerial residences), (churches), and support for presbytery and operations, as valuations enabled reallocations for these purposes. By the early , teinds sustained ministers in approximately 880 parishes, where stipends were directly apportioned from land rentals, forming a core endowment until legislative reforms. The (Property and Endowments) Act 1925 standardized these stipends by averaging teind values over prior decades, securing fixed monetary support calculated county-by-county from grain prices, thereby modernizing the funding model while preserving teind-derived revenue. This framework persisted until the system's integration into feudal abolition under the Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000, after which alternative funding mechanisms largely replaced teinds.

Criticisms and Controversies

Reformation-Era Objections

Reformers in during the mid-16th century criticized the pre-Reformation teind system for diverting revenues away from local parishes toward absentee benefice-holders, monasteries, and papal annates, resulting in underpaid and often unqualified vicars who neglected pastoral responsibilities. articulated a core theological objection, asserting in propositions presented around 1558 that "tithes ought not to be given to Ecclesiastical Men" and that teinds do not pertain to churchmen by necessity under God's law, thereby rejecting the Catholic doctrine of divine right to tithes as a perpetual endowment for the . This stance aimed to undermine the institutional claims of the Roman Church, enabling the redirection of resources while avoiding outright abolition, as Knox viewed tithes as potentially lawful but not exclusively clerical. The First Book of Discipline, drafted by Knox and other reformers in 1560, further highlighted systemic abuses, noting that appropriated teinds had enriched non-resident pluralists and religious orders at the expense of active ministry, leaving many parishes without adequate support for preaching or sacraments. It proposed reallocating "the whole rents and teinds" to fund stipends for ministers (set at a minimum equivalent to 8 chalders of victual), schools, and the poor, administered by deacons to prevent clerical avarice, reflecting a that the old system's had fostered idleness and doctrinal error rather than spiritual edification. These critiques were echoed in complaints to the Reformation Parliament of 1560, where the lack of provision from teinds for the reformed underscored the prior regime's failure to sustain even basic ecclesiastical functions. Lay involvement compounded the reformers' grievances, as powerful heritors often held teinds from alienated church lands, extracting payments from tenants' produce without contributing to upkeep, which Knox decried as an inequitable burden exacerbating amid and unrest in the 1550s. Despite these objections, the reformers retained teinds as a funding mechanism post-1560, albeit with ongoing disputes over valuation and collection, as full implementation required parliamentary action against entrenched interests.

Long-Term Burdens and Litigation

The teind system imposed enduring financial obligations on Scottish landowners, requiring of one-tenth of agricultural or its monetary equivalent to support the church ministry, which often exceeded stipends due to accumulated claims from modified teinds and augmentations. This variable tax on output, assessed annually or via periodic valuations, generated uncertainty as yields fluctuated with , , and farming practices, leaving only nine-tenths of for sustenance, rent, , and profit. Unlike fixed feudal rents, teinds discouraged capital investment in drainage, enclosure, or , since enhancements risked upward revaluations by the Court of Teinds, potentially eroding gains from improved productivity; historical analyses indicate this stagnation persisted into the , hindering broader agricultural modernization until partial buyouts and valuations mitigated the issue. Litigation over teinds proliferated due to ambiguities in ownership, valuation methods, and heritor liabilities, with the Court of Teinds adjudicating thousands of disputes from its 1707 establishment onward, often involving protracted appeals to the . Early examples include the 1629 case Moreston and Craig v. Douglas, which resolved conflicts over teind entitlements linked to tenancies and , highlighting how fragmented rights—stemming from pre-Reformation grants—fueled intergenerational claims. In the 1650s, parish-level strife in Crichton uncovered a decade of concealed payment disputes, reflecting broader rural tensions amid godly reforms and economic pressures. By the late , cases like Sir Alexander Ramsay Irvine v. The Honourable William Maule (post-1772) enforced teind sales despite delays, underscoring heritors' ongoing exposure to compulsory valuations for ministerial augmentations, which could double or triple burdens on undervalued estates. Nineteenth-century parliamentary scrutiny, as in the 1875 House of Lords debate, criticized the teind framework for perpetuating litigation through obsolete valuations—often based on 17th-century assessments ignoring inflation and yield changes—imposing disproportionate costs on heritors via legal fees and delayed resolutions. Records from the Court of Teinds, preserved in the , document recurrent patterns: heritors challenging augmented stipends, ministers seeking revaluations, and disputes over unexhausted teinds in leased lands, with annual caseloads peaking during economic shifts like the post-Culloden clearances. These proceedings, while stabilizing some payments, entrenched a cycle of adversarial proceedings that diverted resources from productive uses, contributing to calls for systemic reform by mid-century.

Debates on Equity and Reform

The teind system's equity was debated primarily due to the mismatch between its structure as a variable tax on agricultural output and the fixed nature of land rents, which created disproportionate burdens on heritors as productivity improved. Historical valuations, often dating to the 17th century or earlier, failed to reflect 18th- and 19th-century agricultural advancements, leading landowners to argue that augmentations—judicially mandated increases in ministers' stipends drawn from teinds—imposed retroactive liabilities without fair adjustment mechanisms. This variability exacerbated economic uncertainty, as teind payments fluctuated annually while rents provided stable income, prompting heritors to advocate for commutation into fixed monetary equivalents to stabilize rural finances. Reform proposals emerged in the mid-17th century, enabling landlords to purchase teind rights from holders and consolidate them into unified rents, a process viewed as essential for agricultural modernization but politically divisive due to its secularizing effects on church revenues. Proponents, including improving landowners, emphasized that such buyouts would reduce litigation over valuations and promote , positioning Scotland's teind reforms two centuries ahead of similar English commutations in the . Critics within the church, however, contended that these changes risked underfunding parochial stipends, which averaged around £150–£200 annually in rural parishes by the early , insufficient for sustaining effective ministry amid rising living costs. The Commission of Teinds' augmentation powers fueled ongoing controversies, with heritors challenging decrees as inequitable for relying on localized, adversarial valuations rather than standardized national assessments. By the late , parliamentary inquiries, such as the 1887 motion for detailed returns on teind allocations across counties, underscored persistent tensions between ensuring clerical adequacy and alleviating landowner hardships, informing later legislative adjustments like the 1925 Act's modifications to teind-based stipends. These debates highlighted causal realities: without , the system's rigidity hindered agricultural investment, yet abrupt changes threatened ecclesiastical stability, balancing empirical needs for church support against landowners' claims to proportional burdens.

Decline and Abolition

19th-Century Parliamentary Challenges

The teind system encountered significant in the , driven by Scottish heritors (landowners) who contested the escalating financial liabilities from stipend augmentations granted by the Commission of Teinds. These augmentations frequently exploited antiquated valuations—often from the —causing teind obligations to surge with rising grain prices, thereby straining agricultural estates amid economic modernization and movements. To address procedural uncertainties and curb arbitrary increases, passed the Teinds Act 1808 on June 30, which delineated the Commission's to augment stipends up to specified limits (typically not exceeding one-fifth of teinds without consent) and mandated modifications in money or victual equivalents for fairness. This legislation responded to heritors' petitions highlighting litigation burdens and valuation disparities, though it preserved the system's core while enabling limited commutations. Subsequent decades saw recurrent bills targeting systemic flaws, such as variability in teind assessments tied to annual produce fluctuations. The Teinds (Scotland) Bill (No. 67) introduced in sought to standardize calculations by pegging them to the average receipts over the seven years preceding , thereby mitigating unpredictability for landowners; it advanced to second reading amid debates on the Established Church's funding model.Bill(No67)) Parliamentary inquiries persisted, including a 1881 Commons question pressing the for new legislation on teinds (equated to tithes) to resolve ongoing disputes over valued and unvalued portions. These initiatives underscored causal tensions between fixed rental incomes and variable teind taxes, fueling heritor for outright commutation or abolition, though full resolution awaited 20th-century measures. Critics, including landed interests, argued the framework incentivized inefficiency in church financing, as ministers pursued augmentations via protracted Court of Teinds processes, often yielding modest gains (averaging £100–£200 annually by mid-century) at high legal costs to parishes.

Integration into Feudal Abolition (2000 Act)

The Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 addressed teinds—historically a tenth part of land produce payable to support or, post-Reformation, ministers' —by classifying them as payments analogous to feuduty, thereby extinguishing them entirely on the appointed day of 28 November 2004. Section 56(1) explicitly extended the Act's Part 3 provisions on feudal tenure abolition to teinds, eliminating any superior's or vassal's rights or obligations related to them without compensation or preservation mechanisms, as their practical value had eroded through prior under statutes like the Tithes Act 1925. This integration aligned teinds' termination with the Act's core objective of severing feudal superior-vassal ties, converting landholdings to absolute ownership free of such burdens. Unlike some feuduties eligible for compensation claims, teinds received no such redress, reflecting legislative recognition of their obsolescence; by the late , they imposed negligible economic impact due to commutation into fixed monetary equivalents decades earlier. The Act's Schedule 12 amended or repealed ancillary provisions in older laws, such as removing teind references in the Act 1825 and extinguishing related valuation processes. Schedule 13 further consolidated abolition by repealing foundational teind legislation, including the Teinds Act 1690 (c.63) in full, the Valuation of Teinds Act 1814 (c.94), and sections of the Heritable Jurisdictions Act 1686 pertaining to teind rights, ensuring no statutory remnants persisted post-2004. Fish teinds, a specialized subset under the Fish Teinds (Scotland) Act 1864, were similarly discharged from section 3's clauses. This comprehensive statutory sweep marked teinds' definitive end, transitioning church funding from variable produce shares to modern fiscal arrangements independent of .

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/teind
  2. https://dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/teind_n1_v1
  3. https://yourscottisharchives.com/teind-court
  4. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3366/inr.2020.0247
  5. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/33/enacted/data.html
  6. https://www.law-dictionary.org/definitions-t/teinds
  7. https://www.churchofgodeveninglight.com/origin-of-tithing/
  8. https://get.tithe.ly/blog/tithing-in-the-new-testament-what-does-it-say
  9. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/327128542.pdf
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351503547_Is_tithing_a_justifiable_development_in_the_Christian_church
  11. https://catholicstraightanswers.com/what-is-tithing-and-what-is-its-basis/
  12. https://www.newvisionministriesonline.org/tithing-was-not-taught-by-the-apostles/
  13. https://poms.ac.uk/record/factoid/24921/
  14. https://www.historicenvironment.scot/visit-a-place/places/foulden-tithe-barn/
  15. https://www.stthomasaboyne.org/medieval-churches-by-hugh-cochran/
  16. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/30976/CowanIB_1961_v1redux.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  17. https://scarf.scot/regional/higharf/medieval/9-6-religion-and-ritual/9-6-1-churches-and-chapels/
  18. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/4476/ElizabethRhodesPhDThesis.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
  19. https://teinds.shca.ed.ac.uk/about/
  20. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/79326/1/13850393.pdf
  21. https://archivecatalogue.pkc.gov.uk/Glossaryt.aspx
  22. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E507E910639FB050ECE294FAF29628A7/S000964070010839Xa.pdf/the-books-of-assumption-of-the-thirds-of-benefices-scottish-ecclesiastical-rentals-at-the-reformation-edited-by-james-kirk-the-british-academys-records-of-social-and-economic-history-new-series-21-oxf.pdf
  23. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004347991/BP000008.pdf
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/7FE33C5D7725B690A7F434CC5E6F37B0/core-reader
  25. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Books_of_Assumption_of_the_Thirds_of.html?id=fZjsAAAAMAAJ
  26. https://archive.org/details/booksofassumptio0000chur
  27. https://www.oxfordscholarlyeditions.com/abstract/10.1093/actrade/9780197261255.book.1/actrade-9780197261255-book-1
  28. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004347991/BP000003.pdf
  29. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/442622/pdf
  30. https://www.amazon.com/Books-Assumption-Thirds-Benefices-Ecclesiastical/dp/0197261256
  31. https://wishart.org/index.php/notablewisharts/sir-john-wishart-of-pittarow/
  32. https://books.google.com/books/about/Accounts_of_the_Collectors_of_Thirds_of.html?id=PgAX0QEACAAJ
  33. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004347991/BP000007.pdf
  34. https://www.rps.ac.uk/search.php?a=fcf&fn=jamesvii_trans&id=47143&t=trans
  35. https://www.rps.ac.uk/static/historicalintro7.html
  36. https://electricscotland.com/bible/historyofchurchofscotland.pdf
  37. https://www.british-history.ac.uk/glasgow-charters/1175-1649/no1/cccx-cccli
  38. https://hansard.parliament.uk/html/Commons/1807-02-03/CommonsChamber
  39. https://victorianweb.org/history/scotland/edinburgh/institutions1.html
  40. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/financing-of-ministerial-stipends-in-the-established-church-of-scotland-the-rural-parish/C1761744B5534F4768D2361BF7ECDC33
  41. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo3/48/138/enacted?view=plain
  42. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff81d60d03e7f57eba4ec
  43. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff80e60d03e7f57eb91c4
  44. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/1875-04-16/debates/60d2863c-d9b9-4a3c-bb98-a4ee0c9a5222/TheEstablishedChurchOfScotland%25E2%2580%2594TheTeindSystem
  45. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff81d60d03e7f57eba459
  46. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo3/48/138
  47. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/sch.2022.0063
  48. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/inr.2020.0247
  49. https://scos.law.virginia.edu/explore/themes/church-religion
  50. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1924/apr/01/church-of-scotland-property-and
  51. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/33/enacted
  52. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/notes/division/1/3/6/4
  53. https://ccel.org/ccel/knox/history_reformation.iii.i.html
  54. https://www.fpchurch.org.uk/about-us/important-documents/the-first-book-of-discipline-1560/
  55. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/14016/14016-h/14016-h.htm
  56. http://teinds.shca.ed.ac.uk/about/
  57. https://books.google.com/books/about/Teinds_and_Agriculture.html?id=CS8JAQAAIAAJ
  58. https://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/3312/7892/5856/dp106_real_burdens.pdf
  59. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b444c8a2c94e050012d8b99
  60. https://www.socantscot.org/society-funded-research/discovering-the-godly-in-rural-scotland-1650-1660/
  61. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff80d60d03e7f57eb8ded
  62. https://books.google.com/books/about/Cases_Decided_in_the_Court_of_Session_Te.html?id=6EtNAQAAMAAJ
  63. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/1887-07-15/debates/aeb9524e-3cbd-4572-9db7-f237a28012a3/Teinds(Scotland)
  64. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/33/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true
  65. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/1875-04-16/debates/60d2863c-d9b9-4a3c-bb98-a4ee0c9a5222/TheEstablishedChurchOfScotland-TheTeindSystem
  66. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo3/48/138/enacted
  67. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1881/feb/14/teinds-or-tithes-scotland-legislation
  68. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/section/56
  69. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/schedule/12/paragraph/16
  70. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/section/71
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.