Hubbry Logo
Text fileText fileMain
Open search
Text file
Community hub
Text file
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Text file
Text file
Text file
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Text file
Filename extension
.text, .txt
Internet media type
text/plain
Type codeTEXT
Uniform Type Identifier (UTI)public.plain-text
UTI conformationpublic.text
Magic numberNone
Type of formatDocument file format, Generic container format

A text file (sometimes spelled textfile; an old alternative name is flat file) is a kind of computer file that is structured as a sequence of lines of electronic text. A text file exists stored as data within a computer file system.

In operating systems such as CP/M, where the operating system does not keep track of the file size in bytes, the end of a text file is denoted by placing one or more special characters, known as an end-of-file (EOF) marker, as padding after the last line in a text file.[1] In modern operating systems such as DOS, Microsoft Windows and Unix-like systems, text files do not contain any special EOF character, because file systems on those operating systems keep track of the file size in bytes.[2]

Some operating systems, such as Multics, Unix-like systems, CP/M, DOS, the classic Mac OS, and Windows, store text files as a sequence of bytes, with an end-of-line delimiter at the end of each line. Other operating systems, such as OpenVMS and OS/360 and its successors, have record-oriented filesystems, in which text files are stored as a sequence either of fixed-length records or of variable-length records with a record-length value in the record header.

"Text file" refers to a type of container, while plain text refers to a type of content.

At a generic level of description, there are two kinds of computer files: text files and binary files.[3]

Data storage

[edit]
A stylized iconic depiction of a CSV-formatted text file

Because of their simplicity, text files are commonly used for storage of information. They avoid some of the problems encountered with other file formats, such as endianness, padding bytes, or differences in the number of bytes in a machine word. Further, when data corruption occurs in a text file, it is often easier to recover and continue processing the remaining contents. A disadvantage of text files is that they usually have a low entropy, meaning that the information occupies more storage than is strictly necessary.

A simple text file may need no additional metadata (other than knowledge of its character set) to assist the reader in interpretation. A text file may contain no data at all, which is a case of zero-byte file.

Encoding

[edit]

The ASCII character set is the most common compatible subset of character sets for English-language text files, and is generally assumed to be the default file format in many situations. It covers American English, but for the British pound sign, the euro sign, or characters used outside English, a richer character set must be used. In many systems, this is chosen based on the default locale setting on the computer it is read on. Prior to UTF-8, this was traditionally single-byte encodings (such as ISO-8859-1 through ISO-8859-16) for European languages and wide character encodings for Asian languages.

Because encodings necessarily have only a limited repertoire of characters, often very small, many are only usable to represent text in a limited subset of human languages. Unicode is an attempt to create a common standard for representing all known languages, and most known character sets are subsets of the very large Unicode character set. Although there are multiple character encodings available for Unicode, the most common is UTF-8, which has the advantage of being backwards-compatible with ASCII; that is, every ASCII text file is also a UTF-8 text file with identical meaning. UTF-8 also has the advantage that it is easily auto-detectable. Thus, a common operating mode of UTF-8 capable software, when opening files of unknown encoding, is to try UTF-8 first and fall back to a locale dependent legacy encoding when it definitely is not UTF-8.

Formats

[edit]

On most operating systems, the name text file refers to a file format that allows only plain text content with very little formatting (e.g., no bold or italic types). Such files can be viewed and edited on text terminals or in simple text editors. Text files usually have the MIME type text/plain, usually with additional information indicating an encoding.

Microsoft Windows text files

[edit]

DOS and Microsoft Windows use a common text file format, with each line of text separated by a two-character combination: carriage return (CR) and line feed (LF). It is common for the last line of text not to be terminated with a CR-LF marker, and many text editors (including Notepad) do not automatically insert one on the last line.

On Microsoft Windows operating systems, a file is regarded as a text file if the suffix of the name of the file (the "filename extension") is .txt. However, many other suffixes are used for text files with specific purposes. For example, source code for computer programs is usually kept in text files that have file name suffixes indicating the programming language in which the source is written.

Most Microsoft Windows text files use ANSI, OEM, Unicode or UTF-8 encoding. What Microsoft Windows terminology calls "ANSI encodings" are usually single-byte ISO/IEC 8859 encodings (i.e. ANSI in the Microsoft Notepad menus is really "System Code Page", non-Unicode, legacy encoding), except for in locales such as Chinese, Japanese and Korean that require double-byte character sets. ANSI encodings were traditionally used as default system locales within Microsoft Windows, before the transition to Unicode. By contrast, OEM encodings, also known as DOS code pages, were defined by IBM for use in the original IBM PC text mode display system. They typically include graphical and line-drawing characters common in DOS applications. "Unicode"-encoded Microsoft Windows text files contain text in UTF-16 Unicode Transformation Format. Such files normally begin with byte order mark (BOM), which communicates the endianness of the file content. Although UTF-8 does not suffer from endianness problems, many Microsoft Windows programs (i.e. Notepad) prepend the contents of UTF-8-encoded files with BOM,[4] to differentiate UTF-8 encoding from other 8-bit encodings.[5]

Unix text files

[edit]

On Unix-like operating systems, text files format is precisely described: POSIX defines a text file as a file that contains characters organized into zero or more lines,[6] where lines are sequences of zero or more non-newline characters plus a terminating newline character,[7] normally LF.

Additionally, POSIX defines a printable file as a text file whose characters are printable or space or backspace according to regional rules. This excludes most control characters, which are not printable.[8]

Apple Macintosh text files

[edit]

Prior to the advent of macOS, the classic Mac OS system regarded the content of a file (the data fork) to be a text file when its resource fork indicated that the type of the file was "TEXT".[9] Lines of classic Mac OS text files are terminated with CR characters.[10]

Being a Unix-like system, macOS uses Unix format for text files.[10] Uniform Type Identifier (UTI) used for text files in macOS is "public.plain-text"; additional, more specific UTIs are: "public.utf8-plain-text" for utf-8-encoded text, "public.utf16-external-plain-text" and "public.utf16-plain-text" for utf-16-encoded text and "com.apple.traditional-mac-plain-text" for classic Mac OS text files.[9]

Rendering

[edit]

When opened by a text editor, human-readable content is presented to the user. This often consists of the file's plain text visible to the user. Depending on the application, control codes may be rendered either as literal instructions acted upon by the editor, or as visible escape characters that can be edited as plain text. Though there may be plain text in a text file, control characters within the file (especially the end-of-file character) can render the plain text unseen by a particular method.

[edit]

The use of lightweight markup languages such as TeX, markdown and wikitext can be regarded as an extension of plain text files, as marked-up text is still wholly or partially human-readable in spite of containing machine-interpretable annotations. Early uses of HTML could also be regarded in this way, although the HTML of modern websites is largely unreadable by humans. Other file formats such as enriched text and CSV can also be regarded as human-interpretable to some degree.

See also

[edit]
  • ASCII – Character encoding standard
  • EBCDIC – Eight-bit character encoding system invented by IBM
  • Filename extension – Filename suffix that indicates the file's type
  • List of file formats – List of computer file types
  • Newline – Special characters in computing signifying the end of a line of text
  • Syntax highlighting – Tool of editors for programming, scripting, and markup
  • Text-based protocol – System for exchanging messages between computing systems
  • Text editor – Computer software used to edit plain text documents
  • Unicode – Character encoding standard

Notes and references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Text file

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A text file is a type of that stores data solely in the form of characters, without any embedded formatting such as bold, italics, images, or elements, making it highly portable and readable across different systems and software. These files are typically encoded using standards like ASCII or to represent alphanumeric characters, symbols, and control codes such as newlines, ensuring compatibility for both human viewing and programmatic processing. Text files serve as a foundational format in computing for tasks ranging from simple note-taking to complex data interchange, owing to their simplicity, small file sizes, and ease of recovery compared to binary formats. They are commonly identified by extensions like .txt for plain text, but also encompass structured variants such as .csv for comma-separated values, .html for web markup, and source code files like .py for Python scripts, all of which remain human-readable when viewed in a text editor. Unlike binary files, which store data in machine-readable but opaque sequences, text files prioritize accessibility and can be opened universally with basic editors like Notepad on Windows or TextEdit on macOS. The versatility of text files extends to their role in , where they form the basis for configuration files (e.g., .log for logs or .xml for markup), data export (e.g., .csv for spreadsheets), and even secure communications via ASCII-based .asc files. Their lightweight nature facilitates sharing and archiving, though limitations include restricted formatting capabilities and potential vulnerabilities if containing executable-like content. Overall, text files embody a core principle of open, interoperable data storage in .

Definition and Fundamentals

Distinction from Binary Files

A text file is fundamentally a sequence of characters encoded in a known scheme, structured to be directly readable and interpretable by humans using basic tools without requiring specialized software or interpreters. This human-centric design distinguishes text files from other data storage methods, as their content—such as plain words or sentences in a document—appears as coherent language when viewed in a simple editor like or vi. In contrast, a comprises raw sequences of bytes that encode data in a machine-oriented format, often including non-printable control codes, compressed structures, or proprietary layouts that render the content unintelligible to humans without dedicated software for decoding or rendering. For instance, a typical text file with a .txt extension might store everyday prose like "Hello, world," which any text viewer can display plainly, whereas a such as an executable .exe contains compiled that appears as gibberish—sequences of values or random symbols—when opened in a . This fundamental difference affects how files are handled: text files prioritize accessibility and editability, while binary files emphasize efficiency for program execution or . The origins of text files trace back to early computing in the , when they emerged as a means for storing and editing human-readable data. This development was underpinned by the adoption of standards like ASCII in the mid-, which provided a common encoding for characters. Devices such as the , prevalent in non-IBM computing installations during that era, exemplified this approach by producing and handling punched paper tape or direct terminal output as editable text streams, laying the groundwork for portable, human-interactable file formats in subsequent decades.

Key Characteristics and Portability

A primary characteristic of text files is their human readability, which allows users to view and comprehend the content directly without specialized software. This feature enables straightforward editing using basic text editors like or Vim, facilitating quick modifications and inspections by non-experts. Text files exhibit high portability across different operating systems and devices due to their minimal metadata and dependence on widely supported character encodings. This simplicity ensures that text files can be transferred and opened consistently without tools, promoting in diverse environments. Key advantages include ease of backup, as the plain structure supports simple copying and archiving without format-specific concerns; effective integration with systems like , where changes to text content can be tracked and merged efficiently; and relatively low overhead in storage for small to medium-sized files, avoiding the complexity of embedded structures. However, text files have notable disadvantages, particularly their inefficiency for handling large datasets compared to binary formats such as , which offer faster access and better compression through optimized storage. Traditionally, text files utilize 7-bit or 8-bit character representations, constraining them to approximately 128 or 256 distinct symbols, respectively, unless extended by additional encoding mechanisms.

Data Representation

Internal Structure and Line Endings

A text file's internal is fundamentally a sequence of lines, where each line (except possibly the last) comprises zero or more non- characters followed by a terminating , and the last line may form an incomplete line without a terminating newline. This organization allows for straightforward parsing and display, treating the file as a linear of delimited records. The entire file concludes without an explicit marker in modern systems, whose detection is addressed separately. The most prevalent line ending delimiters are the line feed character (LF, represented as 0x0A in ), the character (CR, 0x0D), and the combined sequence CR-LF (0x0D followed by 0x0A). These control characters originated from the mechanical operations of typewriters and early printers, where CR instructed the print head to return to the left margin and LF advanced the paper to the next line, often requiring both for a complete line break. In systems, the standard specifies LF as the required , defining a line explicitly as ending with this character to ensure consistency in file processing and portability. However, when text files employing different —such as CR-LF from other environments—are transferred across platforms without conversion, they often appear mangled, with symptoms including duplicated lines, trailing characters, or disrupted formatting due to mismatched interpretations of the . To resolve such issues, utilities like dos2unix automate the conversion of line endings, replacing CR-LF sequences with LF while preserving the file's content integrity. For instance, invoking dos2unix filename.txt processes the file in place, stripping extraneous CR characters that precede LF in DOS-style formats.

End-of-File Detection

In modern filesystems, text files do not contain an explicit (EOF) marker; instead, the end is inferred by attempting to read beyond the file's known size, resulting in no bytes being returned. This approach relies on the operating system's file metadata, such as the file length stored in the directory entry, to determine when all data has been consumed. For instance, in POSIX-compliant systems like Unix and , the read() system call returns 0 when the file offset reaches or passes the end of the file, signaling EOF without any special character in the file itself. Similarly, in Windows, the ReadFile function for synchronous operations returns TRUE with the number of bytes read set to 0 at EOF. Historically, some systems used explicit markers to denote the end of text files, particularly in environments with sector-based storage. In MS-DOS, the Ctrl+Z character (ASCII 0x1A, also known as SUB) served as a conventional EOF indicator for text files, a practice inherited from CP/M to handle partial sectors by padding unused space with this character. This marker allowed applications to stop reading upon encountering it, though MS-DOS itself treated files as byte streams without enforcing it at the kernel level; official documentation, such as the MS-DOS 3.3 Reference, explicitly describes Ctrl+Z as the typical EOF for text operations like file copying. On mainframes, such as IBM z/VM systems, fixed-length records in formats like FB (Fixed Blocked) often rely on an EOF marker (X'61FFFF61') to signal the end of data, especially in short last blocks, as the filesystem does not support varying record lengths in fixed formats. Contemporary programming interfaces abstract EOF detection through standardized functions that check the stream state after read attempts. In the , the feof() function tests the end-of-file indicator for a stream, returning a non-zero value if an attempt to read past the end has occurred, allowing safe iteration without assuming an explicit marker. This is crucial in line-based processing, where line endings precede the EOF condition. For asynchronous reads in Windows, EOF is detected via error codes like ERROR_HANDLE_EOF from GetOverlappedResult. The (BOM), a U+FEFF character at the file's beginning, functions as a header to indicate encoding and byte order but does not serve as an EOF marker; placing it elsewhere has no special effect and can disrupt parsing. In streaming reads, mishandling the BOM might lead to misinterpretation of initial bytes, but it remains unrelated to file termination. A common programming pitfall is failing to properly detect EOF, which can cause infinite loops; for example, , repeatedly calling fgetc() on a until it returns EOF avoids this, but feof() should be checked post-read to confirm the condition, as the indicator is set only after an unsuccessful read attempt.

Character Encoding

Historical Encodings

The American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), formalized as ANSI X3.4-1963, introduced a 7-bit standard in 1963 that supported 128 distinct characters, including 95 printable symbols and 33 control codes, primarily tailored for the English alphabet and basic computing needs. This scheme became the foundational encoding for text files in early computing environments, enabling among diverse systems by mapping each character to a unique 7-bit binary value from 0 to 127. In the early 1960s, developed the (EBCDIC) as an 8-bit encoding for its System/360 mainframe series, announced in 1964, which allowed for 256 possible characters but maintained incompatibility with ASCII due to differing code assignments and structure. evolved from earlier IBM punch-card codes and was optimized for mainframe , featuring zones for numeric and alphabetic characters that prioritized over universal adoption. To extend ASCII's capabilities for international use, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) introduced the ISO-8859 series of 8-bit encodings in the 1980s, with ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) published in February 1987 as the first standard supporting 191 characters for Western European languages, including accented Latin letters beyond basic English. Subsequent parts of the series, such as ISO 8859-2 for Cyrillic and ISO 8859-3 for Southern European scripts, followed in the late 1980s, each reserving the first 128 code points to match ASCII for compatibility while utilizing the upper 128 for language-specific extensions. Early text files relied on 7-bit clean channels for transmission, assuming the eighth bit in an 8-bit byte was reserved as a parity bit to detect errors in noisy communication lines, such as those used in teleprinters and early networks. However, these historical encodings were inherently limited to Latin-based scripts, offering no native support for non-Latin writing systems like Cyrillic, Arabic, or Asian ideographs, which frequently led to mojibake—garbled or nonsensical text—when data from unsupported scripts was misinterpreted through mismatched decoding. This shortfall in multilingual coverage prompted the eventual shift toward more inclusive standards in the 1990s.

Modern Encodings and Standards

The , first published in 1991 by the , serves as the foundational universal for modern text files, assigning unique code points to 159,801 characters (as of version 17.0) across 17 planes, with a total capacity of 1,114,112 code points to support virtually all writing systems worldwide. 17.0, released in 2025, further expanded support with 4,803 new characters, including four new scripts. This standard enables seamless representation of diverse scripts, symbols, and emojis in a single framework, replacing fragmented legacy encodings with a cohesive system. Among Unicode's transformation formats, has emerged as the dominant encoding for text files due to its variable-length structure, which represents code points using 1 to 4 bytes per character, optimizing storage for common Latin scripts while accommodating complex ones. Defined in RFC 3629 by the IETF, UTF-8 maintains with ASCII by encoding the first 128 characters identically, ensuring that existing ASCII files remain readable without alteration. This compatibility, combined with its prevalence in (where 98.8% of websites use UTF-8 as of November 2025) and systems, has solidified its role as the for global text interchange. UTF-16 and UTF-32 provide alternative encodings tailored to specific use cases; UTF-16 employs a variable-width scheme with 2-byte units for most characters but requires surrogate pairs—two 16-bit values—to represent code points beyond the Basic Multilingual Plane, such as emojis, while UTF-32 uses a fixed 4-byte width for uniform access. For instance, the rocket emoji (U+1F680) in UTF-16 is encoded as the surrogate pair D83D DE80 in , allowing systems like Windows internals to handle supplementary characters efficiently through native string APIs. UTF-16 is commonly used in Windows for internal string processing due to its balance of compactness and performance. To facilitate encoding detection and interoperability, the (BOM) serves as an optional Unicode signature at the file's start; for , it consists of the byte sequence EF BB BF (U+FEFF), which software can parse to automatically identify the format without relying on external metadata. IETF standards further standardize text file handling through types, such as text/plain; charset=, as outlined in RFC 6657, ensuring consistent transmission in protocols like HTTP and . Utilities like the GNU iconv library enable conversion between encodings, such as transforming legacy ISO-8859 files to , supporting robust processing in diverse environments.

Platform-Specific Formats

Windows Text Files

In the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, text files traditionally employ the carriage return followed by line feed (, or \r\n) as the standard line ending sequence, a convention inherited from operating systems via . This two-character delimiter originated from early teletype and DEC hardware requirements, where moved the print head to the beginning of the line and LF advanced to the next line, ensuring compatibility with mechanical typewriters and early computer terminals. Windows text files commonly use several default character encodings, including the legacy ANSI code page for Western European languages, (without a byte-order mark) for broader support, and UTF-16 little-endian (LE) for internal system processing. extends ASCII with additional characters for Latin-based scripts and serves as the default "ANSI" encoding in many applications, while (without a byte-order mark) has been the default encoding for saving in since the May 2019 Update (version 1903) to better handle international text without manual specification. UTF-16 LE, the native wide-character encoding in Windows APIs, is often applied to text files generated by system tools or scripts requiring full compatibility. The primary file extension for plain text files in Windows is .txt, which is by default associated with the built-in application for viewing and editing. This association allows users to double-click .txt files to open them directly in , promoting simplicity for basic text handling across the platform. Legacy support persists for OEM code pages, such as (also known as CP437 or Latin US), which was the original character set for PC-compatible systems and remains available for compatibility with older DOS-era files containing graphics and symbols. in and later versions includes improved encoding auto-detection, analyzing file signatures like BOMs or byte patterns to select , UTF-16, or ANSI without user intervention, reducing errors in cross-encoding scenarios. For command-line handling of text files, Windows provides the type command in Command Prompt, which displays file contents to the console while respecting CR-LF line endings and current OEM . In PowerShell, the Get-Content cmdlet offers more advanced functionality, such as reading files line-by-line with optional encoding specification (e.g., -Encoding UTF8) and piping output for further processing, making it suitable for scripting and automation tasks involving text data.

Unix and Linux Text Files

In Unix and systems, text files adhere to the standard by using a single line feed (LF, or \n) as the line ending sequence, a convention dating back to early Unix development in the for its simplicity and efficiency in handling streams of data. This single-character delimiter contrasts with Windows' CR-LF and classic Mac's CR, promoting portability across operating systems. Character encodings in Unix and text files favor as the modern standard, providing full support while maintaining with ASCII for the first 128 characters. Legacy encodings such as ISO-8859 series (e.g., ISO-8859-1 for Western European languages) are still encountered in older files, but has been the de facto preference since the early 2000s, aligned with locale recommendations. Plain text files typically use the .txt extension, but unlike Windows, there is no universal default application association; it varies by desktop environment (e.g., gedit in GNOME, KWrite in KDE Plasma, or nano in terminal-based setups). Users often configure their preferred editor via MIME type handlers or environment variables like $EDITOR. For command-line operations, the cat command concatenates and displays file contents, preserving LF line endings, while editors such as vi/vim or nano provide efficient editing with automatic handling of encodings. Utilities like dos2unix are available to convert line endings from other platforms, ensuring compatibility in mixed environments.

macOS and Legacy Apple Formats

In the classic Mac OS, which spanned from 1984 to 2001, text files utilized a single carriage return (CR, ASCII 13 or \r) as the line ending convention. This differed from Unix's line feed (LF) and Windows' CR-LF pair, reflecting the system's origins in the original Macintosh hardware design where CR aligned with typewriter mechanics. Legacy applications from this era, such as those running on Mac OS 9, expected CR endings, and files lacking them could display incorrectly without conversion tools. With the introduction of Mac OS X in 2001—now evolved into macOS—the platform shifted to a Unix-based foundation derived from Darwin, a BSD variant, adopting the standard LF (\n) for line endings in text files. This change ensured compatibility with Unix tools and standards, while backward compatibility for CR-ended files was maintained through utilities. On the Hierarchical File System Plus (HFS+), used from Mac OS 8.1 through , text files could store additional metadata in resource forks or extended attributes, such as creator codes (e.g., 'ttxt' for ) and type codes (e.g., 'TEXT'), aiding in application association and rendering. Character encoding in Apple text files transitioned from the legacy 8-bit MacRoman, an ASCII extension developed for to support Western European languages with characters like accented letters and symbols in the 128–255 range. MacRoman was the default for pre-OS X systems, ensuring compatibility with early Macintosh fonts and printers. In modern macOS, has become the prevailing encoding for plain text files, aligning with standards and enabling global language support without byte-order issues. Since Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) in 2005, Apple has employed Uniform Type Identifiers (UTIs) to classify text files, with "public.plain-text" serving as the standard UTI for unformatted text, encompassing extensions like .txt and MIME type text/plain. This system supersedes older type/creator codes, facilitating seamless integration across apps and services. Apple's application, the default since , defaults to (RTF) for new documents to preserve formatting like bold and italics, but fully supports mode via the Format > Make Plain Text menu option or by setting preferences to plain text as default. For converting legacy CR line endings to LF in macOS, the Unix-derived tr command is commonly used, such as tr '\r' '\n' < input.txt > output.txt, leveraging the system's compliance.

Usage in Computing

Configuration and Data Files

Text files play a central role in system and application configuration by providing a simple, human-readable means to store settings that can be easily modified without specialized tools. In Windows environments, INI files are a traditional format for configuration, consisting of sections denoted by brackets and key-value pairs separated by equals signs, such as [section] followed by key=value lines.) These files allow applications to define parameters like window positions or database connections in a structured yet accessible way. Similarly, in systems such as , .conf files serve this purpose, often using a similar key-value syntax; for instance, the web server's nginx.conf file in /etc/nginx/ configures server blocks, upstreams, and directives like listen and server_name. Beyond basic key-value pairs, more structured text formats like and have become prevalent for complex configurations due to their hierarchical support and readability. , a lightweight data-interchange format, uses curly braces for objects and square brackets for arrays, making it suitable for nested settings in modern applications. extends this with indentation-based structure for even greater human readability, often preferred for tools where whitespace defines hierarchy without brackets. These formats enable representation of trees of data, such as endpoints or deployment variables, while remaining . Text files are also extensively used for data files, particularly in formats like CSV (), which store tabular data in . In CSV, records are separated by newlines, and fields within records are separated by commas (or other delimiters like semicolons), allowing easy import into applications or databases for analysis and processing. One key advantage of text-based configuration files is their editability by humans, which minimizes reliance on graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for adjustments, allowing quick tweaks via any . This approach also facilitates in systems like , where changes to configs can be tracked, diffed, and rolled back as with , promoting across environments. For example, Windows registry exports to .reg files provide a text-based way to import or export keys and values, using a syntax like [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\key] followed by "value"=type:data. In web servers, Apache's .htaccess files allow per-directory overrides, such as authentication rules or rewrites, using the same directives as the main httpd.conf but in a decentralized text file. Parsing these files is straightforward with standard libraries, enhancing their utility; Python's configparser module, for instance, reads and writes INI-style files, handling sections and automatically. For international configurations, encoding is commonly required to support non-ASCII characters in settings like file paths or messages.

Logging and Scripting Applications

Text files play a crucial role in logging applications by capturing runtime events in a human-readable, format. In the protocol, standardized by RFC 5424, log messages consist of structured fields including a priority value, , , application name, process ID, and message content, enabling systematic event notification across networks. Similarly, access logs record client requests with timestamped entries in a configurable format, typically including the client's , request method, , status code, and bytes transferred, as defined in the server's LogFormat directive. Logging systems append entries to text files in real-time to ensure continuous capture of system activities without interrupting operations. To manage file growth and prevent overflow, tools like logrotate automate rotation by compressing, renaming, or deleting old logs based on size, time, or count criteria, as implemented in its core configuration options. For structured output, JSON-formatted logs within text files organize data as key-value pairs, facilitating machine parsing of fields like timestamps and error levels, as seen in modern logging libraries. transcripts, generated via the Start-Transcript cmdlet, produce text files detailing all commands entered and their outputs during a session, aiding in session replay and analysis. In scripting applications, text files serve as executable scripts for automation tasks. Unix-like shell scripts, typically saved with a .sh extension, begin with a shebang line such as #!/bin/sh to specify the POSIX-compliant shell interpreter, allowing sequential execution of commands for tasks like file manipulation or process control. On Windows, batch files with a .bat extension contain command-line instructions interpreted by cmd.exe, enabling automation of repetitive operations such as system backups or user provisioning. The use of text files in these contexts enhances debuggability by providing chronological traces of application behavior, allowing developers to identify issues through sequential event review. Additionally, they establish audit trails in server environments by maintaining immutable records of actions, supporting compliance and incident investigation as outlined in NIST guidelines for system accountability. This line-based structure simplifies parsing for tools that process logs line by line.

Rendering and Processing

Text Editors and Viewers

Text editors and viewers are software applications designed for creating, opening, viewing, editing, and saving text files, ranging from simple tools for basic operations to sophisticated environments for complex tasks. These tools ensure compatibility with formats while offering varying levels of functionality depending on the user's needs and the operating system. They typically support core operations like inserting, deleting, and navigating text, making them indispensable for tasks involving configuration files, scripts, and . Basic text editors are lightweight and often pre-installed on operating systems to provide straightforward access to text file management. On Windows, Notepad serves as the default viewer and editor, allowing users to instantly view, edit, and search plain text documents with minimal interface elements. In Unix and Linux environments, command-line editors like vi (commonly implemented as Vim) and nano are standard; Vim is a modal editor that enables efficient text manipulation through keyboard commands alone, while nano offers an intuitive terminal-based interface suitable for beginners. For macOS, TextEdit is the built-in application that handles plain text files alongside rich text and HTML, providing essential editing capabilities directly from the Finder. Advanced text editors extend beyond basic functionality by incorporating features tailored for programming and productivity. , a popular (IDE), supports for hundreds of languages, along with intelligent and bracket matching to enhance editing precision. Similarly, functions as a cross-platform editor with a focus on speed, featuring a minimal interface and support for plugins that extend its capabilities for code, markup, and prose. Text editors generally fall into two categories: editors, which use visual menus, toolbars, and mouse interactions for , and editors, which prioritize keyboard efficiency and resource conservation in terminal-based workflows. Common features across both types include search and replace tools for locating and updating text patterns, as well as options to specify character encodings like or ASCII to avoid corruption when working with files across systems. For instance, in Vim, editing large text files can be optimized by using the command :set nowrap to disable automatic line wrapping, which reduces rendering overhead on files with extremely long lines. To ensure compatibility with platform-specific text file formats, such as varying line ending characters, many editors detect and adjust these conventions automatically during file operations.

Handling Control Characters

Control characters in text files refer to a set of non-printable codes defined in the ASCII standard, encompassing codes 0 through 31 () and 127 (), which are used to control hardware or software operations rather than representing visible glyphs. These include the horizontal tab (HT, 0x09), which advances the cursor to the next , and the escape (ESC, 0x1B), which initiates control sequences for formatting or device commands. The ASCII standard, equivalent to ISO/IEC 646, designates these 33 characters (including ) for functions like line feeds, carriage returns, and acknowledgments, originally intended for teletypewriters and early terminals. When rendering text files containing control characters, applications and terminals typically treat them as invisible or represent them symbolically to aid , such as displaying (CR, 0x0D) as ^M in . In terminal emulators, these characters can cause issues like unintended cursor movements or screen clearing if not properly interpreted, as terminals process them according to standards like ECMA-48 for escape sequences. For instance, unhandled controls may lead to garbled output or disrupted layouts when viewing files in command-line environments. The standard extends ASCII controls into its repertoire, preserving codes U+0000 to U+001F and U+007F as category Cc (Other, Control), while adding format characters like (U+200B), which affects text layout without visible rendering. These Unicode controls, including bidirectional overrides, are interpreted similarly to ASCII in markup contexts, where escape sequences (e.g., via \u escapes in ) denote them without altering printable content. Encodings like preserve the byte sequences for these controls, ensuring consistent interpretation across systems. To inspect or manage control characters, hex editors display file contents in hexadecimal and ASCII views, revealing non-printable codes as their byte values (e.g., 0x07 for BEL) alongside any symbolic representations. For processing, utilities like or can strip controls; for example, the POSIX-compliant command sed 's/[[:cntrl:]]//g' removes all ASCII control characters while preserving newlines and printable characters such as . A practical example is the (BEL, 0x07), historically used in legacy systems to trigger an audible alert upon encountering it in a text stream, though modern terminals often mute or visualize it instead.

Security and Limitations

Potential Vulnerabilities

Text files, particularly those serving as scripts, configuration files, or logs, are susceptible to injection attacks when untrusted user input is incorporated without proper sanitization. For instance, command injection can occur if malicious payloads are embedded in log entries that are subsequently processed by scripts or applications, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands. A prominent example is the vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228), where text-based log messages in Log4j configurations enabled remote code execution through injected JNDI lookups. Encoding-related exploits, such as attacks, leverage characters that visually resemble standard ASCII letters to deceive users or systems in text file contents or filenames. Attackers may substitute lookalike characters (e.g., Cyrillic 'а' for Latin 'a') to spoof legitimate data, potentially bypassing security filters or enabling via misleading file names. These attacks exploit inconsistencies in how applications render or process , making them effective in text-based environments like attachments or configuration entries. Path traversal vulnerabilities arise during text file reads when user-supplied paths are not validated, allowing attackers to navigate outside intended directories using sequences like "../". A classic exploitation involves injecting "../../etc/passwd" into a path to access sensitive system files. Such flaws are common in applications that dynamically construct file paths from text inputs without . Buffer overflows in text file parsers occur when applications fail to properly bound-check input , leading to memory corruption from oversized or malformed text. This can happen in log parsers or text processors that allocate fixed buffers for reading file contents, enabling denial-of-service or code execution if exploited. Historical incidents in tools like text editors demonstrate how unchecked string operations in C-based parsers contribute to these risks. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, developers should validate and sanitize all inputs to text files, rejecting or escaping dangerous characters like newlines in logs or traversal sequences in paths. Adopting normalized encoding ensures consistent handling of , reducing risks by decomposing and recomposing characters to canonical forms before processing. Additionally, sandboxing text editors and parsers isolates execution, preventing overflows or injections from affecting the host system.

Performance and Size Constraints

Text files, as unstructured plain files, inherit the size constraints imposed by the host file system, which determines the maximum capacity for any individual file regardless of content type. In , these limits are typically vast, supporting terabytes or more per file, but they vary by file system implementation. For example, the file system used in environments supports a maximum file size of 16 tebibytes (2^44 bytes) with a 4 KiB block size. Similarly, Microsoft's file system permits volumes and files up to 2^64 - 1 bytes theoretically, though practical limits based on cluster size range from 16 terabytes (with 4 KiB clusters) to 256 terabytes (with 64 KiB clusters) in recent Windows versions. Apple's APFS, employed in macOS and , allows files up to 2^63 bytes, enabling exabyte-scale storage. These limits ensure text files can scale to handle massive datasets, such as logs or corpora, but exceeding them requires partitioning data across multiple files or adopting alternative storage solutions. Beyond overall file size, text files face constraints during processing, particularly regarding line lengths in standards-compliant tools. The standard defines {LINE_MAX} as the maximum bytes in a utility's input line, with a minimum acceptable value of 2048 bytes, though many implementations support much larger or effectively unlimited lengths limited only by available memory. This affects utilities like ed or , where excessively long lines may truncate or fail, impacting parsing of unwrapped or concatenated data. Exceeding practical line limits in editors or scripts can also lead to buffer overflows or incomplete reads, necessitating line wrapping or splitting for compatibility. Character encoding further influences text file size, as it determines bytes per character and thus overall storage efficiency. ASCII encoding uses exactly 1 byte per character, making it compact for English text but limited to 128 basic symbols. , the dominant encoding for multilingual text, represents ASCII characters identically (1 byte) while using 2 to 4 bytes for others, potentially increasing by up to 300% for scripts like CJK ideographs compared to fixed-width alternatives like UTF-16. This variable-length nature preserves but amplifies size for non-Latin content; for instance, a heavy in emojis or international characters may consume significantly more space in UTF-8 than in ASCII-equivalent subsets. Performance constraints arise primarily during read/write operations on large text files, where inefficient handling can lead to high latency or exhaustion. Loading an entire file into memory suits small files but fails for gigabyte-scale ones due to RAM limits, often causing out-of-memory errors in editors or parsers. Streaming approaches, data in chunks without full loading, mitigate this by enabling line-by-line or buffered I/O, which is essential for scalability in applications like log analysis. Buffered I/O further optimizes by aggregating small reads/writes into larger blocks, reducing system calls and disk seeks; for example, .NET's StreamReader uses buffering to achieve near-native I/O speeds for . In contrast, unbuffered or on large files incurs substantial overhead, with seek times dominating on mechanical drives, underscoring the need for sequential streaming in high-volume text .
File SystemMaximum File SizeNotesSource
(Linux)16 TiB (2^44 bytes)With 4 KiB block size; theoretical limit higher with larger blocks
NTFS (Windows)2^64 - 1 bytes (~16 EB)Theoretical; practical 16 TB (4 KiB cluster) to 256 TB (64 KiB cluster)
APFS (macOS)2^63 bytes (~9 EB)Supports 64-bit file IDs for massive volumes

References

  1. https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/t/textfile.htm
  2. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/techtips/what-is-a-text-file/
  3. https://adacomputerscience.org/concepts/fileorg_textbinary
  4. https://www.adobe.com/uk/acrobat/resources/document-files/text-files.html
  5. https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/resources/document-files/asc-file.html
  6. https://www.ionos.com/digitalguide/server/configuration/txt-files/
  7. https://www.linfo.org/binary_file.html
  8. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/cpp/difference-between-cpp-text-file-and-binary-file/
  9. https://www.cs.odu.edu/~zeil/cs252/latest/Public/files/index.html
  10. https://www.adobe.com/uk/acrobat/resources/document-files/text-files/txt.html
  11. https://www.nist.gov/itl/publications/standards-ascii-character-set
  12. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/teletype.html
  13. https://statmath.wu.ac.at/courses/data-analysis/itdtHTML/node56.html
  14. https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/ItDT/HTML/node38.html
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/readable-format
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4718703/
  17. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-47c2dc3965f73b199a9cfbe45f09fbc7/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-47c2dc3965f73b199a9cfbe45f09fbc7.pdf
  18. https://www.sdcc.bnl.gov/phobos/Detectors/Computing/Orant/doc/database.804/a58242/ch4.htm
  19. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap03.html
  20. https://www.baeldung.com/linux/line-breaks-types
  21. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040318-00/?p=40193
  22. https://dos2unix.sourceforge.io/
  23. https://linux.die.net/man/1/dos2unix
  24. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/read.html
  25. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/testing-for-the-end-of-a-file
  26. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040316-00/?p=40233
  27. https://bitsavers.org/pdf/hp/9000_hpux/softpc/98870-90050_MSDOS_3.3_Reference_Sep89.pdf
  28. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zvm/7.3.0?topic=files-end-file-marker
  29. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009696599/functions/feof.html
  30. https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-byte-order-mark.en.html
  31. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ASCII
  32. https://ethw.org/Milestones:American_Standard_Code_for_Information_Interchange_ASCII%2C_1963
  33. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/db2-for-zos/12.0.0?topic=schemes-ebcdic
  34. https://www.iso.org/standard/16338.html
  35. http://czyborra.com/charsets/iso8859.html
  36. https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2023/05/binary-ascii-relationship-differences-embedded-applications/
  37. https://revealingerrors.com/mojibake
  38. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/
  39. https://www.unicode.org/history/publicationdates.html
  40. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3629
  41. https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/en-utf8
  42. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/surrogates-and-supplementary-characters
  43. https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2025/03/09/unicode-surrogates/
  44. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6657.html
  45. https://www.gnu.org/software/libiconv/
  46. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/6381/why-is-windows-using-crlf-and-unix-just-lf-when-unix-is-the-older-system
  47. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-10/notepad-default-encoding-utf8-windows-10-version-1903/m-p/958212
  48. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/code-pages
  49. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/type
  50. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.management/get-content?view=powershell-7.5
  51. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cat.html
  52. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap06.html
  53. https://www.baeldung.com/linux/default-common-terminal-encodings
  54. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mac-os-x/0596004605/ch01s06.html
  55. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFileSystem/Articles/FileSystemGuidelines.html
  56. https://community.perforce.com/s/article/3096
  57. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255505463
  58. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/technotes/tn/tn1150.html
  59. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coregraphics/cgtextencoding/encodingmacroman
  60. https://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/APPLE/ROMAN.TXT
  61. https://support.apple.com/guide/terminal/change-encodings-settings-trmlencd/mac
  62. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uniformtypeidentifiers/uttype-swift.struct/plaintext
  63. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/FileManagement/Conceptual/understanding_utis/understand_utis_conc/understand_utis_conc.html
  64. https://support.apple.com/guide/textedit/change-textedit-settings-txted1063/mac
  65. https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-unix-linux-convert-dos-newlines-cr-lf-unix-text-format/
  66. https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/basic-functionality/managing-configuration-files/
  67. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4180
  68. https://www.techtarget.com/searchitoperations/definition/configuration-file
  69. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Configuration
  70. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/how-to-add-modify-or-delete-registry-subkeys-and-values-by-using-a-reg-file-9c7f37cf-a5e9-e1cd-c4fa-2a26218a1a23
  71. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/howto/htaccess.html
  72. https://docs.python.org/3/library/configparser.html
  73. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/511919/what-character-encoding-is-used-for-linux-configuration-files
  74. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5424
  75. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/logs.html
  76. https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate
  77. https://www.loggly.com/use-cases/what-is-structured-logging-and-how-to-use-it/
  78. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.host/start-transcript?view=powershell-7.5
  79. https://phoenixnap.com/kb/shebang-bash
  80. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/windows-commands
  81. https://csrc.nist.rip/publications/nistpubs/800-12/800-12-html/chapter18.html
  82. https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9msmlrh6lzf3?hl=en-US&gl=US
  83. https://www.vim.org/
  84. https://www.nano-editor.org/
  85. https://support.apple.com/guide/textedit/welcome/mac
  86. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/whyvscode
  87. https://www.sublimetext.com/
  88. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editing/codebasics
  89. https://www.baeldung.com/linux/vim-large-files-performance
  90. https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ascii.7.html
  91. https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Text-Terminal-HOWTO-8.html
  92. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/core-spec/chapter-23/
  93. https://www.ultraedit.com/blog/what-is-a-hex-editor-and-how-to-use-it/
  94. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sed.html
  95. https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/12/15/the-everypersons-guide-to-log4shell-cve-2021-44228/
  96. https://www.dynatrace.com/news/blog/what-is-log4shell/
  97. https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/homograph-attacks/
  98. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/email-security-appliance/200146-Homoglyph-Advanced-Phishing-Attacks.html
  99. https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Path_Traversal
  100. https://portswigger.net/web-security/file-path-traversal
  101. https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Buffer_overflow_attack
  102. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/snips/4.6.2?topic=categories-buffer-overflow-attacks
  103. https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Input_Validation_Cheat_Sheet.html
  104. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/sandboxing
  105. https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v2-pages-21-34.pdf
  106. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/filesystem-functionality-comparison
  107. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/FileManagement/Conceptual/APFS_Guide/VolumeFormatComparison/VolumeFormatComparison.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.