Hubbry Logo
Thakur (title)Thakur (title)Main
Open search
Thakur (title)
Community hub
Thakur (title)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Thakur (title)
Thakur (title)
Thakur (title)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Thakur is a historical feudal title of the Indian subcontinent. It is also used as a surname in the present day. The female variant of the title is Thakurani or Thakurain, and is also used to describe the wife of a Thakur.

Portrait of Thakur Bakhtawar Singh Rajput made by Fateh Muhammad around 1880 in western Rajasthan, probably Bikaner.

There are varying opinions among scholars about its origin. Some scholars suggest that it is not mentioned in the Sanskrit texts preceding 500 BCE, but speculates that it might have been a part of the vocabulary of the dialects spoken in northern India before the Gupta Empire. It is viewed to have been derived from word Thakkura which, according to several scholars, was not an original word of the Sanskrit language but a borrowed word in the Indian lexis from the Tukharistan region of Uzbekistan. Another view-point is that Thakkura is a loan word from the Prakrit language.

Scholars have suggested differing meanings for the word, i.e. "god", "lord", and "master of the estate". Academics have suggested that it was only a title, and in itself, did not grant any authority to its users "to wield some power in the state".

In India, this title is widely used by the people belonging to the Rajput community[1][2] while few people of other communities also use this title include communities such as, Bengali Brahmins,[3][4] Bhumihars,[5] Charans[6] and Kolis.[7][8][9]

Etymology and meaning

[edit]

Sisir Kumar Das stated that the word Thakur is derived from the "late Sanskrit" word Thakkura.[3]: 28 

Harka Bahadur Gurung noted that the Nepalese version of the word Thakur is Thakuri.[10]

The meaning of the word Thakur was suggested to be "god" by S. K. Das;[3]: 31  "lord" by Blair B. Kling;[11] and "master of the estate" by H. B. Gurung.[10]

Origin

[edit]

Nirmal Chandra Sinha stated that the word Thakura is "unknown" to the Vedic and Classical Sanskrit and finds no mention in the Sanskrit literature preceding 500 BCE. He suggests, however, that "the word was possibly current in many north Indian dialects before the Imperial Guptas". Sinha notes that many scholars, such as Buddha Prakash, Frederick Thomas, Harold Bailey, Prabodh Bagchi, Suniti Chatterji, and Sylvain Lévi, have suggested that Thakura is a borrowed word in the Indian lexis from the Tukhara regions of Current Uzbekistan.[12] Sinha observed:

"It may be noted that in South India among orthodox Brahmins, Thakura or Thakur is not a popular term obviously because of its Tukhara or Turuska background."[12]

Byomkes Chakrabarti noted that the Sanskrit word Thakkura finds mention in "late Sanskrit". He doubted, however, that Thakkura is "an original Sanskrit word" and was of the opinion that Thakkura is probably a loan word from the Prakrit language.[13]

Usage

[edit]
Thakur Lakhajirajsinhji II Bavajirajsinhji of Rajkot

Susan Snow Wadley noted that the title Thakur was used to refer to "a man of indeterminate but mid-level caste, usually implying a landowning caste". Wadley further notes that Thakur was viewed as a "more modest" title in comparison to "Rājā" (King).[14]

S. K. Das noted that while the word thakur means "god".

In India, this title is widely used by the people belonging to the Rajput caste[15]while few people of some other caste groups using it include castes such as, Bengali Brahmin,[16] Bhumihar, Koli[8] and Charan.[17]

Some academics have suggested that "Thakur was merely a title and not an office whereby a holder was entitled to wield some power in the state".[18] However, some other academics have noted that this title had been used by "petty chiefs" in the western areas of Himachal Pradesh.[19] Examples include the Thakurs of Kolong, Gumrang, and Gondhla in Lahaul, who governed hereditary jagirs in Lahaul under the Rajas of Kullu, and later under British rule.[20]

The title was used by rulers of several princely states, including Ambliara, Vala, Morbi, Barsoda, and Rajkot State. Sons of thakurs were given the Sanskrit title of Kumara ('prince'), popular usage being Kunwar in the North and Kumar in Bengal and southern India.[21]

The territory of land under the control of a Thakur was called thikana.[22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Thakur (title)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Thakur is a historical feudal of the , derived from the term ṭhākura, signifying "lord," "master," or "chief." Primarily associated with () clans, it denoted the head of a thikana—an estate or —held under larger princely states or zamindari systems, where the bearer exercised authority over land, revenue collection, and local governance as a hereditary noble. The title's significance emerged in medieval and colonial-era India, where Thakurs functioned as martial landowners and intermediaries between rulers and peasants, often maintaining private armies and adjudicating disputes in rural domains. It was conferred on rulers of smaller principalities, such as those in and , and extended to upper-caste families as a marker of status, distinct from broader ethnic identifiers like , which encompassed warrior lineages rather than specific titular roles. Over time, following the abolition of feudal privileges post-independence, Thakur evolved into a common surname among communities in northern and , retaining connotations of prestige tied to ancestral landownership and martial heritage, though its feudal connotations have largely faded in modern contexts. The feminine equivalent, Thakurani, applied to consorts or female estate holders. ![Portrait of Thakur Raja Bakhtawar Singh, illustrating a historical bearer of the title][float-right]

Etymology and Linguistic Roots

Derivation and Core Meaning

The term Thakur derives from the word ṭhākura (or thakkura), a late form denoting a figure of or reverence. This root appears in historical texts and inscriptions, where it signified roles such as a or administrative chief in medieval Indian kingdoms, including Mithila. At its core, Thakur conveys meanings of "," "master," or "," reflecting a hierarchical for landowners or nobles who held feudal . Scholarly interpretations vary slightly: some emphasize "" as denoting estate mastery, while others highlight "" or "chief" to underscore divine or supreme authority in social structures. This semantic range underscores its evolution from a term of worship or overlordship to a secular title among warrior and landholding classes, particularly Kshatriyas.

Evolution in Sanskrit and Regional Languages

The term thakkura (or ṭhakkura) appears in late texts as denoting an idol, , or object of reverence, gradually extending to an title for distinguished persons or feudal barons. This usage is attested in medieval works such as the Rājataraṅgiṇī (c. 1148–1150 CE), where it signifies a rank or , and in inscriptions from dynasties like the Śilāhāra (765–1215 CE), referring to administrative ministers or fief-holders. Scholars posit that thakkura may represent a borrowing into from substrates, reflecting the fluid interplay between classical and vernacular Middle Indo-Aryan forms during the early medieval period (c. 500–1200 CE). As evolved through Apabhramśa into modern , the term adapted phonetically and semantically, shifting from primarily religious connotations to secular ones emphasizing lordship and land control. In Hindi, emerged as a direct descendant, meaning "lord," "master," or "God," and functioning as a title for landowners by the medieval era. Regional variants include Gujarati thākor, applied to with feudal associations, and Marathi thākur, denoting tribal groups in the northern with authoritative roles. These forms, documented in linguistic records from the onward, illustrate phonetic simplification (e.g., aspiration retention in ṭhā-) and contextual expansion into caste-specific honorifics across northern and western India.

Historical Origins and Development

Feudal Context in

In , particularly from the 7th to 12th centuries, the title Thakur denoted feudal lords, often chieftains, who functioned as semi-autonomous vassals within a decentralized power structure characterized by land grants in exchange for military allegiance. These lords received jagirs—revenue-yielding land assignments—from paramount rulers, enabling them to govern territories, extract agrarian surplus, and maintain local militias for defense and expeditions. Unlike European feudalism's rigid , the Indian variant emphasized and ties, with Thakurs deriving authority from shared genealogies rather than contractual oaths alone, fostering fragmented polities in regions like . Thakurs' primary responsibilities included revenue collection from peasants, adjudication of disputes (short of ), and provisioning troops during wartime, obligations rooted in reciprocal loyalty to the overlord. In Rajasthan's kingdoms, such as those of the Chauhans or Sisodias, Thakurs operated thikanas (hereditary estates), inheriting land as a alongside privileges like ceremonial honors—e.g., tajim (standing reception by the ) or bah pasav (shoulder-touching gestures)—which reinforced their status. This , evident in structures like Bharatpur's Solah Kotri (sixteen feudal groups organized by clan), integrated Thakurs into state security, where they assisted in succession decisions and rejected unfit heirs, blending administrative and martial roles. By the later medieval period, under Mughal influence from the , Thakurs adapted as zamindars or intermediate revenue collectors, with examples like Rai Singh of (r. 1574–1612) incorporating them into expanded jagirdari frameworks, yet retaining local autonomy over justice and order. This evolution highlighted causal tensions: while land grants decentralized power and spurred militarization, they also led to chronic feuds among Thakurs, weakening central authority and contributing to Rajasthan's mosaic of petty principalities. Empirical records from khyats (chronicles) and inscriptions underscore their role in sustaining agrarian economies, where Thakurs extracted fixed shares (often one-third to one-half of produce) while providing protection against raids.

Association with Landownership and Military Roles

In medieval , Thakurs functioned as feudal lords presiding over thikanas, which were hereditary estates granted by ruling clans such as the Rathores for services rendered, encompassing responsibilities for land revenue collection, local governance, and military provisioning. These arrangements solidified Thakurs' association with landownership, as thikanas provided economic sustenance through agrarian yields while imposing duties to mobilize armed forces in defense of the overlord's domain. The jagirdari system further entrenched this linkage, wherein Thakurs, often synonymous with jagirdars among , received revenue assignments from lands (jagirs) in exchange for maintaining troops and horses scaled to the grant's value, a practice prevalent under Rajput kingdoms and later formalized in Mughal administration. Military obligations were integral, requiring Thakurs to supply contingents for campaigns, reflecting the warrior ethos of lineages that prioritized martial prowess alongside territorial control. During the Mughal period, Thakurs incorporated into the mansabdari framework, holding ranked positions (mansabs) tied to jagirs that mandated specific numbers of soldiers—typically horsemen—for imperial service, thereby merging land-based authority with centralized military demands. This system incentivized loyalty through , as Thakurs' ability to retain estates depended on fulfilling troop quotas, which bolstered Mughal expansion while preserving regional autonomy in Rajasthan's arid terrains suited to mounted warfare. Historical precedents trace to figures like Rao Jodha of , who in the distributed conquered lands to kin as Thakurs, creating a decentralized network of landholders obligated to provide military support during conflicts with neighboring powers. Such roles extended beyond revenue extraction to fort maintenance and resistance against invasions, underscoring Thakurs' dual identity as proprietors and protectors in India's pre-colonial feudal hierarchies.

Caste and Social Associations

The Thakur title maintains its strongest historical and social connection to the Rajput community, a prominent group within the Kshatriya varna of the Hindu social order, characterized by warrior ethos and rulership duties. Rajputs, organized into patrilineal clans, have utilized "Thakur" to signify feudal overlords and estate holders, particularly in northern India where they dominated land control and military affairs from the medieval era onward. This association underscores Thakurs as upper-tier Rajputs, embodying Kshatriya ideals of protection, governance, and martial prowess, with the title often interchanged with Rajput identifiers in regional contexts. Rajputs' affiliation derives from self-ascribed descent from ancient royal and Vedic warrior lineages, as enumerated in Puranic texts listing 36 royal clans from which major houses trace origins. Thakurs, as a , reinforce this through kinship-based territoriality, where networks sustain control over villages and resources, mirroring classical Kshatriya roles in defending and sovereignty. In and , Thakur subgroups like and Gaurua exemplify this tie, with Jadons linking to historic states such as . The title's connotation of "" or "" in further aligns Thakurs with elevated status, denoting authority over land and subjects in feudal structures. While claims face scholarly scrutiny regarding precise Vedic continuity—some evidence points to medieval involving local and migrant elements—the enduring practice and self-identification cement Thakurs' primary alignment with this varna.

Usage Among Other Communities

The title Thakur has been adopted by several non-Rajput communities in , particularly landowning or martial groups seeking to emphasize feudal authority or Kshatriya-like status, reflecting its origins as a marker of lordship rather than exclusivity. In and eastern , Brahmins—a community of agrarian s who acquired extensive zamindari holdings under Mughal and British rule—have historically employed Thakur to denote their role as local chieftains and military recruiters, often alongside surnames like or titles like Babhan. This usage emerged prominently in the amid land revenue systems, where Bhumihars controlled over 40% of certain districts' by 1901 census data, positioning themselves as rulers despite priestly varna claims. Certain Jat clans in northern states like Rajasthan, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh also integrate Thakur into surnames or titles, as seen in the Thakurela subgroup, which traces descent to pastoral-warrior lineages and maintains agricultural dominance in villages. This adoption aligns with Jats' historical assertion of Kshatriya equivalency during the 19th-20th centuries, amid British military recruitment where Jat-Thakurs served in regiments like the Jat Rifles established in 1899. Similarly, isolated instances occur among Gujjars, another pastoral-agricultural group, with figures like Thakur Raghunath Singh Gurjar (active in early 20th-century politics) exemplifying its application to denote leadership in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. In , particularly , Thakur or Thakar functions as a caste identifier for communities listed under Other Backward Classes since the 1950s, comprising subgroups like Ka Thakar and Ma Thakar, often linked to semi-nomadic or artisan origins but claiming titular precedence in rural hierarchies. Other sporadic usages include Kayasthas in and Yadavs in , where the title underscores administrative or Yadav pastoral elites' self-perceived nobility, though less systematically than among Bhumihars or . These extensions highlight Thakur's fluidity as a , often contested in assertions during colonial censuses (e.g., 1901 and 1931), where communities petitioned for recognition to access land rights or reservations.

Regional Variations in Usage

Northern India Dominance

In northern , the title Thakur attained dominance among communities, signifying feudal overlords who controlled estates and wielded military and administrative power from the medieval period onward. Particularly in —historically known as —Thakurs served as heads of thikanas, semi-autonomous feudal units under maharajas, where they collected revenues, maintained order, and led troops against invasions. For instance, the of appointed brothers and sons as Thakurs to govern newly conquered territories, solidifying clan networks across the arid northwest. This structure persisted into the British era, with over 300 thikanas documented in state alone by the , underscoring Thakurs' role in decentralized governance. Extending eastward to and , Thakurs—often interchangeable with —emerged as prominent zamindars and taluqdars, hereditary landowners who dominated rural economies and politics. In , these elites owned extensive tracts, with families like those in the region retaining influence as taluqdars under Mughal and British administrations; post-1947 land reforms diminished but did not eradicate their holdings, as many retained thousands of acres through legal maneuvers. In , Thakurs formed a key landowning stratum, contributing to caste-based power dynamics in villages where they outnumbered other groups in certain districts. The 1931 census recorded approximately 12.8 million individuals identifying as across northern provinces, with Thakur usage reflecting this demographic weight in land control. The surname Thakur's prevalence mirrors this historical entrenchment, with over 1.8 million bearers in , 58% concentrated in , followed by significant clusters in and —states comprising core northern . In agrarian societies of these regions, Thakurs maintained dominance through endogamous marriages, martial traditions, and alliances with ruling powers, often positioning them as the apex of local hierarchies alongside in western areas. This northern preeminence contrasts with sparser usage elsewhere, rooted in migrations and conquests that peaked between the 8th and 12th centuries, when landowners shaped the subcontinent's political landscape.

Extensions to Other Regions

In , the Thakur title was employed by rulers of Gujarati princely states such as , , Ambliara, and Vala, where it denoted feudal authority over estates known as thikanas. In , Thakur-designated landowning groups persist in districts including , Ahmadnagar, , and , extending beyond Rajput lineages to local elites who adopted the title for its connotations of lordship. In eastern , particularly , Thakur integrated into surnames as a marker of respect, appearing in forms like Mitra Thakur, Das Thakur, and Ghosh Thakur from the 16th and 17th centuries onward, often granted to Vaishnava scholars or administrators. This usage diverged from its associations in the north, reflecting adaptation among non-martial scholarly classes rather than military . The title's variant extended to , where it designates aristocratic Khas clans in the western hills from the Gandak to Karnali basins, with historical claims of descent facilitating its adoption by ruling families post-medieval migrations. These Nepalese Thakuris maintained feudal roles analogous to Indian Thakurs until the , though without the same prevalence in southern , where regional titles like Nayak or predominated.

Modern Usage and Political Significance

As a Surname and Title Today

In modern India, Thakur primarily serves as a hereditary surname rather than a formal title, with over 1.2 million bearers recorded as of recent demographic data. Its distribution is concentrated in northern and eastern states, particularly Bihar (58% of incidences), Maharashtra (12%), and Jharkhand (10%), reflecting historical migrations and landholding patterns among associated communities. The term's etymological roots in Sanskrit ṭhākura, denoting "lord" or "master," persist in informal connotations of prestige, though legal abolition of feudal titles post-1947 has diminished any official usage. Among political figures, the surname remains prominent, as seen with (1924–1988), a socialist leader from Bihar's Nai community who implemented backward caste reservations as in 1970 and 1977, earning posthumous recognition in 2024 for advancing equitable resource distribution amid caste-based inequities. His policies, including a 26% quota for Other Backward Classes enacted in 1978, sparked debates on merit versus but demonstrably expanded access to and jobs for underrepresented groups, with Bihar's OBC enrollment in higher education rising from under 10% to over 40% in subsequent decades per state surveys. Contemporary bearers also include leaders like (1925–2003), who rose from grassroots organizer to Chief Minister of Himachal Pradesh (1977–1980) and later Governor of , emphasizing infrastructure development such as rural electrification projects that connected over 500 villages by 1980. In urban and professional spheres, the surname appears among entrepreneurs and professionals, though less dominantly than in politics, underscoring its adaptation from agrarian elites to diverse socioeconomic roles without retaining feudal privileges.

Role in Contemporary Indian Politics

In northern India, particularly , Thakurs—primarily a subcaste of Rajputs—wield significant influence in contemporary politics through their alignment with the (BJP), leveraging historical dominance in landownership and military traditions to mobilize voters and secure legislative representation. As of 2020, Thakurs constituted a key upper-caste bloc in , with approximately 49 members in the state assembly, enabling them to shape policy on issues like and . This influence intensified after 2017, when , a Thakur by , assumed the chief ministership, marking the first upper-caste in the state since Rajnath Singh's tenure ending in 2002 and fostering a sense of caste pride that bolstered BJP support among Thakurs. Thakur loyalty has been pivotal to the BJP's electoral strategy in Uttar Pradesh, where surveys indicate that 79% of upper castes, including Thakurs and Brahmins, favored the party in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, compared to only 16% for the opposition bloc. Nationally, prominent Thakur politicians such as Singh Thakur, who serves as a five-term MP from , and held cabinet positions including Minister of Information and Broadcasting until 2024, exemplify the community's role in BJP governance. Similarly, Savitri Thakur, elected from the Dhar Lok Sabha seat in 2024, was inducted as in the Modi 3.0 cabinet on June 9, 2024, highlighting Thakur representation in federal executive roles. Recent intra-caste dynamics underscore Thakur assertiveness, as evidenced by the August 14, 2025, meeting of about 40 Thakur legislators—predominantly BJP MLAs and MLCs, alongside a few from other parties—announcing the formation of the "Kutumb Parivar" group to address community interests, signaling potential pressure on party leadership amid perceptions of over-reliance on Adityanath's dominance. This mobilization reflects broader tensions, where Thakur support has propelled BJP victories but also fueled internal party resentments from other communities over perceived favoritism. In states beyond , such as and , Thakurs contributed to BJP's 2023 assembly poll successes, with 56% and 64% voter backing respectively among Rajput-upper caste groups. Overall, Thakurs' political role emphasizes caste consolidation within Hindu nationalist frameworks, prioritizing security and prestige over broader social welfare agendas.

Controversies and Societal Debates

Caste Conflicts and Violence

Thakurs, predominantly landowners in northern , have been involved in numerous caste-based clashes, particularly with communities, often stemming from disputes over land access, processions, and assertions of social dominance. These conflicts frequently escalate due to historical hierarchies where Thakurs held feudal authority, clashing with modern Dalit mobilizations inspired by figures like and political parties such as the . Violence has resulted in deaths, injuries, and property destruction, with data from the indicating as a hotspot for such incidents, reporting over 10,000 caste atrocity cases annually in recent years, many involving upper castes like Rajputs. A prominent series of clashes occurred in , , in May 2017, triggered by tensions over a Thakur procession for Pratap's birth anniversary passing through areas in Shabbirpur village. s objected to loud music near an Ambedkar statue, leading to stone-pelting and arson; one Thakur was killed, dozens injured, and over 40 homes burned. The violence spread, displacing hundreds and prompting conversions to among 180 families as a protest against perceived upper-caste aggression and police inaction. Courts later summoned officials for failing to prevent escalation, highlighting administrative biases favoring dominant castes. Similar patterns emerged elsewhere in . In March 2017, Nawipur village in saw clashes between Dalits and Thakurs over alleged eve-teasing, resulting in injuries and police intervention. Aligarh's Keshopur village experienced violence on May 16, 2017, where Dalits clashed with Thakurs, injuring several, followed by allegations of disproportionate against Dalits. More recently, in September 2025, a Dalit family in Ghaziabad was reportedly held hostage and assaulted by Thakur men in a targeted attack, underscoring ongoing land and honor-related animosities. These incidents reflect broader causal dynamics: Thakur resistance to Dalit economic gains via reservations and political empowerment, often manifesting in retaliatory violence to maintain traditional power structures. While media narratives often emphasize Thakur aggression, some clashes involve mutual escalation, as in where initial protests provoked Thakur mobilization. Independent analyses note that Thakur-dominated areas see higher rates of atrocities due to concentrated landholdings—Rajputs control significant rural acreage in —but underreporting of counter-violence against upper castes persists due to institutional biases. Peace efforts, including RSS-BJP mediated talks in , have yielded temporary truces but failed to address root causes like unequal enforcement of the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Stereotypes of Privilege and Criminality

Thakurs, particularly those from lineages in northern , are often stereotyped as embodying caste-based privilege due to their traditional status as landowners and local rulers. Historically, many Thakurs functioned as zamindars under Mughal and British systems, amassing wealth from agrarian estates and exercising quasi-judicial powers over tenants, which fostered perceptions of feudal entitlement persisting into modern socioeconomic disparities. This image is reinforced by their overrepresentation in political and administrative roles in states like , where Thakur communities maintain influence through hereditary networks, contributing to narratives of unearned advantage in access to resources and justice. Countering this, stereotypes of criminality depict Thakurs as aggressive enforcers of dominance, linked to land mafias, caste vigilantism, and . In , prominent figures such as expelled BJP MLA , a Thakur convicted of raping a minor in 2017 and sentenced to in 2019, along with a 10-year term for the 2018 murder of the victim's father, exemplify allegations of political impunity enabling atrocities against lower castes. The 2020 Hathras case, involving four Thakur men accused of gang-raping and causing the death of a 19-year-old woman—though three were acquitted of rape charges in 2023 while one was convicted of murder—intensified portrayals of Thakur involvement in inter-caste violence. These perceptions draw from broader patterns in , where Thakurs feature disproportionately among criminals neutralized in police encounters since 2017, including 207 killings targeting gangsters and strongmen (bahubalis), often tied to disputes and . Rajput-Thakur gangsters like , killed in 2018, have been associated with caste-based criminal syndicates dominating and real estate rackets, fueling media and public views of Thakurs as inheritors of a "mafia raj" legacy. Such stereotypes, while rooted in documented incidents of violence against Dalits and , are amplified by selective reporting in outlets critical of upper-caste politics, potentially overlooking intra-community variations or lower-caste parallels in crime.

References

  1. https://www.wisdomlib.org/names/thakur
  2. https://nobilitytitles.net/indian-royal-titles-aristocratic-ranks/
  3. https://www.indianrajputs.com/glossary.php
  4. https://factsanddetails.com/india/Minorities_Castes_and_Regions_in_India/sub7_4d/entry-4205.html
  5. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Thakur
  6. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/thakkura
  7. https://www.everyculture.com/South-Asia/Thakur.html
  8. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/thakur
  9. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/thakur
  10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41926392
  11. https://www.clearias.com/indian-feudalism/
  12. https://rajras.in/ras/mains/paper-1/rajasthan-history/medieval-administrative-and-revenue-system/
  13. https://www.indianrajputs.com/history/rathore.php
  14. https://rajras.in/land-revenue-system-rajasthan-british-times/
  15. https://vajiramandravi.com/upsc-exam/jagirdari-system/
  16. https://compass.rauias.com/ancient-history/rajput-kingdoms/
  17. https://edukemy.com/free-resources-for-upsc/prelims-notes/mughal-empire/mansabdari-and-jagirdari/101644
  18. https://www.historydiscussion.net/history-of-india/role-of-mansabdari-and-jagirdari-system-during-mughal-empire/2046
  19. https://telibrary.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/India_from_8th_Century_to_Mid_15th_Century.pdf
  20. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/354/oa_edited_volume/chapter/2772584
  21. https://www.indianrajputs.com/history/
  22. https://doi.org/10.3390/h5030064
  23. https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR19D3038.pdf
  24. https://www.quora.com/What-caste-does-Thakur-surname-belong-to
  25. https://prafulkr.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/bhumihars-history-ii/
  26. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/19907/IN
  27. https://www.quora.com/Can-you-explain-the-differences-between-Jats-Thakurs-Rajputs-and-Brahmins-in-India
  28. https://www.reddit.com/r/GurjarsofSouthAsia/comments/1mha04k/thakur_raghunath_singh_gurjar_of_tiktoli_he_was/
  29. https://hmsangh.weebly.com/uploads/9/1/3/3/9133532/caste_list_in_maharashtra.pdf
  30. https://www.quora.com/What-is-difference-between-Thakur-and-Rajput
  31. https://theprint.in/india/who-are-thakurs-of-up-and-why-are-they-powerful-answers-are-key-to-understanding-hathras/519418/
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/273958
  33. https://www.facebook.com/ThakursEra/posts/the-1931-census-reported-a-total-of-128million-people-self-described-as-rajput-t/660896743986013/
  34. https://forebears.io/surnames/thakur
  35. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/print/20440/IN
  36. https://malkhanagar.com/about-malkhanagar-basu-thakur/thakur-title/
  37. https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/who-was-bharat-ratna-karpoori-thakur-trendsetter-bihar-politics-champion-of-marginalised-obc-alcohol-ban/3373734/
  38. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/karpoori-thakur-the-pioneer-of-quota-politics-awarded-bharat-ratna/articleshow/107093220.cms
  39. https://chintan.indiafoundation.in/articles/bharat-ratna-to-karpoori-thakur-significance-relevance/
  40. https://joktacademy.com/the-political-journey-of-thakur-ram-lal-chief-minister-and-governor/
  41. https://www.names.org/n/thakur/about
  42. https://indianexpress.com/article/research/how-the-thakurs-have-dominated-up-politics-since-independence-yogi-adityanath-6717581/
  43. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/india/why-a-thakur-huddle-in-uttar-pradesh-raised-eyebrows-was-it-a-veiled-message-13462370.html
  44. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/5/27/dalit-vs-thakur-who-is-behind-the-simmering-conflict
  45. https://www.deccanherald.com/elections/uttar-pradesh/yogi-a-major-factor-in-thakur-support-for-bjp-1073184.html
  46. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/thakurs-and-other-upper-castes-remain-loyal-to-bjp-in-up-in-ls-polls-survey/articleshow/111029904.cms
  47. https://anuragthakur.in/about/
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-3-0-council-of-ministers-who-is-savitri-thakur/articleshow/110850951.cms
  49. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/40-thakur-legislators-announce-formation-of-kutumb-parivar/article69930395.ece
  50. https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/bjp-uttarpradesh-uogi-bjp.caravanbaatcheet
  51. https://www.ndtv.com/opinion/bjp-keeps-its-brahmins-thakurs-supporters-happy-4671348
  52. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/saharanpur-clashes-decoded-a-cocktail-of-caste-and-politics/story-OiDeUfgwmxxg8iI0xM3kzL.html
  53. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/meerut/1-killed-dozens-hurt-in-violence-between-dalits-thakurs/amp_articleshow/58539971.cms
  54. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc/st-court-summons-up-central-officials-over-2017-clashes/articleshow/87940565.cms
  55. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/meerut/180-dalit-families-convert-to-buddhism-in-riot-hit-saharanpur/articleshow/58755921.cms
  56. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/agra/dalits-and-thakurs-clash-in-mathura-over-alleged-eve-teasing/articleshow/57877317.cms
  57. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/dalit-families-in-aligarh-village-threaten-to-convert-to-islam-alleging-police-crackdown-after-clash-with-thakurs-4668278/
  58. https://cjp.org.in/ghaziabad-horror-dalit-family-assaulted-in-targeted-attack/
  59. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/rss-bjp-hold-peace-meets-with-thakurs-dalits-in-saharanpur-4678542/
  60. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001946466400200204
  61. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/expelled-bjp-mla-kuldeep-sengar-sentenced-to-10-years-in-jail-for-murder-of-unnao-rape-survivors-fat-2194201
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50864968
  63. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/2/india-a-year-later-the-rape-case-that-shook-a-nation-forgotten
  64. https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/hathras-gang-rape-case-court-acquits-other-three-prime-accused-convicted-us-304-ipc
  65. https://www.indiatvnews.com/uttar-pradesh/up-police-data-reveals-207-criminals-killed-over-thousands-injured-in-encounters-akhilesh-yadav-targets-up-stf-latest-updates-2024-09-19-953038
  66. https://www.outlookindia.com/culture-society/book-review-the-caste-based-criminal-gangs-of-uttar-pradesh-news-184150
  67. https://caravanmagazine.in/crime/increasing-thakur-clout-in-uttar-pradesh-leaves-trail-of-caste-violence
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.