Hubbry Logo
Toe (automotive)Toe (automotive)Main
Open search
Toe (automotive)
Community hub
Toe (automotive)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Toe (automotive)
Toe (automotive)
Toe (automotive)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Image of front toe angle 5 degrees (toe in)

In automotive engineering, toe, also known as tracking,[1] is the symmetric angle that each wheel makes with the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, as a function of static geometry, and kinematic and compliant effects. This can be contrasted with steer, which is the antisymmetric angle, i.e. both wheels point to the left or right, in parallel (roughly). Negative toe, or toe out, is the front of the wheel pointing away from the centreline of the vehicle. Positive toe, or toe in, is the front of the wheel pointing towards the centreline of the vehicle.[2] Historically, and still commonly in the United States, toe was specified as the linear difference (either inches or millimeters) of the distance between the two front-facing and rear-facing tire centerlines at the outer diameter and axle-height; since the toe angle in that case depends on the tire diameter, the linear dimension toe specification for a particular vehicle is for specified tires.[3]

Description

[edit]

In a rear-wheel drive vehicle, increased front toe-in provides greater straight-line stability at the cost of some sluggishness of turning response. Performance vehicles may run zero front toe or even some toe-out for a better response to steering inputs. Increased front toe-in marginally increases the wear on the tires as the tires are under slight side slip conditions when the steering is set straight ahead. On front-wheel drive vehicles, the situation is more complex. Rear toe-in provides better stability during cornering.

Toe is usually adjustable in production automobiles, even though caster angle and camber angle are often not adjustable. Maintenance of front-end alignment, which used to involve all three adjustments, currently involves only setting the toe; in most cases, even for a car in which caster or camber are adjustable, only the toe will need adjustment. Toe may only be adjustable on the front wheels.

One related concept is that the proper toe for straight-line travel of a vehicle will not be correct while turning, since the inside wheel must travel around a smaller radius than the outside wheel; to compensate for this, the steering linkage typically conforms more or less to Ackermann steering geometry, modified to suit the characteristics of the individual vehicle.

Road–rail vehicles

[edit]

The front rail wheels of road–rail vehicles are often set to toe-in by a distance of 6 mm over 1 metre. Unlike other forms of rolling stock, road-rail vehicles do not always have a common axle between the rail wheels and the toe-in angle prevents the vehicle from hunting when on-rail.

Interaction with camber

[edit]

When a wheel is set up to have some camber angle, the interaction between the tire and road surface causes the wheel to tend to want to roll in a curve, as if it were part of a conical surface (camber thrust). This tendency to turn increases the rolling resistance as well as increasing tire wear. A small degree of toe (toe-out for negative camber, toe-in for positive camber) will cancel this turning tendency, reducing wear and rolling resistance. On some competition vehicles such as go-karts, especially where power is extremely limited and is highly regulated by the rules of the sport, these effects can become very significant in terms of competitiveness and performance. Toe-in and toe-out give the steering stability.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Toe (automotive)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , toe refers to the angle formed between each 's plane and the vehicle's longitudinal centerline when viewed from above, typically measured in degrees or fractions of a degree. This alignment parameter is a key component of , influencing how the tires contact the road and interact with inputs. Toe is classified as toe-in (positive toe), where the front edges of the tires on a given are closer together than the rear edges, or toe-out (negative toe), where the front edges diverge. Front toe settings often incorporate slight toe-in for rear-wheel-drive vehicles to enhance straight-line stability by countering the tendency of the rear to push the front wheels outward during , while front-driven axles may use minimal toe-out to reduce effort. Rear toe is commonly set to toe-in to promote and prevent oversteer. Improper toe alignment has significant effects on vehicle performance, primarily causing excessive tire wear due to increased and uneven scrubbing of the tire treads, with even small deviations (e.g., fractions of a degree) accelerating wear on both inner and outer edges. On handling, toe-in improves straight-line tracking and reduces wander at high speeds, whereas toe-out enhances initial turn-in response and cornering agility by generating earlier slip angles on the outer wheels. However, excessive toe variations during suspension travel—known as —can induce directional instability, pulling, or drift, compromising overall stability. Toe is adjusted during procedures to manufacturer specifications, which vary by type, suspension design, and driving conditions to balance these factors.

Fundamentals

Definition

In automotive suspension geometry, toe refers to the angular difference between the vehicle's longitudinal centerline and the plane of each wheel when viewed from above. This parameter describes the direction in which the wheels are pointing relative to the straight-ahead position, influencing the overall alignment of the vehicle. Toe-in, also known as positive toe, occurs when the front edges of the wheels are closer together than the rear edges, causing the wheels to point slightly inward toward the vehicle's centerline and creating a convergence point ahead of the vehicle. Conversely, toe-out, or negative toe, is characterized by the front edges of the wheels being farther apart than the rear edges, resulting in the wheels pointing outward and forming a divergence behind the vehicle. Geometrically, toe-in positions the wheels in a subtle V-shape when observed top-down, while toe-out forms an inverted V-shape, with both configurations typically set to small angles for balanced performance. Toe serves as a foundational concept in geometry, particularly in relation to Ackermann steering principles, which ensure that during turns, the inner and outer wheels adopt different toe angles to follow concentric paths around a common turning center, minimizing scrub. This static toe setting provides the baseline from which dynamic adjustments, such as those governed by Ackermann geometry, are derived to optimize under steering inputs.

Measurement

Toe angle in automotive applications is quantified as the formed between the longitudinal plane of each wheel and the vehicle's centerline or thrust line when viewed from above. This measurement is typically expressed in degrees (°) or degrees and minutes ('), where positive values indicate toe-in (wheels angled inward) and negative values indicate toe-out (wheels angled outward). For precision, the total toe angle represents the sum of the individual toe angles for a pair of wheels on an . Practical measurement of toe angle employs a variety of tools and techniques suited to professional and DIY contexts. Professional setups utilize alignment racks equipped with or camera-based systems, such as those developed by Hunter Engineering, which project beams or capture images to determine wheel orientation relative to the vehicle's reference lines with high accuracy. For do-it-yourself checks, simpler methods include string alignment—where taut strings are run parallel to the vehicle's centerline along the sides, allowing measurement of the distance between tire edges using tape measures or calipers—or toe plates placed against the tires to gauge front-to-rear track width differences. These approaches ensure reliable assessment without specialized equipment. Distinctions exist between static and dynamic toe measurements to capture real-world conditions. Static measurements are conducted on a level surface with the stationary and unloaded, providing a baseline geometric assessment that assumes no suspension deflection. In contrast, dynamic measurements occur under load (e.g., with passengers and ) or during motion on a or road, accounting for compliance in bushings, tires, and suspension components that can alter by up to 0.1° or more. This differentiation is crucial for applications where operational forces significantly influence alignment. Industry standards for toe angle terminology and evaluation are outlined in SAE J670, which governs for cars and light trucks, emphasizing consistent definitions to facilitate design and testing. Tolerances for toe angle vary by vehicle type but are often held to ±0.1° in precision setups like or high-performance configurations to minimize variations in handling and wear. Common total toe values for vehicles range from 0° to 0.5° (or 0° to 30'), distributed evenly across wheels. In some applications, is alternatively expressed in linear terms as the difference in track width between the leading and trailing edges of the s, measured at the rim height. For small s, this can be converted to an angular value using the , where the total in degrees is approximately (linear difference / ) × (180/π). Conversion tools or charts are commonly used to relate linear measurements (e.g., in millimeters or inches) to angular degrees based on .

Effects on Performance

Vehicle Handling

Toe-in configuration on the front wheels promotes straight-line stability by generating inward thrust angles that counter lateral side forces from road irregularities and wind, thereby reducing vehicle wander, particularly at speeds. This setup aligns the wheels slightly inward relative to the vehicle's centerline, creating a self-correcting tendency that enhances directional control without constant input. In contrast, toe-out on the front wheels enhances turn-in responsiveness by allowing the wheels to initiate a yaw moment more readily during inputs, resulting in quicker steering feel and reduced understeer tendencies on corner entry. This configuration is commonly applied in front-wheel-drive vehicles, where it compensates for the inherent understeer from driven front tires by promoting sharper initial response, though it may compromise straight-line composure at higher velocities. Dynamic toe alterations occur during suspension travel, such as in scenarios, where vertical wheel movement induces unintended toe changes due to linkage , altering the effective slip angles and generating variations in self-aligning . These shifts can influence handling by modulating the restoring moments on the tires, potentially stabilizing or destabilizing the vehicle depending on the direction of change—positive toe shifts under bump may increase alignment for better recovery, while negative shifts could amplify yaw rates. Regarding handling balance, excessive front toe-in tends to induce understeer by increasing front scrub and resistance to yaw, making the push wide in corners, whereas excessive toe-out promotes oversteer through heightened rear-end rotation and reduced front grip thresholds. Rear axle toe settings play a complementary role; for instance, moderate rear toe-in in sports cars helps achieve neutral handling by providing rear stability that balances front-end agility, preventing over-rotation during aggressive maneuvers.

Tire Wear and Stability

Improper alignment leads to lateral slip of the tires against the road surface, causing scrubbing that results in uneven wear patterns, particularly on the inner or outer edges of the tread. This scrubbing occurs because the tires are not parallel to the direction of travel, generating a that accelerates abrasion on one side of the tread blocks while the other side remains relatively intact. For instance, excessive toe-in promotes inner edge wear, whereas toe-out favors outer edge degradation, both stemming from the continuous scuffing during straight-line rolling. Proper settings enhance stability by ensuring a consistent with the road, which promotes even pressure distribution and better traction in wet conditions. Toe-in, in particular, provides straight-line stability on highways by creating a self-centering effect through mild inward scrubbing forces, minimizing fishtailing or wandering at high speeds. This configuration helps maintain directional control during crosswinds or minor disturbances, as the wheels naturally converge toward the vehicle's centerline. Quantitatively, even small misalignments significantly impact tire longevity; a 0.2° deviation in toe can accelerate wear by up to 30%, potentially reducing life over 10,000 miles compared to properly aligned settings. Diagnostic indicators of toe issues include feathering on the treads, where one edge of each tread rib feels smooth and rounded while the opposite edge remains sharp and raised, often detectable by running a hand across the tread surface.

Adjustment and Configuration

Adjustment Methods

Toe alignment in vehicles is typically adjusted using components such as adjustable tie rods in the steering system, control arms in the suspension, or shims inserted between suspension elements. Tie rods, consisting of inner and outer ends connected by an adjustable , allow for precise front corrections by rotating the to lengthen or shorten the assembly. In rear suspensions, particularly on solid s or independent setups, adjustable control arms with threaded ends or eccentric bushings enable changes, while shims—often dual-angle types—can simultaneously influence and other angles by repositioning the or hub relative to the frame. The adjustment process begins with preparing the vehicle on an alignment rack or flat surface, ensuring proper inflation, , and pre-alignment inspections for worn components like bushings or ball joints. Measurement techniques, such as using toe plates or string lines, are first applied to assess current toe settings. For front toe, loosen the jam nuts on both sleeves, then rotate the sleeves equally—typically clockwise on the right side and counterclockwise on the left to induce toe-in—while monitoring the toe angle until the target is reached; adjustments are made in small increments to maintain symmetry and avoid pull. Rear toe adjustments involve similar steps but target positions: loosen mounting bolts, pivot the arm or insert shims to shift the wheel's fore-aft position, and retighten. Throughout, the is centered, and brakes are locked to simulate straight-line travel. Professional adjustments require specialized tools including an alignment machine with camera heads and targets for precise digital readout, turning radius plates to load tires dynamically, torque wrenches for securing fasteners to manufacturer specifications (e.g., 20-50 ft-lbs for nuts), and a for recalibrating angle sensors in modern vehicles. In contrast, home garage methods rely on simpler, affordable tools like toe plates (e.g., aluminum stands with slots), string alignment kits for tracking parallelism, or DIY turntables made from greased tiles, allowing basic toe setting without electronic equipment but with reduced accuracy for complex suspensions. Post-adjustment verification involves remeasuring to confirm settings within tolerance, followed by a test to ensure the vehicle tracks straight without wandering, the remains centered in the straight-ahead position, and no vibrations or pulls occur. Torque all fasteners and print or record before-and-after alignment for . Common pitfalls include over-tightening tie rod jam nuts, which can cause binding in the and accelerate wear, or under-tightening, leading to movement under load. Ignoring the thrust angle—derived from rear settings—may result in rear-end instability, while unequal adjustments on left and right sides can induce a dog-tracking effect during turns. Additionally, failing to account for or suspension preload during measurement can yield false readings, necessitating compensation steps.

Optimal Settings

Optimal toe settings for vehicle alignment vary by axle, drive configuration, vehicle type, and intended usage, with factory specifications typically outlined in original equipment manufacturer (OEM) service manuals to balance handling, tire wear, and stability. Settings should always be verified against the specific vehicle's OEM manual, as they differ by model, year, and suspension design. For the front axle of most passenger sedans, a slight toe-in, typically around 0.05° to 0.2° total, is common to promote straight-line stability and compensate for suspension compliance during forward motion. In contrast, some stability-focused trucks employ near-zero toe on the front axle to minimize scrubbing and enhance fuel efficiency under heavy loads. On the rear axle, most rear-wheel-drive (RWD) vehicles benefit from a toe-in setting to improve traction during and reduce oversteer tendencies by promoting stability under dynamic conditions. Front-wheel-drive (FWD) vehicles often use similar slight rear toe-in for even contact and longevity. Variations in optimal settings arise with specific applications and configurations. Performance-oriented cars tuned for may use front toe-out, such as around 0.3° total, to sharpen turn-in response, though this can accelerate inner-edge wear. Many vehicles prioritize near-neutral toe (close to zero degrees) across axles to optimize straight-line efficiency, reduce , and minimize drag. Influencing factors include type and load. Staggered setups, common in sedans with wider rear tires, require precise toe adjustments to account for differing rolling diameters, preventing thrust angle errors that could induce pull or uneven wear. For under heavy load or , rear toe may need adjustment toward more toe-in to counter suspension deflection and maintain tracking stability, per OEM guidelines.

Interactions with Alignment Parameters

With Camber

The interaction between toe and camber angles in automotive arises from their coupled effects in suspension geometry, particularly under dynamic conditions like roll during cornering. Camber, the lateral tilt of the wheel relative to the vertical, influences the effective toe—the angular difference between the wheels' pointing direction and the vehicle's centerline—through kinematic changes. As the vehicle body rolls outward in a turn, suspension movement alters the , which in turn induces toe change on roll, where the wheels may toe-in or toe-out relative to their static settings. This toe alteration affects the tires' slip angles and overall directional control, with typical designs aiming to minimize excessive toe change to maintain stability while optimizing grip. In performance-oriented configurations, combining negative camber (top of the tilting inward) with front toe-out enhances turn-in responsiveness by increasing the initial agility and reducing understeer during corner entry. This setup leverages the generated by negative camber, which produces a lateral force that complements the self-aligning from toe-out, allowing for sharper response in dynamic maneuvers. However, this interaction accelerates inner wear due to uneven loading, as the tilted combined with divergent toe directions shifts more stress to the inner tread edges, potentially reducing tire life by promoting feathering or cupping. Rear toe-in paired with neutral or slight negative camber, by contrast, promotes oversteer resistance and straight-line stability, countering the front's aggressive setup. To compensate for these interactions, especially when altering camber through suspension modifications, must often be readjusted to restore neutral or desired settings. In lowered suspensions, for instance, reducing typically increases negative camber due to changes in the suspension's instantaneous , which can inadvertently introduce toe-out if not corrected, leading to or accelerated . Alignment technicians address this by using adjustable components like camber plates or eccentric bolts to fine-tune both parameters simultaneously, ensuring the effective remains within specifications (e.g., 0 to 1/8 inch total toe-in for many street applications) post-modification. This compensation is critical for maintaining balanced handling and even across the vehicle's operating range.

With Caster

In vehicle steering geometry, positive establishes a linkage with by generating a self-aligning that promotes stability, particularly through the mechanical trail created when the steering axis tilts rearward. This arises from the offset between the steering axis and the tire's , causing the front wheels to naturally return to a straight-ahead position after inputs, which can induce subtle changes in angle as the suspension responds to dynamic loads. For instance, under maneuvers, positive contributes to a toe-in tendency due to gravitational and centrifugal forces, enhancing directional control but requiring careful calibration to prevent unintended variations. The combined effects of and significantly influence vehicle behavior; excessive positive paired with toe-out settings can result in darting, where the vehicle abruptly shifts direction in response to minor road imperfections or camber changes, compromising straight-line stability. Conversely, a balanced integration—typically with slight toe-in and moderate positive —optimizes stability by minimizing wander and promoting smooth self-centering without excessive sensitivity to surface irregularities. Adjusting often necessitates recalibration of to mitigate , an undesirable change during suspension travel that can lead to erratic handling over uneven surfaces. Since influences the steering axis inclination, alterations to it can shift the geometry of tie rods and control arms relative to the , amplifying if is not subsequently realigned; standard procedure involves setting first, followed by measurement and adjustment at . In rack-and-pinion steering systems, contributes to improved cornering by inducing camber changes during turns—the rearward tilt of the steering axis causes the outer wheel to gain negative camber, enhancing grip and loading for smoother handling without excessive scrubbing. Since the early 2000s, advancements in (ESC) systems have helped mitigate minor mismatches between and by selectively applying brakes to individual wheels, counteracting induced instabilities like darting or wander without requiring immediate mechanical realignment. These systems, now standard in most passenger vehicles, use sensors to detect yaw rate deviations and adjust traction dynamically, effectively compensating for alignment imperfections that might otherwise amplify caster-toe interactions.

Special Applications

Road-Rail Vehicles

Road-rail vehicles, also known as hi-rail vehicles, require specialized configurations to ensure safe operation across both and rail environments, where the standard rail gauge of 1435 mm must be accommodated alongside conventional handling characteristics. The settings for the road wheels typically incorporate a slight toe-in, often around 1/16 to 1/8 inch total, to promote straight-line stability and reduce scrub during travel, while the rail wheels are adjusted to a parallel (zero ) alignment to facilitate precise tracking along the rails without excessive lateral forces. This dual setup addresses the unique demands of transitioning between modes, maintaining vehicle control in each. Common configurations in road-rail vehicles include retractable rail wheel assemblies mounted on the axles or frame, which can alter the effective by engaging or disengaging to shift load from road tires to rail flanges. Fixed setups with adjustable flanges allow for fine-tuning the rail wheel positions, ensuring the inside distance between flanges measures precisely 53-1/2 inches to match the rail gauge. For front rail wheels, a nominal toe-in of 0.5 to 1.0 degrees (or 2 to 5 mm for a 250 mm rail wheel or U-frame) is often applied to enhance guidance and prevent on curves, contrasting with the zero toe preferred for rear wheels to minimize wear. Key challenges arise from the conflicting requirements: road operations favor toe-in for self-centering and stability at speeds up to limits, whereas rail tracking demands near-parallel alignment to avoid flange climbing or , particularly during mode switches where improper toe can cause binding or . Maintenance vehicles like hi-rail trucks, used for track inspection and repair, exemplify this by setting rail wheels to 0° toe for rail mode and relying on the vehicle's standard wheel toe-in (typically 0.1 to 0.2 degrees per wheel) when operating on pavement. Safety standards mandate rigorous verification of and overall alignment during transitions. Under (FRA) regulations, hi-rail gear—including tram (alignment) and wheel positioning—must be inspected annually, with no more than 14 months between checks, to confirm compliance and prevent hazards like off-center loading. These protocols ensure that toe adjustments maintain the vehicle's integrity across both infrastructures, prioritizing prevention and operational reliability.

Racing and Performance Vehicles

In racing and performance vehicles, aggressive toe configurations prioritize dynamic handling over longevity. Formula 1 cars typically employ front toe-out settings of up to 5 mm per wheel (approximately 0.4° total) to enhance sharp turn-in response during corner entry, allowing quicker steering inputs on demanding circuits. Rear toe-in, often around 0.5 to 2 mm per wheel (approximately 0.02° to 0.1° per wheel), is used in drift-oriented setups to provide stability and prevent over-rotation during controlled slides, maintaining rear grip under power. These setups contrast with street applications by accepting higher scrub rates for superior agility. Track-specific tuning further refines toe angles, with more front toe-out applied on tight, twisty circuits to improve responsiveness in frequent direction changes, as seen in setups for tracks like . Adjustments occur per session, guided by data loggers that analyze lap times and handling feedback to optimize toe for evolving conditions. Advanced materials and technologies enable rapid toe modifications in these environments. Lightweight adjustable toe arms, constructed from steel alloys, facilitate quick changes between sessions while enduring high loads, as utilized in competitive suspension kits. systems monitor toe variations under dynamic loads, integrating suspension data with real-time performance metrics to inform on-track refinements. Such configurations involve inherent trade-offs, where elevated tire wear from aggressive toe is tolerated to shave seconds off lap times. Research has proposed variable toe via active suspension systems for rally cars to allow adaptive control for mixed surfaces, balancing grip and durability.

References

  1. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/38698/165166837-MIT.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  2. https://ninercommons.charlotte.edu/record/1710/files/Paradkar_uncc_0694N_12198.pdf
  3. https://brakes.siu.edu/alignment.htm
  4. https://ninercommons.charlotte.edu/record/746/files/Patel_uncc_0694N_11115.pdf
  5. https://courses.grainger.illinois.edu/ece445/getfile.asp?id=8679
  6. https://www.academia.edu/27662020/EFFECT_OF_WHEEL_GEOMETRY_PARAMETERS_ON_VEHICLE_STEERING
  7. https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/toe/
  8. https://www.speedwaymotors.com/the-toolbox/front-suspension-geometry-explained-caster-camber-toe/143481
  9. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j670_200801/
  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGco7v9mS3Y
  11. https://hotrodhotline.com/static-dynamic-angle/
  12. https://www.brakeandfrontend.com/toe-angles-and-ride-height/
  13. https://www.autolexicon.net/en/articles/sbihavost-kol-d/
  14. https://www.w-body.com/topic/55864-load-alignment/
  15. https://www.mevotech.com/article/how-to-read-and-understand-a-wheel-alignment-report/
  16. https://robrobinette.com/ConvertToeInchesToDegrees.htm
  17. https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/adjust-tune-toe/
  18. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022SPIE12454E..1FA/abstract
  19. https://acl.kaist.ac.kr/wp-content/uploads/2022IJAT_LHJ.pdf
  20. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/334/
  21. https://www.goodyear.com/en_US/learn/tire-care-maintenance/tire-feathering.html
  22. https://jandsautomotive.com/blog/caster-camber-toe-explained/
  23. https://jandsautomotive.com/blog/alignment-for-new-tires/
  24. https://business.michelinman.com/tips-suggestions/irregular-tire-wear-101
  25. https://www.g-w.com/assets/files/pdf/sampchap/9798888172117_ch17.pdf
  26. https://www.brakeandfrontend.com/alignment-shims-and-kits/
  27. https://www.onallcylinders.com/2023/08/03/how-to-check-set-wheel-alignment-at-home/
  28. https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/diy-wheel-alignment-new-tools-tested
  29. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/1kesc1m/how_do_engineers_figure_out_optimal_toe/
  30. https://www.lesschwab.com/article/alignment/understanding-camber-caster-and-toe.html
  31. https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/autocrossing-and-roadracing/4513870-best-alignment-specs-for-autocross.html
  32. https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/1510-understanding-your-cars-alignment
  33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T-CmVzj4S0
  34. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597e7d75f7e0ab110db755e3/t/66f58e93785a2618ac30d73a/1727368853641/Suspension%2BKinematics.pdf
  35. https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-the-different-alignment-settings
  36. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/what-camber-caster-and-toe-handling-basics/
  37. https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/caster/
  38. https://www.tirereview.com/interpreting-angles-the-important-relationship-between-caster-camber-and-toe/
  39. https://www.hydrosteer.com.au/vehicle-darting-and-wandering/
  40. https://www.onallcylinders.com/2014/06/27/correct-bump-steer/
  41. https://nasaspeed.news/tech/suspension/communication-theory-how-to-recognize-measure-and-fix-bump-steer/
  42. https://racing.byu.edu/0000018a-6be7-df21-a5fe-fbef2f9d0001/intro-to-frame-and-suspension-design
  43. https://www.kyb.com/resources/technical-information/electronic-stability-control/
  44. https://www.argonautgarage.com/blog/5-common-causes-of-the-electronic-stability-control-light-coming-on
  45. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-II/part-214/subpart-D
  46. https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/1004clt-wheel-alignment-fundamentals
  47. https://continentalrailworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/60-SERIES-2020-Rev-7.pdf
  48. https://standards.transport.nsw.gov.au/_entity/annotation/872fcd19-a635-ed11-9db1-000d3ae011f9
  49. https://continentalrailworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/H-12B-2018-Rev-2.pdf
  50. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/how-do-you-set-up-an-f1-car-and-other-racing-machines-4982141/4982141/
  51. https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/drift-car-set-up/
  52. https://www.hpacademy.com/technical-articles/going-faster-with-data-analysis/
  53. https://meganracing.com/product/mrs-if-1170/
  54. https://www.autosportlabs.com/shop/racecapture-mk3-apex/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098617306833
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.