Hubbry Logo
Trekking poleTrekking poleMain
Open search
Trekking pole
Community hub
Trekking pole
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Trekking pole
Trekking pole
Trekking pole
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
=A pair of retractable poles with black handles and three fully extended retractable sections, yellow at the top and metallic silver at the bottom, resting against a birch tree
A pair of trekking poles

Trekking poles (also known as hiking poles, hiking sticks or walking poles) are a common hiking accessory that function to assist walkers with their rhythm, to provide stability, and reduce strain on joints on rough terrain.

Description

[edit]
Mountain guide Alice Manfield with a long wooden walking pole in the early 1900s

When in use, modern trekking poles resemble ski poles as they have many features in common, such as baskets at the bottom to prevent the pole sinking through unstable surfaces, and rubber-padded handles and wrist straps to strengthen holding grip. Their maximum length is usually 135 cm (54 inches), however, unlike ski poles, they are often made in two or three sections and can be extended and retracted as necessary for use and collapsed for storage or transport. When fully retracted it may be possible to attach them to a backpack. Some poles come with spring-loaded sections to aid walking under normal conditions and to reduce wrist strain, but such devices may only add unwanted weight and noise to the poles. They are usually made from lightweight aluminum or carbon fiber.

Uses

[edit]
A man bearing a hiking staff in an etching from William Blake's Europe a Prophecy first printed in 1794. This copy of the etching is currently held by the Fitzwilliam Museum

Descendants of the common walking stick, trekking poles are usually used by hikers for the same reasons — to provide some rhythm to their walking pace and for added support. On flat, smooth terrain they really aren't necessary although using them can increase the exercise a hiker gets from the trip, as well as increase the speed. But on less certain terrain, or steep slopes, they provide useful lateral stability, and many turn to them for help with knee pain. They can also be used as aids when climbing rocks or boulders, to probe the depth of mud or water and facilitate a crossing. When traversing steep slopes for long distances, some hikers make one pole shorter than the other to make those trips feel more as if they were taking place on level ground.

Some backpacking tents are designed to use trekking poles as tent poles. Along the same lines, trekking poles can be used to set up a Bivouac shelter. Hikers who take to snowshoes in winter find trekking poles especially useful.

They can also be used in Nordic walking in a rural or urban environment.

Usage

[edit]

The Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) estimates that pole usage rates on the Appalachian Trail vary from 90% among thru-hikers to 10–15% among day hikers.[citation needed]

Environmental impact concerns

[edit]
An impact of trekking poles, scratches left by poles on a rock in a wilderness area

Some hikers have complained that pole use can leave a visible impact on the surrounding trail, for instance poking visible holes in the ground and damaging adjacent vegetation. In particular, the most common complaint is that the carbide tips leave visible white scratches on rock and make scraping sounds. All these can detract from the wilderness experience.[1]

The Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) recommends several measures to mitigate the environmental impact of trekking poles in accordance with Leave No Trace principles of low-impact backcountry recreation. Hikers, it says, should not only be aware of what they put their poles into, they should remove the pole baskets unless hiking in snow and use rubber tips to avoid scratch marks on rocks. On level sections, or in areas where the potential for adverse impact is high, the ATC suggests putting the poles away entirely.[1]

Health benefits

[edit]

"Nordic walking", a type of walking with poles, has been found to have beneficial effects on resting heart rate, blood pressure, exercise capacity, maximal oxygen consumption, and quality of life in patients with various diseases, and to be superior to brisk walking without poles and in some endpoints to jogging.[2][3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trekking pole

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A trekking pole, also known as a pole or walking staff, is a , adjustable rod designed to assist hikers and trekkers by providing extra points of contact with the ground for enhanced stability and balance on uneven . Typically constructed from durable materials such as aluminum alloys or carbon composites, with ergonomic handles, adjustable straps, and hardened tips for traction on rock, , or , trekking poles resemble poles but are optimized for off-road walking rather than . They come in various types, including fixed-length, telescoping (two- or three-section adjustable), and folding models, allowing users to customize length for different activities and body heights. Originating from ancient walking aids used by civilizations like the , , and Romans for support during long journeys, trekking poles evolved significantly in the , drawing from Scandinavian cross-country poles and early alpinist tools such as axes. Their modern form gained widespread popularity in the late among day hikers and long-distance trekkers, coinciding with the shift toward lightweight outdoor gear, and companies like LEKI introduced specialized adjustable versions in the 1970s, with the model in 1974. Today, they are essential equipment in , backpacking, and , offering versatility beyond propulsion—such as aiding in stream crossings, setup, or even emergency splints. The primary benefits of trekking poles include reducing strain on lower body joints, particularly alleviating knee pain, by redistributing up to 25% of body weight to the upper body, thereby decreasing compressive forces on the knees by up to 25%, especially during descents where knee impact forces can multiply several times body weight. Models with anti-shock (shock-absorbing) technology further minimize knee impact by reducing compressive forces and absorbing shock. Scientific studies confirm that their use significantly lowers peak joint moments and power absorption at the ankles, , and hips during downhill with backpacks, thereby decreasing risk and while enabling longer distances and better posture. Aluminum poles are heavier but more impact-resistant and affordable, ideal for rugged use, whereas carbon fiber variants are lighter and stiffer for faster paces but can be brittle in extreme . Despite these advantages, potential drawbacks include added hand commitment, which may hinder tasks like , and environmental concerns like from metal tips if rubber caps are not used.

History and Evolution

Origins

The origins of trekking poles trace back to early walking aids used in rugged terrains, particularly in the European Alps. Medieval shepherds employed alpenstocks—long wooden poles tipped with iron spikes—for stability while traversing snowfields and glaciers with their herds, a practice that dates to at least the Middle Ages. Similarly, Christian pilgrims on long journeys, such as the Camino de Santiago, relied on sturdy staffs known as bordon or pilgrim's staffs for support during extended walks, often carving them from local woods like chestnut or hazel to aid balance and carry provisions. These simple tools provided essential aid in uneven landscapes, laying the groundwork for later specialized poles. Early commercial examples appeared in the 1930s with Komperdell's wooden-shafted trekking poles featuring steel tips. In the , advancements built upon these precursors, with alpenstocks becoming standard equipment for Alpine climbers navigating steep and icy routes. This era saw the evolution of the alpenstock into more versatile forms, influencing the development of ice axes around the mid-1800s, where blacksmiths in Alpine villages crafted shorter, axe-headed versions for cutting steps in ice. Concurrently, ski poles emerged as a parallel innovation in , where the use of two poles became normalized by the 19th century for propulsion and balance in , initially made from wood but marking a shift toward paired aids for dynamic movement. Following , the adoption of lightweight metal materials accelerated the transition toward modern aids, particularly in Scandinavian and Swiss outdoor traditions. Aluminum ski poles, introduced in and refined post-war for their durability and reduced weight compared to bamboo or wood, were increasingly repurposed by hikers and cross-country skiers for summer training walks to maintain fitness. This crossover usage in the 1950s and 1960s paved the way for dedicated trekking designs. The first commercial adjustable trekking poles appeared in 1974 with Leki's model, a three-section aluminum pole initially developed from ski technology to offer collapsible support for off-season Nordic activities and general .

Modern Developments

The popularity of trekking poles surged in the 1990s alongside the rise of , a movement emphasizing minimal gear weight for long-distance hikes, which highlighted poles as versatile tools for stability and load distribution without adding significant ounces. Innovations during this period, such as LEKI's introduction of shock-absorbing mechanisms, addressed strain and vibration, making poles more appealing to hikers on rugged trails like the . principles encourage minimizing trail impact, and using rubber tips on trekking poles helps avoid additional and rock scratches while providing stability. In the , advancements focused on adjustable aluminum constructions, building on earlier designs like LEKI's 1974 model to create lighter, more portable options that collapsed for easier storage and transport. These poles typically weighed under 1 pound per pair, appealing to backpackers seeking durability without bulk, and featured quick-lock mechanisms for rapid height adjustments on varied terrain. Aluminum's affordability and resilience drove widespread adoption, with manufacturers like Black Diamond and expanding product lines to include ergonomic grips and interchangeable tips. The 2010s saw further integration of carbon fiber shafts, which offered superior strength-to-weight ratios compared to aluminum, enabling even lighter poles—often around 12-16 ounces per pair—while maintaining rigidity for technical hikes. Anti-shock systems, refined from prototypes, became standard in many models, using internal springs or elastomers to dampen impacts and protect wrists and elbows. This era also marked significant market expansion, with global trekking pole sales reaching approximately $70 million in 2023, fueled by growing interest in outdoor fitness and . Entering the 2020s, has emerged as a key trend, with manufacturers incorporating eco-friendly materials like fibers and bio-based resins to reduce environmental impact while preserving performance. For instance, LEKI's 2023 hemp-composite poles provide comparable strength to traditional metals but with lower carbon footprints due to hemp's rapid renewability. These developments reflect broader industry shifts toward multifunctional, environmentally conscious gear.

Design and Construction

Key Components

Trekking poles consist of several fundamental components that work together to provide stability, support, and versatility during outdoor activities. The primary parts include the shaft, grip with wrist strap, tip with , and locking mechanisms, each designed to fulfill specific mechanical roles in ensuring durability, adjustability, and traction. The shaft forms the main body of the trekking pole, serving as the structural backbone that transmits force from the user to the ground. It is typically constructed in two or three telescoping sections, allowing for length adjustability ranging from approximately 100 to 140 cm to accommodate different user heights and variations. This enables the pole to extend for uphill or for compact storage, enhancing portability without compromising stability. The grip and wrist strap provide the interface between the user and the pole, facilitating secure handling and weight distribution. Grips are ergonomically shaped handles, often featuring extensions for varied hand positions, to minimize fatigue during prolonged use. The adjustable wrist strap, usually a padded loop, loops around the hand to prevent accidental drops and allows users to push off the ground using arm strength rather than solely gripping the handle, thereby reducing strain on the hands and wrists. At the base, the tip and ensure reliable ground contact and prevent excessive sinking in soft conditions. The tip, often a hardened metal or rubber point, delivers traction on diverse surfaces like rock, dirt, or pavement. Attached to it is the , a small disc or ring that is removable and interchangeable; smaller baskets suit general to avoid snagging, while larger ones for or distribute pressure to maintain pole effectiveness in loose . Locking mechanisms secure the telescoping sections of the shaft at the desired length, with common types including twist-lock systems that use via a rotating collar and lever-lock systems that employ a clamp for quick adjustments. Twist-locks offer and lighter weight but may require more effort to tighten securely, whereas lever-locks provide faster operation, especially with gloves, though they can be bulkier and potentially less durable over time. These mechanisms are critical for maintaining pole integrity under load, preventing slippage during use.

Materials Used

Trekking poles are primarily constructed from aluminum alloys or carbon fiber for the shafts, with each material offering distinct properties suited to different user needs. Aluminum alloys, such as the 7075 series, are widely used due to their excellent durability and affordability, providing a high strength-to-weight ratio that makes them suitable for rugged outdoor use. These alloys have a of approximately 2.81 g/cm³, allowing for yet robust poles that can withstand impacts without deforming easily. Carbon fiber represents a premium alternative for shaft construction, prized for its superior lightness with a density around 1.7 g/cm³, which reduces overall pack weight during extended hikes. This material excels in vibration dampening, minimizing on joints by absorbing shocks from uneven , and is commonly featured in high-end models for ultralight . However, carbon fiber is more brittle than aluminum and susceptible to shattering under sideways stress, such as during slips on wet rocks, limiting its use in high-impact scenarios. Grips on trekking poles typically incorporate natural cork, synthetic , or emerging sustainable options like algae-infused , each balancing comfort and functionality. Cork grips, derived from renewable bark, provide natural absorption and a firm hold even in sweaty or wet conditions, molding to the hand over time for enhanced . In contrast, grips, often made from EVA, are more cost-effective and offer better initial cushioning but degrade faster with prolonged exposure to water. Algae-based foams, as of 2025, promote by using renewable bio-materials while maintaining cushioning properties. Pole tips are usually equipped with rubber caps, which protect the underlying points, extend their lifespan by reducing wear on hard surfaces, and provide quieter, more stable traction on pavement or rock without damaging trails. Selection of materials involves key trade-offs between cost, performance, and environmental resilience. Aluminum poles are ideal for budget-conscious users, often available under $50 per pair, and can be anodized for improved resistance in wet or humid conditions, though untreated versions may oxidize if not properly maintained. Carbon fiber poles, conversely, command premium prices exceeding $150 per pair, offering unmatched lightness and inherent non-corrosive properties but requiring careful handling to avoid fractures. Hikers should prioritize aluminum for affordability and versatility in variable , while opting for carbon fiber when minimizing weight is paramount for long-distance endeavors.

Types and Variations

Trekking poles are categorized primarily by their structural design and adjustability, which determine their suitability for specific activities such as , , or . The main types include fixed-length, adjustable telescoping, and folding poles, each offering trade-offs in weight, packability, and ease of use. Specialized variants further adapt these designs for comfort or minimalism. Fixed-length poles are non-adjustable, consisting of a single solid shaft, making them ideal for , , or activities requiring consistent pole height. These poles are typically the lightest option, weighing around 5 ounces per pole, due to their simple construction without locking mechanisms. For instance, the Black Diamond Distance Carbon Running Poles, at 6.3 ounces (178 grams) per pair as of 2025 for a 110 cm , exemplify this type's emphasis on minimal weight for speed-focused pursuits. Adjustable telescoping poles represent the standard design for general , featuring one or more sections that slide and lock to vary length. Single-collapse models offer basic adjustability with two segments, while double-collapse versions provide greater packability by folding into a shorter profile, often 24-25 inches collapsed. Examples include the Black Diamond Pursuit at 16.4 ounces per pair (100-140 cm adjustable), which uses durable aluminum for reliability on varied . Folding poles, often in a Z-style or segmented configuration, prioritize quick deployment and compactness, collapsing to 14-16 inches for easy storage in running packs. They are particularly popular for , where rapid setup is essential. The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z, weighing 10.2 ounces per pair as of 2025, folds into three segments for swift assembly and is favored in ultralight racing scenarios. Specialized variants build on these core types to address specific needs, such as joint protection or extreme weight reduction. Anti-shock poles incorporate internal springs or absorbers to dampen impact forces, reducing stress on wrists, elbows, and knees during prolonged use; the Leki AS, at 17.5 ounces per pair, includes this feature in a telescoping aluminum frame. Ultralight minimalist poles, designed for , strip away non-essential elements to achieve weights under 12 ounces per pair, often using carbon fiber shafts; the Gossamer Gear LT5, at 9.8 ounces per pair as of 2025, exemplifies this approach with its three-piece carbon construction for long-distance efficiency. Material choices like carbon fiber in these variants enhance durability relative to weight compared to aluminum in standard models.

Usage and Techniques

Basic Usage

Trekking poles are sized for basic use by adjusting their length so that the user's elbows form a when the pole tips are placed on the ground near the feet while standing on flat terrain. This positioning typically corresponds to a length of about 20-30 cm below shoulder height for most adults, depending on individual stature. To hold the poles correctly, insert each hand upward through the wrist strap from below, then grasp the handle such that the strap rests between and fingers, providing support without a tight grip on the handle itself. The straps should be adjusted for a comfortable fit that allows the poles to swing naturally and facilitates quick release if needed. In standard walking rhythm, plant the pole opposite to the forward foot—such as the left pole with the right step—and push gently to propel forward motion, mimicking the alternating pattern of to maintain balance and reduce excessive arm swinging. For terrain adjustments, shorten the poles by 5-10 cm when ascending to position hands at level for better leverage and to avoid straining the shoulders. On descents, lengthen them by a similar amount to engage the more effectively and provide added stability.

Advanced Techniques

In challenging terrains such as steep rock faces, experienced hikers employ trekking poles for assisted by planting both poles firmly before and beside large rocks or boulders, using them as additional handholds to provide leverage and stability while pushing down to vault onto or over obstacles. This technique enhances balance and reduces the risk of slips on uneven surfaces, allowing climbers to maintain without relying solely on upper body strength. For minor falls or slips during , poles can aid in by digging the tips into the ground or to halt quickly, though they are most effective in low-angle scenarios and should not replace dedicated ice axes on steeper slopes. Nordic walking techniques integrate by emphasizing full arm extension and a powerful backward push with each stride, engaging the upper body for propulsion and mimicking motions to distribute effort across more muscle groups. This method, often adapted from fitness programs, synchronizes opposite arm and leg movements while keeping elbows at about 90 degrees and poles angled slightly behind the body for optimal force transfer. indicates that such integration increases burn by approximately 20% compared to regular walking over the same distance, due to the added involvement of core, , and back muscles, with some studies reporting ranges up to 30% in varied intensities. When crossing streams, hikers plant trekking poles upstream against the current to counter water force and maintain stability, leaning into the poles while facing upstream and shuffling sideways to minimize foot displacement. Poles should be lengthened for deeper or rocky crossings to probe the streambed for hidden obstacles or unstable footing, ensuring secure placement before committing weight. In snowy environments, the same probing technique applies to snowfields, where poles without baskets can be inserted to assess depth and risk, helping to identify firm ground beneath soft layers before advancing. In emergencies, trekking poles serve as improvised tent poles by lashing them together with cordage or straps to form a ridgeline or support for tarps or ponchos, creating a quick or pyramid shelter that elevates the occupant off wet ground. For , poles act as rigid splints for fractures or sprains by padding the injured limb, aligning it neutrally, and securing the pole above and below the site with bandages or clothing to immobilize the area and prevent further damage during evacuation. Techniques for lashing poles to backpacks include threading them through compression straps or using shock cord loops to secure them horizontally or vertically, allowing hands-free transport if needed for assessment or gear redistribution in situations.

Applications by Activity

Trekking poles are widely utilized in and backpacking to provide enhanced stability on uneven trails, where they serve as additional points of contact with the ground to prevent slips and falls on rocky or irregular surfaces. This stability is particularly beneficial during descents or when navigating loose , allowing hikers to maintain balance and reduce the risk of . In backpacking scenarios, the poles help distribute the overall load (body plus pack , typically recommended not to exceed 20-30% of the user's body for ) by engaging the upper body, thereby reducing lower body forces during extended carries. In , lightweight folding trekking poles are adapted for rapid deployment and quick terrain changes, enabling runners to adjust length on the fly during ascents or technical sections without slowing pace. These compact designs, often weighing under 10 ounces per pole, help reduce overall fatigue in ultra-distance events such as the (UTMB), where poles redistribute workload from fatigued legs to the upper body, lowering the vertical cost of transport by up to 5% and mitigating muscle exhaustion over 100+ kilometer races. Runners report improved propulsion and efficiency on steep inclines, with studies indicating poles can enhance uphill performance by 2-3% in trained athletes. For snowshoeing and , trekking poles equipped with extended baskets—typically 3-4 inches in diameter—offer crucial flotation in deep powder or packed , preventing the pole tips from sinking and providing reliable support for balance and propulsion. These larger baskets mimic the flotation effect of snowshoes, distributing the user's weight across a broader surface area to aid through unconsolidated during off-trail or routes. In , the adjustable length and robust construction of such poles allow for varied terrain, from groomed paths to steep powder fields, enhancing stability when uphill or transitioning to descent. Trekking poles also find application in urban and accessibility contexts, serving as assistive devices for elderly individuals or those with mobility impairments during daily walks on sidewalks and parks. These poles improve stability and posture by engaging the core and upper body, reducing joint stress and enabling safer navigation on paved or mildly uneven urban surfaces. They can be used in public spaces designed to be accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), supporting independent movement without requiring specialized medical certification.

Benefits and Advantages

Health Benefits

Trekking poles offer notable joint relief by distributing weight more evenly across the body, thereby reducing the impact on lower extremities and the spine. By transferring weight to the arms, they decrease compressive force on the knees by up to 25%, providing significant relief for individuals experiencing knee pain. Research indicates that their use can decrease knee joint forces by 20-25% during downhill walking, helping to mitigate strain on the knees, particularly for those with joint concerns or those carrying loads. For further impact minimization on joints, trekking poles with anti-shock (shock-absorbing) technology are recommended, as they dampen vibrations and additional shock to reduce joint stress. Popular models for knee pain relief include the Black Diamond Trail Shock and Leki anti-shock models (e.g., Leki Thermolite Aergon XL Antishock). High-quality non-anti-shock poles, such as the Black Diamond Pursuit or MSR Dynalock Ascent Carbon, also provide good support and comfort for knee issues through ergonomic design and stability. Similarly, studies demonstrate that trekking poles reduce exercise-induced muscle injury during mountain walking, with prior research showing reductions in lower limb joint forces of 7-13 kg depending on terrain. By incorporating the upper body into the walking motion, trekking poles engage core muscles and promote improved posture, encouraging an upright alignment that counters slouching and forward lean common in prolonged trekking. This activation of the shoulders, arms, and trunk not only enhances overall stability but also reduces lower back strain, as evidenced by biomechanical analyses showing decreased erector spinae activity. Trekking poles contribute to cardiovascular benefits, especially in activities like , where they increase heart rate by 10-15 beats per minute compared to regular walking, thereby elevating aerobic fitness levels and calorie expenditure. This added intensity supports better heart health without proportionally increasing perceived exertion. In terms of , trekking poles enhance balance and on uneven , lowering the risk of ankle sprains. This protective effect stems from the poles' role in absorbing shock and providing immediate support during slips or twists.

Performance Enhancements

Trekking poles enhance by incorporating arm swing into the hiking motion, which adds forward and engages upper body muscles for greater . A study on steep uphill with a 40% body weight load found that poles reduced perceived by 20% and improved by 10%, as measured by the heart rate-running speed index. This boost allows hikers to achieve higher speeds, with one review reporting a 3.6% increase in walking speed and a 6.2% longer stride length when using poles. On extended hikes, the benefits contribute to shorter overall trip times by enabling a more consistent and rapid pace. Field tests on hill climbs demonstrate that poles can accelerate completion rates by 2.5%, equating to about 30 seconds faster over a 433-meter ascent, which compounds to 15-30% time reductions on long routes with repeated elevations. Balance and stability are markedly improved with trekking poles, as they provide additional support points that build confidence in strides on uneven or sloped . This results in lower energy demands, with showing over 5% reduction in ground reaction forces and up to 16% decrease in lower extremity joint moments, translating to 5-8% less energy expenditure per mile through minimized lower body stress. When carrying loads, trekking poles redistribute pack weight to the arms and upper body, permitting heavier gear on multi-day treks without proportional buildup. Studies confirm up to 14.8% less in lower limb muscles and overall offloading that preserves . For challenging terrain, trekking poles optimize efficiency by speeding ascent and descent rates through enhanced stability and force distribution. Controlled experiments indicate 25% lower forces during descents supporting sustained performance across varied landscapes.

Environmental and Practical Considerations

Environmental Impact

The production of trekking poles has notable environmental implications, primarily due to the materials used in manufacturing. Aluminum, the most common shaft material, requires significant energy for extraction and processing, emitting approximately 14-16 kg of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of aluminum produced. For a typical aluminum trekking pole weighing around 0.25-0.3 kg (including components), this translates to an estimated 3.5-5 kg of CO2 emissions per unit, depending on the energy source and content incorporated. Carbon fiber alternatives, while lighter, exacerbate the footprint; their production is roughly three times more emissions-intensive than aluminum per equivalent weight and generates substantial plastic waste from matrices and manufacturing scraps. During use, trekking poles contribute to trail degradation in sensitive ecosystems, particularly in high-traffic areas like national parks. Pole tips, especially uncapped metal ones, compact and damage by creating small holes (0.7-3.9 cm in ) that accelerate , particularly in loose post-monsoon soils. Studies in , Nepal, where over 53% of visitors use poles (with 59% uncapped), demonstrate that uncapped poles cause greater soil loss compared to capped versions, leading to trail widening and increased wear when combined with foot traffic. This lateral soil spread and compaction reduce water infiltration, promoting runoff and vegetation loss in protected areas. Rubber tips on trekking poles, intended to provide grip on hard surfaces, degrade over time and shed microplastic particles, contributing to waterway pollution in backcountry environments. Research on high-elevation lakes near hiking trails shows microplastic concentrations up to 23 times higher in frequented areas, with outdoor gear such as footwear and apparel identified as key vectors. These particles, similar to tire wear debris, persist in soils and aquatic systems, posing risks to wildlife and ecosystems. Sustainable alternatives, such as mushroom-shaped caps made from natural or low-degradation materials, help mitigate this by reducing direct soil contact and plastic shedding. At end-of-life, trekking poles is challenging due to mixed materials like aluminum or carbon fiber shafts combined with grips, , and rubber components, which often require specialized disassembly. Carbon fiber composites are particularly difficult to , frequently ending up in landfills and contributing to long-term waste accumulation. Initiatives like REI's Re/Supply take-back program, active in stores as of November 2025, allow members to trade in used gear—including trekking poles—for credit, facilitating resale or responsible disposal and promoting practices in the outdoor industry.

Safety and Maintenance

Trekking poles, while beneficial for stability, present several safety hazards if not used or maintained properly. One common risk is tip breakage or wear, which can lead to slips and falls, particularly on uneven or rocky terrain where traction is essential. For instance, worn tips may fail to grip effectively on rocks, potentially causing the user to lose balance and fall, which could result in to the pole or the hiker. In icy conditions, poles can slip if excessive weight is placed on them, heightening the chance of a fall, as the tips are not designed to support full body weight on slick surfaces. Additionally, strap entanglement poses a danger, especially in dense brush or during a stumble, where the s can trap the hands, leading to twisted or dislocated shoulders, elbows, or wrists upon impact. Adjustment failures represent another hazard; loose locking mechanisms on telescoping poles can cause sudden collapse during a stride, potentially throwing off balance and resulting in a fall. These issues underscore the importance of proper usage and regular inspections to mitigate risks. To prevent such failures, users should perform routine checks on the locking mechanisms, ensuring they are securely engaged and tightened to the recommended , which can be verified by testing extension and resistance before each outing. For carbon fiber models, which are lightweight but more brittle than aluminum, regular visual inspections for hairline cracks in the shafts are crucial, as undetected damage can lead to sudden, catastrophic breakage under stress. Straps should be adjusted to fit loosely enough to release the hands quickly in emergencies, reducing entanglement risks in brushy areas. Maintenance practices are vital for extending the lifespan and reliability of trekking poles. After each use, especially in muddy or wet conditions, rinse the poles with to remove dirt and debris, then wipe them down with a dry cloth and allow them to air dry completely to prevent , oxidation, or mold growth on grips and straps. Avoid using lubricants or oils on the mechanisms, as they can reduce and cause slips in twist-lock systems. For storage, collapse or disassemble the poles and keep them in a cool, dry place away from extreme temperatures, which could warp components; ensure straps are dry to avoid . Durability can be maintained by replacing tips periodically— tips typically last 500–750 miles of use, depending on —and promptly addressing any wear to baskets or grips. Following these steps ensures the poles remain functional and safe for extended adventures.

References

  1. https://americanhiking.org/trekking-poles/
  2. https://www.mountaineers.org/blog/tell-me-about-trekking-poles
  3. https://www.walking-canes.net/blogs/news/history-of-hiking-sticks
  4. https://www.leki.com/int/en/LEKI/History
  5. https://www.greatcanadiantrails.com/gctblog/the-long-and-skinny-truth-about-hiking-poles
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17218900/
  7. https://www.gstaadlife.com/2022/09/hiking-through-history.html
  8. https://www.pilgrim.es/en/plan-your-way/pilgrims-staff/
  9. https://walkingacademy.com/the-evolution-of-hiking-poles-a-historical-overview-of-trekking-tools/
  10. https://endorfeen.com/alpenstock-before-ice-axe/
  11. https://www.wildernessmag.co.nz/short-history-ice-axe/
  12. https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/historyofskiing/2022/05/05/how-ski-poles-industrialized-and-diversified-becoming-more-efficient-and-safe-3623-bc-to-2019-ad/
  13. https://nrthrnstrong.com/blogs/news/ski-poles-the-essential-gear-for-every-skier
  14. https://thetrek.co/appalachian-trail/backpacking-gear-changes-through-decades/
  15. https://appalachiantrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/at_lnt_trifold_final.pdf
  16. https://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/showthread.php?p=310361
  17. https://www.adventurealan.com/best-trekking-poles/
  18. https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/camping-and-hiking/trekking-poles/leki-corklite-dss-antishock
  19. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/trekking-poles-market-A10219
  20. https://outdoorindustry.org/press-release/leki-introduces-first-ever-trekking-pole-made-from-hemp-focusing-on-a-future-in-sustainability-and-responsible-manufacturing/
  21. https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/topics/camping-and-hiking/best-trekking-poles
  22. https://www.trailspace.com/articles/trekking-poles-parts-explained.html
  23. https://cascademountaintech.com/blogs/news/trail-essentials-everything-you-need-to-know-about-trekking-poles
  24. https://www.montbell.com/eu/en/contents/444
  25. https://asm.matweb.com/search/specificmaterial.asp?bassnum=ma7075t6
  26. https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/trekking-poles-hiking-staffs.html
  27. https://cascademountaintech.com/blogs/news/which-is-better-aluminum-or-carbon-fiber-trekking-poles
  28. https://www.outdoorsportproduct.com/info/
  29. https://www.advnture.com/features/cork-vs-EVA-foam-grip-trekking-poles
  30. https://www.backcountry.com/bulletin/how-to-choose-trekking-poles
  31. https://bettertrail.com/outdoor-gear/best-trekking-poles
  32. https://terradrift.com/cheap-vs-expensive-trekking-poles-are-they-worth-it/
  33. https://www.garagegrowngear.com/blogs/gear-gab/trekking-poles-how-to-choose-and-why-to-use
  34. https://thetrek.co/rainbow-response-all-you-need-to-know-about-trekking-poles/
  35. https://www.switchbacktravel.com/best-trekking-poles
  36. https://blackdiamondequipment.com/products/distance-carbon-running-poles
  37. https://www.cleverhiker.com/hiking/best-hiking-trekking-poles/
  38. https://www.gossamergear.com/products/lt5-three-piece-carbon-trekking-poles-pair
  39. https://www.gossamergear.com/blogs/our-blog/how-to-use-trekking-poles
  40. https://www.cleverhiker.com/hiking/pros-and-cons-of-hiking-with-trekking-poles/
  41. https://camotrek.com/blogs/news/trekking-poles-choosing-using/
  42. https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/how-to-use-trekking-poles.html
  43. https://www.montanaknifecompany.com/blogs/john-barklow-mkc-survival-guide/trekking-poles
  44. https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/nordic-walking-pole-pushing-burns-more-calories-helps-with-stability/
  45. https://www.health.harvard.edu/exercise-and-fitness/fitness-trend-nordic-walking
  46. https://www.pcta.org/discover-the-trail/backcountry-basics/water/stream-crossing-safety/
  47. https://andrewskurka.com/trekking-pole-straps-baskets-removal/
  48. https://www.navigatetoyouradventure.com/2020/08/military-poncho-shelters-configurations.html
  49. https://www.nols.edu/blog/7-materials-that-can-be-used-to-improvise-a-splint/
  50. https://unstuckadventures.com/how-to-attach-hiking-poles-to-backpack-5-ways-to-carry/
  51. https://www.treelinereview.com/learn-skills/top-reasons-for-trekking-poles
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6259461/
  53. https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/how-much-should-your-pack-weigh.html
  54. https://www.irunfar.com/best-trekking-poles
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40622586/
  56. https://www.jasonkoop.com/podcast/do-poles-improve-performance-in-trail-running-with-nicola-giovanelli-phd
  57. https://www.rei.com/product/750121/leki-snowflake-trekking-pole-snow-baskets-pair
  58. https://cascademountaintech.com/products/trekking-pole-parts-snow-baskets
  59. https://us.komperdell.com/Poles/Accessories/Baskets/
  60. https://urbanpoling.com/
  61. https://www.tsloutdoor.com/walking-poles-seniors
  62. https://www.access-board.gov/ada/
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10622357/
  64. https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/best-hiking-trekking-poles.html
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44602410_Trekking_Poles_Reduce_Exercise-Induced_Muscle_Injury_during_Mountain_Walking
  66. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Walking_Poles
  67. https://www.nordicpolewalkingontario.ca/frequently-asked-questions-nordic-pole-walking/
  68. https://mtntactical.com/research/steep-grades-hiking-trekking-poles-20-easier-10-efficient/
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10135831/
  70. https://www.outsideonline.com/health/training-performance/trekking-pole-research-2023/
  71. https://freetrail.com/climb-the-mountain-when-to-run-hike-or-pole/
  72. https://www.outsideonline.com/health/training-performance/trekking-poles-research/
  73. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1016/j.wem.2020.06.009
  74. https://hobnailtrekkingco.com/the-science-behind-trekking-poles-how-they-make-every-step-smarter/
  75. https://www.carbonchain.com/blog/understand-your-aluminum-emissions
  76. https://www.hydro.com/us/global/aluminum/products/low-carbon-and-recycled-aluminum/
  77. https://www.pinkbike.com/news/carbon-frames-produce-more-emissions-than-alloy-and-more-key-points-from-treks-sustainability-report.html
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324376/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025002215
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000277
  81. https://gearjunkie.com/outdoor/study-outdoor-gear-microplastics-backcountry
  82. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/13/microplastics-hiking-shoes-outdoor-gear
  83. https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/how-to-retire-gear.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.