Hubbry Logo
Voltage-controlled filterVoltage-controlled filterMain
Open search
Voltage-controlled filter
Community hub
Voltage-controlled filter
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Voltage-controlled filter
Voltage-controlled filter
Voltage-controlled filter
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A voltage-controlled filter (VCF) is an electronic filter whose operating characteristics (primarily cutoff frequency) can be set by an input control voltage.[1] Voltage-controlled filters are widely used in synthesizers.

Depiction of cutoff frequency of a low-pass filter, showing Butterworth response

A music synthesizer VCF allows its cutoff frequency, and sometimes its Q factor (resonance at the cutoff frequency), to be continuously varied. The filter outputs often include a lowpass response, and sometimes highpass, bandpass or notch responses. Some musical VCFs offer a variable slope which determines the rate of attenuation outside the bandpass, often at 6 dB/octave, 12 dB/octave, 18 dB/octave or 24 dB/octave (one-, two-, three- and four-pole filters, respectively). In modular analog synthesizers, VCFs receive signal input from signal sources, including oscillators and noise, or the output of other processors. By varying the cutoff frequency, the filter passes or attenuates partials of the input signal.

In some popular electronic music styles, "filter sweeps" have become a common effect. These sweeps are created by varying the cutoff frequency of the VCF (sometimes very slowly). Controlling the cutoff by means of a transient voltage control, such as an envelope generator, especially with relatively fast attack settings, may simulate the attack transients of natural or acoustic instruments.

Historically, musical VCFs have included variable feedback which creates a response peak (Q) at the cutoff frequency. This peak can be quite prominent, and when the filter's frequency is swept by a control, partials present in the input signal resonate. Some filters are designed to provide enough feedback to go into self-oscillation, and it can serve as a sine-wave source.

ARP Instruments made a multifunction voltage-controlled filter module capable of stable operation at a Q over 100;[2] it could be shock-excited to ring like a vibraphone bar. Q was voltage-controllable, in part by a panel-mounted control. Its internal circuit was a classic analog computer state variable "loop", which provided outputs in quadrature.

A VCF is an example of an active non-linear filter. The characteristic musical sound of a particular VCF depends on both its linear (small-signal) frequency response and its non-linear response to larger amplitude inputs.

Synthesizer filter types

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Voltage-controlled filter

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A voltage-controlled filter (VCF) is an circuit whose operating characteristics, such as , , or , are dynamically adjusted by an applied control voltage, enabling real-time tuning without mechanical components. VCFs emerged in the as key components in early analog synthesizers, with the Moog ladder filter representing one of the first practical voltage-controlled low-pass designs, inspired by earlier telephone filter structures from the and adapted for musical applications by in 1965. This innovation allowed synthesizers to produce expressive, evolving timbres by modulating filter parameters in response to control voltages from sources like keyboards or envelope generators, fundamentally shaping the sound of electronic music during the late . At their core, VCFs function by replacing fixed resistive or reactive elements in traditional filter topologies—such as Sallen-Key or state-variable configurations—with voltage-variable components like field-effect transistors (FETs), photoresistors paired with lamps, or operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs), which convert the control voltage into a proportional change in conductance or current, thereby shifting the filter's frequency response. For instance, in OTA-based designs, increasing the control voltage raises the transconductance, which directly elevates the cutoff frequency, often spanning several octaves for musical utility. Common filter types include low-pass (attenuating high frequencies), high-pass (attenuating low frequencies), band-pass (passing a specific band), and those with adjustable resonance to emphasize frequencies near the cutoff, creating peaked responses akin to acoustic instrument formants. Beyond music synthesis, where VCFs enable timbre sculpting and dynamic sound envelopes in devices from modular systems to modern digital emulations, they find applications in instrumentation, such as swept-frequency analyzers for signal analysis, and embedded audio processing in low-power systems using micropower op-amps with voltage-tunable bandwidths from tens of kHz to several MHz. Challenges in design include ensuring linear voltage-to-frequency response over a wide range, minimizing distortion from nonlinear elements like FETs (which require low voltages across them, typically under 100 mV), and achieving fast response times without excessive power draw.

Fundamentals of Filters and Control

Basic Principles of Electronic Filters

An is a specialized circuit designed to modify the and/or phase of sinusoidal components comprising an input signal, selectively attenuating or passing frequencies based on desired criteria. This frequency-selective behavior enables the extraction of useful signal information while suppressing noise or interference, forming a foundational element in systems. Key characteristics of electronic filters include the fcf_c, defined as the frequency at which the filter's output power is half that of the input, marking the transition from the (where signals pass with minimal ) to the (where dominates). The order of the filter determines the steepness of this transition; for instance, a filter, such as a simple RC network, exhibits a gradual , while higher-order filters achieve steeper through cascaded stages. Common filter responses encompass low-pass filters, which allow frequencies below fcf_c to pass while attenuating higher ones; high-pass filters, which do the opposite by passing frequencies above fcf_c; band-pass filters, which transmit a specific frequency band between lower and upper cutoff frequencies; and notch filters, which attenuate a narrow band while passing others. A representative example is the first-order , whose in the s-domain is given by H(s)=11+sωc,H(s) = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_c}}, where ωc=2πfc\omega_c = 2\pi f_c represents the cutoff . Electronic filters are classified as passive or active. Passive filters rely solely on resistors, capacitors, and inductors to achieve selection without external power, but they cannot provide gain and are limited in achieving sharp responses. In contrast, active filters incorporate operational amplifiers to enable gain, buffering, and higher-order designs with steeper roll-offs, making them suitable for integrated circuits and precise applications. The rate quantifies the slope in the , typically -20 dB per for each order in Butterworth filters, which offer a maximally flat response. Higher orders thus provide greater selectivity, with a second-order filter exhibiting -40 dB/.

Principles of Voltage Control in Filters

A voltage-controlled filter (VCF) employs an input control voltage (CV) to dynamically adjust key parameters such as the (fcf_c) or the Q-factor (), enabling real-time modulation of the filter's in applications like audio synthesis. This control mechanism transforms a static filter into a responsive module where the CV signal, often derived from envelopes, LFOs, or keyboards, proportionally influences the filter's behavior, allowing for effects like sweeps or formant shaping. The relationship between the control voltage and filter parameters can follow linear or exponential laws, depending on the design goals. In a linear control scheme, the varies directly with the CV, expressed as fc=k⋅Vcontrolf_c = k \cdot V_{control}, where kk is a scaling constant that determines sensitivity. Exponential control, more common in musical contexts, provides a logarithmic mapping to align with pitch , typically using fc=fc0⋅2V/Voctf_c = f_{c0} \cdot 2^{V / V_{oct}}, where fc0f_{c0} is the base frequency and VoctV_{oct} is the volts-per-octave scaling (often 1 V/octave). Control voltage sources in modular synthesizers commonly operate within ranges like 0-10 V for unipolar signals or -5 V to +5 V for bipolar modulation, ensuring compatibility across modules while avoiding saturation. Voltage control introduces potential feedback and stability challenges, particularly when modulating high values, where excessive can amplify or signals at the , leading to —a state where the filter generates its own sinusoidal output independent of the input. This arises from loops in the circuit, often mitigated by limiting CV excursions or incorporating damping elements to maintain linear operation. A basic VCF block diagram consists of an input signal path feeding into voltage-sensitive elements, such as a variable transconductance amplifier (OTA), followed by an RC network that sets the and an stage for selection, with optional feedback for control. To achieve exponential control, an exponential converter circuit processes the linear CV input, generating a current or voltage that logarithmically scales the filter's response, often using pairs or dedicated ICs to match perceptual octave intervals.

Design and Circuit Implementation

Analog Voltage-Controlled Filter Circuits

Analog voltage-controlled filters (VCFs) are implemented using discrete or integrated analog components to achieve frequency response modulation via control voltages, primarily in audio synthesis and signal processing applications. These circuits rely on continuous-time processing, where the cutoff frequency and resonance are adjusted by varying currents or resistances in response to input voltages. Key building blocks include operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs), which convert differential input voltages to output currents proportional to transconductance gmg_m, enabling voltage-variable gain and frequency control. The LM13700 dual OTA, for instance, integrates two independent amplifiers with input buffers, facilitating designs like voltage-controlled low-pass filters where the cutoff frequency is set by fc=gm2πCf_c = \frac{g_m}{2\pi C}, with CC as the and gmg_m modulated by a current derived from the control voltage. Similarly, the CA3080 OTA, an earlier monolithic array, provides a simple voltage-to-current conversion suitable for VCF integrators, though it requires external buffering for low-impedance outputs. These OTAs allow for compact realizations of multi-pole filters by cascading stages, with gmg_m typically ranging from 10 nA/V to 10 mA/V depending on . Popular topologies include the ladder filter, a multi-stage low-pass design emulating passive RC ladders with active elements for voltage control, often achieving 24 dB/octave roll-off in four-pole configurations. In a Moog-style ladder filter, matched pairs form voltage-variable current sources that charge integrators, with the control voltage applied through an exponential converter to achieve logarithmic for musical intervals. The Sallen-Key topology, adapted for voltage control, uses OTAs or JFETs as variable resistors in the feedback network of a second-order , allowing cutoff adjustment while maintaining unity gain at DC. Resonance in analog VCFs is introduced by adding paths around the filter core, boosting the near the ; the feedback gain is modulated by a control voltage, often via a voltage-controlled amplifier (VCA) to prevent instability. In designs, this feedback loops from the output to an early stage, emphasizing peaks that can lead to at high settings. For exponential control in , such as 1 V/ tracking, circuits employ transistor-based converters where the base-emitter voltage difference yields logarithmic response, but accuracy is limited to about 1-2% without compensation due to thermal effects. Temperature compensation techniques, such as incorporating positive temperature coefficient (PTC) resistors or thermistors in the exponential converter feedback, mitigate drift in tracking; for example, a 3300 ppm/°C tempco resistor can stabilize 1 V/ response over 6-8 by countering the -2 mV/°C V_BE variation in matched pairs. Power supply requirements typically range from ±12 V to ±15 V, with careful to avoid saturation in OTA stages. Despite their sonic warmth, analog VCFs face limitations including voltage range constraints (often 0-5 V or ±5 V for control), where excessive CV can cause clipping or non-linearity in OTA bias currents. High resonance introduces distortion through overload in feedback paths, manifesting as harmonic generation beyond 20-30% Q boost, while component drift from temperature or aging affects capacitor and resistor tolerances, leading to up to 5-10% frequency variation without stabilization. These issues necessitate precision components like 1% metal-film resistors and low-drift ceramics for reliable performance.

Digital Voltage-Controlled Filter Implementations

Digital voltage-controlled filters (VCFs) are realized through (DSP) techniques that approximate analog filter behaviors in the discrete-time domain, enabling precise control and integration into software or embedded systems. These implementations primarily utilize (IIR) filters, which employ difference equations to recursively process input samples, mimicking the continuous dynamics of analog circuits. A key design approach is the , which converts s-domain analog transfer functions to z-domain digital equivalents by substituting s=2T1−z−11+z−1s = \frac{2}{T} \frac{1 - z^{-1}}{1 + z^{-1}}, where TT is the sampling period; this method warps the frequency axis but preserves stability and eliminates from high-frequency components. In the , voltage control is implemented by sampling the analog control voltage (CV) via an (ADC), which quantizes the CV into a digital value typically scaled to the system's voltage range, such as 0–3.3 V or 0–5 V. This digital CV is then mapped to filter parameters, such as fcf_c, by normalizing it to the digital ωc=2πfcfs\omega_c = 2\pi \frac{f_c}{f_s}, where fsf_s is the sampling rate; real-time updates to these parameters allow dynamic response to CV changes without hardware tuning elements. Common algorithms for digital VCFs include the state-variable filter, a direct digital emulation of the analog state-variable using trapezoidal integrators in a feedback structure. This design processes inputs through two integrators to generate lowpass, highpass, bandpass, and notch outputs simultaneously, with the difference equations given by: ylp(n)=ylp(n−1)+g⋅ybp(n−1),yhp(n)=x(n)−ylp(n)−f⋅ybp(n−1),ybp(n)=ybp(n−1)+g⋅yhp(n),\begin{align*} y_{lp}(n) &= y_{lp}(n-1) + g \cdot y_{bp}(n-1), \\ y_{hp}(n) &= x(n) - y_{lp}(n) - f \cdot y_{bp}(n-1), \\ y_{bp}(n) &= y_{bp}(n-1) + g \cdot y_{hp}(n), \end{align*} where g=2sin⁡(πfc/fs)g = 2 \sin(\pi f_c / f_s) approximates the normalized cutoff for the original design, and is controlled by the feedback gain ff (related to 1/Q); the CV-digitized fcf_c updates gg for control. Biquad filters, as second-order IIR sections, offer an efficient alternative for VCFs, implementing the general form H(z)=b0+b1z−1+b2z−21+a1z−1+a2z−2H(z) = \frac{b_0 + b_1 z^{-1} + b_2 z^{-2}}{1 + a_1 z^{-1} + a_2 z^{-2}} with coefficients dynamically recomputed from the digitized CV to adjust poles and zeros for lowpass, highpass, or bandpass responses. Digital VCFs are deployed on DSP chips, microcontrollers, and software platforms for real-time parameter adjustment. Microcontrollers like support VCF implementations via libraries such as DSPFilters, which provide IIR biquads and state-variable models runnable at audio rates up to 44.1 kHz with CV input from external ADCs. In software, environments like facilitate modular digital synthesis, where VCF modules process polyphonic CV signals to control multiple filter instances simultaneously, enabling complex routing and automation. Compared to analog VCFs, digital versions provide inherent stability due to fixed-point or , eliminating thermal drift and component aging that affect analog tuning. They also support effortlessly by parallel computation of multiple filter states, without requiring duplicated hardware. However, digital VCFs risk from frequencies exceeding the Nyquist limit (fs/2f_s / 2), necessitating pre-filters, and impose computational loads that can strain low-power processors, potentially introducing latency or requiring for high-fidelity . A representative example is the digital emulation of the Moog ladder filter, a four-pole lowpass design with nonlinear saturation. This is implemented as a cascade of first-order IIR stages using Euler integration of the circuit's differential equations, incorporating tanh nonlinearities to model clipping: Vc(n)=Vc(n−1)+Ts⋅tanh⁡(Vin(n)−Vc(n−1)2Vt),V_c(n) = V_c(n-1) + T_s \cdot \tanh\left( \frac{V_{in}(n) - V_c(n-1)}{2V_t} \right), where Ts=1/fsT_s = 1/f_s and VtV_t is the thermal voltage; the control current, derived from digitized CV, scales the stage gains for adjustment, while feedback from the output enables with stability maintained through delay compensation. This approach captures the analog filter's characteristic warmth and in DSP environments.

Applications in Audio and Synthesis

Role in Analog Synthesizers

In analog synthesizers, the voltage-controlled filter (VCF) serves as a core component in the signal path, positioned immediately after the (VCO) and before the voltage-controlled amplifier (VCA). This arrangement enables subtractive synthesis by allowing the VCF to process the rich, harmonic-laden waveforms generated by the VCO, selectively attenuating specific frequency bands to sculpt the overall of the sound. By shaping harmonics in this manner, the VCF transforms raw oscillator outputs—such as sawtooth or square waves—into more nuanced, musical tones that form the foundation of electronic sound design. The VCF's cutoff frequency responds to control voltages from multiple modulation sources, introducing dynamic timbral evolution. Envelope generators, typically configured as ADSR (attack, decay, sustain, release) circuits, apply time-based voltage contours to the VCF, producing sweeps that open or close the filter during a note's lifecycle for effects like plucky attacks or lingering decays. Low-frequency oscillators (LFOs) provide cyclic modulation for rhythmic or expressive variations, such as wah-wah effects that undulate the filter's response. Additionally, keyboard control voltages can track pitch, scaling the cutoff proportionally to note height (e.g., opening the filter more for higher pitches), which adds natural variation across the instrument's range. Low-pass VCFs dominate in analog synthesis for their ability to mellow bright oscillator signals by attenuating higher frequencies, yielding warmer, more vowel-like tones from otherwise harsh waveforms. enhances this by boosting frequencies near the , creating pronounced peaks that evoke structures in vocals or enable dramatic sweeps under modulation. In monophonic designs, a single VCF handles one note at a time, central to the focused subtractive process of classic instruments like the Moog . Polyphonic synthesizers, by contrast, incorporate multiple VCFs—one per voice—to support simultaneous multi-note playback with independent harmonic shaping. Modular synthesizer systems leverage VCFs for versatile subtractive synthesis, where modules connect via patch cables to route audio and control voltages freely. Standards such as 1V/octave control voltage scaling ensure precise filter tracking aligned with pitch across components, particularly in formats, allowing users to patch modulation sources directly to VCF inputs for customized signal flows.

Types of Voltage-Controlled Filters in Synthesis

In subtractive synthesis, low-pass voltage-controlled filters (VCFs) dominate by attenuating higher frequencies above the cutoff point, allowing fundamental and lower harmonics to shape warm, bass-heavy timbres. These filters typically employ slopes of 12 dB/octave (2-pole) for a smoother roll-off that retains more high-frequency content, resulting in rounder, less aggressive sounds suitable for evolving pads or leads. In contrast, 24 dB/octave (4-pole) designs provide steeper attenuation for more pronounced cuts, yielding darker, more defined tones ideal for punchy basses or dramatic sweeps. High-pass VCFs attenuate frequencies below the , emphasizing treble and removing bass rumble to create brighter, thinner sounds often used for sharpening attacks or clearing low-end clutter in mixes. Band-pass VCFs permit a narrow band around the to pass while rejecting others, focusing on emphasis for telephone-like effects or isolating specific harmonics; they are less common than low-pass types but integral to filters that mimic vocal resonances by stacking multiple band-pass stages in series or parallel. Multimode VCFs enhance versatility by switching between low-pass, high-pass, and band-pass responses, often via voltage control, enabling dynamic morphing within a single module for complex in signal chains. Resonance in VCFs boosts gain at the , adding a peak that imparts nasal or gritty character; fixed-Q designs maintain consistent emphasis without instability, while self-oscillating variants—achieved at high levels—generate sine-like tones that track pitch via 1V/ control, functioning as auxiliary voltage-controlled oscillators. Hybrid types, such as state-variable filters, integrate multiple modes into one topology, providing simultaneous low-pass, high-pass, and band-pass outputs from a shared input and , with adjustable for smooth transitions and balanced suitable for modular synthesis applications.

Historical Development and Examples

Origins and Evolution

The development of voltage-controlled filters (VCFs) emerged in the early amid innovations in modular , where voltage control enabled real-time modulation of audio parameters. Early precursors included voltage-controlled modules in synthesizers built by R.A. Moog, Inc., starting in 1964, which marked a shift from rigid laboratory equipment to more flexible systems. Concurrently, constructed the first fully voltage-controlled in 1963, featuring modules for oscillators, amplifiers, and filters that responded to control voltages for pitch, , and . These designs laid the foundation for VCFs by integrating voltage as a universal control signal, allowing musicians to dynamically shape sounds without mechanical adjustments. A pivotal advancement came in 1965 with Robert Moog's invention of the transistor ladder filter for the Moog modular synthesizer, which facilitated practical subtractive synthesis by enabling smooth, voltage-tunable frequency cutoff and resonance. This four-pole low-pass design, using cascaded transistor stages to achieve a 24 dB/octave roll-off, became iconic for its warm, musical timbre and was formalized in U.S. Patent 3,475,623, granted in 1969 after filing in 1966. The ladder filter's voltage control mechanism allowed envelopes and oscillators to modulate the cutoff frequency, revolutionizing sound design in electronic music. During the 1970s, VCF adoption expanded commercially as synthesizer manufacturers standardized voltage control protocols, typically 1 volt per octave for pitch and similar scaling for filters. , founded in 1969, integrated VCFs into its modular system from 1970, offering versatile low-pass and high-pass options for polyphonic and experimental applications. Similarly, EMS's VCS3 , released in 1969, featured voltage-controlled filters inspired by earlier modular concepts, while Oberheim's Synthesizer Expander Module (SEM) in 1974 incorporated a multimode VCF, contributing to the polyphonic boom in rock and . This era solidified VCFs as essential components, with widespread use in studio recordings and live performances. The 1980s and 1990s saw a decline in analog VCF prominence due to the rise of digital synthesizers, such as the in 1983, which offered preset storage, polyphony, and stability without voltage wiring, rendering modular systems cumbersome and expensive. Analog production waned, with many manufacturers like ARP ceasing operations by 1981, but a revival began in the late 1990s through affordable clones of classic circuits and the introduction of the format by Dieter Döpfer in 1995, which standardized 3U panels and voltage levels for accessible modular builds. In the , VCF evolution continued with software emulations that digitally model analog behaviors, such as Arturia's V Collection, first released in 2008 and updated through versions like V11 in 2025, which accurately replicates ladder and other VCF topologies from Moog, ARP, and EMS synths using circuit modeling techniques. Hybrid analog-digital modules also proliferated, combining analog filter cores with digital control and oscillators for enhanced precision and programmability, as seen in systems like the Buchla 200e series revived in the and modern offerings from manufacturers like . These advancements preserved the organic character of analog VCFs while integrating digital efficiencies, sustaining their relevance in production as of 2025.

Notable Designs and Commercial Examples

One of the most influential voltage-controlled filters (VCFs) in history is the Moog 904A, a 4-pole low-pass filter introduced in the 1960s as part of the Moog Modular system. This discrete design, patented by in 1969, is renowned for its warm, creamy resonance and smooth cutoff sweeps, achieved through a that provides 24 dB/octave attenuation. The 904A's distinctive sonic character became a cornerstone of analog synthesis, notably integrated into the , where it defined the instrument's signature filtered leads and basses. The ARP 4012, featured in the semi-modular synthesizer from 1971, represents another seminal 4-pole low-pass VCF with variable slope options up to 24 dB/octave. This encapsulated transistor ladder design, licensed from Moog's patent, delivers punchy, aggressive tones with pronounced resonance, making it ideal for dynamic filtering in and rock applications. Its versatility in the 2600 allowed musicians to achieve bold, percussive sweeps that contrasted with the Moog's smoother response. Tom Oberheim's SEM filter, introduced in 1974 with the Synthesizer Expander Module (SEM), employs a discrete state-variable offering simultaneous low-pass, band-pass, and high-pass outputs at 12 dB/octave. This multimode design provides a bright, musical character with excellent tracking, serving as the foundation for Oberheim's polyphonic synthesizers like the Four-Voice and Eight-Voice. Modern recreations have revitalized these classic designs for formats, enhancing precision and integration. Behringer's 904A module faithfully clones the original Moog , using through-hole components for authentic warmth while improving calibration stability for better 1V/ tracking. Similarly, Intellijel's SVF 1U offers a compact state-variable VCF inspired by multimode circuits, with voltage control over , , and mode morphing, enabling and improved modulation response in contemporary setups. Robert Moog's innovations in voltage control profoundly shaped VCF development, establishing modular synthesis standards through his patented ladder architecture that influenced generations of designers. In DIY communities, Tim Stinchcombe has advanced OTA-based VCFs, creating accessible designs like voltage-controlled circuits using LM13700 amplifiers for flexible, low-cost implementations. The cultural impact of these VCFs is evident in iconic tracks, such as Kraftwerk's use of Moog 904A sweeps in "Autobahn" (1974) to evoke sweeping electronic landscapes. Parliament-Funkadelic similarly leveraged and ARP filters for funky, resonant basslines and leads, as heard in "" (1977), where Bernie Worrell's modulated VCF sweeps added psychedelic groove to the ensemble's sound.

References

  1. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/en/concept/614184
  2. https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electrical_Engineering/Electronics/Operational_Amplifiers_and_Linear_Integrated_Circuits_-_Theory_and_Application_%28Fiore%29/11%253A_Active_Filters/11.11%253A_Voltage-Controlled_Filters_%28Extended_Topic%29
  3. https://reverb.com/news/a-guide-to-synth-filter-types-ladders-steiner-parkers-and-more
  4. https://academic.oup.com/book/27042/chapter/196329343
  5. https://www.elektormagazine.com/magazine/elektor-198199/44909
  6. https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/snoa830
  7. https://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/design-handbooks/basic-linear-design/chapter8.pdf
  8. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/technical-articles/an-introduction-to-filters/
  9. https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/filter-basics-stop-block-and-rolloff
  10. https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sloa049
  11. https://www.soundsemiconductor.com/downloads/AN701.pdf
  12. https://flypaper.soundfly.com/produce/demystifying-control-voltage/
  13. https://northcoastsynthesis.com/news/exponential-converters-and-how-they-work/
  14. https://www.modwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=122249
  15. https://www.reddit.com/r/synthesizers/comments/eaoqes/can_someone_explain_selfoscillating_filters_to_me/
  16. http://www.slightlynasty.com/docs/2251_SVF_Manual_v1.0_RevA.pdf
  17. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm13700.pdf
  18. https://www.experimentalistsanonymous.com/diy/Datasheets/AN6668.pdf
  19. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/technical-articles/characterizing-the-moog-filter/
  20. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~stilti/papers/moogvcf.pdf
  21. http://www.openmusiclabs.com/files/expotemp.pdf
  22. https://www.soundsemiconductor.com/downloads/ssi2140datasheet.pdf
  23. https://musicfromouterspace.com/analogsynth_new/VCO20090724REV0/VCO20090724REV0.html
  24. https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/snoa224
  25. https://spinlab.wpi.edu/courses/ece503_2014/10-3bilinear_transform.pdf
  26. https://web.ece.ucsb.edu/~yoga/courses/DSP/P20_IIR_Filters_Part3.pdf
  27. https://pichenettes.github.io/mutable-instruments-documentation/tech_notes/cv_inputs/
  28. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/fp/footnode.html
  29. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/svf/svf.pdf
  30. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05592
  31. https://docs.arduino.cc/libraries/dspfilters/
  32. https://vcvrack.com/manual/DSP
  33. https://www.ni.com/docs/en-US/bundle/labwindows-cvi/page/advancedanalysisconcepts/lvac_adv_dig_filt.html
  34. https://qmicrowave.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-an-analog-bandpass-filter-vs-digital-filter
  35. https://dafx.de/paper-archive/2004/P_061.PDF
  36. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-subtractive-synthesis
  37. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/pro-audio/tips-and-solutions/a-guide-to-analog-subtractive-synthesis-with-the-moog-phatty-keyboard
  38. https://web.pdx.edu/~bonnie/MUS411/04_Voltage_Control_Synthesis.pdf
  39. https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/control-voltage-what-it-is-and-how-it-works/
  40. https://www.attackmagazine.com/technique/hardware-focus/exploring-analogue-subtractive-synthesis-with-the-moog-mother-32/
  41. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/learning-synthesis-filters
  42. https://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/VAFilterDesign_2.1.0.pdf
  43. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/formant-synthesis
  44. https://northcoastsynthesis.com/news/modular-synthesis-intro-part-8-statevariable-filters/
  45. https://www.vasulka.org/archive/eigenwelt/pdf.old/035-048.pdf
  46. https://buchla.com/history/
  47. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3475623A/en
  48. https://120years.net/arp-synthesisers-arp-usa-1970/
  49. https://econtact.ca/13_4/bode_history.html
  50. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/tom-oberheim-two-voice-pro
  51. https://www.electronicspecifier.com/news/blog/the-rise-fall-and-rise-again-of-the-analogue-synth/
  52. https://www.arturia.com/products/software-instruments/v-collection/overview
  53. https://www.vintagesynth.com/buchla/200e-series
  54. https://www.altomusic.com/products/behringer-grind-hybrid-semi-modular-synthesizer
  55. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/vintage-moog-modular-filters
  56. https://till.com/articles/moog/patents.html
  57. https://www.prosoundweb.com/the-classic-sound-of-the-moog-ladder-filter/
  58. https://till.com/arptech/pdf/4012.pdf
  59. https://djjondent.blogspot.com/2023/05/arp-2600-filter.html
  60. https://www.arturia.com/products/software-effects/sem-filter/overview
  61. https://www.attackmagazine.com/technique/tutorials/whats-up-with-filters-a-practical-guide-to-synthesizer-tone-control/
  62. https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=0720-AAO
  63. https://intellijel.com/shop/eurorack/1u/svf-1u/
  64. https://www.voltagecontrol.blog/synthesizing-a-new-era-with-the-moog-modular/
  65. https://www.thevinylfactory.com/features/the-14-synthesizers-that-shaped-modern-music
  66. https://reverb.com/news/video-the-synth-sounds-of-parliament-funkadelics-bernie-worrell
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.