Hubbry Logo
Vortex generatorVortex generatorMain
Open search
Vortex generator
Community hub
Vortex generator
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Vortex generator
Vortex generator
Vortex generator
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Aftermarket Micro AeroDynamics vortex generators mounted on the wing of a Cessna 182K
Sketch describing how vortex generators improve flow characteristics on a wind turbine
1967 Model Cessna 182K in flight showing after-market vortex generators on the wing leading edge
TA-4SU Super Skyhawk showing the row of vortex generators on the drooped leading edge slats.
The Symphony SA-160 was designed with two unusual vortex generators on its wing to ensure aileron effectiveness through the stall

A vortex generator (VG) is an aerodynamic device, consisting of a small vane usually attached to a lifting surface (or airfoil, such as an aircraft wing)[1] or a rotor blade of a wind turbine.[2] VGs may also be attached to some part of an aerodynamic vehicle such as an aircraft fuselage or a car. When the airfoil or the body is in motion relative to the air, the VG creates a vortex,[1][3] which, by removing some part of the slow-moving boundary layer in contact with the airfoil surface, delays local flow separation and aerodynamic stalling, thereby improving the effectiveness of wings and control surfaces, such as flaps, elevators, ailerons, and rudders.[3]

Method of operation

[edit]

Vortex generators are most often used to delay flow separation. To accomplish this they are often placed on the external surfaces of vehicles[4] and wind turbine blades. On both aircraft and wind turbine blades they are usually installed quite close to the leading edge of the aerofoil in order to maintain steady airflow over the control surfaces at the trailing edge.[3] VGs are typically rectangular or triangular, about as tall as the local boundary layer, and run in spanwise lines usually near the thickest part of the wing.[1] They can be seen on the wings and vertical tails of many airliners.

Vortex generators are positioned obliquely so that they have an angle of attack with respect to the local airflow[1] in order to create a tip vortex which draws energetic, rapidly moving outside air into the slow-moving boundary layer in contact with the surface. A turbulent boundary layer is less likely to separate than a laminar one, and is therefore desirable to ensure effectiveness of trailing-edge control surfaces. Vortex generators are used to trigger this transition. Other devices such as vortilons, leading-edge extensions, and leading-edge cuffs,[5] also delay flow separation at high angles of attack by re-energizing the boundary layer.[1][3]

Examples of aircraft which use VGs include the ST Aerospace A-4SU Super Skyhawk and Symphony SA-160. For swept-wing transonic designs, VGs alleviate potential shock-stall problems (e.g., Harrier, Blackburn Buccaneer, Gloster Javelin).

Aftermarket installation

[edit]

Many aircraft carry vane vortex generators from time of manufacture, but there are also aftermarket suppliers who sell VG kits to improve the STOL performance of some light aircraft.[6] Aftermarket suppliers claim (i) that VGs lower stall speed and reduce take-off and landing speeds, and (ii) that VGs increase the effectiveness of ailerons, elevators and rudders, thereby improving controllability and safety at low speeds.[7] For home-built and experimental kitplanes, VGs are cheap, cost-effective and can be installed quickly; but for certified aircraft installations, certification costs can be high, making the modification a relatively expensive process.[6][8]

Owners fit aftermarket VGs primarily to gain benefits at low speeds, but a downside is that such VGs may reduce cruise speed slightly. In tests performed on a Cessna 182 and a Piper PA-28-235 Cherokee, independent reviewers have documented a loss of cruise speed of 1.5 to 2.0 kn (2.8 to 3.7 km/h). However, these losses are relatively minor, since an aircraft wing at high speed has a small angle of attack, thereby reducing VG drag to a minimum.[8][9][10]

Owners have reported that on the ground, it can be harder to clear snow and ice from wing surfaces with VGs than from a smooth wing, but VGs are not generally prone to inflight icing as they reside within the boundary layer of airflow. VGs may also have sharp edges which can tear the fabric of airframe covers and may thus require special covers to be made.[8][9][10]

For twin-engined aircraft, manufacturers claim that VGs reduce single-engine control speed (Vmca), increase zero fuel and gross weight, improve the effectiveness of ailerons and rudder, provide a smoother ride in turbulence and make the aircraft a more stable instrument platform.[6]

Increase in maximum takeoff weight

[edit]

Some VG kits available for light twin-engine airplanes may allow an increase in maximum takeoff weight.[6] The maximum takeoff weight of a twin-engine airplane is determined by structural requirements and single-engine climb performance requirements (which are lower for a lower stall speed). For many light twin-engine airplanes, the single-engine climb performance requirements determine a lower maximum weight rather than the structural requirements. Consequently, anything that can be done to improve the single-engine-inoperative climb performance will bring about an increase in maximum takeoff weight.[8]

In the US from 1945[11] until 1991,[12] the one-engine-inoperative climb requirement for multi-engine airplanes with a maximum takeoff weight of 6,000 lb (2,700 kg) or less was as follows:

All multi-engine airplanes having a stalling speed greater than 70 miles per hour shall have a steady rate of climb of at least in feet per minute at an altitude of 5,000 feet with the critical engine inoperative and the remaining engines operating at not more than maximum continuous power, the inoperative propeller in the minimum drag position, landing gear retracted, wing flaps in the most favorable position …

where is the stalling speed in the landing configuration in miles per hour.

Installation of vortex generators can usually bring about a slight reduction in stalling speed of an airplane[4] and therefore reduce the required one-engine-inoperative climb performance. The reduced requirement for climb performance allows an increase in maximum takeoff weight, at least up to the maximum weight allowed by structural requirements.[8] An increase in maximum weight allowed by structural requirements can usually be achieved by specifying a maximum zero fuel weight or, if a maximum zero fuel weight is already specified as one of the airplane's limitations, by specifying a new higher maximum zero fuel weight.[8] For these reasons, vortex generator kits for many light twin-engine airplanes are accompanied by a reduction in maximum zero fuel weight and an increase in maximum takeoff weight.[8]

The one-engine-inoperative rate-of-climb requirement does not apply to single-engine airplanes, so gains in the maximum takeoff weight (based on stall speed or structural considerations) are less significant compared to those for 1945–1991 twins.

After 1991, the airworthiness certification requirements in the USA specify the one-engine-inoperative climb requirement as a gradient independent of stalling speed, so there is less opportunity for vortex generators to increase the maximum takeoff weight of multi-engine airplanes whose certification basis is FAR 23 at amendment 23-42 or later.[12]

Maximum landing weight

[edit]

Because the landing weights of most light aircraft are determined by structural considerations and not by stall speed, most VG kits increase only the takeoff weight and not the landing weight. Any increase in landing weight would require either structural modifications or re-testing the aircraft at the higher landing weight to demonstrate that the certification requirements are still met.[8] However, after a lengthy flight, sufficient fuel may have been used, thereby bringing the aircraft back below the permitted maximum landing weight.

Aircraft noise reduction

[edit]

Vortex generators have been used on the wing underside of Airbus A320 family aircraft to reduce noise generated by airflow over circular pressure equalisation vents for the fuel tanks. Lufthansa claims a noise reduction of up to 2 dB can thus be achieved.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Vortex generator

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A vortex generator (VG) is a small aerodynamic device, typically a low-aspect-ratio vane or tab mounted perpendicular to a lifting surface such as an aircraft , that creates controlled vortices to energize the low-speed by mixing it with higher-energy free-stream , thereby delaying and improving aerodynamic performance. These devices are usually arranged in pairs or arrays, spaced a few inches apart and angled at 12° to 15° relative to the oncoming , often positioned ahead of control surfaces like ailerons to maintain flow at high angles of attack. The concept of vortex generators originated in the mid-20th century, with early applications documented in a 1947 United Aircraft Corporation report by H. D. Taylor, which demonstrated their effectiveness in suppressing boundary layer separation in diffusers and subsonic flows. Since then, VGs have been extensively studied and refined through experimental and computational methods, including NASA investigations into their modeling for turbomachinery and wing applications, confirming their role in thinning the boundary layer. In aviation, they enable lower stall speeds, better roll control during stalls, and enhanced lift coefficients without significant cruise drag penalties when optimized. Beyond aircraft, vortex generators find use in diverse fields, including wind turbine blades to mitigate stall and boost energy capture at low wind speeds, automotive designs for drag reduction on trailers, and even marine propellers for efficiency gains. Modern variants include micro-VGs and active systems that deploy selectively, as explored in sustainable aviation research to minimize fuel burn across flight phases. Their design—often aluminum or composite vanes less than 1% of chord length—balances minimal added weight against substantial performance benefits, making them a staple in aerodynamic flow control.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A vortex generator (VG) is a small aerodynamic device, typically consisting of a vane, tab, or plate attached to a lifting surface such as an wing or a blade, designed to produce streamwise vortices that interact with the . These vortices arise from the device's orientation relative to the oncoming flow, creating controlled swirling motions that influence the airflow characteristics near the surface. The primary purpose of vortex generators is to delay by energizing the low-momentum fluid in the through mixing with higher-energy freestream flow, thereby enhancing aerodynamic efficiency. This mechanism improves lift generation, reduces drag penalties associated with separation, and postpones conditions, leading to better overall performance in high- or adverse flow scenarios. By maintaining attached flow over surfaces, VGs contribute to safer and more effective operation across various engineering contexts. Vortex generators are broadly classified into passive and active types, with passive designs being the most prevalent due to their simplicity and lack of energy requirements. Passive VGs are fixed vanes or plates that generate vortices solely through aerodynamic forces, while active variants, such as deployable flaps or synthetic jet actuators, incorporate mechanisms for on-demand operation to adapt to varying flow conditions. First conceptualized in the late 1940s for applications, vortex generators have since expanded to broader uses, including wind energy systems and ground vehicles, underscoring their versatility in flow control.

Principles of Operation

Vortex generators (VGs) operate by protruding into the of a flow, typically as small vanes or plates oriented at an to the oncoming flow, which induces the formation of counter-rotating vortex pairs. These vortices generate spanwise flow components that effectively transport high-momentum from the outer inviscid region into the low-momentum near-wall area of the , thereby enhancing overall flow stability and attachment to the surface. The interaction with the boundary layer primarily delays the transition from laminar to turbulent flow or re-energizes regions prone to separation by promoting three-dimensional mixing without significantly altering the mean streamwise velocity profile far from the wall. Vortex strength is closely tied to the VG height hh, which is optimally set to approximately 0.5 to 1 times the local boundary layer thickness δ\delta, ensuring the device remains embedded within the layer to maximize momentum transfer while minimizing parasitic effects. A key aspect of this mechanism is quantified by the circulation Γ\Gamma around each vortex, approximated as Γ≈U∞hsin⁡α\Gamma \approx U_\infty h \sin \alpha, where U∞U_\infty is the freestream and α\alpha is the incidence angle of the VG; this circulation drives the induced tangential uθ≈Γ2πru_\theta \approx \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi r}, with rr as the radial distance from the vortex core, facilitating the necessary cross-stream mixing to counteract adverse gradients. Flow visualization techniques, such as smoke wire methods, oil flow patterns, or particle image velocimetry (PIV), reveal the trailing vortices as persistent streamwise structures that alter the surface pressure distribution by reducing peaks and increase local skin friction through enhanced shear in the mixed region. However, if VGs are oversized relative to δ\delta or improperly positioned, they can generate excessive form drag and amplify intensity, potentially leading to net performance degradation rather than improvement.

History

Invention and Early Development

The vortex generator was first proposed by H. D. Taylor in 1947 while working at the , initially to eliminate in diffusers through . This development occurred in the post-World War II era. Taylor's approach involved creating streamwise vortices to mix high-energy free-stream air into the low-momentum , thereby preventing separation without requiring complex mechanical systems. Early prototypes consisted of simple metal tabs or vanes hand-attached to wind tunnel models, positioned normal to the surface at small incidence angles to generate the desired vortices. These devices, typically with heights comparable to the boundary layer thickness, were tested in controlled environments to validate their ability to delay separation in diffusers and, subsequently, on airfoil sections. First patents related to vortex generators for aerodynamic applications were filed in the early 1950s by aeronautical engineers at organizations like United Aircraft, formalizing the technology for potential aircraft integration. The initial focus remained on experimental validation rather than full-scale deployment. A key early publication was Taylor's 1950 summary report, which detailed the fundamental vortex effects, including momentum transfer mechanisms and performance improvements in turbulent boundary layers. This work synthesized findings from tests and laid the groundwork for broader adoption. Vortex generators represented an evolution from precursors like fences, which restricted spanwise flow, and trips, which promoted transition to ; unlike these, vortex generators specifically produced longitudinal vortices for sustained energization.

Adoption and Evolution

The adoption of vortex generators in aviation accelerated during the 1950s and 1960s, marking their transition from experimental devices to standard features on commercial and military aircraft. The Boeing 707, introduced in 1958, was among the first commercial jetliners to integrate vortex generators on its wings to mitigate stall characteristics and enhance low-speed controllability. In military applications, vortex generators were employed on fighter aircraft such as swept-wing designs to improve maneuverability at transonic speeds by delaying flow separation and augmenting lift during high-angle-of-attack maneuvers. During the and , vortex generator technology evolved through material innovations and computational advancements, broadening their utility in . Materials shifted from heavy metal tabs to lighter plastic and composite variants, reducing structural penalties while maintaining aerodynamic effectiveness. Optimization techniques, including early applications of (CFD), enabled precise placement and sizing to maximize . A key milestone was NASA's in the on the F-8 supercritical airplane, where vortex generators were used to suppress and influence buffet characteristics at speeds. Additionally, FAA supplemental type certificates (STCs) issued in the late facilitated vortex generators on existing fleets for performance upgrades, such as improved margins. From the 1990s onward, innovations like micro-vortex generators and active variants expanded the technology's scope beyond traditional . Micro-vortex generators, scaled down to sub-boundary-layer heights, emerged in the late and gained prominence in the 1990s for , offering reduced drag while preserving lift benefits. Active vortex generators, which deploy dynamically via actuators, were developed in the to provide on-demand flow control, minimizing constant drag penalties. Concurrently, post-1970s oil crises spurred adoption in wind energy during the , where vortex generators on blades increased annual energy production by up to 2.6% at low wind speeds by stabilizing airflow and delaying separation. In the , computational tools including CFD have refined designs for emerging applications like drones and electric vertical takeoff vehicles, enhancing efficiency in urban and low-speed environments. Throughout this evolution, early challenges such as induced drag were addressed through meticulous tuning of generator spacing and height, ensuring net aerodynamic gains; for instance, optimal spacing ratios around five times the generator height can boost lift by nearly 50% with minimal drag increase. Patents in the further propelled non-aviation uses, such as in , by protecting designs for management on ground vehicles.

Applications

In Aviation

Vortex generators are widely used in aviation to manage airflow over surfaces, enhancing overall flight characteristics without requiring extensive structural changes. These small aerodynamic devices are typically installed on to improve performance during critical flight phases, such as takeoff, , and low-speed maneuvers. In design, vortex generators are primarily located on wings at the leading or trailing edges, tailplanes, , and flaps to control spanwise flow and prevent tip stall. On wings, they are often placed forward of control surfaces like ailerons to maintain attached airflow during high angles of attack. strakes, a type of vortex generator, are strategically positioned on engine pods to induce vortices that stabilize flow around protrusions. Their application spans various aircraft types, including general aviation planes like the , where they are a popular (STC) modification for better handling. Commercial airliners, such as the , incorporate them as nacelle strakes to optimize engine airflow. In military jets, like the F/A-18 Hornet variants, vortex generators support high-alpha performance by mitigating in inlets and wings during aggressive maneuvers. Integration typically involves counter-rotating pairs on airfoils to generate paired vortices that effectively energize the while minimizing drag penalties. These installations must comply with aviation regulations, such as FAR Part 25 for transport category airplanes, ensuring certification through and for supplemental type certificates. The broader benefits in include enhanced low-speed handling for safer approaches, improved short-field performance on STOL-configured , and gust load alleviation to reduce structural stresses during turbulent conditions—all achieved without major redesigns. Vortex generators are widely used in modern and have seen growing adoption in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) since the to optimize endurance and maneuverability in diverse missions.

In Wind Energy and Other Fields

Vortex generators (VGs) are employed on wind turbine blades to delay boundary layer separation, particularly at low wind speeds where flow detachment typically reduces efficiency. By energizing the boundary layer through induced vortices, these devices maintain attached flow over the airfoil, thereby enhancing lift and overall aerodynamic performance. Studies have shown that applying VGs to turbine blades can increase annual energy production (AEP) by an average of 2.6% under low-wind conditions, with broader implementations yielding gains of up to 2%. For instance, Vestas has integrated VGs into the blades of its V90-3.0 MW turbines as part of aerodynamic upgrades, contributing to improved energy yields since the late 2000s. In wind energy applications, these modifications focus on optimizing the power coefficient (Cp), with reported improvements of up to 3%, contrasting with aviation uses that prioritize lift enhancement at high angles of attack. Specialized VG designs, such as those exhibiting , further refine axial flow control on blades by promoting self-similar vortex structures that sustain transfer along the span. This configuration mitigates separation more effectively in the rotor's rotational environment, leading to sustained gains across varying regimes. Retrofits of such VGs on existing have demonstrated consistent AEP uplifts of 1.7-2%, underscoring their role in extending the operational life and output of aging farms. Beyond , VGs find applications in , where they are integrated into spoilers and body panels of race cars to generate and reduce drag in ground effect. These devices create controlled vortices that energize the underbody flow, preventing separation and improving high-speed stability; for example, parametric studies on ground vehicles show drag reductions of up to 4.23% with optimized VG placements. In marine contexts, VGs are applied to hydrofoils and hulls to enhance hydrodynamic by delaying separation in turbulent water flows, thereby reducing viscous drag on high-block-coefficient ships. Research on wedged VGs for vessels indicates net drag reductions through re-energization, analogous to their roles but adapted for submerged conditions. In heat exchangers, VGs promote to boost rates while minimizing losses; configurations like modified delta-wing VGs have achieved increases alongside drag reductions of 3.2%, making them valuable for compact thermal systems in industrial applications. For ground vehicles beyond racing, underbody VGs on sedans and SUVs manage , yielding drag coefficients improvements through vortex-induced mixing that delays rear-end separation. These non-aeronautical uses highlight VGs' versatility in stationary and low-speed , prioritizing energy efficiency and load management over dynamic lift control.

Aerodynamic Effects in Aircraft

Lift and Drag Modifications

Vortex generators (VGs) primarily enhance lift on airfoils by energizing the , which delays and increases the maximum (C_{L_{max}}) through controlled vortex formation that mixes high-momentum free-stream air into the low-energy near the surface. Typical increases in C_{L_{max}} range from 10% to 20% for optimized configurations across various airfoil types, as documented in aerodynamic studies. For instance, investigations on airfoils have shown lift enhancements at high angles of attack with appropriately shaped VGs. Regarding drag, VGs introduce a small penalty due to their form drag, typically on the order of ΔC_D ≈ 0.001-0.002 at cruise conditions, yet they yield a net reduction in profile drag under off-design conditions by mitigating separation-induced pressure drag. investigations confirm this trade-off, with minimal drag increments for VGs placed forward on the chord, and greater benefits in separated flow regimes. Optimal placement of VGs on subsonic airfoils typically occurs just ahead of the expected separation point, often around 20-60% of the chord length, to target the effectively. This positioning allows generated vortices to interact with the without excessive disruption. Empirical testing underscores these modifications: data reveal stall angle increases by several degrees with VG application, extending the usable lift range. In a real-world example, tests on a scaled Piper Cherokee wing with rectangular VGs in co-rotating arrays demonstrated lift enhancements compared to the clean configuration. The trade-offs are angle-of-attack dependent, with pronounced lift benefits and drag reductions emerging at higher AoA where separation risks rise, while cruise conditions experience negligible gains offset by the minor parasitic penalty.

Stall Prevention and Control Enhancement

Vortex generators (VGs) mitigate stall in aircraft by generating streamwise vortices that energize the through enhanced mixing of high-momentum free-stream air with low-momentum near-wall flow, thereby promoting flow reattachment and delaying separation to higher angles of attack (AoA). This mechanism maintains attached airflow over the wing surface, reducing the likelihood of abrupt lift loss during high-AoA maneuvers such as approaches. On control surfaces like s and elevators, VGs stabilize airflow and prevent premature separation, which enhances control authority at near- conditions. This improvement is particularly valuable for preserving handling qualities when the main is approaching . Placement of VGs is critical for prevention, with outboard installations on wingtips delaying tip to preserve effectiveness and prevent uncommanded roll-off, while inboard placements focus on flow control. An empirical design rule sets VG height at approximately h ≈ δ, where δ is the local , to optimize vortex strength without excessive drag. Notable case studies illustrate these benefits: Aftermarket VG kits on aircraft have demonstrated reduced stall speeds and improved low-speed handling. Despite these advantages, VGs have limitations; they are less effective in fully separated flows or regimes where shock waves can interfere with vortex effects.

Performance Impacts

Weight and Load Considerations

Vortex generators (VGs) can enable increases in an 's maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) by enhancing climb performance and reducing speeds, thereby allowing for higher gross weights under FAA supplemental type certificates (STCs). For instance, an STC for the Piper PA-23-250 permits a 5% increase in takeoff gross weight through VG installation on the wing and . Similar approvals for light twin-engine , such as the 414A, allow gross weight increases of up to 350 pounds, while the T310R benefits from a 385-pound rise in zero-fuel weight, equating to roughly 5-10% gains relative to baseline MTOW in these categories. While VGs do not alter the structural (MLW), their improvement in low-speed control and stall characteristics permits safer approaches at or near MLW without necessitating speed reductions that could compromise safety margins. This enhanced handling ensures compliance with operational limits during landing, avoiding penalties from excessive speeds tied to inadequate airflow management. The structural implications of VGs include minimal added weight, typically constituting less than 0.5% of the 's empty mass due to their small size and use of lightweight aluminum construction. However, the devices redistribute aerodynamic loads across the , necessitating during to verify long-term integrity under cyclic stresses. For transport-category , such evaluations align with FAA regulations under 14 CFR 25.345, which specify load factors for high-lift configurations, ensuring VGs do not exceed design envelopes. Historical retrofits, such as those on 1970s-era commercial jets like the series using vortilons (a variant of VGs), were certified without significant MTOW changes but demonstrated load redistribution benefits under similar regulatory scrutiny. Trade-offs involve a slight rise in empty weight from the VGs themselves, which can partially offset gains, though the net aerodynamic advantages generally prevail in certified applications.

Noise Reduction

Vortex generators (VGs) installed on flaps and slats mitigate noise during landing configurations by energizing the , smoothing , and diminishing at high-lift device edges. This process reduces the intensity of turbulent shear layers that generate acoustic radiation, particularly from the interaction of separated flows with trailing edges. Targeted applications on flap side-edges have yielded up to 1.5 dB in specific frequency bands. Specific implementations include VGs on struts and high-lift devices to control bluff-body wakes and cove instabilities. For instance, experiments in the on modified high-lift systems, including flap noise assessments, reported approximately 3 dB reductions in flap-generated noise through VG-induced flow diffusion. These devices are particularly effective on slat coves and flap tips, where they alter spanwise loading gradients to suppress edge vortex formation. Acoustically, VGs suppress broadband noise arising from turbulent mixing in shear layers, primarily affecting frequencies between 500 and 2000 Hz, which dominate contributions during approach. By promoting earlier transition to and reducing large-scale coherent structures, they attenuate the radiated power from these mechanisms without significantly altering overall lift. This targeted suppression aligns with regulatory requirements, such as FAA Stage 5 noise standards, which mandate cumulative reductions for community exposure. In practice, the employs vortex generators as a retrofit to reduce whistling noise from wing tank vents during approach, achieving up to 4 dB reduction as of and contributing to community noise compliance. However, VGs have minimal impact on cruise noise levels and are most effective when integrated with complementary treatments, such as acoustic liners in nacelles, to address multifaceted noise sources.

Installation and Design

Original Equipment Integration

In the design phase of aircraft manufacturing, vortex generators (VGs) are optimized for placement using (CFD) simulations and testing to ensure effective flow control without compromising overall . These methods allow engineers to model vortex interactions with the boundary layer, determining precise locations—typically ahead of potential separation points—to maximize lift enhancement and delay. Materials for VGs in (OEM) applications commonly include lightweight aluminum alloys, such as 6063-T6, or composite materials, which are bonded to the using high-strength adhesives like AA 330 to ensure durability under aerodynamic loads. During the manufacturing process, VGs are produced via CNC machining for metal variants or molding for composites, enabling precise replication of aerodynamic shapes. They are installed on wing surfaces prior to the painting stage to integrate seamlessly with the skin, avoiding surface irregularities that could arise from post-paint adhesion. Array spacing is typically set at 3 to 5 times the chordwise height of the individual generators to optimize vortex merging and energization without excessive drag penalties. OEM integration of VGs has been a standard practice in modern commercial aircraft, such as models where they contribute to flow management on wings and control surfaces as part of the baseline design. This factory-level incorporation minimizes production disruptions and ensures aerodynamic consistency across the fleet. , such as smart or retractable vortex generators, are being explored for future OEM designs to further optimize performance across flight regimes. VGs undergo rigorous testing as integral components of the , including full-scale static load evaluations and flutter dynamics assessments to verify structural integrity under operational stresses. Durability is confirmed through compliance with standards like , which includes vibration and environmental exposure protocols relevant to VG performance in flight conditions. The primary advantages of OEM VG integration lie in achieving seamless aerodynamic surfaces that enhance performance from the outset, eliminating the need for subsequent field modifications and supporting efficient certification processes.

Aftermarket and Retrofit Methods

The retrofit process for installing vortex generators on existing aircraft typically begins with thorough surface preparation to ensure adhesion and longevity. The aircraft surfaces, such as wings, horizontal stabilizers, and vertical stabilizers, must be cleaned to remove contaminants like dirt, grease, and old paint using approved solvents, followed by abrading or scuffing to create a suitable bonding area without compromising the airframe integrity. Adhesives commonly employed include high-strength double-sided tapes, such as 3M VHB acrylic foam tapes, which provide a secure, weather-resistant bond suitable for aerodynamic environments. Precise alignment is achieved using manufacturer-provided templates or laser-guided tools to position the generators at specific chord percentages and spacings, often requiring masking tape for temporary placement before final commitment. For small general aviation aircraft, the full installation, including both wings and control surfaces, generally requires 6-14 man-hours, depending on the aircraft size and installer experience, and must be performed by certified mechanics in accordance with FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) instructions. Several suppliers offer STC-approved kits tailored for aftermarket retrofits, enabling compliance with FAA regulations for certified . Micro AeroDynamics provides comprehensive made from aircraft-grade aluminum, including all necessary vortex generators, templates, adhesives, and installation manuals, with STCs available for models like the Cessna 150/152, 172, and Maule M-7 series. Other providers, such as BLR and D'Shannon , offer similar certified options for twin-engine and Beechcraft , with permanent metal generators suitable for both certified and experimental applications. These are designed for field installation without major modifications. Costs for on small typically range from $750 to $3,245, excluding labor. Retrofitting vortex generators presents specific challenges, particularly regarding airframe stress analysis and certification compliance. Installers must conduct or reference engineering evaluations to verify that added components do not induce unintended aerodynamic loads or fatigue on aging structures, often requiring FAA Form 337 documentation for major alterations. Improper installation or use of non-STC kits can void manufacturer warranties and necessitate additional inspections to maintain airworthiness directives. Precise placement is critical to avoid interference with existing seams, rivets, or inspection panels, potentially complicating non-destructive testing if generators obstruct access points. Historical examples illustrate the application of retrofits to extend service life on aging fleets. In the late , Douglas Aircraft introduced vortilons—specialized leading-edge vortex generators—as an optional modification for DC-9 aircraft, aimed at improving high-speed stability and reducing vertical bounce during cruise; this modification was applied to existing fleets to enhance handling without full redesigns. Similar retrofits in the on DC-9 and MD-80 series helped prolong operational viability, providing measurable safety and efficiency gains for operators. Maintenance of retrofitted vortex generators follows FAA (AC) 43.13-1B guidelines for inspections and repairs, emphasizing periodic visual checks for , damage, or looseness. Pilots and mechanics should inspect the generators pre-flight and during routine 100-hour or annual inspections, looking for signs of , , or aerodynamic wear, with repairs limited to replacing individual units using approved methods. Removal for non-destructive testing is feasible with non-destructive adhesives, allowing temporary detachment without residue or damage, though certified installations require logging all actions in the records.

References

  1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050205648/downloads/20050205648.pdf
  2. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/07_phak_ch5_0.pdf
  3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19870009489/downloads/19870009489.pdf
  4. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890005715
  5. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2013-01-2458/
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0029801823012921
  7. https://microaero.com/
  8. https://www.nasa.gov/aeronautics/nasa-looks-for-a-new-twist-on-sustainable-aviation/
  9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110016237/downloads/20110016237.pdf
  10. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/37/3/031307/3341063/An-overview-of-flow-control-in-aerodynamic
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/vortex-generator
  12. https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2014/04/epjconf_efm-13_02003.pdf
  13. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/papers/AIAA-2005-1003-Dudek.pdf
  14. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680068324/downloads/19680068324_Update.pdf
  15. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2740596A/en
  16. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930086870/downloads/19930086870.pdf
  17. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc57635/
  18. https://avweb.com/features/vortex-generators-50-years-of-performance-benefits/
  19. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19770025136/downloads/19770025136.pdf
  20. https://planeandpilotmag.com/micro-aerodynamics-celebrates-25-years-and-19000-vg-kits/
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3197/13/4/101
  22. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/SMASIS/proceedings-abstract/SMASIS2017/58257/281858
  23. https://www.aip.org/scilights/vortex-generators-make-wind-turbines-more-efficient
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963821004508
  25. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/24/5495
  26. https://patents.google.com/patent/EP1896323B1/en
  27. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aerodynamics/vortex-generators/
  28. https://blog.gridpro.com/aircraft-vortex-generators-the-nacelle-strakes/
  29. https://www.knots2u.net/vortex-generator-kit-cessna-172-models/
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960009109/downloads/19960009109.pdf
  31. https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/0F7991D8CAA8E592862579C1007999E4.0001
  32. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2017/august/flight-training-magazine/vortex-generators
  33. https://aviationconsumer.com/accessories/vortex-generators-got-stol-think-twice/
  34. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2025-1069
  35. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/vortex-generators-explained.124732/
  36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijae/6134144
  37. https://www.vestas.com/content/dam/vestas-com/global/en/brochures/product-improvements/Aerodynamic_Upgrades_Case_Study.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
  38. https://waila.se/en/aerodynamic-upgrades-with-vortex-generators-and-gurney-flaps-independent-validation-by-waila/
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/we.1882
  40. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/fluidsengineering/article/136/2/021102/372272/Automotive-Application-of-Vortex-Generators-in
  41. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/5712md71k
  42. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/163438/Kimmeth-jackk752-smme-meche-2025-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  43. https://www.ijirset.com/upload/2017/tapsa/11_auto_019.PDF
  44. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030000983
  45. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2514/1.J052529
  46. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930086739/downloads/19930086739.pdf
  47. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/103353/193_2015_551_ReferencePDF.pdf?sequence=1&amp%3BisAllowed=y
  48. https://peer.asee.org/determining-an-optimum-vortex-generator-configuration-for-a-piper-cherokee-wing.pdf
  49. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030000983
  50. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930084217/downloads/19930084217.pdf
  51. https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/microvgkits2.php
  52. https://microaero.com/products/cessna-414a-2/
  53. https://avweb.com/features_old/vortex-generators-band-aids-or-magic/
  54. https://aviationconsumer.com/misc/vortex-generatorshigh-value-safety-enhancers-2/
  55. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25/subpart-C/subject-group-ECFR3e855ea22ea15d0/section-25.345
  56. https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/351749-why-vortilons-dc-9-md-80-b717.html
  57. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2514/6.2017-4030
  58. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050186546/downloads/20050186546.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318143054_Airframe_Noise_Reduction_of_Flap_Side-edge_Using_Vortex_Generators
  60. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac_36-4d.pdf
  61. https://condor-newsroom.condor.com/en/us/news-article/active-noise-control-condors-airbus-fleet-upgraded-with-vortex-generators-1/
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960027891/downloads/19960027891.pdf
  63. https://www.iccfd.org/iccfd10/papers/ICCFD10-019-Paper.pdf
  64. https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/microvgkits9.php
  65. https://www.globeair.com/g/vortex-generator
  66. https://aia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42774-023-00137-1
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358727370_Analysis_of_the_effect_of_vortex_generator_spacing_on_boundary_layer_flow_separation_control
  68. https://www.hpcuserforum.com/presentations/dearborn2010/DesignofBoeingCommercialTransports.pdf
  69. https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/departments/testing-vortex-generators-that-get-out-of-the-way/
  70. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADB184362.pdf
  71. https://cvgstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/MIL-STD-810H-Method-514.8-Vibration.pdf
  72. https://www.stolspeed.com/installing-vortex-generators
  73. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/vortex-generator-installation.54269/
  74. https://microaero.com/products/cessna-150-150a-e-2/
  75. https://www.blraerospace.com/products/vortex-generators
  76. https://www.d-shannon-aviation.com/upgrades/vortex-generators-solution.html
  77. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentid/74417
  78. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac_43.13-1b_w-chg1.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.