Hubbry Logo
WanderwortWanderwortMain
Open search
Wanderwort
Community hub
Wanderwort
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wanderwort
Wanderwort
Wanderwort
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A Wanderwort (German: [ˈvandɐvɔʁt] 'migrant word', sometimes pluralized as Wanderwörter, usually capitalized following German practice) is a word that has spread as a loanword among numerous languages and cultures, especially those that are far away from one another. As such, Wanderwörter are a curiosity in historical linguistics and sociolinguistics within a wider study of language contact.[1] At a sufficient time depth, it can be very difficult to establish in which language or language family a Wanderwort originated and into which it was borrowed.

Frequently, they are spread through trade networks, sometimes to describe a previously unfamiliar plant, animal or food.

Examples

[edit]

Typical examples of Wanderwörter are cannabis, sugar,[2] ginger, copper,[1] silver,[3] cumin, mint, wine, and honey, some of which can be traced back to Bronze Age trade.

Four Wanderwörter with the meaning 'camel'. Extensive loaning has carried Semitic, Turkic, Indo-Iranian, and Chinese words for 'camel' throughout Africa and Eurasia.

Tea, with its Eurasian continental variant chai (both have entered English), is an example[1] whose spread occurred relatively late in human history and is therefore fairly well understood: tea is from Hokkien 茶 tê, specifically Amoy dialect, from the Fujianese port of Xiamen, hence it is the maritime variant, while 茶 chá (whence chai)[4] is used in Cantonese and Mandarin.[5] (See etymology of tea for further details.)

Chocolate and tomato were both taken from Classical Nahuatl via Spanish into many different languages, although the specific origin of chocolate is obscure.

Farang, a term derived from the ethnonym Frank through Andalusian Arabic, refers to foreigners (typically white and European ones). From the above two languages, the word has been loaned into many languages spoken on or near the Indian Ocean, including Hindi, Thai, and Amharic, among others. It also existed in Russian in the form "фрязин" with the same meaning.

Kangaroo was taken from the Guugu Yimithirr word for the eastern grey kangaroo; it entered English through the records of James Cook's expedition of 1770 and through English to languages around the world.

Orange originated in a Dravidian language (likely Tamil, Telugu or Malayalam), and its likely path to English included, in order, Sanskrit, Persian, possibly Armenian, Arabic, Italian, and Old French. (See Orange (word) § Etymology for further details.)

The words for 'horse' across many Eurasian languages seem to be related such as Mongolian морь (mor), Manchu ᠮᠣᡵᡳᠨ (morin), Korean 말 (mal), Japanese 馬 (uma), and Thai ม้า (máː), as well as Sino-Tibetan languages like Mandarin 馬 (mǎ). It is present in several Celtic and Germanic languages, whence Irish marc and English mare.[6][7]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wanderwort

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Wanderwort (German for "wandering word") is a that has diffused widely across multiple s and families, typically through cultural exchange, , or rather than genetic from a common , often rendering its original source untraceable. These terms are distinguished from ordinary loanwords by their extensive geographical and linguistic spread, frequently linked to culturally significant items such as goods, technologies, or innovations that facilitate their migration via borrowing networks, which may occur in chain-like sequences or starburst patterns from a central point. Unlike cognates in related languages, which exhibit regular sound correspondences, Wanderwörter lack such systematic patterns, reflecting their borrowed nature and complicating etymological reconstruction in . Prominent examples illustrate this phenomenon: the word for "tea," originating from Chinese té, spread globally through maritime trade routes, appearing as Dutch thee, English tea, and variants in numerous other languages; similarly, "sugar" derives from Arabic sukkar and traveled via Persian, Greek, and Latin into European tongues. Other cases include the term for "pot" or "vessel," reconstructed as Indo-European pod-, which parallels Finno-Ugric pata and Dravidian patalV, tied to the Neolithic spread of ceramic technology around the 6th millennium BCE. In non-Indo-European contexts, Wanderwörter like hipa for "coca" in South American languages or moji for "datura" in North American ones highlight diffusion through indigenous trade and ritual practices, often involving 15 or more borrowing events across unrelated families. In , Wanderwörter serve as key indicators of past social networks, cultural contacts, and migrations, providing evidence of interactions that transcend genetic language boundaries and revealing patterns of areal influence. Their study often employs quantitative methods, such as clustering algorithms to identify high-frequency loans as outliers among typical borrowings, underscoring their role in reconstructing beyond written records. While challenging due to phonetic adaptations and multiple transmission paths, analyzing these words enhances understanding of how languages evolve through contact, with implications for fields like and .

Definition and Terminology

Linguistic Definition

A is a that diffuses across multiple unrelated s and families over broad geographical regions, typically through successive borrowings enabled by cultural, , or migratory contacts, rather than direct from a shared . This process often obscures the word's ultimate origin, as it passes through numerous intermediaries, creating a trail of adaptations without a clear single source. Central attributes of Wanderwörter encompass their extensive distribution beyond any one , frequent linkage to for cultural novelties such as technologies, , commodities, or rituals, and preservation of a consistent semantic core amid potential phonetic and morphological shifts to align with borrowing languages' structures. These traits highlight their role in reflecting historical interconnections rather than endogenous vocabulary development. In contrast to standard loanwords, which generally feature direct transmission between a donor and one or few recipients with identifiable directionality, Wanderwörter exhibit serial diffusion via intermediary chains (e.g., sequential transfers across languages A to B to C), fostering intricate borrowing networks like linear paths or radial expansions. This multiplicity of transmissions sets them apart, complicating etymological reconstruction while underscoring patterns of prolonged cultural interaction. The term Wanderwort is a German linguistic term for this migratory lexical phenomenon.

Etymology of the Term

The term Wanderwort derives from German wandern ("to wander" or "to roam," ultimately from Old High German wandarōn) and Wort ("word," cognate with English "word" via Proto-Indo-European *wṓr-t-). This literal translation as "wandering word" reflects its application to lexical items that migrate across languages through borrowing, often via cultural or trade contacts. The term emerged in German linguistic scholarship during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, amid advancements in Indo-European comparative philology. Adoption into English occurred in the early . Equivalent expressions exist in other languages, such as French mot voyageur ("traveling word"), which conveys the same idea of migratory loanwords. In English, occasional synonyms like "wandering word" appear in glossaries to emphasize the diffusive nature of such vocabulary.

Characteristics and Identification

Phonological and Morphological Traits

Wanderwörter, as they spread across languages via successive borrowings, commonly undergo phonological adaptations that reflect the phonetic systems of intermediate and recipient languages. These include shifts, where original qualities are altered to fit the target language's inventory, and consonant or assimilation, such as the weakening of stops to fricatives or (e.g., /k/ > /w/). Such changes accumulate through borrowing chains, often resulting in divergent forms that trace the word's migration path. A hallmark of Wanderwörter is their morphological simplification during . Borrowed forms frequently lose inflections, affixes, or other complex morphological elements from the source language, adapting to the more analytic structures prevalent in recipient languages. For instance, processes like the reduction of or the stripping of case markers render these words less morphologically marked, facilitating integration into new grammatical systems. This simplification aids identification, as it contrasts with the fuller morphological paradigms typical of inherited . The irregularity of Wanderwörter in sound correspondences provides crucial evidence for their borrowed status. Unlike inherited words, which follow predictable phonological rules within a , Wanderwörter display inconsistent patterns due to multiple layers of across unrelated languages. These deviations—such as unexpected assimilations or shifts not aligned with family-internal changes—signal external rather than internal . Diagnostic patterns for identifying Wanderwörter often involve substrate influences, where phonological traits from displaced languages imprint on the borrowed form, or areal features in contact zones that promote convergent adaptations like shared lenition processes. These traits, combined with chain-like distribution patterns, help linguists reconstruct diffusion histories without relying solely on geographical spread.

Distribution and Diffusion Patterns

Wanderwörter primarily diffuse through mechanisms such as trade routes, migrations, conquests, and colonial expansions, often involving chain borrowings where terms pass sequentially from a source through multiple intermediaries before reaching distant recipients. These processes facilitate widespread transmission, with patterns including sequential chain-like along linear paths or radial starburst spreads from central hubs. For instance, maritime and overland trade networks, influenced by seasonal winds and sailing routes, enable rapid lexical exchange across regions. Geographically, Wanderwörter cluster in high-contact zones like the , the across , and Atlantic or networks, frequently spanning unrelated language families through sustained intercultural interactions. These patterns reflect the role of interconnected hubs, such as ancient ports and caravan stops, in propagating terms over vast areas, from to and the . Phonological adaptations observed in these diffused forms serve as key evidence for tracing such pathways. Social factors driving diffusion include associations with elite goods, technological innovations, or culturally significant items that create naming needs across societies, often amplified by and where dominant groups influence smaller ones. Economic incentives in trade, such as the high value of exchanged commodities, further promote borrowing, particularly in multilingual merchant communities. Temporally, ancient Wanderwörter typically exhibit slow over centuries or millennia, tied to gradual migrations and prehistoric exchanges, whereas modern instances accelerate during eras of and colonial expansion, spreading via formalized and administrative languages. This contrast highlights how intensified connectivity in recent periods compresses traditional diffusion timelines.

Historical Development

Origin and Coinage in Linguistics

The concept of the Wanderwort emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, coinciding with the maturation of in the German Neogrammarian school, which stressed the regularity of sound laws and the systematic reconstruction of language histories. This school, active from the onward, sought to explain linguistic variation through precise mechanisms of change, creating a framework for identifying borrowed words that deviated from expected inheritance patterns. The term itself reflects this era's focus on tracing lexical diffusion beyond family trees, highlighting words that "wandered" across languages via contact rather than common ancestry. Scholars such as Paul Kretschmer, a prominent figure in linguistic geography and etymology, employed the term to describe words with irregular distributions that suggested borrowing chains, particularly in Indo-European contexts. The word for "apple" has been analyzed as involving potential Wanderwörter, with a form reconstructed as *h₂ébōl- appearing in northwestern Indo-European languages (e.g., Germanic *aplaz 'apple') likely from a non-Indo-European substrate, while another layer *meh₁-lo- (Greek mēlon, Latin mālum) represents a more widespread fruit term that may also show diffusion. Similarly, the term for "beech" (Proto-Indo-European *bhago-) was analyzed as a potential Wanderwort, limited to northern Indo-European branches where the tree grew, indicating diffusion tied to environmental and trade factors rather than proto-language inheritance. Initially, the Wanderwort concept was confined to , aiding reconstructions by distinguishing inherited vocabulary from loans in journals like Zeitschrift für Deutsche Wortforschung, where early attestations appear between 1900 and 1920 amid debates on substrate influences. For instance, articles in this periodical from the explored lexical spreads in Germanic and Romance, using the term to categorize words with Mediterranean or pre-Indo-European origins. Post-World War II, as global expanded, the idea was extended to non-Indo-European cases, incorporating patterns from routes and , though its core application remained rooted in European .

Evolution of the Concept

In the mid-20th century, the concept of Wanderwort expanded significantly within the frameworks of areal linguistics and substrate studies, particularly through the work of Uralic linguists who examined widespread loanwords across non-genetically related languages. Björn Collinder, in his 1955 Survey of the Uralic Languages, analyzed lexical items that diffused across Uralic families and into Indo-European and Altaic languages, emphasizing their role in reconstructing prehistoric contact zones and substrate influences rather than mere isolated borrowings. This approach highlighted how Wanderwörter could reveal areal features, such as shared phonological adaptations in substrate vocabularies, shifting the focus from etymological origins to patterns of horizontal transfer in multilingual regions like northern Eurasia. Post-1960s developments saw the integration of sociolinguistic perspectives into Wanderwort studies, with greater emphasis on models that linked lexical spread to social and economic processes. Influential archaeologist , in Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins (1987), proposed that Wanderwörter facilitated the modeling of expansions, where words for agricultural innovations diffused alongside farming practices across and , independent of population replacements. This sociolinguistic turn underscored the role of , migration, and elite dominance in propagating such terms, moving beyond purely linguistic to interdisciplinary interpretations of cultural exchange. Contemporary views on Wanderwörter incorporate to trace diffusion paths more precisely, distinguishing them from inherited vocabulary or superstrate loans through quantitative modeling of and geographic spread. For instance, studies like those by Honkola et al. (2013) on Uralic expansions use Bayesian phylogenetic methods to map how Wanderwörter, such as terms for metals , followed demographic routes while avoiding false positives from vertical . Ongoing debates center on criteria for separation, with methods like those in Bouckaert et al. (2012) employing distance-based metrics to identify chain-like diffusion in contact-heavy areas, enhancing the reliability of identifying true Wanderwörter amid complex borrowing scenarios. Since the , the Wanderwort concept has broadened globally, extending from its Eurocentric origins to encompass cases in Amerindian, Austronesian, and African linguistic contexts, reflecting increased attention to non-Indo-European contact dynamics. In the , Zamponi (2020) identified precontact Wanderwörter in Greater Amazonia, such as terms for artifacts like , tobacco, and curare diffused through precontact networks, illustrating trade influences. Similarly, Bowern et al. (2015) documented patterns in Australian and North American languages, linking words like those for pearlshell or to expansive exchange systems since the late . In Austronesian and African spheres, analyses of Bantu expansions reveal comparable diffusion, as in Ehret's (2002) work on Nilotic loans across sub-Saharan families, underscoring the term's utility in modeling worldwide cultural interconnectivity.

Examples

Ancient and Prehistoric Wanderwörter

One prominent example of an ancient Wanderwort is the term for "tin," attested in Greek as kassíteros, which spread across through Mediterranean trade networks around 2000 BCE. This word likely originated from a pre-Indo-European substrate, with an uncertain ultimate source, and diffused via commerce involving the Aegean, , and , as evidenced by its appearance in Latin cassiterum and later borrowings into Celtic and Germanic forms. The term's irregular phonological adaptations, such as shifts and assimilations, reflect its non-native status in recipient languages. Note that etymological reconstructions for such prehistoric terms remain debated among linguists. Neolithic agricultural innovations facilitated the diffusion of Wanderwörter related to crops and tools from Near Eastern origins to and , beginning around 8000–6000 BCE. For instance, the word for "" or "," reconstructed in Proto-Indo-European as deriving from *kwoid-yo- (related to "," referring to the grain's color), spread westward to Anatolian and European branches and eastward to through farming migrations and exchanges, potentially incorporating substrate influences. Similarly, terms for the "plow" exhibit a comparable pattern, with Proto-Indo-European h₂erh₃- ("to plow") associated with the spread of ard-based plowing from to the and Pontic by the 5th millennium BCE. These terms' shared semantic field underscores their association with the "Neolithic package" of domesticated cereals and draft tools. Another key case is the Wanderwort for "silver" in northern Indo-European languages, reconstructed as *silubrom or silubra-, which spread via Baltic and North Sea trade routes during the late Bronze Age (c. 1500–500 BCE). Originating from a pre-Indo-European substrate, possibly Uralic or a local European source, it appears in Germanic (e.g., Old English seolfor), Baltic (Lithuanian sidãbras), and Slavic forms, contrasting with the southern IE h₂erǵʰn̥tóm ("white metal," Latin argentum). This diffusion highlights contacts among coastal and riverine communities exchanging precious metals from Scandinavian and Siberian sources. These Wanderwörter illuminate prehistoric interactions, such as the tin trade linking Aegean civilizations to Cornish mines by 2000 BCE, the agricultural expansions from the reaching the by 6000 BCE, and silver exchanges along amber routes from 1500 BCE, providing timelines for cultural connectivity without direct written records. Phonological traits like persistence and labial shifts in these examples aid identification, as detailed elsewhere.

Modern and Global Wanderwörter

In the colonial era and beyond, Wanderwörter proliferated through intensified global trade, , and imperial expansion, introducing terms for novel goods, , and into distant languages. These words often followed maritime and overland routes established by European powers, reflecting the uneven power dynamics of . Unlike prehistoric diffusions reliant on reconstruction, modern examples benefit from historical records documenting their spread via ships, markets, and colonial outposts. One prominent example is , the word for (Ananas comosus), originating from the Old Tupi nana ("excellent fruit") in . Portuguese explorers adopted it as ananás in the during early of , disseminating the term through their Atlantic empire to and beyond. From Portuguese, it entered French (ananas), Spanish (ananás), and numerous other languages in , , and the , appearing in over 40 variants today due to plantation economies in tropical colonies. This diffusion exemplifies how a single indigenous term became a global standard, bypassing English's (from its resemblance to a pine cone). Similarly, derives from Hokkien Chinese tê (a Min Nan dialect pronunciation of 茶, t'é), transmitted via Malay teh to Dutch thee in the 17th century. The , dominant in Asian trade, introduced it to , where it entered English as tea around 1655 and spread to languages like German Tee and Russian чай (from the competing Mandarin chá form via overland routes). This dual diffusion—te by sea through colonial maritime networks and cha by land—illustrates competing paths of , with tea dominating in Western languages due to Dutch and British imperial commerce. By the 19th century, British plantations in and Ceylon amplified its worldwide adoption. The term sugar traces to śarkarā ("grit, gravel"), referring to crystalline sugar from cane, which entered Persian as shakar and as sukkar by the medieval period through . traders spread it to via the and Islamic conquests in and , yielding sucre (late 13th century), Italian zucchero, and English sugar. This Wanderwort's path highlights medieval commerce but accelerated in the colonial era with European plantations in the and , where sugar became a staple , embedding the term in global lexicons including German Zucker and Spanish azúcar. Non-food examples include , from Guugu Yimidhirr (an Australian Aboriginal language) gangurru ("large black kangaroo"), recorded by Captain in 1770 during British exploration of . Adopted into English via Cook's journals, it rapidly diffused globally as a symbol of the continent, entering languages like French kangourou and German Känguru through colonial and media. This term's spread underscores how imperial documentation and propelled indigenous words into international use. Empires, plantations, and emerging media played pivotal roles in this rapid diffusion, as European powers like , the , and Britain integrated new commodities into global economies. Plantations in , , and the not only scaled production of pineapples, , and but also standardized their nomenclature across networks, while printed accounts, maps, and later films amplified terms like in [popular culture](/page/popular culture). These factors, aligned with colonial distribution patterns, facilitated Wanderwörter's leap from local to universal status.

Linguistic Significance

Role in Historical and Cultural Linguistics

Wanderwörter play a crucial role in reconstructing prehistoric language contacts by mapping their diffusion patterns to infer trade routes, migrations, and technological exchanges. For instance, Indo-European loanwords related to , such as Proto-Indo-European *h₂ues- 'copper/bronze/gold', appear in Uralic (e.g., Finnish vaski 'bronze/copper') and (e.g., Proto-Turkic *yez 'copper/bronze'), dating to approximately 3300–2500 BCE and linked to the Afanasievo culture's movements across the Eurasian steppes. Similarly, terms for horses, like Common Iranic *bāraka- borrowed into *mˤraʔ around 2500–1000 BCE, reflect equestrian technology transfer via Andronovo-related interactions. These examples demonstrate how analyzing Wanderwörter's phonological and semantic consistency across unrelated families reveals networks of exchange, such as alliances in , corroborated by archaeological evidence of metal artifacts. In cultural , Wanderwörter provide insights into the spread of innovations, linking lexical diffusion to historical developments like and . Terms for cultivated , such as those for and beans in South American languages, trace the adoption of farming technologies across and Tupi-Guarani networks, indicating cultural shifts from to agricultural societies. -related Wanderwörter, including words for boats and oars shared across Austroasiatic, Tai-Kadai, and Sino-Tibetan families in (e.g., Proto-Vietic *duk 'dugout canoe'), correlate with Neolithic maritime expansions around 4000 BP. Such patterns support theories like the for Indo-European origins, where diffused agricultural vocabulary aligns with the farming dispersal from circa 7500 BCE, as evidenced by Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of lexical data. Wanderwörter foster interdisciplinary connections between , , and by correlating lexical distributions with . In , reconstructed terms for production (e.g., Proto-Austroasiatic *s-maːʔ 'rice plant') match archaeological finds of Neolithic tools and settlements in , predating Han influence and illuminating ethnolinguistic interactions. Anthropological interpretations further reveal , such as in ritual items like pearlshell (%tyakuli in Australian languages), which spread via documented barter routes and reflect cultural prestige systems. These links extend to artifact distributions, where Wanderwörter for metals or crops align with excavated goods, enhancing reconstructions of prehistoric societies. Quantitative approaches leverage databases to model Wanderwörter's impact on phylogenies, distinguishing loans from inherited . The Indo-European Lexical Cognacy Database (IELex), covering over 200 concepts across 84 , identifies potential Wanderwörter through cognate clustering and phonetic alignment, enabling of family trees while excluding contact-induced distortions. Similarly, NorthEuraLex, with 1,016 concepts in 107 Northern Eurasian , integrates data from the World Loanword Database to apply methods like Phylogenetic Lexical Flow Inference (PLFI), which reconstructs borrowing networks using ancestral state reconstruction and achieves F-scores up to 0.57 for arrow directionality in simulations. These tools quantify lexical flow, such as in Uralic-Turkic contacts, supporting robust phylogenetic models of .

Challenges and Methodological Debates

One major challenge in studying Wanderwörter lies in distinguishing genuine cases of from coincidental resemblances or inherited terms, such as false cognates, which can mimic borrowing patterns through chance similarity in form and meaning. This difficulty arises because Wanderwörter often exhibit phonetic and semantic shifts across languages, complicating etymological analysis without clear historical records of contact. Heuristic criteria, like the number of borrowing events or network density in lexical , help identify potential Wanderwörter, but these methods risk over- or under-attributing resemblances to contact rather than . Reconstructing the ultimate origins of Wanderwörter is further hindered by the frequent loss of intermediate languages or substrate influences, which obscure the diffusion path through multiple intermediaries. In regions with sparse documentation, such as ancient or the , source identification becomes particularly arduous, as extinct languages may have served as bridges without leaving traceable evidence. This gap often leads to provisional hypotheses reliant on comparative , but incomplete data can result in where assumed paths retroactively validate origins. Methodological debates center on whether all widespread diffusions qualify as "wandering" or if some reflect direct elite loans from dominant cultures, challenging the traditional chain-borrowing model. Critics argue that early Wanderwort studies exhibited Eurocentric bias by prioritizing Indo-European examples and overlooking non-European diffusion networks, such as those in Austronesian or African contexts. Contemporary approaches leverage computational tools and interdisciplinary data to address these issues, including analyses of lexical networks to map routes and Bayesian models to simulate borrowing probabilities. integrates population admixture patterns with vocabulary distributions, revealing correlations between human migrations and word spreads that refine origin reconstructions.

References

  1. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-a-glossary-of-historical-linguistics.html
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039014000022
  3. https://www.academia.edu/769671/On_Wanderw%C3%B6rter_and_substrate_words_in_etymological_research
  4. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Wanderwort
  5. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/wanderwort
  6. http://tscheer.free.fr/scan/Campbell%20&%20Mixco%2007%20-%20A%20Glossary%20of%20Historical%20Linguistics.pdf
  7. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=41910
  8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.10.001
  9. https://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2022/MTR/kratochvil-0558164.pdf
  10. https://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp338_spices_linguistics.pdf
  11. https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/studia-etymologica-cracoviensia/article/the-proto-indo-european-root-for-apple-and-the-problem-of-comparative-reconstruction
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/411113
  13. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780191080289_A43186008/preview-9780191080289_A43186008.pdf
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jeb.12107
  15. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1219669
  16. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/710009
  17. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-141
  18. https://smerdaleos.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ie-mallory-adams.pdf
  19. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/9/3/89
  20. https://www.etymonline.com/word/pineapple
  21. https://www.etymonline.com/word/tea
  22. https://qz.com/1176962/map-how-the-word-tea-spread-over-land-and-sea-to-conquer-the-world
  23. https://www.etymonline.com/word/sugar
  24. https://anetoday.org/jones-medieval-sugar-production/
  25. https://www.etymonline.com/word/kangaroo
  26. https://www.nma.gov.au/exhibitions/defining-symbols-australia/kangaroo
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10432883/
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359162401_Southeast_Asian_Ethnohistory_through_Historical_Linguistics_and_Archaeology_-Contributions_and_Limits_of_Lexical_Data
  29. http://ielex.mpi.nl/
  30. https://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~jdellert/pubs/jdellert-diss.pdf
  31. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2fb8t2pz/qt2fb8t2pz.pdf
  32. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2010.1917
  33. http://www.geocurrents.info/blog/2013/12/11/vexatious-history-indo-european-studies-part/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361844000_Modeling_the_spread_of_loanwords_in_South-East_Asia_using_sailing_navigation_software_and_Bayesian_networks
  35. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adv7521
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.