Hubbry Logo
Wind controllerWind controllerMain
Open search
Wind controller
Community hub
Wind controller
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wind controller
Wind controller
Wind controller
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
San Francisco musician Onyx Ashanti playing a wind controller

A wind controller, sometimes referred to as a wind synthesizer, is an electronic wind instrument. It is usually a MIDI controller associated with one or more music synthesizers.[1] Wind controllers are most commonly played and fingered like a woodwind instrument, usually the saxophone, with the next most common being brass fingering, particularly the trumpet. Models have been produced that play and finger like other acoustic instruments such as the recorder or the tin whistle. The most common form of wind controller uses electronic sensors to convert fingering, breath pressure, bite pressure, finger pressure, and other gesture or action information into control signals that affect musical sounds. The control signals or MIDI messages generated by the wind controller are used to control internal or external devices such as analog synthesizers or MIDI-compatible synthesizers, synth modules, softsynths, sequencers, or even non-instruments such as lighting systems.

Simpler breath controllers are also available. Unlike wind controllers, they do not trigger notes and are intended for use in conjunction with a keyboard or synthesizer.[2] A breath controller can be used with a keyboard MIDI controller to add articulation and expression to notes sounded on the keyboard. For example, a performer who has pressed a long-held note on the keyboard with a sustained sound, such as a string pad, could blow harder into the breath controller set to control volume to make this note crescendo or gradually blow more and more gently to make the volume die away.

Some wind controllers contain a built-in sound generator and can be connected directly to an amplifier or a set of headphones. Some even include small built-in speakers such as the Roland Aerophone series and the Akai EWI SOLO, however their small speaker systems cannot reproduce bass notes correctly or provide adequate sound levels for serious live performance, so these built in sound systems are strictly for home practice at modest playback levels. Some wind controllers such as EWI USB, Berglund NuEVI, and NuRAD are strictly "controllers" and do not make a sound on their own, and thus must be connected via MIDI or USB to a sound generating device (or a soft synth). For this reason, a wind controller can sound like almost anything (depending on the capabilities of its sound generator). Wind controller models such as the Akai Professional EWI5000, EWI SOLO, and Roland Aerophones have built-in onboard sample sounds, as well as the MIDI and/or USB outputs. The now discontinued EWI 4000s had a DSP subtractive synthesizer built in rather than sampled instruments and so remains popular on the second hand market.

The fingering and shape of the wind controller put no acoustic limitations on how the wind controller actually sounds. For example, a wind controller can be made to sound like a trumpet, saxophone, violin, piano, pipe organ, choir, synthesizers or even a barnyard rooster. Whether designed primarily to appeal to woodwind, brass, or harmonica players, controllers can produce any virtual instrument sound. Some virtual instruments and hardware synthesizers are better suited to adaption for wind controller performance than others. A hardware or software synthesizer's suitability is largely dependent on the control options available. MIDI CC mapping options allow the player to control elements like the filter cut off via breath control for expressive dynamics. Custom patches (or presets) are required for optimal expressivity, to take advantage of the considerable benefits of wind control.

History

[edit]

Predecessors

[edit]

Already in the 1930s Benjamin F. Miessner was working on various electroacoustic instruments. Among these was an electroacoustic clarinet, that featured an electromagnetic pickup for the reed vibration and was connected to a variety of electronic filters. Miessner's patent from 1938[3][4] marks the birth of the electronic wind instrument family.[5]

Early experiments with fully electronic instruments started in the 1940s. Leo F. J. Arnold invented an electronic clarinet that featured an on/off-switch controlled by the human breath. This instrument is documented in Arnold's patent from 1942.[6][7][5]

The Frenchman Georges Jenny and the German engineer Ernst Zacharias played an essential role in the development of the first analog wind controllers in the 1950s. Jenny received his patent for an electronic wind instrument in 1954.[8][9] It features a breath transducer for variable volume control, that works with a piezo element. The prototypes of Zacharias, who started to work on electronic wind instruments in 1956, lead to the first commercially produced wind synthesizer – the Hohner Electra-Melodica, released in 1967.[5]

Analog wind controllers

[edit]
Computone Wind Synthesizer Controller
(essentially, Lyricon II without synthesizer)

The first widely played wind controller was the Lyricon from Computone which came about in the 1970s era of analog synthesizers. The Lyricon was based on the fingerings of the saxophone and used a similar mouthpiece. It set the standard for hardware-based wind controllers with a number of features that have been preserved in today's MIDI wind controllers, including the ability to correctly interpret the expressive use of reed articulation, breath-controlled dynamics, and embouchure-controlled pitch variation. The Lyricon also expanded the playing range several octaves beyond the accustomed range for woodwind players. Tone generation on the Lyricon was limited to a dedicated analog synthesizer designed specifically to interpret various wired analog outputs from the instrument. Notable early recording artists on the Lyricon include Roland Kirk and Tom Scott. Third-party adaptations would later bring the Lyricon into the MIDI era.

The next wind controller of note was the brass style Steiner EVI invented by wind controller pioneer Nyle Steiner. Steiner was the inventor of the brass style EVI (electronic valve instrument) wind controller designed for brass players, as well as the EWI (electronic woodwind instrument) designed for woodwind players. Steiner made many very important contributions to the development wind controllers. His research started in the late 1960s and his first wind controller was the Steiner Parker EVI released in 1975. Originally this EVI was only a "controller" which sent control voltages only for pitch and gate and was to be connected to commercial analog synthesizers. The breath sensor on this early original model EVI was very crude consisting of a simple on/off switch activated by the player's breath pressure. Steiner went on to refine and develop new expressive methods of sensing the player's gestures which have since become standard wind controller features such as an expressive proportional type breath sensor (as compared to earlier switch on/off type breath sensing), tonguing velocity sensing, a vibrato lever for the right hand thumb, pitch bend up and down thumb sensors, glide sensing for portamento effects, bite sensing, lip sensing, and others. Steiner's analog wind controller systems eventually included his own analog synthesizer design bundled into a complete self-contained system (Steinerphone). Steiner was also a studio musician and he played his EVI on the soundtrack of the film "Apocalypse Now". Shortly after the release of the Steiner EVI, woodwind musicians asked Steiner to make a woodwind version of the EVI, and Steiner designed the EWI. The EWI was made famous in the mid 1980s by jazz musician Michael Brecker with the group Steps Ahead when he played the Steinerphone EWI with dazzling bravura. Around 1985 Steiner developed a sophisticated MIDI interface for his EVI and EWI by modifying the JL Cooper Wind Driver box. In 1987, Akai licensed Steiner's EVI and EWI designs and released the Akai EVI1000 brass style and woodwind style EWI1000 wind controllers along with a companion EWV2000 sound module. The EWV2000 featured a MIDI output jack which allowed it to connect to additional MIDI synthesizers opening up a universe of possibilities and numerous recordings in both movie and television soundtracks as well as pop music recordings. The EVI1000 or EWI1000 controllers combined with the EWV2000 sound generator were actually a hybrid digital/analog system. Analog signals were derived from the various sensors (e.g., key, bite, bend, glide, etc.) on the EVI1000/EWI1000 controller unit, then converted to digital signals by a front-end microprocessor in the EWV2000. These digital signals were then altered by the microprocessor and D/A converted to internal analog control voltages appropriate for the analog synthesizer ICs within the EWV2000. The D/A used within the EWV2000 used a very high resolution and conversion rate, such that the responsiveness to the player felt immediate, i.e. "analog". The subsequent EWI3000, EWI3020, and EWI3030m systems also used this A/D/A scheme within their dedicated tone modules, though these later models of the EWI would support MIDI in and out.

MIDI controller revolution

[edit]

With the advent of MIDI and computer-based digital samplers in the early 1980s, the new music technology ushered in a variety of "alternative" MIDI controllers. In the 1960s and 1970s, the main way for a musician to play synthesizers was with a keyboard. With MIDI, it became possible for non-keyboardists to play MIDI synthesizers and samplers for the first time. These new controllers included, most notably: MIDI drums, MIDI guitar synthesizers, and MIDI wind controllers. Leading the way to demonstrate the virtuosic potential of this new arsenal of MIDI technology on the world stage through extensive touring and big-label recordings were guitarist Pat Metheny playing the guitar synthesizer and saxophonist Michael Brecker playing the wind controller, each leading their own bands.

Digital wind controllers and MIDI

[edit]

The most widely played[citation needed] purely digital wind controllers include the Yamaha WX series and the Akai EWI series. These instruments are capable of generating a standard MIDI data stream, thereby eliminating the need for dedicated synthesizers and opening up the possibility of controlling any MIDI-compatible synthesizer or other device. These instruments, while usually shaped something like a clarinet with a saxophone-like key layout, offer the option to recognize fingerings for an assortment of woodwinds and brass. The major distinction between the approach taken by the two companies is in the action of their keys. Yamaha WX series instruments have moving keys like a saxophone or flute that actuate small switches when pressed. Akai EWI series instruments have immovable, touch-sensitive keys that signal when the player is merely making contact with the keys. In the hands of skilled players each of these instruments has proved its ability to perform at a high level of artistry.

The now defunct Casio DH series were toy-like wind controllers introduced in the mid-1980s and had a built-in speaker (with limited sound sources) as well as being usable as MIDI controllers.

A recent addition to the wind controller category is the Synthophone, an entirely electronic wind controller embedded in the shell of an alto saxophone. Since the electronic components take up the open space of the saxophone, it is not playable as an acoustic instrument; however, since the exterior matches that of the acoustic instrument, it is significantly more familiar to play.

Additionally, keyboard-based breath controllers are also available. These modulate standard keyboards, computers and other midi devices, meaning they are not played like a woodwind, but like a keyboard, but with a breath controller (similar to a pump organ.) Yamaha's BC series can be used to control DX and EX units. Midi Solutions makes a converter box that allows any midi device to be controlled by the Yamaha BC controllers. TEControl also makes a USB device that is simply a jump drive with a breath tube attached that can be plugged into any standard computer.

Acoustic wind instrument conversion to software MIDI as wind control

[edit]

Through the 1990s the major hardware-based wind controllers improved through successive models and a number of minor, and less commercially successful, controllers were introduced. These software solutions for a time were the only viable bridge between the woodwind or brass player and the synthesizer. But dating back to the 1980s a lesser known software-based alternative began to emerge. With a software-based conversion program the musician plays an ordinary wind instrument into a microphone at which point a software program (sometimes with dedicated computer hardware) interpreted the pitch, dynamics, and expression of this acoustic sound and generates a standard MIDI data stream just in time to play along with the performer through a synthesizer.

While the first commercial product attempting this approach dates back to the Fairlight Voicetracker VT-5 of 1985, a more successful modern approach using software on personal computers (combined with a digital audio workstation and softsynths) is relatively new. Two more recent examples of this highly unusual archaic approach were Thing-1 from ThingTone Software, and Digital Ear Realtime from Epinoisis Software.

Range of expression

[edit]

Due in part to their fast and sensitive key switching and breath sensing systems both the hardware and software based wind controllers put precise demands on a player who hopes to play with technical mastery. An accomplished woodwind or brass player may find that a hardware or software based wind controller will produce an unwanted note (called a "glitch") even at the slightest imperfection in fingering or articulation technique. As the better recordings show, these difficulties can be overcome with practice.

In contrast to live performance with a wind controller, and in response to these technical challenges, some "performances" in recordings are achieved through careful post-processing or note-by-note insertion and editing using a notation or sequencer program.[original research?]

Virtually all current synthesizers and their sound libraries are designed to be played primarily with a keyboard controller, whereby the player often reserves one hand to manipulate the many real-time controls to determine how the instrument sounds, perhaps using a foot to manipulate an expression pedal.[original research?]

Wind controller players do not have access to as many of these controls and thus are often limited in exploiting all of the potential voicings and articulation changes of their synthesizers, but the technologies of physical modeling (Yamaha VL70-m), sample modeling and hybrid technologies (SWAM engine) promise more expression control for wind controller players. Furthermore, sound designers are paying more attention to the different playing idioms in which their sounds will be used. For example, certain percussion sounds do not work well with a wind controller simply because playing a struck instrument it is not idiomatic to the woodwind, whereas synthesized instruments that model the acoustic properties of a woodwind will seem fitting and natural to a wind controller player.[original research?]

A few of the many hardware (Yamaha, Roland, Akai, Kurzweill, Aodyo) and software (Native Instruments, Garritan, SampleModeling, Sample Logic, LinPlug, Audio Modeling) synthesizers provide specific support for wind controllers, and they vary widely with respect to how well they emulate acoustic wind, brass, and string instruments. The SWAM technology, devised by Audio Modeling, has specific settings for Yamaha, EWI, Sylphyo and Aerophone wind controllers and has succeeded in producing very rapid natural responsiveness with their woodwinds and bowed strings virtual instruments. Also Samplemodeling has specific settings for wind controllers on their Kontakt-based brass. That said, virtually all current synthesizers respond to MIDI continuous controllers and the data provided by wind controller breath and lip input can usually be routed to them in an expressive way.[original research?]

An example of a hardware synthesizer with wind controller support is the Yamaha VL70-m which uses physical modeling synthesis. Physical modeling allows for a unique level of responsiveness to the control signals sent from a wind controller. The emulation of acoustic instrument sounds varies in quality. The VL70-m is able to connect directly to the Yamaha WX series of controllers and via MIDI to the Akai and other wind controllers. Similarly, an example of a software synthesizer with support for wind controller playing is the Zebra synthesizer from Urs Heckmann, Apple's ES2 softsynth, Korg's Mono/Poly softsynth, Audio Modeling's SWAM instruments, and many others. It is important to note that whatever synth is used, it will need to be set up with specially designed breath responsive patches for optimal response to a wind controller.

Manufacturers

[edit]

The major manufacturers of wind controllers are Akai Professional, Roland, and Yamaha. As of the beginning of 2022 the available mass production wind controllers include the Akai EWI SOLO, EWI5000, Roland Aerophone models AE-01, AE-05, AE-10, AE-20 and AE-30, Aodyo Sylphyo. Less commonly available model is Synthophone. Also there are ultra low volume handmade instruments that are nonetheless advanced (owing to clever use of off the shelf electronics) such as the Berglund NuRad, NuEVI and WARBL from Mowry Stringed Instruments.

Models out of production and discontinued include the Akai EWI USB (discontinued 2022), 4000s (discontinued 2019). Also 20th century (part analogue) models from Akai such as the 3020, 3000 and 1000. Older discontinued models from Yamaha include WX11, WX7 and WX5. Casio offered more toy-like offerings including the DH-100, DH-200, DH-500 and DH-800.

Wind controllers with saxophone fingerings

[edit]

Synthophone

[edit]

The Synthophone is a Wind Controller synthesizer. It is a MIDI sax offering real sax fingerings and a standard sax embouchure. The MIDI hardware allows the key action as well as breath and lip pressure to be read as MIDI data. Since it is a saxophone, the fingerings are the same with some additions - Several combinations allow real-time editing of patches and harmony. The instrument has made several appearances at the NAMM Show, including in 1997.[10]

Others

[edit]

After the Synthophone, several other MIDI saxes have been released that offer real sax fingerings: in 2019 the Travel Sax by Odisei Music,[11] in 2020 the YDS-150 digital saxophone by Yamaha[12] and also in 2020 the Emeo.[13] These MIDI saxes have sensors for breath pressure to adjust the volume, but they do not read lip pressure and thus do not allow the pitch to be controlled by the embouchure or by the manner of breathing. With the YDS-150, pitch bend can be achieved using a separate input on the instrument. The Travel Sax, the YDS-150 and the Emeo provide for settings customisation using a Bluetooth-connected mobile app.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wind controller

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A wind controller is an designed to replicate the playing techniques of acoustic wind instruments, such as saxophones or flutes, while generating signals to control external synthesizers, sound modules, or software for sound production. It typically features sensors for breath pressure, lip or bite pressure, and touch-sensitive keys or pads to capture nuances like dynamics, pitch bend, and articulation, enabling expressive performance without producing sound on its own. Unlike traditional wind instruments, wind controllers rely on electronic interfaces, often via , USB, or , to interface with systems. The origins of wind controllers date back to the 1970s, with pioneering developments by inventor Nyle Steiner, who created the Electronic Woodwind Instrument (EWI) and Electronic Valve Instrument (EVI) to provide woodwind and players with access to electronic synthesis. Commercial production began in the late 1980s, led by manufacturers like , which released the EWI1000 and EVI1000 models in 1987, integrating analog synthesis and capabilities for a seven-octave range and effects like reverb and harmonization. Yamaha followed with the WX7 in 1987 and later the WX5 in 1998, introducing advanced lip sensors and multiple fingering modes (e.g., or ) for versatile playability. Subsequent innovations include Roland's series starting in 2016, which added built-in speakers and , and Aodyo's Sylphyo in 2016, emphasizing portability and physical modeling synthesis; more recent models as of 2025 include Roland's AE-30 Pro (2023) and Brisa (announced September 2025), alongside the EWI Solo (2020), though Aodyo ceased operations in 2024. Key aspects of wind controllers include their adaptability to various musical styles, from —where players like and popularized the EWI for its breath-controlled expressiveness—to electronic and orchestral music through integration with workstations (DAWs). These devices support fingering systems tailored to specific instruments, octave rollers for extended range, and customizable parameters like curves and pitch sensitivity, making them suitable for both live performance and studio recording. Despite their niche appeal, wind controllers bridge traditional technique with modern synthesis, offering wind performers unprecedented sonic versatility.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A wind controller is a MIDI-compatible designed to mimic the form and playing technique of acoustic wind instruments, such as woodwinds (e.g., or ) or (e.g., ), where performers use breath pressure, lip or bite sensors, and finger keys to generate control signals that trigger sound synthesis externally rather than producing acoustic tones internally. The primary purpose of wind controllers is to enable musicians, particularly those trained on acoustic winds, to interface seamlessly with synthesizers, virtual instruments, or workstations (DAWs) for highly expressive performances across genres including , electronic music, and orchestral simulations. By translating natural breath dynamics, articulation, and fingering into data, these devices allow for polyphonic note generation and timbral versatility that surpass the limitations of traditional single-voice wind instruments. Wind controllers emerged in the as an innovative bridge between familiar acoustic playing techniques and the burgeoning field of electronic music production, allowing performers to adapt their skills to analog and later digital synthesizers. Key benefits include their portability for live and studio use, straightforward integration with modern software for real-time sound manipulation, and the ability to emulate a wide array of instruments—from to strings—without requiring physical instrument changes, thereby enhancing creative flexibility for composers and improvisers.

Basic Operation

A wind controller functions by converting the musician's breath, bite, and finger actions into digital signals, mimicking the expressive techniques of acoustic wind instruments. The player blows into a mouthpiece fitted with a sensor that measures air variations to generate note and dynamic control, typically mapped to note-on messages with corresponding values ranging from 0 to 127. Biting on a lip or reed transducer, often a separate in the mouthpiece, produces pitch bend or effects through continuous controller (CC) messages, such as CC1 for modulation. Simultaneously, the player presses touch-sensitive keys or buttons on the instrument's body to select pitches, triggering note-on/off events based on woodwind-style fingering, while additional capture aftertouch for sustained expression. The signal flow begins with analog inputs from the sensors, which are amplified and digitized by the controller's onboard microcontroller or processor into standardized MIDI protocol data. This includes discrete events like note numbers (e.g., MIDI note 60 for middle C) and continuous parameters such as breath pressure mapped to CC2 (breath controller) for volume or timbre modulation. The processed MIDI stream is output via USB, Bluetooth, or 5-pin DIN connectors to an external device, such as a synthesizer module or DAW software, where it triggers sound generation; breath sensor calibration adjusts input ranges (e.g., minimum and maximum pressure thresholds) to align with the player's technique and prevent latency or false triggers. Essential components include the mouthpiece housing the primary pressure sensor for breath detection, a multi-key keybed designed for intuitive woodwind fingering, and thumb-operated controls like rollers or levers for octave shifts and fine pitch adjustments, often sending CC messages for real-time transposition. While many wind controllers lack built-in sound synthesis and rely on external tone modules or virtual instruments to produce audio from the input, some models incorporate onboard synthesis and speakers for standalone use. User setup involves connecting the controller to a host device, such as pairing via USB to software like Apple's MainStage or linking via cable to hardware like a , followed by enabling output mode and verifying channel assignments (typically channel 1 by default). Basic includes recalibrating the breath through the device's —adjusting sensitivity curves from linear to exponential for natural response—and testing connections to ensure seamless data transmission without dropouts.

History

Early Predecessors and Analog Era

The origins of wind controllers trace back to the , when experimental efforts sought to adapt breath control from acoustic wind instruments to electronic music production. In 1964, trumpeter and engineer Nyle Steiner began conceptualizing an electronic interface that would allow wind players to control synthesizers using familiar fingering techniques, marking one of the earliest documented ideas for such a device. These early concepts were influenced by the need to integrate expressive breath modulation into electronic organs and synthesizers, though practical implementations remained limited until the 1970s. A pivotal advancement came with the Computone Lyricon in 1975, the first commercially available electronic wind synthesizer. Invented by Bill Bernardi and with patent filed in 1971 (awarded 1973), the Lyricon featured a bass clarinet-style mouthpiece with breath pressure sensing for dynamic control, a ribbon controller for pitch bending, and onboard additive synthesis capable of producing fundamentals in G, B, C, E, and F across multiple octaves. Priced at $3,295 (equivalent to approximately $20,000 as of 2025), fewer than 200 units were sold due to its complex manufacturing and high cost, but it enabled monophonic analog output via control voltage (CV) and gate signals, allowing integration with external synthesizers. Simultaneously, Nyle Steiner developed the Electronic Valve Instrument (EVI) in the mid-1970s, with prototypes dating to 1972 and production from 1975 to 1979. Designed for players, the trumpet-style EVI used breath-activated CV for triggering notes and later incorporated lip-bite sensors for variation, paired with a dedicated analog synthesizer module featuring voltage-controlled oscillators and filters. Like the , the EVI was monophonic and reliant on analog interfacing, lacking polyphony or digital standardization, which restricted its versatility to controlling single-voice synths. Approximately 200 units were produced, with a subsequent Crumar-branded version adding about 500 more. These analog wind controllers found a niche in and fusion music during the , where artists leveraged their breath-sensitive expression to mimic organic nuances amid the rise of portable synthesizers like the , introduced in 1970. Saxophonist Tom Scott prominently featured the on the 1982 recording of "Billie Jean," while players like , , and used it for improvisational solos in studio sessions. Steiner himself performed on the EVI with ensembles like , highlighting its potential for dynamic phrasing but underscoring the era's technological constraints, including incompatibility with emerging polyphonic synths and the absence of standardized interfacing. This period's innovations drove demand for more expressive electronic tools, setting the stage for later digital developments.

MIDI Revolution and Digital Integration

The introduction of the Musical Instrument Digital Interface () standard in marked a transformative era for wind controllers, enabling seamless interoperability between these devices and a wide array of synthesizers, sound modules, and digital audio workstations. Developed by a consortium of leaders including Dave Smith of Sequential Circuits and Ikutaro Kakehashi of , provided a universal protocol for transmitting performance data such as note on/off, velocity, and continuous controllers, which addressed the isolation of proprietary analog systems from the pre- era. For wind controllers, this standardization allowed breath pressure to be mapped to continuous controller (CC) messages, particularly CC2 for breath control, facilitating expressive control over volume, , and modulation without the tuning instabilities and limited synthesis options of earlier analog designs. Key advancements in the late exemplified this digital shift, with Yamaha releasing the WX7 in 1987 as one of the first dedicated MIDI wind controllers. The WX7 featured a saxophone-style fingering system with a sensitive breath that converted air into MIDI breath control data, enabling dynamic velocity mapping and integration with external synthesizers for polyphonic output via MIDI channels. It included adjustable breath thresholds, a bite for , and a pitch bend wheel, allowing performers to achieve nuanced expression comparable to acoustic winds. Similarly, Professional launched the EWI 1000 in 1987, evolving from inventor Nyle Steiner's 1981 analog prototype, which acquired and digitized for MIDI compatibility. The EWI employed touch-sensitive keys and a breath to generate MIDI note and controller data, supporting monophonic play with options for external polyphonic synthesis and overcoming analog limitations through standardized digital signaling. The MIDI era profoundly expanded wind controllers' applications in popular and electronic music, as artists like integrated them into live and studio performances for innovative timbral exploration. Hancock, building on his earlier use of brass-oriented EVI controllers, continued to explore electronic wind interfaces in his work. This compatibility fostered broader adoption, with wind controllers connecting to rack-mounted synths like the Yamaha TX802 for multi-timbral setups, thus promoting their use in genres from to electronic pop. By the 1990s, MIDI's protocols had resolved key challenges in wind controller design, including precise mapping of breath for modulation (via CC1) and aftertouch for sustained expression, while enabling software-based integration for sequencing and effects processing. Yamaha's Virtual Acoustic Synthesis technology, introduced with the VL1 in 1993, further advanced this integration by modeling physical acoustics digitally, allowing WX controllers to drive realistic emulations of brass and woodwinds through breath-responsive parameters like and reed stiffness. This combination of standardized interfacing and early digital modeling solidified wind controllers as versatile tools in professional music production, shifting focus from hardware constraints to creative expressivity.

Modern Advancements and Conversions

In the and , digital enhancements in wind controllers focused on advanced (DSP) for more realistic sound modeling and the introduction of capabilities. Manufacturers like incorporated sound engines in models such as the series, starting with the AE-10 in 2015, which used DSP to emulate acoustic nuances like breath response and tonal variations across woodwind timbres. Similarly, Akai Professional's EWI5000, released in 2014, featured transmission via a proprietary receiver, reducing cable constraints during live performances while maintaining low-latency breath and key data transfer. These developments built on standards to enhance expressivity, with integration emerging in the late , as seen in the GO (2019), enabling direct connectivity to mobile devices for expanded sound libraries. Acoustic-to-MIDI conversion devices gained traction in the , allowing traditional instruments to interface with digital systems without full replacement. The ClariMate, introduced by Crampon in 2022, exemplifies this as a reversible barrel adapter for Bb clarinets that captures breath pressure, reed vibration, and Boehm fingering to generate output via USB, transforming the acoustic into a hybrid electronic controller compatible with virtual instruments. For saxophones and flutes, software solutions like Audio Modeling's SWAM Saxophones (2018) and SWAM Flutes provide real-time physical modeling that responds to input from breath controllers, enabling acoustic players to route signals through adapters like USB interfaces for expressive digital emulation in DAWs. These converters prioritize seamless integration, preserving familiar while outputting polyphonic data for software synthesis. By 2025, recent trends emphasize portability, app integration, and affordability, fostering broader adoption in live and remote settings. The Yamaha YDS-150 digital saxophone, launched in 2021, combines modeling with 73 onboard voices and Bluetooth/USB connectivity to DAWs, allowing performers to layer sounds via the YDS Controller app for real-time editing and looping during concerts. Budget-friendly Chinese models like the Robkoo R1, debuted at NAMM 2023, offer (BLE) MIDI, expandable sound banks via app updates, and motion-sensing for , priced under $300 to democratize access for beginners. Emerging AI-assisted libraries, such as those in virtual instruments like VG Trumpet's VG Trumpet (released 2025), use to refine breath-responsive articulations, enhancing realism in DAW integrations. Post-COVID, wind controllers have seen increased use in music education and , facilitated by USB/ for remote collaboration. During the , educators adopted tools for practices, with devices like the enabling silent, headphone-based instruction to maintain technique without acoustic noise restrictions. In looping performances, artists leverage low-latency wireless features for multi-layered setups, as in remote sessions via platforms like BandLab, where wind controllers contribute orchestral layers without physical proximity. This shift has promoted their role in hybrid learning environments, with rising enrollment in digital wind programs by 2025.

Technical Design

Sensing Mechanisms

Wind controllers employ a range of sensors to detect and translate performer inputs into signals, enabling precise control over synthesized sounds. These sensors primarily capture breath , lip or bite , finger positions, and supplementary gestures, converting analog physical actions into for low-latency . Breath and sensors, typically integrated into the mouthpiece, measure or variations to control volume, note attack, and effects. Common implementations include solid-state transducers in models like the EWI series, which detect air- levels without requiring a reed, or piezoelectric transducers that convert breath-induced mechanical stress into electrical signals, as seen in dedicated controllers like the TEControl USB Breath Controller. These sensors output data in the standard continuous controller (CC) range of 0-127, allowing for graduated control over parameters such as expression (often mapped to CC#2 or CC#11). Capacitive or diaphragm-based variants, such as those in the AE-30, provide responsive detection of subtle breath nuances for dynamic performance. Bite and lip sensors detect jaw or embouchure pressure applied to the mouthpiece, facilitating pitch bend or adjustments. These are commonly force-sensitive mechanisms, such as the bite sensors in EWI USB and EWI5000 models, which measure lip pressure to generate pitch bend data typically limited to ±2 semitones in protocol. High-resolution lip sensors, like those in the Yamaha WX5, use adjustable gain settings and modes (e.g., tight/loose lip) to capture precise pressure variations, converting them to pitch bend, modulation, or CC#18 messages. While strain gauges can be employed for accurate force measurement in custom or advanced designs, many commercial units rely on integrated force sensors for reliable detection of subtle changes. Supplementary inputs enhance control beyond core breath and bite functions. Thumb-operated mechanisms, such as octave rollers or in the EWI USB (with touch sensors for 5- range) or the left-thumb in models like the XR3000, enable rapid octave switching and pitch adjustments. Modern controllers may incorporate accelerometers for tilt-based modulation, sensing device orientation along multiple axes to generate continuous control data for effects like pan or , as integrated in some advanced breath controllers adaptable to wind interfaces. Keybed sensors, often capacitive touch pads in instruments like the EWI series, detect finger positions for note triggering, with note dynamics derived from breath pressure rather than independent sensing; the Yamaha WX5, for instance, offers fixed or wind-controlled options via settings. The evolution of these sensors has progressed from analog voltage outputs in early controllers, such as the 1987 EWI1000's CV-based systems, to digital (ADC) integration in contemporary designs, enabling finer resolution and compatibility with software synthesizers. features, like electronic trimmers on the Yamaha WX series, ensure accurate mapping, while fast-response modes minimize processing delays to support real-time playability; overall system latency in modern wind controllers is typically under 10 ms with optimized setups, prioritizing seamless signal flow from sensor input to output.

Fingering Systems and Interfaces

Wind controllers employ fingering systems primarily modeled after traditional woodwind instruments to facilitate intuitive play for musicians familiar with acoustic counterparts. The most common layouts use woodwind-style keys, such as the , which emulates the fingering of saxophones and clarinets through a series of tone holes and keys arranged in a linear fashion along the body. This system typically includes 14 keys for standard chromatic coverage, with adjustments for key height to accommodate different hand sizes. Roller keys, often positioned under the left thumb, enable smooth shifts and chromatic transitions by allowing rolling motions for rapid note changes, reducing finger strain during passages. These designs prioritize ergonomic symmetry and low movement costs, as optimized in button-based systems derived from melody datasets, ensuring efficient melody performance. Interface connectivity in wind controllers supports integration with various digital setups, emphasizing versatility for live and studio use. Standard USB and ports provide direct hardware connections to synthesizers, computers, and DAWs, enabling low-latency control of virtual instruments. (BLE) offers wireless options, such as pairing with iPads or tablets for mobile performance without cables. For modular synthesizer enthusiasts, outputs allow analog control voltage signals to modulate parameters like pitch, gate triggers, and breath-based envelopes in systems, often via dedicated converters or built-in ports. Ergonomic considerations in wind controller design focus on comfort for , with bodies constructed from lightweight or metal weighing between 300 and 600 grams to minimize fatigue. Adjustable thumb hooks and rollers support varied hand positions, while the overall form factor ensures compatibility with standard stands and racks for stable performance setups. These features, combined with balanced weight distribution, allow musicians to maintain natural posture akin to acoustic winds. Customization enhances adaptability, with software allowing programmable key mappings to remap fingerings for alternative scales or instruments. Hybrid interfaces support multi-instrument use by switching between fingering modes, such as Boehm to recorder, via onboard menus or apps, enabling seamless transitions across genres.

Types

Keyed Wind Controllers

Keyed wind controllers feature a linear keybed design with velocity-sensitive keys and octave rollers, closely resembling the fingering systems of traditional woodwind instruments such as the oboe or saxophone. These instruments typically include 8 to 13 touch-sensitive keys for note selection and 8 octave rollers—often comprising 6 movable rollers and 2 fixed sensors—to extend the range across multiple octaves, enabling access to the full chromatic scale. By default, they operate in monophonic mode, producing a single note at a time, though integration with MIDI software allows control of polyphonic sounds for more complex arrangements. A primary advantage of keyed wind controllers is their familiarity to musicians trained on acoustic woodwinds, facilitating a smoother transition for band and orchestral players without requiring extensive retraining on alternative interfaces. They also offer precise intonation control, as digital processing eliminates the tuning challenges inherent in acoustic instruments, ensuring consistent pitch across performances. These controllers are widely used in both and live performances, where they integrate seamlessly with (VST) plugins to emulate orchestral wind instruments, expanding sonic possibilities beyond traditional ensembles. In professional settings, they enable wind players to contribute diverse timbres, such as or string sections, enhancing arrangements in , pop, and scoring contexts. The EWI 5000, introduced in the , exemplifies this category with its USB-powered operation and optional wireless connectivity, allowing battery-powered mobility for use. While its key travel provides a tactile response akin to acoustic models, improving playability for expressive phrasing, the design prioritizes portability over the extended of full-sized woodwinds, though some users note the keys' sensitivity requires adjustment for optimal response.

Saxophone-Fingering Models

Saxophone-fingering models of wind controllers replicate the ergonomic design and key layout of acoustic saxophones, featuring a curved body, flared bell for visual and balance authenticity, and a single-reed style mouthpiece with simulated vibration through breath and bite sensors. These instruments utilize the Boehm fingering system, incorporating palm keys, side keys, and octave rollers to enable precise intonation and articulation familiar to saxophonists. This design prioritizes tactile similarity to traditional saxophones, converting finger positions, breath pressure, and lip/bite gestures into or digital signals for sound synthesis. A pioneering example is the Synthophone, developed in the late 1980s by Softwind Instruments in and introduced around , which transformed a Yamaha YAS-280 alto saxophone into a MIDI controller by embedding sensors and circuitry within its existing shell. It preserves standard saxophone fingerings while adding specialized combinations—such as pressing high D, side C, and low C keys—for shifts, extending the range to more than nine s, and includes a sealed bell to eliminate acoustic output for purely electronic performance. The sensor-equipped mouthpiece captures breath pressure for volume and expression, alongside aftertouch and pitch bend capabilities, making it one of the first commercial wind controllers to blend saxophone form with digital synthesis. The Roland Aerophone AE-10, released in 2016, represents a modern iteration with a lightweight, portable curved body emulating an alto saxophone, complete with dedicated left-hand octave keys and a responsive key layout for seamless Boehm system play. Its mouthpiece integrates a dual-function breath/bite sensor that detects reed-like vibrations for controlling vibrato, pitch bend, and dynamics, paired with onboard modeling for 128 versatile sounds including realistic saxes. Battery-powered with built-in speakers, the AE-10 supports USB connectivity to DAWs, allowing saxophonists to integrate it into electronic setups without external modules. More recent models include the Roland Aerophone AE-20 (2023), which enhances expression with advanced Zen-Core sound modeling and Bluetooth MIDI, and the Yamaha YDS-120 digital saxophone (2023), offering 73 voices with a focus on saxophones and improved silent practice features. These models particularly benefit saxophonists transitioning to electronic instruments, as the familiar fingering and posture eliminate the associated with alternative systems, while enabling silent practice and access to diverse synthesized tones beyond acoustic limitations. The balanced, standing-friendly of the curved design further supports prolonged sessions, appealing to performers in both practice and live contexts. However, the Synthophone requires adaptation to novel fingering extensions for full range, and both types lack inherent acoustic tone, relying entirely on connected synthesizers. Additionally, their transposing nature—typically Eb for models—necessitates pitch adjustments in non-sax contexts.

Acoustic Conversion Devices

Acoustic conversion devices represent a class of non-invasive accessories designed to transform traditional acoustic wind instruments into MIDI controllers by detecting breath pressure, lip position, and key or finger actions to generate digital control signals. These add-ons typically insert into the instrument's body, such as the barrel of a , without requiring permanent modifications, enabling musicians to retain the original acoustic functionality while integrating electronic synthesis capabilities. This approach bridges the gap between conventional woodwind performance and digital music production, allowing for seamless switching between natural tones and virtual instrument emulations. A prominent example is the ClariMate, developed by Buffet Crampon in partnership with Audio Inventions LTD and launched in November 2022. This reversible hybrid device fits into the barrel of any Bb or A , incorporating sensors that capture key presses and breath dynamics to output data via or connections. The ClariMate supports silent practice through headphones with built-in virtual instrument sounds, while also functioning as a full compatible with workstations (DAWs) on , macOS, and Windows platforms. For players, similar conversion is achieved through pickups and audio-to- processors, such as the IVL Pitchrider series, which dates back to the but remains relevant in modern setups. These systems use a or piezoelectric pickup attached to the instrument's bell or body to analyze the acoustic output in real time, converting pitch, , and variations into messages for controlling synthesizers or software instruments. Representative 2020s implementations include hybrid pickup systems like those from PiezoBarrel, which offer solderable adapters for necks to facilitate both amplification and conversion without invasive alterations. The core functionality of these devices emphasizes versatility: users can detach the to play the instrument acoustically, while in electronic mode, breath control modulates parameters like and expression, and software applications map the instrument's native fingering system to standard note assignments. Calibration tools within companion apps ensure accurate tracking of pitch bends and articulations, supporting polyphonic aftertouch in some models for enhanced expressivity. This dual-mode operation facilitates experimentation with virtual acoustic models, such as those in SWAM or Sample Modeling libraries, where the physical nuances of the original instrument translate directly to digital outputs. Adoption of acoustic conversion devices has surged among professional musicians seeking hybrid acoustic-electronic workflows, particularly in and media scoring, where they enable efficient layering of organic performances with synthesized ensembles. For instance, composers utilize these tools to perform live woodwind lines that trigger orchestral virtual instruments, reducing the need for multiple takes and enhancing creative flexibility in environments. Their popularity stems from preserving the tactile familiarity of traditional instruments, making them accessible for woodwind specialists transitioning to digital composition without relearning interfaces.

Expressive Capabilities

Breath and Pressure Control

Breath pressure in wind controllers is detected by high-resolution sensors in the mouthpiece, typically strain-gauge based, which convert air variations into MIDI continuous controller (CC) messages such as CC#7 (volume), CC#11 (expression), or channel pressure to modulate parameters like , amplitude, and in connected synthesizers. This mapping enables continuous control, allowing performers to create swells and decays by gradually increasing or decreasing breath intensity, mimicking the nuanced dynamics of acoustic instruments. Sensitivity curves for these sensors are adjustable, often via hardware trimmers or software parameters offering linear, exponential, or multi-stage responses (e.g., soft to hard gain settings in five levels), ensuring the controller responds proportionally to subtle pressure changes from pianissimo to fortissimo. Performers employ specific techniques to exploit breath pressure for expression, such as simulations through modulated breath via diaphragm variations at 4-6 Hz for , adding natural pitch oscillation without additional controllers, while the full spans from barely audible (pp) to full forte (ff) levels, calibrated through exercises focusing on smooth crescendos and precise air management. These mechanics provide key advantages, closely replicating the organic expression of traditional wind instruments through intuitive breath-based control, which surpasses the binary on/off nature of keyboard for more fluid phrasing and shifts. Some modern wired wind controllers achieve breath-to-MIDI conversion latency under 10 ms, enabling responsive real-time without perceptible delay in low-buffer setups. In , artists like utilize breath pressure for dynamic phrasing and rapid swells on models such as the Akai EWI4000s, enhancing improvisational flow with lifelike articulation. Similarly, in orchestral contexts, performers like Nyle Steiner apply it for sustained swells and expressive swells in works such as Maurice Jarre's "Concerto for E.V.I.," integrating seamlessly with ensemble dynamics. Supplementary features like bite sensors can complement breath control for added pitch bend, but breath remains the primary expressive input.

Supplementary Expression Features

In addition to primary breath control, wind controllers incorporate bite and lip pressure sensors to enable nuanced pitch manipulation and timbral effects. These sensors, typically located in the mouthpiece, detect or lip force applied by the performer, allowing for pitch bends ranging from subtle to full glides of up to ±12 semitones, depending on the connected 's settings. For instance, the Yamaha WX7 uses its lip sensor to generate MIDI pitch bend messages through reed biting, facilitating expressive bends that simulate acoustic instrument techniques. Similarly, the EWI series employs bite sensors to control depth or growl-like distortions by modulating parameters such as oscillator detuning or filter resonance, enhancing realism in and reed emulations. Gesture-based controls further expand expressivity, often via thumb-operated levers or sensors for real-time modulation and spatial effects. Thumb levers on models like the Yamaha WX series serve as octave switches but can be reassigned to aftertouch or modulation wheel (MIDI CC#1) for dynamic parameter adjustments, such as filter sweeps. In wireless designs, integrated gyroscopes detect instrument orientation and tilt, mapping movements to effects like panning or automated modulation; the Aodyo Sylphyo, for example, uses its built-in gyroscope to generate additional MIDI CC messages responsive to performer gestures, enabling immersive spatial audio in live setups. Recent models as of 2025, such as the Ashun Sound Machines Diosynth, build on this with enhanced motion sensing for more intuitive parameter control in integrated synthesis. These features allow performers to layer subtle nuances without interrupting airflow. Advanced capabilities include glide and functions, often triggered by sustained breath holds or dedicated sensors, which produce smooth pitch transitions between notes for phrasing. On the EWI3000, a metal strip enables control, while programmable macros in devices like the EWI3000m allow users to define custom patches that layer multiple sounds or effects, such as combining primary tones with harmonic overtones. These controllers integrate via CC messages to manipulate elements like filter cutoff (CC#74) or low-frequency oscillators (LFO) for rhythmic pulsing, proving particularly effective in electronic genres where bite or inputs simulate wah-wah pedals or dynamic sweeps, as seen in performances blending wind techniques with or .

Manufacturers and Models

Major Producers

Akai Professional pioneered the modern electronic wind instrument (EWI) series in 1987, acquiring the design from inventor Nyle Steiner and focusing on affordable, USB-compatible controllers that integrate seamlessly with software synthesizers and DAWs. Current models like the EWI USB emphasize portability and breath-based expression for entry-level users, while the wireless EWI5000 offers expanded range for live performance. Roland has dominated the market since the 2010s with its line, launched in 2016, prioritizing built-in sound engines and mobile app integration for expanded customization and connectivity. By 2025, the series includes advanced models like the Pro and the newly introduced Brisa flute-style controller, which support ZEN-Core synthesis for realistic acoustic modeling and wireless transmission. Yamaha's contributions trace back to the WX series in the 1980s, with the WX5 providing robust control via breath and fingering sensors, though it is now discontinued. The company maintains a strong presence through virtual modeling technology in its YDS digital saxophone series, such as the YDS-150 and YDS-120, which replicate acoustic sax response with 73 onboard sounds and app-based editing for dynamic breath control. Other notable producers include Berglund Instruments, specializing in the NuEVI for players with valve-style fingering and wireless options tailored to and horn emulation. Emerging players like France-based Aodyo Instruments introduced the wireless Sylphyo in 2018, a compact recorder-like controller supporting multiple fingering systems and high-precision breath sensing for integration. However, following the company's in 2024, no further development or support is available. Budget-oriented Chinese brands, such as Midiplus with its Wind 2 and Flow models, and Robkoo with the R1 and Clarii Mini synthesizers, offer accessible entry points featuring rechargeable batteries and versatile orientations for beginners. By 2025, market trends reflect a shift toward and hybrid designs, enabling seamless integration with mobile devices and virtual instruments, as seen in updates from major producers at events like NAMM. Specialist retailers like Patchman Music play a key role, providing upgrades, custom soundbanks, and support for models across brands to enhance expressiveness.

Notable and Recent Instruments

Among the most iconic wind controllers is the Professional EWI 5000, released in 2014, which pioneered connectivity for onstage freedom through its 2.4 GHz system and integrated over 3 GB of onboard sounds from SONiVOX, spanning various genres with responsive air-pressure and bite sensors for dynamic control. The Yamaha WX5, introduced in 1998, established a professional standard with its precise wind and lip sensors, multiple fingering modes including and recorder styles, and direct output compatibility for connecting to tone generators without additional interfaces. From the , the Synthophone emerged as a hybrid instrument, combining an acoustic body with embedded electronics for breath-to-MIDI conversion, allowing players to trigger synthesizers while retaining traditional saxophone ergonomics and timbre. In recent years, the Aerophone Pro AE-30, launched in 2020 with significant updates through 2023 including enhanced scenes and harmony functions, features dual modeling engines for acoustic and synth sounds, low-latency breath sensors, and professional connectivity options like USB and for integration with external gear. The Yamaha YDS-150 digital saxophone, released in 2021, offers 73 preset voices including saxophones, brass, and strings, with audio/ support and a lightweight ABS body mimicking ergonomics for versatile practice and performance. The Aodyo Sylphyo, introduced in 2018 via , stands out for its ultra-portable design under 1.3 pounds with wireless transmission up to 10 meters, high-precision breath control across a wide , and onboard processing for sample-based sounds, with internal storage for user expansions. However, following the company's in 2024, no further development or support is available. More recently, the Aerophone Brisa, unveiled in 2025, targets beginners with its flute-inspired straight structure, intuitive Brisa Mode fingering for simplified key placement, built-in speakers, and for up to 7 hours of playtime. Key innovations in these instruments include rechargeable built-in batteries providing 4-12 hours of operation and integrated speakers for self-contained performance, as seen in models like the Sylphyo and series, enhancing portability without external power needs. Prices typically range from $200 for entry-level options to $1,500 for advanced units, balancing accessibility with professional features. Professional models such as the EWI 5000 and WX5 are favored for touring due to their robust integration and expressive controls, enabling seamless live synthesis triggering. In contrast, entry-level instruments like the YDS-150 and AE-Brisa support learning with headphone outputs for silent practice and simplified interfaces to build technique across traditions.

References

  1. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/WindControllerFAQ.html
  2. https://organology.net/instrument/electronic-wind-instrument/
  3. https://usa.yamaha.com/products/music_production/midi_controllers/wx5/features.html
  4. https://paradiso.media.mit.edu/SpectrumWeb/SpectrumX.html
  5. https://www.roland.com/us/company/press_releases/2025/Roland-Introduces-Aerophone-Brisa-Digital-Wind-Ins/
  6. https://synthanatomy.com/2024/10/aodyo-instruments-prones-bankruptcy-due-to-ongoing-challenges.html
  7. https://windworksdesign.com/basics.html
  8. https://www.ericjuberg.com/info
  9. https://www.long-mcquade.com/blog/1040/MIDI-Wind-Controllers-More-Than-Just-Keyboards.htm
  10. https://www.vintagesynth.com/articles/four-wind-controllers-are-worth-owning
  11. https://emeapp.org/2024/12/17/lyricons-evis-and-ewis-the-evolution-of-the-electronic-wind-instrument/
  12. https://ulethelectro.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/yamaha-wx7-wind-controller-an-introduction/
  13. https://bretpimentel.com/wind-controllers-as-practice-woodwinds/
  14. https://support.akaipro.com/en/support/solutions/articles/69000849456-akai-pro-ewi-5000-calibrating-the-ewi-5000
  15. https://files.kraftmusic.com/media/ownersmanual/Roland_Aerophone_Pro_AE-30_Owners_Manual.pdf
  16. https://www.akaipro.com/ewi5000
  17. https://support.roland.com/hc/en-us/articles/4414513906459-Aerophone-AE-20-AE-20W-How-does-this-instrument-operate-when-MIDI-CONTROL-switch-is-on
  18. https://theartofwindsynth.com/info-contact/
  19. https://www.moogmusic.com/synthesizers/minimoog-model-d/
  20. https://midi.org/midi-history-chapter-6-midi-begins-1981-1983
  21. https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/multimedia/emusic/info-docs-FAQs/wind-controllers-FAQ.html
  22. https://ca.yamaha.com/en/products/contents/music_production/synth_50th/anecdotes/006.html
  23. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/manuals/WX7OwnersManual.pdf
  24. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/articles/JoelPeskinEWIStory.html
  25. http://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/yamaha-wx7-akai-ewi/13211
  26. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/WindControllerRecordings.html
  27. http://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/yamaha-wx7/1094
  28. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/yamaha-vl1
  29. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/ElectronicWindInstrumentsSoundHistory.html
  30. https://clarimate.us/
  31. https://audiomodeling.com/swam-engine/solo-woodwinds/swam-saxophones/
  32. https://www.acousticsamples.net/vwindsflutes
  33. https://usa.yamaha.com/products/musical_instruments/winds/digital_wind_instruments/yds_series/index.html
  34. https://www.robkoo.com/en/wind-synthesizer-r1
  35. https://vgtrumpet.com/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7723736/
  37. https://musictech.com/features/music-education-tech-coronavirus-lockdown/
  38. https://soe.syr.edu/the-barriers-have-been-removed-new-research-explores-the-rise-of-digital-music-making-in-schools-during-covid-19/
  39. https://www.akaipro.com/ewi-usb.html
  40. https://www.tecontrol.se/products/usb-midi-breath-controller/breath-controller-facts
  41. https://www.sunrisemelody.com/electronic-wind-instrument/xr3000-midi-wind-controller-ewi-factory.html
  42. https://vi-control.net/community/threads/wind-instruments-with-midi-breath-controller.129731/page-7
  43. https://nime.pubpub.org/pub/pitch-fingering-systems-and-the-search-for-perfection
  44. https://www.akaipro.com/ewi5000white.html
  45. https://www.thomannmusic.com/akai_professional_ewi_5000.htm
  46. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1060291-REG/akai_ewi_5000_electronic_wind.html
  47. https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/EWI5000--akai-professional-ewi-5000-electronic-wind-instrument-midi-controller
  48. https://www.roland.com/us/products/aerophone_ae-10/
  49. https://organology.net/instrument/synthophone/
  50. http://www.softwind.com/Synthophone_Operating_Manual_English.pdf
  51. https://www.roland.com/us/company/press_releases/2016/ROLAND-ANNOUNCES-AEROPHONE-AE-10/
  52. https://www.roland.com/us/company/press_releases/2022/Roland-Announces-Aerophone-AE-20-Digital-Wind-Inst/
  53. https://usa.yamaha.com/products/musical_instruments/winds/digital_wind_instruments/yds-120/index.html
  54. https://cafesaxophone.com/threads/ivl-pitchrider-live-audio-to-midi-converter-box.24134/
  55. https://piezobarrel.com/
  56. https://clarimate.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/A4_ClariMate-UserGuide_AppleRegs-3-4-1-EN-202405.pdf
  57. https://bretpimentel.com/clarimate-review-follow-up/
  58. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JGVcVGhH6w
  59. https://mnmt.no/magazine/2020/10/09/interview-john-gurtler/
  60. https://caml.music.mcgill.ca/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=publications:nime05_breath.pdf
  61. http://mybreathmymusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Yamaha-WX5-Manual-English.pdf
  62. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/EWI5000UserGuideV100.pdf
  63. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/yamaha-wx5
  64. https://saxschoolonline.com/articles/ewi-tips-its-all-about-the-w/
  65. https://community.aodyo.com/topic/1073/latency-testing.html
  66. http://mybreathmymusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Yamaha-WX-7-Manual-English.pdf
  67. https://reverb.com/item/73238619-aodyo-sylphyo-wind-controller-wireless-link-receiver-sylphyo-electronic-wind-instrument-2021-hand-painted-brass
  68. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2025/11/18/ashun-sound-machines-intros-diosynth-wind-synthesizer/
  69. https://www.ewi4christ.com/post/playing-a-synthesizer-with-a-wind-controller
  70. https://www.akaipro.com/products/ewi-series.html
  71. https://www.roland.com/us/products/aerophone_pro/
  72. https://usa.yamaha.com/products/music_production/midi_controllers/wx5/index.html
  73. https://berglundinstruments.com/products/
  74. https://aodyo.com/sylphyo/index.html
  75. https://www.midiplus.com/support.aspx
  76. https://midi.org/the-midi-association-namm-2025
  77. https://www.patchmanmusic.com/
  78. https://www.roland.com/global/products/aerophone_brisa/
  79. https://www.sweetwater.com/c513--Wind_MIDI_Controllers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.