Hubbry Logo
XuetaXuetaMain
Open search
Xueta
Community hub
Xueta
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Xueta
Xueta
from Wikipedia

The Xuetes (Catalan pronunciation: [ʃuˈətə]; singular Xueta, also known as Xuetons and spelled as Chuetas) are a social group on the Spanish island of Majorca, in the Mediterranean Sea, who are descendants of Majorcan Jews who were either Conversos (forcible converts to Christianity) or crypto-Jews, forced to keep their religion hidden. They practiced strict endogamy by marrying only within their own group. Many of their descendants observe a syncretist form of Christian worship known as Xueta Christianity.

Key Information

The Xuetes were stigmatized until the first half of the 20th century. In the latter part of the century, the spread of freedom of religion and laïcité reduced both the social pressure and community ties. An estimated 18,000 people in the island carry Xueta surnames in the 21st century, but only a few people (even if with Xueta surnames) are aware of the complex history of this group.

Etymology

[edit]
Church of Montesión (Mount Zion) in Palma de Mallorca, the main Church of Xuetas of Majorca.[2]

The Balearic word xueta derives, according to some experts, from juetó, diminutive of jueu ("Jew") which give xuetó, a term that also still survives. Other authors consider that it may derive from the word xulla[citation needed] (pronounced xuia or xua, which means a type of salted bacon and, by extension, pork) and, according to popular belief, refers to Xuetes who were seen eating pork to show that they did not practice Judaism.[3] But this etymology has also been linked with the tendency, present in various cultures, of using offensive names related to pork to designate Jews and Jewish converts (see, for example Marrano). A third possibility links both putative etymologies; the word xuia may have provoked the substitution of the j of juetó by the x of xuetó, and xueta could have been imposed over xuetó by the greater phonetic resemblance with xuia.[citation needed]

The Xueta have also been called "del Segell" ("of Segell"), after a street on which many lived, or del carrer ("of the street") as a shortened form of "del carrer del Segell"; possibly also by way of Castilian Spanish "de la calle", provoked from an approximate phonetic translation of "del call" ("of the Jewish quarter", "of the ghetto"; Catalan call, from Hebrew קָהָל (qāhāl, community, synagogue,[4] means "jewish quarter"), perhaps made by functionaries of the Spanish Inquisition of Castilian origin, in reference to the old Jewish quarter of the city of Palma, Majorca. In modern times, it relates to the carrer de l'Argenteria or the street of the silversmiths, after a street that defines the neighborhood around the church of Santa Eulàlia where the majority of the Xueta lived, and takes its name from a popular occupation of that group.[citation needed] In some older official documents, the expressions "de gènere hebreorum" ("of Hebrew genus") or "d'estirp hebrea" ("of Hebrew lineage") are used.[citation needed] The Xueta have been referred to simply as jueus ("Jews") or, more frequently, by the Castilianism “judios”.

The Xuetes, aware of the original offensive meaning of the term xuete, have preferred to identify as "del Segell", "del carrer" or, most commonly, with "noltros" or "es nostros" ("us"), opposed to "ets altres" ("the others") or "es de fora del carrer" ("those from outside the street").

Surnames

[edit]

The Xueta surnames are Aguiló, Bonnin, Cortès, Fortesa, Fuster, Martí, Miró, Picó, Pinya/Piña, Pomar, Segura, Tarongí, Valentí, Valleriola and Valls, as publicly displayed on the convent of Santo Domingo.[5] Picó and Segura are not found among those condemned by the Inquisition, and Valentí, originally the nickname of a family who were then known as Fortesa, is also absent. Many of those surnames are also very common in the general population of Catalan-speaking territories.

The surnames Galiana, Moyà and Sureda figure among the penitents without having been considered Xuetes.

Numerous surnames in Majorca with clear Jewish origin are present on the island but are not considered to belong to the Xueta community. Examples include Abraham, Amar, Bofill, Bonet, Daviu, Duran, Homar, Jordà, Maimó, Salom, Vidal. Inquisition registers from the late 15th and early 16th centuries documented more than 330 surnames for those persons condemned in Majorca.

Therefore, Converso origin is not sufficient to be considered Xueta. Although Xuetas are descendants of Conversos, only a fraction of Converso descendants are considered Xuetas.[6]

Genetics

[edit]

A variety of genetic studies conducted, principally, by the Department of Human Genetics of the University of the Balearic Islands have indicated that the Xuetes constitute a genetically homogeneous group within the populations of Mizrahi Jews and are also related to Ashkenazi Jews and those of North Africa, based on analyzing both the Y chromosome, which traces patrilineal descent, and the mitochondrial DNA, which traces matrilineal descent.[7]

The population is subject to certain pathologies of genetic origin, such as Familial Mediterranean fever,[8] shared with the Sephardi Jews, and a high frequency of iron overload particular to that community.[9]

Historic antecedents

[edit]

The conversos (1391–1488)

[edit]
Saint Vicent Ferrer, predicative assets for the conversion of the Jews.

The assault on the calls – the Majorcan Jewish ghettoes – in 1391, the preaching of Vincent Ferrer in 1413, and the conversion of the remainder of the Jewish community of Majorca, in 1435, are the three events that led to numerous conversions. The community agreed to mass, rather than individual, conversions to manage a collective peril.

Many of the new Christians continued their traditional communal and religious practices. They established the "Confraria de Sant Miquel" or "dels Conversos" ("The Confraternity of Saint Michael" or "of the Converts"). It largely replaced former Aljama in taking care of the group's social needs, for instance, assistance to the needy, an internal organ of justice, officiating at weddings, and supporting religious cohesion. At the end of the last quarter of the 15th century, the conversos carried on their activities, some of them clandestine, without suffering external pressures. The guilds did not discriminate based on Jewish origin. The conversos managed some social cohesion.

The beginnings of the Spanish Inquisition (1488–1544)

[edit]
Shield of the Inquisition used in Mallorca.

In 1488, while some of the last converts of 1435 were still alive, the first inquisitors of the Spanish Inquisition – a tribunal newly created by the Catholic Monarchs as part of an effort to forge a nation state on the base of religious uniformity – arrived in Majorca. The introduction of such a tribunal was followed by public complaints and general opposition in Majorca, as throughout the rest of the Crown of Aragon, but to no avail. The Inquisition's central objective was the repression of crypto-Judaism, which it began by applying the Edicts of Grace, severely punishing heresy by Christians (which the conversos, of course, were deemed to be) unless avoided through self-incrimination.

Under the Edicts of Grace (1488–1492), 559 Majorcans confessed to Jewish practices, and the Inquisition obtained the names of the majority of the Judaizing Majorcans, who, together with their families and their closest associates, they punished harshly. Subsequently, until 1544, 239 Crypto-Jews were reconciled and 537 were "relaxed" – that is, turned over to the civil authorities to be executed; 82 were executed and burned. The majority of the remaining 455, who managed to flee, were burnt in effigy. This exile was distinct from the decree of expulsion of 1492 from the Crowns of Castile and Aragon; officially no Jews lived in Majorca by 1435.

The new clandestinity (1545–1673)

[edit]

After this period, the Majorcan Inquisition ceased to act against the judaizers, even though there were signs of prohibited practices; the causes may have been: the participation of the inquisitorial structure in conflicts between local armed factions (bandositats); the appearance of new religious phenomena such as some conversions to Islam and Protestantism, or the control of the morality of the clergy. But, beyond a doubt, also the adoption of more efficacious strategies of protection on the part of the crypto-Jews: the later inquisitorial trials talk about how religious practices were transferred within families when a child reached the age of adolescence and, very often in the case of women, when it became clear whom she would marry and what were the husband's religious convictions.

In any event, this period was characterized by the reduction of the group by means of the flight of the penitents of the earlier epoch, the unconditional adhesion to Catholicism of the majority of those who remained, and the generalization of the statutes of neteja de sang (literally "purity of blood", most commonly referred to in English by the Spanish language expression limpieza de sangre) in the majority of the guild organizations and religious orders. But despite all this, a small group, essentially those who would later be known as the Xuetes, persevered with clandestine Judaism, and maintained social, familial, and economic strategies of internal cohesion.

The Synagogue of Livorno (built in the 17th century), a city of reference for the Majorcan crypto-Jews

From 1640, the descendants of the converts began a marked process of economic ascent and increasing commercial influence. Previously, and with some exceptions, they had been artisans, shopkeepers, and retail distributors, but starting from this time and for reasons not well explained, some began to focus strongly on economic activity: they created complex mercantile companies, participated in foreign trade, coming to control, at the time of the end of the inquisitorial trials, 36% of the total, dominating the market for insurance and retail commerce of imported products. Other companies were usually owned by conversos, and they gave part of their profits to works of charity in benefit of the "community", unlike the rest of the population, who made charitable donations to the Church. Because of the intense exterior economic activity, the Xuetes resumed their contact with the international communities of Jews, especially of Livorno, of Rome, of Marseille, and of Amsterdam, through whom the converts had access to Jewish literature. It is known that Rafel Valls, known as "el Rabí" ("the Rabbi") religious leader of the Majorcan converts, traveled to Alexandria and Smyrna in the era of Sabbatai Zevi, but it is not known whether he had any contact with him.

An internal system of social stratification probably began in that period, although it is also believed to be a remnant of the Jewish (pre-conversion) period. This system distinguished a kind of aristocracy, called "orella alta" (literally "high ears"), from the rest of the group, "orella baixa" ("low ears"). Along with other distinctions based on religion, professions, and parentage this configured a tapestry of alliances and avoidances among surnames, which had a great influence on endogamic practices of the period.

Origins

[edit]

The second persecution (1673–1695)

[edit]

The reasons why the Inquisition returned to act against the judaizing Majorcans after some 130 years of inactivity, and in an era in which the inquisition was already in decline are not very clear: the preoccupation of decadent economic sectors before the ascent and commercial dynamism of the converts, the resumption of religious practices in community, rather than limited to a domestic context, a new growth of religious zeal, and the judgment against Alonso López could have been influential factors.

The precedents

[edit]

In July 1672, a merchant informed the Inquisition that some Jews of Livorno had made inquiries about the Jews of Majorca with the names "Forteses, Aguilons, Martins, Tarongins, Cortesos, Picons".

Map of the banquet of the act of faith of 1675 in Mallorca

In 1673, a ship with a group of Jews expelled from Oran by the Spanish Crown and headed for Livorno, called in at Palma. The Inquisition arrested a youth of some 17 years named Isaac López. López had been born in Madrid and baptized with the name Alonso, and as a small boy fled to the Berber lands with his converso parents. Alonso refused to renounce Judaism and was burnt alive in 1675. His execution provoked a great commotion among the "judaizers". At the same time he was also the object of great admiration for his persistence and courage.

The same year López was arrested, some servants of the conversos informed their confessor that they had spied upon their masters and observed them participating in Jewish ceremonies.

In 1674, the prosecutor of the Majorca tribunal sent a report to the Supreme Inquisition in which he accused the Majorcan crypto-Jews of 33 charges, among them their refusal to marry "cristianos de natura" ("natural Christians") and their social rejection of those who did so; the practice of secrecy; the giving of Old Testament names to their children; the identification with their tribe of origin, and the arrangement of marriages as a function of that fact; the exclusion in their homes of the iconography of the New Testament and the presence of those of the Old; contempt for and insults toward Christians; exercising professions related to weights and measures in order to trick Christians; holding positions in the Church in order to mock them later with impunity; applying their own legal system; taking up collections for their own poor; financing a synagogue in Rome, where they had a representative; holding clandestine meetings; complying with Jewish dietary practices, including those of animal sacrifice and of fast days; the observance of the Jewish Sabbath; and avoidance of Last Rites at the time of death.

Conspiracism

[edit]
Map of the headquarters of the Inquisition of Mallorca, built in charge to the confiscation of the convicted persons in 1678

Four years later, in 1677, the Supreme Inquisition ordered the Majorcan Inquisition to act on the case of the confession of the servants. According to the servants, the observants, as they called themselves, in reference to the Torah, met in a garden in Palma where they observed Yom Kippur. This led to the detention of some of the leaders of the Crypto-Jewish community of Majorca, Pere Onofre Cortès (also known as Moixina), master of one of the servants and proprietor of the garden, along with five other people. From that point on, they proceeded to arrest 237 individuals in the course of a single year.

Helped by corrupt functionaries, the accused were able to arrange to only provide limited information in their own confessions and to denounce as few of their co-religionists as possible. All of the accused solicited the opportunity to return to the Church, and were reconciled.

Part of the penalty consisted of the confiscation of all of the goods of the condemned, which were valued at two million Majorcan lliura which, according to the usual procedures of the inquisition, had to be paid in actual currency. This constituted an exorbitant quantity for the era and, according to a protest of the Gran i General Consell, there was not this much hard cash on the entire island.

Finally, in the spring of 1679, five autos-da-fé took place, the first of which was preceded by the demolition of the building in the garden and the salting the earth where the conversos met. Before an expectant multitude, condemnation was pronounced against 221 conversos. Afterward, those who were condemned to prison were transported to serve out their sentences in new prisons erected by the Inquisition, and had their goods confiscated.

The Cremadissa (mass burning)

[edit]
Inquisition condemned (Francisco de Goya)

Once the jail penalties were served, a great part of those who persisted in the Jewish faith, whose clandestine practices were noticed, harassed by inquisitorial vigilance and vexed by a society they considered responsible for the economic crisis provoked by the confiscations, decided to gradually flee the island in small groups.

In the middle of this process, an anecdotal event precipitated a new wave of inquisitions. Rafel Cortès (also known as cap loco, 'crazy head') had remarried, this time to a woman with a converso surname, Miró, but who was Catholic. His family did not congratulate him on getting married and censured him for having married someone not of Jewish ancestry. Hurt in his pride, he denounced some of their coreligionists before the Inquisition of maintaining the prohibited faith. Suspecting that he had made a general denunciation, they agreed upon a mass escape. On 7 March 1688, a large group of converts embarked clandestinely on an English vessel, but unexpected rough weather prevented them from leaving, and at daybreak they returned to their houses. The Inquisition was notified of this, and all of the group was arrested.

The trials lasted three years and the cohesion of the group was weakened by a strict regime of isolation, which prevented any joint action, together with a perception of religious defeat due to the impossibility of escape. In 1691, the Inquisition, in three autos de fe, condemned 73 people, of whom 45 were turned over to the civil authorities to be burnt, 5 burnt in effigy; 3 already deceased had their bones burned, 37 were effectively punished; of these, three – Rafel Valls and the siblings Rafel Benet and Caterina Tarongí – were burned alive. 30,000 people attended.

The sentences dictated by the Inquisition included other penalties that were to be maintained for at least two generations: those in the household of the condemned, as well as their children and grandchildren, could not hold public offices, be ordained as priests, marry persons other than Xuetes, carry jewelry or ride a horse. These last two penalties do not appear to have been carried out, although the others continued in effect by the force of custom, beyond the two generations stipulated.

The final trials

[edit]

The Inquisition opened, and eventually closed, several trials of individuals denounced by the accused of the autos de fe of 1691, the majority dead. A single auto de fe was brought in 1695 against 11 dead people and one living woman (who was reconciled). Also, in the 18th century, the Inquisition carried out two individual trials: in 1718, Rafel Pinya spontaneously inculpated himself and was reconciled, and in 1720, Gabriel Cortès (also known as Morrofés) fled to Alexandria and returned formally to Judaism; he was burnt in effigy as the last person condemned to death by the Majorcan Inquisition. There is no doubt that these last cases are anecdotal; with the trials of 1691 came the end of the crypto-Jewry of Majorca. The effect of the escape of the leaders, the devastation of the mass burnings, and the generalized fear made it impossible to sustain the ancestral faith. It is after these events that we can begin to actually speak of the Xuetes.

Anti-Xueta propaganda

[edit]

Faith Triumphant

[edit]
First edition of La Fe Triunfante by Francesc Garau (1691)

The same year as the autos de fe of 1691, Francesc Garau, Jesuit, theologian and active participant in the inquisitorial trials, published la Fee Triunfante en quatro autos celebrados en Mallorca por el Santo Oficio de la Inquisición en que an salido ochenta i ocho reos, i de treinta, i siete relaiados solo uvo tres pertinaces (Faith Triumphant in four acts celebrated in Majorca by the Holy Office of the Inquisition in which tried eighty-eight defendants, and of thirty-seven turned over to civil authorities only three remained stubborn). Apart from its importance as a documentary and historical source, the book was intended to perpetuate the record and the infamy of the converts, and it contributed notably to provide an ideological basis for the segregation of the Xuetes and to perpetuate it. It was republished in 1755, used in the argumentation to limit the civil rights of the Xuetes and served as the basis of the libel of 1857, La Sinagoga Balear o historia de los judios mallorquines (The Balearic Synagogue or the history of the Majorcan Jews). In the 20th century, there have been abundant republications, all with an intention contrary to that of its author, given that some passages were of scandalous crudity, and lack the most elementary sensibility.

Les gramalletes

[edit]
Title page of the Relación de Sanbenitos ... de Palma, 1755

The gramalleta or sambenet (Spanish: sanbenito) was a tunic that individuals condemned by the Inquisition were forced to wear as punishment. The decorations on the gramalleta indicated what crime its bearer had committed and the punishment imposed. Once the autos-da-fé were over, a painting was created of the convicted heretic wearing the gramalleta and the name of its bearer was included in the painting. In the case of Majorca, these were exhibited publicly in the cloister of St. Domingo to perpetuate and exemplify the record of the verdict.

Because of the deterioration of this public display, the Supreme Inquisition ordered its renovation on several occasions in the 17th century. The matter led to conflict because of the presence of a great number of lineages, some of which coincided with those of the nobility, but finally in 1755 the order was carried out, surely because it was now restricted to the renovation of sambenets after 1645, and that the lineages thus implicated in Judaic practices were limited strictly to Xuetes, not the broader range of people prosecuted at an earlier date. The sambenets were to remain exposed until 1820, when a group of Xuetes assaulted and burned St. Domingo.

In the same year, 1755, in which Faith Triumphant was republished, another work was published as well, the Relación de los sanbenitos que se han puesto, y renovado este año de 1755, en el Claustro del Real Convento de Santo Domingo, de esta Ciudad de Palma, por el Santo Oficio de la Inquisición del Reyno de Mallorca, de reos relaxados, y reconciliados publicamente por el mismo tribunal desde el año de 1645 (The relation of the sanbenitos that have been placed, and renovated this year of 1755, in the cloister of the royal convent of Santo Domingo, of this city of Palma, by the Holy Office of the Inquisition of the Kingdom of Majorca, of defendants relaxados, and reconciled publicly by the same tribunal from the year 1645), to insist on the necessity of not forgetting, despite the active opposition of those affected.

The Xueta community

[edit]

The attitude of the Inquisition, which intended to force the disappearance of the Jews by means of their forcible integration into the Christian community, in fact accomplished the opposite: it perpetuated the memory of the condemned and, by extension, of all who carried the infamous lineages, even if they were not relatives and even if they were sincere Christians, and helped create a community that, although it no longer contained Judaic element, was still obliged to maintain a strong cohesion. In contrast, the descendants of the island's other crypto-Jews, those who were not so brought to the public view, lost all notion of their origins.

But, soon after, the Xuetes regained the leading role that they had before the inquisitorial trials. Now, deprived of their religious network, and their fortunes having been requisitioned, they sought to protect commercial alliances with the nobility and the clergy, even with the functionaries of the Inquisition. The renewed energy and the political alliances achieved permitted them to fight actively for equal rights, adjusting to whatever the surrounding circumstances were.

The War of the Spanish Succession (1705–1715)

[edit]

As with the rest of the island's population during the War of the Spanish Succession, amongst Xuetes there were both maulets – supporters of the Habsburg Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor and botiflers – supporters of the Bourbon Philip V of Spain. Some of the latter perceived the French dynasty as a modernizing element in terms of religion and society, since Bourbon France had never exhibited an attitude of repression and discrimination comparable to the Habsburg rule in Spain, renewed – in the case of Majorca – with Charles II.

Thus, a group of Xuetes, led by Gaspar Pinya, clothing dealer and importer, supplier of the botifler nobility, was very active supporting Philip's cause. In 1711, a conspiracy financed by Pinya was discovered. He was sentenced to jail and his properties seized but, as the war ended with a Bourbon victory, he was rewarded with rights associated to the lesser nobility; this did not affect the rest of the community.

The republication of Faith Triumphant (1755)

[edit]
Title page of the second edition of La Fee triunfante... 1755.

The tailor Rafel Cortes, Tomàs Forteza, and the hunchback Jeroni Cortès, among others, raised a request to the Real Audiencia de Mallorca (Royal Majorcan High Court, the island's highest court) aiming to prevent the republication of Faith Triumphant in 1755, which was accepted and so the book's distribution prevented for a time. Eventually, the Inquisitors allowed distribution to be resumed.

The deputies of the Carrer (1773-1788)

[edit]
Allegation in defence of the rights of the xuetes in front of the court of Charles III.

In 1773, the Xuetes designated a group of six deputies – popularly known by the name of perruques (the wigs) because of the luxurious adornment they used during their lobbying – in order to address King Charles III to make a claim for outright social and juridical equality with other Majorcans. In this regard, the Court decided to inquire of the Majorcan institutions, which frontally and decidedly opposed the pretensions of the descendants of the conversos. A lengthy and costly trial followed, in which the parties passionately stated their cases. The documents used in this trial demonstrate the extent to which discrimination was alive and had deep ideological roots; conversely, they are also a proof of the perseverance of the Xuetes in their demands for equality.

In October 1782, the prosecutor of the Real Audiencia de Mallorca, despite being aware of the result of these deliberations favorable to the Xuetes, raised a memorandum including highly racist reasoning, proposing the suspension of the accord and the exile of the Xuetes to Menorca and to Cabrera, where they would be confined with strong restrictions on their liberty.

First of the three royal decrees signed for Charles III (1782)

Finally, the king inclined, timidly, in favor of the Xuetes: on 29 November 1782 he signed the Real Cédula (Royal Decree) that decreed liberty of movement and residency, the elimination of all architectural elements that distinguished the Segell district, and the prohibition of insults, mistreatment, and the use of denigrating expressions. Also, with reservations, the king showed himself to be favorable to the establishment of outright professional liberty and the participation of the Xuetes in the navy and army, but gave instructions that these dispositions would not take effect until some time had passed in order to allow the controversy to ease.

Before half a year had passed, the deputies insisted again on Xuetes gaining access to whatever occupation they sought, and reported that the insults and discrimination had not stopped. The deputies also complained about the exhibition of the sambenets at St. Domingo. The king designated a panel to study the problem; the panel proposed the withdrawal of the sambenets; the prohibition of Faith Triumphant; the dispersion throughout the city, if necessary by force, of the Xuetes and the elimination of all formal mechanisms of mutual assistance among them; access without restriction to all ecclesiastical, university and military positions; the abolition of the guilds; and the suppression of the statutes of "purity of blood", and, if this were not possible, to limit these to 100 years; these last two were proposed to be applied throughout the kingdom.

Then began a new period of consultations and a new trial, which generated in October 1785 a second Cédula Real, which largely ignored the panel's proposal, and was limited to allowing access to the army and the civil administration. Finally, in 1788, a final disposition established simple equality in the exercise of whatever office, but still without a word about the university nor ecclesiastical positions. That same year, the Court and the General Inquisition took action intended to withdraw the sambenets from the cloister, but without result.

Probably the most palpable effect of the Cédulas Reales was the slow disarticulation of the Segell community (el Carrer). Instead, there came to be small nuclei of Xuetes among the majority of the population and, timidly, some began to establish themselves in other streets and neighbourhoods. For those remaining at Segell, the same attitudes of social discrimination, matrimonial endogamy and traditional professions were kept but, in any case, segregation was overt and public in the world of education and religion, bastions untouched by the reforms of Charles III.

The end of the Old Regime (1812–1868)

[edit]

Majorca was not occupied during the Napoleonic invasion and, in contrast to the liberalism that dominated the new Spanish Constitution of 1812, the island became a refuge for those whose ideology was most intransigent and favorable to the Old Regime. In this context, in 1808, soldiers who had been mobilized to go to the front accused the Xuetes of being responsible for their mobilization, and assaulted the Segell district.

The 1812 Constitution, in effect through 1814, abolished the Inquisition and established the full civil equality that the Xuetes had long sought; consequently, the most active Xuetes joined the liberal cause. In 1820, when the Constitution was restored, a group of Xuetes attacked the headquarters of the Inquisition and the Santo Domingo monastery, burning the archives and the sambenets. In turn, when the Constitution was again abolished in 1823, the Carrer was again raided and the shops looted. Such episodes were frequent during this period, as were similar incidents elsewhere on the island, with riots taking place in Felanitx, Llucmajor, Pollença, Sóller, and Campos, Majorca.

In 1836, Onofre Cortès was appointed councilor of the Palma town hall; it was the first time since the 16th century that a Xueta had occupied a public office at such a level. Since then, it has been a regular occurrence that a Xueta holds a public office in the townhall and the Diputación Provincial.

Interior title page of La Sinagoga Balear

In 1857, La sinagoga balear o historia de los judios de Mallorca (The Balearic synagogue or the history of the Jews of Majorca) was published and signed by Juan de la Puerta Vizcaino. A good part of this book reproduced Faith Triumphant and would be replicated a year later with the work Un milagro y una mentira. Vindicación de los mallorquines cristianos de estirpe hebrea (A miracle and a lie. Vindication of the Majorcan Christians of Hebrew lineage).

Although the ideological duality within the Xueta community can be traced back to a time prior to the inquisitorial trials, it was in this context of violent sudden changes that it became clear that one faction, clearly a minority, yet influential, was declaredly liberal, later republican, and moderately anticlerical, fighting for the liquidation of all traces of discrimination; and another, probably the majority, yet almost imperceptible in historical records, was ideologically conservative, fervently religious, and wanted to go as unnoticed as possible. At root, both strategies wished to attain the same goal: the disappearance of the Xueta issue, although they wanted to resolve it in different ways: one by making the injustice visible and the other by blending into the surrounding society.

Coinciding with these progressive periods, the Xuetes formed social clubs and associations of mutual aid; it is also during this time that they gained positions in political institutions via the liberal parties.

From the First Republic to the Second Republic (1869–1936)

[edit]

Once they could, some well-off families gave their children a high degree of intellectual education and played an important part in the artistic movements of the period. Xuetes took a leading role in the Renaixença (the revival of Catalan culture), in the defense of the Catalan language and in the recuperation of the Floral Games (Catalan/Balear literary competitions). A forerunner of this revival was Tomàs Aguiló i Cortès at the beginning of the 19th century, and some prominent successors were Tomàs Aguiló i Forteza, Marian Aguiló i Fuster, Tomàs Forteza i Cortès, and Ramón Picó i Campamar.

Josep Tarongí Cortès (1847–1890)

Josep Tarongí (1847–1890), priest and writer, encountered difficulties in studying and graduating, but was ultimately ordained; because of his Xueta extraction, he obtained a position outside Majorca. He was the protagonist of the greatest 19th century polemic on the Xueta question: when he was forbidden in 1876 to preach at the church of St. Miquel, this began a polemic with Miquel Maura (also a priest), brother of the politician Antonio Maura, in which many other parties participated, and which had a great impact both on and off of the island.

Between January and October 1923, the Xueta urbanist and politician Guillem Forteza Pinya was mayor of Palma. Also, between 1927 and 1930, during the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera, that office was held by Joan Aguiló Valentí and Rafel Ignaci Cortès Aguiló.

The brief period of the Second Spanish Republic was also important both because of the official laicism and because a good number of the Xuetes sympathized with the new model of the state, much as their forebears had sympathized with the ideas of the Enlightenment and the liberals. During the Republic, for the first time a Xueta priest preached a sermon at the cathedral of Palma; this had great symbolic importance.

From the Spanish Civil War to present times (1936–present)

[edit]

During the Spanish Civil War, Majorca was ruled by Fascist Italy in alliance with the Spanish Nationalist side. Nazi authorities requested lists of persons with Jewish ancestry, planning to deport them to camps as in France and Italy but the intervention of the bishop of Majorca Josep Miralles blocked their delivery. The mixing of German and Italian troops with locals led some Palma women intending to marry foreign soldiers to obtain from the mayor Mateo Zaforteza Musoles certificates of not having Jewish ancestry. While Nazi Germany had the Nuremberg Laws and Fascist Italy the Provvedimenti per la difesa della razza italiana, such procedures were not known in Spain since the 19th century.[5]

Anti-Xueta prejudice continued to diminish with the opening of the island to tourism in the first decades of the 20th century, along with economic development which started by the end of the previous century. The presence—in many cases, the permanent residency—of outsiders on the island (Spaniards or foreigners) to whom the status of the Xuetes meant nothing marked a definite point of inflection in the history of this community.

Also, in 1966, the publication of the book Els descendents dels Jueus Conversos de Mallorca. Quatre mots de la veritat (The descendants of the converted Jews of Majorca. Four words of truth), by Miguel Forteza Piña, brother of mayor Guillem, which made public the research of Baruch Braunstein at the National Historical Archive in Madrid (published in the United States in the 1930s) regarding inquisitorial archives that demonstrated that in Majorca those condemned for judaizing affected more than 200 Majorcan surnames; this raised the last popular controversy over the Xueta question. It was in this moment when discriminatory attitudes ended up marginalized in the private dimension and their public expression virtually disappeared.

The Church of Saint Eulalia in Palma de Mallorca has been used by the families of Jewish converts (Xuetas).[1]

Freedom of religion, while restricted to private practice of religion only, was legally introduced at the end of the Franco era. This made it possible for some of the Xuetes to reestablish contact with Judaism. It was also enhanced during the 1960s in some revivalist movements which did not go further than the case of Nicolau Aguiló, who in 1977 emigrated to Israel and returned to Judaism with the name Nissan Ben-Avraham, later obtaining the title of rabbi. In any case, Judaism and the Xuetes have had a relation of a certain ambivalence in that dealing with Jews who have adhered to a Christian tradition had been a matter not contemplated by the political and religious authorities of Israel. They seem to give importance to the fact of the Xuetes being "of Christian tradition", while for those Xuetes interested in some form of drawing closer to world Jewry, their differentiated existence is explained only by the fact of their being "Jews". Perhaps[speculation?] this duality explains the existence of a syncretic Judæo-Christian cult called Xueta Christianity, although very much a minority, preached by Cayetano Martí Valls. Traditionally, the church of Saint Eulalia and the church of Montesión (Mount Zion) in Palma de Mallorca have been used by the families of Jewish converts (Xuetas),[1] and both are the centers of Xueta religious ritual life.[10][11]

Memorial als xuetes (Memorial to the Xuetas), Gomila Square, Palma de Mallorca. Inaugurated in 2018, it remembers the 37 Xuetas who were executed in this same place in 1691, in an auto-da-fé by the Spanish Inquisition.

An important event, with the advent of democracy, was the election in 1979 of Ramon Aguiló (of direct Xueta ancestry), re-elected socialist mayor of Palma until 1991, whose election by popular vote could be considered the principal evidence of the decline of discrimination, ratified by other cases, such as that of Francesc Aguiló, mayor of Campanet.

All of this, however, does not imply a complete elimination of rejection of the Xuetes, as is indicated by a poll conducted by the University of the Balearic Islands in 2001, in which 30% of Majorcans affirmed that they would not marry a Xueta, and 5% declared that they would not even want to have Xuetes as friends, numbers that, despite being high, are nuanced in that those in favor of discrimination tend to be seniors.

Several Xueta institutions have been created in recent years: the association RCA-Llegat Jueu ("Jewish Legacy"), the investigative group Memòria del Carrer,[12] the religious group Institut Rafel Valls, the magazine Segell,[13] and the city of Palma has joined the Red de Juderias de España[14] ("Network of Spanish Jewries", Spanish cities with a historic Jewish presence).

Immigration in the early 21st century is stimulating renewed activity in the community, including at the Palma synagogue, involving newcomers and Chuetas.[1] A son of the community, Rabbi Nissan Ben-Avraham returned to Spain in 2010 after being ordained as a rabbi in Israel.[15]

Recognition

[edit]

In 2011 Rabbi Nissim Karelitz, a leading rabbi and halachic authority and chairman of the Beit Din Tzedek rabbinical court in Bnei Brak, Israel, recognized the Chuetas of Palma de Majorca as Jewish.[16]

The Xuetes' discrimination was in September 2023 formally acknowledged by the parliament of the Balearic Islands. The Federation of Jewish Communities of Spain hailed such an institutional unanimous recognition of "the discrimination and marginalisation suffered by the descendants of the island's Jews". In 2015, the Spanish government had already successfully (more than 30,000 applications) offered citizenship to descendants of Jews expelled in 1492 "to compensate for shameful events in the country's past".[3]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Xuetas, also known as Chuetas or Xuetons, are a distinct Catholic in , , descended from the island's medieval Jewish population that was forcibly converted to during the . Following the anti-Jewish pogroms of 1391 and the mass conversions decreed in 1435, survivors adopted outwardly while initially retaining some Judaizing practices, leading to their classification as conversos or New Christians subject to . Over generations, they intermarried strictly within 15 designated family lines—such as Aguiló, Bonnín, and Cortès—preserving a degree of genetic continuity amid social ostracism that barred them from many professions and intermarriages with "Old Christians." Confined largely to trades like silversmithing, butchery, and lacemaking, the Xuetas endured centuries of stigma, including public executions during autos-da-fé and exclusion from guilds, , and , despite their devout Catholicism and abandonment of overt Jewish customs by the . This discrimination persisted into the , with formal barriers lifted only in , though informal prejudices lingered until societal shifts and genetic studies confirmed their Sephardic Jewish ancestry, prompting official Spanish recognition of historical injustices in 2023. Numbering around 15,000 to 20,000 today, primarily in Palma's historic center, the community has maintained until recent decades, fostering a unique marked by resilience amid assimilation. In contemporary times, a minority of Xuetas have explored their Jewish heritage, with some undergoing formal conversions to and participating in revived rituals, though the group as a whole remains integrated into Mallorcan Catholic society without widespread reversion to pre-conversion practices. Their story exemplifies the long-term causal effects of religious and inquisitorial enforcement, where initial eroded under sustained pressure, yielding a hybrid identity neither fully accepted by host populations nor connected to global Jewry.

Identity and Terminology

Etymology and Definitions

The term Xueta (Catalan spelling; Spanish Chueta) denotes a hereditary social group on the island of Majorca, , consisting of descendants from the island's medieval Jewish community who underwent forced or voluntary conversion to Christianity, especially following the anti-Jewish riots of 1391 and the general expulsion edict of that spared converts. This group, numbering around 15,000–20,000 individuals today concentrated in Palma de Majorca, has maintained strict across generations, often linked to 15 specific surnames, while outwardly practicing Roman Catholicism and dominating trades like silversmithing. Despite assimilation, Xuetes faced persistent as presumed crypto-Jews (), including bans on intermarriage, exclusion from guilds and , and public stigmatization until legal emancipation in 1782 and fuller social integration in the . The etymology of Xueta traces to the dialect, deriving from juetó (or jueto), a diminutive of jueu ("Jew"), connoting "little Jew" or "Jew boy" as a label applied by the Christian majority to mark descendants. This usage emerged in the post-conversion era to enforce social separation, distinguishing Xuetes from Old Christians and genuine converts elsewhere in (often termed Marranos). Less prevalent theories link it to xulla ("pork fat" or ""), implying ostentatious pork consumption to affirm Christian fidelity and refute Judaizing accusations, or to French influences, but linguistic specialists favor the Catalan-Jewish root due to phonetic and historical consistency in Majorcan records from the 15th century onward. The term carries enduring derogatory weight, historically invoked during inquisitorial trials and social boycotts to perpetuate exclusion.

Associated Surnames and Social Identification

The Xueta community on Majorca has been socially identified for centuries by a fixed set of 15 surnames, resulting from enforced following the mass conversions of 1391 and subsequent isolation from the broader population. These surnames—Aguiló, Bonnín, Cortès, Forteza, Fuster, Martí, Miró, Picó, Pinya, Pomar, Segura, Tarongí, , Valentí, and Valleriola—are borne almost exclusively by individuals of Xueta descent on the island, with an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 contemporary bearers. This arose because Xuetas intermarried only within their group to avoid external scrutiny, preserving lineage markers amid persistent that barred them from most guilds, positions, and noble titles. Social identification via these surnames facilitated both internal cohesion and external stigmatization, as non-Xuetas refused intermarriage and social mixing, often enforcing residential segregation in Palma's Call Major or Carrer del Segell. Historical records, including documents and parish registers, consistently link these families to origins, distinguishing them from other Majorcan families with Jewish-derived but non-endogamous surnames such as Abraham, Bofill, or Vidal. Genetic analyses of surname clusters, such as those in the Xueta DNA , further corroborate this isolation, showing shared haplogroups among bearers that trace to medieval Levantine Jewish ancestry. By the , royal decrees like the 1782 cédula began easing formal restrictions, yet informal prejudice persisted, with surnames serving as de facto markers of "impure" blood until the . In modern times, these surnames continue to signal Xueta identity, enabling cultural revival efforts; for instance, since the , associations like the Amics de la Casa de Monti-Sió have used them to trace genealogies and petition for Jewish recognition from bodies like Israel's Chief Rabbinate in 2011. However, not every islander with a Xueta identifies as such, and has diluted some lineages outside Majorca, though the core population remains tightly knit. This -based system underscores the Xuetas' unique status as a Catholic ethnoreligious minority, defined more by descent than practice.

Genetic Evidence

Key Studies on Ancestry and Endogamy

A study published in Scientific Reports in 2020 examined Y-chromosome and from 100 Chueta males and 104 females, identifying a substantial Middle Eastern genetic legacy in both lineages despite historical admixture. Paternal markers included elevated frequencies of s J2-M172 (33%) and J1-M267 (18%), akin to those in Sephardic Jewish populations, with notably low European R1b-M269 (4%) compared to 63% in Majorcans. Maternal lineages featured the rare Middle Eastern-derived R0a2m as the modal (21%), alongside other Jewish-associated types like K1a1b1a and U1a1a, distinguishing Chuetas from the host population. The analysis revealed haplotype diversity levels of 0.965 for Y-chromosome and 0.950 for mtDNA, higher than anticipated for a small, group isolated since the , indicating that strict intra-group marriage practices mitigated and founder effects. Linked to 15 traditional surnames, these patterns supported historical among descendants of Majorcan crypto-Jews, preserving ancestral signatures over generations while showing limited from non-Chuetas. An earlier comparative study in Human Biology from 1997 used classical genetic markers (e.g., G6PD, Rh, ABO) on Chuetas, positioning them genetically intermediate between Middle Eastern Jewish groups and circum-Mediterranean non-Jews due to admixture estimated at around 50%. Principal components and discriminant analyses confirmed a core Jewish origin, with endogamy reinforcing distinctiveness from Balearic neighbors despite intermixing. A 2019 forensic assessment of autosomal STR markers in Chuetas reported diversity indices unexpectedly robust for an isolated, endogamous of roughly 15,000-20,000 individuals, attributing this to sustained internal mating networks that countered isolation-induced homogeneity.30049-6/fulltext) These findings collectively affirm Chueta endogamy's role in retaining Jewish ancestry markers amid social segregation.30049-6/fulltext)

Paternal and Maternal Genetic Markers

Paternal lineages in the Xueta , derived from Y-chromosome of 100 males, exhibit a strong Middle Eastern genetic signature, with J2-M172 comprising 33% and J1-M267 18% of the sample, frequencies indicative of founder effects from Jewish ancestry. These contrast markedly with the surrounding Majorcan , where R1b-M269 reaches 63% and J lineages remain low (around 10% combined for J1/J2). Additional include E1b-M78 (14%), Q1-P36.2 (10%), and G-M201 (8%), further aligning Xueta profiles with Sephardic Jewish groups rather than Iberian baselines, while R1b-M269 appears at only 4%. diversity stands at 0.965, lower than Majorcans (0.998), reflecting historical and reduced , evidenced by star-like network structures and surname-specific clustering.
Y-Chromosome Frequency in Xuetas (%)Notes
J2-M17233Middle Eastern/Jewish founder lineage
J1-M26718Middle Eastern/Jewish founder lineage
E1b-M7814Common in Mediterranean/Jewish contexts
Q1-P36.210Rare in , linked to Central Asian/Jewish
G-M2018Prevalent in
R1a1a-M174Minor Indo-European input
R1b-M2694Low vs. Majorcan norm (63%)
Maternal lineages, assessed via mtDNA control region sequencing in 104 Xueta individuals, show a mix of European and Middle Eastern haplogroups, but with elevated frequencies of non-European clades preserving Jewish maternal ancestry. R0a (including sub-branch R0a + 60.1T at 20%) dominates founder effects, alongside T (19%) and K (12%), while H is reduced to 17% compared to 39% in Majorcans. An earlier study noted a 23% frequency of preHV-1, a Middle Eastern lineage closely tied to Jewish origins, positioning Xuetas phylogenetically between Middle Eastern and local Iberian samples. Diversity metrics, such as theta_k, are lower than in Majorcans but comparable to , with 48% unique haplotypes and evidence of a distinct R0a2m , underscoring endogamy's role in maintaining maternal genetic isolation despite admixture. Overall differentiation from Majorcans is significant (F_ST p < 10^{-5}), confirming a preserved Middle Eastern maternal legacy.

Historical Origins

Medieval Jewish Community in Majorca


The medieval Jewish community in Majorca coalesced after the island's conquest by from 1229 to 1232, building on earlier presence evidenced from 1135 under Muslim rule and influxes of refugees fleeing 12th-century Almohad persecutions. Post-reconquest, from bolstered the population, settling mainly in Palma de Mallorca's Jewish quarter, the Call Major, established by the late between Temple and Calatrava streets. Smaller communities dotted towns including Inca, , Montiori, , Sineu, Alcudia, , and Pollensa, with the overall population exceeding 1,000 families by the late prior to the 1391 violence.
Jews fulfilled vital economic functions, participating in maritime trade, crafts such as gold- and silversmithing and shoemaking, agriculture, and moneylending, while paying a collective annual tax of 5,000 sòlidos to the crown in 1271. Royal privileges granted in 1250 and 1269 protected their practices, enabling roles like physicians to the royal family and tax farming. Intellectual contributions included cartographers Abraham Cresques and Judah Cresques, who produced influential nautical charts, and scholars like R. Aaron ha-Kohen, author of Sefer ha-Hinukh, alongside figures such as Bahye, Solomon Alconstantini, Samuel Benveniste, and Don Jucef Faquim. Religious infrastructure featured synagogues in Palma, one of which was converted into the Church of Santa Fe in 1311, prompting authorization for a new one in 1315. A key intellectual event was the 1286 Disputation of , pitting Jewish scholars against a Christian merchant. Yet, underlying tensions surfaced in anti-Jewish riots of 1305 and 1309, alongside a 1309 accusation, foreshadowing broader perils.

Conversion and Early Converso Period (1391–1488)

The anti-Jewish riots of 1391, which began in Seville in June and spread across the Crown of Aragon, reached Majorca in late July or early August, with violence erupting in Palma de Mallorca. Youths armed with crucifixes infiltrated the Jewish quarter (aljama), breaking down its gates despite defensive efforts by the Jewish community and royal officials. The assault resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Jews, widespread looting and destruction of property, including synagogues, and the forced baptism of a significant portion of the survivors, estimated at several hundred to a thousand individuals from a pre-riot community possibly comprising over 500 families. The riots decimated Majorca's Jewish population, with many fleeing to or accepting conversion to avoid death or enslavement. One prominent in Palma was desecrated and repurposed as the Church of Mont Sion, symbolizing the abrupt end to organized Jewish life on the . Royal intervention was limited; King John I of issued orders to protect remaining , but enforcement was ineffective amid local hostility fueled by economic resentments and religious fervor. By the end of 1391, only a small number of Jewish families persisted openly, taxed as such until further pressures mounted. In the ensuing decades, the conversos—new descended from these converts—faced ongoing suspicion of insincere faith, despite many integrating into Christian society through and public conformity. Preaching campaigns, notably by the Dominican Vicent Ferrer in 1413–1415, targeted the residual Jewish community, leading to additional conversions through , , and disputations that emphasized Christian doctrine. By 1435, no openly practicing remained in Majorca; the communal tax (call) on was discontinued, marking the formal of the aljama. During this early converso period, social and economic barriers emerged, confining many to specific trades like shoemaking and silversmithing, precursors to later stigmatized occupations. While some conversos fully assimilated and intermarried with Old Christians, others preserved elements of through and private rituals, constituting early (Judaizing). Evidence of such practices is anecdotal before systematic inquisitorial records, but royal and ecclesiastical scrutiny of converso orthodoxy increased, reflecting persistent doubts about their loyalty to . This era laid the foundation for the distinct converso lineage that evolved into the Xueta community, characterized by internal cohesion amid external exclusion. The establishment of the Spanish Inquisition's tribunal in Majorca in 1488 would intensify these tensions, but prior to that, local episcopal courts handled sporadic accusations of heresy among conversos.

Inquisition Establishment and Initial Trials (1488–1544)

The Spanish Inquisition's in Majorca was established in 1488, four years after the had eliminated open Jewish practice on the island, with its primary focus on investigating conversos suspected of secretly adhering to , known as judaizing. The arrival of the first inquisitors prompted an initial period of offers, under which approximately 680 conversos sought pardon for by confessing their practices and paying substantial fines, allowing them to reconcile with the Church without immediate severe penalties. This approach facilitated rapid identification of suspected heretics through voluntary disclosures, setting the stage for subsequent enforcement. From onward, the conducted an intensive wave of investigations, resulting in 346 trials by the close of the , during which 257 were relaxed to the secular arm for execution, typically by burning at the stake. Public autos-da-fé were held, with notable executions of secret beginning in 1509 at the Gate of Jesus in Palma, reinforcing communal deterrence against perceived relapse into Jewish customs such as dietary observance or Sabbath-keeping. Reconciliations were common in the early phase, particularly between and 1516, as many conversos opted for and to avoid , though the high volume of trials reflected widespread suspicion toward the endogamous converso community that would later be stigmatized as Xuetas. By the 1520s, inquisitorial activity in Majorca subsided significantly, with fewer prosecutions through 1544 as the shifted resources and the initial fervor waned, though sporadic investigations persisted against individuals accused of persistent judaizing. This lull allowed the population to consolidate socially and economically in Palma, particularly in trades like silversmithing, while maintaining outward Catholic conformity amid lingering distrust. The period's trials entrenched divisions, as denunciations from Old Christians and internal confessions fueled the process, with records indicating a focus on familial networks suspected of transmitting Jewish rites across generations.

Periods of Persecution and Clandestinity

Renewed Underground Practices (1545–1673)

Following the subsidence of intensive inquisitorial activity after 1544, which had convicted and punished numerous conversos for alleged judaizing, the Chueta population in Majorca experienced a phase of diminished overt scrutiny from the local through much of the 16th and early 17th centuries. This allowed for the discreet revival and maintenance of crypto-Jewish customs among certain families, conducted in strict secrecy to evade detection. Archival from later trials reveals that these practices encompassed domestic rituals such as igniting candles on evenings to commence the , selective adherence to dietary prohibitions against and , and the recitation of modified Hebrew prayers during family gatherings, often veiled as . Transmission of these observances frequently occurred matrilineally, with mothers instructing daughters and young children in subtle acts like ritual handwashing prior to eating, avoidance of work on under pretexts, and distinctive mourning rites that echoed Jewish traditions without explicit markers. Such customs persisted amid public conformity to , including attendance at and of offspring, reflecting a pragmatic to under . Testimonies from the era, preserved in inquisitorial records, indicate no widespread prosecutions for these infractions between approximately and the 1660s, suggesting effective concealment or localized tolerance within the island's quarter. Endogamy remained a of Chueta identity, with intermarriages rigidly limited to the descendants of the original 15th-century converts, encompassing surnames like Bonnin, Cortès, and Segura, thereby fostering genetic and cultural insularity despite nominal assimilation. Economic pursuits in silversmithing, butchery, and commerce provided communal cohesion, enabling private reinforcement of ancestral ties. By the early 1670s, however, whispers of collective "judaizing" conspiracies began to surface among informants, precipitating the prosecutor's 1674 report to the Suprema detailing 33 specific infractions, which marked to escalated investigations.

The Second Persecution and Conspiracism (1673–1691)

The second persecution of the Xuetas (also known as Chuetas) commenced in 1673 when a ship carrying around 40 Jews expelled from Orán docked in Palma de Mallorca, sparking rumors of clandestine meetings with local Xueta families and reviving fears of persistent Judaizing practices after nearly 130 years of relative Inquisitorial inactivity. This incident coincided with broader geopolitical tensions, including threats from English and Dutch naval forces, heightening suspicions that the Xuetas—descendants of 15th-century Jewish converts who maintained economic prominence in tanning, butchery, and trade financing—might serve as a fifth column due to their foreign contacts and wealth. The Mallorcan Inquisition, facing financial strains, leveraged these concerns to initiate investigations, framing Xueta activities as part of a subversive network rather than isolated customs. By 1678, denunciations escalated into accusations of a "complicidad" or grand among Xuetas to secretly observe Jewish rites, such as Sabbath-keeping, fasting, and pork avoidance, with prominent families like the Tarongí, Cortès, and implicated as ringleaders. Inquisitors, including influences from Jesuit Vicente Garau, portrayed this as an organized plot threatening Catholic , amplified by economic envy over Xueta control of naval financing and institutional needs for confiscations to fund operations amid royal debts. Arrests swept up hundreds, with extracting confessions that revealed endogamous marriages reinforcing cultural isolation and residual practices, though the coordinated "conspiracism" likely exaggerated diffuse family traditions into a monolithic to justify mass repression. Between 1678 and 1691, the processed numerous cases, imprisoning suspects for years and seizing properties, which provided substantial revenue but devastated Xueta economic positions. Historians attribute the intensity of conspiracism to a confluence of antisemitic stereotypes, fiscal incentives, and political instability, where genuine evidence of Judaizing—sustained through generations despite conversion—was inflated into existential peril. The trials exposed systemic Xueta strategies for cultural survival, including use and ritual adaptations, but under duress, confessions often aligned with Inquisitorial expectations rather than proving a unified cabal. By 1691, over 200 Xuetas faced condemnation in preparatory proceedings for autos de fe, marking the persecution's peak before final executions, with the episode underscoring how source biases in Inquisitorial records—driven by institutional —shaped narratives of collective guilt over individual variances.

The Cremadissa and Final Inquisition Trials (1691–1695)

In 1688, a group of Xuetas attempted to flee Majorca by ship to but were forced back by a storm, prompting the to investigate suspicions of . This led to widespread arrests and trials characterized by strict isolation of prisoners to prevent coordinated defenses and extract confessions through denunciations. The process, building on earlier accusations from 1673–1674 of secret Jewish practices such as observing dietary laws and refusing intermarriage with Old Christians, culminated in three held in Palma during 1691. The Cremadissa, or "great burning," occurred as part of these ceremonies, resulting in the execution of 37 Xuetas by burning at the stake in Gomila Square, Palma, with 34 garroted prior to burning after confessing and 3 burned alive for impenitence. Named victims included Rafel Valls, Rafel Benet, and Caterina Tarongí among the three burned alive, alongside five burned in effigy and the exhumation and burning of three deceased individuals' remains. Overall, 73 to 88 Xuetas were condemned, with dozens reconciled to the Church through public , attended by up to 30,000 spectators. Following the 1691 autos-da-fé, the pursued additional cases arising from denunciations made by the accused during interrogations, extending trials through 1695. These final proceedings targeted individuals implicated in the same network of alleged Judaizing, but with diminished scale, as the severe measures had effectively dismantled organized crypto-Jewish practices among the Xuetas. By 1695, the tribunal closed its last related cases, marking the end of active persecution against the group and the cessation of underground Jewish observances in Majorca.

Social Discrimination and Propaganda

Literary and Cultural Mechanisms of Exclusion

Anti-Xueta literature primarily consisted of polemical pamphlets and treatises that depicted the group as inherently unassimilable and prone to secret Judaizing, thereby justifying their perpetual marginalization despite formal Catholic adherence. These texts often recycled Inquisition-era accusations of and persistence, framing Xuetas as a to social purity. A notable example occurred in the when Xueta petitions for equal rights prompted opponents to republish earlier libels, including works from the 1690s era, to argue against their integration into institutions like universities. Such emphasized fabricated lineages of deceit, influencing and civil authorities to uphold discriminatory statutes into the 1700s. Folk literature and oral traditions amplified exclusion through derogatory rhymes and ballads embedded in Majorcan culture, portraying Xuetas with antisemitic tropes of greed, physical deformity, or demonic traits. Children's chants, such as "Chuetas, chuetas, sin cabeza, con dos cuernos y una greña" (Chuetas, chuetas, headless, with two horns and sidelocks), mocked their supposed Jewish features and persisted in schoolyards well into the mid-20th century, inculcating generational prejudice. These verses, rooted in post-Inquisition folklore, reinforced endogamy taboos by associating Xueta bloodlines with impurity, deterring intermarriage and social mixing. Culturally, Xuetas faced institutional barriers in confraternities (cofradías) and literary academies, which controlled processions, festivals, and intellectual gatherings, effectively barring them from public cultural expression. For instance, exclusion from Palma's religious brotherhoods—key to civic identity and events—isolated Xuetas to their designated church pews, symbolizing their inferior status during communal rituals. This segregation extended to theaters and salons, where non-Xuetas avoided association, perpetuating a parallel cultural sphere that stigmatized Xueta artisans and merchants despite their economic prominence in trades like silversmithing. Such mechanisms sustained by embedding exclusion in everyday traditions, with verbal slurs like "xueta de cor i de pell" (Xueta of heart and skin) invoking immutable Jewish essence.

Economic and Institutional Barriers

The Xuetas encountered profound institutional barriers stemming from statutes, which mandated Old Christian lineage for eligibility in key societal structures. These exclusions barred them from public offices, universities, military commissions, and religious orders, including the priesthood and convents, effectively limiting upward mobility and civic participation until the late 18th century. Such restrictions perpetuated their marginalization, as institutional gatekeeping reinforced social stigma and prevented integration into power centers dominated by established Christian families. Economically, the Xuetas were systematically excluded from membership in craft guilds (gremios), which monopolized access to licensed trades and apprenticeships in Majorca. This forced concentration in unregulated or niche professions such as goldsmithing, silversmithing, , furriery, and certain mercantile roles like druggists and jewelers, where they sometimes achieved dominance despite opposition. Guild resistance was overt; for example, in 1773, the Tailors’ Guild defied a decree by refusing to admit a Xueta applicant, illustrating how local enforcement undermined central edicts aimed at equality. In cases of Xueta majorities within a guild, organizations splintered to exclude them, further entrenching professional silos. Periodic confiscations of property during Inquisition trials, such as the 1691 where over 50 Xuetas lost assets after failed attempts, compounded these barriers by eroding . Residential segregation in Palma's Call Major, enforced until a royal decree permitted free movement and abolished labels, amplified economic isolation by restricting commercial networks and intermarriage, which stifled business partnerships. The 1785 reforms extended eligibility to the , , and public offices, nominally dismantling formal institutional hurdles, yet entrenched prejudices delayed practical access, with guilds and elites continuing to invoke lineage scrutiny into the . These mechanisms, blending statutory exclusion with customary bias, sustained the Xuetas' economic niche-dependence while shielding broader markets from their competition.

Community Development

18th Century: War, Propaganda Revival, and Deputies (1705–1788)

During the (1701–1714), which reached between 1706 and 1715, the Xuetas (also known as Chuetas) exhibited divided loyalties amid the conflict between Bourbon and Habsburg supporters. Some Xuetas aligned with the Bourbon faction under Philip V, viewing the French-backed dynasty as potentially more amenable to their compared to the Habsburgs, whose Austrian allies evoked historical associations with Catholic and anti-converso policies; this alignment fueled accusations of disloyalty from Habsburg sympathizers in Palma. The Bourbon victory culminated in the conquest of in 1715, followed by the of 1716, which centralized authority under and dismantled the island's autonomous institutions, exacerbating economic pressures on Xueta artisans and merchants who had previously navigated local guilds despite restrictions. The early 18th century saw isolated activity against Xuetas, including the 1718 trial of Rafel Pinya, who self-incriminated for judaizing practices and was reconciled to the Church without execution, reflecting waning but persistent inquisitorial oversight. Mid-century witnessed a revival of anti-Xueta , drawing on 17th-century tropes of ritual impurity and economic dominance to reinforce ; pamphlets and sermons portrayed Xuetas as perpetual threats to Catholic purity, justifying barriers to intermarriage, membership, and public office despite their outward conformity. This rhetoric, disseminated through ecclesiastical channels and local print, echoed earlier conspiracism but adapted to Enlightenment-era debates on equality, often framing Xueta petitions for relief as subversive. By the 1780s, Xuetas organized deputies to petition King Charles III for redress, culminating in three royal decrees issued in that tentatively eased prohibitions on professions, , and social mixing. The pivotal of , , and its publication on , marked a cautious royal endorsement of integration, allowing Xuetas access to certain trades and universities while stopping short of full equality due to clerical opposition; this stemmed from documented petitions highlighting their and economic contributions, though local resistance persisted.

19th Century: End of Old Regime to Republics (1812–1936)

The abolition of the Spanish Inquisition in 1834, formalized by royal decree under the regency of Maria Christina during Spain's liberal trienio and Carlist Wars era, marked the end of formal legal persecution against conversos, including the Xuetas of Mallorca. This followed its temporary suppression in 1820 amid Ferdinand VII's constitutional concessions, removing inquisitorial oversight that had historically targeted suspected Judaizing practices among Xueta families. Despite these reforms, which aligned with broader European secularization trends, social and customary discrimination endured, rooted in longstanding communal stigma rather than ecclesiastical enforcement. Throughout the , Xuetas faced exclusion from key institutions, including admission to , convents, and military officer ranks, perpetuating their isolation within Palma de Mallorca's society. Intermarriage with non-Xuetas remained exceptional due to , enforcing among the roughly 15 core families and their descendants, who numbered several hundred households by mid-century. Economic niches in trades—particularly goldsmithing, silversmithing, and emerging plumbing—provided relative prosperity and internal cohesion, with community mechanisms like elected "hombres rectos" resolving disputes and mutual aid sustaining the group amid barriers to entry elsewhere. French writer , during her 1838–1839 residence on the island, documented this , describing Xuetas as a segregated scorned for their ancestral origins despite outward Catholic conformity. Liberal constitutional frameworks, such as the 1812 Cádiz Constitution and the 1837 statutes under , theoretically extended equal citizenship, yet local Mallorcan customs lagged, with Xuetas petitioning unsuccessfully for redress against entrenched biases. By the 1870s, amid the First Republic's brief egalitarian push (1873–1874) and subsequent Restoration monarchy, some Xuetas accessed and professional avenues, though often requiring emigration to mainland or abroad—such as —to evade origin-based rejection. Canon José Tarongí's 1877 writings highlighted ongoing discrimination, underscoring how economic envy and religious residue fueled exclusion even as industrialized. The Second Republic (1931–1936) introduced anti-clerical reforms and expanded civil rights, offering tentative integration prospects for Xuetas through and reduced church influence, though rural in preserved social divides. Community resilience manifested in sustained trade dominance and internal solidarity, but prejudice—manifest in slurs like "chueta" and avoidance rituals—persisted into the , with full abatement delayed until post-1936 upheavals. This era thus bridged formal emancipation with enduring informal barriers, shaping Xueta identity as a distinct, adaptive enclave amid Spain's turbulent shift from absolutism to .

20th Century: Civil War, Francoism, and Transition (1936–1980s)

During the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), the Xuetes, as descendants of conversos integrated into Catholic society, nonetheless encountered renewed suspicion and harassment in Mallorca due to their historical stigma as crypto-Jews. With the island falling under Nationalist control by August 1936 following the failed Republican landings, lists of the 15 traditional Xueta surnames circulated amid initial chaos, subjecting families to scrutiny and demands to affirm their Catholic orthodoxy through public demonstrations of piety. Under Francoism (1939–1975), official policy emphasized Catholic unity and national reconciliation, yet social discrimination against Xuetes persisted, particularly in the 1940s and 1950s, manifesting in exclusion from certain social clubs, marriages, and elite professions outside their traditional niches like jewelry-making and butchery. To counter accusations of disloyalty, some Xuetes enlisted in Falangist organizations or volunteered for the on the Eastern Front during , with Balearic records indicating participation by descendants to prove their allegiance to the regime. By the , economic modernization, influx, and urban migration eroded and overt stigma, though informal prejudices lingered into the 1970s, preserving a distinct community identity centered in Palma. The following Franco's death in November accelerated Xueta integration, as constitutional reforms, amnesty laws, and societal liberalization diminished anti-Xueta sentiment by the early 1980s. Intermarriages with non-Xuetas surged, breaking centuries-old isolation, while some families began openly reclaiming Jewish heritage, including conversions and attendance, exemplified by a 1979 initiative by Nicolas Castro to study . This period marked the effective end of institutionalized , aligning Xuetes with broader Spanish trends toward pluralism and identity reclamation.

Modern Status and Recognition

Post-Democracy Integration and Genetic Affirmation (1990s–2010s)

In the wake of 's , formalized by the 1978 Constitution, Xuetes experienced accelerated social integration in during the 1990s and 2000s, as longstanding legal prohibitions on intermarriage and occupational exclusion were rendered obsolete under equal protection clauses. By the early 1990s, rates—historically near-total due to —had significantly declined, with Xuetes increasingly marrying outside their group and accessing higher education and professions previously barred, such as and roles. This shift reflected broader societal liberalization, though residual informal persisted in social clubs and family networks, prompting some Xuetes to migrate to mainland for anonymity. Genetic research during this era provided empirical affirmation of Xuete descent from , countering centuries of denial by demonstrating distinct Middle Eastern and Iberian Jewish markers. A 1997 study analyzing classical genetic polymorphisms in 40 Chueta individuals found close affinities to other Jewish populations, including elevated frequencies of traits like the FMF gene mutation shared with groups, indicating limited admixture despite isolation. Subsequent analyses of Y-chromosome and mtDNA reinforced this, revealing J1 frequencies (14% in Chuetas) akin to Levantine origins, with low European , thus validating their crypto-Jewish lineage amid endogamous practices. These findings, published in peer-reviewed journals, bolstered community self-perception, though most Xuetes maintained Catholic observance, viewing the data as historical validation rather than impetus for religious change. By the 2000s, heightened awareness of genetic heritage spurred tentative identity exploration, with small groups petitioning rabbinical authorities for recognition as by descent, though formal conversions remained rare due to Orthodox requirements for matrilineal proof. Approximately a dozen Xuetes pursued Judaization processes around 2010, facilitated by Israel's discussions, yet societal integration prioritized civic equality over ethnic revival, as evidenced by Xuete representation in local politics and business without reference to ancestry. This period marked a causal pivot from stigma-driven isolation to evidence-based affirmation, enabling fuller participation in democratic institutions while preserving endogamous surnames as cultural markers.30049-6/fulltext)

Recent Official Recognitions and Identity Debates (2020s)

In September 2023, the Parliament of the Balearic Islands unanimously approved a non-legislative declaration formally acknowledging the centuries-long marginalization, discrimination, and persecution suffered by the Xuetes, descendants of Jews forcibly converted to Christianity on Mallorca in the 15th century. The measure, initiated by the Popular Party parliamentary group in late 2022, described the Xuetes as victims of systemic exclusion, including social stigma, economic barriers, and Inquisition-era executions, and called for educational initiatives to preserve their history and combat lingering prejudice. This recognition, the first of its kind at the regional level, emphasized the community's endogamous preservation of lineage despite assimilation into Catholicism, estimating around 15,000 to 20,000 living Xuetes primarily in Palma. The declaration prompted renewed discussions on Xueta identity, highlighting tensions between historical Catholic integration and ancestral Jewish roots. While some Xuetes and advocates, including organizations like , promote cultural reconnection—such as through genealogy projects and visits—many community members continue to identify exclusively as Catholics, citing generational trauma and of renewed stigma as barriers to embracing . Critics within the community argue that official recognition risks oversimplifying their hybrid identity, forged through and survival strategies like , rather than resolving underlying debates over halachic status under Jewish law, which requires orthodox conversion for most despite shared maternal descent. These debates underscore empirical evidence from genetic studies confirming high and Sephardic markers among Xuetes, yet reveal skepticism toward rapid "return" narratives amid Spain's broader Sephardic citizenship reforms, which have facilitated passports for thousands of descendants since 2015 but exclude automatic religious recognition. Public discourse in the 2020s has also addressed persistent subtle , with parliamentary from Xueta descendants describing intra-family silences and external as echoes of medieval exclusion lists barring them from guilds and marriages. Proponents of further action, including memorials and inclusion, view the 2023 acknowledgment as a step toward reparative , though implementation remains limited to symbolic gestures without financial reparations or legal protections against bias.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.