Hubbry Logo
ZobahZobahMain
Open search
Zobah
Community hub
Zobah
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Zobah
Zobah
Zobah
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Zobah or Aram-Zobah (Hebrew: אֲרָם צוֹבָא, romanized: ʾĂrām Ṣōḇāʾ) was an early Aramean state and former vassal kingdom of Israel mentioned in the Hebrew Bible that extended northeast of David's realm according to the Hebrew Bible.[1]

Alexander Kirkpatrick, in the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (1896), places it broadly between Damascus and the Euphrates.[1] It is thought by some to have extended from the Beqaa Valley along the eastern side of the Anti-Lebanon mountains, reaching Hama to the north and Damascus to the south, making it at one time a state of considerable importance.[2]

Middle Bronze Age

[edit]

The earliest extrabiblical attestation of Zobah occurs in an Old Babylonian tablet unearthed at Mari (M. 5423) that describes the campaign of the troops of Mari, led by Išhî-Addu, king of Qaṭna, to the Beqaa Valley. The tablet describes the city of Ṣîbat (probably identical to biblical Zobah and the Neo-Assyrian city of Ṣubat) as among the cities conquered by the king's troops.[3][4][5]

Iron Age

[edit]

In the Hebrew Bible

[edit]

In 1 Samuel 14:47, the kings of Zobah were said to have fought with the Israelite king Saul. Kirkpatrick suggests that "the 'kings' were independent chiefs", but by the time of David, there was a single king, Hadadezer bar Rehob.[1] Later, King Hadadezer bar Rehob allied with Ammon against King David, who defeated Zobah and made the kingdom tributary to Israel (2 Samuel 10). In this war, Arameans from across the Euphrates came to Hadadezer's aid (2 Sam. 10:16). Upon the accession of Solomon, Zobah became independent of Israel (compare 1 Kings 11:23 et seq.).

The chapter-heading of Psalm 60 in the New King James Version refers to Zobah.[6] In the Revised Standard Version and the New American Bible (Revised Edition), the reference is to Aram-Zobah.[7][8]

Assyrian period

[edit]

During the Neo-Assyrian period, Ṣubat is mentioned in the annals of Tiglath-Pileser III (745–727 BC) as the capital of a province following his conquests in the region. The Assyrian records also name two local governors: Šamaš-aḫu-iddina and Bēl-liqbi.[9]

Zobah is also attested as Ṣbh in Aramaic graffiti from the 8th century BC that were found in Hama.[10]

Medieval Rabbinical sources

[edit]

From the 11th century, it was common Rabbinic usage to apply the term "Aram-Zobah" to the area of Aleppo, and this is perpetuated by Syrian Jews to this day.[11] However, Saadia Gaon (882‒942 CE), in his Judeo-Arabic translation (tafsīr) of the Psalms identified Aram-zobah with Nisibis.[12]

Identification attempts

[edit]

Based on the biblical narrative, primarily from the Books of Kings and 2 Samuel, Berothai, a city belonging to Hadadezer (2 Sam. 8:8) is identified by many with Berothah (Ezekiel 47:16), which was between Hamath and Damascus.[13] Zobah was probably located near this city, though Joseph Halévy claims to have identified Zobah with Chalcis.[13] On the later view, the area in question would be found in the far north of Syria and parts of Turkey.[dubious – discuss][citation needed]

Some sources indicate that Zobah city is the modern city of Homs in Syria,[14] or Anjar in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.[15]

According to Edward Lipiński, the location of the capital city of Ṣoba corresponds to the present archaeological site of Tell Deir in the Beqaa Valley of modern-day Lebanon.[16] Gaby Abousamra connects Zobah with the modern-day village of Zabbud, also in Lebanon.[17] Nadav Na'aman suggests Al-Qusayr north of Riblah as one possible candidate for the biblical city.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Zobah

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Zobah, also known as Aram-Zobah, was an ancient Aramean kingdom in the southern Levant, situated in the region between modern-day and , during the late second millennium BCE and early first millennium BCE. It is primarily attested in the as a significant political entity that interacted with the emerging Kingdom of under its early monarchs. The kingdom first appears in biblical accounts during the reign of King Saul, who waged wars against the kings of Zobah as part of his campaigns to secure Israel's borders (1 Samuel 14:47). Under King David, Zobah's ruler ben Rehob became a central adversary; David decisively defeated Hadadezer's forces near the River, capturing 1,000 chariots, 1,700 horsemen (2 Samuel 8:4) or 7,000 charioteers (1 Chronicles 18:4), and 20,000 foot soldiers, while also subduing Zobah's allies from (2 Samuel 8:3–8; 1 Chronicles 18:3–8). This victory marked the expansion of Israelite influence northward, with David installing garrisons in and incorporating Zobah's territories into a network (2 Samuel 10:16–19). Later, during Solomon's reign, the king reportedly captured Hamath-zobah, further consolidating control over former Zobah lands (2 Chronicles 8:3), though remnants of Zobah's resistance persisted under leaders like Rezon, who established a rival power base in (1 Kings 11:23–25). Zobah's lies in its role as one of several Aramean states that challenged Israelite expansion, contributing to the geopolitical dynamics of the before the rise of larger powers like . Archaeological evidence for Zobah remains elusive, with proposed identifications linking it to sites in the , such as near , though no definitive inscriptions confirm its extent or administration. The kingdom's name, possibly derived from a meaning "station" or "army," reflects its strategic position along trade and military routes connecting to the Mediterranean.

Biblical References

In Samuel and Kings

Zobah is depicted in the as an Aramean kingdom during the monarchic period of ancient , situated northeast of the Israelite territories and involved in regional conflicts with the emerging Kingdom of . The narrative portrays it as a significant power under kings such as , engaging in military expansions and alliances that challenged Israelite dominance. In the account of 's reign, Zobah emerges as one of the early adversaries faced by the first king of . After assuming rule, Saul waged wars against surrounding enemies, including the kings of Zobah, alongside , the Ammonites, , and the , establishing his authority through these campaigns. David's interactions with Zobah mark a period of expanded conquests and subjugation. During his reign, defeated son of Rehob, king of Zobah, while attempted to restore his control at the River, leading to the capture of a thousand s, seven thousand charioteers, and twenty thousand foot soldiers, with hamstringing most of the chariot horses. When from intervened to aid , struck down twenty-two thousand of them and installed garrisons in the Aramean kingdom of , rendering the region tributary and securing tribute; the is said to have granted victory in these endeavors. further seized gold shields from 's officers and a great quantity of bronze from the towns of Tebah and Berothai, dedicating these spoils—along with items from other conquered nations—to the . This victory prompted Tou, king of Hamath, to send his son Joram with gifts of silver, gold, and bronze to congratulate on defeating , a former rival. Further conflicts arose when Hadadezer allied with the Ammonites against . Realizing their offense to —stemming from the mistreatment of his envoys—the Ammonites hired twenty thousand foot soldiers from Beth Rehob and Zobah, plus a thousand from Maakah and twelve thousand from Tob. The of Zobah and Rehob positioned themselves in the open country opposite the Ammonites at their , prompting to dispatch with the full army. divided forces, with his brother Abishai commanding against the Ammonites, and routed the , who fled, followed by the Ammonites retreating into their city. The regrouped under Hadadezer, summoning reinforcements from beyond the to Helam, but crossed the , defeated them, killed seven hundred charioteers and forty thousand foot soldiers, and mortally wounded their commander Shobach. kings of Hadadezer then sued for peace with , becoming subjects, and the ceased aiding the Ammonites. Through these events, Zobah's military power was curtailed, and its territories, extending from the to areas near , fell under Israelite influence. Under , Zobah reasserted some independence despite prior subjugation. God raised Rezon son of Eliada—who had fled from —as an adversary to ; Rezon gathered a band during David's destruction of Zobah's army, seized , and ruled Aram there, harassing throughout 's reign and exacerbating other threats. This resurgence highlighted Zobah's enduring role as a northern Aramean foe, with Rezon recovering key garrisons in the region of . Additionally, went to Hamath-zobah and captured it (2 Chronicles 8:3), further consolidating control over former Zobah lands.

In Psalms

The superscription of references "Aram of Zobah" alongside "" (or "the of " in some translations), situating the psalm within the context of David's victories as a prayer for divine from national distress. This title frames the composition as a liturgical response to military conflicts, emphasizing communal and hope for restoration after apparent setbacks. Scholars interpret Psalm 60 as a poetic reflection on the battles against and Aram-Zobah, likely composed or adapted following the events described in the , where seeks God's reaffirmation of covenant promises amid turmoil. The psalm's structure shifts from complaint over God's apparent rejection (verses 1-3) to confident assertion of divine triumph (verses 6-12), portraying the conflicts as opportunities for 's reliance on Yahweh's sovereignty rather than human strength. This commemorative aspect underscores the psalm's role in temple worship, transforming historical victories into enduring testimony of faithfulness. Theologically, the defeat of Zobah is framed as an act of divine intervention on Israel's behalf, with the psalm invoking God's holy decree to parcel out territories and subdue foes, symbolizing broader themes of Yahweh's power over chaotic enemies akin to phrases elsewhere in like "You have broken in pieces, as one who is slain." Such imagery reinforces the commemorative purpose, assuring the worship community that God's triumph ensures Israel's security. Translation variants in the superscription highlight interpretive nuances: the renders it as "Mesopotamia and of Zobah," while others like the use " and Aram-zobah," reflecting differences in transliterating Hebrew terms for the Aramean regions. These variations preserve the psalm's focus on Zobah as a key adversary in David's era, without altering its prayerful tone.

Ancient Extra-Biblical Sources

Mesopotamian Records

The earliest attestation of Zobah, or its variant Ṣîbat, appears in an Old Babylonian tablet from the archives of Mari (M. 5423), dating to the BCE. This unpublished letter describes a led by Išhî-Addu, of Qaṭna, involving troops from Mari, which targeted cities in the region, including Ṣîbat as one of the conquered locations. The tablet highlights early territorial conflicts in the area, situating Ṣîbat north of Riblah and south of Qidšu, consistent with later references to the site's strategic position along trade and military routes. In the Neo-Assyrian period, Ṣubat (a likely form of Zobah) is documented in the annals of (r. 745–727 BCE) as a key administrative center following Assyrian expansions into the . During his campaigns against the Aramean kingdoms of Hamath and (738–732 BCE), conquered the , incorporating Ṣubat into the Assyrian provincial system as a distinct after the fall of in 732 BCE. The annals record the appointment of governors to oversee the region, including Šamaš-aḫu-iddina, installed shortly after the annexation, and later Bēl-liqbi, both of whom reported to the higher governor of Ḫatarikka, ensuring tribute collection and local stability. These conquests marked the integration of Zobah/Ṣubat into the Assyrian Empire, with administrative reforms emphasizing direct control through appointed officials and obligations to prevent in the volatile zones. The region's incorporation reflects broader Assyrian strategies to consolidate power in the , transforming former Aramean territories into managed provinces. The attestations of Ṣubat in Mesopotamian records also connect to the formation of Aramean states in the following the decline of the Hittite Empire around 1200 BCE, where Zobah emerged as a prominent polity amid shifting alliances and migrations. This evolution underscores Zobah's role in regional politics, paralleling biblical descriptions of Aramean kingdoms without direct dependence on Judean narratives.

Aramaic Evidence

Aramaic graffiti from the ancient city of (biblical Hamath), dating to the 8th century BCE, provide the primary indigenous Levantine evidence for Zobah, attesting to its persistence into the II period. Excavated around the citadel and on red slabs, these nearly fifty short inscriptions reflect everyday use of the script and language in the region, often listing personal names, locations, or brief phrases. Among them, the term Ṣbh appears as a toponym or entity identifier, likely denoting a place or in a local context, possibly within lists of locations or associated with rulers and administrative notations. Scholars interpret Ṣbh in these graffiti as a direct linguistic variant of the biblical Zobah (Hebrew ṣôḇā), reflecting phonetic and orthographic conventions where the final -h represents a for the vowel, common in early writing. This connection situates Zobah within Aramean cultural spheres, suggesting its role as a border region or independent interacting with neighboring powers like Hamath during a time of political fragmentation in . The graffiti's pre-720 BCE dating, before the Assyrian conquest of Hamath, underscores Zobah's continuity as a recognizable entity amid shifting alliances. This evidence emerges against the backdrop of Aramaic's emergence as the lingua franca of in the 8th century BCE, facilitating trade, diplomacy, and administration across Aramean states from the to . The graffiti exemplify this trend, with their simple incised script on architectural elements indicating widespread literacy among non-elites. While Assyrian records from the same era mention similar northwestern entities, the local attestations offer a distinct, non-imperial perspective on Zobah's regional significance.

Later Interpretations

Medieval Rabbinical Sources

In medieval Jewish , Aram-Zobah was frequently interpreted through the lens of biblical and symbolism, particularly in commentaries on 60, which recounts David's victories over northern Aramean kingdoms. (1040–1105 CE), in his commentary on the psalm's superscription, links the reference to Aram-Zobah directly to the historical events in 2 Samuel 8:3, portraying the conflicts as emblematic of divine judgment and national distress akin to exile, where God's temporary rejection scatters the people like an earthquake-riven land ( 60:2–3). This view positioned Zobah not merely as a territorial foe but as a symbol of northern adversaries threatening Israel's spiritual and physical integrity, reflecting broader rabbinic themes of adversity during periods of dispersion. Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE), in his Judeo-Arabic tafsīr (translation and commentary) on the , offered a distinct geographical identification, equating Aram-Zobah with Nisibis (modern , ), a significant Mesopotamian center in his era. This association appears in his of 60:2, where he interprets the Aramean realms as historical entities tied to the region's cultural landscape, emphasizing David's triumph as a prophetic assurance against ongoing exilic threats from the north. Saadia's approach integrated philological precision with theological symbolism, viewing Zobah's defeat as a for redemption from Babylonian and Persian-era exiles, thereby bridging scriptural narrative with contemporary Jewish experiences in the Islamic world. By the , rabbinic traditions in Syrian Jewish communities solidified an alternative identification, associating Aram-Zobah with (ancient Beroea), a usage that permeated local and scholarship. This linkage, rooted in the city's prominence as a hub of Jewish life under Abbasid and Zangid rule, portrayed as the biblical Zobah conquered by , fostering a sense of historical continuity amid existence. These interpretations influenced subsequent Jewish geographical works, such as the 12th-century travelogue of , who explicitly refers to as "Aram Zoba," reinforcing its status in medieval itineraries and commentaries as a northern frontier evoking both biblical glory and exilic resilience.

Modern Identification Attempts

Modern scholars generally agree that Zobah was an early Aramean kingdom situated in the region between and the River, likely encompassing parts of the and extending northward toward in present-day and . This consensus draws on biblical descriptions of its conflicts with and alliances with Hamath, integrated with extra-biblical texts like Mari letters and Neo-Assyrian records that place Aramean polities in these border zones. Specific proposals for Zobah's capital vary, reflecting debates over its precise core territory. Edward Lipiński locates it near Tell Deir Zanun in the central , associating it with Neo-Assyrian toponyms like Šazaʿna and linking it to the post-Hittite decline when Aramean groups filled power vacuums as independent or vassal entities. Gaby Abousamra argues for the village of Zabbud, 2 km north of Ṣugha at the sources in the northern Beqaa, based on philological ties to Mari's Zibat and Assyrian Ṣupat, positioning Zobah as a southern Aramean state near Labweh. Nadav Naʾaman suggests Al-Qusayr, north of Riblah, as a candidate, emphasizing its strategic placement between Hamath and . Alternative identifications include in (proposed by Simo Parpola but critiqued for conflicting with Mari evidence) and Anjar in Lebanon's Beqaa Valley. The biblical city of Berothai, from which captured bronze (2 Samuel 8:8), is often equated with Berothah ( 47:16), situating Zobah's territory between Hamath and ; scholars identify this as ancient Bereitan, about 10 km southwest of in the Beqaa. Older theories, such as equating Zobah with Chalcis ad Belum (near modern al-'Iss, southwest of ), have been largely discarded due to mismatches with Aramean distributions and lack of supporting epigraphy. Recent scholarship, including the 2019 volume Aramaean Borders (Brill), refines these views by stressing Zobah's fluid borders in contested Aramean frontier regions during the 10th–8th centuries BCE. Archaeological evidence remains sparse and inconclusive, with potential Iron Age correlations at sites like Tell Ṣugha and Tell el-Bellan, where illegal digs have uncovered bronze artifacts and pottery hinting at Aramean occupation, though systematic excavations are limited. Surveys in the Beqaa Valley, such as those at Tell Hizzin and Kamid el-Loz, reveal Iron Age I/II settlements, but ongoing political instability in Lebanon has stalled fieldwork as of 2025, leaving Zobah's material footprint incompletely explored. Post-Hittite collapse around 1200 BCE, Zobah likely functioned as an independent kingdom or vassal to larger powers like Hamath before David's campaigns.

References

  1. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004398535/BP000013.xml
  2. https://bible-history.com/map-davids-kingdom/zobah
  3. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/371706
  4. https://www.wisdomlib.org/christianity/concept/zobah
  5. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Samuel+14%3A47&version=NIV
  6. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+8%3A3-4&version=NIV
  7. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+8%3A5-6&version=NIV
  8. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+8%3A7-12&version=NIV
  9. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+8%3A9-10&version=NIV
  10. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+10%3A6&version=NIV
  11. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+10%3A7-14&version=NIV
  12. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+10%3A15-18&version=NIV
  13. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+10%3A19&version=NIV
  14. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Kings+11%3A23-25&version=NIV
  15. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/zobah
  16. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Chronicles+8%3A3&version=NIV
  17. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2060&version=NIV
  18. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2060&version=NKJV
  19. https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/wp-content/uploads/jbq_531_Scolnicpsalmdavid.pdf
  20. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/what-do-we-learn-about-bible-studying-history-its-interpretation
  21. https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/spurgeon_charles/tod/ps060.cfm
  22. http://www.freebiblecommentary.org/old_testament_studies/VOL09BOT/VOL09BOT_60.html
  23. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2089:10&version=NKJV
  24. https://biblicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2022/03/03/commentary-on-psalm-60/
  25. https://www.sefaria.org/Psalms.60?ven=english%257CTanakh:_The_Holy_Scriptures%2C_published_by_JPS&vhe=hebrew%257CMiqra_according_to_the_Masorah&lang=bi&with=Translations
  26. https://www.academia.edu/116343046/State_Archives_of_Assyria_Bulletin
  27. https://dokumen.pub/a-political-history-of-the-arameans-from-their-origins-to-the-end-of-their-polities-1589831284-9781589831285.html
  28. https://www.sefaria.org/Psalms.60?with=Rashi&lang=bi
  29. https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16281/jewish/Chapter-60.htm
  30. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EJIO/COM-0001210.xml
  31. https://sacred-texts.com/jud/mhl/mhl20.htm
  32. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004398535/BP000013.xml
  33. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollbook/title/33748.pdf
  34. https://www.eisenbrauns.org/books/titles/978-1-57506-108-5.html
  35. https://www.academia.edu/100522268/Connected_or_disconnected_The_Bekaa_valley_during_the_early_Iron_Age
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.