Hubbry Logo
A Dangerous MethodA Dangerous MethodMain
Open search
A Dangerous Method
Community hub
A Dangerous Method
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
A Dangerous Method
A Dangerous Method
A Dangerous Method
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A Dangerous Method
Theatrical release poster
Directed byDavid Cronenberg
Screenplay byChristopher Hampton
Based on
  • The Talking Cure
    by Christopher Hampton
  • A Most Dangerous Method
    by John Kerr
Produced byJeremy Thomas
Starring
CinematographyPeter Suschitzky
Edited byRonald Sanders
Music byHoward Shore
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release dates
  • 2 September 2011 (2011-09-02) (Venice)
  • 10 November 2011 (2011-11-10) (Germany)
  • 13 January 2012 (2012-01-13) (Canada)
  • 10 February 2012 (2012-02-10) (United Kingdom)
Running time
99 minutes
Countries
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • United Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Budget$14 million[1]
Box office$30 million[2]

A Dangerous Method is a 2011 historical drama film directed by David Cronenberg. The film stars Keira Knightley, Viggo Mortensen, Michael Fassbender, Sarah Gadon, and Vincent Cassel. Its screenplay was adapted by writer Christopher Hampton from his 2002 stage play The Talking Cure, which was based on the 1993 non-fiction book by John Kerr, A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein.

Set in the period from 1902 to the eve of World War I, A Dangerous Method follows the turbulent relationships between Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology, Sigmund Freud, founder of the discipline of psychoanalysis, and Sabina Spielrein, initially Jung's patient and later a physician and one of the first female psychoanalysts.[3]

A co-production between British, Canadian, and German production companies, the film marks the third consecutive collaboration between Cronenberg and Viggo Mortensen (after A History of Violence and Eastern Promises). This is also the third Cronenberg film made with British film producer Jeremy Thomas, after they collaborated on the William Burroughs adaptation Naked Lunch and the J. G. Ballard adaptation Crash. Filming took place between May and July 2010 in Cologne on a soundstage, with exterior shots filmed in Vienna.

A Dangerous Method premiered at the 68th Venice Film Festival and was also featured at the 2011 Toronto International Film Festival.[4][5] The film was theatrically released in Germany on 10 November 2011 by Universal Pictures International, in Canada on 13 January 2012 by Entertainment One and in the United Kingdom on 10 February 2012 by Lionsgate. The film grossed $24 million worldwide and received positive reviews from critics, many praising the performances of Mortensen and Fassbender and Cronenberg's direction. It appeared on several critics' year-end lists. At the 69th Golden Globe Awards, Mortensen was nominated for the Best Supporting Actor – Motion Picture.

Plot

[edit]

In August 1904, Sabina Spielrein arrives at the Burghölzli, the pre-eminent psychiatric hospital in Zürich, suffering from hysteria and begins a new course of treatment with the young Swiss doctor Carl Jung. He uses word association and dream interpretation as part of his approach to psychoanalysis and finds that Spielrein's condition was triggered by the humiliation and sexual arousal she felt as a child when her father spanked her naked.

Jung and chief of medicine Eugen Bleuler recognize Spielrein's intelligence and energy and allow her to assist them in their experiments. She measures the physical reactions of subjects during word association, to provide empirical data as a scientific basis for psychoanalysis. She soon learns that much of this new science is founded on the doctors' observations of themselves, each other, and their families, not just their patients. The doctors, Jung and Freud, correspond at length before they meet, and begin sharing their dreams and analysing each other, and Freud himself soon adopts Jung as his heir and agent.

Jung finds in Spielrein a kindred spirit, and their attraction deepens due to transference. Jung resists the idea of cheating on his wife, Emma, and breaking the taboo of sex with a patient, but his resolve is weakened by the wild and unrepentant confidences of his new patient Otto Gross, a brilliant, philandering, unstable psychoanalyst. Gross decries monogamy in general and suggests that resistance to transference is symptomatic of the repression of normal, healthy sexual impulses, exhorting Jung to indulge himself with abandon.

Jung finally begins an affair with Spielrein, including rudimentary bondage and spanking. Things become even more tangled as he becomes her advisor to her dissertation; he publishes not only his studies of her as a patient but eventually her treatise as well. Spielrein wants to conceive a child with Jung, but he refuses. After he attempts to confine their relationship again to doctor and patient, she appeals to Freud for his professional help, and forces Jung to tell Freud the truth about their relationship, reminding him that she could have publicly damaged him but did not want to.

Jung and Freud travel to America. However, cracks appear in their friendship as they begin to disagree more frequently on matters of psychoanalysis. Jung and Spielrein meet to work on her dissertation in Switzerland and begin their sexual relationship once more. However, after Jung refuses to leave his wife for her, Spielrein decides to go to Vienna. She meets Freud and says that although she sides with him, she believes he and Jung need to reconcile for psychoanalysis to continue to develop.

Following Freud's collapse at an academic conference, he and Jung continue correspondence via letters. They decide to end their relationship after increasing hostilities and accusations regarding the differences in their conceptualisation of psychoanalysis. Spielrein marries a Russian doctor and, while pregnant, visits Jung and his wife. They discuss psychoanalysis and Jung's new mistress. Jung confides that his love for Spielrein made him a better person.

The film's footnote reveals the eventual fates of the four analysts. Gross starved to death in Berlin in 1920. Freud died of cancer in London in 1939 after being driven out of Vienna by the Nazis. Spielrein trained several analysts in the Soviet Union before she and her two daughters were shot by the Nazis in 1942. Jung emerged from a nervous breakdown to become the world's leading psychologist before dying in 1961.[6]

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Hampton's earliest version of the screenplay, dating back to the 1990s, was written for Julia Roberts in the role of Sabina Spielrein, but the film was never realized. Hampton re-wrote the screenplay for the stage before producer Jeremy Thomas acquired the rights for both the earlier script and the stage version.[7]

Interior of Café Sperl where a meeting between Jung and Freud was filmed. David Cronenberg said of the shoot, "We almost had to change nothing to make it feel like 1907."

The film was produced by Britain's Recorded Picture Company, with Germany's Lago Film and Canada's Prospero Film acting as co-producers.[8] Additional funding was provided by Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg, MFG Baden-Württemberg, Filmstiftung NRW, the German Federal Film Board [de] and Film Fund, Ontario Media Development Corp and Millbrook Pictures.[9]

Christoph Waltz was initially cast as Sigmund Freud, but was replaced by Viggo Mortensen due to a scheduling conflict.[10] Christian Bale had been in talks to play Carl Jung, but he too had to drop out because of scheduling conflicts.[11]

The filming began on 26 May and ended on 24 July 2010.[9] Exteriors were shot in Vienna and interiors were filmed on a soundstage in Cologne (MMC Studios Köln), Germany. Viennese locations included the Café Sperl, Berggasse 19, and the Schloss Belvedere. Lake Constance (Bodensee) stood in for Lake Zurich.[12]

A scene featuring Keira Knightley and Michael Fassbender was filmed aboard the paddle steamer Hohentwiel on Lake Constance

A noted feature of the film is the extensive use in the musical score of leitmotifs from Wagner's third Ring opera Siegfried, mostly in piano transcription. The composer Howard Shore has said that the structure of the film is based on the structure of the Siegfried opera.[13]

Release

[edit]

Universal Pictures released the film in German-speaking territories, Spain and South Africa, while Lionsgate took rights to the United Kingdom[14] and Sony Pictures Classics distributed the film in the United States.[15] The film debuted at the Venice Film Festival in Italy on 2 September 2011.

Reception

[edit]

Critical response

[edit]

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 78% of 191 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.9/10. The website's consensus reads: "A provocative historical fiction about the early days of psychoanalysis, A Dangerous Method is buoyed by terrific performances by Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley, and Viggo Mortensen."[16] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 76 out of 100, based on 41 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[17]

Louise Keller reports from Urban Cinephile, "The best scenes are those between Mortensen and Fassbender...the tension between the two men mounts as their views conflict: Freud insists that sex is an underlying factor in every neurosis while Jung, interested in spiritualism and the occult, is disappointed by what he considers to be Freud's 'rigid pragmatism.'"[18]

Andrew O'Hehir of Salon opines that on the one hand Freud's "single-minded focus on sexual repression as the source of neurosis led to the creation of psychiatry as a legitimate medical and scientific field—one that was often resistant to change and dominated by authoritarian father figures." On the other hand, Sabina's effect on Jung, and "the discoveries they had made together, both in the office and the bedroom," including the potential in "a creative fusion of opposites—doctor and patient, man and woman, dark and light, Jew and Aryan," led to a falling out between the two men "over a variety of issues, most notably the scientific limits of psychiatric inquiry."[19]

In contrast, Steven Rea of The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote that, despite the film's exploration of "the way our subconscious works, the way we repress, and suppress, natural urges—the constant battle between the rational and the instinctive, the civilized and the wild", the film "feels distant, and clinical, in ways you wished it did not."[20] In an interview with The Daily Beast's Marlow Stern, Cronenberg himself is quoted as saying that the love scenes between Jung and Spielrein were "quite clinical. These were people who, even when they were having sex, they were observing themselves having sex because they were so interested in their reactions to things."[11]

The film was listed at number 5 on Film Comment magazine's Best Films of 2011 list.[21]

Top ten lists

[edit]

A Dangerous Method was listed on many critics' 2011 top ten lists.[22]

Accolades

[edit]
Year Award Category Recipient(s) Result
2011 National Board of Review Awards[23] Spotlight Award Michael Fassbender (Also for Shame, Jane Eyre, and X-Men: First Class) Won
Satellite Awards Actor in a Supporting Role Viggo Mortensen Nominated
Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards Best Actor Michael Fassbender (Also for Shame, Jane Eyre, and X-Men: First Class) Won
2012 Golden Globe Awards[24] Best Supporting Actor – Motion Picture Viggo Mortensen Nominated
London Critics' Circle Film Awards[25] British Actor of the Year Michael Fassbender (Also for Shame) Won
Central Ohio Film Critics Association Awards[26] Actor of the Year Michael Fassbender (Also for Shame, Jane Eyre, and X-Men: First Class) Nominated
Genie Awards[27] Best Motion Picture Martin Katz, Marco Mehlitz, Jeremy Thomas Nominated
Achievement in Art Direction/Production Design James Mcateer Won
Best Actor Michael Fassbender Nominated
Best Supporting Actor Viggo Mortensen Won
Best Costume Design Denise Cronenberg Nominated
Best Direction David Cronenberg Nominated
Best Editing Ronald Sanders, C.C.E. A.C.E. Nominated
Achievement in Music – Original Score Howard Shore Won
Best Sound Orest Sushko, Christian Cooke Won
Best Sound Editing Wayne Griffin, Rob Bertola, Tony Currie, Andy Malcolm, Michael O'Farrell Won
Best Visual Effects Jason Edwardh, Oliver Hearsey, Jim Price, Milan Schere, Wojciech Zielinski Nominated
Sant Jordi Award Best Foreign Actor Michael Fassbender (Also for Jane Eyre and X-Men: First Class) Won
Directors Guild of Canada Awards[28] Best Direction David Cronenberg Won
Best Feature Film Won
Best Production Design – Feature Film James McAteer Won
Best Picture Editing – Feature Film Ron Sanders Won
Best Sound Editing Rob Bertola, Tony Currie, Alastair Gray, Michael O'Farrell, Gren-Erich Zwicker Won

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

A Dangerous Method

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Dangerous Method is a 2011 film directed by that examines the origins of through the professional and personal entanglements of Swiss psychiatrist (), Austrian neurologist (), and Russian patient () in the years leading up to . The screenplay, written by Christopher Hampton, adapts his own 2002 stage play The Talking Cure, which draws from John Kerr's 1993 nonfiction book A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein, chronicling the real-life collaboration and eventual rift between Jung and Freud while highlighting Spielrein's role as both patient and emerging psychoanalyst. The film portrays Jung employing Freud's innovative "talking cure" to treat the hysterical Spielrein at his clinic in Zurich, leading to intellectual exchanges, ethical dilemmas, and a profound influence on the field's evolution amid the tensions of early 20th-century Europe. Produced by for with a of approximately $20 million, the film premiered at the on September 2, 2011, and was released theatrically in the United States by on November 23, 2011. It features a distinguished supporting cast including as and as , and was filmed primarily in and to evoke the period's authenticity. Critically, A Dangerous Method holds a 78% approval rating on based on 189 reviews, praised for its intellectual depth, strong performances—particularly Fassbender's nuanced portrayal of Jung—and Cronenberg's restrained direction, though some noted Knightley's intense depiction of Spielrein as occasionally overwrought. The film grossed $5.7 million in the U.S., underscoring its contribution to cinematic explorations of psychological history.

Background and Development

Historical Context

In the early , and Zurich emerged as pivotal hubs for psychological innovation, fostering the development of amid a backdrop of rapid scientific and intellectual advancement in . , under Sigmund Freud's influence, became the epicenter of , with Freud establishing the Psychological Wednesday Society in 1902, which evolved into the Psychoanalytical Society by 1908. Zurich, meanwhile, served as a key center for clinical psychiatry through institutions like the Psychiatric Clinic, where emerging analysts experimented with Freudian methods. This environment culminated in the founding of the () on March 26, 1910, at the Second International Psychoanalytical Congress in , , with elected as its first president to promote the international spread of . Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung's professional relationship, spanning 1906 to 1913, exemplified both the promise and fractures of early . Their collaboration began with correspondence in 1906, after Jung praised Freud's , leading to an intense first meeting in in 1907 where they discussed for 13 hours. Jung initially supported Freud's theories, serving as president of the newly formed IPA in 1910 and helping organize early congresses, including the Third International Psychoanalytical Congress in , , in September 1911, where subtle tensions over theoretical directions first surfaced publicly. However, divergences grew: Freud emphasized sexuality as the core of and psychological development, viewing it as the primary driver of neuroses, while Jung advocated for a broader conception of as general psychic energy and incorporated mysticism and spirituality, which Freud dismissed as unscientific. These differences, compounded by personal strains, led to their definitive rift in 1913, when Jung resigned from the IPA and distanced himself from Freudian orthodoxy. Sabina Spielrein played a significant role in this historical milieu as one of the first patients treated with psychoanalytic methods and later as a pioneering analyst herself. Born in November 1885 in , , to a Jewish family, Spielrein was admitted to the Psychiatric Clinic in Zurich in August 1904 at age 19, suffering from what was diagnosed as psychotic . Assigned to , who was then a young assistant physician with limited experience, she underwent treatment beginning in August 1904 using Freud's emerging "" technique, which facilitated her recovery and discharge as an outpatient in 1905. Spielrein went on to study medicine at the , earning her medical degree in 1911 with a groundbreaking dissertation titled "On the Psychological Content of a Case of ()," recognized as the first psychoanalytic dissertation and published in a psychoanalytic journal. She subsequently trained as a psychoanalyst under Jung and Freud's influences, contributing original ideas on themes like destruction and transformation in psychic life before returning to in 1923 to establish psychoanalytic institutions.

Screenplay and Adaptation

The screenplay for A Dangerous Method was written by Christopher Hampton, adapting his own 2002 stage play The Talking Cure, which originated from John Kerr's 1993 non-fiction book A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein. Hampton's initial script, titled Sabina, dates to the mid-1990s and was developed for potential production with Julia Roberts in the lead role at 20th Century Fox, but it was rejected and subsequently reworked into the stage play. The play premiered at the Cottesloe Theatre in London's National Theatre in 2002, shifting the narrative focus from Sabina Spielrein to Carl Jung as the central figure to better capture the interpersonal dynamics. For the film adaptation, Hampton revised the material to heighten the emphasis on personal relationships and intellectual rivalries among the characters, particularly the evolving bond and eventual rift between and , rather than delving deeply into theoretical . These changes included abbreviating the depiction of Spielrein's treatment under Jung—from an extended sequence in the play to a more concise portrayal—to improve pacing, while expanding scenes of dialogue between Freud and Jung drawn from their historical correspondence. Hampton incorporated authentic details from primary sources, such as Jung's 1904 case notes on Spielrein discovered at Hospital in Zurich and over 360 letters exchanged between Freud and Jung between 1906 and 1913, to ground the dramatic narrative in verifiable historical events without strict adherence to chronological accuracy. This research informed creative decisions, such as adjusting the timeline of Spielrein's treatment from weeks, as suggested in Kerr's book, to approximately six months based on the case notes. David Cronenberg's involvement as director marked a deliberate return to period drama following contemporary thrillers like (2005), driven by his longstanding fascination with psychological repression and the analyst-patient dynamic pioneered by Freud. Cronenberg, who had explored themes of the unconscious and bodily repression in early shorts like Transfer (1966), commissioned Hampton to adapt into a screenplay around the mid-2000s, viewing the project as an opportunity to examine how Freud and Jung revolutionized discourse on eroticism and the psyche through taboo-breaking conversations. He approached the material as a "chamber piece," prioritizing intimate character interactions over spectacle to highlight the era's cultural repressions, particularly around sexuality and . Development of the film progressed from the play's success, with ramping up in after financing was secured, leading to in mid-2010 across locations in , , and . This timeline allowed for further refinements, ensuring the adaptation balanced historical fidelity with dramatic tension.

Historical Authenticity

A Dangerous Method is grounded in real historical events and figures from the early development of psychoanalysis, drawing extensively from primary sources such as Jung's clinical case notes on Sabina Spielrein and the extensive correspondence between Freud and Jung. However, the film takes dramatic liberties for narrative purposes, including the explicit portrayal of a sexual relationship between Jung and Spielrein. Historical evidence, including Spielrein's diaries and letters, indicates an emotionally intimate and possibly erotic transference during her treatment, but scholars debate whether the relationship extended to physical consummation. Some analyses, such as those by Zvi Lothane, argue there is no convincing proof of a sexual affair, viewing it as a myth based on misinterpretations, while others affirm an ethical breach involving intercourse. These adaptations highlight the film's blend of factual basis and fictional embellishment to explore psychological and interpersonal dynamics.

Plot and Themes

Plot Summary

In 1904, eighteen-year-old arrives at the Psychiatric Clinic in , suffering from severe , and is assigned to Dr. Carl Gustav Jung, a promising young psychiatrist influenced by Sigmund Freud's theories. Jung employs Freud's "" method during their sessions, where Sabina gradually reveals traumatic childhood experiences, including physical abuse by her father that intertwined pain with . As her condition improves dramatically, an intense intellectual and emotional bond forms between them; Sabina becomes Jung's assistant, assisting in his research, while suppressed romantic and sexual tensions simmer beneath their professional relationship. By 1906, after treating Sabina, Jung contacts Freud, leading to their first meeting in , where the two men engage in a marathon thirteen-hour discussion on , forging a mentor-protégé bond with Freud viewing Jung as his intellectual successor. Freud later refers the brilliant but cocaine-addicted anarchist to Jung for treatment; Gross's radical views on sexual liberation and rejection of repression convince the conflicted Jung to act on his desires, initiating a passionate, sadomasochistic affair with Sabina, who has since left the clinic and is studying medicine. The liaison involves intense encounters, including instances of that echo Sabina's past traumas, but it soon complicates Jung's life, straining his marriage to the pregnant and prompting Sabina to send anonymous letters confessing the relationship to Freud, Emma, and her own family. Jung terminates the affair amid growing guilt and professional risks. As Sabina pursues her medical degree at the University of Zurich, earning a PhD in 1911 with a thesis on schizophrenia influenced by her experiences, ideological rifts emerge between Jung and Freud during their joint lectures and a trip to America in 1909. Jung's growing interest in mysticism, parapsychology, and non-sexual explanations for the unconscious clashes with Freud's insistence on libido as the core driver of human behavior, exacerbated by Freud's discovery of the affair and his perception of Jung's personal instability. By 1913, escalating arguments, including a dramatic incident at the 1912 Munich conference, culminate in a definitive break through their correspondence, leaving Jung isolated and professionally adrift. In the film's poignant close, a pregnant Sabina, now a trained psychoanalyst, visits Jung one last time; he confides a prophetic dream of a devastating European flood, foreshadowing World War I, while Freud solidifies his dominance in the field of psychoanalysis.

Key Themes

The film A Dangerous Method centers on the theme of as a "dangerous method," portraying the therapeutic process as fraught with risks, particularly the potential for emotional to evolve into unethical personal entanglements. This is vividly illustrated through Carl Jung's treatment of patient , where the intimacy of the "" leads to a sexual affair, blurring professional boundaries and prompting Sigmund Freud's warnings about the perils of such involvement. Freud, depicted as a cautious mentor, cautions Jung against allowing or personal desires to undermine the scientific rigor of , emphasizing that can "contaminate" the analyst's objectivity and harm both parties. A core conflict in the narrative pits rationality against passion, embodied in the ideological rift between Jung and Freud. Jung's embrace of mysticism—evident in his interpretations of prophetic dreams and supernatural phenomena—contrasts sharply with Freud's insistence on sexuality as the primary driver of human behavior, as seen in their discussions of the and its role in psychological development. This tension culminates in their professional schism, with Freud viewing Jung's "occult" leanings as a threat to psychoanalysis's credibility as a scientific discipline, while Jung sees Freud's reductive focus on as overly mechanistic. The film uses these debates to explore how personal passions can infiltrate intellectual pursuits, ultimately fracturing their collaboration. Gender and power dynamics are interrogated through Sabina Spielrein's transformation from a hysterical patient to an influential intellectual, challenging the patriarchal structures of early 20th-century psychology. Initially subjected to Jung's authority during her treatment, Spielrein subverts this imbalance by becoming his lover and intellectual equal, later pursuing her own psychoanalytic career and mediating between Jung and Freud. Her evolution highlights the exploitative undercurrents in male-dominated therapeutic relationships, where women's insights are appropriated yet their agency is constrained by societal and professional norms. This theme underscores how psychoanalysis, while empowering, often reinforced gender hierarchies until figures like Spielrein pushed for change. The motif of repression and liberation is conveyed through sadomasochistic elements in the characters' relationships, symbolizing the breakthrough of suppressed desires as a path to psychological freedom. Spielrein's masochistic fantasies, rooted in childhood experiences of paternal , are explored in and enacted in her affair with Jung, representing a release from repression that propels her personal and intellectual growth. These dynamics extend to Jung's own internal conflicts, where acting on instinctual urges—encouraged by the anarchistic influence of —leads to both liberation and ethical peril, illustrating psychoanalysis's dual potential to heal or destroy. The film's depiction of scenes and intimate confessions emphasizes how confronting impulses can catalyze transformation, though at great personal cost.

Production

Casting

The principal cast for A Dangerous Method was announced in 2009, with director emphasizing actors capable of conveying psychological depth and emotional intensity over mere star power during auditions. was selected for the role of , a young Russian-Jewish patient whose and intellectual evolution drive much of the narrative; her casting highlighted her proven emotional range in period dramas, aligning with Cronenberg's vision of a character oscillating between vulnerability and intellectual rigor. Knightley's preparation was particularly intensive, involving four months of research into early 20th-century women's sexuality and the diagnosis of , which she understood as rooted in societal repression and about . For the demanding scenes, she practiced physical tics—such as jaw jutting and convulsions—in front of a mirror to achieve authenticity, auditioning variations via with Cronenberg to refine the portrayal without veering into . This approach supported the director's intent to depict Spielrein's transformation from tormented to pioneering psychoanalyst, drawing on historical accounts of her real-life treatment under Jung. Michael Fassbender was cast as , the Swiss psychiatrist whose professional and personal boundaries blur in the story; his selection stemmed from his ability to embody tempered by inner conflict, fitting Cronenberg's nuanced take on Jung's early career. Fassbender's preparation included reading biographies that explored Jung's religious upbringing—his father and uncles were pastors—and his fascination with the spirit world, as well as attempting to engage with Jung's complex The Red Book for deeper insight into his psyche. He consulted his sister to validate interpretations and focused on Jung's stiff, socially correct mannerisms, informed by historical writings and the character's from his wife, which allowed for unorthodox pursuits. Viggo Mortensen portrayed Sigmund Freud, Jung's mentor and a figure of authoritative wit amid Vienna's intellectual circles; Cronenberg chose him for his capacity to balance gravitas with subtle humor, reflecting Freud's role as a stabilizing yet provocative influence. Mortensen prepared through extensive study of Freud's writings, biographies, and critical analyses, adopting a languid Viennese-inflected speech pattern to capture the thinker's deliberate, restrained delivery shaped by Victorian restraint and anti-Semitic pressures. He incorporated Freud's habitual cigar-smoking for authenticity, mirroring the director's own wry demeanor to infuse the character with ironic self-defense mechanisms. In supporting roles, played Otto Gross, the anarchic psychoanalyst whose free-spirited influence challenges Jung's conventions and accelerates the story's tensions; Cassel's casting leveraged his experience with intense, boundary-pushing characters to embody Gross's role as a catalyst for psychological rebellion. was cast as Emma Jung, providing a grounded portrayal of the family dynamics and quiet resilience amid her husband's turmoil; her selection as a rising Canadian talent aligned with Cronenberg's preference for performers who could subtly convey emotional undercurrents in domestic scenes.

Filming and Design

Principal photography for A Dangerous Method commenced on May 17, 2010, and wrapped in August after an eight-week schedule, with filming occurring across , (doubling as Zurich, ), , , and locations around (Bodensee) in . Interiors, including a recreation of the psychiatric clinic, were shot at MMC Studios in and Studio Babelsberg in , , while exteriors utilized authentic sites such as a in Inzigkofen for the clinic grounds and Café Sperl in . These choices allowed for period-accurate representation of early 20th-century Europe, with 's urban architecture standing in for the Swiss setting to maintain historical fidelity without extensive travel. Cinematographer , marking his ninth collaboration with director , adopted a straightforward and unadorned visual style to prioritize the actors' performances and , avoiding flashy camera movements in favor of composed framing that captured the film's intellectual and emotional restraint. His approach emphasized natural lighting and selective close-ups on facial expressions to convey psychological intimacy, aligning with the narrative's focus on the inner lives of Freud, Jung, and Spielrein. The overall aesthetic featured a desaturated color palette in both sets and lighting, evoking the somber, restrained atmosphere of the pre-World War I era. Production designer James McAteer crafted interiors with muted, desaturated tones to underscore the film's themes of repression and intellectual rigor, notably recreating Sigmund Freud's study as a claustrophobic space filled with dark wood paneling, bookshelves, and Freud's original antique chair sourced for authenticity. Costume designer complemented this with Edwardian-era attire using period fabrics from 1904 to 1913, featuring high-necked blouses and evolving skirt styles to reflect social and personal transformations among the characters. The $20 million production was a co-production involving companies from , the , , and , enabling access to diverse locations and expertise for historical reconstruction. Filming faced challenges in achieving historical accuracy, particularly in sourcing and integrating props like antique medical instruments for clinic scenes and ensuring delivery matched early 20th-century European cadences without modern inflections. One notable logistical hurdle was adapting Jung's lakeside set near , where modern surroundings required building isolated structures to isolate the period look. Cast members briefly integrated their preparations with these designs, such as rehearsing in recreated clinical environments to embody the era's therapeutic dynamics.

Release and Performance

Premiere and Distribution

A Dangerous Method had its world premiere on September 2, 2011, at the , where it competed for the . The film screened shortly thereafter at the on September 10, 2011, marking key early public unveilings that highlighted its exploration of through the lens of historical figures. Distribution rights were secured by for the , with a on November 23, 2011. In , the film opened widely on January 13, 2012, following its festival exposure. saw an earlier rollout on November 10, 2011, while the release occurred on February 10, 2012, handled by Lionsgate. These staggered dates reflected a strategic international expansion, prioritizing European markets before broader North American availability. Marketing efforts centered on the film's star-studded cast and intellectual drama, with official trailers released by that showcased Keira Knightley's intense portrayal of alongside and . Promotional posters prominently featured Knightley in a state of emotional distress, underscoring the psychological tension at the film's core. Director and the cast conducted promotional tours at major festivals, including , , and the , to build anticipation through press conferences and screenings. The film reached home media in 2012, with DVD and Blu-ray editions released on March 27 by , including extras such as a on the adaptation of Christopher Hampton's play The Talking Cure. These releases provided viewers with additional context on the screenplay's origins and production process.

Box Office Results

A Dangerous Method was produced on a $20 million . The film grossed $30.5 million worldwide, with $5.7 million from the and and $24.8 million from international territories. In its limited release on November 23, 2011, the film earned $167,000 across four theaters. Its expansion to a wider release faced challenges from competition with blockbuster holiday films, limiting its domestic momentum. The movie saw stronger performance in , where its exploration of historical figures like and resonated with local cultural and intellectual ties. In contrast, it underperformed in the US market due to the niche appeal of its psychoanalytic themes and the controversial nature of Keira Knightley's portrayal of , which sparked debate over its intensity. Post-theatrical earnings from streaming and video-on-demand platforms, combined with sustained interest from awards-season buzz—including Knightley's Golden Globe nomination—helped the film achieve overall profitability.

Reception and Legacy

Critical Response

A Dangerous Method received generally positive reviews from critics upon its 2011 release, with praise centered on its intellectual depth and performances, though some found certain elements overwrought or overly dialogue-driven. On , the film holds a 78% approval rating based on 189 reviews, with an average score of 7/10. The critics' consensus describes it as "a provocative about the early days of " bolstered by "terrific performances" from , , and . On , it scores 76 out of 100 from 41 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reception. Critics frequently lauded David Cronenberg's restrained direction, which balanced historical drama with subtle psychological tension without resorting to his signature body horror excess. Roger Ebert awarded the film 3.5 out of 4 stars, commending Cronenberg for creating an "absorbing" narrative that insightfully intertwines psychoanalytic theory with personal turmoil. Performances drew widespread acclaim, particularly Fassbender's nuanced portrayal of Carl Jung as a conflicted intellectual torn between propriety and desire; Ebert highlighted Fassbender's ability to convey Jung's improvisational unpredictability alongside Mortensen's contained Freud. The intelligent dialogue, adapted by Christopher Hampton from his play The Talking Cure, was praised for its clarity in exploring psychoanalytic concepts, with critics like Candice Frederick noting the "enthralling consecutive dialogues and often profound one-liners." Manohla Dargis of The New York Times appreciated how the script's erudite exchanges evoked the era's pioneering "talking cure" sessions, lending authenticity to the film's examination of repressed desires and professional boundaries. However, some reviewers criticized Knightley's depiction of Sabina Spielrein for veering into caricature through exaggerated , particularly in her early scenes of physical convulsions. Dargis described Knightley's as "grotesque and overdone," with contortions that evoked outdated 19th-century tropes rather than psychological realism. in similarly noted Knightley's "exaggerated" facial tics, likening her jaw-jutting to an Alien-like distortion, though he still credited her intensity overall. Pacing issues arose in critiques of the film's theoretical discussions, which some felt dragged despite their intellectual merit; Dargis pointed to "long stretches of earnest and erudite scientific talk" that, while cerebral, occasionally tempered the emotional urgency. Notable reviews included Bradshaw's positive take in The Guardian, which praised the film's historical insight into the Freud-Jung rift and its droll amid clinical detachment, ultimately deeming it a compelling character study. Todd McCarthy's assessment in The Hollywood Reporter was more mixed, calling it effective in embracing intellectual themes but "talky" in its letter-writing and debate-heavy structure, reminiscent of Cronenberg's Dead Ringers yet less viscerally engaging.

Accolades and Cultural Impact

A Dangerous Method received several notable accolades following its release. Michael Fassbender earned the National Board of Review's Spotlight Award in 2011 for his performances across multiple films, including his portrayal of Carl Jung in the movie. Viggo Mortensen was nominated for a Golden Globe Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role at the 69th ceremony in 2012 for his depiction of Sigmund Freud. The film garnered 11 nominations at the 32nd Genie Awards, including for Best Motion Picture, and won five, for Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role (Mortensen), Best Achievement in Art Direction/Production Design, Best Original Score, Best Sound Editing, and Best Overall Sound. At the 55th BFI London Film Festival in 2011, director David Cronenberg was awarded the BFI Fellowship, the institute's highest honor, coinciding with the film's premiere. The film also appeared on several critics' year-end top ten lists, including as the number one selection in J. Hoberman's personal best for The Village Voice in 2011. The film sparked renewed public and scholarly interest in the historical relationship between Freud and Jung, particularly through its dramatization of their professional and personal dynamics with Sabina Spielrein. This contributed to discussions in psychoanalytic literature, including analyses of the film's blend of fact and fiction in portraying early psychoanalysis. Retrospective examinations in psychology journals have evaluated the film's portrayal accuracy, highlighting its role in humanizing Freud and Jung while critiquing dramatic liberties in depicting Spielrein's contributions. The movie's enduring academic discourse includes explorations of gender dynamics in psychoanalysis, emphasizing Spielrein's overlooked influence on both Freud and Jung. Its availability on streaming platforms has sustained viewership, bolstering Cronenberg's reputation for intellectual late-career works. The film's historical psychodrama style shares similarities with later productions, such as The Professor and the Madman (2019), in their approach to intellectual rivalries in period settings.

References

  1. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_dangerous_method
  2. https://psychcentral.com/blog/review-of-jung-vs-freud-in-a-dangerous-method
  3. https://cfe.tiff.net/canadianfilmencyclopedia/content/films/17155
  4. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1571222/
  5. https://www.ipa.world/IPADev/About__Us/Dev/Our_Org/our_history.aspx
  6. https://www.simplypsychology.org/freud-vs-jung.html
  7. https://www.ipa.world/PastCongresses
  8. https://www.thecollector.com/how-carl-jung-differs-from-sigmund-freud/
  9. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11101511
  10. https://thescriptsavant.com/movies/A_Dangerous_Method.pdf
  11. https://tribecafilm.com/news/512c03d11c7d76d9a9000209-a-dangerous-method-from-f
  12. https://www.sonyclassics.com/adangerousmethod/adangerousmethod_presskit.pdf
  13. https://scriptmag.com/features/interview-christopher-hampton-a-dangerous-method
  14. https://www.vulture.com/2011/12/david-cronenberg-on-a-dangerous-method.html
  15. https://filmmakermagazine.com/34949-what-lies-beneath-david-cronenbergs-a-dangerous-method/
  16. https://www.viggo-works.com/index.php?filterpage=on&selectedcat=318&fromday=1&frommonth=6&fromyear=2006&today=7&tomonth=8&toyear=2025&order=date&ascdesc=DESC&page=243&m=on&offset=130
  17. https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/spielrein-sabina
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10669968/
  19. https://jaapl.org/content/40/2/299
  20. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evil-deeds/201112/is-a-dangerous-method-a-dangerous-movie
  21. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/dangerous-method
  22. https://sonyclassics.com/adangerousmethod/synopsis.html
  23. https://left-flank.org/2012/05/10/a-dangerous-method-cronenberg-psychoanalysis-and-science/
  24. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=jrf
  25. https://www.historiesofpsychoanalysis.com/pdf/Heuer-2024-Review-of-A-Dangerous-Method-a-film-by-David-Cronenberg-203.pdf
  26. https://globalnews.ca/news/198830/dangerous-method-director-cronenberg-talks-trouble-with-casting-finding-freud/
  27. https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a359675/keira-knightley-on-dangerous-method-hysteria-was-about-sexuality/
  28. https://theplaylist.net/michael-fassbender-talks-researching-carl-jung-for-a-dangerous-method-20111121/
  29. https://www.popmatters.com/151121-what-would-david-do-the-deliberate-method-of-viggo-mortensen-2495920153.html
  30. https://macleans.ca/culture/movies/a-dangerous-method-in-cronenbergs-madness/
  31. https://www.sonyclassics.com/adangerousmethod/cast.html
  32. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1571222/locations/
  33. https://de-academic.com/dic.nsf/dewiki/2228876
  34. https://filmmakermagazine.com/77033-in-conversation-david-cronenbergs-d-p-peter-suschitzky/
  35. https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Dangerous-Method-A
  36. https://www.filmaffinity.com/en/film382228.html
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/film/video/2011/sep/02/venice-film-festival-dangerous-method-video
  38. https://www.alamy.com/keira-knightley-and-viggo-mortensen-arrive-at-a-dangerous-method-premiere-at-the-2011-toronto-international-film-festival-held-at-roy-thomson-hall-toronto-canada-10th-september-2011-image513152115.html
  39. https://deadline.com/2011/06/sony-classics-acquires-david-cronenbergs-a-dangerous-method-140589/
  40. https://playbackonline.ca/2012/01/24/hot-sheet-top-5-canadian-films-jan-13-to-jan-19-2012/
  41. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1571222/releaseinfo/
  42. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slPN4Gh1TiQ
  43. https://www.justjared.com/2011/09/05/keira-knightley-a-dangerous-method-posters/
  44. https://archive.nytimes.com/artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/the-new-york-film-festival-employs-a-dangerous-method/
  45. https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/A-Dangerous-Method-Blu-ray/36115/
  46. https://mediamikes.com/2012/03/blu-ray-review-a-dangerous-method/
  47. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt1571222/
  48. https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/holiday-box-office-marilyn-dangerous-method-and-the-artist-debut-descendants-continues-to-shine-updated-50912/
  49. https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/24-frames/story/2011-09-02/venice-film-fest-buzz-good-and-bad-for-keira-knightley
  50. https://www.indiewire.com/news/general/telluride-reviews-cronenbergs-a-dangerous-method-isnt-for-everyone-knightley-inspires-debate-184908/
  51. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/a-dangerous-method/
  52. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-dangerous-method-2011
  53. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_dangerous_method/reviews/?type=top_critics
  54. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/movies/a-dangerous-method-by-david-cronenberg-review.html
  55. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2012/feb/09/a-dangerous-method-review
  56. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/a-dangerous-method-venice-film-230566/
  57. https://nationalboardofreview.org/award-names/spotlight-award/
  58. https://goldenglobes.com/film/dangerous-method-a/
  59. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1571222/awards/
  60. https://deadline.com/2011/10/david-cronenberg-ralph-fiennes-to-get-bfi-fellowships-179084/
  61. https://www.awardsdaily.com/2011/12/20/j-hobermans-top-10/
  62. https://hollywoodprogressive.com/television/a-dangerous-method
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25160614/
  64. https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/a-dangerous-method
  65. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/professor-madman-review-1213724/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.