Hubbry Logo
AphanosauriaAphanosauriaMain
Open search
Aphanosauria
Community hub
Aphanosauria
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Aphanosauria
Aphanosauria
from Wikipedia

Aphanosauria
Temporal range: Middle Triassic, Anisian–Ladinian
Illustration of Teleocrater rhadinus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archosauria
Clade: Avemetatarsalia
Clade: Aphanosauria
Nesbitt et al., 2017
Genera

Aphanosauria ("hidden lizards") is an extinct group of reptiles distantly related to dinosaurs (including birds). They are at the base of a group known as Avemetatarsalia, one of two main branches of archosaurs. The other main branch, Pseudosuchia, includes modern crocodilians. Aphanosaurs possessed features from both groups, indicating that they are the oldest and most primitive known clade of avemetatarsalians, at least in terms of their position on the archosaur family tree. Other avemetatarsalians include the flying pterosaurs, small bipedal lagerpetids, herbivorous silesaurids, and the incredibly diverse dinosaurs, which survive to the present day in the form of birds. Aphanosauria is formally defined as the most inclusive clade containing Teleocrater rhadinus and Yarasuchus deccanensis but not Passer domesticus (house sparrow) or Crocodylus niloticus (Nile crocodile). This group was first recognized during the description of Teleocrater.[1]

Although only known by a few genera, Aphanosaurs had a widespread distribution across Pangaea in the Middle Triassic.[2] They were fairly slow quadrupedal long-necked carnivores, a biology more similar to basal archosaurs than to advanced avemetatarsalians such as pterosaurs, lagerpetids, and early dinosaurs. In addition, they seemingly possess 'crocodile-normal' ankles (with a crurotarsal joint), showing that 'advanced mesotarsal' ankles (the form acquired by many dinosaurs, pterosaurs, lagerpetids, and advanced silesaurids) were not basal to the whole clade of Avemetatarsalia. Nevertheless, they possessed elevated growth rates compared to their contemporaries, indicating that they grew quickly, more like birds than other modern reptiles. Despite superficially resembling lizards, the closest modern relatives of aphanosaurs are birds.[1]

Description

[edit]

Members of this group were lightly-built and moderately-sized reptiles. They do not show any adaptations for bipedalism, which became much more common in other avemetatarsalians. In addition, their leg proportions indicate that they were not capable of sustained running, meaning that they were also slow by avemetatarsalian standards.[1]

Skull

[edit]

Very little skull material is known for the group as a whole. The only skull bones which can be confidently referred to this group consist of a few pterygoid and postorbital fragments belonging to Yarasuchus as well as some fragmentary material considered to belong to Teleocrater. These bones include a maxilla (tooth-bearing bone of the middle of the snout), frontal (part of the skull roof above the eyes), and a quadrate (part of the cranium's jaw joint). Although these fragments make it difficult to reconstruct the skull of aphanosaurs, they do show several notable features. For example, the shape of the maxilla shows that aphanosaurs had an antorbital fenestra, a large hole on the snout just in front of the eyes. Coupled with an antorbital depression (a collapsed area of bone which surrounded the fenestra), these indicate that aphanosaurs belonged to the group Archosauria. A partially-erupted tooth was also preserved on the lower edge of the maxilla. This tooth was flattened from the sides, slightly curved backwards, and serrated along its front edge. These tooth features indicate that aphanosaurs were carnivorous, as many meat-eating reptiles (including theropod dinosaurs such as Velociraptor and Deinonychus) had the same features. The front edge of the maxilla also has a small pit, similar to some silesaurids. The rear part of the frontal possessed a round, shallow pit known as a supratemporal fossa. In the past it was believed that only dinosaurs possessed supratemporal fossae, but its presence in aphanosaurs (and Asilisaurus, a silesaurid) shows that it was variable among many avemetatarsalians. As a whole, known aphanosaurian skull material possessed no unique features, meaning that the rest of the skeleton would have to be used to characterize the group.[2]

Vertebrae

[edit]

Aphanosaurs have many distinguishing features of their cervicals (neck vertebrae). The cervicals are very long compared to those of other early avemetatarsalians. As with most other reptiles, the vertebrae are composed of a roughly cylindrical main body (centrum) and a plate-like neural spine jutting out of the top. In the anterior cervicals (vertebrae at the front of the neck), a pair of low ridges run down the underside of the centrum. These ridges are separated by a wide area with other shallower ridges, making the centrum roughly rectangular in cross-section. The neural spines of the cervicals are also unique in aphanosaurs. They are hatchet shaped, with front edges that taper to a point and drastically overhang the centrum, at least in the front and middle parts of the neck. The upper edge of the neural spine is thin and blade-like, but the area immediately below the edge acquires a rough texture and forms a low, rounded ridge. These features are all unique to aphanosaurs.[2]

Cervical vertebrae from Teleocrater, showing features characteristic of aphanosaurs.

As in other reptiles, aphanosaurian vertebrae also have small structures which articulate with either other vertebrae or the ribs which connect to each vertebra. The structures which connect to vertebrae in front of them are called prezygapophyses, while those that connect to vertebrae behind them are called postzygapophyses. The structures which connect to the ribs also have different names. In most archosaurs, the heads of the ribs are two-pronged. As a result, there are two areas on the side of each vertebra for connecting to a rib: the diapophysis in the upper part of the centrum and the parapophysis in a lower position. However, some cervical ribs are very unusual in aphanosaurs due to possessing a three-pronged head, although this feature only occurs in ribs at the base of the neck. In conjunction with this feature, the vertebrae in that area have a facet for the third prong just above the parapophysis, which has sometimes been classified as a 'divided parapophysis'.[2] The only other archosaurs with this feature were the poposauroids, which explains how Yarasuchus had been mistaken for a poposauroid in the past.[3]

In addition to these features which are unique among avemetatarsalians, aphanosaurs also have a few more traits present in other groups. In vertebrae at the front and middle of the neck, the postzygapophyses have additional small prongs just above the articulating plates. These additional prongs are termed epipophyses, and are common in dinosaurs but likely independently evolved due to being absent in other groups of avemetatarsalians. The body vertebrae have a different type of secondary structure. A small structure (hyposphene) below the postzygapophyses fits into a lip (hypantrum) between the prezygapophyses of the following vertebra, forming additional articulations to assist the zygapophyses. These hyposphene-hypantrum articulations are present in saurischian dinosaurs as well as raisuchids, and are often considered to help make the spine more rigid.[2]

Forelimbs

[edit]

Aphanosaurs have several characteristic features of the humerus (upper arm bone). This bone was robust, thin when seen from the side but wide when seen from the front. In anterior (front) view, its midshaft was pinched while the proximal (near) and distal (far) ends were wide, making the bone hourglass-shaped. The edge of the upper part of the humerus which faces away from the body has a rounded crest, known as a deltopectoral crest. This crest points forward and is fairly elongated, extending down about a third the length of the bone. Overall, the humerus of aphanosaurs closely resemble that of sauropod dinosaurs and Nyasasaurus, an indeterminate early dinosaur or dinosaur relative. The arm as a whole was robustly-built and somewhat shorter than the leg, but only the humerus possessed unique features.[2] The hand is mostly unknown in members of this group, but it was presumably small and five-fingered as in most archosaurs (apart from specialized forms like pterosaurs or theropod dinosaurs).[4]

Hip and hindlimbs

[edit]

Pelvic girdle

[edit]

The pelvis (hip) of aphanosaurs shares many similarities with those of early dinosaurs and silesaurids as well as the unrelated poposauroids. Most of these traits can be found in the ischium, a plank-shaped bone which makes up the lower rear branch of the hip. For example, each ischium (on either side of the hip) contacts each other at the hip's midline. This contact is very extensive, although they are not completely fused due to the contact not extending to the upper edge of each bone. In contrast, pterosaurs, lagerpetids, and Marasuchus (other avemetatarsalians) have their ischia only slightly contact at the middle portion of each bone. The tip of the ischium is also rounded and semi-triangular in cross-section, with the lateral (outer) face of each ischium thinning towards the lower edge of the bone while the medial (inner) face is flat and contacts the other ischium. Poposauroids and dinosaurs also have rounded ischia, but lack the semi-triangular shape, which is also known in Asilisaurus. The ischium also has a groove on the upper part of the shaft. Unlike dinosaurs, aphanosaurs have an acetabulum (hip socket) which is closed up by bone, although perhaps a small portion was open according to a notch near where the ischium contacts the ilium (upper blade of the hip).[2][1]

Leg

[edit]

The gracile femur (thigh bone) of aphanosaurs possesses a characteristic set of features which can be used to diagnose the group. The proximal (near) surface of the bone, which connects to the hip socket, has a deep groove on it, rather than simply being a flat articulation surface. In addition, the bone's distal (far) articulation, which connects to the lower leg bones, is concave. The proximal part of the femur also has several bumps (tubers) on either the outer or inner edge of the bone. Many avemetatarsalians have two of these tubers on the inner edge, a small anteromedial tuber in front and a larger posteromedial tuber further back. However, aphanosaurians seem to have completely lost (or never even possessed) the anteromedial tuber. This is nearly unprecedented among archosaurs, but similar to the case in archosaur relatives such as Euparkeria.[2]

A small ridge is present on the inner part of the bone, about a quarter the way down the shaft. This ridge, called a fourth trochanter, is an attachment point for the M. caudofemoralis, a tail muscle which helps to retract the hindlimbs. A scar on the anterolateral (front and outer) edge of the femur may have attached to the M. iliotrochantericus caudalis, a muscle which connects to the hip and helps to stabilize the thigh. This particular scar may be the same thing as the anterior (or lesser) trochanter, a specific structure present in dinosaurs and their close relative. A different scar is located somewhat further back on the bone and lower on the shaft. This scar may have attached to the M. iliofemoralis externus, a muscle which has a similar role to the M. iliotrochantericus caudalis. Likewise, its supposed equivalent in dinosaurs is a structure known as the trochanteric shelf. Aphanosaurs are unique among other avemetatarsalians in the fact that these two scars are separate from each other. In more advanced avemetatarsalians such as dinosaurs, the two structures and their corresponding muscles merge, a condition which is retained in modern birds.[2]

The thin tibia and fibula (lower leg bones) of aphanosaurs do not possess unique traits to the same extent as the femur. However, they are also shorter than the femur. These proportions are rare among early avemetatarsalians, but more common among pseudosuchians and non-archosaur archosauriformes. A short lower leg is inversely correlated with running abilities, indicating that aphanosaurs were not as fast or agile as more advanced members of Avemetatarsalia.[1]

Ankle

[edit]
The calcanea of Yarasuchus (A) and Teleocrater (B) seen from above, showing 'crocodile-normal' features

Two different aphanosaurs (Yarasuchus and Teleocrater) each preserve a calcaneum, also known as a heel bone. Most avemetatarsalians have simple calcaneums which are firmly connected to a large bone known as an astragalus next to them. This type of heel, known as the 'advanced mesotarsal' condition, allows for more stability but less flexibility in the foot as it means the different bones of the ankle cannot flex against each other. Pseudosuchians (including modern crocodiles), as well as the crocodile-like phytosaurs have a different configuration, where the calcaneum is much larger and more complex, connecting to the astragalum with a joint that allows for movement between the two. This configuration is called a 'crocodile-normal' ankle, and reptiles which possess it are called crurotarsans. Some recent studies have suggested that phytosaurs are not actually archosaurs, but instead close relatives of the group.[5] This indicates that 'crocodile-normal' ankles were the plesiomorphic (default) state in the first archosaurs, with 'advanced mesotarsal' ankles only later evolving within Avemetatarsalia, rather than at the base of the group.[2]

The calcaneum of aphanosaurs supports this idea, as it more closely resembles that of 'crocodile-normal' ankles than 'advanced mesotarsal' ankles. The calcaneum lies on the outer side of the ankle, with its front or inner edge connecting to the astragalus, the upper surface connecting to the fibula, and the underside connecting to the fourth tarsal (a minor foot bone). In aphanosaurs, the socket for the astragalus is concave while the connection to the fibula manifests as a rounded dome. These are both characteristics of a 'crocodile-normal' ankle. In addition, the rear part of the calcaneum has a cylindrical structure known as a calcaneal tuber. Although this structure is smaller in aphanosaurs than in pseudosuchians, it is still much larger than in other avemetatarsalians, most of which don't even possess the structure. A few dinosauriformes also have small calcaneal tubers, although aphanosaurs have larger and rounder tubers than these taxa (Marasuchus and a few basal silesaurids). In cross-section, the calcaneal tubers of aphanosaurs are oval-shaped, taller than wide. Most foot material is fragmentary in this group, with only a few phalanges (toe bones) and metatarsals (primary elongated foot bones) known. Based on the length of the preserved metatarsals, the foot was likely rather elongated.[2]

Classification

[edit]

Aphanosauria is a recently named group, so it has a fairly short taxonomic history. Before it was named, its constituent genera were shuffled around Archosauria and its somewhat larger parent group, Archosauriformes. For example, Yarasuchus was first considered a prestosuchid[6] and later a poposauroid by different analyses,[3] with Martin Ezcurra (2016) placing both it and Dongusuchus as Euparkeria-grade archosaur relatives in his analysis.[7] At the time of these analyses, Teleocrater (the most completely known aphanosaur) was not yet described.

In 2017, Aphanosauria was named and defined by Nesbitt et al. during the formal description of Teleocrater. The description was accompanied by two separate phylogenetic analyses, one derived from Nesbitt (2011)'s[5] broad study on archosaurs and the other from Ezcurra (2016).[7] Both analyses, reapplied with new information, gave a similar result for the position of aphanosaurs. They each placed the group at the base of Avemetatarsalia, outside of Ornithodira (the group containing pterosaurs, dinosaurs, and most other avemetatarsalians). A simplified strict consensus tree (a family tree with the fewest steps in evolution) using the Nesbitt (2011) analysis is given below:[1]

Archosauriformes

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Aphanosauria is an extinct of avemetatarsalian s that represents a basal diverging lineage within the avian stem, sister to Ornithodira (the encompassing dinosaurs and pterosaurs), and characterized by a mix of crocodylian-like and early dinosaurian anatomical features. Named in 2017, the unites several previously enigmatic taxa from across the supercontinent , including Teleocrater rhadinus from , Yarasuchus deccanensis from , Dongusuchus efremovi from , and Spondylosoma absconditum from , all of which were carnivorous to omnivorous quadrupeds with elongated snouts, robust limbs, and ankle morphologies resembling those of crocodylians. These reptiles, dating to the stage of the (approximately 247–242 million years ago), provide critical insights into the early diversification of avemetatarsalians following the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, highlighting a period of rapid evolutionary experimentation in body plans before the dominance of dinosaurs. Phylogenetically, Aphanosauria is positioned within , the broader group of bird-line s that split from crocodylian-line pseudosuchians in the , and its recognition has reshaped understandings of early evolution by demonstrating that the ancestors of s were not strictly bipedal but included more sprawling, quadrupedal forms. Members of the clade exhibit transitional traits, such as a four-cusped maxillary tooth row and a postfrontal contacting the squamosal, which bridge stem and ornithodiran morphologies, while their global distribution underscores the biogeographic connectivity of during the . Recent phylogenetic analyses generally affirm Aphanosauria's basal position within and its role in elucidating the assembly of the body plan, though the placement of new taxa like Mambachiton fiandohana (described in 2023) varies between basal to the clade or nested within it.

Etymology and discovery

Etymology

The name Aphanosauria derives from words aphanēs (ἀφανής), meaning "hidden," "obscure," or "invisible," and sauros (σαῦρος), meaning "" or "," collectively signifying "hidden lizards." This etymology was proposed to emphasize the previously enigmatic and poorly understood evolutionary affinities of its constituent taxa, which had long evaded clear placement within phylogeny due to fragmentary evidence. The name was formally coined in 2017 by Nesbitt et al. as part of their description of the basal avemetatarsalian Teleocrater rhadinus, marking the recognition of Aphanosauria as a distinct sister to Ornithodira within . By highlighting the "hidden" position of these early s, the term underscores how Teleocrater and related forms revealed a previously undetected branch in the dinosaurian stem lineage, bridging gaps in the archosaur radiation.

History of discovery

The discovery of taxa now recognized as members of Aphanosauria began in the mid-20th century with fragmentary material from deposits, initially interpreted as belonging to other archosauromorph groups. The earliest described member is Spondylosoma absconditum, named in by Friedrich von Huene based on several vertebrae from the Late in , ; this material was originally classified as a primitive saurischian due to its elongated vertebral centra and other features suggesting a theropod-like form. Subsequent finds in the late expanded the known diversity of similar forms. In 1988, Andrey G. Sennikov described Dongusuchus efremovi based on skeletal elements from the Anisian-aged Donguz Formation along the Donguz River in , ; the was originally classified as a basal member of Archosauria, close to the pseudosuchian lineage. A redescription in 2014 provided a detailed osteological analysis and photographic atlas, confirming its archosauriform affinities but leaving its precise position unresolved at the time. In 2005, Krishnanath Sen named Yarasuchus deccanensis from disarticulated fossils collected from the Yerrapalli Formation in , ; this long-necked was described as a new rauisuchian within , based on features like its elongated and limb proportions. Earlier, in 2013, Sterling J. Nesbitt, Richard J. Butler, and David J. Gower described Asperoris mnyama from cranial material recovered from the Manda Beds (Songea Group) in southwestern ; this small archosauriform was positioned just outside as a stem-archosaur, highlighting early Gondwanan diversity but without linking it to Eurasian taxa like Dongusuchus or Yarasuchus. The recognition of Aphanosauria as a distinct came in 2017 with the description of Teleocrater rhadinus by a team led by Sterling J. Nesbitt and , based on multiple partial skeletons from the lower Lifua Member of the Manda Beds in southern . This carnivorous, quadrupedal reptile, approximately 2–3 meters long, shared osteological features such as a strap-like , elongate cervicals, and a fibulare with recurved proximal and distal ends with the previously known taxa, prompting their unification into Aphanosauria—a new group of non-ian avemetatarsalians sister to Ornithodira (pterosaurs and dinosaurs). A companion anatomical study detailed the of Teleocrater and emphasized its role in reshaping early evolution. Prior misclassifications, such as Yarasuchus within or Dongusuchus as a crown-group , were overturned by this phylogenetic framework, revealing Aphanosauria as a hidden radiation across . In the 2020s, ongoing refinements have incorporated new specimens and analyses, solidifying Aphanosauria's position at the base of while addressing gaps in its fossil record. For instance, restudies of existing material and comparative phylogenies have confirmed the clade's and explored its implications for the assembly of the dinosaur body plan, though no major new aphanosaur taxa have been named since 2017.

Description

Skull and dentition

The skulls of aphanosaurs are characterized by an overall elongate structure, with a large and a reduced postorbital bar, features that align with early archosauromorph conditions but incorporate avemetatarsalian traits such as depressions on the roof for enlarged musculature. In the best-known , Teleocrater rhadinus, the is notably long with a restricted dorsal process and a long posterior process that excludes it from the border of the external naris; it bears an antorbital fossa that is present but lacks pronounced depth, and the itself has a gently rounded anterior margin and straight ventral border. The is gently bowed dorsally and contributes to the orbital margin, with lateral embayments for adjacent bones and a supratemporal fossa indicating relatively large temporal fenestrae compared to other early avemetatarsalians. The quadrate features two rounded condyles, with the medial one extending further ventrally, and includes a paraquadrate-quadratojugal . Cranial elements in other aphanosaurs, such as Yarasuchus deccanensis, show similar elongation in the but with variations in robustness; the there possesses a long posterior process and supports 9–11 blade-like teeth, suggesting a comparable but potentially more robust construction adapted to similar predatory behaviors. Limited cranial material from taxa like Spondylosoma and Dongusuchus corroborates the elongate and large antorbital opening as shared derived traits across Aphanosauria, though postorbital bar reduction is less well-documented outside Teleocrater. Dentition in aphanosaurs is , featuring leaf-shaped crowns with serrations in the anterior and for grasping prey, transitioning to conical, recurved posterior teeth suited for piercing and holding. The typically bears four teeth, while the in Teleocrater has 12–14 tooth positions, with alveoli increasing in size anteriorly before decreasing posteriorly; preserved teeth are mediolaterally compressed, posteriorly recurved, and bear mesial serrations, implanted thecodontly. This arrangement, combined with sharp and serrated margins, indicates a carnivorous or possibly insectivorous diet, with teeth facilitating the capture of small to medium-sized or prey. In Yarasuchus, the blade-like teeth further emphasize recurvature and sharpness, though fewer in number per jaw element, highlighting modest intertaxon variation in dental count while maintaining the pattern.

Axial skeleton

The axial skeleton of aphanosaurs features a vertebral column adapted for flexibility and elongation, particularly in the neck region, distinguishing the clade from other early archosauromorphs through shared traits like low neural spines and the presence of epipophyses on . In known taxa such as Teleocrater rhadinus and Yarasuchus deccanensis, the are notably elongate, with length-to-height ratios up to approximately 3.6 in anterior elements of T. rhadinus, exceeding those in Y. deccanensis (around 2.6). These vertebrae exhibit amphicoelous centra, low blade-like neural spines with rugose dorsal margins, and posteriorly projecting epipophyses that enhance neck mobility; partial series preserve at least four cervicals in T. rhadinus, consistent with an estimated 7–8 in the clade based on preserved proportions and comparisons to basal archosauromorphs. A low median ventral keel and paramedian ridges are also present on anterior to middle cervicals in Y. deccanensis. The dorsal vertebrae, numbering at least 7–8 in preserved T. rhadinus material (likely 12–14 total based on ), are elongated with spool-shaped amphicoelous and hyposphene-hypantrum articulations for intervertebral stability, but lack prominent ventral keels unlike some Y. deccanensis anterior dorsals. Sacral vertebrae are fused, with 2 robust elements observed in both T. rhadinus and Y. deccanensis, featuring amphicoelous and sacral that split into posterolateral and anteroventral processes to support weight transfer to the pelvic girdle. Caudal vertebrae form a , with at least 16 preserved in T. rhadinus (length-to-height ratios 1.9–3.6, mildly amphicoelous, with posterior chevron facets and reduced zygapophyses distally) and 11 proximal elements in Y. deccanensis, indicating an extended series exceeding 30 in some aphanosaurs for balance and . Ribs in aphanosaurs are slender and include triple-headed forms in posterior cervicals, as inferred from divided parapophyses in T. rhadinus, with trunk ribs showing elongate tubercula and sub-triangular cross-sections for flexible thoracic support. are present in at least some aphanosaur taxa, providing ventral abdominal reinforcement as a plesiomorphic archosauromorph feature, though not preserved in holotype material of T. rhadinus or Y. deccanensis.

Appendicular skeleton

The of aphanosaurs exhibits a of primitive archosauriform features and derived traits shared among members, as exemplified by the relatively well-known Teleocrater rhadinus from the of . The pectoral girdle consists of a with a distinct process and a longitudinal ridge along its posterior margin, contributing to a robust articulation for the ; the is closely apposed to the but unfused, featuring a posteroventrally oriented and a coracoid foramen. In Teleocrater, the measures approximately 92 mm in length, with its distal end expanding anteroposteriorly to support shoulder mobility. Forelimbs in aphanosaurs are comparatively slender and adapted for terrestrial support rather than speed, with the displaying an elongated deltopectoral crest exceeding 30% of its shaft length—a synapomorphy of Aphanosauria—and a wide distal end comprising over 30% of total length. of Teleocrater range from 87 to 112 mm in length, featuring a prominent supinator and torsion of about 45 degrees; the (88 mm) and (85–92 mm) are subequal in length, with the bearing a short . The manus is reduced, preserving a tentative metacarpal II (23 mm long) and isolated phalanges suggesting 3–4 functional digits with elongated, ligament-pitted elements. Similar slender humeral proportions occur in Yarasuchus deccanensis from , where the is robust distally but overall gracile compared to pseudosuchians. The pelvic girdle reflects adaptations for quadrupedal locomotion, with an elongate ilium bearing a deep , a prominent supracetabular crest for femoral attachment, and a medially arcing preacetabular process that forms a distinct . In Teleocrater, the ilium articulates with two sacral , and the is closed with a small notch; the pubis is slender but poorly preserved, while the ischium features a widened articular surface, extensive midline , separated dorsal margins, and a long posteroventrally directed shaft with a longitudinal dorsal groove. These elements in Yarasuchus are similarly oriented posteriorly, with a longer, more ventrally directed pubis supporting a sprawling posture. Hindlimbs are proportionally longer than forelimbs, emphasizing weight-bearing on the rear, with the femur (160–170 mm) sigmoidal in shape, exhibiting about 45 degrees of torsion, a weak fourth trochanter, an anterolateral tuber, and specific muscle scars including a proximal placement for M. iliofemoralis externus separated from the M. iliotrochantericus caudalis scar by a straight, deep transverse groove—features diagnostic for Aphanosauria. The tibia (129–145 mm, ~85% of femoral length) has a triangular proximal surface and lacks a prominent cnemial crest, while the fibula (143–153 mm) is weakly sigmoidal with a long iliofibularis crest spanning 21–38% of its length and a laterally curved anterior proximal edge. The ankle retains a plesiomorphic "crocodile-normal" astragalocalcaneal articulation, with the calcaneum featuring a convex proximal surface for the concave astragalus and a tuber taller than broad; the pes includes proximal metatarsals III and IV, plus elongated phalanges indicating 4–5 toes with a reduced fifth digit. Fragmentary remains of Dongusuchus and Spondylosoma preserve partial femora and humeri consistent with these proportions but lack detailed ankle morphology.

Classification and phylogeny

Phylogenetic definition

Aphanosauria is a node-based defined as the most inclusive group containing Teleocrater rhadinus Nesbitt et al., 2017 and Yarasuchus deccanensis Sen, 2005, but excluding Passer domesticus Linnaeus, 1758 and Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti, 1768. This formal definition was established by Nesbitt et al. in 2017 to encompass a previously unrecognized lineage of early avemetatarsalian archosaurs known from deposits across . The is diagnosed by a unique combination of synapomorphies, including the presence of recurved that are labiolingually compressed and serrated along their margins in known taxa. Additional key features comprise elongate with epipophyses on post-axial anterior elements and neural spines that overhang anteriorly with rugose lateral margins, as well as specific pelvic adaptations such as a straight anterior margin of the proximal pubis parallel to the shaft and a posterior process on the postacetabular wing of the ilium. These characters distinguish Aphanosauria from other early archosaurs and highlight its position as a basal avemetatarsalian lineage.

Included taxa

The clade Aphanosauria encompasses four valid genera, all known exclusively from deposits and characterized by slender, gracile builds, elongated neural spines on the vertebrae, and a mix of avemetatarsalian and pseudosuchian-like features in the ankle and limbs. These taxa are primarily represented by fragmentary to partial skeletons, limiting detailed comparisons, but they share synapomorphies such as a reduced fourth on the and elongate prezygapophyses on the . The type genus, Teleocrater rhadinus, is known from multiple partial skeletons including vertebrae, limb bones, and girdle elements from the ~245 Ma Manda Beds of Tanzania, distinguished by its relatively complete postcranial skeleton revealing a crocodile-like body plan with bird-line affinities, including a perforated acetabulum. Yarasuchus deccanensis, from the Middle Triassic Yerrapalli Formation of India, is based on a partial skeleton with prominent neural spines forming a sail-like structure along the back, marking it as a diagnostic aphanosaur with elongated cervical vertebrae. Dongusuchus efremovi, recovered from the Donguz Formation of European Russia, consists of fragmentary axial and appendicular remains and is identified by its slender humeri and a reduced olecranon process on the ulna, supporting its placement within the clade despite limited material. Spondylosoma absconditum, from the of , is the most fragmentary member, known primarily from dorsal vertebrae and ribs, and has been debated for its validity due to potential overlap with other archosauriforms, though phylogenetic analyses consistently recover it as an aphanosaur based on elongated, low neural spines and pleurocoels in the vertebrae. Fragmentary taxa such as Qianosuchus from have been excluded from Aphanosauria due to their affinities with pseudosuchians, particularly poposauroids, as evidenced by features like a closed and aquatic adaptations not seen in aphanosaurs. Overall, the known diversity stands at four genera, with potential for additional members pending further discoveries, all confined to the (Anisian stage).

Evolutionary relationships

Aphanosauria was established as a clade of early avemetatarsalians in 2017, based on the description of Teleocrater rhadinus from the of , which united several previously enigmatic taxa—including Dongusuchus efremovi, Yarasuchus deccanensis, and Spondylosoma absconditum—into a monophyletic group positioned as the sister taxon to Ornithodira (the clade comprising Pterosauria and ) within . Phylogenetic analyses employing comprehensive matrices of archosauromorph characters recovered Aphanosauria as the earliest-diverging avemetatarsalian lineage, highlighting its basal position on the avian stem immediately following the divergence from crocodylian-line archosaurs (). This placement was supported by two independent datasets, one derived from Nesbitt (2011) and another from Ezcurra (2016), which together encompassed over 400 characters and demonstrated robust support for Aphanosauria's exclusion from more derived ornithodiran groups. Subsequent discoveries have refined but upheld Aphanosauria's basal role within . The 2023 description of Mambachiton fiandohana from the ?Earliest (~235 Ma) of , based on a phylogenetic analysis incorporating 37 taxa and 324 characters, positioned Mambachiton as the most basal avemetatarsalian, rendering Aphanosauria the to the Mambachiton + Ornithodira clade. However, a 2025 analysis using an updated matrix derived from Müller (2020) with 282 characters and 74 taxa recovered Mambachiton nested within Aphanosauria, maintaining the clade's status as the earliest-diverging avemetatarsalian lineage. This updated topology underscores Aphanosauria's proximity to the base of the bird-line archosaurs, with shared traits such as precursors to an upright limb posture (e.g., a more vertical femoral orientation and elongated metatarsals) linking it to later stem-avialan evolution, while retaining plesiomorphic features like a crocodylian-like ankle morphology. The recognition of Aphanosauria has significant implications for understanding the origins and early diversification of dinosaurs, filling a critical gap in the radiation of archosauromorphs during the aftermath of the end-Permian . By demonstrating a diverse, geographically widespread avemetatarsalian assemblage predating the first unequivocal dinosauromorphs, Aphanosauria challenges earlier views of early ornithodirans as uniformly small and specialized, instead revealing a of morphologies that likely occupied varied ecological niches across . Later matrices, including those from 2020, 2023, and 2025 studies, continue to affirm Aphanosauria's position through increased taxon sampling and refined character scoring, with 2025 phylogeographic analyses further highlighting its early divergence originating potentially in the Late Permian of , emphasizing its role in bridging the evolutionary transition to the dominant dinosaurian faunas of the .

Distribution and paleoecology

Temporal and geographic distribution

Aphanosaurs are known exclusively from deposits, ranging from the to stages approximately 247 to 237 million years ago. This temporal distribution aligns with the early diversification of avemetatarsalian archosaurs following the Permian-Triassic extinction. Fossils attributed to Aphanosauria have been recovered from disparate regions across the supercontinent , reflecting a broad paleogeographic spread during the . In the southern hemisphere, specimens occur in the Manda Beds of the Ruhuhu Basin in , where the type species Teleocrater rhadinus was found, and in the of , home to Spondylosoma absconditum. To the east, remains are documented from the Yerrapalli Formation (sometimes correlated with the Formation) in , home to Yarasuchus deccanensis. In northern latitudes, Dongusuchus efremovi hails from the Donguz Formation in the Orenburg region of . These occurrences span equatorial to higher paleolatitudes, underscoring the clade's cosmopolitan nature. No aphanosaur fossils have been identified in post-Ladinian strata, consistent with their apparent prior to the dominance of ornithodirans. Biostratigraphically, aphanosaur-bearing assemblages correlate with early archosauromorph faunas, such as the Assemblage Zone in the Manda Beds of and the Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone in related southern Gondwanan sequences.

Habitat and inferred ecology

Aphanosaurs inhabited a variety of terrestrial environments across during the , primarily in regions corresponding to the margins of and southern . Fossil evidence from the Lifua Member of the Manda Beds in indicates that taxa such as Teleocrater rhadinus lived in warm, seasonally wet s characterized by rubified mudrocks deposited alongside rivers draining rift scarps into subsiding basins, with vegetated semipermanent water bodies in floodplain depressions supporting diverse tetrapod assemblages. Similarly, Spondylosoma absconditum from the Santa Maria Formation in is associated with fluvial-lacustrine depositional settings in a subtropical paleoenvironment with periodic flooding and seasonal precipitation, reflecting riverine and floodplain habitats conducive to archosauromorph diversification. In , Yarasuchus deccanensis occurs in the Yerrapalli Formation of the Pranhita-Godavari Basin, a mudstone-dominated sequence indicative of meandering river systems and overbank deposits in a warm, humid continental setting. The holotype of Dongusuchus efremovi from the Donguz Formation in further supports a broadly terrestrial , likely involving alluvial plains in a temperate to subtropical climate. Inferred diets for aphanosaurs point to a carnivorous or insectivorous trophic level, based on cranial and dental features preserved in multiple taxa. Teleocrater rhadinus possessed conical teeth with fine mesial and distal serrations, labiolingually compressed crowns, and recurved apices, adaptations typical of predators targeting small vertebrates or invertebrates in floodplain ecosystems. Comparable dentition in Yarasuchus deccanensis, including ziphodont (triangular, serrated) marginal teeth, reinforces a hypercarnivorous lifestyle, preying on smaller tetrapods amid the diverse faunas of Indian riverine environments. Such dental morphology across Aphanosauria suggests these reptiles occupied mid-to-upper trophic positions, potentially scavenging or actively hunting in semi-aquatic to terrestrial niches shared with early synapsids and other archosaurs. Locomotion in aphanosaurs is reconstructed as quadrupedal, enabling movement across varied terrains. The limb proportions of Teleocrater rhadinus, featuring a long neck, robust forelimbs, and hindlimbs, indicate a sprawling to semi-erect quadrupedal similar to that of basal archosaurs, suited for navigating floodplain vegetation and pursuing prey. Elongate and tall neural spines in Yarasuchus deccanensis further imply a low-slung, quadrupedal posture for stability during in riverine habitats. Overall, these adaptations positioned aphanosaurs as versatile terrestrial hunters rather than specialized cursors. As early-diverging members of , aphanosaurs likely played a key role in the initial radiation of ornithodirans, occupying predatory niches in ecosystems before the dominance of dinosaurs and pterosaurs. The clade Aphanosauria, sister to Ornithodira, represents one of the earliest splits along the avian stem lineage, with taxa like Teleocrater and Yarasuchus demonstrating a mosaic of primitive and derived features that bridged basal archosauromorphs to more specialized ornithodirans. Their distribution across suggests they competed with or complemented early pseudosuchians and dinosauromorphs, potentially facilitating ecological diversification in post-Permian recovery faunas by exploiting small-prey resources in floodplain and riverine settings.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.