Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
House sparrow
View on Wikipedia
| House sparrow | |
|---|---|
| Male | |
| Female | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Order: | Passeriformes |
| Family: | Passeridae |
| Genus: | Passer |
| Species: | P. domesticus
|
| Binomial name | |
| Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)
| |
| Range of P. domesticus Resident Non-breeding Extant and introduced (resident) Possibly extant and introduced (resident) Possibly extinct and introduced
| |
| Synonyms[2] | |
|
Fringilla domestica Linnaeus, 1758 | |
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is a bird of the sparrow family Passeridae, found in most parts of the world. It is a small bird that has a typical length of 16 cm (6.3 in) and a mass of 24–39.5 g (0.85–1.39 oz). Females and young birds are coloured pale brown and grey, and males have brighter black, white, and brown markings. One of about 25 species in the genus Passer, the house sparrow is native to most of Europe, the Mediterranean Basin, and a large part of Asia. Its intentional or accidental introductions to many regions, including parts of Australasia, Africa, and the Americas, make it the most widely distributed wild bird.
The house sparrow is strongly associated with human habitation, and can live in urban or rural settings. Though found in widely varied habitats and climates, it typically avoids extensive woodlands, grasslands, polar regions, and hot, dry deserts far away from human development. For sustenance, the house sparrow routinely feeds at home and public bird feeding stations, but naturally feeds on the seeds of grains, flowering plants and weeds. However, it is an opportunistic, omnivorous eater, and commonly catches invertebrates such as insects and their larvae, caterpillars, and many other natural foods.
Because of its numbers, ubiquity, and association with human settlements, the house sparrow is culturally prominent. It is extensively, and usually unsuccessfully, persecuted as an agricultural pest. It has also often been kept as a pet, as well as being a food item and a symbol of lust, sexual potency, commonness, and vulgarity. Though it is widespread and abundant, its numbers have declined in some areas. The bird's conservation status is listed as least concern on the IUCN Red List.
Description
[edit]Measurements and shape
[edit]The house sparrow is typically about 16 cm (6.3 in) long, ranging from 14 to 18 cm (5.5 to 7.1 in).[3] The house sparrow is a compact bird with a full chest and a large, rounded head. Its bill is stout and conical with a culmen length of 1.1–1.5 cm (0.43–0.59 in), strongly built as an adaptation for eating seeds. Its tail is short, at 5.2–6.5 cm (2.0–2.6 in) long. The wing chord is 6.7–8.9 cm (2.6–3.5 in), and the tarsus is 1.6–2.5 cm (0.63–0.98 in).[4][5] Wingspan ranges from 19–25 centimetres (7.5–9.8 in).[4]
In mass, the house sparrow ranges from 24 to 39.5 g (0.85 to 1.39 oz). Females usually are slightly smaller than males. The median mass on the European continent for both sexes is about 30 g (1.1 oz), and in more southerly subspecies is around 26 g (0.92 oz). Younger birds are smaller, males are larger during the winter, and females are larger during the breeding season. Birds at higher latitudes, colder climates, and sometimes higher altitudes are larger (under Bergmann's rule), both between and within subspecies.[6][7][8][9]
Plumage
[edit]The plumage of the house sparrow is mostly different shades of grey and brown. The sexes exhibit strong dimorphism: the female is mostly buffish above and below, while the male has boldly coloured head markings, a reddish back, and grey underparts.[8] The male has a dark grey crown from the top of its bill to its back, and chestnut brown flanking its crown on the sides of its head. It has black around its bill, on its throat, and on the spaces between its bill and eyes (lores). It has a small white stripe between the lores and crown and small white spots immediately behind the eyes (postoculars), with black patches below and above them. The underparts are pale grey or white, as are the cheeks, ear coverts, and stripes at the base of the head. The upper back and mantle are a warm brown, with broad black streaks, while the lower back, rump and upper tail coverts are greyish brown.[10]
The male is duller in fresh nonbreeding plumage, with whitish tips on many feathers. Wear and preening expose many of the bright brown and black markings, including most of the black throat and chest patch, called the "bib" or "badge".[10][11] The badge is variable in width and general size, and may signal social status or fitness. This hypothesis has led to a "veritable 'cottage industry'" of studies, which have only conclusively shown that patches increase in size with age.[12] The male's bill is dark grey, but black in the breeding season.[3]
The female has no black markings or grey crown. Its upperparts and head are brown with darker streaks around the mantle and a distinct pale supercilium. Its underparts are pale grey-brown. The female's bill is brownish-grey and becomes darker in breeding plumage approaching the black of the male's bill.[3][10]
Juveniles are similar to the adult female, but deeper brown below and paler above, with paler and less defined supercilia. Juveniles have broader buff feather edges, and tend to have looser, scruffier plumage, like moulting adults. Juvenile males tend to have darker throats and white postoculars like adult males, while juvenile females tend to have white throats. However, juveniles cannot be reliably sexed by plumage: some juvenile males lack any markings of the adult male, and some juvenile females have male features. The bills of young birds are light yellow to straw, paler than the female's bill. Immature males have paler versions of the adult male's markings, which can be very indistinct in fresh plumage. By their first breeding season, young birds generally are indistinguishable from other adults, though they may still be paler during their first year.[3][10]
Voice
[edit]Most house sparrow vocalisations are variations on its short and frequent chirping call. Transcribed as chirrup, tschilp, or philip, this note is made as a contact call by flocking or resting birds; or by males to proclaim nest ownership and invite pairing. In the breeding season, the male gives this call repetitively, with emphasis and speed, but not much rhythm, forming what is described either as a song or an "ecstatic call" similar to a song.[13][14] Young birds also give a true song, especially in captivity, a warbling similar to that of the European greenfinch.[15]
Aggressive males give a trilled version of their call, transcribed as "chur-chur-r-r-it-it-it-it". This call is also used by females in the breeding season, to establish dominance over males while displacing them to feed young or incubate eggs.[16] House sparrows give a nasal alarm call, the basic sound of which is transcribed as quer, and a shrill chree call in great distress.[17] Another vocalisation is the "appeasement call", a soft quee given to inhibit aggression, usually given between birds of a mated pair.[16] These vocalisations are not unique to the house sparrow, but are shared, with small variations, by all sparrows.[18]
Variation
[edit]
Some variation is seen in the 12 subspecies of house sparrows, which are divided into two groups, the Oriental P. d. indicus group, and the Palaearctic P. d. domesticus group. Birds of the P. d. domesticus group have grey cheeks, while P. d. indicus group birds have white cheeks, as well as bright colouration on the crown, a smaller bill, and a longer black bib.[19] The subspecies P. d. tingitanus differs little from the nominate subspecies, except in the worn breeding plumage of the male, in which the head is speckled with black and underparts are paler.[20] P. d. balearoibericus is slightly paler than the nominate, but darker than P. d. bibilicus.[21] P. d. bibilicus is paler than most subspecies, but has the grey cheeks of P. d. domesticus group birds. The similar P. d. persicus is paler and smaller, and P. d. niloticus is nearly identical but smaller. Of the less widespread P. d. indicus group subspecies, P. d. hyrcanus is larger than P. d. indicus, P. d. hufufae is paler, P. d. bactrianus is larger and paler, and P. d. parkini is larger and darker with more black on the breast than any other subspecies.[20][22][23]
Identification
[edit]The house sparrow can be confused with a number of other seed-eating birds, especially its relatives in the genus Passer. Many of these relatives are smaller, with an appearance that is neater or "cuter", as with the Dead Sea sparrow.[24] The light brown-coloured female can often not be distinguished from other females, and is nearly identical to those of the Spanish and Italian sparrows.[10] The Eurasian tree sparrow is smaller and slenderer with a chestnut crown and a black patch on each cheek.[25] The male Spanish sparrow and Italian sparrow are distinguished by their chestnut crowns. The Sind sparrow is very similar but smaller, with less black on the male's throat and a distinct pale supercilium on the female.[10]
Taxonomy and systematics
[edit]Names
[edit]The house sparrow was among the first animals to be given a scientific name in the modern system of biological classification, since it was described by Carl Linnaeus, in the 1758 10th edition of Systema Naturae. It was described from a type specimen collected in Sweden, with the name Fringilla domestica.[26][27] Later, the genus name Fringilla came to be used only for the common chaffinch and its relatives, and the house sparrow has usually been placed in the genus Passer created by French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson in 1760.[28][29]
The bird's scientific name and its usual English name have the same meaning. The Latin word passer, like the English word "sparrow", is a term for small active birds, coming from a root word referring to speed.[30][31] The Latin word domesticus means "belonging to the house", like the common name a reference to its association with humans.[32] The house sparrow is also called by a number of alternative English names, including English sparrow, chiefly in North America;[33][34] and Indian sparrow or Indian house sparrow, for the birds of the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia.[35] Dialectal names include sparr, sparrer, spadger, spadgick, and philip, mainly in southern England; spug and spuggy, mainly in northern England; spur and sprig, mainly in Scotland;[36][37] and spatzie or spotsie, from the German Spatz, in North America.[38]
Taxonomy
[edit]
The genus Passer contains about 25 species, depending on the authority, 26 according to the Handbook of the Birds of the World.[39] Most Passer species are dull-coloured birds with short, square tails and stubby, conical beaks, between 11 and 18 cm (4.3 and 7.1 in) long.[8][40] Mitochondrial DNA studies suggest that speciation in the genus occurred during the Pleistocene and earlier, while other evidence suggests speciation occurred 25,000 to 15,000 years ago. Within Passer, the house sparrow is part of the "Palaearctic black-bibbed sparrows" group and a close relative of the Mediterranean "willow sparrows".[39][41]
The taxonomy of the house sparrow and its Mediterranean relatives is complicated. The common type of "willow sparrow" is the Spanish sparrow, which resembles the house sparrow in many respects.[42] It frequently prefers wetter habitats than the house sparrow, and it is often colonial and nomadic.[43] In most of the Mediterranean, one or both species occur, with some degree of hybridisation.[44] In North Africa, the two species hybridise extensively, forming highly variable mixed populations with a full range of characters from pure house sparrows to pure Spanish sparrows.[45][46][47]
In most of Italy, the breeding species is the Italian sparrow, which has an appearance intermediate between those of the house and Spanish sparrows. Its specific status and origin are the subject of much debate, but it may be a case of long-ago hybrid speciation.[46][48] In the Alps, the Italian sparrow intergrades over a narrow roughly 20 km (12 mi) strip with the house sparrow, and some house sparrows migrate into the Italian sparrow's range in winter.[49] On the Mediterranean islands of Malta, Gozo, Crete, Rhodes, and Karpathos, other apparently intermediate birds are of unknown status.[46][50][51]
Subspecies
[edit]

A large number of subspecies have been named, of which 12 were recognised in the Handbook of the Birds of the World. These subspecies are divided into two groups, the Palaearctic P. d. domesticus group, and the Oriental P. d. indicus group.[39] Several Middle Eastern subspecies, including P. d. biblicus, are sometimes considered a third, intermediate group. The subspecies P. d. indicus was described as a species, and was considered to be distinct by many ornithologists during the 19th century.[19]
Migratory birds of the subspecies P. d. bactrianus in the P. d. indicus group were recorded overlapping with P. d. domesticus birds without hybridising in the 1970s, so the Soviet scientists Edward I. Gavrilov and M. N. Korelov proposed the separation of the P. d. indicus group as a separate species.[28][52] However, P. d. indicus group and P. d. domesticus group birds intergrade in a large part of Iran, so this split is rarely recognised.[39]
In North America, house sparrow populations are more differentiated than those in Europe.[7] This variation follows predictable patterns, with birds at higher latitudes being larger and darker and those in arid areas being smaller and paler.[8][53][54] However, how much this is caused by evolution or by environment is not clear.[55][56][57][58] Similar observations have been made in New Zealand[59] and in South Africa.[60] The introduced house sparrow populations may be distinct enough to merit subspecies status, especially in North America and southern Africa,[39] and American ornithologist Harry Church Oberholser even gave the subspecies name P. d. plecticus to the paler birds of western North America.[53]
- P. d. domesticus group
- P. d. domesticus Linnaeus, 1758, the nominate subspecies, is found in most of Europe, across northern Asia to Sakhalin and Kamchatka. It is the most widely introduced subspecies.[26]
- P. d. balearoibericus von Jordans, 1923, described from Majorca, is found in the Balearic Islands, southern France, the Balkans, and Anatolia.[39]
- P. d. tingitanus (Loche, 1867), described from Algeria, is found in the Maghreb from Ajdabiya in Libya to Béni Abbès in Algeria, and to Morocco's Atlantic coast. It hybridises extensively with the Spanish sparrow, especially in the eastern part of its range.[61]
- P. d. niloticus Nicoll and Bonhote, 1909, described from Faiyum, Egypt, is found along the Nile north of Wadi Halfa, Sudan. It intergrades with bibilicus in the Sinai, and with rufidorsalis in a narrow zone around Wadi Halfa. It has been recorded in Somaliland.[61][62]
- P. d. persicus Zarudny and Kudashev, 1916, described from the Karun River in Khuzestan, Iran, is found in the western and central Iran south of the Alborz mountains, intergrading with indicus in eastern Iran, and Afghanistan.[39][61][63]
- P. d. biblicus Hartert, 1910, described from Palestine, is found in the Middle East from Cyprus and southeastern Turkey to the Sinai in the west and from Azerbaijan to Kuwait in the east.[39][61]
- P. d. indicus group
- P. d. hyrcanus Zarudny and Kudashev, 1916, described from Gorgan, Iran, is found along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea from Gorgan to southeastern Azerbaijan. It intergrades with P. d. persicus in the Alborz mountains, and with P. d. bibilicus to the west. It is the subspecies with the smallest range.[39][61]
- P. d. bactrianus Zarudny and Kudashev, 1916, described from Tashkent, is found in southern Kazakhstan to the Tian Shan and northern Iran and Afghanistan. It intergrades with persicus in Baluchistan and with indicus across central Afghanistan. Unlike most other house sparrow subspecies, it is almost entirely migratory, wintering in the plains of the northern Indian subcontinent. It is found in open country rather than in settlements, which are occupied by the Eurasian tree sparrow in its range.[39][61] There is an exceptional record from Sudan.[62]
- P. d. parkini Whistler, 1920, described from Srinagar, Kashmir, is found in the western Himalayas from the Pamir Mountains to southeastern Nepal. It is migratory, like P. d. bactrianus.[19][61]
- P. d. indicus Jardine and Selby, 1831, described from Bangalore, is found in the Indian subcontinent south of the Himalayas, in Sri Lanka, western Southeast Asia, eastern Iran, southwestern Arabia and southern Israel.[19][39][61]
- P. d. hufufae Ticehurst and Cheeseman, 1924, described from Hofuf in Saudi Arabia, is found in northeastern Arabia.[61][64]
- P. d. rufidorsalis C. L. Brehm, 1855, described from Khartoum, Sudan, is found in the Nile valley from Wadi Halfa south to Renk in northern South Sudan,[61][62] and in eastern Sudan, northern Ethiopia to the Red Sea coast in Eritrea.[39] It has also been introduced to Mohéli in the Comoros.[65]
Distribution and habitat
[edit]
The house sparrow originated in the Middle East and spread, along with agriculture, to most of Eurasia and parts of North Africa.[66] Since the mid-19th century, it has reached most of the world, chiefly due to deliberate introductions, but also through natural and shipborne dispersal.[67] Its introduced range encompasses most of North America (including Bermuda),[68] Central America, southern South America, southern Africa, part of West Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and islands throughout the world.[69] It has greatly extended its range in northern Eurasia since the 1850s,[70] and continues to do so, as was shown by its colonisation around 1990 of Iceland and Rishiri Island, Japan.[71] The extent of its range makes it the most widely distributed wild bird on the planet.[69]
Introduction
[edit]The house sparrow has become highly successful in most parts of the world where it has been introduced. This is mostly due to its early adaptation to living with humans, and its adaptability to a wide range of conditions.[72][73] Other factors may include its robust immune response, compared to the Eurasian tree sparrow.[74] Where introduced, it can extend its range quickly, sometimes at a rate over 230 km (140 mi) per year.[75] In many parts of the world, it has been characterised as a pest, and poses a threat to native birds.[76][77] A few introductions have died out or been of limited success, such as those to Greenland and Cape Verde.[78]
The first of many successful introductions to North America occurred when birds from England were released in New York City, in 1852,[79][80] intended to control the ravages of the linden moth.[81] In North America, the house sparrow now occurs from the Northwest Territories of Canada to southern Panama,[4] and it is one of the most abundant birds of the continent.[76] The house sparrow was first introduced to Australia in 1863 at Melbourne and is common throughout the eastern part of the continent as far north as Cape York,[78] but has been prevented from establishing itself in Western Australia,[82] where every house sparrow found in the state is killed.[83] House sparrows were introduced in New Zealand in 1859, and from there reached many of the Pacific islands, including Hawaii.[84]
In southern Africa, birds of both the European subspecies (P. d. domesticus) and the Indian subspecies (P. d. indicus) were introduced around 1900. Birds of P. d. domesticus ancestry are confined to a few towns, while P. d. indicus birds have spread rapidly, reaching Tanzania in the 1980s. Despite this rapid spread, native relatives such as the Cape sparrow also occur and thrive in urban habitats.[78][85] In South America, it was first introduced near Buenos Aires around 1870, and quickly became common in most of the southern part of the continent. It now occurs almost continuously from Tierra del Fuego to the fringes of the Amazon basin, with isolated populations as far north as coastal Venezuela.[78][86][87]
Habitat
[edit]The house sparrow is closely associated with human habitation and cultivation.[88] It is not an obligate commensal of humans as some have suggested: birds of the migratory Central Asian subspecies usually breed away from humans in open country,[89] and birds elsewhere are occasionally found away from humans.[88][90][91] The only terrestrial habitats that the house sparrow does not inhabit are dense forest and tundra. Well adapted to living around humans, it frequently lives and even breeds indoors, especially in factories, warehouses, and zoos.[88] It has been recorded breeding in an English coal mine 640 m (2,100 ft) below ground,[92] and feeding on the Empire State Building's observation deck at night.[93] It reaches its greatest densities in urban centres, but its reproductive success is greater in suburbs, where insects are more abundant.[88][94] On a larger scale, it is most abundant in wheat-growing areas such as the Midwestern United States.[95]
It tolerates a variety of climates, but prefers drier conditions, especially in moist tropical climates.[78][88] It has several adaptations to dry areas, including a high salt tolerance[96] and an ability to survive without water by ingesting berries.[97] In most of eastern Asia, the house sparrow is entirely absent, replaced by the Eurasian tree sparrow.[98] Where these two species overlap, the house sparrow is usually more common than the Eurasian tree sparrow, but one species may replace the other in a manner that ornithologist Maud Doria Haviland described as "random, or even capricious".[99] In most of its range, the house sparrow is extremely common, despite some declines,[1] but in marginal habitats such as rainforest or mountain ranges, its distribution can be spotty.[88]
Behaviour
[edit]Social behaviour
[edit]The house sparrow is a very social bird. It is gregarious during all seasons when feeding, often forming flocks with other species of birds.[100] It roosts communally while breeding nests are usually grouped together in clumps. House sparrows also engage in social activities such as dust or water bathing and "social singing", in which birds call together in bushes.[101][102] The house sparrow feeds mostly on the ground, but it flocks in trees and bushes.[101] At feeding stations and nests, female house sparrows are dominant despite their smaller size, and they can fight over males in the breeding season.[103][104]
Sleep and roosting
[edit]House sparrows sleep with the bill tucked underneath the scapular feathers.[105] Outside of the reproductive season, they often roost communally in trees or shrubs. Much communal chirping occurs before and after the birds settle in the roost in the evening, as well as before the birds leave the roost in the morning.[101] Some congregating sites separate from the roost may be visited by the birds prior to settling in for the night.[106]
Body maintenance
[edit]Dust or water bathing is common and often occurs in groups. Anting is rare.[107] Head scratching is done with the leg over the drooped wing.[106]
Feeding
[edit]
As an adult, the house sparrow mostly feeds on the seeds of cereals and weeds, but it is opportunistic and adaptable, and eats whatever foods are available.[108] In towns and cities, it often scavenges for food in garbage containers and congregates in the outdoors of restaurants and other eating establishments to feed on leftover food and crumbs. It can perform complex tasks to obtain food, such as opening automatic doors to enter supermarkets,[109] clinging to hotel walls to watch vacationers on their balconies,[110] and nectar robbing kowhai flowers.[111] In common with many other birds, the house sparrow requires grit to digest the harder items in its diet. Grit can be either stone, often grains of masonry, or the shells of eggs or snails; oblong and rough grains are preferred.[112][113]
Several studies of the house sparrow in temperate agricultural areas have found the proportion of seeds in its diet to be about 90%.[108][114][115] It will eat almost any seeds, but where it has a choice, it prefers cereals: oats, wheat or maize.[116] Rural birds tend to eat more waste seed from animal dung and seed from fields while urban birds tend to eat more commercial bird seed and weed seed.[117] In urban areas, the house sparrow also feeds largely on food provided directly or indirectly by humans, such as bread, though it prefers raw seeds.[115][118] The house sparrow also eats some plant matter besides seeds, including buds, berries, and fruits such as grapes and cherries.[97][115] In temperate areas, the house sparrow has an unusual habit of tearing flowers, especially yellow ones, in the spring.[119]
Animals form another important part of the house sparrow's diet, chiefly insects, of which beetles, caterpillars, dipteran flies, and aphids are especially important. Various noninsect arthropods are eaten, as are molluscs and crustaceans where available, earthworms, and even vertebrates such as lizards and frogs.[108] Young house sparrows are fed mostly on insects until about 15 days after hatching.[120] They are also given small quantities of seeds, spiders, and grit. In most places, grasshoppers and crickets are the most abundant foods of nestlings.[121] True bugs, ants, sawflies, and beetles are also important, but house sparrows take advantage of whatever foods are abundant to feed their young.[121][122][123] House sparrows have been observed stealing prey from other birds, including American robins.[4]
The gut microbiota of house sparrows differs between chicks and adults, with Pseudomonadota (formerly Proteobacteria) decreasing in chicks when they get to around 9 days old, whilst the relative abundance of Bacillota increase.[124]
Locomotion
[edit]The house sparrow's flight is direct (not undulating) and flapping, averaging 45.5 km/h (28.3 mph) and about 15 wingbeats per second.[106][125] On the ground, the house sparrow typically hops rather than walks. It can swim when pressed to do so by pursuit from predators. Captive birds have been recorded diving and swimming short distances under water.[106]
Dispersal and migration
[edit]Most house sparrows do not move more than a few kilometres during their lifetimes. However, limited migration occurs in all regions. Some young birds disperse long distances, especially on coasts, and mountain birds move to lower elevations in winter.[101][126][127] Two subspecies, P. d. bactrianus and P. d. parkini, are predominantly migratory. Unlike the birds in sedentary populations that migrate, birds of migratory subspecies prepare for migration by putting on weight.[101]
Breeding
[edit]
House sparrows can breed in the breeding season immediately following their hatching, and sometimes attempt to do so. Some birds breeding for the first time in tropical areas are only a few months old and still have juvenile plumage.[128] Birds breeding for the first time are rarely successful in raising young, and reproductive success increases with age, as older birds breed earlier in the breeding season, and fledge more young.[129] As the breeding season approaches, hormone releases trigger enormous increases in the size of the sexual organs and changes in day length lead males to start calling by nesting sites.[130][131] The timing of mating and egg-laying varies geographically, and between specific locations and years because a sufficient supply of insects is needed for egg formation and feeding nestlings.[132]
Males take up nesting sites before the breeding season, by frequently calling beside them. Unmated males start nest construction and call particularly frequently to attract females. When a female approaches a male during this period, the male displays by moving up and down while drooping and shivering his wings, pushing up his head, raising and spreading his tail, and showing his bib.[132] Males may try to mate with females while calling or displaying. In response, a female will adopt a threatening posture and attack a male before flying away, pursued by the male. The male displays in front of her, attracting other males, which also pursue and display to the female. This group display usually does not immediately result in copulations.[132] Other males usually do not copulate with the female.[133][134] Copulation is typically initiated by the female giving a soft dee-dee-dee call to the male. Birds of a pair copulate frequently until the female is laying eggs, and the male mounts the female repeatedly each time a pair mates.[132]
The house sparrow is monogamous, and typically mates for life, but birds from pairs often engage in extra-pair copulations, so about 15% of house sparrow fledglings are unrelated to their mother's mate.[135] Males guard their mates carefully to avoid being cuckolded, and most extra-pair copulation occurs away from nest sites.[133][136] Males may sometimes have multiple mates, and bigamy is mostly limited by aggression between females.[137] Many birds do not find a nest and a mate, and instead may serve as helpers around the nest for mated pairs, a role which increases the chances of being chosen to replace a lost mate. Lost mates of both sexes can be replaced quickly during the breeding season.[133][138] The formation of a pair and the bond between the two birds is tied to the holding of a nest site, though paired house sparrows can recognise each other away from the nest.[132]
House sparrows in natural small populations, as can occur on islands, exhibit inbreeding depression.[139][140] Inbreeding depression is manifested as lower survival probability and production of fewer offspring, and can occur as a result of the expression of deleterious recessive alleles.[140] In such populations sparrows do not appear to avoid inbreeding.[139]
Nesting
[edit]

Nest sites are varied, though cavities are preferred. Nests are most frequently built in the eaves and other crevices of houses. Holes in cliffs and banks, and tree hollows, are also used.[141][142] A sparrow sometimes excavates its own nests in sandy banks or rotten branches, but more frequently uses the nests of other birds such as those of swallows in banks and cliffs, and old tree cavity nests. It usually uses deserted nests, though sometimes it usurps active ones by driving away or killing the occupants.[141][143] Tree hollows are more commonly used in North America than in Europe,[141] putting the sparrows in competition with bluebirds and other North American cavity nesters, and thereby contributing to their population declines.[76]
Especially in warmer areas, the house sparrow may build its nests in the open, on the branches of trees, especially evergreens and hawthorns, or in the nests of large birds such as storks or magpies.[132][141][144] In open nesting sites, breeding success tends to be lower, since breeding begins late and the nest can easily be destroyed or damaged by storms.[141][145] Less common nesting sites include street lights and neon signs, favoured for their warmth; and the old open-topped nests of other songbirds, which are then domed over.[141][142] Usually the couples repeat copulation many times. Every copulation is followed by some break of 3 to 4 seconds, and in that time both pair change their position by some distance. The nest is usually domed, though it may lack a roof in enclosed sites.[141] It has an outer layer of stems and roots, a middle layer of dead grass and leaves, and a lining of feathers, as well as of paper and other soft materials.[142] Nests typically have external dimensions of 20 × 30 cm (8 × 12 in),[132] but their size varies greatly.[142] The building of the nest is initiated by the unmated male while displaying to females. The female assists in building, but is less active than the male.[141] Some nest building occurs throughout the year, especially after moult in autumn. In colder areas house sparrows build specially created roost nests, or roost in street lights, to avoid losing heat during the winter.[141][146] House sparrows do not hold territories, but they defend their nests aggressively against intruders of the same sex.[141]
House sparrows' nests support a wide range of scavenging insects, including nest flies such as Neottiophilum praestum, Protocalliphora blowflies,[147][148] and over 1,400 species of beetle.[149]
Eggs and young
[edit]Clutches usually comprise four or five eggs, though numbers from one to 10 have been recorded. At least two clutches are usually laid, and up to seven a year may be laid in the tropics or four a year in temperate latitudes. When fewer clutches are laid in a year, especially at higher latitudes, the number of eggs per clutch is greater. Central Asian house sparrows, which migrate and have only one clutch a year, average 6.5 eggs in a clutch. Clutch size is also affected by environmental and seasonal conditions, female age, and breeding density.[150][151]

Some intraspecific brood parasitism occurs, and instances of unusually large numbers of eggs in a nest may be the result of females laying eggs in the nests of their neighbours. Such foreign eggs are sometimes recognised and ejected by females.[150][152] The house sparrow is a victim of interspecific brood parasites, but only rarely, since it usually uses nests in holes too small for parasites to enter, and it feeds its young foods unsuitable for young parasites.[153][154] In turn, the house sparrow has once been recorded as a brood parasite of the American cliff swallow.[152][155]

The eggs are white, bluish white, or greenish white, spotted with brown or grey.[106] Subelliptical in shape,[8] they range from 20 to 22 mm (0.79 to 0.87 in) in length and 14 to 16 mm (0.55 to 0.63 in) in width,[4] have an average mass of 2.9 g (0.10 oz),[156] and an average surface area of 9.18 cm2 (1.423 in2).[157] Eggs from the tropical subspecies are distinctly smaller.[158][159] Eggs begin to develop with the deposition of yolk in the ovary a few days before ovulation. In the day between ovulation and laying, egg white forms, followed by eggshell.[160] Eggs laid later in a clutch are larger, as are those laid by larger females, and egg size is hereditary. Eggs decrease slightly in size from laying to hatching.[161] The yolk comprises 25% of the egg, the egg white 68%, and the shell 7%. Eggs are watery, being 79% liquid, and otherwise mostly protein.[162]
The female develops a brood patch of bare skin and plays the main part in incubating the eggs. The male helps, but can only cover the eggs rather than truly incubate them. The female spends the night incubating during this period, while the male roosts near the nest.[150] Eggs hatch at the same time, after a short incubation period lasting 11–14 days, and exceptionally for as many as 17 or as few as 9.[8][132][163] The length of the incubation period decreases as ambient temperature increases later in the breeding season.[164]
Young house sparrows remain in the nest for 11 to 23 days, normally 14 to 16 days.[106][164][165] During this time, they are fed by both parents. As newly hatched house sparrows do not have sufficient insulation, they are brooded for a few days, or longer in cold conditions.[164][166] The parents swallow the droppings produced by the hatchlings during the first few days; later, the droppings are moved up to 20 m (66 ft) away from the nest.[166][167]
The chicks' eyes open after about 4 days and, at an age of about 8 days, the young birds get their first down.[106][165] If both parents perish, the ensuing intensive begging sounds of the young often attract replacement parents which feed them until they can sustain themselves.[166][168] All the young in the nest leave it during the same period of a few hours. At this stage, they are normally able to fly. They start feeding themselves partly after 1 or 2 days, and sustain themselves completely after 7 to 10 days, 14 at the latest.[169]
Survival
[edit]In adult house sparrows, annual survival is 45–65%.[170] After fledging and leaving the care of their parents, young sparrows have a high mortality rate, which lessens as they grow older and more experienced. Only about 20–25% of birds hatched survive to their first breeding season.[171] The oldest known wild house sparrow lived for nearly two decades; it was found dead 19 years and 9 months after it was ringed in Denmark.[172] The oldest recorded captive house sparrow lived for 23 years.[173] The typical ratio of males to females in a population is uncertain due to problems in collecting data, but a very slight preponderance of males at all ages is usual.[174]
Predation
[edit]
The house sparrow's main predators are cats and birds of prey, but many other animals prey on them, including corvids, squirrels,[175] and even humans—the house sparrow has been consumed in the past by people in many parts of the world, and it still is in parts of the Mediterranean.[176] Most species of birds of prey have been recorded preying on the house sparrow in places where records are extensive. Accipiters and the merlin in particular are major predators, though cats are likely to have a greater impact on house sparrow populations.[175] The house sparrow is also a common victim of roadkill; on European roads, it is the bird most frequently found dead.[177]
Parasites and disease
[edit]The house sparrow is host to a huge number of parasites and diseases, and the effect of most is unknown. Ornithologist Ted R. Anderson listed thousands, noting that his list was incomplete.[178] The commonly recorded bacterial pathogens of the house sparrow are often those common in humans, and include Salmonella and Escherichia coli.[179] Salmonella is common in the house sparrow, and a comprehensive study of house sparrow disease found it in 13% of sparrows tested. Salmonella epidemics in the spring and winter can kill large numbers of sparrows.[178] The house sparrow hosts avian pox and avian malaria, which it has spread to the native forest birds of Hawaii.[180] Many of the diseases hosted by the house sparrow are also present in humans and domestic animals, for which the house sparrow acts as a reservoir host.[181] Arboviruses such as the West Nile virus, which most commonly infect insects and mammals, survive winters in temperate areas by going dormant in birds such as the house sparrow.[178][182] A few records indicate disease extirpating house sparrow populations, especially from Scottish islands, but this seems to be rare.[183] House sparrows are also infected by haemosporidian parasites, but less so in urban than in rural areas[184] Toxoplasma gondii has been detected in sparrows in northwestern China where they pose a risk due to their meat being consumed in the region.[185]
The house sparrow is infested by a number of external parasites, which usually cause little harm to adult sparrows. In Europe, the most common mite found on sparrows is Proctophyllodes, the most common ticks are Argas reflexus and Ixodes arboricola, and the most common flea on the house sparrow is Ceratophyllus gallinae.[147] Dermanyssus blood-feeding mites are also common ectoparasites of house sparrows,[186] and these mites can enter human habitation and bite humans, causing a condition known as gamasoidosis.[187] A number of chewing lice occupy different niches on the house sparrow's body. Menacanthus lice occur across the house sparrow's body, where they feed on blood and feathers, while Brueelia lice feed on feathers and Philopterus fringillae occurs on the head.[147]
Physiology
[edit]House sparrows express strong circadian rhythms of activity in the laboratory. They were among the first bird species to be seriously studied in terms of their circadian activity and photoperiodism, in part because of their availability and adaptability in captivity, but also because they can "find their way" and remain rhythmic in constant darkness.[188][189]
Relationships with humans
[edit]The house sparrow is closely associated with humans. They are believed to have become associated with humans around 10,000 years ago. The Turkestan subspecies (P. d. bactrianus) is least associated with humans and considered to be evolutionarily closer to the ancestral noncommensal populations.[190] Usually, the house sparrow is regarded as a pest, since it consumes agricultural products and spreads disease to humans and their domestic animals.[191] Even birdwatchers often hold it in little regard because of its molestation of other birds.[76] In most of the world, the house sparrow is not protected by law. Attempts to control house sparrows include the trapping, poisoning, or shooting of adults; the destruction of their nests and eggs; or less directly, blocking nest holes and scaring off sparrows with noise, glue, or porcupine wire.[192] However, the house sparrow can be beneficial to humans, as well, especially by eating insect pests, and attempts at the large-scale control of the house sparrow have failed.[39]
The house sparrow has long been used as a food item. From around 1560 to at least the 19th century in northern Europe, earthenware "sparrow pots" were hung from eaves to attract nesting birds so the young could be readily harvested. Wild birds were trapped in nets in large numbers, and sparrow pie was a traditional dish, thought, because of the association of sparrows with lechery, to have aphrodisiac properties.[193] A traditional Indian medicine, Ciṭṭukkuruvi lēkiyam in Tamil, was sold with similar aphrodisiac claims.[194] Sparrows were also trapped as food for falconers' birds and zoo animals. During the 1870s, there were debates on the damaging effects of sparrows in the House of Commons in England.[195] In the early part of the 20th century, sparrow clubs culled many millions of birds and eggs in an attempt to control numbers of this perceived pest, but with only a localised impact on numbers.[196] Sparrows were also persecuted in Germany from at least 1650 until 1970.[197] House sparrows have been kept as pets at many times in history, though they have no bright plumage or attractive songs, and raising them is difficult.[193] The house sparrow has an extremely large range and population, so it is assessed as least concern for conservation on the IUCN Red List.[1]
Population decline
[edit]The IUCN estimates for the global population runs up to nearly 1.4 billion individuals, second among all wild birds perhaps only to the red-billed quelea in abundance (although the quelea is, unlike the sparrow, restricted to a single continent and has never been subject to human introductions).[1] However, populations have been declining in many parts of the world, especially near its Eurasian places of origin.[198][199][200] These declines were first noticed in North America, where they were initially attributed to the spread of the house finch, but have been most severe in Western Europe.[201][202] Declines have even occurred in Australia, where the house sparrow was introduced recently.[203] While no serious declines had been reported from Eastern Europe by 2006,[203] as of 2023, a 50% decrease of the sparrow population has been registered in Bulgaria.[204]
In Europe, citizen science data from a 21-year study found its numbers had dwindled in its native range in Europe by nearly 60% by 2021.[205] In Great Britain, populations peaked in the early 1970s,[206] but have since declined by 68% overall,[207] and about 90% in some regions.[208][209] The RSPB lists the house sparrow's UK conservation status as red.[210] In London, the house sparrow almost disappeared from the central city.[208] The numbers of house sparrows in the Netherlands have dropped in half since the 1980s,[94] so the house sparrow is even considered an endangered species.[211] This status came to widespread attention after a female house sparrow, referred to as the "dominomus", was killed after knocking down dominoes arranged as part of an attempt to set a world record.[212] These declines are not unprecedented, as similar reductions in population occurred when the internal combustion engine replaced horses in the 1920s and a major source of food in the form of grain spillage was lost.[213][214]
Declines have been particularly apparent even in North America, where the house sparrow is invasive in some states. Introduced to Philadelphia initially in 1852 the house sparrow rapidly spread across the nation. However, the bird has largely disappeared from the city nowadays and is estimated to have declined in North America by 84% since 1966.[215]
In South Asia, the house sparrow has largely vanished from many major cities.[216] In general, the house sparrow population has been on the decline in many Asian countries, particularly in India.[217]
Various causes for the dramatic decreases in population have been proposed, including predation, in particular by Eurasian sparrowhawks,[218][219][220] possibly facilitated by the elimination of bushes which the sparrows use to hide,[204] electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones;[221] and diseases[222] such as avian malaria.[223] A shortage of nesting sites caused by changes in urban building design is probably a factor, and conservation organisations have encouraged the use of special nest boxes for sparrows.[222][224][225][226] A primary cause of the decline seems to be an insufficient supply of insect food for nestling sparrows.[222][227] Declines in insect populations result from an increase of monoculture crops, the heavy use of pesticides,[228][229][230] the replacement of native plants in cities with introduced plants and parking areas,[231][232] and possibly the introduction of unleaded petrol, which produces toxic compounds such as methyl nitrite.[233]
Protecting insect habitats on farms[234][235] and planting native plants in cities benefit the house sparrow, as does establishing urban green spaces.[236][237] To raise awareness of threats to the house sparrow, World Sparrow Day has been celebrated on 20 March since 2010.[238] To promote conservation, in 2012, the house sparrow was declared as the state bird of Delhi.[217]
Cultural associations
[edit]To many people across the world, the house sparrow is the most familiar wild animal and, because of its association with humans and familiarity, it is frequently used to represent the common and vulgar, or the lewd.[239] One of the reasons for the introduction of house sparrows throughout the world was their association with the European homeland of many immigrants.[80] Birds usually described later as sparrows are referred to in many works of ancient literature and religious texts in Europe and western Asia. These references may not always refer specifically to the house sparrow, or even to small, seed-eating birds, but later writers who were inspired by these texts often had the house sparrow in mind.[39][239][240] In particular, sparrows were associated by the ancient Greeks with Aphrodite, the goddess of love, due to their perceived lustfulness, an association echoed by later writers such as Chaucer and Shakespeare.[39][193][239][241] Jesus's use of "sparrows" as an example of divine providence in the Gospel of Matthew also inspired later references, such as that in Shakespeare's Hamlet[239] and the hymn His Eye Is on the Sparrow.[242]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d BirdLife International (2019) [amended version of 2018 assessment]. "Passer domesticus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019 e.T103818789A155522130. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T103818789A155522130.en. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 307–313.
- ^ a b c d Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 116–117.
- ^ a b c d e "House Sparrow". All About Birds. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010.
- ^ Clement, Harris & Davis 1993, p. 443.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 118–121.
- ^ a b Johnston, Richard F.; Selander, Robert K (May–June 1973). "Evolution in the House Sparrow. III. Variation in Size and Sexual Dimorphism in Europe and North and South America". The American Naturalist. 107 (955): 373–390. Bibcode:1973ANat..107..373J. doi:10.1086/282841. JSTOR 2459538. S2CID 84083164.
- ^ a b c d e f Groschupf, Kathleen (2001). "Old World Sparrows". In Elphick, Chris; Dunning, John B. Jr.; Sibley, David (eds.). The Sibley Guide to Bird Life and Behaviour. London: Christopher Helm. pp. 562–4. ISBN 978-0-7136-6250-4.
- ^ Felemban, Hassan M. (1997). "Morphological differences among populations of house sparrows from different altitudes in Saudi Arabia" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 109 (3): 539–544.
- ^ a b c d e f Clement, Harris & Davis 1993, p. 444.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 202–203.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 224–225, 244–245.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 26–30.
- ^ Cramp & Perrins 1994, p. 291.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, p. 101.
- ^ a b Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 31–32.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 254.
- ^ a b c d Vaurie, Charles; Koelz, Walter (1949). "Notes on some Ploceidae from western Asia". American Museum Novitates (1406). hdl:2246/2345.
- ^ a b Summers-Smith 1988, p. 117.
- ^ Snow & Perrins 1998, pp. 1061–1064.
- ^ Clement, Harris & Davis 1993, p. 445.
- ^ Roberts 1992, pp. 472–477.
- ^ Mullarney et al. 1999, pp. 342–343.
- ^ Clement, Harris & Davis 1993, pp. 463–465.
- ^ a b Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 121–122.
- ^ Linnaeus 1758, p. 183.
- ^ a b Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 114–115.
- ^ Brisson 1760, p. 36.
- ^ Newton, Alfred (1911). . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 25 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 13.
- ^ Jobling 2009, p. 138.
- ^ Saikku, Mikko (2004). "House Sparrow". In Krech III, Shepard; McNeill, John Robert; Merchant, Carolyn (eds.). Encyclopedia of World Environmental History. Vol. 3. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-93735-1.
- ^ Turcotte & Watts 1999, p. 429.
- ^ Sibley & Monroe 1990, pp. 669–670.
- ^ Lockwood 1984, pp. 114–146.
- ^ Swainson 1885, pp. 60–62.
- ^ Carver 1987, pp. 162, 199.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Summers-Smith, J. Denis (2009). "Family Passeridae (Old World Sparrows)". In del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Christie, David (eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 14: Bush-shrikes to Old World Sparrows. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN 978-84-96553-50-7.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 253–254.
- ^ González, Javier; Siow, Melanie; Garcia-del-Rey, Eduardo; Delgado, Guillermo; Wink, Michael (2008). Phylogenetic Relationships of the Cape Verde Sparrow based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA (PDF). Systematics 2008, Göttingen. Archived from the original on 7 July 2011.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 164.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 172.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 16.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 126–127.
- ^ a b c Töpfer, Till (2006). "The Taxonomic Status of the Italian Sparrow – Passer italiae (Vieillot 1817): Speciation by Stabilised Hybridisation? A Critical Analysis". Zootaxa. 1325: 117–145. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1325.1.8. ISSN 1175-5334. S2CID 35687355.
- ^ Metzmacher, M. (1986). "Moineaux domestiques et Moineaux espagnols, Passer domesticus et P. hispaniolensis, dans une région de l'ouest algérien: analyse comparative de leur morphologie externe". Le Gerfaut (in French and English). 76: 317–334.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 13–18, 25–26.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 121–126.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 169–170.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1992, pp. 22, 27.
- ^ Gavrilov, E. I. (1965). "On hybridisation of Indian and House Sparrows". Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club. 85: 112–4.
- ^ a b Oberholser 1974, p. 1009.
- ^ Johnston, Richard F.; Selander, Robert K. (March 1971). "Evolution in the House Sparrow. II. Adaptive Differentiation in North American Populations". Evolution. 25 (1): 1–28. doi:10.2307/2406496. JSTOR 2406496. PMID 28562938.
- ^ Packard, Gary C. (March 1967). "House Sparrows: Evolution of Populations from the Great Plains and Colorado Rockies". Systematic Zoology. 16 (1): 73–89. doi:10.2307/2411519. JSTOR 2411519.
- ^ Johnston, R. F.; Selander, R. K. (1 May 1964). "House Sparrows: Rapid Evolution of Races in North America". Science. 144 (3618): 548–550. Bibcode:1964Sci...144..548J. doi:10.1126/science.144.3618.548. PMID 17836354. S2CID 31619378.
- ^ Selander, Robert K.; Johnston, Richard F. (1967). "Evolution in the House Sparrow. I. Intrapopulation Variation in North America" (PDF). The Condor. 69 (3): 217–258. doi:10.2307/1366314. JSTOR 1366314.
- ^ Hamilton, Suzanne; Johnston, Richard F. (April 1978). "Evolution in the House Sparrow—VI. Variability and Niche Width" (PDF). The Auk. 95 (2): 313–323.
- ^ Baker, Allan J. (July 1980). "Morphometric Differentiation in New Zealand Populations of the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus)". Evolution. 34 (4): 638–653. doi:10.2307/2408018. JSTOR 2408018. PMID 28563981.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 133–135.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 126–128.
- ^ a b c Mackworth-Praed & Grant 1955, pp. 870–871.
- ^ Cramp & Perrins 1994, p. 289.
- ^ Vaurie, Charles (1956). "Systematic notes on Palearctic birds. No. 24, Ploceidae, the genera Passer, Petronia, and Montifringilla". American Museum Novitates (1814). hdl:2246/5394.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 134.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 5, 9–12.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 129–137, 280–283.
- ^ "House Sparrow: Passer domesticus". Bermuda Audubon Society. Bermuda Audubon Society. Retrieved 4 July 2022.
Status: Abundant naturalized species. Introduced in 1870 in belief that they would control flies in towns. A major threat to the breeding success of bluebirds. Local Habitat: Widespread in both built-up and in less developed areas. Habits: Nests February to July in roofs, cliffs, trees and bluebird boxes. Lays four to five brown speckled eggs.
- ^ a b Anderson 2006, p. 5.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 171–173.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 22.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 293–296.
- ^ Martin, Lynn B. II; Fitzgerald, Lisa (2005). "A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus". Behavioral Ecology. 16 (4): 702–7. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari044.
- ^ Lee, Kelly A.; Martin, Lynn B., 2nd; Wikelski, Martin C. (2005). "Responding to inflammatory challenges is less costly for a successful avian invader, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), than its less-invasive congener" (PDF). Oecologia. 145 (2): 244–251. Bibcode:2005Oecol.145..243L. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0113-5. PMID 15965757. S2CID 13394657. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 September 2006.
- ^ Blakers, Davies & Reilly 1984, p. 586.
- ^ a b c d Franklin, K. (2007). "The House Sparrow: Scourge or Scapegoat?". Naturalist News. Audubon Naturalist Society. Archived from the original on 4 March 2009. Retrieved 17 December 2008.
- ^ Clergeau, Philippe; Levesque, Anthony; Lorvelec, Olivier (2004). "The Precautionary Principle and Biological Invasion: The Case of the House Sparrow on the Lesser Antilles". International Journal of Pest Management. 50 (2): 83–89. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.603.208. doi:10.1080/09670870310001647650. S2CID 13123780.
- ^ a b c d e Summers-Smith, J. D. (1990). "Changes in distribution and habitat utilisation by members of the genus Passer". In Pinowski, J.; Summers-Smith, J. D. (eds.). Granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape. Warszawa: Pánstwowe Wydawnictom Naukowe. pp. 11–29. ISBN 978-83-01-08460-8.
- ^ Barrows 1889, p. 17.
- ^ a b Healy, Michael; Mason, Travis V.; Ricou, Laurie (2009). "'hardy/unkillable clichés': Exploring the Meanings of the Domestic Alien, Passer domesticus". Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment. 16 (2): 281–298. doi:10.1093/isle/isp025.
- ^ Marshall, Peyton (14 May 2014). "The Truth About Sparrows". Opinionator. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
- ^ "Sparrows". Western Australia Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. 2 May 2018. Retrieved 7 October 2018.
- ^ Massam, Marion. "Sparrows" (PDF). Farmnote (117/99). ISSN 0726-934X. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 1 February 2009.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 25.
- ^ Brooke, R. K. (1997). "House Sparrow". In Harrison, J. A.; Allan, D. G.; Underhill, L. G.; Herremans, M.; Tree, A. J.; Parker, V.; Brown, C. J. (eds.). The Atlas of Southern African Birds (PDF). Vol. 1. BirdLife South Africa.
- ^ Lever 2005, pp. 210–212.
- ^ Restall, Rodner & Lentino 2007, p. 777.
- ^ a b c d e f Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 137–138.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 424–425.
- ^ Hobbs, J. N. (1955). "House Sparrow breeding away from Man" (PDF). The Emu. 55 (4): 202. doi:10.1071/MU955202.
- ^ Wodzicki, Kazimierz (May 1956). "Breeding of the House Sparrow away from Man in New Zealand" (PDF). Emu. 54 (2): 146–7. Bibcode:1956EmuAO..56..146W. doi:10.1071/mu956143e.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1992, pp. 128–132.
- ^ Brooke, R. K. (January 1973). "House Sparrows Feeding at Night in New York" (PDF). The Auk. 90 (1): 206.
- ^ a b van der Poel, Guus (29 January 2001). "Concerns about the population decline of the House Sparrow Passer domesticus in the Netherlands". Archived from the original on 13 February 2005.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 129.
- ^ Minock, Michael E. (1969). "Salinity Tolerance and Discrimination in House Sparrows (Passer domesticus)" (PDF). The Condor. 71 (1): 79–80. doi:10.2307/1366060. JSTOR 1366060.
- ^ a b Walsberg, Glenn E. (1975). "Digestive Adaptations of Phainopepla nitens Associated with the Eating of Mistletoe Berries" (PDF). The Condor. 77 (2): 169–174. doi:10.2307/1365787. JSTOR 1365787.
- ^ Melville, David S.; Carey, Geoff J. (1998). "Syntopy of Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus and House Sparrow P. domesticus in Inner Mongolia, China" (PDF). Forktail. 13: 125. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 228.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 247.
- ^ a b c d e Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 139–142.
- ^ McGillivray, W. Bruce (1980). "Communal Nesting in the House Sparrow" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 51 (4): 371–2.
- ^ Johnston, Richard F. (1969). "Aggressive Foraging Behavior in House Sparrows" (PDF). The Auk. 86 (3): 558–9. doi:10.2307/4083421. JSTOR 4083421.
- ^ Kalinoski, Ronald (1975). "Intra- and Interspecific Aggression in House Finches and House Sparrows" (PDF). The Condor. 77 (4): 375–384. doi:10.2307/1366086. JSTOR 1366086.
- ^ Reebs, S. G.; Mrosovsky, N. (1990). "Photoperiodism in house sparrows: testing for induction with nonphotic zeitgebers". Physiological Zoology. 63 (3): 587–599. doi:10.1086/physzool.63.3.30156230. S2CID 86062593.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lowther, Peter E.; Cink, Calvin L. (2006). Poole, A. (ed.). "House Sparrow (Passer domesticus)". The Birds of North America Online. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
- ^ Potter, E. F. (1970). "Anting in wild birds, its frequency and probable purpose" (PDF). Auk. 87 (4): 692–713. doi:10.2307/4083703. JSTOR 4083703.
- ^ a b c Anderson 2006, pp. 273–275.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 246.
- ^ Kalmus, H. (1984). "Wall clinging: energy saving by the House Sparrow Passer domesticus". Ibis. 126 (1): 72–74. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1984.tb03667.x.
- ^ Stidolph, R. D. H. (1974). "The Adaptable House Sparrow". Notornis. 21 (1): 88. Archived from the original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 279–281.
- ^ Gionfriddo, James P.; Best, Louis B. (1995). "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and Grit Size" (PDF). The Condor. 97 (1): 57–67. doi:10.2307/1368983. JSTOR 1368983.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 34–35.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 159–161.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, p. 33.
- ^ Roof, Jennifer. "Passer domesticus house sparrow". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
- ^ Gavett, Ann P.; Wakeley, James S. (1986). "Diets of House Sparrows in Urban and Rural Habitats" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 98.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 35, 38–39.
- ^ Vincent 2005, pp. 2–3.
- ^ a b Anderson 2006, pp. 276–279.
- ^ Anderson, Ted R. (1977). "Reproductive Responses of Sparrows to a Superabundant Food Supply" (PDF). The Condor. 79 (2): 205–8. doi:10.2307/1367163. JSTOR 1367163.
- ^ Ivanov, Bojidar (1990). "Diet of House Sparrow [Passer domesticus (L.)] nestlings on a livestock farm near Sofia, Bulgaria". In Pinowski, J.; Summers-Smith, J. D. (eds.). Granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape. Warszawa: Pánstwowe Wydawnictom Naukowe. pp. 179–197. ISBN 978-83-01-08460-8.
- ^ Kohl, K.D.; Brun, A.; Caviedes-Videl, E.; Karasov, W.H. (2019). "Age-related changes in the gut microbiota of wild House Sparrow nestlings". Ibis. 161 (2): 184–191. doi:10.1111/ibi.12618.
- ^ Schnell, G. D.; Hellack, J. J. (1978). "Flight speeds of Brown Pelicans, Chimney Swifts, and other birds". Bird-Banding. 49 (2): 108–112. doi:10.2307/4512338. JSTOR 4512338.
- ^ Broun, Maurice (1972). "Apparent migratory behavior in the House Sparrow" (PDF). The Auk. 89 (1): 187–9. doi:10.2307/4084073. JSTOR 4084073.
- ^ Waddington, Don C.; Cockrem, John F. (1987). "Homing Ability of the House Sparrow". Notornis. 34 (1): 57. doi:10.63172/260196qsboyr. Archived from the original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 135–136.
- ^ Hatch, Margret I.; Westneat, David F. (2007). "Age-related patterns of reproductive success in house sparrows Passer domesticus". Journal of Avian Biology. 38 (5): 603–611. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2007.04044.x.
- ^ Whitfield-Rucker, M.; Cassone, V. M. (2000). "Photoperiodic Regulation of the Male House Sparrow Song Control System: Gonadal Dependent and Independent Mechanisms". General and Comparative Endocrinology. 118 (1): 173–183. doi:10.1006/gcen.2000.7455. PMID 10753579.
- ^ Birkhead 2012, pp. 47–48.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 144–147.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 142–143.
- ^ Brackbill, Hervey (1969). "Two Male House Sparrows Copulating on Ground with Same Female" (PDF). The Auk. 86 (1): 146. doi:10.2307/4083563. JSTOR 4083563.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 145.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 143–144.
- ^ Anderson, T. R. (1990). "Excess females in a breeding population of House Sparrows [Passer domesticus (L.)]". In Pinowski, J.; Summers-Smith, J. D. (eds.). Granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape. Warszawa: Pánstwowe Wydawnictom Naukowe. pp. 87–94. ISBN 978-83-01-08460-8.
- ^ a b Billing AM, Lee AM, Skjelseth S, Borg AA, Hale MC, Slate J, Pärn H, Ringsby TH, Saether BE, Jensen H (March 2012). "Evidence of inbreeding depression but not inbreeding avoidance in a natural house sparrow population". Mol Ecol. 21 (6): 1487–99. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.1487B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05490.x. PMID 22335620.
- ^ a b Niskanen AK, Billing AM, Holand H, Hagen IJ, Araya-Ajoy YG, Husby A, Rønning B, Myhre AM, Ranke PS, Kvalnes T, Pärn H, Ringsby TH, Lien S, Sæther BE, Muff S, Jensen H (June 2020). "Consistent scaling of inbreeding depression in space and time in a house sparrow metapopulation". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117 (25): 14584–92. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11714584N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909599117. PMC 7322018. PMID 32513746.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 52–57.
- ^ a b c d Indykiewicz, Piotr (1990). "Nest-sites and nests of House Sparrow [Passer domesticus (L.)] in an urban environment". In Pinowski, J.; Summers-Smith, J. D. (eds.). Granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape. Warszawa: Pánstwowe Wydawnictom Naukowe. pp. 95–121. ISBN 978-83-01-08460-8.
- ^ Gowaty, Patricia Adair (Summer 1984). "House Sparrows Kill Eastern Bluebirds" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 55 (3): 378–380. Retrieved 1 October 2009.
- ^ Haverschmidt 1949, pp. 33–34.
- ^ Morris & Tegetmeier 1896, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Jansen, R. R. (1983). "House Sparrows build roost nests". The Loon. 55: 64–65. ISSN 0024-645X.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 131–132.
- ^ "Neottiophilum praeustum". NatureSpot. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
- ^ Sustek, Zbyšek; Hokntchova, Daša (1983). "The beetles (Coleoptera) in the nests of Delichon urbica in Slovakia" (PDF). Acta Rerum Naturalium Musei Nationalis Slovaci, Bratislava. XXIX: 119–134. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 March 2012.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 148–149.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 157–172.
- ^ a b Anderson 2006, pp. 145–146.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 319.
- ^ Davies 2000, p. 55.
- ^ Stoner, Dayton (December 1939). "Parasitism of the English Sparrow on the Northern Cliff Swallow" (PDF). Wilson Bulletin. 51 (4).
- ^ "BTO Bird facts: House Sparrow". British Trust for Ornithology. Retrieved 24 November 2009.
- ^ Paganelli, C. V.; Olszowka, A.; Ali, A. (1974). "The Avian Egg: Surface Area, Volume, and Density" (PDF). The Condor. 76 (3): 319–325. doi:10.2307/1366345. JSTOR 1366345.
- ^ Ogilvie-Grant 1912, pp. 201–204.
- ^ Hume & Oates 1890, pp. 169–151.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 175–176.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 173–175.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 176–177.
- ^ Nice, Margaret Morse (1953). "The Question of Ten-day Incubation Periods" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 65 (2): 81–93.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 149–150.
- ^ a b Glutz von Blotzheim & Bauer 1997, p. 60ff.
- ^ a b c Glutz von Blotzheim & Bauer 1997, pp. 105–115.
- ^ "Der es von den Dächern pfeift: Der Haussperling (Passer domesticus)" (in German). nature-rings.de.
- ^ Giebing, Manfred (31 October 2006). "Der Haussperling: Vogel des Jahres 2002" (in German). Archived from the original on 22 November 2007.
- ^ Glutz von Blotzheim & Bauer 1997, pp. 79–89.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 154–155.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 137–141.
- ^ "European Longevity Records". EURING: The European Union for Bird Ringing. Retrieved 24 November 2009.
- ^ "AnAge entry for Passer domesticus". AnAge: the Animal Ageing and Longevity Database. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 333–336.
- ^ a b Anderson 2006, pp. 304–306.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1992, pp. 30–33.
- ^ Erritzoe, J.; Mazgajski, T. D.; Rejt, L. (2003). "Bird casualties on European roads – a review" (PDF). Acta Ornithologica. 38 (2): 77–93. doi:10.3161/068.038.0204. S2CID 52832425.
- ^ a b c Anderson 2006, pp. 311–317.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, p. 128.
- ^ van Riper, Charles III; van Riper, Sandra G.; Hansen, Wallace R. (2002). "Epizootiology and Effect of Avian Pox on Hawaiian Forest Birds". The Auk. 119 (4): 929–942. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0929:EAEOAP]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0004-8038. S2CID 449004.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 427–429.
- ^ Young, Emma (1 November 2000). "Sparrow suspect". New Scientist. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1963, p. 129.
- ^ Santiago-Alarcon, Diego; Carbó-Ramírez, Pilar; Macgregor-Fors, Ian; Chávez-Zichinelli, Carlos Alberto; Yeh, Pamela J. (2020). "The prevalence of avian haemosporidian parasites in an invasive bird is lower in urban than in non-urban environments". Ibis. 162 (1): 201–214. doi:10.1111/ibi.12699. ISSN 1474-919X. S2CID 91994621.
- ^ Cong, Wei; Huang, Si-Yang; Zhou, Dong-Hui; Zhang, Xiao-Xuan; Zhang, Nian-Zhang; Zhao, Quan; Zhu, Xing-Quan (2013). "Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) in Lanzhou, China". The Korean Journal of Parasitology. 51 (3): 363–7. doi:10.3347/kjp.2013.51.3.363. ISSN 0023-4001. PMC 3712113. PMID 23864750.
- ^ Poiani, A.; Goldsmith, A. R.; Evans, M. R. (23 March 2000). "Ectoparasites of house sparrows (Passer domesticus): an experimental test of the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis and a new model". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 47 (4): 230–242. Bibcode:2000BEcoS..47..230P. doi:10.1007/s002650050660. ISSN 0340-5443. S2CID 5913876.
- ^ Neill, S. M.; Monk, B. E.; Pembroke, A.C. (1985). "Gamasoidosis: avian mite dermatitis (Dermanyssus gallinae)". British Journal of Dermatology. 113 (s29): 44. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb13013.x. ISSN 0007-0963. S2CID 84993822.
- ^ Menaker, M. (1972). "Nonvisual light reception". Scientific American. 226 (3): 22–29. Bibcode:1972SciAm.226c..22M. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0372-22. PMID 5062027.
- ^ Tatem, Sue Binkley (1990). The clockwork sparrow: Time, clocks, and calendars in biological organisms. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-073701-1. OCLC 681290505.
- ^ Sætre, G.-P.; et al. (2012). "Single origin of human commensalism in the house sparrow". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 25 (4): 788–796. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02470.x. PMID 22320215. S2CID 11011958.
- ^ Anderson 2006, pp. 425–429.
- ^ Invasive Species Specialist Group. "ISSG Database: Ecology of Passer domesticus". Archived from the original on 11 June 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2009.
- ^ a b c Summers-Smith 2005, pp. 29–35.
- ^ Susainathan, P. (1921). Bird friends and foes of the farmer. Bulletin No. 81 (Report). Madras: Department of Agriculture. p. 22.
- ^ Holmes, Matthew (1 August 2017). "The Sparrow Question: Social and Scientific Accord in Britain, 1850–1900". Journal of the History of Biology. 50 (3): 645–671. doi:10.1007/s10739-016-9455-6. ISSN 1573-0387. PMID 27785658.
- ^ Cocker & Mabey 2005, pp. 436–443.
- ^ Seitz, J. (2007). "Three hundred years of House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) persecution in Germany". Archives of Natural History. 34 (2): 307–317. doi:10.3366/anh.2007.34.2.307. ISSN 0260-9541.
- ^ "Even sparrows don't want to live in cities anymore". The Times of India. 13 June 2005. Archived from the original on 11 August 2011.
- ^ Daniels, R. J. Ranjit (2008). "Can we save the sparrow?" (PDF). Current Science. 95 (11): 1527–8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2017.
- ^ De Laet, J.; Summers-Smith, J. D. (2007). "The status of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus in northwestern Europe: a review". Journal of Ornithology. 148 (Supplement 2): 275–8. Bibcode:2007JOrn..148..275D. doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0154-0. S2CID 10987859.
- ^ Anderson 2006, p. 320.
- ^ Summers-Smith, J. Denis (2005). "Changes in the House Sparrow Population in Britain" (PDF). International Studies on Sparrows. 5: 23–37. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2012.
- ^ a b Anderson 2006, pp. 229–300.
- ^ a b Драстично намалява броят на врабчетата – тревожен знак за проблем в природата. Българско национално радио. 11.06.23
- ^ "Study finds even the common House Sparrow is declining | CALS". cals.cornell.edu. 11 February 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2024.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, pp. 157–158, 296.
- ^ "Sparrow numbers 'plummet by 68%'". BBC News. 20 November 2008. Retrieved 6 December 2009.
- ^ a b McCarthy, Michael (16 May 2000). "It was once a common or garden bird. Now it's not common or in your garden. Why?". The Independent. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 12 December 2009.
- ^ "House sparrow". ARKive. Archived from the original on 3 July 2011. Retrieved 27 July 2011.
- ^ "House sparrow". RSPB. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
- ^ Gould, Anne Blair (29 November 2004). "House sparrow dwindling". Radio Nederland Wereldomroep. Archived from the original on 27 November 2005.
- ^ "Sparrow death mars record attempt". BBC News. 19 November 2005. Retrieved 10 August 2011.
- ^ Summers-Smith 1988, p. 156.
- ^ Bergtold, W. H. (April 1921). "The English Sparrow (Passer domesticus) and the Automobile" (PDF). The Auk. 38 (2): 244–250. doi:10.2307/4073887. JSTOR 4073887.
- ^ "where have all the house sparrows gone?=6 October 2022". blog.nature. 25 March 2019. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ "sparrows disappearing from the skies of south Asian metropolises=6 October 2022". AA.
- ^ a b "Save our sparrows". The Hindu. 11 March 2013.
- ^ MacLeod, Ross; Barnett, Phil; Clark, Jacquie; Cresswell, Will (23 March 2006). "Mass-dependent predation risk as a mechanism for house sparrow declines?". Biology Letters. 2 (1): 43–46. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0421. PMC 1617206. PMID 17148322.
- ^ Bell, Christopher P.; Baker, Sam W.; Parkes, Nigel G.; Brooke, M. de L.; Chamberlain, Dan E. (2010). "The Role of the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in the Decline of the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Britain". The Auk. 127 (2): 411–420. doi:10.1525/auk.2009.09108. S2CID 86228079.
- ^ McCarthy, Michael (19 August 2010). "Mystery of the vanishing sparrows still baffles scientists 10 years on". The Independent. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
- ^ Balmori, Alfonso; Hallberg, Örjan (2007). "The Urban Decline of the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus): A Possible Link with Electromagnetic Radiation". Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 26 (2): 141–151. doi:10.1080/15368370701410558. PMID 17613041. S2CID 2936866.
- ^ a b c McCarthy, Michael (20 November 2008). "Mystery of the vanishing sparrow". The Independent. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ Dadam, Daria; Robinson, Robert A.; Clements, Anabel; Peach, Will J.; Bennett, Malcolm; Rowcliffe, J. Marcus; Cunningham, Andrew A. (26 July 2019). "Avian malaria-mediated population decline of a widespread iconic bird species". Royal Society Open Science. 6 (7) 182197. Bibcode:2019RSOS....682197D. doi:10.1098/rsos.182197. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 6689627. PMID 31417708.
- ^ Vincent, Kate; Baker Shepherd Gillespie (2006). The provision of birds in buildings; turning buildings into bird-friendly habitats. Ecobuild exhibition. Archived from the original (PowerPoint presentation) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
- ^ De Laet, Jenny; Summers-Smith, Denis; Mallord, John (2009). "Meeting on the Decline of the Urban House Sparrow Passer domesticus: Newcastle 2009 (24–25 Feb)" (PDF). International Studies on Sparrows. 33: 17–32. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2011.
- ^ Butler, Daniel (2 February 2009). "Helping birds to nest on Valentine's Day". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- ^ Peach, W. J.; Vincent, K. E.; Fowler, J. A.; Grice, P. V. (2008). "Reproductive success of house sparrows along an urban gradient" (PDF). Animal Conservation. 11 (6): 1–11. Bibcode:2008AnCon..11..493P. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00209.x. S2CID 52366095. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 18 January 2010.
- ^ Vincent 2005, pp. 265–270.
- ^ Vincent, Kate E.; Peach, Will; Fowler, Jim (2009). An investigation in to the breeding biology and nestling diet of the house sparrow in urban Britain. International Ornithological Congress. Archived from the original (PowerPoint presentation) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ Vincent, Kate E. (2009). Reproductive success of house sparrows along an urban gradient. LIPU – Passeri in crisis?. Pisa, Italy. Archived from the original (PowerPoint presentation) on 25 January 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
- ^ Clover, Charles (20 November 2008). "On the trail of our missing house sparrows". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ Smith, Lewis (20 November 2008). "Drivers and gardeners the secret behind flight of house sparrows". The Times. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ Summers-Smith, J. Denis (September 2007). "Is unleaded petrol a factor in urban House Sparrow decline?". British Birds. 100: 558. ISSN 0007-0335.
- ^ Hole, D. G.; et al. (2002). "Ecology and conservation of rural house sparrows". Ecology of Threatened Species. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Archived from the original on 3 January 2010. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
- ^ Hole, David G.; Whittingham, M. J.; Bradbury, Richard B.; Anderson, Guy Q. A.; Lee, Patricia L. M.; Wilson, Jeremy D.; Krebs, John R. (29 August 2002). "Agriculture: Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions". Nature. 418 (6901): 931–2. Bibcode:2002Natur.418..931H. doi:10.1038/418931a. PMID 12198534. S2CID 4382585.
- ^ Adam, David (20 November 2009). "Leylandii may be to blame for house sparrow decline, say scientists". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ Mukherjee, Sarah (20 November 2008). "Making a garden sparrow-friendly". BBC News. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ Sathyendran, Nita (21 March 2012). "Spare a thought for the sparrow". The Hindu. Retrieved 22 March 2012.
- ^ a b c d Summers-Smith 1963, pp. 49, 215.
- ^ Shipley, A. E. (1899). "Sparrow". In Cheyne, Thomas Kelley; Black, J. Sutherland (eds.). Encyclopaedia Biblica. Vol. 4. Toronto: Morang.
- ^ "Sparrow". A Dictionary of Literary Symbols. 2007.
- ^ Todd 2012, pp. 56–58.
Works cited
[edit]- Anderson, Ted R. (2006). Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow: from Genes to Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-530411-4.
- Barrows, Walter B. (1889). "The English Sparrow (Passer domesticus) in North America, Especially in its Relations to Agriculture". United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Economic Ornithology and Mammalology Bulletin (1).
- Birkhead, Tim (2012). Bird Sense: What It's Like to Be a Bird. New York: Walker & Company. ISBN 978-0-8027-7966-3.
- Blakers, M.; Davies, S. J. J. F.; Reilly, P. N. (1984). The Atlas of Australian Birds. Melbourne University Press. ISBN 978-0-522-84285-2.
- Brisson, Mathurin Jacques (1760). Ornithologie ou Méthode contenant la division des oiseaux en Ordres, Sections, Genres, Especes & leurs Variétés: a Laquelle on a joint une Description exacte de chaque Espece, avec les Citations des Auteurs qui en ont traité, les Noms qu'ils leur ont donnés, ceux que leur ont donnés les différentes Nations, & les Noms vulgaires (in French). Vol. IV. Paris: Bauche.
- Carver, Craig M. (1987). American Regional Dialects: a Word Geography. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-10076-7.
- Cocker, Mark; Mabey, Richard (2005). Birds Britannica. London: Chatto & Windus. ISBN 978-0-7011-6907-7.
- Clement, Peter; Harris, Alan; Davis, John (1993). Finches and Sparrows: an Identification Guide. London: Christopher Helm. ISBN 978-0-7136-8017-1.
- Cramp, S.; Perrins, C. M., eds. (1994). The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume 8, Crows to Finches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Davies, Nick B. (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds, and Other Cheats. illustrated by David Quinn. London: T. & A. D. Poyser. ISBN 978-0-85661-135-3.
- Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N.; Bauer, K. M. (1997). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 14-I; Passeriformes (5. Teil). AULA-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-923527-00-7.
- Haverschmidt, François (1949). The Life of the White Stork. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
- Houlihan, Patrick E.; Goodman, Steven M. (1986). The Natural History of Egypt, Volume I: The Birds of Ancient Egypt. Warminster: Aris & Philips. ISBN 978-0-85668-283-4.
- Hume, Allan O.; Oates, Eugene William (1890). The Nests and Eggs of Indian Birds. Vol. II (2nd. ed.). London: R. H. Porter.
- Jobling, James A. (2009). Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4.
- Lever, Christopher (2005). Naturalised Birds of the World. T. & A. D. Poyser. ISBN 978-0-7136-7006-6.
- Linnaeus, Carolus (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin). Vol. I (10th revised ed.). Holmius: Laurentius Salvius.
- Lockwood, W. B. (1984). The Oxford Book of British Bird Names. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-214155-2.
- Mackworth-Praed, C. W.; Grant, C. H. B. (1955). African Handbook of Birds. Series 1: Birds of Eastern and North Eastern Africa. Vol. 2. Toronto: Longmans, Green, and Co.
- Morris, F. O.; Tegetmeier, W. B. (1896). A Natural History of the Nests and Eggs of British Birds. Vol. II (4th. ed.).
- Mullarney, Killian; Svensson, Lars; Zetterstrom, Dan; Grant, Peter (1999). Collins Bird Guide (1st. ed.). London: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-219728-1.
- Oberholser, Harry C. (1974). The Bird Life of Texas. Vol. 2. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-292-70711-5.
- Ogilvie-Grant, W. R. (1912). Catalogue of the Collection of Birds' Eggs in the British Museum (Natural History) Volume V: Carinatæ (Passeriformes completed). Vol. 5. London: Taylor and Francis.
- Restall, Robin; Rodner, Clemencia; Lentino, Miguel (2007). The Birds of Northern South America: An Identification Guide. Vol. I. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10862-0.
- Roberts, Tom J. (1992). The Birds of Pakistan. Volume 2: Passeriformes: Pittas to Buntings. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-577405-4.
- Sibley, Charles Gald; Monroe, Burt Leavelle (1990). Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-04969-5.
- Snow, David; Perrins, Christopher M., eds. (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 2 (Concise ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-854099-1.
- Summers-Smith, J. Denis (1963). The House Sparrow. New Naturalist (1st. ed.). London: Collins.
- Summers-Smith, J. Denis (1988). The Sparrows. illustrated by Robert Gillmor. Calton, Staffs, England: T. & A. D. Poyser. ISBN 978-0-85661-048-6.
- Summers-Smith, J. Denis (1992). In Search of Sparrows. illustrated by Euan Dunn. London: T. & A. D. Poyser. ISBN 978-0-85661-073-8.
- Summers-Smith, J. Denis (2005). On Sparrows and Man: A Love-Hate Relationship. Guisborough: author. ISBN 978-0-9525383-2-5. OCLC 80016868.
- Swainson, William (1885). Provincial Names and Folk Lore of British Birds. London: Trübner and Co.
- Todd, Kim (2012). Sparrow. Animal. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-86189-875-3.
- Turcotte, William H.; Watts, David L. (1999). Birds of Mississippi. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1-57806-110-5.
- Vincent, Kate E. (October 2005). Investigating the causes of the decline of the urban House Sparrow Passer domesticus population in Britain (PDF) (PhD). De Montfort University. hdl:2086/10742. Retrieved 2 December 2009.
External links
[edit]- Explore Species: House Sparrow at eBird (Cornell Lab of Ornithology)
- House sparrow at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds website
- Indian sparrow and house sparrow at Birds of Kazakhstan
- World Sparrow Day
- House sparrow Structured guide to the species in southern Africa
House sparrow
View on GrokipediaIntroduced to North America in the mid-19th century from Europe, the house sparrow has since spread across the continent and to other regions including Australia, South America, and New Zealand, often thriving due to its adaptability and proximity to human food sources.[2] This success has made it one of the most abundant and cosmopolitan bird species, though it competes aggressively with native cavity-nesters for nest sites and resources.[1] Omnivorous and social, it forages in flocks on the ground for seeds, insects, and scraps, exhibiting behaviors like dust bathing and hierarchical pecking orders based on male throat patch size.[2] Monogamous pairs raise multiple broods per year, with clutches of 4–6 eggs incubated for 10–14 days.[1]
Globally classified as Least Concern by the IUCN due to its vast range and large population, the house sparrow has experienced sharp declines in parts of Europe, such as the United Kingdom, attributed to factors including reduced food availability from agricultural intensification and predation.[4] Its ubiquity has rendered it a model organism for avian research, with thousands of studies on topics from genetics to urban ecology.[2] In some introduced areas, it is viewed as invasive, prompting control measures to protect endemic species.[1]
Taxonomy and Systematics
Classification and Evolutionary History
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) belongs to the family Passeridae within the order Passeriformes and is placed in the genus Passer, which encompasses various Old World sparrows adapted to diverse habitats across Eurasia and Africa.[1][2] Phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences position P. domesticus in a clade with closely related taxa such as the Italian sparrow (P. italiae), formerly classified under P. hispaniolensis italiae, underscoring shared ancestry within the genus that originated in Africa before radiating into the Palearctic.[5] Multilocus studies further confirm the monophyly of Passeridae and highlight P. domesticus's affinity to species like the Eurasian tree sparrow (P. montanus), with hybridization events providing evidence of recent gene flow despite ecological divergence.[6] Genetic evidence indicates that the house sparrow's synanthropic adaptation emerged from a single commensal lineage in the Middle East, coinciding with Neolithic agricultural expansions around 10,000 years ago, which provided novel food resources and nesting opportunities.[7] Molecular clock estimates, assuming a 2% sequence divergence rate per million years and a one-year generation time, place the divergence of this commensal form from ancestral populations at approximately 4,300 years ago (90% CI: 3,000–7,400 years ago), likely reflecting a population bottleneck followed by rapid expansion.[8] Holocene fossil records from archaeological sites across the Palearctic document early human associations, supporting an opportunistic evolutionary shift to human proximity that predates widespread domestication of livestock or crops, driven by causal selection pressures from habitat modification rather than direct human selection.[9]Subspecies and Genetic Diversity
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is divided into 12 recognized subspecies, primarily differentiated by variations in body size, plumage tones, and bill morphology, with subspecies grouped into the Palaearctic P. d. domesticus clade and the Oriental P. d. indicus clade.[10][11] The nominate subspecies P. d. domesticus inhabits most of Europe, extending across northern Asia to Sakhalin and Kamchatka, while P. d. indicus is distributed through southern Asia, including India, exhibiting paler plumage and adaptations to warmer climates compared to northern forms.[12] Other subspecies, such as P. d. biblicus in the Middle East, show intermediate traits in size and coloration suited to arid environments.[13] Genomic sequencing reveals low genetic diversity within many introduced populations, resulting from founder effects and bottlenecks during rapid colonization events, yet these populations maintain phenotypic plasticity through epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation variation.[14][15] Studies indicate that despite reduced neutral genetic variation, adaptive alleles can fix rapidly in local environments, enabling persistence in diverse habitats from urban centers to agricultural zones.[16] Whole-genome assemblies have facilitated identification of key loci underlying traits like bill shape and starch digestion efficiency, which vary across subspecies and contribute to ecological niche partitioning.[17] Recent analyses, including those from the early 2020s, highlight sex-biased dispersal patterns, with females displaying higher autosomal crossover counts and recombination rates than males, potentially enhancing gene flow in fragmented landscapes.[18] In urban settings, metapopulation studies show limited gene flow barriers, allowing demographic and genetic connectivity despite human-altered environments, though overall subspecies boundaries remain distinct due to geographic isolation in native ranges.[19][20]Physical Characteristics
Morphology and Measurements
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) measures 15–17 cm in total length from bill tip to tail end, with a wingspan of 19–25 cm.[3] Adult mass typically ranges from 24–39.5 g, averaging around 28.5 g, though banding studies report averages of 24.17 g with males heavier than females by approximately 1–2 g.[1][21] Males exhibit slight sexual dimorphism in size, being marginally larger and heavier than females, with minimal intraspecific variation outside subspecies differences as evidenced by wing length measurements averaging 74–76 mm across populations.[22][1] The bill is stout and conical, measuring 1.1–1.5 cm in culmen length, structurally reinforced for cracking seeds, distinguishing it from slimmer bills in native North American sparrows.[1] The head is rounded and proportionally large relative to body size, contributing to the bird's stocky build, while the tail is short at roughly 5–6 cm, comprising about three-quarters of wing length for compact form.[3][1] Legs are robust and shorter than those of many congeners, adapted for terrestrial foraging with strong tarsi supporting the bird's weight during ground activity.[3] Empirical data from live bird measurements confirm low morphological variability, with standard deviations in wing length under 3 mm in sampled adults.[22]Plumage, Variation, and Identification
Adult male house sparrows exhibit distinct plumage featuring a gray crown, white cheeks, a black bib on the throat, and a chestnut nape, with bright rufous wing coverts and a white wing bar.[4] [3] Females possess duller brown-streaked upperparts, a pale buff eyebrow, plain gray chest lacking the bib, and subtle streaks on the back.[4] [23] Juveniles resemble adult females but display buffier upperparts with darker, clove-brown streaked wings and tail.[24] House sparrows undergo a single annual post-breeding molt in late summer or fall, resulting in brighter, fresher plumage during the breeding season that wears to appear duller and more faded by winter.[25] [26] Males outside breeding exhibit reduced black bib size and paler bills compared to breeding adults.[25] In urban environments, individuals often show darker, duller dorsal plumage and reduced feather quality, attributed to factors including pollution and habitat stressors.[27] [28] For identification, house sparrows differ from similar species like the Eurasian tree sparrow by lacking a black cheek spot and possessing a gray crown in males versus the tree sparrow's uniform brown crown and black ear patch.[29] House sparrows are also chunkier with a larger head, shorter tail, and stouter bill relative to native North American sparrows.[3] The extent of black on the male's bib correlates with age and dominance status.[2]Vocalizations and Communication
The male house sparrow's song consists of a simple series of repeated "cheep" or "chirrup" notes, often delivered incessantly during the breeding season primarily to advertise and defend territories.[30] These songs are structurally basic, lacking the complexity of many other passerines, with bouts typically comprising short, disyllabic chirrups averaging 0.12 seconds in duration and featuring an "M"-shaped spectrogram of rising and falling frequencies.[31] Females occasionally produce similar but softer versions, while both sexes use sharp, high-pitched "chirp" or "tschip" variants as alarm calls to signal predators or threats, as observed in acoustic analyses of responses to simulated dangers like stuffed predators.[32] Regional dialects exist in chirrup structure, with European populations exhibiting lower minimum frequencies and wider bandwidths compared to North American ones, where higher frequencies and narrower bandwidths predominate; these differences correlate with morphological traits like larger body and beak size in Europeans and may reflect acoustic adaptations to varying urban noise levels that could otherwise mask signals.[31] Urban environments appear to influence vocal traits, as North American chirrups align with patterns of frequency shifts to avoid anthropogenic noise interference, though house sparrow repertoires remain inherently simple without evidence of broad simplification beyond baseline structure.[31] Contact calls, including softer chattering chirps, facilitate flock coordination during foraging or movement, maintaining group cohesion in dense social settings.[32] Male songs also play a role in mate attraction, with repetitive delivery signaling fitness to females, though direct empirical links via playback experiments to reproductive outcomes are less documented in house sparrows than in congeners.[30]Distribution and Habitat
Native Range and Historical Spread
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is native to most of Europe (excluding parts of Italy, where the Italian sparrow predominates), the Mediterranean region of North Africa, and temperate Asia, ranging from the Iberian Peninsula eastward across Central Asia to regions including northern India, Burma, and China.[33][1] This distribution reflects a commensal relationship with human populations, with the species originating in the Middle East before expanding alongside early agricultural communities.[7] Genetic and archaeological evidence indicates divergence from related sparrows around 11,000 years before present, coinciding with the onset of Neolithic farming practices that provided reliable food sources like grain stores.[34] The species' historical spread tracked the diffusion of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent through Eurasia, with subfossil bones confirming presence in European sites by the early Holocene, following human migrations from North Africa via the Iberian Peninsula. Jawbone fossils from Middle Pleistocene layers in Palestine represent ancestral forms, while Holocene records in Israel and northern Europe document progressive colonization tied to settled farming villages around 8,000–10,000 years ago.[35] Pre-19th-century expansions occurred gradually via trade routes and rural settlements, as evidenced by increasing synanthropic (human-associated) occurrences in medieval archaeological assemblages from sites like Novgorod, Russia, where house sparrows integrated into urbanizing areas by the 10th–15th centuries CE.[36] Even in its native range, population densities exhibited strong gradients, with highest concentrations historically proximate to human habitations due to dependence on anthropogenic resources such as spilled grains and refuse, a pattern corroborated by genomic signatures of adaptation to commensalism and consistent archaeological bone frequencies near ancient settlements.[7] This human-facilitated distribution precluded significant natural range extensions independent of agrarian expansions prior to modern globalization.[37]Introduced Populations and Invasiveness
The house sparrow was intentionally introduced to North America in Brooklyn, New York, in 1851, with an initial release of 16 birds aimed at controlling insect pests damaging trees.[38] These early releases, contrary to claims requiring hundreds of individuals for viability, established self-sustaining populations that expanded rapidly across the continent, reaching the Rocky Mountains by 1900.[39] In Australia, introductions occurred in the 1860s, with the first successful breeding recorded in Melbourne in January 1863 from 19 birds transported via India rather than directly from Europe.[40] New Zealand saw deliberate releases starting in 1866, involving small numbers—estimated at around 100 birds total by 1871—to address crop insect issues, leading to quick proliferation.[41] Establishment success in these regions stemmed from the species' high reproductive rates, allowing multiple broods per year, combined with opportunistic nesting in human structures and a flexible diet incorporating seeds, insects, and urban waste.[42] Multiple intentional releases facilitated colonization, bypassing migration risks and enabling adaptation to diverse climates, resulting in introduced ranges spanning over 100 million km² globally, including most of North and South America, Australasia, and parts of Africa.[33] Despite these advantages, genetic analyses reveal bottlenecks in some island introductions, with lower intrapopulation variation and more frequent signatures of population constriction compared to mainland sites, indicating founder effects from limited propagule size.[43] The house sparrow is classified as invasive in several introduced regions, including North America, where it competes with native cavity-nesters, and is profiled in the IUCN Global Invasive Species Database for its rapid spread and ecological dominance.[44] Regional assessments highlight its invasiveness metrics, such as displacement of endemic birds and agricultural impacts, though global IUCN Red List status remains Least Concern due to overall abundance.[45] Invasion biology studies attribute persistence to propagule pressure from repeated introductions and phenotypic plasticity, enabling survival in novel environments despite occasional genetic constraints.[37]Habitat Preferences and Urban Adaptation
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) strongly prefers human-altered landscapes, including agricultural fields, rural villages, and urban settlements, while avoiding dense forests, tundra, and other unmodified natural habitats.[46][42] This commensal association with human activity limits its occurrence to areas with buildings, infrastructure, and associated resources, with empirical studies confirming near-exclusive occupancy of anthropogenic environments in both native and introduced ranges.[46] Population densities vary markedly by habitat quality but can exceed 1,200 individuals per km² in rural villages or near livestock-associated dwellings, reflecting optimal conditions in human-modified rural settings.[47] Habitat suitability models derived from GIS analyses of urbanized landscapes further indicate that house sparrows favor older settlements with low-rise buildings and traditional architecture over modern developments, correlating with higher abundance in established human habitations.[48][49] In urban settings, house sparrows exhibit behavioral adaptations facilitating coexistence with high human density, such as faster habituation to disturbances and shorter flight initiation distances compared to rural populations, enabling bolder foraging and nesting amid traffic and pedestrians.[50][51] These shifts, alongside tolerance for urban stressors like pollution—despite induced oxidative stress—allow persistence in environments with heat islands and contaminants, though long-term health impacts from poor diet and toxins remain evident.[52][53] In introduced ranges, such adaptations contribute to predominant urban occupancy, with mapping efforts showing concentrations in over 80% of suitable anthropogenic sites in surveyed cities.[54]Behavioral Ecology
Foraging, Diet, and Resource Use
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) exhibits an omnivorous diet dominated by plant material, particularly seeds and grains, with invertebrates serving as a supplementary component. In North American populations, plant matter constitutes 80–90% of the diet, of which 40–75% comprises seeds, while the remainder includes grains and vegetable matter.[55] Stomach content analyses reveal seasonal variations, with feed and grains ranging from 59% in September to 88% in February, grass and weed seeds peaking at 41% in October, and insects reaching a maximum of 10% in June.[56] In agricultural settings, livestock feed accounts for approximately 60%, weed seeds 36%, and insects 4% of consumption.[57] Foraging primarily occurs on the ground, where individuals hop to uncover and consume fallen seeds, grains, and invertebrates such as spiders and aphids.[56] The species demonstrates opportunistic scavenging, readily exploiting human-associated resources like spilled grain, food scraps, and even meat from litter, which enhances its adaptability in urban and agricultural environments. This behavior contributes to higher foraging efficiency compared to some native species, facilitated by genetic adaptations for digesting starchy grains and a broad dietary tolerance that allows persistence in resource-variable habitats. During the breeding season, dietary emphasis shifts toward invertebrates to meet the nutritional demands of nestlings, who receive primarily insects in their first three days post-hatching, transitioning gradually to seeds thereafter.[60] This protein-rich provisioning supports rapid growth, with females often observed capturing arthropods like beetles, caterpillars, and aphids for delivery to the young.[61] In resource partitioning, house sparrows outcompete smaller avian species for accessible grains through aggressive interference and efficient patch exploitation, as evidenced by exclusion experiments showing dominance over species like house finches in urban foraging sites.[62] Their broad diet and boldness enable superior utilization of anthropogenic waste streams, reducing overlap with more specialized natives while intensifying competition in high-density food patches.[63]Social Structure and Daily Behaviors
House sparrows (Passer domesticus) are highly gregarious outside the breeding season, forming mixed-sex flocks that typically range from dozens to over 100 individuals, particularly during winter when birds aggregate for communal activities.[64] [65] Within these flocks, individuals establish dominance hierarchies through aggressive interactions, including pecking, chasing, and displacement, resulting in moderately strong linear ranks that influence access to resources.[66] Adult males generally dominate females, while adults outrank juveniles, with hierarchy stability affected by group perturbations such as removals or additions of members.[67] [68] Post-fledging, juveniles often maintain loose family units or preferentially associate with siblings during social foraging and roosting, promoting kin-biased behaviors and cooperative interactions even after independence.[69] Daily activity follows a bimodal pattern, with heightened social and movement peaks at dawn and dusk, transitioning to communal roosting as light fades.[70] House sparrows roost nocturnally in dense, protective cover such as thick bushes, ivy-clad structures, or human-made shelters, favoring sites that minimize predation risk over open trees.[71] [72] These roosts can involve large aggregations, reflecting the species' reliance on group vigilance for safety.[70]Reproduction, Nesting, and Parental Care
House sparrows typically produce 2–4 broods per breeding season, which spans from early spring to late summer in temperate regions, with clutch sizes averaging 5 eggs (ranging from 1–8).[73][74] Eggs are laid daily after the first, and incubation begins with the penultimate egg, lasting 10–14 days, primarily performed by the female though males contribute sporadically.[1][75] The eggs are pale blue to white with fine brown speckles, and hatching produces altricial young that remain blind and naked initially.[74] Nesting occurs in cavities such as holes in buildings, roofs, streetlights, or other human-made structures, though natural sites like tree hollows or dense vegetation are also used; nests are bulky constructions of grass, feathers, and debris, often built in loose colonies where multiple pairs nest in proximity.[73][74] Males select and prepare nest sites, which facilitates communal defense but exposes nests to competition and predation; the full nesting cycle from egg-laying to fledging spans 28–31 days, allowing for renesting after failure or successful broods.[75][76] Biparental care is standard, with both sexes sharing incubation (female dominant) and provisioning nestlings with insects and seeds; males emphasize territory defense against intruders, reducing female workload but varying by individual condition and brood size.[1][75] Nestlings fledge after 14–17 days, dependent on parents for food and protection for another 1–2 weeks post-fledging.[77] The capacity for multiple broods per season confers a reproductive edge over many single-brooded native passerines in introduced habitats, supporting rapid population expansion through higher annual fecundity.[73] Fledging success varies widely (often 20–50% of eggs reaching independence), influenced by food availability, predation, and weather, as documented in long-term banding studies.[76]Dispersal, Migration, and Movement Patterns
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is predominantly sedentary, with adults typically remaining within a 2 km radius of their breeding territories year-round.[75] Banding studies reveal high philopatry, as median natal dispersal distances for juveniles are 0 km, with only 10% of individuals moving beyond 16 km from their birth sites.[78] Juveniles exhibit short-range dispersal, often limited to 1–5 km, facilitating local population connectivity without extensive gene flow.[19] Recapture data from long-term monitoring indicate low fidelity to natal or breeding sites, with annual return rates below 20% in many populations, reflecting high mortality and opportunistic relocation rather than directed migration.[79] In northern latitudes, such as parts of continental Europe, partial migration occurs, where a subset of individuals—primarily from colder regions—undertake short southward movements to milder areas like the Mediterranean basin during winter, driven by resource availability.[80] These movements are irregular and density-dependent, with banding recoveries showing displacements of up to several hundred kilometers in response to harsh weather or localized food shortages, though not forming true irruptions like those in finches.[81] GPS tracking in select studies confirms that such events involve flocks covering 100–500 km over weeks, but most birds revert to sedentary habits post-winter.[82] Introduced populations, such as those in North America and Australia, demonstrate even lower migratory tendencies, with initial post-release dispersal exceeding resident norms (up to 10–20 km for females) but rapidly declining as groups establish stable, localized colonies.[83] This reduced mobility contributes to genetic isolation and adaptation to urban matrices, minimizing broad-scale movements even under resource stress.[84] Overall, movement patterns prioritize site tenacity over nomadic or migratory strategies, supported by empirical data from ringing programs spanning decades.[85]Physiological Adaptations
Metabolic, Immune, and Sensory Traits
House sparrows maintain a relatively high basal metabolic rate (BMR), which supports the energetic costs of frequent reproduction, including multiple clutches per year in temperate regions. In populations from Wisconsin, winter BMR is approximately 62% higher than summer values, reflecting metabolic flexibility that enhances thermoregulation and summit metabolic capacity during cold exposure. [86] This seasonal upregulation correlates with increased recruit production, indicating a link between elevated BMR and reproductive success. [87] Cold acclimatization further boosts thermogenic capacity through modifications in pectoralis muscle mass and fatty acid metabolism, enabling efficient energy mobilization without primary reliance on extensive fat reserves. [88] Urban house sparrows exhibit overexpressed immune-related proteins, including those involved in coagulation and pathogen response, as identified through proteomic analyses of blood samples, suggesting physiological adaptations to heightened exposure to urban contaminants and microbes. [53] Adaptive immune defenses, measured via antibody-mediated lysis assays, prove stronger in house sparrows compared to species with weaker inflammatory responses, contributing to resilience in anthropogenically altered environments. [89] Epigenetic factors influence expression of immune genes like TLR4 in blood and tissues, with higher epigenetic potential correlating to elevated baseline immunity. [90] Sensory adaptations include acute monocular vision suited for detecting small seeds and insects at distance, aiding foraging efficiency. [91] Auditory processing shows seasonal variation, with enhanced frequency resolution in females during breeding to improve song discrimination, as evidenced by brainstem response thresholds. [92] House sparrows also display genetic adaptations conferring tolerance to heavy metals like lead in contaminated sites, such as Australian mining areas, where polymorphisms in detoxification genes enable higher survival rates relative to non-adapted populations. [93] Despite this, sublethal lead exposure impairs flight performance and increases anxiety-like behaviors in lab assays. [94]Survival Threats
Predators and Mortality Factors
House sparrows (Passer domesticus) are vulnerable to predation by diverse taxa, including avian raptors such as Cooper's hawks, merlins, and owls like eastern screech owls, which primarily target adults during foraging or roosting.[1] Mammalian predators, especially domestic cats, frequently attack adults, juveniles, and nestlings, while raccoons and occasionally dogs raid nests for eggs and young.[1] Reptilian predators, including various snakes, consume eggs and nestlings, contributing to high early-life losses.[1] Predation imposes substantial mortality, particularly on juveniles, with first-year survival rates averaging around 20%, corresponding to approximately 80% mortality, much of which occurs soon after fledging due to predator encounters.[75] Adult annual mortality exceeds 40%, though lower than juvenile rates, reflecting behavioral adaptations like heightened wariness that enhance evasion of threats.[95] In urban settings, shifts in predator assemblages, such as increased corvid or synanthropic mammal activity, can intensify nest predation compared to rural areas.[96] Non-predatory accidental mortality, including vehicle collisions, affects house sparrows in human-modified landscapes, though quantitative data specific to this species remains limited; carcass surveys in dense habitats indicate such incidents compound predation pressures on populations. Juvenile stages bear the brunt of combined mortality factors, with post-fledging vulnerability peaking before individuals gain experience in threat avoidance.[97]Parasites, Diseases, and Health Challenges
House sparrows (Passer domesticus) harbor a diverse array of ectoparasites, including over 60 species of arthropods such as mites, fleas, and chewing lice reported from European populations, with approximately half that number documented in North America.[98] Experimental studies have linked higher ectoparasite loads to reduced immunocompetence and physiological changes like bib size variation in males.[99] Ticks and lice prevalence varies by habitat, with farming practices influencing infection rates in some regions.[100] Endoparasite infections are widespread, with necropsies of 48 house sparrows revealing 85.4% infected by one or more species, including nematodes, cestodes, and trematodes like liver flukes.[101] Faecal analyses indicate that such infections impose short- and long-term reproductive costs in females, though direct causation requires controlling for confounding factors like nutritional status.[102] The gapeworm Syngamus trachea exhibits temporal and spatial prevalence variation in sparrow metapopulations, transmitted via earthworms and amplified in dense aggregations.[103] Overall parasite incidence reaches 66.5% in some surveys, with endoparasites often correlating with host condition declines that exacerbate but do not solely drive pathology.[104] Viral diseases include avian pox, caused by avipoxviruses and transmitted primarily by biting insects, manifesting as wart-like lesions on unfeathered skin that impair feeding and increase secondary infection risk without typically causing mass mortality.[105] West Nile virus (WNV) infections persist in tissues up to 43 days post-inoculation in experimental settings, with serological evidence of exposure but generally mild clinical effects; sparrows serve as amplifying hosts yet demonstrate seasonal variation in viremia and transmission potential.[106][107] Urban crowding facilitates pathogen spread via shared roosts and feeders, yet empirical data from necropsies show no disproportionate crash events attributable to these agents alone, suggesting inherent resilience modulated by factors like malnutrition.[108][102]Human Interactions and Impacts
Historical Introductions and Global Dispersal
The house sparrow (Passer domesticus), native to Europe, parts of Asia, and North Africa, underwent extensive human-mediated dispersal beginning in the mid-19th century. In the United States, the first documented introduction occurred in Brooklyn, New York, in 1851, when Nicolas Pike imported birds from England to combat caterpillar infestations damaging urban trees, particularly lindens.[38] Subsequent releases in 1852 expanded the effort, framing the species as "English birds" beneficial for pest control, leading to rapid proliferation across North America via deliberate liberations and natural spread, including transport in grain-filled boxcars.[109][110] In Australia, house sparrows arrived via the ship Princess Royal in Melbourne on January 26, 1863, with birds originating from India rather than directly from England, as part of broader acclimatization initiatives by colonial societies aiming to introduce familiar European fauna.[40] These efforts, coordinated by groups like the Victorian Acclimatisation Society, involved multiple liberations between 1863 and 1870 across sites including Sydney, Brisbane, and Hobart, motivated by desires to control insects and enhance agricultural landscapes with "useful" species. Victorian-era acclimatization movements similarly drove introductions to other regions, such as South Africa and New Zealand, where societies promoted the sparrow's perceived value in seed consumption and urban adaptation.[84] Global expansion accelerated through ship-mediated transport, with birds stowing away or being intentionally released at ports, facilitating establishment on Pacific islands and beyond. In temperate zones, introduction success was notably high, with populations establishing in over 80% of deliberate release sites due to the species' adaptability to human-modified environments and broad diet.[111] By the early 20th century, house sparrows had colonized much of the Southern Hemisphere and oceanic islands, reflecting the efficacy of these 19th-century vectors despite limited ecological foresight.[37]Ecological Consequences and Competition with Natives
House sparrows (Passer domesticus), as an introduced species in regions outside their native Eurasian range, aggressively compete for limited nest cavities with native cavity-nesting birds, including eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis), purple martins (Progne subis), tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), and house wrens (Troglodytes aedon).[112] They frequently usurp established nests by evicting or killing adult occupants, destroying eggs, and eliminating nestlings, behaviors documented in nest box monitoring programs where house sparrows accounted for a significant portion of observed takeovers.[113] This direct interference reduces breeding success and survival rates among affected natives, with empirical observations confirming house sparrows' propensity to weave dead native adults into their own bulky nests after fatal attacks.[112][114] Exclusion experiments and comparative nest site studies further demonstrate that house sparrow presence diminishes the reproductive output of native cavity-nesters by limiting access to suitable sites, leading to localized population reductions in these guilds.[115] For instance, competition with house sparrows has been linked to historical declines in bluebird populations in North America, where surging sparrow numbers exacerbated habitat pressures on natives prior to targeted conservation efforts.[116] Resource overlap extends to foraging, as house sparrows consume substantial insects—key for provisioning their own chicks—thereby intensifying competition with insectivorous natives during breeding seasons and potentially constraining prey availability in shared habitats.[63] While house sparrows may occupy vacant niches in highly disturbed anthropogenic environments, long-term monitoring indicates a net negative impact on local biodiversity, particularly within cavity-nesting assemblages, where invasive dominance correlates with reduced native abundance and diversity.[117] Population modeling and field data from invaded regions, such as North America and parts of Africa, support causal links to biodiversity erosion, outweighing any incidental habitat filling in urban fringes.[118][112]Agricultural and Urban Pest Status
House sparrows (Passer domesticus) inflict notable damage on agricultural crops, primarily through consumption of grains and pecking of buds, seedlings, and fruits. Adults consume approximately 6 grams of dry grain daily, equating to over 2 kg annually per bird, with flocks targeting ripening cereals like wheat and sunflower, where damage rates can reach 10.2% in combined plantings or up to 50% loss in Egyptian wheat fields under high infestation.[119][120][121] In greenhouse peppers, regional economic losses in Almería, Spain, were estimated at €703,400 across 500 hectares in recent assessments. Orchard crops suffer from bud pecking, which destroys emerging growth and reduces yields in fruits like apples, grapes, and cherries by pecking holes or consuming buds and small fruits, with general bird-induced losses in apple orchards averaging 6-18% of yield.[122][123][124] In urban settings, house sparrows exacerbate pest status through nesting in structures and fouling from droppings, which are corrosive to buildings, vehicles, and infrastructure. They readily occupy vents, eaves, and machinery, leading to blockages and sanitation issues, while large roosts amplify noise and waste accumulation. Although small size limits their role in aircraft strikes compared to larger species, they pose hazards in hangars and near airfields by entering facilities and contributing to overall bird presence risks.[123][125][126] Offsetting these impacts, house sparrows provide some agricultural benefits by consuming pest insects, particularly during breeding when nestlings rely heavily on arthropods, potentially reducing pesticide needs and crop damage from invertebrates in farmlands. However, grain and structural damages often predominate in net assessments, historically prompting pragmatic controls like bounties; in New Zealand by 1875, "sparrow clubs" incentivized culling due to rapid pest proliferation post-introduction. Such measures reflect economic prioritization over ecological sentiment in regions where flock densities amplify losses.[122][127][128]Management, Control, and Eradication Efforts
Control efforts against house sparrows (Passer domesticus), often classified as pests in agricultural and urban settings due to crop damage and competition with native species, employ a range of lethal and non-lethal methods including trapping, poisoning, nest destruction, shooting, exclusion, and repellents.[129][125] Trapping, such as using funnel, repeating, or in-box designs baited with grains, targets flocks effectively in localized areas like farms or roosts, with operators often humanely euthanizing captured birds.[130][131] Poisoning with alpha-chloralose, a stupefying agent applied to bait at concentrations up to 1% for sparrows, induces torpor for subsequent collection and dispatch; it is registered for use in regions like New Zealand, Australia, and parts of Europe, though secondary poisoning risks to non-target wildlife necessitate careful application.[132][133] Nest destruction and exclusion via netting or sealing entry points prevent breeding, while shooting and chemical repellents address immediate roosting or feeding pressures.[129][134] Integrated pest management (IPM) programs combine these techniques for sustained population reduction, emphasizing habitat modification to limit food and shelter alongside targeted removals; such approaches have demonstrated reductions in bird numbers and damage on farms, though specific efficacy varies by site and implementation rigor.[135][136] For invasive populations, lethal controls like trapping and toxicants are prioritized over non-lethal deterrents (e.g., reflective tapes or decoys) when evidence indicates benefits to native species recovery, as non-lethal methods often fail to achieve meaningful declines in sparrow densities or alleviate competitive exclusion of cavity-nesting birds.[137][112] Eradication attempts on islands highlight both successes and challenges. On Ascension Island, introduced house sparrows were extirpated through systematic trapping and removal efforts between 2000 and subsequent monitoring, confirming local elimination without reinvasion due to biosecurity.[138] In contrast, operations on Round Island, Mauritius, culled 320 individuals primarily via trapping (87% of removals) but failed to eradicate the population, underscoring the need for comprehensive surveillance and sequential method deployment to counter survivors' adaptability.[139] Similar partial efforts on Robinson Crusoe Island, Chile, left four sparrows persisting after 2012, attributed to incomplete coverage and lax biosecurity.[140] Ethical debates center on humane dispatch in lethal programs versus the ecological rationale for control, with proponents arguing that verified native bird rebounds post-culling justify interventions over deterrence-alone strategies that permit ongoing displacement.[136][141]Population Dynamics
Observed Trends and Regional Declines
In Europe, house sparrow (Passer domesticus) populations have declined by approximately 50% since 1980, equating to a loss of 247 million individuals based on pan-European monitoring data.[142] In parts of Western Europe, declines reach nearly 60%, as documented in national surveys.[143] Breeding Bird Survey equivalents, such as those coordinated by BirdLife International, show consistent negative trends from the 1980s through the 2020s, with abundance indices dropping sharply in farmland and urban habitats.[144] In North America, house sparrow numbers have fallen by 84% since 1966, according to analyses from the U.S. Geological Survey's North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS).[145] BBS data indicate an average annual decline of about 2.6% to 3% through 2019, with cumulative reductions approaching 80% in some datasets extending to 2022.[73][146] Trends from citizen science programs like Project FeederWatch corroborate this, showing a 22% drop in mean flock sizes at feeding sites from 1995 to 2016.[143] In the United Kingdom, populations have decreased by 53% since 1979, from an estimated 12 million breeding pairs in the early 1970s to around 5.3 million breeding individuals by the 2020s.[147][148][149] BBS and garden birdwatch counts reflect a reduction from tens of millions of individuals in 1966 to about 10 million by 2009, though recent surveys in 2023 recorded 1.5 million sightings in gardens alone.[150][151] In parts of Asia, such as India, overall populations have remained stable over the past 25 years per national bird status reports, though urban declines contrast with stability or expansion in rural and suburban areas.[152][153] Studies from 2023 to 2025 highlight persistent urban declines globally, with BBS and similar indices showing drops in city centers, while rural trends exhibit variability including regional upticks in recovering farmlands and northern UK areas like Scotland and Wales.[154][155][156]Causal Hypotheses and Empirical Debates
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain regional declines in house sparrow populations, particularly in Europe and parts of North America, with empirical investigations emphasizing testable mechanisms such as food availability, predation pressure, and interspecific competition over mere correlations. One prominent explanation posits food scarcity, especially a reduction in invertebrate prey critical for nestling diets due to intensified agriculture and loss of weedy field margins, which has decreased chick survival rates in farmland areas by limiting protein-rich insects during breeding seasons. Studies indicate that house sparrows fledged fewer young in areas with diminished insect abundance, correlating with post-1970s agricultural changes that reduced hedgerows and increased monocultures, though experimental supplementation of invertebrate food has yielded inconsistent recovery in breeding success. Predation has also been scrutinized, with domestic cats (Felis catus) implicated in urban settings where they account for up to 20-30% of sparrow mortality via direct kills, supported by collar-tracking data showing higher predation rates near human habitations; similarly, recovering raptor populations, such as Eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus), temporally align with declines in Britain since the 1980s, but correlative analyses and exclusion experiments have failed to establish causation, as sparrowhawk numbers stabilized without corresponding sparrow recovery. Competition from exotic or expanding species, like tree sparrows (Passer montanus) or feral pigeons (Columba livia), is hypothesized in urban niches, with resource overlap in seeds and nesting sites evidenced by lower sparrow densities in areas of high competitor abundance, though field observations show sparrows often dominate mixed flocks via aggression. Skepticism persists regarding single-factor models, as empirical data reveal multifactorial interactions and density-dependent regulation rather than isolated drivers; for instance, pesticide residues in sparrow tissues and environments have been detected at low levels insufficient to explain broad declines, with residue studies from the 1990s-2000s indicating sublethal effects overstated relative to natural foraging shifts away from contaminated grains. Natural population cycles, evidenced by historical fluctuations predating modern declines (e.g., 1920s drops in Britain), suggest intrinsic density-dependence via competition for limited resources during winters, where flock sizes inversely correlate with local carrying capacity independent of external stressors. Debates surround urbanization's net effect, with empirical studies showing steeper declines in densely built urban cores (e.g., 60% drops in UK cities since 1990) linked to reduced green spaces and higher pollution, yet stability or slower declines in suburban-rural gradients where access to gardens provides supplementary seeds; no consensus exists on alarmist projections of extinction risk, as North American data indicate rural stability amid urban losses, underscoring context-specific mechanisms over uniform anthropogenic blame.[157][158][159]Conservation Interventions and Outcomes
Nest box provision has been a primary conservation intervention for house sparrows in regions experiencing declines, such as parts of the UK and Europe, where artificial nesting sites address habitat loss from urbanization and building modernization. Trials indicate that nest boxes can increase local breeding densities by 20-100% in some songbird species, including house sparrows, by compensating for reduced natural cavities and eaves. For instance, UK initiatives like the House Sparrow Initiative in Sheffield have distributed nest boxes alongside habitat enhancements, leading to observed occupancy and localized population boosts in urban gardens. However, occupancy rates have declined over time in some long-term studies, such as in Warsaw since the 1980s, suggesting diminishing returns without addressing broader factors like food availability.[160][161][162] Supplemental feeding, particularly during winter, aims to improve survival by mitigating food scarcity from reduced agricultural spill and insect declines, with general studies showing enhanced overwinter survival for small passerines accessing feeders. In house sparrow-specific research from southern Sweden, however, winter feeding showed no significant effect on population changes, indicating that food supplementation alone does not reverse declines in farmland contexts. Habitat enhancements, such as planting native shrubs for cover and insects, complement these efforts but yield variable results, often limited to small-scale improvements in garden or school settings.[163] Outcomes remain mixed globally, with benefits in native declining populations overshadowed by counterproductive effects in invasive ranges like North America and New Zealand, where nest boxes and feeders can exacerbate competition with native cavity-nesters by supporting house sparrow usurpation and higher densities. Management in these areas prioritizes nest removal and monitoring to favor natives, rather than promotion. In the 2020s, community and school programs, including World Sparrow Day initiatives, have installed nest boxes and feeders in educational settings across India and the UK, fostering awareness but achieving only localized gains without broader recovery; UK populations declined 11% from 1995 to 2023 despite such efforts. Emphasis has shifted toward rigorous monitoring of productivity and survival via citizen science, underscoring cost-benefit realism over indiscriminate protection for a species classified as Least Concern by the IUCN.[114][22][164]Cultural and Symbolic Roles
Representations in Folklore, Literature, and Art
In biblical accounts, sparrows exemplify divine providence and care for even the least significant creatures, as in Matthew 10:29, where it is stated that not one sparrow falls to the ground apart from the Father's will, and Luke 12:6-7, noting that five sparrows are sold for two pennies yet none are forgotten by God.[165] These references likely pertain to small, ubiquitous passerines such as the house sparrow or similar species common in the ancient Near East, where the Hebrew term tsippor encompassed grain-feeding birds of that family.[166] The imagery underscores themes of humility and reliance on higher power, portraying sparrows as emblems of insignificance redeemed by oversight. European folklore attributes varied omens to house sparrows, often linking their intrusion into homes with impending death or misfortune, as recorded in traditions where a sparrow entering signals loss, prompting rituals to expel it.[167] Conversely, nesting in a dwelling was deemed auspicious, foretelling prosperity or familial harmony, particularly in Victorian-era interpretations where such events symbolized contentment and domestic joy.[168] In nautical customs, sailors bore sparrow tattoos as talismans for safe passage, evoking the bird's association with landfall and return.[169] Greek myths further elevated sparrows as sacred to Aphrodite, embodying love and spring's renewal due to their prolific breeding.[170] In literature, house sparrows feature as motifs of providence and everyday resilience, notably in Shakespeare's Hamlet (Act 5, Scene 2), where Horatio invokes "there's a special providence in the fall of a sparrow," echoing biblical sentiments to affirm fate's role in mortality.[171] William Blake's 1789 poem "The Blossom" from Songs of Innocence contrasts merry sparrows with contemplative robins, highlighting the bird's joyful, instinctive vitality amid nature's cycles.[172] Nursery rhymes portray sparrows pragmatically, as in "A Little Cock-Sparrow," depicting the bird's cheeky evasion of peril by a greedy child, reinforcing themes of cunning survival in oral traditions dating to the 18th century.[173] Early accounts of introductions, such as 19th-century American texts celebrating their pest-control utility, shifted to ambivalent views in later works decrying invasiveness, reflecting evolving human attitudes toward ubiquity. Artistic representations emphasize the house sparrow's familiarity and adaptability, from detailed 19th-century ornithological illustrations capturing plumage and behavior to symbolic Victorian depictions evoking hearth and humility.[174] These works, often in watercolor or engraving, portray the bird in domestic scenes, underscoring its role as an ever-present companion rather than exotic subject, with shifts in modern pieces highlighting ecological tensions through invasive motifs.[175]Modern Perceptions and Symbolic Meanings
In urban areas of Europe and Asia where house sparrow populations have declined sharply since the 1990s, public sentiment often evokes nostalgia for their former ubiquity as familiar backyard companions, prompting grassroots campaigns to reverse losses attributed to habitat fragmentation and reduced food availability.[176] For instance, India's Save House Sparrow campaign, initiated by organizations like the Hirval Foundation around 2010, highlights how modern lifestyles—such as widespread air conditioning and sealed buildings—have eliminated nesting sites, fostering public efforts to install sparrow-friendly boxes and feeders.[176] Similarly, social media reflections in 2024 lament the absence of chirping flocks that once defined daily routines in cities like Goa, framing their decline as a loss of simple, everyday biodiversity.[177] Conversely, in regions where house sparrows thrive as introduced species, such as North America and Australia, conservation communities stigmatize them as aggressive invasives that displace native birds through nest competition and predation, excluding them from protective legislation like the U.S. Migratory Bird Treaty Act.[131] This view, rooted in 19th-century introductions for insect control that backfired due to dietary shifts toward grains and nest usurpation, persists in management guidelines recommending nest removal and exclusion from birdhouses to prioritize indigenous species.[178] Such framing underscores a tension between utilitarian tolerance in agricultural settings and ecological purism in biodiversity advocacy. Symbolically, house sparrows embody resilience and adaptability, thriving amid human-altered landscapes from cities to farmlands, which some interpret as a counterpoint to narratives of environmental fragility.[179] Cultural analyses in the 2020s portray their opportunistic foraging and rapid colonization of diverse habitats as metaphors for human endurance in urban chaos, with attributes like community flocking and simple joys reinforcing themes of unpretentious survival over vulnerability.[180] This symbolism extends to spiritual contexts, where their persistence despite small size signifies inner strength and flexibility in facing change.[181] Media coverage in the 2020s reflects this duality, balancing pest designations—such as 2025 reports labeling them "fearless pests" for fouling structures and competing with natives—with acknowledgments of ancillary benefits like seed dispersal and occasional insect predation in urban ecosystems.[178] Australian outlets in 2024 quoted scientists arguing that, despite pest status, sparrows could aid in monitoring urban pollutants or controlling minor pests, urging nuanced management over blanket eradication.[182] U.S. studies from 2024 further positioned them as "sentinels" for human-wildlife health links, detecting contaminants in shared environments, which tempers invasive stigma with pragmatic utility.[183]References
- https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/343138016_On_the_meat_scavenging_behavior_of_House_Sparrows_Passer_domesticus
- https://www.[audubon](/page/Audubon).org/news/how-house-sparrow-conquered-world-encoded-its-genes