Hubbry Logo
Books of the MaccabeesBooks of the MaccabeesMain
Open search
Books of the Maccabees
Community hub
Books of the Maccabees
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Books of the Maccabees
Books of the Maccabees
Books of the Maccabees
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Books of the Maccabees or the Sefer HaMakabim (the Book of the Maccabees) recount the history of the Maccabees, the leaders of the Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid dynasty.

List of books

[edit]

The Books of the Maccabees refers to canonical and deutero canonical books of the Bible:

The first two books are considered canonical by the Catholic Church[5] and the first three books are considered canonical by the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Georgian Orthodox Church is the only church which also considers 4 Maccabees canonical. All of the other books are considered biblical apocrypha. The Orthodox Tewahedo biblical canon includes none of the books which are listed above, instead, it includes three books of Ethiopic Maccabees (1 Meqabyan, 2 Meqabyan, and 3 Meqabyan), books which are distinct from those books which are listed above. There is also a non-canonical Jewish work which is titled the Megillat Antiochus ("The Scroll of Antiochus"). This book is read in some synagogues during the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah. The book is unrelated to the "Books of Maccabees" except for the fact that it cites some quotations which are contained in 1 and 2 Maccabees, and it also describes the same events which are described in 1 and 2 Maccabees.[6][better source needed]

First versus Second Books of Maccabees

[edit]

The books of First and Second Maccabees are written in noticeably different literary styles, but contain similar narratives.

In First Maccabees, the author presents an objective historical account of the persecution of the Jews by Antiochus IV. It deals with the rise and legitimacy of the Hasmonean dynasty, beginning with an account of the life of the Jewish priest Mattathias, a forefather of the Maccabean revolt. The sober style of First Maccabees takes influence from the authors of the Hebrew Bible.

In contrast, the author of Second Maccabees presents a heavily dramatic, emotional and theologically dense account of a period of time which is shorter but overlapping (180–161 BC). In Second Maccabees, the author portrays Judas Maccabaeus and the martyrs who fight alongside him as champions; they earn divine favor as a result. The book begins with two letters (Epistles I and II), but these are insubstantial in relation to the narrative.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Books of the Maccabees

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Books of the Maccabees comprise four ancient Jewish texts—designated 1, 2, 3, and 4 —that document the , a mid-second-century BCE uprising by pious against Seleucid imperial decrees enforcing Hellenistic and prohibiting core religious observances such as and Temple sacrifice. Composed originally in Hebrew or for 1 and Greek for the others, these works preserve primary accounts of the resistance initiated by the priest and led principally by his son , culminating in the reconquest and purification of the Temple in 164 BCE—an event commemorated in the Jewish festival of . 1 Maccabees provides a secular historical spanning roughly 175–134 BCE, detailing diplomatic maneuvers, , and the Hasmonean dynasty's consolidation of autonomy under Judas's brothers Jonathan and Simon, with its factual reliability affirmed by alignment with non-biblical sources like the writings of and Seleucid inscriptions. 2 Maccabees, by contrast, abridges a five-volume attributed to of Cyrene, emphasizing providential deliverance, the martyrdom of Jewish resisters, and intercessory practices such as offerings for the deceased, though it incorporates legendary motifs less corroborated archaeologically. 3 Maccabees recounts an earlier Ptolemaic persecution in Egypt unrelated to the Maccabees, while 4 Maccabees functions as a Hellenistic philosophical essay extolling rational self-mastery through the lens of maternal and fraternal martyrdoms described in 2 Maccabees 7. Excluded from the Jewish scriptural canon due to their late composition and lack of prophetic authorship, the books hold deuterocanonical status in Catholic and Orthodox Bibles but apocryphal classification in Protestant ones, valued primarily for illuminating intertestamental Jewish history rather than doctrinal authority.

Historical and Cultural Context

The Seleucid Empire and Jewish Persecution

The , established by as one of the successor states to the Great's conquests after 323 BCE, gained control over following Antiochus III's defeat of Ptolemaic forces at the Battle of Panium in 200 BCE, which transferred —including —from Ptolemaic to Seleucid rule. Antiochus III subsequently confirmed Jewish religious autonomy, permitting Temple sacrifices and exemption from certain imperial taxes in exchange for loyalty, as evidenced by contemporary decrees. The historian , in his Histories, chronicles Antiochus III's broader eastern expansions, portraying them as efforts to reclaim territories lost after 's fragmentation, which strained resources but temporarily stabilized Seleucid holdings in the . Antiochus IV Epiphanes, ascending in 175 BCE amid fiscal pressures from Roman indemnities post-Apamea (188 BCE), pursued aggressive to foster imperial cohesion across diverse subjects, interpreting his epithet "Epiphanes" (manifest god) as divine mandate for cultural uniformity. This policy intensified preexisting Jewish divisions: Hellenizers, often urban elites, promoted Greek institutions like the gymnasium (c. 175 BCE) and civic participation under Seleucid oversight, viewing assimilation as pragmatic advancement, while rural traditionalists upheld Torah-based separatism, seeing Hellenism as idolatrous erosion of covenantal identity. The crisis peaked in 167 BCE when Antiochus IV, responding to perceived disloyalty during his Egyptian campaigns, plundered Jerusalem's Temple treasury—estimated at vast gold and silver reserves—and ordered its desecration by installing an altar to Olympios atop the existing one, accompanied by swine sacrifices, an act defiling Jewish purity laws. Decrees followed banning (enforced via infant inspections and maternal executions), observance, , and kosher practices, with penalties including and death, explicitly targeting markers of Jewish distinctiveness to compel conformity. These measures, rationalized as loyalty tests amid empire-wide revolts, catalyzed widespread resistance by framing Jewish rites as seditious.

The Maccabean Revolt and Its Leaders

The ignited in 167 BCE in the village of Modein, where , a rural of priestly descent, publicly refused Seleucid enforcers' demand to offer sacrifice to Greek deities in violation of Jewish law, instead killing the officer and a Jew who stepped forward to comply. This act of defiance prompted and his five sons—John, Simon, Judas, , and Jonathan—to flee to the Judean mountains, where they organized guerrilla raids against Seleucid patrols and apostate Jews, destroying pagan altars and enforcing observance to consolidate support among traditionalist factions. ' leadership emphasized zealous adherence to ancestral customs amid widespread coerced , but he died soon after, circa 166 BCE, designating Judas as his successor due to the latter's martial prowess. Judas Maccabeus, earning his epithet "the Hammer" for ruthless efficiency in combat, transformed the into a conventional force through innovative tactics like night ambushes and exploiting terrain advantages, defeating larger Seleucid armies led by commanders such as Apollonius, Seron, and despite numerical inferiority—often pitting thousands of rebels against tens of thousands. By late 164 BCE, Judas' forces recaptured , cleansing the Temple of its desecrations, including the erection of a altar, and rededicating it on 25 with reinstated sacrifices, an event marking the revolt's symbolic high point and originating the festival. Continued campaigns yielded further gains, but Judas fell in battle against Bacchides' forces in 160 BCE near Elasa, where overconfident positioning led to and his death alongside most lieutenants. Jonathan, leveraging Judas' momentum, assumed command and blended warfare with , allying with rival Seleucid pretenders like to secure high priesthood in 152 BCE and territorial concessions, thereby institutionalizing Hasmonean influence. Captured and executed by Tryphon in 143 BCE amid shifting dynastic intrigues, Jonathan's tenure preserved rebel cohesion. His brother Simon then consolidated gains, expelling the last Seleucid garrison from Jerusalem's Acra and negotiating with II in 142 BCE to remit and recognize Simon's perpetual high priesthood and ethnarchy, effectively birthing independent Hasmonean rule free from direct foreign oversight.

Overview of the Books

First Book of Maccabees

The First Book of Maccabees chronicles the against Seleucid rule, spanning from the accession of in 175 BCE to the death of Simon Maccabeus in 134 BCE, framing the events as a defense of Jewish law and autonomy through human agency rather than divine miracles. It functions as a dynastic history that legitimizes Hasmonean leadership by portraying the family of —Judas, Jonathan, and Simon—as restorers of observance amid Hellenistic pressures, drawing on official documents, letters, and eyewitness-like detail for its narrative. Composed in Hebrew shortly after 135 BCE, likely during the early reign of , the text survives solely in Greek via the , with its style inferred from linguistic Hebraisms and patristic attestations. The book's 16 chapters emphasize pragmatic political and military strategies over theological embellishment, highlighting alliances with powers like to counter Seleucid threats. For instance, in chapter 8, sends envoys Eupolemus son of John and Jason son of Eleazar to around 161 BCE to secure friendship and mutual defense, citing Roman military prowess against perceived common foes; the ratifies a promising non-aggression and aid against aggressors. Simon later renews such ties in chapters 14–15, dispatching Numenius with a gold shield to affirm the pact, underscoring the Hasmoneans' diplomatic realism in bolstering independence. Military campaigns receive detailed treatment, such as victories at Beth Horon (166 BCE) and , where guerrilla tactics and terrain advantage rout larger Seleucid forces, leading to the Temple's purification in 164 BCE after its desecration by Antiochus's orders. Structurally, chapters 1–2 provide backstory: Alexander the Great's conquests divide into successor kingdoms, enabling Antiochus IV's (r. 175–164 BCE) promotion of Hellenism through forced sacrifices, circumcision bans, and Temple defilement in 167 BCE, prompting Mattathias's refusal and flight to the hills to ignite rural resistance. Chapters 3–9 detail Judas Maccabeus's command (d. 160 BCE), including purges of apostate , reconquests of Judean cities like Bethzur, and setbacks after his death at Elasa against Bacchides. Chapters 9:23–12 cover Jonathan's tenure (160–142 BCE), marked by civil strife with rival high priests, Seleucid manipulations, and renewed Roman-Spartan overtures claiming kinship via Abrahamic descent. Chapters 13–16 culminate in Simon's rule (142–134 BCE), his elimination of Seleucid garrisons, attainment of hereditary high priesthood via public assembly decree in 141 BCE, and coastal expansions, ending with his assassination amid family intrigue. This progression underscores causal chains of loyalty to ancestral customs yielding territorial and priestly gains, positioning the Hasmoneans as rightful successors to pre-exilic Jewish governance.

Second Book of Maccabees

The Second Book of Maccabees offers an episodic, theologically inflected summary of events spanning approximately 180 to 161 BCE, from the high priesthood of Onias III under Seleucus IV to the defeat of the Seleucid general Nicanor by Judas Maccabeus. It serves as an abridgment of a five-volume history by Jason of Cyrene, a Hellenized Jewish writer active around 160 BCE, with the anonymous epitomator condensing the material to emphasize divine intervention and moral lessons over exhaustive chronology. Written directly in Greek, the book incorporates supernatural elements, such as heavenly horsemen aiding Judas in battle (2 Macc 10:29–31; 11:6–12) and apparitions of the high priest Onias and prophet Jeremiah (15:12–16), to portray God as actively directing history against persecutors like Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The narrative highlights martyrdoms as exemplars of piety, including the refusal of the scribe to violate kosher laws by eating , leading to his and death by flogging (2 Macc 6:18–31), and the execution of a mother and her seven sons under similar coercion, each enduring gruesome torments while affirming and divine justice (2 Macc 7:1–42). Judas' victories, such as the reconsecration of the desecrated Temple (2 Macc 10:1–8) and routs of invading armies through prayer-induced miracles (e.g., 8:23–29; 12:22–37), are depicted as rewards for faithfulness rather than tactical prowess alone. A unique passage in 12:43–45 describes Judas gathering 2,000 drachmas from his troops to fund sin offerings in for slain soldiers found with pagan idols beneath their tunics, reflecting a in atonement for the deceased to secure their . Framed by two letters to Egyptian (2 Macc 1:1–2:18) promoting festival observance and a / justifying the abridgment (2:19–32; 15:38–39), the book prioritizes edification, with Antiochus' afflictions and death attributed to supernatural retribution (2 Macc 9:1–29). Scholars observe chronological inconsistencies, such as misalignments in battle sequences and timings compared to or external sources like —e.g., the Temple purification dated to the 25th of but with discrepant lead-up events—indicating the epitomator's selective adaptation for theological emphasis rather than strict . These features distinguish 2 Maccabees as a work of pious , reinforcing through narratives of suffering, vindication, and eschatological hope.

Third Book of Maccabees

The Third Book of Maccabees narrates a purported in under King , who ruled from 221 to 204 BCE. Following his victory over Antiochus III at the in 217 BCE, Ptolemy travels to and attempts to enter the in the Temple, an act repelled by divine intervention that strikes him down, leaving him paralyzed until priests intercede with prayers. Returning to enraged, Ptolemy orders a of the Jewish population for enslavement and plans their execution by trampling under 500 war elephants maddened with wine, intending the spectacle as punishment for their refusal to apostatize and worship . The narrative emphasizes repeated divine providences thwarting the king's schemes: angels unseen by humans terrify the elephants, causing them to turn on Ptolemy's forces; the king falls into a deep sleep during preparations; and ultimately, he awakens repentant, revokes his decrees, restores Jewish privileges, and executes his counselors. Unlike the First and Second Books of Maccabees, which focus on the Hasmonean revolt against Seleucid rule in Judea, this account centers on Egyptian diaspora Jews, features no armed resistance or Maccabean leaders, and portrays deliverance through prayer and supernatural reversal rather than military victory. The story parallels elements of the Book of Esther, such as royal edicts against Jews and providential salvation, but incorporates Hellenistic motifs like the use of elephants, symbolic of Ptolemaic military power. Composed originally in , likely by an Alexandrian Jewish author, the book dates to the late Ptolemaic or early Roman period, with scholarly estimates ranging from the late second century BCE to the first century CE, based on linguistic style and allusions to events like the Roman conquest of . Its rhetorical, novelistic structure—marked by bombastic speeches, petitions, and decrees—suggests an intent to edify the Jewish community in the amid ongoing tensions with Hellenistic rulers, affirming God's sovereignty over empires without reliance on historical chronicles. The text lacks verifiable historical corroboration for its specific events, distinguishing it from the more documentary First , and reflects a theological emphasis on faithfulness amid rather than empirical recording.

Fourth Book of Maccabees

The Fourth Book of Maccabees is a Hellenistic Jewish philosophical composed in Greek, likely in the first century CE by an anonymous author familiar with both Jewish tradition and Greco-Roman thought. It presents a homiletic rather than a historical narrative, employing the martyrdom accounts from to illustrate the central thesis that pious reason (εὐσεβὴς λογισμός) exercises sovereign control over the (πάθη), encompassing emotions such as , , fear, and desire. This work functions as a form of , or moral education, aimed at exhorting adherence to the through rational self-mastery, drawing on the Maccabean martyrs—particularly the seven brothers and their mother—as exemplars of virtue triumphing over bodily torments. The text opens with a programmatic statement of its theme at 1:1–12, defining reason as the hegemonikon (ruling ) that governs the soul's irrational elements, akin to Stoic but integrated with Jewish . It proceeds in three main parts: an initial philosophical exposition (chapters 1–3) using figures like , , , and to demonstrate reason's dominion over specific passions; a detailed retelling and analysis of the Maccabean martyrdoms (chapters 4–17), where the protagonists' obedience to enables endurance of ; and a concluding (chapter 18) linking the narrative to priestly themes from Exodus. Unlike the historiographical focus of 1 and 2 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees subordinates historical detail to ethical argumentation, interpreting suffering not as mere defiance but as proof of reason's autonomy, thereby elevating Torah observance as the ultimate rational pursuit. Philosophically, the absorbs Stoic concepts—such as the of into four genera (distress, , , ) and the ideal of (freedom from passion)—while adapting them to affirm Jewish covenantal fidelity over universal ethics. The author posits that true reason is inherently pious, aligning with rather than abstract alone, thus critiquing Hellenistic by subordinating Greek to commands. This synthesis reflects Diaspora Jewish , defending the rationality of against pagan perceptions of emotional excess in martyrdom. Though influential in early Christian writings on martyrdom and —evident in patristic echoes, such as Origen's Exhortation to Martyrdom—4 holds no status in and is excluded from Protestant and Catholic Bibles, appearing only occasionally as an appendix in some Eastern Orthodox editions without authoritative endorsement. Its marginal reception stems from its late composition and philosophical emphasis, which diverged from normative Jewish scriptural priorities.

Authorship, Composition, and Textual History

Dating and Original Languages

The First Book of Maccabees is dated to approximately 100 BCE, composed after the death of Simon Maccabeus in 134 BCE, as evidenced by its annalistic coverage extending to the early Hasmonean period without mention of later events like John Hyrcanus's full reign. Scholars infer an original Hebrew composition from Semitisms in the Greek translation, biblical stylistic echoes, and historical Hebrew phrasing patterns, despite no extant Hebrew manuscripts surviving. The Second Book of Maccabees, an epitome of a five-volume work by of Cyrene, originated in Greek during the late second or early first century BCE, likely around 125 BCE, based on its epistolary preface referencing events up to Judas Maccabeus's rededication of the Temple in 164 BCE and allusions to contemporary Hasmonean stability. Linguistic analysis confirms Greek as the primary , with neologisms and Septuagintal influences indicating composition directly in that tongue rather than translation. The Third Book of Maccabees was written in Greek between approximately 100 BCE and 30 BCE, drawing from its post-Ptolemaic setting and avoidance of Roman imperial references, which textual allusions to events like the (217 BCE) anchor empirically while excluding later persecutions. Its Hellenistic narrative style and vocabulary align with original Greek production by an Alexandrian Jewish author, without traces of Semitic substrate. The Fourth Book of Maccabees, a philosophical , dates to the first century CE, postdating through direct literary dependence on its martyrdom accounts and early imperial-era Stoic terminology, with composition likely in the decades following 70 CE based on synagogue-oriented . It was authored originally in Greek, as shown by its rhetorical flourishes, philosophical , and integration of Hellenistic discourse absent in translated works.

Sources and Literary Dependencies

The First Book of Maccabees draws upon official Jewish records, including annals of the , temple inscriptions, and diplomatic correspondence preserved in . These sources are evident in the verbatim quotations of letters, such as the alliance with ( 8:23-32) and exchanges with ( 12:5-23; 14:16-23), which reflect authentic diplomatic language and protocols from the late second century BCE. The Second Book of Maccabees serves as an explicit epitome of a lost five-volume history by of Cyrene, a Hellenistic Jewish writing circa 160–110 BCE. The anonymous epitomist, in the preface ( 2:23–32), describes compressing Jason's detailed account of events from Judas Maccabeus's campaigns through the high priesthood of Simon (circa 175–134 BCE), prioritizing moral edification and divine intervention over exhaustive chronology. Jason's work itself likely incorporated eyewitness testimonies and Seleucid administrative records, though its independent sources remain speculative due to the original's loss. The Third Book of Maccabees exhibits no direct dependencies on the other Maccabean texts or identifiable historical sources, instead employing a self-contained Hellenistic structure infused with Septuagintal allusions to frame a legendary account of Jewish persecution under (reigned 221–204 BCE). Its narrative draws loosely from biblical exodus motifs and Greek rhetorical conventions but lacks citations to prior chronicles. The Fourth Book of Maccabees, a philosophical circa 20–50 CE, relies primarily on the martyrdom narratives of 6–7 for its core exempla, reinterpreting the deaths of , the seven brothers, and their mother as proofs of reason's sovereignty over emotion in a Stoic-Jewish synthesis. It does not abbreviate or expand a broader history but selectively adapts ' theological framework into an independent ethical treatise.

Manuscripts and Translations

The Books of the Maccabees survive principally through Greek manuscripts within the tradition, supplemented by Latin and Syriac translations, as no Hebrew originals or manuscripts exist for the second through fourth books. First Maccabees, originally composed in Hebrew around 100 BCE, lacks any extant Hebrew witnesses despite reports from ancient scholars like and of having seen such texts; its preservation relies on Greek versions found in uncial codices including (dated to approximately 330–360 CE) and Codex Vaticanus (circa 325–350 CE), which provide early attestations but exhibit minor textual variants such as differences in proper names and chronological details. Second Maccabees, composed directly in Greek, is attested in manuscripts like (fifth century CE) and Codex Venetus (eighth century CE), with the latter serving as a key witness for critical reconstructions due to its relative completeness; Syriac versions from the seventh century onward also preserve the text, often aligning closely with the Greek but introducing occasional interpretive renderings. Third Maccabees appears in similar codices, primarily Alexandrinus, lacking independent Hebrew or evidence and showing limited manuscript variants confined to orthographic and minor syntactic differences. Fourth Maccabees is included in and among the earliest Greek witnesses, with a complete Syriac translation surviving from antiquity that occasionally preserves variant readings absent in the Greek, such as expanded martyrological emphases; a Latin known as Passio Sanctorum Machabaeorum further attests to its early dissemination but abbreviates the philosophical content. The , Jerome's late fourth-century Latin translation, incorporates First and Second directly from Greek sources, omitting Third and Fourth, and influences subsequent Western textual traditions despite Jerome's reservations about their Hebrew origins. Modern critical editions address manuscript variants—such as discrepancies in between Greek and traditions, where the latter retains Hebrew-influenced readings like expanded historical notices—through eclectic reconstructions prioritizing uncials over minuscules. The Göttingen Septuaginta series and the New English Translation of the Septuagint (NETS) exemplify this, collating Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus to resolve ambiguities, confirming the Greek texts' overall stability while noting Syriac and Latin as secondary aids for conjectural emendations in lacunae.

Canonical Status and Reception

Status in Judaism

The Books of the Maccabees are excluded from the Tanakh, the 24-book canon established by , and thus lack sacred scriptural status. Rabbinic tradition holds that the prophetic era concluded around 400 BCE with the deaths of , Zechariah, and , rendering later compositions ineligible for inclusion regardless of content. The events narrated in 1 and 2 Maccabees occurred between 167 BCE and 134 BCE, postdating this cutoff by centuries, and the texts themselves were likely composed in the late 2nd or early 1st century BCE. Furthermore, the books are not cited as authoritative in core rabbinic texts such as the (compiled c. 200 CE) or (c. 500 CE), which quote extensively from Tanakh verses but omit Maccabees. This absence reflects the prioritization of texts meeting strict criteria: divine inspiration via prophecy, original composition in Hebrew (or for portions like Daniel), and alignment with Pharisaic-rabbinic interpretive traditions over Sadducean or priestly perspectives. While may have originated in Hebrew, its surviving Greek form and the Greek composition of 2–4 Maccabees contributed to exclusion, as the canon favored Hebrew originals. 3 and , focused on Hellenistic Jewish themes, were even less aligned with rabbinic emphases on Torah-centric piety. Rabbinic Judaism acknowledges the historical utility of 1 Maccabees for reconstructing the but critiques its glorification of the , which assumed both priesthood and kingship—a fusion viewed as illegitimate under law (Deuteronomy 17:14–20 specifies a from among the people, interpreted as from Judah, not Levi). Talmudic narratives minimize Hasmonean agency, attributing Hanukkah's miracle to divine intervention via oil rather than military prowess, and later rabbinic sources portray the dynasty's and decadence as self-inflicted downfall. This ambivalence stems from Pharisaic opposition to Hasmonean priest-kings, whom rabbis associated with enforced and power abuses, favoring instead over dynastic rule.

Status in Christianity

The Books of 1 and 2 Maccabees hold deuterocanonical status in the , having been formally affirmed as part of the by the on April 8, 1546, alongside other Septuagint-derived texts. These books are integrated into Catholic liturgical practice, with readings from chapters 1–6 and chapters 6–7 featured in the Roman Catholic during . In Eastern Orthodox traditions, 1 and 2 Maccabees are likewise canonical, while 3 Maccabees is included as deuterocanonical scripture in the Greek Orthodox Church and forms part of the Slavonic Orthodox canon, reflecting regional variations in the broader Septuagint-influenced Old Testament. 4 Maccabees typically appears as an appendix rather than core canon in Orthodox Bibles. Early Christian communities, relying on the Septuagint as their primary Old Testament translation, incorporated 1 and 2 Maccabees into their scriptural collections from at least the fourth century onward, as evidenced by their presence in codices like Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. This acceptance persisted in Catholic and Orthodox traditions, though the books are generally regarded as apocryphal and excluded from the canon in Protestant confessions.

Ecclesiastical Debates and Protestant Rejection

In the early Christian era, doubts about the canonicity of the Books of the Maccabees emerged among some church fathers, particularly regarding their alignment with the Hebrew scriptural tradition. St. Jerome, in his prefaces to the Vulgate translation around 405 AD, classified 1 and 2 Maccabees among books useful for edification but not for establishing doctrine, as they lacked Hebrew originals and were absent from the Jewish canon he deemed authoritative for the Old Testament. Similarly, Origen and Athanasius expressed reservations in their canonical lists, excluding or subordinating deuterocanonical texts like Maccabees due to criteria emphasizing prophetic inspiration and linguistic origins tied to Hebrew prophecy. These positions reflected a first-principles approach prioritizing texts with verifiable ties to the prophetic era and apostolic attestation over broader Hellenistic collections like the Septuagint. The Protestant Reformation intensified scrutiny, with reformers applying scriptural criteria such as presence in the Hebrew canon, direct citation in the New Testament, and doctrinal consistency with core teachings like justification by faith alone. Martin Luther, in his 1534 Bible translation, relegated 1 and 2 Maccabees to an apocryphal section, arguing their Greek composition (especially 2 Maccabees), late dating post-prophetic period, and lack of New Testament quotations as Scripture disqualified them from inspiration; he specifically critiqued 2 Maccabees 12:43–46 for implying prayers for the dead, which he viewed as incompatible with sola scriptura and sola fide. John Calvin echoed this in his Institutes (1536 onward), rejecting deuterocanonicals for failing tests of divine authorship and apostolic endorsement, aligning Protestant Old Testament canons with the 24-book Hebrew Bible finalized by Jewish authorities around the 1st–2nd centuries AD. No explicit New Testament citations of Maccabees occur, with possible allusions (e.g., Hebrews 11:35 to 2 Maccabees 7's martyrdom accounts) deemed insufficient for canonicity by reformers, as mere historical echoes do not confer scriptural authority. In response, the Catholic Church at the Council of Trent in 1546 dogmatically affirmed 1 and 2 Maccabees as canonical, invoking ecclesiastical tradition and the Septuagint's use by early Christians and apostles as countering Protestant emphasis on Hebrew exclusivity. Trent's decree prioritized the church's interpretive authority over individual criteria like original language, defending Maccabees' inclusion based on longstanding liturgical and patristic reception despite Jerome's hesitations. This entrenched a confessional divide, with Orthodox traditions variably retaining them amid similar debates. Modern assessments continue these tensions, with Protestant scholarship upholding rejection on grounds of absent Hebrew attestation and unquoted status in the , while some ecumenical dialogues acknowledge ' historical utility without resolving inspiration disputes; Catholic and Orthodox positions persist via , though critiques note potential biases in favoring post-Reformation defenses over empirical canonical markers like prophetic claims within the texts themselves.

Historical Reliability and Scholarly Assessment

Reliability of 1 Maccabees as Dynastic History

1 Maccabees serves as a for the Hasmonean dynasty's establishment and expansion from the in 167 BCE to the death of Simon Maccabeus in 134 BCE, with scholars assessing it as largely reliable for political, military, and dynastic events due to its proximity to the described occurrences and lack of overt theological embellishment. The text's composition, likely in Hebrew during the early Hasmonean period around 100 BCE, reflects an eyewitness or near-contemporary perspective that prioritizes factual narration over miraculous interventions, distinguishing it from . This focus enables its use as a foundational dynastic , corroborated by independent archaeological and literary evidence. The chronology in aligns precisely with dated Hasmonean coinage, which bears regnal years in the Seleucid era, confirming rulers such as Jonathan (161–143 BCE) and Simon (143–134 BCE) and their territorial expansions as depicted in the book. For instance, bronze coins inscribed with names like "Yehohanan the and the Council of the Jews" from ' reign (134–104 BCE) match the transitional authority described post-Simon, providing numismatic verification of the dynasty's consolidation. This material evidence supports the text's sequential framework, from ' desecration in 167 BCE to Simon's ethnarchy in 142 BCE, without the anachronisms seen in less contemporary accounts. Diplomatic details, such as the alliance with negotiated by around 161 BCE ( 8), demonstrate verifiable elements through parallels in ' , where the envoy Eupolemus and interactions are similarly recorded, indicating a historical kernel despite stylized presentation. While no surviving Roman archival document directly confirms the treaty's terms—like mutual aid clauses—the geopolitical context of Roman expansion against the Seleucids renders the embassy plausible, and the absence of contradiction in external Hellenistic records underscores the narrative's fidelity. Though composed as Hasmonean to legitimize the priestly-ruler lineage, exhibits minimal bias in core events, omitting internal Jewish factionalism and emphasizing verifiable conquests like the capture of Joppa and the defeat of I in 150 BCE, which align with Seleucid regnal timelines. Scholars note its restraint compared to histories, attributing reliability to the author's apparent access to official annals or participant testimonies, rendering it a sound basis for reconstructing dynastic succession despite pro-Hasmonean framing.

Theological Emphases and Errors in 2 Maccabees

2 Maccabees emphasizes divine intervention as the primary mechanism of Jewish deliverance, portraying God as actively combating Hellenistic oppressors through supernatural means, such as heavenly horsemen aiding in battle (2 Macc. 5:2–4; 10:29–31; 11:6–12). This theological framework prioritizes , where persecutors like suffer gruesome ends as punishment for sacrilege, exemplified by his agonizing death from disease and worms after a (2 Macc. 9:5–12). The text advances early Jewish doctrines of and vindication, evident in the martyrs' assertions of bodily and eternal life for the righteous (2 Macc. 7:9, 11, 14, 23), alongside practices like prayers and offerings for the dead to atone for unwitting sins (2 Macc. 12:39–45). These elements reflect a Deuteronomistic outlook on covenant fidelity, collective retribution, and the efficacy of intercessory rites, shaping Judaism's evolving views on postmortem purification. As an epitome of the lost five-volume history by Jason of Cyrene, exhibits compressions that introduce chronological inconsistencies, subordinating historical sequence to theological . For instance, the positions Antiochus IV's death during an eastern campaign prompted by reports of Jewish resistance, implying it precedes the Temple's rededication (2 Macc. 9:1–2; 10:1), yet external accounts, including and , align his demise with late 164 BCE, post-purification, creating a temporal misalignment of months. This abridgment omits intervening events, such as the king's earlier eastern activities, to heighten the motif of immediate divine , resulting in a where serves providence over verifiable timelines. Further inaccuracies arise from inserted visionary elements and moralized etiologies, such as attributing epidemics to angelic agency rather than natural disease (2 Macc. 6:12–16), which scholars attribute to the epitomator's selective amplification for edification. Prefatory letters contain anachronistic details, like erroneous dating of the Temple's original construction to the 18th year of an unspecified reign (2 Macc. 2:8–15), and fabricated diplomatic exchanges that blend with haggadic expansion. While these features undermine literal —prompting rearrangements that disrupt narrative coherence—the text retains value as a window into contemporaneous religious sensibilities, illuminating how theological imperatives molded amid persecution. , including and later confessional critiques, highlighted such divergences as grounds for non-canonical status, favoring sources with greater empirical alignment.

Evaluation of 3 and 4 Maccabees

Third Maccabees purports to recount events under (r. 221–204 BCE) involving persecution of and divine deliverance via drunken elephants, but scholarly analysis identifies it as rather than reliable , characterized by melodramatic elements and loose anchoring in Ptolemaic realities. A key appears in 2:28, which references a (laographia) on , a fiscal practice introduced by Roman administration in around 58 BCE, absent during the Ptolemaic depicted in the narrative. Other improbabilities, such as the logistical implausibility of mass elephant intoxication and the absence of corroboration in Ptolemaic records or , further indicate its composition as edifying romance akin to Hellenistic Greek novellas, likely dating to the Roman period (1st century BCE–1st century CE) for Jewish encouragement. Its limited historical value stems from these fabrications, prioritizing moral uplift over factual precision, with no independent archaeological or documentary support for its central episodes. Fourth Maccabees, dated to approximately 20–50 CE based on linguistic and thematic ties to Philo's era, explicitly frames itself as a philosophical rather than , using martyrdom stories from (ca. 167–160 BCE events) as illustrative exempla for the Stoic-influenced thesis that "pious reason" masters passions. Composed well after the purported incidents, it employs rhetorical embellishments and ethical digressions—such as extended discourses on ()—without chronological sequencing or source-critical intent, rendering it non-historiographic by design. Scholars note its value resides in didactic philosophy blending Jewish observance with Hellenistic ethics, not in verifiable events, as its narratives lack external attestation beyond and serve argumentative purposes over empirical accuracy. Like Third Maccabees, it offers negligible contributions to reconstructing Ptolemaic-Seleucid history, esteemed instead for moral amid pressures.

Theological and Philosophical Themes

Themes of Martyrdom, Resistance, and Divine Intervention

In , martyrdom emerges as a central motif, exemplified by the narrative in chapters 6–7, where a mother and her seven sons endure and execution for refusing to violate Jewish dietary laws by eating , prioritizing fidelity to the over imperial decrees issued under around 167 BCE. These accounts portray the martyrs' steadfastness not merely as passive endurance but as an active affirmation of Jewish law's supremacy, with the mother's encouragement to her sons underscoring communal resilience amid persecution. Similar themes appear in , which recounts the same family's ordeal to illustrate reason's triumph over passion through Torah observance, though without the explicit resurrection hopes found in . These martyrdom narratives function as catalysts for broader resistance, framing individual sacrifices as precipitating divine favor and collective mobilization against Hellenistic imposition. In , the righteous deaths of the martyrs are credited with averting further calamity and enabling military reversals, contrasting with ' emphasis on purging internal apostates to restore divine alignment. Empirically, such stories galvanized adherence to ancestral customs, as evidenced by the revolt's progression from ' initial act of defiance in Modein—killing a compromising Jew and a Seleucid official—to organized guerrilla campaigns that preserved Jewish distinctiveness amid widespread assimilation among urban elites. This resistance motif privileges causal chains rooted in unified defiance, where refusal to conform empirically sustained cultural continuity, unlike assimilated factions that faced marginalization post-revolt. Divine intervention permeates the texts as the purported mechanism linking martyrdom and resistance to success, with depicting explicit supernatural aids—such as angelic apparitions and heavenly horsemen—during battles, absent in the more restrained of , which attributes victories to strategic prowess under . Verifiable outcomes, including the rededication of the Temple on 25 Kislev 164 BCE following the defeat of Seleucid forces at Beth Zur, underscore the revolt's tangible results, interpreted in the narratives as God's ratification of resistance. Across the books, this theme reinforces causal realism in Jewish survival: empirical data from the Hasmonean era's circa 80-year independence (until Roman intervention in 63 BCE) highlights how resistance narratives fostered motivation and cohesion, enabling demographic and territorial recovery against assimilation's erosive pressures.

Doctrinal Implications, Including Prayers for the Dead

In 12:38–46, discovers idolatrous amulets on slain Jewish soldiers during purification rites near , prompting him to collect 2,000 drachmas of silver and dispatch it to for a , as "a holy and pious thought" to atone for their violations so they could be "delivered from their sin," grounded in the expectation of bodily for the just and unjust. This narrative implies a Second Temple Jewish belief in the post-mortem efficacy of sacrificial intercession for the imperfectly righteous, distinct from mere memorial acts, though the text frames it as prudential rather than commanded ritual. Catholic doctrine interprets this as scriptural warrant for prayers and offerings benefiting souls after death, informing the practice of Masses and suffrages for the deceased to aid purification in , a state of remedial for venial sins or temporal punishment, as articulated in councils like (1439) and Trent (1563). , including Luther and Calvin, rejected such inferences as , arguing the passage—lacking New Testament corroboration and residing in non-canonical deuterocanonical literature—describes a superstitious or erroneous Jewish custom without establishing eternal efficacy or an intermediate state, emphasizing instead sola scriptura's silence on post-mortem beyond Christ's finished work. Rabbinic Judaism excludes the Maccabees from the Tanakh, viewing them as historical rather than prophetic, and while practices like reciting for 11 months post-death aim to exalt the soul or mitigate judgment, they emphasize divine mercy and communal sanctification over transactional sin remission, reflecting Pharisaic influences but not halakhic obligation for the dead's purification. Scholarly assessments treat the episode as evidence of evolving in , where intercessory efficacy presupposes without mandating a purgatorial , potentially causal in fostering later Christian developments but contingent on cultural reception rather than inherent normativity.

Philosophical Content in 4 Maccabees

4 Maccabees posits that pious reason (λογικὴ εὐσέβεια), informed by Torah observance, exercises sovereignty over human passions, enabling individuals to withstand extreme torments as demonstrated by the Maccabean martyrs. This central thesis draws heavily from Stoic philosophy, where reason (λόγος) is depicted as the governing principle that subdues irrational impulses such as fear, pleasure, and grief, much like a charioteer mastering unruly horses. The text illustrates this through the seven brothers and their mother, who endure torture not through supernatural aid alone but via rational devotion to divine law, portraying their self-control (ἐγκράτεια) as the highest virtue. The work fuses this Hellenistic framework with Jewish piety by equating adherence to Mosaic law with the exercise of reason, arguing that God implanted reason in humans to align with ethical commands, thereby achieving true . are not eradicated but disciplined under reason's rule, with the martyrs' endurance serving as empirical proof of law's rational supremacy over bodily appetites. Yet this synthesis reveals tensions with uncompromised Jewish : Stoic reason evokes a cosmic immanent in , potentially blurring divine transcendence, whereas subordinates reason explicitly to God's will, adapting Stoic absorption of evil and vice to affirm as the antidote to Hellenistic excess. Composed likely in the first century CE for audiences, the treatise appealed to Hellenized by demonstrating Judaism's philosophical depth amid cultural pressures, presenting piety as intellectually superior to pagan ethics without conceding to . This integration, while innovative, prioritizes scriptural authority over pure rationalism, avoiding full Stoic pantheism by framing reason's autonomy as divinely ordained rather than self-sufficient.

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Jewish and Christian Traditions

The Books of the Maccabees exerted a lasting influence on Jewish ritual observance through the festival of , which annually commemorates the Maccabean Revolt's culmination in the rededication of the Temple on 25 164 BCE, as recounted in 4:36–59. This event, involving the purification of and an eight-day celebration resembling the Feast of Tabernacles, forms the historical backbone of the holiday's themes of defiance against Seleucid-imposed and restoration of Jewish worship practices. Though excluded from the Tanakh, the books' detailed chronicle of Judas Maccabeus's guerrilla campaigns and diplomatic maneuvers preserved the revolt's military and political dimensions, complementing Talmudic accounts focused on the miracle of the oil. In Christian traditions, the Maccabean narratives provided paradigmatic examples of steadfast resistance to idolatrous persecution, shaping early communal memory and hagiographic ideals. The martyrdom of the seven brothers and their mother under Antiochus IV, described in 7, inspired veneration as proto-Christian witnesses, with a dedicated feast day established by the fourth century in Antioch and later formalized on in Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic calendars. This liturgical recognition highlighted their endurance—tortured yet refusing to violate commandments—as a model for believers facing imperial coercion, evidenced by relics and shrines attributed to them in early Christian sites. Patristic authors integrated the texts into exhortations on fidelity, with referencing ' portrayal of Judas's leadership and alluding to its historical events in defenses of Jewish antiquity. These citations embedded the ' legacy within Christian cultural narratives of divine favor amid trial, fostering a shared heritage of ritualized remembrance across confessional lines despite varying canonical statuses.

Role in Doctrinal Development and Liturgy

In the Roman Catholic tradition, 12:43–46, describing Judas Maccabeus's collection for sacrifices on behalf of fallen soldiers bearing idolatrous amulets, serves as a scriptural basis for the practice of prayers and offerings for the dead, influencing the doctrine of as a state of purification after . This passage is prescribed as an reading in Masses and Masses for the Dead, underscoring the efficacy of intercessory acts by the living for the deceased's and release from sin's consequences. interprets this as evidence that such prayers aid souls in achieving heavenly purity, aligning with soteriological views emphasizing post-mortem satisfaction for venial sins or temporal punishments. Eastern Orthodox Christianity includes 1, 2, and often in its broader canon, valuing them for liturgical readings that commemorate martyrdom and divine fidelity, such as during feasts honoring saints or resistances against . These books reinforce themes of communal and remembrance, integrated into services that echo the Maccabean emphasis on fidelity amid trial, though without the same doctrinal weight on as in Catholicism. Critiques of deriving core doctrines from the Maccabees arise principally from Protestant traditions, which classify them as apocryphal due to their absence from the Hebrew canon and perceived theological inconsistencies, such as the efficacy of post-mortem sacrifices implying works-based atonement incompatible with justification by faith alone. Scholars note that 2 Maccabees endorses practices like sin offerings for the dead, which contradict New Testament teachings on Christ's once-for-all atonement, rendering it unreliable for soteriological foundations. Empirical assessment reveals limited New Testament engagement, with only one clear allusion in Hebrews 11:35 to the martyrdoms in 2 Maccabees 7—women receiving their dead raised—suggesting marginal influence on primitive Christian doctrine rather than a pivotal role. This scarcity of direct citations or broader echoes questions the books' authority for shaping universal tenets like intercession's salvific scope, prioritizing protocanonical texts with demonstrable apostolic attestation.

Modern Interpretations and Archaeological Corroboration

Archaeological discoveries since the late 20th century have provided material corroboration for the Hasmonean dynasty and military campaigns described in 1 Maccabees. In 2022, excavators uncovered a hoard of 2,200-year-old silver coins near the Dead Sea, minted during the reign of Antiochus IV Epiphanes (r. 175–164 BCE), interpreted by researchers as direct evidence of Jewish resistance to Seleucid oppression amid the Maccabean Revolt. Similarly, a rare wooden box containing 15 silver coins from Antiochus IV's era was found in the Darageh Stream Nature Reserve, linking to the revolt's economic disruptions. In 2024, 160 coins of John Hyrcanus I (r. 134–104 BCE), the second Hasmonean king, were unearthed, affirming the dynasty's expansion and coinage as detailed in 1 Maccabees 13–16. A 2025 find in the Jordan Valley yielded additional Hasmonean coins, reinforcing the textual accounts of territorial control. These artifacts, analyzed through numismatics and stratigraphy, counter skepticism by demonstrating continuity between literary descriptions and physical remnants of Hasmonean sovereignty. Modern scholarship, particularly from the 2020s, emphasizes ' value as a near-contemporary for dynastic events, bolstered by such archaeological alignments, while viewing through a lens of selective theological amplification rather than unvarnished chronicle. Proceedings from the Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense highlight literary and historical analyses that prioritize empirical cross-verification over confessional biases, treating the texts as windows into Judean under Seleucid pressure. Critiques of "theological "—an approach that retrofits events with divine at the expense of causal chains like geopolitical maneuvering—urge scholars to disentangle apologetic layers in , such as miracle attributions, from verifiable sequences like Judas Maccabeus's guerrilla tactics. This shift favors first-hand reasoning from inscriptions and coins, revealing the books as evidence of Judaism's adaptive resilience against , unburdened by institutional tendencies to inflate supernatural elements for doctrinal ends. Recent studies link the to the emergence of sectarianism, interpreting the texts as catalysts for factional diversification rather than unified triumph. Post-2020 analyses posit that the revolt's success (167–160 BCE) fractured Jewish unity, fostering groups like and as responses to Hasmonean priest-kings' centralization, evident in ' pro-Hasmonean slant omitting rival voices. A 2021 volume on Jewish sects in the Maccabean era examines how resistance narratives in the books underscored purity laws and anti-Hellenistic stances, contributing to long-term sociological splits documented in later sources like . These interpretations, grounded in textual and site excavations (e.g., Modi'in's Hasmonean artifacts), portray the not as eschatological harbingers but as pragmatic actors whose legacy amplified intra-Jewish debates on authority and law. In African scholarly receptions, particularly in postcolonial contexts, the Maccabean motif of outnumbered has been reframed as a for indigenous resistance, though such readings risk without archaeological anchors. A 2015 analysis draws parallels to stories in Ethiopian Jewish traditions, emphasizing empirical defiance over allegorical theology, yet cautions against overgeneralizing to modern insurgencies absent primary data. Overall, 2020s scholarship critiques prior overreliance on theological lenses—often amplified in academic institutions favoring narrative harmonization—for obscuring the texts' role in documenting Judaism's causal endurance via military innovation and diplomatic maneuvering, validated by ongoing field evidence.

References

  1. https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/10237-maccabees-books-of
  2. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1maccabees/0
  3. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195393361/obo-9780195393361-0041.xml
  4. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/books-of-maccabees
  5. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/omitting-the-maccabees/
  6. https://www.bu.edu/mzank/Jerusalem/cp/seleucidhist.htm
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA436236.pdf
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1085914
  9. https://www.thecollector.com/antiochus-iv-seleucid-rule-judaea/
  10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkjxph.20?seq=1
  11. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/miscellanea/trivia/no-man.html
  12. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/antiochus-epiphanes-the-bibles-most-notoriously-forgotten-villain/
  13. https://www.thetorah.com/article/persecuting-circumcision
  14. https://jewishlink.news/why-did-antiochus-issue-decrees-against-the-jews/
  15. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/827/the-maccabean-revolt/
  16. https://www.attalus.org/translate/1macc.html
  17. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/biblical-archaeology-sites/who-were-the-maccabees-and-what-did-they-do/
  18. https://www.thetorah.com/article/chanukah-not-judah-maccabees-holiday
  19. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-hasmonean-calendar-begins-with-the-rule-of-simon-the-high-priest-142-bce
  20. https://brewminate.com/simon-thassi-and-the-hasmonean-dynasty-of-ancient-judea/
  21. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/maccabees-first-book-of
  22. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1maccabees/8
  23. https://www.biblicalcyclopedia.com/M/maccabees-the-second-book-of.html
  24. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/intro/?search=2%2BMaccabees&version=NABRE
  25. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resource/56243/ii-maccabees
  26. https://catholicjournal.us/2016/11/02/maccabees-prayers-dead/
  27. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-maccabean-victory-explained-between-1-and-2-maccabees
  28. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222018000300029
  29. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/maccabees-third-book-of
  30. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/THBO/COM-0210030100.xml?language=en
  31. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-8772
  32. https://www.sots.ac.uk/wiki/3-maccabees/
  33. https://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/3maccabees.html
  34. https://www.gotquestions.org/third-fourth-Maccabees.html
  35. https://www.internationalstandardbible.com/M/maccabees-books-of-3-5.html
  36. https://www.attalus.org/translate/3macc.html
  37. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/maccabees-fourth-book-of
  38. https://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-9080
  39. https://academic.oup.com/book/57955/chapter/475817590
  40. https://www.sots.ac.uk/wiki/4-maccabees/
  41. https://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/4maccabees.html
  42. https://hansmoscicke.wordpress.com/2018/10/05/the-concept-of-evil-in-4-maccabees-stoic-absorption-and-adaptation-part-1/
  43. https://chs.harvard.edu/chapter/3-mothers-and-martyrdom-familial-piety-and-the-model-of-the-maccabees-in-eusebius-of-caesareas-ecclesiastical-history-james-corke-webster/
  44. https://www.catholic.com/qa/why-are-3-and-4-maccabees-not-in-the-bible
  45. https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/wholecounsel/2018/11/08/4-maccabees-martyrdom-and-reason/
  46. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/THBO/COM-0210010100.xml?language=en
  47. https://www.academia.edu/40447785/The_Original_Language_of_1_Maccabees_A_Reexamination_BN_NF_182_2019_91_110
  48. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/73553/what-is-the-dating-for-the-last-books-of-the-catholic-old-testament
  49. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009.05.51/
  50. https://portal.research.lu.se/files/38465945/Domazakis_The_neologisms_in_2_Maccabees.pdf
  51. https://readingacts.com/2018/05/30/what-is-third-maccabees/
  52. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/363498
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322516369_THE_INTENTION_GENRE_DATING_AND_PROVENANCE_OF_2_AND_4_MACCABEES
  54. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-9080
  55. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08324c.htm
  56. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/nets/edition/21-2makk-nets.pdf
  57. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/THBO/COM-0210010100.xml
  58. https://www.codexsinaiticus.org/
  59. https://www.gorgiaspress.com/maccabees-2-according-to-the-syriac-peshitta-version-with-english-translation
  60. https://referenceworks.brill.com/view/entries/THBO/COM-00000503.xml
  61. https://www.academia.edu/43124160/The_First_Book_of_Maccabees_in_Syriac_Dating_and_Context_Full_Text_
  62. https://www.internationalstandardbible.com/M/maccabees-books-of-1-2.html
  63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48551637
  64. https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/33/why-isnt-the-book-of-the-maccabees-part-of-the-jewish-canon
  65. https://aish.com/the-books-of-the-maccabees/
  66. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/transforming-hanukkah/
  67. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/counting-the-canon
  68. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/how-to-defend-the-deuterocanonicals
  69. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09495a.htm
  70. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Old_Testament_Canon
  71. https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/stewart_don/faq/books-missing-from-old-testament/question4-catholic-church-apocrypha.cfm
  72. https://www.saintjohnchurch.org/what-bible-do-orthodox-christians-use/
  73. https://www.catholic.com/qa/how-can-we-use-2-maccabees-for-purgatory-when-st-jerome-rejected-it
  74. https://taylormarshall.com/2011/09/did-st-jerome-reject-deuterocanoical.html
  75. https://stpaulcenter.com/posts/thoughts-on-the-churchs-old-testament-canon
  76. https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_395.cfm
  77. https://faith.edu/faith-pulpit/posts/why-we-reject-the-apocrypha/
  78. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/3189/why-were-deuterocanonical-books-rejected-in-the-reformation
  79. https://jimmyakin.com/deuterocanonical-references-in-the-new-testament
  80. https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/defending-the-deuterocanonicals-996
  81. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2014/10/hon388014
  82. https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/16cd8y4/how_historical_is_1_maccabees/
  83. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/hasmonean-coin-hoard-modiin/
  84. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-last-of-the-maccabees-coins
  85. https://jewish-faculty.biu.ac.il/files/jewish-faculty/shared/JSIJ19/nodet.pdf
  86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48649651
  87. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/modern-scholarship-1-2-maccabees-its-historical-context-three-episodes
  88. https://evidenceunseen.com/world-religions/roman-catholicism/the-apocrypha/2-maccabees
  89. https://www.anthonydelgado.net/blog-1/a-biblical-theology-of-2-maccabees
  90. https://hansmoscicke.wordpress.com/2017/11/10/2-maccabees-1-7-deuteronomistic-theology-and-comparison-with-acts-7/
  91. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03090892231210891
  92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3262055
  93. https://blogatheologica.wordpress.com/2021/02/10/the-death-of-king-antiochus-iv-epiphanes/
  94. https://evidenceunseen.com/world-religions/roman-catholicism/the-apocrypha/3-maccabees
  95. https://brill.com/display/book/9789047417194/B9789047417194_s004.pdf
  96. https://academic.oup.com/book/57955/chapter/475817525
  97. https://www.biblicalcyclopedia.com/M/maccabees-the-fourth-book-of.html
  98. https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/JSEM/article/view/3450
  99. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-faith-of-the-martyred-mother-and-her-seven-sons
  100. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/martyrdom-in-maccabees/
  101. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/2maccabees/12
  102. https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/PurgatoryinHistoricalPerspective
  103. https://www.franciscanmedia.org/ask-a-franciscan/purgatory-and-praying-for-the-dead/
  104. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/salvific-offerings-for-the-dead
  105. https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/roman-catholicism/the-perspicuity-of-2-maccabees-12-on-purgatory/
  106. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2062&context=doctoral
  107. https://jewinthecity.com/2022/11/why-do-jews-pray-for-the-dead/
  108. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/34a37209-229b-461e-b878-9582a3505dae/download
  109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41244690
  110. https://readingacts.com/2018/06/05/fourth-maccabees-and-a-rational-faith/
  111. https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/414182832/Managing_the_Ancestral_Way_of_Life.pdf
  112. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/hanukah-maccabees-and-apocrypha/
  113. https://www.museumofthebible.org/magazine/featured/who-are-the-maccabees
  114. https://www.thetorah.com/article/hasmonean-martyrdom-between-christian-and-jewish-tradition
  115. https://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/2018/08/the-feast-of-holy-maccabees.html
  116. https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/sacraments-and-sacramentals/bereavement-and-funerals/old-testament-readings
  117. https://www.catholic.com/bible-navigator/purgatory/2maccabees1242-46
  118. https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/purgatory-in-scripture-new-developments/
  119. https://www.stots.edu/article/The%2BOld%2BTestament%2BApocrypha
  120. https://www.carm.org/roman-catholicism/purgatory-and-2-maccabees-1239-45/
  121. https://www.crossway.org/articles/should-protestants-read-the-apocrypha/
  122. https://www.timesofisrael.com/2200-year-old-coin-hoard-gives-hard-proof-of-book-of-maccabees-say-archaeologists/
  123. https://www.archaeology.wiki/blog/2022/12/19/evidence-for-the-maccabean-revolt-against-the-greek-seleucid-kingdom/
  124. https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/article-835380
  125. https://archaeologymag.com/2025/01/coin-hoard-unearthed-in-jordan-valley/
  126. https://www.amazon.com/Books-Maccabees-Perspectives-Theologicarum-Lovaniensuium/dp/9042950218
  127. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/daily-life-and-practice/sectarianism-in-the-second-temple-period/
  128. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/isbn/9789004497993/html?lang=en
  129. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/2015/12/07/modern-maccabees-an-african-hanukkah-story/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.