Hubbry Logo
Global warming potentialGlobal warming potentialMain
Open search
Global warming potential
Community hub
Global warming potential
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Global warming potential
Global warming potential
Global warming potential
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In recent research, it has been indicated that methane has the Global warming potential of about 80 over 20 years, 30 for over 100 years, and lastly about 10 for 500 years Based on the IPCC Sixth assessment report. (IPCC, 2021: Annex VII: Glossary. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

Comparison of global warming potential (GWP) of three greenhouse gases over a 100-year period: Perfluorotributylamine, nitrous oxide and methane, compared to carbon dioxide (the latter is the reference value, therefore it has a GWP of one)

Global warming potential (GWP) is a measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere over a specific time period, relative to carbon dioxide (CO2).[1]: 2232  It is expressed as a multiple of warming caused by the same mass of (CO2). Therefore, by definition CO2 has a GWP of 1. For other gases it depends on how strongly the gas absorbs thermal radiation, how quickly the gas leaves the atmosphere, and the time frame considered.

For example, methane has a GWP over 20 years (GWP-20) of 81.2[2] meaning that, a leak of a tonne of methane is equivalent to emitting 81.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide measured over 20 years. As methane has a much shorter atmospheric lifetime than carbon dioxide, its GWP is much less over longer time periods, with a GWP-100 of 27.9 and a GWP-500 of 7.95.[2]: 7SM-24 

The carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e or CO2eq or CO2-e or CO2-eq) can be calculated from the GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO2 that would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas. Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP times mass of the other gas.

Definition

[edit]
See also: Radiative forcing

The global warming potential (GWP) is defined as an "index measuring the radiative forcing following an emission of a unit mass of a given substance, accumulated over a chosen time horizon, relative to that of the reference substance, carbon dioxide (CO2). The GWP thus represents the combined effect of the differing times these substances remain in the atmosphere and their effectiveness in causing radiative forcing."[1]: 2232 

In turn, radiative forcing is a scientific concept used to quantify and compare the external drivers of change to Earth's energy balance.[3]: 1–4  Radiative forcing is the change in energy flux in the atmosphere caused by natural or anthropogenic factors of climate change as measured in watts per meter squared.[4]

GWP in policymaking

[edit]

As governments develop policies to combat emissions from high-GWP sources, policymakers have chosen to use the 100-year GWP scale as the standard in international agreements. The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol sets the global phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), a group of high-GWP compounds. It requires countries to use a set of GWP100 values equal to those published in the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).[5] This allows policymakers to have one standard for comparison instead of changing GWP values in new assessment reports.[6] One exception to the GWP100 standard exists: New York state’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act requires the use of GWP20, despite being a different standard from all other countries participating in phase downs of HFCs.[5]

Calculated values

[edit]
See also: Greenhouse gas § Global warming potential (GWP) and CO2 equivalents

Current values (IPCC Sixth Assessment Report from 2021)

[edit]
Global warming potential of five greenhouse gases over 100-year timescale.[7]

The global warming potential (GWP) depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime. GWP is measured relative to the same mass of CO2 and evaluated for a specific timescale.[8] Thus, if a gas has a high (positive) radiative forcing but also a short lifetime, it will have a large GWP on a 20-year scale but a small one on a 100-year scale. Conversely, if a molecule has a longer atmospheric lifetime than CO2 its GWP will increase when the timescale is considered. Carbon dioxide is defined to have a GWP of 1 over all time periods.

Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 ± 2 years.[9]: Table 7.15  The 2021 IPCC report lists the GWP as 83 over a time scale of 20 years, 30 over 100 years and 10 over 500 years.[9]: Table 7.15  The decrease in GWP at longer times is because methane decomposes to water and CO2 through chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Similarly the third most important GHG, nitrous oxide (N2O), is a common gas emitted through the denitrification part of the nitrogen cycle.[10] It has a lifetime of 109 years and an even higher GWP level running at 273 over 20 and 100 years.

Examples of the atmospheric lifetime and GWP relative to CO2 for several greenhouse gases are given in the following table:

Atmospheric lifetime and global warming potential (GWP) relative to CO2 at different time horizon for various greenhouse gases (more values provided at global warming potential)
Gas name Chemical

formula

Lifetime

(years)[9]: Table 7.15 [11]

Radiative Efficiency

(Wm−2ppb−1, molar basis).[9]: Table 7.15 [11]

20 year GWP[9]: Table 7.15 [11] 100 year GWP[9]: Table 7.15 [11] 500 year GWP[9]: Table 7.15 [12]
Carbon dioxide CO2 (A) 1.37×10−5 1 1 1
Methane (fossil natural gas) CH
4 		12 5.7×10−4 83 30 10
Methane (pure non-fossil) CH
4 		12 5.7×10−4 81 27 7.3
Nitrous oxide N
2O 		109 3×10−3 273 273 130
CFC-11 (R-11) CCl
3F 		52 0.29 8,321 6,226 2,093
CFC-12 (R-12) CCl
2F
2 		100 0.32 10,800 10,200 5,200
HCFC-22 (R-22) CHClF
2 		12 0.21 5,280 1,760 549
HFC-32 (R-32) CH
2F
2 		5 0.11 2,693 771 220
HFC-134a (R-134a) CH
2FCF
3 		14 0.17 4,144 1,526 436
Tetrafluoromethane (R-14) CF
4 		50,000 0.09 5,301 7,380 10,587
Hexafluoroethane C
2F
6 		10,000 0.25 8,210 11,100 18,200
Sulfur hexafluoride SF
6 		3,200 0.57 17,500 23,500 32,600
Nitrogen trifluoride NF
3 		500 0.20 12,800 16,100 20,700
(A) No single lifetime for atmospheric CO2 can be given.

Estimates of GWP values over 20, 100 and 500 years are periodically compiled and revised in reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The most recent report is the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (Working Group I) from 2023.[9]

The IPCC lists many other substances not shown here.[13][9][14] Some have high GWP but only a low concentration in the atmosphere.

The values given in the table assume the same mass of compound is analyzed; different ratios will result from the conversion of one substance to another. For instance, burning methane to carbon dioxide would reduce the global warming impact, but by a smaller factor than 25:1 because the mass of methane burned is less than the mass of carbon dioxide released (ratio 1:2.74).[15] For a starting amount of 1 tonne of methane, which has a GWP of 25, after combustion there would be 2.74 tonnes of CO2, each tonne of which has a GWP of 1. This is a net reduction of 22.26 tonnes of GWP, reducing the global warming effect by a ratio of 25:2.74 (approximately 9 times).

Greenhouse gas Lifetime
(years) 		Global warming potential, GWP
20 years 100 years 500 years
Hydrogen (H2) 4–7[16] 33 (20–44)[16] 11 (6–16)[16] —
Methane (CH4) 11.8[9] 56[17]
72[18]
84 / 86f[13]
96[19]
80.8 (biogenic)[9]
82.5 (fossil)[9] 		21[17]
25[18]
28 / 34f[13]
32[20]
39 (biogenic)[21]
40 (fossil)[21] 		6.5[17]
7.6[18]
Nitrous oxide (N2O) 109[9] 280[17]
289[18]
264 / 268f[13]
273[9] 		310[17]
298[18]
265 / 298f[13]
273[9] 		170[17]
153[18]
130[9]
HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbon) 14.0[9] 3,710 / 3,790f[13]
4,144[9] 		1,300 / 1,550f[13]
1,526[9] 		435[18]
436[9]
CFC-11 (chlorofluorocarbon) 52.0[9] 6,900 / 7,020f[13]
8,321[9] 		4,660 / 5,350f[13]
6,226[9] 		1,620[18]
2,093[9]
Carbon tetrafluoride (CF4 / PFC-14) 50,000[9] 4,880 / 4,950f[13]
5,301[9] 		6,630 / 7,350f[13]
7,380[9] 		11,200[18]
10,587[9]
HFC-23 (hydrofluorocarbon) 222[13] 12,000[18]
10,800[13] 		14,800[18]
12,400[13] 		12,200[18]
Sulfur hexafluoride SF6 3,200[13] 16,300[18]
17,500[13] 		22,800[18]
23,500[13] 		32,600[18]

Earlier values from 2007

[edit]

The values provided in the table below are from 2007 when they were published in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report.[22][18] These values are still used (as of 2020) for some comparisons.[23]

Greenhouse gas Chemical formula 100-year Global warming potentials
(2007 estimates, for 2013–2020 comparisons)
Carbon dioxide CO2 1
Methane CH4 25
Nitrous oxide N2O 298
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
HFC-23 CHF3 14,800
Difluoromethane (HFC-32) CH2F2 675
Fluoromethane (HFC-41) CH3F 92
HFC-43-10mee CF3CHFCHFCF2CF3 1,640
Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) C2HF5 3,500
HFC-134 C2H2F4 (CHF2CHF2) 1,100
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) C2H2F4 (CH2FCF3) 1,430
HFC-143 C2H3F3 (CHF2CH2F) 353
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) C2H3F3 (CF3CH3) 4,470
HFC-152 CH2FCH2F 53
HFC-152a C2H4F2 (CH3CHF2) 124
HFC-161 CH3CH2F 12
1,1,1,2,3,3,3-Heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea) C3HF7 3,220
HFC-236cb CH2FCF2CF3 1,340
HFC-236ea CHF2CHFCF3 1,370
HFC-236fa C3H2F6 9,810
HFC-245ca C3H3F5 693
HFC-245fa CHF2CH2CF3 1,030
HFC-365mfc CH3CF2CH2CF3 794
Perfluorocarbons
Carbon tetrafluoride – PFC-14 CF4 7,390
Hexafluoroethane – PFC-116 C2F6 12,200
Octafluoropropane – PFC-218 C3F8 8,830
Perfluorobutane – PFC-3-1-10 C4F10 8,860
Octafluorocyclobutane – PFC-318 c-C4F8 10,300
Perfluouropentane – PFC-4-1-12 C5F12 9,160
Perfluorohexane – PFC-5-1-14 C6F14 9,300
Perfluorodecalin – PFC-9-1-18b C10F18 7,500
Perfluorocyclopropane c-C3F6 17,340
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
Sulfur hexafluoride SF6 22,800
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)
Nitrogen trifluoride NF3 17,200
Fluorinated ethers
HFE-125 CHF2OCF3 14,900
Bis(difluoromethyl) ether (HFE-134) CHF2OCHF2 6,320
HFE-143a CH3OCF3 756
HCFE-235da2 CHF2OCHClCF3 350
HFE-245cb2 CH3OCF2CF3 708
HFE-245fa2 CHF2OCH2CF3 659
HFE-254cb2 CH3OCF2CHF2 359
HFE-347mcc3 CH3OCF2CF2CF3 575
HFE-347pcf2 CHF2CF2OCH2CF3 580
HFE-356pcc3 CH3OCF2CF2CHF2 110
HFE-449sl (HFE-7100) C4F9OCH3 297
HFE-569sf2 (HFE-7200) C4F9OC2H5 59
HFE-43-10pccc124 (H-Galden 1040x) CHF2OCF2OC2F4OCHF2 1,870
HFE-236ca12 (HG-10) CHF2OCF2OCHF2 2,800
HFE-338pcc13 (HG-01) CHF2OCF2CF2OCHF2 1,500
(CF3)2CFOCH3 343
CF3CF2CH2OH 42
(CF3)2CHOH 195
HFE-227ea CF3CHFOCF3 1,540
HFE-236ea2 CHF2OCHFCF3 989
HFE-236fa CF3CH2OCF3 487
HFE-245fa1 CHF2CH2OCF3 286
HFE-263fb2 CF3CH2OCH3 11
HFE-329mcc2 CHF2CF2OCF2CF3 919
HFE-338mcf2 CF3CH2OCF2CF3 552
HFE-347mcf2 CHF2CH2OCF2CF3 374
HFE-356mec3 CH3OCF2CHFCF3 101
HFE-356pcf2 CHF2CH2OCF2CHF2 265
HFE-356pcf3 CHF2OCH2CF2CHF2 502
HFE-365mcfI’ll t3 CF3CF2CH2OCH3 11
HFE-374pc2 CHF2CF2OCH2CH3 557
– (CF2)4CH (OH) – 73
(CF3)2CHOCHF2 380
(CF3)2CHOCH3 27
Perfluoropolyethers
PFPMIE CF3OCF(CF3)CF2OCF2OCF3 10,300
Trifluoromethyl sulfur pentafluoride SF5CF3 17,400

Importance of time horizon

[edit]

A substance's GWP depends on the number of years (denoted by a subscript) over which the potential is calculated. A gas which is quickly removed from the atmosphere may initially have a large effect, but for longer time periods, as it has been removed, it becomes less important. Thus methane has a potential of 25 over 100 years (GWP100 = 25) but 86 over 20 years (GWP20 = 86); conversely sulfur hexafluoride has a GWP of 22,800 over 100 years but 16,300 over 20 years (IPCC Third Assessment Report). The GWP value depends on how the gas concentration decays over time in the atmosphere. This is often not precisely known and hence the values should not be considered exact. For this reason when quoting a GWP it is important to give a reference to the calculation.

The GWP for a mixture of gases can be obtained from the mass-fraction-weighted average of the GWPs of the individual gases.[24]

Commonly, a time horizon of 100 years is used by regulators.[25][26]

Water vapour

[edit]
See also: Greenhouse gas § Special role of water vapor, and Climate change feedbacks § Water vapor feedback (positive)

Water vapour does contribute to anthropogenic global warming, but as the GWP is defined, it is negligible for H2O: an estimate gives a 100-year GWP between -0.001 and 0.0005.[27]

H2O can function as a greenhouse gas because it has a profound infrared absorption spectrum with more and broader absorption bands than CO2. Its concentration in the atmosphere is limited by air temperature, so that radiative forcing by water vapour increases with global warming (positive feedback). But the GWP definition excludes indirect effects. GWP definition is also based on emissions, and anthropogenic emissions of water vapour (cooling towers, irrigation) are removed via precipitation within weeks, so its GWP is negligible.

Calculation methods

[edit]
The radiative forcing (warming influence) of long-lived atmospheric greenhouse gases has accelerated, almost doubling in 40 years.[28][29][30]

When calculating the GWP of a greenhouse gas, the value depends on the following factors:

A high GWP correlates with a large infrared absorption and a long atmospheric lifetime. The dependence of GWP on the wavelength of absorption is more complicated. Even if a gas absorbs radiation efficiently at a certain wavelength, this may not affect its GWP much, if the atmosphere already absorbs most radiation at that wavelength. A gas has the most effect if it absorbs in a "window" of wavelengths where the atmosphere is fairly transparent. The dependence of GWP as a function of wavelength has been found empirically and published as a graph.[31]

Because the GWP of a greenhouse gas depends directly on its infrared spectrum, the use of infrared spectroscopy to study greenhouse gases is centrally important in the effort to understand the impact of human activities on global climate change.

Just as radiative forcing provides a simplified means of comparing the various factors that are believed to influence the climate system to one another, global warming potentials (GWPs) are one type of simplified index based upon radiative properties that can be used to estimate the potential future impacts of emissions of different gases upon the climate system in a relative sense. GWP is based on a number of factors, including the radiative efficiency (infrared-absorbing ability) of each gas relative to that of carbon dioxide, as well as the decay rate of each gas (the amount removed from the atmosphere over a given number of years) relative to that of carbon dioxide.[32]

The radiative forcing capacity (RF) is the amount of energy per unit area, per unit time, absorbed by the greenhouse gas, that would otherwise be lost to space. It can be expressed by the formula:

where the subscript i represents a wavenumber interval of 10 inverse centimeters. Absi represents the integrated infrared absorbance of the sample in that interval, and Fi represents the RF for that interval.[citation needed]

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides the generally accepted values for GWP, which changed slightly between 1996 and 2001, except for methane, which had its GWP almost doubled. An exact definition of how GWP is calculated is to be found in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment Report.[33] The GWP is defined as the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing from the instantaneous release of 1 kg of a trace substance relative to that of 1 kg of a reference gas:

where TH is the time horizon over which the calculation is considered; ax is the radiative efficiency due to a unit increase in atmospheric abundance of the substance (i.e., Wm−2 kg−1) and [x](t) is the time-dependent decay in abundance of the substance following an instantaneous release of it at time t=0. The denominator contains the corresponding quantities for the reference gas (i.e. CO2). The radiative efficiencies ax and ar are not necessarily constant over time. While the absorption of infrared radiation by many greenhouse gases varies linearly with their abundance, a few important ones display non-linear behaviour for current and likely future abundances (e.g., CO2, CH4, and N2O). For those gases, the relative radiative forcing will depend upon abundance and hence upon the future scenario adopted.

Since all GWP calculations are a comparison to CO2 which is non-linear, all GWP values are affected. Assuming otherwise as is done above will lead to lower GWPs for other gases than a more detailed approach would. Clarifying this, while increasing CO2 has less and less effect on radiative absorption as ppm concentrations rise, more powerful greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide have different thermal absorption frequencies to CO2 that are not filled up (saturated) as much as CO2, so rising ppms of these gases are far more significant.

Applications

[edit]

Carbon dioxide equivalent

[edit]

Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e or CO2eq or CO2-e) of a quantity of gas is calculated from its GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO2 which would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas.[34] Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP multiplied by mass of the other gas. For example, if a gas has GWP of 100, two tonnes of the gas have CO2e of 200 tonnes, and 9 tonnes of the gas has CO2e of 900 tonnes.

On a global scale, the warming effects of one or more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere can also be expressed as an equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO2. CO2e can then be the atmospheric concentration of CO2 which would warm the earth as much as a particular concentration of some other gas or of all gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. For example, CO2e of 500 parts per million would reflect a mix of atmospheric gases which warm the earth as much as 500 parts per million of CO2 would warm it.[35][36] Calculation of the equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO2 of an atmospheric greenhouse gas or aerosol is more complex and involves the atmospheric concentrations of those gases, their GWPs, and the ratios of their molar masses to the molar mass of CO2.

CO2e calculations depend on the time-scale chosen, typically 100 years or 20 years,[37][38] since gases decay in the atmosphere or are absorbed naturally, at different rates.

The following units are commonly used:

  • By the UN climate change panel (IPCC): billion metric tonnes = n×109 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2eq)[39]
  • In industry: million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMTCDE)[40] and MMT CO2eq.[23]
  • For vehicles: grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per mile (gCO2e/mile) or per kilometer (gCO2e/km)[41][42]

For example, the table above shows GWP for methane over 20 years at 86 and nitrous oxide at 289, so emissions of 1 million tonnes of methane or nitrous oxide are equivalent to emissions of 86 or 289 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, respectively.

Use in Kyoto Protocol and for reporting to UNFCCC

[edit]

Under the Kyoto Protocol, in 1997 the Conference of the Parties standardized international reporting, by deciding (see decision number 2/CP.3) that the values of GWP calculated for the IPCC Second Assessment Report were to be used for converting the various greenhouse gas emissions into comparable CO2 equivalents.[43][44]

After some intermediate updates, in 2013 this standard was updated by the Warsaw meeting of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, decision number 24/CP.19) to require using a new set of 100-year GWP values. They published these values in Annex III, and they took them from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which had been published in 2007.[22] Those 2007 estimates are still used for international comparisons through 2020,[23] although the latest research on warming effects has found other values, as shown in the tables above.

Though recent reports reflect more scientific accuracy, countries and companies continue to use the IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR)[17] and IPCC Fourth Assessment Report values for reasons of comparison in their emission reports. The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report has skipped the 500-year values but introduced GWP estimations including the climate-carbon feedback (f) with a large amount of uncertainty.[13]

Other metrics to compare greenhouse gases

[edit]

The Global Temperature change Potential (GTP) is another way to compare gases. While GWP estimates infrared thermal radiation absorbed, GTP estimates the resulting rise in average surface temperature of the world, over the next 20, 50 or 100 years, caused by a greenhouse gas, relative to the temperature rise which the same mass of CO2 would cause.[13] Calculation of GTP requires modelling how the world, especially the oceans, will absorb heat.[25] GTP is published in the same IPCC tables with GWP.[13]

Another metric called GWP* (pronounced "GWP star"[45]) has been proposed to take better account of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) such as methane. A permanent increase in the rate of emission of an SLCP has a similar effect to that of a one-time emission of an amount of carbon dioxide, because both raise the radiative forcing permanently or (in the case of carbon dioxide) practically permanently (since the CO2 stays in the air for a long time). GWP* therefore assigns an increase in emission rate of an SLCP a supposedly equivalent amount (tonnes) of CO2.[46] However GWP* has been criticised both for its suitability as a metric and for inherent design features which can perpetuate injustices and inequity. Developing countries whose emissions of SLCPs are increasing are "penalized", while developed countries such as Australia or New Zealand which have steady emissions of SLCPs are not penalized in this way, though they may be penalized for their emissions of CO2.[47][48][45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Global warming potential

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Global warming potential (GWP) is an index measuring the radiative forcing caused by the emission of one kilogram of a greenhouse gas relative to the same mass of carbon dioxide (CO2), integrated over a specified time horizon, most commonly 100 years, to enable comparisons of their contributions to climate change. The metric relies on the absolute global warming potential (AGWP), which integrates the gas's radiative efficiency—its instantaneous ability to absorb infrared radiation—with its atmospheric decay profile, assuming a fixed background atmosphere and pulse emissions rather than sustained rates. GWPs are tabulated for major gases like methane (GWP100 ≈ 28–34), nitrous oxide (≈ 265–298), and fluorinated compounds (often >1,000), informing emission inventories, carbon pricing, and protocols such as the Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement. Despite its widespread adoption, GWP has faced criticism for simplifying complex atmospheric dynamics, such as chemical interactions and feedbacks, and for conflating pulse responses with ongoing emissions, which can mislead assessments of mitigation strategies—particularly for short-lived gases like , where emission reductions yield faster cooling than GWP implies. Alternatives like GWP*, which better captures temperature-response trajectories for declining emissions, have been proposed to address these shortcomings, though GWP remains the UNFCCC standard due to its simplicity and historical consistency. Values evolve with refined spectroscopic data and models, as in IPCC assessments, underscoring the metric's empirical basis in calculations rather than absolute temperature predictions.

Fundamentals

Definition

Global warming potential (GWP) is a metric that expresses the relative impact of a emission compared to an equivalent mass of (CO2) over a chosen time horizon, typically 20, 100, or 500 years. It integrates the absolute global mean from a pulse emission of the gas, accounting for its atmospheric concentration decay due to removal processes, and normalizes this against the integrated forcing from CO2. By design, GWP enables the aggregation of emissions from diverse es into CO2-equivalent units for inventory and policy purposes, with CO2 assigned a value of 1. The calculation derives from the gas's radiative efficiency—the instantaneous forcing per unit increase in concentration—and its lifetime in the atmosphere, which determines how long the forcing persists. For a gas X, the GWP for time horizon TH is approximated as GWP(TH) = ∫0TH RFX(t) dt / ∫0TH RFCO2(t) dt, where RF(t) is the radiative forcing at time t following a 1 kg emission. This mass-based approach assumes linear forcing-concentration relationships and neglects chemical interactions or saturation effects, which can introduce uncertainties, particularly for gases with lifetimes differing markedly from CO2's effective ~100-year scale. While GWPs facilitate multi-gas comparisons under frameworks like the and , the choice of time horizon influences values disproportionately for short-lived gases like (lifetime ~12 years), yielding higher GWPs over shorter horizons. The 100-year horizon predominates in assessments due to its alignment with long-term climate stabilization goals, though it underweights near-term warming from potent, short-lived pollutants. Updated values reflect refined spectroscopic data and atmospheric models, as in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (2021), but remain simplifications that do not fully capture spatiotemporal forcing variations or biogeochemical feedbacks.

Relation to Radiative Forcing

(RF) quantifies the perturbation to Earth's top-of-atmosphere energy balance caused by a factor such as increased atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, expressed in watts per square meter (W/m²). Positive RF leads to a net warming effect by trapping additional energy. For greenhouse gases, RF is calculated as the product of the gas's radiative efficiency (instantaneous RF per unit increase in concentration) and the change in its atmospheric concentration. Global warming potential (GWP) builds directly on RF by integrating the time-dependent RF resulting from a hypothetical instantaneous emission of 1 kg of a gas, relative to the same for 1 kg of CO₂ over a specified H. Mathematically, GWP(X, H) = [∫₀ᴴ RF(X(t)) dt] / [∫₀ᴴ RF(CO₂(t)) dt], where RF(X(t)) represents the decaying radiative forcing from the emitted gas X as its concentration diminishes due to atmospheric removal processes. This integration accounts for both the initial strength of the forcing (via radiative efficiency) and the gas's atmospheric lifetime, which determines how long the forcing persists. The approach assumes a linear relationship between RF and global mean surface temperature response, without feedbacks, making GWP a simplified metric for comparing gases' impacts on a per-mass basis. For CO₂, the integrated RF is influenced by its complex sinks, resulting in a non-, whereas many other gases follow simpler based on lifetimes. Indirect effects, such as formation from , may be included in some GWP calculations to capture additional RF contributions. Uncertainties arise from radiative efficiency estimates, lifetime variability, and spectral overlap with background gases, often addressed through ensemble modeling in IPCC assessments.

Historical Development

Origins in Early Climate Science

The concept of global warming potential (GWP) emerged from foundational work in climate science on , which quantifies perturbations to Earth's energy balance caused by atmospheric constituents. Early investigations into the , dating to the , focused primarily on (CO2). In 1896, performed the first quantitative calculations, estimating that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 would produce a equivalent to a global temperature increase of 5–6°C, based on empirical and simple energy balance models. These efforts laid the groundwork for comparing gases by their infrared absorption properties, though Arrhenius initially emphasized CO2's dominant role without formal relative metrics for others. By the mid-20th century, researchers expanded assessments to non-CO2 greenhouse gases, driven by laboratory measurements of their absorption spectra. John Tyndall's 1861 experiments had already demonstrated that , CO2, and absorb heat-trapping infrared radiation, but systematic global-scale calculations awaited improved atmospheric models. In the 1960s and 1970s, pioneering modeling by and others incorporated multi-gas effects, revealing that trace gases like (CH4) and (N2O) contribute disproportionately to forcing per unit mass due to their molecular absorption efficiencies. Concurrently, concerns over chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) prompted V. Ramanathan's 1975 calculations, which showed CFCs exert 10,000 times the radiative forcing of CO2 per molecule over short timescales, highlighting the need to account for differing atmospheric lifetimes and decay rates. The 1979 Charney Report marked a pivotal synthesis, defining as the net radiation imbalance at the induced by CO2 doubling (approximately 4 W/m²), while noting emerging contributions from other gases based on updated spectroscopic data. This report emphasized instantaneous forcing but underscored the importance of integrating effects over time to capture transient responses, a precursor to GWP's time-horizon approach. Pre-1990 efforts thus established that relative warming depends on a gas's radiative efficiency (ΔF/Δconcentration) and lifetime (τ), setting the stage for standardized indices. The explicit formulation of GWP as a metric crystallized in early 1990 with Daniel Lashof and Dilip Ahuja's proposal, defining it as the ratio of time-integrated from a 1 kg pulse of a gas to that of 1 kg CO2 over a chosen horizon. Their calculations, using models and emission scenarios, assigned GWPs of approximately 21 for CH4, 310 for N2O, and thousands for CFCs over 100 years, attributing 20–30% of projected 21st-century forcing to non-CO2 gases. This index addressed the limitations of molecule-based comparisons by normalizing to mass emissions, enabling policy-relevant aggregation despite uncertainties in lifetimes and indirect effects.

Evolution Through IPCC Assessments

The concept of global warming potential (GWP) was formally introduced in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) First Assessment Report (FAR) in 1990 as a metric to compare the radiative impacts of different gases relative to over specified time horizons of 20, 100, and 500 years. It was defined as the ratio of the time-integrated from a unit mass emission of a gas to that from CO₂, assuming a one-time pulse emission and based on atmospheric lifetimes. Initial GWPs were calculated for a limited set of gases, including (CH₄, 100-year GWP ≈ 21–30 depending on scenario), (N₂O, ≈ 270–310), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) like CFC-11 (≈ 3,400–5,000), drawing on early radiative efficiency estimates and lifetime data from atmospheric models. In the Second Assessment Report (SAR) of 1995, the IPCC refined GWP calculations by incorporating updated data and expanded coverage to additional hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs), with 100-year GWPs such as CH₄ at 21 and N₂O at 310 becoming the basis for emission accounting under the . Methodological improvements included more precise functions derived from laboratory spectroscopy and global circulation models, though uncertainties remained high (e.g., ±50% for some lifetimes). These values emphasized the 100-year horizon for policy relevance, balancing short-term potency with long-term persistence. Subsequent reports iteratively updated GWPs through enhanced empirical inputs. The Third Assessment Report (TAR) in 2001 adjusted values based on refined isotopic and ice-core data for historical concentrations, yielding minor shifts like CH₄'s 100-year GWP to 23, while introducing uncertainty ranges (e.g., 9–50% for CH₄). The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) in 2007 incorporated advanced calculations and observations, stabilizing CH₄ at 25 (without feedbacks) and expanding to more , with explicit reporting of 90% confidence intervals. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) in 2013 further evolved the approach by distinguishing direct radiative effects from climate-carbon feedbacks (e.g., CH₄ GWP 28 without, 34 with feedbacks) and providing comprehensive uncertainty distributions from simulations of model parameters. It stressed the metric's limitations for non-CO₂ gases with varying lifetimes but retained the pulse-response framework. In the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of 2021, GWPs were recalibrated using integrated assessment models and new measurement campaigns, resulting in CH₄ at 27–29.8 (direct to total) over 100 years, alongside broader inclusion of hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) and updated lifetimes from reanalysis datasets; AR6 also highlighted alternatives like GWP* for short-lived species to better capture emission rate changes, though standard GWPs persisted for inventory consistency. Across assessments, core methodology advanced from rudimentary integrations to probabilistic ensembles, driven by accumulating observational data, yet retained foundational assumptions critiqued for oversimplifying transient climate responses.

Methodology

Core Calculation Approaches

The global warming potential (GWP) of a is computed as the ratio of its absolute global warming potential (AGWP) to that of (CO₂) over a chosen TH. The AGWP represents the time-integrated (RF) from the instantaneous pulse release of 1 kg of the gas, calculated as ∫₀ᴵᴴ RF(t) dt, where RF(t) is the radiative forcing at time t post-emission. For well-mixed, long-lived gases excluding CO₂, RF(t) is derived by multiplying the gas's radiative efficiency (RE)—the steady-state RF per in the present atmosphere—by an term accounting for atmospheric removal: RF(t) ≈ RE × exp(-t/τ), where τ is the perturbation lifetime. The RE is determined via line-by-line models using spectroscopic databases (e.g., HITRAN) to simulate absorption under clear-sky conditions, scaled by atmospheric profiles and overlap with other absorbers. Lifetimes τ are obtained from observational data on emission perturbations or atmospheric chemistry-transport models, with indirect effects (e.g., methane's influence on and stratospheric ) incorporated into RE where relevant. CO₂'s AGWP calculation differs due to its multifaceted removal via uptake, terrestrial sequestration, and geological processes, lacking a simple . IPCC assessments employ system models or parameterized functions (IRFs) to simulate the multi-decadal to evolution of atmospheric CO₂ concentration and associated RF following a 1 kg pulse, often calibrated against observations and including climate-carbon feedbacks like reduced uptake under warming. These IRFs approximate the integrated airborne fraction, yielding CO₂ AGWPs such as 8.69 × 10⁻¹⁴ W m⁻² yr (kg CO₂)⁻¹ for TH = 100 years in earlier reports, updated in later assessments with refined model ensembles. In practice, IPCC computations integrate these components using consistent model frameworks across gases, with AR6 values reflecting laboratory for RE, satellite-derived lifetimes, and multi-model means for CO₂ dynamics to minimize inconsistencies. This pulse-based integration assumes no concentration changes and neglects response (e.g., efficacy factors), focusing solely on forcing accumulation.

Time Horizon Selection

The in global warming potential (GWP) calculations represents the integration period over which the radiative forcing of a is cumulatively assessed relative to (CO2), which has a near-infinite atmospheric lifetime. This horizon, denoted as H, is used in the formula GWP(H) = ∫[0 to H] RF_gas(t) dt / ∫[0 to H] RF_CO2(t) dt, where RF denotes absolute over time t. The choice of H directly influences GWP values, as short-lived gases like (atmospheric lifetime ~12 years) exhibit higher GWPs over shorter horizons due to their rapid decay, while long-lived gases like CO2 or benefit from extended integration. The 100-year time horizon (GWP100) has been the standard since early IPCC assessments and was formalized in the for emission inventories, providing a consistent metric for aggregating diverse gases in frameworks. This duration was selected as a pragmatic balance between capturing near-term climate risks from short-lived pollutants and long-term commitments from persistent ones, facilitating international comparisons without overemphasizing transient spikes. However, the selection lacks a strict physical basis and is acknowledged as arbitrary by the IPCC, with recommendations that horizons align with specific objectives, such as near-term temperature stabilization versus multi-century avoidance of dangerous warming. Shorter horizons, such as 20 years (GWP20), are advocated for scenarios prioritizing rapid warming , as they amplify the relative impact of short-lived forcers; for instance, methane's GWP rises from 28-36 (100-year) to 81-84 (20-year) in recent IPCC data, highlighting its disproportionate role in near-term forcing. Analyses tied to goals suggest even tailored horizons—24 years for 1.5°C limits and 58 years for 2°C—better match cumulative emissions pathways, as GWP100 underestimates short-lived gas metrics by up to 63% for 1.5°C alignment. Longer horizons like 500 years are rarely used but emphasize ultra-persistent . Critics argue that defaulting to GWP100 distorts policy by undervaluing short-term interventions, such as methane reductions from or leaks, which could yield faster temperature responses despite equivalent long-term CO2 equivalence. Empirical modeling shows this choice embeds value judgments, potentially skewing carbon pricing and trading schemes toward fossil fuel phase-outs over diversified mitigation, though proponents counter that 100 years ensures by avoiding overreaction to volatile short-term forcings. The IPCC's AR6 continues GWP100 as the baseline for consistency but urges context-specific alternatives, reflecting ongoing methodological refinement.

Uncertainty Factors

Uncertainties in global warming potential (GWP) calculations arise primarily from variations in estimates of radiative efficiency, atmospheric lifetimes, and the integration of these over chosen time horizons, with additional contributions from climate-carbon feedbacks and model dependencies. Radiative efficiency, which quantifies the instantaneous per unit increase in atmospheric concentration, is subject to errors in spectroscopic measurements, overlapping absorption bands, and atmospheric conditions like and , leading to uncertainties of up to 22% for fluorinated greenhouse gases. For (CH4), direct and indirect radiative forcing uncertainties (including effects on tropospheric and stratospheric ) contribute approximately -24% to +29% to the 100-year GWP . Atmospheric lifetimes introduce significant variability, particularly for gases with chemical sinks influenced by feedbacks; for CH4, (OH) abundance fluctuations due to emissions, temperature, and can alter lifetimes by 20-30%, propagating to GWP uncertainties of -20% to +23% over short horizons like 20 years. Long-lived gases like CO2 face uncertainties from incomplete of and terrestrial carbon sinks, contributing roughly half of the ±15% uncertainty in CO2's absolute global warming potential (AGWP). For halogenated compounds, lifetime estimates rely on global modeling of removal processes, with uncertainties around 14% for species with lifetimes exceeding five years and higher for shorter-lived ones due to heterogeneous chemistry. The choice of (e.g., 20, 100, or 500 years) amplifies relative uncertainties for short-lived gases, as their decay profiles differ sharply from CO2's multi-century persistence, potentially shifting GWPs by factors of 2-4 across horizons; this is compounded by exclusion of nonlinear feedbacks, such as responses, which can double uncertainties in metrics like global temperature potential (GTP) compared to GWP. Multi-model ensembles reveal further dispersion; for example, hydrogen's 100-year GWP varies across models due to indirect CH4 lifetime effects. Overall, 90% confidence intervals for major non-CO2 GWPs typically span 30-50% relative to central estimates, underscoring the metrics' sensitivity to input parameters and the need for scenario-specific applications rather than fixed values.

Standard Values

IPCC AR6 Values (2021)

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Working Group I contribution released on August 9, 2021, updated global warming potential (GWP) values using revised estimates of radiative efficiencies, atmospheric , and indirect effects from recent empirical data and modeling. These calculations exclude climate-carbon feedbacks (CCF) in baseline values to avoid double-counting in emissions inventories, though AR6 notes that including CCF would increase GWPs for long-lived gases like by approximately 20%. GWPs are provided for multiple time horizons (20, 100, and 500 years), with the 100-year horizon adopted as the default for aggregating emissions in CO₂-equivalent terms under international agreements due to its balance between short-term potency and long-term persistence. AR6 distinguishes between fossil and non-fossil (biogenic) GWPs, reflecting that add net carbon to the atmosphere without biogenic offsets, resulting in a higher effective potency. Values for other gases, such as and fluorinated compounds, incorporate updated lifetimes and forcing factors from satellite observations and laboratory measurements. Uncertainties arise primarily from lifetime variability and indirect effects, with AR6 providing 90% confidence intervals (e.g., 100-year GWP ranging 25–30 excluding CCF). The following table lists selected 100-year GWPs from AR6 Table 7.15 (without CCF), relative to CO₂ (GWP=1):
Greenhouse GasFormula100-Year GWP
Carbon dioxideCO₂1
Methane (fossil)CH₄29.8
Methane (non-fossil)CH₄27.0
Nitrous oxideN₂O273
Sulfur hexafluorideSF₆24,300
Nitrogen trifluorideNF₃17,400
HFC-23CHF₃14,600
HFC-125CHF₂CF₃3,740
HFC-134aCH₂FCF₃1,530
HFC-32CH₂F₂771
For 20-year horizons, methane GWPs are substantially higher (e.g., 82.5 for , 81.2 for non-fossil), emphasizing short-term risks from potent, shorter-lived gases. Comprehensive lists, including perfluorocarbons and other hydrofluorocarbons, appear in AR6 Chapter 7 Supplementary Material, with values intended for use in national inventories and policy metrics like those under the .

Comparisons with Prior Reports

The global warming potentials (GWPs) for non-CO₂ gases have been revised in successive IPCC assessment reports based on updated estimates of atmospheric lifetimes, radiative efficiencies, and indirect effects such as chemical reactions in the atmosphere. These revisions stem from refined laboratory measurements, atmospheric observations, and modeling of , leading to fluctuations rather than monotonic trends in values. For the standard 100-year time horizon, AR6 (2021) values generally align closely with AR5 (2013) but differ from AR4 (2007) by incorporating more comprehensive indirect forcing components and, for some gases, distinctions based on emission sources. Key differences are evident for major gases like (CH₄) and (N₂O). Methane's 100-year GWP rose from 25 in AR4 to 28 in AR5, reflecting enhanced estimates of its radiative efficiency and lifetime adjustments, before stabilizing at 27 in AR6 for non-fossil sources (excluding climate-carbon feedbacks from oxidation to CO₂). AR6 further differentiates fossil methane at 29.8 to account for the CO₂ produced upon atmospheric breakdown, a nuance absent in prior reports. For N₂O, the value decreased from 298 in AR4 to 265 in AR5 due to revised indirect effects on stratospheric , then increased modestly to 273 in AR6 with updated lifetime data extending beyond 100 years.
Greenhouse GasAR4 (2007)AR5 (2013, without feedbacks)AR6 (2021, without feedbacks)
Methane (CH₄, non-fossil)252827
Nitrous Oxide (N₂O)298265273
HFC-134a1,4301,3001,530
CF₄ (PFC-14)7,3906,6307,380
These values illustrate iterative refinements; for instance, AR5 to AR6 shifts for hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) like HFC-134a arose from better quantification of their infrared absorption spectra and atmospheric decay pathways. Earlier reports like AR4 lacked the full integration of climate-carbon feedbacks now optionally included in AR5 and AR6, which amplify GWPs for gases contributing to CO₂ release but are typically excluded for direct comparability in emissions inventories. Overall, while AR6 values represent the most current synthesis, policy frameworks such as UNFCCC reporting often retain AR5 or AR4 for consistency to avoid retroactive shifts in historical emissions baselines.

Exclusion of Water Vapor

Water vapor, despite being the most abundant and contributing approximately 50% to the natural , is excluded from global warming potential (GWP) calculations because its atmospheric concentration is primarily regulated by temperature-dependent natural processes rather than direct anthropogenic emissions. According to the Clausius-Clapeyron relation, the atmosphere's capacity to hold increases by about 7% per degree Celsius of warming, making increases a to initial forcings from long-lived gases like CO2, rather than an independent forcing amenable to emission controls. This distinction is critical in GWP methodology, which targets well-mixed, long-lived (typically with lifetimes exceeding a ) whose emissions can be directly quantified and regulated, as 's short —on the order of days to weeks due to and —renders it unsuitable for such metrics. Direct human emissions of , such as from or , are negligible relative to the global hydrological cycle, which cycles about 5.17 × 10^13 kg of water annually through and , dwarfing anthropogenic contributions estimated at less than 0.001% of this flux. Including in GWP would thus distort policy-relevant comparisons, as its radiative efficiency varies nonlinearly with and , and its effects are not additive in the same manner as trace gases; estimates suggest a 100-year GWP for emitted molecules on the order of 0.00003 to 0.000003 relative to CO2, but even these are overestimates due to rapid removal processes. The (IPCC) explicitly limits GWP assessments to gases like CO2, , and fluorocarbons, treating as a feedback in calculations rather than a primary metric for emission inventories. This exclusion aligns with causal realism in climate modeling, where first-principles physics distinguishes forcings (external drivers like CO2 increases) from feedbacks (responses like amplification, which IPCC assessments quantify as contributing roughly 50% of the total ). Stratospheric water vapor, occasionally influenced by human activities such as methane oxidation or aircraft contrails, receives separate treatment in effective (ERF) analyses, with low ERF values (e.g., near-zero for near-surface emissions) confirming its minor direct role. Omitting water vapor from GWP avoids conflating controllable emissions with uncontrollable hydrological responses, though critics note this can underemphasize feedback amplification in overall warming projections.

Limitations and Criticisms

Methodological Flaws

The global warming potential (GWP) metric, while intended to quantify the relative impact of gases, incorporates several methodological simplifications that critics argue distort its representation of physical processes. One primary flaw is the arbitrary selection of the , typically 100 years in applications, which disproportionately weights long-lived gases like CO2 while understating the near-term potency of short-lived species such as ; alternative horizons like 20 years yield markedly different relative values, rendering the metric sensitive to subjective choices without a physically justified default. This arbitrariness stems from GWP's formulation as the time-integrated of a hypothetical 1 kg pulse emission relative to CO2, ignoring that real-world emissions are continuous and sustained, leading to steady-state concentrations for short-lived gases that amplify their cumulative warming beyond pulse-based estimates. Further limitations arise from GWP's exclusive focus on radiative efficiency and atmospheric lifetime, excluding dynamic responses such as -dependent decay rates or feedbacks that modulate CO2's effective lifetime; for instance, the metric assumes a fixed CO2 function without accounting for saturation effects or uptake variations under warming conditions. Critics, including analyses grounded in atmospheric physics, contend that this approach is unphysical because it equates disparate forcing pathways—treating the integrated area under a forcing curve as equivalent to outcomes, despite nonlinear sensitivities and time-dependent factors that GWP overlooks. Additionally, the metric's reliance on simplified models for neglects spatial heterogeneity in emissions and heterogeneous impacts, such as regional forcing patterns or indirect effects like formation from , further decoupling GWP from causal warming mechanisms. These flaws contribute to an unintuitive and misleading metric for , as GWP values do not directly correspond to end-goal metrics like peak warming or total temperature change, potentially incentivizing reductions in high-GWP but low-volume gases over addressing absolute emission volumes of CO2. Empirical assessments highlight uncertainties in input parameters, such as radiative efficiencies derived from laboratory data extrapolated globally, which can vary by up to 20-50% for key gases like due to unmodeled spectroscopic details or interactions. While IPCC reports acknowledge these issues—citing simplifications in lifetime estimates and forcing overlaps—the persistence of GWP in frameworks like the reflects institutional inertia rather than resolution of underlying inconsistencies.

Impacts of Arbitrary Choices

The selection of a time horizon in global warming potential (GWP) calculations, conventionally set at 100 years by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), represents an arbitrary choice without a direct physical basis tied to specific climate goals or atmospheric dynamics. This horizon integrates the radiative forcing of a greenhouse gas pulse relative to CO2 over the chosen period, but alternatives such as 20 years or 500 years yield markedly different relative potencies. For instance, methane (CH4), with an atmospheric lifetime of about 12 years, has a GWP of approximately 84-86 over 20 years but only 28-34 over 100 years, amplifying its short-term impact by a factor of roughly three when using shorter horizons. Such variability arises because GWP assumes instantaneous pulse emissions and neglects the time-dependent nature of ongoing or fluctuating emission sources, distorting comparisons for gases with differing decay rates. These choices profoundly influence CO2-equivalent (CO2e) emissions inventories and sectoral attributions. Under a 100-year horizon, long-lived gases like CO2 and nitrous oxide (N2O) appear relatively more significant, potentially understating the near-term warming from short-lived climate forcers such as methane, which dominate transient radiative forcing. For near-term targets like limiting warming to 1.5°C, analyses suggest optimal horizons of around 24 years, which would elevate methane's apparent contribution and shift emphasis toward rapid abatement of short-lived pollutants. Conversely, longer horizons diminish the relative urgency of methane reductions, as seen in natural gas production where leakage impacts are downplayed, potentially leading to overinvestment in CO2-focused strategies at the expense of immediate climate stabilization.
Gas20-Year GWP100-Year GWPImpact of Shorter Horizon
~84~28Triples reported climate impact per unit mass
~273~273Minimal change due to longer lifetime
Policy applications exacerbate these distortions, as GWP-based metrics underpin schemes, carbon pricing, and national reporting under frameworks like the . Reliance on the 100-year standard can misallocate resources, for example by undervaluing mitigation in and sectors, which contribute disproportionately to short-term warming trends observed since 2010. Critics argue this arbitrariness misleads policymakers by conflating sustained emissions with pulse equivalents, fostering incentives for delayed action on potent but decaying gases while overlooking how emission trajectories—rising, stable, or declining—alter effective warming contributions. In turn, this has led to debates over adopting dynamic metrics like GWP*, which better capture rate-of-change effects for non-CO2 gases, though implementation remains inconsistent across jurisdictions as of 2023.

Distortions in Policy Prioritization

The application of global warming potential (GWP), especially the 100-year horizon (GWP100), in aggregating emissions into CO2-equivalent (CO2e) metrics for policy targets distorts the relative contributions of economic sectors to future warming, often undervaluing the near-term impacts of short-lived climate pollutants like methane (CH4). Methane-dominated sectors, including agriculture, fossil fuel production and distribution, and waste management, are responsible for approximately 60% of projected warming over the next decade and 53% by 2050 under climate modeling that accounts for atmospheric lifetimes, compared to only 28% when using GWP100-based CO2e calculations. This underestimation arises because GWP100 averages radiative forcing over a century, diluting the potent but transient effects of gases with lifetimes of about a decade, such as methane's initial radiative efficiency, which is over 100 times that of CO2 in the first 20 years. Consequently, policies relying on GWP100 may prioritize long-lived CO2 reductions from energy sectors over methane mitigation, reducing the potential to avoid 52% of warming by 2050 through short-lived gas controls in pathways aligned with 1.5°C limits. For ongoing emissions scenarios, GWP further misleads by equating sustained methane emissions to continuous CO2 emissions, implying perpetual warming accumulation rather than equilibrium concentrations and stable forcing levels after an initial ramp-up. Under GWP100, constant methane emissions are scored as positive CO2e outflows akin to accumulating CO2, which discourages crediting stabilization efforts—such as maintaining steady emissions to halt further methane forcing growth—as effectively zero additional warming, comparable to net-zero CO2. This framing distorts national and sectoral targets, such as those in the Paris Agreement framework, by imposing unrealistically deep cuts (near-zero) on methane sources to achieve "net-zero" CO2e, even when stabilization alone would cap their contribution to temperature rise, potentially sidelining feasible near-term strategies like leak reductions in natural gas infrastructure where actual temperature modeling favors low-leak gas over coal at thresholds below 3% (versus GWP-implied 6.5–8%). These distortions risk suboptimal resource allocation, as evidenced by GWP100's failure to reflect time-dependent responses, where short-term methane potency is understated relative to long-term CO2 persistence, leading to policies that undervalue bending the warming curve promptly. In integrated assessment models for 1.5°C or 2°C pathways, alternative short-horizon GWPs (e.g., GWP20) or adjusted metrics better align sectoral responsibilities with actual warming attribution, highlighting the need for horizon selection tied to policy timelines rather than a fixed 100 years. Such misalignments have contributed to debates over schemes, where methane credits may not equivalently offset CO2 in terms of peak temperature avoidance.

Policy Applications

CO2-Equivalent Metrics

Carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO₂e) metrics convert emissions of non-CO₂ greenhouse gases (GHGs) into the mass of CO₂ that would exert an equivalent over a defined time period, enabling aggregation and comparison of diverse GHG impacts. This approach relies on global warming potentials (GWPs), which quantify the time-integrated of a gas relative to CO₂ (assigned GWP = 1). The core calculation for CO₂e of a specific GHG is the emission mass multiplied by its GWP for the chosen : CO₂e = emission × GWP. For total anthropogenic emissions, CO₂e sums contributions across gases: CO₂e_total = Σ (emission_i × GWP_i), excluding as it is not directly controlled by human activities. The 100-year horizon (GWP₁₀₀) predominates in applications due to its balance between capturing long-term effects of persistent gases like CO₂ and fluorocarbons while addressing policy-relevant timescales. In climate policy, CO₂e metrics underpin UNFCCC national inventories and reporting, where countries express basket-of-gases emissions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, and fluorinated gases) as total CO₂e using IPCC GWPs, typically from the latest assessment reports like AR6 (2021). Under the Paris Agreement, many Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) set reduction targets in CO₂e terms, facilitating cross-gas trade-offs in mitigation strategies and alignment with global stocktakes. Recent GHG Protocol updates (2024) incorporate AR6 GWPs, including indirect CO₂ formation from gases like methane, to refine equivalence calculations. These metrics support emission trading schemes and corporate reporting standards, such as those from the EPA and GHG Protocol, by providing a unit for cap-and-trade systems and sustainability disclosures. However, variations in adopted GWPs across jurisdictions—e.g., AR4 vs. AR5—can lead to inconsistencies in reported totals, with AR6 values adjusting methane's GWP₁₀₀ upward to 27.0–30.0 (with climate-carbon feedbacks) from prior estimates.

International Treaty Implementations

The , adopted on December 11, 1997, and entering into force on February 16, 2005, was the first international treaty to establish legally binding emission reduction for developed countries (Annex I parties) using GWP as the metric for aggregating a "basket" of six greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Emissions of non-CO2 gases were converted to CO2-equivalents (CO2e) based on their 100-year GWP values from the IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR, 1995) for the first commitment period (2008–2012), allowing parties to meet through equivalent reductions across gases rather than gas-specific caps. For the second commitment period (2013–2020) under the Doha Amendment, parties could opt for updated GWPs from the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4, 2007). The , adopted on December 12, 2015, and entering into force on November 4, 2016, under the UNFCCC framework, mandates that parties report inventories and nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in CO2e using the 100-year GWP (GWP100) values from the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5, 2014) or any subsequent report, ensuring consistency in multi-gas accounting without reverting to prior metrics unless justified. This approach facilitates comparability of emissions across countries and gases in biennial transparency reports, though NDCs remain voluntary and non-binding in targets, contrasting with Kyoto's quantified obligations. The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, adopted on October 15, 2016, and entering into force on January 1, 2019, extends the treaty's scope beyond ozone-depleting substances to phase down HFCs—potent greenhouse gases not controlled for ozone depletion but with GWPs up to 14,800 (e.g., HFC-23)—using baseline consumption calculated partly via GWP-weighted ODS phase-out under the original protocol. Developed countries committed to 85% reduction by 2036, while developing countries follow phased schedules starting 2024 or 2028, with GWP metrics informing the climate co-benefits of HFC reductions, estimated to avoid up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100 alongside ozone protection. This amendment marks the first multilateral environmental agreement to target high-GWP substances explicitly for climate mitigation, leveraging the protocol's compliance mechanisms.

Reporting Frameworks

Reporting frameworks for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions integrate global warming potential (GWP) values to express emissions of various gases in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), enabling standardized aggregation and cross-gas comparisons in national, corporate, and regulatory inventories. Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Parties submit annual national GHG inventories using 100-year time-horizon GWP values from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5, 2013–2014) or subsequent reports if available, as required by the Enhanced Transparency Framework of the Paris Agreement. This approach, outlined in Decision 18/CMA.1, ensures emissions and removals are reported in CO2e for the basket of seven GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, and NF3), with total anthropogenic emissions calculated accordingly. National inventories must maintain methodological consistency, applying the same GWP values to both base-year and current-year emissions to avoid distortions in trend reporting. The IPCC's 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, refined in 2019, provide the methodological foundation, recommending AR5 GWPs for inventory compilation while allowing AR4 (2007) values for historical consistency in some cases. For instance, the (EPA) in its 1990–2023 inventory applies AR5 GWPs, such as 28 for (CH4) and 265 for (N2O), to ensure international comparability. Similarly, the European Union's Monitoring Mechanism Regulation mandates AR5 GWPs for Member State reporting under the Governance Regulation (EU) 2018/841. Corporate and value-chain reporting follows the GHG Protocol, a collaboration between the World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, which disseminates IPCC-derived GWP tables for Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. The protocol's August 2024 update incorporates AR6 (2021) values, including an adjusted CH4 GWP of 29.8 that accounts for CO2 feedback from oxidation, though it advises consistent application across reporting periods to preserve baseline integrity. Standards like ISO 14064-1:2018 align with this by requiring GWP-based CO2e conversions using IPCC values, emphasizing transparency in GWP selection. These frameworks prioritize a 100-year horizon for policy alignment, though some jurisdictions, such as , periodically review GWPs for state inventories while adhering to UNFCCC conventions.
FrameworkGWP SourceKey RequirementExample Gases' 100-Year GWPs (AR5 unless noted)
UNFCCC National InventoriesIPCC AR5 (or later)Consistent use for base and current years; CO2e aggregation for 7 GHGsCH4: 28; N2O: 265; SF6: 23,500
GHG Protocol (Corporate)IPCC AR6 (2024 update)Scope 3 compatibility; feedback-adjusted for CH4CH4: 29.8 (with CO2 feedback); HFC-134a: 1,370
EU MMRIPCC AR5Annual reporting in CO2eConsistent with UNFCCC for comparability
Adoption of updated GWPs, such as from AR6, remains optional for UNFCCC reporting to prioritize temporal consistency, though the IPCC encourages eventual alignment with latest scientific estimates.

Alternative Metrics

Global Temperature Potential (GTP)

The Global Temperature Potential (GTP) is an emission metric that quantifies the change in global mean surface temperature at a specified future time horizon resulting from a one-unit pulse emission of a , relative to the same for (CO₂). Unlike the Global Warming Potential (GWP), which integrates over a time period, GTP evaluates the endpoint temperature response, providing a direct measure of thermal impact at a chosen year, such as 100 years post-emission. This approach was first formalized by Shine et al. in as an alternative to GWP for comparing gases with differing atmospheric lifetimes and climate feedbacks. GTP calculation involves modeling the absolute global temperature potential (AGTP) for the gas, which represents the temperature perturbation from its emission, divided by the AGTP for CO₂. For short-lived gases like (CH₄), GTP values are significantly lower than corresponding GWPs over long horizons because the temperature peak occurs early and dissipates, whereas CO₂'s effect persists; for instance, the (AR5) lists GTP₁₀₀ for CH₄ at approximately 3.8 (uncertainty range 2.6–5.0), compared to GWP₁₀₀ of 28 (19–34). Long-lived gases like (SF₆) show GTP values closer to their GWPs due to sustained forcing. The metric incorporates climate-carbon cycle feedbacks and can be adjusted for specific targets, such as GTP aligned with 1.5°C or 2°C goals, yielding CH₄ values of 41 (90% PI: 16–102) and 9 (7–16), respectively. GTP offers advantages for policy contexts emphasizing near-term temperature stabilization, as it better reflects the transient warming from short-lived climate forcers without averaging historical forcing equally across years. However, its endpoint focus omits cumulative warming prior to the horizon, potentially understating total climate damage from gases with early peaks, and requires complex modeling of and uptake. The IPCC included GTP in its Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) alongside GWP but retained GWP as the primary metric in subsequent reports due to its simplicity and established use in inventories, though variants like integrated GTP (iGTP) have been proposed to address some limitations by averaging over time. Empirical validations rely on system models, with uncertainties arising from radiative efficiencies and adjustment times derived from spectroscopic data and atmospheric observations.

GWP* for Short-Lived Gases

GWP* (Global Warming Potential Star) is an alternative emission metric formulated to more accurately represent the transient climate response, particularly temperature changes, from short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) like (CH4), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and , which have atmospheric lifetimes of years to decades rather than centuries like CO2. Unlike the standard GWP, which integrates (RF) over a fixed (e.g., 100 years) and treats emission pulses as cumulative regardless of ongoing sources, GWP* approximates the rate of change in atmospheric abundance and associated warming by combining absolute emissions with their year-to-year variations. This approach was first detailed in a 2018 peer-reviewed study by researchers including , emphasizing that for SLCPs under stable emissions, GWP* yields warming-equivalent emissions (CO2-we) near zero net addition to temperature after initial buildup, reflecting the balance between emissions and natural decay. The core formulation of GWP* derives CO2-we emissions for an SLCP as approximately GWP100 × Et + (GWP100 × ΔE / α), where Et is the absolute emissions in year t, ΔE is the change in emissions from the prior year, and α is a scaling factor tied to the gas's lifetime (often ≈3.8 for over 100 years, derived from its ≈12-year lifetime). For constant emissions, the first term (GWP × E) captures the replacement of decayed molecules maintaining steady-state RF, while the second term penalizes or credits emission increases or decreases, aligning more closely with observed trajectories from models than GWP, which would imply perpetual warming accumulation from sustained SLCP sources. This metric leverages existing GWP values from IPCC assessments, enabling retroactive application to reported CO2-equivalent inventories without altering underlying . Proponents argue GWP* enhances policy relevance for near-term warming limits, such as those under the , by distinguishing SLCP sources with growing emissions (e.g., leaks) from stable ones (e.g., in ruminant ), where the latter contribute minimally to additional warming once stabilized. Modeling studies show it reduces overestimation of 's long-term impact by up to 80% for steady biogenic sources compared to GWP100, better matching radiative-convective and outputs for surface temperature. However, critics highlight implementation hurdles, including the need for historical emission baselines to compute ΔE and risks of misinterpretation, such as portraying stable agricultural as climatically neutral despite its role in initial RF buildup. Some analyses warn of potential policy distortions if adopted without safeguards, though empirical validations confirm its superior fidelity to physical causality in SLCP temperature forcing. Adoption of GWP* remains limited but growing in sectoral analyses, particularly for methane abatement strategies; for instance, a 2023 study applied it to emissions, demonstrating that stabilizing herd sizes via GWP* equates to near-zero additional warming, versus GWP100's implication of ongoing CO2-like escalation. International bodies like the IPCC have acknowledged its utility in AR6 for complementary reporting, though standard GWP persists in core inventories due to established conventions. Further refinements, such as integrating GWP* with global temperature potential (GTP) hybrids, are under exploration to address multi-decadal feedbacks.

Other Comparative Methods

The Absolute Global Warming Potential (AGWP) quantifies the cumulative from a 1 kg pulse emission of a over a chosen , expressed in units of W m⁻² yr, without relativizing to CO₂. This metric captures the total energy imbalance induced by the gas's atmospheric decay, incorporating radiative efficiency, lifetime, and adjustment factors for non-CO₂ gases, but for CO₂ it accounts for nonlinear uptake by sinks like oceans and . AGWP values rise with longer horizons due to prolonged forcing from long-lived gases, with CO₂'s AGWP over 100 years estimated at approximately 0.022 W m⁻² yr per kg in multi-model assessments. Unlike relative GWPs, AGWP enables absolute comparisons of emission pulses across scenarios, though it requires separate normalization for policy aggregation. For short-term or instantaneous assessments, the Instantaneous Global Warming Potential (IGWP) compares the initial radiative efficiency of a gas relative to CO₂ at the moment of emission, effectively setting the to zero and excluding decay dynamics. IGWP equals the of specific radiative forcings per unit , yielding high values for potent but fleeting gases like HFCs (e.g., thousands relative to CO₂). This approach highlights immediate perturbations but understates long-term effects of persistent emissions, making it suitable for analyzing acute impacts such as those from industrial leaks. Many emission metrics derive from IGWP scaled by airborne fraction s over time, providing a foundational decomposition for understanding GWP limitations in linear approximations. Sustained-emission variants, such as the Sustained Global Warming Potential (SGWP), adjust for continuous rather than pulse emissions by integrating forcing from steady-state sources over the horizon, divided by emission rate. For short-lived gases, SGWP approximates GWP multiplied by lifetime over horizon length, emphasizing stabilization benefits from emission reductions. These methods reveal GWP's overestimation of short-lived gas impacts under constant emissions, as verified in models showing SGWP values for dropping to near unity over 100 years versus GWP-100's 28. Empirical validations using Earth system models confirm AGWP and SGWP sensitivities to uncertainties in (e.g., ±20% for ) and forcing parameters.

Debates and Controversies

Metric Suitability for Policy Goals

Global warming potential (GWP) has been employed in international agreements such as the and to aggregate emissions into CO2-equivalents for comparability, facilitating national inventories and targets. However, its suitability for policy objectives centered on limiting global temperature rise, such as the 1.5°C or 2°C thresholds under the , is contested due to its foundation in integrated radiative forcing over an arbitrary rather than direct temperature response. This approach equates emissions pulses without fully capturing transient climate dynamics or the differential impacts of gases with varying atmospheric lifetimes, potentially leading policymakers to prioritize cumulative metrics over strategies that address peak warming or emission trajectories. Critics argue that GWP misrepresents physical realities by assuming indefinite retention of excess heat and neglecting the time-dependent nature of sustained emissions, which are more representative of ongoing anthropogenic sources. For instance, the choice of a 100-year horizon yields a methane GWP of 28 relative to CO2, but shorter horizons like years inflate it to 84, introducing arbitrariness that complicates consistent application across gases. This can obscure the actual trajectories: a pulse of short-lived causes early warming that dissipates, whereas GWP's cumulative focus underemphasizes this transience, misleading assessments of timing. Empirical modeling shows that GWP fails to align with global mean change, the explicit metric in goals, as it does not incorporate feedback loops or saturation effects in multiyear emission scenarios. For short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) like , with an atmospheric lifetime of about a decade, GWP particularly distorts policy signals under sustained emissions. Standard GWP treats constant SLCP emissions as equivalent to perpetual CO2 accumulation, implying escalating warming that does not occur; stable levels maintain steady forcing rather than adding incrementally like CO2. This discrepancy can undervalue stabilization efforts—such as maintaining steady herds—for near-term while overpenalizing sectors with unavoidable baseline SLCP outputs in long-horizon accounting. In contrast, emission reductions in SLCPs yield rapid cooling benefits absent in GWP's pulse-based framework, suggesting GWP underincentivizes short-term interventions critical for avoiding overshoot of limits. These limitations risk distorting emission strategies, as GWP's emphasis on total integrated impact may favor long-lived gases over SLCPs in , despite evidence that SLCP reductions could avert 0.5°C of warming by 2050 if prioritized alongside CO2 controls. Proponents of GWP counter that its standardization enables practical treaty compliance and long-term carbon budgeting, but peer-reviewed analyses recommend complementary metrics like global temperature potential (GTP) for better alignment with stabilization pathways, as GTP directly quantifies perturbation at specific future dates. Overall, while GWP supports emission inventories, its indirect link to policy-end outcomes underscores the need for hybrid or alternative approaches to ensure causal efficacy in .

Effects on Emission Strategies

The use of global warming potential (GWP) in emission strategies enables the aggregation of diverse gases into carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), facilitating the prioritization of reductions based on relative over specified time horizons, typically 100 years. This metric incentivizes targeting gases with high GWPs, such as (GWP of 28-36) or hydrofluorocarbons (GWPs exceeding 1,000), over CO2 (GWP of 1), as reducing one ton of a high-GWP gas yields greater apparent benefits in frameworks like national inventories under the UNFCCC. For instance, the to the leverages GWP thresholds to phase down high-GWP hydrofluorocarbons, reshaping and foam-blowing strategies in industry to favor lower-GWP alternatives like hydrofluoroolefins. However, reliance on 100-year GWP can distort strategies by underweighting short-lived pollutants (SLCPs) like , whose atmospheric lifetime is about 12 years, diluting their near-term warming impact in long-horizon calculations. A 20-year GWP assigns a value of 81-87, emphasizing its role in slowing the rate of warming, which could shift policies toward aggressive abatement in sectors like and fossil fuels for immediate temperature stabilization, as opposed to deferring such actions in favor of durable CO2 cuts. This discrepancy influences emission pathways under agreements like the Paris Accord, where CO2e reporting using 100-year GWP may undervalue sustained reductions needed to limit peak warming, potentially leading to higher interim temperatures before long-term stabilization. Critics argue that GWP's pulse-emission assumption fails to capture the cumulative effects of ongoing emissions, misrepresenting policy outcomes; for , standard GWP underestimates warming from stable emission levels, prompting proposals like GWP* to better align strategies with actual trajectories by treating short-lived gases as rather than pulses. Adopting GWP* could reorient strategies toward stabilizing concentrations for near-term benefits, but it risks disadvantaging nations with recent emission spikes, such as developing countries, by amplifying accountability for short-term fluxes over historical CO2 accumulations. Overall, metric choice alters priorities: 100-year GWP favors long-lived gas reductions for cumulative impact, while shorter horizons or alternatives prioritize SLCPs to curb warming rates, highlighting the need for time-sensitive policy designs beyond uniform CO2e aggregation.

References

  1. https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/247.htm
  2. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/sroc/Boxes/b0202.pdf
  3. https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html
  4. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%252F2019RG000691
  5. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials
  6. https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10.html
  7. https://www.bu.edu/igs/files/2020/11/the-global-warming-potential-misrepresents-the-physics-of-global-warming-thereby-misleading-policy-makers-final.pdf
  8. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/1686/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7212016/
  10. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/Global-Warming-Potential-Values%2520%2528August%25202024%2529.pdf
  11. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-7/
  12. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/TAR-06.pdf
  13. https://ghginstitute.org/2024/10/17/which-methane-gwp-value-do-i-use/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932716300308
  15. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4-wg1-chapter1.pdf
  16. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/29941/noaa_29941_DS1.pdf
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/344529a0
  18. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_full_report.pdf
  19. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
  20. https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/greenhouse-gas-data/greenhouse-gas-data-unfccc/global-warming-potentials
  21. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf
  22. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
  23. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/07/WGI_AR5.Chap_.8_SM.pdf
  24. https://www.gti.energy/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CMR-Implications-Using-Different-GWP-Time-Horizons-White-Paper-2019.pdf
  25. https://ghginstitute.org/2010/06/28/what-is-a-global-warming-potential/
  26. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4940
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6711200/
  28. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010GL043803
  29. https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/downloads/Annex_2022OzoneAssessment.pdf
  30. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-00857-8
  31. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/Global-Warming-Potential-Values%20(August%202024).pdf
  32. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae018
  33. https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php?p=5&t=375
  34. https://science.feedback.org/review/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas-not-major-driver-global-warming/
  35. https://essopenarchive.org/users/528869/articles/596962/master/file/data/essoar/essoar.10504991.1.pdf
  36. https://www.bu.edu/igs/2020/11/10/popular-climate-change-metric-misleads-policymakers/
  37. https://www.minimum.com/resources/global-warming-potential
  38. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2023.1163557/full
  39. https://www.resources.org/archives/should-climate-policy-focus-more-on-methane-or-carbon-dioxide/
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901122001204
  41. https://essopenarchive.org/users/528869/articles/596962-the-global-warming-potential-is-inconsistent-with-the-physics-of-climate-change-and-misrepresents-the-effects-of-policy-interventions
  42. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/glossary/
  43. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-ii.pdf
  44. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review/methods-for-climate-change-transparency/common-metrics
  45. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_Chapter02.pdf
  46. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references
  47. https://iiasa.ac.at/~riahi/Multigas_Mitigation/Multigas_Mitigation_paper.pdf
  48. https://carboncontainmentlab.org/documents/emission-metrics-explained.pdf
  49. https://climateanalytics.org/comment/understanding-the-paris-agreements-long-term-temperature-goal
  50. https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/downloads/twentyquestions/Q19.pdf
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621001614
  52. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review/reporting-and-review-under-the-paris-agreement/national-inventory-reports
  53. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/Required%2520gases%2520and%2520GWP%2520values_0.pdf
  54. https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools-and-guidance
  55. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-gwps
  56. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0506865102
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2592361/
  58. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01423-6
  59. https://www.cma.gov.cn/en/SciandTech/201310/P020131022607712758238.pdf
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927813500177
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-019-0086-4
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-018-0026-8
  63. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/adca46
  64. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/news/gwp-more-useful-measuring-warming-cause-livestock-methane-emissions
  65. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/4699/2021/
  66. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9
  67. https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-a-new-way-to-assess-global-warming-potential-of-short-lived-pollutants/
  68. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
  69. https://fexa.io/blog/global-warming-potential/
  70. https://climatetrace.org/news/feeling-the-heat-global-warming-potentials-and-20-vs-100
  71. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4928
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.