Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Cryosphere
View on Wikipedia
The cryosphere is an umbrella term for those portions of Earth's surface where water is in solid form. This includes sea ice, ice on lakes or rivers, snow, glaciers, ice caps, ice sheets, and frozen ground (which includes permafrost). Thus, there is an overlap with the hydrosphere. The cryosphere is an integral part of the global climate system. It also has important feedbacks on the climate system. These feedbacks come from the cryosphere's influence on surface energy and moisture fluxes, clouds, the water cycle, atmospheric and oceanic circulation.
Through these feedback processes, the cryosphere plays a significant role in the global climate and in climate model response to global changes. Approximately 10% of the Earth's surface is covered by ice, but this is rapidly decreasing.[2] Current reductions in the cryosphere (caused by climate change) are measurable in ice sheet melt, glaciers decline, sea ice decline, permafrost thaw and snow cover decrease.
Definition and terminology
[edit]The cryosphere describes those portions of Earth's surface where water is in solid form. Frozen water is found on the Earth's surface primarily as snow cover, freshwater ice in lakes and rivers, sea ice, glaciers, ice sheets, and frozen ground and permafrost (permanently frozen ground).
The cryosphere is one of five components of the climate system. The others are the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, the lithosphere and the biosphere.[3]: 1451
The term cryosphere comes from the Greek word kryos, meaning cold, frost or ice and the Greek word sphaira, meaning globe or ball.[4]
Cryospheric sciences is an umbrella term for the study of the cryosphere. As an interdisciplinary Earth science, many disciplines contribute to it, most notably geology, hydrology, and meteorology and climatology; in this sense, it is comparable to glaciology.
The term deglaciation describes the retreat of cryospheric features.
Properties and interactions
[edit]
There are several fundamental physical properties of snow and ice that modulate energy exchanges between the surface and the atmosphere. The most important properties are the surface reflectance (albedo), the ability to transfer heat (thermal diffusivity), and the ability to change state (latent heat). These physical properties, together with surface roughness, emissivity, and dielectric characteristics, have important implications for observing snow and ice from space. For example, surface roughness is often the dominant factor determining the strength of radar backscatter.[5] Physical properties such as crystal structure, density, length, and liquid water content are important factors affecting the transfers of heat and water and the scattering of microwave energy.
Residence time and extent
[edit]The residence time of water in each of the cryospheric sub-systems varies widely. Snow cover and freshwater ice are essentially seasonal, and most sea ice, except for ice in the central Arctic, lasts only a few years if it is not seasonal. A given water particle in glaciers, ice sheets, or ground ice, however, may remain frozen for 10–100,000 years or longer, and deep ice in parts of East Antarctica may have an age approaching 1 million years.[citation needed]
Most of the world's ice volume is in Antarctica, principally in the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. In terms of areal extent, however, Northern Hemisphere winter snow and ice extent comprise the largest area, amounting to an average 23% of hemispheric surface area in January. The large areal extent and the important climatic roles of snow and ice is related to their unique physical properties. This also indicates that the ability to observe and model snow and ice-cover extent, thickness, and physical properties (radiative and thermal properties) is of particular significance for climate research.[6]
Surface reflectance
[edit]The surface reflectance of incoming solar radiation is important for the surface energy balance (SEB). It is the ratio of reflected to incident solar radiation, commonly referred to as albedo. Climatologists are primarily interested in albedo integrated over the shortwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (~300 to 3500 nm), which coincides with the main solar energy input. Typically, albedo values for non-melting snow-covered surfaces are high (~80–90%) except in the case of forests.[citation needed]
The higher albedos for snow and ice cause rapid shifts in surface reflectivity in autumn and spring in high latitudes, but the overall climatic significance of this increase is spatially and temporally modulated by cloud cover. (Planetary albedo is determined principally by cloud cover, and by the small amount of total solar radiation received in high latitudes during winter months.) Summer and autumn are times of high-average cloudiness over the Arctic Ocean so the albedo feedback associated with the large seasonal changes in sea-ice extent is greatly reduced. It was found that snow cover exhibited the greatest influence on Earth's radiative balance in the spring (April to May) period when incoming solar radiation was greatest over snow-covered areas.[7]
Thermal properties of cryospheric elements
[edit]The thermal properties of cryospheric elements also have important climatic consequences.[citation needed] Snow and ice have much lower thermal diffusivities than air. Thermal diffusivity is a measure of the speed at which temperature waves can penetrate a substance. Snow and ice are many orders of magnitude less efficient at diffusing heat than air. Snow cover insulates the ground surface, and sea ice insulates the underlying ocean, decoupling the surface-atmosphere interface with respect to both heat and moisture fluxes. The flux of moisture from a water surface is eliminated by even a thin skin of ice, whereas the flux of heat through thin ice continues to be substantial until it attains a thickness in excess of 30 to 40 cm. However, even a small amount of snow on top of the ice will dramatically reduce the heat flux and slow down the rate of ice growth. The insulating effect of snow also has major implications for the hydrological cycle. In non-permafrost regions, the insulating effect of snow is such that only near-surface ground freezes and deep-water drainage is uninterrupted.[8]
While snow and ice act to insulate the surface from large energy losses in winter, they also act to retard warming in the spring and summer because of the large amount of energy required to melt ice (the latent heat of fusion, 3.34 x 105 J/kg at 0 °C). However, the strong static stability of the atmosphere over areas of extensive snow or ice tends to confine the immediate cooling effect to a relatively shallow layer, so that associated atmospheric anomalies are usually short-lived and local to regional in scale.[9] In some areas of the world such as Eurasia, however, the cooling associated with a heavy snowpack and moist spring soils is known to play a role in modulating the summer monsoon circulation.[10]
Climate change feedback mechanisms
[edit]There are numerous cryosphere-climate feedbacks in the global climate system. These operate over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales from local seasonal cooling of air temperatures to hemispheric-scale variations in ice sheets over time scales of thousands of years. The feedback mechanisms involved are often complex and incompletely understood. For example, Curry et al. (1995) showed that the so-called "simple" sea ice-albedo feedback involved complex interactions with lead fraction, melt ponds, ice thickness, snow cover, and sea-ice extent.[11]
The role of snow cover in modulating the monsoon is just one example of a short-term cryosphere-climate feedback involving the land surface and the atmosphere.[10][citation needed]
Components
[edit]Glaciers and ice sheets
[edit]

Ice sheets and glaciers are flowing ice masses that rest on solid land. They are controlled by snow accumulation, surface and basal melt, calving into surrounding oceans or lakes and internal dynamics. The latter results from gravity-driven creep flow ("glacial flow") within the ice body and sliding on the underlying land, which leads to thinning and horizontal spreading.[13] Any imbalance of this dynamic equilibrium between mass gain, loss and transport due to flow results in either growing or shrinking ice bodies.

Relationships between global climate and changes in ice extent are complex. The mass balance of land-based glaciers and ice sheets is determined by the accumulation of snow, mostly in winter, and warm-season ablation due primarily to net radiation and turbulent heat fluxes to melting ice and snow from warm-air advection[14][15] Where ice masses terminate in the ocean, iceberg calving is the major contributor to mass loss. In this situation, the ice margin may extend out into deep water as a floating ice shelf, such as that in the Ross Sea.
A glacier (US: /ˈɡleɪʃər/; UK: /ˈɡlæsiə/ or /ˈɡleɪsiə/) is a persistent body of dense ice, a form of rock,[16] that is constantly moving downhill under its own weight. A glacier forms where the accumulation of snow exceeds its ablation over many years, often centuries. It acquires distinguishing features, such as crevasses and seracs, as it slowly flows and deforms under stresses induced by its weight. As it moves, it abrades rock and debris from its substrate to create landforms such as cirques, moraines, or fjords. Although a glacier may flow into a body of water, it forms only on land[17][18][19] and is distinct from the much thinner sea ice and lake ice that form on the surface of bodies of water.
On Earth, 99% of glacial ice is contained within vast ice sheets (also known as "continental glaciers") in the polar regions, but glaciers may be found in mountain ranges on every continent other than the Australian mainland, including Oceania's high-latitude oceanic island countries such as New Zealand. Between latitudes 35°N and 35°S, glaciers occur only in the Himalayas, Andes, and a few high mountains in East Africa, Mexico, New Guinea and on Zard-Kuh in Iran.[20] With more than 7,000 known glaciers, Pakistan has more glacial ice than any other country outside the polar regions.[21][22] Glaciers cover about 10% of Earth's land surface. Continental glaciers cover nearly 13 million km2 (5 million sq mi) or about 98% of Antarctica's 13.2 million km2 (5.1 million sq mi), with an average thickness of ice 2,100 m (7,000 ft). Greenland and Patagonia also have huge expanses of continental glaciers.[23] The volume of glaciers, not including the ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland, has been estimated at 170,000 km3.[24]
Glacial ice is the largest reservoir of fresh water on Earth, holding with ice sheets about 69 percent of the world's freshwater.[25][26] Many glaciers from temperate, alpine and seasonal polar climates store water as ice during the colder seasons and release it later in the form of meltwater as warmer summer temperatures cause the glacier to melt, creating a water source that is especially important for plants, animals and human uses when other sources may be scant. However, within high-altitude and Antarctic environments, the seasonal temperature difference is often not sufficient to release meltwater.In glaciology, an ice sheet, also known as a continental glacier,[27] is a mass of glacial ice that covers surrounding terrain and is greater than 50,000 km2 (19,000 sq mi).[28] The only current ice sheets are the Antarctic ice sheet and the Greenland ice sheet. Ice sheets are bigger than ice shelves or alpine glaciers. Masses of ice covering less than 50,000 km2 are termed an ice cap. An ice cap will typically feed a series of glaciers around its periphery.
Although the surface is cold, the base of an ice sheet is generally warmer due to geothermal heat. In places, melting occurs and the melt-water lubricates the ice sheet so that it flows more rapidly. This process produces fast-flowing channels in the ice sheet — these are ice streams.
Even stable ice sheets are continually in motion as the ice gradually flows outward from the central plateau, which is the tallest point of the ice sheet, and towards the margins. The ice sheet slope is low around the plateau but increases steeply at the margins.[29]
Increasing global air temperatures due to climate change take around 10,000 years to directly propagate through the ice before they influence bed temperatures, but may have an effect through increased surface melting, producing more supraglacial lakes. These lakes may feed warm water to glacial bases and facilitate glacial motion.[30]
In previous geologic time spans (glacial periods) there were other ice sheets. During the Last Glacial Period at Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet covered much of North America. In the same period, the Weichselian ice sheet covered Northern Europe and the Patagonian Ice Sheet covered southern South America.Sea ice
[edit]

Sea ice covers much of the polar oceans and forms by freezing of sea water. Satellite data since the early 1970s reveal considerable seasonal, regional, and interannual variability in the sea ice covers of both hemispheres. Seasonally, sea-ice extent in the Southern Hemisphere varies by a factor of 5, from a minimum of 3–4 million km2 in February to a maximum of 17–20 million km2 in September.[31][32] The seasonal variation is much less in the Northern Hemisphere where the confined nature and high latitudes of the Arctic Ocean result in a much larger perennial ice cover, and the surrounding land limits the equatorward extent of wintertime ice. Thus, the seasonal variability in Northern Hemisphere ice extent varies by only a factor of 2, from a minimum of 7–9 million km2 in September to a maximum of 14–16 million km2 in March.[32][33]
The ice cover exhibits much greater regional-scale interannual variability than it does hemispherical. For instance, in the region of the Sea of Okhotsk and Japan, maximum ice extent decreased from 1.3 million km2 in 1983 to 0.85 million km2 in 1984, a decrease of 35%, before rebounding the following year to 1.2 million km2.[32] The regional fluctuations in both hemispheres are such that for any several-year period of the satellite record some regions exhibit decreasing ice coverage while others exhibit increasing ice cover.[34]
Frozen ground and permafrost
[edit]
Permafrost (from perma- 'permanent' and frost) is soil or underwater sediment which continuously remains below 0 °C (32 °F) for two years or more; the oldest permafrost has been continuously frozen for around 700,000 years.[35] Whilst the shallowest permafrost has a vertical extent of below a meter (3 ft), the deepest is greater than 1,500 m (4,900 ft).[36] Similarly, the area of individual permafrost zones may be limited to narrow mountain summits or extend across vast Arctic regions.[37] The ground beneath glaciers and ice sheets is not usually defined as permafrost, so on land, permafrost is generally located beneath a so-called active layer of soil which freezes and thaws depending on the season.[38]
Around 15% of the Northern Hemisphere or 11% of the global surface is underlain by permafrost,[39] covering a total area of around 18 million km2 (6.9 million sq mi).[40] This includes large areas of Alaska, Canada, Greenland, and Siberia. It is also located in high mountain regions, with the Tibetan Plateau being a prominent example. Only a minority of permafrost exists in the Southern Hemisphere, where it is consigned to mountain slopes like in the Andes of Patagonia, the Southern Alps of New Zealand, or the highest mountains of Antarctica.[37][35]
Permafrost contains large amounts of dead biomass that has accumulated throughout millennia without having had the chance to fully decompose and release its carbon, making tundra soil a carbon sink.[37] As global warming heats the ecosystem, frozen soil thaws and becomes warm enough for decomposition to start anew, accelerating the permafrost carbon cycle. Depending on conditions at the time of thaw, decomposition can release either carbon dioxide or methane, and these greenhouse gas emissions act as a climate change feedback.[41][42][43] The emissions from thawing permafrost will have a sufficient impact on the climate to impact global carbon budgets. It is difficult to accurately predict how much greenhouse gases the permafrost releases because the different thaw processes are still uncertain. There is widespread agreement that the emissions will be smaller than human-caused emissions and not large enough to result in runaway warming.[44] Instead, the annual permafrost emissions are likely comparable with global emissions from deforestation, or to annual emissions of large countries such as Russia, the United States or China.[45]Snow cover
[edit]

Most of the Earth's snow-covered area is located in the Northern Hemisphere, and varies seasonally from 46.5 million km2 in January to 3.8 million km2 in August.[46]
Snow cover is an extremely important storage component in the water balance, especially seasonal snowpacks in mountainous areas of the world. Though limited in extent, seasonal snowpacks in the Earth's mountain ranges account for the major source of the runoff for stream flow and groundwater recharge over wide areas of the midlatitudes. For example, over 85% of the annual runoff from the Colorado River basin originates as snowmelt. Snowmelt runoff from the Earth's mountains fills the rivers and recharges the aquifers that over a billion people depend on for their water resources.[citation needed]
Furthermore, over 40% of the world's protected areas are in mountains, attesting to their value both as unique ecosystems needing protection and as recreation areas for humans.[citation needed]
Ice on lakes and rivers
[edit]Ice forms on rivers and lakes in response to seasonal cooling. The sizes of the ice bodies involved are too small to exert anything other than localized climatic effects. However, the freeze-up/break-up processes respond to large-scale and local weather factors, such that considerable interannual variability exists in the dates of appearance and disappearance of the ice. Long series of lake-ice observations can serve as a proxy climate record, and the monitoring of freeze-up and break-up trends may provide a convenient integrated and seasonally-specific index of climatic perturbations. Information on river-ice conditions is less useful as a climatic proxy because ice formation is strongly dependent on river-flow regime, which is affected by precipitation, snow melt, and watershed runoff as well as being subject to human interference that directly modifies channel flow, or that indirectly affects the runoff via land-use practices.[citation needed]
Lake freeze-up depends on the heat storage in the lake and therefore on its depth, the rate and temperature of any inflow, and water-air energy fluxes. Information on lake depth is often unavailable, although some indication of the depth of shallow lakes in the Arctic can be obtained from airborne radar imagery during late winter (Sellman et al. 1975) and spaceborne optical imagery during summer (Duguay and Lafleur 1997). The timing of breakup is modified by snow depth on the ice as well as by ice thickness and freshwater inflow.[citation needed]
Changes caused by climate change
[edit]Ice sheet melt
[edit]
The Greenland ice sheet is an ice sheet which forms the second largest body of ice in the world. It is an average of 1.67 km (1.0 mi) thick and over 3 km (1.9 mi) thick at its maximum.[51] It is almost 2,900 kilometres (1,800 mi) long in a north–south direction, with a maximum width of 1,100 kilometres (680 mi) at a latitude of 77°N, near its northern edge.[52] The ice sheet covers 1,710,000 square kilometres (660,000 sq mi), around 80% of the surface of Greenland, or about 12% of the area of the Antarctic ice sheet.[51] The term 'Greenland ice sheet' is often shortened to GIS or GrIS in scientific literature.[53][54][55][56]
If all 2,900,000 cubic kilometres (696,000 cu mi) of the ice sheet were to melt, it would increase global sea levels by ~7.4 m (24 ft).[51] Global warming between 1.7 °C (3.1 °F) and 2.3 °C (4.1 °F) would likely make this melting inevitable.[56] However, 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) would still cause ice loss equivalent to 1.4 m (4+1⁄2 ft) of sea level rise,[57] and more ice will be lost if the temperatures exceed that level before declining.[56] If global temperatures continue to rise, the ice sheet will likely disappear within 10,000 years.[58][59] At very high warming, its future lifetime goes down to around 1,000 years.[60]
Beneath the Greenland ice sheet are mountains and lake basins.Decline of glaciers
[edit]
The retreat of glaciers since 1850 is a well-documented effect of climate change. The retreat of mountain glaciers provides evidence for the rise in global temperatures since the late 19th century. Examples include mountain glaciers in western North America, Asia, the Alps in central Europe, and tropical and subtropical regions of South America and Africa. Since glacial mass is affected by long-term climatic changes, e.g. precipitation, mean temperature, and cloud cover, glacial mass changes are one of the most sensitive indicators of climate change. The retreat of glaciers is also a major reason for sea level rise. Excluding peripheral glaciers of ice sheets, the total cumulated global glacial losses over the 26 years from 1993 to 2018 were likely 5500 gigatons, or 210 gigatons per year.[70]: 1275
On Earth, 99% of glacial ice is contained within vast ice sheets (also known as "continental glaciers") in the polar regions. Glaciers also exist in mountain ranges on every continent other than the Australian mainland, including Oceania's high-latitude oceanic island countries such as New Zealand. Glacial bodies larger than 50,000 km2 (19,000 sq mi) are called ice sheets.[71] They are several kilometers deep and obscure the underlying topography.Sea ice decline
[edit]
Sea ice reflects 50% to 70% of the incoming solar radiation back into space. Only 6% of incoming solar energy is reflected by the ocean.[73] As the climate warms, the area covered by snow or sea ice decreases. After sea ice melts, more energy is absorbed by the ocean, so it warms up. This ice-albedo feedback is a self-reinforcing feedback of climate change.[74] Large-scale measurements of sea ice have only been possible since satellites came into use.[75]
Sea ice in the Arctic has declined in recent decades in area and volume due to climate change. It has been melting more in summer than it refreezes in winter. The decline of sea ice in the Arctic has been accelerating during the early twenty-first century. It has a rate of decline of 4.7% per decade. It has declined over 50% since the first satellite records.[76][77][78] Ice-free summers are expected to be rare at 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) degrees of warming. They are set to occur at least once every decade with a warming level of 2 °C (3.6 °F).[79]: 8 The Arctic will likely become ice-free at the end of some summers before 2050.[80]: 9
Sea ice extent in Antarctica varies a lot year by year. This makes it difficult to determine a trend, and record highs and record lows have been observed between 2013 and 2023. The general trend since 1979, the start of the satellite measurements, has been roughly flat. Between 2015 and 2023, there has been a decline in sea ice, but due to the high variability, this does not correspond to a significant trend.[81]Permafrost thaw
[edit]Snow cover decrease
[edit]
Studies in 2021 found that Northern Hemisphere snow cover has been decreasing since 1978, along with snow depth.[83] Paleoclimate observations show that such changes are unprecedented over the last millennia in Western North America.[84][85][83]
North American winter snow cover increased during the 20th century,[86][87] largely in response to an increase in precipitation.[88]
Because of its close relationship with hemispheric air temperature, snow cover is an important indicator of climate change.[citation needed]
Global warming is expected to result in major changes to the partitioning of snow and rainfall, and to the timing of snowmelt, which will have important implications for water use and management.[citation needed] These changes also involve potentially important decadal and longer time-scale feedbacks to the climate system through temporal and spatial changes in soil moisture and runoff to the oceans.(Walsh 1995). Freshwater fluxes from the snow cover into the marine environment may be important, as the total flux is probably of the same magnitude as desalinated ridging and rubble areas of sea ice.[89] In addition, there is an associated pulse of precipitated pollutants which accumulate over the Arctic winter in snowfall and are released into the ocean upon ablation of the sea ice.[citation needed]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Cryosphere - Maps and Graphics at UNEP/GRID-Arendal". 2007-08-26. Archived from the original on 2007-08-26. Retrieved 2023-09-25.
- ^ "Global Ice Viewer – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet". climate.nasa.gov. Retrieved 27 November 2021.
- ^ a b Planton, S. (2013). "Annex III: Glossary" (PDF). In Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; Allen, S.K.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P.M. (eds.). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
- ^ σφαῖρα Archived 2017-05-10 at the Wayback Machine, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus
- ^ Hall, Dorothy K. (1985). Remote Sensing of Ice and Snow. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-009-4842-6.
- ^ "Properties of Snow – Our Winter World". ourwinterworld.org. Archived from the original on 2025-01-15. Retrieved 2025-03-06.
- ^ Groisman, Pavel Ya.; Karl, Thomas R.; Knight, Richard W. (14 January 1994). "Observed Impact of Snow Cover on the Heat Balance and the Rise of Continental Spring Temperatures". Science. 263 (5144): 198–200. Bibcode:1994Sci...263..198G. doi:10.1126/science.263.5144.198. PMID 17839175. S2CID 9932394. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- ^ Lynch-Stieglitz, M., 1994: The development and validation of a simple snow model for the GISS GCM. J. Climate, 7, 1842–1855.
- ^ Cohen, J., and D. Rind, 1991: The effect of snow cover on the climate. J. Climate, 4, 689–706.
- ^ a b Vernekar, A. D., J. Zhou, and J. Shukla, 1995: The effect of Eurasian snow cover on the Indian monsoon. J. Climate, 8, 248–266.
- ^ Curry, Judith A.; Schramm, Julie L.; Ebert, Elizabeth E. (1995). "Sea Ice-Albedo Climate Feedback Mechanism". Journal of Climate. 8 (2): 240–247. Bibcode:1995JCli....8..240C. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<0240:SIACFM>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0894-8755.
- ^ Google Maps: Distance between Wildspitze and Hinterer Brochkogel, cf. image scale at lower edge of screen
- ^ Greve, R.; Blatter, H. (2009). Dynamics of Ice Sheets and Glaciers. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2. ISBN 978-3-642-03414-5.
- ^ Paterson, W. S. B., 1993: World sea level and the present mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet. In: W.R. Peltier (ed.), Ice in the Climate System, NATO ASI Series, I12, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 131–140.
- ^ Van den Broeke, M. R., 1996: The atmospheric boundary layer over ice sheets and glaciers. Utrecht, Universitiet Utrecht, 178 pp.
- ^ "Is glacier ice a type of rock?". United States Geological Survey. 26 April 2019. Retrieved 2025-02-06.
- ^ “Glacier, N., Pronunciation.” Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford UP, June 2024, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/7553486115. Accessed 25 Jan. 2025.
- ^ "Glacier Features - Mount Rainier National Park (U.S. National Park Service)". National Park Service. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
- ^ "Geology, Geography, and Meteorology". The Ultimate Family Visual Dictionary. DK Pub. 2012. pp. 286–287. ISBN 978-0-1434-1954-9.
- ^ Post, Austin; LaChapelle, Edward R (2000). Glacier ice. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-97910-6.
- ^ Staff (June 9, 2020). "Millions at risk as melting Pakistan glaciers raise flood fears". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2020-06-09.
- ^ Craig, Tim (2016-08-12). "Pakistan has more glaciers than almost anywhere on Earth. But they are at risk". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2020-09-04.
With 7,253 known glaciers, including 543 in the Chitral Valley, there is more glacial ice in Pakistan than anywhere on Earth outside the polar regions, according to various studies.
- ^ National Geographic Almanac of Geography, 2005, ISBN 0-7922-3877-X, p. 149.
- ^ "170'000 km cube d'eau dans les glaciers du monde". ArcInfo. Aug 6, 2015. Archived from the original on August 17, 2017.
- ^ "Ice, Snow, and Glaciers and the Water Cycle". www.usgs.gov. 8 September 2019. Retrieved 2021-05-25.
- ^ Brown, Molly Elizabeth; Ouyang, Hua; Habib, Shahid; Shrestha, Basanta; Shrestha, Mandira; Panday, Prajjwal; Tzortziou, Maria; Policelli, Frederick; Artan, Guleid; Giriraj, Amarnath; Bajracharya, Sagar R.; Racoviteanu, Adina (November 2010). "HIMALA: Climate Impacts on Glaciers, Snow, and Hydrology in the Himalayan Region". Mountain Research and Development. 30 (4). International Mountain Society: 401–404. Bibcode:2010MRDev..30..401B. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-10-00071.1. hdl:2060/20110015312. S2CID 129545865.
- ^ American Meteorological Society, Glossary of Meteorology Archived 2012-06-23 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Glossary of Important Terms in Glacial Geology". Archived from the original on 2006-08-29. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
- ^ IPCC, 2021: Annex VII: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022.
- ^ Sections 4.5 and 4.6 of Lemke, P.; Ren, J.; Alley, R.B.; Allison, I.; Carrasco, J.; Flato, G.; Fujii, Y.; Kaser, G.; Mote, P.; Thomas, R.H.; Zhang, T. (2007). "Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground" (PDF). In Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor, M.; Miller, H.L. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Zwally, H. J., J. C. Comiso, C. L. Parkinson, W. J. Campbell, F. D. Carsey, and P. Gloersen, 1983: Antarctic Sea Ice, 1973–1976: Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations. NASA SP-459, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., 206 pp.
- ^ a b c Gloersen, P., W. J. Campbell, D. J. Cavalieri, J. C. Comiso, C. L. Parkinson, and H. J. Zwally, 1992: Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice, 1978–1987: Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations and Analysis. NASA SP-511, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., 290 pp.
- ^ Parkinson, C. L., J. C. Comiso, H. J. Zwally, D. J. Cavalieri, P. Gloersen, and W. J. Campbell, 1987: Arctic Sea Ice, 1973–1976: Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations, NASA SP-489, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., 296 pp.
- ^ Parkinson, C. L., 1995: Recent sea-ice advances in Baffin Bay/Davis Strait and retreats in the Bellinshausen Sea. Annals of Glaciology, 21, 348–352.
- ^ a b McGee, David; Gribkoff, Elizabeth (4 August 2022). "Permafrost". MIT Climate Portal. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- ^ "What is Permafrost?". International Permafrost Association. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- ^ a b c Denchak, Melissa (26 June 2018). "Permafrost: Everything You Need to Know". Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- ^ Cooper, M. G.; Zhou, T.; Bennett, K. E.; Bolton, W. R.; Coon, E. T.; Fleming, S. W.; Rowland, J. C.; Schwenk, J. (4 January 2023). "Detecting Permafrost Active Layer Thickness Change From Nonlinear Baseflow Recession". Water Resources Research. 57 (1) e2022WR033154. Bibcode:2023WRR....5933154C. doi:10.1029/2022WR033154. S2CID 255639677.
- ^ Obu, J. (2021). "How Much of the Earth's Surface is Underlain by Permafrost?". Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. 126 (5) e2021JF006123. Bibcode:2021JGRF..12606123O. doi:10.1029/2021JF006123.
- ^ Sayedi, Sayedeh Sara; Abbott, Benjamin W.; Thornton, Brett F.; Frederick, Jennifer M.; Vonk, Jorien E.; Overduin, Paul; Schädel, Christina; Schuur, Edward A. G.; Bourbonnais, Annie; Demidov, Nikita; Gavrilov, Anatoly (22 December 2020). "Subsea permafrost carbon stocks and climate change sensitivity estimated by expert assessment". Environmental Research Letters. 15 (12): B027-08. Bibcode:2020AGUFMB027...08S. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abcc29. hdl:10852/83674. S2CID 234515282.
- ^ Schuur, T. (November 22, 2019). "Permafrost and the Global Carbon Cycle". Natural Resources Defense Council – via NOAA.
- ^ Koven, Charles D.; Ringeval, Bruno; Friedlingstein, Pierre; Ciais, Philippe; Cadule, Patricia; Khvorostyanov, Dmitry; Krinner, Gerhard; Tarnocai, Charles (6 September 2011). "Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (36): 14769–14774. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10814769K. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103910108. PMC 3169129. PMID 21852573.
- ^ Galera, L. A.; Eckhardt, T.; Beer C., Pfeiffer E.-M.; Knoblauch, C. (22 March 2023). "Ratio of in situ CO2 to CH4 production and its environmental controls in polygonal tundra soils of Samoylov Island, Northeastern Siberia". Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 128 (4) e2022JG006956. Bibcode:2023JGRG..12806956G. doi:10.1029/2022JG006956. S2CID 257700504.
- ^ Fox-Kemper, B.; H. T. Hewitt, C. Xiao, G. Aðalgeirsdóttir, S. S. Drijfhout, T. L. Edwards, N. R. Golledge, M. Hemer, R. E. Kopp, G. Krinner, A. Mix, D. Notz, S. Nowicki, I. S. Nurhati, L. Ruiz, J.-B. Sallée, A. B. A. Slangen, and Y. Yu, 2021: Chapter 9: Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V.; P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, pp. 1211–1362.
- ^ Schuur, Edward A. G.; Abbott, Benjamin W.; Commane, Roisin; Ernakovich, Jessica; Euskirchen, Eugenie; Hugelius, Gustaf; Grosse, Guido; Jones, Miriam; Koven, Charlie; Leshyk, Victor; Lawrence, David; Loranty, Michael M.; Mauritz, Marguerite; Olefeldt, David; Natali, Susan; Rodenhizer, Heidi; Salmon, Verity; Schädel, Christina; Strauss, Jens; Treat, Claire; Turetsky, Merritt (2022). "Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks From the Warming Arctic". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 47: 343–371. Bibcode:2022ARER...47..343S. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011847. S2CID 252986002.
- ^ Robinson, D. A., K. F. Dewey, and R. R. Heim, 1993: Global snow cover monitoring: an update. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1689–1696.
- ^ Getting to Know the Cryosphere Archived 15 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Earth Labs
- ^ Thackeray, Chad W.; Derksen, Chris; Fletcher, Christopher G.; Hall, Alex (2019-12-01). "Snow and Climate: Feedbacks, Drivers, and Indices of Change". Current Climate Change Reports. 5 (4): 322–333. Bibcode:2019CCCR....5..322T. doi:10.1007/s40641-019-00143-w. ISSN 2198-6061. S2CID 201675060.
- ^ IPCC, 2019: Technical Summary [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M. Weyer (eds.)]. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.- O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M. Weyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 39–69. doi:10.1017/9781009157964.002
- ^ Beckmann, Johanna; Winkelmann, Ricarda (27 July 2023). "Effects of extreme melt events on ice flow and sea level rise of the Greenland Ice Sheet". The Cryosphere. 17 (7): 3083–3099. Bibcode:2023TCry...17.3083B. doi:10.5194/tc-17-3083-2023.
- ^ a b c "How Greenland would look without its ice sheet". BBC News. 14 December 2017. Archived from the original on 7 December 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
- ^ Greenland Ice Sheet. 24 October 2023. Archived from the original on 30 October 2017. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
- ^ Tan, Ning; Ladant, Jean-Baptiste; Ramstein, Gilles; Dumas, Christophe; Bachem, Paul; Jansen, Eystein (12 November 2018). "Dynamic Greenland ice sheet driven by pCO2 variations across the Pliocene Pleistocene transition". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4755. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07206-w. PMC 6232173. PMID 30420596.
- ^ Noël, B.; van Kampenhout, L.; Lenaerts, J. T. M.; van de Berg, W. J.; van den Broeke, M. R. (19 January 2021). "A 21st Century Warming Threshold for Sustained Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss". Geophysical Research Letters. 48 (5) e2020GL090471. Bibcode:2021GeoRL..4890471N. doi:10.1029/2020GL090471. hdl:2268/301943. S2CID 233632072.
- ^ Höning, Dennis; Willeit, Matteo; Calov, Reinhard; Klemann, Volker; Bagge, Meike; Ganopolski, Andrey (27 March 2023). "Multistability and Transient Response of the Greenland Ice Sheet to Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions". Geophysical Research Letters. 50 (6) e2022GL101827. doi:10.1029/2022GL101827. S2CID 257774870.
- ^ a b c Bochow, Nils; Poltronieri, Anna; Robinson, Alexander; Montoya, Marisa; Rypdal, Martin; Boers, Niklas (18 October 2023). "Overshooting the critical threshold for the Greenland ice sheet". Nature. 622 (7983): 528–536. Bibcode:2023Natur.622..528B. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06503-9. PMC 10584691. PMID 37853149.
- ^ Christ, Andrew J.; Rittenour, Tammy M.; Bierman, Paul R.; Keisling, Benjamin A.; Knutz, Paul C.; Thomsen, Tonny B.; Keulen, Nynke; Fosdick, Julie C.; Hemming, Sidney R.; Tison, Jean-Louis; Blard, Pierre-Henri; Steffensen, Jørgen P.; Caffee, Marc W.; Corbett, Lee B.; Dahl-Jensen, Dorthe; Dethier, David P.; Hidy, Alan J.; Perdrial, Nicolas; Peteet, Dorothy M.; Steig, Eric J.; Thomas, Elizabeth K. (20 July 2023). "Deglaciation of northwestern Greenland during Marine Isotope Stage 11". Science. 381 (6655): 330–335. Bibcode:2023Sci...381..330C. doi:10.1126/science.ade4248. OSTI 1992577. PMID 37471537. S2CID 259985096.
- ^ Armstrong McKay, David; Abrams, Jesse; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Sakschewski, Boris; Loriani, Sina; Fetzer, Ingo; Cornell, Sarah; Rockström, Johan; Staal, Arie; Lenton, Timothy (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points". Science. 377 (6611) eabn7950. doi:10.1126/science.abn7950. hdl:10871/131584. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 36074831. S2CID 252161375. Archived from the original on 14 November 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
- ^ Armstrong McKay, David (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points – paper explainer". climatetippingpoints.info. Archived from the original on 18 July 2023. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
- ^ Aschwanden, Andy; Fahnestock, Mark A.; Truffer, Martin; Brinkerhoff, Douglas J.; Hock, Regine; Khroulev, Constantine; Mottram, Ruth; Khan, S. Abbas (19 June 2019). "Contribution of the Greenland Ice Sheet to sea level over the next millennium". Science Advances. 5 (6): 218–222. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.9396A. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav9396. PMC 6584365. PMID 31223652.
- ^ Lau, Sally C. Y.; Wilson, Nerida G.; Golledge, Nicholas R.; Naish, Tim R.; Watts, Phillip C.; Silva, Catarina N. S.; Cooke, Ira R.; Allcock, A. Louise; Mark, Felix C.; Linse, Katrin (21 December 2023). "Genomic evidence for West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse during the Last Interglacial" (PDF). Science. 382 (6677): 1384–1389. Bibcode:2023Sci...382.1384L. doi:10.1126/science.ade0664. PMID 38127761. S2CID 266436146.
- ^ A. Naughten, Kaitlin; R. Holland, Paul; De Rydt, Jan (23 October 2023). "Unavoidable future increase in West Antarctic ice-shelf melting over the twenty-first century". Nature Climate Change. 13 (11): 1222–1228. Bibcode:2023NatCC..13.1222N. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01818-x. S2CID 264476246.
- ^ Garbe, Julius; Albrecht, Torsten; Levermann, Anders; Donges, Jonathan F.; Winkelmann, Ricarda (2020). "The hysteresis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet". Nature. 585 (7826): 538–544. Bibcode:2020Natur.585..538G. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2727-5. PMID 32968257. S2CID 221885420.
- ^ a b Armstrong McKay, David; Abrams, Jesse; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Sakschewski, Boris; Loriani, Sina; Fetzer, Ingo; Cornell, Sarah; Rockström, Johan; Staal, Arie; Lenton, Timothy (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points". Science. 377 (6611) eabn7950. doi:10.1126/science.abn7950. hdl:10871/131584. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 36074831. S2CID 252161375.
- ^ a b Armstrong McKay, David (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points – paper explainer". climatetippingpoints.info. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
- ^ Fretwell, P.; et al. (28 February 2013). "Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica" (PDF). The Cryosphere. 7 (1): 390. Bibcode:2013TCry....7..375F. doi:10.5194/tc-7-375-2013. S2CID 13129041. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2014.
- ^ Crotti, Ilaria; Quiquet, Aurélien; Landais, Amaelle; Stenni, Barbara; Wilson, David J.; Severi, Mirko; Mulvaney, Robert; Wilhelms, Frank; Barbante, Carlo; Frezzotti, Massimo (10 September 2022). "Wilkes subglacial basin ice sheet response to Southern Ocean warming during late Pleistocene interglacials". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 5328. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.5328C. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32847-3. PMC 9464198. PMID 36088458.
- ^ Pan, Linda; Powell, Evelyn M.; Latychev, Konstantin; Mitrovica, Jerry X.; Creveling, Jessica R.; Gomez, Natalya; Hoggard, Mark J.; Clark, Peter U. (30 April 2021). "Rapid postglacial rebound amplifies global sea level rise following West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse". Science Advances. 7 (18) eabf7787. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.7787P. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf7787. PMC 8087405. PMID 33931453.
- ^ "Vanishing glaciers of Alaska". CBS News. 1 September 2015. Archived from the original on 19 April 2022.
- ^ Fox-Kemper, B., H.T. Hewitt, C. Xiao, G. Aðalgeirsdóttir, S.S. Drijfhout, T.L. Edwards, N.R. Golledge, M. Hemer, R.E. Kopp, G. Krinner, A. Mix, D. Notz, S. Nowicki, I.S. Nurhati, L. Ruiz, J.-B. Sallée, A.B.A. Slangen, and Y. Yu, 2021: Chapter 9: Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, US, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.011.
- ^ "Glossary of Meteorology". American Meteorological Society. Archived from the original on 2012-06-23. Retrieved 2013-01-04.
- ^ Purich, Ariaan; Doddridge, Edward W. (13 September 2023). "Record low Antarctic sea ice coverage indicates a new sea ice state". Communications Earth & Environment. 4 (1): 314. Bibcode:2023ComEE...4..314P. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00961-9. S2CID 261855193.
- ^ "Thermodynamics: Albedo | National Snow and Ice Data Center". nsidc.org. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
- ^ "How does sea ice affect global climate?". NOAA. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
- ^ "Arctic Report Card 2012". NOAA. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 8 May 2013.
- ^ Huang, Yiyi; Dong, Xiquan; Bailey, David A.; Holland, Marika M.; Xi, Baike; DuVivier, Alice K.; Kay, Jennifer E.; Landrum, Laura L.; Deng, Yi (2019-06-19). "Thicker Clouds and Accelerated Arctic Sea Ice Decline: The Atmosphere-Sea Ice Interactions in Spring". Geophysical Research Letters. 46 (12): 6980–6989. Bibcode:2019GeoRL..46.6980H. doi:10.1029/2019gl082791. hdl:10150/634665. ISSN 0094-8276. S2CID 189968828.
- ^ Senftleben, Daniel; Lauer, Axel; Karpechko, Alexey (2020-02-15). "Constraining Uncertainties in CMIP5 Projections of September Arctic Sea Ice Extent with Observations". Journal of Climate. 33 (4): 1487–1503. Bibcode:2020JCli...33.1487S. doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0075.1. ISSN 0894-8755. S2CID 210273007.
- ^ Yadav, Juhi; Kumar, Avinash; Mohan, Rahul (2020-05-21). "Dramatic decline of Arctic sea ice linked to global warming". Natural Hazards. 103 (2): 2617–2621. Bibcode:2020NatHa.103.2617Y. doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04064-y. ISSN 0921-030X. S2CID 218762126.
- ^ IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-24. doi:10.1017/9781009157940.001.
- ^ Fox-Kemper, B., H.T. Hewitt, C. Xiao, G. Aðalgeirsdóttir, S.S. Drijfhout, T.L. Edwards, N.R. Golledge, M. Hemer, R.E. Kopp, G. Krinner, A. Mix, D. Notz, S. Nowicki, I.S. Nurhati, L. Ruiz, J.-B. Sallée, A.B.A. Slangen, and Y. Yu, 2021: Chapter 9: Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, US doi:10.1017/9781009157896.011
- ^ "Understanding climate: Antarctic sea ice extent". NOAA Climate.gov. 14 March 2023. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 2023-03-26.
- ^ Carrer, Marco; Dibona, Raffaella; Prendin, Angela Luisa; Brunetti, Michele (February 2023). "Recent waning snowpack in the Alps is unprecedented in the last six centuries". Nature Climate Change. 13 (2): 155–160. Bibcode:2023NatCC..13..155C. doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01575-3. hdl:11577/3477269. ISSN 1758-6798.
- ^ a b Fox-Kemper, B.; Hewitt, H.T.; Xiao, C.; Aðalgeirsdóttir, G.; Drijfhout, S.S.; Edwards, T.L.; Golledge, N.R.; Hemer, M.; Kopp, R.E.; Krinner, G.; Mix, A. (2021). Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pirani, A.; Connors, S.L.; Péan, C.; Berger, S.; Caud, N.; Chen, Y.; Goldfarb, L. (eds.). "Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change" (PDF). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: 1283–1285. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.011. ISBN 9781009157896.
- ^ Pederson, Gregory T.; Gray, Stephen T.; Woodhouse, Connie A.; Betancourt, Julio L.; Fagre, Daniel B.; Littell, Jeremy S.; Watson, Emma; Luckman, Brian H.; Graumlich, Lisa J. (2011-07-15). "The Unusual Nature of Recent Snowpack Declines in the North American Cordillera". Science. 333 (6040): 332–335. Bibcode:2011Sci...333..332P. doi:10.1126/science.1201570. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 21659569. S2CID 29486298.
- ^ Belmecheri, Soumaya; Babst, Flurin; Wahl, Eugene R.; Stahle, David W.; Trouet, Valerie (2016). "Multi-century evaluation of Sierra Nevada snowpack". Nature Climate Change. 6 (1): 2–3. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6....2B. doi:10.1038/nclimate2809. ISSN 1758-6798.
- ^ Brown, Ross D.; Goodison, Barry E.; Brown, Ross D.; Goodison, Barry E. (1996-06-01). "Interannual Variability in Reconstructed Canadian Snow Cover, 1915–1992". Journal of Climate. 9 (6): 1299–1318. Bibcode:1996JCli....9.1299B. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1299:ivircs>2.0.co;2.
- ^ Hughes, M. G.; Frei, A.; Robinson, D.A. (1996). "Historical analysis of North American snow cover extent: merging satellite and station-derived snow cover observations". Proceedings of the Annual Meeting - Eastern Snow Conference. Williamsburg, Virginia: Eastern Snow Conference. pp. 21–31. ISBN 9780920081181.
- ^ Groisman, P. Ya, and D. R. Easterling, 1994: Variability and trends of total precipitation and snowfall over the United States and Canada. J. Climate, 7, 184–205.
- ^ Prinsenberg, S. J. 1988: Ice-cover and ice-ridge contributions to the freshwater contents of Hudson Bay and Foxe Basin. Arctic, 41, 6–11.
External links
[edit]Cryosphere
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Fundamentals
Definition and Scope
The cryosphere comprises those parts of Earth's surface where water is in frozen form, including continental ice sheets, glaciers, permafrost, seasonal snow cover, river and lake ice, and sea ice.[9][4] This frozen realm exists under sub-zero temperatures that maintain water's solid state, distinguishing it from liquid or vapor phases in the broader hydrosphere.[10] The term "cryosphere" derives from the Greek "kryos," signifying cold, frost, or ice, combined with "sphaira," meaning globe or sphere, thus denoting the planet's cold, icy envelope.[11] Geographically, the cryosphere spans polar regions, high mountain chains, and even mid-latitude areas during winter, occurring in roughly one hundred countries across all latitudes, though concentrated in the Arctic, Antarctic, and alpine zones.[11] Permanent ice from glaciers and ice sheets covers about 10% of Earth's land area, while seasonal elements like snow and sea ice expand its temporary footprint significantly.[5] These components interact dynamically with the atmosphere, oceans, and land, influencing global energy balance through high albedo and freshwater storage—holding approximately 70% of Earth's freshwater reserves.[5][12] The scope excludes atmospheric ice like clouds or hail, focusing solely on surface and near-surface frozen water, which varies in scale from vast Antarctic ice sheets (spanning 14 million km²) to transient river ice formations.[9] This delineation underscores the cryosphere's role as a distinct subsystem within Earth's climate machinery, responsive to thermal forcings yet integral to long-term hydrological cycles.[13]Terminology and Classification
The term cryosphere originates from the Greek word krios, meaning "icy cold," and denotes the portions of Earth's surface where water exists in solid form due to temperatures at or below 0°C, encompassing all frozen elements of the hydrologic cycle.[9] This includes both perennial and seasonal features, such as ice sheets covering vast continental areas and transient snow accumulations.[4] Key components are defined by their physical state, location, and persistence. Ice sheets are expansive masses of land-based ice exceeding 50,000 km² in area, exemplified by the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, which store over 70% of Earth's freshwater as ice.[9] Glaciers and ice caps, smaller than ice sheets, consist of compacted snow that deforms and flows under its own weight; ice caps are distinguished as those under 50,000 km², often atop mountains or plateaus.[9] Sea ice forms from frozen seawater in polar oceans, freezing at approximately -1.8°C due to salinity effects, and is categorized by age into first-year (one season) and multi-year ice.[9] Permafrost refers to ground remaining below 0°C for at least two consecutive years, underlying about 24% of the Northern Hemisphere's land surface, while seasonally frozen ground thaws annually above a permafrost active layer.[9] Snow cover arises from precipitated ice crystals, providing insulation and high albedo, whereas lake and river ice covers freshwater bodies in colder regions.[9] Classification schemes typically divide the cryosphere into terrestrial and marine domains to reflect interactions with land and ocean systems. Terrestrial components include land ice (glaciers, ice sheets, ice caps), frozen ground (permafrost and seasonal frost), and snow cover, which dominate freshwater storage and continental hydrology.[14] Marine components, primarily sea ice, influence ocean circulation and atmospheric heat exchange without contributing to sea-level rise upon melting, unlike land ice.[4] Additional categorizations consider residence time—perennial (e.g., ice sheets, permafrost) versus seasonal (e.g., snow cover, river ice)—or by form, such as freshwater ice (lakes, rivers) distinct from saline sea ice.[14] These distinctions aid in monitoring cryospheric responses to temperature variations, with organizations like the Global Cryosphere Watch standardizing terminology across components including snow, freshwater ice, glaciers, ice sheets, and permafrost.[14]Physical Properties
Thermal and Mechanical Properties
Ice in the cryosphere exhibits distinct thermal properties that influence heat transfer and phase changes. Pure ice has a specific heat capacity of approximately 2.097 J/g/K at 0°C, decreasing to 1.741 J/g/K at -50°C, which is roughly half that of liquid water.[15] Its thermal conductivity is about 2.3 W/m/K, enabling efficient conduction compared to air but varying with impurities and temperature.[16] The latent heat of fusion for ice is 334 kJ/kg, absorbing significant energy during melting without temperature change, a process critical to cryospheric energy balances.[16] Snow and firn display lower thermal conductivities due to their porous structures, acting as insulators. Snow's thermal conductivity ranges from 0.33 to 0.47 W/m/K, with a median of 0.39 W/m/K in Arctic conditions, reducing heat flux from underlying surfaces to the atmosphere by up to orders of magnitude relative to bare ground.[17] Firn, transitional between snow and ice, has conductivity increasing with density, reaching up to 2.4 W/m/K at ice densities, affecting heat diffusion in ice sheets.[18] Sea ice incorporates brine pockets, lowering effective conductivity and altering latent heat transfer during freeze-thaw cycles.[19] In permafrost regions, snow cover's insulation preserves ground ice by limiting winter conductive heat loss, with conductivity schemes varying by snow type influencing modeled permafrost stability.[20] Mechanically, cryospheric ice behaves as a viscoelastic material, combining elastic, delayed elastic, and viscous responses under stress.[21] Glacier ice deforms primarily through creep, following Glen's flow law where strain rate is proportional to the third power of deviatoric stress, enabling slow plastic flow over geological timescales.[22] At low strain rates, viscous creep dominates, while higher rates induce brittle fracture or elastic behavior, as seen in sea ice floe interactions.[23] Polycrystalline ice strength depends on grain size, fabric, and temperature; colder ice (-50°C) resists deformation more than temperate ice near 0°C due to reduced dislocation mobility.[24] Brine inclusions in sea ice weaken mechanical integrity, promoting frictional sliding and ridging under compressive forces.[25] These properties govern cryospheric dynamics, from glacier surging to sea ice pack deformation, with flow laws calibrated against laboratory data spanning 70 years confirming non-linear viscous rheology for ice sheets.[22]Extent, Volume, and Residence Time
The cryosphere encompasses diverse frozen components with varying spatial extents. The Antarctic Ice Sheet covers approximately 14 million km², while the Greenland Ice Sheet spans about 1.71 million km².[26] Glaciers and ice caps outside these major ice sheets occupy roughly 706,000 to 726,000 km² globally.[27] Permafrost underlies 14 to 23 million km² in the Northern Hemisphere, representing 15% to 24% of exposed land there.[28] [29] Sea ice extent varies seasonally: Arctic averages 14-15 million km² at winter maximum and 4-5 million km² at summer minimum, while Antarctic reaches 17-18 million km² maximum and 2-3 million km² minimum.[30] [31] Northern Hemisphere snow cover averages 24 million km² annually.[32] Ice volumes are dominated by continental ice sheets. The Antarctic Ice Sheet holds about 26.5 million km³, equivalent to 58 meters of global sea level rise if fully melted. The Greenland Ice Sheet contains approximately 2.9 million km³, corresponding to 7.4 meters sea level equivalent.[33] Glaciers outside ice sheets store 158,000 to 170,000 km³, or 0.32 to 0.4 meters sea level equivalent after adjusting for bedrock below sea level.[34] [35] Sea ice volumes are smaller and seasonal, with Arctic peaks around 15,000-20,000 km³ and Antarctic higher but variable. Permafrost ground ice volume is estimated in tens of thousands of km³ but dispersed in soil. Total land ice volume exceeds 29 million km³, primarily from ice sheets.[6] Residence times differ markedly across components, reflecting formation and persistence timescales. Snow cover persists seasonally, from days to months. Sea ice has residence times of 1 to 10 years, with first-year ice turning over annually and older multi-year ice rarer. Glaciers exhibit decadal to centennial turnover, depending on size and location. Ice sheets involve millennial to multimillennial scales, with deep interior ice aged tens of thousands of years. Permafrost can remain frozen for thousands to millions of years, though active layer thaws annually.[36] These timescales influence cryospheric responses to climatic forcing, with shorter-residence elements more sensitive to annual variations.Surface Properties
The surfaces of cryospheric components exhibit high albedo, typically reflecting 50% to 90% of incoming solar radiation, which plays a critical role in Earth's energy balance by limiting absorption of shortwave radiation. Fresh snow albedo ranges from 0.80 to 0.90, while snow-covered sea ice can reach up to 0.90, enhancing reflectivity compared to bare ice. Bare sea ice albedo is generally 0.65 to 0.70, decreasing to 0.5 or lower during melt seasons due to ponding, grain metamorphism, and impurities like black carbon that reduce reflectivity.[37][19][38] Albedo variations are influenced by factors such as solar zenith angle, surface microstructure, and wavelength, with small-scale roughness potentially lowering total albedo by up to 0.10 through increased multiple scattering and trapping of light.[39] Aerodynamic surface roughness, quantified by the roughness length , governs momentum and heat exchange between the cryosphere and atmosphere, affecting turbulent fluxes in models of snowpack evolution and ice-atmosphere interactions. For fresh snow under rough flow conditions, averages approximately 0.24 mm, while smoother surfaces like interior ice sheets exhibit values as low as m, escalating to m over hummocky or sastrugi-formed terrain.[40][41] These parameters are derived from field measurements and eddy covariance data, underscoring the need for site-specific parameterization in simulations, as dynamic roughness alters snowpack thermal profiles and ablation rates.[42] In the thermal infrared, cryospheric surfaces display high emissivity, approximating blackbody behavior and facilitating efficient longwave radiation emission. Snow and ice emissivity reaches 0.98 to 0.99, enabling accurate retrieval of surface skin temperatures from satellite infrared sensors, though values vary slightly with grain size, viewing angle, and contaminants.[43] This property contrasts with lower microwave emissivities used in sea ice detection, highlighting wavelength-dependent radiative behavior essential for remote sensing and energy budget calculations.[44]Components of the Cryosphere
Glaciers and Ice Sheets
Glaciers form where the accumulation of snow exceeds melting and sublimation over multiple years, leading to the compaction of snow into ice that deforms plastically and flows downslope under its own weight due to gravity. This flow occurs through internal deformation of ice crystals and basal sliding over the underlying terrain, with rates varying from centimeters to hundreds of meters per year depending on slope, thickness, and temperature. Ice sheets represent the largest class of glaciers, defined as contiguous ice masses exceeding 50,000 km² that blanket entire continents or large islands, overriding underlying topography and spreading radially outward from high-elevation domes. The two extant ice sheets are the Antarctic Ice Sheet and the Greenland Ice Sheet, which together store approximately 68% of global fresh water and influence regional climate through albedo effects and freshwater discharge. The Antarctic Ice Sheet covers about 13.61 million km², encompassing nearly 98% of the Antarctic continent, with an average thickness of 1.9 km and maximum depths exceeding 4.5 km in East Antarctica. Its volume totals roughly 26.5 million km³, equivalent to 58.3 meters of global mean sea level rise if fully melted. The East Antarctic Ice Sheet, comprising 80% of the total, is largely stable or gaining mass in interior regions due to increased snowfall, while the West Antarctic Ice Sheet shows greater variability and net loss primarily from enhanced iceberg calving and surface melting. Mass balance assessments from satellite altimetry, gravimetry, and input-output methods indicate a net loss of 2,720 ± 1,390 gigatons from 1992 to 2020, with the rate accelerating to 142 ± 49 Gt yr⁻¹ in the 2010s, though uncertainties remain high due to challenges in partitioning accumulation changes and oceanic forcing. These losses contribute to sea level rise but are modulated by compensatory snowfall increases linked to warmer atmospheric moisture capacity. The Greenland Ice Sheet spans 1.71 million km², with an average thickness of 1.6 km and maxima up to 3.4 km near the summit. Its volume is approximately 2.96 million km³, corresponding to 7.4 meters of sea level equivalent. Unlike Antarctica, Greenland experiences significant surface melting in summer, amplified by albedo feedback from melt ponds, with mass loss dominated by runoff (about 50%) and calving (about 50%) in recent decades. The Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE) reports a cumulative loss of 4,890 Gt from 1992 to 2020, with an average rate of 169 Gt yr⁻¹ increasing to 234 Gt yr⁻¹ after 2010, driven by marine-terminating outlet glaciers' rapid retreat and thinning. Interior accumulation has risen slightly from enhanced precipitation, offsetting some peripheral losses, but net imbalance persists, with gravimetric data confirming acceleration linked to submarine melting from Atlantic Water intrusion. Beyond ice sheets, glaciers number approximately 215,000 worldwide outside Antarctica and Greenland, covering a total area of about 680,000 km² as of inventories from the early 2000s, though ongoing retreat has reduced this extent. These include valley glaciers, ice caps, and piedmont glaciers primarily in mountain ranges like the Alps, Himalayas, Andes, and Alaska, where they respond sensitively to temperature and precipitation changes. Global glacier mass loss averaged -1.0 m water equivalent per year from 2000 to 2019, totaling over 21,000 Gt, equivalent to 58 mm of sea level rise, with acceleration in low-latitude regions due to reduced accumulation and increased melt. Observations from repeat airborne and satellite surveys, such as those by NASA's Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) mission, highlight causal drivers including black carbon deposition lowering albedo and geothermal heat flux beneath thin ice. Regional variations exist, with some temperate glaciers showing surging behavior from hydrological feedbacks, underscoring that mass balance is not uniformly negative but governed by local topography and microclimate.| Major Ice Masses | Area (million km²) | Volume (million km³) | Sea Level Equivalent (m) | Primary Mass Loss Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antarctic Ice Sheet | 13.61 | 26.5 | 58.3 | Calving and basal melt |
| Greenland Ice Sheet | 1.71 | 2.96 | 7.4 | Surface melt and calving |
| Non-polar Glaciers | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.63 | Surface ablation |
Sea Ice
Sea ice consists of frozen seawater that forms and floats on the ocean surface in polar regions. It develops through the freezing of seawater, which occurs at temperatures below -1.8°C due to the presence of salts, lower than the freezing point of pure water at 0°C.[45][46] This process rejects brine, creating a porous structure with lower salinity than the underlying ocean water, typically around 4-5 parts per thousand compared to seawater's 35.[47] Sea ice exhibits pronounced seasonal variability, expanding during winter and contracting in summer in both the Arctic and Antarctic. In the Arctic Ocean, which is semi-enclosed, sea ice reaches its maximum extent in March, covering up to 14-16 million square kilometers historically, and minimum in September. The Antarctic, surrounding the continent, sees maximum extent in September, historically around 18-20 million square kilometers, and minimum in February. Multi-year ice persists in the Arctic, while Antarctic sea ice is predominantly annual.[45][48] Physically, sea ice has a density of about 920 kg/m³, causing it to float with roughly 10% above water. Thickness varies from thin nilas (centimeters) to deformed ridges exceeding 10 meters, though average Arctic thickness is 1-3 meters and Antarctic 0.5-1 meter. Its high albedo, ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 for snow-covered ice, contrasts sharply with the ocean's 0.06, reflecting most incoming solar radiation. Sea ice also insulates the underlying ocean, limiting winter heat loss to the atmosphere by up to 90%.[19][49] Observed trends show Arctic sea ice extent declining markedly since satellite records began in 1979, with summer minima decreasing at approximately 13% per decade. The 2025 Arctic maximum extent on March 22 was the lowest in the 47-year record, while the September minimum of 4.60 million square kilometers ranked among the ten lowest. Antarctic trends were modestly positive until the mid-2010s but have since shown variability with recent record lows; the 2025 maximum of 17.81 million square kilometers on September 30 was the third lowest on record. Volume estimates indicate Arctic losses exceeding 50% since 1979, driven primarily by thinning.[50][51][52] In the climate system, sea ice modulates energy exchanges by enhancing planetary albedo, reducing absorbed solar heat in polar regions. Its retreat amplifies warming via the ice-albedo feedback, where exposed darker ocean absorbs more radiation, further melting ice. Additionally, sea ice formation drives thermohaline circulation through brine rejection, producing dense water that sinks and contributes to global ocean overturning. It barriers wind-driven mixing and influences atmospheric moisture and salinity fluxes.[19][53][47]Permafrost and Frozen Ground
Permafrost consists of soil, sediment, rock, and included ice or organic material that remains at or below 0°C continuously for at least two consecutive years.[54][55] This perennial frozen state distinguishes it from seasonally frozen ground, which thaws annually and freezes for more than 15 days per year, or intermittently frozen ground that freezes for fewer than 15 days.[54][56] Above the permafrost lies the active layer, a surface zone that thaws during summer and refreezes in winter, typically ranging from 30 cm to several meters in depth depending on climate, vegetation, and soil properties.[57] Permafrost underlies approximately 14 to 16 million km² of the Northern Hemisphere's exposed land surface, equivalent to about 15% of the total, with continuous permafrost in polar regions and discontinuous or sporadic zones toward lower latitudes and elevations.[28][58] It also occurs in subsea sediments beneath Arctic continental shelves, high mountain ranges like the Alps and Rockies, and limited areas in Antarctica.[54] Ground ice within permafrost exists in forms such as pore ice filling sediment voids, segregated ice lenses formed by water migration, and massive ice wedges or blocks resulting from thermal contraction cracks. Ice content varies widely, from ice-poor dry permafrost to ice-rich layers exceeding 90% ice volume by weight in some Arctic lowlands, influencing stability and thaw susceptibility.[59] Permafrost regions store an estimated 1,460 to 1,700 petagrams of organic carbon, roughly twice the amount currently in Earth's atmosphere, accumulated over millennia in frozen soils and peat.[60][61] Thawing permafrost, driven by rising air temperatures, can release this carbon as carbon dioxide and methane through microbial decomposition, potentially amplifying global warming, while also causing ground subsidence, thermokarst lake formation, and infrastructure instability in affected areas.[57][62] Recent observations indicate active layer thickening and permafrost temperature increases of up to 0.3–0.4°C per decade in continuous zones since the 1980s.[57]Snow Cover and Seasonal Ice
Snow cover constitutes the seasonal accumulation of solidified precipitation on terrestrial surfaces, forming a transient yet extensive component of the cryosphere that influences regional albedo, hydrology, and energy budgets. In the Northern Hemisphere, where the majority of seasonal snow occurs, maximum extent typically reaches 46 to 47 million square kilometers during January, covering roughly 10% of the land surface and spanning Eurasia and North America.[63][64] Minimum extent contracts to about 2 million square kilometers by late summer, primarily residual in high-latitude or high-elevation regions.[64] Southern Hemisphere snow cover remains limited, averaging 0.5 to 2 million square kilometers annually, concentrated in the Andes, Patagonia, and Antarctic coastal areas during austral winter.[65] Satellite observations, initiated in 1967 by NOAA and processed by Rutgers University's Global Snow Lab, provide the primary record of Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent (SCE), combining weekly charts from 1967 to 1999 with daily visible-band imagery thereafter.[66] These data reveal a pronounced seasonal cycle, with accumulation driven by winter precipitation and ablation governed by spring warming, resulting in snow persistence durations of 100 to 250 days across mid-to-high latitudes.[67] Regional variations are stark: Eurasia hosts over 60% of NH maximum SCE due to vast continental interiors, while North American cover correlates more closely with mid-latitude storm tracks.[65] Snow water equivalent (SWE), a measure of stored water volume, peaks at 200 to 500 millimeters in continental interiors but exhibits high interannual variability tied to precipitation anomalies.[68] Seasonal ice, encompassing ephemeral formations such as ice crusts, depth hoar layers within snowpacks, and aufeis (spring-fed ice sheets in permafrost margins), integrates with snow cover to modulate subsurface heat exchange and runoff.[11] These features arise from freeze-thaw cycles, with ice lenses forming via capillary action in porous snow or soil, enhancing structural stability but accelerating melt through insulation effects. In Arctic and subarctic zones, seasonal ground ice contributes to active layer dynamics, thawing annually to depths of 0.3 to 2 meters while preserving underlying permafrost.[9] Observational trends from 1981 to 2018 indicate negative SCE anomalies in the Northern Hemisphere across all months, with rates exceeding 50,000 square kilometers per year in November, December, March, and May, attributed to warmer spring temperatures advancing melt onset by 1 to 2 weeks per decade in many regions.[65] April snow mass, a proxy for pre-melt storage, declined 4.3% per decade through 2016, reflecting reduced accumulation efficiency amid variable precipitation.[68] However, annual maximum SCE exhibits relative stability since the 1970s, with fluctuations linked to large-scale modes like the North Atlantic Oscillation rather than monotonic decline.[64] These patterns underscore snow cover's sensitivity to hemispheric circulation shifts, with low-elevation sites showing more pronounced reductions than high-elevation refugia.[69] Monitoring continues via passive microwave sensors (e.g., SSM/I) for all-weather SWE estimates and MODIS optical data for fractional cover, enabling detection of sub-grid variability down to 500-meter resolution.[70]Lake and River Ice
Lake and river ice forms on inland water bodies in regions where sustained subfreezing air temperatures cause surface cooling and eventual solidification, typically in the Northern Hemisphere's higher latitudes and altitudes.[71] This seasonal ice cover influences local heat exchange, hydrological regimes, and ecosystems by insulating water from atmospheric conditions during winter.[72] Unlike perennial cryospheric components such as glaciers, lake and river ice undergoes annual freeze-up, maximum extent, and break-up cycles driven primarily by air temperature thresholds around 0°C, modulated by factors like water depth, currents, snowfall, and solar radiation.[73] The phenological cycle begins with freeze-up, when ice nucleation spreads across the surface, often starting in shallow margins and progressing inward; this process can take days to weeks depending on turbulence and wind.[74] Maximum ice thickness, typically 0.5–2 meters in temperate lakes and thinner on fast-flowing rivers, accumulates through thermodynamic growth and snow loading before break-up initiates via rising temperatures, melting, and mechanical forces like wave action or ice jams.[75] Ice duration varies regionally: in subarctic zones, it spans 4–6 months, while in milder climates like the Great Lakes, it averages 2–3 months with interannual variability tied to winter severity.[76] Historical records, compiled in databases like the Global Lake and River Ice Phenology Database encompassing 865 sites, reveal consistent trends toward diminished ice seasons across the Northern Hemisphere.[77] Analysis of 3510 time series from 678 water bodies indicates later freeze-up dates by approximately 1–2 days per decade and earlier break-up by 2–3 days per decade over the 20th century, shortening ice-covered periods by 2–5 days per decade on average.[71] Longer paleorecords, some extending to the 16th century, show initial reductions in ice cover accelerating post-1850, with a notable regime shift in North American lakes around the late 1980s coinciding with amplified warming.[78][79] For rivers, 56% of monitored segments exhibit delayed freeze-up by 2.7 days per decade, though trends are less uniform due to hydrological influences like flow velocity.[80] Monitoring employs a mix of in-situ observations, such as thermistor chains and visual logs, alongside remote sensing techniques including passive microwave radiometry for freeze-thaw detection and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for mapping ice extent and thickness.[81][82] Satellite datasets, like ESA's Climate Change Initiative lake ice records since 2001, provide near-global coverage at resolutions down to 250–500 meters, enabling daily tracking of ice phenology.[83] Web-based cameras and unmanned aerial vehicles supplement these for real-time river ice dynamics, particularly jam formation risks.[84][85] These methods confirm ongoing declines, with projections under warming scenarios estimating 10–28 additional days of ice loss per century in vulnerable regions.[79]Role in Global Systems
Climate Feedbacks
The cryosphere exerts significant influence on Earth's climate through various feedback mechanisms, predominantly positive ones that amplify warming. These feedbacks arise from interactions between ice, snow, permafrost, and atmospheric processes, altering energy balances and greenhouse gas concentrations. Empirical observations and modeling indicate that reductions in cryospheric extent enhance radiative forcing, with albedo changes and carbon releases contributing substantially to global temperature sensitivity.[86] A primary feedback is the ice-albedo effect, where melting of high-albedo surfaces like sea ice and snow exposes darker ocean or land, increasing solar absorption and accelerating melt. In the Arctic, sea ice loss has decreased regional albedo by approximately 3% per decade in August, intensifying local warming through this positive loop. Ice sheet-albedo feedback alone amplifies the total climate feedback parameter by 42%, equivalent to 0.55 W/m² per Kelvin of warming. Cloud-albedo interactions further enhance Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity in recent climate models.[87][88][89] Permafrost thaw triggers a carbon feedback by releasing stored organic matter as CO₂ and CH₄ upon decomposition, potentially adding 6 to 118 petagrams of carbon by 2100 under varying scenarios. This process is gradual, spanning decades to centuries, and is regulated by soil temperature, carbon quantity, and ice content, with abrupt thaw events exacerbating emissions in vulnerable regions like Siberia. Such releases could reduce carbon budgets for limiting warming to 1.5°C or 2°C by up to 20-22%.[90][91][92][93] Additional feedbacks include ice sheet elevation changes, where surface lowering reduces atmospheric lapse rates, exposing ice to warmer air and hastening mass loss, as seen in Greenland simulations. Sea ice decline also perturbs ocean circulation and moisture fluxes, potentially altering cloud cover and hemispheric energy transport. While some negative feedbacks exist, such as increased freshwater stabilizing stratification, positive mechanisms dominate, contributing to polar amplification observed since the 20th century.[94][86]Hydrological and Biogeochemical Cycles
The cryosphere constitutes a primary reservoir in the Earth's hydrological cycle, storing roughly 69% of global freshwater, with the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets alone accounting for over 68% of this total.[33] Glaciers, seasonal snow cover, and permafrost further regulate water distribution by sequestering precipitation in solid form and releasing it via melt processes, which influence river discharge, groundwater infiltration, and ocean salinity gradients.[95] In high-latitude and mountain catchments, cryospheric melt synchronizes peak freshwater availability with periods of highest demand, such as summer low-precipitation seasons, thereby stabilizing downstream hydrologic regimes.[96] Seasonal snowpacks, in particular, accumulate winter snowfall—equivalent to 10-20% of annual precipitation in many mid-latitude basins—and release it gradually in spring, functioning as a temporal buffer that supports irrigation, hydropower, and ecosystems for more than one-sixth of the world's population.[97] Glacial melt contributes baseflow to proglacial rivers, with rates varying by region; for instance, in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya, it supplies 10-30% of annual discharge to major rivers like the Indus and Ganges during dry months.[98] Perturbations, such as earlier snowmelt or glacier mass loss, observed at rates of 200-300 Gt per year globally since the 1990s, can advance peak runoff timing by 1-4 weeks, compressing the hydrograph and increasing flood risks while exacerbating late-season deficits.[99] In biogeochemical cycles, the cryosphere exerts control over carbon storage and flux, with permafrost soils containing an estimated 900-1,000 Gt of organic carbon in the upper 3 meters alone, vulnerable to decomposition upon thaw.[100] Thawing exposes this material to microbial oxidation, releasing CO₂ and CH₄; field measurements indicate efflux rates of 1-2 Gt C per year from Arctic permafrost regions, with deeper destabilization potentially mobilizing additional hundreds of Gt over centuries.[60] Sea ice modulates ocean carbon uptake by limiting vertical mixing and gas exchange, reducing CO₂ solubility in underlying waters during winter expansion; its decline correlates with enhanced primary production but variable net carbon sequestration due to stratification effects.[101] Glacial meltwaters deliver micronutrients like bioavailable iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) to coastal oceans via sediment-laden runoff, fertilizing phytoplankton blooms in high-nutrient, low-Fe environments such as the Southern Ocean, where inputs from icebergs alone may supply 0.1-0.5 μmol Fe per liter in melt plumes.[102] However, retreating tidewater glaciers reduce fine-particle ("rock flour") production from bedrock abrasion, potentially lowering nutrient concentrations in discharge by 20-50% per unit volume, as evidenced by Alaskan fjord observations from 2010-2020.[103] Permafrost degradation further perturbs nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, with thaw mobilizing 10-50 kg N per hectare annually into Arctic rivers, elevating export to shelves and risking downstream eutrophication.[95] These dynamics underscore the cryosphere's dual role as stabilizer and potential amplifier in elemental cycling, contingent on thaw extent and microbial response rates.Sea Level and Ocean Dynamics
The land-based components of the cryosphere, principally glaciers and ice sheets, drive barystatic sea level rise by transferring solid ice mass into ocean water upon melting, distinct from steric rise caused by thermal expansion of seawater.[104] Sea ice, being afloat, contributes negligibly to global mean sea level changes, as its melt displaces equivalent volume without net mass addition.[19] Empirical assessments from satellite gravimetry, such as NASA's GRACE-FO mission, quantify ice sheet mass losses as a primary barystatic driver: the Greenland Ice Sheet averaged 266 ± unknown gigatons per year (Gt/yr) of net loss in recent years, equating to approximately 0.73 mm/yr of sea level equivalent after accounting for the conversion factor of roughly 362 Gt per mm.[105] The Antarctic Ice Sheet contributed an average of 135 Gt/yr, or about 0.37 mm/yr.[105] Glaciers and ice caps outside the major sheets add another ~0.7 mm/yr collectively, making land cryosphere melt responsible for over half of barystatic rise, which forms roughly 40-50% of total observed global mean sea level increase (around 3.7 mm/yr from 2006-2018).[34] Variability persists; for instance, Greenland's 2024 mass loss dropped to 55 ± 35 Gt due to elevated snowfall, the lowest since 2013, underscoring the role of precipitation in modulating annual balances.[26] Cryospheric meltwater inputs influence ocean dynamics by injecting low-salinity freshwater into high-latitude surface layers, reducing density and promoting stratification that inhibits vertical mixing and deep-water formation.[106] In the Arctic and North Atlantic, this freshening—exacerbated by both land ice discharge and sea ice melt—alters the thermohaline circulation, potentially weakening the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) by limiting convective sinking of saline water.[107] Observations indicate Arctic surface salinity declines of 0.1-0.5 practical salinity units per decade in recent decades, correlating with increased runoff and ice loss, which sustains shallower haloclines and shifts heat transport patterns.[106] Antarctic contributions, though smaller in freshwater volume, similarly affect Weddell and Ross Sea polynyas, where melt-driven circulation enhances basal melting under ice shelves while exporting freshwater southward, influencing Southern Ocean overturning and global carbon uptake efficiency.[108] These density perturbations propagate via wave adjustments, with modeled and observed responses showing reduced poleward heat fluxes in stratified scenarios, though empirical quantification remains challenged by sparse polar observations and model uncertainties in eddy-resolving simulations.[109]Historical Evolution
Geological Timescales
The cryosphere has exhibited episodic expansions and contractions over Earth's 4.5 billion-year history, primarily during periods of global cooling driven by factors such as atmospheric CO₂ drawdown, continental configurations, and orbital variations. Evidence for ancient glaciations derives from sedimentary deposits including tillites, striated pavements, and dropstones in rock records, corroborated by oxygen isotope ratios in marine sediments indicating expanded ice volumes. The oldest documented glaciations occurred during the Huronian Supergroup in North America, dated to approximately 2.4 to 2.1 billion years ago (Ga), associated with the Great Oxidation Event that reduced greenhouse gases via oxygen-mediated weathering.[110] In the Neoproterozoic Era, the Cryogenian Period (720 to 635 million years ago, Ma) featured severe "Snowball Earth" events, with the Sturtian glaciation spanning roughly 720 to 660 Ma and the Marinoan from 650 to 635 Ma, evidenced by equatorial glacial deposits and cap carbonates signaling rapid post-glacial warming. These episodes involved near-global ice cover, potentially down to sea level at low latitudes, as inferred from geological proxies like banded iron formations and paleomagnetic data. Paleozoic glaciations included the Late Ordovician (around 450 to 440 Ma) and the extensive Carboniferous-Permian (Karoo) Ice Age (360 to 260 Ma), linked to supercontinent assembly (Gondwana) and vascular plant evolution enhancing silicate weathering, with tillites preserved across southern continents. Mesozoic records show minimal cryospheric persistence, with hothouse conditions limiting ice to transient mountain glaciers.[111][112] The Cenozoic Era marks the establishment of modern polar cryosphere components, initiating the Late Cenozoic Ice Age around 34 Ma with the onset of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, driven by Drake Passage opening, thermal isolation of Antarctica, and declining CO₂ levels below 600 ppm, as evidenced by benthic foraminiferal δ¹⁸O shifts and fossil wood assemblages indicating permanent glaciation in East Antarctica by 33.7 Ma. Northern Hemisphere glaciation emerged later, with initial alpine ice around 7-5 Ma in late Miocene, intensifying to continental ice sheets by 3.3 to 2.7 Ma during the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition, tied to Panama Isthmus closure altering ocean circulation and further CO₂ decline. The Quaternary Period (2.58 Ma to present) encompasses 50+ glacial-interglacial cycles, with ice sheets covering up to 30% of land surface at maxima, reconstructed from marine sediment cores and cosmogenic nuclides. Permafrost and seasonal snow likely expanded concurrently with these glaciations, though direct geological evidence is sparser due to post-thaw erosion.[113][114][115]Paleoclimate Records from Cryosphere
Ice cores from polar ice sheets provide high-resolution paleoclimate records spanning hundreds of thousands of years, capturing temperature variations through stable isotopes like deuterium (δD) and oxygen-18 (δ¹⁸O), atmospheric composition via trapped gas bubbles, and dust flux as indicators of aridity.[116] In Antarctica, the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dome C core extends to 800,000 years before present (BP), revealing eight glacial-interglacial cycles with temperature shifts of up to 10°C between cold stadials and warm interglacials, corroborated by CO₂ concentrations fluctuating between 180 and 300 ppm.[117] Greenland cores, such as GISP2 and GRIP, offer records up to approximately 110,000 years BP with finer millennial-scale variability, including Dansgaard-Oeschger events characterized by abrupt warmings of 8-15°C over decades followed by gradual coolings.[118] [119] Glacial moraines and erratics serve as terrestrial proxies for past glacier extents, dated via cosmogenic nuclides like ¹⁰Be to reconstruct timings of ice advances during cold phases.[120] In tropical and mid-latitude regions, such as the Andes and Alps, moraine chronologies indicate synchronized glacier maxima around 20,000-18,000 years BP during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), aligning with global ice volume peaks and lowered sea levels of 120-130 meters.[121] These records highlight regional responses to orbital forcings, with deglaciation phases correlating to rising insolation and atmospheric CO₂, though local topography modulates response times.[122] Permafrost sequences preserve multiproxy evidence of past ground thermal regimes, including ice-wedge polygons for extreme winter cold, fossil pollen for vegetation shifts, and stable isotopes in syngenetic ice for precipitation sources.[123] Reconstructions from Arctic lowlands show widespread permafrost during the LGM, with aggradation rates exceeding 1 mm/year, but highly restricted near-surface permafrost during warmer interglacials like the Eemian (130,000-115,000 years BP), where proxy data indicate thaw depths exceeding modern limits.[124] In alpine settings, thermokarst lake sediments from the Last Interglacial reveal pollen assemblages suggesting warmer, wetter conditions with reduced ice-cemented permafrost, challenging models of uniform high-latitude freezing.[125] Snow cover duration reconstructions, often derived from tree-ring width and maximum latewood density in high-elevation conifers sensitive to melt-out dates, extend records back several centuries to millennia.[126] In the European Alps, a 600-year proxy from juniper shrubs indicates that recent snowpack reductions since the mid-19th century are unprecedented in magnitude and persistence, with modeled durations declining by 20-30 days relative to the Little Ice Age maxima around 1650-1850 CE.[127] These proxies link shorter snow seasons to warmer springs, influencing regional hydrology and biosphere, though uncertainties arise from site-specific elevation effects and proxy calibration against instrumental data post-1834 CE.[126]Holocene Variations
The Holocene epoch (approximately 11,700 years ago to present) marked a transition from late Pleistocene deglaciation to more stable but variable cryospheric conditions, driven primarily by orbital forcings, solar variability, and volcanic activity that modulated insolation and temperatures. Following the abrupt warming at the end of the Younger Dryas stadial around 11,700 years before present (BP), continental ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere, including the Laurentide and Fennoscandian sheets, underwent rapid retreat, contributing to a global mean sea level (GMSL) rise of about 40-50 meters by 7,000 BP.[128] Glaciers in extratropical regions similarly diminished, with many mid-latitude systems, such as those in the Alps and Cordillera, approaching near-minimal extents during the Holocene Thermal Maximum (HTM, roughly 9,000-5,000 BP), when summer insolation peaked due to Milankovitch cycles.[129] This period saw reduced cryospheric coverage globally, with proxy records from moraines, cosmogenic nuclides (e.g., 10Be dating), and lake sediments indicating glacier fronts retreating to higher elevations or disappearing in some sectors.[130] In polar regions, ice sheet dynamics reflected these trends: the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) experienced enhanced ablation and thinning in its margins during the early-to-mid Holocene, contributing to GMSL elevations 2-3 meters above present levels around 6,000-4,000 BP, as evidenced by coral reef records and glacio-isostatic modeling.[131][128] Antarctic ice cores and marine sediments suggest the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) surface lowered by up to 500 meters since the early Holocene due to warmer seasonal temperatures, though overall Antarctic volume remained relatively stable compared to the Northern Hemisphere.[132] Sea ice reconstructions from biomarkers (e.g., IP25) and dinocysts indicate perennial Arctic sea ice persisted in key areas like the northern Barents Sea through the HTM, despite regional air temperatures 1-2°C warmer than today, implying wind-driven polynya formation and ocean heat transport limited summer melt.[133] In the Ross Sea sector of Antarctica, sea ice cover showed contrasting patterns, with reduced coastal ice during warmer intervals but increased open-ocean extent tied to efficiency of katabatic winds and upwelling.[134] Permafrost responded to early Holocene warming with widespread thaw in discontinuous zones, particularly in Eurasia; pollen and peat records from West Siberia document permafrost retreat and peatland expansion by 10,000-8,000 BP, amplifying methane release via thermokarst formation and woody shrub encroachment that reduced albedo.[135][136] By the mid-to-late Holocene, cooling trends associated with decreasing Northern Hemisphere insolation fostered permafrost aggradation in northern peatlands, with late-Holocene shrubification signaling stabilized frozen ground in continuous zones.[137] Snow cover duration, reconstructed from tree-ring widths in the Alps, exhibited millennial-scale variability, with shorter seasonal persistence during the HTM and extensions during Neoglacial cooling phases starting around 5,000 BP, correlating with glacier readvances.[138] The late Holocene (post-5,000 BP) initiated the Neoglaciation, characterized by progressive glacier expansions in response to orbital-driven cooling and amplified by internal feedbacks like ice-albedo effects; advances culminated in the Little Ice Age (circa 1450-1850 CE), when Alpine glaciers reached maximum Holocene extents, overtopping historical moraines and impounding new lakes, as dated by dendrochronology and historical records.[129] Arctic sea ice extent likely increased during this interval, with proxy data showing thicker multi-year ice in the northern North Atlantic, though reconstructions remain sparse due to proxy limitations like biomarker sensitivity to open water.[139] These variations underscore regional asynchronies—e.g., earlier HTM warmth in the Arctic versus delayed peaks in the Southern Hemisphere—highlighting the role of ocean circulation (e.g., Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation stability) and topography in modulating cryospheric responses to hemispheric forcings.[140] Overall, Holocene cryosphere extents were often more limited than present during warm phases, challenging uniform anthropogenic attribution for recent changes.[141] ![Holocene snow cover duration reconstruction for the Alps from tree-ring data][center]Modern Observations and Monitoring
Measurement Methods and Advances
In-situ measurements form the foundation for cryosphere monitoring, providing direct data on properties such as ice velocity, snow density, and permafrost temperature. For glaciers and ice sheets, techniques include ablation stakes drilled into ice surfaces to track surface mass balance through periodic height and density measurements, often combined with GPS for velocity profiling.[142] Permafrost monitoring relies on borehole thermistor strings, which record ground temperatures at depths from 10 to over 30 meters, enabling detection of thaw layers and thermal gradients; these are standardized for network-scale observations to ensure comparability across sites.[143] Sea ice and lake/river ice studies employ ice coring for thickness and salinity profiles, supplemented by electromagnetic induction devices for rapid surveys.[144] These methods, while precise at local scales, are labor-intensive and limited by logistical challenges in remote polar regions. Remote sensing has revolutionized cryosphere observations by enabling global, repetitive coverage. Optical and multispectral satellites, such as Landsat series, delineate glacier extents and snow cover through reflectance analysis, achieving resolutions down to 15-30 meters.[145] Microwave sensors provide all-weather capabilities: passive microwave radiometers like SSM/I measure sea ice concentration via brightness temperature differences, with extents defined at 15% threshold.[146] Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) on platforms like Sentinel-1 detects ice deformation and ridging patterns insensitive to clouds or darkness. For mass and elevation, gravimetry via GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites tracks ice sheet mass loss through monthly gravity field variations, revealing Greenland's net loss of about 280 Gt/year from 2002-2021.[147] Altimetry missions measure height changes: CryoSat-2's radar altimeter derives sea ice freeboard and thickness by subtracting snow depth assumptions, with Arctic mean thicknesses around 1-2 meters in winter.[148] Recent advances integrate multi-sensor data and novel techniques to enhance accuracy and resolve fine-scale processes. ICESat-2, launched in 2018, employs photon-counting lidar for sub-meter vertical precision, enabling first-time measurements of thin Arctic sea ice (<0.5 meters) and vegetation-penetrating canopy heights over permafrost.[149] Drift-aware algorithms now correct sea ice thickness retrievals from CryoSat-2 by incorporating motion vectors, improving daily maps and reducing biases in dynamic regions; a 2025 method using Envisat/CryoSat data reconstructed Arctic thicknesses declining from 1.61 m in 1992 to 1.08 m in 2022.[150] For permafrost, autonomous electrical resistivity tomography (A-ERT) and passive seismic interferometry offer non-invasive, continuous monitoring of thaw dynamics, complementing boreholes with spatial coverage over kilometers.[151] Machine learning enhances data fusion, such as reconstructing continuous ice sheet elevations from 2003-2021 using Envisat, ICESat, and ICESat-2 inputs.[152] Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) bridge scales, providing high-resolution velocity fields, as demonstrated in 2020 Eqip Sermia Glacier surveys.[153] These developments, validated against in-situ data, reduce uncertainties but highlight persistent challenges like snow depth estimation in altimetry, which can introduce 10-20% errors in thickness derivations.[154]20th Century to Present Trends
Satellite observations since 1979 document a pronounced decline in Arctic sea ice extent, particularly during summer minima, with September extents shrinking at a rate of 12.2% per decade relative to the 1981–2010 baseline.[155] Multiyear ice has also decreased, remaining below pre-2005 levels despite short-term fluctuations.[19] In the Antarctic, sea ice extent exhibited a modest increase from 1979 to 2014, but transitioned to sharp declines thereafter, recording the four lowest minima in the satellite era from 2022 to 2025.[156] Mountain glaciers globally have retreated since the end of the Little Ice Age around 1850, with mass loss rates accelerating through the 20th century and reaching historically unprecedented levels in the early 21st century based on glaciological and geodetic records spanning over 5,200 observations since 1850.[157] In the European Alps, retreat and downwasting intensified post-1980, while peripheral glaciers in Greenland doubled their retreat rates over the last two decades compared to the 20th century.[158][159] The Greenland Ice Sheet has experienced accelerating mass loss, shedding an average of 280 gigatons per year from 2002 to 2021 as measured by GRACE satellites, with rates increasing decade by decade into the 21st century.[160] Permafrost in the Northern Hemisphere has warmed at 0.6°F per decade overall, with thaw accelerating in boreal regions since the mid-20th century, particularly in peatlands where late-century warming drove deeper active layers.[57][161] Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent has trended downward since the mid-20th century, with spring declines most evident: April at 1.32% per decade, May at 4.1% per decade, and June at 12.95% per decade from 1967 to 2022.[162] These observational trends reflect a transition from 20th-century variability to more consistent reductions in cryospheric components amid rising global temperatures, though regional exceptions persist, such as variable Antarctic sea ice dynamics.[163]Regional and Component-Specific Changes
In the Arctic, sea ice extent has declined markedly since satellite observations began in 1979, with the September 2024 minimum reaching 4.28 million square kilometers, the seventh lowest on record and 12.4% below the 1981-2010 average per decade trend.[30] The March 2025 maximum extent set a record low, reflecting persistent thinning and loss of multi-year ice, which now constitutes less than 5% of the pack compared to over 25% in the 1980s. In contrast, Antarctic sea ice extent has shown greater variability, with overall increases through the early 2010s but sharp declines since 2016, approaching record lows in 2024 austral summer minima. The Greenland Ice Sheet has experienced accelerating mass loss, averaging 280 gigatons per year from 2002 to 2021 based on GRACE satellite gravimetry, contributing 0.8 millimeters annually to global sea level rise, with 177 gigatons lost in 2023 alone due to enhanced surface melt and outlet glacier dynamics.[160] [166] Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance, per the 2023 IMBIE assessment covering 1992-2020, indicates cumulative losses of 2,671 gigatons, accelerating to 107 gigatons per year in the 2010s, though with regional gains in East Antarctica offsetting West Antarctic and Peninsula losses; 2023 saw a net loss of 57 gigatons.[167] [166] Global glaciers have lost mass at an accelerating rate, with annual losses averaging 335 billion tons over the past three decades per World Glacier Monitoring Service data, and 2023-2024 marking the highest three-year loss on record at over 80 gigatons above prior peaks, affecting all 19 monitored regions including the Alps, Himalayas, and Andes.[168] [169] Permafrost in the Northern Hemisphere, covering about 12.5 million square kilometers as of the 2010s, has warmed at 0.3°C per decade since the 1980s, with thawing accelerating in the 2020s, leading to ground subsidence, coastal erosion rates up to 1-2 meters per year in Arctic sites, and release of stored carbon equivalent to 30-85% of near-surface layers under 3°C global warming scenarios.[57] [170] Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent has trended downward, particularly in spring and summer, with April declines of 1.32% per decade from 1967-2022 and June losses exceeding 12% per decade, driven by earlier melt onset; 2024 November extent was slightly below average at 34.32 million square kilometers.[162] [171] Regional variations persist, such as stable or increasing winter snow in parts of Eurasia amid overall hemispheric contraction.[172]Drivers of Variability and Change
Natural Drivers
Astronomical forcing through Milankovitch cycles—variations in Earth's orbital eccentricity, axial tilt (obliquity), and precession—drives long-term fluctuations in seasonal insolation, profoundly influencing cryosphere extent over tens to hundreds of thousands of years. These cycles initiate glacial-interglacial transitions by altering the distribution of solar radiation, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere summers, which controls the buildup or retreat of continental ice sheets and glaciers; for instance, reduced summer insolation during periods of high orbital eccentricity and low obliquity promotes ice accumulation, as seen in paleoclimate records linking these forcings to Pleistocene ice volume changes of up to 70 meters in sea level equivalent.[173][174] The cryosphere responds with hysteresis, where ice sheet margins exhibit multistability, requiring sustained insolation shifts to cross thresholds between expanded and contracted states.[175] Solar variability, including cycles in total solar irradiance (TSI) such as the 11-year Schwabe cycle, modulates cryospheric parameters on decadal to centennial scales, though its global radiative forcing is modest at approximately 0.1–1 W/m² peak-to-peak. During low solar activity phases, like the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715), reduced TSI correlates with cooler Northern Hemisphere temperatures and expanded snow cover or glacier advances in regions sensitive to insolation changes, such as the Alps and Scandinavia; paleoclimate proxies from ice cores indicate these variations amplified cooling in ice sheet mass balances during the Little Ice Age.[176][177] In the Arctic, solar minima have been linked to multidecadal sea ice variability, with low activity periods enhancing ice extent through stratospheric pathways influencing winter circulation.[178] Volcanic eruptions inject stratospheric sulfate aerosols that reflect sunlight, inducing short-term global cooling of 0.1–0.5°C lasting 1–3 years, which temporarily boosts sea ice and snow cover extents. Major events like the 1963 Agung, 1982 El Chichón, and 1991 Pinatubo eruptions increased Northern Hemisphere sea ice area by 5–10% in subsequent winters due to radiative cooling and altered atmospheric dynamics, with sensitivity heightened under pre-eruption warmer conditions.[179] In glacierized regions, this cooling reduces summer melt rates, preserving mass balance, as evidenced by reduced ablation in Alpine glaciers post-Pinatubo; however, ash deposition from proximal eruptions can lower surface albedo, counteracting cooling via enhanced absorption in some cases.[180][181] Internal climate oscillations, such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), generate regional cryosphere variability through teleconnections altering temperature, precipitation, and circulation. ENSO's warm phases (El Niño) typically reduce Antarctic sea ice extent by 1–2 million km² via anomalous warming and weakened westerlies, while enhancing variability in Northern Hemisphere snow cover; conversely, La Niña phases expand sea ice.[182] The positive AMO phase, characterized by warmer North Atlantic sea surface temperatures, correlates with reduced Arctic sea ice volume and accelerated glacier retreat in Svalbard and Greenland over multidecadal periods, contributing up to 20–30% of observed variability in ice extent since 1850.[183] Similarly, the PDO's cool phases promote greater Alaskan glacier mass gain and expanded Bering Sea ice, with phase shifts explaining interdecadal fluctuations independent of long-term trends.[184] These modes interact, amplifying or damping cryospheric responses; for example, concurrent positive AMO and PDO phases have historically aligned with reduced pan-Arctic ice minima.[185]Anthropogenic Factors
Human activities, principally through emissions of long-lived greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane from fossil fuel combustion, cement production, agriculture, and land-use changes, have increased atmospheric concentrations to levels unprecedented in at least 800,000 years, enhancing the greenhouse effect and causing global surface temperature rise of approximately 1.1°C since pre-industrial times.[186] This anthropogenic warming is the primary driver of recent cryosphere changes, with high to very high confidence in attribution based on detection-attribution studies comparing observed trends to natural variability and model simulations under anthropogenic forcing scenarios.[187] For instance, century-scale warming trends have substantially increased the likelihood of rapid glacier mass loss events, with synthetic experiments indicating that without human forcing, extreme annual losses observed in regions like the Alps or Himalayas would be far less probable.[188] Global glacier retreat since the 1990s is very likely driven by human-induced atmospheric and oceanic warming, overriding natural variability such as post-Little Ice Age recovery; mass loss accelerated to 266 Gt yr⁻¹ from 2000 to 2019, accounting for about 4% of glacier volume lost since 2000 and contributing 17.1 mm to global mean sea level rise from 1993 to 2019.[187] Attribution analyses estimate that 36 ± 8% of present-day glacier mass is committed to loss due to cumulative emissions to date, with regional examples including 23% greater mass loss in northeast Greenland from 1980–2014 compared to 1910–1978 under anthropogenic influence.[187] In the Arctic, more than 50% of observed summer sea ice extent decline since 1979—equating to a roughly 13% per decade reduction—is attributable to greenhouse gas forcing, as evidenced by strong correlations (R² 0.76–0.92) with cumulative CO₂ emissions and model simulations isolating anthropogenic signals from internal variability like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.[187] Recent modeling indicates that while internal variability has temporarily offset some forced loss in the 2000s–2020s, the long-term trend remains dominated by human emissions, with projections of near ice-free September Arctic conditions before 2050 under all shared socioeconomic pathways if emissions exceed 1000 Gt CO₂ post-2020.[189] Ice sheet dynamics in Greenland and Antarctica reflect anthropogenic influences through amplified surface melting and basal/ocean-driven discharge; Greenland lost 4890 Gt of mass from 1992 to 2020 (rate peaking at 243 Gt yr⁻¹ in 2010–2019), with high confidence that human forcing has enhanced surface mass balance deficits via elevated air temperatures and reduced snowfall efficiency.[187] Antarctic mass loss totaled 2670 Gt over the same period (148 Gt yr⁻¹ in 2010–2019), primarily from ocean warming-induced ice shelf thinning and calving, where greenhouse gas-driven heat uptake in the Southern Ocean has facilitated Circumpolar Deep Water intrusion beneath shelves.[187] Permafrost thaw, affecting ~22 million km² of near-surface ground, has seen temperatures rise 0.29°C per decade from 2007 to 2016, directly linked to anthropogenic warming with high confidence, potentially releasing ~25% of volume per 1°C global increase and altering soil stability through ground subsidence.[187] Secondary factors include anthropogenic aerosols: sulfate aerosols have masked some warming via cooling effects, while black carbon deposition reduces snow/ice albedo, accelerating melt in polluted regions like parts of the Arctic and Himalayas by up to 20–50% locally in deposition hotspots.[190] Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover has declined since 1978 at a rate of -1.9 million km² per 1°C warming, attributable to human-induced temperature increases with very high observational confidence.[187]Interactions and Feedback Loops
The cryosphere interacts with the atmosphere through exchanges of radiant energy, heat, and moisture, influencing regional and global climate patterns. Ice and snow surfaces exhibit high albedo values of approximately 0.8, reflecting up to 80% of incoming solar radiation and thereby exerting a cooling effect on the lower atmosphere.[191] Melting processes release latent heat and freshwater vapor, which can enhance cloud formation and alter precipitation regimes, particularly in polar regions where reduced sea ice cover increases open water evaporation.[86] These interactions are bidirectional, as atmospheric warming accelerates cryospheric melt while cryospheric changes modify atmospheric circulation, such as through strengthened heat fluxes from exposed ocean surfaces.[192] A primary positive feedback mechanism is the ice-albedo effect, wherein diminishing ice extent lowers planetary reflectivity, permitting greater absorption of shortwave radiation and further amplifying local warming and melt rates. Empirical observations indicate this feedback has contributed to a 3% per decade decline in Arctic summer albedo since satellite records began, with ice sheet components alone amplifying the total climate feedback parameter by 0.55 W/m² per degree Celsius of warming.[87][88] This process operates across sea ice, glaciers, and continental ice sheets, though its magnitude varies regionally; for instance, Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to albedo changes has increased in recent coupled model assessments due to enhanced cloud feedbacks.[89] Cryospheric-ocean interactions involve substantial freshwater fluxes that alter marine salinity, density stratification, and circulation. Annual discharge from the Greenland Ice Sheet totals about 1,174 km³, predominantly entering the North Atlantic via fjords and shelves, which can suppress deep convection and weaken the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) by freshening surface layers.[193] Antarctic contributions, projected to rise under warming scenarios, similarly influence Southern Ocean upwelling and heat redistribution, with sea ice melt adding variable salt rejection during formation and dilution during retreat.[194] These fluxes create feedbacks by modulating ocean heat uptake, potentially delaying but intensifying polar amplification as stratified waters trap heat near the surface. Permafrost degradation within the cryosphere represents another potent positive feedback via carbon release, as thawing exposes organic matter to microbial decomposition, emitting CO₂ and CH₄ that enhance greenhouse forcing. Northern permafrost regions store 1,460–1,600 Gt of soil organic carbon, with estimates suggesting that even partial thaw could release emissions equivalent to offsetting a significant portion of global terrestrial sinks by mid-century.[69] Observations link talik formation—unfrozen ground layers beneath permafrost—to elevated cold-season respiration, accelerating net carbon losses in ecosystems like tundra.[195] While vegetation greening may partially mitigate this through enhanced uptake, empirical data indicate net positive forcing, with feedbacks potentially amplifying transient climate response to cumulative emissions.[196] Overall, cryospheric feedbacks are predominantly amplifying, though quantitative uncertainties persist due to nonlinear thresholds and interactions with biosphere responses.[86]Debates and Uncertainties
Attribution of Recent Changes
Detection and attribution analyses seek to distinguish human-induced influences from natural variability in cryosphere changes, employing methods such as comparing observed trends to climate model simulations with anthropogenic forcings versus natural-only scenarios. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assesses that human activities have contributed to widespread cryosphere alterations since the mid-20th century, including Arctic sea ice loss and glacier retreat, with medium confidence in attribution for many components.[69] However, these assessments rely on models that exhibit discrepancies with observations, such as underestimating historical variability, which introduces uncertainty in partitioning causes.[187] For Arctic sea ice, the post-1979 decline in summer extent is substantial, averaging a loss of about 13% per decade through 2010, but attribution debates center on the interplay of greenhouse gas forcing and internal variability modes like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Studies indicate that natural variability explains 30–50% of the observed September extent decline, with anthropogenic forcing dominating the remainder in multi-model ensembles.[197] Recent data reveal a slowdown in melt rates since approximately 2007, with minimal net loss over the past two decades, consistent with internal variability offsetting forced trends; climate simulations suggest this pause results from multidecadal ocean current fluctuations rather than a reversal in anthropogenic influence.[189][198] Such episodes underscore low confidence in precise attribution for short-term trends, as models often fail to capture episodic natural accelerations or stabilizations in ice loss.[199] Global glacier mass loss, totaling around 150–200 gigatons per year in recent decades, began accelerating in the late 19th century, predating substantial industrial emissions. Attribution estimates for the period 1851–2010 assign only 25% ± 35% of the loss to anthropogenic warming, attributing the majority to natural fluctuations in temperature and precipitation, including the end of the Little Ice Age.[200] Regional variations complicate this: tropical glaciers show retreat rates unprecedented in millennia, more directly linked to post-1950 warming, while mid-latitude glaciers exhibit stronger natural signals from modes like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.[201] Formal attribution remains limited by data sparsity before satellite era and model biases in simulating pre-industrial variability, leading to debates over whether recent accelerations exceed natural baselines or reflect amplified forcing.[188] Permafrost thaw, affecting up to 20% of northern hemisphere permafrost by active layer deepening since 1980, correlates with air temperature rises of 0.3–0.5°C per decade in the Arctic, but quantitative attribution to anthropogenic versus natural drivers is hindered by heterogeneous ground conditions and limited long-term monitoring. While warming from greenhouse gases is deemed the primary trigger for widespread degradation, natural factors such as wildfires, drainage changes, and decadal oscillations contribute significantly to abrupt thaw events, with studies noting that internal variability can account for up to half of regional temperature trends.[202] Uncertainties persist in projecting carbon release feedbacks, as models overestimate thaw rates compared to borehole data, potentially inflating human-attributable impacts.[203] Ice sheet contributions to sea level, with Greenland losing 270 ± 14 Gt/year and Antarctica 150 ± 20 Gt/year on average from 2000–2020, show higher attribution confidence to anthropogenic warming via enhanced surface melt and ice dynamics, yet natural variability modulates rates; for instance, AMO-positive phases have amplified Greenland discharge independently of forcing. Detection studies confirm emergence of human signals in mass balance since the 1990s, but pre-satellite reconstructions reveal prior fluctuations, questioning the uniqueness of recent changes.[187] Overall, while anthropogenic forcing is detectable in aggregated cryosphere trends, the magnitude of its role versus natural variability—estimated at 20–50% across components—remains debated, with source biases in consensus reports potentially underemphasizing model-observation mismatches.[204]Model Reliability and Predictions
Climate models, particularly those from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), exhibit mixed reliability in simulating historical cryosphere changes, with notable biases affecting predictive accuracy. For Arctic sea ice, many CMIP6 models underestimate the observed rate of summer extent decline since the late 20th century, as satellite records show faster losses than hindcast simulations, attributed to inadequate representation of feedbacks like cloud cover and ocean heat transport.[205] In contrast, these models often overestimate processes such as sea ice melt and growth when compared to in-situ buoy measurements, highlighting deficiencies in ice dynamics and thermodynamics parameterization.[206] Antarctic sea ice simulations show consistent biases in concentration and compactness, with models struggling to reproduce observed expansions in the early 21st century despite projections of decline.[207] Ice sheet and glacier models face deeper uncertainties due to incomplete physics, such as marine ice cliff instability and rapid calving, leading to discrepancies between simulated and observed mass balance. Greenland ice sheet models project accelerating melt but underestimate historical surface mass balance losses when driven by reanalysis data, while Antarctic projections reveal substantial spread across CMIP ensembles, contributing to "deep uncertainty" in sea-level rise estimates.[208][209] Permafrost models in CMIP6 generally capture broad thaw trends but underestimate active layer deepening in some regions, influenced by biases in soil thermal properties and vegetation feedbacks.[210] Overall, while models reliably hindcast large-scale warming-driven losses, quantitative predictions remain challenged by structural errors and parameter tuning, as evidenced by inter-model spread exceeding observational variability in key metrics.[187] Future cryosphere projections under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) anticipate continued decline, with Arctic summer sea ice potentially reaching occasional ice-free conditions by mid-century in high-emission scenarios, though timing varies widely due to internal variability and model biases.[211] Ice sheet contributions to sea-level rise by 2100 range from 0.1 to 0.9 meters under SSP5-8.5, dominated by uncertain Antarctic dynamics, prompting calls for hybrid approaches integrating emulators and expert elicitation to quantify deep uncertainties beyond ensemble means.[212][213] Glacier mass loss is projected more robustly, with global volume reductions of 18-36% by 2100 across scenarios, but regional predictions for permafrost carbon release carry low confidence owing to nonlinear thaw processes.[187] These projections underscore the need for improved process representation, as current models may understate risks from abrupt shifts while overemphasizing gradual trends in vulnerable components like polar ice sheets.[214]Exaggerations in Public Discourse
Public discourse on the cryosphere has occasionally amplified predictions of imminent and catastrophic melt that subsequent observations have not substantiated. In December 2009, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore stated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen that computer modeling indicated the Arctic Ocean could become nearly ice-free during summer as early as 2014, citing research by Wieslaw Maslowski. [215] [216] Maslowski's model suggested a high probability of low ice conditions by 2016 under continued warming, but emphasized it was a projection based on extrapolated trends rather than a validated forecast. [217] In reality, the Arctic sea ice minimum extent in September 2014 reached 5.02 million square kilometers, the sixth lowest on record but far from ice-free, with persistent multi-year ice persisting in the region. [218] [219] Such statements, while rooted in model outputs, contributed to narratives of an accelerating "death spiral" that overstated near-term probabilities, as Arctic sea ice extent has exhibited high interannual variability rather than linear collapse. [220] A prominent institutional error involved the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, which asserted that Himalayan glaciers were projected to disappear by 2035 if present trends continued, potentially threatening water supplies for hundreds of millions. [221] This claim originated from a 2005 World Wildlife Fund report citing anecdotal observations rather than peer-reviewed modeling, and the IPCC later acknowledged it as "poorly substantiated" with no rigorous scientific basis. [222] [223] The projection was retracted in 2010 amid criticism, highlighting vulnerabilities in IPCC review processes where non-peer-reviewed sources influenced high-confidence statements. [224] Empirical data since then shows Himalayan glaciers retreating at rates of 0.3 to 0.6 meters per year on average, with regional variations but no evidence of wholesale disappearance by mid-century. [225] Media amplification of this unsubstantiated timeline fueled alarm over Asia's "water towers," despite assessments indicating sustained glacier volume for decades under moderate warming scenarios. Coverage of Greenland Ice Sheet dynamics has also featured distortions, such as 2019 reports claiming the sheet "melted nearly four trillion tons" in days, implying existential threat. These figures referred to surface meltwater volume from a heatwave, much of which refroze or ran off without net mass loss equivalent to sheet disintegration; actual annual mass balance loss for 2019 was about 532 gigatons, consistent with decadal trends but not unprecedented. Similarly, some outlets extrapolated localized glacial retreat to forecast rapid total melt, overlooking interior accumulation gains that partially offset peripheral losses. [227] For Antarctica, early 2000s media emphasized West Antarctic shelf thinning while downplaying overall sea ice expansion, which reached record highs in 2014 before recent declines. [228] These patterns reflect a tendency to prioritize dramatic endpoints over measured variability, where cryospheric components respond to multifaceted forcings including ocean currents and albedo feedbacks, rather than unidirectional collapse. Such exaggerations, often from advocacy-driven reporting, contrast with satellite gravimetry data showing cumulative ice loss but within uncertainty bands of long-term projections. [27]Implications and Future Outlook
Environmental and Ecological Impacts
The retreat of Arctic sea ice has disrupted marine ecosystems by reducing habitat for ice-dependent species such as polar bears and ringed seals, leading to declines in body condition and population shifts, while enabling range expansions of sub-Arctic species like killer whales that prey on ice-associated marine mammals.[230] These changes cascade through food webs, altering primary productivity and fish distributions, with observed reductions in ice algae that underpin Arctic biodiversity.[231] Permafrost thaw in the Arctic, affecting approximately 25% of Northern Hemisphere land, mobilizes stored organic carbon, with models estimating that 4% to 8% of newly thawed carbon—equivalent to tens of gigatons—could be emitted as CO2 and CH4 by 2100, potentially amplifying regional warming and stressing vegetation and microbial communities.[232] [233] Glacier mass loss, documented at an average rate of -267 ± 16 Gt yr⁻¹ globally from 2000 to 2023, alters downstream freshwater ecosystems by increasing meltwater turbidity and nutrient inputs, initially enhancing planktonic productivity in proglacial lakes but risking long-term oligotrophication and biodiversity loss as seasonal flows diminish.[27] [234] In high-mountain regions, this shift threatens endemic aquatic species adapted to cold, stable flows, with cascading effects on riparian habitats and fisheries.[235] The cryosphere's albedo feedback exacerbates these ecological pressures by reducing surface reflectivity, absorbing more solar radiation, and accelerating warming that desynchronizes phenological events like plant flowering and animal migration in tundra and alpine zones.[236] Loss of lake and river ice cover, observed across northern latitudes, exposes ecosystems to prolonged thermal stress, diminishing winter refugia for fish and invertebrates while promoting invasive species proliferation and altering nutrient cycling, with projections indicating widespread impacts on boreal biodiversity by mid-century.[237] In fjord systems, intensified glacial calving introduces freshwater plumes that stratify waters, suppressing primary production and affecting benthic communities, as evidenced in Svalbard where cryosphere meltdown has driven shifts in microbial and macrofaunal assemblages since the 1990s.[238] These interconnected changes underscore the cryosphere's role in modulating habitat stability, though empirical data reveal variability, with some tundra diversity buffered by herbivore grazing amid warming.[239]Human Societal Effects
Changes in the cryosphere, particularly the retreat of glaciers and thawing of permafrost, threaten freshwater availability for human populations dependent on glacial meltwater. Glaciers in mountain regions contribute significantly to seasonal river flows, supporting irrigation, drinking water, and hydropower for over one billion people, with mountains providing up to 60% of global annual freshwater. Accelerated melting has led to initial increases in water supply in some areas, but long-term projections indicate peak water availability followed by declines, exacerbating scarcity in regions like the Himalayas and Andes, where two billion people face risks to agriculture and food security by mid-century.[240][241] Thawing permafrost undermines infrastructure in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions, causing subsidence, erosion, and structural failures. In Alaska, projected costs for repairing damage to buildings and roads from permafrost thaw range from $37 billion to $51 billion by 2100 under moderate to high emissions scenarios, driven by ground settlement and thermokarst development. Across the broader Arctic, including pipelines, airports, and railroads, cumulative repair expenses could reach $276 billion by 2050 due to accelerated thaw from rising temperatures. These effects disproportionately impact remote communities reliant on stable ground for housing and transportation.[242][243] Melting of land-based ice contributes to global sea level rise, posing risks to coastal settlements through inundation, erosion, and storm surges. Since 1880, sea levels have risen 8-9 inches globally, with glacier and ice sheet melt accounting for a substantial portion alongside thermal expansion; Greenland's ice loss alone drove much of the recent acceleration. Low-lying coastal areas, home to hundreds of millions, face heightened flooding, with projections indicating faster rises in tropical and mid-latitude regions due to gravitational effects from ice mass loss.[244][245] Loss of sea ice and snow cover disrupts indigenous livelihoods in the Arctic, shortening safe hunting and travel seasons on ice-dependent ecosystems. Declining sea ice has curtailed seal-hunting periods in northern Alaska, increasing travel risks and contributing to food insecurity rates among indigenous groups that exceed national averages. Coastal erosion from reduced ice buffering has threatened 31 Alaska Native villages with relocation, amplifying vulnerabilities to storms and undermining cultural practices tied to traditional lands.[246][247] Economic sectors face mixed but predominantly challenging shifts from cryospheric changes. Winter tourism in alpine areas suffers from reduced snow reliability, impacting resorts dependent on consistent cover for skiing and related revenues. Fisheries in polar regions experience alterations in prey distribution due to sea ice variability, affecting commercial catches and indigenous subsistence. Conversely, diminished sea ice extends navigable shipping seasons in the Arctic, potentially lowering transport costs via routes like the Northwest Passage, though this benefit is offset by increased risks from unstable ice conditions. Glacier retreat also heightens hazards such as lake outburst floods, damaging downstream infrastructure and agriculture in vulnerable valleys.[248][95][249]Projections with Uncertainty Ranges
Projections for cryospheric components under CMIP6 scenarios, particularly SSP5-8.5, forecast substantial declines in ice volume and extent by 2100, driven primarily by atmospheric warming, though ice sheet dynamics introduce the dominant uncertainties in sea-level rise estimates.[250] Global glacier mass is expected to decrease by 26 ± 6% relative to 2015 under +1.5°C warming or 41 ± 11% under +4°C, contributing 79 to 159 mm to sea level in low- versus high-emission pathways, with climate model spread and glacier-specific responses accounting for much of the variance.[251] [252] The Greenland Ice Sheet's projected sea-level contribution ranges from 5 to 33 cm by 2100 across ensemble models, with recent climate disequilibrium committing at least 27.4 ± 6.8 cm from an area of 59 ± 15 × 10³ km² retreat, though ice flow models often underestimate observed mass loss due to inadequacies in capturing outlet glacier dynamics.[253] [254] Uncertainty in basal friction and surface mass balance feedbacks amplifies projections, with ISMIP6 intercomparisons showing spreads driven by these parameters under high-emission scenarios.[255] Antarctic Ice Sheet projections exhibit deeper uncertainties, potentially contributing up to 28 cm by 2100, but with internal climate variability influencing 45% to 93% of the sea-level signal depending on the CMIP6 model, and marine ice sheet instability potentially skewing outcomes toward higher-end estimates if thresholds are crossed.[256] [257] East Antarctic dynamics dominate under strong warming, where ice flow instabilities could elevate contributions beyond structured models, as evidenced by ISMIP6 assessments where climate model choice contributes up to 13% of 2100 uncertainty.[258] [259] Arctic sea ice projections from CMIP6 indicate an ice-free September Arctic by mid-century in high-emission scenarios, but models systematically underestimate historical loss, leading to overly conservative timelines; emergent constraints narrow the first ice-free year spread, yet multidecadal variability and circulation biases persist as key uncertainty sources.[260] [261] Permafrost thaw is projected to release carbon equivalent to emissions from a major nation, with abrupt thaw in 20% of permafrost areas amplifying releases, though microbial decomposition efficiencies and abrupt versus gradual thaw pathways yield budgets reduced by up to 20-22% for 1.5-2°C targets due to feedbacks.[262] [93] Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent is anticipated to decline further, with historical trends of -3.6 ± 2.7% annually extending into projections of reduced duration and mass, particularly in mid-latitudes, where model interquartile spreads highlight uncertainties from surface albedo feedbacks and precipitation phase changes.[263] [65] Overall, ice sheet processes, especially dynamical instabilities, overshadow other cryospheric uncertainties in long-term sea-level projections, underscoring the need for improved process representation in models to refine ranges.[187]References
- https://www.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/earth/arctic-winter-sea-ice-at-record-low/
- https://earthobservatory.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/images/153457/arctic-and-antarctic-sea-ice-approached-historic-lows
- https://www.jpl.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/news/nasa-study-more-greenland-ice-lost-than-previously-estimated/
- https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/140513-antarctic-ice-sheet-[collapse](/page/Collapse)-in-perspective