Hubbry Logo
Common marmosetCommon marmosetMain
Open search
Common marmoset
Community hub
Common marmoset
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Common marmoset
Common marmoset
Common marmoset
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Common marmoset[1][2]
Common marmoset at Aquazoo-Löbbecke-Museum, Düsseldorf
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Callitrichidae
Genus: Callithrix
Species:
C. jacchus
Binomial name
Callithrix jacchus
Geographic range
Synonyms
  • Hapale communis South, 1845
  • Jacchus hapale Gray, 1870
  • Hapale leucotis Lesson, 1840
  • Jacchus albicollis Spix, 1823
  • Jacchus vulgaris rufus Fischer, 1829
  • Jacchus vulgaris Humboldt, 1812
  • Simia jacchus Linnaeus, 1758
  • Simia (Sagoinus) jacchus moschatus Kerr, 1792

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), also called white-tufted marmoset or white-tufted-ear marmoset, is a New World monkey. It originally lived on the northeastern coast of Brazil, in the states of Piauí, Paraíba, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Pernambuco, Alagoas, and Bahia.[5] Through release (both intentional and unintentional) of captive individuals, it has expanded its range since the 1920s to Southeast Brazil (its first sighting in the wild for Rio de Janeiro was in 1929), where it became an invasive species, raising concerns about genetic pollution of similar species, such as the buffy-tufted marmoset (Callithrix aurita), and predation upon bird nestlings and eggs.[6]

The whole genome sequence of a female common marmoset was published on 20 July 2014.[7] It became the first New World monkey to have its genome sequenced.[8]

Physical description and morphology

[edit]
Drawing of a marmoset

Common marmosets are very small monkeys with relatively long tails. Males are slightly larger than females; males have an average height of 188 mm (7.40 in) and females have an average height of 185 mm (7.28 in). Males weigh 256 g (9.03 oz) on average and females weigh 236 g (8.32 oz) on average.[9] The pelage of the marmoset is multicolored, being sprinkled with brown, grey, and yellow. It also has white ear tufts and the tail is banded. Its face has black across the nose-area skin and a white blaze on the forehead.[10] The coats of infants are brown and yellow with the ear tuft developing later.

As with other members of the genus Callithrix, the common marmosets have claw-like nails known as tegulae on most of their fingers. Only their halluces (big toes) have the flat nails or ungulae that most other primates have.[11] Marmosets have an arboreal locomotion similar to squirrels. They can hang onto trees vertically and leap between them, and run across branches quadrupedally.[9][12] Tegulae are an adaptation for this type of locomotion. Other Callithrix traits shared include enlarged, chisel-shaped incisors and ceca specialized for their diet.[9]

Range and ecology

[edit]
The common marmoset has white tufted ears.

Common marmosets are native only to east-central Brazil. They have been introduced into other areas and live within the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Buenos Aires, Argentina.[13] Marmosets can be found in a number of forest habitats. They live in Atlantic coastal forests as well as semideciduous forests farther inland. They can also inhabit savanna forests and riverine forests.[14] Marmosets are successful in dry secondary forests and edge habitats.[12]

Diet

[edit]

The common marmoset's claw-like nails, incisor shape, and gut specialization reflect their unique diet, which is primarily made of plant exudates and insects. Common marmosets feed on gum, sap, latex, and resin.[12][14] They use their nails to cling to the side of a tree, and with their long lower incisors, chew a hole in the tree.[15] The marmoset then licks up the exudates or swoops them with the teeth.[16] From 20 to 70% of the marmoset's feeding behavior includes eating exudates.[9][15]

Exudates provide marmosets with a reliable food source in their seasonal habitat. They rely on these foods particularly between January and April, when fruit is not abundant. A marmoset may visit a tree hole multiple times, including those made by other animals. In addition to exudates, insects also prove an important food source for marmosets, making up 24-30% of their food. The small size of marmosets allows them to stalk and ambush them.[14] Marmosets also eat fruits, seeds, flowers, fungi, nectar, snails, lizards, tree frogs, bird eggs, nestlings, and infant mammals.[16] Marmosets may compete for fruit with birds, such as parrots and toucans, and with woolly opossums.[16]

Behavior

[edit]

Social organization

[edit]
Two marmosets

Common marmosets live in stable extended families, with only a few members allowed to breed.[17][18] A marmoset group can contain as many as 15 members, but a more typical number is nine.[16] A marmoset family usually contains one or two breeding females, a breeding male, their offspring, and their adult relatives, be they their parents or siblings.[18] The females in a group tend to be closely related, and males less so. Males do not mate with breeding females to which they are related. Marmosets may leave their natal groups when they become adults, in contrast to other primate species, which leave at adolescence. Not much is known of the reasons marmosets leave their natal groups.[18] Family groups fuse into new groups when a breeding male dies.[19] Within the family groups, the breeding individuals tend to be more dominant. The breeding male and female tend to share dominance. Between two breeding females, though, one is more dominant. In addition, the subordinate female is usually the daughter of the dominant one. For the other members, social rank is based on age.[17] Dominance is maintained though various behaviors, postures, and vocalizations, and subordinates groom their superiors.[17]

Reproduction and parenting

[edit]
Mother and babies at Forte da Ponta da Vigia, Brazil

Common marmosets have a complex mating system. They were thought to be monogamous, but both polygamy and polyandry have been observed.[17] Nevertheless, most matings are monogamous. Even in groups with two breeding females, the subordinate female often mates with males from other groups. Subordinate females usually do not give birth to fit offspring.[20] Mating with extra-group males may allow the female to find potential mates in the future. Females that mate successfully but lose their young move to other groups and may gain dominant breeding positions.[20]

Common marmoset found in a Pernambuco resort

The breeding individuals in a group need the other members to help raise their young. Thus, the pair behaviorally and physiologically suppresses the reproduction of the other members of the group.[21][22] Since these suppressed individuals are likely related to the breeding pair, they have an incentive to care for the young, as they share genes with them.[22] In addition, the presence of a related male affects female ovulation. Female ovulation does not occur when their fathers are around, but does occur when an unrelated male is nearby, instead. They also display aggressive behavior towards their mothers,[22] possibly to displace them.

When conditions are right for them to breed, adult females breed regularly for the rest of their lives. Females flick their tongues at males to solicit mating. The gestation period lasts for 5 months, and females are ready to breed again around 10 days after giving birth. Five months pass between each parturition, so they can give birth twice a year.[16] Marmosets commonly give birth to nonidentical twins. Because of this, females are under stress during pregnancy and lactation, and need help from the other members of the family.[12][16] Infant marmosets instinctively cling to their mother's back and do not voluntarily let go for the first two weeks. After that, they become very active and explore their environment.[16] The breeding male (likely the father) begins handling the twins, and all members of the family care for them.[23] In the following weeks, the young spend less time on their mother's back and more time moving around and playing.[16] Infants are weaned at 3 months. At 5 months, they enter their juvenile stage, when they have more interactions with family members other than their parents, and rough play helps to establish their future status. Another set of infants may be born and the previous young carry and play with them.[23] Marmosets become subadults between 9 and 14 months old, act like adults, and go through puberty. At 15 months, they reach adult size and are sexually mature, but cannot breed until they are dominant.[23]

Communication

[edit]
Common marmoset at the Hanover Zoo, Germany

Common marmosets employ a number of vocal and visual communications. To signal alarm, aggression, and submission, marmosets use the "partially open mouth stare", "frown", and "slit-stare", respectively. To display fear or submission, marmosets flatten their ear tufts close to their heads.[16] Marmosets have two alarm calls - a series of repeating calls that get higher with each call, known as "staccatos", and short, trickling calls given either intermittently or repeatedly, called "tsiks". Marmoset alarm calls tend to be short and high-pitched.[19] Marmosets monitor and locate group members with vibrato-like, low-pitched, generic calls called "trills".[24] Marmosets also employ "phees", which are whistle-like, generic calls. These serve to attract mates, keep groups together, defend territories, and locate missing group members. Marmosets were recently found to encode the identity of the receiver in their phee calls[25] — a behavior similar to the human use of names, and one that has been observed in only a few species: humans, dolphins, and African elephants. Marmosets use scent glands on their chests and anogenital regions to mark objects. These are meant to communicate social and reproductive status.[16]

Status

[edit]

The common marmoset remains an abundant species and is not currently threatened, but its habitat had been degraded at a fast rate, with around 67% of the Cerrado region cleared for human use in the 1990s and around 80% cleared for cultivation more recently.[26] In addition, marmosets are captured and traded as pets. Though popular as pets, they become difficult to control as they get older and may be abandoned or killed.[27] Common marmosets have also been used for medical experiments. They are used as such in Europe more so than in the United States, and are the most common nonhuman primates to be experimented on.[28] They are used as model organisms in areas of research such as teratology, periodontal disease, reproduction, immunology, endocrinology, obesity, and aging.[28][29]

Genome

[edit]

In 2014, a female became the first nonhuman primate, among the New World monkeys, to have its complete genome sequenced.[8] The genome size is 2.26 Gbp, and contains 21,168 genes.[7] Segmental duplications added a total of 138 Mb of nonredundant sequences (4.7% of the whole genome), slightly fewer than observed in humans[30][31] or chimpanzees (about 5%),[32] but more than in orangutans (3.8%).[33]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Common marmoset

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), also known as the white-tufted-ear marmoset, is a small belonging to the family , characterized by its compact size, distinctive white ear tufts, and mottled brown, gray, and yellow fur covering a body length of 14–19 cm (excluding the tail, which measures 25–35 cm) and an average adult weight of 300–400 g. Native to the northeastern Atlantic coastal forests of , this species has adapted to a range of habitats including tropical rainforests, dry scrublands like the , savannas, and even urban edges, where it occupies home ranges of 0.005–0.065 km². Diurnal and arboreal, common marmosets are highly social, living in stable family groups of 3–15 individuals typically led by a dominant , with cooperative behaviors such as where non-breeding males and siblings assist in carrying and caring for infants. Their diet is primarily exudativorous, consisting of 20–70% tree sap and obtained by gouging bark with specialized chisel-like lower incisors and claw-like nails, supplemented by (24–30%), fruits, flowers, , and occasionally small vertebrates like frogs or eggs. is notable for its high twinning rate, with females typically giving birth to non-identical twins after a 144–150-day , representing up to 40% of the mother's body weight; is reached at about 1.5 years, and wild lifespan averages 12 years, though captivity extends it to 16–20 years. Due to their small size, physiological similarities to humans, and ease of maintenance, common marmosets are widely used in biomedical research on , , aging, and infectious diseases since the 1960s. Classified as Least Concern by the owing to their wide distribution and adaptability, they face localized threats from , illegal pet trade, and hunting, with populations introduced outside their native range in places like Rio de Janeiro and .

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification

The common marmoset is scientifically known by the binomial name Callithrix jacchus (Linnaeus, 1758). This nomenclature originates from Carl Linnaeus's , where it was initially described as Simia jacchus. The species occupies a specific position within the broader taxonomic hierarchy of , reflecting its classification as a . The full hierarchy is as follows:
RankTaxon
KingdomAnimalia
Subkingdom
InfrakingdomDeuterostomia
PhylumChordata
SubphylumVertebrata
Infraphylum
SuperclassTetrapoda
ClassMammalia
Subclass
Infraclass
Order
SuborderHaplorrhini
InfraorderSimiiformes
ParvorderPlatyrrhini
Family
Genus
SpeciesC. jacchus
Historical synonyms for jacchus include Simia jacchus (Linnaeus, 1758), Jacchus albicollis (Spix, 1823), Hapale communis (South, 1845), Hapale leucotis (Lesson, 1840), Jacchus vulgaris (Humboldt, 1812), Simia jacchus moschatus (Kerr, 1792), and Jacchus vulgaris rufus (Fischer, 1829). No subspecies are currently recognized for this species. Callithrix jacchus is one of six recognized species in the genus Callithrix, which comprises the Atlantic marmosets endemic to eastern Brazil; its closest relatives include the black-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata), with which it shares significant genetic and morphological similarities. The genus Callithrix belongs to the family Callitrichidae, which also encompasses tamarins and shares a common evolutionary ancestry within this group of small New World primates. Potential hybridization occurs with other Callithrix species, particularly C. penicillata, in areas of sympatry due to anthropogenic introductions and habitat overlap, leading to viable hybrid offspring.

Evolutionary history

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) belongs to the Platyrrhini clade of , which diverged from the (Old World monkeys and apes) approximately 35 million years ago during the late Eocene to early , marking a key event in primate diversification across the Americas following the Great American Biotic Interchange precursors. This divergence coincided with the isolation of South American primate lineages, allowing platyrrhines to evolve independently in neotropical environments. Within this broader context, the family, encompassing marmosets and tamarins, underwent radiation around 14 million years ago in the , originating from a widespread that spanned the Amazon and regions. A hallmark of marmoset evolution within is the development of specialized claw-like nails, known as tegulae, on all digits except the hallux, which replaced the flat nails typical of most and facilitated vertical clinging and gouging behaviors essential for feeding. These adaptations emerged secondarily after the family's radiation, enabling to exploit tree s as a primary resource, distinct from the leaping locomotion of tamarins. Within , the genus belongs to the marmoset clade (including Mico and Cebuella), which is sister to the tamarins (Saguinus). sequencing of the common in 2014 revealed signatures of positive selection on genes influencing small body size (e.g., IGF1R, GHSR, and IGF2 in / pathways), frequent twinning (e.g., GDF9 and BMP15 in reproductive signaling), and activity (enrichment involving 16 genes). These genetic changes underscore adaptive miniaturization and sensory specialization that distinguish from other platyrrhines. Phenotypic studies highlight evolutionary divergence in pelage patterns, dentition, and vocalizations when comparing marmosets to tamarins and broader platyrrhine relatives, with strong phylogenetic signals in these traits driving genus-level classifications. For instance, marmoset pelage exhibits distinct tufting and coloration adapted for camouflage in Atlantic Forest canopies, while specialized dentition supports exudate processing through elongated lower incisors for gouging; vocalizations, particularly long calls, show high heritability and species-specific frequencies that reinforce social boundaries. In recent evolutionary dynamics, human-mediated introductions of the black-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata) into northeastern Brazil have led to hybridization with wild C. jacchus populations, creating hybrid zones that reduce genetic diversity and alter phenotypic traits in affected areas.

Physical description

Morphology

The common marmoset exhibits a distinctive multicolored pelage characterized by a mottled brown-gray body coat interspersed with yellowish tones, complemented by prominent ear tufts that enhance its visual identification in arboreal settings. The facial region features pale skin, often pinkish, that can darken with sun exposure, along with a blaze on the , while the overall provides in the dappled light of forest canopies. Adaptations in the limbs support agile locomotion suited to vertical clinging and leaping among trees, with claw-like known as tegulae present on all digits except the hallux, which bears a flat nail for enhanced grip. The long, banded , while non-prehensile, aids in balance during quadrupedal running and sudden leaps between supports, contributing to stability in the three-dimensional arboreal environment. The dental structure includes specialized lower incisors that are enlarged and chisel-shaped, enabling the animal to gouge tree bark effectively to access plant exudates, a key dietary adaptation reflected in the anterior dentition's morphology. Facial and sensory features emphasize diurnal activity, with large eyes providing acute binocular vision for navigating and foraging in bright forest understories. The enhanced olfactory system, supported by a robust nasal apparatus, allows detection of scents from food sources and social cues, integrating with visual acuity for comprehensive environmental awareness. Skeletally, the common marmoset is adapted for agility through a lightweight framework with elongated limbs relative to its compact body, facilitating rapid movements and precise clinging to vertical surfaces.

Size and sexual dimorphism

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) displays minimal , with adult males being only slightly larger than females in overall body dimensions and mass, and lacking pronounced differences in size or body build. Adults have a head-body of 14-19 cm and of 25-35 cm, with average weights of 300-400 g (wild ~320 g, captive higher due to nutrition and lower activity). Newborn common marmosets weigh approximately 28-30 g at birth, often in litters of twins that collectively represent 15-20% (up to 27%) of the mother's body mass. They exhibit rapid growth, attaining adult size between 12 and 18 months of age, with body weight stabilizing around 500-550 days. Captive common marmosets tend to be slightly larger and heavier than their wild counterparts, primarily due to consistent access to nutrient-rich diets, though both populations show similar patterns of minimal sexual dimorphism.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic range

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is native to northeastern Brazil, where its range extends from the coastal Atlantic Forest in the states of Maranhão and Bahia westward inland to Ceará and Pernambuco, encompassing a diverse array of forested and transitional habitats. This distribution primarily covers the humid Atlantic coastal forests and drier inland areas, including semideciduous forests and caatinga dry scrub, as well as savanna-forest mosaics of the Cerrado biome up to elevations of approximately 1,000 m. The native extent of occurrence reflects the species' adaptability to a variety of woodland environments within this region. Introduced populations of the common marmoset have established outside this native range due to human activities, particularly the pet trade beginning in the early 20th century. In southeastern Brazil, notably around Rio de Janeiro, the species was introduced through releases of captive individuals starting in the , leading to self-sustaining populations that have spread into urban parks, suburban gardens, and peri-urban forests. Similarly, escaped pets have resulted in feral groups in , , where they occupy city greenspaces and adjacent areas. These introduced ranges often integrate into human-modified landscapes, covering fragmented urban and peri-urban zones rather than contiguous wild habitats. The expansion of common marmosets beyond their native distribution has been almost entirely human-mediated, driven by the illegal pet trade, accidental escapes, and intentional releases, which have facilitated their establishment as an in non-native regions. In southeastern , these introductions have led to competition with endemic marmoset species and hybridization, contributing to ecological concerns in the Atlantic Forest remnants. Overall, while the native range remains stable, introduced populations continue to expand in altered environments, highlighting the role of anthropogenic factors in altering the ' global footprint.

Ecological niche

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) primarily inhabits lowland tropical s along the Atlantic coast of northeastern , as well as semi-deciduous s farther inland, riverine s within the biome, and mangroves in urban-adjacent areas. These show a strong preference for secondary and disturbed edges over primary s, where they can exploit open canopies and avoid overly dense understory vegetation that limits mobility and access to resources. Such selection allows them to thrive in fragmented landscapes, including savanna woodlands (cerrado) and areas altered by human activity, with home ranges typically spanning 0.5 to 6.5 hectares centered on clusters of suitable trees. Within these habitats, common marmosets utilize both canopy and layers for and movement, leaping between vines and branches at heights of 5 to 12 meters while occasionally descending to lower strata for in dense foliage. They exhibit a notable dependence on holes and vine-tangled cavities as sleeping sites, selecting elevated locations to minimize predation risk during nightly rest periods of 11-12 hours. This microhabitat use supports their exudativorous lifestyle, as proximity to bark-gouging sites in the lower canopy facilitates efficient resource access without excessive exposure. Ecologically, common marmosets maintain symbiotic relationships with gum-producing trees such as , which they stimulate to exude nutrient-rich through specialized tooth-gouging, providing a stable source that constitutes up to 70% of their foraging time in certain seasons. Adapted to tropical and subtropical climates, common marmosets tolerate temperatures ranging from 19-36°C and humidity levels from low (in semiarid Caatinga, with 300-1000 mm annual rainfall and 7-10 month dry seasons) to high (in Atlantic forests, 1000-2000 mm rainfall). They adjust activity patterns to cope with thermal extremes, increasing rest during midday peaks above 31°C while maintaining foraging in cooler periods. In introduced ranges beyond their native northeastern Brazil distribution—such as southeastern Atlantic Forest regions—these marmosets act as invasives, competing with native primates like buffy-tufted marmosets (Callithrix aurita) for exudates and nesting sites, and reducing local arthropod populations through intensive insectivory that alters understory prey dynamics.

Diet and foraging

Primary food sources

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is an omnivorous with a diet dominated by exudates, , and fruits in the wild. Exudates, including gums and saps obtained through tree gouging, constitute the primary component, typically comprising about 45% of the overall diet but varying seasonally from 20% to over 70%. , such as (e.g., and beetles) and spiders, provide essential protein and make up approximately 39% of the diet, with for these items occupying 24–30% of time. Fruits and flowers contribute 10–20% of the intake, often as seasonal supplements like berries, while adds variety particularly during drier periods. Vertebrates and other items, including small , bird eggs, nestlings, and occasional fungi or snails, are consumed opportunistically but form a minor portion of the diet. Exudates remain a year-round staple, increasing to around 80% during the dry season when fruit and insect availability declines, whereas arthropod consumption rises in the alongside more abundant fruits. In captive settings, diets are formulated to approximate wild intake while ensuring nutritional balance, typically featuring commercial primate chows or gels (e.g., 20% protein from or animal sources, 4–9% , and 4–6% ) supplemented with fresh or dried fruits, vegetables, seeds, nuts, live like or mealworms, and gum substitutes such as Arabic gum. These provisions support health, reproduction, and stability, with gel-based diets often preferred for better and outcomes compared to biscuit forms.

Foraging strategies

Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) primarily forage for tree exudates through a specialized technique known as bark gouging, using their lower incisors to scrape away bark and stimulate sap flow from trees such as those in the genera Anadenanthera and Enterolobium. After gouging, individuals often wait or return to the site—sometimes up to 30 minutes or longer per bout—for exudates to accumulate before licking or lapping them up, a process that can occupy up to 50% of their feeding time. Insect hunting involves active visual scanning of foliage, branches, and the ground to detect cryptic prey such as grasshoppers and beetles, followed by rapid pouncing or grasping motions to capture them. Group foraging is characterized by cooperative visual scanning across the canopy and , where family members coordinate to cover more area efficiently, supplemented by allomarking—rubbing on tree trunks at feeding sites—to signal ownership and guide group members to productive resources. Individuals typically engage in 20–30 bouts per day, consuming 50–100 g of food overall, with a focus on energy-dense exudates to meet metabolic demands in their small-bodied, high-metabolism lifestyle. No tool use has been observed in wild common marmoset , though their manual dexterity allows precise extraction of hidden from crevices or bark using fingers and claws. Foraging efficiency is enhanced by small group sizes (typically 3–15 members), which minimize intragroup at patches while prioritizing high-energy exudates over less reliable fruits or arthropods.

Behavior and social life

Social organization

Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) live in stable, groups typically consisting of 3 to 15 individuals, with an average of around 9 members, including multiple generations such as breeding adults, subadults, and juveniles. These units are usually centered on a dominant , which is generally monogamous, though occasionally polygynous with one or two breeding females and a single breeding male. The holds codominant status within the group, exerting influence over subordinates through behavioral and olfactory cues that help maintain reproductive exclusivity. Non-breeding members form an age-graded without strict sex-based dominance, contributing to the group's cooperative structure. Group roles are highly specialized, emphasizing . The dominant female is the primary breeder, while helper males—often fathers, brothers, or other relatives—play key roles in carrying and caring for , reducing the energetic burden on the . All group members, including subadults and non-breeding adults, act as allomothers, assisting with infant transport, feeding, and protection to enhance offspring survival. This division of labor fosters group cohesion and is essential for the species' in resource-variable environments. Territories range from 0.5 to 6.5 hectares and are actively defended against intruders using scent marking from specialized glands and vocalizations to delineate boundaries and core resource areas like gum trees. Groups exhibit long-term stability, often persisting for years with minimal fission or fusion events; changes primarily occur through the birth of new offspring or the death of breeding adults, which can lead to group dissolution or realignment. Dispersal is typically undertaken by subadult males seeking opportunities in other groups, promoting while preserving family integrity. In urban or invasive contexts, such as forest fragments near settlements, group sizes can reach the upper end of the spectrum (up to 15 individuals) due to reliable supplemental resources like food waste, allowing larger aggregations in smaller home ranges compared to wild habitats. This adaptability enhances their persistence in altered landscapes but may alter traditional dynamics by increasing intergroup interactions.

Communication systems

Common marmosets employ a multifaceted communication system that includes vocal, olfactory, visual, gestural, and tactile signals to facilitate social interactions, territory maintenance, and predator avoidance within their family groups. Vocalizations form the primary modality due to the ' arboreal and dense habitats, where visual cues may be limited, while olfactory and tactile signals reinforce close-range bonding and individual recognition. These signals are context-dependent, allowing marmosets to coordinate group activities and respond to environmental threats effectively. Vocal communication in common marmosets is diverse and includes several distinct call types with specific functions. The phee call serves as a long-distance contact call, enabling individuals to maintain group cohesion when out of visual range, and recent research has demonstrated that marmosets use individualized phee calls to vocally label specific conspecifics, akin to name-like addressing, with callers producing unique variants directed at particular family members. Tsik calls, often repeated in rapid series (tsik-tsik), function as alarm signals during predator encounters, eliciting behaviors from group members toward threats such as snakes. Trill calls, by contrast, promote affiliation and are exchanged during close-range interactions to reinforce social bonds and coordinate activities within the group. Olfactory signals are conveyed through specialized , primarily the sternal on the chest and anogenital s, which produce secretions used for marking and identifying . Sternal marking communicates , age, rank, and group membership, with dominant depositing scents on prominent substrates to advertise boundaries and deter intruders. These marks also facilitate recognition during social encounters, as investigate scents to assess familiarity and reproductive status. Visual and gestural displays provide rapid cues for emotional states and intentions, particularly in proximity. Ear tufts are erected and directed forward during aggressive displays to signal or dominance, while flattened tufts accompany submissive postures, often with averted , to de-escalate conflicts. postures further convey submission or affiliation; a raised, arched indicates , whereas a lowered or wrapped signals or non-. These displays are often combined with piloerection of for emphasis during intergroup encounters. Tactile communication emphasizes and maintenance through physical contact, with allogrooming being the most prominent behavior. Grooming sessions, particularly between breeding pairs, strengthen pair bonds and reduce tension, with males often grooming females more frequently to solicit affiliation. This reciprocal tactile exchange also occurs among family members to reinforce cooperative caregiving roles. Anti-predator vocalizations elicit group responses to threats. Vocal development in common marmosets involves learning and individualization from infancy, with infants producing immature calls that mature through social feedback. Parental contingent responses, such as vocal replies to infant calls, accelerate the transition to adult-like phee and trill structures, demonstrating vocal learning plasticity similar to human infants. By early juvenility, calls become individualized, allowing and group-specific signatures.

Reproduction and development

Mating and breeding

The common marmoset exhibits a primarily monogamous , characterized by stable breeding pairs that form long-term bonds, though occasional and have been documented in wild populations. In cases of , subordinate males or helpers may sire offspring, contributing to within groups, albeit infrequently compared to dominant pair reproduction. This flexibility in mating strategies is thought to enhance in cooperative family units. Females undergo an ovulatory estrus cycle lasting 28-35 days, with peak marked by increased sexual receptivity around . In their native tropical habitats, breeding occurs year-round, facilitated by consistent environmental conditions and resource availability, allowing for multiple reproductive cycles annually. Copulation involves multiple matings per estrus cycle, often initiated by female tongue-flicking displays to solicit males, with females exerting choice based on male provisioning behaviors such as food sharing and grooming. A notable reproductive is the high twinning rate, with 60-80% of births resulting in dizygotic twins, an evolutionary trait linked to the demands of where multiple offspring can be supported by group members. typically lasts 144-150 days, yielding litters of 1-3 infants, most commonly twins, which are born altricial and dependent on communal care. To prevent , common marmosets employ sex-biased dispersal, where both males and females leave natal groups upon reaching maturity, combined with olfactory mediated by secretions that allow individuals to distinguish relatives and avoid mating with close kin.

Parental care and offspring development

Common marmoset infants are typically born as twins, though triplets and occasionally quadruplets occur in , with each newborn weighing approximately 25-35 grams. At birth, the infants have closed eyes and are fully dependent on their parents for the first two weeks, relying on the for while other group members begin carrying them shortly after delivery. Parental care in common marmosets is highly cooperative, with the breeding pair dominant in the group facilitating by non-breeding members. Fathers and older siblings (helpers) carry the infants for about 50% of the time in the first week, often rotating to prevent , while the focuses primarily on and spends less time carrying to avoid energy depletion. By the second week, alloparents increase their involvement in carrying and grooming, and from onward at around 6-8 weeks, they provision solid food to the young, enhancing survival through shared responsibilities. Offspring development progresses rapidly, with weaning completed by 2-3 months of age, after which juveniles begin independently but remain in the family group. Full independence is achieved around 12-15 months, coinciding with the onset of , and is reached at 15-18 months. Early is high, affecting 20-35% of live births primarily due to rejection or inadequate care in smaller groups, though larger group sizes with more reduce this rate by distributing caregiving duties. In the wild, common marmosets have a lifespan of about 12 years, while in captivity it extends to a maximum of 16-20 years under optimal conditions.

Conservation status

Population dynamics

The global population of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is unknown but considered abundant and remains stable overall, classified as Least Concern by the (last assessed in 2020, with no status change indicated as of 2025). This stability reflects the species' wide distribution across northeastern and adaptability to varied environments, though precise totals are unavailable due to challenges in surveying dense forest habitats. Population densities in native and habitats typically range from 10 to 50 individuals per km², influenced by resource availability such as gum-producing trees. In fragmented landscapes, densities often increase due to concentrated resources at edges, sometimes exceeding 50 individuals per km². The species' growth rate is supported by high reproductive output, with breeding females producing 1-2 litters annually (typically twins), though degradation offsets potential rapid expansion to maintain stability. Wild lifespan averages 12 years. Ongoing monitoring in Brazil using camera traps and genetic surveys highlights population resilience, with consistent detections across sites, but also documents local declines in isolated fragments where hybridization or occurs. Outside their native range, invasive populations of C. jacchus are expanding in urban and peri-urban areas of southeastern , supported by sources and reaching densities up to 100 individuals per km² in suitable green spaces. These introduced groups show rapid establishment and potential for further spread, contributing to broader demographic trends beyond core habitats.

Threats and protection efforts

The primary threat to the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is habitat loss and fragmentation in its native range within the Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil, where over 80% of the original forest cover has been cleared for agriculture, urbanization, and other human activities, with ongoing loss of mature forest reported as of 2025. This extensive deforestation isolates populations and limits access to mature trees suitable for gouging, which are critical for stimulating exudate production—a staple food source that constitutes up to 30-70% of their diet depending on seasonal availability. Fragmented landscapes exacerbate vulnerability to edge effects, such as increased predation and reduced genetic diversity, further compounding the impact on gouging-dependent foraging behaviors. The illegal pet trade represents a significant anthropogenic pressure, with common marmosets captured from the wild in to supply domestic and international markets, resulting in high mortality rates during capture and transport—estimated at over 90% for trafficked overall—and the spread of diseases like and among both wild and captive populations. Abandoned or escaped pets often survive in urban fringes, introducing competition and hybridization risks, while also leading to welfare issues such as and behavioral disorders in unsuitable home environments. Additionally, invasive competition from congeneric marmoset species, such as the black-tufted-ear marmoset (Callithrix penicillata), poses threats through resource overlap for s and insects, as well as hybridization that dilutes genetic purity in overlapping ranges. Hunting for remains rare due to the species' small size and protected status, though opportunistic occurs in some rural areas. further endangers populations by altering temperature regimes and precipitation patterns, potentially reducing exudate availability through shifts in tree and forest composition. Conservation efforts for the common marmoset include its listing under Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), which regulates international trade to prevent overexploitation while allowing sustainable use. In Brazil, protected areas such as national parks and reserves safeguard remaining habitats, with initiatives like those in the Serra da Malacacheira region focusing on monitoring and habitat connectivity to support native populations. Reforestation programs, including community-led planting of native tree species in degraded Atlantic Forest fragments, aim to restore gouging substrates and corridors, with projects emphasizing species like Caryocar brasiliense that provide essential exudates. As of 2025, conservation strategies have intensified with urban management protocols to curb invasive marmoset spread through targeted removal and sterilization in non-native areas, reducing hybridization risks to core populations. campaigns, promoted by organizations like the Mountain Marmosets Conservation Program, raise awareness about pet welfare and the ecological consequences of illegal capture, fostering local support for anti-trafficking enforcement and habitat protection.

Role in scientific research

Biomedical modeling

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) serves as a valuable nonhuman model in biomedical due to its physiological similarities to humans, ease of handling, and reproductive efficiency. Its small adult body weight of 300–500 g facilitates lower housing and maintenance costs compared to larger like macaques, while its short gestation period of approximately 144–150 days (about 5 months) allows for rapid generation turnover in studies. Additionally, the species exhibits a high twinning rate, often producing litters of two to four offspring with nearly 80% twinning frequency, which supports genetic and developmental investigations by enabling the study of sibling comparisons and chimerism. Historically, common marmosets have been employed in settings since the 1960s, initially in (particularly the ) and , where breeding colonies were established for studies in , , and infectious diseases. Early focused on their endocrine and metabolic profiles, which closely resemble those of humans, leading to applications in and ; by the 1970s, use expanded globally, including in the United States and , for preclinical safety assessments. Today, these models are widely adopted worldwide for their outbred , mirroring human population variability. Key applications include modeling infectious diseases, where marmosets demonstrate susceptibility to pathogens like , replicating human-like congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental effects, and , aiding in and therapeutic evaluations. In reproductive , their hepatic metabolism (e.g., enzyme expression) translates well to human , making them suitable for assessing developmental toxicity and safety of compounds during . Recent advancements (2024–2025) have leveraged marmosets for inner ear development models, providing insights into primate-specific cochlear maturation and potential therapies for due to their anatomical similarities to humans. Concurrently, studies on disease prevalence in captive populations have identified common issues like wasting marmoset syndrome (affecting up to 60% in some colonies), informing better health management protocols. Ethical considerations in marmoset research emphasize adherence to the 3Rs principles—replacement with non-animal alternatives where feasible, reduction in animal numbers through optimized study designs, and refinement of procedures to minimize and distress, such as using awake techniques. Welfare standards mandate social housing in enriched environments with vertical space to accommodate their arboreal nature, alongside rigorous veterinary monitoring to prevent captivity-related issues like stress-induced behaviors. Despite these advantages, a notable limitation is the natural hematopoietic chimerism resulting from placental fusion during twinning, which creates genetic mosaicism and can confound interpretations in genetic and immunological studies.

Neuroscience applications

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) serves as a valuable model in due to its small size, cooperative social structure, and features that facilitate advanced and manipulation techniques. Its lissencephalic , which lacks deep sulci and gyri unlike the gyrencephalic , exposes large portions of cortical areas such as the on the lateral surface, making it highly accessible for electrophysiological recordings, optical , and functional mapping. This smooth cortical structure simplifies the study of neural circuits and parallels aspects of early development, enabling investigations into visual processing and higher-order functions. In , marmosets model through tasks that reveal cooperative decision-making, such as the string-pulling apparatus, where pairs of must coordinate pulls on ropes to access rewards, demonstrating prosocial behaviors without extensive training. Their vocal learning capabilities further highlight advanced communication systems; a 2024 study showed that use acoustically distinct "phee-calls" as individual vocal labels to address specific group members, indicating referential signaling akin to naming in humans. These traits position as models for studying the neural basis of social bonds and vocal production in . Age-related cognitive decline in mirrors human patterns, particularly in . A 2025 comparative analysis revealed parallel impairments in delayed non-matching-to-sample tasks between aging and macaques, with showing reduced performance after age 7 years, similar to human midlife deficits, thus aiding on neurodegenerative processes. Technical tools enhance marmoset ; adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors enable precise optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits in animals, allowing targeted excitation or inhibition of projection-specific neurons with high specificity (up to 94% in cells). (fMRI) is feasible due to their compact brain size (approximately 10-fold smaller than macaques), supporting high-resolution mapping in states with minimal motion artifacts. Recent advances include 2025 resting-state fMRI mapping of connectivity, which identified strong functional links to prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices in awake marmosets, validating this structure's role in across . Large-scale vocalization datasets, comprising over 800,000 annotated files from captive colonies, support AI-driven analyses of call acoustics and individual signatures, advancing models for communication. To optimize welfare in settings, 2024 studies implemented visual barriers between enclosures, reducing inter-group and stress indicators like levels while increasing positive behaviors such as play, thereby improving experimental reliability.

Genetics and

Genome structure

The of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) was the first New World to be sequenced, marking a significant milestone in . This sequencing effort, led by the Washington University Genome Sequencing Center in collaboration with other institutions, produced an initial assembly in 2014 using with 7× coverage, combined with whole-genome shotgun paired-end and mate-pair reads, resulting in a 2.26-Gb assembly from a marmoset. The assembly spans 2.91 Gb overall, with 2.77 Gb ordered and oriented along chromosomes, providing a foundational resource for comparative studies. The consists of 46 diploid chromosomes (2n=46), comprising 22 pairs of autosomes and the X and Y , with most autosomes being acrocentric pairs characterized by centromeres positioned near one end. Annotation of this genome identified 21,168 protein-coding genes, including an expanded repertoire of genes (396 intact genes), which exceeds that in humans and reflects adaptations to the marmoset's arboreal . Subsequent improvements in the have elevated the assembly to chromosome-level resolution; for instance, a 2020 de novo assembly achieved a contig N50 of 6.37 Mb and scaffold N50 of 143.91 Mb, while a 2021 diploid reference incorporated long-read sequencing for fully haplotype-resolved chromosomes. A 2023 de novo assembly (Callithrix_jacchus-6.0) further improved contiguity to a contig N50 of 25.23 Mb and scaffold N50 of 98.2 Mb using PacBio long-read sequencing (70× coverage) combined with Illumina short reads and data, achieving 98.8% completeness for genes. A unique challenge in sequencing the genome arises from natural hematopoietic chimerism, where fraternal twins exchange stem cells , leading to mixed cell lines in adult tissues that can confound genomic analyses by introducing allelic mosaicism. This phenomenon, prevalent in over 80% of marmosets, was accounted for in the initial assembly by using tissues from a non-chimeric individual and validating against chimeric samples. The refined assemblies have further mitigated these issues through separation and deep sequencing. Public access to the marmoset genome is facilitated through repositories such as Ensembl, which hosts the chromosome-level assembly with gene annotations, and NCBI , providing raw sequence data and variant resources for ongoing research.

Genetic adaptations

The common marmoset exhibits unique genetic adaptations that facilitate its strategy, particularly through mechanisms supporting obligatory twinning and reproductive suppression in subordinates. Dizygotic twinning, a hallmark of callitrichid , is linked to nonsynonymous changes in genes such as BMP15, GDF9, and WFIKKN1, which influence maturation and follicular development to promote multiple ovulations. In subordinate females, ovarian suppression is primarily physiological, involving inadequate secretion and failure to ovulate, though genetic factors like variations in the (including LATS2 homologs) may contribute to inhibited follicular proliferation in non-dominant individuals across . These adaptations ensure that only dominant pairs breed, with subordinates aiding in offspring care, enhancing group survival in resource-limited environments. The marmoset's shows an expanded repertoire of (OR) genes, with 396 intact functional OR genes identified in its , enabling sophisticated detection of environmental cues such as critical for its exudativorous diet. This repertoire, part of a larger cluster exceeding 800 OR loci including pseudogenes, reflects evolutionary retention of olfactory sensitivity in despite pseudogenization trends in other primates. The expansion supports precise gouging and scent-marking behaviors at exudate sites, where volatile compounds signal resource quality and territorial boundaries. Genetic features of the render common marmosets highly susceptible to pathogens, serving as valuable models for infectious diseases. They lack key immune effectors like NAIP and NLRC4 and have a reduced killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) repertoire (only two genes versus dozens in s), contributing to vulnerability. Notably, marmosets are susceptible to GB virus B (GBV-B), a hepacivirus closely related to (HCV), which integrates into host cells and induces acute mirroring infection; while GBV-C (a pegivirus) has not been directly reported, related simian pegiviruses occur endogenously in marmoset populations. Positive selection on immune genes like CD48 and IL-5 may reflect adaptations to parasitic pressures in their native habitat. Positive selection has shaped genes in the / (GH-IGF) axis, promoting the marmoset's diminutive body size (around 250-350 grams) and accelerated reproductive rate, with females producing twins annually. Specific targets include IGF1R, IGF2, and GHSR, where substitutions enhance growth pathway efficiency, supporting early maturity ( at 12-18 months) and high despite small stature. These changes likely arose under selective pressures for rapid population turnover in fragmented habitats. Population genetics reveal low nucleotide diversity in native northeastern Brazilian ranges (π ≈ 0.001), attributed to historical bottlenecks from deforestation and isolation in coastal forests, contrasting with elevated diversity in invasive populations outside their range. Invasive groups in southeastern Brazil exhibit higher heterozygosity through multiple founder introductions and hybridization with congeners like Callithrix penicillata, mitigating inbreeding depression but posing risks to endemic taxa via genetic swamping. Recent 2025 studies on chimerism—stemming from twin exchange affecting up to 37% of hematopoietic cells—have advanced demographic inference by developing Bayesian models that account for chimeric sampling biases in genomic data. These approaches reveal stable ancestral effective sizes (Ne ≈ 10,000-20,000) over the past million years, with recent declines in native ranges, informing evolutionary history and conservation without overestimating diversity due to chimeric artifacts. Building on this, a October 2025 study quantified the impacts of chimerism on selection inference, identifying genome-wide patterns of purifying, positive, and balancing selection while accounting for twinning and chimerism biases.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Callithrix_jacchus/
  2. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/pin-factsheets/pin-factsheet-common-marmoset/
  3. https://neprimateconservancy.org/common-marmoset/
  4. https://www.worldlandtrust.org/species/mammals/common-marmoset/
  5. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=572915
  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=9483
  7. https://www.cell.com/trends/genetics/fulltext/S0168-9525(21)00141-4
  8. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=572807
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4464756/
  10. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/20/3/424/1035768
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790314001596
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8235625/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4138798/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790317302762
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4075048/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9444974/
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/callithrix-jacchus
  18. https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6c903ce8-76c9-4d0e-a260-6123bafdb3d9/content
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254408543_Body_Weight_of_Wild_and_Captive_Common_Marmosets_Callithrix_jacchus
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3607500/
  21. https://www.nationalzoo.com.au/common-marmosets
  22. https://rep.bioscientifica.com/downloadpdf/journals/rep/53/1/jrf_53_1_031.pdf
  23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005433722475
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11440105_Relations_among_measures_of_body_composition_age_and_sex_in_the_common_marmoset_monkey_Callithrix_jacchus
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345546484_Callithrix_jacchus
  26. https://www.gbif.org/species/5219542
  27. https://news.mongabay.com/2020/10/marmosets-trafficked-as-pets-now-threaten-native-species-in-atlantic-forest/
  28. https://www.cokesmithwildlife.com/common-marmoset-callithrix-jacchus
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/callithrix-jacchus
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533491/
  31. https://www.perspectecolconserv.com/en-are-invasive-marmosets-harmful-atlantic-articulo-S2530064421000225
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347707404_Common_marmosets_Callithrix_jacchus_Linnaeus_1758_Primates_Cebidae_Callitrichinae_in_an_urban_mangrove_behavioral_ecology_and_environmental_influences
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/callithrix
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27813145/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308932414_Feeding_habits_of_marmosets_A_case_study_of_bark_anatomy_and_chemical_composition_of_Anadenanthera_peregrina_gum
  36. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112321
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241275/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293638193_Feeding_ecology_and_behavioral_adjustments_flexibility_of_a_small_neotropical_primate_Callithrix_jacchus_to_survive_in_a_semiarid_environment
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334461/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4221360/
  41. https://www.dpz.eu/en/service/animal-husbandry/primates-at-the-dpz/common-marmosets
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48643-x
  43. https://nagonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/NAGFS1303CALLITRICHIDSAPR7-2003.pdf
  44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1749-4877.12448
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10203885/
  46. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13609
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326906270_Do_Common_Marmosets_Callithrix_jacchus_Use_Scent_to_Communicate_Information_about_Food_Resources
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2015/685816
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3140946/
  50. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/callicam/c-jacchus-social-organization-and-behavior/
  51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02736250
  52. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02382857
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4840471/
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/callithrix
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937914/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4644241/
  57. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp3757
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X0500173X
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32298305/
  60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.23669
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229768297_Social_communication_by_olfactory_signals_in_marmosets
  62. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajp.22167
  63. https://nc3rs.org.uk/3rs-resources/senses-and-communication-non-human-primate
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239943028_The_Behavioral_Context_of_Visual_Displays_in_Common_Marmosets_Callithrix_jacchus
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261535/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8245035/
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217305407
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16163713/
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003347295801065
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482116/
  71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55632/
  72. https://aszk.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Mammals.-Common-Marmoset-2008SF.pdf
  73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6683847/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11650941/
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275064934_The_common_marmoset_Callithrix_jacchus_as_a_model_for_developmental_and_reproductive_toxicity_testing
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143105/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2799416/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5619809/
  79. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185695
  80. https://aalas.kglmeridian.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/72010023/53/4/article-p364.pdf
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6008109/
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482509000948
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1518282/
  84. https://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1855
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989423002585
  86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25407393/
  87. https://genomics.senescence.info/species/entry.php?species=Callithrix_jacchus
  88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378870751_Mammal_surveys_and_vertical_strata_use_in_an_Atlantic_Forest_patch_in_the_Pernambuco_Endemism_Center_northeastern_Brazil
  89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278044227_Natural_and_Anthropogenic_Hybridization_in_Two_Species_of_Eastern_Brazilian_Marmosets_Callithrix_jacchus_and_C_penicillata
  90. https://search.proquest.com/openview/d2034bcd32ba91c062aac9a42be0aeca/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54815
  91. https://worldrainforests.com/mata-atlantica/
  92. https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/brazils-atlantic-forest-still-losing-large-amounts-of-mature-forest-despite-legal-protection/
  93. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44353-025-00024-4
  94. https://news.[mongabay](/page/Mongabay).com/2020/10/marmosets-trafficked-as-pets-now-threaten-native-species-in-atlantic-forest/
  95. https://www.wwf.org.br/?33822/Illegal-trading-threat-species-all-over-the-world
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419300848
  97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.12872
  98. https://earthwatch.org/expeditions/wildlife-and-reforestation-brazil
  99. https://www.mountainmarmosetsconservation.com/mmcp-initiatives
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9310150/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4160941/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10202718/
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12328889/
  104. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1548757/full
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9214643/
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8541938/
  107. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk3986
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10889019/
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40131878/
  110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40667064/
  111. https://academic.oup.com/ilarjournal/article/61/2-3/274/6149923
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12344515/
  113. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-04951-8
  114. https://awionline.org/awi-quarterly/fall-2024/improving-welfare-captive-marmosets-using-visual-barriers
  115. https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3042
  116. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-6657-2
  117. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03535-x
  118. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122185
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8517930/
  120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986838/
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC16022/
  122. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30089296/
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5008089/
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7599636/
  125. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-04276-7
  126. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/42/6/msaf119/8150930
  127. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41437-025-00804-7
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.