Hubbry Logo
CerradoCerradoMain
Open search
Cerrado
Community hub
Cerrado
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cerrado
Vegetation in Pirineus State Park, Goiás
Map of the Cerrado ecoregion as delineated by the World Wide Fund for Nature.
Ecology
RealmNeotropical
Biometropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrublands
Borders
List
Geography
Area1,910,037 km2 (737,469 sq mi)
Countries
Conservation
Conservation statusVulnerable
Global 200Cerrado woodlands and savannas
Protected433,581 km2 (23%)[1]

The Cerrado (Portuguese pronunciation: [seˈʁadu]) is a vast ecoregion of tropical savanna in central Brazil, being present in the states of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Tocantins, Maranhão, Piauí, Bahia, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná and the Federal District. The core areas of the Cerrado biome are the Brazilian highlands – the Planalto. The main habitat types of the Cerrado consist of forest savanna, wooded savanna, park savanna and gramineous-woody savanna. The Cerrado also includes savanna wetlands and gallery forests.[2]

The second largest of Brazil's major habitat types, after the Amazonian rainforest, the Cerrado accounts for a full 21 percent of the country's land area (extending marginally into Paraguay and Bolivia).[3] About 75% of the Cerrado’s 2 million km2 is privately owned.[4]

Vast amounts of research have shown that the Cerrado is one of the richest of all tropical savanna regions and has high levels of endemism. Characterizing it by its enormous ranges of plant and animal biodiversity, World Wide Fund for Nature named the Cerrado the biologically richest savanna in the world, with about 10,000 plant species and 10 endemic bird species.[3] There are nearly 200 species of mammal in the Cerrado, though only 14 are endemic.[3] The large fraction of private ownership makes protection difficult, however.[4]

Climate

[edit]

The Cerrado's climate is typical of the wetter savanna regions of the world, with a semi-humid tropical climate. The Cerrado is limited to two dominant seasons throughout the year: Wet and dry. Annual temperatures for the Cerrado average between 22 and 27 °C and average precipitation between 80–200 cm for over 90% of the area.[5] This ecoregion has a very strong dry season during the southern winter (approx. April–September).[5]

Green vegetation during the summer, Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, Brazil

Flora

[edit]
See also: List of plants of Cerrado vegetation of Brazil
See also: Category:Flora of the Cerrado
Fields of flowers in bloom during spring, Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, Brazil

The Cerrado is characterized by unique vegetation types.[5] It is composed of a shifting mosaic of habitats, with the savanna-like cerrado itself on well-drained areas between strips of gallery forest (closed canopy tall forest) which occur along streams.[6][5] Between the cerrado and the gallery forest is an area of vegetation known as the wet campo with distinct up- and downslope borders where tree growth is inhibited due to wide seasonal fluctuations in the water table.[5][6]

The savanna portion of the Cerrado is heterogeneous in terms of canopy cover. Goodland (1971)[7] divided the Cerrado into four categories ranging from least to most canopy cover: campo sujo (herbaceous layer with occasional small trees about 3 m tall), campo cerrado (slightly higher density of trees about 4 m tall on average), cerrado sensu stricto (orchard-like vegetation with trees about 6 m high) and cerradão (canopy cover near 50% with general height 9 m).[7]

Probably around 800 species of trees are found in the Cerrado.[5] Among the most diverse families of trees in the Cerrado are the Leguminosae (153 spp.), Malpighiaceae (46), Myrtaceae (43), Melastomataceae (32), and Rubiaceae (30).[8] Much of the Cerrado is dominated by the Vochysiaceae (23 species in the Cerrado) due to the abundance of three species in the genus Qualea.[5] The herbaceous layer usually reaches about 60 cm in height and is composed mainly of the Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Leguminosae, Compositae, Myrtaceae and Rubiaceae.[5] Much of the vegetation in the gallery forests is similar to nearby rainforest; however, there are some endemic species found only in the Cerrado gallery forests.[5]

Soil fertility, fire regime and hydrology are thought to be most influential in determining Cerrado vegetation. Cerrado soils are always well-drained and most are oxisols with low pH and low calcium and magnesium.[5][9] The amount of potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus has been found to be positively correlated with tree trunk basal area in Cerrado habitats.[10] Much as in other grasslands and savannas, fire is important in maintaining and shaping the Cerrado's landscape; many plants in the Cerrado are fire-adapted, exhibiting characters like thick corky bark to withstand the heat.[5]

Cerrado vegetation is believed to be ancient, stretching back perhaps as far in a prototypic form as the Cretaceous, before Africa and South America separated.[11] A dynamic expansion and contraction between cerrado and Amazonian rainforest has probably occurred historically, with expansion of the Cerrado during glacial periods like the Pleistocene.[12] These processes and the resulting fragmentation in multiple refugia have probably contributed to the high species richness both of the Cerrado and of the Amazonian rainforest.[5]

Fauna

[edit]
See also: Category:Fauna of the Cerrado
The frog species Physalaemus nattereri (posterior view shown) is found in the open cerrado, but not in adjacent gallery forests[13]

The Cerrado has a high diversity of vertebrates, with 150 amphibian species, 120 reptile species, 837 bird species, and 161 mammal species recorded.[14] Lizard diversity is generally thought to be relatively low in the Cerrado compared to other areas like caatinga or lowland rainforest,[15] although one recent study found 57 species in one cerrado area with the high diversity driven by the availability of open habitat.[16] Ameiva ameiva is among the largest lizards found in the Cerrado and is the most important lizard predator where it is found in the Cerrado.[15] There is a relatively high diversity of snakes in the Cerrado (22–61 species, depending on site) with Colubridae being the richest family.[17] The open nature of the cerrado vegetation most likely contributes to the high diversity of snakes.[17] Information about Cerrado amphibians is extremely limited, although the Cerrado probably has a unique assemblage of species with some endemic to the region.[13]

Most birds found in the Cerrado breed there although there are some Austral migrants (breed in temperate South America and winter in the Amazon basin) and Nearctic migrants (breed in temperate North America and winter in the Neotropics) that pass through.[18] Most breeding birds in the Cerrado are found in more closed canopy areas like gallery forests although 27% of the birds breed only in open habitats and 21% breed in either open or closed habitats.[18] Many of the birds in the Cerrado, especially those found in closed forest, are related to species from the Atlantic rainforest and also the Amazon rainforest.[19] The crowned solitary eagle, hyacinth macaw, toco toucan, buff-necked ibis, dwarf tinamou, and Brazilian merganser are examples of birds found in the Cerrado.

Gallery forests serve as primary habitat for most of the mammals in the Cerrado, having more water, being protected from fires that sweep the landscape and having a more highly structured habitat.[20] Eleven mammal species are endemic to the Cerrado.[20] Notable species include large herbivores like the Brazilian tapir and Pampas deer and large predators like the maned wolf, cougar, jaguar, giant otter, ocelot and jaguarundi. Although the diversity is much lower than in the adjacent Amazon and Atlantic Forest, several species of monkeys are present, including black-striped capuchin, black howler monkey and black-tufted marmoset.[21]

The insects of the Cerrado are relatively understudied.[22] A yearlong survey of the Cerrado at one reserve in Brazil found that the orders Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Isoptera accounted for 89.5% of all captures.[22] The Cerrado also supports a high density (up to 4000 per hectare) of the nests of leaf cutter ants (saúvas), which are also very diverse.[23] Along with termites, leaf cutter ants are the primary herbivores of the Cerrado and play an important role in consuming and decomposing organic matter, as well as constituting an important food source to many other animal species.[24] The highest diversity of galling insects (insects that build galls) in the world is also found in the Cerrado, with the most species (46) found at the base of the Serra do Cipó in southeast Brazil.[25]


History and human population

[edit]

The first detailed European account of the Brazilian cerrados was provided by Danish botanist Eugenius Warming (1892) in the book Lagoa Santa,[26] in which he describes the main features of the cerrado vegetation in the state of Minas Gerais.[27]

Taking advantage of the sprouting of the herbaceous stratum that follows a burning in the Cerrado, the aboriginal inhabitants of these regions learned to use fire as a tool, to increase the fodder to offer to their domesticated animals.

Xavantes, Tapuias [pt], Karajás, Avá-Canoeiros, Krahôs, Xerentes, Xacriabás were some of the first indigenous peoples occupying different regions in the Cerrado. Many groups among the indigenous were nomads and explored the Cerrado by hunting and collecting. Others practiced coivara agriculture, an itinerant type of slash-and-burn agriculture. The mixing of indigenous, quilombola maroon communities, extractivists, geraizeiros (living in the drier regions), riverbank dwellers and vazanteiros (living on floodplains) shaped a diverse local population that relies heavily on the resources of their environment.[28]

Until the mid-1960s, agricultural activities in the Cerrado were very limited, since natural cerrado soils are not fertile enough for crop production, directed mainly at the extensive production of beef cattle for subsistence of the local market.[5] After this period, however, the urban and industrial development of the Southeast Region has forced agriculture to the Central-West Region. The transfer of the country's capital to Brasília has been another focus of attraction of population to the central region: From 1975 until the beginning of the 1980s, many governmental subsidy programs were launched to promote agriculture, with the intent of stimulating the development of the Cerrado region.[29] As a result, there has been a significant increase in agricultural and cattle production.

On the other hand, the urban pressure and the rapid establishment of agricultural activities in the region have been rapidly reducing the biodiversity of the ecosystems, and the population in the Cerrado region more than doubled from 1970 to 2010, going from 35.8 to 76 million.[30]

Rivers

[edit]

The Cerrado biome is strategic for the water resources of Brazil. The biome contains the headwaters and the largest portion of South American watersheds (the Paraná-Paraguay, Araguaia-Tocantins, and São Francisco river basins) and the upper catchments of large Amazon tributaries, such as the Xingu and Tapajós. During the last four decades, the Cerrado’s river basins have been highly impacted by extreme deforestation, expansion of the agricultural and cattle ranching frontier, construction of dams, and extraction of water for irrigation.[31][non-primary source needed]

Commercial activity

[edit]

Agriculture

[edit]

The Cerrado was thought challenging for agriculture until researchers at Brazil's agricultural and livestock research agency, Embrapa, discovered that it could be made fit for industrial crops by appropriate additions of phosphorus and lime. In the late 1990s, between 14 million and 16 million tons of lime were being poured on Brazilian fields each year. The quantity rose to 25 million tons in 2003 and 2004, equaling around five tons of lime per hectare. This manipulation of the soil allowed for industrial agriculture to grow exponentially in the area. Researchers also developed tropical varieties of soybeans, until then a temperate crop, and currently, Brazil is the world's main soyabeans exporter due to the boom in animal feed production caused by the global rise in meat demand.[32][33][34]

Today the Cerrado region provides more than 70% of the beef cattle production in the country, being also a major production center of grains, mainly soya, beans, maize, and rice.[35] Large extensions of the Cerrado are also used for the production of cellulose pulp for the paper industry, with the cultivation of several species of eucalyptus and pines, but as a secondary activity. Coffee produced in the Cerrado is now a major export.[36]

During the last 25 years this biome has been increasingly threatened by industrial monoculture farming, particularly soybeans, the unregulated expansion of industrial agriculture, the burning of vegetation for charcoal and the development of dams to provide irrigation are drawing criticisms and have been identified as potential threats to several Brazilian rivers.[29]

This industrial farming of the Cerrado, with the clearing of land for eucalyptus and soy plantations, has grown so much because of various forms of subsidy, including very generous tax incentives and low interest loans. This has resulted in the establishment of a highly mechanized, capital intensive system of agriculture.[37] There is also a strong agribusiness lobby in Brazil and in particular, the production of soybeans in the Cerrado is influenced by large corporations such as ADM, Cargill and Bunge, these latter two directly associated with the mass deforestation of this biome.[38][39][40]

Charcoal production

[edit]

Charcoal production for Brazil's steel industry is a significant income generating activity in the Cerrado.[8] It is closely interwined with agriculture. When land is cleared for agricultural land use, the tree's trunks and roots are often used in the production of charcoal, financing the clearing. The Brazilian steel industry has traditionally used the trunks and roots from the Cerrado for charcoal, but now that the steel mills in the state of Minas Gerais are among the world's largest, it has taken a much higher toll on the Cerrado.[8] Due to conservation efforts and the diminishing vegetation in the Cerrado, charcoal is increasingly sourced from the eucalyptus plantations.[8]

Conservation

[edit]
[edit]

The Cerrado is the second-largest biome in South America and the most biodiverse savanna in the world. It encompasses the Guarani Aquifer and holds the largest underground freshwater reservoirs on the continent. The Cerrado also plays a crucial hydrological role, supplying water to one-third of the Amazon River and supporting several of South America's major river basins.[40][41]

Despite its ecological importance, Brazilian agricultural policies and land-use planning have historically regarded the Cerrado as having low conservation value. As a result, only 1.5% of the biome is protected under federal reserves.[3] By 1994, roughly 695,000 km², representing 35% of its total area, had already been converted to anthropogenic landscapes.[29][27] In total, 37.3% of the Cerrado has been completely converted for human use, while an additional 41.4% is used for extensive pasture and charcoal production.

The biome’s gallery forests are among the most degraded ecosystems. As of recent estimates, only about 432,814 km² (or 21.3% of the original vegetation) remains intact.[42] Vegetation loss continues at an alarming rate, with projections suggesting that a further 31–34% of the remaining biome could be cleared by 2050 if current trends persist.[43] Recent studies have shown that approximately 19% of the Cerrado, around 17 million hectares, exhibits significant woody plant encroachment. This densification, marked by a 40% increase in wood cover, has led to a reduction in plant diversity by about 30%.[44][45]

One of the key challenges in establishing effective nature reserves in the Cerrado lies in its floristic heterogeneity and complex mosaic of vegetation types, which complicates the selection of representative conservation areas.[29] To address this, collaborative efforts have been underway involving the University of Brasília, Embrapa's Cerrado Research Center (CPAC), and the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, supported by Brazilian, European, and British funding. These partnerships have expanded into a major Anglo-Brazilian initiative titled "Conservation and Management of the Biodiversity of the Cerrado Biome", funded by the UK Overseas Development Administration. The project's primary objective is to survey floristic patterns, identify biodiversity hotspots, and recommend priority areas for conservation.[5]

Protected areas

[edit]
A State Park in the Cerrado - Protected Area

According to Brazil's National Registry of Conservation Units (Portuguese: Castrado Nacional de Unidades de Conservação), there are, as of November 2024, 560 protected areas within the Cerrado biome.[46] In Brazil, protected areas are known as conservation units, and those in the Cerrado account for 19% of all units in the country. While a 2017 assessment found that 433,581 km2, or 23%, of the ecoregion is in protected areas, in total, these registered conservation units make up roughly 17.96 Mha of land, which represents about 9% of the total area of the Cerrado.[1][46] Despite its ecological importance, the Cerrado is not recognized by the Brazilian Constitution as a National Heritage.[5]

The first protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado was the Paraobepa National Forest which was established in 1950.[46] Until the early 1990’s, the progression of the network was slow, with only a handful of protected areas established each year. During the late 1990’s and early 2000’s there was a boom of new protected areas, which coincides with the passing of Law No. 9.985, of July 18, 2000.[47] This law established the National System of Nature Conservation Units (SNUC) and defines the concepts for the creation and management of conservation units in Brazil, marking the beginning of their legal regulation. Between 1997 and 2006, a total of 179 conservation units were established in the Cerrado, accounting for almost one third of the entire current network.[46] Since this boom, the rate at which new conservation units are created each year has slowed down but varies considerably from year to year.

Types of Protected Areas

[edit]

Protected areas in Brazil are called conservation units (UC) and are governed by the National System of Nature Conservation Units (SNUC). The SNUC itself is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change.

There are two groups of conservation units in Brazil, namely Integral Protection (IP) and Sustainable Protection (SP). Integral protection units exist to protect nature, and use of their resources is limited to recreation and tourism.[48] Sustainable protection units aim to reconcile the conservation of nature with the sustainable use of its natural resources.[48] Out of the 560 conservation units in the Cerrado, there are 176 integral protection units and 384 sustainable protection units.[46] Within each type of conservation unit, there exist several categories, which are each associated with a category of the IUCN protected area classification system.

All categories of conservation units can exist at the federal, state, or municipal level. Federal conservation units are managed by the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio).[49] In the Cerrado biome, there are currently 241 federally managed conservation units, which make up 6.41 Mha of land.[46] State conservation units are managed by state environmental agencies. There are currently 210 conservation units managed at the state level in the Cerrado, which make up 10.15 Mha of land.[46] Municipal conservation units are managed by the municipal environmental secretariats. There are currently 109 conservation units managed at the municipal level in the Cerrado, spanning roughly 1.41 Mha of land.[46]

Integral Protection Units in the Cerrado (as of 2024)
Type IUCN Category [50] Purpose and Characteristics [48] No. of Units Area Examples [46]
Ecological Station Ia Dedicated to scientific research and strict nature preservation; public visitation limited to educational purposes. 24 916.4 thousand ha Serra Geral do Tocantins Ecological Station
Biological Reserve Ia Aims to preserve biodiversity; interventions allowed only for restoration; visitation limited to educational purposes. 6 8,196 ha Culuene Biological Reserve
National Park (including State and Municipal Parks) II Protects ecologically significant ecosystems; allows recreation, education, and scientific research. 116 4.37 million ha Araguaia National Park
Natural Monument III Preserves unique, rare, or scenic natural features; visitation allowed if aligned with conservation goals. 18 46 thousand ha Tocantins Fossil Trees Natural Monument
Wildlife Refuge III Protects habitats for the reproduction and survival of local flora and fauna; visitation permitted for certain uses. 12 261 thousand ha Corixão de Mata Azul Wildlife Refuge
Sustainable Use Protected Areas in the Cerrado (as of 2024)
Type IUCN Category [50] Purpose and Characteristics [48] No. of Units Area Examples [46]
Environmental Protection Area (APA) V Large areas with natural, aesthetic, and cultural value; aim to conserve biodiversity, guide human occupation, and promote sustainable use. 114 11.9 million ha Baixada Maranhense Environmental Protection Area
Area of Relevant Ecological Interest (ARIE) IV Small areas with unique regional/local ecosystems; limited human occupation; may be public or private. 22 11.4 thousand ha Cerrado Pé de Gigante ARIE
National Forests (Federal/State/Municipal) VI Native forests for sustainable resource use and scientific research; traditional populations may remain. 11 51.6 thousand ha Cristópolis National Forest
Extractive Reserve VI Publicly owned; supports traditional populations using extractivism, small farming, and husbandry; allows research and visitation. 7 100 thousand ha Chapada Limpa Extractive Reserve
Sustainable Development Reserve VI Inhabited by traditional populations using sustainable systems; supports cultural preservation, research, and visitation. 2 97.3 thousand ha Nascentes Geraizeiras and Veredas do Acari SDRs
Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park - UNESCO World Heritage Site

UNESCO World Heritage Sites

[edit]

Two conservation units in the Cerrado biome have been designated together as a UNESCO World Heritage Site: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. Together they are known by UNESCO as the Cerrado Protected Areas, making up 38.14 kha of land.[51] These conservation units were inscribed by UNESCO in 2001 for two main reasons. Firstly, the units are centrally localized and have varying altitudes, making them robust areas of refuge for species. Secondly, the units excellently represent the biodiversity of the Cerrado biome, with more than 60% of all plant species and almost 80% of all vertebrate species that exist in the region. Many endangered species occur in these units, making them important targets for conservation.[51]

Both Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas are National Parks that are federally managed. As National Parks, they are registered as integral protection units and benefit from strict regulations preventing the direct use of their resources. Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park was established in 1961 and comprises 240 kha of land. Its area overlaps with the Environmental Protection Area of Pouso Alto, which is a sustainable protection conservation unit that was established in 2001.[46][51] Emas National Park was established in 1961, and it makes up 132 kha of land.[46] Its management focuses on preventing the negative effects of the agricultural area that almost completely surrounds it.[51]

Effectiveness of Protected Areas

[edit]

Concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado given the small proportion of land they cover and their varying degrees of strictness. Overlapping conservation units is an area of particular interest given the redundancy of the same area being protected and the possibility of management conflicts. In 2020, almost 40% of all conservation units in the Cerrado had some overlap with other units.[52] A total of 64 conservation units were completely within other units.[52] Most of these were areas of ecological interest within environmental protection areas, which are both sustainable protection units.

When they are created, each conservation unit in Brazil should be assigned a management plan which outlines the conservation practices that will take place within the unit as well as a management council to guide its conservation.[53] The management plan establishes a number of guidelines and rules necessary for the management of the conservation unit. This includes the zoning of the area, in which the conservation unit is divided into different sections categorized by their required degrees of protection.[53] The management council is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the management plan and acts as a link between local populations and stakeholders with economic or environmental priorities. As of 2024, almost 40% of all conservation units registered in the Cerrado do not have a management plan and about 60% do not have a management council.[46]

Some studies have evaluated the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado depending on their strictness. Sustainable protection units, which are less strict as biodiversity conservation is not their primary goal, have been found to be ineffective against deforestation.[54] In 2015, 85% of all protected areas in the Cerrado, excluding private natural heritage reserves, were environmental protected areas, which are sustainable protection units.[54] Integral protection units in the Cerrado are the most efficient in biodiversity protection in terms of reducing deforestation and maintaining species richness.[54][55]

Conservation units should be representative of the biome they protect. In 2015, only two thirds of protected areas corresponded to remaining native vegetation in the Cerrado, with the other one third representing deforested areas within different conservation units.[54] Despite this, protected areas have been found to be effective in representing both ecosystem services and biodiversity of the Cerrado.[56]

Privately Owned Land

[edit]

Privately owned land is essential for conservation efforts as the majority of remaining native vegetation in the Cerrado occurs in private properties and farms. In 2019, private lands held 57.9% of the remaining native vegetation in the Cerrado.[57] Brazil’s Forest Code requires land owners to retain 20% of native vegetation as Legal Reserves on their properties in all biomes except the Amazon, where the number is 80%.[58] Legal Reserves in the Cerrado are essential for biodiversity protection, as about 13% of the distribution range of threatened species exist within them.[59] Changes made to the Forest Code in 2012 legally allow almost 40 Mha of extra native vegetation to be cleared on top of the original allowance.[58] In 2017, this amounted to 40% of remaining native vegetation in the biome legally able to be converted.[43]

Compliance with the Forest Code by landowners is an issue in the Cerrado as some consider the legislation to be a roadblock for agricultural development.[58][60] There are measures in place to increase compliance, such as the Rural Environmental Registry System (CAR), which is a documentation system of environmental information of millions of rural properties that facilitates their monitoring and management.[58] Monetary incentives are also offered by the Brazilian government in the form of the Low-Carbon Agriculture (ABC) program to promote sustainable agriculture and forest restoration.[58]

Indigenous Land

[edit]

Indigenous lands (IL) remain an important sector for biodiversity conservation in the Cerrado. The government of Brazil has recognized 4.8% of the Cerrado’s area as IL.[56] In 2019, 6.72% of remaining native vegetation occurred within IL, compared to the 2.27% that was preserved within conservation units.[57] Indigenous lands also effectively represent the ecosystem services and biodiversity characteristic of the Cerrado biome and are efficient in reducing habitat conversion and deforestation.[56][61]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cerrado

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Cerrado is a vast tropical savanna biome in central South America, primarily encompassing approximately 2 million km² within Brazil, equivalent to about 22% of the nation's land area. This ecoregion features a heterogeneous mosaic of open grasslands, shrublands, and dry woodlands adapted to infertile, acidic soils, pronounced seasonal rainfall, and recurrent wildfires that shape its structure and maintain its ecological dynamics. Renowned as the world's most biodiverse savanna, the Cerrado harbors over 12,000 vascular plant species—more than 4% of global flora—with roughly one-third endemic, alongside diverse vertebrate assemblages including endemic mammals like the maned wolf and giant anteater, and high reptile and bird diversity. Its floristic richness surpasses that of other savannas, with woody plants exhibiting fire-resistant traits such as thick bark and resprouting capabilities, while herbaceous layers thrive post-fire. Ecologically, the biome functions as a critical hydrological hub, supplying headwaters to major watersheds like the Amazon, Paraná, and São Francisco rivers, which sustain water resources for over 120 million people across South America. Despite its global significance, the Cerrado has undergone extensive habitat conversion, with more than 50% of its original vegetation cleared for soybean cultivation, cattle ranching, and other agriculture, rendering it one of Brazil's most deforested biomes after the Atlantic Forest. This expansion, driven by economic demands for commodities, has accelerated biodiversity loss and disrupted fire regimes, exacerbating soil degradation and carbon emissions, though only about 1-2% remains formally protected. Conservation efforts lag behind those for rainforests, underscoring the need for balanced land-use strategies that account for the biome's role in food production and ecosystem services.

Geography and Physical Characteristics

Extent and Location

The Cerrado is a tropical savanna ecoregion situated primarily in central Brazil, encompassing the Brazilian Central Plateau at elevations ranging from 300 to 1,700 meters above sea level. It occupies a transitional position between the Amazon rainforest to the north and west, the Atlantic Forest along the southeastern coast, the semi-arid Caatinga to the northeast, and the Pantanal wetlands to the southwest. This central location positions the Cerrado as a critical hydrological hub, with headwaters of major river systems originating within its boundaries. The biome originally covered approximately 2 million square kilometers, representing about 22 percent of Brazil's land area, making it the country's second-largest biome after the Amazon. It spans 11 states—Bahia, Goiás, Maranhão, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Piauí, Rondônia, São Paulo, and Tocantins—along with the Federal District, with the largest extents in Goiás, Mato Grosso, and Minas Gerais. Minor extensions reach into northeastern Paraguay and eastern Bolivia, though over 90 percent lies within Brazil.

Geology and Soils

The Cerrado biome is underlain by the ancient rocks of the Brazilian Shield, one of South America's largest and oldest geological formations, encompassing and cratons with ages exceeding 2 billion years. These basement rocks, including gneisses, granites, and metamorphic complexes, form a stable platform with minimal post- deformation, resulting in landscapes of dissected plateaus, undulating plains, and scattered inselbergs or rocky hills. The shield's stability has facilitated prolonged surface exposure and , shaping the biome's without significant sedimentary cover in most areas. Soils in the Cerrado are predominantly Oxisols, classified as Latosols in the Brazilian system, which are highly weathered, deep, and well-drained due to the extended tropical climate acting on the stable shield substrate. These soils exhibit dystrophic characteristics, including low fertility, high acidity, elevated aluminum saturation, and low cation exchange capacity from intense leaching and mineral alteration over geological timescales. Kaolinite dominates the clay fraction, with iron and aluminum oxides contributing to their red or yellowish hues and granular structure. Latosols cover the majority of the biome, with red Latosols being particularly prevalent, though patches of less weathered Entisols or lithosols occur on steeper slopes or sedimentary remnants. This soil profile, among the most ancient and impoverished globally, underscores the adaptive pressures on Cerrado flora, favoring species with extensive root systems to exploit subsurface resources.

Climate and Hydrology

Climate Patterns

The Cerrado biome exhibits a tropical savanna climate, predominantly classified as Aw under the Köppen-Geiger system, marked by high temperatures year-round and pronounced seasonality between wet and dry periods. Annual mean temperatures typically range from 22 to 27 °C, with monthly averages varying between 18 and 28 °C and maximums often surpassing 40 °C during the hottest months of September and October. Precipitation averages 800 to 2000 mm annually, though values decrease from 1800 mm in northern transitional zones near the Amazon to around 1000 mm in southern areas bordering semi-arid regions. Over 80% of rainfall occurs during the wet season, spanning October or November to April, driven by the South American monsoon and Intertropical Convergence Zone migration, while the dry season from May to September receives negligible amounts, peaking in aridity during June to August. Regional variations exist, with northeastern Cerrado areas recording the lowest annual totals (as low as 663 mm in some locales) and more uniform but still seasonal patterns in central highlands. These patterns foster a fire regime, as dry-season droughts desiccate vegetation, promoting natural and anthropogenic burns that shape ecosystem dynamics.

Rivers and Water Resources

The Cerrado biome serves as a critical hydrological hub for Brazil, encompassing headwaters and substantial portions of eight of the country's twelve major river basins, which collectively supply water to diverse regions including the Amazon to the north, the Pantanal wetlands to the southwest, and the Caatinga to the northeast. This positioning enables the Cerrado to contribute significantly to transcontinental water flows, with its savanna landscapes facilitating groundwater recharge and surface runoff during the pronounced wet season from October to April. Prominent rivers originating or primarily draining the Cerrado include the Araguaia, which extends over 2,160 kilometers and drains approximately 385,000 square kilometers as the biome's largest free-flowing river; the Tocantins-Araguaia system, which feeds into the Amazon basin; and the São Francisco, whose headwaters derive about 70% of their flow from Cerrado soils, supporting northeastern Brazil's water needs. Other key waterways encompass the Paraná (with major tributaries like the Grande and Paranaíba rivers sourcing from the biome), Xingu, Parnaíba, Gurupi, and Jequitinhonha, collectively underscoring the Cerrado's role in sustaining over 40% of Brazil's freshwater resources. Water resources in the Cerrado exhibit strong , with annual ranging from 800 to 2,000 millimeters concentrated in the summer months, leading to high streamflow variability and reliance on deep-rooted vegetation for aquifer replenishment—such as the Guarani Aquifer System—and maintenance during the extended . Diffuse seeps and valley wetlands, comprising permanent and semi-permanent water bodies, further regulate hydrological dynamics by storing and slowly releasing water, contributing to the biome's function as a regional "" that powers for approximately 90% of Brazil's population. Hydrological models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), have quantified these processes in Cerrado basins, revealing that native vegetation enhances infiltration and reduces erosion compared to converted agricultural lands.

Biodiversity

Flora Adaptations

Plants in the Cerrado biome exhibit specialized adaptations to endure pronounced seasonal droughts, recurrent fires, and nutrient-impoverished, acidic soils. These traits enable survival in an environment characterized by 4–6 months of dry conditions with rainfall below 50 mm monthly, annual precipitation of 1,100–1,600 mm concentrated in the wet season, and frequent surface fires. To cope with drought, many woody species develop extensive deep root systems, extending to depths of at least 7.5 m in cerrado denso formations, allowing access to groundwater reserves unavailable to shallow-rooted vegetation. These roots facilitate hydraulic redistribution, drawing water from deep aquifers during the dry season (October–April) to superficial layers and reversing flow to store moisture underground during wet periods. Root lengths can reach up to 15 m in some trees, sustaining transpiration and contributing up to 82% of dry-season water uptake from below 1 m soil depth. Leaves often feature leathery textures and waxy cuticles to minimize water loss and resist wilting under high evaporative demand. Fire adaptations predominate in the woody flora, with thick, corky bark insulating vascular tissues from lethal heat during annual or biennial burns. This bark thickness correlates positively with fire frequency, reducing topkill and mortality. Post-fire resprouting from basal buds, root crowns, or underground organs enables rapid regeneration, observed in 40–60% of trees exhibiting basal resprouting and an additional 20% with combined crown and basal strategies. Such traits, including root sprouting, have evolved in situ, distinguishing Cerrado lineages as fire-resilient despite the biome's edaphic constraints. Nutrient acquisition in dystrophic, aluminum-rich soils (pH often below 5.5) involves tolerance to aluminum toxicity and efficient phosphorus use, with native species demonstrating higher uptake efficiency than crops. Mechanisms include root dimorphism for enhanced exploration, mycorrhizal symbioses, nutrient resorption from senescing leaves (up to 70% for nitrogen and phosphorus), and internal recycling via litter decomposition. Nocturnal transpiration and selective ion exclusion further mitigate toxicities from manganese and aluminum, allowing persistence on weathered Oxisols with low cation exchange capacity. These strategies underpin the biome's high plant diversity, exceeding 12,000 species, many endemic.

Fauna Diversity

The Cerrado biome supports a diverse vertebrate fauna, including approximately 199 mammal species, 837 bird species, 120 reptile species, and 150 amphibian species, many adapted to the region's seasonal fires, nutrient-poor soils, and open woodlands. This assemblage represents about 5% of global terrestrial vertebrate diversity despite the biome covering less than 2% of Earth's land surface. Endemism is notable among mammals and birds, with at least 11 mammal species unique to the Cerrado, such as the Cerrado fox (Tolpeutes spp. armadillos and small rodents like Cerradomys taxa), though larger mammals like the giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) and maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) are characteristic but more widespread. Mammalian diversity includes large herbivores like the Brazilian tapir (Tapirus terrestris) and pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus), alongside predators such as jaguars (Panthera onca) and bush dogs (Speothos venaticus), with many species exhibiting burrowing behaviors or long-distance foraging suited to the patchy habitat. Over 250 medium- and large-sized mammals have been documented in remnants, underscoring the biome's role as a refuge for savanna specialists amid fragmentation. Insectivores and granivores dominate smaller mammal guilds, reflecting the abundance of termites and seeds in the understory. Avifauna comprises over 850 species, with around 30 endemics, including the red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) and learnèd browntail (Philydor dimidiatus), many of which forage in open areas or gallery forests. Insectivorous and omnivorous birds form the bulk of communities, with guilds like leaf-gleaners prominent in wooded patches. Reptiles and amphibians, totaling over 270 species, include diverse lizards, snakes, and frogs like Physalaemus nattereri, often exhibiting seasonal breeding tied to wet periods and fire evasion strategies such as nocturnal habits or soil refuge. Invertebrate fauna, though less quantified, exceeds 90,000 insect species, contributing to trophic complexity and pollination networks essential for the biome's persistence. Overall, faunal richness rivals that of rainforests in species density but features higher specialization to disturbance regimes, with ongoing habitat loss threatening endemics documented in protected areas like Serra da Canastra National Park.

Human Settlement and History

Indigenous and Pre-Colonial Periods

Archaeological evidence reveals human occupation in the Cerrado biome dating back to approximately 12,000 years before present, with early sites in central Brazilian regions such as Tocantins indicating pre-colonial settlements and lithic tool use. By the onset of the Holocene around 11,000 years ago, ancestral Macro-Jê speaking groups, including predecessors to the Xavante and Bororo, established presence on the central plateau as nomadic hunter-gatherers adapted to the savanna's seasonal droughts and fires. These populations remained primarily mobile until about 2,000 years ago, when shifts toward semi-sedentary patterns emerged, evidenced by archaeological findings of villages and ceramic use around 1,400 years ago. Rockshelter occupations between 9,000 and 7,000 BP indicate earlier human presence. Indigenous groups like the Xavante, who self-identify as A'uwẽ or "true people," traditionally occupied vast territories in the eastern Mato Grosso Cerrado, relying on collective hunting, gathering of wild fruits and roots, and rudimentary swidden agriculture suited to the nutrient-poor soils. The Bororo, another Macro-Jê group in the Mato Grosso highlands, similarly practiced itinerant lifestyles, with social structures organized around kin-based bands that facilitated resource mobility across the heterogeneous landscape of open grasslands and gallery forests. These communities were present regionally prior to intensified European incursions, though exact pre-contact population estimates remain uncertain due to sparse records. A defining pre-colonial practice was the strategic use of fire to shape the ecosystem, with indigenous burning retarding forest expansion into savannas during moister climatic phases and promoting herbaceous regrowth for game animals. Xavante traditions involved igniting large-scale fires during ceremonial hunts, converting dense undergrowth into accessible hunting grounds and maintaining biodiversity hotspots, a technique corroborated by paleoenvironmental charcoal records predating European arrival. Recent discoveries of over 16 rock art sites in the Jalapão Cerrado further document cultural expressions, including depictions of fauna and human figures, underscoring millennia of landscape stewardship and spiritual ties to the biome.

European Colonization and Settlement

European exploration of the Cerrado interior began with expeditions led by bandeirantes, semi-nomadic adventurers primarily originating from São Paulo, who ventured into the uncharted sertão from the late 16th to the 18th centuries in search of gold, precious stones, and indigenous captives for enslavement. These expeditions systematically pushed Portuguese frontiers beyond the coastal and southeastern highlands into the vast central plateaus encompassing much of the Cerrado biome, defying Spanish territorial claims under the Treaty of Tordesillas and establishing de facto Portuguese dominance through armed incursions and rudimentary mapping. The bandeirantes' incursions, often involving alliances with or coercion of local indigenous groups, facilitated initial pathways for later settlement but also precipitated sharp declines in native populations due to enslavement, warfare, and introduced diseases, reducing indigenous numbers in affected areas to approximately one-tenth of pre-contact levels by the mid-18th century. The pivotal catalyst for sustained European settlement in the Cerrado was the discovery of alluvial gold deposits in the early 18th century, extending the gold rush from Minas Gerais into Goiás and Mato Grosso regions around 1722, drawing thousands of prospectors, laborers, and administrators inland. In Goiás, explorer Bartolomeu Bueno da Silva (Anhanguera) prospected key sites in the 1690s, but systematic mining and town-founding accelerated after 1722, culminating in the establishment of Santa Anna (later Vila Boa de Goiás) by 1727 as a burgeoning colonial center, which served as the administrative hub for the captaincy formalized in 1748. Similarly, in Mato Grosso, gold finds spurred the creation of mining outposts and the captaincy in 1748, with fortifications like Fort Príncipe da Beira erected later in the century to counter rival colonial powers, anchoring settlement along riverine corridors amid the biome's challenging topography of nutrient-poor soils and seasonal droughts. These mining arraiais (camps) evolved into permanent vilas, attracting Portuguese settlers, African slaves for labor, and mixed-race populations, though overall density remained low compared to coastal enclaves due to logistical hardships and the ephemeral nature of placer deposits. Settlement patterns emphasized extractive enclaves rather than agrarian diffusion, with European colonists introducing cattle ranching and rudimentary farming on cleared savanna patches to support mining communities, while the Crown imposed the quinto tax (one-fifth of output) to fund infrastructure like royal roads linking São Paulo to Goiás by the 1730s. Gold production peaked in the 1730s–1750s, yielding an estimated 18–20 tons annually across interior sites, but exhaustion of surface deposits by the late 18th century shifted reliance to subsistence herding, fostering dispersed fazendas (estates) that presaged later expansions. This colonial footprint, though limited to river valleys and mineral veins, entrenched Portuguese legal and cultural hegemony in the Cerrado, viewing its woody grasslands as a frontier for conquest and transformation despite initial perceptions of aridity and infertility.

20th-Century Expansion and Modern Demographics

During the mid-20th century, Brazilian government policies initiated significant settlement expansion in the Cerrado, transforming sparsely populated savanna lands into agricultural frontiers. The "March to the West" campaign, launched in the 1940s under President Getúlio Vargas and continued through the 1950s, aimed to populate and develop the interior regions, including the Cerrado, by incentivizing migration from the overcrowded Northeast and Southeast through land grants, infrastructure projects, and tax breaks. This was complemented by the construction of Brasília in 1960, which accelerated road networks like the BR-153 highway, facilitating access to Goiás and Mato Grosso states. Population in the Cerrado region surged 73% between 1950 and 1960, driven primarily by employment in nascent agriculture and mining sectors. The 1970s marked a pivotal phase with the establishment of Embrapa (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) in 1973, which developed lime-based soil correction techniques to overcome the Cerrado's acidic, nutrient-poor soils, enabling large-scale cultivation of soybeans, cotton, and maize. Agricultural frontiers expanded rapidly during the 1980s, with mechanized farming attracting settlers and investors, converting vast tracts from native vegetation to pastures and croplands; by the late 20th century, the Cerrado had emerged as a key contributor to Brazil's food production boom. Official subsidies, credit programs, and colonization projects under military rule (1964–1985) further propelled this inward migration, shifting the biome from marginal to economically central. As of the early 21st century, the Cerrado supports approximately 25.5 million inhabitants across its ~2 million km² expanse, spanning parts of nine states primarily in Brazil's Central-West region, with a population density averaging around 12–15 people per km²—lower than coastal biomes but rising due to agribusiness hubs. About 83% reside in urban areas, including major centers like Brasília (population ~3 million), Goiânia (~1.5 million), and Campo Grande (~900,000), reflecting rapid urbanization tied to service economies and agro-exports. Rural demographics feature a mix of smallholder farmers, large landowners, and traditional communities, including over 80 indigenous ethnic groups and quilombola (descendants of escaped slaves) populations totaling several hundred thousand, often concentrated in less developed fringes. Ethnic composition mirrors national trends, with ~48% identifying as mixed-race (pardos), ~43% white, and ~8% black or indigenous per IBGE-aligned regional data, though rural areas show higher indigenous and traditional shares amid ongoing land conflicts.

Economic Utilization

Agriculture and Crop Production

The Cerrado biome, encompassing parts of central Brazil's states such as Mato Grosso, Goiás, and Bahia, has emerged as a cornerstone of the nation's crop production since the mid-20th century, driven by Embrapa-led innovations in soil correction—primarily liming to neutralize acidity—and the development of tropical-adapted crop varieties. These interventions enabled large-scale cultivation on previously marginal savanna lands, transforming the region into a high-yield agricultural frontier. By 2024, the Cerrado accounted for over 60% of Brazil's total agricultural output value, with annual grain production exceeding levels from the combined Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes. Soybeans dominate Cerrado crop production, occupying approximately 50% of Brazil's soybean planted area and contributing over half of the country's total soybean output, which reached about 169 million metric tons nationally in the 2023/24 harvest. Embrapa's breeding programs pioneered soybean cultivars suited to low-latitude conditions, incorporating traits like photoperiod insensitivity and drought tolerance, which facilitated expansion from negligible production in the 1960s to over 55% of national soybean yields by the 2020s. This crop's economic significance is underscored by its role in Brazil's export surplus, with Cerrado soybeans supporting roughly 15% of global supply as of 2019. Cotton production is similarly concentrated, with the Cerrado supplying 98% of Brazil's cotton output, primarily from Mato Grosso and Bahia, where yields averaged around 1,500–1,800 kg/ha in recent seasons under rainfed and irrigated systems. The biome also supports substantial maize (corn) cultivation, representing 31% of national production, often as a second crop following soybeans in rotation systems that boost overall land productivity. Sorghum, valued for its drought resilience, contributes to diversified grain output, with Brazil's total sorghum production forecasted at 5 million tons for 2025/26, much of it from Cerrado regions amid a 380% national increase over the prior decade. These crops benefit from the biome's flat topography and seasonal rainfall, though irrigation expansion in northeastern areas has mitigated dry-season variability.
CropShare of National ProductionKey Production StatesApproximate Yield (kg/ha, recent avg.)
Soybeans>50%Mato Grosso, Bahia, Goiás3,000–3,500
Cotton98%Mato Grosso, Bahia1,500–1,800
Maize31%Mato Grosso, Goiás5,000–6,000 (second crop)
SorghumSignificant portion (national total rising)Bahia, Maranhão2,500–3,000
Double-cropping practices, such as soybean-maize sequences, have amplified yields, with the Cerrado's aggregate grain output growing 192% in volume from 1985 to 2006 alone, reflecting sustained productivity gains from precision agriculture and input intensification.

Livestock and Pasturelands

The Cerrado biome supports approximately 36% of Brazil's total livestock population, making it a pivotal region for national meat and dairy production. Pasturelands occupy roughly 50 million hectares within the biome, representing over half of the converted agricultural area and enabling extensive cattle ranching as the dominant land use. This sector contributes significantly to Brazil's status as the world's largest commercial beef exporter, with the Cerrado's output bolstering exports that reached historic highs in 2024 through the slaughter of nearly 46 million cattle nationwide. Cattle ranching in the Cerrado relies on introduced African grasses such as Brachiaria species, adapted to the biome's nutrient-poor, acidic soils through fertilization and liming practices that have expanded viable production since the mid-20th century. Stocking densities typically range from 0.85 animal units per hectare in extensive systems, reflecting low-input management that prioritizes land extensification over intensification. However, up to 67% of these pastures exhibit intermediate to severe degradation by 2022, characterized by reduced forage productivity and soil compaction, which limits carrying capacity and necessitates periodic clearing of native vegetation for renewal. Integrated crop-livestock systems, combining pastures with soy or maize rotations, have emerged as a productivity enhancer, yielding gross profits up to USD 200 per hectare higher than traditional ranching alone, according to assessments in the biome. These approaches leverage the Cerrado's flat topography and seasonal rainfall to support dual-use land, with approximately 14 million hectares of low-vigor pastures identified for potential recovery through such methods as of 2024. Despite these advances, overall livestock productivity remains constrained by edaphic challenges and historical underinvestment in soil restoration, with pasture expansion historically accounting for 70% of biome-wide deforestation.

Forestry, Charcoal, and Mining

Forestry in the Cerrado biome remains limited compared to denser tropical forests, as the region's savanna structure—characterized by scattered trees and shrubs—yields lower timber volumes suitable for large-scale commercial logging. Native species such as Caryocar brasiliense (pequi) and Dipteryx alata (baru) provide occasional wood resources, but extraction is often opportunistic and tied to land clearing for agriculture rather than sustainable silviculture. Eucalyptus plantations, introduced for pulp and fuelwood, have expanded into converted Cerrado areas, covering thousands of hectares in states like Goiás and Mato Grosso, though these are frequently criticized for depleting soil nutrients and reducing biodiversity. Charcoal production constitutes a key economic activity in the Cerrado, primarily supplying Brazil's steel industry, which relies on it as a metallurgical reductant due to its high fixed carbon content from native hardwoods like Qualea grandiflora. Annual yields from select Cerrado woods average around 35%, comparable to national benchmarks, but production often involves illegal harvesting of protected species, contributing to deforestation rates exceeding 1 million hectares per decade in some periods. Since 1995, Brazilian authorities have rescued approximately 2,830 individuals from slavery-like conditions in charcoal kilns, with a significant portion linked to Cerrado operations involving undocumented labor and rudimentary carbonization techniques. While "green" eucalyptus-derived charcoal from managed plantations mitigates some native wood depletion—Brazil produces 6.5 million tons annually—its expansion still drives habitat conversion and emissions equivalent to millions of metric tons of CO2. Mining operations in the Cerrado target minerals including gold, iron ore, nickel, and phosphates, with historical gold rushes in the 19th century in areas like Lavras do Abade causing early environmental degradation through mercury pollution and sediment runoff. Modern industrial projects, such as proposed iron ore mines in Minas Gerais, occupy limited land—less than 1% of the biome—but amplify localized impacts like water contamination and displacement of traditional communities, as seen in disputes over inadequate consultations. Artisanal and illegal mining, particularly for gold, has proliferated in reserves and savanna fringes, expanding over sixfold nationally from 1985 to 2020, with Cerrado sites contributing to soil erosion and heavy metal leaching that persist for decades. In Goiás and Tocantins, phosphate extraction supports fertilizer production but correlates with elevated cadmium levels in waterways, underscoring causal links between open-pit methods and biome-wide hydrological disruptions.

Environmental Changes and Human Impacts

Deforestation Rates and Drivers

Deforestation in the Cerrado biome has accelerated in recent decades, with annual losses of native vegetation averaging over 9,200 km² in the past ten years. Between 1985 and 2023, approximately 38 million hectares of native vegetation were cleared, representing a cumulative loss of about 27% of the biome's extent. This contrasts with reductions in Amazon deforestation, as Cerrado faces less stringent enforcement and legal allowances for clearing up to 80% of private properties while reserving only 20% as legal reserve, compared to the Amazon's 80% reserve requirement. Recent annual rates highlight the trend: in 2022, deforestation reached 10,689 km², the highest in seven years according to monitoring data. This increased by 43% in 2023 to approximately 11,100 km², or 3,042 hectares per day, accounting for a significant portion of Brazil's total native vegetation loss that year. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate a potential slowdown in tree cover loss by 14% from 2023 levels, though native vegetation suppression remains high at around 1,786 hectares per day. These figures derive from satellite-based monitoring by platforms like MapBiomas, which track land cover changes more comprehensively for savanna ecosystems than traditional forest-focused metrics. The primary drivers are agricultural expansion and livestock production, which together account for the majority of cleared land. Soybean cultivation has been a key factor, with production driving vegetation loss as cropland expanded by 74% between 1985 and 2024. Most deforested areas convert to pasture for cattle ranching, though stocking densities often remain low, indicating inefficient land use. Other contributors include charcoal production for the steel industry, often illegal, and to a lesser extent mining and urban growth, with agriculture-linked clearing responsible for over 90% of recent alerts in some analyses. Disparities in policy focus, with greater international scrutiny on the Amazon, exacerbate Cerrado's vulnerability despite its role as a biodiversity hotspot and water source.

Soil Degradation and Climate Effects

Intensive agricultural conversion in the Cerrado has accelerated soil degradation primarily through erosion, nutrient depletion, and compaction. Native Cerrado soils are predominantly dystrophic and highly weathered, characterized by low nutrient availability, high acidity, and pseudo-sandy structures that limit water retention and fertility. Conversion to croplands and pastures, often without adequate soil management, exposes these soils to water erosion, with annual soil loss rates rising from 10.4 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in 2000 to 12.0 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ by 2012 due to expanded mechanized farming. Severely eroded areas exhibit 13.1 to 25.9 times greater nutrient losses compared to low-erosion zones, exacerbating fertility decline and necessitating increasing inputs of lime and fertilizers to sustain yields. Approximately 46% of Cerrado pastures show signs of degradation, particularly in the MATOPIBA agricultural frontier, where overgrazing and poor tillage practices compound compaction and organic matter loss. These degradation processes are driven by causal mechanisms rooted in land-use change: removal of native vegetation reduces root systems that stabilize soil, while monoculture cropping and heavy machinery increase runoff and tillage-induced erosion. Under bare soil conditions, erosion rates can reach 15.68 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, compared to 0.24 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ under intact Cerrado cover, highlighting the protective role of natural biomass. Nutrient balances in cropping systems reveal deficits, as harvested exports often exceed inputs, leading to long-term depletion unless offset by precise fertilization—a practice inconsistently applied amid economic pressures for expansion. Climate projections under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios forecast further soil loss increases of 4.9% and 7.6% by 2100, respectively, due to intensified rainfall variability eroding already vulnerable profiles. Deforestation and soil degradation in the Cerrado contribute to localized climate alterations by diminishing evapotranspiration and altering surface albedo. Land-cover changes have reduced atmospheric water recycling by about 10% annually, elevating land surface temperatures (LST) by 0.9°C on average. This feedback loop intensifies seasonal dryness in the biome's tropical climate, which features dry winters and average temperatures of 22–23°C, with peaks exceeding 40°C; vegetation loss prolongs droughts, reduces rainfall infiltration, and heightens fire risk through drier fuels. Empirical modeling links these shifts to decreased precipitation patterns, as degraded soils with low infiltration capacity amplify runoff over recharge, further desiccating the regional hydrological cycle. Overall, these effects compound global warming signals, rendering the Cerrado hotter and drier, with implications for agricultural viability in an area already producing over 30% of Brazil's grains.

Conservation and Policy Debates

The Cerrado biome features a network of protected areas administered primarily under Brazil's National System of Conservation Units (SNUC), established by Law No. 9,985 of July 18, 2000, which classifies units into categories of full protection, such as national parks, and sustainable use, like ecological stations and extractive reserves. Despite this framework, only about 8% of the Cerrado's 2 million km² is formally protected, with less than 3% under strict protection regimes that prohibit resource extraction. This limited coverage stems from historical prioritization of agricultural expansion over conservation, resulting in the biome's designation as a de facto "sacrifice zone" under national policy. Prominent full-protection areas include Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, created in 1961 and spanning 65,514 hectares in Goiás state, and Emas National Park, established in 1989 across 132,868 hectares in Goiás and Mato Grosso do Sul. These sites, jointly inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage property in 2001, safeguard core Cerrado habitats including savanna woodlands and gallery forests, harboring over 60% of the biome's plant species and nearly 80% of its vertebrates. Additional key parks encompass Brasília National Park (established 1961, 29,000 hectares near the capital) and Grande Sertão Veredas National Park (created 1989, 160,000 hectares along Minas Gerais and Bahia borders), which collectively preserve endemic flora and fauna amid surrounding deforestation. Legal safeguards on private lands are outlined in the Brazilian Forest Code (Law No. 12,651 of May 25, 2012), also known as the Native Vegetation Protection Law, requiring rural properties in the Cerrado to retain 20% as legal reserve in native vegetation—lower than the 80% mandated in the Amazon or 35% minimum in the Atlantic Forest. Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs) along watercourses and hilltops provide further restrictions, prohibiting conversion to agriculture or pasture. However, the code's provisions for amnesty on past deforestation and reduced reserve ratios in consolidated agricultural areas have drawn criticism for undermining Cerrado conservation, as they legalize prior clearances and facilitate ongoing habitat loss. Enforcement relies on federal agencies like IBAMA, but inconsistent application exacerbates vulnerabilities in this biome lacking biome-specific legislation akin to the Atlantic Forest Protection Law of 2006.

International Regulations and Trade Impacts

The European Union's Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR), formally adopted in May 2023 and applicable from December 30, 2024, for large operators, requires importers of commodities including soy, beef, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, and wood to ensure no deforestation occurred after December 31, 2020, on associated land, verified through geolocation and due diligence. This targets supply chains linked to biomes like the Cerrado, where legal frameworks under Brazil's Forest Code permit up to 80% land conversion for agriculture on private properties, contrasting with stricter Amazon reserves, potentially rendering significant Cerrado soy production non-compliant despite domestic legality. The Cerrado supplies roughly half of Brazil's soy output, a key EU import commodity, with over 80% of EU "imported deforestation" risk concentrated in soy and beef from Brazil. Trade impacts include heightened compliance costs for traceability and certification, risking market exclusion for non-adherent exporters; as of October 2025, satellite data showed ongoing post-2020 deforestation for soy in the Cerrado, breaching EUDR thresholds and threatening shipments to Europe, where Brazil holds a substantial share of soy imports. Analysts project potential shifts in deforestation pressure to less-regulated Cerrado areas if Amazon compliance intensifies, exacerbating biome loss already at record levels, with a 43% rise in 2023 over 2022. A 2019 study estimated that restricting soy expansion in Cerrado natural areas could preserve nearly 3.6 million hectares, but enforcement gaps in Brazilian data hinder verification, amplifying export uncertainties. Brazil has responded assertively, with officials arguing the EUDR undermines national sovereignty by imposing extraterritorial standards that ignore Cerrado-specific ecosystems and legal conversions, prompting threats of World Trade Organization disputes, as seen in 2022 diplomatic pushback against a similar UK law. In October 2024, the Brazilian government reaffirmed commitments to domestic deforestation reduction while critiquing European measures as inconsistent with bilateral trade goals, potentially redirecting Cerrado commodities to markets like China less stringent on origin tracing. Voluntary initiatives, such as the Amazon Soy Moratorium, have limited coverage in the Cerrado, leaving it "behind" in international supply chain safeguards and heightening vulnerability to regulatory trade barriers.

Restoration Initiatives and Economic Trade-offs

Restoration efforts in the Cerrado biome focus on recovering degraded pastures and deforested areas, primarily through native species reintroduction and sustainable land management practices. The Brazilian government's ABC+ Plan, launched in 2020 as an extension of the earlier ABC Program, allocates resources for low-carbon agriculture, including restoration of up to 15 million hectares nationwide by 2030, with a portion targeting Cerrado pastures degraded by overgrazing. However, a 2024 analysis by Climate Policy Initiative found that ABC credit disbursements for Cerrado pasture recovery have been inadequate, covering only a fraction of needs due to limited uptake and funding shortfalls. Private initiatives, such as The Nature Conservancy's Reverte Program initiated in 2014, assist rural producers in restoring areas via integrated techniques like direct seeding and agroforestry, emphasizing compatibility with ongoing farming. International and NGO-led projects have scaled up restoration, with Conservation International's Project Alpha committing to restore or conserve 275,000 hectares across South American savannas, including Cerrado, projecting capture of 32 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents. In 2025, partnerships like those between BTG Pactual Timberland Investment Group and research entities initiated restoration on over 10,000 hectares, prioritizing biodiversity corridors through techniques adapted to Cerrado's fire-prone soils. WWF Brazil's seed collection networks have supported restoration on over 700 hectares by 2023, generating local employment in harvesting native grasses and trees while addressing seed scarcity for large-scale replanting. As of 2023, approximately 12,000 hectares of Cerrado were under active restoration across various programs, though this represents less than 0.1% of the biome's 200 million hectares. These initiatives face significant economic trade-offs, as the Cerrado underpins Brazil's agribusiness sector, which contributes 26.6% to national GDP through soy, corn, and beef production on converted lands. Spatial analyses indicate a direct conflict between restoration priorities and agricultural expansion, particularly on underproductive pastures that could be intensified for crops rather than reverted to native vegetation, potentially forgoing short-term yields of up to 20-30% higher profitability from soy cultivation. Restoration costs, estimated at $1,000-5,000 per hectare depending on methods, compete with investments in mechanized farming, where landowners prioritize immediate revenue from exports—soy alone accounts for a substantial share of Brazil's trade balance. Policy scenarios modeling restoration under legal mandates, such as the Native Vegetation Protection Law requiring recovery of rural legal reserves, suggest feasibility for cropland growth and cattle herd expansion alongside reduced pasture extent, but only if intensification offsets land demand—otherwise, enforcement risks economic contraction in rural areas. Synergies exist in programs like Syngenta's target to restore 1 million hectares of degraded soils by 2030, which aim to enhance farm productivity through improved soil health rather than sacrificing arable land. Yet, without addressing root drivers like commodity prices and land tenure insecurities, restoration often yields lower private returns compared to conversion, perpetuating a cycle where over half of original Cerrado vegetation has been cleared for agriculture since the 1960s.

References

  1. https://www.worldwildlife.org/places/cerrado/
  2. https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/en/zoom/cerrado-biome/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12004096/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7766540/
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-020-01967-x
  6. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.77
  7. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/cerrado
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112720316443
  9. https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/80/3/223/2587654
  10. https://www.nature.org/en-us/get-involved/how-to-help/places-we-protect/cerrado/
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/cerrado
  12. https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/cerrado/
  13. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/earth-and-atmospheric-sciences/cerrado-grasslands
  14. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/age-measurements-a-part-brazilian-shield
  15. https://rigeo.sgb.gov.br/bitstream/doc/21694/1/Br-Su_report.pdf
  16. https://www.episodes.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.18814/epiiugs/1985/v8i1/004
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/cerrado-soils
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9635749/
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283721258_Cerrado_Soils_from_the
  20. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/claymin/article/43/1/137/56558/Minerals-in-the-clay-fraction-of-Brazilian
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233054435_Carbon_Stocks_in_Brazilian_Latosols_Oxisols_from_Different_Morphoclimatic_Regions_and_Management_Systems
  22. https://medcraveonline.com/MOJFPT/agriculture-in-the-cerrado-a-sleeping-giant-rose-up.html
  23. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42408-024-00298-4
  24. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/where-is-the-biodiversity-hotspot-of-the-cerrado-located.html
  25. https://ecologicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13717-023-00433-0
  26. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38174-x
  27. https://cerrado-biome.jimdofree.com/geophysical-characteristics/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004113
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895981121003291
  30. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8670
  31. https://www.wwf.org.br/?89766/Cerrado-is-the-most-devastated-biome-in-Brazil-accounting-by-far-for-eight-of-the-12-main-rivers-that-supply-the-countrys-water
  32. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013WR015202
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895981125002779
  34. https://www.aventuradobrasil.com/blog/the-cerrado-the-savannah-with-the-greatest-biodiversity-in-the-world/
  35. https://www.brazilreports.com/brazils-cerrado-the-second-largest-biome-after-the-amazon-could-lose-almost-34-of-its-water-by-2050/4420/
  36. https://phys.org/news/2025-09-cerrado-wetlands-legally-neglected.html
  37. https://www.scielo.br/j/ambiagua/a/y6TjgPB3TjmCs9qLRzPLRNP/
  38. https://iwaponline.com/hr/article/49/3/908/38873/Hydrological-simulation-in-a-tropical-humid-basin
  39. https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2018.00022
  40. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01003.x
  41. https://news.mongabay.com/2021/07/cerrado-desertification-savanna-could-collapse-within-30-years-says-study/
  42. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665973
  43. https://www.perspectecolconserv.com/en-fire-drives-abandoned-pastures-savanna-like-articulo-S2530064419300525
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322001340
  45. https://www.scielo.br/j/bjpp/a/8qM6snZjxMDYKBHhrrw8vFB/?lang=en
  46. https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/19/3649/2022/bg-19-3649-2022.pdf
  47. https://www.wwf.org.br/?50242/The-Big-Five-of-the-Cerrado
  48. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/10827/
  49. https://www.cepf.net/our-work/biodiversity-hotspots/cerrado/species
  50. https://neotropical.pensoft.net/article/37653/
  51. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1595&context=ornitologia_neotropical
  52. https://news.mongabay.com/2020/10/at-risk-cerrado-mammals-need-fully-protected-parks-to-survive-researchers/
  53. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/occupation-of-primordial-brazil-2/
  54. https://mirim.org/en/before-cabral/the-occupation-of-brazil
  55. https://leiaarqueologia.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/2018_bueno-e-isnardis_qi.pdf
  56. https://icmagazine.org/indigenous-peoples/xavante/
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718320350
  58. https://brilliantbrazil.com/mato-grosso-indigenous/
  59. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.4996/fireecology.0701024
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638430/
  61. https://arkeonews.net/16-new-ancient-rock-art-sites-discovered-in-jalapao-brazil/
  62. https://www.britannica.com/topic/bandeirante
  63. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-768
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136822003134
  65. https://lacgeo.com/goias-velho-brazil
  66. https://whc.unesco.org/document/154784
  67. https://countrystudies.us/brazil/5.htm
  68. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/brazilian-gold-rush
  69. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-1021
  70. https://www.scielo.br/j/bpsr/a/4DbRZcSrbkwJBkpxHmqR65S/?lang=en
  71. https://www.jica.go.jp/jica-ri/news/topics/post_14.html
  72. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11e95e3a-354f-4f3c-ad05-a4f3600dc41d/content
  73. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Sustainable_Transition_Cerrado_2024.pdf
  74. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/2024/08/Brazil/index.pdf
  75. https://cals.ncsu.edu/international-programs/news/embrapa-brazilian-agricultural/
  76. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/brasil/tnc-environmentalframeworksoy-eng.pdf
  77. http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/5ee2029656ab0.pdf
  78. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cultivating%2520Growth-%2520The%2520State%2520of%2520Sorghum%2520Production%2520in%2520Brazil_Brasilia_Brazil_BR2025-0022.pdf
  79. https://www.ipipotash.org/publications/eifc-261
  80. https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=76985
  81. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/581
  82. https://www.proforest.net/news-and-events/news/monitoring-protocol-defines-environmental-commitments-for-livestock-farming-in-the-cerrado/
  83. https://www.wwf.org.br/?90663/For-a-more-resilient-Cerrado
  84. https://abiec.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Beef-Report-2025-ENG-WEB.pdf
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0309174009001648
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0341816224008671
  87. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1518747/full
  88. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/brasil/tnc-environmentalframeworkcattle.pdf
  89. https://www.scielo.br/j/cflo/a/V93RZHnjCq6JHRTQB6K4CdL/
  90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27192198/
  91. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/in-brazil-charcoal-industry-fuels-illegal-deforestation-and-slavery-idUSKBN2JF0PK/
  92. https://www.dw.com/en/brazil-the-rise-and-risks-of-green-eucalyptus-charcoal/a-68003328
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440311002913
  94. https://dialogue.earth/en/uncategorized/390063-brazil-cerrado-iron-ore-mine-over-traditional-communities/
  95. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/cerrado-worlds-most-biodiverse-tropical-savannah-peril
  96. https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/en/2021/08/30/area-ocupada-pela-mineracao-no-brasil-cresce-mais-de-6-vezes-entre-1985-e-2020/
  97. https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/en/2024/08/21/em-2023-a-perda-de-areas-naturais-no-brasil-atinge-a-marca-historica-de-33-do-territorio/
  98. https://www.sustainableviews.com/pension-funds-and-agribusinesses-are-driving-destruction-of-the-brazilian-cerrado-746afbc3/
  99. https://www.wwf.org.br/?84401/Deforestation-in-the-Brazilian-Cerrado-increases-by-25-in-2022-and-registers-the-highest-rate-in-seven-years
  100. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/forests/the-cerrado-crisis-brazils-deforestation-frontline/
  101. https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2024/05/RAD2023_FACTSHEET_EN_FINAL_27-05-24.pdf
  102. https://gfr.wri.org/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends
  103. https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2025/05/RAD-2024_Destaques_ENG_14.05.2025_FINAL.pdf
  104. https://news.mongabay.com/2025/10/deforestation-for-soy-continues-in-brazilian-cerrado-despite-eudr-looming/
  105. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/deforestation_fronts_factsheet___brazilian_cerrado.pdf
  106. https://climate-diplomacy.org/magazine/environment/deforestation-brazil-its-not-just-amazon
  107. https://news.mongabay.com/2023/08/a-tale-of-two-biomes-as-deforestation-surges-in-cerrado-but-wanes-in-amazon/
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352009414000431
  109. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/1/12
  110. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i1p12-d195799.html
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721019707
  112. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015EGUGA..17.1304O/abstract
  113. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5331
  114. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020JG005673
  115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36073184/
  116. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.70022
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002912
  118. https://thinklandscape.globallandscapesforum.org/46494/the-brazilian-cerrado-the-upside-down-forest-on-the-frontlines-of-agriculture/
  119. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1035/
  120. https://nationalparksassociation.org/brazil-national-parks/brasilia-national-park/
  121. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/brazils-new-forest-code-how-to-navigate-the-complexity/policy-brief-part-i-how-to-navigate-the-complexity-1-2/
  122. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/03/environmental-protection-cerrado-brazil-economy/
  123. https://cebri.org/revista/en/artigo/197/expected-effects-on-brazil-from-the-eu-regulation-on-deforestation-free-products
  124. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2024/07/how-the-eu-deforestation-rule-will-affect-agriculture-in-brazil.html
  125. https://www.iatp.org/brazilian-perspectives-eudr
  126. https://www.worldwildlife.org/places/cerrado/save-the-cerrado-our-climate-depends-on-it/
  127. https://news.mongabay.com/2022/12/historic-eu-law-against-deforestation-linked-imports-ignores-brazils-cerrado/
  128. https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2022/09/27/brazil-threatened-uk-wto-deforestation-legislation/
  129. https://www.gov.br/secom/en/latest-news/2024/10/official-response-to-recent-statements-by-european-agrifood-companies
  130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378025000421
  131. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/press-release/brazils-abc-program-credit-is-insufficient-for-pasture-recovery-in-the-cerrado-biome-shows-study/
  132. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/latin-america/brazil/stories-in-brazil/restoring-degraded-landscapes-in-the-cerrado/
  133. https://www.conservation.org/projects/restoring-brazils-savannas
  134. https://timberlandinvestmentgroup.com/restoration-of-more-than-10000-hectares-is-under-way-in-the-cerrado-increasing-biodiversity-and-climate-impact/
  135. https://www.wwf.org.br/?82722/Restoration-creates-work-and-income-in-the-Cerrado
  136. https://news.mongabay.com/2023/04/in-brazil-scientists-fight-an-uphill-battle-to-restore-the-disappearing-cerrado-savanna/
  137. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2010007824500088
  138. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.14262
  139. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362460473_Spatial_planning_for_restoration_in_Cerrado_balancing_the_trade-offs_between_conservation_and_agriculture
  140. https://www.wwf.org.br/?77034/Conservation-of-the-Cerrado-in-the-economic-logic
  141. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5ab2
  142. https://www.syngentagroup.com/sustainability/stories/conservation-program-brazil-could-lead-more-profitable-farms-and-ranches
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.