Hubbry Logo
CartonnageCartonnageMain
Open search
Cartonnage
Community hub
Cartonnage
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cartonnage
Cartonnage
Cartonnage
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Rear of a cartonnage Anubis mask, Ptolemaic era
This mummy of an unknown girl has a cartonnage composed of layers of linen and plaster.[1] The Walters Art Museum.

Cartonnage or cartonage is a type of material used in ancient Egyptian funerary masks from the First Intermediate Period to the Roman era. It was made of layers of linen or papyrus covered with plaster. Some of the Fayum mummy portraits are also painted on panels made of cartonnage.[2]

Technique

[edit]
Cartonnage of Nespanetjerenpere, ca. 945–718 BCE. Linen or papyrus mixed with plaster, pigment, glass, lapis lazuli, 69 11/16 in. (177 cm). Brooklyn Museum, 35.1265.

In a technique similar to papier-mâché, scraps of linen or papyrus were stuck together with plaster or resin and used to make mummy cases and masks.[3] It could be molded to the shape of the body, forming a type of shell. After the material dried it could be painted or gilded. The shell could be decorated with geometric shapes, deities, and inscriptions. During the Ptolemaic era, the single shell method was altered to include four to six pieces of cartonnage. There would generally be a mask, pectoral, apron, and foot casing. In certain instances there were two additional pieces used to cover the ribcage and stomach.[4]

Materials

[edit]
Fragment of cartonnage from a New Kingdom coffin (Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum)

The materials used to produce cartonnage changed over time. In the Middle Kingdom it was common to use plastered linen; during the Third Intermediate Period, linen and stucco; during the Ptolemaic period, old papyrus scrolls; and during the Roman period, thicker fibrous materials.[5]

Reusing papyrus that was considered waste was a common practice during the Ptolemaic period. Many discarded documents from the government and archives were used for this purpose.[4]

Archeological significance

[edit]

The preparation of cartonnage preserved the sections of papyrus; therefore, it is a prominent source of well-preserved manuscript sections.[5] In 1993, the city of Helsinki received fourteen fragments of cartonnages from the Egyptian Museum of Berlin. Conservators at the University of Helsinki, working with specialists from the University of Michigan, were tasked with preserving the cartonnages and publishing all Greek papyrus texts derived from them.[6][7]

More recently, advances in digital and metrological analysis have demonstrated that cartonnage also holds significant value for reconstructing archaeological provenance and workshop practices. High-resolution three-dimensional shape analysis has been used to compare fragmentary cartonnage remains with complete funerary masks, allowing researchers to re-identify artefacts with lost provenience and attribute them to specific production traditions or burial contexts. Such approaches show that cartonnage fragments can contribute not only to the study of reused papyri but also to broader questions of funerary manufacture, regional styles, and object circulation in Graeco-Roman Egypt.[8][9]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cartonnage

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cartonnage is a type of ancient Egyptian funerary casing made from multiple layers of , , or a combination of both, bonded with or other organic adhesives, coated with , and often painted with polychrome pigments, varnishes, or to create masks, partial body covers, or full-body cases for . This , moldable material served as an affordable alternative to wooden coffins, allowing for intricate designs that protected and idealized the deceased for the . The production of cartonnage involved layering the fibrous materials over a temporary mold shaped like the body or specific parts, applying for smoothness, and then decorating with symbolic imagery such as protective deities, floral motifs, and hieroglyphic texts. Its use emerged during the First Intermediate Period (c. 2181–2055 BCE) for mummy masks but evolved into more comprehensive body enclosures by the Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BCE), becoming widespread in the Third Intermediate Period (c. 1069–664 BCE) and continuing through the Late, Ptolemaic, and Roman periods. Notable examples include masks for high officials, such as a Middle Kingdom cartonnage mask at Art Museum, and painted foot cases featuring rare pigments like pararealgar, as studied in a Late Period example.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Use

Cartonnage is a material consisting of multiple layers of or stiffened with or , primarily used in ancient Egyptian funerary contexts for creating mummy masks and protective cases over the wrapped body. This lightweight, moldable substance allowed for the representation of the deceased in an idealized form, facilitating their transformation into an akh (transfigured spirit) for the . The origins of cartonnage trace to the First Intermediate Period (c. 2181–2055 BCE), a time of political fragmentation following the collapse of centralized Old Kingdom authority. During this era, it emerged as an economical substitute for the rigid wooden or stone sarcophagi reserved for elites in the preceding Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BCE), where such containers were costly and labor-intensive to produce. In the context of widespread instability, including regional conflicts and economic strain, cartonnage enabled non-elite individuals—such as local officials and commoners—to participate in mummification and afterlife preparation rituals that were previously limited to the upper classes. Early cartonnage pieces took simple forms, typically limited to basic masks enveloping the head and shoulders of the mummy, with many remaining unpainted or featuring only minimal decorative elements like basic facial outlines or protective symbols. These modest designs contrasted sharply with the elaborate, nested coffins of royalty and high nobility, reflecting the period's emphasis on accessibility over opulence. Archaeological evidence for these early uses includes cartonnage masks recovered from tombs in , such as the undisturbed example from tomb 275 at , associated with the overseer Tjay and dating to the late First Intermediate Period or early 11th Dynasty (c. 2055–1985 BCE). Similar finds from sites like Deir el-Bersha and Gebelein highlight cartonnage's role in provincial burials during this transitional phase, underscoring its rapid adoption among middle- and lower-status groups.

Evolution Across Periods

Cartonnage emerged as a prominent funerary material during the Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BCE), marking a shift toward more durable forms constructed from layers of plastered , which replaced earlier, simpler wrappings and were increasingly used in elite burials in conjunction with wooden coffins. These typically covered the head and shoulders, molded to fit the mummy and tied in place with cords, providing a lightweight yet protective layer that allowed for detailed painting to depict the deceased's idealized features. Initially featuring or limited color schemes, these early examples emphasized functionality over elaborate decoration, reflecting the period's focus on standardized elite burial practices. In the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), cartonnage underwent significant refinements, with thicker layers of and enabling more robust construction and the integration of protective amulets directly into the material during assembly. This period saw an expansion in scope, as cartonnage evolved from head-and-shoulder masks to include pectorals, aprons for the lower torso, and foot coverings, allowing for near full-body encasement painted in vibrant to mimic jewelry and religious symbols. Such advancements are evident in elite burials of the period, where cartonnage incorporated amuletic designs to enhance the mummy's spiritual safeguarding. During the Third Intermediate Period (c. 1069–664 BCE), cartonnage became more widespread, particularly among non-elite classes, with regional styles emerging, such as the northern Upper Egyptian type seen from to the Memphite region. Examples include painted cartonnage cases featuring floral motifs and protective deities, reflecting continued innovation in funerary artistry amid political fragmentation. In the Late Period and Ptolemaic era (c. 664 BCE–30 BCE), innovations included the widespread use of recycled alongside for cartonnage production, making it a more economical yet versatile medium for multi-piece assemblies typically comprising 4–6 components to form complete cases. Hellenistic influences under Greek rule introduced for divine symbolism and more naturalistic portraiture, blending traditional Egyptian motifs with Greco-Roman stylistic elements, as seen in gilded masks from sites like . These changes coincided with a further increase in size to provide full-body coverage, while painting transitioned fully to schemes rich in symbolic . By the Roman Period (30 BCE–395 CE), cartonnage began to decline as it fused with Greco-Roman traditions, particularly in the creation of hybrid mummy portraits known as Fayum-style , where wooden panels with lifelike encaustic paintings were set into cartonnage body cases. This synthesis produced highly individualized representations, often featuring contemporary Roman attire and hairstyles overlaid on Egyptian funerary forms, but the practice waned by the 2nd century CE amid shifting burial customs and the eventual rise of , which rendered traditional pagan elements obsolete. Overall, cartonnage's evolution—from modest masks to elaborate, full-body ensembles—influenced by material innovations and cultural exchanges, underscores its adaptability across Egypt's dynastic phases.

Materials and Construction

Components and Materials

Cartonnage primarily consists of layered base materials selected for their flexibility and local availability, including strips woven from fibers or sheets of . Linen, prized for its strength and durability, was the preferred material in earlier applications, while papyrus provided a more economical option in subsequent uses due to its abundance and ease of processing. These materials form the structural core, allowing for the creation of lightweight funerary elements. Adhesives such as , derived from boiled animal tissues, or from acacia trees bind the layers together, with plaster-based , typically composed of (calcium sulfate) or (calcium carbonate), applied as a stiffening agent. In some cases, natural resins like or species were incorporated into the mixture to improve resistance to moisture in the humid conditions of environments. These components ensure cohesion while maintaining pliability during formation. Surface treatments begin with a white ground layer of fine plaster mixed with water, creating an adhesive base for subsequent decoration. For high-status pieces, thin sheets of or —a natural gold-silver —were applied to impart a luminous, divine appearance. was sourced from plants cultivated extensively in the fertile agricultural fields of the Valley, where the annual flooding enriched the soil for optimal growth. , harvested from the sedge plant , originated in the marshy wetlands of the and low-lying valley areas requiring shallow, fresh water. During the Ptolemaic period, discarded documents were frequently recycled, embedding reused texts within the layers. or for plaster was readily obtained from abundant natural deposits in Egypt's desert regions, valued for its low cost and widespread availability. These materials result in cartonnage that is lightweight, often weighing under 5 kilograms for complete cases, and moldable when wetted with adhesives for shaping over forms. However, the organic components make it susceptible to degradation from exposure to moisture, which softens the glue and plaster, or insect activity that consumes the fibers.

Production Techniques

The production of cartonnage involved a multi-layered fabrication process beginning with the preparation of base materials. Strips or sheets of linen or papyrus, numbering 3 to 20 layers depending on the period, thickness, and durability required, were soaked in animal glue derived from hides or bones. These were then applied in overlapping fashion over a temporary mold or core, often constructed from bundled straw mixed with Nile silt, clay, sand, and chaff, or supported by a wooden post to maintain the form of the mummy's contours. The core was built in sections—such as the head, torso, and limbs—to allow for precise shaping, with the layers pressed firmly to eliminate air pockets and ensure adhesion. Once layered, the cartonnage was allowed to dry and harden, with experimental recreations indicating initial textile layers setting in approximately 16 hours and paste layers in about 3 hours, though full hardening may have taken longer under ancient conditions; either in the sun for faster setting or in shaded areas to prevent cracking. During this phase, a slit was cut into the back while the material remained slightly damp, facilitating the removal of in pieces after partial hardening; the wooden post, if used, was extracted last. Evidence from experimental recreations indicates that initial layers could set overnight (approximately 16 hours), followed by shorter drying times for subsequent paste applications. Finishing began after full drying, with the surface smoothed using fine plaster or gesso (a mixture of gypsum or calcite and animal glue), followed by sanding to create a uniform base. A base coat was applied for even pigment adhesion, after which mineral-based paints were used, including malachite for green hues and azurite for blue, mixed with binders like gum arabic or egg tempera. The painted surface was sometimes varnished for protection, particularly on raised elements. Artisans employed simple tools such as knives for cutting slits and trimming edges, brushes and reed pens for applying glue and outlines, and pointed metal tools for piercing holes to secure sections with lacing or wooden nails. Production occurred in specialized ateliers, particularly in Thebes (modern ) and Memphis, with archaeological evidence revealing organized craft spaces with evidence of glue preparation and mold reuse. These workshops supported serial production, with uniform dimensions suggesting templated forms. Techniques varied across eras, with hand-built construction predominant in the Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BCE), where pieces were custom-formed for individual using fewer standardized elements. Production evolved toward greater in later periods.

Forms and Iconography

Common Types

Cartonnage in took various physical forms designed to encase and protect the , primarily evolving from single-piece masks to more segmented constructions in later periods. These forms were tailored to cover specific areas of the body, facilitating both preservation and presentation in burial contexts. represent one of the most prevalent types, typically covering the head and shoulders of the deceased while extending to the upper chest in some cases. Crafted from layered or coated with , these masks were often the most intricately shaped elements, incorporating details such as molded wigs, broad collars, and facial features to idealize the deceased's appearance. Their use dates back to the First Intermediate Period (c. 2160–2040 BCE), with examples becoming more elaborate by the Middle Kingdom, around 2000 BCE, where they served as the foundational protective layer over the wrapped head. Breastplates, also known as pectorals, were designed to shield the , particularly the chest area, forming a rigid panel that could be tied or fitted over the mummy's wrappings. These pieces were generally rectangular or arched, providing and a surface for decoration while ensuring the integrity of the upper body during transport and interment. They became common in multi-piece ensembles from the Late Period onward, complementing by extending coverage downward. Aprons and foot casings addressed the lower body, with aprons shaped like kilts to cover the and upper thighs, and foot casings molded to enclose the feet in boot-like forms. These protective elements were lightweight yet durable, often produced as separate components in Ptolemaic-era sets (circa 305–30 BCE) to allow for flexible assembly around the mummy's legs and feet. Such designs prevented damage to the wrappings while maintaining the body's elongated posture essential for burial. Full-body cases, though rarer, encompassed the entire mummy in a single, seamless shell that integrated , pectoral, , and foot elements into one cohesive enclosure. Reserved primarily for elite individuals due to their complexity and cost, these complete cartonnage coffins provided comprehensive protection from head to toe and were most noted in Middle Kingdom and occasional later examples. In the Roman period (30 BCE–395 CE), hybrid forms emerged, blending traditional cartonnage with wooden panels featuring encaustic portraits, as seen in the where a painted limewood face panel was inset into a cartonnage body case. This integration allowed for realistic Greco-Roman portraiture while retaining Egyptian encasement traditions, particularly in provincial burials around the Fayum region.

Symbolic Elements

Cartonnage decorations in ancient Egypt served as a visual and textual conduit for ensuring the deceased's safe passage and transformation in the afterlife, incorporating motifs that invoked divine protection, resurrection, and eternal stability. These symbolic elements drew from a rich theological framework, where images and inscriptions acted as magical agents to ward off threats and facilitate rebirth, aligning the individual with cosmic cycles of renewal. Central to cartonnage iconography were depictions of key deities embodying protective and regenerative forces. , portrayed as a -headed figure or reclined atop a on leg panels, symbolized guardianship over burials and guidance through the , ensuring the mummy's integrity against perils. appeared in mummiform, often linked to Isis's resurrective wings on torso sections, representing the cycle of death and revival central to Egyptian eschatology. Nut, the sky goddess, was frequently shown arched over the body or with outstretched wings enveloping the deceased, signifying maternal shelter and the eternal cosmic embrace that shielded the soul during its ascent. Inscriptions from the Book of the Dead further amplified these protections, with spells etched in hieroglyphs or, in later periods, demotic script to invoke ritual efficacy. Spell 151, dedicated to safeguarding the head and mummy mask, was commonly inscribed on cartonnage elements like masks and wrappings, detailing protections for specific body parts against netherworld assaults and promoting sensory restoration in the . These texts transformed the cartonnage into a dynamic , where the written words empowered the deceased to navigate judgment and achieve deification. Color choices and recurring patterns reinforced theological themes of vitality and permanence. Green pigments, derived from , evoked Osiris's regenerative essence and the fertile realm, symbolizing rebirth and vegetation's eternal cycle. Gold, applied as or inlays, denoted the gods' immortal flesh and unending duration, illuminating the deceased's path to divine eternity. Motifs like the pillar, resembling a backbone, stood for stability and Osiris's restored integrity, often integrated into borders or panels to anchor the against chaos. Regional differences in cartonnage symbolism reflected local cultic priorities while maintaining core funerary ideals. In Theban productions, motifs emphasized Amun-Ra, the syncretic central to the region's theology, portraying him in radiant forms to invoke solar rebirth and royal legitimacy. Saqqara examples, tied to Memphite traditions, favored more conservative designs with standardized Osirian and Anubine figures, prioritizing underworld navigation over expansive solar narratives. Social status influenced the elaboration of these symbols, underscoring stratified beliefs in solar and stellar . cartonnage, especially for pharaohs and high , featured lavish inlays and intricate vignettes, aligning the owner with Ra's daily rejuvenation and stellar among the imperishable . In contrast, commoners' pieces employed simpler painted vignettes and basic protective motifs, focusing on essential Osirian without opulent solar embellishments, yet equally affirming access to a blessed eternity.

Cultural and Archaeological Importance

Role in Funerary Practices

In , cartonnage was integrated into the mummification process after the removal of the viscera and the drying of the body with , serving as a protective covering placed directly over the linen-wrapped corpse to maintain its form and facilitate recognition by the spirit in the . This lightweight material, molded to fit the contours of the head, shoulders, and often the entire body, acted as an additional layer of preservation, shielding the mummy from decay while embodying the deceased's idealized identity. Typically consisting of multiple pieces such as a , broad collar, pectoral, , and foot casing, it was secured with bandages during the final wrapping stages, ensuring the body's integrity for eternal existence. Ritually, cartonnage functioned as a "second skin" or Osirian shell, symbolizing the deceased's transformation and resurrection akin to the god , thereby aiding the ka—the vital essence—in its journey through the to the Field of Reeds. It played a key role in ceremonies like the Opening of the Mouth, where priests ritually activated the mummy's senses using adzes and other tools on the cartonnage-covered face, enabling the deceased to eat, drink, and perceive in the . These elements, often inscribed with spells from the , underscored cartonnage's spiritual purpose in warding off threats and ensuring divine protection. The use of cartonnage democratized access to elite burial customs for the , particularly after , as in workshops made it more affordable than wooden coffins, allowing broader participation in rituals. Evidence from burials of officials and non-royals from the Middle Kingdom onward illustrates this shift, where cartonnage enabled middle-strata individuals to incorporate protective and symbolic elements previously reserved for . In assemblages, it was commonly combined with shabtis for labor in the , amulets for safeguarding the body, and canopic jars housing preserved organs, forming a cohesive set of to support the deceased's eternal needs. By the Roman period in , cartonnage persisted until around the CE, but its use declined with the rise of practices, which rejected mummification and pagan in favor of simple inhumation and Christian symbols. Emperor Theodosius I's edicts in the late suppressing traditional rites accelerated this transition, marking the end of cartonnage as a core funerary element.

Discoveries and Preservation

Major archaeological discoveries of cartonnage artifacts began in the late , with British Egyptologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie excavating numerous Ptolemaic and Roman-era mummy masks at the site of in the Fayum region during campaigns in 1888–1889 and 1910–1911. These finds, including gilded and painted cartonnage pieces, provided early insights into Late Period funerary practices and were distributed to museums worldwide, such as the and the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute. In the , excavations continued to uncover significant examples, though intact pieces remain rare due to post-depositional disturbances. Cartonnage's organic composition—typically layers of linen or papyrus bound with plaster—renders it highly fragile, particularly susceptible to environmental degradation from fluctuating humidity, which promotes mold and bacterial growth, and soluble salts that cause efflorescence and cracking. Physical damage from ancient tomb robbers, who often dismantled artifacts in search of valuables, compounded these issues, while modern improper storage in uncontrolled climates has led to further distortion, peeling, and loss of decorative layers. Biodeterioration by bacteria and fungi is a persistent threat, accelerating breakdown in humid conditions and necessitating strict environmental controls in collections. Conservation efforts have advanced with non-invasive imaging techniques, such as radiography and computed (CT) scanning, which allow detailed internal analysis of cartonnage structure without disassembly; for instance, CT scans of the Roman-era mummy Chenet-aa at the Field Museum revealed hidden construction details beneath the surface in 2024. Chemical stabilization using acrylic resins like , introduced in the 1970s, has become standard for consolidating flaking plaster and reattaching fragments, as applied to gilded Greco-Roman cartonnage pieces. These methods, often combined with multi-analytical characterization like , help preserve both the artifact and its pigments. Ongoing scholarly projects emphasize recovery and restoration; the University of Helsinki's initiatives in the 1990s and early 2000s developed techniques to extract and recycle documentary papyri embedded in cartonnage from sites like Abu Sir al-Malaq, yielding new Ptolemaic texts. In the , the undertook comprehensive restorations of its Egyptian collection, including rewrapping and conserving cartonnage cases like that of the Third Intermediate Period Nespanetjerenpere, as part of the 2010 Mummy Chamber reinstallation. Despite these efforts, gaps persist, with relatively few well-preserved examples from the Third Intermediate Period due to material scarcity and degradation, limiting understanding of early cartonnage evolution. Recent advancements include digital applications for virtual reconstruction, such as Egypt's 2024 interactive mobile application using VR to restore damaged artifacts.

References

  1. https://mc.minia.edu.eg/research/admin/Publications/270030201025441-s2.0-S0924203119301286-main.pdf
  2. https://rammuseum.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/RAMM-Ancient-Egypt-Resource-for-Teachers.pdf
  3. https://australian.museum/learn/cultures/international-collection/ancient-egyptian/funerary-egyptian-masks/
  4. https://art.thewalters.org/object/78.4/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345315459_Coffins_Sarcophagi_and_Cartonnage
  6. https://smarthistory.org/old-kingdom-first-intermediate-period-introduction/
  7. https://www.thoughtco.com/ancient-egypt-first-intermediate-period-118154
  8. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-1203
  9. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/objects/194065
  10. https://data.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/id/object/50810
  11. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/refresh/cont-ed-62/olli/21-fall/egypt3.pdf
  12. https://www.spurlock.illinois.edu/exhibits/online/mummification/artifacts5.html
  13. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/591314
  14. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/552245
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207423001899
  16. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/galleries/egyptian-death-and-afterlife-mummies/aswan-cartonnage
  17. https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/depicting-dead-ancient-egyptian-mummy-portraits
  18. https://www.artic.edu/articles/767/gilding-the-dead-mummy-portraits-in-roman-egypt
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-01655-5
  20. https://www.khm.at/fileadmin/pdf_KHM/online-publikationen/2025/technologische_studien-band_14/KHM_Technologische-Studien_14_Kern_EN_Haslauer.pdf
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349490916_New_results_on_the_manufacture_and_durability_of_cartonnage_experimental_archaeology_as_a_method_to_understand_the_history_of_22nd_Dynasty_cartonnage_cases_from_KV40_Thebes_Egypt
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X21000481
  23. https://sci-cult.com/wp-content/uploads/6.3/6_3_3_Ali_et_al.pdf
  24. https://papyri.tripod.com/texts/cartonnage.html
  25. https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/457707-studying-cartonnage-to-better-understand-the-role-of-funerary-artefacts-in-ancient-egypt
  26. https://fisher.library.utoronto.ca/fisher-blog/iconography-ancient-egyptian-funerary-objects-cartonnage-papyri-fisher
  27. https://oi-idb-static.uchicago.edu/multimedia/239131/oimp39.pdf
  28. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/objects/3357
  29. https://www.worldhistory.org/osiris/
  30. https://www.artic.edu/digital-publications/42/ancient-egyptian-art-at-the-art-institute-of-chicago/186/cats-107-9-funerary-masks-late-ptolemaic-period-early-roman-period
  31. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/999/color-in-ancient-egypt/
  32. https://resources.metmuseum.org/resources/metpublications/pdf/The_Art_of_Ancient_Egypt_A_Resource_for_Educators.pdf
  33. https://www.academia.edu/7428972/Cartonnage_fragments_from_the_22nd_Dynasty_originating_from_Theban_Tomb_65_and_its_surroundings_2017_
  34. https://ncartmuseum.org/introduction-to-golden-mummies-of-egypt/
  35. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/funerary-beliefs-of-the-ancient-egyptians/
  36. https://worldmuseumhub.com/ancient-egyptian-funerary-symbols
  37. https://www.si.edu/spotlight/ancient-egypt/mummies
  38. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/116784
  39. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/history-magazine/article/al-fayyum-egypt-mummies-portraits-history
  40. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/saoc56.pdf
  41. https://www.mdpi.com/2412-382X/8/3/22
  42. https://ejars.journals.ekb.eg/article_23503_b9aa69dd91887ebbfbc3268b5c5ec9ad.pdf
  43. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-024-01298-y
  44. https://www.fieldmuseum.org/about/press/new-research-on-mummified-remains-offer-rare-glimpse-behind-ancient-wrappings
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331969653_Using_Interdisciplinary_Studies_and_Analyses_in_the_Conservation_of_Greco-Roman_Cartonnage
  46. https://www.maajournal.com/index.php/maa/article/download/495/429/832
  47. https://guides.lib.uchicago.edu/c.php?g=297602&p=1986208
  48. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/arts/design/09mummies.html
  49. http://karacooney.squarespace.com/s/CooneyK_CoffinsCartonnageSarcophagi_WileyBlackwell2015.pdf
  50. https://english.news.cn/africa/20241112/4e2a5ac9e9f44f9c913ce9627e7187a3/c.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.