Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Chebyshev polynomials
View on Wikipedia


The Chebyshev polynomials are two sequences of orthogonal polynomials related to the cosine and sine functions, notated as and . They can be defined in several equivalent ways, one of which starts with trigonometric functions:
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are defined by
Similarly, the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are defined by
That these expressions define polynomials in is not obvious at first sight but can be shown using de Moivre's formula (see below).
The Chebyshev polynomials Tn are polynomials with the largest possible leading coefficient whose absolute value on the interval [−1, 1] is bounded by 1. They are also the "extremal" polynomials for many other properties.[1]
In 1952, Cornelius Lanczos showed that the Chebyshev polynomials are important in approximation theory for the solution of linear systems;[2] the roots of Tn(x), which are also called Chebyshev nodes, are used as matching points for optimizing polynomial interpolation. The resulting interpolation polynomial minimizes the problem of Runge's phenomenon and provides an approximation that is close to the best polynomial approximation to a continuous function under the maximum norm, also called the "minimax" criterion. This approximation leads directly to the method of Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature.
These polynomials were named after Pafnuty Chebyshev.[3] The letter T is used because of the alternative transliterations of the name Chebyshev as Tchebycheff, Tchebyshev (French) or Tschebyschow (German).
Definitions
[edit]Recurrence definition
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind can be defined by the recurrence relation
The Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind can be defined by the recurrence relation
which differs from the above only by the rule for n=1.
Trigonometric definition
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kind can be defined as the unique polynomials satisfying
and
for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ….
An equivalent way to state this is via exponentiation of a complex number: given a complex number z = a + bi with absolute value of one,
Chebyshev polynomials can also be defined in this form when studying trigonometric polynomials.[4]
That is an th-degree polynomial in can be seen by observing that is the real part of one side of de Moivre's formula:
The real part of the other side is a polynomial in and , in which all powers of are even and thus replaceable through the identity . By the same reasoning, is the imaginary part of the polynomial, in which all powers of are odd and thus, if one factor of is factored out, the remaining factors can be replaced to create a st-degree polynomial in .
For outside the interval [-1,1], the above definition implies
Commuting polynomials definition
[edit]Chebyshev polynomials can also be characterized by the following theorem:[5]
If is a family of monic polynomials with coefficients in a field of characteristic such that and for all and , then, up to a simple change of variables, either for all or for all .
Pell equation definition
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials can also be defined as the solutions to the Pell equation:
in a ring .[6] Thus, they can be generated by the standard technique for Pell equations of taking powers of a fundamental solution:
Generating functions
[edit]The ordinary generating function for is
There are several other generating functions for the Chebyshev polynomials; the exponential generating function is
The generating function relevant for 2-dimensional potential theory and multipole expansion is
The ordinary generating function for Un is
and the exponential generating function is
Relations between the two kinds of Chebyshev polynomials
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds correspond to a complementary pair of Lucas sequences and with parameters and :
It follows that they also satisfy a pair of mutual recurrence equations:[7]
The second of these may be rearranged using the recurrence definition for the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind to give:
Using this formula iteratively gives the sum formula:
while replacing and using the derivative formula for gives the recurrence relationship for the derivative of :
This relationship is used in the Chebyshev spectral method of solving differential equations.
Turán's inequalities for the Chebyshev polynomials are:[8]
The integral relations are[9][10]
where integrals are considered as principal value.
Explicit expressions
[edit]Using the complex number exponentiation definition of the Chebyshev polynomial, one can derive the following expressions, valid for any real :[citation needed]
The two are equivalent because .
An explicit form of the Chebyshev polynomial in terms of monomials follows from de Moivre's formula:
where denotes the real part of a complex number. Expanding the formula, one gets
The real part of the expression is obtained from summands corresponding to even indices. Noting and , one gets the explicit formula:
which in turn means that
This can be written as a 2F1 hypergeometric function:
where the prime at the summation symbol indicates that the contribution of needs to be halved if it appears.
A related expression for as a sum of monomials with binomial coefficients and powers of two is
Similarly, can be expressed in terms of hypergeometric functions:
Properties
[edit]Symmetry
[edit]
That is, Chebyshev polynomials of even order have even symmetry and therefore contain only even powers of . Chebyshev polynomials of odd order have odd symmetry and therefore contain only odd powers of .
Roots and extrema
[edit]A Chebyshev polynomial of either kind with degree n has n different simple roots, called Chebyshev roots, in the interval [−1, 1]. The roots of the Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind are sometimes called Chebyshev nodes because they are used as nodes in polynomial interpolation. Using the trigonometric definition and the fact that:
one can show that the roots of are:
Similarly, the roots of are:
The extrema of on the interval are located at:
One unique property of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is that on the interval all of the extrema have values that are either −1 or 1. Thus these polynomials have only two finite critical values, the defining property of Shabat polynomials. Both the first and second kinds of Chebyshev polynomial have extrema at the endpoints, given by:
The extrema of on the interval where are located at values of . They are , or where , , and , i.e., and are relatively prime numbers.
Specifically (Minimal polynomial of 2cos(2pi/n)[13][14]) when is even:
- if , or and is even. There are such values of .
- if and is odd. There are such values of .
When is odd:
- if , or and is even. There are such values of .
- if , or and is odd. There are such values of .
Differentiation and integration
[edit]The derivatives of the polynomials can be less than straightforward. By differentiating the polynomials in their trigonometric forms, it can be shown that:
The last two formulas can be numerically troublesome due to the division by zero (0/0 indeterminate form, specifically) at and . By L'Hôpital's rule:
More generally,
which is of great use in the numerical solution of eigenvalue problems.
Also, we have:
where the prime at the summation symbols means that the term contributed by k = 0 is to be halved, if it appears.
Concerning integration, the first derivative of the Tn implies that:
and the recurrence relation for the first kind polynomials involving derivatives establishes that for :
The last formula can be further manipulated to express the integral of as a function of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind only:
Furthermore, we have:
Products of Chebyshev polynomials
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind satisfy the relation:
which is easily proved from the product-to-sum formula for the cosine:
For this results in the already known recurrence formula, just arranged differently, and with it forms the recurrence relation for all even or all odd indexed Chebyshev polynomials (depending on the parity of the lowest m) which implies the evenness or oddness of these polynomials. Three more useful formulas for evaluating Chebyshev polynomials can be concluded from this product expansion:
The polynomials of the second kind satisfy the similar relation:
(with the definition by convention ). They also satisfy:
for . For this recurrence reduces to:
which establishes the evenness or oddness of the even or odd indexed Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind depending on whether starts with 2 or 3.
Composition and divisibility properties
[edit]The trigonometric definitions of and imply the composition or nesting properties:[15]
For the order of composition may be reversed, making the family of polynomial functions a commutative semigroup under composition.
Since is divisible by if is odd, it follows that is divisible by if is odd. Furthermore, is divisible by , and in the case that is even, divisible by .
Orthogonality
[edit]Both and form a sequence of orthogonal polynomials. The polynomials of the first kind are orthogonal with respect to the weight:
on the interval [−1, 1], i.e. we have:
This can be proven by letting and using the defining identity .
Similarly, the polynomials of the second kind Un are orthogonal with respect to the weight:
on the interval [−1, 1], i.e. we have:
(The measure is, to within a normalizing constant, the Wigner semicircle distribution.)
These orthogonality properties follow from the fact that the Chebyshev polynomials solve the Chebyshev differential equations:
which are Sturm–Liouville differential equations. It is a general feature of such differential equations that there is a distinguished orthonormal set of solutions. (Another way to define the Chebyshev polynomials is as the solutions to those equations.)
The also satisfy a discrete orthogonality condition:
where is any integer greater than ,[10] and the are the Chebyshev nodes (see above) of :
For the polynomials of the second kind and any integer with the same Chebyshev nodes , there are similar sums:
and without the weight function:
For any integer , based on the } zeros of :
one can get the sum:
and again without the weight function:
Minimal ∞-norm
[edit]For any given , among the polynomials of degree with leading coefficient 1 (monic polynomials):
is the one of which the maximal absolute value on the interval [−1, 1] is minimal.
This maximal absolute value is:
and reaches this maximum exactly times at:
Let's assume that is a polynomial of degree with leading coefficient 1 with maximal absolute value on the interval [−1, 1] less than 1 / 2n − 1.
Define
Because at extreme points of Tn we have
From the intermediate value theorem, fn(x) has at least n roots. However, this is impossible, as fn(x) is a polynomial of degree n − 1, so the fundamental theorem of algebra implies it has at most n − 1 roots.
Remark
[edit]By the equioscillation theorem, among all the polynomials of degree ≤ n, the polynomial f minimizes ‖ f ‖∞ on [−1, 1] if and only if there are n + 2 points −1 ≤ x0 < x1 < ⋯ < xn + 1 ≤ 1 such that | f(xi)| = ‖ f ‖∞.
Of course, the null polynomial on the interval [−1, 1] can be approximated by itself and minimizes the ∞-norm.
Above, however, | f | reaches its maximum only n + 1 times because we are searching for the best polynomial of degree n ≥ 1 (therefore the theorem evoked previously cannot be used).
Chebyshev polynomials as special cases of more general polynomial families
[edit]The Chebyshev polynomials are a special case of the ultraspherical or Gegenbauer polynomials , which themselves are a special case of the Jacobi polynomials :
Chebyshev polynomials are also a special case of Dickson polynomials:
In particular, when , they are related by and .
Other properties
[edit]The curves given by y = Tn(x), or equivalently, by the parametric equations y = Tn(cos θ) = cos nθ, x = cos θ, are a special case of Lissajous curves with frequency ratio equal to n.
Similar to the formula:
we have the analogous formula:
For x ≠ 0:
and:
which follows from the fact that this holds by definition for x = eiθ.
There are relations between Legendre polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials
These identities can be proven using generating functions and discrete convolution
Chebyshev polynomials as determinants
[edit]From their definition by recurrence it follows that the Chebyshev polynomials can be obtained as determinants of special tridiagonal matrices of size :
and similarly for .
Examples
[edit]First kind
[edit]
The first few Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are OEIS: A028297
Second kind
[edit]
The first few Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are OEIS: A053117
As a basis set
[edit]
In the appropriate Sobolev space, the set of Chebyshev polynomials form an orthonormal basis, so that a function in the same space can, on −1 ≤ x ≤ 1, be expressed via the expansion:[16]
Furthermore, as mentioned previously, the Chebyshev polynomials form an orthogonal basis which (among other things) implies that the coefficients an can be determined easily through the application of an inner product. This sum is called a Chebyshev series or a Chebyshev expansion.
Since a Chebyshev series is related to a Fourier cosine series through a change of variables, all of the theorems, identities, etc. that apply to Fourier series have a Chebyshev counterpart.[16] These attributes include:
- The Chebyshev polynomials form a complete orthogonal system.
- The Chebyshev series converges to f(x) if the function is piecewise smooth and continuous. The smoothness requirement can be relaxed in most cases – as long as there are a finite number of discontinuities in f(x) and its derivatives.
- At a discontinuity, the series will converge to the average of the right and left limits.
The abundance of the theorems and identities inherited from Fourier series make the Chebyshev polynomials important tools in numeric analysis; for example they are the most popular general purpose basis functions used in the spectral method,[16] often in favor of trigonometric series due to generally faster convergence for continuous functions (Gibbs' phenomenon is still a problem).
The Chebfun software package supports function manipulation based on their expansion in the Chebyshev basis.
Example 1
[edit]Consider the Chebyshev expansion of log(1 + x). One can express:
One can find the coefficients an either through the application of an inner product or by the discrete orthogonality condition. For the inner product:
which gives:
Alternatively, when the inner product of the function being approximated cannot be evaluated, the discrete orthogonality condition gives an often useful result for approximate coefficients:
where δij is the Kronecker delta function and the xk are the N Gauss–Chebyshev zeros of TN (x):
For any N, these approximate coefficients provide an exact approximation to the function at xk with a controlled error between those points. The exact coefficients are obtained with N = ∞, thus representing the function exactly at all points in [−1,1]. The rate of convergence depends on the function and its smoothness.
This allows us to compute the approximate coefficients an very efficiently through the discrete cosine transform:
Example 2
[edit]To provide another example:
Partial sums
[edit]The partial sums of:
are very useful in the approximation of various functions and in the solution of differential equations (see spectral method). Two common methods for determining the coefficients an are through the use of the inner product as in Galerkin's method and through the use of collocation which is related to interpolation.
As an interpolant, the N coefficients of the (N − 1)st partial sum are usually obtained on the Chebyshev–Gauss–Lobatto[17] points (or Lobatto grid), which results in minimum error and avoids Runge's phenomenon associated with a uniform grid. This collection of points corresponds to the extrema of the highest order polynomial in the sum, plus the endpoints and is given by:
Polynomial in Chebyshev form
[edit]An arbitrary polynomial of degree N can be written in terms of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.[10] Such a polynomial p(x) is of the form:
Polynomials in Chebyshev form can be evaluated using the Clenshaw algorithm.
Families of polynomials related to Chebyshev polynomials
[edit]Polynomials denoted and closely related to Chebyshev polynomials are sometimes used. They are defined by:[18]
and satisfy:
A. F. Horadam called the polynomials Vieta–Lucas polynomials and denoted them . He called the polynomials Vieta–Fibonacci polynomials and denoted them .[19] All of these polynomials have 1 as their leading coefficient. Lists of both sets of polynomials are given in Viète's Opera Mathematica, Chapter IX, Theorems VI and VII.[20] The Vieta–Lucas and Vieta–Fibonacci polynomials of real argument are, up to a power of and a shift of index in the case of the latter, equal to Lucas and Fibonacci polynomials Ln and Fn of imaginary argument.
Shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds are related to the Chebyshev polynomials by:[18]
When the argument of the Chebyshev polynomial satisfies 2x − 1 ∈ [−1, 1] the argument of the shifted Chebyshev polynomial satisfies x ∈ [0, 1]. Similarly, one can define shifted polynomials for generic intervals [a, b].
Around 1990 the terms "third-kind" and "fourth-kind" came into use in connection with Chebyshev polynomials, although the polynomials denoted by these terms had an earlier development under the name airfoil polynomials. According to J. C. Mason and G. H. Elliott, the terminology "third-kind" and "fourth-kind" is due to Walter Gautschi, "in consultation with colleagues in the field of orthogonal polynomials."[21] The Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind are defined as:
and the Chebyshev polynomials of the fourth kind are defined as:
where .[21][22] They coincide with the Dirichlet kernel.
In the airfoil literature and are denoted and . The polynomial families , , , and are orthogonal with respect to the weights:
and are proportional to Jacobi polynomials with:[22]
All four families satisfy the recurrence with , where , , , or , but they differ according to whether equals , , , or .[21]
Irreducible Factorization of Chebyshev Polynomials
[edit]It is easier to discuss this detail by first examining the factorization of the Vieta-Lucas and Vieta-Fibonacci polynomials.
Given the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials, it is easy to see—by comparing their root sets—that and
By expressing the right-hand side expressions in form and the numerators and denominators of these fractions—and consequently the fractions themselves—can be written as products of expressions like where each is a primitive root of unity. Thus, we obtain: and where is the th cyclotomic polynomial.
It can be shown that, for every , corresponding to the cyclotomic polynomial of degree there exists a unique polynomial of degree such that where is the well known Euler's totient function.
The polynomials may be referred to as cyclotomic pre-polynomials, since the cyclotomic polynomials can be obtained from them via a well-defined mapping.
An obvious property of the mapping applicable to any polynomial of degree is that it maps the product of two or more polynomials to the product of the images of the individual polynomials.
From all of the above, it follows that and
Now, it follows directly that the Chebyshev polynomials and can be factorized as follows: and
From the irreducibility of the polynomials it follows that the polynomials are also irreducible.
For more details, see [23].
Even order modified Chebyshev polynomials
[edit]Some applications rely on Chebyshev polynomials but may be unable to accommodate the lack of a root at zero, which rules out the use of standard Chebyshev polynomials for these kinds of applications. Even order Chebyshev filter designs using equally terminated passive networks are an example of this.[24] However, even order Chebyshev polynomials may be modified to move the lowest roots down to zero while still maintaining the desirable Chebyshev equi-ripple effect. Such modified polynomials contain two roots at zero, and may be referred to as even order modified Chebyshev polynomials. Even order modified Chebyshev polynomials may be created from the Chebyshev nodes in the same manner as standard Chebyshev polynomials.
where
- is an N-th order Chebyshev polynomial
- is the i-th Chebyshev node
In the case of even order modified Chebyshev polynomials, the even order modified Chebyshev nodes are used to construct the even order modified Chebyshev polynomials.
where
- is an N-th order even order modified Chebyshev polynomial
- is the i-th even order modified Chebyshev node
For example, the 4th order Chebyshev polynomial from the example above is , which by inspection contains no roots of zero. Creating the polynomial from the even order modified Chebyshev nodes creates a 4th order even order modified Chebyshev polynomial of , which by inspection contains two roots at zero, and may be used in applications requiring roots at zero.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Rivlin, Theodore J. (1974). "Chapter 2, Extremal properties". The Chebyshev Polynomials. Pure and Applied Mathematics (1st ed.). New York-London-Sydney: Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons]. pp. 56–123. ISBN 978-047172470-4.
- ^ Lanczos, C. (1952). "Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations". Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. 49 (1): 33. doi:10.6028/jres.049.006.
- ^ Chebyshev first presented his eponymous polynomials in a paper read before the St. Petersburg Academy in 1853: Chebyshev, P. L. (1854). "Théorie des mécanismes connus sous le nom de parallélogrammes". Mémoires des Savants étrangers présentés à l'Académie de Saint-Pétersbourg (in French). 7: 539–586. Also published separately as Chebyshev, P. L. (1853). Théorie des mécanismes connus sous le nom de parallélogrammes. St. Petersburg: Imprimerie de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences. doi:10.3931/E-RARA-120037.
- ^ Schaeffer, A. C. (1941). "Inequalities of A. Markoff and S. Bernstein for polynomials and related functions". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 47 (8): 565–579. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1941-07510-5. ISSN 0002-9904.
- ^ Ritt, J. F. (1922). "Prime and Composite Polynomials". Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 23: 51–66. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1922-1501189-9.
- ^ Demeyer, Jeroen (2007). Diophantine Sets over Polynomial Rings and Hilbert's Tenth Problem for Function Fields (PDF) (Ph.D. thesis). p. 70. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2007.
- ^ Bateman & Bateman Manuscript Project 1953, p. 184, eqs. 3–4.
- ^ Beckenbach, E. F.; Seidel, W.; Szász, Otto (1951), "Recurrent determinants of Legendre and of ultraspherical polynomials", Duke Math. J., 18: 1–10, doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-51-01801-7, MR 0040487
- ^ Bateman & Bateman Manuscript Project 1953, p. 187, eqs. 47–48.
- ^ a b c Mason & Handscomb 2002.
- ^ Cody, W. J. (1970). "A survey of practical rational and polynomial approximation of functions". SIAM Review. 12 (3): 400–423. doi:10.1137/1012082.
- ^ Mathar, Richard J. (2006). "Chebyshev series expansion of inverse polynomials". Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 196 (2): 596–607. arXiv:math/0403344. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2005.10.013.
- ^ Gürtaş, Y. Z. (2017). "Chebyshev Polynomials and the minimal polynomial of ". American Mathematical Monthly. 124 (1): 74–78. doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.124.1.74. S2CID 125797961.
- ^ Wolfram, D. A. (2022). "Factoring Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds with minimal polynomials of ". American Mathematical Monthly. 129 (2): 172–176. doi:10.1080/00029890.2022.2005391. S2CID 245808448.
- ^ Rayes, M. O.; Trevisan, V.; Wang, P. S. (2005), "Factorization properties of chebyshev polynomials", Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 50 (8–9): 1231–1240, doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2005.07.003
- ^ a b c Boyd, John P. (2001). Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods (PDF) (second ed.). Dover. ISBN 0-486-41183-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2010. Retrieved 19 March 2009.
- ^ "Chebyshev Interpolation: An Interactive Tour". Archived from the original on 18 March 2017. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
- ^ a b Hochstrasser 1972, p. 778.
- ^ Horadam, A. F. (2002), "Vieta polynomials" (PDF), Fibonacci Quarterly, 40 (3): 223–232
- ^ Viète, François (1646). Francisci Vietae Opera mathematica : in unum volumen congesta ac recognita / opera atque studio Francisci a Schooten (PDF). Bibliothèque nationale de France.
- ^ a b c Mason, J. C.; Elliott, G. H. (1993), "Near-minimax complex approximation by four kinds of Chebyshev polynomial expansion", J. Comput. Appl. Math., 46 (1–2): 291–300, doi:10.1016/0377-0427(93)90303-S
- ^ a b Desmarais, Robert N.; Bland, Samuel R. (1995), "Tables of properties of airfoil polynomials", NASA Reference Publication 1343, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- ^ Kéri, Gerzson (2021): Compressed Chebyshev Polynomials and Multiple-Angle Formulas, Omniscriptum Publishing Company, ISBN 978-620-0-62498-7.
- ^ Saal, Rudolf (January 1979). Handbook of Filter Design (in English and German) (1st ed.). Munich, Germany: Allgemeine Elektricitais-Gesellschaft. pp. 25, 26, 56–61, 116, 117. ISBN 3-87087-070-2.
Sources
[edit]- Hochstrasser, Urs W. (1972) [1964]. "Orthogonal Polynomials". In Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene (eds.). Handbook of Mathematical Functions (10th printing, with corrections; first ed.). Washington D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. Ch. 22, pp. 771–792. LCCN 64-60036. MR 0167642. Reprint: 1983. New York: Dover. ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0.
- Bateman, Harry; Bateman Manuscript Project (1953). "Tchebichef polynomials". In Erdélyi, Arthur (ed.). Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. 2. Research associates: W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F. Tricomi (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. § 10.11, pp. 183–187. LCCN 53-5555. Caltech eprint 43491. Reprint: 1981. Melbourne, FL: Krieger. ISBN 0-89874-069-X.
- Mason, J. C.; Handscomb, D.C. (2002). Chebyshev Polynomials. Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi:10.1201/9781420036114. ISBN 978-1-4200-3611-4.
Further reading
[edit]- Dette, Holger (1995). "A note on some peculiar nonlinear extremal phenomena of the Chebyshev polynomials". Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society. 38 (2): 343–355. arXiv:math/9406222. doi:10.1017/S001309150001912X.
- Elliott, David (1964). "The evaluation and estimation of the coefficients in the Chebyshev Series expansion of a function". Math. Comp. 18 (86): 274–284. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1964-0166903-7. MR 0166903.
- Eremenko, A.; Lempert, L. (1994). "An Extremal Problem For Polynomials" (PDF). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 122 (1): 191–193. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1207536-1. MR 1207536.
- Hernandez, M. A. (2001). "Chebyshev's approximation algorithms and applications". Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 41 (3–4): 433–445. doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(00)00286-8.
- Mason, J. C. (1984). "Some properties and applications of Chebyshev polynomial and rational approximation". Rational Approximation and Interpolation. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 1105. pp. 27–48. doi:10.1007/BFb0072398. ISBN 978-3-540-13899-0.
- Koornwinder, Tom H.; Wong, Roderick S. C.; Koekoek, Roelof; Swarttouw, René F. (2010), "Orthogonal Polynomials", in Olver, Frank W. J.; Lozier, Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F.; Clark, Charles W. (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-19225-5, MR 2723248.
- Remes, Eugene. "On an Extremal Property of Chebyshev Polynomials" (PDF).
- Salzer, Herbert E. (1976). "Converting interpolation series into Chebyshev series by recurrence formulas". Mathematics of Computation. 30 (134): 295–302. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1976-0395159-3. MR 0395159.
- Scraton, R.E. (1969). "The Solution of integral equations in Chebyshev series". Mathematics of Computation. 23 (108): 837–844. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1969-0260224-4. MR 0260224.
- Smith, Lyle B. (1966). "Computation of Chebyshev series coefficients". Comm. ACM. 9 (2): 86–87. doi:10.1145/365170.365195. S2CID 8876563. Algorithm 277.
- Suetin, P. K. (2001) [1994], "Chebyshev polynomials", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
External links
[edit]
Media related to Chebyshev polynomials at Wikimedia Commons- Weisstein, Eric W. "Chebyshev polynomial[s] of the first kind". MathWorld.
- Mathews, John H. (2003). "Module for Chebyshev polynomials". Department of Mathematics. Course notes for Math 340 Numerical Analysis & Math 440 Advanced Numerical Analysis. Fullerton, CA: California State University. Archived from the original on 29 May 2007. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
- "Numerical computing with functions". The Chebfun Project.
- "Is there an intuitive explanation for an extremal property of Chebyshev polynomials?". Math Overflow. Question 25534.
- "Chebyshev polynomial evaluation and the Chebyshev transform". Boost. Math.
Chebyshev polynomials
View on GrokipediaDefinitions
Recurrence relations
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are defined by the three-term linear recurrence relation with initial conditions and .[7] Applying the recurrence yields, for instance, .[7] The Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind satisfy an analogous recurrence with initial conditions and .[7] For , this gives .[7] These relations generate the polynomials iteratively: starting from the degree-zero and degree-one terms, each subsequent polynomial is obtained via a simple linear combination of the two predecessors, requiring only a fixed number of arithmetic operations per step.[8] This approach is computationally efficient, achieving evaluation of or in time and exhibiting numerical stability when .[9]Trigonometric identities
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, denoted , are fundamentally defined through their trigonometric representation as for .[3] This definition establishes a direct connection to multiple-angle formulas for the cosine function, originating from the work of Pafnuty Chebyshev in the 19th century on trigonometric series and approximation theory.[10] For instance, the double-angle formula yields upon substituting .[11] Higher-degree polynomials follow similarly from iterative applications of multiple-angle identities, such as , giving .[11] The trigonometric form extends beyond the interval via analytic continuation to the complex plane, where for , .[3] This hyperbolic representation maintains the polynomial's properties while allowing evaluation outside the real unit interval. Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, denoted , are similarly expressed trigonometrically as for , excluding points where the denominator vanishes.[4] This form arises from sine multiple-angle formulas, paralleling the cosine basis for the first kind. At the endpoints of the interval, these polynomials exhibit specific values: and for all ; likewise, and .[3][4] These boundary behaviors underscore their oscillatory nature within , mimicking cosine and sine waves scaled to the interval.Generating functions
The generating functions for Chebyshev polynomials offer a formal power series representation that encapsulates the entire sequence in a closed rational form, aiding in coefficient analysis and links to broader analytic structures. For the first kind, the generating function is which converges for when , and for when (assuming real and greater than 1; analogous for ). For the second kind, it is with the same convergence conditions. These functions derive from the trigonometric characterizations of the polynomials. With and , , so the series . This sums via the formula for the real part of a geometric series: for and , yielding the rational expression after taking the real component and simplifying.[8] A parallel derivation holds for , where the series becomes ; the numerator sums to via the imaginary part of the geometric series, and the overall form simplifies to the reciprocal of the denominator.[8] The common denominator factors as under , explicitly connecting it to products of geometric series terms in the complex plane.[3] Such generating functions allow extraction of individual coefficients through the Cauchy integral formula, for instance, over a contour encircling the origin within the radius of convergence. They further support series manipulations to derive identities and, briefly, underpin proofs of orthogonality by generating integral representations.Explicit expressions
Closed-form formulas
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, , admit an explicit summation formula as a polynomial of degree : This expression arises from the binomial expansion underlying the trigonometric identity .[3] Similarly, Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, , have the explicit form which is also a polynomial of degree .[4] Both and can be expressed using the hypergeometric function . Specifically, and These representations highlight their connections to classical special functions.[3][4] The leading coefficient of is for (with ), while for it is .[3][4]Rodrigues-type formulas
The Rodrigues-type formulas provide differential representations for Chebyshev polynomials, analogous to Rodrigues' formula for other classical orthogonal polynomials. These expressions are particularly valuable in theoretical contexts, such as deriving properties through repeated differentiation and integration by parts, and they arise naturally from the Sturm-Liouville theory associated with the Chebyshev differential equation. In this framework, the polynomials are generated as solutions to a self-adjoint boundary value problem on the interval , where the weight function and the form of the operator lead to these explicit derivative-based definitions.[12] For the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind , the Rodrigues-type formula is where denotes the double factorial, equivalent to . This representation highlights the role of the weight function in the orthogonality integral, as the formula can be viewed as with an appropriate normalization constant .[13] For the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind , the corresponding formula is Here, the inverse weight appears explicitly, reflecting the orthogonality with respect to . This form facilitates generalizations and connections to other polynomial families, as it stems from the special case of Jacobi polynomials via the relation .[13] These formulas are instrumental in Sturm-Liouville theory, where the Chebyshev polynomials emerge as eigenfunctions of singular differential operators of the form , with for the second kind and adjusted accordingly for the first kind; the Rodrigues representation allows direct construction of the eigenfunctions without solving the differential equation explicitly.[12] Furthermore, by taking limits in the parameter space of the underlying Jacobi polynomials (specifically, as the parameters ), the Chebyshev Rodrigues formulas connect to those of Legendre polynomials, providing a pathway for asymptotic analysis and uniform approximations across classical families.Relations between kinds
Connections via identities
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, , and the second kind, , are interconnected through several fundamental identities that highlight their unified role in approximation theory and orthogonal polynomial systems. Pafnuty Chebyshev originally developed these polynomials in the mid-19th century as part of his investigations into the best uniform approximation of functions by polynomials, particularly in the context of minimizing maximum deviations on the interval . His work, such as the 1854 paper "Théorie des mécanismes connus sous le nom de parallélogrammes," demonstrated how these polynomials arise naturally from trigonometric substitutions and linkages in mechanisms, providing a basis for their mutual relations that facilitate efficient computational methods in numerical analysis.[5] A key linking identity is the product relation , which expresses the second-kind polynomial in terms of consecutive first-kind polynomials and underscores their shared oscillatory behavior on . This formula can be derived from the trigonometric definitions and where , by manipulating sine and cosine multiple-angle expressions. The derivative relation provides another direct connection, showing that the derivative of a first-kind polynomial is a scalar multiple of a second-kind polynomial of one lower degree; this is particularly useful in spectral methods and quadrature rules, as it preserves orthogonality properties under differentiation. A reciprocal form is , which inverts the derivative relation.Differences in degree and leading coefficients
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and second kind are both polynomials of exact degree for each nonnegative integer . [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory. John Wiley & Sons.] For , the leading coefficient of is , whereas that of is . [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory. John Wiley & Sons.] These differences in leading coefficients imply that the monic version of is simply , while the monic requires division by for . [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory. John Wiley & Sons.] A key distinction in normalization arises from their behaviors on the interval . The polynomials are bounded such that for all , equioscillating between and $1. [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). *The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory*. John Wiley & Sons.] In contrast, U_n(x)nU_n(1) = n+1U_n(-1) = (-1)^n (n+1). [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). *The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory*. John Wiley & Sons.] For T_n(x)T_n(1) = 1T_n(-1) = (-1)^n. [Rivlin, T.J. (1974). *The Chebyshev Polynomials: From Approximation Theory to Algebra and Number Theory*. John Wiley & Sons.] These endpoint behaviors are illustrated in the following table for small values of n$:| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | -2 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | 4 | -4 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Fundamental properties
Symmetry and parity
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind exhibit definite parity under the reflection , satisfying . Thus, for even , is an even function, while for odd , it is an odd function. The same parity relation holds for the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, , making even when is even and odd when is odd.[14][15] This reflection symmetry implies that polynomials of even degree and are even functions, whereas those of odd degree and are odd functions. Reduction formulas exploit this structure to express higher-degree polynomials in terms of lower-degree ones. For instance, the even-degree case yields , derived from the double-angle identity with . A similar relation holds for , facilitating computations and decompositions into even and odd components.[15][16] The parity properties have practical implications for integration over symmetric intervals such as . For odd , since and are odd functions, their integrals over this interval vanish: and . This simplifies evaluations involving even weight functions or symmetric integrands, as the odd parts contribute nothing.[17] Graphically, these polynomials display symmetric oscillations around the x-axis within , with even-degree instances mirroring across the y-axis and odd-degree ones antisymmetric, underscoring their utility in approximation theory for symmetric domains.[18]Roots and extrema
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, , possess distinct real roots within the open interval , explicitly given by These roots stem from the trigonometric representation , where the zeros correspond to odd multiples of in the argument . In addition to these roots, exhibits interior extrema on , with the full set of extremal points (including endpoints) located at At these points, alternates between maximum and minimum values of and , demonstrating equioscillation across the interval .[3] The Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, , similarly have distinct real roots in , located at These polynomials feature extrema on . A notable interlacing property holds between the two kinds: the roots of strictly interlace the roots of within , meaning each root of lies between consecutive roots of . This follows from the three-term recurrence relations satisfied by both families.Orthogonality relations
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind satisfy the orthogonality relation with respect to the weight function on the interval .[12] The corresponding squared -norms are and for .[12] Similarly, the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are orthogonal with respect to the weight function , satisfying The squared norms are for all .[12] These relations can be proved using the trigonometric substitution , where . For , this yields and , transforming the integral into , which evaluates to the stated values via standard trigonometric orthogonality.[12] For , and , leading to .[12] Discrete variants of these orthogonality relations exist, where the polynomials are orthogonal with respect to summation over Chebyshev-Gauss or Chebyshev-Lobatto points, providing the foundation for efficient numerical quadrature rules such as Gauss-Chebyshev quadrature.[19]Calculus and algebraic operations
Differentiation rules
The differentiation of Chebyshev polynomials follows directly from their trigonometric definitions. For the polynomials of the first kind, let , so . Differentiating with respect to gives where the chain rule has been applied since .[20] The expression is precisely the definition of the Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind , yielding the fundamental relation For the polynomials of the second kind, defined by , differentiation again uses the chain rule and trigonometric identities, but the resulting expression is more conveniently handled via the recurrence relation satisfied by : with and . Differentiating this recurrence term by term produces a recurrence for the derivatives: with base cases and . This allows computation of iteratively for any . Higher-order derivatives of can be obtained by repeated application of the basic rule , combined with the recurrences for . The closed-form expression for the -th derivative, with , is This follows from induction on , matching leading coefficients at each step (the leading coefficient of is for , and that of is ), and is verified explicitly for small and . These rules facilitate integration by parts in proofs of the orthogonality relations for both kinds of Chebyshev polynomials over .Integration formulas
The indefinite integral of the Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind for is For , where , the integral simplifies to .[21] Similarly, the indefinite integral of the Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind is These expressions follow from the recurrence relations and trigonometric representations of the polynomials. A key definite integral involving is This result arises from the substitution , which transforms the integral into , evaluating to zero for positive integers due to symmetry, and for . The substitution also connects the integral to the inverse sine function, as . For products of Chebyshev polynomials, reduction formulas can be derived using integration by parts on the weighted inner product . Specifically, leveraging the derivative relation and the orthogonality weight, integration by parts yields recurrences that reduce the degrees and , facilitating computation of non-orthogonal cases.Product identities
The product of two Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind admits a simple expression in terms of a linear combination of other such polynomials: valid for nonnegative integers and , where . This identity follows directly from the trigonometric representation and the product-to-sum formula for cosines. As a consequence, the addition formula for the first kind is obtained by rearranging: For example, taking , which matches the direct expansion of . This product identity facilitates the multiplication of functions via their Chebyshev series expansions, as the product corresponds to a discrete convolution that can be efficiently computed. For Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, the corresponding addition formula is assuming , with . This relation arises from the trigonometric definition and the angle addition formula for sines. A direct product-to-sum identity for is more involved but can be derived similarly using sine product formulas, often resulting in expressions involving both and terms adjusted by powers of . These identities underpin applications in spectral methods and orthogonal expansions where products appear.[22]Composition properties
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind satisfy a simple and elegant composition rule: for nonnegative integers and , This identity holds because both sides equal under the standard trigonometric definition . The operation is commutative, so as well. As a direct consequence of this substitution property, the polynomial divides in the ring of polynomials with rational coefficients for any positive integer , since expresses the higher-degree polynomial as a polynomial in . For Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, the composition does not yield a single , but a related product identity provides a useful functional relation: for nonnegative integers and , This follows from the trigonometric forms and , combined with angle addition formulas. Chebyshev polynomials also connect to cyclotomic polynomials through their roots and algebraic structure; specifically, the discriminants and resultants of can be expressed using cyclotomic polynomials, reflecting the relation between the roots and roots of unity via the substitution .[23]Approximation and minimax aspects
Minimal infinity norm
Among all monic polynomials of degree on the interval , the scaled Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind achieves the minimal infinity norm, with .[24] This property establishes the Chebyshev polynomials as the unique minimizers in the uniform norm for this class of polynomials.[25] The minimal norm arises from the equioscillation of , which attains the values at exactly points in , alternating in sign.[26] These points correspond to the extrema of , located at for .[3] A proof sketch proceeds by contradiction using the alternation theorem: suppose there exists another monic polynomial of degree with . Then would satisfy at the equioscillation points, but since has leading coefficient zero and changes sign at least times, it must have at least roots, implying and contradicting the strict inequality.[26] This uniqueness holds for the continuous case on compact intervals.[27] In comparison, other orthogonal polynomial families, such as the Legendre polynomials, yield monic versions with strictly larger infinity norms on ; for instance, the monic Legendre polynomial of degree 2 has norm .[28] The leading coefficient of the standard Legendre polynomial is , so the monic form exceeds the Chebyshev bound asymptotically by a factor involving .[25] This scaling of Chebyshev polynomials is fundamental in minimax approximation, where provides the tightest bound on the deviation from zero among monic polynomials, enabling optimal error estimates in polynomial interpolation and expansion.Equioscillation theorem
The equioscillation theorem, also known as Chebyshev's alternation theorem, characterizes the unique best uniform approximation to a continuous function by polynomials of lower degree. For a continuous function on a compact interval , let be the polynomial of degree at most that minimizes the uniform norm . Then the error function attains its maximum absolute value at exactly points in , with the signs of alternating between consecutive points.[29] This property ensures uniqueness and provides a practical criterion for verifying optimal approximations. The Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind exemplifies this theorem in the context of approximating the zero function by polynomials of degree less than . The monic polynomial of degree with the minimal uniform norm on is , and its values equioscillate—reaching with alternating signs—precisely at the extrema of in . This minimal deviation follows directly from the equioscillation property, as any other monic polynomial of degree would have a larger maximum norm by the theorem's characterization.[29] The theorem extends to arbitrary compact intervals via an affine transformation that maps to . Specifically, define the linear map for ; then the best approximation on corresponds to the best approximation on under this change of variables, preserving the equioscillation structure after rescaling. Pafnuty Chebyshev first developed this theorem in his 1854 study of mechanical linkages, where minimizing deviations in approximate representations required optimal polynomial approximations; he applied the equioscillation idea to ensure the smallest possible maximum error in such systems.[30] A concrete illustration arises in approximating the monomial on by polynomials of degree less than or equal to . The error in the best uniform approximation is proportional to , which equioscillates at points: the points for , attaining alternately. This confirms the optimality via the theorem, with the leading coefficient determining the exact constant of proportionality.[29]Special representations
As determinants
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind can be represented as the determinant of an tridiagonal matrix derived from their three-term recurrence relation , with initial conditions and . The matrix has in the (1,1) entry, in all other diagonal entries, and in the off-diagonal entries (sub- and super-diagonals). This structure accommodates the initial condition at degree 1 while enforcing the recurrence for higher degrees through the linear algebra of the tridiagonal form.[31] For example, when , the matrix is and its determinant is . This explicit computation illustrates how the modified (1,1) entry shifts the scaling to match the leading coefficient of .[31] Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind follow a similar tridiagonal structure from their recurrence , with and . These determinant representations stem from the broader theory of orthogonal polynomials, where the polynomials are the characteristic polynomials of Jacobi (tridiagonal) matrices encoding the recurrence coefficients. For Chebyshev polynomials, the zero diagonal shifts (beyond the linear term) reflect their symmetry with respect to the origin. Additionally, the recurrences link to continued fraction expansions of the orthogonalizing measures—such as for and for —where the convergents' denominators are these determinants, providing a bridge to moment problems and spectral theory.[32][33]Links to other polynomial families
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind arise as a special case of the Jacobi polynomials when the parameters are set to . Specifically, establishing a direct proportional relationship up to a scaling factor that depends on .[34] Similarly, the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind correspond to Jacobi polynomials with , given by [4] The Legendre polynomials, another classical family, are likewise special cases of Jacobi polynomials with parameters , where . Thus, Chebyshev polynomials connect to Legendre polynomials through the broader Jacobi framework, with the relation emerging as a limit of the Jacobi parameters approaching zero from the Chebyshev-specific values . This positioning highlights their shared role within the hierarchy of classical orthogonal polynomials.[12] Both Chebyshev and Jacobi polynomials admit representations in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function . The explicit form for the Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is while the general Jacobi polynomial is Substituting into the Jacobi expression recovers the Chebyshev form, underscoring their unified hypergeometric structure.[3] In the discrete domain, Hahn polynomials serve as a generalization, reducing to discrete analogs of Chebyshev polynomials under specific parameter choices. The discrete Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are obtained as Hahn polynomials , and those of the second kind as , where is the discrete support size. This connection embeds Chebyshev polynomials within the Askey scheme's discrete branch.[35] At the apex of the Askey scheme, Wilson polynomials encompass the continuous classical families through limiting processes. Taking the limit in the q-Wilson polynomials yields the Wilson polynomials, from which further limits—such as reducing parameters to recover Jacobi polynomials—include the Chebyshev polynomials as special cases. This hierarchical limit relation positions Chebyshev polynomials as foundational within the full spectrum of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials.[36]Examples and computations
Low-degree polynomials of the first kind
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, denoted , are defined for low degrees explicitly as follows.[3] For degree 0:[3][37] For degree 1:
[3][37] For degree 2:
[3][37] For degree 3:
[3][38] For degree 4:
[3][38] For degree 5:
[3][38] On the interval , these polynomials satisfy , exhibiting half-oscillations between -1 and 1, with the amplitude and frequency of oscillations increasing with .[3][39]
Low-degree polynomials of the second kind
The Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are defined for low degrees by the following explicit expressions, derived from their generating function or recurrence relation.[4]| Degree | Polynomial |
|---|---|
| 0 | |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 |