Hubbry Logo
Chromate and dichromateChromate and dichromateMain
Open search
Chromate and dichromate
Community hub
Chromate and dichromate
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chromate and dichromate
Chromate and dichromate
Chromate and dichromate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Chromate and dichromate
The structure and bonding of the dichromate ion
Ball-and-stick model of the chromate anion
Space-filling model of the dichromate anion
Names
Systematic IUPAC name
Chromate and dichromate
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChEBI
ChemSpider
DrugBank
UNII
  • chromate: InChI=1S/Cr.4O/q;;;2*-1
    Key: ZCDOYSPFYFSLEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
  • dichromate: InChI=1S/2Cr.7O/q;;;;;;;2*-1
    Key: SOCTUWSJJQCPFX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
  • chromate: [O-][Cr](=O)(=O)[O-]
  • dichromate: O=[Cr](=O)([O-])O[Cr](=O)(=O)[O-]
Properties
CrO2−4 and Cr2O2−7
Molar mass 115.994 g mol−1 and 215.988 g mol−1
Conjugate acid Chromic acid
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).

Chromate salts contain the chromate anion, CrO2−4. Dichromate salts contain the dichromate anion, Cr2O2−7. They are oxyanions of chromium in the +6 oxidation state and are moderately strong oxidizing agents. In an aqueous solution, chromate and dichromate ions can be interconvertible.

Chemical properties

[edit]

Chromates react with hydrogen peroxide, giving products in which peroxide, O2−2, replaces one or more oxygen atoms. In acid solution the unstable blue peroxo complex Chromium(VI) oxide peroxide, CrO(O2)2, is formed; it is an uncharged covalent molecule, which may be extracted into ether. Addition of pyridine results in the formation of the more stable complex CrO(O2)2(pyridine).[1]

Acid–base properties

[edit]

In aqueous solution, chromate and dichromate anions exist in a chemical equilibrium.

2 CrO2−4 + 2 H+ ⇌ Cr2O2−7 + H2O

The predominance diagram shows that the position of the equilibrium depends on both pH and the analytical concentration of chromium.[notes 1]

Predominance diagram for chromate

The chromate ion is the predominant species in alkaline solutions, but dichromate can become the predominant ion in acidic solutions.

Further condensation reactions can occur in strongly acidic solution with the formation of trichromates, Cr3O2−10, and tetrachromates, Cr4O2−13.[2] All polyoxyanions of chromium(VI) have structures made up of tetrahedral CrO4 units sharing corners.[3]

The hydrogen chromate ion, HCrO−4, is a weak acid:

HCrO−4 ⇌ CrO2−4 + H+;      pKa ≈ 5.9

It is also in equilibrium with the dichromate ion:

2 HCrO−4 ⇌ Cr2O2−7 + H2O

This equilibrium does not involve a change in hydrogen ion concentration, which would predict that the equilibrium is independent of pH. The red line on the predominance diagram is not quite horizontal due to the simultaneous equilibrium with the chromate ion. The hydrogen chromate ion may be protonated, with the formation of molecular chromic acid, H2CrO4, but the pKa for the equilibrium

H2CrO4 ⇌ HCrO−4 + H+

is not well characterized. Reported values vary between about −0.8 and 1.6.[4]

The dichromate ion is a somewhat weaker base than the chromate ion:[5]

HCr2O−7 ⇌ Cr2O2−7 + H+,      pKa = 1.18

The pKa value for this reaction shows that it can be ignored at pH > 4.

Oxidation–reduction properties

[edit]

The chromate and dichromate ions are fairly strong oxidizing agents. Commonly three electrons are added to a chromium atom, reducing it to oxidation state +3. In acid solution the aquated Cr3+ ion is produced.

Cr2O2−7 + 14 H+ + 6 e− → 2 Cr3+ + 7 H2O      ε0 = 1.33 V

In alkaline solution chromium(III) hydroxide is produced. The redox potential shows that chromates are weaker oxidizing agent in alkaline solution than in acid solution.[6]

CrO2−4 + 4 H2O + 3 e− → Cr(OH)3 + 5 OH−      ε0 = −0.13 V

Applications

[edit]
School bus painted in Chrome yellow[7]

Approximately 136,000 tonnes (150,000 tons) of hexavalent chromium, mainly sodium dichromate, were produced in 1985.[8] Chromates and dichromates are used in chrome plating to protect metals from corrosion and to improve paint adhesion. Chromate and dichromate salts of heavy metals, lanthanides and alkaline earth metals are only very slightly soluble in water and are thus used as pigments. The lead-containing pigment chrome yellow was used for a very long time before environmental regulations discouraged its use.[7] When used as oxidizing agents or titrants in a redox chemical reaction, chromates and dichromates convert into trivalent chromium, Cr3+, salts of which typically have a distinctively different blue-green color.[8]

Natural occurrence and production

[edit]
Crocoite specimen from the Red Lead Mine, Tasmania, Australia

The primary chromium ore is the mixed metal oxide chromite, FeCr2O4, found as brittle metallic black crystals or granules. Chromite ore is heated with a mixture of calcium carbonate and sodium carbonate in the presence of air. The chromium is oxidized to the hexavalent form, while the iron forms iron(III) oxide, Fe2O3:

4 FeCr2O4 + 8 Na2CO3 + 7 O2 → 8 Na2CrO4 + 2 Fe2O3 + 8 CO2

Subsequent leaching of this material at higher temperatures dissolves the chromates, leaving a residue of insoluble iron oxide. Normally the chromate solution is further processed to make chromium metal, but a chromate salt may be obtained directly from the liquor.[9]

Chromate containing minerals are rare. Crocoite, PbCrO4, which can occur as spectacular long red crystals, is the most commonly found chromate mineral. Rare potassium chromate minerals and related compounds are found in the Atacama Desert. Among them is lópezite – the only known dichromate mineral.[10]

As chromate is isostructural to sulfate, sulfate and chromate minerals can form solid solutions such as hashemite, and chromate minerals are often listed alongside sulfate minerals in mineral classification schemes such as Nickel-Strunz classification.

Toxicity

[edit]
Further information: Hexavalent chromium § Toxicity

Hexavalent chromium compounds can be toxic and carcinogenic (IARC Group 1). Inhaling particles of hexavalent chromium compounds can cause lung cancer. Also positive associations have been observed between exposure to chromium (VI) compounds and cancer of the nose and nasal sinuses.[11] The use of chromate compounds in manufactured goods is restricted in the EU (and by market commonality the rest of the world) by EU Parliament directive on the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive (2002/95/EC).

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chromate and dichromate

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Chromate and dichromate are the CrO₄²⁻ and Cr₂O₇²⁻ anions, respectively, which constitute the key polyatomic s in salts of . The chromate ion features a tetrahedral arrangement of four oxygen atoms around the central atom, whereas the dichromate ion comprises two edge-sharing CrO₄ tetrahedra linked via a bridging oxygen. These ions exhibit an acid-base equilibrium governed by the reaction 2 CrO₄²⁻ + 2 H⁺ ⇌ Cr₂O₇²⁻ + H₂O, wherein dichromate predominates in acidic media (appearing orange) and chromate in alkaline conditions (yellow). Both serve as potent oxidizing agents due to the high of , finding applications in for resistance, leather tanning, pigment formulation, and as titrants. However, hexavalent chromium compounds like these are highly toxic, acting as carcinogens through mechanisms involving cellular uptake and DNA damage, prompting regulatory restrictions on their industrial deployment.

Nomenclature and Structure

Chemical Formulas and Ionic Species

The , a polyatomic anion of in the +6 , has the chemical formula , consisting of one central atom bonded to four oxygen atoms. The , a dimeric also featuring Cr(VI), possesses the formula , with two atoms bridged by an oxygen atom and each bearing three terminal oxygens. In aqueous solutions, chromium(VI) manifests as multiple ionic species governed by and concentration, including the neutral H₂CrO₄, the hydrogen chromate ion HCrO₄⁻, the chromate ion CrO₄²⁻, and the dichromate ion Cr₂O₇²⁻. These species interconvert via acid-base equilibria, with dichromate predominating in acidic conditions and chromate in basic media due to and dynamics. At low concentrations and neutral to alkaline , monomeric chromate CrO₄²⁻ is the primary form, while higher acidity or concentration favors the bidentate dichromate Cr₂O₇²⁻ through .

Geometric and Electronic Structure

The chromate ion (CrO₄²⁻) exhibits a geometry, with the central (VI) atom surrounded by four equivalent oxygen atoms arranged at the vertices of a . This structure features Cr–O bond lengths of approximately 1.62 Å, resulting from that distributes partial double-bond character across all bonds. The ideal bond angles are 109.5°, and the center adopts sp³ hybridization to accommodate the four bonds. The dichromate ion (Cr₂O₇²⁻) comprises two distorted tetrahedral CrO₄ units linked by a shared bridging oxygen atom, forming a nonlinear Cr–O–Cr bridge with a bond angle of 126°. Terminal Cr–O bonds are shorter, measuring about 1.63 Å, while bridging Cr–O bonds are elongated to roughly 1.79 Å, reflecting reduced bond order in the bridge due to the shared oxygen. Crystal structure analyses of dichromate salts confirm terminal Cr–O distances ranging from 1.59 to 1.64 Å and bridging distances from 1.77 to 1.80 Å. Each chromium retains approximate tetrahedral coordination, with sp³ hybridization. In both ions, exists in the +6 with a d⁰ electronic configuration, possessing no valence d electrons. Consequently, electronic transitions responsible for their colors—yellow for chromate and orange for dichromate—originate from ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) rather than d–d excitations, which are absent in d⁰ systems. Valence electron studies via reveal distinct orbital energies, with oxygen 2p orbitals dominating the highest occupied molecular orbitals and contributions in lower-lying levels.

Historical Context

Discovery and Early Isolation

The mineral (PbCrO4), a naturally occurring chromate of lead, was first identified in 1761 by German mineralogist Johann Gottlob Lehmann from specimens collected in , noted for its vivid red-orange crystals. This marked the earliest recognition of a chromium-containing compound, though its elemental composition remained unknown until later analysis. served as the primary source for early investigations into chemistry due to its accessibility and distinctive color. In 1797, French chemist Louis-Nicolas Vauquelin announced the discovery of the element chromium by isolating it from crocoite. Vauquelin treated powdered crocoite with aqueous potassium carbonate, yielding soluble potassium chromate (K2CrO4), which he then precipitated as lead chromate or reduced to chromium(III) oxide (Cr2O3) for further purification. This process effectively isolated chromate as a distinct anionic species in solution, enabling the preparation of various chromate salts. Vauquelin reduced the oxide with charcoal to obtain metallic chromium in 1798, confirming the element's identity. Dichromate ions (Cr2O72-) were first observed shortly thereafter through acidification of chromate solutions, shifting the equilibrium toward the dichromate form as described by 2 CrO42- + 2 H+ ⇌ Cr2O72- + H2O. (K2Cr2O7), a stable crystalline compound, was prepared by reacting potassium chromate with acids such as , with early industrial-scale production emerging by 1820 for use as a in . These early isolations laid the foundation for understanding the interconversion and properties of species.

Development of Industrial Uses

The synthesis of lead chromate, known as (PbCrO₄), marked one of the earliest industrial applications of chromate compounds, with production beginning shortly after Louis-Nicolas Vauquelin's 1797 discovery of and subsequent isolation of its oxygenated salts around 1809. This vivid, opaque yellow was quickly scaled for use in paints, printing inks, ceramics, and textiles, offering superior brightness and over organic alternatives available at the time. By the 1810s, had entered commercial manufacturing, driving demand for sodium and chromates as precursors. Potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇) saw rapid industrial adoption in the , particularly in textile dyeing for and , where it functioned as a to fix dyes and as an oxidizer in color development processes; annual consumption reached significant volumes by , reflecting its efficiency in enabling vibrant, durable hues. This application spurred the first large-scale production of dichromate from via with soda ash and lime, establishing extraction methods that persisted into the . Dichromate's role expanded to wood staining and by the mid-19th century, leveraging its strong oxidizing properties. Chrome tanning emerged in 1858 through the work of Friedrich Knapp and Anton Hölft-Cavallin, who developed processes using chromium(III) salts obtained by reducing dichromate with sugars or alcohols; this method shortened tanning times from months to days, penetrating hides more uniformly than traditional vegetable tannins and yielding softer, more flexible leather suitable for footwear and garments. Industrial chrome tanning proliferated in the 1860s–1870s, particularly in the United States and Europe, accounting for over 90% of global leather production by the early 20th century due to its cost-effectiveness and scalability. In parallel, chromates and dichromates entered metal treatment by the 1850s, with the invention of electrolytic chromium plating using (derived from dichromate acidification) providing corrosion-resistant coatings for iron and ; this enhanced durability in machinery and weaponry during the . Zinc chromate pigments, introduced around the same period, served as anticorrosive primers in paints, further embedding chromate compounds in manufacturing sectors like automotive and by the late .

Physicochemical Properties

Acid-Base Equilibria

The speciation of hexavalent chromium in aqueous solution is governed by acid-base equilibria that depend strongly on pH. The key interconversion occurs between the chromate anion \ceCrO42−\ce{CrO4^2-} and the dichromate anion \ceCr2O72−\ce{Cr2O7^2-}, described by the equilibrium: 2\ceCrO42−+2\ceH+⇌\ceCr2O72−+\ceH2O2 \ce{CrO4^2-} + 2 \ce{H+} \rightleftharpoons \ce{Cr2O7^2-} + \ce{H2O} The equilibrium constant for this reaction, K=[\ceCr2O72−][\ceCrO42−]2[\ceH+]2K = \frac{[\ce{Cr2O7^2-}]}{[\ce{CrO4^2-}]^2 [\ce{H+}]^2}, is approximately 4.2×10144.2 \times 10^{14} at 25°C, indicating a strong preference for dichromate formation under acidic conditions. This large value reflects the protonation of chromate ions, which facilitates dimerization to the dichromate species. An intermediate species, hydrogen chromate \ceHCrO4−\ce{HCrO4-}, forms via of chromate: \ceHCrO4−⇌CrO42−+H+\ce{HCrO4- \rightleftharpoons CrO4^2- + H+}, with the equilibrium shifting toward \ceHCrO4−\ce{HCrO4-} as decreases below approximately 7. Two \ceHCrO4−\ce{HCrO4-} ions then condense: 2\ceHCrO4−⇌Cr2O72−+H2O2 \ce{HCrO4- \rightleftharpoons Cr2O7^2- + H2O}, further favoring dichromate at lower . In strongly acidic conditions ( < 2), \ceCr2O72−\ce{Cr2O7^2-} predominates, while \ceCrO42−\ce{CrO4^2-} and \ceHCrO4−\ce{HCrO4-} coexist between 2 and 6, and \ceCrO42−\ce{CrO4^2-} dominates above 6. This pH-dependent speciation is visually evident in solutions of chromium(VI) salts, which appear yellow in alkaline media due to \ceCrO42−\ce{CrO4^2-} and orange in acidic media due to \ceCr2O72−\ce{Cr2O7^2-}. The equilibrium responds to changes in hydrogen ion concentration according to , with acidification shifting toward dichromate and basification toward chromate. The exact speciation also varies slightly with total chromium concentration and ionic strength, but pH is the primary determinant in dilute solutions.

Redox Behavior and Reactivity

Chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions feature chromium in the +6 oxidation state, rendering them potent oxidizing agents capable of undergoing multistep reductions, typically to Cr(III) species, via one-electron transfers that generate reactive intermediates such as Cr(V) and Cr(IV). The redox reactivity is highly pH-dependent due to the protonation-deprotonation equilibrium 2CrO₄²⁻ + 2H⁺ ⇌ Cr₂O₇²⁻ + H₂O, which favors the orange dichromate form in acidic conditions (pH < 6) and the yellow chromate form in basic conditions (pH > 8), with a transition region around neutral pH where both coexist. This shift modulates their oxidizing power, as dichromate exhibits greater thermodynamic favorability for reduction in proton-rich environments. In acidic media, dichromate dominates and drives efficient six-electron reductions, as exemplified by the half-reaction Cr₂O₇²⁻ + 14H⁺ + 6e⁻ → 2Cr³⁺ + 7H₂O with a standard reduction potential E° = +1.33 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode, enabling spontaneous oxidation of reductants like Fe²⁺ (to Fe³⁺) or iodide (to I₂). This high potential facilitates applications in volumetric analysis, where excess dichromate is back-titrated with Fe²⁺ after oxidizing analytes, with reaction kinetics accelerated by H⁺ concentration and often involving initial formation of Cr(IV) intermediates that disproportionate or react further. Organic substrates, such as primary alcohols, are oxidized to aldehydes or carboxylic acids via chromate esters in mechanisms akin to those in chromic acid oxidations, though dichromate solutions are less selective and prone to over-oxidation without catalysts. In basic media, chromate prevails and exhibits diminished reactivity, with the three-electron reduction CrO₄²⁻ + 4H₂O + 3e⁻ → Cr(OH)₃ + 5OH⁻ having E° ≈ -0.12 V, insufficient to oxidize most common reductants under standard conditions and resulting in negligible reaction rates without elevated temperatures or strong reducing agents. Consequently, chromate solutions are stable toward many substrates that react readily with dichromate, such as Fe²⁺, highlighting the causal role of proton availability in stabilizing higher-energy Cr=O bonds for electron acceptance. Further reductions to Cr(II) or elemental chromium are possible under forcing conditions, like with zinc amalgam, but proceed via Cr(III) intermediates and are limited by kinetic barriers in neutral or basic environments. Overall, the pH-modulated speciation underlies the selective use of Cr(VI) in redox processes, with acidic conditions maximizing oxidizing efficiency while basic ones minimize unintended reactions.

Stability in Solution

In aqueous solutions, chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions exhibit pH-dependent stability through the equilibrium reaction 2 CrO₄²⁻ + 2 H⁺ ⇌ Cr₂O₇²⁻ + H₂O. This interconversion determines the predominant species: chromate prevails in alkaline conditions ( > 6), yielding yellow solutions, while dichromate dominates in acidic conditions ( < 6), producing orange solutions. The equilibrium position also depends on chromium(VI) concentration, with higher concentrations favoring dichromate formation even at moderately higher pH values, as shown in predominance diagrams for Cr(VI) speciation. Protonation steps underpin this behavior, including HCrO₄⁻ ⇌ CrO₄²⁻ + H⁺ (pK_a ≈ 6.5) and dimerization of hydrogenchromate to dichromate, rendering chromate less stable in acidic media due to conversion to the protonated dimer. Temperature influences the equilibrium, with higher temperatures shifting it toward dichromate, narrowing the pH range for chromate predominance. Both ions remain chemically stable against spontaneous decomposition in solution under typical conditions, though the oxidizing nature of Cr(VI) allows reduction by strong reductants.

Production Methods

Industrial Extraction from Ores

The principal source of chromate and dichromate compounds is chromite ore, primarily FeCr₂O₄, which constitutes about 46-48% Cr₂O₃ in high-grade deposits mined mainly from South Africa (accounting for over 40% of global supply as of 2020), Kazakhstan, India, and Turkey. Extraction begins with ore beneficiation via crushing, grinding, and gravity or magnetic separation to concentrate chromite, achieving Cr:Fe ratios suitable for processing, typically above 2:1. Industrial production employs the oxidative roasting of chromite with soda ash (Na₂CO₃) in air at 1,000–1,200°C, converting insoluble Cr(III) to soluble Na₂CrO₄ via the reaction 4FeCr₂O₄ + 8Na₂CO₃ + 7O₂ → 8Na₂CrO₄ + 2Fe₂O₃ + 8CO₂; lime (CaO) is often added as a flux to neutralize silica impurities and facilitate slag formation. The roasting occurs in rotary kilns or multiple-hearth furnaces, with reaction kinetics dependent on oxygen partial pressure and particle size, yielding 70-90% chromium extraction efficiency under optimized conditions (e.g., Na₂CO₃:Cr₂O₃ molar ratio of 2-3:1). Post-roasting, the calcine is leached with hot water (80-100°C) to dissolve Na₂CrO₄, followed by filtration to remove insoluble residues such as Fe₂O₃ and aluminosilicates, which comprise 10-20% of the original ore mass. The resulting alkaline chromate liquor, containing 50-100 g/L Cr(VI), is partially neutralized with CO₂ or acidified directly with H₂SO₄ to precipitate impurities and convert to Na₂Cr₂O₇ via 2Na₂CrO₄ + 2H⁺ ⇌ Na₂Cr₂O₇ + 2Na⁺ + H₂O, enabling crystallization and purification to >99% purity for commercial dichromate. This process, dominant since the mid-20th century, generates chromium-containing residues requiring due to residual . Alternative alkali fusion with NaOH has been tested for lower-grade ores but remains less common industrially due to higher energy demands.

Laboratory Preparation Techniques

In laboratory settings, potassium chromate (K₂CrO₄) is commonly prepared by fusing chromium(III) oxide (Cr₂O₃) with potassium hydroxide (KOH) in the presence of an oxidizing agent such as potassium nitrate (KNO₃). A typical procedure involves mixing 10 g of Cr₂O₃ with 20 g of KOH and 10 g of KNO₃ in a nickel crucible, heating until a clear melt forms (around 600–700°C), cooling the melt, dissolving it in hot water, filtering insoluble residues, and allowing the filtrate to cool for crystallization of yellow K₂CrO₄ crystals. This method oxidizes Cr(III) to Cr(VI) under alkaline conditions, yielding the tetrahedral chromate anion (CrO₄²⁻). Potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇) is typically obtained from by acidification, exploiting the pH-dependent equilibrium 2 CrO₄²⁻ + 2 H⁺ ⇌ Cr₂O₇²⁻ + H₂O, which shifts to the orange dichromate ion (Cr₂O₇²⁻) in acidic media. To prepare it, a solution of K₂CrO₄ is treated with dilute (H₂SO₄) until the color changes from yellow to orange, followed by evaporation and cooling to crystallize the product; excess acid is avoided to prevent formation of . Alternatively, direct synthesis from (FeCr₂O₄) on a small scale mirrors industrial roasting: the ore is fused with K₂CO₃ in air or with an oxidizer at 1000–1100°C to form K₂CrO₄, which is then acidified as above. Other techniques include oxidizing aqueous Cr(III) salts (e.g., CrCl₃) to chromate via hot alkaline fusion with NaOH and NaNO₃, followed by metathesis with salts for K₂CrO₄, though yields are lower due to incomplete oxidation without high temperatures. For dichromate solutions used in titrations, commercial crystals are often dissolved, but lab standardization involves precise weighing (e.g., 0.245 g in 1 L for 0.001 M) without synthesis. All procedures require ventilation due to toxic Cr(VI) fumes and corrosive bases.

Natural Occurrence

Mineral Forms

Chromate minerals, containing the CrO₄²⁻ anion, are rare and typically form in the oxidized zones of deposits where trivalent chromium from primary minerals like is mobilized and oxidized to the hexavalent state under acidic or alkaline conditions. These minerals often associate with lead or metals and occur in specific geochemical environments such as arid caliches or alteration of bodies. Dichromate minerals, featuring the Cr₂O₇²⁻ , are even scarcer, requiring more acidic settings for stability. The principal chromate mineral is (PbCrO₄), a lead chromate that crystallizes in the monoclinic system as prismatic to acicular crystals exhibiting brilliant red to orange hues due to charge transfer in the chromate group. It forms through the oxidation of and in lead deposits, with notable occurrences at the Dundas district in , , where specimens up to 10 cm long have been collected since the , and historic sites in the , . Crocoite's specific gravity ranges from 5.9 to 6.1, and its Mohs hardness is 2.5 to 3, making it soft and sectile. Tarapacáite (K₂CrO₄), the natural analog of , appears as yellow to greenish-yellow crusts or powders in nitrate-rich deposits of the , , particularly at Oficina María Elena. Discovered in 1878, it results from the interaction of volcanic sources with alkaline brines and nitrates, crystallizing in the orthorhombic system with a specific gravity of about 2.9. This mineral is accessory and minor, often alongside and . Lópezite (K₂Cr₂O₇), the sole known dichromate mineral, manifests as reddish efflorescent crusts or globular aggregates up to 1 mm in the same Chilean fields, such as and María Elena. Identified in and named for Chilean Emiliano Saa, it forms via or acidification of chromate precursors in hyper-arid conditions, with triclinic and a of 2.72 g/cm³. Its instability in humid environments limits preservation. Additional rare chromates include phoenicochroite (Pb₂CrO₅), a basic lead chromate from oxidation zones in and , and hashemite (BaCrO₄), reported in vugs of deposits. These exemplify the limited diversity of Cr(VI) , constrained by the ion's high and , which favor dissolution over precipitation in most natural settings.

Geochemical Distribution

, primarily in the trivalent state (Cr(III)), constitutes approximately 100 mg/kg of the , ranking as the 21st most abundant element. (Cr(VI)), existing as chromate (CrO₄²⁻) or dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) anions, occurs at trace levels naturally, generated via oxidation of Cr(III)-bearing minerals like by oxides (Mn(III/IV)) under oxidizing, alkaline conditions prevalent in ultramafic and serpentinized rock-derived soils and sediments. This shift enhances Cr(VI) mobility, with chromate dominating in neutral to alkaline (>6.5) environments typical of many natural waters, while dichromate prevails in more acidic, concentrated solutions. In soils and sediments, Cr(VI) concentrations vary regionally, often elevated in areas with outcrops, such as California's Great Valley, where natural oxidation yields groundwater levels up to several μg/L without anthropogenic input. Globally, riverine inputs and sedimentary fluxes deliver Cr to oceans, but Cr(VI) remains dilute (<1 μg/L) in most surface waters due to reduction by organic matter or Fe(II), though it persists in oxic, high-pH groundwaters where up to 90% of total Cr may exist as Cr(VI). Sedimentary Cr(VI) is typically low, as reductive precipitation favors Cr(III) hydroxides, but oxidative remobilization occurs in contact with Mn-oxides, influencing local distributions in arid or alkaline basins. These patterns underscore Cr(VI)'s geochemical partitioning toward soluble, bioavailable forms in oxidized compartments, contrasting with the insoluble Cr(III) reservoir in primary minerals.

Applications

Industrial and Commercial Uses

Chromates and dichromates, particularly sodium and potassium salts, are employed in electroplating baths to produce decorative and functional chromium coatings on metals such as steel and aluminum, enhancing corrosion resistance and facilitating adhesion of subsequent paint layers. In these processes, chromic acid derived from dichromate serves as the electrolyte, with industrial-scale operations consuming significant quantities; for instance, hexavalent chromium compounds account for a substantial portion of chrome plating applications despite regulatory restrictions on emissions. In leather tanning, potassium dichromate acts as a key oxidizing agent, cross-linking collagen proteins in hides to yield chrome-tanned leather, which constitutes over 80% of global leather production due to its durability and water resistance compared to vegetable tanning methods. This application relies on the redox properties of Cr(VI) to penetrate and stabilize animal skins, with industrial processes typically using 4-6% chromium oxide content in the final product. Chromate compounds, including lead chromate and zinc chromate, are utilized in the manufacture of pigments for paints, inks, plastics, and ceramics, providing bright yellow to orange hues with high opacity and lightfastness; these pigments remain in use where alternatives lack equivalent performance, though production has declined in regions with strict environmental controls. Sodium chromate is specifically applied in textile dyes and enamel formulations for its color stability. Additional commercial roles include corrosion inhibition in Portland cement additives and cooling tower water treatments, where soluble chromates form protective passivation layers on metal surfaces, and in wood preservatives to prevent fungal decay, albeit with phase-outs in many markets due to toxicity concerns. Potassium dichromate also finds niche use in metal polishing and electrochemical processes for surface finishing.

Laboratory and Analytical Roles

Potassium dichromate functions as a primary standard in redox titrations for the quantitative determination of ferrous iron. The procedure involves the oxidation of Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺ by the dichromate ion in acidic medium, with the endpoint marked by the appearance of the persistent orange color of excess dichromate, which serves as its own indicator due to the sharp color change. This method relies on the high stability and solubility of potassium dichromate compared to its sodium analog, ensuring accurate volumetric measurements. Solutions of potassium dichromate are utilized in the analysis of reducing agents beyond iron, including applications in organic chemistry as a strong oxidant for synthesizing carbonyl compounds from alcohols. In qualitative gas detection, acidified dichromate reagent detects sulfur dioxide, where the orange solution decolorizes or turns green upon reduction to Cr³⁺, confirming the gas's presence. Chromate ions, typically from potassium chromate, precipitate as yellow lead(II) chromate to confirm Pb²⁺ in qualitative cation analysis schemes. Similarly, barium chromate forms an insoluble yellow precipitate for Ba²⁺ identification under controlled pH conditions. The interconversion between yellow chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and orange dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions exemplifies acid-base equilibria in instructional laboratories, demonstrating : acidification drives the shift to dichromate, while addition of base restores chromate. This reversible color change aids in teaching equilibrium dynamics without specialized equipment.

Toxicity and Health Effects

Mechanisms of Biological Action

Hexavalent chromium compounds, including chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions, exert toxicity through an uptake-reduction model wherein Cr(VI) enters cells and is metabolically activated to genotoxic species. At physiological pH, Cr(VI) predominantly exists as chromate, which mimics sulfate and phosphate structurally, facilitating uptake via anion transporters such as the SLC26A family sulfate transporters or sodium-phosphate cotransporters. Dichromate, stable in acidic environments, equilibrates to chromate in neutral biological fluids, enabling similar cellular entry. Intracellular reduction of Cr(VI) occurs via sequential one-electron transfers by reductants like glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid, and NADPH-dependent enzymes, yielding unstable intermediates Cr(V) and Cr(IV) that generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide (O₂⁻•), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and hydroxyl radicals (•OH). This process depletes GSH and other antioxidants, amplifying oxidative stress that damages lipids through peroxidation, oxidizes proteins via thiol group modification, and induces DNA strand breaks independent of reduction. The final Cr(III) product, poorly membrane-permeable, accumulates intracellularly and coordinates with DNA bases, phosphates, and GSH to form stable adducts, including binary Cr(III)-DNA lesions and ternary Cr(III)-GSH-DNA complexes. These adducts distort DNA structure, inhibit replication and transcription, and lead to mutations such as G-to-T transversions, chromosomal aberrations, and micronuclei formation during cell division. Genotoxic effects are compounded by epigenetic alterations, including DNA hypermethylation at tumor suppressor genes and histone modifications that disrupt gene expression, contributing to carcinogenesis without requiring cell proliferation. In respiratory epithelia, where Cr(VI) exposure is common, these mechanisms manifest as clastogenicity and aneugenicity, with ROS-mediated signaling activating pathways like p53 and Nrf2 that influence cell fate toward apoptosis or survival.

Exposure Risks and Epidemiological Evidence

Chromate and dichromate ions, as sources of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), pose significant exposure risks primarily through occupational inhalation of dusts, mists, or fumes in industries such as chrome electroplating, stainless steel welding, and chromate pigment production. Inhalation accounts for the majority of documented cases, with airborne concentrations historically exceeding 0.1 mg/m³ in uncontrolled settings, leading to respiratory tract deposition and systemic absorption after cellular reduction. Dermal exposure, common during handling of chromate solutions, causes chrome ulcers, contact dermatitis, and potential percutaneous absorption, though skin penetration is limited by the ionic nature of these compounds unless barriers are compromised. Ingestion risks are lower but occur via contaminated hands or water in occupational or environmental contexts, with gastrointestinal absorption estimated at 2-5% for Cr(VI). Non-cancerous effects from chronic exposure include nasal septum perforation from ulcerative lesions, chrome "holes" on skin, and occupational asthma, with onset linked to cumulative doses above 0.025 mg/m³-years in cohort data. Acute high-level inhalation (>1 mg/m³) can induce and hemorrhagic , as observed in case series from accidental overexposures in the mid-20th century. These risks are dose-dependent, with no established safe threshold for Cr(VI) due to its genotoxic mechanism involving DNA adducts formed post-reduction to Cr(III). Epidemiological evidence establishes Cr(VI) as a human carcinogen, classified as Group 1 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer based on sufficient data from occupational cohorts showing excess mortality. A of 44 cohort studies involving over 94,000 workers reported standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) elevated for (pooled SMR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51), with associations persisting after adjustment for and co-exposures. Similar excesses were found for sinonasal cancers (SMR 2.50-6.00 across studies) and suggestive links to laryngeal, , and cancers, though by other metals complicates attribution. Retrospective cohorts from chromate production plants, such as those in the U.S. and followed from 1940-2000, demonstrate linear exposure-response trends, with lifetime risks exceeding 1 in 100 at cumulative exposures of 1 mg/m³-years. Recent reviews confirm these findings, attributing to Cr(VI)'s ability to cross cell membranes and induce mutations, independent of repair mechanisms.

Environmental Impact

Fate and Transport in Ecosystems

Chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions, the primary forms of (Cr(VI)) in , exhibit high across a wide range, enabling significant mobility in , , and runoff-dominated ecosystems. This , exceeding that of trivalent chromium (Cr(III)), allows Cr(VI) to migrate rapidly through vadose zones and aquifers, with studies showing breakthrough in undisturbed heterogeneous soils under hydrologic forcing. In uncontaminated ecosystems, natural Cr(VI) levels are low, but anthropogenic inputs from industrial effluents or leaching amplify transport, often exceeding 0.05 mg/L thresholds in receiving waters. In soils and sediments, Cr(VI) adsorption is limited compared to Cr(III), particularly in light-textured soils or those with competing anions like or , which reduce sites and enhance leaching. Geochemical reduction to insoluble Cr(III) represents the dominant attenuation mechanism, driven by abiotic reactions with Fe(II), sulfides, or , and biotic processes via chromium-resistant or soil microbes, with rates influenced by and organic content. However, in organic-rich or acidic soils, Cr(VI) can persist metastably for years, resisting full reduction and facilitating vertical migration under alternating wet-dry cycles that mimic rainfall. Atmospheric deposition contributes to ecosystem-wide dispersal, with Cr(VI) aerosols from or industrial sources enabling long-range before wet or dry deposition into soils and waters. In integrated soil-water systems, coupled hydrologic-geochemical processes control net , with modeling indicating persistence near chlorate facilities where reduction is incomplete, leading to plumes. Overall, while ecosystem-specific factors like , , and microbial activity modulate fate, Cr(VI)'s inherent mobility poses risks of widespread contamination absent reductive transformation.

Ecological and Remediation Considerations

Hexavalent chromium, present as chromate (CrO₄²⁻) and dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻) ions, exhibits high toxicity to aquatic organisms due to its strong oxidizing properties and ability to penetrate biological membranes, leading to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and disrupted respiration in species such as fish and invertebrates. In freshwater ecosystems, chronic exposure concentrations as low as 0.016 mg/L have been shown to impair reproduction and survival in sensitive species like cladocerans, while acute effects occur at higher levels, with lethality observed in fish at 10-100 mg/L depending on species and exposure duration. Unlike trivalent chromium, hexavalent forms do not significantly bioaccumulate in fish tissues but adsorb to gills, causing respiratory distress and reduced osmoregulation without substantial trophic transfer up the food chain. In terrestrial ecosystems, chromate and dichromate disrupt microbial communities by inhibiting enzyme activities such as and , reducing microbial diversity and biomass at concentrations exceeding 5 mg/kg , which impairs cycling and essential for . Plants exposed to Cr(VI) experience primarily in roots, leading to , stunted growth, and inhibited at levels above 1-5 mg/kg, with translocation to shoots exacerbating oxidative damage and deficiencies like iron and magnesium. Earthworms and other show reduced reproduction and survival at 100-500 mg/kg Cr(VI) in , further cascading to higher trophic levels through disrupted detrital food webs. Remediation of Cr(VI) contamination prioritizes reduction to the less mobile and toxic Cr(III) form, achieved via chemical methods such as injection of calcium (CaS₅), which precipitates Cr(III) as hydroxides while achieving >99% reduction at 7-9 in systems. employs chromium-resistant bacteria, such as those from genera and isolated from contaminated soils, which enzymatically reduce Cr(VI) using soluble enzymes or membrane-bound reductases, with field applications demonstrating 70-90% removal in anaerobic conditions over weeks to months. Adsorption onto like or removes Cr(VI) from aqueous phases, with capacities up to 200 mg/g under optimized <3, though regeneration and disposal of spent media pose secondary challenges. Integrated approaches combining chemical reduction with phytoremediation, using hyperaccumulators like Brassica species, enhance long-term stabilization in soils, reducing leaching risks by 50-80% in pilot studies. These methods must account for site-specific factors like redox potential and , as Cr(VI) persistence increases in oxidizing environments, necessitating monitoring to prevent reoxidation of remediated Cr(III).

Regulations and Controversies

Global Regulatory Measures

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a specialized agency of the World Health Organization, classifies chromium(VI) compounds—including chromates and dichromates—as Group 1 carcinogens, based on sufficient evidence from human epidemiological studies linking inhalation exposure to lung cancer and sinonasal cancer, as well as supporting animal data demonstrating genotoxicity and tumor formation. This classification, established in IARC Monograph Volume 100C (2012) and reaffirmed in subsequent reviews, informs global hazard assessments and drives regulatory limits worldwide. The World Health Organization sets a provisional guideline value of 50 µg/L for total chromium in drinking water, applicable to both trivalent and hexavalent forms, derived from a no-observed-adverse-effect level for oral toxicity in animal studies adjusted by uncertainty factors; this value accounts for potential oxidation of chromium(III) to the more toxic chromium(VI) under certain environmental conditions but emphasizes that hexavalent forms pose the primary carcinogenic risk via ingestion. In occupational settings, WHO-aligned guidelines through the International Labour Organization recommend exposure limits below 0.05 mg/m³ for chromium(VI) compounds to minimize respiratory risks, influencing national standards in over 100 countries. In the European Union, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) lists multiple chromium(VI) substances, such as chromic acid, sodium dichromate, and potassium dichromate, on Annex XIV (the Authorisation List) since 2015, requiring companies to obtain time-limited authorizations for uses after demonstrating adequate control of risks and socio-economic benefits outweighing alternatives; authorizations have been granted for specific industrial applications like chrome plating and aerospace coatings, but with strict emission limits (e.g., wastewater below 0.1 mg/L Cr(VI)). On April 29, 2025, the proposed an EU-wide restriction under REACH Article 68 to replace the authorisation route for certain chromium(VI) compounds, imposing enforceable exposure limits (e.g., airborne 0.1 µg/m³ in workplaces) and bans on non-essential uses due to persistent evidence of inadequate risk control in authorized applications, with public consultation ongoing as of May 2025. Beyond the EU, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) enforces a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 5 µg/m³ for airborne chromium(VI) across general industry, construction, and maritime sectors under 29 CFR 1910.1026 (updated 2006), supported by engineering controls, respiratory protection, and medical surveillance requirements, with this standard cited in international harmonization efforts under the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of Classification and Labelling. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulates chromium(VI) under the with effluent limits (e.g., 0.1-1.0 mg/L depending on industry) and the 's maximum contaminant level of 100 µg/L for total chromium, though states like California enforce a public health goal of 0.02 µg/L specifically for hexavalent chromium based on cancer risk assessments. These measures, alongside similar restrictions in Canada (e.g., 0.05 mg/m³ PEL) and Australia (e.g., 0.05 mg/m³ TLV), reflect a convergence toward stringent controls driven by IARC evidence, though enforcement varies by jurisdiction and industry compliance challenges persist in developing regions.

Debates on Utility Versus Risk

The utility of chromates and dichromates, primary sources of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), stems from their exceptional performance in industrial applications such as corrosion inhibition via chromate conversion coatings on aluminum and steel, where they provide self-healing properties and superior adhesion for paints and primers, outperforming many alternatives in harsh environments like aerospace and automotive components. These compounds also enable durable chrome plating for wear-resistant surfaces and serve as oxidants in leather tanning and pigment production, contributing to economic sectors valued in billions annually, with global sodium dichromate markets projected to grow due to demand in these areas. Industry advocates, including the American Chemistry Council, argue that outright bans overlook the lack of equivalently effective substitutes, potentially compromising safety in critical infrastructure where corrosion failure risks exceed managed Cr(VI) exposure hazards. Opposing viewpoints emphasize Cr(VI)'s established carcinogenicity, classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Group 1 human carcinogen linked to lung and sinonasal cancers via inhalation, prompting regulatory actions like California's 2023 ban on chrome electroplating with a multi-year transition to trivalent alternatives, despite industry concerns over performance gaps and job losses. In the European Union, REACH regulations have imposed authorization requirements since 2011, with ongoing proposals for broader restrictions on Cr(VI) compounds unless applicants demonstrate socio-economic benefits outweigh risks and no feasible alternatives exist, leading to derogations for specific uses like sanitary fittings but heightening compliance costs. Debates intensify over risk assessment models, with the U.S. EPA's 2024 IRIS review adopting a linear no-threshold approach criticized by industry for ignoring detoxification thresholds at low doses supported by over 30 peer-reviewed studies, potentially inflating regulatory burdens without proportional health gains. Proponents of continued selective use contend that engineering controls, personal protective equipment, and occupational exposure limits—such as OSHA's 5 µg/m³ permissible exposure limit established in 2006—sufficiently mitigate risks in controlled settings, preserving utility where alternatives like trivalent chromium coatings fail to match durability or conductivity in demanding applications. Conversely, environmental and public health groups, including the Environmental Working Group, advocate stricter phase-outs, citing epidemiological evidence of excess cancer risks even at regulated levels and the precautionary principle to avoid offshoring pollution to less-regulated regions. These tensions underscore a core contention: whether empirical evidence of manageable risks under stringent controls justifies retaining Cr(VI) for irreplaceable functions or if substitution, despite current shortcomings, should prevail to eliminate causal pathways to toxicity.

Alternatives and Future Directions

Substitute Materials

Due to the carcinogenic and environmental hazards of hexavalent chromium compounds like chromates and dichromates, industries have pursued substitutes across applications such as corrosion protection, metal plating, pigments, and wood preservation. These alternatives aim to replicate performance attributes like adhesion promotion and oxidative stability while minimizing toxicity, though many fall short in durability or cost-effectiveness under stringent conditions. In corrosion protection and conversion coatings for metals like aluminum and steel, trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) processes have emerged as primary substitutes for chromate conversion coatings, offering reduced toxicity via acidic baths that deposit Cr(III) oxides rather than hexavalent forms. Non-chromium options include plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO), which forms ceramic-like oxide layers through high-voltage anodization, providing comparable corrosion resistance without chromium; sol-gel coatings incorporating silanes or ceramers; and inhibitor-based systems using molybdates, rare earth salts (e.g., cerium), or organic compounds like benzotriazoles. For aerospace aluminum alloys, nanoparticle-enhanced inhibitors and epoxy primers like PPG CA 7521 serve as chromate-free alternatives in pretreatments, though they may require additional layers for equivalent long-term protection. For electroplating and decorative chrome finishes, trivalent chromium baths replace hexavalent solutions, achieving similar hardness and aesthetics but with lower covering power and efficiency, often necessitating additives like basic chromium sulfate. In pigments, such as anti-corrosive primers, zinc chromate alternatives include phosphating treatments or molybdate-based pigments, which provide inhibition via phosphate layers or molybdate passivation. Organic pigments and bismuth vanadate have supplanted lead chromate in yellow hues for paints, offering stability without heavy metal leachate. In wood preservation, chromated copper arsenate (CCA) has been largely replaced by alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ) or copper azole formulations since 2003 EPA restrictions, which deliver fungicidal and insecticidal effects through copper ions without chromium's oxidative contribution. Leather tanning, where dichromate may appear as an after-treatment oxidizer, shifts toward synthetic phenolic tannins or glutaraldehyde-based agents to achieve cross-linking without hexavalent risks. Despite these advances, full substitution remains challenged by performance gaps, with ongoing research emphasizing hybrid systems for regulatory compliance under REACH and OSHA standards.

Research on Safer Chromium Forms

Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) compounds represent the primary focus of research on safer chromium forms, as they exhibit substantially lower toxicity compared to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) species like chromate and dichromate, which are known carcinogens via inhalation and dermal exposure. Cr(III) is an essential trace element involved in glucose metabolism and insulin action, with dietary intake recommended at 20–35 μg/day for adults, and studies indicate no widespread deficiency in populations consuming balanced diets. Unlike Cr(VI), which readily penetrates cell membranes and generates reactive oxygen species leading to DNA damage, Cr(III) forms insoluble hydroxides at physiological pH, limiting bioavailability and systemic toxicity. Toxicity assessments of Cr(III) compounds, including chromic chloride and oxide, demonstrate low acute oral LD50 values exceeding 1,870 mg/kg in rats, classifying them as practically non-toxic by ingestion, though inhalation of fine particulates can irritate respiratory tissues at high concentrations. Chronic studies in rodents exposed to Cr(III) via drinking water up to 100 mg/L for 90 days showed no significant genotoxic or carcinogenic effects, contrasting with Cr(VI)'s potency in similar models. However, some in vitro research suggests certain soluble Cr(III) complexes, like chromium picolinate used in supplements, may induce oxidative stress or DNA adducts at supraphysiological doses (>1 mM), prompting caution against excessive supplementation despite overall safety in recommended amounts. In industrial applications, research since the early has advanced trivalent as a direct substitute for Cr(VI) hard , achieving resistance comparable to 10–20% of hexavalent deposits while reducing toxicity by over 500-fold due to lower oxidation potential and absence of carcinogenic byproducts. Processes using - or chloride-based Cr(III) baths operate at 2–3 and temperatures of 40–60°C, with ongoing optimization via additives like to enhance throwing power and uniformity on complex geometries. Lifecycle analyses indicate trivalent systems lower use by 30–50% and eliminate hexavalent generation, supporting regulatory transitions in and automotive sectors. Emerging research explores bioavailable Cr(III) complexes, such as histidinate or polynicotinate, for nutritional enhancement, with human trials showing improved glycemic control in at 200–1,000 μg/day without adverse effects over 6–12 months. Remediation studies also investigate Cr(III) stabilization in soils via with organic ligands to prevent reoxidation to Cr(VI), demonstrating >90% immobilization in field trials amended with humic acids. Despite these advances, challenges persist in scaling trivalent for high-hardness applications (e.g., >800 HV), where hybrid Cr(III)/Cr(VI) processes or nanocrystalline enhancements are under evaluation as of 2022. Overall, evidence supports Cr(III) as a viable safer form, though compound-specific and exposure route must guide risk assessments.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Dichromate-ion
  2. https://www.turito.com/blog/chemistry/chromate
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317133894_Equilibria_and_kinetics_of_chromiumVI_speciation_in_aqueous_solution_-_A_comprehensive_study_from_pH_2_to_11
  4. https://www.osha.gov/chromium
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599502/
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/chromate-and-dichromate
  7. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Chromate
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10053122/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000828
  10. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c05020
  11. https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-cbse-chemistry-class-12/section/4.3/primary/lesson/potassium-dichromate/
  12. https://askfilo.com/chemistry-question-answers/consider-the-structures-of-chromate-ion-and-dichromate-ion-the-true-statement-is
  13. https://www.vedantu.com/question-answer/identify-the-correct-structure-of-dichromate-ion-class-12-chemistry-cbse-5f569c22ec70530520289256
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5418799/
  15. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00790a012
  16. https://melscience.com/US-en/articles/chromium-bright-and-dangerous/
  17. https://www.lindahall.org/about/news/scientist-of-the-day/louis-vauquelin/
  18. https://sites.dartmouth.edu/toxmetal/more-metals/chromium-a-thoroughly-modern-metal/
  19. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=594
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/potassium-dichromate
  21. https://periodic-table.rsc.org/element/24/chromium
  22. https://www.naturalpigments.com/artist-materials/chrome-yellow-paint
  23. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/vincent-van-gogh-chrome-yellow-the-national-gallery-london/GgURl4IDCftC1A
  24. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/0381/report.pdf
  25. https://www.leather-dictionary.com/index.php/Chrome_tanned
  26. https://mike-redwood.com/the-start-of-chrome-tanning/
  27. https://www.icdacr.com/about-chrome/chromes-colourful-history/
  28. https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/equilibrium-constant-reaction-2cro4-2-2h-cr2o7-2-h2o-42-1014-molar-absorptivities-two-prin-q236878823
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7841920/
  30. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/a-chromate-dichromate-equilibrium/1710.article
  31. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_and_Websites_%28Inorganic_Chemistry%29/Descriptive_Chemistry/Elements_Organized_by_Block/3_d-Block_Elements/Group_06%253A_Transition_Metals/Chemistry_of_Chromium/Chemistry_of_Chromium
  32. https://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/redoxeqia/combinations.html
  33. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Analytical_Chemistry%29/Electrochemistry/Redox_Potentials/Standard_Potentials
  34. https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-chemistry-flexbook-2.0/section/22.10/primary/lesson/balancing-redox-reactions%253A-half-reaction-method-chem/
  35. https://www.chemteam.info/Redox/DichromateHalfReaction-Ans.html
  36. https://crunchchemistry.co.uk/explaining-the-redox-behaviour-of-transition-metals/
  37. https://www.thesciencehive.co.uk/redox-and-electrode-potentials
  38. https://www.chemedx.org/JCESoft/jcesoftSubscriber/CCA/CCA8/MAIN/8/08/32/thumbs.html
  39. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/134075/why-is-chromate-stable-in-basic-medium-and-dichromate-stable-in-acidic-medium
  40. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01556a008
  41. https://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/chromate_dichromate/index.html
  42. https://pubs.usgs.gov/usbmic/ic-9411/ic-9411.pdf
  43. https://www.911metallurgist.com/blog/extraction-chromium-chromite-ore/
  44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK158858/
  45. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11663-001-0115-6
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225935290_The_soda-ash_roasting_of_chromite_minerals_Kinetics_considerations
  47. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MMTB...32..987A/abstract
  48. https://www.nap.edu/read/9248/chapter/7
  49. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/10484/cdc_10484_DS1.pdf
  50. https://www.prepchem.com/synthesis-of-potassium-chromate/
  51. https://byjus.com/chemistry/potassium-dichromate-and-potassium-permanganate/
  52. https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=155084
  53. http://chemistry.uohyd.ac.in/~mvr/ch104/Vogel-extract_8.pdf
  54. https://www.geo.arizona.edu/xtal/group/pdf/AM102_612.pdf
  55. https://australian.museum/learn/minerals/mineral-factsheets/crocoite-limonite/
  56. https://www.mindat.org/min-1157.html
  57. https://webmineral.com/data/Crocoite.shtml
  58. https://www.mindat.org/min-3891.html
  59. https://rruff.geo.arizona.edu/doclib/hom/tarapacaite.pdf
  60. https://www.handbookofmineralogy.org/pdfs/lopezite.pdf
  61. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/22/8/929/537909/Lopezite-A-New-Mineral
  62. https://www.mindat.org/min-2433.html
  63. https://www.mindat.org/min-3194.html
  64. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1885/b/pp1885b.pdf
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3658852/
  66. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0701085104
  67. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.6b04039
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004313549190160R
  69. https://www.exponent.com/article/sources-hexavalent-chromium-california-groundwater-natural-or-anthropogenic
  70. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2025GB008525
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088329271530024X
  72. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/pp1885E
  73. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/npi/substances/fact-sheets/chromium-vi-compounds
  74. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/chromium-compounds.pdf
  75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519246/
  76. http://www.afirm-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/afirm_chromium_VI_v2.pdf
  77. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304377/
  78. https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/resource-library/hazardous-chemicals/chromium-technical-fact-sheet
  79. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/potassium-dichromate-market-applications-across-lczke/
  80. https://staff.buffalostate.edu/nazareay/che112/chromate.htm
  81. https://www.sarthaks.com/3488410/read-the-following-statements-statement-potassium-dichromate-used-volumetric-analysis
  82. https://byjus.com/chemistry/dichromate/
  83. https://www.vedantu.com/chemistry/dichromate
  84. https://web.williams.edu/wp-etc/chemistry/epeacock/EPL_CHEM_153/153-LABMAN_PDF_05/2-3-qualanalysis.pdf
  85. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Analytical_Chemistry%29/Qualitative_Analysis/Characteristic_Reactions_of_Select_Metal_Ions/Characteristic_Reactions_of_Chromium_Ions_%28Cr%29
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069994/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6737927/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6658109/
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3955998/
  90. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-128/pdfs/2013_128.pdf
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230021001896
  92. https://www.osha.gov/hexavalent-chromium/health-effects
  93. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/210041
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/jes201577
  95. https://publications.iarc.who.int/_publications/media/download/5224/5637a4f4ad9cfd4e81ab40a8fa057015a3e8911b.pdf
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6369173/
  97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30778374/
  98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34506880/
  99. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2012/375843
  100. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es981211v
  101. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/issue_behavior_metals_soil.pdf
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653505007265
  103. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2136/vzj2010.0102
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10602641_Chromate_Reduction_by_Chromium-Resistant_Bacteria_Isolated_from_Soils_Contaminated_with_Dichromate
  105. https://photon-science.desy.de/research/research_highlights/archive/the_fate_of_ecotoxic_hexavalent_chromium_in_the_environment/index_eng.html
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749109000311
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188526/
  108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395022529_Fate_And_Transport_Modeling_of_Hexavalent_Chromium_in_Soil_and_Groundwater_Near_Chlorate_Manufacturing_Facilities
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9778184/
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2860883/
  111. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0351-0455/content.pdf
  112. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/documents/ambient-wqc-chromium.pdf
  113. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/chromium.html
  114. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp7-c6.pdf
  115. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1131204/full
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8973695/
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7020214/
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147651304001332
  119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969705008387
  120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12931876/
  121. https://microbiologyjournal.org/microbial-mechanisms-for-remediation-of-hexavalent-chromium-and-their-large-scale-applications-current-research-and-future-directions/
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9880494/
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666765725000067
  124. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/chromium.pdf?sfvrsn=37abd598_6
  125. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp7-c8.pdf
  126. https://rpaltd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/RPA-chromates-restriction-factsheet-June-2024.pdf.pdf
  127. https://www.cirs-group.com/en/chemicals/echa-proposes-restriction-on-hexavalent-chromium-cr-substances
  128. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1026
  129. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA-3373-hexavalent-chromium.pdf
  130. https://www.valencesurfacetech.com/the-news/chromate-conversion-coating/
  131. https://cen.acs.org/articles/95/i9/Confronting-looming-hexavalent-chromium-ban.html
  132. https://www.americanchemistry.com/industry-groups/hexavalent-chromium
  133. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/6151554/dichromate-market-global-forecast
  134. https://calmatters.org/environment/2023/05/hexavalent-chrome-plating-ban/
  135. https://ecomundo.eu/en/blog/consultation-public-restriction-chromevi
  136. https://www.vdma.eu/en/viewer/-/v2article/render/148248404
  137. https://www.americanchemistry.com/industry-groups/hexavalent-chromium/peer-reviewed-research-on-hexavalent-chromium
  138. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2006-02-28-0
  139. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2022/03/what-chromium-6-heres-what-you-need-know
  140. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41529-018-0034-5
  141. https://dsiac.dtic.mil/technical-inquiries/notable/alternatives-to-using-hexavalent-chromium-coatings/
  142. https://blog.keronite.com/what-are-the-viable-alternatives-to-chrome-coatings
  143. https://serdp-estcp.mil/page/f153f790-fc42-4310-933b-baf6b70bc50d
  144. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/15/4/439
  145. https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/2525577
  146. https://www.finishing.com/07/02.shtml
  147. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2023/chromeatcm2023/chrome_fsor.pdf
  148. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/environmentally.pdf
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416622000699
  150. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/cr3m3.html
  151. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK158851/
  152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691509006048
  153. https://pavco.com/blog/hexavalent-vs-trivalent-chromium
  154. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/plating/1364-a-process-comparison-hexavalent-vs-trivalent-hard-chrome
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1552031/
  156. https://www.aaem.pl/pdf-118228-62859?filename=62859.pdf
  157. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chromium-general-information-incident-management-and-toxicology/chromium-toxicological-overview
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.