Hubbry Logo
Nationally determined contributionNationally determined contributionMain
Open search
Nationally determined contribution
Community hub
Nationally determined contribution
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nationally determined contribution
Nationally determined contribution
Nationally determined contribution
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Probability that countries achieve their Paris Agreement Goals according to their nationally determined contributions (left: entire world; right: Europe only)[1]

The nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are commitments that countries make to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as part of climate change mitigation. These commitments include the necessary policies and measures for achieving the global targets set out in the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement has a long-term temperature goal which is to keep the rise in global surface temperature to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) above pre-industrial levels. The treaty also states that preferably the limit of the increase should only be 1.5 °C (2.7 °F). To achieve this temperature goal, greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced as soon as, and by as much as, possible.[2] To stay below 1.5 °C of global warming, emissions need to be cut by roughly 50% by 2030. This figure takes into account each country's documented pledges or NDCs.[3]

NDCs embody efforts by each country to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change.[4] The Paris Agreement requires each of the 195 Parties to prepare, communicate and maintain NDCs outlining what they intend to achieve.[4] NDCs must be updated every five years.[4] The NDCs due before the 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference are called NDC 3.0, and some countries have published them.[5] Some are accompanied by information to facilitate clarity, transparency and understanding (ICTU).[6]

Prior to the Paris Agreement in 2015, the NDCs were referred to as intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) and were non-binding. The INDCs were initial, voluntary pledges made by countries, whereas the NDCs are more committed but also not legally binding.

The rates of emissions reductions need to increase by 80% beyond NDCs to likely meet the 2 °C upper target range of the Paris Agreement (data as of 2021).[7] The probabilities of major emitters meeting their NDCs without such an increase is very low. Therefore, with current trends the probability of staying below 2 °C of warming is only 5% – and if NDCs were met and continued post-2030 by all signatory systems the probability would be 26%.[7][1]

Role within Paris Agreement

[edit]

Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are "at the heart of the Paris Agreement and the achievement of its long-term goals".[8]

This section is an excerpt from Paris Agreement § Nationally determined contributions.[edit]

Countries determine themselves what contributions they should make to achieve the aims of the treaty. As such, these plans are called nationally determined contributions (NDCs).[9] Article 3 requires NDCs to be "ambitious efforts" towards "achieving the purpose of this Agreement" and to "represent a progression over time".[9] The contributions should be set every five years and are to be registered by the UNFCCC Secretariat.[10] Each further ambition should be more ambitious than the previous one, known as the principle of progression.[11] Countries can cooperate and pool their nationally determined contributions. The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions pledged during the 2015 Climate Change Conference are converted to NDCs when a country ratifies the Paris Agreement, unless they submit an update.[12][13]

The Paris Agreement does not prescribe the exact nature of the NDCs. At a minimum, they should contain mitigation provisions, but they may also contain pledges on adaptation, finance, technology transfer, capacity building and transparency.[14] Some of the pledges in the NDCs are unconditional, but others are conditional on outside factors such as getting finance and technical support, the ambition from other parties or the details of rules of the Paris Agreement that are yet to be set. Most NDCs have a conditional component.[15]

While the NDCs themselves are not binding, the procedures surrounding them are. These procedures include the obligation to prepare, communicate and maintain successive NDCs, set a new one every five years, and provide information about the implementation.[16] There is no mechanism to force[17] a country to set a NDC target by a specific date, nor to meet their targets.[18][19] There will be only a name and shame system[20] or as János Pásztor, the former U.N. assistant secretary-general on climate change, stated, a "name and encourage" plan.[21]

Process

[edit]
Number of countries that have submitted first and second versions of NDCs by 2023[4]
Number of parties in multilateral environmental agreements, such as the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change[22]

The establishment of NDCs combine the top-down system of a traditional international agreement with bottom-up system-in elements through which countries put forward their own goals and policies in the context of their own national circumstances, capabilities, and priorities. The overall goal is to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions enough to limit anthropogenic temperature rise to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) above pre-industrial levels; and to pursue efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F).[23][24]

NDCs contain steps taken towards emissions reductions and also aim to address steps taken to adapt to climate change impacts, and what support the country needs, or will provide, to address climate change. After the initial submission of INDCs in March 2015, an assessment phase followed to review the impact of the submitted INDCs before the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference.[23]

The information gathered from parties' individual reports and reviews, along with the more comprehensive picture attained through the "global stocktake" will, in turn, feed back into and shape the formulation of states' subsequent pledges. The logic, overall, is that this process will offer numerous avenues where domestic and transnational political processes can play out, facilitating the making of more ambitious commitments and putting pressure on states to comply with their nationally determined goals.[25]

NDCs are the first greenhouse gas targets under the UNFCCC that apply equally to both developed and developing countries.[23]

Timeframe

[edit]

The NDCs should be set every five years and are to be registered by the UNFCCC Secretariat.[26] The timeframes facilitate periodic updates to reflect changing circumstances or increased ambitions.

NDCs are established independently by the parties (countries or regional groups of countries) in question. However, they are set within a binding iterative "catalytic" framework designed to ratchet up climate action over time.[8] Once states have set their initial NDCs, these are expected to be updated on a 5-year cycle. Biennial progress reports are to be published that track progress toward the objectives set out in states' NDCs. These will be subjected to technical review, and will collectively feed into a global stocktaking exercise, itself operating on an offset 5-year cycle, where the overall sufficiency of NDCs collectively will be assessed.[citation needed]

Current status

[edit]
Paris climate accord emission reduction targets and real-life reductions offered

Through the Climate Change Performance Index, Climate Action Tracker[27] and the Climate Clock, people can see on-line how well each individual country is currently on track to achieving its Paris agreement commitments. These tools however only give a general insight in regards to the current collective and individual country emission reductions. They do not give insight in regards on the emission reductions offered per country, for each measure proposed in the NDC.

As of 31 March 2020, 186 parties (185 countries plus the European Union) had communicated their first NDCs to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat. A report by the UN stated in 2020 that: "the world is way off track in meeting this target at the current level of nationally determined contributions."[28]

The Sustainable Development Goal 13 on climate action has an indicator related to NDCs for its second target: Indicator 13.2.1 is the "Number of countries with nationally determined contributions, long-term strategies, national adaptation plans, strategies as reported in adaptation communications and national communications".[29]

Challenges

[edit]
Updated probabilistic forecast of CO2 emissions, based on data to 2015[1]

Countries face a number of challenges in NDC implementation, for example establishing a mandate for coordinating actions around NDCs and driving their implementation; and addressing resource constraints for developing and implementing climate change policy.[30] The rates of emissions reductions need to increase by 80% beyond NDCs to likely meet the 2 °C upper target range of the Paris Agreement (data as of 2021).[7] The probabilities of major emitters meeting their NDCs without such an increase is very low. Therefore, with current trends the probability of staying below 2 °C of warming is only 5% – and if NDCs were met and continued post-2030 by all signatory systems the probability would be 26%.[7][1]

This section is an excerpt from Paris Agreement § Effectiveness.[edit]
Scenarios of global greenhouse gas emissions. If all countries achieve their current Paris Agreement pledges, average warming by 2100 would still exceed the maximum 2°C target set by the agreement.

The effectiveness of the Paris Agreement to reach its climate goals is under debate, with most experts saying it is insufficient for its more ambitious goal of keeping global temperature rise under 1.5 °C.[31][32] Many of the exact provisions of the Paris Agreement have yet to be straightened out, so that it may be too early to judge effectiveness.[31] According to the 2020 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), with the current climate commitments of the Paris Agreement, global mean temperatures will likely rise by more than 3 °C by the end of the 21st century. Newer net zero commitments were not included in the Nationally Determined Contributions, and may bring down temperatures by a further 0.5 °C.[33]

With initial pledges by countries inadequate, faster and more expensive future mitigation would be needed to still reach the targets.[34] Furthermore, there is a gap between pledges by countries in their NDCs and implementation of these pledges; one third of the emission gap between the lowest-costs and actual reductions in emissions would be closed by implementing existing pledges.[35] A pair of studies in Nature found that as of 2017 none of the major industrialized nations were implementing the policies they had pledged, and none met their pledged emission reduction targets,[36] and even if they had, the sum of all member pledges (as of 2016) would not keep global temperature rise "well below 2°C".[37][38]

In 2021, a study using a probabilistic model concluded that the rates of emissions reductions would have to increase by 80% beyond NDCs to likely meet the 2 °C upper target of the Paris Agreement, that the probabilities of major emitters meeting their NDCs without such an increase is very low. It estimated that with current trends the probability of staying below 2 °C of warming is 5–26% if NDCs were met and continued post-2030 by all signatories.[39]

As of 2020, there is little scientific literature on the topics of the effectiveness of the Paris Agreement on capacity building and adaptation, even though they feature prominently in the Paris Agreement. The literature available is mostly mixed in its conclusions about loss and damage, and adaptation.[31]

According to the stocktake report, the agreement has a significant effect: while in 2010 the expected temperature rise by 2100 was 3.7–4.8 °C, at COP 27 it was 2.4–2.6 °C and if all countries will fulfill their long-term pledges even 1.7–2.1 °C. Despite it, the world is still very far from reaching the aim of the agreement: limiting temperature rise to 1.5 degrees. For doing this, emissions must peak by 2025.[40][41] Recent work – on the basis of the first single calendar year in 2024 with an average temperature above 1.5 degrees Celsius – indicates that most probably Earth has already entered the 20-year period that will reach an average warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius.[42] Furthermore, it has been suggested that the global mean temperature may have already passed the 1.5 degrees Celsius level in 2024.[43]

The Paris Agreement also seemed to have influenced the focus of the following IPCC reports. Before the Paris Agreement was settled, the IPCC assessment reports focused roughly in equal proportions on temperatures above and below 2 °C. However, in the 6th assessment report, after the Paris Engagement was reached, slightly less than 20% of the temperature mentions are above 2 °C and almost 50% focus on 1.5 °C alone.[44]

History

[edit]

NDCs have an antecedent in the pledge and review system that had been considered by international climate change negotiators back in the early 1990s.[45] All countries that were parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) were asked to publish their intended nationally determined contributions (INDC) at the 2013 United Nations Climate Change Conference held in Warsaw, Poland, in November 2013.[46][47] The intended contributions were determined without prejudice to the legal nature of the contributions.[47] The term was intended as a compromise between "quantified emissions limitation and reduction objective" (QELROs) and "Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions" (NAMAs) that the Kyoto Protocol used to describe the different legal obligations of developed and developing countries.

After the Paris Agreement entered into force in 2016, the INDCs became the first NDC when a country ratified the agreement unless it decided to submit a new NDC at the same time. NDCs are the first greenhouse gas targets under the UNFCCC that apply equally to both developed and developing countries.[23]

Intended nationally determined contributions (INDC) submissions

[edit]

On 27 February 2015, Switzerland became the first nation to submit its INDC.[48] Switzerland said that it had experienced a temperature rise of 1.75 °C since 1864, and aimed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030.[49]

India submitted its INDC to the UNFCCC in October 2015, committing to cut the emissions intensity of GDP by 33–35% by 2030 from 2005 levels.[50] On its submission, India wrote that it needs "at least USD 2.5 trillion" to achieve its 2015–2030 goals, and that its "international climate finance needs" will be the difference over "what can be made available from domestic sources."[51]

Of surveyed countries, 85% reported that they were challenged by the short time frame available to develop INDCs. Other challenges reported include difficulty to secure high-level political support, a lack of certainty and guidance on what should be included in INDCs, and limited expertise for the assessment of technical options. However, despite challenges, less than a quarter of countries said they had received international support to prepare their INDCs, and more than a quarter indicated they are still applying for international support.[52] The INDC process and the challenges it presents are unique to each country and there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach or methodology.[53]

By country

[edit]
See also: List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions

Information about NDCs by country are shown in some of the country climate change articles below.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nationally determined contribution

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are the self-determined national climate action plans that Parties to the submit to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), outlining their intended policies and targets for reducing and enhancing resilience to climate impacts. These contributions, which replace the top-down emission targets of prior agreements like the , emphasize a bottom-up approach where each country sets its own goals based on national circumstances, with an expectation of progressively increasing ambition over time. Under the Paris Agreement adopted in 2015, Parties are legally obligated to prepare, communicate, and maintain successive NDCs every five years, covering mitigation, adaptation, and support for finance, technology, and capacity-building, though the specific targets lack binding enforcement mechanisms. The framework aims to collectively limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, pursuing efforts toward 1.5°C, but empirical assessments reveal substantial shortfalls: the 2024 UNFCCC NDC Synthesis Report projects that full implementation of the latest available NDCs from 195 Parties would result in 2030 emissions approximately 4.7% above 2019 levels, far exceeding the 43% reduction below 2019 required for the 1.5°C pathway as outlined in the IPCC's Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C. Global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise since the Agreement's entry into force in 2016, underscoring causal challenges in translating pledges into verifiable reductions amid varying national priorities and economic dependencies on fossil fuels. Critics highlight controversies surrounding NDCs' voluntary nature, including risks of insufficient ambition, delayed or weakened submissions, and limited , as there are no penalties for non-compliance or downgrading commitments, potentially undermining the Agreement's goals despite transparency requirements under its enhanced reporting framework. While some updated NDCs demonstrate heightened targets—particularly in and efficiency measures—aggregate outcomes remain misaligned with empirical needs for rapid decarbonization, prompting calls for stronger international cooperation and domestic policy enforcement to bridge implementation gaps.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Core Principles

Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are the self-defined climate action plans that Parties to the communicate to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), specifying efforts to reduce national in pursuit of the agreement's collective temperature goals of limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with efforts to restrict it to 1.5°C. These contributions, first required as Intended NDCs (INDCs) prior to and formalized upon entry into force in 2016, encompass targets expressed as absolute reductions, intensity metrics relative to GDP or population, or sector-specific policies, alongside information on , , , and capacity-building needs. The core principles underpinning NDCs derive from Article 4 of the , emphasizing a bottom-up, voluntary approach that respects national sovereignty by allowing each Party to determine its contribution based on its specific circumstances, capabilities, and priorities, in contrast to the top-down, legally binding targets of the preceding . This nationally determined nature ensures flexibility, enabling countries to align commitments with domestic political, economic, and technological realities, while requiring Parties to pursue implementation through domestic laws and policies aiming to achieve their stated objectives. A foundational principle is progression: each successive NDC, updated every five years, must represent a progression beyond previous efforts, reflecting the highest possible level of ambition feasible at the time of communication. Additional principles include transparency and accountability, mandating that NDCs include quantifiable information on baselines, assumptions, methodologies, and how contributions contribute to overall emission reductions, subject to international review under the Enhanced Transparency Framework to build trust without imposing penalties for non-achievement. Fairness and equity are embedded through the recognition of , whereby developed nations are expected to undertake economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets and provide financial support to developing countries, though all Parties bear obligations scaled to their capacities. These principles collectively aim to foster global while avoiding uniform mandates that could undermine participation, as evidenced by the Paris Agreement's near-universal ratification by 196 Parties as of 2025.

Relation to Paris Agreement Objectives

Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) serve as the primary mechanism under the for parties to pursue its central objective of limiting global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C. Article 4 of the Agreement mandates that each party prepare, communicate, and maintain successive NDCs representing its highest possible ambition, determined in light of its national circumstances, with efforts to achieve economy-wide emission reductions. These contributions must embody progressive enhancement over time, informed by the process, which assesses collective progress toward the long-term goals every five years. The Paris Agreement's bottom-up approach via NDCs contrasts with top-down targets of prior protocols like , emphasizing national sovereignty while requiring transparency and ratcheting up ambition to align with temperature limits. Parties must communicate NDCs every five years, with the first round due by 2020 and subsequent updates, such as those planned for 2025, needing to reflect outcomes from the first in 2023, which highlighted insufficient progress. NDCs are required to include quantifiable information on baselines, time frames, and methodologies for tracking progress, ensuring accountability toward the Agreement's goals of peaking global emissions as soon as possible and achieving balance between sources and sinks in the second half of the century. Despite this framework, aggregate NDC commitments as of remain inadequate to meet temperature objectives. The UNEP Emissions Gap Report indicates that full implementation of current unconditional NDCs would result in only a 5-10% reduction in global by 2030 relative to 2019 levels, whereas a 42% reduction is necessary for a least-cost pathway to 1.5°C, and a 28% reduction for 2°C. The UNFCCC's NDC Synthesis Report similarly assesses that submitted NDCs, covering 164 parties, project emissions trajectories far exceeding pathways compatible with goals, underscoring gaps in both mitigation ambition and implementation. These shortfalls arise from varying national priorities, including needs in developing countries and reliance on fuels in major emitters, though the Agreement's structure lacks binding enforcement beyond transparency mechanisms.

Historical Evolution

Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs)

The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) represented the preliminary voluntary pledges submitted by countries in advance of the negotiations, serving as a bridge from the expiring commitments to a new post-2020 framework. Adopted under the Lima Call for Climate Action at the 20th (COP20) on December 11, 2014, the decision urged all parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to communicate their INDCs well in advance of COP21 in , with an invitation for submissions by March 31, 2015, for those able to do so early to facilitate assessment of aggregate effects. These contributions were nationally driven, encompassing intended actions on , , finance, , and capacity-building, without legal enforceability, reflecting a shift toward bottom-up, differentiated responsibilities among developed and developing nations. Submissions of INDCs accelerated through 2015, with the UNFCCC secretariat compiling synthesis reports to evaluate their collective implications. By October 2, 2015, 146 countries—accounting for approximately 87% of global —had lodged their INDCs, comprising 119 separate submissions from 147 parties (treating the as a single entity). An updated synthesis report, released on , 2016, incorporated additional INDCs submitted up to April 4, 2016, revealing that unconditional pledges from all submitters projected a 3.7% reduction in global emissions below business-as-usual levels by 2030, though conditional pledges tied to support could achieve up to 7.5% if fully realized. By the opening of COP21 on November 30, 2015, over 180 countries had submitted INDCs, providing a foundation for the Agreement's adoption on December 12, 2015, where many INDCs were subsequently formalized as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) upon ratification. The INDC process emphasized transparency and comparability in reporting, drawing on guidelines from the Lima Call to include quantifiable information on baselines, time frames, and assumptions, though implementation varied widely due to differing national capacities and priorities. Independent analyses, such as those from the , highlighted that while INDCs marked unprecedented participation, their aggregate ambition fell short of the 2°C warming limit endorsed in prior UNFCCC decisions, underscoring the need for iterative strengthening in future cycles. This phase demonstrated causal linkages between pre-negotiation pledges and negotiated outcomes, with early submissions enabling and of ambition, though reliance on self-determined targets introduced variability in stringency and verifiability.

Transition to Formal NDCs and Subsequent Updates

Following the entry into force of the on November 4, 2016, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) submitted by parties prior to its adoption at COP21 in 2015 were converted into formal Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) upon ratification, provided no revisions were submitted. This automatic transition applied to the 185 parties that had ratified by mid-2017 and formalized pre-Paris pledges—covering emission reduction targets, adaptation plans, and finance commitments—under the agreement's bottom-up framework, while allowing parties to enhance ambition through voluntary updates. By 2018, over 180 parties had transitioned their INDCs to NDCs, though some, including major emitters like and , retained their original targets without immediate strengthening. Article 4 of the mandates that each party communicate a new or updated NDC every five years, with successive submissions required to represent a progression beyond the previous NDC in and efforts, reflecting the party's highest possible ambition. The first update cycle targeted submissions by 2020, ideally 9 to 12 months ahead of the subsequent COP to allow review, though the agreement lacks enforcement penalties for delays. In practice, while 187 parties met the initial 2020 window with varying degrees of enhancement—such as the European Union's updated target of at least 55% reduction by 2030 relative to 1990 levels—many submissions arrived late, extending into 2021 amid the pandemic's disruptions to negotiations. The 2025 update cycle, focusing on enhanced targets through 2035 to align with long-term low-emission strategies, carried a recommended deadline of February 2025 (9 months before COP30 in November 2025), but compliance was low, with only about 5% of parties submitting on time as of early 2025. By October 2025, over 127 parties plus the had communicated updated NDCs, though analyses indicate aggregate ambition remains insufficient for temperature goals, with systemic delays highlighting challenges in domestic and international coordination. Future cycles in 2030 and beyond continue this ratcheting mechanism, tying updates to global stocktakes that assess collective progress against 1.5–2°C warming limits.

Development and Submission Process

Procedural Requirements and Cycles

Article 4 of the mandates that all Parties prepare, communicate, and maintain successive nationally determined contributions (NDCs), determining their efforts to reduce national emissions and adapt to climate impacts. These communications must occur every five years and be informed by the results of the , a periodic assessment of collective progress toward the Agreement's long-term goals. Parties are required to provide information necessary to ensure clarity, transparency, and understanding of their NDCs, including details on emissions baselines, , and methodologies for tracking . The procedural cycle begins with the initial NDCs, which most Parties were expected to communicate by 2020, building on pre-Paris intended NDCs (INDCs) submitted ahead of the 2015 conference. Subsequent updates follow a five-year rhythm: the next round, termed NDC 3.0, is due by early 2025 and covers actions through 2035, with further cycles in 2030 (to 2040) and beyond. At COP26 in 2021, Parties adopted a decision establishing a common time frame for NDCs of successive five-year periods, aligning submissions to facilitate comparability and aggregation of efforts while allowing national circumstances to influence target scopes. This framework supports progressive ambition, requiring each successive NDC to represent an advancement over the previous one in and efforts, reflecting the "highest possible ambition" based on available and national capabilities. NDCs are formally communicated to the UNFCCC Secretariat and recorded in a public online registry to enhance transparency and . Parties may update or adjust their NDCs at any time to increase ambition ahead of the five-year cycle, though and receive flexibility in timing to accommodate capacity constraints. The process, commencing in 2023 and recurring every five years, directly informs NDC revisions by evaluating aggregate progress and identifying gaps, thereby linking procedural submissions to empirical assessments of effectiveness. As of October 2025, ongoing submissions for the 2025 cycle underscore the mechanism's role in iteratively ratcheting up commitments, though compliance relies on voluntary adherence rather than enforcement penalties.

Key Components Mandated in NDCs

The , in Article 4, paragraph 2, mandates that each Party's NDC include a contribution representing its intended efforts to reduce national emissions by sources and enhance removals by sinks, pursued through domestic measures. This core element ensures contributions align with the agreement's objective of holding global temperature increase well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with efforts toward 1.5°C. Successive NDCs must demonstrate progression beyond prior efforts, reflecting each Party's highest possible ambition in light of available , national circumstances, and evolving capacities (Article 4, paragraph 3). To facilitate clarity, transparency, and understanding (CTU) as required by Article 4, paragraph 8, NDCs or accompanying communications must specify quantifiable details on the contribution, including:
  • The reference indicator (e.g., absolute emissions, emissions intensity relative to GDP, or other metrics), reference point or base year, and target level.
  • Time frames and/or periods covered by the contribution, with initial NDCs not exceeding 10 years from and subsequent ones aligning with five-year cycles.
  • Scope and coverage, detailing greenhouse gases (e.g., CO₂, CH₄, N₂O), sectors (e.g., , , ), and any exclusions.
  • Methodological approaches for estimating emissions and removals, including assumptions on global economic growth, technological development, and land-use changes.
For conditional contributions dependent on external support (e.g., , ), Parties must delineate the circumstances under which full occurs, including estimated costs and support needs (Article 4, paragraph 5). Parties are required to consider including elements, such as plans for reduction and resilience building, which may be integrated into or submitted alongside NDCs (Article 7, paragraph 11). Developed country Parties must report on provision of , technology, and capacity-building support to enable by others (Article 9, paragraph 3). These components are formalized through decisions like 1/CP.21 and the Katowice Rulebook (decision 18/CMA.1), which establish the transparency framework without prescribing uniform target types, allowing flexibility while enforcing disclosure for comparability and . Non-compliance with CTU provisions can hinder global stocktakes, but enforcement relies on facilitative review rather than punitive measures.

Scope and Contents of NDCs

Emission Reduction Targets and Baselines

Emission reduction targets in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) outline each country's planned reductions in (GHG) emissions to contribute to the 's objective of limiting global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. These targets must be communicated every five years and represent progressively ambitious efforts, with Parties required to pursue domestic mitigation measures to achieve them. Baselines, or reference points, provide the benchmark against which emission reductions are measured, typically consisting of either historical emissions from a fixed base year or period, or projected emissions under a business-as-usual scenario. The Paris Agreement mandates that NDCs include quantifiable information on these reference points, including base years, starting points, or baseline scenarios, along with methodologies and assumptions used to calculate them, to ensure clarity, transparency, and understanding. Targets can be absolute, specifying a cap on total GHG emissions relative to the baseline, or relative (intensity-based), expressing reductions per unit of GDP, population, or economic output, which allows for emissions growth if the denominator expands faster than emissions decline. Absolute targets are preferred for economy-wide coverage to align with global emission limits, but many NDCs, particularly from developing countries, employ intensity targets or sector-specific pledges due to needs. For instance, the has committed to a 55% absolute reduction in GHG emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels, while targets a peak in emissions before 2030 and a reduction in carbon intensity by 18% from 2020 levels. UNFCCC guidance encourages baselines to be updated transparently if new data or methodologies alter projections, particularly for dynamic baselines, to avoid inflating apparent progress. However, inconsistencies in baseline assumptions across NDCs complicate global comparability, with some analyses noting that intensity targets may permit higher absolute emissions trajectories than absolute caps.

Adaptation, Finance, and Support Elements

Adaptation elements within Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) focus on strategies to build resilience against climate impacts, as encouraged by Article 7 of the , which promotes enhanced adaptive capacity, strengthening resilience, and reducing vulnerability. Developing countries, in particular, are urged to include adaptation planning in their NDCs, often integrating National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) or adaptation communications that detail vulnerabilities in sectors like , , and coastal zones, along with priority actions, timelines, and monitoring frameworks. These components, guided by decision 9/CMA.1, specify such as current and projected impacts, adaptation goals, and implementation progress, though assessments show variability in specificity and measurability across submissions. Finance elements in NDCs address the mobilization of resources for , with developed countries required under Article 9 to provide financial support to developing nations for both and , building on the pre- commitment of $100 billion annually from public funds. Developed Parties' NDCs outline provisions for grants, concessional loans, and other flows, while developing countries articulate their estimated financial needs, often linking them to specific NDC targets; countries access financial assessments for climate investment plans primarily through international organizations and online platforms, with the UNDP Climate Promise initiative supporting Investment and Financial Flows Assessments to evaluate needs for mitigation and adaptation, the NDC 3.0 Navigator platform providing tools and databases such as Climate Funds Explorer and OECD Climate Fund Inventory for assessing finance sources, for adaptation-specific plans resources from the NAP Global Network and funding via UNFCCC-associated funds like the Green Climate Fund, Adaptation Fund, and Global Environment Facility, and the UNFCCC Climate Finance Data Portal offering information on activities in developing countries. For example, the second round of NDCs submitted by highlighted gaps in finance delivery, prompting calls for a new collective quantified goal post-2025. This integration aims to align finance with NDC ambitions, though independent reviews note persistent shortfalls, with actual mobilization falling below pledged levels in years like 2019, where and member states reported €23.2 billion but global totals lagged. Support elements encompass capacity-building and , as outlined in Articles 10 and 11 of the , which establish frameworks for developing countries to access technical assistance, knowledge sharing, and low-emission technologies to implement NDCs. NDCs from developing nations typically identify gaps in institutional capacity, such as training for policymakers or data systems for monitoring, and request support through mechanisms like the UNFCCC Capacity-Building Initiative for Transparency; developed countries may detail contributions, including technology needs assessments and cooperation on innovation. These provisions facilitate enhanced implementation, with the Paris Committee on Capacity-building coordinating efforts, though evaluations indicate that support remains uneven, often prioritizing over needs in resource allocation.

Assessment of Global Commitments

Aggregate Impact on Emissions Trajectories

The collective nationally determined contributions (NDCs), if fully implemented, project global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2030 but remain insufficient to align with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C temperature goal, with assessments estimating a trajectory toward 2.5–2.9°C warming by 2100. The Climate Action Tracker's analysis of 2030 NDC targets indicates an end-of-century warming of 2.6°C, assuming linear extrapolation beyond 2030 due to limited long-term commitments in most NDCs. This projection accounts for conditional elements in some NDCs, which depend on international finance and technology support, though unconditional pledges alone yield similar high warming outcomes. UNEP's Emissions Gap Report 2024 quantifies that full implementation of current unconditional NDCs would reduce global emissions by only 4–10% below levels by 2030, reaching approximately 58–60 GtCO₂e, far exceeding the 42% reduction (to about 30 GtCO₂e) required from a baseline of roughly 52 GtCO₂e for a 50% chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C. Including conditional NDCs, which incorporate support mechanisms, emissions could decline by up to 20–25% below levels by 2030, but gaps persist, with post-2030 trajectories dependent on unratified long-term strategies. These estimates highlight that while NDCs have driven some ambition since , aggregate commitments prioritize national circumstances over stringent global convergence, resulting in emissions pathways that overshoot least-cost 1.5°C scenarios by 20–30 GtCO₂e annually through 2035.
AssessmentProjected 2030 Emissions Reduction (from 2019)Implied Long-Term Warming
Unconditional NDCs4–10%~2.8°C
Conditional NDCsUp to 20–25%~2.5–2.6°C
1.5°C Pathway42%1.5°C (50% probability)
Independent analyses, such as those from the Climate Action Tracker, differentiate NDC pledges from implemented policies, noting that current policies alone project 2.7°C warming, suggesting NDCs provide marginal additional mitigation potential amid implementation shortfalls. Variability arises from modeling assumptions on , , and economic growth, with optimistic interpretations of NDCs assuming full compliance and technology deployment, yet empirical trends indicate slower-than-pledged reductions in major emitters. The 2023 Global Stocktake under the UNFCCC reinforced this, urging enhanced ambition in upcoming NDC updates to bridge the trajectory gap, though historical patterns show incremental rather than transformative shifts.

Evaluations from Global Stocktakes and Independent Analyses

![Probability that countries achieve their Paris Agreement Goals according to their nationally determined contributions (NDCs)][float-right] The first (GST) under the , concluded at COP28 in 2023, assessed collective progress toward the agreement's goals and found that the mitigation ambition reflected in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) remains insufficient to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The synthesis report highlighted persistent emissions gaps, with current NDCs projected to result in global 14-22% higher than required in 2030 to align with the 1.5°C pathway, even assuming full implementation. This evaluation underscored the need for accelerated action across , , and , informing the development of updated NDCs due in 2025. The United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) Emissions Gap Report 2024, an annual independent assessment, reinforced these findings by quantifying the shortfall in NDC commitments. Full implementation of unconditional NDCs would reduce 2030 emissions by only 4% below 2019 levels, while conditional NDCs (dependent on external support) achieve a 10% reduction—far below the 42% cut necessary for a least-cost 1.5°C trajectory. The report projects that current policies and pledges collectively point to approximately 2.6°C warming by 2100, emphasizing untapped technical potential for up to 52% emissions reductions by 2030 through accelerated deployment of existing technologies and measures. UNEP urged a "quantum leap" in ambition for the NDC round to close this gap, noting that sectoral analyses reveal opportunities in , and . Independent analyses, such as those from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT), provide country-specific ratings and global projections, rating most major economies' NDCs as "insufficient" or worse against Paris compatibility. As of early 2025, CAT estimates that meeting existing NDCs would lead to 2030 emissions nearly double the levels compatible with 1.5°C, with a substantial gap persisting between pledged and required reductions even after accounting for announced updates. The UNFCCC's 2024 NDC Synthesis Report, aggregating from 168 recent submissions covering 195 parties, similarly indicates that collective commitments fall short of Paris goals, projecting emissions trajectories inconsistent with well-below-2°C warming. These evaluations, drawing on peer-reviewed models and disaggregated , highlight systemic under-ambition, particularly in major emitters, while acknowledging variability in implementation risks and baseline assumptions.

Implementation Realities

National Policies and Progress Tracking

![Probability that countries achieve their Paris Agreement goals according to NDCs][float-right] Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the are implemented through domestic policies that align with each party's economic and developmental priorities, including legislation, regulatory frameworks, and fiscal incentives to curb . These policies often target key sectors such as energy, transportation, and industry; for example, the incorporates provisions from the of 2022 and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to drive emissions reductions consistent with its NDC target of 61-66% below 2005 levels by 2035, as updated in December 2024. Similarly, parties develop sector-specific strategies, such as mandates or carbon pricing mechanisms, to operationalize emission reduction pledges, though the effectiveness depends on enforcement and integration with broader economic policies. Progress tracking is mandated under Article 13 of the through the Enhanced Transparency Framework, which requires all parties to submit biennial transparency reports (BTRs) detailing national inventories, progress, and information necessary to assess of NDCs. These reports include quantitative on emissions trends and qualitative updates on outcomes, with developed countries submitting annually and others biennially, facilitating and international review. Independent analyses, such as those evaluating biennial update reports from developing countries, indicate that while reporting has improved since 2015, gaps persist in granularity and comparability, particularly for land-use sectors where carbon flux measurements vary widely between national inventories. Empirical evidence highlights implementation challenges, including inadequate monitoring infrastructure and enforcement, which obscure true progress in many jurisdictions. For instance, assessments of 25 major economies show that while updated NDCs reflect some advancement, projected emissions often exceed targets due to insufficient policy stringency and capacity constraints in data collection. In developing nations, limited technical expertise exacerbates these issues, leading to reliance on aggregated estimates rather than precise, verifiable metrics, as noted in reviews of NDC risks under the Paris framework. Overall, national tracking mechanisms, while structurally in place, frequently underperform in delivering the causal insights needed for corrective action, underscoring the need for enhanced domestic measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems.

Barriers to Execution Including Capacity Constraints

Developing , particularly (LDCs) and (SIDS), encounter substantial capacity constraints in executing their nationally determined contributions (NDCs), stemming from limited institutional frameworks, technical expertise, and . A survey of 58 developing countries identified key gaps, with 61% citing the need for strengthened institutional structures and coordination mechanisms, 62% requiring improved monitoring and information systems, and 59% emphasizing awareness-building among leaders and the public to foster ownership. These deficiencies often result in fragmented policy implementation, as seen in countries like and , where weak bureaucratic administration—scoring low on governance indices such as V-Dem's metric (ranging from -1.5 to 1.8)—undermines consistent execution across sectors like and . Financial barriers exacerbate these capacity issues, as many NDCs in developing nations are conditional on international support that has historically fallen short. Mobilizing resources ranked as the top need in the aforementioned survey, with 77% of respondents rating it extremely relevant, reflecting uncertainties in accessing . Global adaptation finance flows, estimated at under $30 billion annually in recent years, lag far behind the $212 billion per year required by developing countries through 2030, as outlined in national plans and NDCs. This shortfall delays and investment in low-emission , particularly in LDCs lacking domestic fiscal capacity. Technical and data-related constraints further hinder progress, including inadequate systems for emissions tracking and verification, which impede accurate assessment of NDC advancement. In regions like , institutional capacity gaps manifest in poor alignment with emission sources, such as incomplete coverage of land-use sectors, compounded by reliance on external for baseline development. Political and economic factors, including opposition from fuel-dependent interest groups—where rents constitute up to 23.7% of GDP in some cases—and prioritization of short-term growth over long-term , amplify these execution risks. Overall, these intertwined barriers contribute to low rates, with many countries failing to translate NDC commitments into verifiable on-ground actions absent enhanced international capacity-building support.

Critical Evaluations

Debates on Ambition and Effectiveness

Critics argue that current NDCs lack sufficient ambition to align with the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C, with efforts falling short of the 1.5°C threshold. According to the UNFCCC's 2022 synthesis report, even full implementation of updated NDCs from 143 parties would result in global only 9% below 2010 levels by 2030, whereas IPCC assessments indicate a required reduction of approximately 43% from 2019 levels to pursue 1.5°C pathways. Independent analyses, such as those from Climate Analytics, project that present policies and NDCs combined would lead to 2.6–2.7°C warming by 2100, necessitating roughly seven times greater reductions for 1.5°C compatibility. Proponents of heightened ambition, including organizations like the , contend that successive NDC updates have modestly narrowed the emissions gap but remain inadequate, with only marginal improvements in 2035 targets submitted as of 2025. They advocate for bolder 2030 and 2035 pledges incorporating net-zero alignment and sectoral measures to bridge the divide. However, skeptics highlight an "ambition trap" wherein overpromising targets without corresponding implementation capacity erodes credibility and invites backlash, as evidenced by historical shortfalls in meeting prior commitments under frameworks like the . On effectiveness, debates center on the non-binding nature of NDCs, which fosters implementation risks including policy inconsistencies, interest group opposition, and institutional capacity deficits in developing nations. Studies indicate that while updated NDCs promise 3.8–3.9 GtCO₂eq reductions by 2030, uncertainties in baselines, conditional elements, and socioeconomic projections undermine reliability, with many projections relying on indirect estimates rather than verified actions. Economic modeling reveals that pursuing conditional (higher-ambition) NDCs could impose greater GDP losses—up to 1.17% globally by 2030—compared to unconditional ones at 0.96%, particularly affecting trade-exposed economies dependent on fossil fuels. Effectiveness is further questioned by empirical gaps between pledges and outcomes; for instance, despite NDC commitments, global emissions continued rising post-2015, with only limited evidence of transformative policy shifts in high-emission sectors. Analysts from the Environment Institute emphasize that amplifying ambition without bolstering enforcement mechanisms or addressing free-rider incentives yields marginal impact, as voluntary frameworks struggle against national sovereignty priorities. Conversely, some evaluations suggest that modest NDC-driven investments in clean energy—reaching $2 trillion globally in 2024—have spurred innovation, though causal attribution remains contested amid confounding economic factors.

Economic Costs, Sovereignty Implications, and Alternative Perspectives

Implementing NDCs entails substantial financial requirements, with 98 countries estimating total costs between USD 5 trillion and USD 6.9 trillion by 2030 to meet current commitments, encompassing , , and support measures. Model-based assessments indicate modest global GDP reductions from NDC adherence, such as a 0.96% decline for unconditional targets and 1.17% for conditional ones by 2030, with enhanced ambitions projecting 0.38% loss by 2035 and 0.87% by 2040. These projections, derived from integrated assessment models, often assume technological advancements and international cooperation like Article 6 carbon trading, which could halve implementation costs by reallocating abatement efforts; however, empirical ex-ante simulations consistently forecast small negative economic effects, varying by national effort levels and sector-specific disruptions in fossil fuel-dependent economies. Critics of the Paris framework, including former U.S. President , have contended that NDC obligations impose undue constraints on national by subjecting domestic policies to international scrutiny, reporting mandates, and peer pressure for progressive enhancements every five years, potentially prioritizing global norms over unilateral economic priorities. The U.S. withdrawal in explicitly cited risks to alongside economic burdens, arguing that non-binding pledges still exert de facto influence through reputational and trade-linked incentives, as evidenced by subsequent re-engagement under different administrations. Proponents counter that NDCs preserve by design, allowing self-determined without legal , yet assessments highlight tensions where high-ambition pledges correlate with domestic and implementation risks from interest group resistance. Alternative perspectives emphasize that NDC ambition alone insufficiently addresses effectiveness gaps, as many commitments diverge from least-cost abatement paths and overlook implementation barriers like institutional capacity deficits. Analyses suggest prioritizing transparency, sectoral coherence, and market-based mechanisms—such as voluntary carbon markets under Article 6—over rigid targets to minimize economic distortions while achieving comparable emissions outcomes. Some evaluations propose that global decarbonization via NDCs could benefit from reallocating efforts among major emitters through alternative strategies like technology-neutral policies, arguing that top-down pledges risk inefficient absent robust enforcement, with updated NDCs showing limited aggregate impact on emissions trajectories despite heightened rhetoric. These views underscore causal uncertainties in linking NDC actions to verifiable temperature stabilization, favoring adaptive, innovation-driven approaches over prescriptive where empirical progress tracking reveals frequent shortfalls.

Comparative National Approaches

Profiles of Major Emitters

Major greenhouse gas emitters, responsible for over 60% of global anthropogenic emissions in 2023, include (30.7%), the (13.7%), (7.3%), the (6.7%), and (4.7%). These nations' NDCs under the differ significantly in structure, with developed economies typically adopting absolute reduction targets relative to historical baselines, while developing ones emphasize intensity metrics or capacity expansions tied to economic growth. Independent assessments, such as those from the Climate Action Tracker, rate most targets and policies as insufficient to align with Paris goals, reflecting persistent gaps between pledges and emission trajectories driven by energy demands and policy implementation challenges. , the world's largest emitter, committed in its 2020 NDC update to peaking CO2 emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060, alongside reducing carbon intensity by 65% from 2005 levels by 2030. In September 2025, President announced an updated NDC targeting a 7-10% emissions cut below peak levels by 2035, with ambitions to expand and solar capacity over 1,200 GW. Despite growth, coal-fired power capacity expanded by 47 GW in 2023 alone, contributing to emissions rising 5.9% year-over-year to 12.7 GtCO2e, with projections indicating peak unlikely before 2025-2030 under current policies. The Climate Action Tracker rates China's targets and actions as "highly insufficient," noting that absolute emissions continue upward amid industrial and export-driven growth, undermining global mitigation efforts. United States emissions fell 17% from 2005 to 2023, largely due to displacing rather than deliberate policy, reaching 6.3 GtCO2e. The Biden administration's 2021 NDC pledged 50-52% reductions below 2005 by 2030, updated in December 2024 to 61-66% by 2035 economy-wide, including a 35% cut. However, federal policies like the have spurred investments, yet projected 2030 emissions remain 25-40% above targets without further state-level or market-driven shifts, per modeling. Political volatility exacerbates uncertainty; a potential reversal under future administrations could stall progress, with the Climate Action Tracker deeming current policies "highly insufficient" against fair-share obligations. , emissions grew to 3.7 GtCO2e in 2023 amid rapid development, but its 2022 NDC update targets a 45% reduction in emissions intensity per GDP unit from by 2030 and 50% non-fossil energy capacity. Progress includes a 33% intensity decline from 2005-2020—exceeding interim paces—and renewable capacity surpassing 40% of total by 2023, though remains dominant at 70% of power generation. Absolute emissions are projected to rise until mid-century due to and industrialization, with the Climate Action Tracker rating targets "insufficient" as they permit continued growth incompatible with stringent global limits without technology transfers. The , as a collective, emitted 3.4 GtCO2e in 2023, down 24% from 1990, targeting at least 55% net reductions by 2030 relative to 1990 via the . Member states vary: emissions fell 8% in 2023, driven by renewables and efficiency, but sectors like transport and agriculture lag, with projections showing a 52-57% cut feasible only with full policy enforcement. The bloc updated its NDC in to reflect this ambition, yet internal disputes over burden-sharing and energy crises post-2022 have slowed momentum, earning a "sufficient" rating from the Climate Action Tracker contingent on delivery. Russia pledged in its 2020 NDC to limit emissions to 70% of 1990 levels by 2030 (unconditional 75%), updated in 2025 to 65-67% by 2035 including sinks, amid stable emissions around 2.5 GtCO2e driven by exports. comprise 80% of , with limited renewables transition; emissions rose slightly post-2022 due to war-related shifts, rendering "critically insufficient" per assessments, as they allow expansion in oil and gas without offsetting domestic cuts. Policies prioritize over , with net-zero by 2060 aspirational but unsupported by current trends.
Country/Bloc2023 Emissions ShareKey NDC Target (2030 unless noted)Assessment Rating (CAT)Projected Gap to Target
30.7%Peak pre-2030; intensity -65%Highly InsufficientEmissions rising; peak delayed
13.7%50-52% below 2005Highly Insufficient25-40% short without acceleration
7.3%Intensity -45%; 50% non-fossil capInsufficientOn intensity track; absolute up
6.7%55% below 1990Sufficient (conditional)Near-track with enforcement
4.7%≤70% of 1990 (w/ sinks)Critically InsufficientAllows fossil expansion

Experiences in Developing and Emerging Economies

Developing and emerging economies have encountered significant hurdles in formulating and implementing nationally determined contributions (NDCs), primarily due to limited institutional capacity, inadequate access to international , and competing priorities for and alleviation. According to the UNFCCC's 2023 NDC Synthesis Report, 75% of parties, including many from these regions, identified capacity-building as essential for , with 46% quantifying financial needs but facing persistent shortfalls in mobilized support. Conditional targets, which depend on enhanced finance and , dominate NDCs in these contexts; full realization of such conditions could peak global emissions before 2030 and reduce 2030 levels by up to 8.2% below figures, yet historical delivery of promised funds—estimated in billions rather than the required trillions annually—has undermined execution. In India, the updated 2022 NDC committed to reducing emissions intensity by 45% from 2005 levels by 2030 and achieving 50% non-fossil energy capacity, both pursued unconditionally; by 2024, India exceeded the latter target five years early through rapid solar and wind deployments, reaching over 50% non-fossil installed capacity amid record investments. However, absolute emissions continue rising due to industrial and population growth, with the forthcoming 2025 NDC update expected to emphasize equity and developed nations' historical responsibilities amid ongoing finance gaps. China's NDCs, updated in 2021, aim to peak CO2 emissions before 2030 and achieve neutrality by 2060, with reported progress via energy mix optimization and industrial adjustments reducing fossil dependence; implementation has advanced non-CO2 controls and long-term visions, but lacks quantifiable agricultural targets, contributing to critiques of insufficient granularity for verifiable reductions. Brazil's 2024 NDC update pledged net emissions reductions aligned with 1.5°C pathways, prioritizing halts—responsible for over 40% of its emissions—but faces implementation risks from data opacity and weak enforcement, as evidenced by fluctuating Amazon clearance rates despite policy efforts. Indonesia and , both coal-reliant, have integrated NDC targets into plans, with Indonesia targeting immediate emissions declines and strengthening 2030 goals by 25-30%; shared barriers include mobilizing domestic investment for just transitions and overcoming institutional silos, where international via shows limited efficacy in curbing or fossil lock-in. Across these economies, progress tracking remains inconsistent, with quantitative baselines in 96% of NDCs but frequent reliance on projected rather than achieved metrics, exacerbating skepticism about alignment with Paris goals absent scaled-up, verifiable support.

References

  1. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs
  2. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
  3. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs/ndc-synthesis-report/ndc-synthesis-report
  4. https://unfccc.int/documents/306848
  5. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023
  6. https://academic.oup.com/jel/article/29/3/537/4318807
  7. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/all-about-ndcs
  8. https://www.c2es.org/content/q-and-a-understanding-paris-agreement-ndcs/
  9. https://unfccc.int/most-requested/key-aspects-of-the-paris-agreement
  10. https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/NDCs-nationally-determined-contributions-climate-change-what-you-need-to-know
  11. https://www.wri.org/insights/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs-explained
  12. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  13. https://unfccc.int/ndc-3.0
  14. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2024
  15. https://climateanalytics.org/publications/emissions-gap-report-2024-no-more-hot-air-please
  16. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs/2024-ndc-synthesis-report
  17. https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/lima_dec_2014/application/pdf/auv_cop20_lima_call_for_climate_action.pdf
  18. https://unfccc.int/news/lima-call-for-climate-action-puts-world-on-track-to-paris-2015
  19. https://www.wri.org/indc-definition
  20. https://unfccc.int/ru/node/14495
  21. https://unfccc.int/news/indc-synthesis-report-press-release
  22. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs/indcs
  23. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/12/12/paris-agreement-paves-way-for-world-bank-group-helping-countries-deliver-on-climate-commitments
  24. https://www.wri.org/research/interpreting-indcs-assessing-transparency-post-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets-8-top
  25. https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-what-are-intended-nationally-determined-contributions/
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014098832100089X
  27. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contrinutions-ndcs/NDC-submissions
  28. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-95-of-countries-miss-un-deadline-to-submit-2035-climate-pledges/
  29. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/02/cop29-ndcs-and-why-they-matter/
  30. https://climateactiontracker.org/climate-target-update-tracker-2035/
  31. https://www.wri.org/ndcs
  32. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46945
  33. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48248
  34. https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/BloombergNEF-NDC-comparison-note-2021.pdf
  35. https://ercst.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Accounting-for-baseline-targets-in-NDCs-Issues-and-options-for-guidance-OECD.pdf
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9209833/
  37. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Policy-brief-NAPs-NDCs-AdComs.pdf
  38. https://ndcpartnership.org/knowledge-portal/climate-toolbox/adaptation-communication-adaptation-component-ndc-guidelines-and-considerations
  39. https://climatepromise.undp.org/tags/investment-and-financial-flows-assessments
  40. https://ndcnavigator.org/
  41. https://napglobalnetwork.org/accordion/what-is-a-climate-change-adaptation-investment-plan/
  42. https://unfccc.int/climatefinance?home=
  43. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/bodies/funds-and-financial-entities
  44. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/paris-agreement-climate/timeline-paris-agreement/
  45. https://ndcpartnership.org/knowledge-portal/climate-toolbox/unfccc-capacity-building-portal
  46. https://climateactiontracker.org/global/cat-thermometer/
  47. https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/
  48. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-01/egr2024.pdf
  49. https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/unep-emissions-gap-report-2024
  50. https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/1277/CAT_2024-11-14_GlobalUpdate_COP29.pdf
  51. https://climateanalytics.org/publications/cat-global-update-as-the-climate-crisis-worsens-the-warming-outlook-stagnates
  52. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/sb2023_09_adv.pdf
  53. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/global-stocktake-reports-highlight-urgent-need-for-accelerated-action-to-reach-climate-goals
  54. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/statements/emissions-gap-report-2024-press-statement
  55. https://climateactiontracker.org/
  56. https://climateactiontracker.org/press/release-the-climate-is-warming-and-sea-levels-rising-way-faster-than-governments-are-acting/
  57. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/12/19/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2035-climate-target-aimed-at-creating-good-paying-union-jobs-reducing-costs-for-all-americans-and-securing-u-s-leadership-in-the-clean-energy-economy-of-the-future/
  58. https://ndcpartnership.org/knowledge-portal/climate-toolbox/tracking-progress-made-implementing-and-achieving-nationally-determined-contributions-under
  59. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2023.2285519
  60. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02494-9.pdf
  61. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13876988.2023.2255151
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2025.2513023
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10006568/
  64. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Developing%20Country%20Support%20Needs%20for%20NDCs_Survey%20Analysis.pdf
  65. https://gca.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/State-and-Trends-in-Climate-Adaptation-Finance-2023_WEB.pdf
  66. https://unctad.org/publication/least-developed-countries-report-2024
  67. https://ndcpartnership.org/news/improving-access-multilateral-climate-funds
  68. https://unfccc.int/news/updated-ndc-synthesis-report-worrying-trends-confirmed
  69. https://climateanalytics.org/publications/latest-science-on-the-1-5-c-limit-of-the-paris-agreement
  70. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
  71. https://www.wri.org/insights/assessing-2025-ndcs
  72. https://direct.mit.edu/glep/article/25/2/27/128805/The-Ambition-Trap-How-Overpromising-on-Climate
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000463
  74. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/increasing-ambitions-of-ndcs-is-hardly-useful-unless-they-also-become-more-effective/
  75. https://www.e3g.org/news/the-case-for-ndc-ambition-in-2025/
  76. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/investing-in-climate-for-growth-and-development_16b7cbc7-en/full-report/unpacking-implementable-and-investible-ndcs_95e9fcf8.html
  77. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/investing-in-climate-for-growth-and-development_16b7cbc7-en/full-report/accelerated-climate-action-can-deliver-strong-economic-benefits_bee34dd7.html
  78. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c4671aef-1ef7-5db0-8eb1-c1dc2739b3c0/content
  79. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/Staff-Climate-Notes/2023/English/CLNEA2023002.ashx
  80. https://www.climatecenter.pitt.edu/news/america-and-paris-agreement-withdrawal-recommitment-and-future-implications
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927817301028
  82. https://www.nature.org/en-us/what-we-do/our-insights/perspectives/us-paris-agreement-opportunity/
  83. https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/learning-from-nationally-determined-contributions/
  84. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2020.1722607
  85. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-022-10008-7
  86. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-top-15-countries-by-carbon-emissions/
  87. https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-chinas-new-paris-agreement-pledge-mean-for-climate-action/
  88. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/
  89. https://rhg.com/research/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-1990-2022-and-preliminary-2023-estimates/
  90. https://rhg.com/research/us-climate-policy-2030/
  91. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/usa/
  92. https://teriin.org/sites/default/files/files/India-NDC-briefing.pdf
  93. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/targets/
  94. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2023
  95. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/targets/
  96. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/2025-09/RF_second_NDC.pdf
  97. https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/113099/
  98. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/
  99. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/targets/
  100. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/
  101. https://unfccc.int/ndc-synthesis-report-2023
  102. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-updated-climate-action-plan-cop30-meet-brazil-10267831/
  103. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/China%25E2%2580%2599s%2520Achievements%252C%2520New%2520Goals%2520and%2520New%2520Measures%2520for%2520Nationally%2520Determined%2520Contributions.pdf
  104. https://www.cgiar.org/research/publication/review-of-nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs-of-china-from-the-perspective-of-food-systems/
  105. https://nature4climate.org/crunch-time-for-ndcs-ambition-brazils-plan-and-whats-at-stake-for-cop30/
  106. https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/mid-year-check-on-2035-climate-plans/
  107. https://www.orfonline.org/research/ibsa-indonesia-energy-transitions-mapping-shared-ambitions-and-challenges
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000590
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.