Hubbry Logo
Cool JapanCool JapanMain
Open search
Cool Japan
Community hub
Cool Japan
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cool Japan
Cool Japan
Cool Japan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cool Japan (クールジャパン, Kūru Japan) refers to the aspects of Japanese culture that non-Japanese people perceive as "cool". After the success of "Cool Britannia," the Japanese government started using the phrase. The Cool Japan strategy is part of Japan's overall brand strategy, aiming to disseminate Japan's attractiveness and allure to the world. The target of Cool Japan "encompasses everything from video games, manga, anime, and other forms of content, fashion, commercial products, Japanese cuisine, and traditional culture to robots, eco-friendly technologies, and other high-tech industrial products".[1][2]

Due to the combination of its failures in World War II and its aggressive imperial history, Japan was forced by circumstances, specifically the United States, to alter its approach to global diplomacy. Under Article 9, Japan was no longer able to employ hard power through its military. As a result, it cultivated and pioneered soft power as its approach to its position on the global stage. In this, Japan was forced to figure out how to go about in security, aid, and leadership, starting with reinventing their image and rebuilding their negative reputation. Japan's "Cool Japan" Initiative was a major cornerstone of its soft power policy and greatly contributed to their reintegration into regional and global leadership.[3]

Cool Japan has been described as a form of soft power,[4][5] with the ability to "indirectly influence behavior or interests through cultural or ideological means".[6][7]

Origins

[edit]

Starting in 1980, following the emergence of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Japan began to increase its nation branding efforts through the release of a television series titled Oshin, a Japanese soap opera. Oshin was distributed at no cost outside of Japan, and was well received in 46 countries. Through the success of Oshin and multiple other television shows, Japan successfully established the idea of "Cool Japan" as a method of establishing and improving the country's cultural perception.[8]

In a 2002 article in Foreign Policy titled "Japan's Gross National Cool", Douglas McGray wrote of Japan "reinventing superpower" as its cultural influence expanded internationally, despite the economic and political problems of the Lost Decade. Surveying youth culture and the role of J-pop, manga, anime, video games, fashion, film, consumer electronics, architecture, cuisine, and phenomena of kawaii ("cuteness") such as Hello Kitty, McGray highlighted Japan's considerable cultural soft power, posing the question of what message the country might project. He also argued that Japan's recession may even have boosted its national cool, due to the partial discrediting of erstwhile rigid social hierarchies and big-business career paths.[9][10][11]

Adoption

[edit]

Taken up in the international media, with The New York Times running a retrospect "Year in Ideas: Pokémon Hegemon",[12] an increasing number of more reform-minded government officials and business leaders in Japan began to refer to the country's "gross national cool" and to adopt the unofficial slogan "Cool Japan".[13][14][15] In a 2005 press conference, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs linked the idea to Bhutan's concept of Gross National Happiness.[16]

The phrase gained greater exposure in the mid-2000s as NHK began a series entitled Cool Japan Hakkutsu: Kakkoii Nippon!, which by the end of 2009 had reached over 100 episodes.[17] Academic initiatives include the establishment of a "Cool Japan" research project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,[18] while some western universities have reported an increase in the number of applicants for Japanese Studies courses due to the "cool" effect.[19]

The adoption of Cool Japan has also spurred changes in culture studies. As a result of the fascination of Cool Japan with Japanese youth culture and schoolgirls, a new wave of studies called 'girl studies' focuses specifically on the experience of girls and the girls-at-heart. Previously a subject of adolescent psychology or feminism, girl studies emerged from Cool Japan to include an interdisciplinary analysis of girl culture.[20]

Creative Industries Promotion Office

[edit]

The Japanese government has identified the culture industry as one of five potential areas of growth.[21] In June 2010, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry established a new Creative Industries Promotion Office to promote cultural and creative industries as a strategic sector "under the single, long term concept of "Cool Japan", to coordinate different government functions, and to cooperate with the private sector".[22] The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry announced that Japanese pop culture is one of the key elements for Cool Japan and that pop culture includes idol, anime, and B class gourmet (B級グルメ).[23]

The deputy director described its mission as to "brand Japanese products with the uniqueness of Japanese culture",[24][25] with a budget of ¥19 billion for 2011 alone.[25] In the fiscal year 2008, public spending on cultural activities was ¥116.9 billion in South Korea, ¥477.5 billion in China, and ¥101.8 billion in Japan, forming 0.79%, 0.51%, and 0.12% of total government spending respectively.[24] The fund was launched in 2013,[26] and the Japanese government committed to the Cool Japan Fund ¥50 billion ($500 million) over 20 years, with a target of ¥60 billion ($600 million) via private investor partnerships.[27] However, Nikkei Asian Review reported that within five years the fund "suffered pretax losses totaling 10 billion yen ($88.9 million)", and that many projects failed to deliver earnings. Since June 2018, the management has been led by former Sony Music Entertainment (Japan) CEO Naoki Kitagawa.[28][29]

Timeline of notable endeavors

[edit]
2013
Establishment of Cool Japan Fund Inc. under the Law of Cool Japan Fund Inc. (Act No.51 of 2013).
2014
Traditional Japanese crafts showcased at Maison & Objet, the world's largest trade fair for interior goods and designs, to promote Japan's monodzukuri (manufacturing) culture.[30]
WakuWaku Japan, Japanese satellite television channel that broadcasts Japanese programs to overseas viewers in Asia.[26] It was a joint venture with broadcaster Sky Perfect JSAT who contributed ¥6.6 billion out of ¥11 billion, but failed to expand in multiple markets and generate viewership, with nearly ¥4 billion losses until 2017.[29]
2015
METI starts Nippon Quest, a website to showcase and disseminate unknown Japanese regional specialties to the world.[31]
US cafes focused on Japanese tea, on which was spent ¥250 million for nearly 50% stake.[29]
Funding of the development of content creators for anime and manga outside Japan by KADOKAWA Contents Academy Co., Ltd.[32]
2016
Isetan the Japan Store, a joint venture with Isetan to make a five-floor department store in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to promote Japanese goods and services.[26] However, lack of demand resulted with a loss of circa $4.5 million, and all Cool Japan Fund shares sold to Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings.[33]
2018
The first investment with new management was $12.5 million in Tastemade, becoming a minority shareholder, to support making of content promoting Japanese food and destinations.[28]
2019
Cool Japan Fund invests US$30 million in American anime licensing company Sentai Holdings, aiming to provide support at the copyright level, and increasing the presence of anime in North America.[34] On September 30, 2020, the Cool Japan Fund made an additional US$3.6 million available, stating that Sentai had achieved better financial results in 2019 compared to 2018, with plans for medium and long-term growth, and strategic changes following the COVID-19 pandemic.[35]

Criticism

[edit]

Japan's use of soft power through its "Cool Japan" has faced criticism connected to its imperialist history. Under its imperial rule over South Korea, Japan cultivated an extremely negative perception of itself due to its treatment of Koreans.[36] Thus, when Japan began implementing "Cool Japan" policies as a form of soft power in its post-WW2 era as a non-militaristic country, they were met with hesitation from many countries in the region, but most significantly, South Korea.[37] While "Cool Japan" efforts have now improved their image in South Korea and the region as a whole, it took a while for South Korea to trust Japan's intentions, and still faces hesitancy. South Koreans viewed this initiative as another way that Japan was inserting itself too much into different realms and cultures they did not belong to. Additionally, by attempting to spread their culture as a form of soft power, it was seen by others as Japan trying to put themselves into other countries in a way too similar to when they had done so during its imperial era. It appeared to be reminiscent of the Co-Prosperity Sphere, in which Japan attempted, and ultimately failed, to implement too much of itself into others under imperial rule.[38] However, while this historical legacy of colonization had impeded Japan's efforts to implement "Cool Japan" initiatives in the region, the past two decades have indicated that it is improving their image and relationships. For instance, by coming together to create media and distribute it to each other's countries, Japan has been able to integrate a positive image in South Korea. This was evident when the two countries co-hosted the 2002 World Cup, showing that the two countries were willing to come together for a significant cultural moment, thus creating a positive image for the public.[39] Another issue which challenged the effectiveness of "Cool Japan" was the lack of relatability throughout Asia. This is also due to the combination of Japan's imperial history and the resulting closed approach of other countries to the Japanese media. In Japan's attempts to spread culture through television and movies, they faced difficulties because other countries were not receptive to it and did not feel a connection to the characters. This is rooted in the rejection of Japanese culture and their attempts to separate themselves as different from its neighbors. Japan was forced to shift their approach to media and improve the relatability of how they present characters. However, Japan was successful in this and as a result saw a spread of Japanese media and culture to their neighboring countries.[40]

A 2010 editorial in the Yomiuri Shimbun argued that the government was not doing enough to advance the country's business interests in this sphere, allowing the Korean Wave to overshadow Japan's efforts. The editorial highlighted structural inefficiencies, with the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry promoting "Cool Japan", the Ministry of Foreign Affairs responsible for cultural exchange, and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in charge of Japanese foods.[41][42][43] Lecturer Roland Kelts has also suggested that a failure to fully distinguish, brand and engage the overseas audience and market may mean that "Cool Japan" is "over".[44][45] In 2011, Laura Miller critiqued Cool Japan campaign as exploiting and misrepresenting youth subcultural fashion and language.[46] In 2013, Nancy Snow referred to Cool Japan as a form of state-sponsored cultural retreading she calls Gross National Propaganda.[47] Japanese singer-songwriter Gackt criticized the government in 2015 for having set up a huge budget, yet "have no idea where that money should go. It's no exaggeration to say it has fallen into a downward spiral of wasted tax money flowing into little known companies", and that such lack of support is causing Japan to "fall behind its Asian neighbors in terms of cultural exports".[48][26] In 2016, Benjamin Boas pointed out that Cool Japan-branded efforts are often promoted without participation of foreigners, leaving out the perspectives of the very foreigners that they are trying to target.[49]

In 2017, a senior executive and several other senior male employees of Cool Japan Fund Inc. were accused of sexual harassment targeting female employees of the fund. The employees formed a labor union in order to fight against sexual harassment.[50] In the same year, Nikkei Asian Review journalist Yuta Saito criticized fund's ambitions because their "lack of strategy, discipline gives rise to unprofitable projects", and there's possible conflict of interest by the executives.[29] In 2018, Japan Today reported that it was too soon to consider it "grossly incompetent or corrupt", but was at least "under-performing" for now.[26]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cool Japan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cool Japan is a Japanese government strategy, initiated by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry around 2010, aimed at promoting the nation's —encompassing content such as , fashion, media, design, cuisine, and traditional crafts—to build international appeal, enhance , and drive through overseas expansion and inbound . The initiative evolved from earlier recognition of Japan's cultural exports' potential, formalized in policies like the Cool Japan Strategy and updated in 2024 to address post-pandemic shifts, including and global market demands, with targets such as generating 50 trillion yen in economic impact by 2033 and expanding content-related overseas revenue to 20 trillion yen in the same period. Key components include fostering cross-sector synergies in content production, tourism promotion, and food exports; supporting digitization through technologies like AI, , and metaverses; and combating challenges such as piracy via public-private partnerships. Notable efforts encompass investing in creator training, overseas market development, and high-value experiences to elevate "Japan love" sentiment globally by 10% by 2033. Achievements include record inbound with 25 million visitors and 5.3 yen in spending in 2023, alongside cultural exports valued at 1.45 yen that year, contributing to broader economic ripple effects in related industries. Despite these ambitions, the strategy has faced criticisms for underwhelming export performance, with Japan capturing only about 5% of its cultural content abroad as of the early —far below competitors—and persistent issues like lagging , human resource shortages, insufficient inter-sectoral collaboration, and inadequate performance metrics, which have hindered sustainable profitability. Detractors have also highlighted the inherent awkwardness of state-led self-promotion of "coolness," potentially undermining authenticity, alongside concerns over domestic market contraction in and amid global competition. The 2024 reboot acknowledges these gaps by emphasizing data-driven cycles and international standards, though realization of lofty targets remains contingent on overcoming structural barriers like and talent retention.

Conceptual and Historical Foundations

Etymology and Pre-Policy Recognition

The term "Cool Japan" originated from the English phrase "Japan's Gross National Cool," coined by American journalist Douglas McGray in his May–June 2002 article published in magazine. McGray used the expression to argue that Japan's since the bubble burst had been offset by its rising global cultural influence, particularly through exports like , , video games, fashion, and consumer gadgets, which he quantified as generating significant and economic value—such as the ¥2.7 trillion (approximately $23 billion at the time) annual market for Japanese content in alone. This concept drew partial inspiration from the earlier British "" campaign of the 1990s, which promoted UK pop culture under Tony Blair's government, but McGray framed Japan's version as an organic, bottom-up phenomenon rather than a top-down policy. Prior to governmental adoption, "Cool Japan" gained informal recognition in international media, academic discourse, and cultural analyses throughout the , often highlighting the appeal of Japanese aesthetics and innovation in Western markets—for instance, the global popularity of franchises like Pokémon (launched 1996, generating over $100 billion in revenue by 2010) and films, which earned critical acclaim and box-office success abroad without state intervention. By the late , the term appeared in conferences, essays, and reports from institutions across the U.S., , and , signaling growing awareness of Japan's "kawaii" (cute) and tech-savvy cultural exports as a counterbalance to its demographic challenges and low birth rates (1.26 children per woman in ). These discussions emphasized empirical metrics, such as the 2002 export value of Japanese pop culture exceeding traditional sectors like and , underscoring an unintended "gross national cool" that predated formal strategies.

Intellectual Influences and Organic Cultural Appeal

The concept of "Cool Japan" draws intellectual roots from Joseph Nye's formulation of , introduced in his 1990 book Bound to Lead, which emphasized a nation's ability to attract and persuade through cultural appeal rather than coercion or economic incentives. Nye's framework highlighted how cultural products could shape global perceptions, a principle later applied to Japan's exports of , , and , which organically built international fascination without state orchestration. By the late , Japan's had exported over 60% of global content, with companies like and achieving $10 billion in annual overseas revenue from films and games alone, demonstrating self-sustaining appeal driven by innovative and aesthetic novelty. This organic draw predated formal policies, rooted in post-World War II cultural exports that blended traditional motifs—such as minimalist design and seasonal impermanence—with modern pop elements like (cuteness) aesthetics, evident in the global proliferation of merchandise, which generated $1 billion in sales by 2000. Douglas McGray's 2002 Foreign Policy article "Japan's Gross National Cool" crystallized these influences, arguing that despite economic stagnation since the 1990s bubble burst, cultural industries accounted for 10-15% of GDP growth through exports like and video games, outpacing traditional . McGray posited that this "coolness" stemmed from Japan's mastery of hybridity—merging high-tech precision with narrative depth—fostering voluntary affinity abroad, as seen in the 2001 Pokémon franchise's $150 billion lifetime revenue, largely from non-Japanese markets. Critics of state-led amplification, however, note that organic appeal relied on market dynamics rather than engineered narratives; for instance, circulation reached 5 billion copies annually worldwide by 2005, propelled by fan-driven translations and conventions, not subsidies. Intellectual discourse around this emphasized causal links between cultural authenticity and influence, with McGray attributing Japan's edge to its avoidance of overt , allowing products to permeate via universal themes of resilience and whimsy, as in Hayao Miyazaki's films, which earned $3.5 billion globally by without domestic policy support. This pre-policy foundation underscored that true appeal arises from endogenous creativity, not exogenous mandates, influencing later strategies to leverage rather than fabricate such dynamics.

Policy Development and Government Adoption

Initial Formulation by METI (2010-2012)

In 2010, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) established the Cool Japan Promotion Office as part of its broader policy, marking the inception of organized efforts to promote Japanese cultural contents overseas for economic revitalization. This office focused on identifying and exporting elements of Japanese pop culture—such as , , , and —that had already gained international recognition, aiming to transform cultural appeal into measurable trade and investment gains amid Japan's post-financial crisis economic challenges. The formulation emphasized a market-driven approach, integrating content industries with manufacturing and tourism to create synergies; for instance, METI targeted expanding exports of "cool" products like character goods and media, projecting potential annual economic contributions in the trillions of yen through global demand stimulation. Early activities included advisory council discussions and pilot projects to assess overseas , prioritizing regions with high affinity for Japanese content, such as the and . METI's internal analyses highlighted the need to overcome barriers like intellectual property fragmentation and distribution inefficiencies to realize these gains. By 2012, METI refined the initiative into a more structured "Cool Japan " document released in and updated in , which outlined specific mechanisms for public-private , including funding for content adaptation and international matchmaking events. The strategy incorporated digital tools, such as the "Cool Japan Daily" web platform developed under METI projects, to aggregate and disseminate promotional content. It also addressed regional revitalization by linking urban creative hubs with rural traditional crafts, though implementation remained METI-led without yet involving a dedicated cabinet-level post, which was established in December 2012. These steps laid the groundwork for quantifying success through export metrics, with initial emphases on sectors like (valued at over ¥500 billion in domestic production by then) and .

National Strategy Launch and Expansion (2013-2019)

The Cool Japan Fund Inc. was established in November 2013 as a public-private to support the and overseas promotion of Japanese cultural contents, including anime, manga, fashion, food, and tourism-related industries, with the objective of fostering sustainable through increased foreign demand. The Japanese government contributed ¥50 billion in initial capital, supplemented by private investments aiming for a total fund size of around ¥100 billion, focusing on equity investments and loans to projects that enhance Japan's global brand appeal. To coordinate national efforts, the government appointed a for Cool Japan Strategy in December 2012, with the role continuing into 2013 to oversee policy integration across ministries, though the formal national launch aligned with the fund's inception amid Abe's economic revitalization agenda. Regional Cool Japan Promotion Councils were initiated in 14 prefectures starting in 2013, facilitating and industry to identify and regionally distinctive contents such as traditional crafts and . Expansion accelerated through targeted initiatives, including the designation of 45 Cool Japan Ambassadors—prominent figures in culture and business—and 36 Regional Producers by 2019 to spearhead international outreach, alongside a public-private platform comprising 130 members for strategic planning. Notable projects included the opening of Houses in (2018), (2017), and (2017), serving as hubs that attracted over 2.37 million visitors collectively by mid-2019 to showcase , technology, and lifestyle. Economic impacts during this period showed measurable gains in select exports: Japanese alcoholic beverages rose from ¥20.7 billion in 2012 to ¥61.8 billion in 2018, koi carp from ¥2.7 billion to ¥4.3 billion, and from ¥700 million to ¥3.8 billion, attributed to coordinated under the strategy emphasizing "" culture, food, and . The 2019 Cool Japan Strategy document further expanded the framework by integrating enhancement, such as leveraging international events for societal revitalization and inbound promotion, while addressing challenges like in content industries.

Institutional Framework

Key Agencies and Administrative Bodies

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) serves as the primary originator and coordinator of the Cool Japan initiative, having launched the policy framework in 2010 through its Creative Industries Promotion Office to foster overseas demand for Japanese cultural and creative industries. METI continues to oversee implementation, including investment promotion and industry vision formulation in sectors like and content, in collaboration with academia and local governments. The provides national-level strategic oversight, formulating and updating the Cool Japan Strategy since 2012, with key documents issued in 2019 emphasizing inter-ministerial coordination and public-private partnerships. It manages platforms such as the Cool Japan Public-Private Partnership Platform, which integrates government agencies, private firms, and diplomatic missions like Japan House for global outreach, and has proposed establishing a Cool Japan Strategy Council to replace prior liaison committees for enhanced policy consistency. The Cool Japan Fund, Inc., established in November 2013 as a public-private investment corporation under METI supervision, operates with ¥225 billion in initial capital (split between government and private contributions) to finance projects expanding Japanese content, food, fashion, and tourism abroad, targeting sustainable economic growth through equity investments and loans. Supporting bodies include the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), which aids regional consulting offices for producer matchmaking, and the Japan National Tourist Organization (JNTO), focused on tourism-linked cultural promotion, both integrated into broader strategy execution via directives. A dedicated Minister of State for Cool Japan Strategy was appointed to centralize leadership across ministries, ensuring alignment with economic security and intellectual property goals as of the latest cabinet configurations.

Funding Mechanisms and Financial Allocations

The primary funding mechanism for the Cool Japan initiative is the Cool Japan Fund Inc., a public-private established in November 2013 under the supervision of Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). The fund provides risk capital to businesses in sectors such as content, , , , and to support overseas expansion and commercialization of Japanese cultural products. Its capital stands at 143.3 billion yen as of March 2025, with the government contributing 132.6 billion yen and private companies providing 10.7 billion yen, reflecting heavy reliance on public funds to leverage private investment. Financial allocations through the Cool Japan Fund emphasize equity investments, financing, and project-specific partnerships aimed at creating synergies between Japanese exports and local markets abroad. For instance, the fund targets platforms like retail and as "bridgeheads" for , with investments evaluated based on alignment, profitability, and broader economic impact. Despite these mechanisms, the fund reported cumulative losses of 35.6 billion yen as of March 2023, prompting revised operational plans to address deficits while continuing support for content localization and global production. Supplementary funding comes from METI subsidies allocated to content industry initiatives, including overseas expansion, digitization, and high-quality aligned with international standards. These allocations encourage external domestic and international financing to cover production costs, with a focus on medium-term resource securing for diversification and market growth targets, such as expanding Japan's share in the global content market to 10 trillion yen by 2028. The coordinates broader strategy implementation, integrating Cool Japan efforts into national growth policies without specified standalone budgets beyond fund-linked expenditures. Overall, funding prioritizes public seed capital to stimulate involvement, though performance metrics highlight ongoing challenges in achieving profitability.

Core Promotion Strategies

Targeted Cultural Exports

The Cool Japan strategy identifies key cultural sectors for export promotion, including audiovisual content, , , and traditional crafts, with the aim of generating economic returns through increased overseas demand and brand enhancement. These exports leverage Japan's established appeal in pop culture to drive merchandise, licensing, and related revenues. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) coordinates efforts to commercialize these assets, focusing on markets in , , and where Japanese content has demonstrated strong reception. Audiovisual content, particularly , forms the core of targeted exports, serving as an entry point to broader Japanese cultural influence. In , overseas sales from Japan's content industry, centered on , , and , reached approximately 4.7 trillion yen, approaching the value of traditional exports like . overseas revenues grew 11.1% that year, nearing parity with the domestic market, driven by streaming platforms and international licensing deals. The has set a target to expand these sales to 20 trillion yen by 2033 through subsidies and international co-productions. From 2013 to 2023, cumulative overseas content sales totaled 5.8 trillion yen, reflecting sustained policy support for global distribution. Fashion and gastronomy represent complementary export pillars, with promotions emphasizing unique aesthetics and culinary traditions to complement content-driven appeal. Japanese exports benefit from initiatives highlighting and high-end design, integrated into campaigns that tie into anime-inspired trends. promotion targets washoku and regional specialties, with exports of agricultural and food products strengthening during the period amid rising international interest. These efforts use as gateways to introduce food and fashion, fostering cross-sector synergies. The Cool Japan Fund, established in with public-private financing, supports these exports by investing in overseas ventures for media, fashion, food, and operators. The fund provides risk capital to firms expanding Japanese cultural products internationally, such as through joint ventures and market entry assistance, aiming to sustain long-term demand growth. By 2025, it has backed projects in cultural adventure and content localization, though evaluations note challenges in achieving projected returns amid competitive global markets.

International Collaboration and Marketing Initiatives

The Cool Japan strategy emphasizes international collaborations through mechanisms like the Cool Japan Fund, established in November 2013 with initial capital of 100 billion yen to finance projects that expand Japanese cultural exports abroad via joint ventures and business alliances with overseas partners. This fund targets sectors such as media, , , and , supporting initiatives like co-production of content or facility development in foreign markets to integrate Japanese elements with local demands. For instance, in 2024, the fund invested in the UK's Inside Travel Group to enhance promotion incorporating Japanese cultural experiences. Similarly, it formed a partnership with Singapore-based Funding Societies in December 2024 to leverage for broader access to Japanese cultural financing opportunities. Complementing these are cross-border investment vehicles, such as the 2024 joint fund with 's CDIB Capital Group, totaling up to $100 million, aimed at fostering collaborative projects in content and between and Taiwan. The Cool Japan Public-Private Partnership Platform (CJPF), operational since 2022, facilitates such efforts by coordinating between government agencies, private firms, and international stakeholders to unearth regional Japanese assets for global export, including through consulting offices and producer networks established with organizations like JETRO. Marketing initiatives under Cool Japan focus on digital and experiential promotion to amplify cultural allure overseas, incorporating influencer collaborations, social media campaigns on platforms like and , and cultural events to drive inbound and content consumption. These efforts align with the strategy's goal of overseas content development, where public-private synergies target markets in , , and , often tying into events like international festivals or pop-up experiences showcasing and fashion. The 2024 New Cool Japan Strategy further integrates these by emphasizing data-driven global outreach, building on prior frameworks to sustain ties through targeted branding of "Cool Japan" elements like and traditional crafts.

Implementation Timeline and Major Projects

Early Endeavors and Pilot Programs

In June 2010, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) established the Promotion Office to coordinate efforts in expanding Japan's creative sectors, including content, fashion, and lifestyle products, as an initial step toward systematizing cultural exports. This office conducted preliminary studies and policy formulations to identify marketable aspects of Japanese culture, laying groundwork for subsequent strategies without large-scale funding commitments. By 2012, METI had developed an interim framework under the Cool Japan banner, emphasizing trade promotion through cultural allure, with advisory councils reviewing mechanisms for content industry growth targeting overseas markets valued at trillions of yen by 2020. These early consultations produced reports assessing soft power potential, such as and , but focused on diagnostic pilots rather than full deployments, including small-scale market analyses in and . The establishment of the Cool Japan Fund in November marked the transition to actionable pilots, with initial capitalization of ¥50 billion from government and private sources to support overseas investments in Japanese brands. The fund's first commitments involved basic agreements for three projects in Asian markets, aimed at testing collaborative models for content distribution and retail expansion, such as joint ventures in media and consumer goods to gauge economic returns from cultural promotion. These endeavors prioritized low-risk trials to refine investment criteria, with early evaluations focusing on feasibility in regions like where Japanese pop already held traction.

Peak Activities and Global Campaigns

The period from 2015 to 2017 marked the peak of Cool Japan activities, characterized by expanded funding, institutional collaborations, and high-profile international engagements aimed at amplifying Japan's cultural exports. In June 2015, the Cool Japan Strategy Public-Private Collaboration Initiative was launched, establishing the Cool Japan Public-Private Partnership Platform to coordinate efforts between government agencies and private enterprises in promoting content such as , , and overseas. This built on the Cool Japan Fund's operations, which by then had committed initial investments totaling over 100 billion yen in public-private capital to support overseas ventures in , including media production and retail expansions. Concurrently, annual budgets for promotional activities surged, with the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) allocating resources for targeted market development in and , reflecting a strategic push to generate 1 trillion yen in annual content exports by 2020. Global campaigns during this height emphasized immersive exhibitions and multimedia promotions to foster demand for Japanese products. A flagship effort was Japan's participation in Expo Milano 2015 (May 1 to October 31), where the pavilion, designed by Atsushi Kitagawara Architects, featured a nail-free wooden lattice structure symbolizing sustainable satoyama landscapes and hosted interactive installations by artists like teamLab, drawing over 1.2 million visitors to showcase food culture, technology, and design as exemplars of balanced, innovative living. Complementary initiatives included booths at international trade fairs, such as those promoting tourism and content licensing, which facilitated partnerships with global platforms to distribute Japanese media and merchandise. The Cool Japan Movement Promotion Council, formed in 2015, further drove these campaigns by framing as a provider of creative solutions to global challenges, integrating traditional crafts with pop culture in events across and . These peak efforts also encompassed digital and broadcasting ventures, such as the expansion of global streaming services for and the launch of channels like to broadcast variety shows and dramas internationally, targeting markets and . By 2017, cumulative investments and event participations had elevated Japan's creative industry profile, with reported increases in overseas demand for licensed content exceeding prior years, though evaluations noted variances in across projects. This phase underscored a shift toward scalable, partnership-driven promotion, setting the stage for subsequent refinements amid evolving global media landscapes.

Recent Reforms and Ongoing Efforts (2020-2025)

In response to the , the Cool Japan strategy shifted toward digital distribution and content archiving to sustain overseas engagement, with updates to the underlying framework in April 2021 incorporating subsequent environmental changes. Inbound recovery accelerated after border relaxations, reaching 25.07 million visitors in 2023—approaching pre-pandemic levels—with foreign spending totaling ¥5.3 trillion, driven by attractions like Japanese food culture. Food exports also grew to ¥1.45 trillion in 2023, reflecting targeted high-value market diversification amid global supply challenges. The strategy underwent a comprehensive reboot on June 4, 2024, via the New Cool Japan Strategy, which reviewed prior shortcomings such as inadequate cycles, systemic inefficiencies, and human resource gaps identified in the 2019 framework. This emphasized enhancing international competitiveness through high value-added experiences over mere product promotion, strategic data-driven , and cross-sector collaborations in anime, food, and . Integration with Japan's Strategic Program reinforced IP leverage for , building on the 2020 Copyright Act revisions to combat and support sustainable content profitability. The Cool Japan Fund, facing a ¥30.9 billion deficit by 2022, prompted recommendations for restructuring to curb losses, though investments in cultural expansion projects continued. Ongoing efforts prioritize (DX), incorporating AI, , VR/, and generative AI—outlined in March 2024 guidelines—for content production and enhancement, alongside examples like NFT-based regional resource tokens. Quantitative targets include ¥50 trillion in combined economic impact from content, , food, and beauty sectors by 2033 (interim ¥30 trillion by 2028), with overseas content markets reaching ¥20 trillion by 2033, and a 10% rise in global "I love " sentiment. Initiatives extend to in , aiming to showcase cultural attractiveness to 3.5 million visitors, and creator training programs for overseas . These measures align with broader economic policies, such as the 2024 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal and , supporting Web3-enabled business models.

Empirical Impacts and Assessments

Economic Metrics and Trade Data

The overseas market for Japanese content, a core focus of the Cool Japan initiative, expanded to 4.7 trillion yen in , marking a 3.3-fold increase from 2012 levels and approaching the value of exports at 5.7 trillion yen. The domestic scale of the content industry stood at 13.1 trillion yen in the same year. Within this, production and related activities generated 2.928 trillion yen in value in , with exports totaling 85.6 billion yen. Trade data for Cool Japan-promoted sectors show notable growth in specific categories. Exports of agricultural, forestry, and fishery products reached 1.454 trillion yen in 2023, a 3.2-fold rise since 2012. Japanese alcoholic beverage exports climbed to 134.4 billion yen in 2023, increasing 6.5 times over the same period. Inbound , bolstered by cultural appeal, recorded 5.307 trillion yen in foreign visitor spending in 2023, up 4.9 times from 2012, with 25.07 million arrivals representing 78.6% recovery from 2019 pre-pandemic levels.
Category2012 Value (billion yen)2023 Value (billion yen)Growth Multiple
Agricultural/Food Exports~454 (implied)1,4543.2x
Alcoholic Beverages Exports~211346.5x
Inbound Spending~1,0835,3074.9x
The Cool Japan Fund, tasked with financing overseas expansion of cultural products, has incurred substantial losses, with cumulative deficits reaching 35.6 billion yen as of March 2023 and escalating to 39.8 billion yen by mid-2024, highlighting operational challenges despite public-private investment aims. targets project an overall Cool Japan economic impact of 50 trillion yen by 2033 (interim 30 trillion yen by 2028) and content exports of 20 trillion yen by 2033 (interim 10 trillion yen by 2028). These figures encompass inbound goals of 15 trillion yen in visitor spending by 2030 and food exports of 5 trillion yen by the same year.

Soft Power Indicators and Cultural Reception

Japan maintains a strong position in global soft power assessments, ranking fourth in the Brand Finance Global Soft Power Index for both 2024 and 2025, behind the , , and the . This ranking reflects high scores in (second globally) and influence through cultural and technological pillars, with 's nation brand evaluated across 55 metrics including familiarity, , and perceptions from over 3,500 respondents in 193 countries. In the 2023 index, similarly placed fourth, underscoring consistent performance driven by exports in and rather than political or military influence. Cultural reception of Japanese media underscores these indicators, particularly through , which generated $19.8 billion in global revenue in 2023 according to the Association of Japanese Animations. The global market reached $15.6 billion in 2024, with projections to $42.5 billion by 2030 at an 18.7% CAGR, fueled by digital platforms and international licensing. 's market size stood at $31.2 billion in 2023, expected to grow to $68.7 billion by 2032, reflecting sustained demand in and where adaptations like series amplify reach. Google search interest for remains highest in , the , and as of 2025 data, indicating broad appeal in and emerging markets, though consumption patterns differ overseas with preference for serialized streaming over Japan's episodic ties. Tourism metrics further illustrate reception, with 36.87 million inbound visitors to in 2024, of whom approximately 3 million (8.1%) engaged with - or media-linked sites, per a government-linked study on regional economic impacts. This "contents tourism" correlates with Cool Japan-promoted elements like landmarks and districts, contributing to a $1.05 billion tourism segment in 2024. Public opinion surveys show enduring favorability; for instance, 2018 Pew Research data across nations indicated 80% positive views in the and , tied to cultural affinity rather than . While recent comprehensive global polls on Japan-specific sentiment are limited, its stability in indices suggests cultural exports mitigate any dips from economic or demographic narratives.

Criticisms, Failures, and Debates

Financial Losses and Project Inefficacies

The Cool Japan Fund, established in with an initial capital of approximately ¥100 billion to invest in overseas promotion of Japanese culture and content, has incurred significant accumulated losses exceeding ¥30.9 billion as of fiscal year 2022, primarily from withdrawals from unprofitable ventures and appraisal losses on equity holdings. By mid-2024, these losses had reportedly grown to ¥39.8 billion, highlighting persistent underperformance despite government backing. Such deficits stem from investments in sectors like media, retail, and that failed to generate expected returns of 7-9 percent, as projected by fund managers. Specific projects exemplify these inefficacies, including the Cool Japan Fund's stake in a Malaysian operated with , which posted losses of about $4.5 million in 2024 before the fund divested its shares entirely in June 2025. Similarly, early endeavors like the World TV channel expansion in 2016 aimed at global broadcasting but resulted in financial shortfalls due to low viewership and inability to secure . Audits and operational reviews have revealed broader issues, such as mismatched strategies where bureaucratic selection of "winners" in overlooked market realities, leading to stalled projects and asset impairments. Critics, including industry figures like in 2015, have attributed these failures to a top-down governmental approach lacking clear vision and measurable outcomes, resulting in "almost no results" for cultural exports despite billions allocated. Reports from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) acknowledge structural flaws, such as insufficient private-sector alignment and overreliance on state directives, which have hampered adaptability to global consumer preferences. In response, the fund outlined operational reforms in May 2021 targeting loss containment at ¥25.7 billion, but subsequent escalations indicate limited efficacy. These patterns underscore causal disconnects between promotional spending—totaling over ¥60 billion in related budgets by some estimates—and tangible economic multipliers, with returns often confined to domestic spillovers rather than sustained overseas gains.

Strategic and Ideological Shortcomings

The Cool Japan Strategy has been critiqued for its absence of a coherent long-term vision, often shifting priorities without a unified framework linking cultural promotion to broader economic or diplomatic goals, as evidenced by deviations from initial inspirations toward focuses on and regional revitalization. This fragmentation stems from decentralized oversight across multiple ministries, including the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), (MOFA), and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), resulting in inconsistent implementation and minimal intersectoral synergy. Official reviews acknowledge intrinsic issues such as unshared understandings of core aims—like fostering global empathy—and a failure to adopt evidence-based policymaking, with comprehensive data compilation on strategy impacts only beginning in 2023. Executional flaws compound these strategic gaps, including a predominant "product-out" orientation that prioritizes exporting predefined Japanese content over market-responsive adaptations, leading to ineffective overseas expansions and partnerships. The lacks robust metrics and a full (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle for evaluation, while relying heavily on foreign digital platforms without developing indigenous alternatives, which limits control over global dissemination. Additional hurdles involve inadequate support ecosystems for creators, such as legal and financial aid, alongside shortages of personnel skilled in , hindering adaptation of domestic models to diverse markets. Ideologically, the approach has been faulted for its superficial emphasis on established "cool" exports like and , essentializing as a culturally monolithic entity and sidelining contributions from ethnic minorities and migrants, which suppresses broader creative diversity and labor reforms within industries. This national branding focus overlooks evolving global audience preferences and digital shifts, fostering complacency based on overconfidence in inherent appeal rather than proactive storytelling or crisis awareness. Critics argue that the weak theoretical grounding—relying on unsubstantiated popularity claims without quantitative validation—undermines causal links between promotion efforts and sustained gains, prioritizing state-orchestrated narratives over organic .

Alternative Perspectives on Organic vs. State-Driven Success

Critics of state-driven cultural promotion argue that Japan's global cultural influence, particularly in , , video games, and fashion, predominantly emerged from organic, market-led innovation by private enterprises long before the formal Cool Japan strategy was implemented in 2012. For instance, the international breakthrough of franchises like Pokémon in 1998 and Nintendo's in the late 1980s relied on corporate risk-taking and consumer demand rather than government subsidies, with exports growing from niche markets in the 1990s through fan-driven dissemination via unofficial channels. This bottom-up dynamism, fueled by Japan's post-war and ' adaptability, generated organically, as evidenced by the term "Japan Cool" coined by Douglas McGray in 2002 to describe pre-policy cultural exports already captivating global audiences. Proponents of organic success contend that state intervention risks distorting authentic cultural output by imposing bureaucratic priorities, potentially stifling the very innovation that drove earlier triumphs. Japanese musician , in 2015 testimony, lambasted Cool Japan for yielding "almost no results" in overseas exports despite billions in funding, asserting that private creators thrive without such top-down orchestration, which often favors safe, marketable tropes over edgy, countercultural elements that organically resonated abroad. Academic analyses echo this, noting that Cool Japan's failure to replicate the subversive appeal of 1980s-1990s pop culture—such as Akira or —stems from government-led curation that commodifies rather than cultivates genuine appeal, leading to lackluster performance compared to private sector-led growth. Empirical contrasts highlight the limitations of state-driven models: while Cool Japan aimed to boost exports to ¥15 trillion by , actual cultural content exports hovered around 5% of production in 2012, far below the U.S. ' 17.8% share, suggesting that organic demand, not promotion, dictates sustained global penetration. Furthermore, involvement has been critiqued for erasing nuanced aspects of Japanese identity in favor of sanitized narratives, as seen in selective promotion that overlooks the domestic subculture's role in fostering international fandoms pre-2010. In this view, causal drivers of success lie in competitive markets rewarding quality and novelty, rendering state efforts superfluous or even counterproductive amid fiscal inefficiencies reported in Cool Japan projects. Alternative frameworks emphasize that true accrues from endogenous cultural evolution, not exogenous branding; Japan's pre-Cool Japan era demonstrated this through private firms like and Namco capturing markets via technological edge and narrative innovation, without needing policy scaffolds that risk politicizing creativity. This perspective aligns with observations that rival exporters like South Korea's Hallyu succeeded via targeted but less intrusive state support for private ecosystems, underscoring Japan's potential for amplified organic trajectories absent heavy-handed intervention.

References

  1. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/policy/mono_info_service/creative_industries/creative_industries.html
  2. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/chitekizaisan2024/pdf/siryou4_e.pdf
  3. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/speeches/press_conferences/2024/0614001.html
  4. https://www.cnbc.com/2012/12/10/is-japan-losing-its-cool.html
  5. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/1208/Is-Japan-losing-its-cool
  6. https://globalitemagazine.com/2012/12/10/cool-japan-why-japan-losing-its-cool-might-be-a-cool-thing/
  7. https://pueaa.unam.mx/uploads/materials/McGray_Gross-National-Cool.pdf?v=1627598201
  8. https://nosigner.com/en/projects/cooljapan
  9. https://www.globalasia.org/v6no1/feature/cool-japan-soft-power_asger-r%25C3%25B8jle-christensen
  10. https://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/japanamerica-why-cool-japan-is-over/
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200457070_Japan%27s_Gross_National_Cool
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373617285_the_Phenomenon_that_Influenced_the_Development_of_Cool_Japan_in_Indonesia
  13. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1633&context=honors
  14. https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr/article/view/1
  15. https://aboutjapan.japansociety.org/popular_culture_and_japans_gross_national_cool
  16. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ZJ24806339348.pdf
  17. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/english/about_the_coolJapan_strategy.pdf
  18. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/report/downloadfiles/2012WhitePaper/0-1.pdf
  19. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/case-studies/cool-japan.pdf?sfvrsn=c7b6690a_2
  20. https://wise.co.th/wise/References/Creative_Economy/Cool_Japan_Strategy_January_2012.pdf
  21. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/4505108/cool-japan-strategy-september-2012pdf476kb
  22. https://www.cj-fund.co.jp/en/about/company.html
  23. https://www.cj-fund.co.jp/en/about/cjfund.html
  24. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/english/main_document_2019.pdf
  25. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/english/platform_en/platform_en.html
  26. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/2791/en
  27. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/kaigi/senryakusuishin/pdf/20150617_initiative_gaiyou_e.pdf
  28. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/103/meibo/daijin/index_e.html
  29. https://www.theworldfolio.com/interviews/cool-japan-fund-investing-in-japans-cultural-future/6846/
  30. https://www.gov-online.go.jp/eng/publicity/book/hlj/html/202006/202006_01_en.html
  31. https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/editorial/yomiuri-editorial/20241007-215457/
  32. https://news.animenomics.com/p/anime-market-outside-japan-grew-11-percent-2022
  33. https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/193rd_Column04.pdf
  34. https://www.hsfkramer.com/news/2024-11/Herbert-Smith-Freehills-advises-Cool-Japan-Fund-on-investment-in-UK-tour-operator
  35. https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/funding-societies-secures-investment-from-cool-japan-fund-302335604.html
  36. https://meet-global.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/48196
  37. https://cjpf.jp/en/about/
  38. https://5wpr.net/great-asian-travel-pr-campaigns/
  39. https://medium.com/tokyo-fintech/the-new-cool-japan-strategy-091dfe160798
  40. https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/naratourismstatisticsweek/statistical/pdf/2014_Tourism_and_the_creative.pdf
  41. https://jdramatastic.com/cool-japan-initiative-a-deep-dive-into-its-journey-and-future/
  42. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/culture/library/reports/eac-omc-report-ccs-strategies_en.pdf
  43. https://www.academia.edu/9857589/Rekijo_Pilgrimage_and_Pop_spiritualism_pop_culture_induced_heritage_tourism_of_for_Young_Women
  44. https://www.yokogaomag.com/editorial/project-cool-japan
  45. https://culture360.asef.org/news-events/cool-japan-fund-agrees-first-projects/
  46. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/kaigi/senryakusuishin/pdf/20150617_initiative_honbun_e.pdf
  47. https://www.designboom.com/architecture/japan-pavilion-expo-milan-2015-atsushi-kitagawara-teamlab-nendo-04-30-2015/
  48. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2021/05/31/general/cool-japan-success/
  49. https://overtheoffing.wordpress.com/2021/06/10/a-decade-in-cool-japan/
  50. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/chitekizaisan2024/pdf/siryou3_e.pdf
  51. https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14774650
  52. https://www.crunchyroll.com/news/latest/2022/6/20/japans-ministry-of-finance-recommends-cool-japan-fund-restructure-if-deficit-cant-be-curbed
  53. https://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai-shimon/kaigi/cabinet/honebuto/2024/2024_basicpolicies_en.pdf
  54. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04714049v1/document
  55. https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/editorial/yomiuri-editorial/20240628-195266/
  56. https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15320854
  57. https://brandfinance.com/insights/brand-finance-global-soft-power-index-2025-china-overtakes-uk-for-the-first-time-us-remains-top-ranked-nation-brand
  58. https://brandfinance.com/press-releases/the-land-of-the-rising-sun-overtakes-the-us-germany-and-china-as-the-worlds-leading-nation-for-business-trade
  59. https://brandirectory.com/softpower
  60. https://moc.gov.ae/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Global-Soft-Power-Index-2023.pdf
  61. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/06/01/japan/japan-soft-power-anime-streaming/
  62. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/manga-market-report
  63. https://www.skyquestt.com/report/anime-market
  64. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/anime-popularity-by-country
  65. https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-topics/b11502/
  66. https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/55746
  67. https://dataintelo.com/report/anime-tourism-market
  68. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/11/12/countries-views-of-japan-abe-japanese-views-of-china/
  69. https://brandfinance.com/insights/global-soft-power-index-2025-the-shifting-balance-of-global-soft-power
  70. https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/editorial/yomiuri-editorial/20221206-75345/
  71. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bureaucrats-seek-pick-winners-1-billion-cool-japan-210530352--sector.html
  72. https://newsonjapan.com/article/123137.php
  73. https://japantoday.com/category/entertainment/gackt-lashes-out-at-cool-japan-almost-no-results-of-japanese-culture-exported-overseas
  74. https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/260th_Cover_Story_05.pdf
  75. https://aramajapan.com/news/flop-cool-japan-fund-on-verge-of-death/120425/
  76. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=61423
  77. https://www.cao.go.jp/cool_japan/english/outline_summary.pdf
  78. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/ERIA_DP_no.287.pdf
  79. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9127040/file/9127051.pdf
  80. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=eastasia_hon
  81. https://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/ejcjs/vol19/iss3/garvizu.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.