Hubbry Logo
Cross-coupling reactionCross-coupling reactionMain
Open search
Cross-coupling reaction
Community hub
Cross-coupling reaction
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cross-coupling reaction
Cross-coupling reaction
Cross-coupling reaction
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In organic chemistry, a cross-coupling reaction is a reaction where two different fragments are joined. Cross-couplings are a subset of the more general coupling reactions. Often cross-coupling reactions require metal catalysts. One important reaction type is this:

R, R' = organic fragments, usually aryl;
M = main group center such as Li or Mg;
X = halide

These reactions are used to form carbon–carbon bonds but also carbon-heteroatom bonds.[1][2][3][4] Cross-coupling reaction are a subset of coupling reactions.

Richard F. Heck, Ei-ichi Negishi, and Akira Suzuki were awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for developing palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions.[5][6]

Mechanism

[edit]

Many mechanisms exist reflecting the myriad types of cross-couplings, including those that do not require metal catalysts.[7] Often, however, cross-coupling refers to a metal-catalyzed reaction of a nucleophilic partner with an electrophilic partner.

Mechanism proposed for Kumada coupling (L = Ligand, Ar = Aryl).

In such cases, the mechanism generally involves reductive elimination of R-R' from LnMR(R') (L = spectator ligand). This intermediate LnMR(R') is formed in a two-step process from a low valence precursor LnM. The oxidative addition of an organic halide (RX) to LnM gives LnMR(X). Subsequently, the second partner undergoes transmetallation with a source of R'−. The final step is reductive elimination of the two coupling fragments to regenerate the catalyst and give the organic product. Unsaturated substrates, such as C(sp)−X and C(sp2)−X bonds, couple more easily, in part because they add readily to the catalyst.

Catalysts

[edit]
Mechanism proposed for the Sonogashira coupling.

Catalysts are often based on palladium, which is frequently selected due to high functional group tolerance. Organopalladium compounds are generally stable towards water and air. Palladium catalysts can be problematic for the pharmaceutical industry, which faces extensive regulation regarding heavy metals. Many pharmaceutical chemists attempt to use coupling reactions early in production to minimize metal traces in the product.[8] Heterogeneous catalysts based on Pd are also well-developed.[9]

Copper-based catalysts are also common, especially for coupling involving heteroatom-C bonds.[10][11]

Iron-,[12] cobalt-,[13] and nickel-based[14] catalysts have been investigated.

Leaving groups

[edit]

The leaving group X in the organic partner is usually a halide, although triflate, tosylate, pivalate esters, and other pseudohalides have been used.[15] Chloride is an ideal group due to the low cost of organochlorine compounds. Frequently, however, C–Cl bonds are too inert, and bromide or iodide leaving groups are required for acceptable rates. The main group metal in the organometallic partner is usually an electropositive element such as tin, zinc, silicon, or boron.

Carbon–carbon cross-coupling

[edit]

Many cross-couplings entail forming carbon–carbon bonds.

Reaction Year Reactant A Reactant B Catalyst Remark
Cadiot–Chodkiewicz coupling 1957 RC≡CH sp RC≡CX sp Cu requires base
Castro–Stephens coupling 1963 RC≡CH sp Ar-X sp2 Cu
Corey–House synthesis 1967 R2CuLi or RMgX sp3 R-X sp2, sp3 Cu Cu-catalyzed version by Kochi, 1971
Kumada coupling 1972 RMgBr sp2, sp3 R-X sp2 Pd or Ni or Fe
Heck reaction 1972 alkene sp2 Ar-X sp2 Pd or Ni requires base
Sonogashira coupling 1975 ArC≡CH sp R-X sp3 sp2 Pd and Cu requires base
Negishi coupling 1977 R-Zn-X sp3, sp2, sp R-X sp3 sp2 Pd or Ni
Stille cross coupling 1978 R-SnR3 sp3, sp2, sp R-X sp3 sp2 Pd or Ni
Suzuki reaction 1979 R-B(OR)2 sp2 R-X sp3 sp2 Pd or Ni requires base
Murahashi coupling[16] 1979 R-Li sp2, sp3 R-X sp2 Pd or Ru
Hiyama coupling 1988 R-SiR3 sp2 R-X sp3 sp2 Pd requires base
Fukuyama coupling 1998 R-Zn-I sp3 RCO(SEt) sp2 Pd or Ni see Liebeskind–Srogl coupling, gives ketones
Liebeskind–Srogl coupling 2000 R-B(OR)2 sp3, sp2 RCO(SEt) Ar-SMe sp2 Pd requires CuTC, gives ketones
Cross dehydrogenative coupling 2004 R-H sp, sp2, sp3 R'-H sp, sp2, sp3 Cu, Fe, Pd etc. requires oxidant or dehydrogenation
Decarboxylative cross-coupling 2000s R-CO2H sp2 R'-X sp, sp2 Cu, Pd Requires little-to-no base

The restrictions on carbon atom geometry mainly inhibit β-hydride elimination when complexed to the catalyst.[17]

Carbon–heteroatom coupling

[edit]

Many cross-couplings entail forming carbon–heteroatom bonds (heteroatom = S, N, O). A popular method is the Buchwald–Hartwig reaction:

Reaction Year Reactant A Reactant B Catalyst Remark
Ullmann-type reaction 1905 ArO-MM, ArNH2,RS-M,NC-M sp3 Ar-X (X = OAr, N(H)Ar, SR, CN) sp2 Cu
Buchwald–Hartwig reaction[18] 1994 R2N-H sp3 R-X sp2 Pd N-C coupling,
second generation free amine
Chan–Lam coupling[19] 1998 Ar-B(OR)2 sp2 Ar-NH2 sp2 Cu

Miscellaneous reactions

[edit]

Palladium-catalyzes the cross-coupling of aryl halides with fluorinated arene. The process is unusual in that it involves C–H functionalisation at an electron deficient arene.[20]

Applications

[edit]

Cross-coupling reactions are important for the production of pharmaceuticals,[4] examples being montelukast, eletriptan, naproxen, varenicline, and resveratrol.[21] with Suzuki coupling being most widely used.[22] Some polymers and monomers are also prepared in this way.[23]

Reviews

[edit]
  • Fortman, George C.; Nolan, Steven P. (2011). "N-Heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands and palladium in homogeneous cross-coupling catalysis: a perfect union". Chemical Society Reviews. 40 (10): 5151–69. doi:10.1039/c1cs15088j. PMID 21731956.
  • Yin; Liebscher, Jürgen (2007). "Carbon−Carbon Coupling Reactions Catalyzed by Heterogeneous Palladium Catalysts". Chemical Reviews. 107 (1): 133–173. doi:10.1021/cr0505674. PMID 17212474. S2CID 36974481.
  • Jana, Ranjan; Pathak, Tejas P.; Sigman, Matthew S. (2011). "Advances in Transition Metal (Pd,Ni,Fe)-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions Using Alkyl-organometallics as Reaction Partners". Chemical Reviews. 111 (3): 1417–1492. doi:10.1021/cr100327p. PMC 3075866. PMID 21319862.
  • Molnár, Árpád (2011). "Efficient, Selective, and Recyclable Palladium Catalysts in Carbon−Carbon Coupling Reactions". Chemical Reviews. 111 (3): 2251–2320. doi:10.1021/cr100355b. PMID 21391571.
  • Miyaura, Norio; Suzuki, Akira (1995). "Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Organoboron Compounds". Chemical Reviews. 95 (7): 2457–2483. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.735.7660. doi:10.1021/cr00039a007.
  • Roglans, Anna; Pla-Quintana, Anna; Moreno-Mañas, Marcial (2006). "Diazonium Salts as Substrates in Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions". Chemical Reviews. 106 (11): 4622–4643. doi:10.1021/cr0509861. PMID 17091930. S2CID 8128630.
  • Korch, Katerina M.; Watson, Donald A. (2019). "Cross-Coupling of Heteroatomic Electrophiles". Chemical Reviews. 119 (13): 8192–8228. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00628. PMC 6620169. PMID 31184483.
  • Cahiez, Gérard; Moyeux, Alban (2010). "Cobalt-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions". Chemical Reviews. 110 (3): 1435–1462. doi:10.1021/cr9000786. PMID 20148539.
  • Yi, Hong; Zhang, Guoting; Wang, Huamin; Huang, Zhiyuan; Wang, Jue; Singh, Atul K.; Lei, Aiwen (2017). "Recent Advances in Radical C–H Activation/Radical Cross-Coupling". Chemical Reviews. 117 (13): 9016–9085. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00620. PMID 28639787.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cross-coupling reaction

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A cross-coupling reaction is a type of organic in which two distinct molecular fragments, typically an such as an organic or pseudohalide and a such as an organometallic reagent, are joined to form a new carbon-carbon or carbon-heteroatom bond, mediated by a catalyst, most often or . These reactions proceed via a involving , , and steps, allowing for the selective formation of bonds between sp²-hybridized carbons or between carbon and heteroatoms like , oxygen, or . The foundational developments in cross-coupling reactions occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, building on earlier work in . Key milestones include the (1972), which couples aryl or vinyl halides with alkenes; the (1977), utilizing organozinc reagents for broad substrate compatibility; and the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction (1979), employing organoboranes for mild conditions and aqueous media compatibility. These innovations were recognized with the 2010 , awarded jointly to Richard F. Heck, Ei-ichi Negishi, and "for palladium-catalyzed cross couplings in ," highlighting their transformative impact on synthetic methodology. Cross-coupling reactions have become indispensable tools in modern due to their versatility, functional group tolerance, and ability to construct complex structures from readily available precursors. They are widely applied in the for assembling drug candidates, such as in the synthesis of and resveratrol derivatives, enabling efficient routes to bioactive molecules. In , these reactions facilitate the preparation of conjugated polymers, liquid crystals, and used in and . Ongoing advancements, including ligand-free , photoredox variants, and sustainable conditions, continue to expand their scope and environmental compatibility.

Introduction

Definition and Scope

Cross-coupling reactions constitute a fundamental class of synthetic transformations in , characterized by the formation of new carbon-carbon (C-C) or carbon-heteroatom (C-X) bonds between two electrophilically and nucleophilically distinct molecular fragments, mediated by a catalyst. These reactions enable the selective union of diverse organic groups, typically involving an such as an aryl, vinyl, or alkyl and a nucleophilic organometallic species, under mild conditions that preserve compatibility. The general reaction scheme for cross-coupling can be represented as: R1-X+R2-M→R1-R2+X-M\text{R}^1\text{-X} + \text{R}^2\text{-M} \rightarrow \text{R}^1\text{-R}^2 + \text{X-M} where R1\text{R}^1 and R2\text{R}^2 denote the organic fragments, X is a (commonly a or pseudohalide), and M is a metal center, often from main-group elements like , magnesium, , or tin. This schematic highlights the catalytic role of transition metals, such as or , in facilitating the bond formation through a sequence of elementary steps, though the precise mechanism varies by variant. The nomenclature "cross-coupling" originated in the , coined by Linstead and coworkers to denote the of two different substrates, in contrast to homocoupling of identical ones, initially in the context of electrolytic dimerizations but later applied to metal-catalyzed processes. The scope of cross-coupling encompasses catalytic methodologies, primarily palladium-mediated variants like those involving organoboranes or organostannanes, but extends to other metals and excludes stoichiometric or non-metal-mediated couplings; it has broadened beyond traditional C(sp²)-C(sp²) bonds to include C(sp³) partners and linkages, reflecting ongoing advancements in synthetic efficiency.

Historical Overview

The origins of cross-coupling reactions date back to the early , with the pioneering work of Fritz Ullmann on copper-mediated couplings. In 1901, Ullmann and his student Joseph Bielecki described the copper-promoted homocoupling of aryl iodides to form biaryls, a process that became known as the Ullmann coupling and served as an early method for aryl-aryl bond formation under harsh conditions. This reaction laid foundational groundwork for subsequent developments in metal-catalyzed C-C bond formations, though its limitations, such as high temperatures and poor tolerance, spurred the search for milder alternatives. The modern era of cross-coupling began in the late 1960s and 1970s with the introduction of palladium and nickel catalysts, enabling more efficient and selective transformations. Richard F. Heck reported the palladium-catalyzed coupling of aryl mercurials with alkenes in 1968, followed by the more practical aryl halide-alkene coupling in 1972, independently paralleled by Tsutomu Mizoroki's work in 1971 on aryl halide-olefin reactions. In 1972, Robert Corriu and Makoto Kumada independently developed nickel-catalyzed couplings of Grignard reagents with aryl and vinyl halides, marking the first use of main-group organometallics in such processes. This period saw rapid advancements, including Kenkichi Sonogashira's 1975 palladium-copper cocatalyzed coupling of terminal alkynes with aryl halides, John K. Stille's 1978 palladium-catalyzed reaction of organostannanes with organic halides, and Ei-ichi Negishi's 1977 coupling of organozinc reagents with aryl halides. Akira Suzuki's 1979 method using alkenylboranes with alkenyl or alkynyl halides, later extended to arylboronic acids with aryl halides in 1981, further expanded the scope, offering high selectivity and mild conditions. Tamejiro Hiyama's 1988 palladium-catalyzed coupling of organosilanes with organic halides completed this foundational series, utilizing fluoride activation for efficient transmetalation. These palladium-catalyzed methodologies achieved widespread recognition in 2010, when the was awarded to Heck, Negishi, and for their development of cross-coupling reactions that transformed by enabling precise construction of C-C bonds. Building on this legacy, the saw extensions to carbon-heteroatom bonds, particularly through the independent efforts of Stephen L. Buchwald and John F. Hartwig, who developed palladium-catalyzed aminations of aryl halides with amines using ligands, thus broadening applications to pharmaceuticals and materials. These innovations continued to evolve post-2010, standardizing cross-couplings as indispensable tools in synthetic chemistry.

Fundamental Principles

Reaction Components

Cross-coupling reactions fundamentally involve the coupling of an electrophilic partner with a nucleophilic partner in the presence of supporting reagents to form new carbon-carbon or carbon-heteroatom bonds. The electrophilic partner is typically an organic , such as aryl, vinyl, or alkyl iodides (RI), bromides (RBr), or chlorides (RCl), where reactivity generally follows the order I > Br > Cl due to the ease of to the metal catalyst. Pseudohalides, including triflates (ROTf), tosylates (ROTs), and mesylates (ROMs), serve as effective alternatives, particularly for substrates sensitive to conditions, as they undergo similar without the issues of . The nucleophilic partner consists of organometallic reagents that deliver the carbon or , such as boronic acids (RB(OH)2) or esters, organozinc compounds (RZnX), organostannanes (R3SnR'), organosilicon reagents (R-SiR''3), and Grignard reagents (RMgX). These reagents provide transmetalation-capable groups, with boronic acids being particularly versatile due to their stability and commercial availability. Solvents play a crucial role in solubilizing reactants and stabilizing intermediates, with polar aprotic options like N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) commonly used to enhance reactivity and prevent . Other solvents, such as for high-temperature reactions or aqueous mixtures including and , allow for milder conditions and improved compatibility with water-soluble components. Bases are essential for deprotonating or activating the nucleophilic partner and facilitating , with inorganic bases like (K2CO3), cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3), and (K3PO4) widely employed for their mild basicity and in mixed systems. Organic bases, such as triethylamine (Et3N) or 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (), are used in reactions requiring non-aqueous environments to avoid . Component compatibility varies significantly; for instance, air- and moisture-sensitive organometallics like organozinc and Grignard reagents necessitate inert atmospheres (e.g., or ) and anhydrous conditions to prevent decomposition. catalysts are often required to activate less reactive electrophiles like chlorides, enabling broader substrate scope.

General Mechanism

The general mechanism of cross-coupling reactions follows a comprising three principal stages: , , and . This cycle, prototypical for catalysis, enables the formation of new carbon-carbon or carbon-heteroatom bonds under mild conditions. The cycle initiates with , wherein a low-valent palladium(0) species, often coordinated to ligands such as phosphines, reacts with an electrophilic substrate like an organic halide (R-X) to form a palladium(II) organometallic intermediate, Pd(II)(R)(X). This step involves the insertion of the Pd(0) into the R-X bond, increasing the metal's and . In many cross-couplings, particularly those involving aryl or vinyl halides, serves as the rate-determining step due to the strength of the C-X bond and steric influences from substituents on R or the ligands. Next, transmetalation occurs, in which the nucleophilic organometallic reagent (R'-M, where M is typically a main-group metal like , , or tin) transfers the R' group to the center, displacing the X and forming the bis-organometallic complex Pd(II)(R)(R'). This step is facilitated by coordination of the to the metal and often requires base activation to generate a more nucleophilic species. The efficiency of transmetalation can be modulated by the choice of M and reaction conditions, with steric factors influencing the rate. The cycle concludes with , where the two organic groups on palladium couple to form the product R-R', simultaneously reducing the metal back to Pd(0) and completing the catalytic turnover. This step is generally fast and exothermic for palladium systems. The overall catalytic cycle can be summarized as: \cePd(0)+R−X−>Pd(II)(R)(X)\cePd(II)(R)(X)+R′−M−>Pd(II)(R)(R′)+MX\cePd(II)(R)(R′)−>Pd(0)+R−R′\begin{align*} &\ce{Pd(0) + R-X -> Pd(II)(R)(X)} \\ &\ce{Pd(II)(R)(X) + R'-M -> Pd(II)(R)(R') + MX} \\ &\ce{Pd(II)(R)(R') -> Pd(0) + R-R'} \end{align*} Although palladium exemplifies this mechanism, analogous cycles apply to other transition metals; for instance, nickel operates via Ni(0)/Ni(II) redox changes, while copper typically involves Cu(I)/Cu(III) states, often with distinct ligand dependencies.

Catalysts and Additives

Transition Metal Catalysts

catalysts are essential for facilitating cross-coupling reactions, with emerging as the most widely used due to its versatility and efficiency in forming carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds. typically operates through a involving Pd(0) and Pd(II) oxidation states, where Pd(0) undergoes to the , followed by and to regenerate the active Pd(0) species. Common precatalysts include tetrakis()palladium(0), denoted as Pd(PPh3)4Pd(PPh_3)_4, which serves as a source of the active Pd(0) complex in reactions such as the Negishi and couplings, and (II) , Pd(OAc)2Pd(OAc)_2, which is often reduced to Pd(0) for broader applicability. Catalyst loadings for palladium-mediated cross-couplings generally range from 0.1 to 5 mol%, allowing for efficient turnover while minimizing the amount of required; lower loadings, down to parts per million levels, have been achieved in optimized systems to enhance economic viability. The regeneration of Pd(0) within the is crucial for sustained activity, often supported by external reductants or inherent reaction components to prevent accumulation of inactive Pd(II) species. However, catalyst performance can be compromised by from impurities such as sulfur-containing compounds or excess ligands, which bind strongly to and inhibit the step, necessitating high-purity reagents for reliable outcomes. While palladium dominates, alternative transition metals offer cost-effective options for specific substrates. Nickel catalysts, being cheaper and earth-abundant, are particularly effective for couplings involving sp³-hybridized carbons, where they enable milder conditions and broader tolerance compared to palladium. Copper finds utility in Ullmann-type couplings, historically mediating C-N and C-O bond formations with aryl halides, often using simple copper(I) salts like CuI as precatalysts. Iron has emerged as a promising catalyst for reductive cross-couplings, leveraging low-valent iron species to couple alkyl or aryl electrophiles under mild conditions, driven by its low cost and environmental benignity. These metals typically follow similar cycles to palladium but exhibit distinct reactivity profiles suited to niche applications. Ligands can modulate the activity of these catalysts, though their design is addressed separately.

Ligands and Bases

In cross-coupling reactions, ligands play a crucial role in modulating the reactivity of catalysts by stabilizing low-valent metal species, facilitating key mechanistic steps such as , and preventing catalyst aggregation or . These ancillary molecules coordinate to the metal center, influencing the electronic and steric properties of the catalytic complex to enhance overall efficiency and selectivity. Phosphine ligands represent one of the earliest and most widely adopted classes in cross-coupling catalysis. Triphenylphosphine (PPh₃) serves as a prototypical monodentate phosphine, stabilizing palladium(0) species and promoting oxidative addition of aryl halides. Bidentate phosphines like BINAP (2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl) introduce chirality, enabling asymmetric variants of reactions such as the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling by controlling stereoselectivity during transmetalation and reductive elimination. More advanced phosphines, such as Buchwald's dialkylbiarylphosphines, further tune steric bulk to accommodate challenging substrates like aryl chlorides at room temperature. N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) have emerged as robust alternatives to phosphines, offering superior stability due to their strong σ-donor abilities and resistance to oxidation. Common examples include IMes (1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) and IPr (1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene), which bind tightly to metals like and , facilitating while suppressing side reactions such as β-hydride elimination. Bulky NHC variants, such as those in PEPPSI-type complexes, enhance reactivity for sterically demanding couplings by creating a protective steric environment around the metal center. Bases are essential additives that activate nucleophilic partners and drive the forward, typically through or halide abstraction mechanisms. Inorganic bases like (K₃PO₄) are commonly employed in Suzuki-Miyaura reactions to boronic acids, forming reactive boronate anions that accelerate with palladium-halide intermediates. Organic bases such as DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene) provide milder conditions for in direct arylation processes, often via concerted metalation- pathways. To advance principles, the development of water-soluble ligands has enabled cross-couplings in aqueous media, reducing organic solvent use and improving . Sulfonated phosphines and hydrophilic NHC derivatives, for instance, maintain catalytic activity in while facilitating of products.

Carbon-Carbon Bond Forming Reactions

Traditional Nucleophile-Based Couplings

Traditional nucleophile-based cross-couplings represent foundational methods for forming carbon-carbon bonds by coupling organometallic nucleophiles with organic electrophiles, typically aryl or vinyl halides, using or catalysts. These reactions proceed via of the organometallic species to the metal center, enabling selective bond formation with high efficiency and broad substrate compatibility for sp²-hybridized centers. The Kumada-Corriu coupling pairs Grignard reagents, R-MgX, with organic halides, R'-X, to yield R-R' products, primarily catalyzed by or complexes. It provides rapid reactivity for aryl-aryl, aryl-vinyl, and some alkyl couplings under mild conditions (0–60 °C) in solvents like THF or , achieving yields typically ranging from 80–100%. The method is highly efficient for non-functionalized substrates but has limited tolerance due to the reactivity of Grignard reagents toward carbonyls, esters, and other electrophiles, often requiring protection; stereoretention is maintained for vinyl and allylic Grignard reagents. The –Miyaura coupling pairs organoboronic acids or esters, such as Ar-B(OH)₂, with aryl or heteroaryl halides, Ar'-X, to yield biaryls, Ar-Ar', under with a base in aqueous or mixed solvents. Standard conditions employ Pd(PPh₃)₄ or similar precatalysts, K₂CO₃ or Na₂CO₃ as base, and solvents like dioxane/water, allowing reactions at 80–100 °C with yields often exceeding 80–95% for aryl-aryl couplings. The method excels in scope for heteroaryl substrates, including couplings of pyridyl-, furyl-, or thienylboronic acids with aryl bromides or iodides, tolerating functional groups like esters and nitriles due to the mild, water-compatible conditions. The involves organozinc reagents, R-ZnX, with organic halides, R'-X, to form R-R' products, catalyzed by or complexes. It offers superior tolerance compared to other methods, accommodating sensitive moieties such as ketones, aldehydes, and nitro groups without protection, and proceeds under mild conditions ( to 50 °C) in solvents like THF or DMF, achieving yields of 80–95%. Stereoretention is preserved in couplings involving chiral secondary alkylzinc reagents or vinylzinc species, making it valuable for asymmetric synthesis. In the Stille coupling, organostannanes, R-SnR'₃, react with R'-X to produce R-R', facilitated by catalysts under mild, neutral conditions (often in DMF or ). Yields typically range from 80–95%, with excellent scope for vinyl and aryl substrates, including stereospecific retention of geometry. However, toxicity concerns arise from organotin reagents and byproducts, prompting efforts to mitigate through or alternative stannanes. The Hiyama coupling employs organosilanes, R-SiR'₃, with R'-X, activated by ions (e.g., TBAF) to promote under . Reactions occur in polar solvents like THF at 50–80 °C, yielding 80–95% for aryl and alkenyl products, with stereoretention for vinylsilanes. The scope includes challenging couplings with alkyl halides, though sensitivity limits compatibility with certain protecting groups. These couplings share a common of , , and , as outlined in the general mechanism section.

Olefin and Alkyne Couplings

Olefin cross-couplings, particularly the Mizoroki-Heck reaction, enable the formation of carbon-carbon bonds between organic halides and s through , producing substituted s without the need for preformed organometallic nucleophiles. In the Mizoroki-Heck reaction, an aryl or (R-X) reacts with an (CH₂=CH-R') in the presence of a base and catalyst to yield the coupled product R-CH=CH-R'. The reaction proceeds via of the halide to Pd(0), followed by coordination and migratory insertion of the alkene into the Pd-C bond, and culminates in β-hydride elimination to regenerate the alkene and Pd(0) catalyst. This elimination step typically favors the formation of the thermodynamically more stable trans (E) isomer, though Z-selective variants have been developed using bulky ligands or specific conditions. Regioselectivity in the Heck reaction often favors the linear (E)-1,2-disubstituted product due to the preference for syn β-hydride elimination from the less hindered position, but branched isomers can predominate with electron-rich alkenes or certain ligands. Typical conditions involve Pd(OAc)₂ or PdCl₂ catalysts, often with ligands, a base such as triethylamine or NaOAc, and high temperatures (80–150 °C) in polar solvents like DMF or to facilitate the process. The reaction's scope extends to aryl iodides and bromides, with vinyl halides being less reactive, and it has been applied in the synthesis of complex molecules, including pharmaceuticals and natural products. Alkyne cross-couplings, exemplified by the Sonogashira reaction, couple terminal alkynes with aryl or vinyl halides to form enynes or diarylacetylenes, crucial for constructing conjugated systems. The general transformation is R-X + HC≡C-R' → R-C≡C-R', mediated by Pd and Cu catalysts in the presence of a base. Copper(I) iodide serves as a co-catalyst to generate the alkynyl copper intermediate via deprotonation of the terminal alkyne, which then transmetalates to the palladium center, followed by reductive elimination. This dual-metal system enhances reactivity, allowing milder conditions compared to purely Pd-catalyzed variants, typically using Pd(PPh₃)₄ or PdCl₂(PPh₃)₂, CuI, and amines like Et₃N at room temperature to 60 °C in solvents such as THF or DMF. The Sonogashira reaction exhibits high tolerance, accommodating halides with electron-withdrawing or donating substituents, and is widely used in enyne synthesis for and assembly, such as in the preparation of dendrimers and antitumor agents. is inherent due to the linear geometry of the , though homocoupling of alkynes can be minimized by slow addition of the alkyne or using copper-free protocols.

Comparison of Heck Reaction and Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling

The Heck reaction and the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling are both palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions for carbon-carbon bond formation, but they differ in substrates, products, mechanisms, and advantages. Substrates and products: The Heck reaction couples aryl or vinyl halides with alkenes to produce substituted alkenes (e.g., arylated alkenes). The Suzuki-Miyaura coupling pairs aryl or vinyl halides with aryl or vinyl boronic acids/esters to yield biaryls or aryl-alkenyl compounds. Mechanism: The Heck reaction proceeds via oxidative addition of the halide to Pd(0), migratory insertion of the alkene, and β-hydride elimination (no transmetalation step). The Suzuki-Miyaura coupling involves oxidative addition, base-activated transmetalation from boron, and reductive elimination. Advantages: The Suzuki-Miyaura coupling provides mild conditions, broad functional group tolerance, low toxicity (boronic acids), easy byproduct removal, and water compatibility, making it widely preferred in pharmaceutical synthesis for biaryls. The Heck reaction enables direct alkene arylation without an organometallic partner, useful for specific alkene syntheses. Overall, Suzuki-Miyaura is often favored for versatility and practicality, while Heck is foundational for alkene couplings.

Carbon-Heteroatom Bond Forming Reactions

C-N Bond Formation

The represents a cornerstone of carbon-nitrogen cross-coupling reactions, enabling the formation of Ar–NR₂ bonds from aryl or heteroaryl halides (Ar–X, where X = I, Br, Cl, or OTf) and amines (H–NR₂). This palladium-catalyzed process, independently developed by the groups of Stephen L. Buchwald and John F. Hartwig in the mid-1990s, built upon earlier tin-mediated variants to provide a tin-free, general method for synthesizing arylamines. Seminal reports demonstrated efficient coupling of aryl bromides and iodides with primary and secondary amines, marking a significant advancement in synthetic methodology. Key to the reaction's efficacy are catalysts paired with bulky, electron-rich monophosphine ligands, such as DavePhos (2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2',6'-dimethoxybiphenyl), which enhance to the C–X bond and facilitate while suppressing side reactions like β-hydride elimination. These biaryl phosphine ligands, pioneered by Buchwald, provide steric bulk and electronic tuning that allow coupling with less reactive aryl chlorides and expand substrate compatibility. Common precatalysts include Pd₂(dba)₃ or Pd(OAc)₂, often at 1–5 mol% loading. The scope encompasses primary and secondary amines, including anilines and heterocyclic amines (e.g., indoles, pyrroles), yielding diverse diarylamines, aryl alkylamines, and nitrogen-containing heterocycles essential for pharmaceuticals and materials. For instance, coupling of with affords the corresponding aryl morpholine in high yield. However, challenges persist with unactivated aliphatic amines, where competitive β-hydride elimination or strong coordination to can reduce efficiency, often requiring optimized ligands or milder conditions. Mechanistically, the reaction adapts the general catalytic cycle: of Ar–X to Pd(0) forms an Ar–Pd(II)–X intermediate, followed by with the deprotonated (facilitated by base) to generate Ar–Pd(II)–NR₂, and to release Ar–NR₂ while regenerating Pd(0). Variations include direct of neutral in some ligand systems or, less commonly, to N–X bonds in specialized protocols. This cycle's efficiency relies on design to accelerate rate-determining steps like . Typical conditions employ strong, non-nucleophilic bases such as NaOtBu or K₃PO₄ in or dioxane at 80–110 °C, achieving yields of 70–99% for most substrates within hours. For example, the amination of 4-bromotoluene with using Pd₂(dba)₃/DavePhos (2 mol%) and NaOtBu proceeds in 95% yield. These mild, selective conditions have made the reaction indispensable for complex molecule synthesis.

C-O and C-S Bond Formation

Carbon-oxygen bond formation through palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling typically involves the reaction of aryl or alkenyl halides (Ar-X) with oxygen nucleophiles such as (Ar'-OH) or alcohols (R-OH) to yield aryl ethers (Ar-OR or Ar-OAr'). These reactions proceed under mild conditions using palladium catalysts like Pd₂(dba)₃ combined with bidentate phosphine ligands, such as , which provide a wide bite angle to stabilize key intermediates and promote efficient turnover. The scope encompasses both electron-rich and electron-poor aryl halides, with generally coupling more readily than aliphatic alcohols due to their higher nucleophilicity. Bases like Cs₂CO₃ or NaOtBu are employed to generate the or phenoxide species . A major challenge in C-O couplings arises from β-hydride elimination, particularly with primary or secondary alcohols, which competes with the desired and leads to byproducts. This issue is mitigated by electron-rich ligands that lower the energy barrier for C-O bond formation in the palladium(II) intermediate. Seminal contributions from Hartwig demonstrated high-yielding arylations of ; for instance, the coupling of aryl bromides with sodium phenoxides using Pd(dba)₂ and DPPF or electron-deficient phosphines afforded diaryl ethers in yields exceeding 90%. Later advancements with ligands like Q-Phos expanded the scope to aryl chlorides and aliphatic alcohols, achieving 78–99% yields for a range of substrates. Carbon-sulfur bond formation follows analogous palladium-catalyzed protocols, coupling aryl halides (Ar-X) with thiols (HS-R) or thiolates to produce aryl thioethers (Ar-SR). Conditions mirror those for C-O couplings, often employing Pd₂(dba)₃ with bidentate ligands like or monophosphines such as CyPF-tBu, in the presence of bases like K₃PO₄, typically in solvents like dioxane at elevated temperatures. The reaction tolerates a broad range of functional groups, including nitro, carbonyl, and amino substituents on the . Thioethers are valuable motifs in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and due to their stability and electronic properties. Hartwig's development of functional-group-tolerant systems enabled efficient coupling of unactivated aryl chlorides with aliphatic and aromatic thiols, delivering products in excellent yields (often >90%) with minimal protodehalogenation. As of 2025, new semiheterogeneous Pd catalyst systems have enabled efficient, mild formation of C–N, C–O, C–S, and C–Se bonds across diverse substrates.

Advanced and Alternative Methods

Non-Precious Metal and Metal-Free Couplings

Cross-coupling reactions traditionally rely on precious metals like , but the development of methods using earth-abundant metals such as iron, , and offers significant advantages in terms of cost, availability, and reduced toxicity, promoting greater in synthetic applications. These non-precious metal catalysts often achieve comparable or selective reactivity to systems, particularly for challenging sp³-hybridized couplings, while avoiding the environmental and economic drawbacks of rare metals. Metal-free approaches further enhance by eliminating transition metals entirely, leveraging organocatalysts or hypervalent reagents to facilitate bond formation under mild conditions. Iron catalysis has emerged as a cornerstone for non-precious metal cross-couplings, particularly in reductive C-C bond formations involving alkyl and aryl electrophiles. A notable advancement involves iron/phosphine systems that enable the reductive coupling of sterically hindered substrates to form quaternary carbon centers, proceeding via a directing-group strategy that enhances selectivity and efficiency. For instance, iron-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling of inert C-O bonds with alkyl bromides, supported by bis(pinacolato)diboron, allows for the activation of unactivated alkyl groups under mild conditions, yielding diverse alkylated products with good functional group tolerance. These methods often employ simple phosphine ligands to stabilize low-valent iron species, mimicking Negishi-like reactivity but with earth-abundant precursors, thus reducing costs by orders of magnitude compared to palladium analogs. Cobalt catalysts excel in sp³-sp³ couplings, addressing limitations in traditional methods by harnessing radical intermediates for hydrofunctionalization pathways. Recent protocols utilize cobalt(II) complexes with bidentate ligands to capture alkyl radicals, enabling enantioselective C(sp³)-C(sp³) bond formation from alkyl halides and nucleophiles like Grignard reagents or boranes, with high stereocontrol for chiral centers. For example, cobalt-catalyzed hydroalkylation of alkenes with alkylzinc reagents proceeds via sequential radical addition and protonation, providing access to complex aliphatic frameworks in yields exceeding 80% for diverse substrates. Manganese variants complement these by focusing on decarboxylative processes; manganese-mediated reductive cross-couplings of aliphatic carboxylic acids with alkyl halides or alkenes generate alkyl radicals from NHPI esters, facilitating C(sp³)-C(sp³) or C(sp³)-C(sp²) bonds without requiring precious metals, as demonstrated in the coupling of primary amines and acids to form functionalized alkanes. These manganese systems operate at room temperature, offering scalability for pharmaceutical intermediates. Metal-free cross-couplings leverage hypervalent iodine for oxidative arylations and organoboranes for borylations, bypassing entirely. Hypervalent iodine(III) , such as diaryliodonium salts, promote direct C-H arylation of heteroarenes like indoles and pyrroles via radical mechanisms, yielding biaryls in moderate to excellent yields under mild conditions without transition metals. This approach is particularly effective for electron-rich nucleophiles, avoiding over-oxidation common in metal-catalyzed variants. Borane-mediated methods, including NHC-boranes, enable radical borylation of aryl sulfones or C-H in indoles, generating boronic esters suitable for subsequent couplings; for instance, metal-free of terminal alkynes with catecholborane provides vinylboranes regioselectively. These organocatalytic strategies underscore the viability of sustainable, ligand-free protocols for diverse carbon-carbon bond formations.

Photocatalytic and Radical Approaches

Photocatalytic cross-coupling reactions represent an emerging class of methods that leverage visible to drive the formation of carbon-carbon (C-C) and carbon-nitrogen (C-N) bonds under mild conditions, often through dual involving transition metals like or paired with photoredox catalysts such as fac-Ir(ppy)₃. In these systems, the photocatalyst absorbs visible to generate excited states that facilitate single-electron transfer (SET) processes, enabling the activation of substrates that are challenging under traditional thermal conditions. For instance, -catalyzed C-N cross-couplings of aryl halides with amines proceed via photoredox/Cu dual , where Ir(ppy)₃ mediates reductive quenching to generate aryl radicals that couple with Cu(I) species. Similarly, Ni/Ir dual has enabled C(sp³)-C(sp³) couplings of alkyl halides with boronic acids, expanding access to complex alkyl frameworks with high tolerance. These approaches integrate seamlessly with traditional cross-coupling cycles by modulating potentials through , allowing orthogonal selectivity.00265-0) Radical-mediated cross-couplings offer redox-neutral pathways that avoid stoichiometric oxidants or reductants, particularly advantageous for sensitive substrates. A seminal advancement is the 2025 method developed by Baran and colleagues, utilizing sulfonyl hydrazides as versatile precursors for radical generation in nickel-catalyzed C-C bond formations. This platform enables seven distinct redox-neutral couplings, including C(sp³)-C(sp³) connections via SET from hydrazide-derived radicals to Ni(I) species, followed by recombination with electrophiles like alkyl bromides. The approach demonstrates broad substrate scope, with yields up to 90% for diverse fragments, and has been applied to late-stage functionalization of pharmaceuticals. Single-electron transfer mechanisms in these radical processes are particularly suited for C(sp³)-C(sp³) bonds, where radical stability overcomes the limitations of two-electron pathways in classical . Three-component radical cross-couplings further enhance molecular complexity by incorporating alkenes, oximes, and additional electrophiles in a single transformation. Recent variants from 2023 to 2025 highlight photoredox or copper catalysis for alkene difunctionalization with oxime carbonates and aryl boronic acids, generating vicinal C-C and C-N bonds with high regioselectivity. For example, a 2024 copper/chiral PyBim ligand system achieves asymmetric sulfonyl-esterification of alkenes using SO₂ surrogates from oximes, affording enantioenriched products in up to 95% ee. A 2025 redox-neutral protocol extends this to iron-catalyzed difunctionalization, incorporating alkyl radicals for 1,2-dicarbofunctionalization with yields exceeding 80% for unactivated alkenes. These methods exemplify radical relay strategies that proceed under visible light or mild heating, bypassing the need for prefunctionalized partners. Photocatalytic and radical approaches provide key advantages, including operation at to avoid substrate decomposition and enhanced site-selectivity through radical intermediates that target remote C-H bonds or specific functional groups. These methods also promote by using earth-abundant metals like Cu or Ni and visible , reducing energy input compared to high-temperature Pd . However, challenges persist in , as penetration in larger reactors diminishes , and photocatalyst stability under prolonged irradiation can limit industrial viability. Ongoing efforts focus on heterogeneous photocatalysts and flow chemistry to address these hurdles, paving the way for broader adoption.

Applications

Synthetic Applications

Cross-coupling reactions play a pivotal role in laboratory by enabling the efficient construction of complex molecular architectures through selective carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond formation. These reactions facilitate the assembly of intricate scaffolds from simpler building blocks, allowing chemists to build molecular complexity in a controlled manner, particularly in the synthesis of biologically active compounds. In , cross-couplings are indispensable for forging key bonds in natural products and pharmaceuticals. For instance, the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction has been employed to construct the biaryl linkages in , a , through atropselective coupling of aryl halides with boronic acids, enabling the synthesis of semisynthetic derivatives with enhanced activity. Similarly, the is widely used in pharmaceutical synthesis to generate styrenes, such as in the preparation of intermediates for drugs like naproxen, where aryl halides couple with or styrene equivalents to form vinylarenes essential for agents. Modular assembly via cross-couplings supports late-stage diversification in , permitting the rapid modification of advanced intermediates to generate diverse libraries. This approach involves installing reactive handles, such as aryl halides or boronic acids, early in the synthesis, followed by selective couplings to introduce varied substituents without disrupting the core structure, thereby accelerating lead optimization in programs. Stereocontrol in cross-coupling reactions is achieved through asymmetric variants, particularly in the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, where chiral ligands coordinate to catalysts to produce enantioenriched products. For example, binaphthyl-based ligands enable the enantioselective formation of axially chiral biaryls with up to 99% , crucial for synthesizing optically active natural products like korupensamine A. In , cross-couplings facilitate parallel synthesis of heterocycle libraries by allowing multiple coupling partners to be reacted simultaneously on solid supports or in solution-phase arrays. The Suzuki-Miyaura reaction, in particular, has been utilized for one-step parallel assembly of dibenzopyranone derivatives, yielding diverse oxygen-containing heterocycles as potential therapeutic candidates through efficient C-C bond formation between arylboronic acids and halo-heterocycles.

Industrial and Materials Applications

Cross-coupling reactions, particularly the Suzuki-Miyaura variant, play a pivotal role in , enabling the efficient construction of biaryl motifs essential for drug candidates. For instance, this reaction is employed in the synthesis of sartans such as losartan and , which are blockbuster antihypertensive agents, as well as kinase inhibitors like used in cancer therapy. Similarly, it facilitates the production of HIV inhibitors like atazanavir, highlighting its utility in forming carbon-carbon bonds critical for therapeutic efficacy. These applications underscore the reaction's scalability in industrial settings, where it supports the assembly of complex heterocycles under mild conditions compatible with sensitive pharmaceutical intermediates. In the realm of fine chemicals, is instrumental for synthesizing acetylenic linkages in conjugated materials, notably for organic light-emitting diodes (s). This reaction couples terminal alkynes with aryl or vinyl halides to produce extended π-systems, such as oligo(p-phenylene ethynylenes) with pendant groups, which enhance electron transport and device performance in OLED displays. For example, pyrene-based derivatives synthesized via Sonogashira are incorporated into OLED emitters, achieving high external quantum efficiencies due to their rigid, luminescent structures. These materials contribute to the advancement of and lighting technologies, where the reaction's tolerance for functional groups allows precise molecular design. Industrial process development has increasingly integrated cross-couplings with flow chemistry to enhance efficiency and , particularly through continuous processing and recycling. In flow systems, palladium-catalyzed reactions like Suzuki-Miyaura achieve high throughput and reduced reaction times, as demonstrated in the scalable synthesis of pharmaceutical intermediates with minimal solvent use. recycling strategies, such as supported palladium nanoparticles or thermoresponsive ligands, enable over multiple cycles—up to 10 iterations in some cases—minimizing metal and costs while maintaining yields above 90%. These adaptations align with 2025 trends in green manufacturing, where aqueous micellar media replace organic solvents, promoting eco-friendly conditions for large-scale operations and reducing environmental impact in sectors like pharmaceuticals and .

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/cross-coupling-reaction
  2. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ar8001798
  3. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/advanced-chemistryprize2010.pdf
  4. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2010/illustrated-information/
  5. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2010/summary/
  6. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02573
  7. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/op900311z
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403901022274
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7582370/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5090684/
  11. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00204
  12. https://www.nature.com/subjects/cross-coupling-reactions
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9878734/
  14. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr100327p
  15. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr8002505
  16. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00479a077
  17. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00498a026
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)95429-2
  19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397918108064140
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6860378/
  21. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/sc/d2sc00174h
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010854504002383
  23. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00051
  24. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00588
  25. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr500425u
  26. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chem.202101880
  27. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/v05-048
  28. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/kumada-coupling.shtm
  29. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00979a024
  30. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ol051654l
  31. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470716076
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040403900910943
  33. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo9808021
  34. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ra/d0ra10575a
  35. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2016/03/10/the-heck-suzuki-and-olefin-metathesis-reactions/
  36. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Synthesis_(Shea)/02%3A_Transition_Metal_Catalyzed_Carbon-Carbon_Bond_Forming_Reactions/2.02%3A_Pd-Catalyzed_Cross_Coupling_Reactions
  37. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201904795
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8025245/
  39. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chem.200600949
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61812-z
  41. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/sc/d4sc00482e
  42. https://www.chinesechemsoc.org/doi/10.31635/ccschem.023.202303412
  43. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr400274j
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64781-5
  45. https://www.chinesechemsoc.org/doi/10.31635/ccschem.022.202202234
  46. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jacs.5c12288
  47. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.5c07125
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666951X25000245
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7542462/
  50. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07446
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8308686/
  52. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05071
  53. https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/68edef61bc2ac3a0e0dc34bb
  54. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejoc.202301312
  55. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01463
  56. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/cs.2024.140
  57. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.202309069
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666951X25000269
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61639-8
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11350580/
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949839224000981
  62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-021-10195-6
  63. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm9017543
  64. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/v01-033
  65. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac6153
  66. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja409669r
  67. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cc100068a
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277538722004764
  69. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/ob/c3ob41464g
  70. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00231
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229364285_Synthesis_characterization_and_OLED_application_of_oligop-phenylene_ethynylenes_with_polyhedral_oligomeric_silsesquioxanes_POSS_as_pendant_groups
  72. https://chem.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/mazza%2520review.pdf
  73. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.7b00725
  74. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00457
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9585/3/1/1
  76. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejoc.202500499
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.