Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Curve of constant width
View on Wikipedia

In geometry, a curve of constant width is a simple closed curve in the plane whose width (the distance between parallel supporting lines) is the same in all directions. The shape bounded by a curve of constant width is a body of constant width or an orbiform, the name given to these shapes by Leonhard Euler.[1] Standard examples are the circle and the Reuleaux triangle. These curves can also be constructed using circular arcs centered at crossings of an arrangement of lines, as the involutes of certain curves, or by intersecting circles centered on a partial curve.
Every body of constant width is a convex set, its boundary crossed at most twice by any line, and if the line crosses perpendicularly it does so at both crossings, separated by the width. By Barbier's theorem, the body's perimeter is exactly π times its width, but its area depends on its shape, with the Reuleaux triangle having the smallest possible area for its width and the circle the largest. Every superset of a body of constant width includes pairs of points that are farther apart than the width, and every curve of constant width includes at least six points of extreme curvature. Although the Reuleaux triangle is not smooth, curves of constant width can always be approximated arbitrarily closely by smooth curves of the same constant width.
Cylinders with constant-width cross-section can be used as rollers to support a level surface. Another application of curves of constant width is for coinage shapes, where regular Reuleaux polygons are a common choice. The possibility that curves other than circles can have constant width makes it more complicated to check the roundness of an object.
Curves of constant width have been generalized in several ways to higher dimensions and to non-Euclidean geometry.
Definitions
[edit]Width, and constant width, are defined in terms of the supporting lines of curves; these are lines that touch a curve without crossing it. Every compact curve in the plane has two supporting lines in any given direction, with the curve sandwiched between them. The Euclidean distance between these two lines is the width of the curve in that direction, and a curve has constant width if this distance is the same for all directions of lines. The width of a bounded convex set can be defined in the same way as for curves, by the distance between pairs of parallel lines that touch the set without crossing it, and a convex set is a body of constant width when this distance is nonzero and does not depend on the direction of the lines. Every body of constant width has a curve of constant width as its boundary, and every curve of constant width has a body of constant width as its convex hull.[2][3]
Another equivalent way to define the width of a compact curve or of a convex set is by looking at its orthogonal projection onto a line. In both cases, the projection is a line segment, whose length equals the distance between support lines that are perpendicular to the line. So, a curve or a convex set has constant width when all of its orthogonal projections have the same length.[2][3]
Examples
[edit]
Circles have constant width, equal to their diameter. On the other hand, squares do not: supporting lines parallel to two opposite sides of the square are closer together than supporting lines parallel to a diagonal. More generally, no polygon can have constant width. However, there are other shapes of constant width. A standard example is the Reuleaux triangle, the intersection of three circles, each centered where the other two circles cross.[2] Its boundary curve consists of three arcs of these circles, meeting at 120° angles, so it is not smooth, and in fact these angles are the sharpest possible for any curve of constant width.[3]
Other curves of constant width can be smooth but non-circular, not even having any circular arcs in their boundary. For instance, the zero set of the polynomial below forms a non-circular smooth algebraic curve of constant width:[4]
Its degree, eight, is the minimum possible degree for a polynomial that defines a non-circular curve of constant width.[5]
Constructions
[edit]


Every regular polygon with an odd number of sides gives rise to a curve of constant width, a Reuleaux polygon, formed from circular arcs centered at its vertices that pass through the two vertices farthest from the center. For instance, this construction generates a Reuleaux triangle from an equilateral triangle. Some irregular polygons also generate Reuleaux polygons.[6][7] In a closely related construction, called by Martin Gardner the "crossed-lines method", an arrangement of lines in the plane (no two parallel but otherwise arbitrary) is sorted into cyclic order by the slopes of the lines. The lines are then connected by a curve formed from a sequence of circular arcs; each arc connects two consecutive lines in the sorted order, and is centered at their crossing. The radius of the first arc must be chosen large enough to cause all successive arcs to end on the correct side of the next crossing point; however, all sufficiently-large radii work. For two lines, this forms a circle; for three lines on the sides of an equilateral triangle, with the minimum possible radius, it forms a Reuleaux triangle, and for the lines of a regular star polygon it can form a Reuleaux polygon.[2][6]
Leonhard Euler constructed curves of constant width from involutes of curves with an odd number of cusp singularities, having only one tangent line in each direction (that is, projective hedgehogs).[1][8] An intuitive way to describe the involute construction is to roll a line segment around such a curve, keeping it tangent to the curve without sliding along it, until it returns to its starting point of tangency. The line segment must be long enough to reach the cusp points of the curve, so that it can roll past each cusp to the next part of the curve, and its starting position should be carefully chosen so that at the end of the rolling process it is in the same position it started from. When that happens, the curve traced out by the endpoints of the line segment is an involute that encloses the given curve without crossing it, with constant width equal to the length of the line segment.[9] If the starting curve is smooth (except at the cusps), the resulting curve of constant width will also be smooth.[1][8] An example of a starting curve with the correct properties for this construction is the deltoid curve, and the involutes of the deltoid that enclose it form smooth curves of constant width, not containing any circular arcs.[10][11]
Another construction chooses half of the curve of constant width, meeting certain requirements, and forms from it a body of constant width having the given curve as part of its boundary. The construction begins with a convex curved arc, whose endpoints are the intended width apart. The two endpoints must touch parallel supporting lines at distance from each other. Additionally, each supporting line that touches another point of the arc must be tangent at that point to a circle of radius containing the entire arc; this requirement prevents the curvature of the arc from being less than that of the circle. The completed body of constant width is then the intersection of the interiors of an infinite family of circles, of two types: the ones tangent to the supporting lines, and more circles of the same radius centered at each point of the given arc. This construction is universal: all curves of constant width may be constructed in this way.[3] Victor Puiseux, a 19th-century French mathematician, found curves of constant width containing elliptical arcs[12] that can be constructed in this way from a semi-ellipse. To meet the curvature condition, the semi-ellipse should be bounded by the semi-major axis of its ellipse, and the ellipse should have eccentricity at most . Equivalently, the semi-major axis should be at most twice the semi-minor axis.[6]
Given any two bodies of constant width, their Minkowski sum forms another body of constant width.[13] A generalization of Minkowski sums to the sums of support functions of hedgehogs produces a curve of constant width from the sum of a projective hedgehog and a circle, whenever the result is a convex curve. All curves of constant width can be decomposed into a sum of hedgehogs in this way.[14]
Properties
[edit]
A curve of constant width can rotate between two parallel lines separated by its width, while at all times touching those lines, which act as supporting lines for the rotated curve. In the same way, a curve of constant width can rotate within a rhombus or square, whose pairs of opposite sides are separated by the width and lie on parallel support lines.[2][6][3] Not every curve of constant width can rotate within a regular hexagon in the same way, because its supporting lines may form different irregular hexagons for different rotations rather than always forming a regular one. However, every curve of constant width can be enclosed by at least one regular hexagon with opposite sides on parallel supporting lines.[15]
A curve has constant width if and only if, for every pair of parallel supporting lines, it touches those two lines at points whose distance equals the separation between the lines. In particular, this implies that it can only touch each supporting line at a single point. Equivalently, every line that crosses the curve perpendicularly crosses it at exactly two points of distance equal to the width. Therefore, a curve of constant width must be convex, since every non-convex simple closed curve has a supporting line that touches it at two or more points.[3][8] Curves of constant width are examples of self-parallel or auto-parallel curves, curves traced by both endpoints of a line segment that moves in such a way that both endpoints move perpendicularly to the line segment. However, there exist other self-parallel curves, such as the infinite spiral formed by the involute of a circle, that do not have constant width.[16]
Barbier's theorem asserts that the perimeter of any curve of constant width is equal to the width multiplied by . As a special case, this formula agrees with the standard formula for the perimeter of a circle given its diameter.[17][18] By the isoperimetric inequality and Barbier's theorem, the circle has the maximum area of any curve of given constant width. The Blaschke–Lebesgue theorem says that the Reuleaux triangle has the least area of any convex curve of given constant width.[19] Every proper superset of a body of constant width has strictly greater diameter, and every Euclidean set with this property is a body of constant width. In particular, it is not possible for one body of constant width to be a subset of a different body with the same constant width.[20][21] Every curve of constant width can be approximated arbitrarily closely by a piecewise circular curve or by an analytic curve of the same constant width.[22]
A vertex of a smooth curve is a point where its curvature is a local maximum or minimum; for a circular arc, all points are vertices, but non-circular curves may have a finite discrete set of vertices. For a curve that is not smooth, the points where it is not smooth can also be considered as vertices, of infinite curvature. For a curve of constant width, each vertex of locally minimum curvature is paired with a vertex of locally maximum curvature, opposite it on a diameter of the curve, and there must be at least six vertices. This stands in contrast to the four-vertex theorem, according to which every simple closed smooth curve in the plane has at least four vertices. Some curves, such as ellipses, have exactly four vertices, but this is not possible for a curve of constant width.[14][23] Because local minima of curvature are opposite local maxima of curvature, the only curves of constant width with central symmetry are the circles, for which the curvature is the same at all points.[13] For every curve of constant width, the minimum enclosing circle of the curve and the largest circle that it contains are concentric, and the average of their diameters is the width of the curve. These two circles together touch the curve in at least three pairs of opposite points, but these points are not necessarily vertices.[13]
A convex body has constant width if and only if the Minkowski sum of the body and its 180° rotation is a circular disk; if so, the width of the body is the radius of the disk.[13][15]
Applications
[edit]Because of the ability of curves of constant width to roll between parallel lines, any cylinder with a curve of constant width as its cross-section can act as a "roller", supporting a level plane and keeping it flat as it rolls along any level surface. However, the center of the roller moves up and down as it rolls, so this construction would not work for wheels in this shape attached to fixed axles.[2][6][3]
Some coinage shapes are non-circular bodies of constant width. For instance the British 20p and 50p coins are Reuleaux heptagons, and the Canadian loonie is a Reuleaux 11-gon.[24] These shapes allow automated coin machines to recognize these coins from their widths, regardless of the orientation of the coin in the machine.[2][6] On the other hand, testing the width is inadequate to determine the roundness of an object, because such tests cannot distinguish circles from other curves of constant width.[2][6] Overlooking this fact may have played a role in the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, as the roundness of sections of the rocket in that launch was tested only by measuring widths, and off-round shapes may cause unusually high stresses that could have been one of the factors causing the disaster.[25]
Generalizations
[edit]The curves of constant width can be generalized to certain non-convex curves, the curves that have two tangent lines in each direction, with the same separation between these two lines regardless of their direction. As a limiting case, the projective hedgehogs (curves with one tangent line in each direction) have also been called "curves of zero width".[26]
One way to generalize these concepts to three dimensions is through the surfaces of constant width. The three-dimensional analog of a Reuleaux triangle, the Reuleaux tetrahedron, does not have constant width, but minor changes to it produce the Meissner bodies, which do.[2][13] The curves of constant width may also be generalized to the bodies of constant brightness, three-dimensional shapes whose two-dimensional projections all have equal area; these shapes obey a generalization of Barbier's theorem.[13] A different class of three-dimensional generalizations, the space curves of constant width, are defined by the properties that each plane that crosses the curve perpendicularly intersects it at exactly one other point, where it is also perpendicular, and that all pairs of points intersected by perpendicular planes are the same distance apart.[27][28][29][30]
Curves and bodies of constant width have also been studied in non-Euclidean geometry[31] and for non-Euclidean normed vector spaces.[20]
See also
[edit]- Mean width, the width of a curve averaged over all possible directions
- Zindler curve, a curve in which all perimeter-bisecting chords have the same length
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Euler, Leonhard (1781). "De curvis triangularibus". Acta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae (in Latin). 1778 (II): 3–30.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Gardner, Martin (1991). "Chapter 18: Curves of Constant Width". The Unexpected Hanging and Other Mathematical Diversions. University of Chicago Press. pp. 212–221. ISBN 0-226-28256-2.
- ^ a b c d e f g Rademacher, Hans; Toeplitz, Otto (1957). "Chapter 25: Curves of Constant Breadth". The Enjoyment of Mathematics: Selections from Mathematics for the Amateur. Princeton University Press. pp. 163–177.
- ^ Rabinowitz, Stanley (1997). "A polynomial curve of constant width" (PDF). Missouri Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 9 (1): 23–27. doi:10.35834/1997/0901023. MR 1455287.
- ^ Bardet, Magali; Bayen, Térence (2013). "On the degree of the polynomial defining a planar algebraic curves of constant width". arXiv:1312.4358 [math.AG].
- ^ a b c d e f g Bryant, John; Sangwin, Chris (2008). "Chapter 10: How Round Is Your Circle?". How Round Is Your Circle? Where Engineering and Mathematics Meet. Princeton University Press. pp. 188–226. ISBN 978-0-691-13118-4.
- ^ Cundy, H. Martyn; Rollett, A. P. (1961). Mathematical Models (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 212.
- ^ a b c Robertson, S. A. (1984). "Smooth curves of constant width and transnormality". The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 16 (3): 264–274. doi:10.1112/blms/16.3.264. MR 0738517.
- ^ Lowry, H. V. (February 1950). "2109. Curves of constant diameter". Mathematical notes. The Mathematical Gazette. 34 (307): 43. doi:10.2307/3610879. JSTOR 3610879. S2CID 187767688.
- ^ Goldberg, Michael (March 1954). "Rotors within rotors". American Mathematical Monthly. 61 (3): 166–171. doi:10.2307/2307215. JSTOR 2307215.
- ^ Burke, John F. (March 1966). "A curve of constant diameter". Mathematics Magazine. 39 (2): 84–85. doi:10.2307/2688715. JSTOR 2688715.
- ^ Kearsley, M. J. (September 1952). "Curves of constant diameter". The Mathematical Gazette. 36 (317): 176–179. doi:10.2307/3608253. JSTOR 3608253. S2CID 125468725.
- ^ a b c d e f Martini, Horst; Montejano, Luis; Oliveros, Déborah (2019). Bodies of Constant Width: An Introduction to Convex Geometry with Applications. Birkhäuser. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03868-7. ISBN 978-3-030-03866-3. MR 3930585. S2CID 127264210. For properties of planar curves of constant width, see in particular pp. 69–71. For the Meissner bodies, see section 8.3, pp. 171–178. For bodies of constant brightness, see section 13.3.2, pp. 310–313.
- ^ a b Martinez-Maure, Yves (1996). "A note on the tennis ball theorem". American Mathematical Monthly. 103 (4): 338–340. doi:10.2307/2975192. JSTOR 2975192. MR 1383672.
- ^ a b Chakerian, G. D. (1966). "Sets of constant width". Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 19: 13–21. doi:10.2140/pjm.1966.19.13. MR 0205152.
- ^ Ferréol, Robert; Boureau, Samuel; Esculier, Alain (2017). "Self-parallel curve, curve of constant width". Encyclopédie des formes mathématiques remarquables.
- ^ Lay, Steven R. (2007). Convex Sets and Their Applications. Dover. Theorem 11.11, pp. 81–82. ISBN 9780486458038..
- ^ Barbier, E. (1860). "Note sur le problème de l'aiguille et le jeu du joint couvert" (PDF). Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées. 2e série (in French). 5: 273–286. See in particular pp. 283–285.
- ^ Gruber, Peter M. (1983). Convexity and its Applications. Birkhäuser. p. 67. ISBN 978-3-7643-1384-5.
- ^ a b Eggleston, H. G. (1965). "Sets of constant width in finite dimensional Banach spaces". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 3 (3): 163–172. doi:10.1007/BF02759749. MR 0200695. S2CID 121731141.
- ^ Jessen, Börge (1929). "Über konvexe Punktmengen konstanter Breite". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 29 (1): 378–380. doi:10.1007/BF03326404. MR 3108700. S2CID 122800988.
- ^ Wegner, B. (1977). "Analytic approximation of continuous ovals of constant width". Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan. 29 (3): 537–540. doi:10.2969/jmsj/02930537. MR 0464076.
- ^ Craizer, Marcos; Teixeira, Ralph; Balestro, Vitor (2018). "Closed cycloids in a normed plane". Monatshefte für Mathematik. 185 (1): 43–60. arXiv:1608.01651. doi:10.1007/s00605-017-1030-5. MR 3745700. S2CID 119710622.
- ^ Chamberland, Marc (2015). Single Digits: In Praise of Small Numbers. Princeton University Press. pp. 104–105. ISBN 9781400865697.
- ^ Moore, Helen (2004). "Space shuttle geometry". In Hayes, David F.; Shubin, Tatiana (eds.). Mathematical Adventures for Students and Amateurs. MAA Spectrum. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. pp. 7–16. ISBN 0-88385-548-8. MR 2085842.
- ^ Kelly, Paul J. (1957). "Curves with a kind of constant width". American Mathematical Monthly. 64 (5): 333–336. doi:10.2307/2309594. JSTOR 2309594. MR 0092168.
- ^ Fujiwara, M. (1914). "On space curves of constant breadth". Tohoku Mathematical Journal. 1st series. 5: 180–184.
- ^ Cieślak, Waldemar (1988). "On space curves of constant width". Bulletin de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Łódź. 38 (5): 7. MR 0995691.
- ^ Teufel, Eberhard (1993). "On the length of space curves of constant width". Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie. 34 (2): 173–176. MR 1264285.
- ^ Wegner, Bernd (1972). "Globale Sätze über Raumkurven konstanter Breite". Mathematische Nachrichten (in German). 53 (1–6): 337–344. doi:10.1002/mana.19720530126. MR 0317187.
- ^ Leichtweiss, K. (2005). "Curves of constant width in the non-Euclidean geometry". Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg. 75: 257–284. doi:10.1007/BF02942046. MR 2187589. S2CID 119927817.
External links
[edit]- Interactive Applet Archived 2015-11-23 at the Wayback Machine by Michael Borcherds showing an irregular shape of constant width (that you can change) made using GeoGebra.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Curve of Constant Width". MathWorld.
- Mould, Steve. "Shapes and Solids of Constant Width". Numberphile. Brady Haran. Archived from the original on 2016-03-19. Retrieved 2013-11-17.
- Shapes of constant width at cut-the-knot
Curve of constant width
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition
A curve of constant width is a simple closed convex curve in the Euclidean plane for which the width—the distance between any pair of parallel supporting lines—is the same constant value, say , regardless of the direction of the lines.[5] This property requires the curve to bound a convex set, as non-convex sets cannot maintain a uniform minimum distance between parallel supporting lines in all directions; convexity ensures that the set lies entirely on one side of any supporting line, which touches the boundary at least at one point.[6] Supporting lines are defined as lines that intersect the curve's boundary while containing the entire bounded convex region on one half-plane.[7] The width in a specific direction, given by a unit vector , is precisely the distance between the two parallel supporting lines with outward normals and ; for a curve of constant width, this distance equals for every .[5] To illustrate, consider two parallel tangent lines touching the curve at points and ; the perpendicular distance between these lines measures the width in the direction normal to them, and this measurement remains invariant under rotation of the direction.[7] An equivalent characterization is that the orthogonal projection of the bounded convex set onto any line in has constant length .[6] This projection length equivalence follows from the fact that the distance between supporting lines equals the extent of the projection in the perpendicular direction. Unlike general convex curves, where the width varies by direction and the maximum width equals the diameter (the supremum of distances between any two points on the curve), curves of constant width have width equal to the diameter in every direction—a property shared by the circle, which is the unique smooth curve of constant width that is rotationally symmetric in all directions.[8]History
The concept of curves of constant width originated in the 18th century with the work of Leonhard Euler, who in 1778 introduced the notion of "orbiform curves" that maintain a constant distance between parallel supporting lines, particularly in connection with shapes capable of rolling without slipping. Euler constructed such curves using involutes of hypocycloids and explored their properties in relation to polygons with an odd number of sides, laying foundational ideas for non-circular examples.[9] In the 19th century, significant advancements occurred, beginning with Joseph-Émile Barbier's 1860 theorem, which established that all plane convex curves of constant width have the same perimeter , providing a key characterization independent of the specific shape. Shortly thereafter, in 1875, Franz Reuleaux developed the Reuleaux triangle—a non-circular curve of constant width formed by the intersection of three circular arcs from an equilateral triangle—as part of his kinematic mechanisms for engineering applications, popularizing practical constructions beyond the circle. The 20th century brought deeper theoretical insights and generalizations. In 1915, Wilhelm Blaschke demonstrated that any convex set of constant width can be uniformly approximated by Reuleaux polygons, bridging polygonal and smooth cases.[9] Further progress included explorations of smooth variants, with seminal contributions emphasizing their analytic properties and approximations, such as those by Jaglom and Boltyanskii in 1951 on curvature-consistent polygonal limits.[9] These developments solidified the mathematical framework, influencing subsequent studies in convex geometry.Examples
Reuleaux Triangle
The Reuleaux triangle is the archetypal non-circular curve of constant width, formed by the intersection of three circular disks centered at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, each with radius equal to the side length of the triangle. Equivalently, it can be constructed by drawing circular arcs of that radius, centered at each vertex and connecting the other two vertices.[10] This shape exhibits rotational symmetry of order 3 and possesses a constant width equal to the side length of the underlying equilateral triangle. Its area is given by [10] Visually, the Reuleaux triangle maintains an equilateral triangular outline in all orientations due to its threefold rotational symmetry, presenting three distinct vertices regardless of rotation. Kinematically, its constant width enables smooth rolling motion with a fixed height, and it has inspired the rotor design in Wankel rotary engines, where a similar curved triangular shape facilitates rotation within a chamber.[10][11] Compared to a circle of the same width, the Reuleaux triangle encloses a smaller area, and in fact achieves the minimal area among all curves of constant width. It serves as the simplest case of a Reuleaux polygon, which generalizes the construction to regular polygons with an odd number of sides.[10]Smooth and Other Curves
Smooth curves of constant width represent a class of non-circular, infinitely differentiable closed convex curves that preserve a uniform distance between any pair of parallel supporting lines, distinguishing them from the circle while retaining the core geometric property. These curves avoid the infinite curvature points inherent in polygonal approximations like the Reuleaux triangle, which features sharp vertices that can cause jerky motion in rotational applications; instead, smooth variants ensure finite curvature throughout, facilitating more uniform and efficient rotation in mechanisms such as bearings or cams.[12] The existence of infinitely many such smooth curves follows from the theory of support functions, where a curve has constant width if its support function satisfies for all . Any sufficiently smooth periodic function meeting this condition—such as with coefficients chosen to ensure convexity—yields a distinct smooth curve of constant width , allowing for arbitrary variation in shape while preserving the width.[13] A seminal construction originates from Leonhard Euler, who demonstrated that the involute of a plane curve with an odd number of cusps produces a smooth curve of constant width; a representative example is the involute of the deltoid, a three-cusped hypocycloid, resulting in a differentiable boundary with uniform width equal to the deltoid's generating radius.[12] Further examples include algebraic constructions, such as the polynomial curve of constant width developed by Rabinowitz, parameterized as for , which defines an algebraic curve of degree 4 with width 1, verified through its support function properties.[14] Another approach generates curves based on a semi-ellipse, where the boundary is the intersection of circular disks of fixed radius centered at points along the semi-ellipse, yielding a constant width equal to a specified chord length; additional smoothing may be applied for full differentiability.[15] These constructions illustrate the diversity of smooth curves of constant width, which can maintain the defining diameter while exhibiting varied shapes, such as rounded lobes or undulations, to suit specific design needs without compromising the constant width property.[13]Constructions
Geometric Constructions
Curves of constant width can be constructed geometrically using basic tools such as a compass and straightedge, often by replacing straight sides of polygons with circular arcs or by employing intersection and rotation techniques.[16] The Reuleaux triangle serves as a foundational example, built from an equilateral triangle. To construct it, first draw a horizontal base line of length 10 cm using a ruler. Set the compass to a 10 cm radius and place it at one endpoint of the base to draw an arc above the line; repeat from the other endpoint so the arcs intersect at a point, forming the apex. Connect this apex to the base endpoints with the ruler to complete the equilateral triangle, labeling the vertices A (left base), B (right base), and C (apex). Keeping the compass at 10 cm, place it at A and draw a semicircular arc from C to B; repeat with the compass at C (arc from B to A) and at B (arc from A to C). The intersections of these arcs form the boundary of the Reuleaux triangle, which has constant width equal to the side length of the original triangle.[16] This method extends to Reuleaux polygons based on regular polygons with an odd number of sides, such as a pentagon. Begin by constructing a regular pentagon using standard compass and ruler techniques, ensuring all sides are equal. For each side, identify the opposite vertex (skipping two vertices in a pentagon) and use the compass set to the side length as radius to draw a circular arc centered at that opposite vertex, connecting the adjacent vertices of the side. Repeating this for all five sides yields the Reuleaux pentagon, where the arcs bulge outward to maintain constant width equivalent to the polygon's side length. This construction works only for odd-sided polygons because even-sided ones would result in overlapping or non-constant width boundaries due to symmetric vertex pairings.[17] Another approach, known as the crossed-lines method, generates curves of constant width through successive intersections and rotations of lines. Start with three lines intersecting pairwise at points, forming a triangular configuration, and select an additional point on one line. Rotate this point around the nearest intersection vertex to trace an arc until it reaches the next line, using the compass for the rotation with a fixed radius. The new intersection becomes the center for the subsequent rotation, continuing this process for six steps until the curve closes. This method allows flexibility in line angles and radii, producing various constant-width shapes, including non-convex ones if lines are arranged accordingly.[18] Involute constructions offer a way to create smooth curves of constant width from base curves with an odd number of cusps, such as hypocycloids. First, geometrically construct the hypocycloid—for instance, a deltoid (three-cusped hypocycloid) by drawing a fixed circle and rolling a smaller circle (one-third radius) inside it, marking the path of a point on the rolling circle's circumference using string or parametric intersection points. The involute is then the locus of a point at fixed distance along the tangent lines unwrapping from this hypocycloid, achievable by drawing perpendiculars from the cusp curve at equal arc lengths and connecting the endpoints. Leonhard Euler demonstrated that such involutes of odd-cusped curves yield constant-width boundaries, with the width determined by the unwrapping string length. These methods can produce smoother variants beyond polygonal arcs.[19][20]Algebraic Constructions
Algebraic constructions of curves of constant width rely on mathematical formulations that enable precise definition and computational generation, primarily through support functions and their parametric representations. The support function of a convex curve describes the signed distance from the origin to the tangent line at angle , and for a curve of constant width , it satisfies for all . This condition ensures the width—the distance between parallel supporting lines—is invariant under rotation.[13] A general parametric representation derives from the support function as where is the derivative with respect to , and ranges from 0 to . This form parameterizes the curve as the envelope of its tangent lines. For the simplest non-circular case, an example support function is with small enough to ensure convexity, yielding a smooth curve via the parametric equations above. Extensions to higher orders involve adding terms like or , maintaining only odd harmonics to preserve the constant width condition.[4][13] Fourier series provide a flexible framework for constructing smooth curves of constant width by representing the support function as where even harmonics are absent to satisfy . This series ensures the curve is -smooth if sufficiently many terms are included. Polynomial approximations arise by truncating the series and eliminating the parameter , resulting in algebraic equations of even degree. A seminal example is an 8th-degree polynomial curve given by derived from the support function , with a corresponding parametric form Higher-degree polynomials follow similarly from support functions with more harmonics.[13][21] Computational generation often employs algorithms based on rotating an initial curve and intersecting with its offsets to enforce constant width. Starting from a base convex set, the process involves computing the 180-degree rotation around the centroid and taking the intersection with an offset version scaled to width , iteratively refining until closure. More directly, numerical evaluation of the parametric form uses the Fourier support function: discretize , compute and via series summation, then plot the points. Basic pseudocode for plotting in a language like Python is:import numpy as np
import [matplotlib](/page/Matplotlib).pyplot as plt
w = 1.0 # width
a3 = 0.1 # [coefficient](/page/Coefficient) for cos(3θ)
theta = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, 1000)
h = w/2 + a3 * np.cos(3*theta)
dh = -3*a3 * np.sin(3*theta)
x = h * np.cos(theta) - dh * np.sin(theta)
y = h * np.sin(theta) + dh * np.cos(theta)
plt.plot(x, y)
plt.axis('equal')
plt.show()
import numpy as np
import [matplotlib](/page/Matplotlib).pyplot as plt
w = 1.0 # width
a3 = 0.1 # [coefficient](/page/Coefficient) for cos(3θ)
theta = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, 1000)
h = w/2 + a3 * np.cos(3*theta)
dh = -3*a3 * np.sin(3*theta)
x = h * np.cos(theta) - dh * np.sin(theta)
y = h * np.sin(theta) + dh * np.cos(theta)
plt.plot(x, y)
plt.axis('equal')
plt.show()
Properties
Geometric Properties
Curves of constant width enclose areas bounded above by that of the circle, , achieved uniquely by the circle itself via the isoperimetric inequality applied to the fixed perimeter from Barbier's theorem.[22] The lower bound is attained by the Reuleaux triangle, with area , which minimizes the area among all such curves by the Blaschke-Lebesgue theorem.[23] These curves possess distinctive curvature properties, including the relation that the radius of curvature at any point satisfies .[22] Non-circular examples feature at least six vertices—points where the curvature attains a local extremum—often manifesting as cusps or extrema in parametric representations.[12] Their projections onto any line are line segments of fixed length , exhibiting rotational invariance in width measurements. The defining geometric trait involves supporting lines: the distance between any pair of parallel supporting lines equals the constant width , establishing a uniform caliper diameter across all orientations.[24] As convex sets, these curves coincide with the boundaries of their own convex hulls, ensuring no interior points lie outside the spanned region.[22] In kinematic contexts, a curve of constant width rolls without slipping along a straight line while maintaining a constant distance from the line to its centroid, mimicking the motion of a circle despite deviations in shape.[24]Analytic Properties
Curves of constant width exhibit several key analytic properties that distinguish them from general convex curves. A fundamental result is Barbier's theorem, which asserts that the perimeter of any convex curve of constant width is . This holds regardless of the specific shape, as long as the width—the distance between parallel supporting lines—is constant in every direction. The proof relies on the Cauchy-Crofton formula from integral geometry, which relates the length of a curve to the measure of lines intersecting it; for constant width sets, this integral simplifies to yield the perimeter as times the width. The support function provides a powerful analytic representation for such curves, defined as the distance from the origin to the supporting line in direction . For a curve of constant width , it satisfies for all . This condition implies that can be expressed as , where , reflecting the odd symmetry relative to the constant term. The implications for arc length follow directly: the radius of curvature is , and since , the total arc length integrates to , recovering Barbier's theorem via this parameterization.[21] Regarding curvature, the total curvature of a convex closed plane curve, including those of constant width, is exactly , as established by the fact that the tangent turning angle over the full loop sums to . In terms of the support function, the curvature , so the integral . A notable feature is the Blaschke theorem, which guarantees at least three pairs of points on a closed convex plane curve with parallel tangents and equal radii of curvature; for constant width curves, these pairs occur at antipodal points where .[25] Finally, constant width implies constant diameter for convex sets: the diameter , defined as the supremum of distances between any two points, equals the constant width . This follows because the distance between any two points is at most the width in the direction perpendicular to the line joining them, and equality is achieved in some directions, making .[26]Applications
Mechanical Engineering
In mechanical engineering, curves of constant width have been employed since the late 19th century to enable precise, uniform motion in mechanisms where traditional circular components would introduce variability or instability. Franz Reuleaux, a pioneering figure in kinematics, explored these curves—particularly the Reuleaux triangle—in his seminal work The Kinematics of Machinery (1875), demonstrating their utility in constrained motion systems such as steam engine regulators and rollers that maintain consistent spacing between parallel planes without gaps or wobbling during rotation.[27] This foundational analysis laid the groundwork for practical applications, emphasizing how the constant breadth ensures predictable kinematic behavior under load. Reuleaux's kinematic models, preserved in collections like those at Cornell University, illustrated these principles through physical demonstrations of linkages and cams, influencing machine design well into the 20th century.[28] One key application lies in cams and linkages, where constant-width profiles provide positive drive without reliance on springs or weights, ensuring reliable intermittent motion. For instance, box beater cams in textile machinery utilize Reuleaux triangle shapes to deliver consistent reciprocating action for beating warp threads, maintaining uniform contact and eliminating backlash during operation.[29] Similarly, early rotary engines employed Reuleaux rotors meshed with internal gears to produce smooth circular motion, serving as conceptual precursors to the Wankel engine's eccentric rotary design, which adapts a curved Reuleaux-like triangle for internal combustion.[29] These configurations exploit the curve's invariant width to achieve stable rotation and load distribution in high-speed linkages. In precision structures, constant-width curves enhance tools and components requiring unwavering diameter for effective performance. Drilling bits based on the Reuleaux triangle, developed by engineer Harry James Watts in the early 20th century, enable the machining of near-square holes by rotating against a square socket, with the constant breadth ensuring even cutting edges and minimal deviation—ideal for filleted square holes in mechanical fittings.[29] Reuleaux rollers, cylindrical components with constant-width cross-sections, facilitate stable material transport in conveyor systems or bearings by rolling between parallel surfaces without axial wobble, preserving uniform support under varying loads.[27] This property also benefits seals in rotary applications, where the invariant diameter maintains consistent contact pressure to prevent leakage in dynamic environments like pumps. Advancing into the 21st century, computer numerical control (CNC) machining has revitalized these curves for fabricating complex precision parts, allowing lathes and mills to turn solids of constant width with high accuracy for custom mechanisms. Such modern techniques enable the production of Reuleaux-based components for advanced robotics and actuators, building on Reuleaux's kinematics to achieve sub-millimeter tolerances in non-circular profiles.[30]Numismatics and Design
Curves of constant width have found notable applications in numismatics, particularly in coin design, where their unique properties enhance functionality and security. The British 50 pence coin, introduced in 1969, features a seven-sided equilateral curve heptagon shape, a Reuleaux polygon variant that maintains constant width across all orientations.[31] This design allows the coin to roll smoothly like a circle in vending machines while being easily distinguishable by sight and touch from round coins, facilitating quick recognition in transactions.[32] Similarly, the British 20 pence coin, first circulated on June 9, 1982, adopts the same seven-sided constant-width profile to reduce the overall weight of pocket change post-decimalisation, while preserving compatibility with automated coin-handling systems.[33] The Canadian one-dollar "loonie," launched in 1987, employs an 11-sided Reuleaux polygon outline, ensuring constant width for reliable vending machine acceptance and aiding anti-counterfeiting through its distinctive non-circular form that mimics the diameter of existing round coins like the U.S. Susan B. Anthony dollar.[34] These shapes deter counterfeits by complicating replication of the precise curvature, which machines can verify alongside weight and composition for authentication.[29] In art and architecture, constant-width curves inspire creations that exploit their paradoxical appearance—resembling circles in motion yet revealing angularity when stationary—for visual illusions of circularity. Sculptors like Dario Santacroce have incorporated Reuleaux triangles into 3D-printed sandstone works, such as interlocking spherical forms, to evoke dynamic, rounded motion in static pieces.[35] Mathematical models blending art and science, including Reuleaux-based volumes, appear in installations that generalize the triangle's form, often evoking the curved tracery in Gothic cathedral rose windows for an illusion of seamless rotational symmetry.[36] Tiles employing constant-width profiles, such as Reuleaux-inspired mosaics, create flooring or wall patterns that simulate rolling circular paths, enhancing perceptual depth without traditional round elements.[37] Industrial design leverages rounded constant-width profiles for ergonomic benefits in everyday products, promoting comfortable handling through uniform grip dimensions. The adoption of constant-width coins has had measurable economic impacts, including cost savings in manufacturing and machinery compatibility. The British 20 pence's 1982 introduction, following trials in 1981, lightened average pocket change compared to equivalent round denominations, easing daily carry for consumers.[38] Vending machine operators benefited from reduced jamming incidents, as the constant width ensured smooth insertion akin to circular coins.[29] Overall, these designs balanced aesthetic innovation with practical efficiency, influencing global numismatic trends toward non-circular security features.Computational Uses
Software tools for generating and plotting curves of constant width have been developed in various programming environments, facilitating digital experimentation and visualization. In MATLAB, interactive programs enable the creation of Reuleaux triangle generalizations by parameterizing curves based on odd-sided regular polygons and circular arcs, allowing users to adjust parameters like the number of sides and arc radii to maintain constant width.[39] Similarly, MATLAB file exchanges provide scripts for rendering Reuleaux polygons and related shapes, supporting parametric equations for arcs centered at vertices opposite each side.[40] In Python, libraries such as NumPy and Matplotlib are used to construct Reuleaux polygons through vertex calculations and SVG output, with scripts handling odd numbers of sides (e.g., 3 for the triangle, 7 for the heptagon) to ensure constant width via equal arc radii.[41] Simulations of curves of constant width leverage parametric representations to analyze properties like projections and shadows in computer graphics applications. Shadow functions, defined as for a parametric curve , are computed piecewise for shapes like the Reuleaux triangle, revealing variations in projected width under different light angles while confirming overall constancy.[42] In computer-aided design (CAD) software such as AutoCAD, optimization routines model solids of constant width by revolving 2D curves, targeting minimal area enclosures; for instance, theoretical characterizations identify Reuleaux polygons as optimal for least area given fixed width and inradius constraints.[43][44] Recent advances in the 2020s include algorithmic tools for constructing constant-width curves suitable for 3D printing. C++-based generators produce Reuleaux polyhedra by embedding self-dual planar graphs and optimizing arc intersections via differential evolution, outputting STL files for additive manufacturing while preserving constant width.[45] A 2020 study on the graphs behind Reuleaux polyhedra used computational graph theory to construct hundreds of new 3D constant-width bodies, extending beyond traditional tetrahedra for printable prototypes.[46] In 2024, mathematicians developed algorithms for building n-dimensional shapes of constant width with volumes at most 0.9^n times that of the unit ball, with potential applications in optimization and simulation.[47] In robotics, curves of constant width model uniform-width objects for path planning, particularly in locomotion systems requiring stable trajectories. Bipedal robots employ Reuleaux triangle cam-follower mechanisms to generate foot paths with constant body height, where the triangle's rotation parameter (from to ) ensures a straight-line support phase and quasi-static stability during stepping.[48] This approach simplifies kinematic planning by leveraging the curve's inherent width constancy for predictable contact and velocity (e.g., 21.9 mm/s step speed).[49]Generalizations
Three-Dimensional Bodies
A three-dimensional body of constant width is a compact convex set in Euclidean space such that the distance between every pair of parallel supporting planes—known as the width—is the same constant value regardless of direction. This property requires the body to be strictly convex, as non-strict convexity would lead to varying widths in certain directions. The width equals the diameter of the body, the maximum distance between any two points on its boundary.[50] The sphere of diameter provides the trivial example of such a body, possessing rotational symmetry and uniform properties in all directions. A prominent non-spherical example is the Meissner tetrahedron, introduced by Ernst Meissner in 1911 through a modification of the Reuleaux tetrahedron. The Reuleaux tetrahedron, formed by the intersection of four balls of radius centered at the vertices of a regular tetrahedron with edge length , approximates constant width but fails strictly due to greater separation between opposite edges than between a vertex and opposite face; the Meissner construction remedies this by replacing three edges with suitably curved spherical portions centered at the opposite vertices, yielding a smooth surface of exact constant width. The Meissner tetrahedron is significant for minimizing volume among bodies of constant width , with its volume serving as a lower bound in this class.[51][3] Key properties include bounds on volume and surface area established by Wilhelm Blaschke in 1915: among all such bodies, the sphere maximizes both, achieving volume and surface area , the latter serving as the three-dimensional analog to Barbier's theorem for two-dimensional perimeters. Tetrahedral bodies like the Meissner tetrahedron realize the minimal volume, approximately , illustrating the variability possible within the constant width constraint while underscoring the sphere's extremal role. All such bodies are also strictly convex and possess a diameter of .[3] Constructions typically rely on intersections of balls of radius ; a body of constant width coincides with the intersection of all balls of radius centered at points on its own boundary, providing a self-consistent geometric definition. Alternative methods involve offset surfaces parallel to a core skeleton at distance or parametric formulations using the support function , where for all unit vectors on the sphere . These approaches extend two-dimensional techniques, such as rotating curves of constant width, to generate three-dimensional examples like solids of revolution.[50][52]Non-Convex and Non-Euclidean Cases
While the classical definition of a curve of constant width applies to convex sets in the Euclidean plane, where the distance between parallel supporting lines remains constant regardless of orientation, generalizations to non-convex curves introduce significant definitional challenges. In particular, for non-convex shapes such as star-shaped or self-intersecting curves, the notion of "width" must be carefully adapted using supporting lines that may touch the boundary at multiple points, potentially leading to ambiguities in measurement since inward dents could violate the constant separation property. One approach to overcome this is through hedgehogs of constant width, which are non-convex generalizations constructed as the boundary of the union of line segments connecting points on a closed curve to a fixed interior point, maintaining a constant width via these supports despite concavities. These hedgehogs allow for self-intersecting or star-like forms while preserving the directional width invariance, though their construction often requires ensuring the support function remains well-defined across non-smooth regions.[53] Another generalization employs envelopes of families of lines defined by periodic functions, such as , which yield non-convex curves of constant width by generating astroid-like shapes with cusps, though these may not be simple closed curves. Such constructions highlight the tension between maintaining constant width and avoiding self-intersections or non-simplicity, often resulting in curves that are only piecewise smooth.[54] In non-Euclidean geometries, the concept of constant width adapts to the underlying metric, with supporting "lines" replaced by geodesics and widths measured along geodesic parallels. In hyperbolic geometry, curves of constant width are represented using a track function relative to a diameter geodesic , where the curve satisfies a parametric equation ensuring constant geodesic distance between parallel horocycles. These curves, such as hyperbolic analogs of the Reuleaux triangle, exhibit constant width but vary in length depending on the support function , as given by the formula for curvature . An adaptation of Barbier's theorem in the Lobachevski plane states that for a horocycle-convex curve of constant width , the length differs from the Euclidean , with the geodesic circle achieving and the Reuleaux analog . Uniqueness results further characterize the hyperbolic disk as the only body of constant width with constant projection lengths onto normal geodesics.[55][56] On the sphere , spherical bodies of constant width are defined such that the width across any supporting hemisphere —measured as the thickness of the narrowest lune containing the body—is constantly . A key property is that the spherical diameter equals , and for , the body is strictly convex. Moreover, on the 2-sphere, a convex body has constant diameter if and only if it has constant width , providing a direct analog to the Euclidean case without additional conditions. Approximations of such bodies by spherical polygons or reductions in surface area have been studied, with Blaschke's theorem extended to show that any constant width body with can be approximated arbitrarily well by inscribed polytopes. Barbier's theorem adapts here as well, though the perimeter (great circle length) scales with the spherical excess rather than .[57][58][59] Advanced generalizations extend constant width to higher dimensions via bodies of constant girth, where girth denotes the constant length of projections onto great hyperspheres or the invariant separation by parallel hyperplanes in curved spaces. In discrete settings, analogs appear as lattice polytopes of constant lattice width, defined by the minimal number of parallel lattice lines separating the polytope, with minimal volume examples studied in .[60]References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Constant-width_semi-ellipse.svg