Hubbry Logo
Ørsted (company)Ørsted (company)Main
Open search
Ørsted (company)
Community hub
Ørsted (company)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ørsted (company)
Ørsted (company)
Ørsted (company)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ørsted A/S (formerly DONG Energy) is a Danish multinational energy company. Headquartered in Fredericia, Denmark, Ørsted is the largest energy company in Denmark. The company adopted its current name on 6 November 2017. It was previously known as DONG.

Key Information

As of January 2022, the company is the world's largest developer of offshore wind power by number of built offshore wind farms.[3] Ørsted developed approximately 30% of the global offshore wind power installed capacity, excluding mainland China.[4] Globally, Ørsted produces 90% of its energy from renewable sources, and has an objective of exceeding 95% by 2023 and 99% by 2025.[4] The company has a goal of net zero generation by 2025 and no carbon emissions by 2040.[5]

In 2025, Ørsted A/S broke into the top 10 in the Corporate Knights Global 100, coming in ninth in the annual ranking of the world's most sustainable corporations.

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

Ørsted has its origin in the Danish state-owned company Dansk Naturgas A/S. The company was founded in 1972 to manage gas and oil resources in the Danish sector of the North Sea. After some years, the company was renamed to Dansk Olie og Naturgas A/S (DONG), meaning Danish Oil and Natural Gas. At the beginning of the decade of the 2000s, DONG started to expand itself into the electricity market by taking long positions in electricity companies. In 2005, DONG acquired and merged Danish electrical power producers Elsam and Energi E2 and public utility (electricity distribution) companies NESA, Københavns Energi and Frederiksberg Forsyning. The result of the merger was the creation of DONG Energy. The merger was approved by the European Commission on 14 March 2006. In 2002 Elsam had installed the 160 MW Horns Rev offshore wind farm, which was the first large-scale offshore wind farm in the world.[6][7][8]

In 2005, DONG Energy acquired 10.34% in the Ormen Lange gas field (operated by Shell). The share of gas reserves allocated to DONG Energy are approximately 40 billion cubic metres (1.4 trillion cubic feet). The following year, DONG entered a 20-year contract for one billion cubic meters of natural gas per year from 2011, from Gazprom in Russia through Nord Stream 1 and Germany. The deal included that DONG delivers 600 million cubic meters per year (for 15 years) from the Ormen Lange gas field to Gazprom in United Kingdom.[9]

In 2007, DONG and Wingas (partly owned by Gazprom) agreed to a gas swap, where DONG delivers gas to Wingas UK, while Wingas delivers the same amount to DONG in North Germany.[10] The deal was criticized as "damaging to European interests".[11]

Use of fossil fuels

[edit]

At about the time of the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, DONG Energy adopted the "85/15 vision" strategy, with the aim of changing from a company with 85% of activities fossil fuel based to a company 85% based on green energy activities.[12]

In 2009, the Gazprom->DONG contract was doubled to 2 bcm/year for 18 years, beginning in 2012.[13] However, Gazprom records showed that DONG only bought 15% of that amount in 2012 and 2013.[14]

In 2009, DONG Energy sold its fiber broadband in northern Zealand to TDC A/S.[15]

In 2010, the company started a cooperation with Dutch Nederlandse Energie Maatschappij [nl].[16] However, in 2014 DONG Energy withdrew its consumer activities from the Dutch market.[17][18] In 2010, DONG divested Norwegian power companies Salten and Nordkraft.[19]

In September 2013, DONG Energy sold a power cable accessing the London Array wind farm to its partners, E.ON and Masdar for around $728 million.[20]

Focus on offshore wind power

[edit]

By 2012, DONG Energy had a wind turbine capacity of 794 MW and planned to add another 594 MW the following year.[21] In 2013, the company finished the construction of the 400 MW Anholt Offshore Wind Farm off the Danish island of Anholt in the Kattegat at a cost of 10 billion Danish kroner (€1.35 bln). DONG Energy was the only bidder in the process.[22][23][24] The following year, DONG Energy divested its last onshore wind turbines, focusing on offshore wind power.[25] of which DONG Energy had 3,000 MW in 2015;[26]

As part of the restructuring plan to fund offshore wind projects, in January 2014 the company sold an 18% stake to New Energy Investment S.a.r.l., a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs, while Danish pension funds, ATP and PFA Pension acquired 4.9% and 1.8% accordingly. The deal was heavily criticised and caused a split of the ruling coalition of Helle Thorning-Schmidt.[12][27] Six cabinet ministers and the Socialist People's Party withdrew from the government.[28] On 9 June 2016, some of these shares were sold in an IPO at Copenhagen Stock Exchange.[29] In 2015, DONG Energy had a deficit of 12 billion DKK, the largest of any Danish company ever.[30]

DONG Energy was listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange in June 2016. At the same time, it divested its ownership shares of five Norwegian oil and gas fields to Faroe Petroleum. That year, the company was voted number 11 on the Clean200 list.[31][32]

In 2017, DONG Energy completed decommissioning of the world's first offshore wind farm, Vindeby Offshore Wind Farm.[33]

Name change

[edit]

In 2017, the company decided to phase-out the use of coal for power generation, and it sold off its oil and gas business to Ineos for US$1.05 billion.[34][35] After selling its oil and gas business the company announced its transition to renewable energy was fulfilled and changed its name to Ørsted after the Danish scientist Hans Christian Ørsted, citing that DONG was inappropriate considering they no longer owned any oil and natural gas assets.[12][36]

In 2018 Ørsted acquired Deepwater Wind to expand offshore wind in the US.[37]

In 2018, a gas price arbitration case was closed between Gazprom on one side, and Ørsted, Shell and others on the opposite side.[38]

In 2019, Ørsted divested the Copenhagen electricity distribution network to Andel for $3 billion.[39]

On 9 September 2020 it was revealed that Mads Nipper, former CEO of Grundfos, will take over as CEO from Henrik Poulsen on 1 January 2021.[40]

In 2020 developer Ørsted sold a 50% stake in the Greater Changhua 1 Offshore Wind Farm in Taiwan to Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec and Cathay PE for $2.7 billion.[41]

In 2022, Ørsted began rewilding the seabottom near some of its offshore wind farms.[42]

Operations

[edit]

Ørsted considers Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Netherlands as core markets of corporation.[43] However, in 2015 they also received a lease from the US agencies the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which, in the lease, handed over some sea area in the United States for wind park development, specifically in New Jersey.

Oil and gas exploration and production

[edit]

Before the divestment of its oil and gas upstream assets to Ineos in 2017, DONG Energy's core areas of oil and gas exploration and production lay in the southern part of the Norwegian North Sea and the Danish part of the North Sea, Barents Sea, west of Shetland, and in the central region of Norway (gas production). The reserve base was expected to be 570 million barrels (91,000,000 m3) of oil equivalent.[34] In 2016, it produced 100,000 barrels per day (16,000 m3/d) of oil equivalent.[34]

In 2016, DONG Energy agreed to sell its oil and gas pipelines to Energinet.dk.[44][45] It owned oil and gas pipelines which extend from the Danish part of the North Sea to Nybro and the Swedish gas transmission network (Nova Naturgas). DONG Energy co-owned the Tyra West – F3 pipeline pipelines, which create a link from the North Sea Danish section to the Netherlands natural gas hub in Den Helder, the DEUDAN pipeline from Jutland to north of Hamburg in Germany, and the Langeled pipeline from Nyhamna terminal in Norway to Easington in the UK.

Power production

[edit]

Ørsted is the largest power producer in Denmark with market shares of 49% for electricity production and 35% for heat production. It also owns power production facilities and projects in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom.

Ørsted is the largest offshore wind farm company in the world[46] with a market share of 16%.[47] Ørsted surpassed 1,000 offshore wind turbines in 2016.[48] In Denmark, it operates the 209 MW Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm.[49][50] In the United Kingdom Ørsted operates Barrow and Burbo Bank offshore windfarms and will construct Walney and Gunfleet Sands I and II wind farms.[51][52] In addition, it is building the world largest wind farms, the 1,200 MW Hornsea 1 and the 1,386 MW Hornsea 2.[53][54][55]

In North America it is a joint-venture partner in multiple proposed offshore wind projects, including the Block Island Wind Farm, Revolution Wind, South Fork Wind, and Sunrise Wind, all off the southern coast of New England.[56] In August 2025, the Revolution Wind project received an offshore stop-work order from US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.[57]

The company was also developing Ocean Wind, an offshore wind farm on the Atlantic coast near Atlantic City, New Jersey, until it was cancelled in October 2023, and Skipjack Wind, southeast of the mouth of Delaware Bay. The company also has interests in onshore wind farms in Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, and Illinois.

Ørsted was until 2017 [58] the largest shareholder (51%) of offshore wind turbine installer A2SEA,[59] while Siemens owns the other 49%.[60] Ørsted also has 30% of subsea cabling installer CT Offshore.[61]

Ørsted has been developing Borssele 1 and 2 wind farms in the Netherlands since 2021.[62]

Shareholders

[edit]

Ørsted is listed at the Nasdaq Copenhagen stock exchange.[63] The Danish Government holds the majority of Ørsted shares (50.1%).[64] Capital Group Companies, EuroPacific Growth Fund's, and SEAS-NVE holds over 5% of shares.[65] According to a political agreement, the Danish Government shall maintain a majority in the company until 2025.[66]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ørsted (company)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Ørsted A/S is a Danish multinational energy company headquartered in Fredericia, specializing in the development, construction, and operation of renewable energy assets, with a primary emphasis on offshore wind power.
Formerly known as DONG Energy, the company originated from a 2006 merger involving Denmark's state-owned oil and natural gas entity and several regional utilities, initially deriving most revenues from fossil fuels including 85% from coal, oil, and gas. In the 2010s, Ørsted executed a strategic pivot to renewables, divesting its oil and gas business in 2017, phasing out coal, and rebranding to reflect its green focus, thereby achieving over 90% renewable energy generation by the early 2020s. This transformation positioned it as the world's largest offshore wind energy producer by capacity in 2019, with installed renewable capacity surpassing 18 GW across wind, solar, and storage projects in Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific. Ørsted's portfolio includes major offshore wind farms such as Project Two in the UK, capable of supplying to over 1.6 million homes, and it targets expanding to more than 30 GW of renewable capacity by 2030 to support green energy transitions. The company has committed to reducing emission intensity from energy production by 96% by 2023 relative to 2006 levels and aims for net-zero operations aligned with ambitious goals for new projects from 2030. Financially, Ørsted reported 2024 of DKK 71.0 billion and operating profit excluding certain items of DKK 24.8 billion, underscoring operational resilience amid global expansion. Despite these advances, Ørsted has encountered notable setbacks, particularly in U.S. offshore wind endeavors, including the 2023 cancellations of Ocean Wind I and II projects due to , disruptions, and rising costs, incurring impairments up to $5.6 billion, alongside subsequent delays and regulatory halts on projects like Revolution Wind in 2024-2025. These challenges highlight execution risks in scaling renewable infrastructure amid economic and policy volatilities, though the company's European core operations have sustained profitability.

History

Origins as a Fossil Fuel Company

Dansk Naturgas A/S was founded by the Kingdom of on 27 March 1972 as a state-owned entity tasked with developing and managing oil and resources in the Danish sector. The initiative aimed to secure domestic energy supplies amid emerging geopolitical risks to oil imports, with early efforts centered on seismic surveys, drilling, and infrastructure for hydrocarbon extraction. By the mid-1970s, following the , the company accelerated offshore exploration, leading to initial discoveries and production from fields such as the Danish Underground Consortium's assets. Renamed Dansk Olie og Naturgas A/S (DONG) in the late 1970s, the firm expanded its portfolio to include distribution and refining, while maintaining full until partial in the 2000s. Over the subsequent two decades, DONG invested heavily in -fired power generation to support Denmark's industrial base, constructing multiple thermal plants that relied on imported and domestic . This diversification positioned the company as a key supplier of both upstream hydrocarbons—primarily from platforms—and downstream electricity, with accounting for the majority of its output and revenue through the . In 2006, DONG merged with five other Danish utilities, including Energi E2 and Københavns Energi, to form DONG Energy A/S, enhancing its scale in and gas , production, and fossil-based power amid partial sales of equity to private investors such as and A.P. Møller–Mærsk. At this stage, the company operated extensive assets, contributing to Denmark's production of approximately 65,000 barrels per day in the early 2000s and gas output exceeding 5 billion cubic meters annually by the mid-2000s, underscoring its entrenched role in dependency. By 2009, fossil fuels generated 85% of DONG Energy's energy portfolio.

Initial Diversification into Renewables

Following the 2006 merger that formed DONG Energy from six Danish energy companies, three of which already had operations, the company inherited an initial renewable portfolio including early offshore projects such as the Vindeby wind farm (commissioned in 1991 with 5 MW capacity) and began developing onshore wind in markets like , , , and , alongside nascent offshore initiatives in and the . This marked the foundational step in diversifying beyond its predominantly fossil fuel-based assets, where renewables constituted a minor share amid heavy reliance on and for over 85% of power generation. A pivotal strategic shift occurred in 2007–2009, driven by regulatory pressures, the global financial crisis eroding fossil fuel advantages, and European policies favoring renewables, including Denmark's feed-in tariffs and the EU's emerging emissions targets. In April 2007, DONG committed to constructing the 209 MW Horns Rev 2 offshore farm off Denmark's west coast, which became operational in 2009 and supplied power equivalent to 200,000 households. By May 2009, DONG partnered with and to invest DKK 16.4 billion (approximately €2.2 billion) in the initial 630 MW phase of the London Array offshore project in the , then planned as the world's largest, aligning with DONG's explicit strategy to boost renewable electricity generation. These moves followed the abandonment of a proposed 1,600 MW plant in due to opposition, redirecting capital toward . In 2009, DONG formalized its long-term commitment by announcing the "85/15" vision under CEO Anders Eldrup, aiming to transition from 85% fossil-based to 85% by 2040, leveraging offshore wind's scalability and government-backed contracts in the UK and to offset high upfront costs. This period saw renewables grow from a marginal segment—contributing less than 15% of EBITDA in 2008—to a core focus, with investments funneled from operations despite initial about wind's and . By 2010, however, renewables still accounted for only a small fraction, underscoring the gradual nature of the pivot amid ongoing dependencies.

Strategic Pivot and Name Change

In 2017, DONG Energy executed a decisive strategic pivot by divesting its upstream oil and gas business to on September 29, following years of incremental investments in renewables that had already shifted over 50% of its EBITDA to green energy sources by 2016. This divestment, valued at approximately €1.55 billion, eliminated the company's exposure to exploration and production, aligning with a broader commitment to achieve operations and phase out by 2023. The pivot culminated in a corporate rebranding, announced on October 2, 2017, when DONG Energy proposed changing its name to Ørsted to symbolize its departure from heritage—"DONG" having originally denoted and —and embrace a future centered on innovation. The new name paid homage to , the 19th-century Danish physicist who discovered , evoking principles of curiosity, natural forces, and simplicity. Shareholders approved the change at an Extraordinary General Meeting on October 30, 2017, with the effective November 6, 2017, accompanied by a new visual identity emphasizing functionality and . This transformation was underpinned by empirical market dynamics, including declining profitability amid low oil prices and surging demand for offshore wind, enabling Ørsted to reposition as a global leader in renewables without the legacy constraints of its prior name. The move enhanced investor clarity on the company's green focus, contributing to a share price increase of over 300% from 2016 to 2017, though it required navigating and asset reallocation risks.

Expansion and Recent Milestones (2017–2025)

Following the rebranding to Ørsted in 2017, the company accelerated its expansion in offshore wind, divesting its oil and gas business and committing to phase out coal by 2023 as part of a broader to achieve carbon neutrality by 2025 through at least 98% emissions reductions. This period saw Ørsted commission multiple large-scale projects, growing its installed offshore wind capacity from approximately 1.7 GW in 2017 to 10.2 GW by May 2025, with an additional 8.1 GW under construction. Key early milestones included the 2017 commissioning of the Burbo Bank Extension (259 MW, ) and Formosa 1 (128 MW, ), marking initial entries into Asian markets. Expansion intensified in Europe with the 2018 commissioning of Borkum Riffgrund 2 (450 MW, ) and Race Bank (546 MW, ), followed by the 2019 launch of Hornsea 1 (1,218 MW, ), then the world's largest offshore wind farm. Subsequent projects included Borssele 1 & 2 (752 MW, , 2020) and Hornsea 2 (1,320 MW, , 2022), solidifying Ørsted's dominance in the region. In 2017 and 2018, Ørsted secured rights to three German projects totaling over 1 GW, including elements later integrated into Borkum Riffgrund 3. By 2018, the company announced plans to invest DKK 200 billion (approximately $30 billion) in green energy by 2025 to support this growth and target over 30 GW in installed offshore capacity long-term. Geographic diversification advanced into the and further in , with the 2024 commissioning of South Fork Wind (132 MW, off New York), Ørsted's first fully owned US offshore project and among the nation's initial commercial-scale farms. In , Greater Changhua 1 (605 MW) and Greater Changhua 2a (295 MW) entered operation in 2024, while Changhua 2b & 4 (920 MW) neared completion by late 2025. The 2025 commissioning of Gode Wind 3 (253 MW, ) further bolstered European capacity. In March 2025, Ørsted invested $55 million in US developer Mission Clean Energy to expand its American project pipeline. Amid rapid scaling, Ørsted faced industry headwinds by 2025, including elevated costs and delays prompting project cancellations and impairments, particularly in the . In response, the company refocused on core offshore wind in , announcing organizational adjustments in September 2025 to prioritize competitiveness, including a planned reduction of 2,000 global positions by 2027. Despite these challenges, Ørsted remained on track for 99% generation and net-zero emissions by 2025, having decommissioned its final assets ahead of schedule.

Operations

Offshore Wind Development and Capacity

Ørsted's offshore wind development traces its origins to early projects under its predecessor entity, including Horns Rev 1, a 160 MW farm off Denmark's coast commissioned in 2002, which marked one of the world's first large-scale offshore installations. The company accelerated expansion in the through investments in the UK and , achieving milestones such as Hornsea 1 (1,218 MW, operational 2019), the world's largest offshore wind farm at the time, and Hornsea 2 (1,320 MW, operational 2022). This scaling was driven by standardized turbine designs, serial production, and efficiencies, reducing levelized costs from over €100/MWh in the early to competitive levels below €50/MWh by the late . By May 2025, Ørsted reached 10.2 GW of installed offshore wind capacity globally, the largest portfolio outside , following the commissioning of (342 MW) in during Q1 2025. Core operational assets are concentrated in , with significant contributions from projects like Walney Extension (659 MW, 2022) and German sites such as Riffgrund 1 and 2 (762 MW combined). Expansion extended to with Greater 1 and 2a (900 MW combined, , inaugurated April 2024) and to the , where South Fork Wind (132 MW, New York) became the first commercial-scale offshore farm to deliver power in 2024. As of October 2025, Ørsted has 8.1 GW of offshore capacity under construction, including Hornsea 3 (over 2,800 MW, , expected 2027), Revolution Wind (704 MW, , expected 2026), and Borkum Riffgrund 3 (913 MW, , expected 2026). The development pipeline features projects like Baltica 2 (1,498 MW, /, expected 2027) and Sunrise Wind (924 MW, , expected 2027), though economic pressures prompted discontinuation of Hornsea 4 (2,400 MW, ) in May 2025 due to escalated costs, elevated interest rates, and execution uncertainties.
Key Operational Offshore Wind FarmsLocationCapacity (MW)Commissioning Year
Hornsea 11,2182019
Hornsea 21,3202022
Gode Wind 1 & 25822017
Borkum Riffgrund 1 & 27622014/2019
Greater Changhua 1 & 2a9002024
South Fork Wind1322024
This table highlights select high-capacity farms contributing to the 10.2 GW total; full portfolio includes additional Danish and UK sites.

Other Renewable Sources and Fossil Phase-Out

Ørsted maintains a portfolio of onshore projects totaling 3.8 GW in capacity across operation and construction phases, primarily in and , leveraging expertise from its offshore operations to develop utility-scale farms. These assets contribute to diversified renewable generation, with recent milestones including the expected commissioning of the 16.8 MW St. Wendel onshore farm in in 2025. The company also invests in solar photovoltaic (PV) farms and battery energy storage systems, integrating these into hybrid projects that combine renewables with grid stabilization technologies, though these segments represent a smaller share of its overall capacity compared to wind. facilities form another component, utilizing sustainably sourced fuels like wood chips, pellets, and straw to generate heat and power, positioned by Ørsted as a lower-emission bridge technology replacing in combined heat and power plants. Ørsted divested its entire upstream oil and gas business, including licenses, in 2017, marking the completion of its exit from exploration and production. For , the company announced in 2017 its intent to cease operations by 2023 as the first Danish to commit to such a timeline, reducing usage by 81 percent from 2006 levels in the interim; however, the final shutdown of its last -fired combined heat and power plant at Power Station occurred on 31 August 2024, delayed by a Danish government mandate to ensure . This phase-out aligns with Ørsted's strategic shift, resulting in approximately 90 percent of its energy production derived from renewables by 2024.

Global Project Portfolio

Ørsted maintains a diversified global portfolio of renewable energy projects, with offshore wind comprising the core, alongside onshore wind, solar, and assets primarily in and . As of October 2025, the company's installed offshore wind capacity stands at 10.2 GW, with an additional 8.1 GW under construction or in advanced development stages across , the , and . Total installed renewable capacity exceeds 18 GW, powering millions of households while reflecting Ørsted's strategic emphasis on scaling cost-competitive offshore wind outside . In , Ørsted operates over a dozen offshore wind farms, including the UK's Hornsea 1 (1,218 MW, operational since 2019) and Hornsea 2 (1,320 MW, operational since 2022), which together represent some of the world's largest individual projects, with Hornsea 3 (2,800 MW, under construction for 2027 commissioning) and Hornsea 4 (2,400 MW, awarded for 2030) expanding the cluster off . Germany's Borkum Riffgrund series includes Riffgrund 1 (312 MW, operational 2015) and 2 (450 MW, operational 2018), alongside Borkum Riffgrund 3 (913 MW, under construction for 2026), while the ' Borssele 1&2 (752 MW, operational 2020) and Poland's Baltica 2 (1,498 MW, awarded for 2027) and Baltica 3 (1,255 MW, awarded for 2029) underscore expansion into the . Earlier Danish projects like Anholt (400 MW, operational 2013) and Horns Rev 1&2 (369 MW combined, operational) laid foundational experience, though assets, such as biomass-fired plants in , remain a smaller segment tied to legacy operations. North American efforts center on the U.S. East Coast, where Ørsted pioneered commercial offshore with (30 MW, operational 2016) and recently commissioned South Fork Wind (132 MW, operational 2024), delivering power to New York. Revolution Wind (704 MW, originally slated for 2026 commissioning to serve and ) faced a U.S. stop-work order in August 2025 over construction delays, amid broader U.S. market challenges including supply chain issues and policy uncertainties that prompted Ørsted to impair projects like Ocean Wind 1&2 in 2023 and refocus resources. Sunrise Wind (924 MW, under construction for 2027) advanced with Ørsted acquiring full ownership in 2024 following a New York solicitation award. Onshore, U.S. assets include the Helena Energy Center (518 MW combined and solar, completed June 2024 in ), supporting hybrid renewable integration. In , Taiwan hosts Ørsted's key projects, including Formosa 1 (128 MW, operational 2017) as the region's first commercial-scale farm, Greater Changhua 1 (605.2 MW, operational 2024), and Greater Changhua 2a (294.8 MW, operational 2024), with Changhua 2b & 4 (920 MW combined, under construction for 2025-2026 completion) securing TWD 90 billion ($3 billion) financing in July 2025. These initiatives position Ørsted as holding about one-quarter of Taiwan's offshore wind , leveraging local partnerships amid typhoon-resilient designs. Overall, the portfolio's growth reflects heavy reliance on government auctions and contracts, with recent U.S. setbacks—contributing to 2,000 planned job cuts by 2027—prompting a pivot toward European and select international stability.

Corporate Governance and Ownership

Ownership Structure and Major Shareholders

Ørsted A/S is a publicly traded company listed on with the ORSTED.CO, where shares are freely tradable subject to standard market regulations. The company's is dominated by a few major stakeholders, reflecting its origins as a partially state-owned utility that transitioned through while retaining significant public control. As of the latest disclosures in 2024 and post-2025 , the Danish maintains , ensuring strategic alignment with national policies. The Government of Denmark holds 50.1% of the shares through the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities, a stake that has remained stable and provides veto power over key decisions. Equinor ASA, the Norwegian state-controlled energy firm, owns 10.0% following an increase to this level on December 20, 2024. Andel A.M.B.A., a Danish energy cooperative, controls 5%, a position it reaffirmed by participating fully in Ørsted's October 2025 rights issue of approximately 59.56 billion Danish kroner ($9.35 billion). The remaining shares are dispersed among institutional investors and retail holders, with notable positions including Investment Management at around 3.17%, BlackRock Inc. at 0.53%, and at 0.48%. Institutional ownership overall constitutes about 4.76% of the float, with low insider holdings excluding major stakeholders at approximately 20.71% when broadly interpreted to include aligned entities. The 2025 , approved by shareholders and executed at a discount to bolster capital amid impairments, saw participation from existing major holders without diluting their relative control significantly.
Major ShareholderOwnership PercentageAs of Date
Government of 50.1%2024–2025
ASA10.0%December 2024
Andel A.M.B.A.5.0%Post-October 2025
Norges Bank ~3.17%Latest available
This structure underscores Ørsted's hybrid public-private model, where state influence tempers market-driven decisions, particularly in offshore wind investments reliant on policy support.

Executive Leadership and Strategic Decisions

Rasmus Errboe has served as Group President and Chief Executive Officer of Ørsted since February 1, 2025, succeeding Mads Nipper following a period of significant financial pressures from U.S. offshore wind project impairments and cancellations. Errboe, previously since April 2024, leads a Group Executive Team that was expanded effective May 1, 2025, to better align with the full offshore wind , comprising Trond Westlie as , Henriette Fenger Ellekrog, Patrick Harnett, Amanda Dasch as Chief Development Officer, and Godson Njoku as Chief Generation Officer. This structure emphasizes execution in development, construction, and operations amid market volatility. Under Errboe's , Ørsted announced organizational adjustments on October 9, 2025, to enhance competitiveness by streamlining operations, reducing the global workforce by approximately 25%—or 2,000 jobs—by the end of 2027, and sharpening focus on offshore projects in while deprioritizing less viable U.S. and other international efforts. These measures respond to elevated supply-chain costs, financing hurdles, and regulatory uncertainties, including potential shifts under U.S. changes. In 2025, the executive team pursued a to raise capital specifically for advancing the South Fork and Revolution Wind projects off New York, despite share price declines tied to broader offshore sector challenges. Nipper's earlier tenure from 2021 to 2025 involved aggressive expansion targets, including a goal of 50 GW renewable capacity by 2030, but was marked by strategic retreats such as the October 31, 2023, decision to halt Ocean Wind 1 and 2 projects off due to escalating costs exceeding $2.9 billion in impairments, contributing to a 60% drop in since early 2023. Errboe's approach builds on this by prioritizing capital discipline and European core markets, where Ørsted maintains operational advantages from prior investments in mature supply chains.

Financial Performance

Ørsted's primary revenue streams derive from electricity generation and sales from its renewable energy assets, predominantly offshore wind farms operating under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs), contracts for difference (CfDs), and merchant market exposure. In 2024, total revenue amounted to DKK 71.0 billion, reflecting a 10% decline from DKK 79.3 billion in 2023, primarily due to lower power sales volumes amid market conditions. Offshore wind contributed the largest share at DKK 53.8 billion (75.7%), driven by 9.9 GW of installed capacity generating significant output. Onshore renewables, including wind and solar, generated DKK 2.7 billion (3.8%), while bioenergy and other segments, encompassing cogeneration and solar PV, accounted for DKK 15.1 billion (21.2%). Approximately 91% of revenue was aligned with EU taxonomy criteria for sustainable activities, underscoring the dominance of low-carbon sources, though residual contributions from gas (6%) and coal (1%) persisted until phase-out completions. The following table summarizes the 2024 revenue breakdown by key segments:
SegmentRevenue (DKK million)Share of Total (%)
Offshore Wind53,80875.7
Onshore Renewables2,7203.8
15,10521.2
Adjustments-599-0.8
Total71,034100
Profitability, measured by EBITDA, has exhibited volatility tied to asset performance, project impairments, and external factors like wind resource variability and costs. In , EBITDA reached DKK 32.0 billion, a sharp rise from DKK 18.7 billion in 2023, bolstered by elevated generation from operational assets and DKK 7.3 billion in cancellation fees from divested projects, though offset by DKK 15.6 billion in impairments related to U.S. offshore developments and impacts. Adjusted EBITDA, excluding such fees and new partnerships, stood at DKK 24.8 billion, up 3% year-over-year and aligning with guidance. Historical trends show a peak of approximately DKK 32.1 billion in 2022, followed by the 2023 dip amid U.S. market challenges including and permitting delays, reflecting Ørsted's exposure to development risks in unsubsidized auctions. Into 2025, first-half EBITDA climbed to DKK 13.9 billion (excluding partnerships and fees), a 9% increase from the prior year, supported by offshore site earnings of DKK 7.7 billion in Q1 alone from enhanced output at assets like Gode Wind 3. However, full-year guidance was revised downward to DKK 24-27 billion in September 2025 due to below-normal wind speeds in summer months, highlighting risks. Overall, profitability has trended toward stabilization through matured operational portfolios, with 99% of 2024 EBITDA taxonomy-aligned, though sustained gains depend on execution in high-cost offshore expansions and mitigation of policy-driven impairments.

Investments, Impairments, and Capital Raises

Ørsted has pursued substantial investments in offshore wind development, with a planned capital expenditure of DKK 200 billion (approximately $30.2 billion) in green energy projects through 2025 to expand capacity toward 30 GW globally. In its 2024 business plan update, the company outlined a DKK 270 billion investment program for 2024–2030, prioritizing offshore wind construction and expecting to allocate around DKK 130 billion by 2027, though this was later refined to focus on core assets amid rising costs and policy risks. By early 2025, Ørsted adjusted its strategy to reduce the 2030 investment program by 25% and emphasize financial resilience, directing funds toward select high-return projects like Revolution Wind in the US while suspending dividends for 2023–2025 to conserve capital. The company recorded significant impairments in 2024, totaling DKK 15.6 billion, primarily driven by challenges in its portfolio amounting to DKK 14.1 billion. These stemmed from elevated US interest rates reducing asset values, downward revisions in appraisals, and execution delays with cost overruns on the project, which alone prompted a DKK 4.3 billion charge in Q4 2024 due to postponed commissioning and higher-than-expected expenses. Overall Q4 impairments reached DKK 12.1 billion ($1.7 billion), reflecting broader sector headwinds including disruptions and regulatory uncertainties in the US market. To bolster its balance sheet amid these pressures, Ørsted executed a major capital raise in 2025, completing an oversubscribed on October 6 that generated DKK 59.6 billion ($9.4 billion) from existing shareholders at a discounted price. Announced in August following US policy shifts under the Trump administration that halted projects like Revolution Wind, the issuance aimed to enhance liquidity for ongoing developments, mitigate impairment impacts, and support credit ratings through 2027. This followed strategic divestments, such as the February 2025 sale of a 24.5% stake in the West of Duddon Sands for GBP 456 million, to optimize capital allocation.

Market Valuation and Stock Performance

As of October 24, 2025, Ørsted A/S had a of approximately 156.81 billion Danish kroner (DKK), reflecting its shares trading at 118.70 DKK on under the ticker ORSTED.CO. This valuation positioned the company as a mid-tier player in the global sector, with its enterprise value incorporating significant debt from offshore wind project financing. The stock exhibited a one-year decline of 16.75% in market capitalization, driven by operational challenges including project delays and adverse weather impacting generation. Ørsted's stock reached an all-time high closing price of 218.82 DKK on January 7, 2021, amid optimism over offshore wind expansion and pre-COVID stability, but has since depreciated substantially, trading at roughly half that level by late 2025. The decline accelerated post-2021 due to rising rates, in costs, and impairments from canceled U.S. projects such as Ocean Wind 1, which contributed to net losses in exceeding 900 million DKK. In , annual revenue fell 10.37% to 71.03 billion DKK, correlating with a share price drop from highs near 150 DKK in early to the 115-120 DKK range by October 2025. Recent performance in 2025 has been volatile, with shares fluctuating between 110.05 DKK and 126.00 DKK year-to-date, averaging around 119.04 DKK, amid lowered guidance. In 2025, Ørsted reduced its full-year EBITDA forecast to 24-27 billion DKK, citing below-norm speeds in Q3 (particularly July-August) and grid connection delays for assets like Riffgrund 3, which eroded investor confidence and pressured the stock downward by approximately 7% in the preceding month. Despite maintaining gross guidance at 50-54 billion DKK for 2025, the company's beta of 0.61 indicates lower volatility relative to the broader market, though sensitivity to subsidies and prices remains a key valuation risk. Q3 2025 results, scheduled for release on November 5, are anticipated to show continued margin pressure from , with analyst EPS estimates at -0.03 DKK versus +0.58 DKK in Q3 2024.

Business Model and Economic Realities

Reliance on Government Subsidies and Contracts

Ørsted's offshore wind projects, which constitute the core of its portfolio, depend significantly on government-supported mechanisms such as Contracts for Difference (CfDs) and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) to secure revenue predictability amid volatile wholesale electricity prices and high capital costs. These instruments often function as subsidies by guaranteeing minimum payments when market prices fall below agreed strike levels, enabling projects that might otherwise be uneconomic. For instance, in its Q1 2025 interim financial report, Ørsted recorded income from government grants in its offshore segment, though this decreased year-over-year, highlighting ongoing but varying reliance. In , particularly the and , CfDs have been pivotal for Ørsted's project pipeline. The company's 3 offshore wind farm operates under a CfD with a of £48.69 per MWh (adjusted to 2025 prices), providing payments during periods of low market prices to cover costs. Similarly, Ørsted's 3 and 4 projects received CfD allocations in September 2024 for a combined 1,080 MW capacity share, underscoring continued use of these contracts to de-risk investments and reduce financing costs by up to 2%. In , where the government holds a 50.1% stake in Ørsted, offshore wind tenders incorporate explicit ; a May 2025 announcement outlined up to $8.3 billion in support for 3 GW of capacity, sufficient to power three million homes, reflecting state-backed incentives to drive deployment. In the United States, Ørsted's projects have leveraged federal tax credits under the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and state-level incentives alongside PPAs. New Jersey awarded Ørsted a $1 billion in 2023 for an offshore , allowing retention of federal tax credits that would otherwise pass to ratepayers, though this faced legal challenges from residents. Projects like Sunrise Wind and Revolution Wind, totaling billions in development costs, incorporated these supports but encountered disruptions in 2025 when the U.S. government issued stop-work orders amid policy shifts, exposing the fragility of subsidy-dependent models. This reliance extends to direct state intervention, as evidenced by Denmark's August 2025 commitment of approximately $4.7 billion—its proportional share of a $9.4 billion —to bolster Ørsted amid U.S. project impairments and construction halts. Critics, including analysts, argue that Ørsted's strategy of bidding low in subsidized auctions followed by cost overruns and impairments reveals an inherent dependence on policy guarantees, with historical UK wind farms linked to the company receiving nearly £8.9 billion in total subsidies. While Ørsted has pursued unsubsidized bids, such as zero-subsidy wins in in 2017, the prevalence of CfDs and grants in recent financials and tenders indicates that full market competitiveness remains elusive without governmental backing.

Cost Structures and Efficiency Compared to Fossil Fuels

Ørsted's offshore wind projects feature a cost structure characterized by substantial upfront capital expenditures (CAPEX), encompassing , substation , subsea cabling, and installation, which can account for 70-80% of lifetime costs due to the scale and engineering demands of marine environments. Operational expenditures (OPEX) remain low, primarily limited to , monitoring, and decommissioning, with global averages for offshore wind at approximately 79-91 USD/kW/year depending on region. In comparison, the company's legacy operations, such as combined-cycle plants, involved lower initial CAPEX—often 30-50% less per MW installed—but higher OPEX dominated by volatile fuel costs, which constituted 60-80% of ongoing expenses amid fluctuating commodity prices. This shift has exposed Ørsted to greater financing risks during phases, as evidenced by rising interest rates impacting project economics in 2023-2024. Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) metrics highlight ongoing disparities, with the global weighted-average LCOE for offshore wind reaching 79 USD/MWh in 2024, driven by technology advancements but tempered by inflation and larger turbine scales. Unsubsidized LCOE for new combined-cycle plants ranged from 45-108 USD/MWh in the same period, benefiting from modular and flexibility, though sensitive to gas price surges as seen in Europe's 2022 . Ørsted has achieved cost reductions through serial production and larger projects, positioning some assets competitively in subsidized auctions, yet analyses indicate offshore wind's LCOE remains 20-50% higher than efficient gas generation without policy support, underscoring reliance on contracts for difference to bridge the gap. Efficiency comparisons reveal structural limitations in renewables versus fossil fuels. Offshore wind turbines operated by Ørsted achieve capacity factors of 40-55%, reflecting variable wind resources and wake effects in arrays, lower than the 50-60% and near-100% dispatchable utilization potential of modern gas plants during . generation's baseload reliability contrasts with wind's , necessitating grid-scale backups or storage—costs not fully captured in standard LCOE—which can elevate effective system expenses by 20-50% in high-renewable grids, as demonstrated in Denmark's integration challenges. Ørsted's transition has thus prioritized scale to boost utilization, yet empirical data affirm ' superior on-demand efficiency for .

Risks from Intermittency and Supply Chain Dependencies

Ørsted's offshore wind assets are subject to risks arising from the inherent variability of speeds, which directly impacts power output and revenue stability. In 2024, lower speeds contributed to a 5% reduction in fourth-quarter power to 5.7 TWh, while overall offshore wind load factors stood at 42%, reflecting dependence on fluctuating patterns. This variability exposes approximately 15% of projected revenue from offshore and onshore assets between 2025 and 2030 to power fluctuations, as production mismatches with hedged volumes can lead to hedge ineffectiveness. Ørsted defines risk as the difference between a baseload hedged and the typically lower capture , which erodes profitability during periods of subdued or grid constraints. strategies include fixed-volume hedging up to a 70% maximum ratio within a two-year horizon and long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) that incorporate intermittency-adjusted pricing, such as ERCOT contracts at DKK 195/MWh for 2025-2033. However, chronic exposure to pattern shifts, compounded by events, continues to pose operational challenges, as evidenced by weather-related output reductions in onshore assets during the first quarter of 2024. Supply chain dependencies represent a significant vulnerability for Ørsted, given the concentrated supplier base for critical components like turbines, blades, nacelles, vessels, and export cables. The European offshore wind supply chain is constrained to approximately 10 GW annual capacity due to bottlenecks in these areas, leading to delays, cost inflation, and eroded project economics. In 2024, supply chain issues drove delays and cost overruns for projects including Sunrise Wind (DKK 4.3 billion increase) and Revolution Wind (DKK 3.8 billion increase), while broader dependencies on scarce raw materials such as rare earths and heightened risks. Ørsted has acknowledged that "the Group has suffered and may suffer significant losses in the future as a result of its supply chain and related dependencies," contributing to project discontinuations like 4 in May 2025, where continued supply chain challenges eroded commercial viability amid macroeconomic pressures. These dependencies also amplify risks from supplier financial distress or defaults, prompting Ørsted to implement volume agreements, processes, and fixed-price contracts for commodities like , though stretched supplier finances persist as a to execution timelines. Geopolitical and maturation risks in sourcing minerals from regions prone to labor issues further underscore the fragility, with efforts to diversify through partnerships (e.g., lower-emission with Dillinger) providing partial resilience but not eliminating exposure.

Controversies and Criticisms

Project Cancellations and Cost Overruns

In October 2023, Ørsted ceased development of the Ocean Wind 1 and Ocean Wind 2 offshore wind projects off the coast of , totaling 2,400 MW capacity, due to supplier delays, high , rising interest rates, and bottlenecks that rendered the projects economically unviable. The cancellation of Ocean Wind 1 alone resulted in an impairment charge of approximately $2.8 billion, contributing to total impairments of DKK 28.4 billion for the first nine months of 2023, primarily tied to U.S. projects. In January 2024, Ørsted terminated its offtake agreement with the State of Maryland for the 966 MW Skipjack Wind project off the , citing challenging market conditions including elevated costs and insufficient revenue support, while repositioning the project for potential future opportunities. This move effectively stalled development, as the loss of the power purchase agreement undermined commercial viability amid broader U.S. offshore wind sector pressures. In May 2025, Ørsted discontinued the 2.4 GW Hornsea 4 offshore wind project in the UK, attributing the decision to surging costs, higher interest rates, and elevated project risks that exceeded the fixed revenue from its award. The cancellation incurred an impairment of up to DKK 5.5 billion ($838 million). Ongoing projects have also faced significant cost overruns, exemplified by the Sunrise Wind project off New York, where delays in commissioning and escalated expenses led to a DKK 4.3 billion impairment in Q4 , part of broader quarterly impairments totaling DKK 12.1 billion ($1.7 billion). These overruns stem from factors such as inflation-driven material costs and permitting hurdles, contributing to Ørsted's net impairments of DKK 15.6 billion for overall. Such issues underscore the vulnerabilities in offshore wind development, where initial bid prices often prove insufficient against real-world execution challenges.

Political Exposure and Policy Dependence

Ørsted's operations are highly susceptible to shifts in government policies, particularly those governing subsidies, tax credits, and permitting for offshore wind projects, which constitute the core of its portfolio. The company's relies on long-term support from national and supranational frameworks, such as the European Union's renewable targets and U.S. incentives, to ensure project viability amid high upfront capital costs. Policy reversals can trigger immediate financial distress, as evidenced by Ørsted's cancellation of the Ocean Wind 1 project off in 2023, attributed to escalating costs compounded by an "unexpected political and regulatory environment." In the United States, where Ørsted has pursued aggressive expansion, political changes under the Trump administration in 2025 exposed acute vulnerabilities. The administration issued stop-work orders on the Revolution Wind project, revoked permits, and canceled $679 million in federal funding for offshore wind initiatives, affecting nearly completed infrastructure and prompting Ørsted to evaluate significant financial impacts. This led to a $9.4 billion in August 2025 to bolster capital amid "material adverse developments" in the U.S. market, with shares plunging over 16% to record lows following the halt. Ørsted subsequently sued the administration, securing a ruling in 2025 to lift a ban on Revolution Wind, though ongoing legal battles underscore the sector's entanglement with executive policy decisions. These events highlight how U.S. electoral outcomes directly threaten project pipelines, with analysts noting Ørsted's lack of diplomatic leverage exacerbates risks compared to competitors with stronger bilateral ties. Domestically in , Ørsted benefits from state ownership— the government holds a 50.1% stake—enabling interventions like the 2025 infusion of billions to support the , framed partly as a security-policy measure amid U.S. tensions. However, this reliance sparked political backlash, with critics questioning taxpayer exposure to Ørsted's international gambles. In response to U.S. headwinds, Ørsted announced plans in October 2025 to cut 2,000 jobs by 2027 and pivot toward the , where policy stability under frameworks like the plan offers relative insulation, though still contingent on sustained commitments. Overall, such dependence amplifies Ørsted's exposure to geopolitical tensions and populist policy shifts, as seen in the company's explicit attribution of derailment to U.S. changes.

Environmental and Economic Critiques of the Renewable Shift

Critics contend that the rapid shift toward renewables, exemplified by Ørsted's offshore wind developments, imposes underappreciated environmental costs on marine ecosystems. Construction activities, including high-intensity pile-driving for turbine foundations, produce underwater noise levels exceeding 200 decibels, which can cause temporary or permanent in marine mammals and disrupt and migration behaviors. A 2025 U.S. Government Accountability Office assessment identified acoustic disturbances, electromagnetic fields from cables, and as key risks, with limited long-term data on cumulative effects from multiple projects. U.S. Congressman Chris Smith described ocean wind turbines as environmentally dangerous, citing potential harm to fisheries and wildlife amid Ørsted's U.S. initiatives. Lifecycle analyses reveal additional trade-offs, as offshore wind relies on rare earth elements and concrete foundations involving energy-intensive and production processes that generate emissions equivalent to 10-20 grams of CO2 per over a turbine's lifespan—lower than fossil fuels but nontrivial when scaled globally. dependencies, including extraction in regions with lax regulations, contribute to and , offsetting some decarbonization gains. Economically, the renewable transition's intermittency—where wind generation varies unpredictably—forces reliance on fossil fuel backups or overbuilt capacity, elevating system-wide costs by 20-50% in high-penetration scenarios without affordable storage. Ørsted's 2023 cancellation of its Ocean Wind 1 and 2 projects off , incurring a 28.4 billion Danish kroner impairment, underscored vulnerabilities to inflation and hikes, which inflated costs beyond contracted power prices. Subsidies, while enabling deployment, distort markets by concentrating intermittent capacity in suboptimal locations, exacerbating curtailment and grid instability rather than resolving underlying dispatchability issues. These dynamics have contributed to Ørsted's declining over 80% from 2021 peaks, signaling about the shift's viability amid persistent subsidies exceeding $100 billion annually in major markets.

Impact on Energy Sector

Contributions to Renewable Capacity and Energy Transition

Ørsted has installed approximately 10.2 GW of offshore wind capacity globally as of October 2025, supplemented by additional onshore wind, solar, and assets to reach a total renewable portfolio exceeding 18 GW. This capacity includes foundational projects like the Vindeby offshore in , commissioned in 1991 as the world's first of its kind with 11 turbines generating 5 MW, which operated until 2017 and demonstrated early feasibility of marine-based renewables. Subsequent scale-up efforts encompass major European developments such as Hornsea One (1.2 GW, operational since 2019 in the UK, powering over 1 million homes), Hornsea Two (1.4 GW, 2022), and Hornsea Three (2.9 GW under construction, expected by 2027). In , projects like the Greater Changhua 2a and 4 (, 900 MW combined, under construction since 2025) contribute to regional grids, supplying renewable power equivalent to one million households. These installations represent direct additions to renewable generation, with Ørsted constructing 9.2 GW across projects in 2024 alone. The company's expansion has driven technological maturation in offshore wind, reducing levelized costs through larger turbines and fixed-bottom foundations in water depths up to 60 meters, enabling deployment in high-wind and Atlantic sites. By 2025, Ørsted achieved a milestone of over 10 GW operational offshore capacity, with 8.1 GW more under , positioning it as a primary developer in where it holds leading market share. This build-out supports grid integration of variable renewables, often paired with interconnectors and storage pilots, though actual dispatch depends on wind availability and curtailment protocols in host countries. In Denmark's , Ørsted's divestment from (completed by 2023) and pivot to renewables since 2008 have aligned with national goals, contributing to over 50% penetration in supply by enabling export of expertise and capacity to markets. Globally, the firm's 18 GW portfolio advances decarbonization by displacing fossil generation in contracted markets, with ambitions for 27 GW by 2027 emphasizing localization and integration for firmer transition pathways. Empirical data from operational farms indicate capacity factors of 40-50% in mature sites, underscoring contributions to low-carbon MWh but highlighting needs for complementary dispatchable sources to mitigate in broader systems.

Broader Implications for Reliability and National Energy Security

The intermittency of offshore wind power, a core component of Ørsted's portfolio, poses challenges to grid reliability by necessitating substantial backup capacity and flexible generation sources to manage fluctuations in output. In Denmark, where Ørsted originated and contributes over 50% of at peak times, grid stability is maintained through extensive interconnections with Nordic neighbors—exporting surplus during high production and importing hydro or fossil-based power during lulls—along with domestic gas-fired for rapid response. However, this model relies on regional cooperation and dispatchable alternatives, which may not scale reliably in isolated or larger grids like those in the or , where Ørsted operates major projects; without equivalent backups, high renewable penetration can elevate reserve requirements, curtailment risks, and overall system costs, potentially leading to supply shortfalls during prolonged low- periods. Ørsted's expansion amplifies these reliability concerns in export markets, as evidenced by US projects like Revolution Wind, where delays or halts—such as the 2025 federal stop-work order—have been linked by regional officials to heightened blackout risks during , underscoring the peril of overcommitting to intermittent capacity without proven integration strategies. Broader adoption of Ørsted-style offshore wind, which generated 34% of Denmark's by 2013 but required compensatory flexibility, highlights a causal trade-off: while adding , it demands overprovisioning (e.g., 2-3 times baseload equivalent) or unproven large-scale storage to avoid reliability gaps, as inherently disrupts baseload predictability absent technological mitigations like advanced batteries, which remain economically marginal at grid-scale. On national energy security, Ørsted's renewable focus reduces dependence on imported fossil fuels—Denmark's wind diversification has cut gas import vulnerability—but introduces new risks from concentrated supply chains for turbines and components, often sourced from geopolitically sensitive regions like for rare earths and blades. Offshore installations face heightened physical threats, including sabotage of subsea cables (with at least six incidents since 2022) and damage, which could cascade into widespread outages given the clustered nature of wind farms. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities further compound this, as wind systems are prime targets for attacks that could disable monitoring and control, rendering fleets inoperable and exposing grids to tactics. In contexts like the US, where Ørsted's projects aim to bolster domestic production, policy-driven halts citing national security—such as the 2025 Revolution Wind suspension—reveal tensions between renewable scaling and safeguards against foreign tech dependencies or infrastructure espionage, potentially eroding if wind reliance supplants diversified, resilient sources without addressing these exposures. Empirical patterns from suggest that while Ørsted enhances short-term security via exportable surplus, systemic scaling risks fragmenting if grids prioritize variable output over hardened, fuel-agnostic alternatives, shifting vulnerabilities from fuel to technological and climatic contingencies.

References

  1. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/our-organisation/company-overview
  2. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ORSTED.CO/profile/
  3. https://us.orsted.com/about-us/our-green-energy-transformation
  4. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/orsteds-renewable-energy-transformation
  5. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/our-purpose/about-our-name
  6. https://poweringpastcoal.org/insights/orsteds-profitable-transformation-from-oil-gas-and-coal-to-renewables/
  7. https://orsted.co.uk/insights/expert-take/innovation
  8. https://www.london.edu/think/iie-from-fossil-fuels-to-green-energy-the-orsted-story
  9. https://www.annualreports.com/Company/orsted
  10. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action/case-studies/orsted
  11. https://orsted.co.uk/energy-to-deliver
  12. https://via.ritzau.dk/announcement/14517782?publisherId=13560592&lang=en
  13. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/09/orsted-adjusts-full-year-ebitda-guidance-for-2025-145634951
  14. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/orsted-cease-development-some-us-offshore-wind-projects-2023-10-31/
  15. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/01/rsted-cancels-two-us-offshore-windfarm-projects-at-33bn-cost
  16. https://energynews.pro/en/orsted-suffers-massive-losses-and-delays-key-u-s-wind-project/
  17. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/debt_invest/2022/a49818098v00a48528128v290projectaeolus-hybrid-2022-prospectus-final.pdf?rev=36677e52dbaf443188b27d892f5121eb&hash=EEF950DE98087C13C57D6FA9EEDE3FA3
  18. https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/oil_and_gas_production_in_denmark_2013_uk.pdf
  19. https://www.companieshistory.com/orsted/
  20. https://d3.harvard.edu/platform-rctom/submission/dong-energy-transforming-the-renewable-energy-industry/
  21. https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/DONG_to_Orsted_Seven_Insights_Transform_NOCs.pdf
  22. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2007/05/782799
  23. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2009/05/854462
  24. https://www.businessinsider.com/renewable-energy-strategy-oil-companies-switch-to-clean-energy-2023-4
  25. https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Orsted_A-Leading-Utilitys-Green-Energy-Transition_September-2021.pdf
  26. https://www.leave-it-in-the-ground.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Orsted-Transition-LINGO-2021.pdf
  27. https://www.offshorewind.biz/2017/10/02/dong-energy-renames-to-orsted/
  28. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/financial-reports/2017/aarsrapport2017/orsted_annual_report_2017_final.pdf
  29. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2017/10/we-are-changing-our-company-name-to-orsted
  30. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/02/dong-energy-changes-name-to-orsted-goes-big-on-renewables.html
  31. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2017/10/1623554
  32. https://www.imd.org/ibyimd/case-study/case-study-quadrant-4/
  33. https://www.power-technology.com/features/orsteds-wind-power-pivot-story-far/
  34. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/391208884_DONG_to_Orsted_Seven_insights_to_transform_national_oil_companies
  35. https://stateofgreen.com/en/news/orsted-to-become-carbon-neutral-by-2025/
  36. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/05/solid-operational-performance-and-reached-more-tha-143901901
  37. https://orsted.com/en/what-we-do/renewable-energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
  38. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2017/04/1557851
  39. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2018/11/1852037
  40. https://www.offshore-windindustry.com/news/wind/article-6902-expansion-of-us-project-pipeline-orsted-makes-strategic-investment-in-mission-clean-energy
  41. https://www.emerald.com/shr/article/doi/10.1108/SHR-07-2025-0069/1276851/Orsted-s-strategic-transformation-and-renewable
  42. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/10/orsted-adjusts-organisation-to-strengthen-competit-1461994111
  43. https://www.windtech-international.com/company-news/orsted-to-reduce-workforce-as-part-of-new-strategic-plan
  44. https://orsted.com/en/what-we-do/renewable-energy-solutions/onshore-wind-energy
  45. https://www.energyglobal.com/wind/14032025/rsted-reaches-german-onshore-wind-milestones/
  46. https://orsted.com/en/what-we-do/renewable-energy-solutions/bioenergy
  47. https://beyondfossilfuels.org/europes-coal-exit-tab/
  48. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2024/08/orsted-shuts-down-its-last-coal-fired-heat-and-pow-14000900
  49. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/energy-group-orsted-shuts-down-its-last-coal-fired-plant-2024-08-29/
  50. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/fast-facts
  51. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/08/revolution-wind-receives-offshore-stop-work-order--145387701
  52. https://us.orsted.com/news-archive/2023/10/orsted-ceases-development-of-ocean-wind-1-and-ocean-wind-2
  53. https://us.orsted.com/news-archive/2024/01/orsted-to-acquire-full-ownership-of-sunrise-wind-subject-to-award-in-new-york-4-offshore-wind-solicitation
  54. https://via.ritzau.dk/announcement/13905153?publisherId=13560592&lang=en
  55. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/07/orsted-secures-project-financing-for-greater-chang-1449523911
  56. https://orsted.tw/en/renewable-energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-projects
  57. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/orsted-cut-2000-jobs-by-end-2027-2025-10-09/
  58. https://orsted.com/en/investors/shares
  59. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/ORSTED-A-S-28607554/company/
  60. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2024/12/major-shareholder-announcement-142044081
  61. https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/1933394/major-shareholder-backs-orsted-rights-issue
  62. https://simplywall.st/stocks/dk/utilities/cph-orsted/rsted-shares/ownership
  63. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ORSTED.CO/holders/
  64. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/orsted-raises-935-billion-share-issue-2025-10-06/
  65. https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/01/31/mads-nipper-steps-down-from-leading-orsted-rasmus-errboe-named-new-ceo/
  66. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/04/orsted-expands-group-executive-team-and-appoints-t-1436646511
  67. https://www.windtech-international.com/company-news/orsted-updates-executive-leadership-team-to-reflect-full-offshore-wind-value-chain
  68. https://knowledge.energyinst.org/new-energy-world/article?id=139909
  69. https://www.eenews.net/articles/orsted-scrambles-for-cash-in-face-of-trump-opposition/
  70. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2023/10/oersted-ceases-development-of-its-us-offshore-wind-73751
  71. https://www.rechargenews.com/markets/orsted-s-nipper-a-danish-ceo-who-met-his-downfall-in-the-us/2-1-1773095
  72. https://view.news.eu.nasdaq.com/view?id=b8189dc94269528ea9521238b5f566150&lang=en&src=micro
  73. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/annual2024/orsted-annual-report-2024.pdf
  74. https://www.windtech-international.com/company-news/offshore-wind-growth-and-us-challenges-shape-orsteds-2024-financial-results
  75. https://www.windtech-international.com/company-news/orsted-reports-increased-q1-2025-earnings-amid-short-term-industry-challenges
  76. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/invesments/orsted-to-invest-302b-in-green-energy-by-2025-/22499
  77. https://www.windtech-international.com/company-news/orsted-presents-updated-business-plan-for-2024-2030
  78. https://windinsider.com/2025/02/10/orsted-refines-business-strategy-with-focused-capital-allocation-and-adjusted-2030-investment-plan/
  79. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/02/orsted-adjusts-its-business-plan-to-strengthen-the-142487181
  80. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/02/delivering-operational-earnings-in-line-with-expec-142508951
  81. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/01/orsted-announces-impairments-relating-to-us-intere-142283101
  82. https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/rsted-faces-17-billion-impairment-due-to-us-headwinds-93CH-3820744
  83. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-06/orsted-raises-9-4-billion-to-counter-hit-from-us-u-turn-on-wind
  84. https://stockanalysis.com/quote/cph/ORSTED/market-cap/
  85. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ORSTED.CO/
  86. https://companiesmarketcap.com/orsted/stock-price-history/
  87. https://stockanalysis.com/quote/cph/ORSTED/
  88. https://www.investing.com/equities/dong-energy-as-historical-data
  89. https://www.rechargenews.com/markets-and-finance/new-orsted-blow-as-low-winds-and-delay-hit-profits-outlook/2-1-1867661
  90. https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/rsted-lowers-2025-earnings-guidance-due-to-weak-wind-conditions-93CH-4225947
  91. https://www.reuters.com/markets/companies/ORSTED.CO/key-metrics
  92. https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/DK/XCSE/ORSTED/financials
  93. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/about-us/whitepaper/offshore-wind-at-a-crossroads.pdf
  94. https://www.rechargenews.com/policy/offshore-wind-could-grind-to-a-halt-dutch-rush-back-subsidies-and-eye-cfds/2-1-1873235
  95. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/q12025/interim-financial-report-q1-2025.pdf
  96. https://cloudwisdom.substack.com/p/rsteds-bailout-and-the-sunrise-wind
  97. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2024/09/orsteds-hornsea-3-and-hornsea-4-awarded-capacity-i-140173681
  98. https://www.rechargenews.com/wind/cfds-can-lop-2-off-our-capital-costs-says-top-orsted-executive/2-1-1804359
  99. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/denmark-plans-offshore-wind-tender-with-up-83-bln-subsidy-2025-05-19/
  100. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/new-jersey-residents-challenge-orsted-offshore-wind-farms-1-billion-subsidy-2023-07-28/
  101. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-orders-orsted-halt-offshore-wind-project-deepening-industry-woes-2025-08-22/
  102. https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202508115469/denmark-says-there-is-security-policy-dimension-to-47-billion-orsted-investment
  103. https://davidturver.substack.com/p/orsted-leaves-investors-consumers-twisting-in-the-wind
  104. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Jul/IRENA_TEC_RPGC_in_2024_2025.pdf
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223010222
  106. https://www.rff.org/documents/4393/Report_24-04.pdf
  107. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Jul/IRENA_TEC_RPGC_in_2024_Summary_2025.pdf
  108. https://www.lazard.com/media/xemfey0k/lazards-lcoeplus-june-2024-_vf.pdf
  109. https://newbedfordlight.org/how-many-homes-does-an-offshore-wind-farm-actually-power/
  110. https://us.orsted.com/renewable-energy-solutions/offshore-wind/seven-facts-about-offshore-wind/carbon-footprint
  111. https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/debt_invest/2025/orsted-dip-update-2025---base-prospectus---14-march-2025.pdf
  112. https://energywatch.com/EnergyNews/Utilities/article18537212.ece
  113. https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2025/05/orsted-to-discontinue-the-hornsea-4-offshore-wind--143901911
  114. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/orsted-cancel-ocean-wind-offshore-project-development-new-jersey/698464/
  115. https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2024/01/skipjack-wind-to-be-repositioned-for-future-offtak-815811
  116. https://www.offshorewind.biz/2024/01/26/orsted-terminates-skipjack-wind-offtake-agreement-amid-challenging-market-conditions/
  117. https://www.power-technology.com/news/orsted-cancels-agreement-skipjack-wind/
  118. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/offshore-wind-developer-orsted-q1-beats-forecasts-2025-05-07/
  119. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/orsted-flags-impairments-about-17-billion-us-rate-increases-2025-01-20/
  120. https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/02/06/orsteds-earnings-from-operational-offshore-wind-farms-up-20-pct/
  121. https://ieefa.org/resources/orsted-raises-capital-navigate-us-offshore-wind-uncertainties
  122. https://www.mideastoday.org/news/articleView.html?idxno=118
  123. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-administration-cancels-679-million-in-funding-for-offshore-wind-projects
  124. https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/orsted-cash-plan-risk-trump-050734575.html
  125. https://money.usnews.com/investing/news/articles/2025-09-23/orsted-shares-jump-12-after-us-judge-lifts-trump-ban-on-revolution-wind-project
  126. https://ionanalytics.com/insights/mergermarket/orsted-woes-highlight-new-level-of-political-risk-for-european-energy-businesses-comment/
  127. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-11/denmark-injects-billions-into-orsted-sparking-political-backlash
  128. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/11/orsted-wind-generator-shares-sink-9bn-cash-call
  129. https://newjerseyglobe.com/climate/government-watchdog-study-finds-some-problems-and-much-uncertainty-in-offshore-wind-industry/
  130. https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=411746
  131. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/sustainability/decarbonisation/decarbonisation-of-supply-chain-and-natural-gas-wholesale/increasing-transparency-of-supply-chain-emissions
  132. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/promise-and-pitfalls-clean-energy-transition
  133. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-08-13/orsted-is-symptomatic-of-what-s-ailing-the-wind-power-industry
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032124001382
  135. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/orsted-shares-sink-record-lows-after-us-halts-wind-farm-off-rhode-island-2025-08-25/
  136. https://www.texaspolicyresearch.com/federal-energy-subsidies-distort-the-market-and-impact-texas-a-closer-look-at-the-true-costs/
  137. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/our-purpose/powering-the-world-with-green-energy
  138. https://www.evwind.es/2024/09/15/orsted-is-the-global-leader-in-offshore-wind-and-one-of-the-largest-renewable-energy-companies-in-the-world/100911
  139. https://www.renewable-energy-industry.com/news/world/article-6884-more-than-900-mw-offshore-capacity-orsted-starts-offshore-construction-of-large-scale-offshore-wind-farm-projects-in-taiwan
  140. https://orsted.com/en/insights/building-more-than-ever-before
  141. https://windinsider.com/2025/05/13/orsted-reports-strong-q1-2025-performance-and-10-gw-offshore-capacity-milestone/
  142. https://orsted.com/en/what-we-do/renewable-energy-solutions
  143. https://orsted.com/en/who-we-are/our-purpose/our-green-energy-transformation
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261925012668
  145. https://www.agora-energiewende.org/fileadmin/Success_Stories/BP/BP_DK_RE-integration/A-E_287_Succ_Stor_BP_Denmark_Grid-Integration_WEB.PDF
  146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261917308346
  147. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/us-halt-wind-project-defies-explanation-new-england-officials-say-2025-08-25/
  148. https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-risks-blackouts-by-halting-revolution-wind-officials-say/
  149. https://blog.se.com/infrastructure-and-grid/power-management-metering-monitoring-power-quality/2016/01/13/helping-wind-turbines-and-grids-form-more-reliable-connections/
  150. https://mediaenviron.org/article/125711-from-wind-turbines-to-energy-islands-wind-as-model-power-in-denmark
  151. https://windeurope.org/news/new-collaborations-to-ensure-physical-and-cybersecurity-of-wind-turbines/
  152. https://inspenet.com/en/articulo/risks-at-sea-wind-energy/
  153. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/protecting-wind-energy-systems-cyberattacks
  154. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/offshore-wind-industry-cybersecurity/
  155. https://www.enlit.world/library/us-government-stops-work-on-rsted-s-revolution-wind-project
  156. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024OceYb..38..433B/abstract
  157. https://montel.energy/commentary/balancing-green-markets-denmark-sets-the-standard-in-europe
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.