Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Decimal time
View on Wikipedia| At 17:48:15 UTC 22 November 2025 () | ||
|---|---|---|
| Format | Decimal time | Zone |
| French | 7h 48m 33s | Paris MT |
| Fraction | 0.74184 d | GMT/UTC |
| Swatch beats | @783 | BMT/CET |

Decimal time is the representation of the time of day using units which are decimally related. This term is often used specifically to refer to the French Republican calendar time system used from 1794 to 1800, during the French Revolution, which divided the day into 10 decimal hours, each decimal hour into 100 decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds (100,000 decimal seconds per day), as opposed to the more familiar standard time, which divides the day into 24 hours, each hour into 60 minutes and each minute into 60 seconds (86,400 SI seconds per day).
The main advantage of a decimal time system is that, since the base used to divide the time is the same as the one used to represent it, the representation of hours, minutes and seconds can be handled as a unified value. Therefore, it becomes simpler to interpret a timestamp and to perform conversions. For instance, 1h23m45s is 1 decimal hour, 23 decimal minutes, and 45 decimal seconds, or 1.2345 decimal hours, or 123.45 decimal minutes or 12345 decimal seconds; 3 hours is 300 minutes or 30,000 seconds. This property also makes it straightforward to represent a timestamp as a fractional day, so that 2025-11-22.54321 can be interpreted as five decimal hours, 43 decimal minutes and 21 decimal seconds after the start of that day, or a fraction of 0.54321 (54.321%) through that day (which is shortly after traditional 13:00). It also adjusts well to digital time representation using epochs, in that the internal time representation can be used directly both for computation and for user-facing display.

| decimal | 24-hour | 12-hour |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00 | 00:00 | 12:00 a.m. |
| 1:00 | 02:24 | 2:24 a.m. |
| 2:00 | 04:48 | 4:48 a.m. |
| 3:00 | 07:12 | 7:12 a.m. |
| 4:00 | 09:36 | 9:36 a.m. |
| 5:00 | 12:00 | 12:00 p.m. |
| 6:00 | 14:24 | 2:24 p.m. |
| 7:00 | 16:48 | 4:48 p.m. |
| 8:00 | 19:12 | 7:12 p.m. |
| 9:00 | 21:36 | 9:36 p.m. |
History
[edit]Egypt
[edit]The decans are 36 groups of stars (small constellations) used in the ancient Egyptian astronomy to conveniently divide the 360 degree ecliptic into 36 parts of 10 degrees. Because a new decan also appears heliacally every ten days (that is, every ten days, a new decanic star group reappears in the eastern sky at dawn right before the Sun rises, after a period of being obscured by the Sun's light), the ancient Greeks called them dekanoi (δεκανοί; pl. of δεκανός dekanos) or "tens". A ten-day period between the rising of two consecutive decans is a decade. There were 36 decades (36 × 10 = 360 days), plus five added days to compose the 365 days of a solar based year.
China
[edit]Decimal time was used in China throughout most of its history alongside duodecimal time. The midnight-to-midnight day was divided both into 12 double hours (traditional Chinese: 時辰; simplified Chinese: 时辰; pinyin: shí chén) and also into 10 shi / 100 ke (Chinese: 刻; pinyin: kè) by the 1st millennium BC.[1][2] Other numbers of ke per day were used during three short periods: 120 ke from 5 to 3 BC, 96 ke from 507 to 544 CE, and 108 ke from 544 to 565. Several of the roughly 50 Chinese calendars also divided each ke into 100 fen, although others divided each ke into 60 fen. In 1280, the Shoushi (Season Granting) calendar further subdivided each fen into 100 miao, creating a complete decimal time system of 100 ke, 100 fen and 100 miao.[3] Chinese decimal time ceased to be used in 1645 when the Shíxiàn calendar, based on European astronomy and brought to China by the Jesuits, adopted 96 ke per day alongside 12 double hours, making each ke exactly one-quarter hour.[4]
Gēng (更) is a time signal given by drum or gong. The character for gēng 更, literally meaning "rotation" or "watch", comes from the rotation of watchmen sounding these signals. The first gēng theoretically comes at sundown, but was standardized to fall at 19:12. The time between each gēng is 1⁄10 of a day, making a gēng 2.4 hours long (2 hours 24 minutes). As a 10-part system, the gēng are strongly associated with the 10 celestial stems, especially since the stems are used to count off the gēng during the night in Chinese literature.
As early as the Bronze-Age Xia dynasty, days were grouped into ten-day weeks known as xún (旬). Months consisted of three xún. The first 10 days were the early xún (上旬), the middle 10 the mid xún (中旬), and the last nine or 10 days were the late xún (下旬). Japan adopted this pattern, with 10-day-weeks known as jun (旬). In Korea, they were known as sun (순,旬).
France
[edit]Pre-Revolution
[edit]
In 1754, Jean le Rond d'Alembert wrote in the Encyclopédie:
- It would be very desirable that all divisions, for example of the livre, the sou, the toise, the day, the hour, etc. would be from tens into tens. This division would result in much easier and more convenient calculations and would be very preferable to the arbitrary division of the livre into twenty sous, of the sou into twelve deniers, of the day into twenty-four hours, the hour into sixty minutes, etc.[5][6]
In 1788, Claude Boniface Collignon proposed dividing the day into 10 hours or 1,000 minutes, each new hour into 100 minutes, each new minute into 1,000 seconds, and each new second into 1,000 tierces (older French for "third"). The distance the twilight zone travels in one such tierce at the equator, which would be one-billionth of the circumference of the earth, would be a new unit of length, provisionally called a half-handbreadth, equal to four modern centimetres. Further, the new tierce would be divided into 1,000 quatierces, which he called "microscopic points of time". He also suggested a week of 10 days and dividing the year into 10 "solar months".[7]
French Republic
[edit]Decimal time was officially introduced during the French Revolution. Jean-Charles de Borda made a proposal for decimal time on 5 November 1792. The National Convention issued a decree on 5 October 1793, to which the underlined words were added on 24 November 1793 (4 Frimaire of the Year II):
- VIII. Each month is divided into three equal parts, of ten days each, which are called décades...
- XI. The day, from midnight to midnight, is divided into ten parts or hours, each part into ten others, so on until the smallest measurable portion of the duration. The hundredth part of the hour is called decimal minute; the hundredth part of the minute is called decimal second. This article will not be required for the public records, until from the 1st of Vendémiaire, the year three of the Republic. (September 22, 1794) (emphasis in original)
Thus, midnight was called dix heures ("ten hours"), noon was called cinq heures ("five hours"), etc.
Representation
[edit]
The colon (:) was not yet in use as a unit separator for standard times, and is used for non-decimal bases. The French decimal separator is the comma (,), while the period (.), or "point", is used in English. Units were either written out in full, or abbreviated. Thus, five hours eighty three minutes decimal might be written as 5 h. 83 m. Even today, "h" is commonly used in France to separate hours and minutes of 24-hour time, instead of a colon, such as 14h00. Midnight was represented in civil records as "ten hours". Times between midnight and the first decimal hour were written without hours, so 1:00 am, or 0.41 decimal hours, was written as "four décimes" or "forty-one minutes". 2:00 am (0.8333) was written as "eight décimes", "eighty-three minutes", or even "eighty-three minutes thirty-three seconds".
As with duodecimal time, decimal time was represented according to true solar time, rather than mean time, with noon being marked when the sun reached its highest point locally, which varied at different locations, and throughout the year.
In "Methods to find the Leap Years of the French Calendar", Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Delambre used three different representations for the same decimal time:
- 0,386 (comma is the decimal sign in French)
- 0j386 ("j" is for jour, day in French)
- 3h 86' (apostrophe is for minutes)

Sometimes in official records, decimal hours were divided into tenths, or décimes, instead of minutes. One décime is equal to 10 decimal minutes, which is nearly equal to a quarter-hour (15 minutes) in standard time. Thus, "five hours two décimes" equals 5.2 decimal hours, roughly 12:30 p.m. in standard time.[8][9] One hundredth of a decimal second was a decimal tierce.[10]
Usage
[edit]Although clocks and watches were produced with faces showing both standard time with numbers 1–24 and decimal time with numbers 1–10, decimal time never caught on; it was not used for public records until the beginning of the Republican year III, 22 September 1794, and mandatory use was suspended 7 April 1795 (18 Germinal of the Year III). In spite of this, decimal time was used in many cities, including Marseille and Toulouse, where a decimal clock with just an hour hand was on the front of the Capitole for five years.[11] In some places, decimal time was used to record certificates of births, marriages, and deaths until the end of Year VIII (September 1800). On the Palace of the Tuileries in Paris, two of the four clock faces displayed decimal time until at least 1801.[12] The mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace had a decimal watch made for him, and used decimal time in his work, in the form of fractional days.
Decimal time was part of a larger attempt at decimalisation in revolutionary France (which also included decimalisation of currency and metrication) and was introduced as part of the French Republican Calendar, which, in addition to decimally dividing the day, divided the month into three décades of 10 days each; this calendar was abolished at the end of 1805. The start of each year was determined according to the day of the autumnal equinox, in relation to true or apparent solar time at the Paris Observatory.
Metric system
[edit]In designing the new metric system, the intent was to replace all the various units of different bases with a small number of standard decimal units. This was to include units for length, weight, area, liquid capacity, volume, and money. Initially the traditional second of time equal to 1/86400 day was proposed as the base of the metric system, but this was changed in 1791 to base the meter on a decimal division of a measurement of the Earth, instead. Early drafts of the metric system published in 1793 included the new decimal divisions of the day included with the Republican calendar, and some of the same individuals were involved with both projects.[13]
On March 28, 1794, Joseph-Louis Lagrange proposed to the Commission for Republican Weights and Measures on dividing the day into 10 decidays and 100 centidays, which would be expressed together as two digits, counting periods of 14 minutes and 24 seconds since midnight, nearly a quarter hour. This would be displayed by one hand on watches. Another hand would display 100 divisions of a centiday, which is 1/10,000 day, or 8.64 seconds. A third hand on a smaller dial would further divide these into 10, which would be 1/100,000 day, or 864 milliseconds, slightly less than a whole second. He suggested the deciday and centiday be used together to represent the time of day, such as "4 and 5", "4/5", or simply "45".
This was opposed by Jean-Marie Viallon, of the Sainte-Geneviève Library in Paris, who thought that decimal hours, equal to 2.4 old hours, were too long, and that 100 centidays were too many, and proposed dividing two halves of the day into 10 new hours each, for a total of 20 per day, and that simply changing the numbers on watch dials from 12 to 10, he thought, would be sufficient for rural people. For others, there would be 50 decimal minutes per decimal hour, and 100 decimal seconds per decimal minute. His new hours, minutes, and seconds would thus be more similar to the old units.[14]
C.A. Prieur (of the Côte-d'Or), read at the National Convention on Ventôse 11, year III (March 1, 1795):
- 1) As it does not offer almost all of the nation any marked advantage, it would only throw a disadvantage on the new system of measures and the decimal method, which is however very useful;
- 2) Since the hourly compilation is not a commercial object or susceptible to a police regulation, the old uses would be maintained by the immense force of habit;
- 3) This habit would be further consolidated by the fear of confusion. It would be necessary, to prevent it, to take new names that have not yet been indicated, and that it would be very difficult to introduce into common language, especially for so many people who do not write, who do not calculate, and who appreciate time only by a routine based on common opinion;
- 4) The expense of changing the clocks would be enormous;
- 5) Finally, citizens and watchmakers would be infinitely dismayed, some to change their watches, others to lose the ability to sell those that are already made. This truth is acquired by the result of the contest which took place recently, under the decree on watchmaking movements.
- But by asking that the decimal division of the day is not a condition of rigor, there is no disagreement that there are several circumstances where it has advantages. We know that in several objects of the Navy service, in astronomical or trigonometric calculations, and for delicate experiments, the decimal division of time is more convenient. It will therefore be good to reserve it for these cases, until the use can spread more generally, which will happen by itself imperceptibly.
Thus, the law of 18 Germinal An III (April 7, 1795) establishing the metric system, rather than including metric units for time, repealed the mandatory use of decimal time, although its use continued for a number of years in some places. As predicted, it was quickly found to be useful by astronomers, who still use it in the form of fractional days.
Carl Friedrich Gauss recommended the ephemeris second as a metric base unit for time interval in 1832, which eventually became the atomic second in the International System. However, for longer periods of time interval, the old non-decimal units were approved for use.

Later proposals
[edit]At the International Meridian Conference of 1884, the following resolution was proposed by the French delegation and passed nem con (with 3 abstentions):
- VII. That the Conference expresses the hope that the technical studies designed to regulate and extend the application of the decimal system to the division of angular space and of time shall be resumed, so as to permit the extension of this application to all cases in which it presents real advantages.
In the 1890s, Joseph Charles François de Rey-Pailhade, president of the Toulouse Geographical Society, proposed dividing the day into 100 parts, called cés, equal to 14.4 standard minutes, and each divided into 10 decicés, 100 centicés, etc. The Toulouse Chamber of Commerce adopted a resolution supporting his proposal in April 1897. Although widely published, the proposal received little backing.[15]
The French made another attempt at the decimalization of time in 1897, when the Commission de décimalisation du temps was created by the Bureau des Longitudes, with the mathematician Henri Poincaré as secretary. The commission adopted a compromise, originally proposed by Henri de Sarrauton of the Oran Geographical Society, of retaining the 24-hour day, but dividing each hour into 100 decimal minutes, and each minute into 100 seconds. The plan did not gain acceptance and was abandoned in 1900.
Swatch Internet Time
[edit]
On 23 October 1998, the Swiss watch company Swatch introduced a decimal time called Internet Time for its line of digital watches, which divided the day into 1,000 ".beats", (each 86.4 seconds in standard time) counted from 000–999, with @000 being midnight and @500 being noon standard time in Switzerland, which is Central European Time (one hour ahead of Universal Time).
Although Swatch did not specify units smaller than one .beat, third party implementations extended the standard by adding "centibeats" or "sub-beats", for extended precision: @248.00. Each "centibeat" was a hundredth of a .beat and was therefore equal to one French decimal second (0.864 seconds).[16][17]
When using .beats and centibeats, Swatch Internet Time divided the day into 1,000 French decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds. So 9pm was 21:00:00 in standard time and @875.00 in extended Swatch Internet Time.
Swatch no longer markets digital watches with Internet Time.
Conversions
[edit]There are exactly 86,400 standard seconds (see SI for the current definition of the standard second) in a standard day, but in the French decimal time system there were 100,000 decimal seconds in the day; thus, the decimal second was 13.6% shorter than its standard counterpart.
| Unit | Seconds (SI) | Minutes | Hours | h:mm:ss.sss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Decimal second | 0.864 | 0.0144 | 0.00024 | 0:00:00.864 |
| 1 Decimal minute | 86.4 | 1.44 | 0.024 | 0:01:26.400 |
| 1 Décime | 864 | 14.4 | 0.24 | 0:14:24.000 |
| 1 Decimal hour | 8,640 | 144 | 2.4 | 2:24:00.000 |
Decimal hours
[edit]Another common type of decimal time is decimal hours. In 1896, Henri de Sarrauton of the Oran Geographical Society proposed dividing the 24 hours of the day each into 100 decimal minutes, and each minute into 100 decimal seconds.[18] Although endorsed by the Bureau des Longitudes, this proposal failed, but using decimal fractions of an hour to represent the time of day instead of minutes has become common.
Decimal hours are frequently used in accounting for payrolls and hourly billing. Time clocks typically record the time of day in tenths or hundredths of an hour. For instance, 08:30 would be recorded as 08.50. This is intended to make accounting easier by eliminating the need to convert between minutes and hours.
For aviation purposes, where it is common to add times in an already complicated environment, time tracking is simplified by recording decimal fractions of hours. For instance, instead of adding 1:36 to 2:36, getting 3:72 and converting it to 4:12, one would add 1.6 to 2.6 and get 4.2 hours.[19]
Fractional days
[edit]The time of day is sometimes represented as a decimal fraction of a day in science and computers. Standard 24-hour time is converted into a fractional day by dividing the number of hours elapsed since midnight by 24 to make a decimal fraction. Thus, midnight is 0.0 day, noon is 0.5 d, etc., which can be added to any type of date, including the following, all of which refer to the same moment in time:
- Gregorian dates: 2000 January 1.5
- Two-line elements: 00001.50000000
- Julian dates: 2451545.0
- Excel serial dates: 36526.5
As many decimal places may be used as required for precision, so 0.5 d = 0.500000 d. Fractional days are often calculated in UTC or TT, although Julian Dates use pre-1925 astronomical date/time (each date began at noon = ".0") and Microsoft Excel uses the local time zone of the computer. Using fractional days reduces the number of units in time calculations from four (days, hours, minutes, seconds) to just one (days).
Fractional days are often used by astronomers to record observations, and were expressed in relation to Paris Mean Time by the 18th century French mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace, as in these examples:[20]
... et la distance périhélie, égale à 1,053095; ce qui a donné pour l'instant du passage au périhélie, sept.29j,10239, temps moyen compté de minuit à Paris.
Les valeurs précédentes de a, b, h, l, relatives à trois observations, ont donné la distance périhélie égale à 1,053650; et pour l'instant du passage, sept.29j,04587; ce qui diffère peu des résultats fondés sur cinq observations.
— Pierre-Simon Laplace, Traité de Mécanique Céleste
Fractional days have been used by astronomers ever since. For instance, the 19th century British astronomer John Herschel gave these examples:[21]
Between Greenwich noon of the 22d and 23d of March, 1829, the 1828th equinoctial year terminates, and the 1829th commences. This happens at 0d·286003, or at 6h 51m 50s·66 Greenwich Mean Time ... For example, at 12h 0m 0s Greenwich Mean Time, or 0d·500000...
— John Herschel, Outlines of Astronomy
Fractional days are commonly used to express epochs of orbital elements. The decimal fraction is usually added to the calendar date or Julian day for natural objects, or to the ordinal date for artificial satellites in two-line elements.
Decimal multiples and fractions of the second
[edit]The second is the International System of Units (SI) unit of time duration. It is also the standard single-unit time representation in many programming languages, most notably C, and part of UNIX/POSIX standards used by Linux, Mac OS X, etc.; to convert fractional days to fractional seconds, multiply the number by 86400. Fractional seconds are represented as milliseconds (ms), microseconds (μs) or nanoseconds (ns). Absolute times are usually represented relative to 1 January 1970, at midnight UT. Other systems may use a different zero point (like Unix time).
In principle, time spans greater than one second may be given in units such as kiloseconds (ks), megaseconds (Ms), gigaseconds (Gs), and so on. Occasionally, these units can be found in technical literature, but traditional units like minutes, hours, days and years are much more common, and are accepted for use with SI.
It is possible to specify the time of day as the number of kiloseconds of elapsed time since midnight. Thus, instead of saying 3:45 p.m. one could say (time of day) 56.7 ks. There are exactly 86.4 ks in one day (each kilosecond being equivalent to 16 minutes and 40 seconds worth of conventional time). However, this nomenclature is rarely used in practice.
Scientific decimal time
[edit]Scientists often record time as decimal. For example, decimal days divide the day into 10 equal parts, and decimal years divide the year into 10 equal parts. Decimals are easier to plot than both (a) minutes and seconds, which uses the sexagesimal numbering system, (b) hours, months and days, which has irregular month lengths. In astronomy, the so-called Julian day uses decimal days centered on Greenwich noon.
- Seconds in a decimal minute
Since there are 60 seconds in a minute, a tenth part represents 60/10 = 6 seconds.
| Decimal minutes | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second | 6s | 12s | 18s | 24s | 30s | 36s | 42s | 48s | 54s | 60s |
- Minutes in a decimal hour
Since there are 60 minutes in an hour, a tenth part represents 60/10 = 6 minutes.
| Decimal hours | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 6m | 12m | 18m | 24m | 30m | 36m | 42m | 48m | 54m | 60m |
- Hours in a decimal day
Since there are 24 hours in a day, a tenth part represents 24/10 = 2.4 hours (2 hours and 24 minutes).
| Decimal days | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hours/minutes | 2h 24m | 4h 48m | 7h 12m | 9h 36m | 12h | 14h 24m | 16h 48m | 19h 12m | 21h 36m | 24h |
- Length of a decimal year
Since there are about 365 days in a year, there are about 365/10 = 36.5 days in a tenth of a year. Hence the year 2020.5 represents the day 2 July 2020.[22] More exactly, a "Julian year" is approximately 365.25 days long, so a tenth of the year is 36.525 days (36 days, 12 hours, 36 minutes).
| Decimal years | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days | 0 | 36.525 | 73.050 | 109.575 | 146.100 | 182.625 | 219.150 | 255.675 | 292.200 | 328.725 | 365.250 |
| Date Time |
1 Jan 00:00 |
6 Feb 12:36 |
15 Mar 01:12 |
20 Apr 13:48 |
27 May 2:24 |
1 Jul 15:00 |
8 Aug 03:36 |
13 Sep 16:12 |
20 Oct 04:48 |
25 Nov 17:24 |
1 Jan 06:00 |
These values, based on the Julian year, are most likely to be those used in astronomy and related sciences. A Gregorian year, which takes into account the 100 vs. 400 leap year exception rule of the Gregorian calendar, is 365.2425 days (the average length of a year over a 400–year cycle), resulting in 0.1 years being a period of 36.52425 days (3155695.2 seconds; 36 days, 12 hours, 34 minutes, 55.2 seconds).
Other decimal times
[edit]Numerous individuals have proposed variations of decimal time, dividing the day into different numbers of units and subunits with different names. Most are based upon fractional days, so that one decimal time format may be easily converted into another, such that all the following are equivalent:
- 0.500 day
- 5 heures décimales
- @500.beats Swatch Internet Time (see above)
- 50.0 kes or cés (centidays)
- 500 millidays
- 50.0% time as a percentage of the day
- 12:00 standard time
Some decimal time proposals are based upon alternate units of metric time. The difference between metric time and decimal time is that metric time defines units for measuring time interval, as measured with a stopwatch, and decimal time defines the time of day, as measured by a clock. Just as standard time uses the metric time unit of the second as its basis, proposed decimal time scales may use alternative metric units.
In the fictional Star Trek universe, each stardate increment represents one milliyear, with 78 years in 2401, counted from 2323. The decimal represents a fractional day. Thus, stardates are a composition of two types of decimal time.[citation needed] In 2023, 78 years earlier would be 1945.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Nachum Dershowitz, Edward M. Reingold, "Calendrical Calculations", page 207
- ^ Joseph Needham, Ling Wang, and Derek John de Solla Price Heavenly clockwork: the great astronomical clocks of medieval China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) 199-202, ISBN 0-521-32276-6.
- ^ Jean-Claude Martzloff, "Chinese mathematical astronomy", in Helaine Selin, ed., Mathematics across cultures (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000) 373–407, p. 393, ISBN 0-7923-6481-3.
- ^ K. Yabuuti [Kiyoshi Yabuuchi], "Astronomical tables in China, from the Wutai to the Ch'ing dynasties", in Japanese Studies in the History of Science no. 2 (1963) 94–100.
- ^ Vera, Hector (2009). "Decimal Time: Misadventures of a Revolutionary Idea, 1793–2008". KronoScope. 9 (1–2). Brill: 31–32. doi:10.1163/156771509X12638154745382. ISSN 1567-715X.[permanent dead link]
- ^ d'Alembert, Jean le Rond (1754). Encyclopédie. Archived from the original on 2012-12-15.
- ^ Collignon, Claude Boniface (1788). Découverte d'étalons justes, naturels, invariables et universels. Chez l'auteur. pp. 39–40.
- ^ Jean Nicolas (1989). La Révolution française dans les Alpes: Dauphiné et Savoie, 1789-1799. Privat. p. 256. ISBN 9782708953529.
- ^ Carrigan, Richard A. (May–June 1978). "Decimal Time: Unlike the metric system of measurements, decimal time did not survive the French Revolution. But is dividing the day by tens a possibility for the future?". American Scientist. 66 (3): 305–313. JSTOR 27848641.
- ^ "Instruction sur l'ère de la République, à la suite du décret du 3 brumaire, an II" (PDF). Université de Toulouse.
- ^ Matthew Shaw (2011). Time and the French Revolution: The Republican Calendar, 1789-year XIV. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. pp. 132–3. ISBN 978-0-86193-311-2.
- ^ Ernest Leroux, ed. (1900). Bulletin de géographie historique et descriptive, année 1899. Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques. p. 142.
- ^ Commission des poids et mesures (1793). Haüy, René-Just (ed.). Instruction abrégée sur les mesures déduites de la grandeur de la Terre, uniformes pour toute la République, et sur les calculs relatifs à leur division décimale; par la Commission temporaire des poids & mesures républicaines, en exécution des décrets de la Convention nationale. Édition originale (in French). France: de l'imprimerie nationale exécutive du Louvre (A Paris).
- ^ Procès-verbaux du Comité d'instruction publique de la Convention nationale. Imprimerie nationale. 1897. p. 605.
- ^ Bulletin of the International Railway Congress (English ed.). 1899. p. 784.
- ^ "Nucleus Plugin: NP_InternetTime". TeRanEX Wiki. 2005-11-23. Archived from the original on 2007-08-07.
- ^ "iBeat". Archived from the original on 2008-12-24.
- ^ Sarrauton, Henri de (1896). L'Heure décimale et la division de la circonférence, Oran: Fouque
- ^ "Pilot Log Books". Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Archived from the original on 2012-03-21. Retrieved 2012-06-23.
- ^ Laplace, Pierre Simon de (1823). Traité de Mécanique Céleste.
- ^ Outlines of Astronomy.
- ^ Campbell, Wallace Hall (2003). Introduction to geomagnetic fields (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 316. ISBN 0-521-52953-0. ISBN 978-0-521-52953-2
Sources
[edit]- National Convention of the French Republic (1793) LE CALENDRIER RÉPUBLICAIN Textes officiels Décrets Relatifs à l'établissement de l'Ère Républicaine Archived 2013-03-17 at the Wayback Machine published by Philippe Chapelin 2002
- Sizes, Inc. (2000) decimal time units Last revised 27 February 2004
- Herschel, John (1849) Outlines of Astronomy published by Gallica 1995
External links
[edit]Decimal time
View on GrokipediaHistorical Development
Ancient and Pre-Modern Attempts
In ancient Egypt, around 2000 BCE, astronomers employed 36 decans—groups of stars whose heliacal risings marked temporal intervals—to divide the night into 12 parts, with each decan associated with 10-day calendar periods known as decades, introducing a rudimentary decimal element tied to stellar observations rather than equal divisions of the 24-hour solar day.[4][5] This approach prioritized empirical tracking of celestial events for nocturnal timekeeping, as decans rose sequentially to indicate hour-like segments, but daytime hours varied seasonally with sunlight duration, precluding a fully decimalized uniform day.[4] In China, starting from the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), water clocks (clepsydrae) and incense timers incorporated decimal divisions by marking the day into 100 ke units, each equivalent to roughly 14.4 modern minutes, for applications in astronomy, administration, and ritual timing.[6][7] These ke, derived from incisions or scales on timekeeping devices, reflected China's prevalent decimal arithmetic but coexisted with the dominant duodecimal system of 12 shi (double hours aligned with zodiacal positions), subordinating decimal precision to cyclical celestial and calendrical harmonies.[8][9] Such partial implementations did not evolve into comprehensive decimal time systems, as ancient timekeeping emphasized synchronization with lunar-solar cycles and sexagesimal subdivisions inherited from Babylonian astronomy, which offered greater commensurability for predicting eclipses and seasons over abstract base-10 uniformity.[7][6]Enlightenment and Pre-Revolutionary Proposals
During the Enlightenment, European intellectuals increasingly advocated for rational reforms to measurement systems, favoring decimal divisions to align with base-10 arithmetic's computational efficiency over the irregular fractions inherent in sexagesimal systems. This push stemmed from first-principles reasoning that human numeral systems, rooted in decimal counting, should extend to all metrics for harmony and precision in science and commerce, contrasting with time's persistent Babylonian-derived base-60 subdivisions preserved in astronomy for their divisibility.[10][1] Time measurement proved resistant to early decimalization due to entrenched horological traditions and the need for compatibility with celestial observations, where sexagesimal allowed straightforward division into halves, thirds, and sixths without cumbersome decimals. Proposals for decimal time emerged sporadically in the late 18th century as extensions of broader metric advocacy, emphasizing potential simplifications in engineering calculations and navigation logarithms, though practical clock adaptations lagged.[11] A concrete pre-revolutionary scheme was advanced in 1788 by French attorney Claude Boniface Collignon, who proposed partitioning the day into 10 hours, each comprising 100 minutes, with minutes subdivided into 1000 seconds to maintain decimal progression while approximating traditional durations. Collignon's plan highlighted decimal time's alignment with emerging metric reforms, arguing for reduced complexity in arithmetic operations over the "arbitrary" 24-60-60 structure, though it overlooked disruptions to existing instruments and societal rhythms.[12]French Revolutionary Implementation
The National Convention decreed the adoption of decimal time on 24 November 1793 (4 Frimaire Year II), establishing a system where each day comprised 10 hours, each hour 100 decimal minutes, and each decimal minute 100 decimal seconds.[1] This reform extended the decimal principle to timekeeping, with each decimal hour equivalent to 144 traditional minutes and each decimal second to 0.864 traditional seconds, aiming for consistency with emerging metric standards.[1] The initiative formed part of the revolutionary drive to rationalize measurements and sever ties with pre-revolutionary traditions, including religious influences embedded in duodecimal divisions.[13] It complemented the French Republican Calendar, decreed on 24 October 1793, which restructured the year into 12 months of 30 days each, subdivided into three 10-day periods known as décades rather than seven-day weeks, thereby eliminating the Christian Sabbath cycle in favor of a purely decimal framework.[13][1] Implementation began in urban centers like Paris, where public clocks on buildings such as the Palais Royal were adjusted to display decimal time alongside traditional markings, and almanacs printed with dual notations to facilitate transition.[2] Official announcements and printed materials promoted its use in government and scientific contexts, though practical enforcement varied, with stronger adherence in revolutionary strongholds compared to rural regions where traditional timekeeping persisted due to limited administrative reach.[14] Specialized decimal watches and instruments were crafted by Parisian horologists to support the system during its active period from late 1793 to early 1795.[15]Post-Revolutionary and 19th-Century Efforts
Following the abandonment of the French Revolutionary decimal time system, Napoleon Bonaparte formally abolished it on 1 January 1806, reverting to the Gregorian calendar and traditional sexagesimal time divisions as a conciliatory gesture toward the Catholic Church to bolster political alliances.[1] This decision prioritized ecclesiastical and social stability over rationalist reforms, despite lingering intellectual support; for instance, astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace continued employing decimal time notations in his 1799 Traité de Mécanique Céleste for computational convenience in celestial mechanics.[1] However, no widespread institutional revival occurred in the early 1800s, as entrenched practices in astronomy, navigation, and daily life favored the divisibility of 24 hours and 60 minutes, which aligned with angular measurements (e.g., 360 degrees divided into 24 hours yields 15 degrees per hour for longitude calculations).[1] Interest in decimal time reemerged pragmatically in the late 19th century amid broader metric standardization efforts in science and engineering, aiming to simplify arithmetic in an era of expanding railroads, telegraphs, and international trade. At the 1884 International Meridian Conference in Washington, D.C., delegates from 25 nations, including representatives from Britain, France, and the United States, adopted a resolution vaguely endorsing further study of decimal time subdivisions to potentially harmonize with metric units, though no concrete implementation followed due to the conference's primary focus on establishing Greenwich as the prime meridian and standard time zones.[1] This reflected a utilitarian push for calculational efficiency rather than ideological overhaul, yet it overlooked entrenched sexagesimal dependencies in equatorial astronomy and maritime chronometry. A more detailed proposal came in 1897 from a French Bureau des Longitudes commission chaired by mathematician Henri Poincaré, which recommended retaining the 24-hour day but decimalizing subdivisions into 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per minute to facilitate scientific computations while minimizing disruption.[1] The commission argued this hybrid would ease metric alignments without fully upending solar-based mean time, but the report was shelved by July 1900 amid opposition from navigators, who cited incompatibility with sextant readings and existing chronometers calibrated to sexagesimal units essential for precise longitude determination; physicists and astronomers similarly resisted due to the obsolescence of instruments and tables, as well as the absence of international consensus.[1] These efforts ultimately yielded to the inertial force of global standardization, where sexagesimal time's divisibility by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 proved more adaptable for practical divisions like shifts and watches, overriding decimal's arithmetic purity.[1]20th-Century Initiatives
In the 20th century, decimal time proposals remained marginal and experimental, confined to individual advocates rather than institutional or national implementation, consistently failing due to entrenched sexagesimal standards, synchronization challenges across industries and borders, and minimal perceived gains in daily utility. Proponents argued for arithmetic simplification aligned with decimal metrics, yet empirical evidence from prior attempts underscored the prohibitive costs of recalibrating clocks, schedules, and international coordination, which far exceeded benefits in calculation ease. No major governments or standards bodies pursued widespread reform, as adherence to ISO 8601 and universal civil time prioritized compatibility over reform.[16] A notable American initiative emerged in the 1960s under Noble Stibolt, a retired Chicago attorney, who advocated "Metrictime" to rationalize time amid frustrations with time zones and daylight saving discrepancies. Published in his 1961 pamphlet Should ‘TIME’ Be Modernized?, the system divided the day into 10 hours of 100 minutes each, with minutes further subdivided into 100 seconds (each second lasting 86.4 standard seconds), aiming to facilitate decimal arithmetic in engineering and commerce. Stibolt extended the proposal to a metric calendar with 10-day weeks named after planets (e.g., Earthday, Venusday), 9 weeks per season, 4 seasons per year, and 5 intercalary holidays to total 365 days, drawing inspiration from Enlightenment rationalism and the metric system's success in measurement. His son, Noble H. Stibolt, supported distribution, but the effort gained no traction beyond pamphlets and expired trademarks by 1983 following the elder Stibolt's death in 1969.[16][17] Soviet explorations in the interwar period considered decimal divisions for industrial planning but dismissed them, as altering time units would disrupt productivity metrics tied to traditional work shifts and international trade data, compounding inefficiencies in a command economy already experimenting with continuous weeks and decree time shifts. These niche efforts highlighted causal barriers: retrofitting machinery, retraining labor, and aligning with non-adopting partners imposed net losses, as quantified in failed pilots where coordination overhead negated decimal computation advantages. By mid-century, decimal time's rejection solidified, with global forums favoring stability over innovation absent overwhelming evidence of superiority.[18]Core Systems and Variants
French Republican Decimal Time
The French Republican decimal time system redivided the solar day—retained at its empirical length of 86,400 standard seconds—into 10 decimal hours, each subdivided into 100 decimal minutes, and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds, yielding 100,000 decimal seconds per day overall.[19][1] This full decimalization of the day distinguished the system from variants that decimalized only subunits within a 24-hour framework, enabling arithmetic operations like expressing midday as precisely 5 decimal hours without fractional adjustments.[1] The units were designated heure décimale for the decimal hour, minute décimale for the decimal minute, and seconde décimale for the decimal second, aligning with the era's metric nomenclature conventions.[20] Timepieces manufactured or adapted for the system, such as pocket watches and public clocks, incorporated auxiliary or dual dials to display these divisions, often with a primary scale for decimal hours marked 1 through 10 and concentric or sub-dials for decimal minutes subdivided into quarters (e.g., indicators at 25, 50, 75, and 100).[15][21] Additional notations on some instruments marked tenths of a decimal hour as a décime, equivalent to 10 decimal minutes, to support practical quarter-hour equivalents in decimal form.[20] While the subdivisions were rigorously decimal, the system's adherence to the fixed solar day introduced inconsistencies with the broader metric framework, as the decimal second equated to 0.864 standard seconds—a non-decimal fraction—rather than deriving from a rational decimal progression tied to metric length units, such as those based on the Earth's meridian quadrant.[1] This anchoring to observed astronomical periodicity, rather than redefining the day to achieve commensurability with decimalized physical standards (e.g., via adjusted pendulum lengths for exact decimal relations to the meter), resulted in mismatches that hindered integration with metric measures of space and motion.[1]Decimal Hours and Day Fractions
Decimal hours express time intervals within the conventional 24-hour day using decimal fractions of an hour, where 60 minutes are divided into tenths, hundredths, or other decimal parts for simplified arithmetic, as in 1.5 hours representing one hour and 30 minutes.[22] This format avoids redefining the hour's length while enabling straightforward addition and multiplication, particularly in payroll where minutes are converted via division by 60—e.g., 45 minutes equals 0.75 hours—to compute wages without sexagesimal complexity.[23] Conversion charts standardize this process, listing equivalents like 6 minutes as 0.1 hours or 31 minutes as 0.52 hours, ensuring precision in billing for services rendered in partial hours.[24] Fractional days denote portions of the full 24-hour solar day as decimals, such as 0.5 day equating to 12 hours or 0.04167 day to one hour, prioritizing proportional calculations over base-60 divisions.[25] In astronomy, this manifests in the Julian Day system, where timestamps combine an integer day count with a decimal fraction of the day (e.g., 0.25 for six hours past noon UTC), allowing precise ephemeris computations across long spans without cumulative rounding errors from hours and minutes.[26] Such fractions support orbital mechanics and celestial event timing, as the decimal form aligns with algorithmic efficiency in scientific software.[27] Unlike comprehensive decimal time reforms that partition the day into 10 unequal hours to achieve base-10 uniformity, decimal hours and day fractions preserve the 24-hour framework tied to Earth's rotation and diurnal rhythms, applying decimalization selectively to intervals for practical utility in non-temporal restructuring contexts.[28] This hybrid approach mitigates disruption to human physiology and international synchronization while exploiting decimal notation's computational advantages in fields requiring fractional precision, such as logistical scheduling where day fractions model transit durations proportionally.[29]Sub-Second Decimal Divisions
Proposals for subdividing the decimal second into smaller decimal units, such as 10 deci-seconds or 100 centi-seconds, have aimed to maintain consistency with the decimal structure of broader time systems, analogous to metric prefixes applied to the SI second.[30] These extensions prioritize arithmetic simplicity in calculations involving fractions of a second but have remained largely theoretical, as they conflict with the fixed length of the modern second. In the French Republican decimal time system, the base decimal second was defined as one 100,000th of the mean solar day, measuring approximately 0.864 SI seconds.[1] Subdivisions below this unit were not formally standardized or widely implemented, though logical decimal fractions—such as the deci-second equaling 0.1 decimal seconds—could extend the system for precision needs. Modern critiques highlight the misalignment: the SI second, established in 1967 as exactly 9,192,631,770 oscillations of the cesium-133 atom's microwave radiation, derives from atomic standards rather than solar day fractions, rendering decimal day-based sub-units incompatible with high-precision scientific measurements like atomic clocks or GPS timing. Practical applications of sub-second decimal divisions have been confined to niche experiments, such as 19th-century efforts in chronometry for astronomical observations, where decimal scales were tested on instruments to evaluate precision against sexagesimal alternatives. However, the entrenched SI framework, with its own decimal submultiples (e.g., millisecond = 10^{-3} s), has precluded broader adoption, as redefining sub-seconds would disrupt fields reliant on atomic time standards.[30]Alternative Decimal Schemes
Swatch Internet Time, introduced by the Swatch Group in 1998, divides the 24-hour day into 1000 equal ".beats," each lasting 86.4 seconds.[31] This system uses Biel Mean Time as a global reference, eliminating time zones to facilitate synchronized online activities.[31] Despite initial marketing as a universal standard for the internet era, adoption remained limited to niche applications and Swatch-branded devices.[32] Hexadecimal time proposals, explored in computing contexts, represent the fraction of the day as a base-16 number rather than base-10 decimals.[33] For instance, the Hexclock displays time using three hexadecimal digits for improved resolution over binary clocks, leveraging hex's compactness in digital systems.[33] However, these remain experimental and marginal, as human cognition favors base-10 for everyday use, limiting practical integration beyond specialized software.[33] Modern cultural revivals of decimal-like schemes appear in educational tools and mobile applications, such as decimal clock widgets that simulate 100 or 1000 units per day for demonstration purposes.[34] These lack institutional support and serve primarily as curiosities or learning aids, without influencing broader timekeeping standards.[35]Mathematical Foundations
Conversion Formulas
The conversion between French Republican decimal time and standard (sexagesimal) time preserves the mean solar day of approximately 86,400 seconds, but accounts for the decimal system's division into 10 hours, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute, yielding 100,000 decimal seconds per day.[1][3] The fundamental ratio is thus 86,400 standard seconds per 100,000 decimal seconds, or 0.864 standard seconds per decimal second. This factor enables precise interconversion, verifiable by direct computation against astronomical observations of solar transit times, which confirm the day's invariance across systems. To convert from decimal hours to standard hours, multiply by 2.4, as one decimal hour equals 1/10 of the day while one standard hour equals 1/24 of the day: , where is standard hours and is decimal hours. For example, 5 decimal hours equals standard hours. Similarly, fractions of the decimal day convert directly: 0.5 decimal days = standard hours. Verification involves equating both to the shared day length, ensuring no cumulative drift in repeated conversions, as tested in historical almanacs aligning decimal timestamps with standard ephemerides.[1] Decimal minutes convert to standard minutes by multiplying by 1.44, derived from 100 decimal minutes equaling one decimal hour (2.4 standard hours or 144 standard minutes): , where is standard minutes and is decimal minutes. One decimal minute thus spans 86.4 standard seconds (1.44 standard minutes). For decimal seconds, multiply by 0.864 to obtain standard seconds: . Comprehensive conversion of a full timestamp (e.g., 2 decimal hours, 30 decimal minutes, 45 decimal seconds) first aggregates to decimal hours () then applies the 2.4 factor ( standard hours, or 5 hours and minutes), with residuals handled iteratively for precision.[2] In practical applications such as payroll or scientific logging, lookup tables mitigate approximation errors from manual arithmetic, listing equivalents like:| Decimal Minutes | Standard Minutes Equivalent |
|---|---|
| 10 | 14.4 |
| 50 | 72 |
| 100 | 144 |