Hubbry Logo
Decimal timeDecimal timeMain
Open search
Decimal time
Community hub
Decimal time
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Decimal time
Decimal time
from Wikipedia
At 17:48:15 UTC 22 November 2025 (update)
Format Decimal time Zone
French 7h 48m 33s Paris MT
Fraction 0.74184 d GMT/UTC
Swatch beats @783 BMT/CET
Times are in different time zones.
French decimal clock from the time of the French Revolution. The large dial shows the ten hours of the decimal day in Arabic numerals, while the small dial shows the two 12-hour periods of the standard 24-hour day in Roman numerals.

Decimal time is the representation of the time of day using units which are decimally related. This term is often used specifically to refer to the French Republican calendar time system used from 1794 to 1800, during the French Revolution, which divided the day into 10 decimal hours, each decimal hour into 100 decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds (100,000 decimal seconds per day), as opposed to the more familiar standard time, which divides the day into 24 hours, each hour into 60 minutes and each minute into 60 seconds (86,400 SI seconds per day).

The main advantage of a decimal time system is that, since the base used to divide the time is the same as the one used to represent it, the representation of hours, minutes and seconds can be handled as a unified value. Therefore, it becomes simpler to interpret a timestamp and to perform conversions. For instance, 1h23m45s is 1 decimal hour, 23 decimal minutes, and 45 decimal seconds, or 1.2345 decimal hours, or 123.45 decimal minutes or 12345 decimal seconds; 3 hours is 300 minutes or 30,000 seconds. This property also makes it straightforward to represent a timestamp as a fractional day, so that 2025-11-22.54321 can be interpreted as five decimal hours, 43 decimal minutes and 21 decimal seconds after the start of that day, or a fraction of 0.54321 (54.321%) through that day (which is shortly after traditional 13:00). It also adjusts well to digital time representation using epochs, in that the internal time representation can be used directly both for computation and for user-facing display.

Paper dial to convert a 12-hour clock face to decimal time, presented to the Revolutionary Committee of Public Instruction by Hanin.
decimal 24-hour 12-hour
0:00 00:00 12:00 a.m.
1:00 02:24 2:24 a.m.
2:00 04:48 4:48 a.m.
3:00 07:12 7:12 a.m.
4:00 09:36 9:36 a.m.
5:00 12:00 12:00 p.m.
6:00 14:24 2:24 p.m.
7:00 16:48 4:48 p.m.
8:00 19:12 7:12 p.m.
9:00 21:36 9:36 p.m.

History

[edit]

Egypt

[edit]

The decans are 36 groups of stars (small constellations) used in the ancient Egyptian astronomy to conveniently divide the 360 degree ecliptic into 36 parts of 10 degrees. Because a new decan also appears heliacally every ten days (that is, every ten days, a new decanic star group reappears in the eastern sky at dawn right before the Sun rises, after a period of being obscured by the Sun's light), the ancient Greeks called them dekanoi (δεκανοί; pl. of δεκανός dekanos) or "tens". A ten-day period between the rising of two consecutive decans is a decade. There were 36 decades (36 × 10 = 360 days), plus five added days to compose the 365 days of a solar based year.

China

[edit]

Decimal time was used in China throughout most of its history alongside duodecimal time. The midnight-to-midnight day was divided both into 12 double hours (traditional Chinese: 時辰; simplified Chinese: 时辰; pinyin: shí chén) and also into 10 shi / 100 ke (Chinese: ; pinyin: ) by the 1st millennium BC.[1][2] Other numbers of ke per day were used during three short periods: 120 ke from 5 to 3 BC, 96 ke from 507 to 544 CE, and 108 ke from 544 to 565. Several of the roughly 50 Chinese calendars also divided each ke into 100 fen, although others divided each ke into 60 fen. In 1280, the Shoushi (Season Granting) calendar further subdivided each fen into 100 miao, creating a complete decimal time system of 100 ke, 100 fen and 100 miao.[3] Chinese decimal time ceased to be used in 1645 when the Shíxiàn calendar, based on European astronomy and brought to China by the Jesuits, adopted 96 ke per day alongside 12 double hours, making each ke exactly one-quarter hour.[4]

Gēng (更) is a time signal given by drum or gong. The character for gēng 更, literally meaning "rotation" or "watch", comes from the rotation of watchmen sounding these signals. The first gēng theoretically comes at sundown, but was standardized to fall at 19:12. The time between each gēng is 1⁄10 of a day, making a gēng 2.4 hours long (2 hours 24 minutes). As a 10-part system, the gēng are strongly associated with the 10 celestial stems, especially since the stems are used to count off the gēng during the night in Chinese literature.

As early as the Bronze-Age Xia dynasty, days were grouped into ten-day weeks known as xún (旬). Months consisted of three xún. The first 10 days were the early xún (上旬), the middle 10 the mid xún (中旬), and the last nine or 10 days were the late xún (下旬). Japan adopted this pattern, with 10-day-weeks known as jun (旬). In Korea, they were known as sun (순,旬).

France

[edit]

Pre-Revolution

[edit]
Astronomical table from the Almanach national de France using decimal time

In 1754, Jean le Rond d'Alembert wrote in the Encyclopédie:

It would be very desirable that all divisions, for example of the livre, the sou, the toise, the day, the hour, etc. would be from tens into tens. This division would result in much easier and more convenient calculations and would be very preferable to the arbitrary division of the livre into twenty sous, of the sou into twelve deniers, of the day into twenty-four hours, the hour into sixty minutes, etc.[5][6]

In 1788, Claude Boniface Collignon proposed dividing the day into 10 hours or 1,000 minutes, each new hour into 100 minutes, each new minute into 1,000 seconds, and each new second into 1,000 tierces (older French for "third"). The distance the twilight zone travels in one such tierce at the equator, which would be one-billionth of the circumference of the earth, would be a new unit of length, provisionally called a half-handbreadth, equal to four modern centimetres. Further, the new tierce would be divided into 1,000 quatierces, which he called "microscopic points of time". He also suggested a week of 10 days and dividing the year into 10 "solar months".[7]

French Republic

[edit]

Decimal time was officially introduced during the French Revolution. Jean-Charles de Borda made a proposal for decimal time on 5 November 1792. The National Convention issued a decree on 5 October 1793, to which the underlined words were added on 24 November 1793 (4 Frimaire of the Year II):

VIII. Each month is divided into three equal parts, of ten days each, which are called décades...
XI. The day, from midnight to midnight, is divided into ten parts or hours, each part into ten others, so on until the smallest measurable portion of the duration. The hundredth part of the hour is called decimal minute; the hundredth part of the minute is called decimal second. This article will not be required for the public records, until from the 1st of Vendémiaire, the year three of the Republic. (September 22, 1794) (emphasis in original)

Thus, midnight was called dix heures ("ten hours"), noon was called cinq heures ("five hours"), etc.

Representation

[edit]
3 different representations of 3 hours 86 minutes decimal time by Delambre (9:15:50 a.m.)

The colon (:) was not yet in use as a unit separator for standard times, and is used for non-decimal bases. The French decimal separator is the comma (,), while the period (.), or "point", is used in English. Units were either written out in full, or abbreviated. Thus, five hours eighty three minutes decimal might be written as 5 h. 83 m. Even today, "h" is commonly used in France to separate hours and minutes of 24-hour time, instead of a colon, such as 14h00. Midnight was represented in civil records as "ten hours". Times between midnight and the first decimal hour were written without hours, so 1:00 am, or 0.41 decimal hours, was written as "four décimes" or "forty-one minutes". 2:00 am (0.8333) was written as "eight décimes", "eighty-three minutes", or even "eighty-three minutes thirty-three seconds".

As with duodecimal time, decimal time was represented according to true solar time, rather than mean time, with noon being marked when the sun reached its highest point locally, which varied at different locations, and throughout the year.

In "Methods to find the Leap Years of the French Calendar", Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Delambre used three different representations for the same decimal time:

  • 0,386 (comma is the decimal sign in French)
  • 0j386 ("j" is for jour, day in French)
  • 3h 86' (apostrophe is for minutes)
Marriage certificate for Napoleon's sister, dated 12 floreal l'An V "à Sept heures Cinq Decimes" (May 1, 1797, at 6:00 pm).

Sometimes in official records, decimal hours were divided into tenths, or décimes, instead of minutes. One décime is equal to 10 decimal minutes, which is nearly equal to a quarter-hour (15 minutes) in standard time. Thus, "five hours two décimes" equals 5.2 decimal hours, roughly 12:30 p.m. in standard time.[8][9] One hundredth of a decimal second was a decimal tierce.[10]

Usage

[edit]

Although clocks and watches were produced with faces showing both standard time with numbers 1–24 and decimal time with numbers 1–10, decimal time never caught on; it was not used for public records until the beginning of the Republican year III, 22 September 1794, and mandatory use was suspended 7 April 1795 (18 Germinal of the Year III). In spite of this, decimal time was used in many cities, including Marseille and Toulouse, where a decimal clock with just an hour hand was on the front of the Capitole for five years.[11] In some places, decimal time was used to record certificates of births, marriages, and deaths until the end of Year VIII (September 1800). On the Palace of the Tuileries in Paris, two of the four clock faces displayed decimal time until at least 1801.[12] The mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace had a decimal watch made for him, and used decimal time in his work, in the form of fractional days.

Decimal time was part of a larger attempt at decimalisation in revolutionary France (which also included decimalisation of currency and metrication) and was introduced as part of the French Republican Calendar, which, in addition to decimally dividing the day, divided the month into three décades of 10 days each; this calendar was abolished at the end of 1805. The start of each year was determined according to the day of the autumnal equinox, in relation to true or apparent solar time at the Paris Observatory.

Metric system

[edit]

In designing the new metric system, the intent was to replace all the various units of different bases with a small number of standard decimal units. This was to include units for length, weight, area, liquid capacity, volume, and money. Initially the traditional second of time equal to 1/86400 day was proposed as the base of the metric system, but this was changed in 1791 to base the meter on a decimal division of a measurement of the Earth, instead. Early drafts of the metric system published in 1793 included the new decimal divisions of the day included with the Republican calendar, and some of the same individuals were involved with both projects.[13]

On March 28, 1794, Joseph-Louis Lagrange proposed to the Commission for Republican Weights and Measures on dividing the day into 10 decidays and 100 centidays, which would be expressed together as two digits, counting periods of 14 minutes and 24 seconds since midnight, nearly a quarter hour. This would be displayed by one hand on watches. Another hand would display 100 divisions of a centiday, which is 1/10,000 day, or 8.64 seconds. A third hand on a smaller dial would further divide these into 10, which would be 1/100,000 day, or 864 milliseconds, slightly less than a whole second. He suggested the deciday and centiday be used together to represent the time of day, such as "4 and 5", "4/5", or simply "45".

This was opposed by Jean-Marie Viallon, of the Sainte-Geneviève Library in Paris, who thought that decimal hours, equal to 2.4 old hours, were too long, and that 100 centidays were too many, and proposed dividing two halves of the day into 10 new hours each, for a total of 20 per day, and that simply changing the numbers on watch dials from 12 to 10, he thought, would be sufficient for rural people. For others, there would be 50 decimal minutes per decimal hour, and 100 decimal seconds per decimal minute. His new hours, minutes, and seconds would thus be more similar to the old units.[14]

C.A. Prieur (of the Côte-d'Or), read at the National Convention on Ventôse 11, year III (March 1, 1795):

1) As it does not offer almost all of the nation any marked advantage, it would only throw a disadvantage on the new system of measures and the decimal method, which is however very useful;
2) Since the hourly compilation is not a commercial object or susceptible to a police regulation, the old uses would be maintained by the immense force of habit;
3) This habit would be further consolidated by the fear of confusion. It would be necessary, to prevent it, to take new names that have not yet been indicated, and that it would be very difficult to introduce into common language, especially for so many people who do not write, who do not calculate, and who appreciate time only by a routine based on common opinion;
4) The expense of changing the clocks would be enormous;
5) Finally, citizens and watchmakers would be infinitely dismayed, some to change their watches, others to lose the ability to sell those that are already made. This truth is acquired by the result of the contest which took place recently, under the decree on watchmaking movements.
But by asking that the decimal division of the day is not a condition of rigor, there is no disagreement that there are several circumstances where it has advantages. We know that in several objects of the Navy service, in astronomical or trigonometric calculations, and for delicate experiments, the decimal division of time is more convenient. It will therefore be good to reserve it for these cases, until the use can spread more generally, which will happen by itself imperceptibly.

Thus, the law of 18 Germinal An III (April 7, 1795) establishing the metric system, rather than including metric units for time, repealed the mandatory use of decimal time, although its use continued for a number of years in some places. As predicted, it was quickly found to be useful by astronomers, who still use it in the form of fractional days.

Carl Friedrich Gauss recommended the ephemeris second as a metric base unit for time interval in 1832, which eventually became the atomic second in the International System. However, for longer periods of time interval, the old non-decimal units were approved for use.

French timepiece with 12-hour (upper) and decimal (lower) faces, 1793–94

Later proposals

[edit]

At the International Meridian Conference of 1884, the following resolution was proposed by the French delegation and passed nem con (with 3 abstentions):

VII. That the Conference expresses the hope that the technical studies designed to regulate and extend the application of the decimal system to the division of angular space and of time shall be resumed, so as to permit the extension of this application to all cases in which it presents real advantages.

In the 1890s, Joseph Charles François de Rey-Pailhade, president of the Toulouse Geographical Society, proposed dividing the day into 100 parts, called cés, equal to 14.4 standard minutes, and each divided into 10 decicés, 100 centicés, etc. The Toulouse Chamber of Commerce adopted a resolution supporting his proposal in April 1897. Although widely published, the proposal received little backing.[15]

The French made another attempt at the decimalization of time in 1897, when the Commission de décimalisation du temps was created by the Bureau des Longitudes, with the mathematician Henri Poincaré as secretary. The commission adopted a compromise, originally proposed by Henri de Sarrauton of the Oran Geographical Society, of retaining the 24-hour day, but dividing each hour into 100 decimal minutes, and each minute into 100 seconds. The plan did not gain acceptance and was abandoned in 1900.

Swatch Internet Time

[edit]
A Swatch watch showing .beat time in the bottom part of the display

On 23 October 1998, the Swiss watch company Swatch introduced a decimal time called Internet Time for its line of digital watches, which divided the day into 1,000 ".beats", (each 86.4 seconds in standard time) counted from 000–999, with @000 being midnight and @500 being noon standard time in Switzerland, which is Central European Time (one hour ahead of Universal Time).

Although Swatch did not specify units smaller than one .beat, third party implementations extended the standard by adding "centibeats" or "sub-beats", for extended precision: @248.00. Each "centibeat" was a hundredth of a .beat and was therefore equal to one French decimal second (0.864 seconds).[16][17]

When using .beats and centibeats, Swatch Internet Time divided the day into 1,000 French decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds. So 9pm was 21:00:00 in standard time and @875.00 in extended Swatch Internet Time.

Swatch no longer markets digital watches with Internet Time.

Conversions

[edit]

There are exactly 86,400 standard seconds (see SI for the current definition of the standard second) in a standard day, but in the French decimal time system there were 100,000 decimal seconds in the day; thus, the decimal second was 13.6% shorter than its standard counterpart.

Unit Seconds (SI) Minutes Hours h:mm:ss.sss
1 Decimal second 0.864 0.0144 0.00024 0:00:00.864
1 Decimal minute 86.4 1.44 0.024 0:01:26.400
1 Décime 864 14.4 0.24 0:14:24.000
1 Decimal hour 8,640 144 2.4 2:24:00.000

Decimal hours

[edit]

Another common type of decimal time is decimal hours. In 1896, Henri de Sarrauton of the Oran Geographical Society proposed dividing the 24 hours of the day each into 100 decimal minutes, and each minute into 100 decimal seconds.[18] Although endorsed by the Bureau des Longitudes, this proposal failed, but using decimal fractions of an hour to represent the time of day instead of minutes has become common.

Decimal hours are frequently used in accounting for payrolls and hourly billing. Time clocks typically record the time of day in tenths or hundredths of an hour. For instance, 08:30 would be recorded as 08.50. This is intended to make accounting easier by eliminating the need to convert between minutes and hours.

For aviation purposes, where it is common to add times in an already complicated environment, time tracking is simplified by recording decimal fractions of hours. For instance, instead of adding 1:36 to 2:36, getting 3:72 and converting it to 4:12, one would add 1.6 to 2.6 and get 4.2 hours.[19]

Fractional days

[edit]

The time of day is sometimes represented as a decimal fraction of a day in science and computers. Standard 24-hour time is converted into a fractional day by dividing the number of hours elapsed since midnight by 24 to make a decimal fraction. Thus, midnight is 0.0 day, noon is 0.5 d, etc., which can be added to any type of date, including the following, all of which refer to the same moment in time:

As many decimal places may be used as required for precision, so 0.5 d = 0.500000 d. Fractional days are often calculated in UTC or TT, although Julian Dates use pre-1925 astronomical date/time (each date began at noon = ".0") and Microsoft Excel uses the local time zone of the computer. Using fractional days reduces the number of units in time calculations from four (days, hours, minutes, seconds) to just one (days).

Fractional days are often used by astronomers to record observations, and were expressed in relation to Paris Mean Time by the 18th century French mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace, as in these examples:[20]

... et la distance périhélie, égale à 1,053095; ce qui a donné pour l'instant du passage au périhélie, sept.29j,10239, temps moyen compté de minuit à Paris.

Les valeurs précédentes de a, b, h, l, relatives à trois observations, ont donné la distance périhélie égale à 1,053650; et pour l'instant du passage, sept.29j,04587; ce qui diffère peu des résultats fondés sur cinq observations.

— Pierre-Simon Laplace, Traité de Mécanique Céleste

Fractional days have been used by astronomers ever since. For instance, the 19th century British astronomer John Herschel gave these examples:[21]

Between Greenwich noon of the 22d and 23d of March, 1829, the 1828th equinoctial year terminates, and the 1829th commences. This happens at 0d·286003, or at 6h 51m 50s·66 Greenwich Mean Time ... For example, at 12h 0m 0s Greenwich Mean Time, or 0d·500000...

— John Herschel, Outlines of Astronomy

Fractional days are commonly used to express epochs of orbital elements. The decimal fraction is usually added to the calendar date or Julian day for natural objects, or to the ordinal date for artificial satellites in two-line elements.

Decimal multiples and fractions of the second

[edit]

The second is the International System of Units (SI) unit of time duration. It is also the standard single-unit time representation in many programming languages, most notably C, and part of UNIX/POSIX standards used by Linux, Mac OS X, etc.; to convert fractional days to fractional seconds, multiply the number by 86400. Fractional seconds are represented as milliseconds (ms), microseconds (μs) or nanoseconds (ns). Absolute times are usually represented relative to 1 January 1970, at midnight UT. Other systems may use a different zero point (like Unix time).

In principle, time spans greater than one second may be given in units such as kiloseconds (ks), megaseconds (Ms), gigaseconds (Gs), and so on. Occasionally, these units can be found in technical literature, but traditional units like minutes, hours, days and years are much more common, and are accepted for use with SI.

It is possible to specify the time of day as the number of kiloseconds of elapsed time since midnight. Thus, instead of saying 3:45 p.m. one could say (time of day) 56.7 ks. There are exactly 86.4 ks in one day (each kilosecond being equivalent to 16 minutes and 40 seconds worth of conventional time). However, this nomenclature is rarely used in practice.

Scientific decimal time

[edit]

Scientists often record time as decimal. For example, decimal days divide the day into 10 equal parts, and decimal years divide the year into 10 equal parts. Decimals are easier to plot than both (a) minutes and seconds, which uses the sexagesimal numbering system, (b) hours, months and days, which has irregular month lengths. In astronomy, the so-called Julian day uses decimal days centered on Greenwich noon.

Seconds in a decimal minute

Since there are 60 seconds in a minute, a tenth part represents 60/10 = 6 seconds.

Conversion between decimal minutes and seconds
Decimal minutes 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Second 6s 12s 18s 24s 30s 36s 42s 48s 54s 60s
Minutes in a decimal hour

Since there are 60 minutes in an hour, a tenth part represents 60/10 = 6 minutes.

Conversion between decimal hours and minutes
Decimal hours 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Minutes 6m 12m 18m 24m 30m 36m 42m 48m 54m 60m
Hours in a decimal day

Since there are 24 hours in a day, a tenth part represents 24/10 = 2.4 hours (2 hours and 24 minutes).

Conversion between decimal day and hours/minutes
Decimal days 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Hours/minutes 2h 24m 4h 48m 7h 12m 9h 36m 12h 14h 24m 16h 48m 19h 12m 21h 36m 24h
Length of a decimal year

Since there are about 365 days in a year, there are about 365/10 = 36.5 days in a tenth of a year. Hence the year 2020.5 represents the day 2 July 2020.[22] More exactly, a "Julian year" is approximately 365.25 days long, so a tenth of the year is 36.525 days (36 days, 12 hours, 36 minutes).

Conversion between decimal years and date (in a common year)
Decimal years 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Days 0 36.525 73.050 109.575 146.100 182.625 219.150 255.675 292.200 328.725 365.250
Date
Time
1 Jan
00:00
6 Feb
12:36
15 Mar
01:12
20 Apr
13:48
27 May
2:24
1 Jul
15:00
8 Aug
03:36
13 Sep
16:12
20 Oct
04:48
25 Nov
17:24
1 Jan
06:00

These values, based on the Julian year, are most likely to be those used in astronomy and related sciences. A Gregorian year, which takes into account the 100 vs. 400 leap year exception rule of the Gregorian calendar, is 365.2425 days (the average length of a year over a 400–year cycle), resulting in 0.1 years being a period of 36.52425 days (3155695.2 seconds; 36 days, 12 hours, 34 minutes, 55.2 seconds).

Other decimal times

[edit]

Numerous individuals have proposed variations of decimal time, dividing the day into different numbers of units and subunits with different names. Most are based upon fractional days, so that one decimal time format may be easily converted into another, such that all the following are equivalent:

  • 0.500 day
  • 5 heures décimales
  • @500.beats Swatch Internet Time (see above)
  • 50.0 kes or cés (centidays)
  • 500 millidays
  • 50.0% time as a percentage of the day
  • 12:00 standard time

Some decimal time proposals are based upon alternate units of metric time. The difference between metric time and decimal time is that metric time defines units for measuring time interval, as measured with a stopwatch, and decimal time defines the time of day, as measured by a clock. Just as standard time uses the metric time unit of the second as its basis, proposed decimal time scales may use alternative metric units.

In the fictional Star Trek universe, each stardate increment represents one milliyear, with 78 years in 2401, counted from 2323. The decimal represents a fractional day. Thus, stardates are a composition of two types of decimal time.[citation needed] In 2023, 78 years earlier would be 1945.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Decimal time denotes a system of timekeeping that divides the solar day into ten hours, each hour into one hundred minutes, and each minute into one hundred seconds, employing base-10 subdivisions throughout. This approach contrasts with the traditional system inherited from , which uses twenty-four hours, sixty minutes, and sixty seconds. The most notable implementation occurred during the , when the decreed its adoption on 24 November 1793 to promote rational, decimal-based measurements aligned with the emerging and to sever ties with ecclesiastical influences on time reckoning. Proponents, including astronomers like Joseph Jérôme Lalande, envisioned it facilitating calculations and standardizing public life, with clocks and watches produced to display both systems during the transition. A subsequent law on 1 November 1795 mandated the production of decimal timepieces for official use, though enforcement was inconsistent and largely confined to and revolutionary institutions. Despite initial revolutionary zeal, decimal time encountered swift opposition due to its disruption of ingrained habits, incompatibility with international commerce and scientific instruments calibrated to sexagesimal units, and the absence of empirical advantages in daily or astronomical applications, as critiqued by figures like . Public resistance manifested in reluctance to adopt new clocks amid economic strains, leading to its demotion from mandatory status on 7 April 1795 and full reversion under in 1806. Subsequent efforts, such as the Internet Time's division of the day into 1,000 decimal "beats" in 1998, similarly faltered, underscoring the enduring practicality of the conventional system tied to observable celestial cycles.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Attempts

In , around 2000 BCE, astronomers employed 36 —groups of stars whose heliacal risings marked temporal intervals—to divide the night into 12 parts, with each decan associated with 10-day calendar periods known as decades, introducing a rudimentary element tied to stellar observations rather than equal divisions of the 24-hour solar day. This approach prioritized empirical tracking of celestial events for nocturnal timekeeping, as decans rose sequentially to indicate hour-like segments, but daytime hours varied seasonally with sunlight duration, precluding a fully decimalized uniform day. In , starting from the (206 BCE–220 CE), water clocks (clepsydrae) and incense timers incorporated decimal divisions by marking the day into 100 ke units, each equivalent to roughly 14.4 modern minutes, for applications in astronomy, administration, and ritual timing. These ke, derived from incisions or scales on timekeeping devices, reflected China's prevalent decimal arithmetic but coexisted with the dominant duodecimal system of 12 shi (double hours aligned with zodiacal positions), subordinating decimal precision to cyclical celestial and calendrical harmonies. Such partial implementations did not evolve into comprehensive decimal time systems, as ancient timekeeping emphasized synchronization with lunar-solar cycles and subdivisions inherited from , which offered greater commensurability for predicting eclipses and seasons over abstract base-10 uniformity.

Enlightenment and Pre-Revolutionary Proposals

During the Enlightenment, European intellectuals increasingly advocated for rational reforms to measurement systems, favoring decimal divisions to align with base-10 arithmetic's computational efficiency over the irregular fractions inherent in systems. This push stemmed from first-principles reasoning that human numeral systems, rooted in , should extend to all metrics for harmony and precision in science and , contrasting with time's persistent Babylonian-derived base-60 subdivisions preserved in astronomy for their divisibility. Time measurement proved resistant to early decimalization due to entrenched horological traditions and the need for compatibility with celestial observations, where allowed straightforward division into halves, thirds, and sixths without cumbersome decimals. Proposals for decimal time emerged sporadically in the late as extensions of broader metric advocacy, emphasizing potential simplifications in calculations and logarithms, though practical clock adaptations lagged. A concrete pre-revolutionary scheme was advanced in 1788 by French attorney Claude Boniface Collignon, who proposed partitioning the day into 10 hours, each comprising 100 minutes, with minutes subdivided into 1000 seconds to maintain progression while approximating traditional durations. Collignon's plan highlighted time's alignment with emerging metric reforms, arguing for reduced complexity in arithmetic operations over the "arbitrary" 24-60-60 structure, though it overlooked disruptions to existing instruments and societal rhythms.

French Revolutionary Implementation

The decreed the adoption of time on 24 November 1793 (4 Frimaire Year II), establishing a system where each day comprised 10 hours, each hour 100 minutes, and each decimal minute 100 seconds. This reform extended the decimal principle to timekeeping, with each decimal hour equivalent to 144 traditional minutes and each decimal second to 0.864 traditional seconds, aiming for consistency with emerging metric standards. The initiative formed part of the revolutionary drive to rationalize measurements and sever ties with pre-revolutionary traditions, including religious influences embedded in divisions. It complemented the , decreed on 24 October 1793, which restructured the year into 12 months of 30 days each, subdivided into three 10-day periods known as décades rather than seven-day weeks, thereby eliminating the Christian cycle in favor of a purely decimal framework. Implementation began in urban centers like , where public clocks on buildings such as the were adjusted to display decimal time alongside traditional markings, and almanacs printed with dual notations to facilitate transition. Official announcements and printed materials promoted its use in government and scientific contexts, though practical enforcement varied, with stronger adherence in revolutionary strongholds compared to rural regions where traditional timekeeping persisted due to limited administrative reach. Specialized decimal watches and instruments were crafted by Parisian horologists to support the system during its active period from late 1793 to early 1795.

Post-Revolutionary and 19th-Century Efforts

Following the abandonment of the French Revolutionary decimal time system, Napoleon Bonaparte formally abolished it on 1 January 1806, reverting to the and traditional time divisions as a conciliatory gesture toward the to bolster political alliances. This decision prioritized ecclesiastical and social stability over rationalist reforms, despite lingering intellectual support; for instance, continued employing decimal time notations in his 1799 Traité de Mécanique Céleste for computational convenience in . However, no widespread institutional revival occurred in the early 1800s, as entrenched practices in , , and daily life favored the divisibility of 24 hours and 60 minutes, which aligned with angular measurements (e.g., 360 degrees divided into 24 hours yields 15 degrees per hour for calculations). Interest in decimal time reemerged pragmatically in the late amid broader metric efforts in science and , aiming to simplify arithmetic in an era of expanding railroads, telegraphs, and . At the 1884 in , delegates from 25 nations, including representatives from Britain, , and the , adopted a resolution vaguely endorsing further study of decimal time subdivisions to potentially harmonize with metric units, though no concrete implementation followed due to the conference's primary focus on establishing Greenwich as the and standard time zones. This reflected a utilitarian push for calculational efficiency rather than ideological overhaul, yet it overlooked entrenched dependencies in equatorial astronomy and maritime chronometry. A more detailed proposal came in 1897 from a French Bureau des Longitudes commission chaired by mathematician , which recommended retaining the 24-hour day but decimalizing subdivisions into 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per minute to facilitate scientific computations while minimizing disruption. The commission argued this hybrid would ease metric alignments without fully upending solar-based mean time, but the report was shelved by July 1900 amid opposition from navigators, who cited incompatibility with readings and existing chronometers calibrated to units essential for precise determination; physicists and astronomers similarly resisted due to the obsolescence of instruments and tables, as well as the absence of international consensus. These efforts ultimately yielded to the inertial force of global standardization, where time's divisibility by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 proved more adaptable for practical divisions like shifts and watches, overriding decimal's arithmetic purity.

20th-Century Initiatives

In the , decimal time proposals remained marginal and experimental, confined to individual advocates rather than institutional or national implementation, consistently failing due to entrenched standards, synchronization challenges across industries and borders, and minimal perceived gains in daily utility. Proponents argued for arithmetic simplification aligned with decimal metrics, yet from prior attempts underscored the prohibitive costs of recalibrating clocks, schedules, and international coordination, which far exceeded benefits in calculation ease. No major governments or standards bodies pursued widespread reform, as adherence to and universal prioritized compatibility over reform. A notable American initiative emerged in the 1960s under Noble Stibolt, a retired attorney, who advocated "Metrictime" to rationalize time amid frustrations with time zones and daylight saving discrepancies. Published in his 1961 pamphlet Should ‘TIME’ Be Modernized?, the system divided the day into 10 hours of 100 minutes each, with minutes further subdivided into 100 seconds (each second lasting 86.4 standard seconds), aiming to facilitate decimal arithmetic in engineering and commerce. Stibolt extended the proposal to a metric calendar with 10-day weeks named after planets (e.g., Earthday, Venusday), 9 weeks per season, 4 seasons per year, and 5 intercalary holidays to total 365 days, drawing inspiration from Enlightenment rationalism and the metric system's success in measurement. His son, Noble H. Stibolt, supported distribution, but the effort gained no traction beyond pamphlets and expired trademarks by 1983 following the elder Stibolt's death in 1969. Soviet explorations in the considered decimal divisions for industrial planning but dismissed them, as altering time units would disrupt productivity metrics tied to traditional work shifts and data, compounding inefficiencies in a command already experimenting with continuous weeks and decree time shifts. These niche efforts highlighted causal barriers: retrofitting machinery, retraining labor, and aligning with non-adopting partners imposed net losses, as quantified in failed pilots where coordination overhead negated decimal advantages. By mid-century, decimal time's rejection solidified, with global forums favoring stability over innovation absent overwhelming evidence of superiority.

Core Systems and Variants

French Republican Decimal Time

The French Republican decimal time system redivided the solar day—retained at its empirical length of standard seconds—into 10 decimal hours, each subdivided into 100 decimal minutes, and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds, yielding decimal seconds per day overall. This full decimalization of the day distinguished the system from variants that decimalized only subunits within a 24-hour framework, enabling arithmetic operations like expressing as precisely 5 decimal hours without fractional adjustments. The units were designated heure décimale for the hour, minute décimale for the decimal minute, and seconde décimale for the decimal second, aligning with the era's metric nomenclature conventions. Timepieces manufactured or adapted for the system, such as pocket watches and public clocks, incorporated auxiliary or dual dials to display these divisions, often with a primary scale for decimal hours marked 1 through 10 and concentric or sub-dials for decimal minutes subdivided into quarters (e.g., indicators at 25, 50, 75, and 100). Additional notations on some instruments marked tenths of a decimal hour as a décime, equivalent to 10 decimal minutes, to support practical quarter-hour equivalents in decimal form. While the subdivisions were rigorously decimal, the system's adherence to the fixed solar day introduced inconsistencies with the broader metric framework, as the decimal second equated to 0.864 standard seconds—a non- —rather than deriving from a rational decimal progression tied to metric units, such as those based on the Earth's meridian quadrant. This anchoring to observed astronomical periodicity, rather than redefining the day to achieve commensurability with decimalized physical standards (e.g., via adjusted for exact decimal relations to the meter), resulted in mismatches that hindered integration with metric measures of and motion.

Decimal Hours and Day Fractions

Decimal hours express time intervals within the conventional 24-hour day using decimal fractions of an hour, where are divided into tenths, hundredths, or other decimal parts for simplified arithmetic, as in 1.5 hours representing one hour and 30 minutes. This format avoids redefining the hour's length while enabling straightforward addition and multiplication, particularly in where minutes are converted via division by 60—e.g., 45 minutes equals 0.75 hours—to compute wages without sexagesimal complexity. Conversion charts standardize this process, listing equivalents like 6 minutes as 0.1 hours or 31 minutes as 0.52 hours, ensuring precision in billing for services rendered in partial hours. Fractional days denote portions of the full 24-hour solar day as , such as 0.5 day equating to 12 hours or 0.04167 day to one hour, prioritizing proportional calculations over base-60 divisions. In astronomy, this manifests in the system, where timestamps combine an integer day count with a decimal of the day (e.g., 0.25 for six hours past noon UTC), allowing precise computations across long spans without cumulative rounding errors from hours and minutes. Such fractions support and celestial event timing, as the decimal form aligns with algorithmic efficiency in scientific software. Unlike comprehensive decimal time reforms that partition the day into 10 unequal hours to achieve base-10 uniformity, decimal hours and day fractions preserve the 24-hour framework tied to and diurnal rhythms, applying decimalization selectively to intervals for practical utility in non-temporal restructuring contexts. This hybrid approach mitigates disruption to human physiology and international synchronization while exploiting decimal notation's computational advantages in fields requiring fractional precision, such as logistical scheduling where day fractions model transit durations proportionally.

Sub-Second Decimal Divisions

Proposals for subdividing the decimal second into smaller decimal units, such as 10 deci-seconds or 100 centi-seconds, have aimed to maintain consistency with the decimal structure of broader time systems, analogous to metric prefixes applied to the SI second. These extensions prioritize arithmetic simplicity in calculations involving fractions of a second but have remained largely theoretical, as they conflict with the fixed length of the modern second. In the French Republican decimal time system, the base decimal second was defined as one 100,000th of the mean solar day, measuring approximately 0.864 SI seconds. Subdivisions below this unit were not formally standardized or widely implemented, though logical decimal fractions—such as the deci-second equaling 0.1 decimal seconds—could extend the system for precision needs. Modern critiques highlight the misalignment: the SI second, established in 1967 as exactly 9,192,631,770 oscillations of the cesium-133 atom's radiation, derives from atomic standards rather than solar day fractions, rendering decimal day-based sub-units incompatible with high-precision scientific measurements like atomic clocks or GPS timing. Practical applications of sub-second decimal divisions have been confined to niche experiments, such as 19th-century efforts in for astronomical observations, where scales were tested on instruments to evaluate precision against alternatives. However, the entrenched SI framework, with its own submultiples (e.g., = 10^{-3} s), has precluded broader adoption, as redefining sub-seconds would disrupt fields reliant on atomic time standards.

Alternative Decimal Schemes

, introduced by in 1998, divides the 24-hour day into 1000 equal ".beats," each lasting 86.4 seconds. This system uses Biel Mean Time as a global reference, eliminating time zones to facilitate synchronized online activities. Despite initial marketing as a universal standard for the internet era, adoption remained limited to niche applications and Swatch-branded devices. Hexadecimal time proposals, explored in computing contexts, represent the fraction of the day as a base-16 number rather than base-10 decimals. For instance, the Hexclock displays time using three hexadecimal digits for improved resolution over binary clocks, leveraging hex's compactness in digital systems. However, these remain experimental and marginal, as human favors base-10 for everyday use, limiting practical integration beyond specialized software. Modern cultural revivals of decimal-like schemes appear in educational tools and mobile applications, such as decimal clock widgets that simulate 100 or 1000 units per day for demonstration purposes. These lack institutional support and serve primarily as curiosities or learning aids, without influencing broader timekeeping standards.

Mathematical Foundations

Conversion Formulas

The conversion between French Republican decimal time and standard (sexagesimal) time preserves the mean solar day of approximately seconds, but accounts for the decimal system's division into 10 hours, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute, yielding 100,000 decimal seconds per day. The fundamental ratio is thus 86,400 standard seconds per 100,000 decimal seconds, or 0.864 standard seconds per decimal second. This factor enables precise interconversion, verifiable by direct computation against astronomical observations of solar transit times, which confirm the day's invariance across systems. To convert from decimal hours to standard hours, multiply by 2.4, as one decimal hour equals 1/10 of the day while one standard hour equals 1/24 of the day: hs=hd×2410=hd×2.4h_s = h_d \times \frac{24}{10} = h_d \times 2.4, where hsh_s is standard hours and hdh_d is decimal hours. For example, 5 decimal hours equals 5×2.4=125 \times 2.4 = 12 standard hours. Similarly, fractions of the decimal day convert directly: 0.5 decimal days = 0.5×24=120.5 \times 24 = 12 standard hours. Verification involves equating both to the shared day length, ensuring no cumulative drift in repeated conversions, as tested in historical almanacs aligning decimal timestamps with standard ephemerides. Decimal minutes convert to standard minutes by multiplying by 1.44, derived from 100 decimal minutes equaling one decimal hour (2.4 standard hours or 144 standard minutes): ms=md×144100=md×1.44m_s = m_d \times \frac{144}{100} = m_d \times 1.44, where msm_s is standard minutes and mdm_d is decimal minutes. One decimal minute thus spans 86.4 standard seconds (1.44 standard minutes). For decimal seconds, multiply by 0.864 to obtain standard seconds: ss=sd×0.864s_s = s_d \times 0.864. Comprehensive conversion of a full timestamp (e.g., 2 decimal hours, 30 decimal minutes, 45 decimal seconds) first aggregates to decimal hours (2+30/100+45/10,000=2.30452 + 30/100 + 45/10{,}000 = 2.3045) then applies the 2.4 factor (2.3045×2.45.53082.3045 \times 2.4 \approx 5.5308 standard hours, or 5 hours and 0.5308×6031.8480.5308 \times 60 \approx 31.848 minutes), with residuals handled iteratively for precision. In practical applications such as or scientific logging, lookup tables mitigate approximation errors from manual arithmetic, listing equivalents like:
Decimal MinutesStandard Minutes Equivalent
1014.4
5072
100144
These derive from the 1.44 factor and ensure exactness when scaled to full days, as discrepancies otherwise accumulate in high-volume computations (e.g., billing 1,000 work units). Algorithms in modern software replicate this by normalizing to day fractions before rescaling, empirically validated against standard chronometers to sub-second accuracy.

Arithmetic Advantages

Decimal time's alignment with the base-10 numeral system inherent to most arithmetic practices eliminates the mismatches between time units and computational bases, streamlining , division, and fractional operations. In standard time, divisions like 1/60 of an hour yield recurring decimals (approximately 0.016666... hours), complicating manual or mental calculations, whereas decimal time expresses 1/10 of a decimal hour as exactly 0.1 decimal hours, terminating cleanly and aligning with decimal place values. This congruence reduces the for handling fractions, as operations on time intervals become indistinguishable from ordinary decimal arithmetic, avoiding conversions between disparate bases such as 60 minutes per hour or 24 hours per day. For example, computing 3/7 of a (10 decimal hours) yields approximately 4.2857 decimal hours, a straightforward recurring decimal manageable via base-10 patterns, whereas 3/7 of a 24-hour day requires handling 10 hours and (3/7 × 60) ≈ 25.714 minutes, necessitating separate integer and fractional computations with potential carry-overs. Historical advocates, including the in 1793, emphasized this for enhancing calculational efficiency in trade and , positing that decimal uniformity would minimize errors in multiplying rates (e.g., work output per decimal hour) or dividing durations without auxiliary tables for factors. Addition and subtraction further benefit, as carry-overs occur predictably every 10 units rather than irregularly at 60 or 24, mirroring number addition and reducing procedural steps. on numeral systems confirms that regular decimal structures outperform irregular ones in mental arithmetic speed and accuracy, as they leverage familiar base-10 chunking and heuristics. In purely computational frameworks, such as mechanical calculators or early algorithms tuned to base-10, this alignment obviates internal unit scaling, though hybrid environments impose conversion penalties when interfacing with non-decimal standards.

Compatibility with Standard Time

The subdivision of the solar day into ten equal decimal hours, each equivalent to 2.4 standard hours or approximately 86,400 seconds divided by 10, created misalignment with traditional astronomical observations calibrated to sexagesimal divisions. This discrepancy necessitated recalibration of instruments like astrolabes and celestial tables, as decimal time disrupted established calculations in celestial mechanics, requiring new ephemerides and adjustments noted by astronomers such as Pierre-Simon Laplace during the French Revolutionary period. Sundials, reliant on the to mark equal intervals based on hours, proved incompatible without redesign, as the shadow progression over a 24-hour solar day does not naturally align with ten uniform divisions, complicating equitable marking of hours across varying latitudes and seasons. Implementation of decimal time under the French law of 24 November 1793 (effective from 1 January 1794) mandated replacement of existing clocks and watches nationwide, rendering vast numbers of instruments obsolete and imposing substantial economic costs far exceeding those for metric length or standards. Contemporary reports highlighted the prohibitive expense of retrofitting or discarding timepieces, particularly public and scientific ones, contributing to practical frictions in with unaltered foreign or legacy systems. In modern standards, permits decimal fractions only for seconds (e.g., HH:MM:SS.sss) within its hour-minute-second structure, explicitly rejecting full divisions of the day to preserve with global conventions and computing systems built on base-60 subdivisions. This limited accommodation avoids the conversion overhead of decimal hours or day fractions, which would fragment data exchange in international timestamps, navigation, and software protocols.

Adoption and Practical Usage

Enforcement During the French Revolution

The National Convention issued a decree on 5 October 1793 establishing the French Republican Calendar, which incorporated decimal time by dividing the day into ten hours of 100 minutes each, with the provision for decimal subdivisions added on 4 Frimaire Year II (24 November 1793). This measure mandated the adaptation of public timepieces, including modifications to the Convention Nationale's clock in Paris with dual decimal dials as proposed on 17 Frimaire Year II (7 December 1793), and similar alterations to urban tower clocks such as Toulouse's Capitole by the end of Thermidor Year II (late July–early August 1794). Enforcement emphasized installation in public spaces to symbolize rational reform and egalitarian principles, with propaganda disseminated through almanacs like Gilbert Romme's Annuaire des cultivateurs and theatrical productions, such as Paris's Théâtre du Vaudeville staging L’Heureuse Decade on 5 Brumaire Year II (26 October 1793) to promote republican timekeeping. Compliance varied, achieving partial adherence in urban administrative centers like , , and , where decimal hours appeared in official records and some public announcements, but everyday usage lagged due to entrenched habits and insufficient infrastructure. Theaters in observed decimal schedules for republican festivals and plays on décadi (every tenth day), yet contemporary observer Louis-Sébastien Mercier noted in Pluviôse Year IX (early 1801) the scarcity of audible or visible public clocks, indicating widespread reliance on private traditional timepieces. Resistance manifested in unofficial persistence with clocks, including dual-dial adaptations for covert standard-time use, though explicit records are archival rather than widespread; local attachments to familiar rhythms contributed to uneven enforcement, particularly outside Jacobin strongholds. Decimal time's mandatory status endured briefly, from its effective rollout in Vendémiaire Year III (22 September 1794) until suspension on 18 Germinal Year III (7 April 1795), spanning approximately 197 days of strict obligation. This reversion aligned with the following the 9 Thermidor Year II coup (27 July 1794) against Robespierre, which ushered in pragmatic moderation, diminishing radical Jacobin impositions like decimalization in favor of stabilizing social and economic functions amid post-Terror recovery. Archival evidence from justice de paix records and police reports underscores how enforcement waned as authorities prioritized practicality over ideological uniformity.

Commercial Applications in Billing and Payroll

Decimal hours, which express durations as base-10 fractions of an hour (e.g., 7 hours and 30 minutes as 7.5 hours, or in some contexts like payroll in Spanish-speaking countries, notations such as "9,2" denoting 9.2 hours equivalent to 9 hours and 12 minutes with the comma as decimal separator), are standard in commercial systems for calculating employee compensation based on tracked work time. This approach simplifies by hourly rates, avoiding the need to convert 60-based minute fractions into equivalent decimals or percentages. software such as those from ADP and routinely automates these conversions, integrating time entries from clocks or timesheets into decimal totals for precise gross pay computation. In billing applications, particularly for hourly services like consulting or legal work, decimal hours enable straightforward invoicing by converting client-engaged time into billable units, reducing manual arithmetic and associated discrepancies. Industry analyses indicate that this method lowers the risk of calculation errors that could trigger compliance violations or disputes, as decimal operations align with standard computational tools and auditing standards. For instance, systems handling or freelance report enhanced efficiency in aggregating daily hours into weekly or monthly summaries without fractional minute adjustments. Despite these advantages within hourly contexts, decimal time has not extended to full-day restructuring in commercial operations, as enterprises rely on the conventional 24-hour framework for scheduling, client interactions, and regulatory reporting, which demand with non-decimal clocks and calendars. This limitation preserves compatibility but confines decimal applications to backend processing rather than operational timekeeping.

Scientific and Technical Implementations

In astronomy, the Julian Date system employs decimal fractions of the day to represent time precisely for ephemeris calculations and , where the date is expressed as an integer Julian Day Number plus a decimal fraction elapsed since noon (UT1), enabling seamless arithmetic across extended timescales without the discontinuities of hours. This approach, standardized since the , supports computational tasks in software like Astropy, which internally maintains time as double-precision Julian days for high-fidelity simulations of celestial events. However, empirical usage remains limited to backend calculations and data tables, with no adoption for operational clocks or daily astronomical observations, as standard time aligns better with human scheduling and instrument synchronization. In scientific and simulations, decimal time representations appear sporadically, often as fractional days in domain-specific models such as astrophysical or geophysical codes, where they simplify over irregular intervals. For instance, orbital propagation software may use decimal day fractions to avoid accumulation of rounding errors inherent in hour-minute-second conversions. Yet, overriding prevalence of seconds—rooted in the Unix epoch's standards—constrains interoperability, with libraries defaulting to seconds for timestamping and logging, rendering decimal variants niche and non-standard across platforms. Evidence from simulation frameworks indicates negligible performance gains in general-purpose , where decimal time introduces conversion overhead without offsetting entrenched ecosystem dependencies. A March 2025 proposal advocates a decimal overhaul for physical time units, defining the "Nimesa" as 1/100,000th of a mean solar day (approximately 0.864 seconds) with hierarchical decimal subunits like Pal (10 Nimesa) and Muhurt (100 Pal), purportedly easing calculations in physics by aligning time with base-10 metrics. This scheme, however, disregards the SI system's coherence, where the atomic second integrates with metric prefixes and constants like the , potentially disrupting precision instrumentation and international standards without demonstrated empirical superiority in measurements or simulations. No peer-reviewed validations or adoptions have emerged, underscoring limited practical traction amid entrenched atomic timekeeping.

Evaluations and Debates

Purported Benefits

Proponents of decimal time have argued that its base-10 divisions align naturally with human numeral systems, facilitating arithmetic operations such as , , and conversion between units without the need for fractional multipliers inherent in systems. This purported cognitive efficiency was emphasized during the French Revolutionary era, where advocates claimed it would streamline time-related computations in and administration by treating time intervals as pure decimal shifts. In modern contexts, decimal time variants like , which divides the day into 1000 ".beats" without time zones, have been promoted for enabling seamless global synchronization, particularly in digital networks where traditional offsets complicate coordination. Supporters contend this eliminates discrepancies in international scheduling, allowing uniform timestamps across regions based on a single mean solar day reference from Biel Mean Time. Ideologically, decimal time has appealed to reform movements seeking to supplant perceived arbitrary historical divisions—rooted in ancient Babylonian base-60—with rational, metric-consistent units, ostensibly promoting precision in scientific measurement and egalitarian of daily rhythms. However, such claims have not been substantiated by productivity data from implementations, remaining largely theoretical assertions by enthusiasts of decimalization.

Empirical Failures and Criticisms

The French time system, decreed on October 24, 1793, and briefly mandated for public use starting September 22, 1794, lasted only until its suspension on April 7, 1795, a period of roughly six months of enforcement amid reports of operational disarray. This short lifespan stemmed from acute coordination failures, as timepieces manufactured to comply often incorporated dual scales for decimal and traditional hours, fostering frequent misreadings and errors in synchronizing labor shifts, market openings, and official announcements. Implementation incurred substantial economic burdens, including the production of specialized clocks and the retraining of clockmakers and administrators, which diverted resources during the ongoing revolutionary wars and proved disproportionate to any observed arithmetic conveniences in record-keeping. The system's incompatibility with prevailing international standards further amplified these issues, as French entities struggled to align with foreign trade timetables and astronomical data tables calibrated to the 24-hour duodecimal framework, rendering cross-border coordination inefficient and error-prone. Scientific objections in the , voiced by bodies like the Bureau des Longitudes, underscored practical incompatibilities with existing measurement practices, including nascent electrical experiments tied to traditional second-based intervals, foreshadowing broader redefinition challenges. Later 19th-century assessments echoed these concerns, with physicists citing the need to overhaul electromagnetic units—such as amperes defined via traditional seconds—forcing abandonment of revival proposals due to the cascade of recalibrations required for instruments and formulas.

Biological and Astronomical Constraints

Human circadian rhythms, endogenous oscillations regulating , , and cognitive functions, exhibit a free-running period averaging 24.18 hours under constant environmental conditions, closely matching the ~24-hour solar day driven by . These rhythms entrain to geophysical zeitgebers like daylight, maintaining phase coherence essential for health; disruptions, as in misalignment, correlate with adverse outcomes including impaired glucose regulation and increased cardiovascular risk. Decimal time's subdivision of this fixed solar day into 10 equal hours (each spanning 2.4 standard hours or 144 standard minutes) imposes artificial intervals lacking correspondence to sub-daily biological oscillations, such as ultradian cycles, potentially complicating entrainment during societal transitions despite the unchanged total day length. Astronomically, the mean solar day comprises 86,400 standard seconds, derived from Earth's axial rotation relative to the Sun, with prime factorization (2^7 × 3^3 × 5^2) incorporating non--friendly factors that preclude exact division into higher powers of 10 without unit rescaling. time compensates by defining 100,000 seconds per day, yielding a second of precisely 0.864 standard seconds, which introduces persistent conversion factors misaligned with sidereal periods (23 hours 56 minutes 4 seconds) used in stellar observations. Sundials, tracking apparent via shadow projection, require specialized markings with angular spacings calibrated to equal time intervals rather than traditional 12-hour divisions, diminishing with historical instruments tied to seasonal daylight variations. Celestial mechanics further constrains decimal adoption, as sexagesimal time persists in right ascension measurements (dividing the celestial equator into 24 hours of 60 minutes each) due to 60's superior divisibility by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30—facilitating fractional computations for ephemerides and navigation absent in base-10 equivalents. This legacy reflects ancient astronomical practices optimizing predictions around the 360-degree circle (360/60=6), where decimal alternatives yield awkward decimals (e.g., thirds as 0.333 hours), perpetuating sexagesimal for precision despite decimal's arithmetic simplicity in non-astronomical contexts.

Socioeconomic Resistance Factors

In the , decimal time encountered substantial grassroots resistance from workers and farmers, who viewed the mandate as an unwelcome disruption to ingrained daily routines, work cycles, and market timings synchronized with traditional divisions. Informal adherence to persisted widely, as the system's abstract failed to override the practical coordination embedded in local and labor practices, rendering top-down enforcement ineffective by April 1795 when it was officially abandoned. This pushback exemplified decentralized socioeconomic preferences prioritizing continuity over elite-driven reforms, with minimal voluntary uptake beyond official announcements. Twentieth-century proposals for decimal time, such as those tied to global standardization efforts, faltered against the immense sunk costs of entrenched infrastructure, including rail networks spanning continents with timetables calibrated to 24-hour cycles and subdivisions. Retrofitting millions of clocks, signals, and schedules would impose coordination expenses far exceeding marginal arithmetic gains, as cost-benefit assessments revealed the uneconomic nature of overhauling systems optimized for and transport over decades of incremental investment. The framework's cultural entrenchment, originating from Sumerian commerce and astronomy around the third millennium BCE, further reinforced resistance by embedding divisibility advantages—yielding exact fractions for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, and other trade-relevant factors—in voluntary economic interactions spanning millennia. This historical outweighed decimal purity's theoretical appeal, as market-driven adoption metrics favored the system's flexibility in bargaining, measurement, and synchronization across diverse societies rather than uniform base-10 abstraction.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.