Hubbry Logo
DerivatizationDerivatizationMain
Open search
Derivatization
Community hub
Derivatization
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Derivatization
Derivatization
Derivatization
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Derivatization is a technique used in chemistry which converts a chemical compound into a product (the reaction's derivate) of similar chemical structure, called a derivative.

Generally, a specific functional group of the compound participates in the derivatization reaction and transforms the educt to a derivate of deviating reactivity, solubility, boiling point, melting point, aggregate state, or chemical composition. Resulting new chemical properties can be used for quantification or separation of the educt.

Derivatization techniques are frequently employed in chemical analysis of mixtures and in surface analysis, e.g. in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy where newly incorporated atoms label characteristic groups.

Derivatization reactions

[edit]

Several characteristics are desirable for a derivatization reaction:

  1. The reaction is reliable and proceeds to completion. Less unreacted starting material will simplify analysis. Also, this allows a small amount of analyte to be used.
  2. The reaction is general, allowing a wide range of substrates, yet specific to a single functional group, reducing complicating interference.
  3. The products are relatively stable, and form no degradation products within a reasonable period, facilitating analysis.

Some examples of good derivatization reactions are the formation of esters and amides via acyl chlorides.

Classical qualitative organic analysis

[edit]

Classical qualitative organic analysis usually involves reacting an unknown sample with various reagents; a positive test usually involves a change in appearance — color, precipitation, etc.

These tests may be extended to give sub-gram scale products. These products may be purified by recrystallization, and their melting points taken. An example is the formation of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones from ketones and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine.

By consulting an appropriate reference table such as in Vogel's, the identity of the starting material may be deduced. The use of derivatives has traditionally been used to determine or confirm the identity of an unknown substance. However, due to the wide range of chemical compounds now known, it is unrealistic for these tables to be exhaustive. Modern spectroscopic and spectrometric techniques have made this technique obsolete for all but pedagogical purposes.

For gas chromatography

[edit]

Polar N-H and O-H groups on which give hydrogen bonding may be converted to relatively nonpolar groups on a relatively nonvolatile compound. The resultant product may be less polar, thus more volatile, allowing analysis by gas chromatography. Bulky, nonpolar silyl groups are often used for this purpose.[1]

Chiral derivatizing agent

[edit]
Main article: Chiral derivatizing agent

Chiral derivatizing agents react with enantiomers to give diastereomers. Since diastereomers have different physical properties, they may be further analyzed by HPLC and NMR spectroscopy.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Derivatization

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Derivatization is a fundamental technique in that involves the chemical modification of analytes to enhance their physical and chemical properties, making them more amenable to detection, separation, and quantification in methods such as and spectrometry. This process typically targets functional groups like hydroxyl, amino, carboxyl, or carbonyl to introduce derivatives that improve volatility, stability, selectivity, or . The primary purposes of derivatization include increasing the sensitivity and detectability of compounds that are otherwise poorly responsive to analytical instruments, such as non-volatile or polar molecules in (GC). For instance, it masks active hydrogens on polar groups (e.g., -OH, -NH) to reduce interactions with stationary phases, thereby enhancing chromatographic resolution and preventing decomposition during analysis. In liquid chromatography (LC) and bioanalysis, derivatization boosts ionization in or for trace-level detection in complex matrices like plasma. Common derivatization strategies encompass , which replaces labile hydrogens with trimethylsilyl (TMS) groups using reagents like N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide () to volatilize sugars or for GC; acylation, employing agents such as (TFAA) to add electron-capturing for improved sensitivity in detection; and alkylation, which introduces alkyl groups with reagents like to stabilize carboxylic acids. These reactions often occur pre-column (in-sample), post-column (during separation), or , with conditions requiring environments and catalysts like to optimize yields. Applications of derivatization span diverse fields, including pharmaceutical for quantifying metabolites in biological fluids, environmental monitoring of pesticides and , and food safety assessments of steroids or vitamins. While it enables of challenging analytes and supports green analytical practices by reducing sample volumes, challenges include potential side reactions, toxicity, and the need for method validation to ensure derivative stability and specificity.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Derivatization is a chemical process in that involves the modification of an to produce a compound with a similar core structure but altered physical or chemical properties, facilitating its detection or separation in analytical techniques. This transformation typically occurs through selective reactions targeting functional groups, such as hydroxyl (-OH) or amino (-NH) moieties, to enhance attributes like volatility, thermal stability, or spectroscopic without fundamentally changing the molecule's identity. The underlying principles of derivatization rely on covalent bonding or other targeted reactions that adjust the 's polarity, , or reactivity to suit specific analytical methods, particularly in and . A key classification distinguishes between pre-column derivatization, performed prior to chromatographic separation to optimize analyte interactions with the stationary phase, and post-column derivatization, conducted after separation to rapidly enhance detection signals while minimizing band broadening. These approaches ensure the maintains the original compound's structural integrity for accurate identification. The practice of derivatization originated in 19th-century , where it was employed for compound identification through selective reactions, predating modern spectroscopic tools. For instance, the Schiff reagent, developed in 1866, exemplifies early derivatization for detection via color change. A representative principle is illustrated in , where an active is replaced by a : R-OH+Cl-Si(CH3)3→R-O-Si(CH3)3+HCl\text{R-OH} + \text{Cl-Si(CH}_3\text{)}_3 \rightarrow \text{R-O-Si(CH}_3\text{)}_3 + \text{HCl} This reaction reduces polarity and increases volatility, exemplifying the covalent modification central to derivatization.

Purposes and Benefits

Derivatization serves several primary purposes in , primarily to modify the physical and chemical properties of analytes to make them more amenable to separation and detection techniques. One key purpose is to enhance volatility and thermal stability, particularly for (GC), where non-volatile or thermally labile compounds are converted into derivatives that can withstand high temperatures without . Another purpose is to improve detectability by introducing chromophores for UV absorption, fluorophores for fluorescence, or groups that facilitate ionization in , thereby enabling the analysis of compounds that lack inherent spectroscopic or electrochemical activity. Additionally, derivatization reduces polarity or increases , facilitating better compatibility with solvents and stationary phases in techniques like (HPLC). The benefits of derivatization are substantial, as it overcomes inherent limitations of native compounds, such as poor chromatographic behavior or low sensitivity. For instance, non-volatile polar molecules become GC-compatible through or , allowing their separation and quantification where direct analysis would fail. This leads to increased sensitivity and selectivity, and enables by converting enantiomers into diastereomers separable on achiral columns. Specific advantages include the requirement for quantitative reaction yields to ensure accurate quantification. Despite these advantages, derivatization carries potential drawbacks that must be managed to maintain analytical integrity. Side reactions can occur if conditions are not optimized, leading to incomplete derivatization or formation of multiple products that complicate interpretation. Furthermore, improper reagent selection or reaction conditions may result in loss of stereochemistry, particularly in chiral derivatizations, necessitating the use of optically pure reagents to preserve enantiomeric integrity. These challenges underscore the importance of controlled conditions to maximize the technique's benefits while minimizing artifacts.

Derivatization Reactions

Common Reaction Types

Derivatization reactions in primarily involve modifying the chemical structure of analytes to enhance their suitability for separation and detection techniques. The most common types include , , and , which typically proceed via mechanisms where active hydrogens on functional groups such as hydroxyl (-OH), amino (-NH), or carboxyl (-COOH) are replaced by less polar substituents. These reactions often require conditions to minimize side reactions like and ensure high yields. Silylation is a widely used derivatization method that replaces active hydrogens with trialkylsilyl groups, such as trimethylsilyl (TMS), to increase the volatility and thermal stability of polar compounds like alcohols, , and amines. The reaction follows a pathway, where the acts as a attacking the atom of silyl halides or similar , liberating a leaving group like . This modification reduces hydrogen bonding and polarity, making the derivatives more amenable to gas-phase analysis. For instance, trimethylchlorosilane (TMSCl) is a common for this purpose. Silylation is particularly effective for compounds prone to adsorption on chromatographic surfaces. Acylation involves the reaction of active hydrogens with acylating agents, such as acid anhydrides or chlorides, to form esters or amides that decrease polarity and can introduce chromophores or fluorophores for improved detection. The mechanism is again nucleophilic acyl substitution, where the analyte's nucleophilic site attacks the carbonyl carbon of the , displacing the and forming a stable . This type is suitable for carboxylic acids, amines, and alcohols, with fluorinated s often used to enhance electron-capture detection sensitivity. Acylation reactions typically occur under mild conditions in aprotic solvents to promote selectivity. Alkylation derivatizes s by introducing alkyl groups through , often forming alkyl esters or ethers that enhance basicity, volatility, and chromatographic behavior for compounds like , steroids, and . In this process, the displaces a from an alkyl halide or similar , with being a prevalent example using agents like or . The reaction favors anhydrous environments to prevent of the and ensure efficient . This method is valued for its simplicity and ability to stabilize labile functional groups. Other less common reaction types include arylation, which replaces active hydrogens with aryl groups to facilitate UV detection by introducing conjugated systems, proceeding via , often on a benzylic carbon of activated arylalkyl halides such as those bearing nitro or pentafluorophenyl groups. Photochemical derivatization, a rarer approach, utilizes UV to activate reactions such as radical formation or photo-oxidation, enabling derivative formation without traditional and typically in flow-based systems for enhanced sensitivity. These methods expand derivatization options for specific analytical challenges but are applied more selectively due to their specialized conditions.

Reagents and Examples

Silylating reagents are among the most commonly employed in derivatization, particularly for enhancing the volatility of polar compounds containing active hydrogens such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups. N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) is a highly reactive silylating agent that forms stable trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives, often used with 1-10% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) as a catalyst to improve yields for sterically hindered groups. N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) offers similar reactivity but greater volatility and is particularly effective for trimethylsilylation of steroids, where it converts polar steroid alcohols and ketones into less polar, more volatile TMS ethers and enol ethers suitable for gas chromatography analysis. For instance, the trimethylsilylation of steroids like testosterone using MSTFA at 70°C for 30 minutes increases thermal stability and chromatographic efficiency. Acylating reagents target similar functional groups to produce esters or amides, often improving detectability in electron-capture detection. Acetic anhydride is a mild acylating agent that acetylates hydroxyl and amino groups, forming acetate esters that enhance volatility without introducing halogens. Pentafluoropropionic anhydride (PFPA) is more reactive and provides halogenated derivatives with high electron affinity, ideal for sensitive trace analysis. A representative example is the esterification of fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, using PFPA in dichloromethane solvent, which converts the carboxylic acid to a pentafluoropropyl ester, improving volatility and enabling low-level quantification in biological samples. Alkylating reagents are primarily used to methylate acidic compounds like carboxylic acids and , forming methyl esters or to reduce polarity. is a potent alkylating agent that rapidly methylates carboxylic groups under mild conditions, often in or . Trimethylsulfonium (TMSH) serves as a safer alternative, functioning as a flash methylating for in-injection port reactions. For example, of fatty acids or with TMSH in produces methyl esters or that exhibit better chromatographic behavior. Recent advances in derivatization include online and in-port techniques integrated with chromatography-mass spectrometry, enabling automated, efficient reactions with reduced reagent consumption and waste, as of 2024. Derivatization procedures can be classified as off-line or in-situ, depending on the analytical workflow. Off-line derivatization involves preparing the derivative in a separate reaction vessel prior to injection, allowing control over conditions like solvent and catalyst addition, whereas in-situ methods occur directly in the injection port or on-column, minimizing handling steps but requiring optimized instrument parameters. Reaction times typically range from 15 to 60 minutes, with temperatures of 60-80°C commonly used for silylation to accelerate kinetics without degrading sensitive analytes; for instance, BSTFA reactions with steroids are often heated at 70°C for 30 minutes. Safety considerations are paramount when handling these reagents, particularly alkylating agents like , which is highly toxic, carcinogenic, and potentially due to its instability and tendency to form peroxides. It must be generated fresh in a with appropriate , and safer alternatives like TMSH are preferred to mitigate risks.

Applications in Qualitative Analysis

Classical Organic Qualitative Analysis

Classical organic qualitative analysis relied heavily on derivatization as a cornerstone method for identifying unknown organic compounds during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when dominated laboratory practices. This approach, integral to systematic structure elucidation, involved transforming volatile or oily unknowns into stable, crystalline solids through targeted chemical reactions. Pioneering chemists like contributed foundational knowledge of organic reactivity, including familiar reactions of functional groups that informed derivatization strategies in qualitative workflows. These techniques emphasized empirical observation, behavior, and physical constants to classify and confirm compound identities without advanced instrumentation. The core methodology centered on preparing solid derivatives suitable for melting point determination, a reliable for verification against reference data. For instance, aldehydes were routinely derivatized to semicarbazones by reaction with , yielding white crystalline products whose melting points uniquely characterized the parent carbonyl compound; semicarbazone, for example, melts at 162–164°C. This process typically involved dissolving the unknown in a , adding the under controlled conditions, isolating the precipitate, purifying via recrystallization, and measuring the melting point to match tabulated values. Such derivatives enhanced characterization by amplifying differences between structurally similar compounds, often requiring multiple derivatives for unambiguous identification. Comprehensive lab manuals, like those by Shriner and colleagues, outlined these procedures as standard for educational and settings. A systematic framework for derivative selection and interpretation was provided by the Beilstein Handbook of , first compiled in the 1880s and expanded through subsequent volumes, which cataloged thousands of organic compounds and their recommended organized by structural classes. Analysts consulted Beilstein tables to choose with high melting points (>100°C) for ease of handling and sharp characterization. Post-derivatization solubility tests in water, acids, or bases further refined classification—for example, acidic derivatives dissolving in indicated formation. This handbook-driven approach ensured reproducibility and breadth, covering functional groups from alcohols to nitro compounds. Specific tests exemplified derivatization's utility, such as the Hinsberg test developed in 1890 for distinguishing types. Primary react with benzenesulfonyl chloride in basic medium to form N-alkylbenzenesulfonamides, soluble in alkali due to acidity; secondary yield insoluble N,N-dialkyl derivatives; tertiary remain unreacted. The products, isolated as solids, were then subjected to analysis for confirmation—e.g., the derivative from melts at 110°C. This test's derivatives provided both qualitative distinction and quantitative verification, highlighting derivatization's role in functional group-specific identification. Despite their precision in era-appropriate contexts, these classical methods were inherently time-consuming, often requiring days for synthesis, purification, and multiple confirmations, and suffered from non-specificity when unknowns bore multiple functional groups. By the mid-20th century, post-1950s advancements in instrumental methods like and rendered derivatization obsolete for routine qualitative analysis, shifting focus to direct structural probing. Nonetheless, these techniques laid the groundwork for modern organic and remain valuable in resource-limited settings.

Functional Group Identification

Derivatization plays a crucial role in confirming the presence of specific functional groups in organic molecules through the formation of characteristic derivatives that exhibit distinct physical or spectroscopic properties. By converting the functional group into a more stable or easily observable compound, analysts can verify its identity without relying on advanced instrumentation in preliminary qualitative assessments. This approach is particularly valuable in classical organic analysis, where solubility changes, color formations, or solid derivatives with known melting points provide confirmatory evidence. For carbonyl groups, such as aldehydes and ketones, (DNPH) is a widely employed that reacts to form 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones, which are typically to orange crystalline solids with sharp melting points used for identification. These hydrazones exhibit characteristic melting points that match literature values for specific carbonyl compounds, enabling precise confirmation of the and even the parent molecule's identity. Schiff's test variants, involving decolorized fuchsin , provide a rapid color-based confirmation for aldehydes by forming a magenta-colored derivative upon reaction, distinguishing them from ketones which do not react under these conditions. Alcohols and are often derivatized through , typically with or , to produce esters that alter properties—such as increased in nonpolar solvents—facilitating separation and of the hydroxyl group. This derivatization enhances the compound's volatility and purity for further , with the resulting esters showing distinct physical characteristics compared to the original alcohol or phenol. The Lucas test offers another derivatization route for alcohols, where treatment with in concentrated forms alkyl chloride derivatives; primary alcohols react slowly without turbidity, secondary alcohols form cloudy solutions within minutes, and tertiary alcohols react immediately, providing a classification-based of the alcohol type through the observation of the derivative's formation. Amines and can be confirmed via , which converts primary to amines with one fewer carbon atom through treatment with and base, yielding products whose structure and properties verify the original functionality. For amines, derivatives are formed by reaction with phenyl isocyanate or similar reagents, producing solid monosubstituted with characteristic melting points that distinguish primary, secondary, and tertiary amines based on reactivity and derivative solubility. These transformations allow for the isolation of identifiable solids, confirming the nitrogen-containing . Carboxylic acids are derivatized through salt formation with bases like sodium bicarbonate, resulting in water-soluble salts that confirm the acidic nature via pH changes and solubility shifts from organic to aqueous phases. Ester derivatives, such as methyl or ethyl esters prepared via Fischer esterification with methanol and sulfuric acid, provide solid compounds with known melting points for unambiguous identification, often matching literature data for specific acids. Confirmation of these derivatives commonly involves melting point determination, where the observed value is compared to tabulated data for the expected product, ensuring high purity and structural match with a tolerance of ±2–3°C. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy further validates the derivatization by revealing shifts in characteristic bands, such as the disappearance of the broad O-H stretch at 2500–3300 cm⁻¹ for carboxylic acids upon esterification or the absence of the carbonyl stretch at ~1710 cm⁻¹ after hydrazone formation from carbonyls, providing spectroscopic evidence of the functional group's transformation.

Applications in Chromatographic Techniques

Gas Chromatography

Derivatization plays a crucial role in (GC) by modifying non-volatile or thermally labile analytes to enhance their suitability for gas-phase separation and detection. The primary needs addressed include increasing volatility and thermal stability, particularly for polar compounds such as , steroids, and carbohydrates that would otherwise decompose or fail to elute under standard GC conditions. For instance, converts hydroxyl, amino, and carboxyl groups into less polar trimethylsilyl (TMS) ethers or esters, enabling the analysis of non-volatiles like . This modification reduces hydrogen bonding and polarity, allowing efficient and passage through the column without degradation. Common derivatization strategies in GC include perfluoroacylation, which introduces electron-capturing atoms to improve sensitivity with detection (ECD), and on-column for real-time modification during injection. Perfluoroacylation, often using like pentafluoropropionyl anhydride (PFPA), is particularly effective for trace-level detection of halogenated or nitrogen-containing compounds. Representative examples encompass the formation of TMS derivatives from carbohydrates, which facilitate their separation on non-polar columns, and PFPA derivatization of pesticides like organophosphates, enhancing ECD response by factors of 10^3 to 10^5 compared to flame ionization detection (FID). These methods were popularized in the alongside the development of FID and ECD detectors, which benefited from derivatized analytes to achieve better peak shapes and quantification limits. Despite these advantages, derivatization in GC presents challenges such as artifact formation from incomplete reactions or side products, which can obscure peaks, and reagent interference that contaminates the chromatogram. Optimization is essential for modern columns, often involving and selection to minimize tailing or degradation; for example, excess silylating agents can hydrolyze to siloxanes, forming ghost peaks. These issues necessitate rigorous validation to ensure reproducibility, particularly in high-throughput analyses.

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), derivatization serves to enhance detection sensitivity and selectivity, particularly for analytes lacking strong UV absorbance or native fluorescence, by introducing chromophoric or fluorophoric groups. This is especially crucial in reverse-phase HPLC, where derivatization can also reduce analyte polarity to improve retention and separation on non-polar stationary phases. For instance, primary amines are commonly derivatized with o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) in the presence of a thiol like 2-mercaptoethanol to form highly fluorescent 1-alkylthio-2-alkylisoindoles, enabling sub-picomole detection limits via fluorescence spectrometry. Pre-column derivatization remains the predominant approach in HPLC, allowing offline reaction of analytes with reagents prior to injection for optimized chromatographic conditions. Dansyl chloride, an acylating agent, reacts with primary and secondary amines to produce stable fluorescent dansyl derivatives detectable at excitation/emission wavelengths of 340/500 nm, significantly improving sensitivity for trace-level analysis. This method has been widely applied in the quantification of catecholamines, where dansylation of extracted norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, and their metabolites from rat tissues enables baseline separation and fluorescence detection with limits of detection around 0.1 pmol. Similarly, 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) is employed for pre-column labeling of amino acids and peptides, introducing a UV-absorbing fluorene moiety that facilitates reverse-phase HPLC separation of hydrophilic species, as demonstrated in the analysis of short-chain peptides from dairy products with detection limits below 1 pmol. Post-column derivatization offers an alternative for real-time enhancement, involving mixing of the eluate with in reaction coils to generate detectable products immediately before the detector, minimizing sample manipulation while preserving separation integrity. This technique is particularly useful for analytes requiring immediate reaction, such as sugars with oxidation for , achieving enhanced selectivity without altering chromatographic behavior. Since the 1980s, advances in automated systems have integrated pre- and post-column derivatization into HPLC workflows, enabling high-throughput processing with robotic sample handling and inline reaction modules for reproducible analysis of hundreds of samples daily in clinical and pharmaceutical settings.

Chiral Derivatization

Principles and Methods

Chiral derivatization for resolution relies on the principle of converting a of enantiomers into a pair of through reaction with a chiral reagent, thereby enabling their separation on conventional achiral stationary phases. Enantiomers, being mirror images, exhibit identical physical properties and cannot be distinguished by standard achiral chromatographic methods; however, the introduction of a chiral center from the reagent creates diastereomers, which differ in their physicochemical properties such as , stability, and interaction with stationary phases. This indirect approach exploits the inherent differences in diastereomer behavior to achieve resolution, often applied in (GC) or (HPLC) where direct chiral recognition is challenging. The primary method involves pre-separation derivatization, where the racemate is chemically modified prior to analysis, contrasting with direct resolution techniques that employ chiral stationary phases (CSPs) to separate underivatized enantiomers through transient diastereomeric interactions. In indirect resolution, the derivatization step is crucial for transforming enantiomers into separable diastereomers, allowing use of non-chiral columns; this method is particularly advantageous for analytes lacking suitable functional groups for direct CSP compatibility. While direct methods avoid chemical modification, indirect approaches offer flexibility for a broader range of compounds but require careful control to prevent artifacts. Kinetic resolution, an extension in preparative contexts, may occur if the derivatization reaction proceeds with enantioselective kinetics, enriching one enantiomer during the process. Key requirements for effective chiral derivatization include a quantitative reaction yield to ensure complete conversion without kinetic bias, and absence of to maintain the integrity of the original enantiomeric composition. The chiral must be enantiomerically pure and readily available in both forms to allow absolute configuration assignment via comparison; additionally, the derivatives should exhibit sufficient stability and differences in chromatographic behavior for practical separation. These criteria minimize errors in enantiomeric excess and are essential for applications in pharmaceutical . The technique was pioneered in the 1960s and 1970s, driven by the need to assess enantiomeric purity in pharmaceuticals following regulatory recognition of stereoisomer-specific effects, with early advancements in GC and HPLC enabling routine implementation. A general scheme for -containing racemates involves reaction with a chiral derivative, such as an acid , to form diastereomeric amides: for instance, a racemic primary (R-NH₂ and S-NH₂) reacts with (R)-chiral acid to yield (R,R)- and (R,S)-amides, which are then separable on achiral phases. This covalent approach ensures robust formation, though ionic salt formation with chiral acids like serves as a non-covalent alternative in some cases.

Chiral Derivatizing Agents

Chiral derivatizing agents (CDAs) are enantiomerically pure reagents that react with racemic substrates to form diastereomeric derivatives, enabling their separation and analysis by techniques such as or NMR . Common CDAs for amines include (S)-N-trifluoroacetylprolyl , which reacts to form stable diastereomers suitable for (GC) resolution of primary and secondary amines, such as amphetamines and cathinones. Another widely used agent for amines is (R)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl , which produces derivatives that exhibit excellent chromatographic separation due to the bulky naphthyl group enhancing diastereomeric differences. For NMR and GC applications, Mosher's acid (also known as MPPA or MTPA, α-methoxy-α-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetic acid) and its chloride derivatives are staples, particularly for alcohols and amines; the resulting esters or amides display distinct differences in ¹H and ¹⁹F NMR spectra, allowing assignment via the modified Mosher's method. Camphanic acid chloride complements these by forming camphanate esters of alcohols, which provide robust GC resolution owing to the rigid bicyclic that amplifies conformational differences in diastereomers. Representative examples illustrate CDA utility: Marfey's reagent (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-L-alanine amide) derivatizes to form diastereomers resolvable by reversed-phase HPLC, enabling quantification of D/L ratios in peptides and proteins with high sensitivity and broad applicability to over 50 . For alcohols, (S)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl (often abbreviated in contexts as variants like NEIC) yields derivatives that achieve baseline GC separation, as demonstrated in the analysis of chiral secondary alcohols in pharmaceutical intermediates. Selection of CDAs prioritizes high enantiomeric purity (typically >99% ee) to avoid baseline errors in enantiomeric excess (ee) determination, quantitative reactivity under mild conditions to prevent , and formation of diastereomers with sufficient stability and physicochemical differences (e.g., ΔR_f >0.1 in ) for reliable resolution. Recent developments include enzymatic CDAs, such as lipases (e.g., Candida antarctica lipase B), which enable kinetic resolution derivatization by selectively acylating one enantiomer of alcohols or amines with , allowing ee assessment via GC after partial reaction; this approach offers greener alternatives with E-values >50 for many substrates.

Other Analytical Applications

Mass Spectrometry

Derivatization in serves to enhance the efficiency and fragmentation patterns of analytes, particularly for polar or low- compounds, enabling better detection in techniques such as (ESI) and (APCI). By introducing functional groups that promote , fixed charges, or improved gas-phase stability, derivatization addresses challenges like poor signal intensity and instability during . For instance, in ESI and APCI, derivatization reagents increase the or hydrophobicity of analytes, facilitating more efficient formation and transfer into the gas phase. This is especially critical for biomolecules like peptides and metabolites that exhibit variable responses without modification. Common derivatization strategies include permethylation, which is widely applied to glycans to stabilize residues, improve ionization yield, and generate characteristic fragmentation patterns in tandem MS. In this process, all free hydroxyl and amino groups are methylated, enhancing sensitivity in MALDI and ESI-MS analyses by up to several orders of magnitude. Charge tagging with quaternary ammonium groups introduces a permanent positive charge, bypassing the need for and improving detection limits in ESI-MS, particularly for peptides and small molecules. Another approach involves (siloxylation), which replaces active hydrogens with trimethylsilyl groups to increase volatility and thermal stability, commonly used in GC-MS for since the early 2000s to profile hundreds of metabolites simultaneously. Specific examples illustrate these applications: dansyl chloride labeling of peptides enhances MALDI-MS signals by incorporating a fluorescent and ionizable moiety, leading to improved sequence coverage in tandem MS through directed fragmentation. Deuterated reagents, such as deuterated dansyl or silylating agents, enable accurate quantification in MS by serving as internal standards, compensating for derivatization inefficiencies and matrix effects in isotope dilution assays. Techniques vary between pre-MS derivatization, performed offline for controlled reactions, and in-source derivatization, which occurs during to minimize sample handling but requires optimized conditions for reproducibility. In tandem MS, derivatization benefits include selective fragmentation; fixed-charge tags promote specific cleavages at bonds, yielding diagnostic ions for structural elucidation without extensive spectral interpretation. Advances in the field, particularly post-2000, have focused on , where derivatization in GC-MS has enabled high-throughput profiling of polar metabolites like and organic acids, with methods achieving detection limits in the femtomole range. These developments, including automated sequential derivatization protocols, have expanded MS applications to complex biological samples, emphasizing reproducible enhancement and fragmentation for quantitative accuracy.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Derivatization in (NMR) spectroscopy is employed to enhance and facilitate the interpretation of molecular structures, particularly when native analytes exhibit overlapping resonances or poor in common NMR solvents like chloroform-d or dimethyl sulfoxide-d6. By chemically modifying the sample, derivatization shifts proton or carbon chemical shifts, dispersing signals that would otherwise overlap and enabling clearer assignment of functional groups. This approach is especially valuable for complex mixtures or molecules with symmetric environments, where standard NMR spectra may lack sufficient dispersion for unambiguous analysis. A primary need addressed by derivatization is the resolution of resonance overlap, achieved through reactions that introduce electron-withdrawing or paramagnetic groups to alter the electronic environment around nuclei of interest. For instance, esterification of carboxylic acids or alcohols with lanthanide shift reagents, such as europium tris(1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-7,7-dimethyl-4,6-octanedione) [Eu(fod)3], induces pseudocontact shifts that proportionally displace resonances based on their distance and angle relative to the metal center, aiding in stereochemical assignments. Additionally, derivatization can improve solubility by converting polar or ionic compounds into more lipophilic derivatives compatible with non-polar deuterated solvents, thus preventing broadening from aggregation or precipitation. Chiral solvating agents, which form diastereomeric complexes without covalent bonding, are another common strategy, briefly linking to methods discussed in chiral derivatization sections. Notable examples include Mosher's method, developed in the early 1970s, which involves esterification of alcohols or amines with α-methoxy-α-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetic acid (MTPA) chloride to determine enantiomeric purity. In this technique, the resulting diastereomers produce distinct differences (Δδ values) in the 1H NMR spectrum, allowing quantification of enantiomeric excess by integrating separated peaks—typically with Δδ up to 0.2 ppm for key protons. of hydroxyl or amino groups serves as a simpler derivatization for assigning carbonyl environments in ketones or aldehydes, as the acetyl group's deshielding effect shifts adjacent resonances by 0.5–1.0 ppm, confirming presence without extensive spectral overlap. These methods gained historical prominence in the 1970s for confirming in natural products, such as and alkaloids, where traditional NMR resolution was insufficient. Despite these advantages, derivatization for NMR has limitations, including the irreversible alteration of the analyte's natural structure, which can introduce artifacts or complicate quantification if side reactions occur. It is less commonly applied than in due to NMR's inherent non-destructive , favoring direct analysis of underivatized samples when possible; derivatization is reserved for cases where spectral quality critically impedes interpretation. Reaction yields must exceed 95% to avoid impurity signals, and purification steps like are often required post-derivatization.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8912107/
  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33084080/
  3. https://diverdi.colostate.edu/C442/references/analysis/derivitization/gc%20derivatization%20methods.pdf
  4. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/64643
  5. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4155/bio.15.151
  6. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_(Analytical_Chemistry)/Analytical_Sciences_Digital_Library/Contextual_Modules/Sample_Preparation/06_Derivatization
  7. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/migrationresource4/Derivatization%20Rgts%20brochure.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123813732000600
  9. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247416
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313662434_Derivatization_reactions_and_reagents_for_gas_chromatography_analysis
  11. https://gcms.cz/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/application::paper.paper/t196909.pdf
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993625001682
  13. https://celqusb.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/kupdf-com_systematic-identification-of-organic-compounds-wiley-shrinerhermannmorrillcurtinfuson.pdf
  14. https://umsl.edu/~chickosj/202/beils.pdf
  15. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/74296
  16. https://peer.asee.org/organic-qualitative-analysis-expert-system.pdf
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/derivatization
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993624002826
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000326701500817X
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967301010561
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301477005800181
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3613598/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7749486/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967300922568
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3614593/
  26. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.6073
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9267260/
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bmc.41
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967312014914
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/ethyl-isocyanate
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0731708517304223
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26615706/
  33. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00726-004-0118-0
  34. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00940a023
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51669757_Enantiomeric_purity_of_chiral_derivatizing_reagents_for_enantioresolution
  36. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jos/66/10/66_ess17114/_pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.