Hubbry Logo
DiamictiteDiamictiteMain
Open search
Diamictite
Community hub
Diamictite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Diamictite
Diamictite
Diamictite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Diamictite from Stolpe, eastern Germany
'Snowball Earth'-type diamictite from the Pocatello Formation, Idaho, United States
Boulder of diamictite of the Mineral Fork Formation, Antelope Island, Utah, United States
Elatina Formation diamictite below Ediacaran GSSP site in the Flinders Ranges NP, South Australia. A$1 coin for scale.

Diamictite ( /ˈdaɪ.əmɪktaɪt/; from Ancient Greek dia- (δια): 'through' and meiktós (µεικτός): 'mixed') is a type of lithified sedimentary rock that consists of unsorted to poorly sorted terrigenous sediment containing particles that range in size from clay to boulders, suspended in a matrix of mudstone or sandstone. The term was coined by Richard Foster Flint and others as a purely descriptive term, devoid of any reference to a particular origin.[1] Some geologists restrict the usage to unsorted or poorly sorted conglomerate or breccia that consists of sparse, terrigenous gravel suspended in either a mud or sand matrix.[2]

Unlithified diamictite is referred to as diamicton.

The term diamictite is often applied to unsorted or poorly sorted, lithified glacial deposits such as glacial tillite and boulder clay, and diamictites are often mistakenly interpreted as having an essentially glacial origin (see Snowball Earth). The most common origin for diamictites, however, is deposition by submarine mass flows like turbidites and olistostromes in tectonically active areas, and they can be produced in a wide range of other geological conditions. Possible origins include:[3][4]


References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Diamictite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Diamictite is a type of siliciclastic characterized by poor sorting and a wide range of particle sizes, including a fine-grained matrix of clay, , and that supports coarser clasts such as pebbles, cobbles, and boulders, with clasts comprising more than 50% by volume derived from pre-existing siliceous rocks. The term was proposed in 1960 by Flint, Sanders, and Rodgers as a purely descriptive nongenetic substitute for earlier terms like symmictite, emphasizing the rock's heterogeneous, matrix-supported fabric without implying a specific origin. Diamictites typically exhibit a massive, structureless appearance on macro- and mesoscales, though they may contain subtle laminations or pods of coarser material in some cases. These rocks form through high-viscosity depositional processes that prevent size-based sorting, including subaqueous or debris flows involving sediment-water slurries, glacial deposition by ice transport, and occasionally bioturbation or in non-glacial settings. In glacial-marine environments, diamictites often result from rain-out of ice-rafted or resedimentation via flows, leading to thick, homogeneous units up to hundreds of meters that lack clear due to and compaction. While commonly associated with ancient glaciations—such as those in the Late Dwyka Formation of or the Late tillites of —diamictites can also originate from tectonic olistostromes, volcanic flows, or impact ejecta, highlighting the need for detailed lithofacies and fabric analysis to distinguish origins. In geological records, diamictites serve as key proxies for reconstructing paleoclimates and depositional environments, particularly in identifying episodes of widespread glaciation during Earth's history, though their interpretation remains challenging due to multiple possible formation mechanisms and post-depositional alterations. Notable examples include the matrix-supported, polymictic diamictites of the Atud Formation in the Eastern Desert of , which exhibit subrounded clasts up to boulder size and are linked to glacial events.

Definition and Terminology

Definition

Diamictite is a lithified consisting of unsorted to poorly sorted terrigenous , with particles ranging in size from clay to boulders embedded in a matrix of or . The term is pronounced /ˈdaɪ.əmɪktaɪt/. The term diamictite was introduced by Richard F. Flint, J. E. Sanders, and John Rodgers in 1960 as a descriptive, non-genetic substitute for the earlier term "symmictite," to avoid implying any specific depositional process or origin. Unlike typical conglomerates, which feature well-rounded, sorted clasts supported by a framework of grains with minimal matrix, diamictite is characterized by its poor sorting and dominance of the fine-grained matrix, which often comprises 15-50% of the rock and supports dispersed, angular to subrounded clasts that may not touch one another. The unlithified equivalent of diamictite is known as diamicton or diamict. The term "diamictite" originates from the Greek roots "dia-" meaning "through" and "miktos" meaning "mixed," highlighting the rock's characteristic mixture of particle sizes across a broad spectrum. This nomenclature was introduced by Flint et al. in 1960 as a purely descriptive, non-genetic label for lithified, poorly sorted sedimentary rocks to avoid implying specific origins. The unlithified equivalent of diamictite is known as diamicton, referring to the soft-sediment deposit before . Diamicton shares the same poorly sorted nature, consisting of a wide range of particle sizes in a fine-grained matrix. In glacial contexts, diamictite is often synonymous with tillite, the lithified form of glacial deposited directly by ice. The unlithified glacial counterpart is , a traditional term for unconsolidated diamicton rich in clay matrix and scattered boulders. Non-genetic alternatives to diamictite include terms like pebbly mudstone, which describes similar poorly sorted rocks with pebbles embedded in a mud-dominated matrix, and conglomerate, emphasizing the conglomeratic aspect without depositional implications. Modern geological usage favors diamictite as a neutral, descriptive term to sidestep genetic assumptions about formation, applicable to both glacial and non-glacial origins.

Physical Characteristics

Texture and Sorting

Diamictite exhibits poor to very poor sorting, characterized by a wide range of particle sizes spanning more than 15 units, typically from fine clay (<0.002 mm) to large boulders (>256 mm), with no significant size segregation among components. This extreme variability in reflects the lack of selective or deposition processes that would otherwise sort sediments into more uniform classes. In hand specimens and outcrops, this results in a heterogeneous mixture where coarse clasts are interspersed with finer matrix materials without layering or grading. The structure of diamictite is predominantly matrix-supported, where clasts constitute more than 50% of the total volume and are suspended within a finer-grained matrix of , , and . This fabric distinguishes it from clast-supported conglomerates, as the matrix provides the primary support for the dispersed clasts, typically comprising 15-50% of the rock volume. Rare variants exhibit clast-supported textures, where clasts are in mutual contact and the matrix fills interstices, but these are less common in primary diamictite deposits. Fabric analysis of diamictite reveals generally chaotic clast orientations, with random to weakly preferred alignments that lack consistent or stratification in unaltered examples. In flow-deposited types, subtle imbrication or linear fabrics may occur, indicating directional movement, but overall, the clast arrangement appears disorganized due to the turbulent depositional conditions. Such fabrics are quantified through macro- and microscale orientation measurements, highlighting the absence of strong tectonic or sedimentary alignment in many cases. For visual identification in the field, matrix-supported diamictite resembles a "floatstone" when containing more than 10% grains larger than 2 mm embedded in a mud-dominated matrix, while clast-supported variants appear as "rudstone" with closely packed coarser particles. These terms, adapted from classifications, aid in distinguishing diamictite from finer-grained mudstones or coarser conglomerates based on textural balance at scale.

Composition and Matrix

Diamictite clasts are predominantly siliciclastic in composition, consisting mainly of , , and lithic fragments derived from local sources. These clasts exhibit variable angularity, typically ranging from subangular to rounded depending on transport distance and intensity. In some deposits, clasts are exclusively composed of , , and lithologies, reflecting derivation from nearby sedimentary sequences. The matrix of diamictite forms the finer-grained component, generally comprising a of clay, , and sand-sized particles that support the dispersed clasts. This matrix is often argillaceous, dominated by clay minerals with subordinate , and may constitute 24–50% or more of the rock volume in matrix-supported varieties. Post-lithification, the matrix commonly features cementation by minerals or silica, enhancing cohesion. Accessory components in diamictite are typically minor but include rare exotic clasts of volcanic or metamorphic origin, such as granitic or amphibole-bearing schists, which suggest extended transport. Traces of or biogenic elements may also occur, particularly in non-glacial variants. Petrographic classification of diamictite follows the (BGS) scheme, requiring greater than 50% siliciclastic clasts within a fine matrix of , , and clay. Subtypes are distinguished by dominant : rudaceous (gravelly, with >25% clasts >2 mm), arenaceous (sandy, predominantly 32 μm–2 mm grains), or lutaceous (muddy, with >75% <32 μm). This poor sorting integrates clasts of all sizes into the matrix, as noted in textural analyses.

Formation Processes

Glacial Depositional Mechanisms

Glacial depositional mechanisms for primarily involve the direct release of unsorted sediment from ice, resulting in poorly sorted mixtures characteristic of that lithify into diamictite. These processes occur in subglacial, supraglacial, and glaciomarine/proglacial environments, where glacial dynamics entrain, transport, and deposit debris without significant sorting. Basal , a common precursor to diamictite, forms as a matrix-supported sediment with clasts ranging from clay to boulders, reflecting the intense mixing under ice pressure. Subglacial deposition dominates diamictite formation through lodgement and deformation processes. Lodgement till arises when overriding glacial ice presses debris-laden basal ice against the substrate, forcing clasts into the bed and creating a compact, matrix-rich diamictite; this occurs at rates of about 3 cm per year in actively moving glaciers, with clasts often oriented parallel to ice flow. Deformation till, in contrast, develops via shear-induced mixing of pre-existing sediments beneath the glacier, where pervasive shearing homogenizes the material into a structureless diamictite, acting as a deformable layer that absorbs strain between ice and bedrock. These subglacial tills exhibit poor sorting due to the combined effects of glacial erosion, entrainment, and pressure melting, distinguishing them as primary glacial deposits. Supraglacial and meltout processes contribute to diamictite via the release of surface or englacial debris as ice stagnates or melts. Debris accumulated on the glacier surface through rockfall or wind transport flows downslope at ice margins, forming flow tills that deposit as unsorted diamictite with minimal subsequent reworking by eskers or outwash streams. Meltout till specifically results from the melting of debris-rich stagnant ice, either supraglacial or subglacial, preserving faint englacial structures like debris bands in thin, low-preservation layers; this mechanism is less common due to rapid erosion but yields diamictite with relatively intact clast fabrics aligned to original ice flow. In glaciomarine and proglacial settings, diamictite forms through ice-rafted deposition and suspension settling, often in marine or lacustrine basins adjacent to glaciers. Icebergs calved from tidewater margins release dropstones—solitary clasts that penetrate and deform underlying soft sediments—creating isolated boulders within a finer matrix of glacial flour and marine silt, resulting in a matrix-supported diamictite. Some glaciomarine diamictites display varve-like layering from seasonal alternations of coarse debris drops and fine suspension fallout, reflecting pulsed meltwater inputs and iceberg melt; these deposits accumulate rapidly near glacial fronts, with dropstones serving as key indicators of floating ice influence. Diagnostic features of glacially derived diamictite include modified clasts and exotic lithologies that record ice transport dynamics. Clasts often exhibit faceting and striations from subglacial abrasion against bedrock, with bullet-nosed or flat-iron shapes—elongate pentagonal forms with blunt ends oriented down-glacier—resulting from streamlined erosion under high shear stress. Erratics, boulders of lithologies foreign to the local bedrock, indicate long-distance glacial transport, sometimes tens to hundreds of kilometers, embedded within the diamictite matrix as evidence of ice-rafted or basal entrainment. These traits, combined with the overall poor sorting, confirm glacial origins over other sedimentary processes.

Non-Glacial Depositional Mechanisms

Non-glacial diamictites form primarily through gravity-driven mass wasting and tectonic processes that mix unsorted clasts within a finer matrix, often in submarine or subaerial environments without ice involvement. These deposits result from slope instabilities, where sediment failures incorporate diverse lithologies, leading to poorly sorted, matrix- or clast-supported textures. Unlike glacial origins, non-glacial mechanisms emphasize downslope transport and resedimentation, producing characteristic fabrics and associations that aid in identification, though origins can be debated for some ancient examples. Submarine mass flows represent a key mechanism, including debris flows and hybrid turbidite-debris events triggered by slope failures in deep-water settings. In such cases, cohesive sediment masses fail along continental slopes or basin margins, flowing basinward and entraining material to form blocky, chaotic deposits like olistostromes. For instance, in the Neoproterozoic Kingston Peak Formation of the Valjean Hills, California, diamictites exhibit shear-related deformation, rotational microstructures, and interbedding with turbidites, suggestive of distal subaqueous debris flows with fluidal components, though a glacial influence remains possible. Key indicators include bimodal fabrics (planar and linear orientations reflecting shear), upward-coarsening grain size trends due to kinetic sieving, and downslope-dipping clasts, all pointing to gravitational collapse without glacial influence. Similarly, in the Saddle Peak Hills, angular dolostone megaclasts in diamictites suggest local platform foundering, with coarsening-upward sequences and soft-sediment folding distinguishing these from finer-grained glacial tills. Olistostromic variants often feature large, intact blocks within a sheared matrix, as seen in extensional graben margins. Subaerial processes contribute to non-glacial diamictites via landslides, debris flows on alluvial fans, and volcanic collapses, where rapid mobilization of heterogeneous regolith occurs on steep terrains. Debris flows in coarse-grained alluvial systems, such as those in the late Paleozoic Fountain and Cutler Formations of Colorado, originate from paleohighland incisions, incorporating water to form cohesive, fine-grained flows that deposit massive, poorly sorted units with clay-to-granule matrices and rare coarse clasts. Volcanic debris avalanches, like those from sector collapses, produce matrix-supported deposits with jigsaw-cracked blocks and hummocky topography, resembling diamictites through substrate liquefaction and shear mixing; proximal zones feature megablocks, while distal areas show finer, unsorted matrices. These subaerial deposits often display inverse grading from dispersive pressures and lack organized bedding, contrasting with submarine variants. Tectonic settings further drive non-glacial diamictite formation, particularly in fault-controlled environments like rift basins, foreland basins, or accretionary prisms, where brecciation and mélanges arise from seismic triggering or scarp failures. In the Neoproterozoic Atud Diamictite of the Arabian-Nubian Shield, Egypt—interpreted as non-glacial in a recent study (Sayed et al., 2025), challenging earlier links to glacial events—deposition occurred in a syn-orogenic foreland basin during Pan-African collision, involving Gilbert-type fan-deltas and coseismic mass flows that produced polymictic, texturally immature units with fining-upward cycles and diverse clasts up to 60 cm in a matrix-supported fabric. Fault-scarp breccias and tectonic mélanges, as along the eastern margin of the Malay Peninsula's Central Basin, form through resedimentation in developing grabens, yielding sheared, chaotic bedding with sub-angular clasts (mm to >1 m) embedded in foliated matrices. In accretionary prisms, block-in-matrix textures mimic diamictites via tectonic mixing, often associated with oversteepened slopes from rapid subsidence. Distinguishing features include braided foliation from deformation, abrupt thickness variations near faults, and integration with or sequences, without evidence of ice-rafted components.

Geological Occurrences

Major Formations and Deposits

The Pocatello Formation in southeastern , , represents a key sequence associated with the glaciation events. This formation features thick sequences of tillite, interpreted as glaciogenic diamictites, with prominent dropstones embedded in finer-grained matrices, indicating ice-rafted debris deposition during widespread ice ages. The Scout Mountain Member within the formation preserves evidence of multiple glacial episodes, including massive diamictite beds up to several hundred meters thick, overlain by cap carbonates that mark phases. Re-Os geochronology dates these deposits to approximately 717-659 Ma, linking them to the . In the region of , , the Mineral Fork Formation, which overlies the Big Cottonwood Formation, exemplifies with boulder-rich diamictites that reflect proximal glacial depositional environments. These diamictites contain abundant striated clasts of and granitic rocks, alongside volcanic fragments, suggesting a mix of subglacial and ice-marginal processes in a rift-related basin setting. The unit's thickness reaches up to 300 meters, with lower beds dominated by intrabasinal volcanic clasts transitioning to more exotic, far-traveled boulders in upper layers, highlighting dynamic during the ~720 Ma glacial maximum. Paleomagnetic data support low-latitude deposition, consistent with global models. The Elatina Formation in , dated to the Late (~635 Ma), is renowned for its rhythmically bedded diamictites that record tidal influences on glacial deposits during the Marinoan glaciation. These beds exhibit finely laminated siltstones and sandstones interbedded with massive diamictite lenses containing dropstones, interpreted as deglacial marine in a tide-dominated shelf environment. The rhythmic bedding, with cycles on the order of 10-20 cm, reflects semidiurnal tidal modulation of glacial outwash, providing a unique proxy for equatorial sea-level changes post-Snowball Earth. Glacigenic features include faceted and striated pebbles within the diamictites, confirming a hybrid glacial-tidal origin. The Gowganda Formation in , , forms part of the Huronian Supergroup and preserves extensive tillite sequences from the ~2.2 Ga Huronian glaciation. These diamictites, reaching thicknesses of over 1 km, feature massive to stratified beds with horizons in overlying shales, evidencing subaqueous glacial deposition in a rift basin. Clast compositions include local metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, with striations and faceting on pebbles supporting direct glacial override. The formation's multiple diamictite units, separated by non-glacial intervals, record episodic ice advances during Earth's early oxygenation and climate instability.

Distribution and Age

Diamictites are primarily documented from to successions, with a pronounced concentration during the Period (ca. 720–635 Ma), particularly the Sturtian (717–660 Ma) and Marinoan (650–635 Ma) glaciations associated with "" events. These deposits mark extreme global cooling episodes, with evidence of low-latitude glaciation across . examples peak during the late Ice Age (ca. 338–265 Ma), while occurrences are linked to the expansion of polar ice sheets. Globally, glacial diamictites are widespread in ancient continents during the , with deposits spanning , , , , and , reflecting ice centers that migrated across the supercontinent as it drifted over the . For instance, Permo-Carboniferous tillites in the Basin of and Dwyka Group equivalents exhibit basin-wide distribution tied to high southern latitudes. Modern glacial analogs occur in till plains, where unsorted debris flows mimic ancient subglacial and glaciomarine processes. Non-glacial diamictites, formed by mass flows, are prevalent in tectonically active margins such as the and Japanese arcs, where and convergence generate slope instability. Tectonically, glacial diamictites serve as paleolatitude indicators, with examples deposited at equatorial to mid-latitudes, supporting global refrigeration models, while ones align with Gondwanan polar positions. Mass-flow types are commonly associated with orogenic belts, including the Appalachians, where to deformation facilitated debris shedding into foreland basins. These settings highlight diamictites' role in recording both climatic and tectonic forcings. Diamictite sequences can reach thicknesses up to 1 km in or foreland basins, as seen in the Pocatello Formation of , though total preserved volumes are limited by widespread erosion over billions of years. Estimated global extents for major episodes, such as the late Gondwanan glaciation, covered millions of square kilometers but are fragmented in the rock record due to tectonic reworking.

Significance and Applications

Role in Paleoclimate Reconstruction

Diamictites serve as key indicators of ancient glaciations, particularly through features like dropstones and striations that suggest the presence of polar ice caps and floating ice shelves. Dropstones, which are isolated clasts embedded in finer-grained sediments, form when icebergs melt and release into marine or lacustrine environments, providing of glacial over long distances. Striations and faceted clasts within diamictites further indicate direct glacial and abrasion by ice sheets. These features have been documented in and deposits, supporting reconstructions of widespread ice coverage during periods of . In paleogeographic reconstructions, clast analysis of diamictites helps trace the extent and movement of ancient ice sheets by identifying source regions of exotic clasts through petrographic and geochemical methods. For instance, U-Pb dating of detrital zircons in clasts can link deposits to specific continental margins, revealing ice flow directions and the scale of glaciations. Additionally, oxygen ratios (δ¹⁸O) in the fine-grained matrix of diamictites act as proxies for paleotemperatures, reflecting the isotopic composition of glacial or ambient during deposition. These δ¹⁸O values, often depleted due to ice formation preferences, help quantify the severity of cooling events when integrated with stratigraphic context. Neoproterozoic diamictites, such as those in the Rapitan Group (associated with the around 717–660 Ma) and other units, provide compelling evidence for extreme global freezing events central to the hypothesis, including tillites deposited at low paleolatitudes. These equatorial diamictites, containing dropstones and striated clasts amid otherwise warm-water facies, imply near-total ice coverage from pole to equator. Their abrupt termination is marked by overlying cap carbonates, which record rapid post-glacial warming and CO₂ buildup, as seen in successions like the Ice Brook Formation in the . Such couplets correlate globally, reinforcing the synchroneity of these glaciations. Despite their value, diamictites have limitations as paleoclimate proxies due to ambiguous origins, as many can form via non-glacial processes like debris flows or , potentially overestimating glacial extents. This ambiguity requires integration with complementary evidence, such as microfossils indicating cold-water assemblages or geochemical signatures like triple oxygen isotopes (Δ¹⁷O) to confirm glacial conditions and distinguish climate signals from tectonic influences. Multiproxy approaches mitigate these issues, ensuring robust interpretations of ancient climate dynamics.

Distinction from Similar Rocks

Diamictite is primarily distinguished from conglomerate by its matrix-supported fabric and extreme poor sorting, where a fine-grained matrix of and (typically 15-50% by volume) dominates and suspends clasts of varying sizes and shapes, often angular to subrounded; in contrast, conglomerates are clast-supported with rounded pebbles greater than 2 mm, better sorted, and containing minimal matrix less than 15% without significant content. This difference arises from diamictite's depositional processes involving suspension and minimal segregation, unlike the bedload transport that shapes conglomerates. Compared to , diamictite features a softer, mud-rich matrix that imparts a ductile flow texture, with clasts embedded rather than forming a rigid, clast-supported framework; , derived from brittle fracturing, consist of angular clasts with sparse or absent fine matrix, resulting in a more fragmented and less cohesive structure. The presence of this pervasive matrix in diamictite, often silty to sandy, prevents the sharp, clast boundaries typical of . Turbidites differ markedly from diamictite through their organized , including and the (divisions A-E representing waning flow from coarse-grained traction deposits to fine-grained pelagics), reflecting density-driven sorting during turbidity currents; diamictite, however, lacks such vertical grading or sequential layering, exhibiting instead a chaotic, massive to poorly bedded texture with no evidence of flow segregation. When diamictites occur interbedded with turbidites, they are often interpreted as debris-flow deposits rather than turbiditic, based on the abrupt lack of sorting. In field identification, diamictites show no imbrication of clasts (aligned for current direction in conglomerates) or sole marks (erosional features at turbidite bases), and glacial varieties uniquely display striations or faceting on clasts indicative of ice abrasion; confirmation often requires thin-section petrography to verify the mud-rich matrix composition or X-ray imaging to assess clast distribution and fabric. These criteria, combined with the rock's inherent poor sorting, enable reliable differentiation from similar lithologies.

References

  1. https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/bgsrcs/rcs_details.cfm?code=DIAMIT
  2. https://geo.libretexts.org/Courses/SUNY_Potsdam/Sedimentary_Geology%253A_Rocks_Environments_and_Stratigraphy/05%253A_Siliciclastic_Sedimentary_Rocks/5.04%253A_Diamictites_Pebbly_Sandstones_and_Outsized_Clasts
  3. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/71/12/1809/3441875/i0016-7606-71-12-1809.pdf
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/earths-glacial-record/interpretation-of-massive-rainout-and-debrisflow-diamictites-from-the-glacial-marine-environment/E4E2B9A7F675AB1F045818CC82C9713C
  5. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10083579
  6. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/629685
  7. https://www.utdallas.edu/~rjstern/pdfs/AliAtudIJES10.pdf
  8. https://sandatlas.org/diamictite/
  9. https://www.howtopronounce.com/diamictite
  10. https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.tufts.edu/dist/9/5044/files/2021/08/Chap5-SedimentaryRocks.pdf
  11. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/178_IR/chap_03/ch3_htm3.htm
  12. https://www.geological-digressions.com/etymology-of-earth-science-words-and-phrases/
  13. https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary/browse/d
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/tillite
  15. https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?pub=TILL
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/diamictite
  17. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/47/12/1166/574372/Serra-Sul-diamictite-of-the-Carajas-Basin-Brazil-A
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016787822000682
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895981109001722
  20. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/535337/1/feart-11-929011.pdf
  21. https://people.earth.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Rooney/Busch-etal-2021.pdf
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Massive-diamictite-consisting-of-coarse-silt-to-sand-sized-clasts-of-quartz-feldspar-and_fig2_233795939
  23. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.929011/full
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703722006196
  25. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/7/4/922/132482/Amphibole-bearing-metamorphic-clasts-in-ANDRILL
  26. https://geology.byu.edu/0000017c-f27b-db54-a5fe-f6ffae130001/geo-stud-vol-32-christie-blick-pdf
  27. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/3227/1/RR99003.pdf
  28. https://www.geo.umass.edu/courses/geo563/Geo563-9Tills.pdf
  29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1975.tb00684.x
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/theory-of-glacial-erosion-transport-and-deposition-as-a-consequence-of-subglacial-sediment-deformation/3F7B5775EA035725B5703BCBA39A00A2
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/on-the-deposition-of-subglacial-and-meltout-tills-at-the-margins-of-certain-svalbard-glaciers/1A3483152F75A89AD6840CC53E571A07
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027737919090004T
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229413530_Dropstones_Their_origin_and_significance
  34. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacial-geology/glacial-landforms/glacial-depositional-landforms/glacial-erratics/
  35. https://asutoshcollege.in/new-web/Study_Material/Glacial_Sed_from_HG_Reading_for_your_reading_compressed.pdf
  36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dep2.67
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273125183_Diamictite_along_the_eastern_margin_of_the_Central_Basin_of_the_Malay_Peninsula
  38. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/jsedres/article/87/8/763/506754/FINE-GRAINED-DEBRIS-FLOWS-IN-COARSE-GRAINED
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348117967_Sedimentology_of_Volcanic_Debris_Avalanche_Deposits
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395994467_Non-Glacial_Origin_of_the_Neoproterozoic_Atud_Diamictite_Arabian-Nubian_Shield_Implications_for_Pan-African_Tectonics_and_the_Snowball_Earth_Hypothesis
  41. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/fmacdonald/files/rooney-etal-2013-re-os-sturtian-all.pdf
  42. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/91/8/495/187978/Upper-Precambrian-Eocambrian-Mineral-Fork-Tillite
  43. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dschrag/files/46._the_snowball_earth_hypothesis_2002.pdf
  44. https://earth.geology.yale.edu/~ajs/2001/Mar/qn030100261.pdf
  45. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600983
  46. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/43/5/459/131888/A-Cryogenian-chronology-Two-long-lasting
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825218301612
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S089598112030599X
  49. https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/115177/preprint_pdf/3d240ce521ff7c140f7142874e3ef254.pdf
  50. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/121/11-12/1537/2347/The-stratigraphic-signature-of-the-late-Cenozoic
  51. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.904787/full
  52. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/18/2/825/5575955/825.pdf
  53. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Historical_Geology_(Bentley_et_al.)/20:_Snowball_Earth_glaciations/20.02:_Evidence_of_glaciation
  54. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1047/ea/of2007-1047ea118.pdf
  55. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1422887112
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825221002579
  57. https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/25232/diamictite-and-beyond-understanding-sedimentary-proxies-of-glaciation-and-their-paleoclimatic-implications/magazine
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.