Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Don River (Ontario)
View on Wikipedia| Don River | |
|---|---|
The new mouth of the Don River | |
![]() | |
| Location | |
| Country | Canada |
| Province | Ontario |
| Cities | |
| Physical characteristics | |
| Source | Oak Ridges Moraine |
| • location | Ontario, Canada |
| • coordinates | 43°59′20″N 79°23′57″W / 43.98889°N 79.39917°W |
| Mouth | Keating Channel| and the Toronto Harbour |
• location | Ontario, Canada |
• elevation | 75 m (246 ft) |
| Length | 38 km (24 mi) |
| Basin size | 360 km2 (140 sq mi) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Keating Channel and the Toronto Harbour |
| Basin features | |
| Progression | Lake Ontario→ Saint Lawrence River→ Gulf of Saint Lawrence |
| River system | Lake Ontario drainage basin |
| Tributaries | |
| • left | Taylor-Massey Creek |
| • right | German Mills Creek, Burke Brook, Mud Creek, Yellow Creek, Castle Frank Brook |
The Don River is a watercourse in southern Ontario that empties into Lake Ontario, at Toronto Harbour. Its mouth was just east of the street grid of the town of York, Upper Canada, the municipality that evolved into Toronto, Ontario. The Don is one of the major watercourses draining Toronto (along with the Humber, and Rouge Rivers) that have headwaters in the Oak Ridges Moraine.
The Don is formed from two rivers, the East and West Branches, that meet about seven kilometres (4 mi) north of Lake Ontario while flowing southward into the lake. The area below the confluence is known as the "lower Don", and the areas above as the "upper Don". The Don is also joined at the confluence by a third major branch, Taylor-Massey Creek. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is responsible for managing the river and its surrounding watershed.
Toponymy
[edit]In 1788, Alexander Aitkin, an English surveyor who worked in southern Ontario, referred to the Don River as Ne cheng qua kekonk.[1] Elizabeth Simcoe, wife of Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe, reported in her diary that another name used was Wonscotanach.[2] This is an Anishnaabe phrase meaning 'the river coming from the back burnt grounds', which could refer to an earlier forest fire in the poplar plains to the north.[3] The name Don River was given by Lieutenant Governor Simcoe because the wide valley reminded him of the River Don in Yorkshire, England.[4]
History
[edit]
Humans are believed to have first arrived in the Don River area approximately 12,500 years BP, most likely as nomadic hunters.[5] While there is little archaeological evidence in the Don valley itself, regional finds in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence area have revealed that permanent settlements started to occur about 6000 BP.[6] The most significant recorded find is known as the "Withrow Site". It was discovered in 1886 during road building just east of Riverdale Park. It contained human remains and other artifacts dating back to about 5000 years BP.[5]
Wendat longhouse villages were developed along the river starting in the 1300s when corn became a staple food.[citation needed] In the 1700s, the Mississaugas moved into the region, seeing the Haudenosaunee withdraw south of Lake Ontario. The French were the first Europeans to visit the region, trading at posts in the area. In the 1760s, the French were displaced by the British after the fall of Quebec.
The British and the Mississaugas concluded the problematic Toronto Purchase treaty in 1787. Believing the purchase to be a rental of the area, and not the release of their rights to the land, the Mississaugas surrendered most of the land that would become York, and then Toronto, and York County to the British.[7] After a land claims process, the surrender of aboriginal title to the Toronto Purchase lands was eventually concluded in 2010 for financial considerations.[8]
After the founding of York in 1793, several mills were constructed along the lower Don. One of the first was at Todmorden Mills. These mills initially turned out lumber, flour and paper products. By the 1850s, there were more than 50 mills along the Don and its tributaries.[9] The Lower Don was becoming an industrial setting. Petroleum storage facilities, poultry and pork processing plants were constructed along the banks of the Don. In 1879, the Don Valley Brick Works opened.[10] Polluted effluent from these factories and the growing city nearby was turning the Don and its marshy mouth into a polluted hazard.
There were two prominent hills that were north of Bloor. "Sugar Loaf Hill" at Bloor Street was a conical hill removed during the construction of the Prince Edward Viaduct (commonly referred to as the Bloor Viaduct).[11] "Tumper's Hill", near Don Mills Road, was flattened in the 1960s during the construction of the Don Valley Parkway.[citation needed]
In the 1880s, the lower part of the Don south of the former Winchester Street bridge was straightened (east of the original mouth) and placed in a channel to create additional harbour space and industrial dock space for boats. Known as "The Don Improvement Project", the straightened river was also supposed to divert the polluted waters into the Ashbridges Bay marsh. This proved unsuccessful so the mouth was turned 90 degrees west where it empties into the inner harbour. This short extension of the harbour is known as the Keating Channel. The channel north of Lake Shore Blvd. East ceased being navigable when the Gardiner Expressway was constructed in the 1950s.[citation needed] Large boats can no longer enter the Keating Channel due to the removal of the Cherry Street lift bridge and it's replacement by the Cherry Street North bridges.

During the early part of the 20th century the river and the valley continued to be neglected. 31 separate sewage treatment facilities were constructed along the river.[12] Over 20 sites in the valley and adjacent ravines were used as landfills for garbage and industrial refuse.[13] In 1917, the Don Destructor was built beside the river, just north of Dundas Street East. The incinerator operated for 52 years, burning about 50,000 tonnes of rubbish annually.[14]
In the 1910s through to the early 1930s, the Don Valley was used as a camping site by the homeless. These sites were commonly referred to as the "hobo jungle" of the valley.[15] Campers at the hobo jungle were often harassed, arrested, and raided by police.[16]
In 1946, a plan by the Shirriff company to demolish pioneer dwellings in the area of Todmorden Mills led outraged citizens to form the Don Valley Conservation Association volunteer organization. The Association's opposition was successful in causing Shirriff to abandon the project in 1947.[citation needed] The Association continued its activities, planting tree seedlings, halting the picking of wild flowers, particularly trilliums and preventing vandalism. The Association held educational events to educate the public about the Don Valley, including special trains through the valley, and a recreation of Lt. Governor Simcoe's journey up the Don by canoe. The Association also advocated for the building of trunk sewers to stop the run-off of pollution into the Don.[17]
After World War II, rapid urban expansion occurred in the northern reaches of the watershed. At the same time, interest in conservation led to the formation of conservation authorities across Ontario for watershed management. Authorities were established to manage watersheds, and the Don Valley Conservation Authority was established in 1947.[citation needed] The authority had limited powers, and was funded by local municipalities which had to pay for specific land purchases. For example, a 1950 plan to build a large conservation area on the East Don River at Milne Hollow at Lawrence Avenue never came to fruition over the high cost of development.[citation needed]
In 1954, Hurricane Hazel struck the Toronto area. Most of the damage occurred in the Humber River area. While there was some flooding, substantially less rain fell over the Don Watershed and there was no loss of life.[18] However, the impact of the hurricane led to changes for the conservation authorities in the Toronto region. In 1957, the DVCA, along with other Toronto-area conservation authorities, was reformed into the Metro Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and given a mandate to construct flood control features as well as acquire property in the Don and other valleys to prevent a future re-occurrence of the disaster. Large tracts of industrial land adjacent to the river were added to the regulatory floodplain. This meant that the MTRCA had a veto on any developments that were not flood-proofed. The MTRCA became the TRCA in 1998.

In the 1950s and early 1960s, the Don Valley Parkway (DVP) was constructed through the Lower Don to serve growing commuter traffic. The project was a large civil engineering project. Homes, farms, and cottages in the valley were expropriated.[9] Two hills within the valley were leveled and the soil used for grading the highway. The railways and the river were re-routed, Don Mills Road was improved and the Eglinton Avenue and Lawrence Avenue concession roads were extended across the valley. At the intersection of Lawrence and the Parkway, the remains of the old village of Milneford Mills were removed.[19] Bayview Avenue was extended south into the valley along the west bank of the valley.
Increasing development reduced the natural areas of the watershed. This impacted the Don with increased pollution, heavy flooding, and turbid sediment laden waters. The combined result meant that by the 1960s the river had become a neglected, polluted mess. In 1969, Pollution Probe held a much celebrated "Funeral for the Don" to highlight the plight of the river.[10]
Efforts to restore the Don gathered steam in 1989 with a public forum at the Ontario Science Centre which was attended by about 500 people.[20] The result was the formation of the Task Force to Bring Back the Don, a citizen's advisory body to Toronto City Council. Their mandate and vision was to make the Don "clean, green, and accessible". Since then they have hosted garbage cleanups, tree plantings, and help to create or restore eight wetlands in the lower reaches of the valley, including Chester Springs Marsh, a 3 hectares (7.4 acres) site south of the Bloor Viaduct.[21] Other groups also became active including Friends of the Don East. In 1995, the MTRCA created the Don Watershed Regeneration Council to coordinate restoration efforts throughout the watershed.[22]
In 1991 Bring Back the Don released a document called "Bringing Back the Don" which laid out plans for restoration, including a renaturalized mouth of the Don. In 1998 a plan to revive Toronto's waterfront was initiated. One of the four projects mentioned was a natural mouth for the Don River. In 2001 an environmental assessment was started to look into a natural mouth of the Don. The project was also coupled with a plan to handle a major flood modeled on the expected output from a Hurricane Hazel size storm. In 2007, the Toronto Waterfront Development Corporation (now WaterfrontToronto) held a design competition that looked at four different configurations for the mouth of the Don. The winning bid was made by Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates.[23] The environmental assessment was completed in 2014 and construction began in 2016.[24] In 2024, Waterfront Toronto announced that it had connected the Don River to the new mouth of the river channel and completed the creation of a new island, Ookwemin Minising. For the first time since the 1880s the Keating Channel was no longer the primary outlet for the river into Toronto Harbour.[25]
| Part of a series on the |
| Don Valley |
|---|
| Rivers |
| Parks |
| History |
| Environment |
Since the cessation of industrial pollution and the cleanup efforts by various groups, the river has regenerated to the point where a number of species of fish have returned to the river, and there is a limited sports fishery.[26]
Wonscotonach Parklands (Don River Valley Park)
[edit]In October 2016, the city of Toronto announced the creation of a 200 acres (81 ha) Don River Valley Park that will stretch for 7 kilometres (4.3 mi) from the West Don Lands up to approximately Todmorden Village in the north.[27] The park will have three zones, an urban zone from West Don Lands to Riverdale Park, a park zone from Riverdale north to Bloor and finally a natural zone for the remaining section to Todmorden Village. Trails for biking and pedestrian use will be connected from existing ones for recreational and transportation needs.[27] Another aim for the park is restoration of land and the upper sections of the Don River.[27] The project aims to revitalize the ravine space through a series of projects that will advance the priorities set out in the city of Toronto's Lower Don Trail Master Plan, prepared by DTAH.[28][29] Together with a series of accessible new entry points, the Master Plan calls for the reclamation of former green spaces throughout the valley, including the former snow dump site north of the Bloor Viaduct.[28] Naturalized ecological conditions throughout the valley would offer improved flood protection. A "nature-inspired" public art program is set to launch in 2017, aiming to strengthen the cultural presence of the Don Valley, which—according to the Master Plan—already serves as a de facto backyard to some 250,000 Torontonians.[28] This new park will be under the management of the Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division. In 2018 City Council directed staff to consult community about naming the network of parks in the Lower Don "Wonscotonach Parklands", with Wonscotonach meaning "black burnt grounds" or "area previously swept by fire", deriving as an Anglicized form of the name "Waasayishkodenayosh" meaning "burning bright point" or "peninsula" in Anishinaabemowin.[30][31]
Geography
[edit]Geology
[edit]
The Don Valley is notable because of its deep wide valley in the lower reaches. At the Bloor Street Viaduct, the valley is about 400 m wide while the river is only about 15 m wide.[32] This is due to its glacial origins. The Don River and its deep valley were formed about 12,000 years ago at the end of the Wisconsinan Glaciation. During that glaciation which lasted for 35,000 years, all of Ontario was covered in ice. As the climate warmed the glaciers began to melt. As the ice front retreated in southern Ontario, several rivers were formed that drained into Lake Iroquois, a glacier lake which was the precursor to Lake Ontario.[dubious – discuss] The Don River is now small in comparison to the deep and wide valley that resulted from its glacial origin. The Don River is now classified as an underfit river.
The landscape at that time was loose glacial till so the large amounts of glacier melt water eroded deep valleys over thousands of years. As time progressed, isostatic uplift caused the earth's plate to rise and tilt. This caused Lake Iroquois to drain towards the south.[dubious – discuss] A remnant of its shoreline can be seen on the north side of Davenport Road in Toronto. In the Don Valley, the old shoreline is evident just north of Eglinton Avenue.[33] Today the source of the Don River is the Oak Ridges Moraine, another legacy of the Wisconsin glaciation.
The location of the old shoreline delineates a change in the soils in the Don watershed. Soils north of the old shoreline are mostly luvisolic Halton Till while south of the shoreline they are sandy glaciolacustrine deposits.
The Don Valley provides an appropriate location for studying the regional geological history. The Don Valley Brick Works was an old brick making factory with a quarry where they extracted shale. At the rear wall, local geologists discovered a record of the past three glaciations. There are nine distinct layers visible dating back 120,000 years.[34]
Hydrology
[edit]
Due to the urbanized nature of the watershed, the Don River experiences low base flows interspersed with high volume floods. The water level can rise very quickly following a moderate to heavy rainfall, up to 1–2 metres inside of three hours. The average base flow for the Don River is about 4 m3/s.[35] Peak flows occur in late February and late September which corresponds to seasonal variation in the Toronto region. Maximum flows, based on a Hurricane Hazel level flood have been estimated at nearly 1700 m3/s.[36] On August 19, 2005, an unusually strong summer storm caused short term flooding in the Don Valley. Peak flow rates for that event were measured at 55.3 m3/s. Since high flow rates occur during storm events, the resulting floods tend to scour the bottom of the river which reduces fish habitat. In addition, the flood waters carry a large amount of sediment washed into the river from surrounding tablelands. The sediment collects in the Keating Channel just past the mouth of the river. The TRCA which is responsible for the dredging estimates that the amount of sediment dredged is 35,000 m3/year weighing nearly 60,000 tonnes (59,000 long tons; 66,000 short tons).[37]
Course and tributaries
[edit]The east branch of the Don, also called the Little Don River,[38] rises at the south edge of the Oak Ridges Moraine just to the west of Yonge Street, flowing south-eastward through ravine forests in Richmond Hill, Thornhill, east of Willowdale and Don Mills.
A second branch of the eastern Don, known as German Mills Creek, parallels the main eastern branch and joins it at Steeles Avenue, the northern boundary of Toronto. South of Lawrence Avenue the river passes through the Charles Sauriol Conservation Reserve. This area is mostly undeveloped parkland. The reserve occupies the valley south to the forks of the Don. It was at one time home of a Maple sugar shack and tapline, which was visited yearly by students from across East York. Charles Sauriol was a historic protector of the Don.
The western branch starts Vaughan, in the Maple district; flowing south-east through the suburban industrial area of Concord, and the G. Ross Lord Reservoir. It crosses Yonge Street as it flows through Hoggs Hollow, past York University's Glendon ("valley of the Don") campus, and then flows on to Leaside, Flemingdon Park, and Thorncliffe Park before joining the eastern half.
The western section of Taylor-Massey Creek and the southern portion of the western branch are surrounded by parkland (see also: Toronto ravine system). In more recent years the retreat of the industrial plants and rail infrastructure has freed up room which is now being turned into bicycling trails, which now extend from the shore of Lake Ontario northward in several directions to provide some 30 km of off-road paved trails. While Toronto is fairly flat in general, local cyclists have developed a number of technically challenging singletrack trails throughout the area, following the main trails.

Downstream from the forks, the river flows through a wooded area known as Crothers' Woods which is designated as an Environmentally Sensitive Area due to the high quality beech-maple forest that grows on the ravine slopes. South of Pottery Road it enters a more degraded section and ends up in a straightened section that includes cement and steel dock wall, a remnant from an earlier industrial era. The river flows from there into the Keating Channel at Lake Shore Boulevard East which is at the north east corner of the Toronto Harbour.
To control flooding from the Don River, Waterfront Toronto's Port Lands Flood Protection Project extended the river south past the Keating Channel (roughly parallel to the west side of the Don Roadway), and then west (roughly parallel to the south side of Commissioners Street) to a new mouth at Toronto Harbour. The man-made extension naturalized the river valley and provided new parkland. Since 2024, water now flows into the Keating Channel from the Don River and the new mouth of the river. A byproduct of the river extension is the creation of Ookewmin Minising, at the north-west corner of Toronto's Port Lands.[39]
Cleanup
[edit]
In the 1880s, sewers were laid through ravines in the Don Valley to carry sewage, offal and industrial effluents. Pollution and foul odours continued until the late 1950s. Since then, small improvements have been made. The city installed waste water storage tanks, required homeowners to disconnect downspouts, and swept streets for contaminants that flowed into waterways. Since 1979, the Lower Don has shown improvements in dissolved oxygen, phosphates and suspended solids; however by 2021, the tributary Taylor-Massey Creek had shown little improvement.[40]
As of 2021[update], the Don River still suffers from sewage pollution during heavy rainfalls, when storm sewers carrying both rain water and sewage overflow into the Don River and its tributaries. To remedy this problem, the city is spending $3 billion to build three tunnels totaling 22 kilometres (14 mi) in length to divert sewage away from the river and redirect it to the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant. The project began in 2018 with an expected completion in 2038 of all three tunnels plus five storm water storage shafts. As of 2021[update], a tunnel boring machine has completed roughly half of the 10.4-kilometre (6.5 mi) Coxwell Bypass tunnel located 50 metres (160 ft) underground alongside the Lower Don south of the Leaside Bridge.[40]
In October 2025, a peer-reviewed study found that the river carried the equivalent of 18-cars worth of microplastics into Lake Ontario every year.[41]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ City of Toronto Toronto Golf History. Accessed March 24, 2007
- ^ Robertson, J.R. 2001. The Diary of Mrs. John Graves Simcoe. Toronto, Ont. Prospero Books.
- ^ Scadding 1873, p. 233.
- ^ ODPD 1950, p. Part IV, 1.
- ^ a b Task Force to Bring Back the Don (August 1991), Bringing Back the Don, City of Toronto
- ^ "Civilization.ca. Early Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Culture". civilisations.ca. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- ^ "About the Park". Evergreen in partnership with the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
- ^ Edwards, Peter (June 8, 2010). "Shrugs greet historic $145M Toronto land claim settlement". Toronto Star. Retrieved April 29, 2013.
- ^ a b "When the Don Valley was cottage country".Toronto Star, September 4, 2016, page IN4.
- ^ a b Task Force to Bring Back the Don (1998). "Story of the Don". City of Toronto. Archived from the original on 2011-06-07.
- ^ "That time Toronto opened the Don Valley Parkway".
- ^ "How polluted is the Don. Don Watershed Regeneration. Note: only one treatment plant remains". Archived from the original on 2007-12-31.
- ^ Howard, K.W.F.; Eyles, N.; Livingstone, S. (1996). "Municipal Landfilling Practice And Its Impact On Groundwater Resources In And Around Urban Toronto, Canada". Hydrogeology Journal. 4 (1): 64–79. Bibcode:1996HydJ....4...64H. doi:10.1007/s100400050092. S2CID 129112142.
- ^ "The Don Destructor". Lost Rivers.
- ^ Bonnell, Jennifer L. (2014). Reclaiming the Don : an environmental history of Toronto's Don River Valley. University of Toronto Press. pp. 97–103. ISBN 9781442643840.
- ^ Joesph, Mobólúwajídìde (2023). "A Brief History of Toronto Encampments: Don Valley". University of Toronto Exhibits. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
- ^ Sauriol 1992, pp. 268–281.
- ^ Peter Bowyer (2004). "Impacts — Don River". Canadian Hurricane Centre. Retrieved 2009-06-17.
- ^ Brown 1997, p. 167.
- ^ Wilson, Mark J. (2001). "Frequently Asked Questions: How did the Task Force to Bring Back the Don get started?". Bring Back the Don. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27.
- ^ "Chester Springs Marsh". www.lostrivers.ca. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- ^ "Community: Don Watershed Regeneration Council". TRCA. Retrieved October 21, 2016.
- ^ "Portlands Estuary". Waterfront Toronto. 2007.
- ^ Toronto Region Conservation Authority (2006). "Don Mouth Environmental Assessment, Terms of Reference". Archived from the original on 2007-11-22.
- ^ Weingarten, Naama (November 8, 2024). "Toronto's 'waterfront city' project reaches new milestone". CBC News. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
- ^ Hunter, Paul (August 28, 2016). "Urban fishing enthusiasts feel the lure of the Don River". Toronto Star.
- ^ a b c "The Don River Valley Park". donrivervalleypark.ca. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- ^ a b c "Lower Don Trail : Access, Environment + Art Master Plan" (PDF). Evergreen.ca. Retrieved 27 May 2018.
- ^ "Welcome to DTAH". Dtah. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- ^ "Wonscotonach Parklands: What we're hearing | the Don River Valley Park".
- ^ "About Evergreen | Evergreen".
- ^ "Google Maps". Google Maps. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- ^ Chapman, L.J., Putnam, D.F. 1972. Map 2226:Physiography of the South Central Portion of Southern Ontario. Ontario Department of Mines and Northern Affairs. Ontario Research Foundation.
- ^ Nick Eyles. 1997. Toronto Rocks. Fitzhenry and Whiteside.
- ^ "Archived Hydrometric Data for Station 02HC024 (Todmorden Mills). 1962-2005". Environment Canada. Archived from the original on 2007-12-31.
- ^ "Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project, Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Report Section 4.1". Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-10-30.
- ^ Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (2006). Terms of Reference – Don Mouth Naturalization and PortLands Flood Protection Project, Section 8.1.
- ^ "Archived - Stormwater Control Facility Rehabilitation, Little Don River, Town of Richmond Hill". Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. 24 March 2009. Retrieved October 21, 2016.
- ^ "Breaking Down the Port Lands Flood Protection Project". Waterfront Toronto. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
- ^ a b McClearn, Matthew (April 23, 2021). "Toronto's natural drainage systems, its ravines, get a makeover". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 25, 2021.
- ^ Omstead, Jordan (October 23, 2025). "This river sends 500 billion microplastics into Lake Ontario each year: study". CityNews. The Canadian Press. Retrieved October 23, 2025.
Bibliography
[edit]- Bonnell, Jennifer L. (2014). Reclaiming the Don: An Environmental History of Toronto's Don River Valley. University of Toronto Press.
- Bonnell, Jennifer (2010). Imagined Futures and Unintended Consequences: An Environmental History of Toronto's Don River Valley. thesis, University of Toronto.
- Brown, Ron (1997). Toronto's Lost Villages. Polar Bear Press. ISBN 1896757022.
- Ontario Department of Planning and Development (1950). Don Valley Conservation Report. Toronto, Ontario.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Sauriol, Charles (1981) Remembering the Don: A Rare Record of Earlier Times Within the Don River Valley. Consolidated Amethyst Communications. ISBN 0-920474-22-5
- Sauriol, Charles (1984) Tales of the Don. Natural Heritage/Natural History. ISBN 0-920474-30-6
- Sauriol, Charles (1992). Trails of the Don. Hemlock Press. ISBN 0-929066-10-3.
- Scadding, Henry (1873). Toronto of Old. Adam, Stevenson & Co.
Further reading
[edit]- Bonnell, Jennifer L. (2014). Reclaiming the Don: An Environmental History of Toronto's Don River Valley. University of Toronto Press.
External links
[edit]- Don River Watershed at the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
- Environment Canada (Toronto Remedial Action Plan) Great Lakes Portrait: Bringing back the Don River
- Task Force to Bring back the Don
- Don Watershed Regeneration
- Lower Don River at Lost River Walks
- Friends of the Don East
- Todmorden Mills Wildflower Preserve in the Don River Valley
Don River (Ontario)
View on GrokipediaEtymology
Indigenous Designations
The Anishinaabe, particularly the Mississaugas, designated the Don River as Wonscotonach (or variants such as Waasayishkodenayosh), a term interpreted as "burning bright point," denoting prominent landscape features like sandy or reflective points in the lower valley that stood out after natural or managed fires cleared vegetation.[6][7] This nomenclature derived from direct observation of the river's ecology, where periodic burns—used to promote hunting grounds and prevent overgrowth—highlighted the waterway's path through steep ravines, broad wetlands, and meandering channels, aiding navigation and visibility for travelers.[8] Pre-colonial records and oral traditions document the river's role as a key artery for Mississauga seasonal camps, where groups exploited anadromous fish runs (e.g., Atlantic salmon until the 19th century) for sustenance, and portage trails like Gete-Onigaming connected it to the Humber River for overland trade and migration spanning millennia.[9][10] These uses tied the designation to the river's causal utility in a post-glacial watershed, with archaeological evidence of campsites confirming reliance on its predictable hydrology for fishing weirs and canoe routes rather than abstract symbolism.[11]European Adoption
The Don River received its European name in 1793 from Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe, who designated it after the River Don in Yorkshire, England, owing to the visual similarity of its broad valley.[12][13] This renaming occurred amid the establishment of York (present-day Toronto), replacing Indigenous terms like Wonscotonach—derived from Anishinaabe language elements signifying a returning or bending waterway—with an English equivalent to streamline colonial mapping and settler orientation.[13][14] Simcoe's directive aligned with broader British practice of substituting native toponyms with those from the British Isles, promoting administrative efficiency in land surveys and navigation for incoming Loyalist and military personnel.[15] By 1793, surveyors under Simcoe, including Alexander Aitken, incorporated the name into preliminary plats for land grants along the river's course, enabling pragmatic resource allocation for milling and agriculture without reliance on untranslated Indigenous nomenclature.[3] Contemporary records, including Simcoe's correspondence and early provincial dispatches, document the adoption as a direct transposition rather than phonetic adaptation, prioritizing familiarity for English-speaking administrators over linguistic continuity with prior Mississauga or Anishinaabe usage.[16] This formalization persisted in official gazetteers and charts by the early 1800s, embedding the name in Upper Canada's cadastral systems despite the river's pre-existing role in Indigenous trail networks.[12]Historical Context
Pre-Colonial Indigenous Utilization
Archaeological evidence indicates that Indigenous groups, particularly ancestral Huron-Wendat and later Haudenosaunee, utilized the Don River watershed for resource extraction dating back thousands of years, with intensified settlement in the Late Woodland period (AD 700–1651). Sites such as the Parsons site near the East Don River reveal longhouse structures, palisades, stone and bone tools, pottery, and an ossuary containing remains of approximately 90 individuals from around AD 1300–1500, associated with ancestral Huron-Wendat villages. Animal remains from these excavations include bones of salmon, eel, bear, beaver, and other species, confirming fishing and hunting as primary activities tied to the river's aquatic and riparian habitats.[17][10] The watershed supported seasonal exploitation patterns, with spring and fall focusing on fish spawning runs and waterfowl, as evidenced by net-sinkers, groundstone tools, and faunal assemblages from Archaic and Woodland campsites. Over 193 registered archaeological sites within the Don River area include 55 campsites and 10 villages, such as the 15th-century McGaw site, where Iroquoian groups maintained semi-permanent settlements for maize agriculture supplemented by riverine hunting and fishing. Haudenosaunee, particularly Seneca bands, extended use into the pre-1700 period for similar purposes, with artifacts from the 1400s indicating continued reliance on the valley's deer, fish, and trade-accessible resources.[10][17] Mississauga groups, arriving in the Toronto region by the late 1600s, primarily employed the Don as a fishing and hunting corridor, with ethnohistorical accounts verifying eel and salmon harvesting amid broader Anishinaabe mobility patterns. The river facilitated canoe navigation and portage connections to Lake Ontario, enabling access to seasonal runs without evidence of overexploitation in pre-contact faunal records. These activities aligned with the watershed's hydrological cycles, where floodplains provided wild rice and medicinals, though site distributions reflect opportunistic rather than uniform carrying capacity utilization.[18][10]Colonial Settlement and Milling Era
European settlers initiated the colonial exploitation of the Don River's hydropower potential in the late 18th century, with the construction of the first sawmill at the site of Todmorden Mills in 1795.[4] This facility, powered by the river's steep gradient, processed local timber to supply building materials for the nascent settlement of York, facilitating early infrastructure development amid the river valley's abundant forests.[19] By the early 19th century, additional milling operations proliferated along the Don, including a second sawmill erected by 1827 near Todmorden and a gristmill at the Forks of the Don around 1829 by John Eastwood and Colin Skinner.[20][21] The Helliwell family further diversified the Todmorden site starting in 1821 with a brewery and distillery, later incorporating paper and flour production, which harnessed the waterway to generate essential goods like lumber, milled grain, and industrial outputs for Toronto's growing population.[22] These ventures anchored settlement patterns in the Don Valley, drawing laborers and capital to exploit the river's flow for mechanical power and timber transport, thereby underpinning York Mills and other hamlets as key nodes in the regional economy.[23] The concentration of such sites—several documented along the valley by mid-century—directly correlated with accelerated urban expansion, as river-powered mills converted raw forest resources into commodities vital for construction and trade.[24]Industrial Transformation and Degradation
The mid-19th century marked a pivotal shift for the Don River, as its role evolved from primarily powering mills to accommodating heavy industry, with tanneries, breweries like the Don Brewery (established 1834), and distilleries such as Gooderham & Worts establishing operations along its banks for hydropower, raw material access, and effluent disposal.[3] By the 1880s, the lower river valley hosted concentrated noxious facilities, including abattoirs (e.g., William Davies Co., relocated 1879) and emerging oil refineries, which discharged untreated organic wastes, animal byproducts, and chemical effluents directly into the waterway, exploiting its flow as a cost-free conduit to Lake Ontario.[3][25] This pattern intensified post-Confederation, aligning with Toronto's population surge from approximately 30,000 in 1851 to over 200,000 by 1901, as the river's capacity to assimilate wastes underpinned locational advantages for manufacturers avoiding private treatment costs.[26] Economically, the Don's industrial corridor drove Toronto's manufacturing ascent, with facilities like Gooderham & Worts producing half of Canada West's spirits by 1871 and employing hundreds in processing and distribution, while Don Valley brick works output reached 100,000 bricks daily by 1894, fueling residential and infrastructural expansion.[25] Over 50 mills and factories dotted the watershed by 1860, contributing to a broader sector that sustained thousands in wage labor amid Canada's post-1867 tariff protections and rail integration, transforming the riverine landscape into a hub for value-added production from lumber to refined goods.[25][27] Yet this productivity hinged on environmental externalities: wastewater volumes overwhelmed the river's dilutive capacity, with organic loadings from tannery offal and slaughterhouse runoff depleting dissolved oxygen essential for aerobic decomposition, while inorganic discharges of acids and alkalis altered pH balances, fostering anaerobic conditions by the early 1900s.[25] Degradation cascaded ecologically, as pollution compounded physical alterations like channelization, leading to the cessation of salmon spawning by the 1860s and native salmon extinction by the 1870s—direct outcomes of effluent toxicity, silt occlusion, and oxygen deficits that shifted fish assemblages toward pollution-tolerant species.[25] Industrial hazards materialized in recurrent fires fueled by petrochemical slicks; the river ignited multiple times in the early 20th century due to refinery discharges, culminating in a 1931 blaze from heavy oil pollution that consumed the Keating Street bridge.[19][28] These events underscored the causal trade-offs: short-term industrial efficiencies via unregulated dumping accelerated Toronto's urbanization but imposed verifiable long-term costs in lost biodiversity and heightened flood-vulnerability from impaired self-cleansing flows.[3]Post-Industrial Decline and Initial Revival
By the 1960s, the Don River had reached a nadir of ecological degradation, declared biologically dead due to severe pollution from industrial effluents and municipal sewage, which depleted dissolved oxygen levels to the point of supporting no viable fish populations. In 1969, the environmental group Pollution Probe staged a widely publicized mock funeral for the river to draw attention to its dire state, underscoring years of unchecked discharges that had transformed a once-navigable waterway into an open sewer. This condition stemmed from post-World War II industrial expansion along the river's banks, where factories released untreated wastes amid lax regulatory enforcement that failed to curb point-source pollution effectively.[29][30] Deindustrialization in the Toronto area, accelerating from the 1950s onward with factory closures in heavy manufacturing sectors, played a key causal role in initial pollution abatement by naturally reducing industrial outflows, independent of comprehensive policy interventions. While regulatory shortcomings—such as inconsistent enforcement of waste discharge limits—prolonged the degradation despite existing provincial water quality standards, the decline in riparian industries correlated with measurable drops in certain contaminants, setting the stage for recovery without attributing causality solely to anti-capitalist reforms. Sewage contributions persisted as a dominant factor, with untreated or partially treated effluents from growing urban populations overwhelming the river's assimilative capacity.[25] Initial revival efforts in the 1960s and 1970s focused on sewage management, including the construction and upgrading of treatment facilities like those operated by Metro Toronto, which implemented secondary treatment to cut organic loads and biochemical oxygen demand. These measures, combined with the ongoing contraction of industrial activity, yielded empirical gains: by the 1980s, monitoring data indicated partial benthic and fish community recovery, with species such as brook trout observed in upper reaches, signaling improved oxygen regimes and reduced toxicity. However, enforcement gaps in industrial waste permits continued to hinder full restoration, as sporadic violations sustained localized hotspots of contamination.[31][32]Physical Characteristics
Geological Formation
The Don River valley formed primarily during the retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at the end of the Wisconsinan Glaciation approximately 12,000 years ago, as meltwater flows eroded channels into glacial tills such as the Newmarket Till (deposited 18,000–20,000 years ago) and underlying bedrock.[33] This process carved the initial morphology amid thick Quaternary overburden, up to 270 meters in places overlying a pre-existing Laurentian bedrock valley.[33] The watershed's bedrock comprises the Ordovician Georgian Bay Formation, characterized by shale with interbedded limestone layers dating to 505–438 million years ago, which provided a relatively soft substrate conducive to glacial and fluvial incision.[33] Post-glacial river downcutting deepened ravines through differential erosion of shale versus more resistant tills and limestones, with subglacial tunnel channels—1–4 kilometers wide and tens of meters deep—evidencing high-energy meltwater scour preserved in the stratigraphy.[33] Borehole records and seismic reflection surveys confirm linkages to Glacial Lake Iroquois, a proglacial precursor to Lake Ontario existing around 12,500 years ago, whose shorelines stood 40–60 meters above modern levels and deposited sandy-gravel veneers that influenced subsequent valley infilling and stabilization.[33] These data delineate a sequence of incision followed by sediment aggradation, reflecting isostatic rebound and base-level adjustments post-deglaciation.[33]Course and Watershed Extent
The Don River originates from headwaters on the Oak Ridges Moraine near Markham and Vaughan, Ontario, where its two primary branches—the East Don River and West Don River—form separately before converging to create the main stem approximately 7 kilometers north of Lake Ontario.[34] The West Don River begins north of the village of Maple in Vaughan, while the East Don River heads in Markham, with both branches draining southward through suburban and urban landscapes of the Greater Toronto Area.[34] From the confluence, the Don River flows southward as a single channel for about 31 kilometers, traversing ravine systems, urban corridors, and engineered sections to reach its mouth at the Keating Channel in Toronto's Port Lands.[1] The total length measures approximately 38 kilometers, with the lower reaches historically featuring natural meanders that were later straightened through channelization for flood control and development.[1] The watershed spans roughly 360 square kilometers (36,000 hectares), encompassing lands primarily in the City of Toronto, with extensions into Markham, Vaughan, and Richmond Hill.[1] Boundaries are delineated via GIS mapping by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, reflecting a highly urbanized extent where over 80% of the area consists of impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings, and infrastructure.[35] This urbanization gradient increases southward, from semi-rural headwaters to dense city fabric near the outlet.[35]Tributaries and Drainage Patterns
The Don River's primary tributaries are the East Don River and West Don River, which converge at the Forks of the Don near the intersection of Leslie Street and Finch Avenue in Toronto. The East Don River drains a sub-basin of approximately 151 km², encompassing urbanized areas south of the Oak Ridges Moraine and receiving inflows from German Mills Creek and Taylor-Massey Creek. The West Don River covers a sub-basin of about 123 km², regulated upstream by the G. Ross Lord Dam, and incorporates tributaries such as Wilket Creek and Burke Brook. Taylor-Massey Creek, with a sub-basin of 35 km², joins the system near the Forks, contributing additional flow from densely developed residential and institutional lands.[36][35]| Major Tributary | Sub-basin Area (km²) | Key Inflows or Features |
|---|---|---|
| East Don River | 151 | German Mills Creek, Taylor-Massey Creek; flows through ravine systems |
| West Don River | 123 | Wilket Creek, Burke Brook; impounded by G. Ross Lord Dam |
| Taylor-Massey Creek | 35 | Urban drainage; joins near Forks of the Don |
Hydrological Dynamics
Flow Regimes and Seasonal Variations
The Don River maintains a mean discharge of approximately 3.9 m³/s at the Todmorden gauging station (02HC024), based on historical records spanning 1962 to 2005 from the Water Survey of Canada, equivalent to an annual volume of about 124 million m³.[34] Flow regimes are dominated by flashy hydrographs, with baseflows constituting roughly 49% of total annual discharge and rapid rises during precipitation events due to the watershed's urbanization.[37] Seasonal peaks typically occur during spring snowmelt and late summer to autumn storms, with flows exceeding 100 m³/s in moderate events and reaching up to 255 m³/s in 100-year frequency storms at Todmorden, as derived from frequency analysis of gauged data.[35] Urban impervious cover, varying from 19% in upper subwatersheds to 43% in densely developed areas like Taylor-Massey Creek, amplifies this variability, shortening time-to-peak to 1-10 hours and elevating coefficients of variation compared to rural analogs.[34] Hydrological trends post-2000 reflect climate influences, including decreased spring flows and increased summer flows when comparing periods 1963-1972 to 2007-2016, aligned with regional declines in snowpack driven by warmer winters and reduced snowfall accumulation across southern Ontario.[35][38] These shifts, observed in updated intensity-duration-frequency curves from 1940-2017, indicate a 2-11% rise in rainfall intensities, further contributing to altered seasonal discharge patterns.[35]Flood Events and Mitigation Engineering
![Don River flood near Bayview Avenue during July 16, 2024, event][float-right] The Don River has experienced significant flooding throughout its history, with the most devastating event occurring during Hurricane Hazel on October 15, 1954, when remnants of the storm dumped approximately 210 mm of rain on the watersheds of the Don and Humber rivers in under 48 hours, leading to widespread inundation, 81 fatalities in the Toronto area, and extensive property damage.[39] This catastrophe prompted the establishment of conservation authorities, including the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (now Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, or TRCA), to coordinate floodplain management and prevent future losses.[40] In response, structural interventions included the construction of dams and channel modifications. The G. Ross Lord Dam, completed in 1973 on the West Don River near Dufferin Street and Finch Avenue, provides flood storage capacity of about 5.5 million cubic meters, protecting downstream areas like Hoggs Hollow by attenuating peak flows during storms.[41] The TRCA oversees additional flood control infrastructure in the Don watershed, including channels and dikes designed to convey higher discharges safely, which have collectively reduced the frequency of major floods compared to pre-1954 conditions.[40] More recent efforts focus on integrated flood protection and river restoration, exemplified by the $1.25 billion Port Lands Flood Protection Project, initiated in the late 1980s and advanced with tri-government funding in 2017, which creates a new naturalized mouth for the Don River while protecting over 1,200 hectares of waterfront lands from a 1-in-100-year flood event.[42] Milestones such as the flooding of the new river valley in February 2024 demonstrate progress, though the project's design does not fully mitigate extreme localized events like the July 16, 2024, deluge that caused the Don to overflow, stranding vehicles on the Don Valley Parkway and necessitating rescues.[43] Empirical assessments indicate these measures have lowered overall flood risk, with maintained reservoirs and channels preventing repeats of Hazel-scale disasters, but ongoing challenges include project delays and cost escalations; for instance, improvements to the Lower Don Trail, tied to flood-related infrastructure upgrades, faced repeated postponements from an initial summer 2024 reopening to at least August 2025 due to site complexities near rail corridors and the river.[44] Such overruns highlight tensions between ambitious naturalization goals and reliable flood conveyance, underscoring the need for rigorous cost-benefit evaluations in urban watershed engineering.[45]Ecological Profile
Native Flora and Fauna
Prior to European settlement, the Don River watershed was nearly entirely covered in forests and wetlands, providing diverse habitats shaped by the river's floodplain dynamics and seasonal flooding. Riparian zones along the river featured floodplain forests dominated by species such as American elm (Ulmus americana), butternut (Juglans cinerea), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), silver maple (Acer saccharinum), and [black walnut](/page/Juglans nigra) (Juglans nigra), which tolerated periodic inundation and contributed to bank stabilization and shading.[46][47] Upland areas included mixed deciduous-coniferous stands with sugar maple (Acer saccharinum), red oak (Quercus rubra), white pine (Pinus strobus), and white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), while wetlands supported species adapted to saturated soils, such as narrow-leaved cattail (Typha angustifolia) and bristly sedge (Carex comosa).[46] Aquatic habitats sustained migratory fish runs tied to the river's cool, gravel-bedded tributaries and spring-fed flows. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) migrated upstream for spawning, with historical records noting abundant populations in the late 18th century, including fine fishing reported in 1798 and the last documented catch in the Don in 1874.[31][48] Lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) spawned in the river prior to population declines beginning in the 1840s, while American eel (Anguilla rostrata) was historically abundant in connected waters.[48] Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) occupied headwater streams in the 1700s, favoring oxygenated, low-temperature conditions maintained by riparian cover.[49] Terrestrial fauna exploited the mosaic of riverine, forested, and wetland niches. North American beaver (Castor canadensis) inhabited wetlands and riparian areas, engineering dams that influenced local hydrology and created ponds for other species.[46] River otters (Lontra canadensis) and mink (Mustela vison) preyed on aquatic life in the river and its tributaries, with historical presence inferred from the ecosystem's productivity.[46] Birds such as wood duck (Aix sponsa), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), and wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina) utilized floodplain forests and wetlands for nesting and foraging, while bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were observed in early accounts from 1796.[46] Wetlands provided breeding grounds for amphibians including wood frog (Rana sylvatica), spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer), and gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor), which relied on ephemeral pools formed by seasonal flooding.[46]Biodiversity Recovery Post-Cleanup
Following reductions in industrial effluents and wastewater discharges since the 1970s, the Don River has experienced measurable recoveries in aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. Fish populations, which approached near-zero diversity in the 1960s due to severe oxygen depletion and toxicity, have rebounded to include over 20 species in recent monitoring efforts by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA).[49] Species such as rainbow trout (steelhead), stocked intermittently since 1992 in upper tributaries, have demonstrated spawning activity verified through electrofishing and observational surveys, indicating improved habitat suitability.[49] Avian and mammalian indicators further evidence this trend. Great blue heron sightings along the river and adjacent wetlands have increased, correlating with enhanced foraging opportunities from revived prey bases, as documented in urban wildlife counts.[29] White-tailed deer populations in the Don Valley have proliferated, with trail camera data revealing stable groups thriving amid reduced human disturbance and regenerating riparian vegetation, though exact quantification remains limited by urban monitoring challenges.[50] This recovery aligns more closely with the causal mechanism of deindustrialization—evidenced by factory closures along the watershed reducing direct pollutant inputs—than solely with regulatory mandates, as effluent declines preceded stringent enforcement in some sub-basins.[29] However, data gaps persist in disentangling these factors, with long-term studies noting confounding influences like invasive species introductions and ongoing urban stormwater runoff.[51] Comprehensive attribution requires further empirical analysis beyond current observational datasets.Environmental Challenges
Historical Pollution Mechanisms
Industrial effluents from tanneries, breweries, and abattoirs, established along the lower Don River from the early 19th century, introduced high loads of organic matter via direct discharges and rudimentary sewer systems, depleting dissolved oxygen through microbial decomposition and fostering anoxic zones. Tanneries such as William Smith's (opened 1820) released hides, tanning agents, and dyes into the waterway, while breweries including Helliwell's (early 1800s), Gooderham & Worts (1832, near the river mouth), and the Don Brewery (1834–1901) contributed fermentative wastes like spent grains, which elevated organic pollution and overwhelmed the river's assimilative capacity, particularly as urban sewage outfalls expanded in the 1880s. These pathways—primarily untreated point-source dumping—intensified in the 1920s with minimally processed municipal effluents, rendering sections of the river biologically inert during low-flow periods.[25][3] Clay mining in the Don Valley, exemplified by the Don Valley Brick Works (1889–1984), generated substantial sedimentation through soil disturbance and erosion of exposed deposits, burying riffles and infilling channels with fine particulates transported downstream during storms. Upstream activities, including deforestation for agriculture and urban expansion, compounded this by increasing overland runoff and suspended solids, with archival records noting channel aggradation by the 1890s that hindered flow and amplified effluent retention. Precise volumetric estimates remain elusive in period documentation, but the cumulative effect transformed the riverbed morphology, reducing habitat complexity and exacerbating pollutant persistence.[25] These mechanisms underpinned economic expansion in Toronto's early industrial era, as polluted river access supported manufacturing hubs employing hundreds—evidenced by 800 brewery workers' 1884 petition against restrictions—and funded projects like the Don Improvement Project (1886–1891, budgeted at $300,000–$450,000) for navigation and land reclamation. However, the deferred health burdens manifested in waterborne diseases, with Don Valley pollution vectors implicated in cholera epidemics of 1832 (273 deaths) and 1834 (over 500 deaths), alongside typhoid surges like 1891's outbreak (900 cases, 170 deaths), highlighting causal links between unchecked effluents and elevated mortality prior to filtration advancements.[25][3]Contemporary Contaminants like Microplastics
A 2025 University of Toronto study quantified the annual flux of microplastics from the Don River into Lake Ontario at over 500 billion particles, equivalent to 36,000 kg in mass, primarily consisting of fragments smaller than 5 mm.[52][53] These particles originate predominantly from urban non-industrial sources, including abrasion of vehicle tires generating road dust, fragmentation of single-use consumer plastics such as grocery bags and wet wipes, and inputs from stormwater and sewage overflows.[52] Unlike larger macroplastics (over 20,700 items totaling 160 kg annually), which often accumulate within the river valley, microplastics' small size enables greater mobility, allowing them to bypass natural traps and discharge directly into the lake.[53] Urban pathways exacerbate this influx, as stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces like roads and parking lots carries microplastics through dedicated storm sewers that discharge untreated into the Don River, circumventing wastewater treatment plants optimized for soluble pollutants and larger debris.[52] Peak transport occurs during rain events and snowmelt, when surface flows mobilize particulates from streets and construction sites, with road dust alone contributing via tire wear particles that dominate microplastic compositions in similar urban watersheds.[53] This contrasts with mid-20th-century industrial effluents, which emphasized point-source heavy metals and chemicals at higher localized concentrations but lacked the diffuse, persistent particulate load from contemporary vehicle-dependent consumerism and plastic packaging ubiquity.[52] Ecological disruptions from microplastics in the Don include impaired feeding, growth, and survival in aquatic species like fish and insects, potentially cascading to birds and mammals, though direct causation in field settings requires further validation beyond lab exposures.[53] For human health, while microplastic detections in tissues correlate with conditions like hypertension and inflammation in observational data, no robust causal mechanisms have been established, with 2025 reviews concluding that evidence remains associative rather than definitive, tempering alarmist interpretations absent controlled exposure proofs.[54][55] This underscores a shift from legacy factory emissions to ongoing urban lifestyle drivers, where mitigation hinges on source reduction like tire innovation or plastic bans rather than attributing persistence to outdated industrial relics.[52]Restoration Projects and Measured Outcomes
Restoration efforts on the Don River began in the late 1980s and 1990s with initiatives led by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and citizen advocacy groups, emphasizing bank stabilization, daylighting of urban streams, and removal of concrete channels to restore meandering patterns and riparian habitats.[56][57] These projects aimed to enhance hydrological connectivity and reduce erosion, with early outcomes including stabilized streambanks in segments like the Lower Don, where pre-restoration incision rates exceeded 1 meter per year in some areas, dropping post-intervention through bioengineering techniques such as live staking and root wad installations.[58] The flagship Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project, a $1.4 billion tri-government effort completed in 2025, diverted the Don River from the artificial Keating Channel into a newly excavated 1-kilometer naturalized valley, incorporating wetlands, marshes, and four new bridges to mitigate flooding.[42][59] This engineering reconfiguration protects approximately 230 hectares of previously flood-vulnerable land in the Port Lands, South Riverdale, and Leslieville from 1-in-100-year events, while creating 25 hectares of public greenspace including the Don Greenway with enhanced wetland capacity for sediment trapping and stormwater retention.[60][42] Project costs escalated from initial 2016 estimates of around $900 million due to site complexities and delays, prompting audits highlighting risks in delivery timelines.[61][62] Ecological metrics from TRCA assessments of Toronto waterfront restorations, including Don River embayments, indicate post-project improvements such as a 6.6-point rise in the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI), elevated piscivore biomass, and higher native fish biomass, reflecting enhanced nursery habitats for species like largemouth bass and yellow perch.[63] Shoreline availability for fish utilization increased by up to 115% in restored areas, supporting shifts toward warmwater communities with reduced common carp dominance.[63] Water quality enhancements, including dissolved oxygen levels sustained above critical thresholds for fish survival through reduced combined sewer overflows, complement these gains, though legacy contaminants persist.[64] Despite these advances, challenges remain, with invasive species like common carp and round goby comprising significant portions of fish biomass in some segments and ongoing bank erosion in unrestored upstream areas necessitating adaptive management.[63] Long-term monitoring post-2025 will quantify full wetland functionality and flood attenuation efficacy amid climate-driven variability.[65]Human Interactions
Economic Contributions Over Time
The Don River played a foundational role in Toronto's early economy through water-powered milling operations that harnessed its flow for processing timber and grain. Established in the 1790s, Todmorden Mills along the river produced lumber essential for construction in the nascent settlement of York, alongside flour from gristmills and later paper products, supporting local building and export needs amid rapid population growth from under 1,000 residents in 1800 to over 9,000 by 1834.[66] [19] Abundant clay deposits in the Don Valley further bolstered economic activity via the brick industry, which supplied materials for Toronto's 19th-century urban expansion. Operations like those of the Taylor family, active by the late 1800s, yielded up to 12 million bricks annually by century's end, while the Don Valley Brick Works—founded in 1889 and operating until 1985—emerged as one of Ontario's largest producers, manufacturing wire-cut, dry-press, and enamelled varieties that underpinned the city's red-brick architectural boom and infrastructure development.[67] [68] During the 20th century, the river's utility shifted toward accommodating industrial expansion as a low-cost waste sink, absorbing effluents from Toronto's manufacturing base—including tanneries, breweries, and steel plants—which minimized operational expenses for polluters and facilitated the city's growth into a major industrial hub, though this contributed to severe degradation without quantified direct economic offsets.[19] [3] Restoration initiatives under the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Don River Watershed Plan have repositioned the river as a provider of ecosystem services, particularly flood risk reduction that protects downstream economic infrastructure valued in billions across the watershed, with projects like the Port Lands Flood Protection enabling redevelopment of 475 acres of flood-vulnerable land into viable commercial and residential zones.[69] [70] Future economic potential remains tied to enhanced natural capital, including indirect revenue from sustained flood mitigation amid climate pressures, though viable hydropower generation is constrained by the river's scale and ecology, with no operational facilities or feasibility studies indicating significant output.Infrastructure Developments
The Don Valley Parkway, a controlled-access highway paralleling much of the Don River's course through ravines, was built in phases from 1958 to 1966, extending 15 kilometers from Toronto's waterfront northward and engineered for a capacity of 60,000 vehicles per day with multi-lane configuration and interchanges over the valley.[71] [72] Its first segment, from Bloor Street to Eglinton Avenue, opened on August 31, 1961, incorporating bridges such as those spanning the river's tributaries to support urban commuter traffic.[73] Rail infrastructure includes the Canadian Pacific Railway's East Don Trestle Bridge, a multi-span structure crossing the East Branch, and the skewed steel through plate girder Don River Canadian Pacific Railway Bridge from the 1920s, supported by stone piers to navigate the valley's contours for freight and passenger lines.[74] These crossings, alongside earlier developments like the 1910 Don Roadway along the valley's eastern edge, enabled industrial and transport access while altering riverbank alignments.[75] The Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant, commissioned in 1910 with primary and secondary treatment processes, diverts combined sanitary and stormwater flows from the Don River watershed and central Toronto, channeling approximately 818 million liters daily through interceptors to prevent untreated discharge into the river and harbor.[76] Ongoing Metrolinx GO Expansion and Ontario Line projects involve new rail viaducts and bridges over the Lower Don, including a permanent Lower Don Bridge and temporary trestle for construction access, with river channel restrictions from May 20, 2025, to September 15, 2027, at the West Don Crossing to facilitate elevated track installation and utility relocations.[77] [78] These enhancements aim to increase service frequency on the Stouffville and Lakeshore East lines, incorporating double-tracking and signaling upgrades adjacent to the river corridor.[79]Recreational and Cultural Uses
The Don River valley supports a variety of recreational activities, primarily through its extensive trail network utilized for hiking, cycling, walking, and mountain biking. The Don Valley contains approximately 183 kilometers of mountain biking trails, integrating with multi-use paths that facilitate pedestrian and cyclist access along the river corridor.[80] Specific segments, such as the 5-kilometer Lower Don Trail, provide paved routes from Pottery Road to Corktown Commons, accommodating both casual and fitness-oriented users.[81] Natural surface trails in areas like Crothers Woods extend about 10 kilometers, offering opportunities for off-road exploration amid forested habitats.[81] The Don River Valley Park, encompassing 200 hectares from Pottery Road to Corktown Common, enhances public access with trails linking urban neighborhoods to greenspaces and emphasizing non-motorized recreation.[82] Upon full opening in 2025, the park is anticipated to draw over 1 million visitors annually, underscoring its role in promoting outdoor engagement within Toronto's downtown.[83] Historical winter uses include curling on frozen river sections, reflecting seasonal adaptations to the waterway. Culturally, the valley inspires artistic and interpretive projects, such as the Mare Liberum collective's community mapping of the Lower Don from 2020 to 2022, which documents human-river interactions through collaborative art.[85] In the 2020s, portions of the park system adopted the name Wonscotonach Parklands, drawing from the anglicized Indigenous term for the river, to highlight its historical and ecological context in public spaces.[6] These elements contribute to the river's non-economic value as a site for reflection and community connection, though high usage necessitates ongoing maintenance to mitigate trail wear and occasional graffiti.[82]References
- ./assets/CurlingonDonRiver.jpg
