Hubbry Logo
Four Corners Generating StationFour Corners Generating StationMain
Open search
Four Corners Generating Station
Community hub
Four Corners Generating Station
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Four Corners Generating Station
Four Corners Generating Station
Four Corners Generating Station
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Four Corners Generating Station is a 1,540 megawatt coal-fired power plant located near Fruitland, New Mexico, on property located on the Navajo Nation that is leased from the Navajo Nation government.

Key Information

Description

[edit]
Four Corners Power Plant (by Morgan Lake) with Chaco River (left) San Juan River (right and background) confluence at Shiprock, New Mexico; aerial view looking west-northwest toward Four Corners.
Aerial view of the Navajo Mine, about 12 miles south, which supplies coal to the Four Corners Generating Station

The Four Corners Generating Station originally consisted of five generating units with a total rated generating capacity of about 2,040 megawatts. Units 1, 2, and 3 (permanently shut down in 2014 as part of a $182 million plan for Arizona Public Service Co. to meet environmental regulations)[3] had a combined generating capacity of 560 megawatts, while units 4 and 5 each have a generating capacity of 770 MW. Units 1, 2 and 3 opened in 1963–64 and units 4 and 5 opened in 1969–70.

The Arizona Public Service Company (APS) owned 100% of units 1, 2, and 3, while units 4 and 5 are operated by APS but owned jointly by APS and several other electric utilities. Originally, units 4 and 5 were owned by Southern California Edison Company (48%), APS (15%), Public Service Company of New Mexico (13%), Salt River Project (10%), Tucson Electric Power (7%), and El Paso Electric Company (7%). In 2013 Southern California Edison sold its 48% share to APS (and APS then immediately shut down units 1–3), and subsequently the El Paso Electric 7% share was acquired by Navajo Transitional Energy Company.

The station is cooled using water from Morgan Lake, which is man-made and is replenished by about 28 million gallons of water each day from the San Juan River. The plant burns sub-bituminous coal delivered from the nearby Navajo Coal Mine by the Navajo Mine Railroad.

The Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC) bought the mine from BHP, three mines in Montana and Wyoming, and 7% of Four Corners Generating Station. In 2020, Arizona Public Service announced plans to decommission the Four Corners Generating Station, leaving no prospect for the mine and the railroad.[4][5]

History

[edit]

The Four Corners Generating Station was constructed on property that was leased from the Navajo Nation in a renegotiated agreement that will expire in 2041.[6] Unit 1 and unit 2 were completed in 1963, unit 3 was completed in 1964, unit 4 was completed in 1969, and unit 5 was completed in 1970.

Apparently the astronauts of the Mercury program reported that they could see two human-constructed things from space: one was the Great Wall of China and the other was the "plume streaming from Four Corners Power Plant."[7]

In 1975, New Mexico enacted a tax on the generation of electricity and an in-state credit such that only electricity exported out-of-state was subject to the tax. Objections to this tax led to two United States Supreme Court cases. In Arizona v. New Mexico (1976), on a motion seeking to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the court initially decided not to be involved and denied the motion, leaving the matter to the state court.[8] The owners of Four Corners filed an action in state court to declare the tax invalid, leading to the United States Supreme Court decision Arizona Public Service Co. v. Snead (1979), which held that the tax violated the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.[9]

In November 2010, APS announced that it would purchase the SCE share of units 4 and 5, add air pollution control systems to these units, and shut down units 1, 2, and 3.[6] This transaction and shutdown were completed in 2013.[3] Following the shutdown of units 1 through 3, the capacity of Four Corners is 1,540 megawatts.

After a lawsuit by a coalition of environmental organizations, the plant owners and the plaintiffs reached a consent decree in 2015. According to the decree the plant will reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, pay $1.5 million in civil penalties and $6.7 million in healthcare and other mitigation costs for the people in the affected parts of the Navajo Nation. The lawsuit was based on pollution of Class I areas under the Clean Air Act in Grand Canyon National Park and 15 other areas of the National Park Service as well as hazardous conditions for health of neighbors of the plant.[10]

Decommissioning

[edit]

In January 2020, Arizona Public Service announced it would be decommissioning the Four Corners Generating Station by the end of 2031, seven years ahead of the originally scheduled closure date of 2038.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Four Corners Generating Station

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Four Corners Generating Station is a 1,540-megawatt coal-fired power plant located in , approximately 20 miles southwest of Farmington on land within the . Originally equipped with five generating units commissioned between 1963 and 1975, the facility retired Units 1 through 3 in 2013, retaining Units 4 and 5 to supply baseload electricity across the using coal from the adjacent Navajo Mine. Operated by Arizona Public Service Company on behalf of its co-owners—including the , Navajo Transitional Energy Company, Public Service Company of , and Tucson Electric Power Company—the plant has implemented emission control upgrades, such as systems, to comply with Clean Air Act requirements and reduce nitrogen oxides and outputs. It plays a vital economic role for the , employing more than 220 tribal members and contributing around $59 million annually through royalties, taxes, and other payments. Amid rising regional electricity demand driven by data centers and electrification, the station's operators announced in 2025 plans to extend operations beyond the previously scheduled 2031 retirement, potentially until 2038, to maintain grid reliability with its dispatchable capacity.

Location and Ownership

Site Characteristics and Navajo Lease

The Four Corners Generating Station occupies a site in San Juan County, northwestern , on the Indian Reservation, approximately 6 miles southwest of Fruitland and 20 miles west of Farmington, near . As a mine-mouth facility, it is situated adjacent to the Navajo Mine, with coal delivered via an on-site railroad for direct fueling of its coal-fired units. The plant's operations include an on-site for cooling water supply, supporting the steam cycle in its generating process. The site is held under lease agreements with the Navajo Nation dating to the facility's initial development, with the original lease established in 1960 to enable construction of the first generating units. This agreement was amended in 1966 to accommodate expansions and has undergone multiple extensions, including one in 2011 approved by the Navajo Nation Council. A key 25-year extension, endorsed via a Record of Decision by the U.S. Department of the Interior on July 17, 2015, extends the lease term to July 6, 2041, allowing continued operation of the remaining units and associated infrastructure while providing economic benefits to the tribe, such as annual revenue and employment. These leases cover the power plant, switchyards, and related facilities on approximately 15,000 acres of tribal land designated for energy development.

Ownership Structure and Stakeholders

The Four Corners Generating Station's ownership is shared among five utility entities, with Arizona Public Service (APS) holding the majority stake of 63% and serving as the plant's operator. Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) owns 13%, owns 10%, Tucson Electric Power (TEP) owns 7%, and the Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC), a tribally controlled entity owned by the and Southern Ute Indian Tribe, owns 7%. This structure emerged following the retirement of Units 1–3 in December 2013 and subsequent acquisitions, including NTEC's purchase of its share from a prior owner in July 2018. PNM's attempted transfer of its 13% stake to NTEC, proposed in 2020 with a planned completion by 2024, was denied by the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission in 2021 and upheld by the in July 2023, citing risks of prolonging coal operations without sufficient economic transition plans for affected communities. Key stakeholders include the , which leases the 3,000-acre site to the plant owners under a federal approval extended for 25 years in July 2015, running through approximately 2041 and directing lease revenues exceeding $200 million to tribal programs. NTEC plays a dual role as both a partial owner of Units 4 and 5 and the operator of the adjacent Navajo Mine, which supplies exclusively to the station under long-term contracts, employing over 400 workers, many , and contributing royalties to tribal . Other stakeholders encompass regulatory bodies such as the U.S. , which oversees lease approvals, and environmental groups advocating for emissions reductions, though tribal economic interests—emphasizing job retention for approximately 220 employees at the plant—often prioritize operational continuity amid rising southwestern power demands. As of August 2025, non-NTEC owners have signaled intentions to exit operational involvement by no later than 2031, potentially shifting greater responsibility to NTEC, though APS has delayed full retirement plans to 2038 in response to surging needs.

Technical Design and Operations

Generating Units and Capacity

The Four Corners Generating Station originally comprised five coal-fired generating units with a total of approximately 2,100 MW. Units 1, 2, and 3, which collectively provided about 560 MW of net summer capacity, were decommissioned on December 30, 2013, reducing the plant's output to serve reliability and economic considerations amid environmental compliance costs. The remaining Units 4 and 5 each have a of 770 MW, yielding a combined operational capacity of 1,540 MW as of 2025. These units continue to operate, with recent assessments extending their expected beyond initial 2031 retirement plans due to regional energy demand pressures.
UnitNameplate Capacity (MW)Status (as of 2025)Notes
1~200 (part of 633 MW for Units 1-3)Decommissioned (2013)Smaller original units; combined net summer capacity ~560 MW for Units 1-3.
2~200 (part of 633 MW for Units 1-3)Decommissioned (2013)Smaller original units; combined net summer capacity ~560 MW for Units 1-3.
3~233 (part of 633 MW for Units 1-3)Decommissioned (2013)Smaller original units; combined net summer capacity ~560 MW for Units 1-3.
4770OperatingLarger units with steam turbines; supports baseload power for southwestern U.S. grid.
5770OperatingLarger units with steam turbines; supports baseload power for southwestern U.S. grid.
Units 4 and 5 utilize subcritical steam cycles with coal from adjacent Navajo Mine, delivering dispatchable power primarily to utilities in , , and surrounding states via high-voltage transmission lines. Net generating capacity for these units is estimated at around 1,500–1,636 MW depending on operational conditions and ratings.

Fuel Supply and Power Generation Process

The Four Corners Generating Station relies on as its primary fuel, sourced exclusively from the adjacent Navajo Mine owned and operated by the Transitional Energy Company (NTEC). This surface mine produces low-sulfur thermal with a heating value of 8,950 Btu per pound, optimized for baseload power generation. Coal is transported approximately 22.2 kilometers from the Navajo Mine to the plant via a dedicated electrified railroad, ensuring a reliable and efficient directly to the facility's storage yards and handling systems. Upon arrival, the is crushed, stockpiled, and fed into pulverizers that grind it into fine powder to facilitate complete . In the power generation process, pulverized coal is burned in the furnaces of the plant's two operating units (Units 4 and 5), each equipped with a coal-fired that heats water to produce high-pressure . This steam expands through tandem steam —typically comprising high-pressure, intermediate-pressure, and low-pressure sections—driving synchronous generators to produce at 1,540 megawatts total capacity. The operate on the , where steam condenses back to water in surface condensers after passing through the turbine, and is recirculated via feedwater pumps to the for reheating, minimizing water loss and maximizing efficiency. Generated power is stepped up via transformers and transmitted over high-voltage lines to the grid, serving utilities across , , and surrounding states. The process incorporates electrostatic precipitators for ash capture and units for sulfur control, integral to the exhaust handling before stack release.

Historical Development

Construction and Initial Operations (1960s–1970s)

The Generating Station, located approximately 15 miles west of , on land, began construction in the early as a coal-fired power facility developed by Arizona Public Service (APS). APS initiated the project to meet growing electricity demand in the Southwest, constructing Units 1, 2, and 3 with each unit rated at approximately 175 MW capacity. Construction of these initial units progressed rapidly, with Units 1 and 2 entering commercial operation in 1963 and Unit 3 following in 1964. The plant utilized steam turbines powered by coal from the adjacent Navajo Mine, marking one of the largest undertakings for APS at the time. In the late 1960s, APS partnered with and three other utilities to expand the facility with larger Units 4 and 5, each boasting around 570 MW capacity, to further bolster regional power supply. Construction on these units commenced amid increasing energy needs driven by post-war and population expansion in the . Unit 4 achieved commercial operation in 1969, followed by Unit 5 in 1970, effectively doubling the plant's total capacity to over 2,000 MW. Initial operations relied on low-sulfur transported via dedicated rail from the Navajo Mine, with the plant's design emphasizing reliability for baseload power generation serving multiple states including , , and . Early operations in the and focused on optimizing efficiency and output, though the facility faced nascent environmental scrutiny due to visible emissions from its tall stacks, which at the time lacked advanced controls mandated by later regulations. The plant's location on tribal land was secured through a lease agreement with the , providing economic benefits such as royalties and employment while establishing a long-term energy infrastructure hub in the region. By the end of the decade, the fully operational station had become a cornerstone of the Southwest's power grid, demonstrating the era's emphasis on large-scale coal-fired generation for affordable, dispatchable electricity.

Expansions and Modernizations (1980s–2000s)

In the mid-1980s, the Four Corners Generating Station retrofitted its generating units with (FGD) to reduce (SO₂) emissions, aligning with emerging federal requirements under the Clean Air Act for controlling precursors. These wet limestone were installed across the plant's units, achieving SO₂ removal efficiencies of approximately 90%, though initial designs focused on units 1 through 3 for particulate and partial SO₂ control upgrades from earlier experimental systems. The modifications, including major alterations in 1985 and 1986, enhanced operational reliability but later drew scrutiny for inadequate permitting under New Source Review provisions, as the plant's high-sulfur coal from the adjacent Navajo Mine necessitated such retrofits to maintain compliance amid tightening air quality standards. During the 1990s, further modernizations included upgrades to the existing FGD systems to improve SO₂ capture efficiency and the addition of particulate collection systems, reducing fly ash emissions to meet particulate matter limits under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. These enhancements, negotiated with the Environmental Protection Agency prior to formal federal implementation plans in 1999, involved optimizing performance rather than full replacements, reflecting cost-effective incremental improvements for the aging built in the and . No significant capacity expansions occurred, as the plant's total output remained anchored at around 2,040 MW gross from its five units, with modernizations prioritizing emission reductions over output increases to avoid triggering stricter permitting thresholds. Into the early 2000s, the station implemented low- burner technologies and overfire air systems on select units to curb nitrogen oxide () emissions, responding to regional haze concerns in the airshed and precursor requirements for the Clean Air Interstate Rule. These upgrades, completed by operators including Arizona Public Service, extended unit lifespans while addressing visibility impairment in nearby national parks, though full (SCR) systems were deferred until later decades due to high estimated in the hundreds of millions. Overall, these efforts balanced regulatory compliance with economic viability for stakeholders, who derived substantial lease revenues from the facility despite ongoing debates over environmental trade-offs.

Partial Decommissioning (2010s)

In late 2013, the operators of the Four Corners Generating Station elected to permanently retire Units 1, 2, and 3 rather than retrofit them with costly pollution controls mandated under federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. These units, the plant's oldest and originally commissioned between 1963 and 1966 with a combined of approximately 660 megawatts, were deemed uneconomical to upgrade for compliance with the EPA's Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements under the Clean Air Act's regional haze rules, which aimed to improve visibility in national parks and wilderness areas by reducing , nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter emissions. The shutdown occurred on December 30, 2013, executed by Arizona Public Service (APS), the plant's managing operator and majority owner at the time. This partial decommissioning reduced the station's total generating capacity from about 2,200 megawatts to 1,540 megawatts, as Units 4 and 5—newer installations from the 1969–1970 expansion—remained operational after receiving systems and other upgrades to meet the same EPA standards. The decision followed a multi-year regulatory process, including a 2010 with the EPA and environmental groups that outlined emission limits and retrofit deadlines, culminating in the owners' assessment that retirement was more cost-effective than investments estimated at hundreds of millions for , low-nitrogen oxide burners, and fabric filters on the aging units. Post-retirement, the plant shifted to a two-unit configuration, with fuel supply from the adjacent Navajo Mine adjusted accordingly to sustain power output for utilities in , , and other states. While the move addressed federal air quality mandates, it prompted scrutiny over compliance costs versus operational viability, as the EPA's determinations had been challenged in court for potentially overestimating retrofit feasibility on older facilities without fully accounting for economic factors like declining prices and rising natural gas competition. The , as lessor of the site, received adjusted lease revenues reflecting the reduced capacity, though Units 4 and 5 continued to provide economic benefits through royalties and .

Environmental Regulations and Emissions

Key Federal and Tribal Regulations

The Four Corners Generating Station is subject to federal oversight under the Clean Air Act (CAA), primarily through a source-specific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2010 and revised thereafter, addressing visibility impairment in Class I areas like the Grand Canyon due to (SO2) and particulate matter emissions. This FIP implements Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements for Units 4 and 5, mandating dry systems to achieve at least 90% SO2 removal efficiency and upgrades to existing controls for (). The regulations apply because the Navajo Nation lacks an approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) equivalent, necessitating federal intervention under the Tribal Authority Rule to prevent regulatory gaps on tribal lands. A 2015 consent decree, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the District of , resolved litigation by environmental groups and required the plant's owners—utilities including Public Service and Public Service Company of —to install or upgrade (SCR) systems on Units 4 and 5 for control by 2018, achieving up to 90% reduction, alongside $6.7 million in projects and civil penalties exceeding $3 million. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits under the CAA have governed major modifications, such as the 2014 approval for SCR installations on Units 4 and 5, which triggered reviews for sulfuric acid mist emissions but confirmed compliance with ambient air quality increments. Additionally, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, reissued by EPA in 2021 as NN0000019, regulates wastewater discharges into the San Juan River, incorporating federal standards and technology-based effluent limits for parameters like and , while considering but not deferring to less stringent tribal criteria. Tribal regulations stem from the plant's location on lands under a lease originally granted in the late 1950s and extended for 25 years via a 2015 Record of Decision by the , ensuring continued operations through 2040 while requiring environmental compliance consultations with tribal authorities. The Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) enforces air quality standards aligned with federal CAA limits where possible, but lacks full primacy, leading to EPA's FIP dominance; for instance, NNEPA coordinates on monitoring but cannot supersede federal BART mandates. The 's 2013 Energy Policy acknowledges the plant's role in tribal revenue from leases and royalties—estimated at tens of millions annually—but subordinates to federal frameworks, reflecting sovereignty limits in implementing enforceable emission caps without EPA delegation. This hybrid structure has drawn critiques for federal overreach into tribal affairs, though empirical compliance data from post-2015 upgrades show NOx emissions reduced by over 80% from baseline levels.

Emission Reduction Technologies and Compliance

The Four Corners Generating Station (FCPP) employs multiple pollution control technologies on its operating Units 4 and 5 to mitigate emissions of (SO₂), oxides (), particulate matter (PM), and other pollutants. (FGD) scrubbers, retrofitted on these units, remove over 90% of SO₂ emissions by injecting slurry to capture compounds in the stream. (SCR) systems, upgraded in 2019, use injection over a catalyst to convert into and , achieving reduction rates exceeding 90% under optimal conditions. Baghouses, fabric filter systems, capture PM by trapping ash and particulates, with ongoing requirements for their maintenance to ensure efficiency above 99%. These technologies were installed or enhanced primarily in response to regional and Clean Air Act mandates, following the 2014 decommissioning of Units 1–3, which itself eliminated over 90% of the plant's pre-retrofit output. Compliance with federal regulations is governed by a 2015 Clean Air Act settlement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Justice, and plant owners, including Arizona Public Service (APS) and affiliates. This agreement mandates continuous SCR operation to limit emissions to 0.098 pounds per million British thermal units (lb/MMBtu), alongside Best Available Retrofit Technology () determinations for regional haze under the Clean Air Act. The settlement also requires proper operation of existing baghouses on Units 4 and 5 to control PM and prohibits operational changes that could increase emissions without permits. A source-specific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under 40 CFR § 49.5512 enforces these limits on the , integrating tribal sovereignty with national standards while allowing EPA oversight due to limited tribal regulatory capacity. Additional compliance measures address mercury and air toxics under the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), with FGD and baghouses contributing to reductions, though injection has been evaluated for further mercury capture. The plant reports emissions data annually under EPA's Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 98) and maintains National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for wastewater from and cooling systems. Post-2015 upgrades have reduced emissions from approximately 45,000 tons per year plant-wide to around 9,000 tons, demonstrating the efficacy of SCR retrofits in meeting thresholds without full unit shutdowns. Independent audits and continuous emissions monitoring systems ensure adherence, with penalties for exceedances outlined in consent decrees. As of 2025, no major violations have been reported since the settlement, though ongoing DOE-funded studies explore carbon capture as a potential future enhancement, not yet required for compliance.

Measured Environmental Impacts

The Four Corners Generating Station, operating Units 4 and 5 since the 2013–2014 decommissioning of Units 1–3, has seen substantial reductions in criteria pollutant emissions following installation of advanced controls including for and for SO2. In 2024, measured emissions totaled 1,688 short tons of SO2 and approximately 9.1 million short tons of CO2, reflecting operational output of over 9 million MWh while achieving rates compliant with federal limits under the Clean Air Act's regional haze and requirements. emissions have similarly declined post-2018 retrofits, with plant-wide controls limiting outputs to under 10,000 tons annually, verified through continuous emissions monitoring systems reported to the EPA. Particulate matter emissions are controlled via electrostatic precipitators and baghouses, maintaining levels below tightened SO2 and PM regulatory caps established in 2018. Groundwater monitoring at the site's coal ash storage areas, comprising 42 wells, has detected contaminants exceeding federal advisory levels in all sampled locations, including arsenic, selenium, and lithium from legacy ash ponds closed by April 2021. A required Seepage Monitoring and Management Plan tracks parameters such as boron, mercury, nickel, selenium, uranium, zinc, and total dissolved solids within 650 meters downgradient, with industry-submitted data indicating persistent leaching despite pond closures and no reported exceedances of maximum contaminant levels in downgradient aquifers as of 2022 assessments. These findings align with national analyses of coal ash sites, where 91% show similar groundwater impacts, though site-specific remediation under EPA's Coal Combustion Residuals Rule has not triggered unlined pond retrofits at Four Corners due to tribal jurisdiction nuances. Wastewater discharges under NPDES Permit NN0000019, averaging 4.2 million gallons per day from cooling and process , have shown no violations in discharge monitoring reports from March 2017 to March 2019, with parameters like maintained at 6.0–9.0, below 100 mg/L daily maxima, and oil/grease under 20 mg/L. Priority pollutant scans confirm most effluents below detection limits, and testing for outfalls has not indicated acute impacts on San Juan River biota, though and mercury are monitored quarterly due to ash-related risks. validations from 2012, prior to full controls, measured plume enhancements of 3–10 ppm CO2, 1–3 Dobson Units NO2, and SO2/CO2 ratios of 3.0 × 10^{-4}, corroborating post-retrofit emission models that attribute over 90% of local enhancements to the plant.

Economic and Energy Security Contributions

Revenue and Employment for

The Four Corners Generating Station employs more than 220 residents of the , providing stable, high-wage jobs in operations, maintenance, and support roles that bolster local household incomes and community infrastructure. When integrated with the Navajo Mine, which exclusively supplies to the station, the facilities collectively support over 500 positions held by Navajo tribal members, representing a significant portion of skilled labor opportunities in the region. These employment figures exclude indirect jobs in supply chains and services, which amplify the total economic multiplier effect. The station generates substantial revenue for the through lease payments, property taxes, and related fees tied to its operation on tribal land, with a 25-year site lease extension approved by the U.S. Department of the Interior in 2023 to sustain these inflows. Combined with coal royalties from the Navajo Mine, annual contributions from the power plant and mine exceed $72.7 million to the 's General Fund, accounting for more than 35% of the tribe's and enabling funding for education, health services, and infrastructure. In 2024, Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC) operations linked to these assets delivered over $128 million in total economic impact, including nearly $47 million in direct taxes and royalties paid to the tribal government in the prior year. This revenue stream, derived from dispatchable baseload power generation, has historically comprised a critical buffer against volatile tribal income sources, with plant-specific contributions estimated at $59 million annually to the broader economy prior to recent optimizations. Preservation of these benefits remains a priority amid decommissioning pressures, as abrupt closure risks annual economic losses exceeding $183 million and over 600 jobs. officials, including NTEC CEO Vern , emphasize that such operations underpin tribal sovereignty and self-determination by funding essential public services without reliance on federal transfers.

Role in Regional Power Reliability

The Four Corners Generating Station, with its two operating units providing approximately 1,636 megawatts of capacity, serves as a critical baseload power source in the , delivering dispatchable electricity to utilities in , , and surrounding states during periods of high demand. Unlike intermittent renewable sources, the plant's coal-fired units enable continuous operation, contributing to grid stability by maintaining frequency control and voltage support essential for preventing blackouts in the Southwest's variable load environment. This reliability is particularly vital at the trading hub, where transmission lines connect to , , , and , facilitating power flows that mitigate congestion and support regional balancing. During peak summer demand events, such as extreme , the station has historically supplied affordable power to meet evening load spikes, helping utilities like Arizona Public Service avoid capacity shortfalls that could lead to rolling outages. Its ability to ramp up quickly and operate around the clock addresses the limitations of solar and generation, which diminish output during non-daylight hours or low-wind conditions, thereby enhancing overall system and reserve margins in the region. As the largest generating facility in by capacity and output, it underpins for industrial, residential, and emerging loads like data centers amid rising electricity needs projected to strain the grid. Recent surges in power demand, driven by and technology growth, have prompted evaluations to extend operations beyond the planned 2031 , underscoring the plant's ongoing necessity for reliability amid a potential crunch in dispatchable capacity. Owners, including Transitional Energy Company, emphasize its role in providing stable baseload power that renewables alone cannot yet fully replace without significant storage advancements, preserving grid resilience against weather-dependent variability and vulnerabilities in alternative fuels. Empirical data from integrated plans highlight that premature decommissioning could exacerbate reserve shortages, as evidenced by 2024-2025 assessments showing insufficient replacement capacity to maintain adequacy standards.

Cost-Effectiveness Compared to Alternatives

The operational economics of the Four Corners Generating Station, an existing coal-fired facility with sunk capital costs, are primarily evaluated through its marginal cost of electricity (MCOE)—encompassing fuel, operations, maintenance, and compliance expenses—rather than full levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) applicable to new builds. Between 2012 and 2017, production costs at the plant nearly doubled, driven by environmental retrofits and regulatory compliance, exceeding wholesale market prices at the Palo Verde Hub since 2011. However, as a baseload provider with high dispatchable capacity (over 1,500 MW), its MCOE remains lower than the effective system costs of intermittent alternatives when accounting for reliability needs in the Southwest grid, where solar and wind require storage or backup to match firm power output. Comparisons to natural gas combined-cycle plants show ' operating costs competitive for sustained baseload generation, particularly amid low regional gas prices but rising demands; new gas facilities have unsubsidized LCOE estimates of $40–60 per MWh in recent analyses, excluding transmission upgrades often needed for remote gas sourcing. Renewable power purchase agreements (PPAs) for solar and in the region averaged $24–35 per MWh in 2016–2018, appearing cheaper on a LCOE basis (often below $30/MWh unsubsidized for utility-scale solar per EIA 2023 data), but these exclude capacity credits below 20–30% and integration costs for , which can add 50–100% to effective levelized avoided costs in high-penetration scenarios. Critics, including analyses from groups advocating phaseouts, project cumulative customer excess costs exceeding $2.3 billion from 2020–2027 relative to market alternatives, attributing this to the plant's aging and declining utilization (down due to gas and renewable competition). By 2025, surging regional electricity demand from data centers and —potentially rising 45% in under a decade—has prompted reassessments, with operators indicating that extending operations beyond the planned 2031 retirement could avert reliability shortfalls and higher replacement costs for firm capacity, as new renewables-plus-storage bundles exceed $80–100/MWh equivalent in dispatchable terms. The plant's proximity to on-site Navajo Mine coal reduces fuel transport expenses (estimated at under $2/MWh), enhancing viability versus distant gas or imported renewables requiring grid expansions. Empirical grid studies underscore that while raw LCOE favors unsubsidized renewables for marginal additions, full-system dispatch in arid, peak-demand regions like the area favor retaining existing coal for cost stability, with projected Navajo Nation contributions of $59 million annually underscoring localized economic offsets against broader transition expenses.

Controversies and Debates

Environmental Advocacy Claims vs. Empirical Data

Environmental advocacy groups, such as and the , have long claimed that the Four Corners Generating Station contributes to severe , including high levels of (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), particulate matter, and mercury, leading to respiratory illnesses, cancer risks, and in surrounding communities and national parks. These assertions often emphasize the plant's historical status as one of the largest point-source emitters in the U.S., with pre-control annual SO₂ emissions exceeding 100,000 tons and NOₓ around 40,000 tons, attributing elevated and other health issues directly to stack emissions without distinguishing ambient sources. Empirical data from post-retrofit monitoring, however, indicates substantial emission reductions following the installation of (FGD) scrubbers on Units 4 and 5 in 2012, achieving over 90% SO₂ removal efficiency, and (SCR) systems upgraded in 2019 for NOₓ control, resulting in combined SO₂ and NOₓ cuts exceeding 2 million tons each from settlement baselines. filters have similarly reduced particulate matter by capturing over 99% of fly ash. The of Units 1-3 in 2014 further halved the plant's capacity and emissions profile, with remaining operations compliant under Clean Air Act permits and no reported exceedances in recent discharge monitoring reports. Health impact studies near , reveal higher rates among residents, including prevalence up to 20% in some households, but attribute these primarily to indoor combustion for heating rather than ambient from the plant, as adjusted models show no significant with proximity to stacks after controlling for household fuel use. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm anecdotal reports of breathing difficulties exist but lack published causal evidence linking them directly to emissions post-controls, contrasting advocacy narratives that amplify unverified community complaints. Air quality data from the Four Corners Air Quality Network, operational since 1976, demonstrate improvements in regional SO₂ and PM levels following retrofits, with current monitors in , reporting attainment of for criteria pollutants, though ozone precursors from NOₓ persist as a regional challenge influenced by multiple sources including oil and gas operations. validations, such as satellite observations in 2014, verified stack plumes but aligned with permitted levels after controls, underscoring that advocacy claims often overlook verified compliance and per-MWh emission rates now comparable to or below many plants when normalized for output. While cumulative historical deposition affects soil and water mercury, ongoing remediation under tribal and federal oversight has not substantiated claims of acute ongoing toxicity driving local health crises.

Socioeconomic Trade-offs and Navajo Sovereignty

The Four Corners Generating Station and its supplying Navajo Mine represent a cornerstone of economic activity for the , generating substantial revenue and employment that underpin tribal self-sufficiency. Operations contribute approximately 35% of the 's general fund through annual taxes and royalties, totaling around $183 million, with direct payments of nearly $47 million in 2023 alone and a broader economic impact exceeding $114 million that year. The Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC), which owns and operates the mine, sustains 587 jobs as of 2025, with 87% held by workers, providing high-wage opportunities in a marked by chronic and few comparable industrial alternatives. These inflows support essential tribal services, including infrastructure and social programs, amid a fiscal landscape where extractive industries have historically driven household income and tax base growth. Yet these gains entail trade-offs, as combustion and activities impose localized environmental burdens, including air emissions historically linked to elevated respiratory conditions among nearby communities. Federal data and tribal reports indicate that while emission controls have reduced pollutants by over 95% at the plant since upgrades, residual impacts persist, prompting debates over long-term health costs versus immediate economic imperatives. Closure scenarios, as seen in prior mine contractions, have triggered revenue shortfalls and job losses—exacerbating rates exceeding 40% on the reservation—without verifiable evidence of equivalent substitution from intermittent renewables, which lack the dispatchable reliability of coal-fired baseload power. has argued that such trade-offs reflect causal trade-offs inherent to resource-dependent economies, where premature phase-outs risk fiscal collapse absent diversified revenue streams. Navajo sovereignty manifests in the tribe's control over land leases and resource decisions, exemplified by NTEC's acquisition of the Navajo Mine in 2014 and extensions of the plant's site lease through 2041, enabling autonomous economic strategy amid federal regulatory pressures. This autonomy underscores tensions with national energy policies favoring rapid decarbonization, which tribal officials contend overlook sovereign rights to prioritize verifiable socioeconomic stability over speculative climate benefits, particularly as surging regional power demands have revived discussions of extending operations beyond the planned 2031 retirement. Empirical reliance on coal revenue—$59 million annually from the plant alone—reinforces the Navajo Nation's assertion of self-determination, balancing internal governance with external mandates that have historically undervalued tribal input on development trajectories.

Regulatory Overreach and Energy Policy Critiques

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) enforcement of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements under the Clean Air Act's regional haze rules compelled the retirement of Units 1, 2, and 3 at the Four Corners Generating Station on December 30, 2013, reducing the plant's capacity from 2,100 MW to approximately 1,615 MW from the remaining Units 4 and 5. Owners, including Arizona Public Service (APS), opted for shutdown rather than incurring estimated compliance costs of up to $1 billion for selective catalytic reduction and other pollution controls to meet nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide limits, which APS described as "prohibitively expensive." Critics, including utility stakeholders, contend this federal implementation plan (FIP)—imposed after the Navajo Nation failed to submit a state implementation plan—represented regulatory overreach by prioritizing visibility improvements in national parks over verifiable cost-benefit analyses, with marginal air quality gains failing to justify the economic disruption to tribal revenues and regional power supply. Subsequent EPA settlements, such as the 2015 Clean Air Act agreement mandating $160 million in upgrades for and controls, have drawn accusations of coercive tactics that exacerbate operational burdens without adequate deference to tribal on Navajo lands. Industry analyses highlight how such mandates under the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and regional haze provisions accelerate premature coal plant retirements, disregarding the plants' dispatchable baseload role essential for grid stability amid rising demand from and data centers. For instance, federal policies forcing these closures have been linked to projected capacity shortfalls that could increase blackout risks by orders of magnitude, as retiring reliable fossil generation outpaces intermittent renewable additions. Energy policy critiques extend to the broader framework incentivizing phase-outs, which overlook causal links between regulatory stringency and heightened prices—up 20-50% in coal-dependent regions post-retirements—while undermining economic self-determination through lost royalties and jobs estimated at hundreds annually per unit. Congressional reports argue that EPA rules, often developed with limited empirical scrutiny of grid impacts, constitute overreach by substituting agency preferences for market-driven transitions, as evidenced by rebukes of similar EPA authority expansions. stakeholders have echoed these concerns, with some leaders favoring persistence for revenue stability over federally driven decarbonization timelines that ignore localized needs. Recent delays in the plant's 2031 retirement underscore how surging load growth exposes the folly of policies that deprioritize firm capacity, potentially necessitating emergency interventions to avert reliability crises.

Recent Developments and Outlook

Post-2020 Operational Changes

In 2021, Arizona Public Service (APS), the plant's operator, announced plans to implement seasonal operations for one of the two remaining units (Units 4 and 5, each rated at 770 MW) starting in fall 2023, limiting runtime to June through October while the other unit continued year-round dispatch. This adjustment aimed to curtail annual carbon emissions by 20-25% and reduce fuel and maintenance costs amid declining coal demand, without compromising grid reliability during peak summer periods. The plan followed an agreement among owners, including APS (63% stake), Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC, increasing to majority influence through prior acquisitions), (10%), and Tucson Electric Power (7% after transfers). New Mexico regulators rejected Public Service Company of New Mexico's (PNM) bid to divest its 13% share in December 2021, citing risks to ratepayers and reliability, thereby stabilizing ownership and precluding immediate capacity reductions from partial shutdowns. Concurrently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extended and updated the plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit in 2021, imposing stricter wastewater discharge limits for and other contaminants from ash ponds and cooling systems, necessitating operational tweaks such as enhanced treatment processes to comply with standards. By 2023-2024, surging regional electricity demand—driven by data centers, , and industrial growth—prompted owners to reassess the seasonal model, with APS indicating potential retention of fuller dispatch to meet up to 45% projected load increases by 2030, effectively prioritizing baseload capacity over prior emission-reduction targets. In September 2024, NTEC secured U.S. Department of Energy funding to evaluate carbon capture retrofits for Units 4 and 5, signaling exploratory operational enhancements to extend viability beyond the 2031 lease end while addressing air quality mandates. These adaptations reflect empirical responses to grid constraints, with the plant's net capacity held at approximately 1,540 MW despite historical declines in average capacity factors from market and regulatory pressures.

Debates on 2031 Retirement Extension

The Generating Station, a 1,636 MW -fired facility operational since 1966, was originally slated for retirement by 2031 as part of owners' commitments to phase out generation. In August 2025, Public Service (APS), the majority owner, announced plans to delay this retirement until no later than 2038, citing surging regional power demand driven by , data centers, and industrial growth that has strained grid reliability. This shift reflects broader challenges where planned retirements conflict with empirical needs for baseload capacity, as intermittent renewables alone cannot guarantee supply during peak loads or adverse weather. Proponents of the extension emphasize energy security and economic imperatives for the Navajo Nation, which derives over 35% of its annual revenue—exceeding $59 million—from the plant and adjacent Navajo Mine, alongside sustaining more than 200 direct jobs. The Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC) supports prolonging operations through initiatives like the NavEnergy Hub, which aims to integrate carbon capture to reduce emissions while preserving sovereignty over tribal resources. A September 2024 U.S. Department of Energy grant of $6.55 million to NTEC funds feasibility studies for post-combustion carbon capture using amine-based technology, potentially capturing CO2 from flue gas to enable continued viability beyond 2031 without full retirement. Advocates argue that abrupt closure risks blackouts and higher costs, as alternatives like solar and wind require massive storage investments that remain underdeveloped, with coal's dispatchable nature proven essential for grid stability. Opponents, including environmental groups like the and Tó Nizhóní Ání, contend that extending operations exacerbates air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the aging plant, advocating instead for accelerated transition to renewables despite reliability gaps. These critics highlight potential health impacts on nearby communities and question the feasibility of carbon capture, citing high costs and unproven scalability at , though empirical data shows such technologies have captured millions of tons of CO2 at similar facilities without halting operations. Some proposals involve partial conversion to , but tribal stakeholders prioritize full extension with mitigation over rushed shutdowns that could undermine economic self-determination. As of October 2025, no final regulatory approval for extension has been secured, leaving debates centered on balancing verifiable demand pressures against long-term decarbonization goals.

Potential Carbon Capture and Transition Options

The Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC), a partial owner of the Four Corners Generating Station, received a $6.55 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy in September 2024 to conduct a and design study for retrofitting carbon capture technology at the plant. This initiative targets the installation of post-combustion carbon capture systems capable of removing over 95% of CO2 emissions from the plant's , potentially positioning it among the lowest-emitting facilities in the U.S. if implemented. NTEC asserts that such retrofitting could preserve more than 600 jobs and avert an estimated $183 million in annual economic losses for the upon the plant's potential 2031 retirement. Complementing the capture efforts, the DOE is supporting the Four Corners Carbon Storage Hub project under its CarbonSAFE initiative, which seeks to characterize geologic formations in the region for permanent CO2 sequestration. The hub aims to develop for storing at least 50 million metric tons of CO2 over the project's lifetime, leveraging saline aquifers and other formations near the plant to enable Class VI well permitting and injection operations. Feasibility hinges on site-specific assessments of storage capacity, injectivity, and containment integrity, with preliminary data indicating viable options within a 50-mile of the facility. However, commercial deployment would require resolving technical challenges such as the 20-30% energy penalty from capture processes, which reduces net output and increases operational costs absent substantial federal incentives like 45Q tax credits. Transition alternatives beyond carbon capture include operational extensions to address regional power reliability amid surging demand from data centers and electrification. Originally slated for full retirement by 2031 under prior agreements, the plant's 1,540 MW capacity—critical for the Southwest grid—prompted owners like Arizona Public Service to evaluate prolonging coal-fired operations potentially to 2038, preserving over 200 direct jobs and supporting Navajo mineral revenues. Other options, such as partial conversion to natural gas or integration with renewables, have been discussed but lack firm commitments, as coal's dispatchable baseload remains unmatched for peak reliability without equivalent storage scale-up. Full decommissioning risks exacerbating transmission constraints in the Four Corners region, where coal units provide inertia and voltage support unavailable from intermittent sources. NTEC emphasizes that any transition must prioritize empirical grid stability data over accelerated phase-outs, given historical blackouts linked to premature retirements elsewhere.

References

  1. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/documents/nn0000019-aps-four-corners-factsheet-2021-02-17.pdf
  2. https://navenergy.com/four-corners-power-plant/
  3. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/four-corners-power-plant-clean-air-act-settlement
  4. https://www.gem.wiki/Four_Corners_Steam_Plant
  5. https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/environment/info/mha/fourcorners/images/FourCorners_Sept2011web.pdf
  6. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/7286/000076462218000052/exhibit1074c-063018.htm
  7. https://www.sundt.com/projects/aps-four-corners-generating-station/
  8. https://www.nhonews.com/features/navajo-council-approves-aps-four-corners-lease-extension/article_a4f904ae-704c-5b78-a202-3b35f8058e88.html
  9. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/7286/000095012311041426/c14889exv10w2.htm
  10. https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/us-department-interior-signs-record-decision-four-corners-power-plant-and-navajo-mine
  11. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/07/21/2015-17881/final-four-corners-power-plant-and-navajo-mine-energy-project-record-of-decision
  12. https://ieefa.org/resources/bad-bet-owning-four-corners-coal-plant-risky-gamble-navajo-nation-and-plants-other-owners
  13. https://www.sierraclub.org/environmental-law/new-mexico-supreme-court-upholds-denial-utility-s-attempt-increase-mine-owner-s
  14. https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2023/03/29/nm-supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-four-corners-ownership-transfer-case/
  15. https://www.bia.gov/as-ia/opa/online-press-release/us-department-interior-signs-record-decision-four-corners-power
  16. https://navenergy.com/generation-and-transmission/
  17. https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/08/11/crushing-power-demand-breathes-new-life-into-n-m-coal-plant-00499577
  18. https://navenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/25-NEH-02168-2024-NTEC-Operational-Report-Digital-Web.pdf
  19. https://www.power-eng.com/coal/plant-decommissioning/regulators-reject-utilitys-bid-to-abandon-four-corners-power-plant/
  20. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/projects/four-corners-power-plant-new-mexico/
  21. https://www.countoncoal.org/2025/08/planned-coal-plant-retirements-crash-into-energy-reality/
  22. https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Owning-Four-Corners-Coal-Plant-is-a-Losing-Bet_December-2018.pdf
  23. https://www.srpnet.com/grid-water-management/grid-management/power-generation-stations
  24. https://navenergy.com/navajo/
  25. https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/Environment/info/mha/fourcorners/images/Four%2520Corners_Final%2520ISND_website.pdf
  26. https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-four-corners-power-station-us/
  27. https://coyotegulch.blog/2025/08/16/meditations-on-monkeywrenching-also-the-data-center-boom-and-the-four-corners-power-plant-jonathan-p-thompson-landdesk-org/
  28. https://www.powermag.com/scr-project-upgrades-two-units-at-four-corners/
  29. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/local/2018/09/25/san-juan-generating-station-power-history-future-pnm-southwest-utility/1072851002/
  30. https://kids.kiddle.co/Four_Corners_Generating_Station
  31. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=9101DQ7F.TXT
  32. https://ictnews.org/archive/168-million-settlement-between-navajo-coal-plant-and-environmental-protection-agency/
  33. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-10-19/pdf/2010-26262.pdf
  34. https://www.aps.com/en/About/Our-Company/Newsroom/Articles/Four-Corners-A-Coal-Plant-Navigates-the-Clean-Energy-Transition
  35. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a104/
  36. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/07/11/2013-16078/source-specific-federal-implementation-plan-for-implementing-best-available-retrofit-technology-for
  37. https://www.sanjuancitizens.org/four-corners-power-plant-navajo-mine
  38. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/www3/region9/air/navajo/pdfs/20130924factsheet.pdf
  39. https://ieefa.org/resources/another-expensive-mistake-ntec-wasting-more-navajo-nations-resources-four-corners
  40. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/49.5512
  41. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/www3/region9/air/navajo/fcpp-final-facts.html
  42. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-requires-arizona-and-new-mexico-plant-owners-reduce-emissions-navajo-nation-four-corners
  43. https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0545
  44. https://dnr.navajo-nsn.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Urueav8k7w4%253D&portalid=0
  45. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/02/2016-28870/revisions-to-the-source-specific-federal-implementation-plan-for-four-corners-power-plant-navajo
  46. https://carboncapturemagazine.com/articles/ntec-awarded-655m-by-doe-for-carbon-capture-study-at-four-corners-power-plant
  47. https://www.env.nm.gov/air-quality/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/11/1_10242018_4CAQTF_Update_Final.pdf
  48. https://ashtracker.org/site/208
  49. https://environmentalintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/National-Coal-Ash-Report-Revised-7.11.19.pdf
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4060651/
  51. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240912766355/en/Navajo-Transitional-Energy-Company-Awarded-%246.55-Million-by-the-U.S.-Department-of-Energy-for-Carbon-Capture-Study-at-Four-Corners-Power-Plant
  52. https://www.4cornersed.com/membership/our-members/p/item/17064/arizona-public-service-co-aps
  53. https://x.com/BuuVanNygren/status/1917755746932199619
  54. https://navenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2023-Operational-Report-Digital.pdf
  55. https://carbonherald.com/ntec-gets-6-5m-from-doe-to-explore-carbon-capture-at-four-corners-power-plant/
  56. https://nmreta.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/RETA_2022_UPDATE_TransmissionStudy2.pdf
  57. https://navenergy.com/ntec-plays-a-vital-role-in-providing-reliable-electricity-during-unprecedented-demand/
  58. https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=NM
  59. https://www.eenews.net/articles/surging-power-demand-breathes-new-life-into-new-mexico-coal-plant/
  60. https://energyinnovation.org/report/the-coal-cost-crossover/
  61. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf
  62. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/electricity_generation/pdf/AEO2023_LCOE_report.pdf
  63. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/mexicos-four-corners-generating-station-030300850.html
  64. https://earthjustice.org/case/sale-of-four-corners-coal-fired-power-plant-challenged
  65. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2786&context=ilj
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2910467/
  67. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20015ONP.TXT
  68. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140520100527.htm
  69. https://coloradoriverrecovery.org/sj/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/04/BiOp_Four_Corners_Power_Plant_Navajo_Mine_Energy_Project_2014_OCR.pdf
  70. https://navenergy.com/cool_timeline/revenue-benefits-to-the-navajo-nation/
  71. https://navajoeconomy.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024-2029-Navajo-Nation-Comprehensive-Economic-Development-Strategy.FINAL_.pdf
  72. https://ictnews.org/archive/navajo-activists-spearhead-energy-transformation-in-the-four-corners-area/
  73. https://www.facebook.com/navajonationcouncil/posts/for-immediate-releasejune-19-202525th-navajo-nation-council-holds-second-public-/1138926181603746/
  74. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-A104
  75. https://www.txnmenergy.com/~/media/Files/P/PNM-Resources/rates-and-filings/PNM%25202024%2520Rate%2520Change%2520Filing/22-00270-UT-12-08-2023-Recommended%2520Decision.pdf
  76. https://turtletalk.blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/navajo-transitional-energy-company-llc-brief.pdf
  77. https://www.countoncoal.org/2025/03/undoing-the-regulatory-assault-on-grid-reliability/
  78. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/load-growth-plant-retirements-blackouts-doe/752408/
  79. http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Orr-Palmer-Coal-Paper-1.pdf
  80. https://meuser.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/meuser.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/7-25-23-coal-caucus-electricity-reliability-report-final-compressed.pdf
  81. https://news.azpm.org/s/100730-trumps-coal-executive-order-draws-mixed-reactions-from-navajo-nation-leaders/
  82. https://www.aps.com/en/About/Our-Company/Newsroom/Articles/aps-announces-plans-for-seasonal-operations-at-four-corners-power-plant
  83. https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/aps-announces-plans-for-seasonal-operations-at-four-corners-power-plant-2021-03-12
  84. https://www.pinnaclewest.com/newsroom/company-news/news-release-details/2021/APS-Announces-Plans-for-Seasonal-Operations-at-Four-Corners-Power-Plant/default.aspx
  85. https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2024/09/16/ntec-receives-doe-funding-to-study-four-corners-carbon-capture/
  86. https://navenergy.com/navajo-transitional-energy-company-awarded-6-55-million-by-the-u-s-department-of-energy-for-carbon-capture-study-at-four-corners-power-plant/
  87. https://www.energytech.com/energy-efficiency/article/55140044/navajo-tribal-energy-transition-company-gains-65m-doe-grant-for-power-plant-carbon-capture-feasibility-study
  88. https://www.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2025/09/new-sierra-club-report-arizona-utilities-doubling-down-fossil-fuels-putting
  89. https://tonizhoniani.org/tna-raises-concerns-about-gas-expansion/
  90. https://www.powermag.com/carbon-capture-projects-at-gas-fired-cane-run-7-coal-fired-four-corners-get-federal-awards/
  91. https://navenergy.com/nav-energy/carbon-capture/
  92. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/24CM/24CM_CTS1_9_Ampomah2.pdf
  93. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/Virtual%2520Briefing_4C_Slide%2520deck_FECM_9.5.pdf
  94. https://www.abqjournal.com/business/article_333f37d2-ce4f-4ac4-b4cc-a5e5ea42f1f4.html
  95. https://navajotimes.com/reznews/from-coal-to-clean-energy-four-corners-power-plant-faces-2031-shuttering/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.