Hubbry Logo
GravitropismGravitropismMain
Open search
Gravitropism
Community hub
Gravitropism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gravitropism
Gravitropism
Gravitropism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This is an image taken of a tree from Central Minnesota. The tree was on the face of a hill and had blown over in a storm or fell over due to erosion in the soil surrounding it. The tree continues to grow however, and because it was horizontal, its growth exhibits gravitropism which can be seen in its arched growth.
Example of gravitropism in a tree from central Minnesota. This tree has fallen over and due to gravitropism exhibits this arched growth.
Gravitropism maintains vertical orientation of these trees. These trees, typical of those in steep subalpine environments, are covered by deep snow in winter. As small saplings, they are overwhelmed by the snow and bent nearly flat to the ground. During spring growth, and more so as larger trees, gravitropism allows them to orient vertically over years of subsequent growth.

Gravitropism (also known as geotropism) is a coordinated process of differential growth by a plant in response to gravity pulling on it. It also occurs in fungi. Gravity can be either "artificial gravity"[clarification needed] or natural gravity. It is a general feature of all higher and many lower plants as well as other organisms. Charles Darwin was one of the first to scientifically document that roots show positive gravitropism and stems show negative gravitropism.[1] That is, roots grow in the direction of gravitational pull (i.e., downward) and stems grow in the opposite direction (i.e., upwards). This behavior can be easily demonstrated with any potted plant. When laid onto its side, the growing parts of the stem begin to display negative gravitropism, growing (biologists say, turning; see tropism) upwards. Herbaceous (non-woody) stems are capable of a degree of actual bending, but most of the redirected movement occurs as a consequence of root or stem growth outside.[clarification needed] The mechanism is based on the Cholodny–Went model which was proposed in 1927, and has since been modified.[2] Although the model has been criticized and continues to be refined, it has largely stood the test of time.[citation needed]

In roots

[edit]
[this image is incorrect! the high auxin is always on the opposite side of the tropic movement!
In the process of plant roots growing in the direction of gravity by gravitropism, high concentrations of auxin move towards the cells on the bottom side of the root. This suppresses growth on this side, while allowing cell elongation on the top of the root. As a consequence of this, curved growth occurs and the root is directed downwards.[3]

Root growth occurs by division of stem cells in the root meristem located in the tip of the root, and the subsequent asymmetric expansion of cells in a shoot-ward region to the tip known as the elongation zone. Differential growth during tropisms mainly involves changes in cell expansion versus changes in cell division, although a role for cell division in tropic growth has not been formally ruled out. Gravity is sensed in the root tip and this information must then be relayed to the elongation zone so as to maintain growth direction and mount effective growth responses to changes in orientation to and continue to grow its roots in the same direction as gravity.[4]

Abundant evidence demonstrates that roots bend in response to gravity due to a regulated movement of the plant hormone auxin known as polar auxin transport.[5] This was described in the 1920s in the Cholodny-Went model. The model was independently proposed by the Ukrainian scientist N. Cholodny of the University of Kyiv in 1927 and by Frits Went of the California Institute of Technology in 1928, both based on work they had done in 1926.[6] Auxin exists in nearly every organ and tissue of a plant, but it has been reoriented in the gravity field, can initiate differential growth resulting in root curvature.

Experiments show that auxin distribution is characterized by a fast movement of auxin to the lower side of the root in response to a gravity stimulus at a 90° degree angle or more. However, once the root tip reaches a 40° angle to the horizontal of the stimulus, auxin distribution quickly shifts to a more symmetrical arrangement. This behavior is described as a "tipping point" mechanism for auxin transport in response to a gravitational stimulus.[3]

In shoots

[edit]

Gravitropism is an integral part of plant growth, orienting its position to maximize contact with sunlight, as well as ensuring that the roots are growing in the correct direction. Growth due to gravitropism is mediated by changes in concentration of the plant hormone auxin within plant cells.

In the process of plant shoots growing opposite the direction of gravity by gravitropism, high concentration of auxin moves towards the bottom side of the shoot to initiate cell growth of the bottom cells, while suppressing cell growth on the top of the shoot. This allows the bottom cells of the shoot to continue a curved growth and elongate its cells upward, away from the pull of gravity as the auxin move towards the bottom of the shoot.[7]

As plants mature, gravitropism continues to guide growth and development along with phototropism. While amyloplasts continue to guide plants in the right direction, plant organs and function rely on phototropic responses to ensure that the leaves are receiving enough light to perform basic functions such as photosynthesis. In complete darkness, mature plants have little to no sense of gravity, unlike seedlings that can still orient themselves to have the shoots grow upward until light is reached when development can begin.[8]

Differential sensitivity to auxin helps explain Darwin's original observation that stems and roots respond in the opposite way to the forces of gravity. In both roots and stems, auxin accumulates towards the gravity vector on the lower side. In roots, this results in the inhibition of cell expansion on the lower side and the concomitant curvature of the roots towards gravity (positive gravitropism).[4][9] In stems, the auxin also accumulates on the lower side, however in this tissue it increases cell expansion and results in the shoot curving up (negative gravitropism).[10]

A recent study showed that for gravitropism to occur in shoots, a lot of an inclination, instead of a weak gravitational force, is necessary. This finding sets aside gravity sensing mechanisms that would rely on detecting the pressure of the weight of statoliths.[11]

In fruit

[edit]

A few species of fruit exhibit negative geotropism. Bananas are one well-known example.[12] Once the canopy that covers the fruit dries, the bananas will begin to curve upwards, towards sunlight, in what is known as phototropism. The specific chemical that initiates the upward curvature is a phytohormone in the banana called auxin. When the banana is first exposed to sunlight after the leaf canopy dries, one face of the fruit is shaded. On exposure to sunlight, auxin in the banana migrates from the sunlight side to the shaded side. Since auxin is a powerful plant growth hormone, the increased concentration promotes cell division and causes the plant cells on the shaded side to grow.[13] This asymmetrical distribution of auxin is responsible for the upward curvature of the banana.[13][14]

Gravity-sensing mechanisms

[edit]

Statoliths

[edit]
Banana fruit exhibiting negative geotropism.

Plants possess the ability to sense gravity in several ways, one of which is through statoliths. Statoliths are dense amyloplasts, organelles that synthesize and store starch involved in the perception of gravity by the plant (gravitropism), that collect in specialized cells called statocytes. Statocytes are located in the starch parenchyma cells near vascular tissues in the shoots and in the columella in the caps of the roots.[15] These specialized amyloplasts are denser than the cytoplasm and can sediment according to the gravity vector. The statoliths are enmeshed in a web of actin and it is thought that their sedimentation transmits the gravitropic signal by activating mechanosensitive channels.[4] The gravitropic signal then leads to the reorientation of auxin efflux carriers and subsequent redistribution of auxin streams in the root cap and root as a whole.[16] Auxin moves toward higher concentrations on the bottom side of the root and suppresses elongation. The asymmetric distribution of auxin leads to differential growth of the root tissues, causing the root to curve and follow the gravity stimuli. Statoliths are also found in the endodermic layer of the hypocotyl, stem, and inflorescence stock. The redistribution of auxin causes increased growth on the lower side of the shoot so that it orients in a direction opposite that of the gravity stimuli.

Modulation by phytochrome

[edit]

Phytochromes are red and far-red photoreceptors that help induce changes in certain aspects of plant development. Apart being itself the tropic factor (phototropism), light may also suppress the gravitropic reaction.[17] In seedlings, red and far-red light both inhibit negative gravitropism in seedling hypocotyls (the shoot area below the cotyledons) causing growth in random directions. However, the hypocotyls readily orient towards blue light. This process may be caused by phytochrome disrupting the formation of starch-filled endodermal amyloplasts and stimulating their conversion to other plastid types, such as chloroplasts or etiolaplasts.[17]

Compensation

[edit]
The compensation reaction of the bending Coprinus stem. C – the compensating part of the stem.

Bending mushroom stems follow some regularities that are not common in plants. After turning into horizontal the normal vertical orientation the apical part (region C in the figure below) starts to straighten. Finally this part gets straight again, and the curvature concentrates near the base of the mushroom.[18] This effect is called compensation (or sometimes, autotropism). The exact reason of such behavior is unclear, and at least two hypotheses exist.

  • The hypothesis of plagiogravitropic reaction supposes some mechanism that sets the optimal orientation angle other than 90 degrees (vertical). The actual optimal angle is a multi-parameter function, depending on time, the current reorientation angle and from the distance to the base of the fungi. The mathematical model, written following this suggestion, can simulate bending from the horizontal into vertical position but fails to imitate realistic behavior when bending from the arbitrary reorientation angle (with unchanged model parameters).[18]
  • The alternative model supposes some "straightening signal", proportional to the local curvature. When the tip angle approaches 30° this signal overcomes the bending signal, caused by reorientation, straightening resulting.[19]

Both models fit the initial data well, but the latter was also able to predict bending from various reorientation angles. Compensation is less obvious in plants, but in some cases it can be observed combining exact measurements with mathematical models. The more sensitive roots are stimulated by lower levels of auxin; higher levels of auxin in lower halves stimulate less growth, resulting in downward curvature (positive gravitropism).

Gravitropic mutants

[edit]

Mutants with altered responses to gravity have been isolated in several plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana (one of the genetic model systems used for plant research). These mutants have alterations in either negative gravitropism in hypocotyls and/or shoots, or positive gravitropism in roots, or both.[10] Mutants have been identified with varying effects on the gravitropic responses in each organ, including mutants which nearly eliminate gravitropic growth, and those whose effects are weak or conditional. In the same way that gravity has an effect on winding and circumnutating, thus aspects of morphogenesis have defects on the mutant. Once a mutant has been identified, it can be studied to determine the nature of the defect (the particular difference(s) it has compared to the non-mutant 'wildtype'). This can provide information about the function of the altered gene, and often about the process under study. In addition the mutated gene can be identified, and thus something about its function inferred from the mutant phenotype.

Gravitropic mutants have been identified that affect starch accumulation, such as those affecting the PGM1 (which encodes the enzyme phosphoglucomutase) gene in Arabidopsis, causing plastids – the presumptive statoliths – to be less dense and, in support of the starch-statolith hypothesis, less sensitive to gravity.[20] Other examples of gravitropic mutants include those affecting the transport or response to the hormone auxin.[10] In addition to the information about gravitropism which such auxin-transport or auxin-response mutants provide, they have been instrumental in identifying the mechanisms governing the transport and cellular action of auxin as well as its effects on growth.

There are also several cultivated plants that display altered gravitropism compared to other species or to other varieties within their own species. Some are trees that have a weeping or pendulate growth habit; the branches still respond to gravity, but with a positive response, rather than the normal negative response. Others are the lazy (i.e. ageotropic or agravitropic) varieties of corn (Zea mays) and varieties of rice, barley and tomatoes, whose shoots grow along the ground.

See also

[edit]
  • Amyloplast – starch organelle involved in sensing gravitropism
  • Astrobotany – the field of science concerned with plants in a spaceflight environment
  • Clinostat – a device used to negate the effects of gravitational pull by single-axis rotation
  • Random positioning machine – a device used to negate the effects of gravitational pull by multi-axis rotation
  • Free fall machine – a device used to negate the effects of gravitational pull by simulating microgravity
  • Large diameter centrifuge – a device used to create a hyper-gravity pull
  • Prolonged sine – reaction of plants to turning from their usual vertical orientation
  • Phototropism – growth of a plant in response to a light stimulus

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gravitropism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gravitropism is the by which sense changes in the direction of and reorient their growth accordingly, with shoots exhibiting negative gravitropism (upward growth) and roots displaying positive gravitropism (downward growth). This tropic response ensures that shoots access and air while roots reach water and nutrients in soil, enhancing plant survival and resource acquisition. The mechanism of gravitropism begins with sensing in specialized cells, primarily through the sedimentation of dense, starch-filled amyloplasts known as statoliths, which act as detectors. In , this occurs in cells of the , where statolith movement triggers mechanosensitive ion channels, leading to calcium influx and other signaling events. In shoots, sensing involves endodermal cells, contributing to a unified model that integrates gravisensing with —the plant's ability to detect its own curvature—for precise posture control. Signal transduction in gravitropism primarily involves the plant hormone , which redistributes asymmetrically to create a concentration gradient across the affected organ. In , auxin efflux carriers like PIN3 and PIN7 relocalize to the lower side of statocytes, promoting auxin flow to the elongation zone where higher concentrations inhibit on the lower side, causing upward curvature. This auxin-mediated differential growth restores vertical orientation, a process studied since Charles Darwin's observations in 1880 and advanced through and microgravity experiments. Beyond basic orientation, gravitropism influences broader , including formation in trees and to environmental stresses, with emerging applications in crop breeding for marginal soils and space agriculture. approaches have revealed genes and pathways, such as those involving ARG1, underscoring gravitropism's role in plant resilience on and potential extraterrestrial habitats.

Introduction

Definition and Types

Gravitropism is the directed growth or of organs in response to , functioning as a that reorients the growth axes of and shoots to optimize resource acquisition. This process enables to position for anchorage and uptake while directing shoots toward sources. Gravitropism in is primarily classified into positive and negative types, depending on whether growth aligns with or opposes the vector. Positive gravitropism drives downward growth, as exemplified by elongating toward to penetrate ; this ensures efficient and absorption. In contrast, negative gravitropism promotes upward growth in shoots, such as the shoot apical meristem orienting away from to facilitate and structural support. Certain organs, like some stems or lateral branches, exhibit transverse gravitropism, where growth occurs perpendicular to the vector to maintain horizontal orientations. The basic process of gravitropism encompasses three phases: perception of the of that signal into biochemical changes, and a growth response leading to curvature. Gravity sensing relies on statoliths in specialized cells, while the hormone plays a key role in asymmetric redistribution, leading to differential cell elongation that causes curvature.

Historical Background

The earliest systematic observations of gravitropism were made by and his son Francis in their 1880 book The Power of Movement in Plants, where they experimented with (Phalaris canariensis) coleoptiles to demonstrate that the tip serves as the primary gravity-perceiving region. By decapitating coleoptiles or covering the tip with opaque material, they showed that gravitropic bending was abolished, but reattaching or exposing the tip restored the response, indicating that the apex detects the gravitational stimulus and transmits it downward. Building on Darwin's work, key milestones in the early 20th century confirmed the involvement of a diffusible chemical signal in gravitropism. In 1913, Peter Boysen-Jensen conducted experiments by severing tips and inserting thin sheets to block transmission, which prevented bending, while permeable allowed the signal to pass and restored gravitropism, proving the signal's mobility from the perceiving tip to the growth zone. Frits Went advanced this in 1926 by isolating the growth-promoting substance from tips using blocks, and in 1928, he linked its asymmetric redistribution to differential growth causing gravitropic bending, forming the basis of the Cholodny-Went theory. Twentieth-century advancements included the use of centrifuges to quantify the role of in gravitropism. These experiments helped establish the effects of altered levels on perception and response across plant species. The terminology evolved from "geotropism," coined by in 1882 to describe Earth-directed tropic movements in his Textbook of Botany, to "gravitropism" in the mid-20th century, particularly during , to emphasize the universal gravitational force rather than Earth-specific geo-orientation. This shift, adopted in seminal reviews, better accommodated experiments in altered environments like clinostats and orbital flights.

Gravity Sensing

Statolith Mechanism

The statolith hypothesis, first proposed by Gottlieb Haberlandt in 1900, explains gravity perception in plants through the sedimentation of dense, starch-filled amyloplasts known as statoliths, which act as intracellular gravity sensors by settling toward the lower cell wall in response to the gravitational vector. Independently formulated by Bohumil Němec in the same year, this model posits that the physical displacement of statoliths provides a directional cue for gravitropic signaling. The hypothesis gained empirical support in the 1960s through electron microscopy studies that visualized amyloplasts as sedimentable organelles within specialized gravity-sensing cells, confirming their structural role in higher plants. These statoliths are primarily located in the cells of the , where they form layered arrays, and in the endodermal cells of shoots, enabling organ-specific gravity detection. Upon reorientation relative to gravity, statoliths sediment rapidly, typically within minutes, due to their high density (approximately 1.4–1.6 g/cm³ from grains), interacting with cytoskeletal elements and the to transduce the mechanical signal. This sedimentation is thought to exert localized pressure on mechanosensitive channels embedded in the plasma membrane or cortical , triggering an influx of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) that serves as the earliest biochemical response. Concentrations of cytosolic Ca²⁺ can rise asymmetrically in the lower statocyte half shortly after gravistimulation, initiating downstream cascades. Supporting evidence includes experiments depleting starch via growth in prolonged darkness or on high-sucrose media, which reduces amyloplast density and significantly impairs root gravitropism, as seen in starchless mutants like Arabidopsis thaliana pgm, which exhibit diminished bending responses compared to wild type. Restoration of starch accumulation reverses this defect, underscoring the necessity of sedimentable mass. Centrifugal studies further validate density dependence; low-g simulations (e.g., clinostats) diminish responses in wild-type plants, while hypergravity (3–7 g) enhances gravitropism in starch-deficient lines by amplifying sedimentation forces on residual dense organelles. High-resolution imaging, including electron tomography, has revealed intimate statolith-membrane contacts, showing amyloplasts deforming endoplasmic reticulum membranes (e.g., by up to 50 nm in observations), providing direct visualization of force transduction sites. This sedimentation ultimately contributes to asymmetric auxin redistribution across the gravisensing tissue as a key downstream effect.

Cellular and Molecular Sensors

Statocytes are specialized cells that serve as primary sites for gravity perception in , exhibiting heightened sensitivity to gravitational stimuli. In roots, the columella cells within the function as statocytes, where they detect changes in orientation through interactions involving dense organelles. These cells maintain a dynamic that facilitates the repositioning of statoliths, enabling rapid transduction of gravitational signals. Disruption of the F-actin network in columella cells alters statolith dynamics and enhances gravitropic responses, underscoring the cytoskeleton's role in signal modulation. At the molecular level, several proteins contribute to gravity sensing beyond structural components. The ARG1 protein, a DnaJ-like chaperone, is essential for normal root and gravitropism by participating in early events in gravity-perceiving cells. Mutations in ARG1 impair the asymmetric distribution of signaling molecules without affecting or levels. Similarly, (PGM), involved in starch synthesis within amyloplasts, supports gravity sensing; pgm mutants exhibit reduced gravitropism due to diminished statolith density, though lateral roots retain partial responsiveness. These proteins highlight the integration of metabolic and chaperone functions in perception. Gravity perception triggers rapid changes in , detectable within minutes of reorientation. Transcriptomic analyses of root apices reveal gravity-specific upregulation of hundreds of genes as early as 5-15 minutes post-stimulation, involving pathways for stress response and cytoskeletal reorganization. These early transcriptional shifts precede visible bending and indicate an immediate molecular reprogramming in statocytes. Early events in gravity sensing include ion fluxes that generate membrane depolarization and gradients. In root statocytes, gravistimulation induces influxes of Ca²⁺ and alterations in pH, creating asymmetric gradients that propagate the signal. These changes, measured using ion-selective microelectrodes, occur within seconds to minutes and involve Ca²⁺-permeable channels. Patch-clamp techniques applied in the 1990s and 2000s to root protoplasts confirmed voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels responsive to mechanical stress, linking ion dynamics to depolarization during reorientation. Recent advances have identified mechanoreceptors as additional sensors integrating with mechanical cues. The MCA1 channel, a Ca²⁺-permeable mechanosensitive protein in the plasma membrane, contributes to perception in roots by facilitating Ca²⁺ influx upon statolith movement. Studies from 2021-2023 using MCA1 mutants demonstrate delayed Ca²⁺ signaling in response to gravistimulation, suggesting its role in early detection. CRISPR/Cas9 knockouts of multiple mechanosensitive channel genes, including MCA family members, have revealed functional redundancy in sensing, where single knockouts show mild defects but combinatorial edits severely impair tropic responses. Space-based experiments on the have quantified the sensitivity threshold for detection in plants at approximately 10⁻³ g, with some responses to forces as low as 10⁻⁴ g in roots under clinorotation simulations. These thresholds, derived from centrifugal and micro assays, confirm that statocytes can subtle accelerations, informing models of in altered environments.

Signal Transduction and Response

Auxin-Mediated Signaling

Gravity perception in statocytes initiates leading to asymmetric distribution of the hormone (), primarily through relocalization of PIN-FORMED (PIN) efflux carrier proteins to the plasma membrane on the lower side of the organ. This process establishes a lateral gradient that drives differential growth, with accumulation inhibiting elongation in roots but promoting it in shoots. The foundational Cholodny-Went theory, originally proposed in the 1920s, has been updated with molecular evidence confirming that gravity-induced redistribution creates the necessary for tropic bending. In roots, higher levels on the lower flank suppress cell elongation via auxin response factors, while in shoots, it stimulates expansion on that side. Key regulatory steps include dephosphorylation of PIN proteins by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which antagonizes the PINOID (PID) to favor basal or lateral PIN targeting and enhance efflux toward the lower side. Additionally, the AGRAVITROPIC1 (ARG1) protein, a peripheral membrane component, facilitates vesicle trafficking of PIN carriers and modulates early pH changes in statocytes to support asymmetry. Auxin gradients form rapidly, with reporters such as DII-VENUS revealing approximately twofold asymmetry in the elongation zone within 5 minutes of gravistimulation, peaking during and dissipating thereafter. Recent studies (as of 2025) have shown that SnRK2 kinases (SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3) regulate gravitropism by directly phosphorylating PID, thereby controlling PIN localization and asymmetry.

Differential Growth and Bending

The differential growth underlying gravitropic bending arises from asymmetric distribution, which triggers uneven cell elongation across the organ's transverse axis. In , higher concentrations on the lower side inhibit elongation there, while the upper side experiences relatively greater expansion, resulting in downward curvature. This asymmetry activates plasma membrane H+-ATPases, leading to proton extrusion and apoplastic acidification primarily on the side with elevated . The lowered activates expansins, proteins that loosen cell walls by disrupting non-covalent bonds in the cellulosic matrix, facilitating turgor-driven cell expansion where growth is promoted. In shoots, the response is inverted: auxin accumulation on the lower side promotes elongation there via the same acid growth mechanism, causing upward bending against gravity. Proton pumping acidifies the on the lower flank, enhancing expansin activity and wall extensibility specifically in that region, while the upper side grows more slowly. This polarity-dependent regulation ensures organ-specific tropic responses, with auxin thresholds determining promotion versus inhibition. Gravitropic bending unfolds in distinct kinetic phases: an initial presentation phase, lasting seconds to minutes, during which gravity is sensed and signaling initiates without visible curvature; followed by the curvature phase, where differential elongation drives reorientation at rates typically 10-20° per hour in roots. Time-lapse imaging of fluorescently labeled cell files reveals that during curvature, upper-side cells in roots elongate faster than lower-side counterparts, confirming the spatial pattern of growth asymmetry. Laser ablation experiments further demonstrate this link, as targeted removal of root cap columella cells abolishes the auxin gradient and prevents subsequent bending, underscoring the necessity of localized signaling for differential growth. Mathematical models of often adapt beam theory to describe rate as a function of growth differentials induced by asymmetry, with larger gradients or thinner organs accelerating by amplifying relative elongation differences across the diameter. Recent finite element models from the have extended these concepts by simulating tissue-level stresses during , revealing that outer cortical layers bear disproportionate tensile forces, which modulate expansin efficacy and overall kinetics. These simulations highlight how viscoelastic properties of cell walls integrate with -driven growth to stabilize without fracturing.

Responses in Plant Organs

In Roots

In roots, positive gravitropism directs growth downward to anchor the and access resources. Gravity perception occurs primarily in the columella cells of the , where starch-filled amyloplasts, known as statoliths, sediment toward the lower side in response to gravitational pull, initiating the signaling cascade. This sedimentation repolarizes proteins such as LAZY family members and transporters like PIN3 and PIN7 on the lower cell sides, establishing an asymmetric distribution of the hormone . The resulting signal travels acropetally from the to the distal elongation zone, approximately 2-10 mm behind the tip, where higher concentrations inhibit cell elongation on the lower side relative to the upper side, promoting downward through differential growth. The kinetics of root reorientation are rapid and sensitive to gravitational strength. For an optimal 90° gravistimulation, primary typically achieve maximum curvature within 1-2 hours, with the initial bending response detectable in minutes as the gradient propagates. The threshold acceleration for eliciting a detectable gravitropic response is approximately 0.003 g, below which show diminished or absent bending, highlighting the precision of this in varying environmental conditions. Experimental decapitation of the eliminates gravitropic sensitivity, as the site of perception is removed, while recapping restores it, underscoring the cap's indispensable role in signal initiation. In microgravity environments, studies reveal that lose directional control, displaying random orientations and waving patterns driven primarily by rather than . Adaptations in root systems further refine gravitropic responses for soil foraging. Lateral roots exhibit a transient strong positive gravitropism immediately after , enabling initial downward penetration, but soon transition to a stable gravitropic set-point angle of about 30-60° from vertical, promoting horizontal spread and resource exploitation without excessive deepening. In heterogeneous , gravitropism interacts with , where moisture gradients can counteract or enhance downward bending by modulating asymmetries, allowing roots to prioritize water sources over pure gravitational alignment. Recent investigations also reveal that rhizosphere microbes influence root gravitropism; for instance, growth-promoting in the root vicinity can induce coiling and alter bending angles by interacting with transcription factors, potentially optimizing architecture for microbial and nutrient uptake.

In Shoots

In shoots, negative gravitropism orients aerial organs upward against , enabling efficient light interception and facilitating the circumvention of physical obstacles like surfaces or neighboring during and growth. This response is prominent in shoot tips, including coleoptiles in monocots and young stems in dicots, where gravity sensing occurs via the sedimentation of amyloplasts—starch-filled plastids acting as statoliths—in specialized endodermal cells. Upon reorientation, such as when a shoot is tilted, these amyloplasts settle to the lower side of the endodermal cells within minutes, initiating a signaling cascade that redistributes the phytohormone laterally across the organ. The asymmetric auxin distribution results in higher concentrations on the lower flank of the shoot, where it promotes differential cell elongation in the elongation zone, causing the organ to curve upward and restore vertical orientation. This auxin-mediated mechanism follows the Cholodny-Went model, with influx and efflux carriers like PIN proteins facilitating the gradient; in shoots, unlike roots, elevated auxin stimulates rather than inhibits growth on the affected side. In monocots such as maize coleoptiles, auxin transport is regulated by genes like ZmLAZY1, which polarize efflux carriers to enhance the response, while dicots like Arabidopsis rely on similar but phylogenetically distinct regulators, leading to conserved yet nuanced variations in sensitivity and timing. Circumnutation, an endogenous oscillatory movement with a periodicity of several hours, further modulates gravitropism by superimposing helical trajectories on the bending, which aids shoots in probing and navigating around obstacles. Shoot bending proceeds more slowly than in roots, with steady curvature rates often ranging from 1 to 5 degrees per hour in cereal grasses and up to 50 degrees per hour in initial phases for under clinorotation, allowing gradual reorientation without excessive energy expenditure. Recovery from a full 180-degree inversion typically occurs over several hours, with inflorescences achieving 90 degrees of in about 90 minutes under optimal conditions, scaling to 4-6 hours for complete upright restoration in many species. Environmental cues modulate this process; mechanical perturbations from trigger thigmomorphogenesis, reducing gravitropic sensitivity by dampening asymmetry and promoting sturdier growth forms to withstand stress. Physical support, such as contact with a substrate, similarly attenuates the signal, as shoots perceive reduced need for active bending. Etiolated shoots, developed in darkness, display hypersensitivity to , with amplified responses leading to faster and more pronounced curvatures compared to light-grown counterparts.

In Fruits and Seeds

In fruits, gravitropism often manifests as positive responses that orient developing structures downward, facilitating and dispersal. For instance, in tomato plants, the peduncles exhibit positive gravitropism, causing hanging fruits to bend downward under gravity's influence, which positions them optimally for maturation and reduces stress on the plant. This downward orientation is mediated by redistribution, which promotes differential cell elongation on the upper and lower sides of the peduncle during development. In processes, an interplay between and further modulates these responses; , a key , influences transport to sustain the gravitropic curvature while promoting softening and color changes. Seeds demonstrate distinct gravitropic behaviors during germination and early development, particularly in dicotyledonous species where the forms a protective . Upon in darkness, the initially exhibits transient positive gravitropism, bending downward to form the apical that shields the emerging shoot tip from abrasion. This response transitions to negative gravitropism as the emerges, straightening the upward. Statoliths, in the form of amyloplasts containing granules, are present in the embryonic cells and contribute to perception during these early stages, enabling precise orientation before full and shoot differentiation. gradients in reproductive tissues briefly establish asymmetry in the , supporting this formation without dominating the overall response. Representative examples highlight the role of gravitropism in . In ( hypogaea), the gynophore—a specialized structure connecting the to the developing fruit—displays strong positive gravitropism after , elongating downward into the to enable underground pod maturation, a process known as geocarpy. This gravitropic penetration ensures protection and nutrient access for , enhancing dispersal by burial. These gravitropic responses in fruits and primarily serve functional roles in and dispersal. Positive gravitropism in structures like peanut gynophores directly supports geocarpy, burying to protect them from predators and while promoting in moist . In hanging fruits, downward bending optimizes weight distribution and diffusion during ripening, preventing premature drop and ensuring seed viability. Gravitropism rates in mature fruits are notably slower than in vegetative organs, typically progressing at 2-5° per day, allowing gradual adjustment without disrupting development.

Modulations and Variations

Light and Phytochrome Influence

Light plays a crucial role in modulating gravitropism in , primarily through photoreceptors such as , which sense red and far-red , and cryptochromes, which detect blue light. These photoreceptors integrate light signals with perception to fine-tune growth orientations, often prioritizing over gravitropism in illuminated conditions. In shoots, inhibit negative gravitropism under light exposure, thereby promoting the dominance of . This inhibition occurs by regulating the development of endodermal amyloplasts, the starch-filled organelles that act as statoliths in sensing, through interactions with phytochrome-interacting factors (PIFs). As a result, light-grown shoots exhibit reduced gravitropic bending compared to dark-grown etiolated seedlings, where negative gravitropism is more pronounced to facilitate rapid upward elongation in soil. Experiments with hypocotyls demonstrate that phytochrome mutants display enhanced negative gravitropism in light, confirming the inhibitory role of active in shifting growth priority toward light directionality. At the molecular level, phytochromes influence distribution, a key mediator of gravitropic responses, by regulating the polar localization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN1. Phytochrome activation leads to PIF-mediated transcriptional changes that alter PIN1 trafficking, thereby modifying asymmetric flow and dampening gravitropic curvature in shoots. This light-dependent modulation ensures that phototropic signals override gravitational cues when unilateral light is present, as observed in studies where lateral red light completely suppresses gravitropic in favor of phototropic orientation. In roots, light enhances positive gravitropism by stabilizing HY5, which promotes LAZY4 expression and downward growth. This contrasts with the inhibitory effects in shoots. Comparative experiments highlight these differences, with dark-grown seedlings showing greater shoot bending in response to gravistimulation than light-grown ones, underscoring light's suppressive effect on shoot gravitropism, while roots display enhanced responses under illumination. Unilateral blue or red light further overrides gravity in both organs, redirecting growth toward the light source and illustrating the hierarchical integration of environmental cues. Light also interacts with gravitropism by inducing changes in the , which amplify statolith displacement in gravisensing cells. In shoots, diurnal cycles regulate actin-binding proteins like RMD, reorganizing the to enhance statolith and thereby strengthening gravitropic signaling during the day. This dynamic adjustment ensures precise orientation despite competing phototropic inputs.

Compensation Mechanisms

Compensation mechanisms in gravitropism refer to the feedback processes that dampen the gravitropic signal after initial bending, preventing continuous curvature and allowing plant organs to stabilize in their optimal orientation, such as shoot tips aligning vertically at 0° to the vector. This signal damping is primarily achieved through -mediated feedback loops that reduce tissue sensitivity to gravitational stimuli once reorientation is underway. For instance, in shoots, accumulation on the lower side during bending triggers a that repolarizes efflux carriers like PIN3, restoring symmetric distribution and terminating the response. In , similar feedback inhibits excessive elongation on the upper side post-bending, symmetrizing growth rates. Nutation cycles, or circumnutations, in shoots further compensate for potential overshoot in gravitropic bending by introducing oscillatory movements that average out directional errors over time. These endogenous oscillations, amplified by gravity sensing in endodermal cells, enable shoots to spiral around the vertical axis while progressively aligning with gravity, effectively damping deviations through repeated corrective adjustments. In roots encountering tilted soil, realignment occurs via damped oscillations where the initial curvature overshoots the vertical before decaying back to straight growth. Mathematical models of this process describe the response amplitude as decaying exponentially, following the form A(t)=A0e−t/τA(t) = A_0 e^{-t/\tau}, where τ\tau represents the time constant on the order of hours, analogous to a damped harmonic oscillator that minimizes oscillations for efficient reorientation. These mechanisms exhibit age-dependent variation, with younger tissues displaying heightened sensitivity to gravitational signals due to elevated responsiveness and more active feedback loops, leading to faster initial bending that diminishes as tissues mature. In microgravity environments, the absence of gravitational cues disrupts these compensation mechanisms, resulting in random growth orientations for both shoots and roots as lack the feedback signals needed for directed alignment.

Genetic and Evolutionary Aspects

Gravitropic Mutants

Gravitropic mutants in have provided critical insights into the genetic pathways underlying gravity responses, particularly in where defects are more pronounced than in shoots. These mutants often exhibit altered growth patterns, such as reduced curvature or agravitropism, while shoot gravitropism remains largely intact due to partially redundant mechanisms. Forward genetic screens using (EMS) mutagenesis in the 1990s and 2000s identified over 20 genetic loci involved in gravitropism, enabling the isolation of recessive mutants with specific defects in gravity sensing, , or response execution. A prominent example is the agr1 (AGRAVITROPIC 1) mutant, defective in the ARG1 gene, which encodes a DnaJ-like chaperone protein that regulates the asymmetric localization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN2 via vesicle trafficking; this leads to impaired basipetal auxin transport and agravitropic roots that fail to reorient properly upon gravistimulation. The agr1 phenotype includes wavy root growth on inclined surfaces, resulting from unsuccessful relocalization of PIN proteins to create auxin gradients necessary for differential elongation. Similarly, the pgm (phosphoglucomutase) mutant is starchless, lacking sedimentable amyloplasts in statocytes, which reduces gravitropic sensitivity in both roots and hypocotyls by approximately 50-70% compared to wild-type plants, though some residual response persists via alternative mechanisms. These mutants have been instrumental in space biology research, where Arabidopsis strains like pgm and agr1 are flown on missions to the to dissect microgravity effects on gravitropism; for instance, starchless pgm seedlings show enhanced random growth in orbit, highlighting starch's role in amplifying but not essential for gravity perception. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in crops like have linked natural variations in gravitropism-related genes to improved root angles and yield stability under drought stress, identifying loci that enhance resource acquisition in compacted or water-limited soils.

Evolutionary Significance

Gravitropism has deep evolutionary roots, with evidence of gravity sensing present in early land plants such as bryophytes. In mosses, rhizoids exhibit positive gravitropism, growing downward to anchor the plant to substrates and facilitate resource uptake, a response observed in species like Funaria hygrometrica and Ceratodon purpureus. This mechanism likely aided the transition from aquatic to terrestrial environments by enabling protonemata to orient against gravity for optimal attachment. The conservation of PIN auxin transporter genes, which mediate asymmetric auxin distribution essential for gravitropic bending, traces back to streptophyte algae ancestors like Klebsormidium flaccidum, where primitive PIN proteins localize to membranes but lack the polarity refinements seen in land plants. In bryophytes such as Marchantia polymorpha, a single long-PIN gene (MpPIN1) supports orthotropic growth in response to gravity, demonstrating functional conservation from algal origins through gene duplication and neofunctionalization in vascular plants. This ancient trait provides key adaptive advantages by directing organ growth for efficient resource acquisition in heterogeneous environments. Positive gravitropism in ensures downward penetration into for water and nutrient access, while negative gravitropism in shoots promotes upward elongation toward light, optimizing and . Such directed growth enhances during terrestrial , as seen in the evolution of faster responses in seed via specialized PIN2 proteins and root-specific statoliths. Comparatively, plant gravity sensing via sedimenting amyloplast statoliths in columella cells parallels animal statocyst mechanisms, where dense otoliths displace against sensory epithelia to trigger mechanotransduction, though plants rely on hormonal signaling rather than neural pathways. However, in fully aquatic like duckweeds ( spp.), gravitropism is minimal or absent, with genome analyses revealing losses of key gravity-sensing genes such as LAZY family members, reflecting evolutionary relaxation in buoyancy-supported habitats where directional growth offers little benefit. In modern contexts, gravitropism contributes to climate resilience by modulating root architecture under abiotic stresses like drought. Drought conditions attenuate positive root gravitropism through proteins like MIZ1, which reduce PIN polarity and auxin gradients, thereby enhancing hydrotropism to steer roots toward water sources and improve foraging efficiency. This plasticity, conserved across angiosperms, underscores gravitropism's role in adapting to environmental variability. Beyond plants, gravity responses termed gravitaxis appear in fungi and bacteria, potentially linked to horizontal gene transfer; for instance, the fungal protein OCTIN, acquired from bacteria, assembles into large crystals that sediment in vacuoles to sense gravity in Phycomyces blakesleeanus, enabling sporangiophore orientation. Such cross-kingdom parallels suggest ancient shared mechanisms repurposed through gene exchange.

References

  1. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2014.00610/full
  2. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(17)30873-4
  3. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1214301109
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34647245/
  5. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.3.1140
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3243349/
  7. https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/e32/32c.htm
  8. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1325&viewtype=text&pageseq=1
  9. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135158
  10. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1200340
  11. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA367698.pdf
  12. https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1880_Movement_F1326.pdf
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2671718/
  14. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1200318
  15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00197897
  16. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.01304/full
  17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00392807
  18. https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/28/6/1472/6098349
  19. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/52/355/265/2897049
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19276442
  21. https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/21/3/843/6095255
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC166895/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16061504/
  24. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.96.3.1140
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14507996/
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21921698/
  27. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.18474
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC166601/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4689802/
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16154983/
  31. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1200408
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236680808_Electrophysiology_of_Plant_Gravitropism
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-80733-z
  34. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10265-024-01575-8
  35. https://rupress.org/jgp/article/155/3/e202213248/213829/Mechanosensitive-membrane-proteins-Usual-and
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6607005/
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16656768/
  38. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-023-00315-x
  39. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01807/full
  40. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1201498109
  41. https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(07)00971-3
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC280565/
  43. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2512274122
  44. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1613499114
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03976-4
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11134415/
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34848141/
  48. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2032704100
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC59034/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11542616/
  51. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12764
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33003550/
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11471-8
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4986716/
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11541373/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6288823/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583895/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC35160/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327515/
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23583551/
  61. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.14689
  62. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tpj.70338
  63. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38069-x
  64. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/57/4/837/558857
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982202009430
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3813652/
  67. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/141646/ajb208758.pdf?sequence=1
  68. https://bioone.org/journals/the-arabidopsis-book/volume-2002/issue-1/tab.0043/Arabidopsis-thaliana--A-Model-for-the-Study-of-Root/10.1199/tab.0043.full
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12529527/
  70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00425-020-03448-5
  71. https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-016-0730-7
  72. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2014.00137/full
  73. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.15932
  74. https://journals.biologists.com/dev/article/146/17/e1704/223016/Seedling-germination-hooked-on-gravity
  75. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600899113
  76. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/b03-024
  77. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2446395
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4211383/
  79. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1011066108
  80. https://www.publish.csiro.au/fp/FP08013
  81. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01037/full
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273117701001582
  83. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2005871117
  84. https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/181/2/630/6000139
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27773568/
  86. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0504617102
  87. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/75/2/620/7326822
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2799357/
  89. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2021.729154/full
  90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24057369/
  91. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/51/349/1323/508540
  92. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040089376
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3256359/
  94. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040089308
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847225001376
  96. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111782
  97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11471-8
  98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-020-00130-8
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.