.jpg/250px-Hesperornis_regalis_(1).jpg){kind=small}
.jpg/2000px-Hesperornis_regalis_(1).jpg)
Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Hesperornithes.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hesperornithes
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
| Hesperornitheans Temporal range:
Late Cretaceous, | |
|---|---|
.jpg)
| |
| Restored skeleton of Hesperornis regalis | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Reptilia |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | Theropoda |
| Clade: | Avialae |
| Clade: | Ornithurae |
| Clade: | †Hesperornithes Fürbringer, 1888 |
| Subgroups[4] | |
| |
| Synonyms | |
Hesperornithes is an extinct and highly specialized group of aquatic avialans closely related to the ancestors of modern birds. They inhabited both marine and freshwater habitats in the Northern Hemisphere, and include genera such as Hesperornis, Baptornis, Parahesperornis, Enaliornis, and Potamornis, all strong-swimming, predatory divers. Many of the species most specialized for swimming were completely flightless. The largest known hesperornithean, Canadaga arctica, may have reached a maximum adult length of 2.2 metres (7.2 ft).[5]
Hesperornitheans were the only Mesozoic avialans known to colonize the oceans. They were wiped out in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, along with enantiornitheans and all other non-avian dinosaurs.
Anatomy and ecology
[edit].jpg)
Most of what is known about this group rests on analyses of single species, as few provide sufficiently complete fossils for analysis. Although some of the smaller and more basal species, like those belonging to the subgroups Enaliornithidae and Brodavidae, might have been able to fly, the larger hesperornithids like Hesperornis and Baptornis had only vestigial wings. As in the case of modern foot-propelled diving birds, the femur and metatarsus of these animals were short, whereas the tibia was long. The legs were also set far back on the body, as in loons, grebes or penguins. Hesperornithids must have been powerful swimmers and divers but extremely ungainly on the land, and probably spent little time ashore except to nest. They were rather long-bodied, and measured about 6 feet (180 cm) long.[6]
Some researchers think that on land they had to slide on their bellies and push with their legs; the hip and knee joints were shaped such that these species could not move them dorsoventrally, and in a resting position the feet projected sideways from the body, which would have prevented them from walking upright.[1] The anatomy of their toes suggests that hesperornitheans had lobes of skin for propulsion underwater similar to grebes, rather than being webbed. The dense bones of these animals decreased their buoyancy, making diving easier.[7] However, morphometric comparison with modern diving birds suggests that hesperornitheans share more similarities with diving ducks and cormorants rather than with loons or grebes.[8]
The snout was long, and tipped with a slightly hooked beak. Behind the beak, the jaws were filled with a series of simple, sharp teeth which were set into a longitudinal groove. These probably helped to seize fish, like the serrated beak of mergansers.[9][10] Unlike modern birds, they retained a joint between the lower jaw bones. It is believed that this allowed them to rotate the back portion of the mandible independently of the front, thus allowing the lower teeth to disengage.[6]
Evolution
[edit]Currently, the hesperornitheans are recognized as a very specialized lineage that is not ancestral to modern birds. Still, their relationship is close enough that they probably diverged from the ancestors of modern birds as late as the earliest Cretaceous.
The earliest known hesperornithean is the Early Cretaceous Enaliornis. The majority of hesperornithean species are known from the Late Cretaceous of North America. Small hesperornithean bones are known from the freshwater deposits of the Late Cretaceous of the Judith River Group as well as the Hell Creek and Lance Formations, and in several Eurasian sites. These species were about the size of a cormorant or a loon.
Classification
[edit]The clade Hesperornithes was originally named as a subclass of Aves by Furbringer in 1888.[11] However, it was generally ignored in the scientific literature in favor of the order-level name Hesperornithiformes, coined one year later. In 2004, Clarke became the first to define the hesperornithean group in terms of phylogenetics. Clarke defined Hesperornithes as all species closer to Hesperornis regalis than to modern birds, and regarded Hesperornithiformes as a junior synonym, though she did not define the latter name. Clarke also defined the more inclusive group Hesperornithidae as all hesperornitheans closer to Hesperornis than to Baptornis.[3]
Hesperornitheans were originally combined with Ichthyornis in the paraphyletic group "Odontornithes" by Othniel Charles Marsh, in 1873. In 1875, they were separated as Odontolcae. The group was often considered to be related to loons and grebes,[12] or to the Paleognathae (based on perceived similarities in the bony palate).[13] These similarities, however, as the more recently determined fact that the osteons of their bones – at least in Hesperornis – were arranged in a pattern similar to that in Neognathae,[14] are today considered to be due to convergent evolution.[15][16]
Relationships
[edit]In 2015, a species-level phylogenetic analysis found the following relationships among hesperornitheans.[17]
| Hesperornithes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
[edit]- ^ a b Larry D. Martin; Evgeny N. Kurochkin; Tim T. Tokaryk (2012). "A new evolutionary lineage of diving birds from the Late Cretaceous of North America and Asia". Palaeoworld. 21: 59–63. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2012.02.005.
- ^ Tomonori Tanaka; Yoshitsugu Kobayashi; Ken'ichi Kurihara; Anthony R. Fiorillo; Manabu Kano (2017). "The oldest Asian hesperornithiform from the Upper Cretaceous of Japan, and the phylogenetic reassessment of Hesperornithiformes". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. Online edition. doi:10.1080/14772019.2017.1341960.
- ^ a b c Clarke, J. A. (2004). "Morphology, Phylogenetic Taxonomy, and Systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae)" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 286: 1–179. doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2004)286<0001:MPTASO>2.0.CO;2. hdl:2246/454.
- ^ Holtz, Thomas R. Jr. (2012) Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages, Winter 2011 Appendix.
- ^ Wilson, Laura; Chin, Karen; Cumbaa, Stephen; Dyke, Gareth (2011-03-01). "A high latitude hesperornithiform (Aves) from Devon Island: palaeobiogeography and size distribution of North American hesperornithiforms". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 9: 9–23. doi:10.1080/14772019.2010.502910.
- ^ a b Perrins, Christopher (1987) [1979]. "Bird Families of the World". In Harrison, C.J.O. (ed.). Birds: Their Lifes, Their Ways, Their World. Reader's Digest Association, Inc. pp. 165–167. ISBN 978-0895770653.
- ^ Chinsamy, A.; Martin, Larry D.; Dobson, P. (1998). "Bone microstructure of the diving Hesperornis and the volant Ichthyornis from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas". Cretaceous Research. 19 (2): 225. doi:10.1006/cres.1997.0102.
- ^ Bell, Alyssa; Wu, Yun-Hsin; Chiappe, Luis M. (2019). "Morphometric comparison of the Hesperornithiformes and modern diving birds". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 513: 196–207. Bibcode:2019PPP...513..196B. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.12.010. S2CID 133964417.
- ^ Marsh, Othniel Charles (1880): Odontornithes, a Monograph on the Extinct Toothed Birds of North America. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
- ^ Gregory, Joseph T. (1952). "The Jaws of the Cretaceous Toothed Birds, Ichthyornis and Hesperornis" (PDF). Condor. 54 (2): 73–88. doi:10.2307/1364594. JSTOR 1364594.
- ^ Fürbringer, M. (1888): Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel (2 vols). Von Holkema, Amsterdam.
- ^ Cracraft, Joel (1982). "Phylogenetic relationships and monophyly of loons, grebes, and hesperornithiform birds, with comments on the early history of birds". Systematic Zoology. 31 (1): 35–56. doi:10.2307/2413412. JSTOR 2413412.
- ^ Gingerich, P. D. (1973). "Skull of Hesperornis and the early evolution of birds". Nature. 243 (5402): 70–73. Bibcode:1973Natur.243...70G. doi:10.1038/243070a0. S2CID 27583011.
- ^ Houde, Peter (1987). "Histological evidence for the systematic position of Hesperornis (Odontornithes: Hesperornithiformes". The Auk. 1045 (1): 125–129. doi:10.2307/4087243. JSTOR 4087243.
- ^ Stolpe, M. (1935). "Colymbus, Hesperornis, Podiceps: ein Vergleich ihrer hinteren Extremität". Journal für Ornithologie (in German). 83: 115–128. doi:10.1007/BF01908745. S2CID 11147804.
- ^ Bogdanovich, I.O. (2003). "Морфологiчнi аспекти філогеніі Hesperornithidae (Ornithurae, Aves)" [Morphological Aspects of the Phylogeny of the Hesperornithidae (Ornithurae, Aves)] (PDF). Vestnik Zoologii (in Ukrainian, Russian, and English). 37 (6): 65–71. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 31, 2021.
- ^ Bell, A.; Chiappe, L. M. (2015). "A species-level phylogeny of the Cretaceous Hesperornithiformes (Aves: Ornithuromorpha): Implications for body size evolution amongst the earliest diving birds". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 14 (3): 239–251. doi:10.1080/14772019.2015.1036141. S2CID 83686657.
.jpg)
Hesperornithes
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Description
Anatomy
Hesperornithes possessed a long, streamlined body adapted for an aquatic lifestyle, with the largest species, Hesperornis regalis, reaching lengths of up to 1.8 meters.[1] Their skeletons were characterized by a robust, flightless build, including vestigial wings with a reduced, slender humerus and fused carpals that rendered aerial locomotion impossible.[2] A strong, keeled sternum provided attachment sites for powerful swimming muscles, supporting the body's propulsion through water despite the absence of flight capabilities.[2] The vertebral column featured heterocoelous cervical vertebrae numbering 20–22, enabling significant neck flexibility akin to that in modern diving birds such as loons, while the tail featured a reduced pygostyle, indicating a specialized caudal region.[2] Cranial anatomy in hesperornitheans was specialized for underwater foraging, with an elongate skull bearing a toothed rostrum that included small, recurved teeth set in shallow grooves along the premaxilla and dentary, often covered by a keratinous rhamphotheca sheath.[3] The rostrum exhibited serrated margins on the teeth for grasping prey, and a transverse intramandibular joint between the angular and splenial bones allowed flexible jaw movement independent of the cranium, facilitated by a mobile quadrate bone.[4] Orbits were relatively large, potentially aiding vision in aquatic environments, though the tectal fossa was shallower than in many modern birds, with neognathous features such as an intrapterygoid joint and a palatine with a slender premaxillary process.[5] Limb adaptations emphasized hindlimb dominance for foot-propelled diving. The femur was short and robust, positioned posteriorly on the body to optimize balance, while the tibia and fibula were elongated to extend the leg for powerful strokes.[2] The metatarsus was robust and similarly rearward, with a twisted tarsometatarsus featuring an elongate hypotarsus for muscle anchorage; the toes were webbed or lobed, including a reversed hallux, enhancing propulsion and maneuverability in water.[2] Forelimbs were extremely reduced, underscoring their vestigial nature.[1] Bones throughout the skeleton were dense with thickened cortical layers, providing ballast to reduce buoyancy and facilitate diving, though without the extreme pachyostosis seen in some marine reptiles; this microstructure included fibrolamellar bone with longitudinal vascular canals indicative of rapid growth.[6] Inferred soft tissues included a keratinous covering over the dental structures and possible scalation on the legs.[5]Size and variation
Hesperornithes exhibited a broad range of body sizes, reflecting their diversification into various aquatic niches during the Late Cretaceous. The smallest taxa, such as those in the family Enaliornithidae (e.g., Enaliornis), were grebe-sized and measured approximately 0.5 m in length, representing early, less specialized forms with shorter skulls and reduced diving adaptations. In contrast, later hesperornithiforms in the family Hesperornithidae showed greater size variation, with Baptornis advenus reaching 0.8–1 m, Parahesperornis alexi intermediate at 1.2–1.5 m, and Hesperornis regalis attaining up to 1.8 m, characterized by elongated skulls and robust hindlimbs for enhanced propulsion. The largest known member, Canadaga arctica, possessed the most substantial vertebral centra among hesperornithiforms, indicating a body length exceeding 1.5 m and a robust build suited to high-latitude environments.[1] Morphological variation across hesperornithean taxa often correlated with temporal and geographic differences. Early Eurasian forms like Enaliornis displayed more gracile builds with shorter wings compared to the larger, more robust North American species of the Late Cretaceous, such as Baptornis with its longer femur and less derived hindlimb proportions, suggesting potential niche partitioning in marine habitats. Parahesperornis exhibited a slimmer rostrum relative to Hesperornis, further highlighting diversity in cranial morphology among contemporaneous taxa. Overall, hesperornithean diversity encompassed about 17 genera across four families, with skeletal variations in limb robusticity and proportions adapting to foot-propelled diving lifestyles.[1] Ontogenetic studies of Hesperornis fossils reveal continuous bone growth without lines of arrested growth, indicating rapid development. Juvenile specimens show underdeveloped peripheral lamellar bone, distinguishing subadults from mature individuals, while limb proportions grew quickly to support diving maturity by adulthood. This pattern underscores the group's adaptation to an aquatic lifestyle from an early age.[1]Paleoecology
Habitat and distribution
Hesperornithiforms primarily inhabited shallow marine environments, including epicontinental seaways, coastal lagoons, and nearshore settings across the Northern Hemisphere during the Late Cretaceous. In North America, the majority of fossils derive from deposits associated with the Western Interior Seaway (WIS), a vast inland sea that bisected the continent from the Arctic to the Gulf of Mexico, encompassing formations such as the Niobrara Chalk, Pierre Shale, Judith River Group, and Hell Creek Formation. These sedimentary contexts, often consisting of chalks, shales, and limestones, indicate deposition in warm, temperate marine shelves rich in fish and invertebrates, with water depths ranging from shallow coastal zones to deeper basinal areas.[1] In Eurasia, records are sparser but include marine chalk and greensand deposits along the margins of the Tethys Sea, such as the Cambridge Greensand in England and the Rybushka Formation in Russia, reflecting similar shallow marine paleoenvironments.[1] Paleotemperature estimates for these habitats, derived from oxygen isotope analysis (δ¹⁸O) of marine fossils like ammonites and inoceramids from the WIS, suggest sea surface temperatures of 22–24°C in southern regions near the Gulf of Mexico, cooling to 10–15°C in northern areas toward the Arctic, indicative of overall subtropical to temperate conditions that supported diverse aquatic ecosystems.[7] Hesperornithiforms are notably absent from Southern Hemisphere records, with their distribution confined to Laurasian landmasses, likely limited by biogeographic barriers and the group's evolutionary origins in northern high latitudes. Some Maastrichtian specimens from the Hell Creek Formation occur in transitional or fluvial deposits, hinting at occasional exploitation of brackish or freshwater habitats near shorelines.[1] Temporally, hesperornithiform fossils are rare in pre-Cenomanian strata, with the oldest known records attributed to Enaliornis from the late Albian Cambridge Greensand of England, marking an initial appearance around 100 million years ago. Diversity peaked during the Campanian and Maastrichtian stages (approximately 83–66 million years ago), coinciding with the expansion of the WIS and Tethys margins, where multiple genera coexisted in fish-abundant marine settings across North America and Eurasia, including sites in Canada (e.g., Carrot River Valley), Mongolia, and Japan.[1][8]Diet and behavior
Hesperornithes were primarily piscivorous, preying on small fish and invertebrates in marine and coastal environments.[9] Their diet is inferred from the conical, recurved teeth with smooth enamel, which were adapted for grasping slippery prey such as fish.[3] Direct evidence comes from coprolites associated with specimens like Baptornis advenus, which contain fish remains including scales and bones, confirming a fish-based diet. Some high-latitude hesperornithiforms may have exhibited dietary flexibility, potentially including opportunistic scavenging of available carrion or invertebrates when fish were scarce.[10] Locomotion in Hesperornithes was specialized for aquatic life, with powerful foot-propelled propulsion enabling efficient underwater swimming and diving, similar to modern grebes.[11] Their lobed or webbed feet, positioned far posteriorly on the body, provided thrust during dives, while vestigial wings likely served for steering and stability rather than flight.[11] On land, however, their rear-set legs resulted in poor mobility, with a waddling or shuffling gait that limited terrestrial travel to short distances.[12] Behavioral inferences suggest Hesperornithes were solitary or small-group hunters, as fossil assemblages lack evidence of large flocking or communal roosting.[11] Breeding was likely seasonal and occurred on land, with individuals hauling out briefly to nest, though direct evidence such as eggs or shells is rare in the fossil record.[13] Comparisons to modern foot-propelled divers like loons indicate they could pursue prey through underwater dives.[14]Systematics
Definition and classification
Hesperornithes is a clade of extinct avialans comprising all taxa more closely related to Hesperornis regalis than to Neornithes, the crown group of modern birds; this stem-based definition was formalized by Clarke in 2004, positioning Hesperornithes as stem-group ornithurines within the broader Ornithuromorpha. These birds are characterized by adaptations for foot-propelled diving, including reduced wings and robust hindlimbs, though such traits are referenced here only to contextualize the clade's ecological specialization.[1] The taxonomic history of Hesperornithes traces back to the late 19th century, when Othniel Charles Marsh described Hesperornis regalis in 1872 and initially classified it alongside Ichthyornis within the group Odontornithes, an assemblage of toothed birds from the Late Cretaceous; this grouping emphasized shared dental features but was later recognized as paraphyletic.[1] By the 1880s, further studies separated hesperornithiforms from ichthyornithiforms due to differences in skeletal morphology and inferred lifestyles, leading to the establishment of Hesperornithiformes as a distinct order by Fürbringer in 1888.[1] Currently, the clade includes approximately 12 genera across North America and Eurasia, such as Hesperornis, Parahesperornis, and Baptornis from North American deposits, and Enaliornis, Potamornis, and Canadaga from Eurasian sites, with additional taxa like Brodavis, Pasquiaornis, Judinornis, Asiahesperornis, Chupkaornis, and Fumicollis contributing to its diversity.[1][16] In higher-level classification, Hesperornithes is placed within Ornithurae, where it forms the sister group to the crown group Neornithes, with Ichthyornis positioned more basally; this positioning underscores that Hesperornithes is not directly ancestral to modern birds but rather a parallel lineage that shared a common ancestor with Neornithes.[1] Nomenclaturally, Hesperornithes serves as the preferred phylogenetic clade name under modern cladistic frameworks, often treated as node-based in recent revisions to encompass all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of Hesperornis regalis and close relatives like Parahesperornis alexi; the traditional rank-based term Hesperornithiformes persists as a synonym for the order but is increasingly supplanted by the clade name to align with PhyloCode principles.[17]Phylogenetic relationships
Hesperornithes occupy a basal position within Ornithurae, as the sister group to the crown group Neornithes, as supported by cladistic analyses that highlight shared derived traits such as heterocoelous cervical vertebrae and a reduced tail with a pygostyle.[18][19] These features distinguish Hesperornithes from more primitive avialans and align them closely with the lineage leading to modern birds, emphasizing their role in the mosaic evolution of ornithurine skeletal morphology.[20] The clade was first formally established through a phylogenetic matrix in Clarke's 2004 analysis, which incorporated 202 morphological characters from Mesozoic ornithurines and positioned Hesperornithes as a monophyletic group sister to Ichthyornis + Neornithes.[18] Subsequent refinement came from Bell and Chiappe's 2015 species-level phylogeny, which analyzed 28 described taxa and supported the monophyly of Hesperornithidae while finding Baptornithidae polyphyletic, and incorporated Enaliornis as the earliest diverging member from the Early Cretaceous Cambridge Greensand Formation.[19] Analyses from the 2020s, including comprehensive reviews of hesperornithiform diversity and a 2022 study of new Ichthyornis specimens, have revised the topology to place Hesperornithes as sister to Neornithes, with Ichthyornis more basal, and estimated the divergence of Hesperornithes from other ornithurines around 110–120 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous.[11][21] Ichthyornithes, comprising toothed volant birds like Ichthyornis, is positioned basal to Hesperornithes within Ornithurae in recent analyses, with Hesperornithes and Neornithes forming the sister groups leading to the crown; this relationship underscores convergent evolution of aquatic adaptations in Hesperornithes and certain enantiornithine avialans.[21][3] Ongoing debates center on the placement of fragmentary taxa like Potamornis from the Maastrichtian Lance Formation, which some analyses suggest may represent a true hesperornithine while others recover it as a more basal ornithurine due to limited diagnosable material.[11] There is no cladistic support for Hesperornithes directly ancestral to Palaeognathae or other neornithine lineages, reinforcing their status as a specialized stem group.[19]Evolutionary history
Origins and timeline
The Hesperornithes, a clade of aquatic ornithurine birds, trace their origins to the Early Cretaceous, with the earliest definitive fossils known from the late Albian to early Cenomanian stages (approximately 100 million years ago) in Europe. The genus Enaliornis, represented by fragmentary postcranial remains from the Cambridge Greensand Formation in England, is recognized as the basalmost hesperornithiform, exhibiting primitive features such as a shorter skull and less specialized hindlimb adaptations compared to later taxa. Phylogenetic analyses place the divergence of Hesperornithes from their common ancestor with Neornithes (crown-group birds) in the mid-Cretaceous, around 110–100 million years ago, based on fossil-calibrated morphological clock estimates that account for evolutionary rates in avian skeletal traits. These estimates align with the broader radiation of Ornithuromorpha following the Jurassic diversification of avialans, during which hesperornithiforms adapted to foot-propelled diving in marine and coastal environments.[1] Diversification remained limited during the Albian-Cenomanian interval, with low taxonomic diversity comprising only a few basal genera such as Enaliornis in Europe and Pasquiaornis in North America, reflecting an initial phase of experimentation with aquatic niches amid stable marine ecosystems. A marked radiation occurred from the Turonian to Santonian stages (approximately 93–83 million years ago), as evidenced by the appearance of more derived forms like Fumicollis in North American deposits, coinciding with expanding epicontinental seaways that facilitated ecological opportunities for diving birds. Diversity peaked during the Campanian-Maastrichtian (83–66 million years ago), with around 10 recognized genera—including Hesperornis, Baptornis, Parahesperornis, and Brodavis—documented primarily from the Western Interior Seaway of North America, indicating a proliferation of body sizes and habitat preferences from fully marine to brackish settings. Throughout this timeline, no significant lineage turnover events disrupted hesperornithiform evolution until the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, allowing steady accumulation of specializations such as robust tarsometatarsi for propulsion.[1][16] The global distribution of Hesperornithes was confined to Laurasian landmasses, from North America and Europe to scattered Arctic and Asian sites, likely due to vicariance following the breakup of Pangaea and the isolation of Gondwana, which prevented southward dispersal. Fossil evidence from Asia remains sparse, with rare finds like Chupkaornis from the Campanian of South Korea highlighting limited eastern expansion, while mainland Africa yields no records, possibly reflecting sampling biases in continental interiors. Similarly, South America lacks described hesperornithiforms. These gaps underscore the incomplete nature of the fossil record, particularly in under-explored regions, but emphasize the clade's role as a key Laurasian component of Cretaceous aquatic avifaunas.[1][22]Extinction
Hesperornithes underwent an abrupt extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary approximately 66 million years ago, coinciding with the broader mass extinction event that eliminated non-avian dinosaurs and many other groups. Fossil records indicate their persistence into the latest Maastrichtian stage, with specimens such as tarsometatarsi from Lancian North American deposits dated to within about 300,000 years of the boundary, but no remains occur in overlying Paleogene sediments, including those above the Hell Creek Formation. This pattern aligns with the disappearance of other archaic avian lineages, representing a significant loss of avian diversity at the K-Pg transition.[23] The primary driver of hesperornithian extinction was the Chicxulub asteroid impact, which triggered a rapid collapse of marine ecosystems through global darkness and inhibition of photosynthesis, leading to widespread plankton die-off and disruption of food chains critical for these piscivorous, diving birds. Secondary factors included intensified environmental stress from Deccan Traps volcanism, which contributed to ocean acidification via elevated CO2 levels, further exacerbating conditions for marine-adapted taxa. No hesperornithian fossils are known from the Paleogene, confirming their complete eradication without any post-boundary survival.[24][23] Compared to flying ichthyornithiforms, hesperornithians were particularly vulnerable due to their flightlessness and strict specialization in shallow marine habitats, limiting mobility and access to alternative resources during the crisis. In contrast, surviving neornithine birds, the crown-group ancestors of modern avians, benefited from greater terrestrial adaptability, including seed-eating and ground-foraging behaviors that buffered them against marine and arboreal disruptions. Archaic aquatic specialists like hesperornithians lacked such flexibility, contributing to their selective extinction.[25][23] Hesperornithes left no direct descendants, as phylogenetic analyses place them as basal ornithurines outside the neornithine crown clade. Their extinction vacated ecological niches in aquatic environments, facilitating the early Cenozoic radiation of modern diving birds such as loons (Gaviiformes) and grebes (Podicipediformes), which convergently evolved similar foot-propelled locomotion despite no close relation. This niche availability underscores how the K-Pg event reshaped avian evolution toward terrestrial and versatile forms before renewed aquatic diversification.[26][25]History of research
Discovery and initial studies
The initial discovery of hesperornithean fossils occurred during Othniel Charles Marsh's expeditions in the Western Interior Seaway deposits of Kansas in the late 1860s and early 1870s. In December 1870, Marsh collected the distal end of a tibiotarsus from the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Chalk Formation near Fort Wallace, initially interpreting it as belonging to a large, extinct bird.[11] This specimen formed the basis for the description of Hesperornis regalis in 1872, named from more complete material including a skull recovered by Marsh's student Benjamin Franklin Mudge in 1871.[27] These finds were part of the intense "Bone Wars" rivalry between Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope, which spurred rapid collection of numerous hesperornithean specimens from quarries in Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota throughout the 1870s, yielding insights into their aquatic adaptations.[28] By the late 1870s, additional taxa had been recognized, leading to early taxonomic groupings. Marsh described several species of Hesperornis and the related Ichthyornis, initially placing them together in informal associations before formalizing the subclass Odontornithes in his 1880 monograph to highlight their shared toothed jaws.[29] Concurrently, European discoveries included Enaliornis, described by Harry Govier Seeley in 1876 based on hindlimb elements from the Albian-age Cambridge Greensand Formation in England, marking the first hesperornithean identified outside North America.[30] Early interpretations positioned hesperornitheans as a "missing link" between reptiles and modern birds, with their teeth viewed as a primitive retention supporting Darwinian evolution.[31] Debates arose over whether the teeth represented an ancestral trait shared with reptilian ancestors or a derived specialization, while their robust hindlimbs and webbed feet led Marsh to infer a lifestyle as foot-propelled diving predators of fish in marine environments.[11] Key milestones in the early 20th century included Alexander Wetmore's detailed anatomical studies of Hesperornis in the 1920s, which refined understandings of its skeletal structure and reinforced its position among basal ornithurines.[32] By the 1930s, the consensus had solidified that hesperornitheans were secondarily flightless, based on their reduced, keel-less sterna and vestigial wings, distinguishing them from volant relatives like Ichthyornis.[11]Modern analyses
Modern phylogenetic analyses of Hesperornithes have advanced significantly since the early 2000s, incorporating cladistic methods and expanded taxonomic matrices to refine clade definitions and relationships. Julia Clarke's 2004 study provided a foundational cladistic framework for Ornithurae, defining Hesperornithes as a stem-based clade encompassing all ornithuromorphs more closely related to Hesperornis than to modern birds, thereby establishing its position as a sister group to Ichthyornithes within the earliest diverging ornithurines. Subsequent analyses, such as the 2015 species-level phylogeny by Bell and Chiappe, integrated additional taxa into character matrices, confirming the monophyly of Hesperornithidae while highlighting variability in body size evolution among early diving birds.[33] This work also incorporated Enaliornis, positioning it as the most basal hesperornithiform based on shared derived traits like reduced flight capabilities and enhanced aquatic adaptations in its hindlimb morphology.[8] Technological innovations have enabled detailed examinations of hesperornithiform anatomy and ecology in the 21st century. Synchrotron X-ray microtomography, applied to specimens like Hesperornis regalis in 2016, revealed intricate dentition details, including tooth implantation and enamel microstructure, which differ markedly from those in Ichthyornithes and support inferences of specialized piscivory.[3] Although direct imaging of soft tissues in Canadaga arctica remains limited, broader applications of high-resolution CT scanning in the 2020s have illuminated cranial mechanics, such as the evolutionary assembly of kinetic skull joints in basal ornithuromorphs, suggesting transitional flexibility in hesperornithiform feeding.[34] Biomechanical models of hindlimb myology, developed through comparative dissections and 3D reconstructions in studies from 2010 onward, demonstrate that hesperornithiforms achieved efficient foot-propelled swimming via elongated tarsometatarsi and robust digital flexors, with propulsion efficiencies comparable to modern loons despite trade-offs in terrestrial locomotion.[35][36] Recent fossil discoveries have broadened the known geographic and temporal scope of Hesperornithes, particularly in Asia. In the 2010s, isolated elements like the quadrate of Potamornis skutchi from the Maastrichtian Lance Formation in Wyoming provided insights into late-stage hesperornithiform diversity, suggesting persistence of smaller-bodied forms near the K-Pg boundary.[11] Asian records, once sparse, have expanded with finds such as Chupkaornis keraorum from the 2017 Izumi Group in Japan—the oldest Asian hesperornithiform—indicating a Campanian origin and wider Laurasian distribution than previously recognized.[8] Additional Maastrichtian material from the Oki Islands, described in 2020, further documents marine hesperornithiforms in East Asia, revealing morphological mosaics that bridge North American and Eurasian forms.[37] Histological analyses of bone microstructure, including those in a 2022 comprehensive review, show dense Haversian bone and rapid deposition rates in hesperornithiform femora, implying fast growth akin to modern diving birds and supporting high metabolic demands for aquatic lifestyles; post-2023 studies continue to refine these patterns but have not yet yielded major revisions.[11] Despite these advances, significant gaps persist in hesperornithiform research. The Asian fossil record remains incomplete, with most discoveries limited to fragmentary elements from marine deposits, hindering comprehensive assessments of regional endemism and dispersal patterns across Laurasia.[37] Debates continue regarding basal hesperornithine diversity, particularly the placement of early taxa like Enaliornis and the potential for undiscovered stem forms that could alter understandings of early ornithuromorph divergence; as of 2025, no substantial updates beyond 2019 phylogenetic matrices have resolved these uncertainties.[38]References
- https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2004)286<0001:MPTAAS>2.0.CO;2