Hubbry Logo
HippoideaHippoideaMain
Open search
Hippoidea
Community hub
Hippoidea
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hippoidea
Hippoidea
Hippoidea
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hippoidea
Temporal range: Maastrichtian–Recent
Blepharipoda occidentalis
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Malacostraca
Order: Decapoda
Suborder: Pleocyemata
Infraorder: Anomura
Superfamily: Hippoidea
Latreille, 1825
Families

Hippoidea is a superfamily of decapod crustaceans known as mole crabs or sand crabs.[1][2][3]

Ecology

[edit]

Hippoids are adapted to burrowing into sandy beaches, a habit they share with raninid crabs, and the parallel evolution of the two groups is striking.[4] In the family Hippidae, the body is almost ovoid, the first pereiopods have no claws, and the telson is long, none of which are seen in related groups.[5] Unlike most other decapods, sand crabs cannot walk; instead, they use their legs to dig into the sand.[6] Members of the family Hippidae beat their uropods to swim.[6]

Apart from the polar regions, hippoids can be found on beaches throughout the world. Larvae of one species have also been found in Antarctic waters, despite the lack of suitable sandy beaches in the Antarctic.[7]

Classification

[edit]

Alongside hermit crabs and allies (Paguroidea), squat lobsters and allies (Galatheoidea) and the hairy stone crab (Lomis hirta, Lomisoidea), Hippoidea is one of the four groups that make up the infraorder Anomura.[8] Of the four, Hippoidea is thought to be the most basal, with the other three groups being more closely related to each other than to Hippoidea.[9]

The fossil record of sand crabs is sparse,[10] but extends back to the Cretaceous period.[4] Sand crabs are placed in three families (exclusively fossil taxa are marked †):[11][12]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hippoidea

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hippoidea is a superfamily of decapod crustaceans within the infraorder , comprising mole crabs or sand crabs that are specialized for life in the zones of sandy beaches, where they rapidly to exploit dynamic coastal environments. These small to medium-sized anomurans, typically measuring 1–5 cm in length, exhibit a flattened, oval and modified appendages adapted for digging and filter feeding, with a fossil record extending back to the stage of the . Known for their ecological significance in intertidal ecosystems, hippoideans serve as key prey for shorebirds, , and other predators while contributing to sediment turnover and nutrient cycling through their burrowing activities. The superfamily Hippoidea includes three extant families: Albuneidae (with approximately 59 species in 13 genera, often featuring ornate carapaces and symbiotic associations), Blepharipodidae (6 species in 2 genera, characterized by elongated eyestalks), and Hippidae (approximately 23–32 species in 3 genera, including the well-studied Emerita with 11 species and Hippa). Species diversity totals approximately 88 as of 2025, predominantly in tropical and subtropical regions, though some extend into temperate waters; recent molecular studies have clarified phylogenies and revealed new species, such as in the western Atlantic. Distribution is cosmopolitan but centered in the Indo-West Pacific, with genera like Albunea widespread across the Indian and Pacific Oceans and Emerita common along Atlantic and eastern Pacific coasts. Ecologically, hippoideans inhabit exposed sandy shores from the intertidal to shallow subtidal zones, where they exhibit rapid burrowing behaviors—completing submersion in seconds—to avoid wave action and predation, often aligning with tidal cycles for feeding and . Feeding primarily involves filter mechanisms, with densely setose second antennae extended into the water column to capture , , and organic particles during swash inundation, making them vital links in coastal food webs. Their populations are sensitive to environmental changes, serving as bioindicators for health, , and degradation, and they support fisheries in some regions while facing threats from coastal development and climate-driven .

Description

Morphology

Hippoidea species exhibit a distinctive adapted to a lifestyle, characterized by a smooth, egg-like or subrectangular that fuses the into a streamlined form, with the reduced typically tucked beneath the and flexed ventrally. The is heavily calcified and convex in genera like Emerita (Hippidae), measuring up to 35 mm in length, while in Albuneidae such as Albunea, it is flatter and subrectangular, around 16 mm wide. Eyestalks are short or sessile, often with limited mobility, and in some albuneids, the eyes are nearly flush with the carapace surface; antennae are elongated and setose in hippids, functioning as sensory "feelers" with long flagella bearing rows of hairs for detecting water flow and particles. The is abbreviated, comprising five pleonites plus a , with pleura forming protective flaps that aid in burrowing stability. The appendages of Hippoidea are highly specialized, reflecting their anomuran affinities while showing modifications for substrate interaction. The first three pairs of pereopods are robust and adapted for , with dactyls that are flattened and spinose in Emerita for pushing , or hook-shaped for excavating; the fourth pair features broad, paddle-like dactyls suited for lateral displacement and occasional . The fifth pereopods are slender and filiform, bearing small, asymmetrical chelae used for grooming and reproductive functions rather than defense, as true chelipeds are absent or vestigial across the superfamily. In albuneids like Albunea symmysta, pereopods show smoother propodi and dactyli with rounded heels, emphasizing their role in fine manipulation. Adult Hippoidea typically range from 1 to 5 cm in total length, though most species are smaller, with Emerita individuals reaching up to 3.5 cm in length. is evident in some taxa, particularly in Hippidae, where females are generally larger than males—for instance, Emerita analoga females measure 14–35 mm in length compared to 10–22 mm for males. Coloration in Hippoidea serves primarily for in sandy substrates, with most species displaying pale or sandy tones that blend with their environment; Emerita individuals often appear translucent to light brown, while Albunea symmysta exhibits a mottled greyish-black and white pattern, occasionally with spots. These pigments can vary slightly with sand color, enhancing during exposure at the surface.

Burrowing adaptations

Members of the superfamily Hippoidea exhibit specialized structural modifications that facilitate efficient burrowing in sandy substrates. The is typically oval, egg-like, or subrectangular and flattened, reducing drag and enabling streamlined insertion into during digging. The thoracic legs, particularly the first four pereopods, are flattened into paddle-like structures adapted for shoveling sand forward from beneath the body, with coordinated interleg movements that propel the crab downward. Additionally, the uropods and form a compact "tail fan" that aids in backward propulsion and anchoring within the sand, enhancing stability during the burrowing process. Setae on the legs further assist in sediment displacement by increasing surface and facilitating the movement of loose particles. Sensory adaptations in Hippoidea are tailored to the challenges of subsurface life in low-light, dynamic environments. The antennae are elongated and feathery, serving chemosensory functions to detect chemical cues from waves, prey, and environmental changes while the body remains buried. These structures protrude above the sand surface, allowing the to sense hydrodynamic disturbances without full exposure. The eyes are reduced in size and mounted on short stalks, optimized for detecting in dimly lit intertidal zones rather than providing detailed vision, which is less critical in buried states where other senses dominate. Physiological traits enable Hippoidea to sustain respiration and while buried in compact sand. Water is actively pumped through the branchial chamber via scaphognathite action, allowing high oxygen extraction efficiency even when the body is submerged in , with measured oxygen uptake rates supporting prolonged burial. These crabs also demonstrate tolerance to anoxic conditions in dense sand layers, achieved through metabolic adjustments that reduce energy demands during hypoxia, permitting survival for extended periods without surfacing. These burrowing adaptations in Hippoidea evolved from anomuran ancestors, with the superfamily representing a derived lineage specialized for intertidal sandy habitats through modifications like the and enhanced digging appendages. Such traits, including the ability to achieve rapid in 0.3 to 2.7 seconds in species like Hippa pacifica, underscore their enhanced survival in wave-swept zones by minimizing exposure to predators.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification history

The superfamily Hippoidea was established by in 1825 as part of the infraorder , a grouping that initially associated these sand-burrowing crabs with hermit crabs (Paguroidea) based on shared abdominal asymmetry and reduced or modified abdomens. This early placement reflected the limited morphological data available at the time, emphasizing superficial resemblances in body form rather than deeper phylogenetic relationships. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, classifications advanced with the definition of key families. William Stimpson formalized the family Albuneidae in 1858, distinguishing its members by their flattened, sand-adapted carapaces and burrowing lifestyles, initially including genera like Albunea and Lepidopa. Johan Ernst Boas, in his 1880 revision of decapod crustaceans, recognized the family Hippidae, separating it from Albuneidae based on differences in antennal structure and pereopod morphology, while maintaining Hippoidea as a cohesive superfamily. These developments marked a shift toward more refined family-level distinctions, though broader debates persisted regarding the monophyly of Hippoidea, with some early workers questioning whether its members formed a natural group or represented convergent adaptations to sandy habitats. Such uncertainties lingered into the late 20th century, as morphological analyses alone struggled to resolve internal relationships, leading to provisional groupings without consensus on superfamily boundaries. The advent of molecular data in the 2000s catalyzed significant revisions, confirming Hippoidea's monophyly and its basal position within Anomura through combined 18S rRNA and morphological phylogenies. A pivotal update came from Christopher Boyko in 2002, who erected the family Blepharipodidae as distinct from Albuneidae, based on spiny features and structures, thereby establishing a three-family framework while synonymizing several junior synonyms within genera. This was further solidified by Sammy De Grave and colleagues in 2009, who, in a comprehensive of decapod genera, affirmed the three families—Albuneidae (ca. 50 species), Blepharipodidae (ca. 10 species), and Hippidae (ca. 30 species)—as monophyletic units within Hippoidea, integrating taxa and resolving prior ambiguities in generic assignments. Ongoing challenges in Hippoidea taxonomy stem from cryptic species complexes, particularly in widespread genera like Emerita, where molecular and morphological analyses have revealed hidden diversity, such as the 2023 description of a new western Atlantic species previously conflated with Emerita brasiliensis. Fossil records add further complexity, with ambiguous placements of Cretaceous and Eocene forms complicating subfamily delineations due to incomplete preservation of soft tissues. Over 100 species have been described across the superfamily (including fossils), yet debates continue on subfamily validity, driven by integrative approaches combining molecules, morphology, and biogeography to refine generic synonymies and phylogenetic positions.

Current classification

Hippoidea is a superfamily within the infraorder of the suborder in the order Decapoda, positioned as the sister group to other anomuran superfamilies such as Paguroidea and Galatheoidea. The superfamily currently includes three accepted families: Albuneidae (approximately 52 species in about 10 genera, such as Albunea, characterized by highly flattened bodies adapted for sand dwelling), Blepharipodidae (6 species in 2 genera, including Blepharipoda primarily in the eastern Pacific and Lophomastix in the northwestern Pacific), and Hippidae (about 30 species in 3 genera, such as Emerita and Hippa, commonly known as mole crabs). Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses, including mitogenomic and multi-locus studies, support the of Hippoidea and its basal position within , with Blepharipodidae as the to Albuneidae + Hippidae; however, some trees indicate potential of Albuneidae, awaiting further resolution through additional genomic data. In total, Hippoidea encompasses approximately 88 valid extant species (as of 2025), with representative examples including Emerita analoga (the Pacific mole crab, a key intertidal species) and Albunea symnoda (noted for symbiotic associations with holothurians).

Fossil record

The fossil record of Hippoidea is sparse and fragmentary, reflecting the challenges of preserving remains from their specialized sandy burrowing habitats, but it documents a temporal range from the Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous (approximately 70 million years ago) to the present, with continuous but low-diversity occurrences through the Paleogene. The earliest known fossils are from the upper Maastrichtian Nekum Member of the Maastricht Formation in southern Limburg, Netherlands, where the albuneid Praealbunea rickorum was described from a single carapace specimen; this find represents the first Cretaceous record of sand crabs and indicates their presence in shallow marine, sandy environments prior to the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event. In the Paleogene, fossil diversity remained limited, consistent with a post-extinction recovery phase for Anomura. Early Eocene records from North America include Sklallamia buchanani, a new genus and species of Albuneidae from the shallow-water Crescent Formation in Washington State, USA, marking the first confirmed Pacific Basin occurrence of the family and highlighting early Cenozoic persistence in temperate coastal sands. Eocene fossils from Europe, such as species allied to modern Albuneidae (e.g., from Italian and Spanish deposits), further demonstrate the superfamily's survival and adaptation in Old World margins during this interval of relatively low taxonomic richness. Preservation is inherently challenging for Hippoidea, as their intertidal and shallow subtidal sandy habitats promote rapid erosion and disarticulation; nearly all known fossils are isolated carapaces, with no complete exoskeletons or larval stages documented, limiting insights into soft-tissue morphology or . A marked increase in diversity is evident in the , particularly within the , where multiple genera across Albuneidae, Blepharipodidae, and Hippidae (e.g., Albunea species from and ) reflect regional radiation tied to expanding tropical shallow-water ecosystems. This fossil history underscores Hippoidea's basal position within , with origins in the predating the end-Cretaceous mass extinction and subsequent survival through niche conservatism, as evidenced by minimal changes in shape and burrowing adaptations across 70 million years.

Distribution and

Geographic range

Hippoidea exhibit a across temperate and tropical coastal regions worldwide, primarily inhabiting sandy beaches in the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones, but they are absent from true polar environments. While adult forms do not occur in or habitats due to unsuitable conditions, planktonic larvae of in the family Hippidae have been recorded in Antarctic waters near the , likely transported by ocean currents from subantarctic sources. This broad range reflects their adaptation to warm and temperate marine environments, with approximately 88 documented across the three families: Albuneidae (approximately 52 ), Blepharipodidae (6 ), and Hippidae (approximately 30 ), as of 2024. Regional diversity is highest in the Indo-West Pacific, a hotspot for the superfamily with more than 50 of Albuneidae alone, alongside numerous representatives from the other families; this area accounts for a significant portion of global hippoid richness due to its extensive tropical coastlines and archipelagos. In the , are abundant along Pacific coasts, particularly the Emerita (Hippidae), which dominates sandy beaches from to , including well-known populations of E. analoga in . The Atlantic exhibits sparser distribution, with fewer overall, mainly limited to tropical western Atlantic shores and rare occurrences in the eastern Atlantic. Endemism is pronounced among island systems, with several species restricted to isolated archipelagos; for instance, Albunea marquisiana (Albuneidae) is endemic to the in the South Pacific. Recent discoveries have expanded known ranges, including new Albuneidae species in such as Paralbunea from the and , and additional records in Australian waters highlighting ongoing exploration in these regions. Dispersal in Hippoidea is facilitated by planktonic larval stages, which can last weeks to months and enable long-distance transport via ocean currents, contributing to their wide geographic spread despite limited adult mobility. Phylogenetic analyses further suggest vicariance events tied to the breakup of as a key driver of diversification, with basal splits in Albuneidae aligning with the separation of ancient southern continents around 100-80 million years ago.

Habitat preferences

Hippoidea, commonly known as mole crabs or sand crabs, primarily inhabit sandy coastal environments characterized by fine to medium-grained sands on ocean beaches. These substrates allow for efficient burrowing, which is essential for avoiding predation and in the dynamic . Species in the family Hippidae, such as , prefer the upper intertidal swash zone where waves intermittently wash over the sand, enabling them to filter-feed while remaining partially buried. In contrast, members of the Albuneidae often occupy subtidal sandy habitats, extending into shallower offshore areas up to several meters deep, where sediment stability supports their burrowing lifestyle. Zonation patterns within these habitats are species-specific and influenced by tidal cycles and wave action. For instance, Emerita species migrate vertically with the , positioning themselves in the zone during to exploit nutrient-rich waters while burrowing to depths of 0-30 cm to evade exposure. Albuneid species like Albunea symmysta exhibit greater flexibility, inhabiting both intertidal zones and adjacent subtidal sands near river estuaries. These crabs demonstrate tolerance to fluctuations typical of coastal environments, ranging from 20 to 35 ppt, particularly in estuarine-influenced areas where freshwater inflows create gradients. Abiotic factors play a critical role in habitat selection, with a strong preference for wave-exposed shores that provide the high-energy swash necessary for their passive filter-feeding strategy. Burial depths typically range from surface levels to 30 cm in loose sands, allowing rapid reburial during wave retreat—often within seconds for smaller individuals. However, Hippoidea are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances, including pollution from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which accumulate in their tissues and reduce population densities, and beach grooming practices that compact sand and remove organic matter, disrupting burrowing efficiency. Biotic associations further define their , with frequent co-occurrence alongside ghost crabs (Ocypode spp.) in the upper intertidal and backshore zones of sandy beaches, where both exploit similar burrowable substrates. Some Albuneidae exhibit symbiotic or epibiotic relationships, such as facultative or attachment by gastropods like Kurtziella spp. in the chambers, providing the crabs with potential oxygenation benefits while utilizing their burrows as . These interactions highlight the interconnectedness of sandy beach communities, though they can impose physiological costs under stressed conditions.

Ecology and behavior

Feeding ecology

Members of the superfamily Hippoidea, commonly known as mole crabs or crabs, exhibit feeding strategies adapted to their dynamic intertidal habitats, primarily functioning as detritivores and suspension feeders. They strain , organic particles, and small from the using specialized feathery antennae during wave action in the swash zone. In the genus Emerita, such as E. analoga, the diet primarily consists of , mostly dinoflagellates, and , with occasional small captured passively. occurs without active hunting; instead, crabs position themselves burrowed in with antennae extended to filter food as waves pass over, relying on the natural flow for particle capture. In contrast, species in the genus Hippa, such as H. pacifica, display more selective scavenging behaviors, targeting larger prey like (Physalia utriculus) fragments detected via chemical cues on their antennae and antennules. Gut contents of H. pacifica consist primarily of nematocysts and shredded zooids from such prey, distinguishing them from the unselective filtration seen in Emerita. Across Hippoidea, the antennae structure facilitates this passive yet efficient method, with secondary antennae in Emerita species particularly adapted for sieving fine particles. Hippoidea occupy an intermediate trophic position as primary to secondary consumers in coastal food webs, where their high renders them a crucial prey resource for higher predators. For instance, they comprise over 70% of the diet for some shorebirds, such as the (Gelochelidon nilotica), supporting avian populations along sandy beaches. This role underscores their ecological importance in transferring energy from microbial and planktonic sources to consumers. Feeding activity in Hippoidea varies seasonally, with increased rates during coastal events that enhance availability and blooms, particularly in spring for Emerita . In populations of E. analoga, feeding and related metabolic processes decline from mid-October to mid-April, aligning with reduced wave energy and food supply outside periods.

Locomotion and interactions

Hippoidea species exhibit highly specialized locomotion adapted exclusively to burrowing in sandy substrates, with no capability for terrestrial walking. Adults burrow backward into the sand using coordinated movements of their pereopods and uropods; the first three pairs of pereopods function like oars to pull the body forward into an excavated cavity, while the fourth pair of pereopods and uropods excavate and eject sand dorsally in a continuous motion. For rapid escape from threats, individuals propel backward using uropods in a swimming-like action, often achieving burial in seconds. Larval stages, in contrast, are planktonic and capable of limited to disperse in coastal waters. Behavioral sequences in Hippoidea are tightly synchronized with wave action and tidal cycles, facilitating emergence for feeding and breeding. Aggregations of individuals, particularly in species like Emerita analoga, rise to the surface and adopt pre-feeding postures as waves approach, allowing coordinated filter-feeding before rapid re-burial during wave backwash. These groups form dense populations, with densities reaching up to 4000 individuals per square meter in Emerita aggregations, and even higher (over 50,000/m²) in juvenile clusters at the core. Such wave-synchronized emergence enhances survival by minimizing exposure time. Interspecific interactions among Hippoidea involve competition for intertidal , notably with ghost crabs (Ocypodidae), which occupy overlapping sandy beach zones and may displace burrowing sites through their own excavation activities. Predation pressure from and shorebirds triggers mass burial responses, where entire aggregations submerge synchronously to evade attacks. Some species host commensal organisms, such as the bivalve Kurtiella pedroana living on Blepharipoda occidentalis without apparent harm to the host. Circadian and circatidal rhythms govern activity in Hippoidea, with peaks often occurring nocturnally to reduce diurnal predation risk from visually hunting birds. Responses to tidal cycles enable tidal migration, where populations shift up the on rising and down on ebbing , optimizing access to food while avoiding and predators during low exposure.

Reproduction and life cycle

Mating systems

Hippoidea exhibit pronounced sexual dimorphism, with females generally larger than males to accommodate egg brooding. In species such as Emerita analoga, females reach carapace lengths of 14–35 mm, while males are smaller at 10–22 mm, allowing females to develop broader abdomens for carrying egg masses under the telson. This size difference arises from variations in growth rates and size at sexual maturity, with females investing more energy in reproduction. Males often display neotenic traits, remaining smaller and retaining larval-like features, such as shorter eyestalks, which may facilitate mate location without interfering with the female's burrowing activities. Mating strategies in Hippoidea are adapted to their burrowing lifestyle in dynamic zones, where precopulatory mate guarding is rare due to the need for rapid submersion in sand. Instead, often involves opportunistic encounters during brief emergences from burrows, with aggregations of males and females potentially enhancing opportunities. In Emerita asiatica, multiple small males (up to five) can deposit spermatophores directly onto a single female's pleopodal region in turbulent waters, ensuring effective transfer without prolonged pairing; this polygynandrous approach is likely similar in other congeners like E. analoga. Copulation appears indiscriminate, with limited evidence of pheromonal attraction, though olfactory and tactile cues may play a role in precopulatory rituals. Physical contact is restricted to these short emergence periods, minimizing exposure to predators. Fecundity varies by species but is generally high, reflecting substantial energy investment in that contributes to post-reproductive decline. Females of E. analoga produce 1,000–45,000 eggs per brood, with multiple broods possible annually during the reproductive season (–), though the overall lifespan of 2–3 years limits total reproductive output. This intense investment often leads to mortality after the primary reproductive phase, particularly in older individuals, as resources are depleted following egg production and larval release.

Larval stages

The larval development of Hippoidea, a superfamily of anomuran decapods commonly known as mole crabs or sand crabs, proceeds through a planktonic phase consisting of multiple zoeal stages followed by a megalopa stage, before transitioning to the benthic juvenile phase. This biphasic life cycle, with an extended pelagic period, facilitates widespread dispersal in coastal marine environments. The zoeal stages are characterized by planktonic, leaf-like swimming appendages adapted for filter-feeding and , while the megalopa stage marks the onset of benthic orientation with more crab-like morphology. In most hippoidean species, larval development includes five to six zoeal stages, succeeded by a megalopa; for instance, Emerita emeritus exhibits six zoeal stages and one megalopa stage. The total duration of this planktonic phase varies from 1 to 4 months, influenced by environmental factors such as , with shorter times in warmer conditions; laboratory rearing of Emerita talpoida at approximately 20–25°C yields an average pelagic duration of 28 days. Higher temperatures accelerate development, as seen in Emerita species where completes in 20–30 days at 20°C, but prolonged exposure to extremes like 38.5°C leads to 100% mortality. During the planktonic dispersal phase, zoeae actively swim and feed primarily on and small , filtering particles with their appendages to support rapid growth to sizes up to 12 mm, among the largest for anomuran zoeae. This phase incurs high mortality rates, often exceeding 90%, due to predation, , and in currents, though laboratory studies on related like Lepidopa benedicti report only about 31% survival to megalopa under controlled conditions. Antarctic records of anomuran larvae, including hippoidean morphotypes, demonstrate tolerance to cold waters near 0°C, enabling potential southward dispersal in polar regions. Metamorphosis occurs when the final zoea molts into the megalopa, which actively seeks settlement in intertidal sandy substrates typical of adult habitats, using chemical cues from conspecific adults and organic sediments to select appropriate sites. Upon settlement, the megalopa molts into the first juvenile , adopting the burrowing lifestyle of the ; this process is cued by detecting metabolites in sandy environments, ensuring habitat matching for survival. In Emerita talpoida, megalopae respond to chemical signals from the swash zone, accelerating and reducing time to benthic . Detailed developmental studies highlight intraspecific and interfamilial variations; for Emerita emeritus, complete descriptions confirm six zoeal stages with morphological changes in setation and appendages across each molt, reared successfully on mixed diets. In contrast, species in the Blepharipodidae family, such as Blepharipoda spp., exhibit five zoeal stages, reflecting adaptations to more stable subtropical habitats. These differences underscore the superfamily's diversity in larval strategies, optimized for varying dispersal needs.

References

  1. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/99432/
  2. https://isopods.nhm.org/pdfs/30380/30380.pdf
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33056584/
  4. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=106686
  5. https://bioflux.com.ro/docs/2015.224-235.pdf
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002209810000294X
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6482010/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141113624004069
  9. https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/html/C5657B52FF03B38C44D1FD7ACD500F22
  10. https://meridian.allenpress.com/scasbulletin/article-pdf/62/2/45/3158663/i0038-3872-62-2-45.pdf
  11. https://bioflux.com.ro/docs/2015.611-615.pdf
  12. https://decapoda.nhm.org/pdfs/38918/38918.pdf
  13. https://inverts.wallawalla.edu/Arthropoda/Crustacea/Malacostraca/Eumalacostraca/Eucarida/Decapoda/Anomura/Family_Hippidae/Emerita_analoga.html
  14. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/200/4/793/7448/Digging-in-Sand-Crabs-Decapoda-Anomura-Hippoidea
  15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ec656955a7f58ef71583c18d71818458edc38e2
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13644236_Digging_in_sand_crabs_Coordination_of_joints_in_individual_legs
  17. https://limpets.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ThePacificMoleCrabFS_2018.pdf
  18. https://www.facebook.com/groups/5972414882871675/posts/24956351244051420/
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326573344_Population_abundances_tidal_movement_burrowing_ability_and_oxygen_uptake_of_Emerita_analoga_Stimpson_Crustacea_Anomura_on_a_sandy_beach_of_South-Central_Chile
  20. https://research.bangor.ac.uk/files/68153102/S_J_McCLEARY_Ph.D_2006_-_OCR.pdf
  21. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-13-128
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232674277_Burrowing_and_Swash_Behavior_of_the_Pacific_Mole_Crab_Hippa_Pacifica_Anomura_Hippidae_in_Tropical_Sandy_Beaches
  23. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=106686
  24. https://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/app/uploads/2017/04/s23rbz139-151.pdf
  25. https://research.nhm.org/pdfs/29407/29407.pdf
  26. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/293646.pdf
  27. https://zobodat.at/pdf/Arthropod-Systematics-Phylogeny_67_0119-0135.pdf
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232686042_A_worldwide_revision_of_the_recent_and_fossil_sand_crabs_of_the_Albuneidae_Stimpson_and_Blepharipodidae_new_family_Crustacea_Decapoda_Anomura_Hippoidea
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39064758_A_Classification_of_Living_and_Fossil_Genera_of_Decapod_Crustaceans
  30. https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/items/46c269c6-c768-43ab-9450-d4784e813aa6
  31. https://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/app/uploads/2017/04/s23rbz139-151.pdf
  32. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=106735
  33. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=467686
  34. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=158390
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269336613_Anomuran_Phylogeny_New_Insights_from_Molecular_Data
  36. https://bioone.org/journals/Proceedings-of-the-Biological-Society-of-Washington/volume-125/issue-3/11-04.1/A-new-genus-and-species-of-sand-crab-Decapoda/10.2988/11-04.1.short
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296630309_A_worldwide_revision_of_the_recent_and_fossil_sand_crabs_of_the_Albuneidae_Stimpson_and_Blepharipodidae_new_family_Crustacea_Decapoda_Anomura_Hippoidea
  38. https://www.city.mizunami.lg.jp/_res/projects/default_project/_page_/001/002/291/2014092922827_02.pdf
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691835/
  40. https://sanctuarysimon.org/dbtools/species-database/id/436/emerita/analoga/pacific-sand-crab
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240809626_Effects_of_morphodynamic_and_estuarine_gradients_on_the_demography_and_distribution_of_a_sandy_beach_mole_crab_Implications_for_source-sink_habitat_dynamics
  42. https://www.bhp.com/-/media/bhp/regulatory-information-media/copper/olympic-dam/0000/draft-eis-appendices/odxeisappendixo8sensitivityofmarinebiotatochangesinsalinity.pdf
  43. https://www.academia.edu/8889167/Body_shape_and_burial_behavior_of_the_sand_crab_Emerita_analoga_Stimpson_1857_in_a_reflective_to_intermediate_morphodynamic_range_of_sandy_beaches
  44. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/sandcrab.pdf
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352485520304382
  46. https://journal-of-parasitology.kglmeridian.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/para/103/6/article-p646.xml
  47. https://sanctuarysimon.org/species-database/?id=436
  48. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/52289e77-904e-498e-b801-069e990c2301/content
  49. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/e3717b42-ddf0-4e9c-b6a4-363ee073a844/download
  50. https://bioone.org/journals/waterbirds/volume-45/issue-4/063.045.0409/Dietary-Plasticity-Mitigates-Impacts-to-Reproduction-for-the-Gull-Billed/10.1675/063.045.0409.full
  51. https://www.seasonsinthesea.com/mar/beaches.shtml
  52. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/53/3/701/21690/The-Mechanism-of-Burrowing-of-the-Mole-Crab
  53. https://repository.si.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6121e277-1e95-4223-be71-d6477b627058/content
  54. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/crustacea/44/0/44_1/_pdf
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5365580_Breeding_biology_of_the_intertidal_sand_crab_Emerita_Decapoda_Anomura
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044523104700704
  57. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1388&context=bio_fac
  58. https://www.blackbeardbiologic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Forward_2007-Mole-Crabs.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231966139_The_tidal_rhythm_in_activity_of_the_mole_crab_Emerita_talpoida
  60. https://limpets.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/PacificMoleCrabFS_Oct2010.pdf
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771498903961
  62. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00396930
  63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01651269.1979.10553314
  64. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/363172.pdf
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233673999_Larval_development_in_the_sand_crab_Emerita_emeritus_L_1767_Anomura_Hippoidea_reared_in_the_laboratory
  66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1538915
  67. https://journals.flvc.org/jcr/article/download/77554/75019
  68. https://research.nhm.org/pdfs/11475/11475.pdf
  69. https://www.scielo.br/j/nau/a/CdVjNkRXZT5thSY77MfzWyz/?lang=en
  70. https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=bio_fac
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236325541_Cues_and_context_Larval_responses_to_physical_and_chemical_cues
  72. https://scholars.duke.edu/person/rforward/publications
  73. http://sio-legacy.ucsd.edu/zooplanktonguide/species/blepharipoda-occidentalis
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.