Hubbry Logo
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground ForcesIslamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground ForcesMain
Open search
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
Community hub
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces
نیروی زمینی سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی
FoundedActual: 1980; 45 years ago (1980)
Official: 17 September 1985
(40 years ago) (1985-09-17)[1]
Country Iran
BranchLand force
Size≈150,000 (2020)[2]
Part ofIslamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
EngagementsIran–Iraq War
Syrian Civil War
Commanders
CommanderBG Mohammad Karami
Deputy CommanderBG Rouhollah Nouri
Chief of StaffSBG Ahmad Akhavan Mahdavi
Insignia
Flag
Flag of armored units
Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps
Command
Supreme Leader
Commanders
Joint Staff
Military branches
Ground Forces
Aerospace Force
Navy
Quds Force
Basij
Intelligence agencies
Intelligence Organization
Intelligence Protection Organization
Personnel
Ranks insignia
Facilities
Imam Hossein University
Baqiyatallah University
University of Command and Staff
Amir Al-Momenin University

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces (Persian: نیروی زمینی سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی), acronymed NEZSA (Persian: نزسا), are the ground forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The IRGC Ground Forces are more geared towards internal disorder than the regular Iranian Army. However, in recent years, the IRGC Ground Forces and by extension the entire IRGC, have transitioned to becoming an expeditionary force, capable of projecting power abroad, through conventional military operations or via proxies and unconventional warfare.[3] There are at least around 150,000 IRGC Ground Force troops.[4]

Following this transition, the Ground Forces structure remains focused on brigade levels units, supported by armoured, air support (drone), artillery, intelligence and special forces formations.[5]

History

[edit]

The Guardians of the Islamic Revolution Ground Forces was officially established on 5 May 1979. It was conceived as a popular militia force to monitor the remainders of the Shah's Artesh and defend the Islamic Revolution (such as against Nojeh coup plot).[6] However, the official establishment followed several months of activity of the Revolutionary Guards.[7]

According to Mohsen Rafiqdust, the establishment of and armed force tasked to secure the Revolution was proposed by Hujjat al-Islam Mohammad Montazeri, son of Ayatollah Hussein Ali Montazeri; Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini ordered in February 1979 the establishment of such a force, which was established by Mohammad Montazeri itself and Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti, leader of the Islamic Republican Party.[7] Moshen Rafiqdust was charged with organizing the Revolutionary Guard and Abbas Duzduzani was the first Commander.

Between February and December 1979, the IRGC evolved from a loose militia into an armed force;[7] In early days, IRGC units seemed to operate independently and in different capacities in different locations.[7] In March 1979, a national command was established.[7]

The mission of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution accorded primacy to an internal security role, while at the same time pushing for the export of the Islamic Revolution:[6] in the early days, the IRGC was responsible for both internal and external intelligence and security, which was carried out in conjunction with the prime minister's office; the alghare’eh, combat units, were involved in fighting enemy groups.[6][7]

Initially, the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution operated in coordination with Komitehs and their command echelon, but with an official approval.[7]

In the aftermath of the official establishment of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, there were four factions within it; these factions were included in the Command and Central Councils, with the greatest influence exercised by the Mojahedin of the Islamic Revolution Organization.[7] Members of the Mojahedin of the Islamic Revolution Organization in the IRGC used their positions against the People's Mujahedin of Iran, Tudeh and Fadai in the general campaign against the political left and ethnic minorities, where the left was strong.[7] In September 1979, the IRGC were entrusted with providing security detail to Friday congregational prayer leader Ayatollah Montazeri, while failed to resist Iranian students in the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.[7] The 1979 Iranian constitution gave Khomeini the supreme command of all armed forces, including the IRGC.[7]

In the wake of Iraq invasion of Iran in 1980, Islamic Republican Party (whose forces were led by the IRGC) and leftist organizations harshly confronted each other, resulting in thousands of casualties; the impeachment and removal of President Abolhassan Banisadr allowed the Islamic Republican Party to gain control of the defence strategy and to involve deeply the IRGC in it.[7]

The Iran–Iraq war caused the IRGC to align closely with the clerical rule of the Islamic Republican Party; IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaee resigned from Mojahedin of the Islamic Revolution Organization due to the latter's contrast with the clerical rule.[7] During the confrontation between Montazeri and President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, hundreds were arrested from IRGC ranks. By 1988, the radical-leftist faction had vanished within the IRGC.[7]

IRGC membership grew steadily in the first years of operation and during the Iran–Iraq War: by the end of 1979 there were about 10,000 guardsmen; in mid 1980 the number swelled to 25,000 and reached 50,000 by the end of 1981. In 1986 there were 350,000 guardsmen,[7] organized into battalion-level units.[8] The Iran–Iraq war forged the identities of the IRGC, Basij, and other associated organizations.[7]

After the war, the Iranian leadership provided the IRGC new outlets of service.[7] Some, external to the Basij, proposed their demobilization or their merger in the IRGC under the name of Resistance Guard.[9] Instead of demobilizing IRGC and Basij, Iranian leadership maintained and expanded their mobilization, particularly in extra-military sectors.[7]

In 1989, the IRGC lost its ministry and was merged with the Artesh in the Ministry of Defence and Armed Force Logistics as part of a Rafsanjani's policy aimed at reforming and consolidating the state control over governmental institutions. The IRGC even received a military ranks system.[7] Between 1990 and 1995 the Basij Resistance Force was supported by new Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei against the Ground Forces of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution in equipment allocations. The Basij supplanted the IRGC also in guarding sensitive buildings and installations.[9]

However, Supreme Leader Khamanei managed to forge in the early 1990s a solid alliance with the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution; in the late 1990s, during the Mohammad Khatami's presidency, the IRGC provided the conservative faction considerable resources in the usage of force in combating perceived political threats.[7]

During the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2005–2013), the IRGC was increased its influence in Middle East (in Lebanon but especially with Shiite stakeholders in Iraq), but also in Chavez's Venezuela.[7] In 2009 Basij military responsibilities (including Basij military training) were transferred back to the Ground Forces of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution in order to free the former and let it to concentrate on cultural struggle.[9]

The Islamic Republic of Iran has been involved in active support to Syria since early stages of the Syrian Civil War; while the initial instrument of support was the Qods Force, the IRGC Ground Forces subsequently stepped in.[4]

In 2017, Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour, IRGC Ground Forces Commander, stated that the NESZA set up a drone centre.[citation needed]

Commanders

[edit]
No. Portrait Commander Took office Left office Time in office Ref.
1
Yahya Rahim Safavi
Safavi, Yahya RahimYahya Rahim Safavi
(born 1952)		198519893–4 years–
2
Mostafa Izadi
Izadi, MostafaBrigadier general
Mostafa Izadi
(born 1956)		198919922–3 years–
3
Mohammad Ali Jafari
Jafari, Mohammad AliBrigadier general
Mohammad Ali Jafari
(born 1957)		1992200512–13 years–
4
Ahmad Kazemi
Kazemi, AhmadBrigadier general
Ahmad Kazemi
(1958–2006)		20059 January 2006 †0–1 years[10]
5
Mohammad Reza Zahedi
Zahedi, Mohammad RezaBrigadier general
Mohammad Reza Zahedi
(1960–2024)		200620081–2 years–
6
Mohammad Jafar Asadi
Asadi, Mohammad JafarBrigadier general
Mohammad Jafar Asadi
(born 1958)		200820090–1 years–
7
Mohammad Pakpour
Pakpour, MohammadBrigadier general
Mohammad Pakpour
(born 1961)		2009202515–16 years–
8
Mohammad Karami
Karami, MohammadBrigadier general
Mohammad Karami
(born 1966)		2025Incumbent0 years[11]

Organization

[edit]

Across their 38 years-long history, the IRGC Ground Forces underwent to several organizational changes. From 2007 until 2015, they were organized in territorial commands in order to ensure defence against ground invasion and decapitation strikes, as well as to counter internal unrest. Alongside territorial commands, the IRGC Ground Forces also have conventional formations.[4]

Operational organization

[edit]

According to Anthony Cordesman and Bryan Gold, the IRGC Ground Forces control the Basij and strictly cooperate with Basij's Imam Hossein Brigades.[5]

Iranian APCs and armoured cars. From left to right: Toophan MRAP, Yuz armored car, Rakhsh APC (tracked), Rakhsh APC (wheeled).
Toophan 5, the latest variant of the Iranian copy of the American anti-tank missile TOW

Due to the involvement of the IRGC Ground Forces in the Syrian Civil War,[4] according to Ali Alfoneh for Atlantic Council an increased deployment of IRGC Ground Forces in Syria changed the IRGC itself from a political army, tasked with countering domestic unrest, to an expeditionary force.[12]

Divisions and Brigades

[edit]

The IRGC also maintains a structure of infantry and armoured formations. NEZSA also include artillery and engineer units and an airborne brigade. The IRGC Ground Forces have recently announced efforts to form an air assault unit.[4]

According to Marie Donovan, Nicholas Carl, and Frederick W. Kagan, IRGC Ground Forces military formations are in service as cadre organizations, with officers and NCOs, but without or with few enlisted personnel. These commands and formations may be complemented by Basij's Imam Hussein infantry battalions or foreign militia and military units.[13]

Some IRGC Ground Forces have a readiness preparation higher than others.

The Imam Hussein battalions are mixed IRGC-Basij units, with one battalion assigned to each region within a province.[14] Imam Hussein battalions are infantry units used for internal military defence as well as for missions beyond Iranian borders.[13] Imam Hossein Battalions deployed to Syria with IRGC operational division and brigade cadres.

Alongside Imam Hussein battalions, each Provincial command establishes at least one Basij Fatehin unit in its own boundary. While being light infantry units, Fatehin units have also been used as anti-riot force multipliers to law enforcement.[14]

Saberin Unit

[edit]

The IRGC Ground Forces have several elite units that form one single unit at a brigade level, the Saberin Unit, established in 2000. The Saberin Unit is a force highly trained in a number of specialized capabilities.[15] Some IRGC divisions and brigades have separate Saberin units directly subordinated to them.[4] The IRGC has also designated certain formations as light infantry commandos, or takavaran.[4] In 2017 the NESZA set up a drone centre.[15]

The Saberin Unit ranks its commandos according to three levels:[15]

  • Rapid Response (Vakonesh-e Sarie);
  • Special Force (Nirooy-e Vijeh);
  • Special Operations Force (Nirooy-e Makhsoos).

Aviation Unit

[edit]
A Mohajer-2 drone

The Aviation Unit (Yegan-e Havanirooz) of the IRGC Ground Forces is the IRGC's most important helicopter unit.[15] It was established in 2015, by order of Ali Khamenei.[15]

The Aviation Unit consists of four subdivisions:[15]

  • Advanced Aviation Training Center;
  • Helicopter Research Center;
  • Helicopter Professional Repair Center;
  • Seyyed-al-Shohada Aviation Base.

Territorial organization

[edit]

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces have a territorial organization in charge of activities and operations. This organization has multiple layers: multi-provincial regional headquarters, provincial headquarters, commands for each county, district commands for each bakhsh (township), and a local Basij base for each neighborhood.[16]

According to Saeid Golkar, this arrangement should constitute a system directly parallelling the state's administrative system.[16]

Thar-Allah Headquarters

[edit]
See also: Thar-Allah Headquarters

The Thar-Allah Headquarters is a command directly subordinated to the Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. It is in charge of security for the Tehran area.[17] and doubles as Headquarters with territorial responsibilities.[13]

The Thar-Allah Headquarters is among the most important IRGC commands in Iran, tasked with protecting key institutions and the offices of the Government of Iran. The Thar-Allah Headquarters is also tasked with thwarting all threats against Tehran.[18]

Officially, Thar-Allah's commander is the same as the IRGC commander. The Thar-Allah Headquarters, however, also has a deputy commander in charge of day-to-day operations.

Headquarters

[edit]

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces maintain ten regional headquarters (Gharargah), with the Sar-Allah headquarters in charge for Tehran and Alborz provinces as well as Tehran City. These headquarters are responsible for coordinating the activities of both operational and territorial units, being similar to corps-level commands.[13]

This territorial organization, according to the Mosaic Doctrine and the Layered Defence approach, is focused heavily on security against internal threats and on "soft war" operations.[13][14]

IRGC Ground Forces Headquarters
Headquarters
(Gharargah)		 Provinces Commander[19] Notes
Sar-Allah Tehran province
Alborz province		 Hossein Nejat[20] The Sarallah Headquarters is in charge of security for Tehran area and doubles as Headquarters with territorial responsibilities. Its most important units are the 10th Seyyed ol Shohada Operational Division of Karaj, Alborz province, and the 27th Mohammad Rasoul Allah Operational Division in Tehran.[13]
Hamze Seyyed-al-Shohada West Azerbaijan province
Kurdistan province		 Mohammad Taghi Osanlou It controls the western borders with Iraq and Turkey.[15] Brigadier General Osanlou holds command of two Headquarters: Ashura and Hamze Seyyed-al-Shohada.[19]
Karbala Khuzestan province
Lorestan province
Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province		 Ahmad Khadem Established in 1981.[19]
Samen-al-Aeme North Khorasan province
South Khorasan province
Razavi Khorasan province		 Hassan Mortazavi Established in 2017 following the rise of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan province (ISKP) in Afghanistan.[15]
Najaf-al-Ashraf Ilam province
Hamadan province
Kermanshah province		 Mohammad Nazar Azimi It tracks its origins to the Iran–Iraq War. Its most important units are the 29th Division of Kermanshah, the 11th Brigade of Ilam and the 32nd Brigade of Hamadan.[19]
Quds Sistan and Baluchestan province
Kerman province		 Mohammad Karami Its most important units are the 41st Sarallah division of Kerman and the 110th Salman brigade of Sistan and Baluchistan.[19]
Ghadir Mazandaran province
Golestan province
Gilan province		 Ali Shalikar Established in 1985.[15] Its most important units are the 25th Karabala division in Mazandaran and the 16th Qods brigade in Gilan.[19]
Madineh-ye al-Munavareh Fars province
Bushehr province
Hormozgan province		 Hamid Sarkheili Its most important units are is the Fajr division of Shiraz and the 33rd brigade of the Special Forces.[19]
Ashura East Azerbaijan province
Zanjan province
Ardabil province		 Mohammad Taghi Osanlou Brigadier General Osanlou holds command of two Headquarters: Ashura and Hamze Seyyed-al-Shohada.[19]
Saheb-al-Zaman Markazi province
Qom province
Semnan province
Qazvin province		 Ali Akbar Nouri The Saheb-al-Zaman headquarters is in charge of the city of Qom.[19]
Hazrat Seyyed-al-Shohada Isfahan province
Yazd province		 Javad Esteki The Headquarters controls several IRGC Ground Forces formations.[15] Its most important units are the 8th Najaf Division, the 14th Imam Hossein Division, the 18th Brigade of Yazd and the 44th Brigade of Shahr-e Kord.[19]

Provincial commands

[edit]
Flag of Muhammad Rasul Allah Corps of IRGC in charge for Tehran.

Below the multi-provincial Headquarters, there are 32 provincial or city commands.[14][15][19] These new command centers are intended to operate flexibly and independently from Tehran.[21]: 19 

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces structure includes 32 separate territorial commands. These territorial commands, styled "Corps" (Sepah), have been established in 2008. They are part of the four-layered military doctrine for the defence of Iran.

The Provincial Guard was created to take over the IRGC's responsibilities on the provincial level against any and all threats as well as to enforce and coordinate re-islamization processes in Iran through social welfare programmes.[14][22] Provincial units are composed of the natives of the province in which the IRGC Ground Force members serve.[12]

The territorial commands are 31 Provincial commands and a Tehran city command for a total of 32 commands.[4]

The provincial commands are under direct control and supervision of the IRGC commander, but the Basij are responsible for planning, supporting them logistically, and inspecting their functions.[14] In turn, IRGC territorial commanders have a direct supervision over local Basij organizations[9] and enjoy of authority and autonomy in order to be enabled to independently take action in case of an immediate crisis arising,[14][23]

The Provincial commands do not form an independent command of their own, and as such does not have an independent line in Iran's annual state budget. Financing of provincial commands activity comes from both the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces and Basij.[14]

Each Provincial command is composed of three main branches:[14]

  • Military command;
  • Counterintelligence: primarily responsible for protecting the IRGC personnel against both physical and moral threats and identifying foreign espionage;
  • Office of the Representative of the Supreme Leader: responsible for mobilizing, the IRGC and the Basij.

The main anti-riot units are Imam Ali Battalions, consisting of both cadre and full members. Imam Ali battalions are responsible for suppressing internal unrest, maintaining public order and for security patrols in the neighborhoods where they operate. Each Imam Ali battalion has a motorcycle unit for rapid deployment purposes.[13][14]

Administratively, an Imam Ali battalion aligns with the Basij district. Imam Ali battalions have their training, education, and logistics centrally coordinated through the Imam Ali Headquarters. Imam Ali battalions in each city have a close relationship with the Iranian police and receive specific anti-riot equipment and training.[14]

Since September 2012, the IRGC and Basij have established small Basij-only Beit al-Muqaddas battalions (for male Basiji) and Kowsar battalions (for female Basiji). These battalions consist of 234 active Basij members in each district. These units are designed to fulfill support roles:[14]

  • Around 1,000 of these units are assigned to support Imam Ali riot battalions;
  • Around 500 Beit al-Muqaddas (i.e. male-only) battalions are assigned to support Imam Hussein infantry battalions in their military and defence missions in their local area;
  • Around 500 battalions are mainly trained for relief and rescue missions under the operational command of the Imam Hadi Headquarters.

Each Provincial command also has a cyberspace division responsible for directing pro-government online voices as well as producing cyberspace propaganda in their own boundary. The intelligence department in each provincial command is directly subordinate to the IRGC Intelligence Organization.[14]

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces provincial corps
Province Provincial Command Commander[19] IRGC Ground Forces Headquarters Notes
Kurdistan province Kurdistan Beit-ol-Moqaddas Corps Sadegh Hosseini Hamze-ye Sayyed al-Shohada
West Azerbaijan province Sepah-e Shohada Habib Shahsavari Hamze-ye Sayyed al-Shohada
Ardabil province Sepah-e Hazrat-e Abbas Jalil Babazadeh Ashura
East Azerbaijan province Sepah-e Ashura Abedin Khorram Ashura It includes a cyberspace headquarters.[15]
Zanjan province Sepah-e Ansar al-Mahdi Jahanbakhsh Karami Ashura
Hamedan province Sepah-e Ansar al-Hossein Mazahar Majidi Najaf-e Ashraf
Ilam province Sepah-e Amir al-Mouminin Jamal Shakarami Najaf-e Ashraf
Kermanshah province Kermanshah Nebi Akram Corps Bahman Reyhani Najaf-e Ashraf
Markazi province Sepah-e Ruhollah Mohsen Karimi Saheb al-Zaman
Qazvin province Sepah-e Saheb al-Amr Mohammad Shahrokhi Saheb al-Zaman
Qom province Sepah-e Ali bin Abu Taleb Nohammad Taghi Shahgheraghi Saheb al-Zaman
Semnan province Sepah-e Ghaem al-Muhammad Hamid Damghani Saheb al-Zaman
Gilan province Sepah-e Qods Mohammad Abdollahpour Ghadir
Golestān province Sepah-e Neynava Ali Malek Shahkoui Ghadir
Mazandaran province Sepah-e Karbala Mohammad Hossein Babaei Ghadir
Khuzestan province Sepah-e Vali-ye Asr Hassan Shahvarpour Karbala
Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province Sepah-e Fath Hamid Khoramdel Karbala
Lorestan province Sepah-e Abolfazl Morteza Kashkouli Karbala
Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province Sepah-e Ghamar Bani Hashem Ali Mohammad Akbari Sayyed al-Shohada
Isfahan province Sepah-e Saheb al-Zaman Hossein Fada Sayyed al-Shohada
Yazd province Sepah-e al-Ghadir Reza Shamsipour Sayyed al-Shohada
Razavi Khorasan province Sepah-e Imam Reza YaghoubAli Nazari Samen al-Aeme
North Khorasan province Sepah-e Javad al-Aeme Aboulghasem Chaman Samen al-Aeme
South Khorasan province Sepah-e Ansar al-Reza Ali Ghasemi Samen al-Aeme
Bushehr province Sepah-e Imam Sadeq Ali Razmjou Madineh-ye al-Munavareh
Fars province Sepah-e Fajr Hashem Ghiasi Madineh-ye al-Munavareh
Hormozgan province Sepah-e Imam Sadjad Abazar Salari Madineh-ye al-Munavareh
Kerman province Sepah-e Sarallah Hossein Maroufi Qods
Sistan and Baluchestan province Sepah-e Salman Amanollah Garshasbi Qods
Alborz province Sepah-e Imam Hassan Mojtaba Yousef Molaei Sarallah
Tehran province Sepah-e Sayyed al-Shohada Ahmad Zolghadr[24] Sarallah
Tehran city Sepah-e Muhammad Rasoul Allah Mohammadreza Yazdi Sarallah It is the largest IRGC provincial command.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Ground Forces (IRGC-GF), known in Persian as Nezāmat-e Zamini-ye Sepāh-e Pāsadārān-e Enqelāb-e Eslāmi, constitutes the land component of the , Iran's ideologically committed parallel military established shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution to safeguard the nascent theocratic regime against coups, insurgencies, and foreign incursions, operating independently from the regular Artesh ground forces. Numbering an estimated 150,000 active personnel organized into 32 provincial corps headquartered across Iran's 31 provinces and , the IRGC-GF emphasizes tactics, rapid mobilization for internal security, and defense of revolutionary principles, with its ranks bolstered by integration of paramilitary volunteers during crises. The force expanded dramatically during the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), where it deployed hundreds of thousands in human-wave assaults and trench warfare, suffering heavy casualties but solidifying its loyalty to clerical rule and gaining control over key military appointments. Since its formalization under early commanders like Ahmad Kazemi, the IRGC-GF has been led by figures such as Mohammad Pakpour until Brigadier General Mohammad Karami's appointment in June 2025 by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, reflecting the entity's direct subordination to the regime's highest authority. Equipped with domestically produced armored vehicles like the Toophan MRAP, infantry weapons, and unmanned aerial systems for and strike, the IRGC-GF prioritizes self-reliance amid sanctions, enabling operations in rugged terrain and urban environments. Defining characteristics include its dual role in territorial defense and regime preservation, marked by controversies such as brutal suppression of domestic unrest—including the political prisoner executions and 2022 protests—and facilitation of proxy militias abroad through coordination with the IRGC's , leading to its terrorist designation by the in 2019.

History

Formation and Early Development (1979-1980)

The (IRGC) was established by decree of on May 5, 1979, shortly after the triumph of the , to consolidate disparate paramilitary groups and revolutionary committees into a unified force dedicated to protecting the nascent . This creation addressed immediate concerns over the loyalty of the regular Iranian Army (Artesh), which had been closely associated with the ousted Pahlavi monarchy and was perceived as vulnerable to counter-revolutionary plots or foreign influence. Unlike the conventional Artesh, focused on national defense through traditional , the IRGC was envisioned as an ideologically driven emphasizing guardianship of the revolution's Islamic principles, including the export of Shia revolutionary ideals beyond Iran's borders. In its formative phase, the IRGC drew recruits primarily from revolutionary volunteers, mosque networks, and local komitehs (committees), rapidly expanding from loosely organized units to more structured formations by late 1979. One of its earliest priorities was purging remnants of Shah-era loyalists from state institutions, particularly the military and security apparatus, through arrests, executions, and forced retirements to eliminate perceived threats of coups or sabotage. This internal consolidation effort, approved by the Revolutionary Council, positioned the IRGC as a to the Artesh, ensuring stability amid factional rivalries and external pressures. Founding members, including figures like Mohammad Montazeri who helped organize initial armed groups, emphasized (mobilization) of the oppressed masses to defend against both domestic dissent and ideological enemies. By 1980, the IRGC's ground elements—its primary component at inception—had begun formalizing basic command structures and training regimens, though still reliant on tactics suited to urban and asymmetric defense rather than . This development reflected Khomeini's directive to prioritize revolutionary zeal over professional , fostering a distinct identity rooted in Shia Islamist doctrine and vigilance against "hypocrites" or monarchist infiltrators. The force's early growth, reaching an estimated 10,000-20,000 personnel by mid-1980, underscored its role in power consolidation, setting the stage for broader operational mandates without supplanting the Artesh's territorial defense responsibilities.

Role in the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988)

The IRGC Ground Forces, initially comprising irregular militias with limited training and armament, assumed a primary combat role following Iraq's on September 22, 1980, defending key urban areas in through guerrilla tactics and against Iraqi armored advances. Lacking heavy weapons, they relied on small arms, RPGs, and improvised explosives to inflict losses on Iraqi forces, such as in the defense of where Iraq suffered approximately 15,000 casualties and over 100 vehicles destroyed. This phase highlighted their ideological motivation but exposed deficiencies in conventional capabilities, including poor integration with the and vulnerability to mechanized assaults. As shifted to counteroffensives in 1981–1982, the IRGC evolved into a mass-mobilized force, deploying tens of thousands alongside volunteers in human-wave assaults to breach Iraqi lines, often advancing in daylight with minimal to absorb , clear minefields by foot, and exploit demoralized defenders. Tactics incorporated revolutionary zeal, with fighters motivated by promises of martyrdom, enabling penetrations like the failed Susangerd counterattack in 1981, where IRGC envelopments destroyed over half of Iran's available tanks but demonstrated growing tactical adaptability. By mid-war, refinements included night infiltrations and intelligence-driven raids, though mass assaults remained central, integrating captured Iraqi equipment—such as T-55 and tanks—to bolster offensives amid sanctions-induced shortages. A pivotal engagement was the liberation of on May 24, 1982, during , where IRGC forces, numbering around 75,000 alongside army units, conducted intense urban combat to recapture the city after 578 days of occupation, capturing 19,000 Iraqi troops and marking a psychological turning point that boosted IRGC prestige. These operations, repeated in subsequent pushes into , showcased resilience but incurred devastating losses—IRGC personnel suffered approximately 41,000 deaths from combat injuries alone, with broader estimates including affiliates exceeding 200,000 total fatalities—cementing their role as enforcers of regime loyalty through sacrificial commitment. The strategy's emphasis on volume over precision revealed persistent weaknesses, including high attrition from Iraqi chemical weapons and , limited , and friction with professional forces, yet it prolonged the war by sustaining pressure until the 1988 ceasefire. Combat experience underscored the need for engineering and specialized units to counter fortified defenses, informing wartime adjustments toward partial conventionalization without abandoning ideological mobilization.

Post-War Restructuring and Expansion (1989-2000)

Following the end of the Iran-Iraq War in August 1988, the IRGC Ground Forces underwent significant reorganization under Commander , who held the position until April 1997, to consolidate territorial control and enhance internal security amid economic reconstruction efforts. Rezaee oversaw the establishment of provincial corps ( and provincial units) aligned with Iran's 31 administrative divisions, transforming the force from a largely war-mobilized entity into a structured network for domestic defense and ideological enforcement, with specialized brigades focused on , , and rapid response capabilities. This restructuring emphasized decentralized command to counter perceived internal threats, integrating volunteers for mass mobilization while prioritizing loyalty to the revolutionary principles over conventional military hierarchy. Personnel expanded during the to bolster these provincial structures, reaching estimates of approximately 150,000 active members by the late decade, reflecting a shift toward sustained peacetime readiness despite partial of wartime volunteers. Concurrently, international arms embargoes, including U.S. restrictions and limited access to global markets, compelled a drive for , with the IRGC Ground Forces investing in domestic production of basic armored vehicles like the (reverse-engineered from pre-revolution U.S. M113 designs) and towed systems, supplemented by engineering units adapting captured Iraqi equipment. These efforts, though rudimentary, aimed to reduce dependence on imports and support asymmetric defenses against regional isolation. In September 1997, Yahya Rahim Safavi assumed command, accelerating professionalization by improving training regimens and integrating limited conventional tactics, while maintaining the force's ideological core. This period highlighted the Ground Forces' pivot to domestic primacy, exemplified by their deployment alongside militias to suppress the July 1999 student protests in and other cities, where IRGC units conducted arrests and dispersed demonstrators protesting regime policies, underscoring a doctrinal preference for safeguarding internal stability over external engagements. Safavi's leadership reinforced this role, viewing such actions as essential to preserving the amid reformist challenges.

Modern Era and Expeditionary Shift (2001-2025)

Following the U.S.-led invasion of in 2003, elements of the IRGC Ground Forces provided limited support to operations, including training Shia militias such as through advisory roles and logistics, though primary combat deployments remained the purview of expeditionary units rather than core ground formations. In from 2011, the IRGC Ground Forces contributed personnel for front-line stabilization, with the deploying advisory teams and volunteers to secure key areas against rebel advances, marking an initial expeditionary pivot amid the civil war's escalation. These deployments, often framed by Iranian officials as defensive aid to allies, exposed Ground Forces units to , influencing tactical adaptations like rapid insertion via airborne assets. Domestically, the IRGC Ground Forces solidified their hybrid role by coordinating with Basij paramilitaries during major unrest, deploying for and lethal force in the 2009 Green Movement protests against alleged election fraud, where they helped suppress demonstrations in and other cities using batons, , and selective shootings. In November 2019 fuel price hikes sparked nationwide riots, Ground Forces units participated in the crackdown, with security forces killing at least 300 protesters per estimates, though independent analyses suggest totals exceeding 1,000 amid widespread use of live ammunition and Basij auxiliaries. The 2022 , triggered by her death in morality police custody, saw Ground Forces brigades enforce quarantines and fire on crowds in provinces like and Lorestan, contributing to over 500 documented deaths through coordinated operations with IRGC intelligence. The 2020 U.S. assassination of commander prompted IRGC Ground Forces to reinforce border defenses along and frontiers, expanding provincial commands with additional mechanized units to deter cross-border incursions amid heightened Israel-Iran tensions. From 2020 to 2025, the force integrated unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance and strike support in ground operations, unveiling suicide drones and establishing new bases to enhance hybrid capabilities against perceived threats, as evidenced by public drills showcasing anti-personnel payloads. This period reflected an order-of-battle growth, with reports of brigade expansions focused on asymmetric deterrence rather than , aligning with broader IRGC shifts toward expeditionary sustainment while prioritizing internal stability.

Command and Leadership

Historical Commanders

The (IRGC) Ground Forces, known as Nazaja, emerged under the overarching command of IRGC leaders who shaped its early doctrine during the Iran-Iraq War. , IRGC commander-in-chief from September 1981 to April 1997, directed the rapid expansion of ground units, integrating irregular militias into human-wave offensives that prioritized ideological fervor over conventional tactics, resulting in over 200,000 IRGC casualties by war's end. This approach embedded a resilience against superior firepower, influencing subsequent ground force strategies despite high costs. Yahya Rahim Safavi, succeeding Rezaee as IRGC commander-in-chief from 1997 to 2007, pivoted the Ground Forces toward , emphasizing mobility, guerrilla tactics, and integration with proxy networks to counter technological disparities with adversaries like the . Under his tenure, Nazaja restructured post-war, establishing provincial corps and enhancing defensive depth, which laid groundwork for expeditionary roles in and . Safavi's doctrine reduced reliance on mass , fostering specialized units for hybrid threats, though internal factionalism between clerical loyalists and pragmatic officers occasionally disrupted implementation. Brigadier General Ahmad Kazemi served as Nazaja commander from approximately 1998 until his death on January 9, 2006, in a plane crash that killed 11 senior officers, officially attributed to mechanical failure but speculated by analysts to involve amid rising tensions. Kazemi advanced mechanized capabilities and training reforms, balancing Safavi's irregular focus with conventional ground maneuvers, including armored brigade expansions to deter border incursions. His loss prompted a transition under deputies, maintaining operational continuity but highlighting vulnerabilities to attrition in command echelons. Subsequent commanders, such as Mostafa Izadi in interim roles, navigated purges tied to loyalty tests under Supreme Leader Khamenei, ensuring ideological alignment over factional rivals. The 2020 assassination of commander , while not directly a Ground Forces role, disrupted coordinated ground expeditions in and , eroding morale and forcing doctrinal adaptations toward decentralized proxy reliance to sustain influence without direct deployments. These events underscored how targeted losses reshaped Nazaja's strategic posture, prioritizing survivability and indirect confrontation.

Current Leadership Structure

The (IRGC) Ground Forces operate under a hierarchical command structure that reports directly to Iran's Supreme Leader, , bypassing conventional military chains to ensure ideological alignment with the principles of the Islamic Revolution. This direct oversight emphasizes loyalty to the Supreme Leader over purely merit-based promotions, with commanders required to pledge allegiance to his authority as of the Armed Forces. Brigadier General Mohammad Karami serves as the current of the IRGC Ground Forces, appointed by Khamenei on June 19, 2025, following a series of high-level assassinations attributed to Israeli strikes that disrupted the IRGC's senior leadership. Karami oversees a decentralized network comprising 31 provincial corps—one for each of Iran's provinces, with hosting two—each responsible for territorial defense, internal security, and coordination with paramilitary units like the . These corps function semi-autonomously but align operations through central headquarters focused on countering perceived Western threats, reflecting appointments prioritizing anti-Western ideological commitment amid escalating regional conflicts in 2024-2025. Deputy commanders handle specialized roles, including operations and intelligence integration with the broader IRGC Intelligence Organization to combat and maintain internal vigilance. Brigadier General Hossein Akhavan was appointed deputy commander on August 3, 2025, underscoring the regime's emphasis on rapid replacement of loyal cadres to sustain operational continuity. This structure reinforces a vetting process where ideological purity, demonstrated through oaths of and rhetorical opposition to U.S. and Israeli influence, supersedes conventional military expertise in leadership selections.

Ideological and Operational Control

The (IRGC) Ground Forces integrate ideological indoctrination into their command structure as a core mechanism for ensuring loyalty to the principle of wilayat al-faqih (), under which the Supreme Leader holds absolute authority over military decisions and . This fusion distinguishes the Ground Forces from Iran's conventional , the Artesh, which operates under a more apolitical, professional framework focused on territorial defense without parallel religious oversight. Recruitment and promotion within the Ground Forces involve rigorous vetting by the IRGC's Ideological-Political Organization (IPO), which assesses candidates' adherence to revolutionary principles, including anti-Western sentiment and commitment to exporting the Islamic Revolution, often through mandatory training programs that emphasize and divine allegiance over tactical proficiency. Operational control incorporates parallel political commissar-like roles, such as representatives of the Supreme Leader embedded in units and bases, who monitor morale, enforce doctrinal purity, and approve command decisions to align with clerical directives. These mechanisms, including "political guides" from the Leader's office, conduct ongoing sessions and ideological evaluations, fostering unyielding loyalty but introducing redundancies that can delay in field operations. Clerics in advisory capacities further reinforce wilayat al-faqih by vetting promotions and intervening in disputes to prioritize ideological conformity, a practice rooted in the IRGC's founding mandate to safeguard the theocratic system against internal dissent. In contrast to the Artesh's hierarchical command reporting to the Joint Staff without such ideological filters, this dual-track system in the Ground Forces ensures operational primacy in domestic suppression roles, even as expeditionary deployments encroach on territory. While the Ground Forces maintain doctrinal focus on homeland defense and regime protection—distinguishing them from the Quds Force's external proxy warfare—their ideological controls have enabled limited overseas commitments, such as in , without diluting internal vigilance. This structure's emphasis on loyalty over efficiency stems from post-revolutionary fears of military coups, as evidenced by the IRGC's establishment in to counter perceived disloyalty in the Artesh. Empirical assessments indicate that such sustains high cohesion during domestic unrest, though it may hinder adaptability against conventional threats due to politicized command layers.

Organization and Structure

Operational Components

The operational components of the IRGC Ground Forces encompass approximately 19 divisions and at least 29 independent brigades configured for deployable offensive maneuvers, including mechanized units such as the 31st Ashura Division and armored elements like the 8th Najaf Ashraf Division. These formations emphasize mobility and combined arms tactics, with brigades like the 20th Ramadan (armored) and Imam Zaman (mechanized) structured for rapid reinforcement of fronts or expeditionary insertions. Independent brigades, including the 38th Zolfaghar (armored) and 60th Ammar Yasir (armored), operate semi-autonomously to execute strikes or secure objectives beyond provincial boundaries. Special operations fall under the Saberin units, an elite commando force formed in 2000 comprising hand-selected volunteers trained for raids, sabotage, and deep reconnaissance. Saberin elements, such as the 110th Salman Farsi Brigade and 15th Imam Hassan Mojtaba Brigade, integrate with regular formations for high-risk missions, drawing from provincial corps but deployable nationwide or abroad. Their structure prioritizes small-team infiltration over massed assaults, with documented roles in foreign interventions requiring specialized unconventional tactics. Rapid response capabilities include airborne units like the 33rd Brigade, equipped for parachute insertions and seizure of key terrain to support ground advances. Complementing these is the Aviation Unit (Yegan-e Havanirooz), activated in to furnish rotary-wing assets for troop transport, , and during maneuvers. This unit operates helicopters such as Mi-17 variants for attack roles, with expansions including a 2023 southeastern base to bolster operational reach against evolving threats. Order-of-battle assessments post-2020 highlight incremental growth in these components to integrate drone-reconnaissance hybrids, adapting to asymmetric and multi-domain challenges.

Territorial and Provincial Commands

The IRGC Ground Forces maintain 32 provincial , aligned with Iran's 31 provinces and including a second for , serving as the primary structure for territorial defense, border vigilance, and domestic stability operations. These commands oversee brigades, armored elements, and support units tailored to regional threats, such as cross-border incursions or internal unrest, with each headquartered in its respective provincial capital or key site. Personnel strength per corps varies by location and strategic importance, typically ranging from 15,000 to 25,000 active troops, contributing to the overall IRGC Ground Forces estimate of over 150,000 personnel. Prominent examples include the Mohammad Rasulullah Corps, responsible for Tehran Province's outer defenses with approximately 15,000 personnel; the Thar-Allah Headquarters, focused on securing city and religious shrines with around 20,000 troops; the Sarallah Corps in , guarding western borders against with about 25,000 members; and the Karbala Corps in Mazandaran, oriented toward northern coastal and Caspian security. These units emphasize defensive postures, including fortified positions and integrated , while coordinating with local for preemptive threat neutralization. Originating as ad hoc militias during the 1979-1980 revolutionary consolidation and Iran-Iraq War, the provincial commands evolved into semi-autonomous, brigade-based entities post-1988, with enhanced infrastructure such as hardened bases and basic air defense systems to counter aerial incursions. This development prioritized internal resilience over mobility, incorporating local networks for auxiliary manpower that can expand operational capacity to hundreds of thousands—or potentially millions—in sustained crises through rapid volunteer enlistment and training protocols. Such integration ensures scalable responses without depleting central reserves, though it relies on ideological motivation for effectiveness.

Integration with Basij and Other Forces

The Basij Resistance Force functions as a volunteer directly subordinate to the IRGC Ground Forces, providing a scalable reservoir of irregular personnel for internal security, , and auxiliary support while the core Ground Forces retain command over regular units. Formal integration of Basij bases into provincial IRGC occurred in 2008, with full structural incorporation under Ground Forces command by October 2009, enabling coordinated operations without diluting the professional troops' operational autonomy. The Basij's volunteer base, estimated at 1 million mobilizable personnel though with lower active organized strength, has been deployed extensively for and suppression duties, including nationwide activations during the 2022 protests sparked by Mahsa Amini's death in custody, where Basij units augmented IRGC and police efforts in at least dozens of provinces. This setup exemplifies the Ground Forces' strategy of leveraging mass human resources to amplify defensive depth, a doctrinal preference rooted in human-wave assaults from the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) and persisting in post-2022 mobilizations amid economic constraints limiting technological investments. Coordination with the regular Iranian Army (Artesh) is constrained by enduring rivalry over budgets, recruitment, and doctrinal priorities, with the IRGC Ground Forces historically prioritizing ideological loyalty over conventional interoperability; joint exercises occur infrequently, such as limited maneuvers post-2016, but lack substantive fusion of command structures. The , as the IRGC's expeditionary branch, routinely draws seasoned operators from Ground Forces ranks for overseas missions, as seen in deployments where at least dozens of identified IRGC casualties included Ground Forces veterans reassigned to Quds-led units, thereby channeling elite talent away from domestic formations and underscoring the Ground Forces' residual emphasis on territorial defense augmented by reserves.

Equipment and Capabilities

Ground Combat Assets

The (IRGC) Ground Forces' armored capabilities rely heavily on main battle tanks, including Soviet-era models numbering in the hundreds within the broader Iranian inventory, supplemented by indigenous designs like the series. Total tank estimates for Iranian ground forces, encompassing IRGC assets, exceed 1,600 units, with a significant portion originating from Soviet stocks acquired during the Iran-Iraq War era. The -1 and -3 variants, produced domestically since the late , incorporate hybrid designs blending chassis with local upgrades, but production remains limited to dozens due to technological constraints. Towed artillery forms a core of indirect fire support, featuring systems such as the 155mm Chinese Type 88 (WAC-021) and U.S.-origin 203mm M115 howitzers, with inventories emphasizing quantity for sustained barrages in defensive postures. These legacy platforms, many dating to pre-1979 acquisitions or wartime captures, prioritize volume over precision or mobility, aligning with attrition-focused tactics. Infantry armament centers on mass-produced small arms like the Iranian Hoveizeh rifle ( variant) and G3 battle rifles, alongside launchers for anti-armor roles, enabling high-volume engagements in scenarios. Domestic production of copies and 40mm grenades supports doctrinal emphasis on decentralized, manpower-intensive operations. Amid intensified U.S. sanctions following the 2018 JCPOA withdrawal, IRGC efforts accelerated , including upgrades to existing fleets and modernization, yet sanctions have exacerbated spare parts shortages, contributing to chronic maintenance shortfalls across legacy systems. Analysts note that while reverse-engineering has yielded partial self-reliance, operational reliability remains hampered by inferior materials and limited testing.

Support and Logistics Capabilities

The IRGC Ground Forces incorporate dedicated units, restructured in 2007 as part of a broader organizational overhaul to enhance operational support capabilities, including construction of pontoon bridges for rapid river crossings and mine-clearing operations to enable advances in mined terrain. These assets draw from historical expertise developed during the Iran-Iraq War, where IRGC engineers deployed pontoon systems to sustain offensives, and continue to prioritize mobility engineering for defensive and asymmetric ground maneuvers. To support extended operations, the IRGC emphasizes domestic production of ammunition and supplies through entities like the Research and Self-Sufficiency Jihad Organization, which facilitates indigenous manufacturing of key munitions to reduce reliance on imports amid arms embargoes. Iranian officials claim over 90% self-sufficiency in defense equipment, including small-arms ammunition and artillery rounds, enabling stockpiling for prolonged engagements without external resupply. However, sanctions constrain full supply chain reliability, prompting the IRGC to utilize illicit smuggling networks—often involving front companies in third countries—for critical components like electronics and chemicals essential to logistics sustainment. The engineering conglomerate Khatam al-Anbiya, established in 1989 using IRGC engineering personnel, further bolsters logistics by handling infrastructure projects such as roads, dams, and supply depots, which indirectly support ground force deployments through dual-use civil-military construction. These efforts reflect a doctrine of self-reliance, though procurement vulnerabilities persist due to international restrictions targeting IRGC-linked evasion tactics.

Technological and Doctrinal Limitations

The IRGC Ground Forces maintain an inventory dominated by legacy systems, including 1970s-era Soviet tanks, pre-1979 U.S.-imported armored vehicles, and domestically modified artillery, constrained by that limit access to advanced components and production of main battle tanks. These platforms lack modern fire control systems and integrated sensors, rendering them inferior in direct engagements against peer adversaries equipped with precision-guided munitions and networked warfare capabilities. Command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) infrastructure remains underdeveloped for ground operations, hindering real-time coordination and compared to U.S. or regional forces. Doctrinally, the IRGC Ground Forces prioritize asymmetric tactics such as swarming infantry assaults and Basij-led human wave attacks, rooted in Iran-Iraq War experiences where massed, martyrdom-oriented advances compensated for equipment shortfalls but incurred high casualties against maneuver-oriented defenses. This approach favors attrition and ideological zeal over combined-arms maneuver, proving effective for internal security but exposing vulnerabilities in conventional scenarios where superior airpower and precision strikes disrupt uncoordinated ground advances. U.S. assessments of Iranian exercises, such as Noble Prophet drills, highlight persistent gaps in transitioning to offensive maneuver warfare, with reliance on light infantry and proxies underscoring doctrinal rigidity. Post-2024 Israeli strikes and the June 2025 conflict further revealed integration failures between IRGC Ground Forces and air defense systems, as degraded radar networks and missile interceptors left ground units without adequate cover, amplifying risks from enemy air superiority in potential theater operations. These events underscored empirical limitations in layered defense architectures, where ground maneuver depends on contested airspace control that Iranian systems have repeatedly failed to secure against technologically advanced opponents.

Operations and Engagements

Domestic Suppression and Security Operations

The (IRGC) Ground Forces played a pivotal role in suppressing post-revolutionary Kurdish insurgencies in western during the late and , engaging in direct combat against groups such as the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI) and Komala to prevent separatist fragmentation of the new . These operations, which involved ground assaults and territorial control measures, helped forge the IRGC's combat experience and structure amid the chaos following the 1979 Revolution. In subsequent domestic unrest, IRGC Ground Forces have supported escalation responses during widespread protests, including the 2009 Green Movement following disputed presidential elections, where provincial corps units were deployed alongside paramilitaries to contain demonstrations in urban centers. Similar involvement occurred in the 2019 fuel price protests, with Ground Forces elements mobilized for in provinces where unrest intensified beyond local police capacity, resulting in official Iranian acknowledgments of over 200 deaths while independent estimates placed the toll at 1,500. The 2022 nationwide protests saw further activation of Ground Forces for reinforcement in restive areas, contributing to suppression efforts amid tactics such as communication disruptions; Iranian military statements reported approximately 300 fatalities, contrasting with UN-verified figures exceeding 550 deaths across 26 provinces. Along Iran's borders, IRGC Ground Forces maintain vigilant patrols through provincial commands to counter smuggling networks and separatist incursions, particularly in western regions adjacent to where Kurdish militants have launched cross-border attacks. Operations have included strikes and unit reinforcements to repel infiltrations, as seen in responses to 2022 separatist threats. In eastern frontiers, amid heightened Afghan migration pressures in 2025—with illegal crossing attempts doubling to around 40,000 prevented in the first half of the year—Ground Forces have intensified and interdiction to secure against undocumented entries and potential risks. Iranian authorities assert these measures reflect calibrated restraint to preserve internal stability, though external assessments highlight discrepancies in reported versus observed force application.

Foreign Deployments and Interventions

The IRGC Ground Forces, primarily oriented toward domestic defense, have undertaken foreign deployments primarily in support of Iran's regional allies, augmenting the 's extraterritorial operations despite their non-specialized mandate. In , beginning in late 2011 and intensifying from 2012, Ground Forces units were dispatched to bolster Syrian government defenses, particularly along critical fronts near and other Shia-majority areas. These deployments involved conventional infantry and armored elements securing supply lines and urban positions against rebel advances, with estimates indicating several thousand personnel rotated through the theater by the mid-2010s to compensate for attrition. In , IRGC Ground Forces contributed to training and advisory roles for Shia militias following the U.S. invasion, focusing on ground tactics and countermeasures amid the . Operations peaked during 2006-2008 , where Ground Forces personnel embedded with groups like the to counter Sunni extremists and Coalition forces, though scale remained smaller than in and often overlapped with Quds coordination. By 2011, as U.S. withdrawal neared, these efforts shifted toward sustaining precursors against threats emerging in 2014. Limited engagements extended to , involving sporadic training for Shia Hazara militias against incursions in the 2000s, per U.S. intelligence assessments of cross-border . In , Ground Forces provided rear-echelon support for Houthi allies from 2015 onward, including equipment transport and basic tactical instruction, but avoided direct combat due to naval and Quds primacy. Casualties in mounted significantly, with acknowledging over 1,000 IRGC personnel deaths by 2016, many from Ground Forces in ground assaults; adaptations by 2024 incorporated drone integration, such as Shahed-131 suicide variants for in escalated clashes near . These interventions reflect a doctrinal toward expeditionary capabilities, driven by strategic imperatives to preserve the Assad regime and Shia corridors.

Asymmetric and Guerrilla Warfare Roles

The (IRGC) Ground Forces, or Nazaja, prioritize asymmetric and doctrines shaped by lessons from the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), where initial conventional defenses faltered against Iraq's mechanized superiority, prompting a shift to irregular tactics emphasizing attrition and disruption over direct confrontation. This approach exploits resource constraints by favoring ambushes, improvised explosive devices, and decentralized operations to impose costs on technologically advanced invaders, drawing on geographic depth to conduct hit-and-run engagements rather than sustained battles. Such tactics align with Iran's broader "mosaic defense" concept, layering irregular ground actions to deny enemy advances without matching conventional firepower. Unlike the Artesh's focus on territorial defense through armored formations and artillery, the IRGC Ground Forces integrate guerrilla methods with militia augmentation, leveraging paramilitaries for massed irregular resistance that amplifies force multipliers in defensive scenarios. This doctrinal divergence enables the Nazaja to support proxy engagements indirectly, providing training and tactical expertise for hybrid insurgencies that maintain operational deniability amid regional conflicts. In exercises like Great Prophet 17 in December 2021, the IRGC demonstrated this through simulated irregular assaults combined with proxy coordination, underscoring adaptability against superior adversaries. By the 2020s, Nazaja training pipelines have incorporated cyber-ground fusion, blending electronic warfare with physical guerrilla maneuvers to disrupt command networks and enable synchronized ambushes, reflecting an evolution toward hybrid threats that counters precision strikes from potential foes. This emphasis sustains effectiveness in asymmetric contexts, such as augmenting allied militias in proxy wars, where deniability preserves strategic ambiguity without escalating to full conventional war.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Human Rights Violations

The (IRGC) Ground Forces have faced allegations of employing excessive lethal force during domestic protest suppressions, particularly in events like the November 2019 fuel price demonstrations, where security units under IRGC coordination opened fire on crowds, resulting in documented deaths of 304 individuals according to 's analysis of victim identities and circumstances. , citing sources within Iran's establishment, reported a higher toll of approximately 1,500 killed, including many shot in the head or chest at close range, contrasting with official Iranian figures from the Interior Ministry estimating around 225 deaths, which included security personnel. These incidents involved IRGC-affiliated militias and ground units using live ammunition, including automatic weapons, against unarmed protesters, with forensic evidence indicating deliberate targeting rather than measures. Further accusations center on systematic torture of detained dissidents and protesters held in IRGC-controlled facilities, as detailed in the Fact-Finding Mission on , which classified such practices—including beatings, electrocution, and forced confessions—as perpetrated by security forces like the IRGC. In the context of the 2022-2023 "" protests, documented patterns of physical and psychological torture by IRGC agents against hundreds of detainees, often involving sleep deprivation and mock executions to extract compliance. Iranian authorities, including IRGC spokespersons, have countered these claims by framing operations as legitimate against "rioters" and foreign-instigated chaos, asserting that any fatalities resulted from armed clashes and denying systematic abuse while acknowledging limited use of force against violent actors. Allegations of , including , have also surfaced in IRGC detention settings such as vans and informal sites during crackdowns, with reporting cases of inflicted on male and female detainees to instill terror and break resistance, corroborated by survivor testimonies describing rectal injuries and bleeding. The UN mission similarly identified and other sexual abuses as tools of repression by Iranian apparatus, including IRGC elements, though official responses dismiss these as fabricated propaganda aimed at undermining national sovereignty, with no independent investigations conceded. Empirical data from these events reveal a higher per-incident rate in IRGC-involved suppressions compared to regular police actions, evidenced by the disproportionate use of snipers and heavy weaponry, which patterns suggest stem from doctrinal prioritization of regime preservation over de-escalation.

Support for Proxy Militias and Terrorism

The IRGC Ground Forces have provided logistical and material support to operations backing Shia militias in and , including the supply of advanced improvised explosive devices such as explosively formed penetrators (EFPs) to groups like and . U.S. Department of Defense assessments attribute at least 603 American troop deaths in from 2003 to 2011 to Iranian-backed militants using IRGC-supplied EFPs, which were smuggled and distributed through IRGC networks to enable attacks on coalition forces. This support extended to training militia fighters in ground tactics and fortification, with IRGC Ground Forces elements reportedly detaching personnel to coordinate logistics for proxy units combating U.S. and Sunni insurgent forces. In , IRGC Ground Forces contributed to the "resistance axis" by deploying conventional units alongside Quds-backed militias like and , providing rear-guard logistics, armored transport, and artillery support during offensives against rebel-held areas from 2012 onward. Iranian officials frame such involvement as defensive aid to allied governments against "Zionist aggression" and Sunni extremism, preserving for the . However, U.S. and allied intelligence describe it as enabling and regional destabilization, with proxies expanding influence through cross-border arms and asymmetric attacks. The Ground Forces' role in proxy support traces to early IRGC operations, including facilitation of Hezbollah's 1983 Beirut barracks bombings, where IRGC advisors coordinated truck bomb logistics and training for the suicide attacks that killed 241 U.S. service members and 58 French paratroopers. More recently, amid Houthi Red Sea disruptions starting October 2023, IRGC elements—including Ground Forces logistics for missile and drone transfers—have bolstered Ansar Allah's capabilities, with Iranian commanders overseeing targeting of commercial shipping through 2025. This assistance, per U.S. Central Command reports, has sustained over 100 Houthi attacks on vessels, disrupting global trade lanes while Iran publicly endorses the actions as solidarity against perceived Western-Israeli encirclement. Western designations, including the U.S. labeling the IRGC a foreign terrorist organization in 2019, highlight these activities as state-sponsored terrorism rather than legitimate defense.

Internal Corruption and Economic Impact

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Ground Forces maintain extramilitary economic roles through and units, which support broader IRGC fronts like the Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters, Iran's largest contractor employing approximately 25,000 personnel and executing major projects such as dams, roads, and bridges. These activities, justified as enhancing and self-sufficiency, have enabled the IRGC to dominate segments of Iran's sector, leading to accusations of where contracts are awarded preferentially to affiliated entities, sidelining private competitors and stifling market efficiency. Internal corruption within the IRGC, including Ground Forces elements, manifests in , , and , as documented in official Iranian reports highlighting and in military and operations. networks exacerbate inefficiency, with hires often based on rather than merit, resulting in bureaucratic bloat that inflates operational costs and undermines logistical readiness despite the forces' role in deterrence. Scandals such as the 2022 Yas Holding case, involving IRGC cooperatives, illustrate systemic graft where front companies funds intended for military infrastructure. Economically, these practices drain national resources, with IRGC-linked activities estimated to exacerbate Iran's fiscal pressures by prioritizing opaque networks over transparent investment, contrasting the Ground Forces' contributions to border security and asymmetric defense capabilities. Sanctions evasion through black-market smuggling, in which Ground Forces logistics units participate to procure equipment, generates profits for operations but imposes markups of up to several times market prices, further straining budgets and diverting funds from core military modernization. This dual military-economic posture, while self-justified for regime survival, has been critiqued for perpetuating inefficiency amid Iran's stagnant growth, where military spending—including IRGC allocations—reaches about 3% of GDP without proportional productivity gains.

International Perspectives and Sanctions

Designations as Terrorist Organization

On April 8, 2019, U.S. President announced the intent to designate the entire (IRGC), including its Ground Forces, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The designation became effective on April 15, 2019, following formal notification to , marking the first time the U.S. labeled a foreign government entity as an FTO. The rationale cited IRGC's orchestration of terrorist activities abroad, including support for proxy groups such as and , provision of lethal aid to militants attacking U.S. personnel, and harboring of al-Qaeda affiliates within . Several other countries have followed with full or partial designations of the IRGC as a terrorist entity. Canada listed the entire IRGC under its Criminal Code on June 19, 2024, citing its role in transnational terrorism, assassination plots against dissidents, and destabilizing activities in the Middle East. Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates designated the IRGC as a terrorist organization as early as 2018-2019, pointing to its backing of Houthi rebels in Yemen and other regional proxies that threaten Gulf security. In contrast, the European Union has designated only the IRGC's Quds Force as a terrorist entity since 2001, without extending the label to the full organization including Ground Forces, despite repeated calls from the European Parliament for broader action due to plots on European soil. The U.S. FTO designation imposes strict measures, including criminal penalties for providing material support to the IRGC, asset freezes on designated entities and individuals, and bans for members entering the U.S. Similar restrictions apply under other countries' listings, such as Canada's on financial dealings or by IRGC affiliates. has focused on sanctions compliance, with the designating over 200 IRGC-linked entities since 2019 for evasion attempts, though challenges persist in tracking opaque networks. In response to the U.S. designation, declared U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces in the region as terrorists on April 8, 2019, mirroring the FTO label and escalating rhetoric against American military presence. Iranian officials vowed retaliation, including potential disruptions to U.S. interests, while framed the move as evidence of American aggression.

Strategic Assessments by Adversaries

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessments characterize the IRGC Ground Forces as proficient in protracted , utilizing human wave tactics, fortified positions, and integration with ballistic missiles to impose high costs on invaders, but fundamentally constrained by obsolete armored vehicles, poor logistical sustainment, and exposure to aerial . These forces, estimated at around 150,000 personnel with limited , prioritize homeland defense through layered defenses in western but lack the mobility and air defense integration to counter modern combined-arms offensives, rendering them susceptible to rapid degradation by precision strikes as demonstrated in simulations of U.S. intervention scenarios. Israeli military evaluations, informed by operations in , acknowledge IRGC Ground Forces' role in securing supply lines and advisory roles that bolstered Assad regime stability from 2013 onward, enabling territorial gains against rebels, yet highlight systemic overextension with forces spread thin across proxy fronts, incurring significant casualties—over 2,000 IRGC-linked deaths by airstrikes through —due to inadequate concealment and reliance on vulnerable convoys. This exposure underscores a core vulnerability: without air cover, ground elements falter in sustaining offensive momentum, prompting reductions in senior officer deployments by early to mitigate risks. Analyses of the June 2025 Israel-Iran conflict reveal IRGC Ground Forces' endurance in decentralized guerrilla operations, where dispersed units evaded total destruction through terrain adaptation and proxy augmentation, but conventional formations suffered decisive losses to dominance, with armored assets neutralized early and command nodes disrupted, affirming predictions of swift defeat in peer-level engagements absent missile saturation or nuclear escalation. Independent strategic reviews balance this by crediting IRGC capabilities with deterring U.S. ground invasion post-2003 , as the prospect of urban attrition, IED networks, and mobilized militias—potentially prolonging occupation costs beyond tolerable thresholds—factored into American restraint, per causal evaluations of decision-making under uncertainty.

Iranian Defensive Justifications

Iranian officials portray the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Ground Forces as a vital safeguard against existential threats stemming from U.S. and Israeli aggression, rooted in the experiences of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War and subsequent economic sanctions designed to undermine the Islamic Republic's sovereignty. Established to defend the 1979 Revolution from both internal coups and foreign interference, the Ground Forces are positioned as the regime's primary bulwark in a doctrine emphasizing resistance to encirclement by adversarial powers encircling Iran through military bases and alliances. This narrative frames sanctions, imposed since the early 1980s and intensified post-1979, not as responses to Iranian actions but as tools of economic warfare aimed at regime change, necessitating robust defensive postures to preserve independence. IRGC Ground Forces Commander Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour has repeatedly asserted that the unit maintains full security along Iran's borders, foiling terrorist incursions and ensuring national safety amid threats from groups like . In 2023, the forces conducted operations along the Iraqi border, driving back terrorists and preventing cross-border attacks, as part of ongoing efforts to neutralize infiltrations linked to foreign-backed militants. Pakpour emphasized in 2024 that all Iranian borders are under comprehensive protection, with forces prepared for sustained vigilance against subversive plots. These actions are cited as evidence of defensive efficacy, including the interdiction of hundreds of and infiltration attempts annually, countering narratives of by highlighting preservation. Tehran justifies support for regional proxies not as offensive expansion but as forward resistance to prevent aggression from reaching Iranian soil, with Ground Forces contributing to stabilization that indirectly bolsters this axis against U.S.-Israeli encirclement. Pakpour warned in January 2025 that the IRGC stands at peak readiness to respond decisively to any threats, underscoring a commitment to asymmetric deterrence rooted in first-hand lessons rather than unprovoked adventurism. This perspective counters Western assessments by prioritizing empirical defense data over ideological critiques, viewing sanctions as validation of the forces' necessity in maintaining survival.

References

  1. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/pasdaran.htm
  2. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/irans-revolutionary-guards
  3. https://iranwire.com/en/features/65748-the-irgc-ground-forces/
  4. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/irans-reserve-of-last-resort-uncovering-the-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps-ground-forces-order-of-battle
  5. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2025/06/19/3338237/irgc-ground-force-gets-new-commander
  6. http://english.khamenei.ir/news/11745/Brigadier-General-Mohammad-Karami-appointed-Commander-of-IRGC
  7. https://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/timeline-military-and-security-events
  8. https://www.aei.org/articles/eternal-rivals-the-artesh-and-the-irgc/
  9. https://alexanderhamiltonsociety.org/security-strategy/issue-one/irgc-history-and-role-in-iranian-statecraft/
  10. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA126915.pdf
  11. https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/historical-background-and-structure
  12. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/publications/special-reports/the-iranian-regimes-irgc-quds-force-1980s-present/
  13. https://iranwire.com/en/features/65744/
  14. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA473957.pdf
  15. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo216012/pdf/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo216012.pdf
  16. https://www.kavehfarrokh.com/military-history-1900-present/the-liberation-of-khorramshahr-may-24-25-1981/
  17. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/672/67240163025.pdf
  18. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/pasdaran-rezaei.htm
  19. https://www.dia.mil/portals/110/images/news/military_powers_publications/iran_military_power_lr.pdf
  20. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/iranmiltrend88-93.pdf
  21. https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-1999-protests-violence-batebi/33027920.html
  22. https://spreadingjustice.org/individual-violator/sj43478/
  23. https://www.csis.org/analysis/war-proxy-irans-growing-footprint-middle-east
  24. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2020/03/u-s-sanctions-leader-of-pro-iran-terror-group-in-iraq.php
  25. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/irgc-morphs-expeditionary-force
  26. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-quds-force-in-syria-combatants-units-and-actions/
  27. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/almost-700-iranian-troops-killed-in-syria-to-preserve-bashar-al/
  28. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/tg1204
  29. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/01/04/why-the-coming-crackdown-in-iran-will-strengthen-the-hand-of-the-revolutionary-guard/
  30. https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/iran
  31. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/iran
  32. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/10/05/iran-security-forces-fire-kill-protesters
  33. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1436
  34. https://agsi.org/analysis/the-military-dimension-of-iran-protests/
  35. https://www.reuters.com/world/air-strike-kills-irgc-commander-iraq-syria-border-iraqi-officials-2020-11-30/
  36. https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/irans-irgc-unveils-new-suicide-drones-2025-2-20-0/
  37. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/02/iran-unveils-new-drones-military-drill-what-know
  38. https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/order-of-battle-of-the-iranian-artesh-ground-forces/
  39. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/irans-vip-plane-crash-sabotage-or-accident
  40. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/15/who-are-irans-new-top-military-leaders-after-israels-assassinations
  41. https://english.khamenei.ir/news/11745/Brigadier-General-Mohammad-Karami-appointed-Commander-of-IRGC
  42. https://iranwire.com/en/news/142350-khamenei-appoints-new-irgc-ground-forces-commander/
  43. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/235015/Brig-Gen-Akhavan-becomes-deputy-IRGC-Ground-Force-cmdr
  44. https://www.aei.org/articles/a-new-era-of-iranian-military-leadership/
  45. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/explainer-the-iranian-armed-forces
  46. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/media/1179
  47. https://institute.global/insights/geopolitics-and-security/creating-radicals-inside-indoctrination-programme-irans-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps
  48. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/iran-resistance/who-are-political-guides-in-the-irgc/
  49. https://www.mei.edu/publications/irans-revolutionary-guard-and-rising-cult-mahdism-missiles-and-militias-apocalypse
  50. https://www.brookings.edu/events/the-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps-military-and-political-influence-in-todays-iran/
  51. https://institute.global/insights/geopolitics-and-security/beyond-borders-expansionist-ideology-irans-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps
  52. https://www.criticalthreats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/20200121-Report-Iran%E2%80%99s-Reserve-of-Last-Resort.pdf
  53. https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/world/iran/irgc.htm
  54. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2016/02/irgc-saberin-special-forces-at-work-in-syria.php
  55. https://oe.tradoc.army.mil/product/iran-opens-new-helicopter-drone-base-in-southeastern-provincial-capital/
  56. https://iranwire.com/en/features/65962-the-irgc-provincial-corps/
  57. https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/2065235.html
  58. https://www.aei.org/articles/iran-primer-the-basij-resistance-force/
  59. https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/islamic-revolutionary-guards-corps-and-irans-2022-uprisings-37166
  60. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA568444.pdf
  61. https://www.aei.org/foreign-and-defense-policy/middle-east/is-irans-regular-military-pivoting-to-force-projection/
  62. https://agsi.org/analysis/the-war-in-syria-is-transforming-the-irgc-into-an-expeditionary-force/
  63. https://www.warpoweriran.com/landpower.php
  64. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/ground-equipment.htm
  65. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2020/01/the-oryx-handbook-of-iranian-fighting.html
  66. http://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/conventional-military
  67. https://www.ifmat.org/10/08/iranian-small-arms-manufacturing-is-bigger-than-you-think/
  68. https://weaponsdocs.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/small-arms-and-rpgs-produced-in-iran/
  69. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Master-Sanctions-List-Updated-10-01-2024-.pdf
  70. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2019/iran-military-power_2019.pdf
  71. https://www.iranwatch.org/iranian-entities/islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps-irgc-research-self-sufficiency-jihad-organization
  72. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2025/03/24/3280411/iran-s-defense-industry-fully-indigenous-says-military-official
  73. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0233
  74. https://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/irans-military-doctrine
  75. https://www.fpri.org/article/2025/10/shallow-ramparts-air-and-missile-defenses-in-the-june-2025-israel-iran-war/
  76. https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-october-16-2025/
  77. https://www.rudaw.net/english/middleeast/iran/060220201
  78. https://www.clingendael.org/publication/kurdish-struggle-iran-power-dynamics-and-quest-autonomy
  79. https://old.iranintl.com/en/iran/iran-army-commander-admits-role-suppressing-november-2019-bloody-protests
  80. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/19/un-urges-restraint-over-reports-of-multiple-deaths-in-iran-protests
  81. https://www.npr.org/2022/11/28/1139625631/iran-acknowledges-more-than-300-are-dead-from-unrest-from-nationwide-protests
  82. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147681
  83. https://thecradle.co/articles/irgc-reinforces-iran-iraq-border-to-confront-separatist-threat
  84. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2022-11-26/Iran-beefs-up-border-security-near-Iraq-citing-separatist-threats-1fgHnQlcmFa/index.html
  85. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510074414
  86. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/487867/IRGC-says-drives-terrorists-back-at-Iraqi-border
  87. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/9/iran-condemns-un-experts-report-on-protest-crackdown-as-false-biased
  88. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/iran-s-revolutionary-guards-transform-into-an-expeditionary-force/
  89. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/22/iran-more-than-1000-soldiers-die-in-syria-since-2011
  90. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2024/02/20/3042241/irgc-ground-force-equipped-with-suicide-combat-drones
  91. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/iranian-casualties-syria-and-strategic-logic-intervention
  92. https://www.iiss.org/globalassets/media-library---content--migration/images/comment/analysis/2017/december/2-mcinnis2125.pdf
  93. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/artificial-intelligence-is-accelerating-iranian-cyber-operations
  94. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/NCO-Journal/Archives/2020/February/Iran-Framing-the-Threat/
  95. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Iranian-Concepts-of-Warfare.pdf
  96. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/irgc-conducts-hybrid-military-drills-nuclear-talks-teeter
  97. https://www.mei.edu/publications/upgrading-irans-military-doctrine-offensive-forward-defense
  98. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde13/2308/2020/en/
  99. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/special-report-irans-leader-ordered-crackdown-on-unrest-do-whatever-it-take-idUSKBN1YR0QO/
  100. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/11/iran-more-than-100-protesters-believed-to-be-killed-as-top-officials-give-green-light-to-crush-protests/
  101. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/27/iran-deliberate-coverup-brutal-crackdown
  102. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/middle-east/iran/report-iran/
  103. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/3/rioters-shot-and-killed-at-protests-iran-admits-for-first-time
  104. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/12/iran-security-forces-used-rape-and-other-sexual-violence-to-crush-woman-life-freedom-uprising-with-impunity/
  105. https://www.ajc.org/news/crimes-against-humanity-another-un-report-finds-sexual-violence-by-irgc-and-other-authorities
  106. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MDE1323082020ENGLISH.pdf
  107. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2021/iran
  108. https://www.newsweek.com/iran-us-iraq-war-troops-killed-efps-shiite-militias-1385990
  109. https://jcpa.org/killing-americans-allies-irans-war/
  110. https://www.cfr.org/article/irans-regional-armed-network
  111. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/irans-islamist-proxies
  112. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12587
  113. https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/middle-east/iran-eastern-states/1696242955-iranian-official-admitting-tie-to-beirut-1983-attack-breaks-decades-of-denial
  114. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iranian-hezbollah-commanders-help-direct-houthi-attacks-yemen-sources-say-2024-01-20/
  115. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/irans-revolutionary-guard-deployed-yemen
  116. https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-april-9-2025/
  117. https://www.mei.edu/publications/irgcs-role-irans-economy-growing-its-engineering-arm-set-execute-40-mega-projects
  118. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/the-revolutionary-guards-looting-of-irans-economy/
  119. https://iranwire.com/en/features/69671/
  120. https://freeiransn.com/how-the-irgcs-corruption-and-monopolies-have-destroyed-iranian-industry/
  121. https://www.rferl.org/a/farda-leaked-conversation-corruption-irgc/31710316.html
  122. https://www.csis.org/analysis/crisis-iran-what-now
  123. https://2017-2021.state.gov/designation-of-the-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps/
  124. https://www.state.gov/foreign-terrorist-organizations
  125. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2024/06/government-of-canada-lists-the-irgc-as-a-terrorist-entity.html
  126. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/iran-targeted-human-rights-sanctions-series-irgc-terrorist-designations/
  127. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/eu-can-and-should-designate-irgc-terrorist-group
  128. https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/533
  129. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IN/PDF/IN11093/IN11093.1.pdf
  130. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/08/710987393/u-s-labels-irans-revolutionary-guard-as-a-foreign-terrorist-organization
  131. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2025-Unclassified-Report.pdf
  132. https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2025_dia_statement_for_the_record.pdf
  133. https://jstribune.com/lerman-assessing-israels-ongoing-campaign-against-iran-in-syria/
  134. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202402019470
  135. https://www.csis.org/analysis/air-superiority-twenty-first-century-lessons-iran-and-ukraine
  136. https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/defense-security/irans-achilles-heel-in-the-12-day-war-lessons-for-aerial-warfare/
  137. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25751654.2024.2319381
  138. https://www.brandeis.edu/crown/publications/middle-east-briefs/meb160.html
  139. https://nournews.ir/en/news/182683/All-Iran-borders-have-full-security-IRGC-Cmdr
  140. https://iranpress.com/content/303000/irgc-ground-forces-commander-public-security-our-red-line
  141. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2025/01/08/3234384/irgc-at-highest-level-of-readiness-to-defend-iran-general
  142. https://en.irna.ir/news/85714049/Iran-to-respond-to-any-threat-strongly-decisively-IRGC-cmdr
  143. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Iranian-Commander-Discusses-the-State-of-the-Axis-of-Resistance.pdf?x85095
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.