Hubbry Logo
IkhwanIkhwanMain
Open search
Ikhwan
Community hub
Ikhwan
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ikhwan
Ikhwan
Ikhwan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Ikhwān
الإخوان
إخوان من أطاع الله
Flag of the Ikhwan
Country
TypeLand warfare
ColorsGreen and white
Commanders
LeadersFaisal al-Duwaish
Sultan bin Bajad bin Humaid
Dhaydan bin Hithlain
Eqab bin Mohaya

The Ikhwān (Arabic: الإخوان, romanized: al-ʾIkhwān‎, lit. 'the Brethren'), commonly known as Ikhwān man Aṭāʿa Allāh (Arabic: إخوان من أطاع الله‎, 'Brethren of those who obey God'),[a] was a Wahhabi religious militia made up of traditionally nomadic tribesmen which formed a significant military force of the ruler Ibn Saud and played an important role during the unification of Saudi Arabia whereby establishing him as ruler of most of the Arabian Peninsula in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.[3]

The Ikhwan first appeared around 1902. They were the product of clergy who aimed to break up the Bedouin tribes and settle them around the wells and oases of the sedentary Arabian populations, mainly those of the Najd, on the grounds that nomadic life was incompatible with the strict conformity of their interpretation of Islam. The newly Islamicized Bedouin would be converted from nomad raiders to soldiers for Islam. The cleric/teachers of the Ikhwan were dedicated to their idea of the purification and the unification of Islam, and some of the newly converted Ikhwan rebelled against their emir Ibn Saud, accusing him of religious laxity. The conquest of the Hejaz in 1924 brought all of the current Saudi state under Ibn Saud's control. The monarch then found himself in conflict with elements of the Ikhwan. He crushed their power at the Battle of Sabilla in 1929,[4] following which the militia was reorganised into the Saudi Arabian National Guard.[5]

Background

[edit]
Hand-painted image in January 1930 of the Sheikh of the Mutair tribe and one of the most prominent leaders of the Brotherhood Faisal bin Sultan Al-Duwish
Portrait of the Sheikh of the Otaibah tribe and one of the most prominent leaders of the Brotherhood Sultan bin Bajad bin Humaid
Eqab bin Mohaya

According to scholar David Commins, around 1913, the same time that Ibn Saud regained al-Ahsa Oasis, there emerged in obscure circumstances a zealous movement known as the Ikhwan ('Brethren'). Salafi ulama went out to domesticate nomadic tribesmen, to convert them from idolatry to Islam and to make them soldiers for Saudi expansion. The Ikhwan became religious warriors united and motivated by idealism more than allegiance to Ibn Saud. The result was a rebellion by some of the Ikhwan against their creator, who crushed them and in so doing reasserted dynastic power over the religious mission.[6]

The arid, remote region of Najd had been ruled by the House of Saud and religiously dominated by the Islamic revival movement known as Wahhabism (with some exceptions) since the mid-18th century. Wahhabism was a movement of townspeople, and traditionally thought of the Beduin nomadic herders as "bearers of religious ignorance, jahiliyyah, and thus as raw material for conversion".[7] To remedy this situation, the Beduin were gathered in agricultural settlements known as hijra, where they were to be taught farming, crafts or trades and how to be "proper Muslims".[8] There were 52 hujar (plural of hijra) by 1920 and 120 by 1929.[9] Ikhwan were known for wearing white turbans rather than the traditional Arab Kufiya (roped headcloth), and for covering their faces when they encountered Europeans or Arabs from outside Saudi Arabia.[10]

An Ikhwan man wearing a keffiyeh or head covering

The pacification of the tribesmen was not entirely a success, and the former nomads continued their raids, which now had religious sanction and were bloodier than before. Unlike nomadic raiders, the Ikhwan earned "notoriety for routinely killing male captives" and for sometimes putting "children and women to death".[11] From 1914 to 1926 Ibn Saud and Wahhabi religious leadership allied with him urged the Ikhwan to not attack or harass other nomads and townspeople of the Najd.[12] From 1926 and 1930, the conflict was more serious, and effectively a rebellion and attempt to overthrow Ibn Saud by a minority of the Ikhwan leaders.[12] With the conquest of the Hejaz in 1925, Ibn Saud had completed his territorial expansion and negotiated border agreements with his neighbors, the British protectorates of Transjordan, Iraq and Kuwait. Some Ikhwan leaders wanted to continue the expansion of the Wahhabi realm into these states, and launched raids into them. This left Ibn Saud responsible for military attacks originating in his country and facing British military power if he did not stop them.[12]

Differences with Ibn Saud

[edit]

In general the Ikhwan wished Ibn Saud to pursue strict Wahhabi policies, while Ibn Saud sought more flexibility to adapt "policy to local circumstances" and maintain political stability, especially in newly conquered lands that had few Wahhabi believers. Wahhabis supported forced conversion of Shia in al-Hasa, while Ibn Saud was willing to tolerate their practices.[13] After conquest of the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina—which had been part of the Ottoman Empire for four centuries and developed a pluralistic religious culture—Ibn Saud sought to "[reassure] the Muslim world that a new Saudi regime would not disrupt the pilgrimage",[14] while the Ikhwan "pressed for strict adherence to norms" such as forbidding smoking tobacco and worshiping at shrines.[15]

Two men from Ikhwan in al-Hasa Photographed by Paul Harrison

In 1926 meeting of Ikhwan leaders at al-Artawiya, found Ibn Saud at fault for "not upholding the sharp separation of belief and infidelity". Among his misdeeds were allowing two of his sons to travel to "idolatrous lands" (Faisal to England and Saud to Egypt); allowing (what they believed to be) idolatrous nomads from Iraq and Transjordan to pasture their animals in "the abode of Islam"; leniency towards Shiites; the introduction of modern inventions (car, telephone and telegraph); and (what they considered) illegal taxation of nomadic tribes.[16] Ibn Saud attempted to mollify the Ikhwan by submitting their accusations to the religious scholars ('ulama'), who agreed on the need for more strict policies towards non-Wahhabi subjects, but also affirmed that only the ruler (Ibn Saud) had the right to declare jihad.[17]

Weaponry and combat style

[edit]
Soldiers from akhwan min taʽa Allah Army on Camels carrying the Flags of the Third Saudi State, and Flag of Saud dynasty, Flag and the akhwan Army.
Old rifle used by Ikhwan
A drawing of a typical Ikhwan fighter
Sultan bin Bijad's personal sword

The Ikhwan, being irregular tribesmen, relied mainly on traditional weapons such as lances and swords and sometimes old fashioned firearms. Usually, they attacked in the forms of raids which is a style Bedouins had always used in the deserts of Arabia. Those raiders travelled mainly on camels and some horses. Typically, every enemy male captured was killed by cutting his throat.[18]

Raids on Transjordan

[edit]
Main article: Ikhwan raids on Transjordan

Two notable raids on Emirate of Transjordan, a British protectorate, occurred in 1922 and 1924. In August 1922, around 1,500 Ikhwan camel mounted fighters led by Eqab bin Mohaya,[citation needed] attacked Transjordan. According to one account they retreated before they reached their objective—the capital Amman.[19] According to another account, they massacred the inhabitants of two small villages before being decimated by British armoured cars and planes.[20]

In August 1924, another larger Ikhwan force, numbering around 4,500 raiders,[19] travelled 1,600 kilometres from Najd to come within 15 kilometres of Amman before being spotted and attacked by British RAF aircraft. The Ikhwan army reportedly suffered 500 dead.[19] Without the help of the RAF, Amman would most likely have been captured by the Ikhwan.[19]

Revolt and defeat

[edit]
Main article: Ikhwan Revolt
Ikhwan men taa Allah flag

By 1927, the Saudi forces had overrun nearly all of the central Arabian Peninsula. The few areas not under Saudi control had treaties with Britain. Ibn Saud was smart enough to realize that it would be folly to provoke London and forbade further raiding. This edict did not sit well with the Ikhwan, who believed that all non-Wahabbis were infidels.

In 1927 tribesmen of the Mutayr and Ajman rebelled against the ulama's judgment and the authority of Ibn Saud and engaged in cross-border raids into parts of Trans-Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait.[21] The destruction of an Iraqi police post provoked an international incident by violating the Saudi–Iraqi neutral zone between Iraq and Arabia established by Great Britain and Ibn Sa'ud (1927–28). The British bombed Najd in retaliation.[22] A congress convened by Ibn Saud in October 1928 deposed Ibn Humayd ad-Dawish, and Ibn Hithlayn, the leaders of the revolt.[22] The Ikhwanis also raided Kuwait in January 1928.

With the Ikhwan leadership defiant, Ibn Saud took to the field to lead his army, which was now supported by four British aircraft (flown by British pilots) and a fleet of 200 military vehicles that symbolized the modernization that the Ikhwan abhorred.[23] After suffering a major defeat at the Battle of Sabilla (30 March 1929), the main body of Ikhwan surrendered to British forces on the Saudi-Kuwaiti frontier in January 1930.

  • Nayef bin Hathleen handing his pistol to a British officer
    Nayef bin Hathleen handing his pistol to a British officer
  • The surrender of Faisal Al-Dawish and Ikhwan
    The surrender of Faisal Al-Dawish and Ikhwan
  • Faisal Al-Dawish in Iraq
    Faisal Al-Dawish in Iraq
  • Faisal Al-Dawish and Nayef bin Hathleen
    Faisal Al-Dawish and Nayef bin Hathleen
  • A personal picture of Faisal Al-Dawish while he is in prison in Iraq
    A personal picture of Faisal Al-Dawish while he is in prison in Iraq
  • Faisal Al-Dawish on board a British ship to take him to Ibn Saud prison
    Faisal Al-Dawish on board a British ship to take him to Ibn Saud prison
  • Nayef bin Hathleen and Sahoud bin Lami
    Nayef bin Hathleen and Sahoud bin Lami
  • From the right, Sahoud bin Lami, Faisal Al-Dawish and Nayef bin Hathlin on board a British ship to transport them to Ibn Saud prison
    From the right, Sahoud bin Lami, Faisal Al-Dawish and Nayef bin Hathlin on board a British ship to transport them to Ibn Saud prison
  • A picture of Nayef bin Hathlin as he exited the plane, and behind him was Jasir bin Sahoud bin Lami
    A picture of Nayef bin Hathlin as he exited the plane, and behind him was Jasir bin Sahoud bin Lami

Ibn Saud completed the military defeat of the Ikhwan rebels "with a deft mix of punishment and rehabilitation" to avoid antagonizing the bulk of Ikhwan who had agreed with many of the rebels' complaints but remained on the sidelines. Rebel leaders Duwish and Ibn Bujad "died in captivity in Riyadh." Their tribal followers were punished with the confiscation of "the lion's share of their camels and horses."[24] The remnants of the irregular Ikhwanis formed units in Ibn Saud's new military institution, initially known as the White Army (from the name of their white thawb, robe), later called the National Guard.[5]

Grand Mosque seizure

[edit]
Main article: Grand Mosque seizure

Religious insurgents who participated in the 1979 Grand Mosque seizure in Mecca referred to themselves as the 'al-Ikhwan', although with no direct connection with the original militia, thus in their eyes justifying the seizure as a means to liberate the Kingdom from what they deemed as 'Western apostasy'.[25] They were led by Juhayman al-Otaybi, an echo of his father's charge in 1921 against the former Saudi king. The seizure and its aftermath led to the increased power and influence of conservative clerics over Saudi political, cultural and social life, putting an abrupt end to the comparatively moderate outlook (at the time) of the kingdom towards modernization and Westernization.[26]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ikhwan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Ikhwan, or "brethren," were a fanatical Wahhabi militia that formed the irregular vanguard of ibn Saud's military campaigns during the from 1902 to 1932. Recruited primarily from nomadic tribes in and organized into sedentary settlements known as hujjar beginning around , they embraced a puritanical interpretation of that emphasized relentless against perceived unbelievers and apostates, enabling rapid conquests across the . These warriors spearheaded key victories, including the capture of al-Hasa from Ottoman control in 1913 and the subjugation of the Hashemite in 1924–1925, where they sacked and enforced strict Wahhabi practices on conquered populations. Their mobility and zeal allowed to expand from a small in to control over most of modern , though their methods often involved massacres and forced conversions that terrorized rivals. However, as sought stability through treaties with Britain and introduction of modern technologies like automobiles and telegraphs, the Ikhwan chafed against restrictions on raiding neighboring British protectorates such as , , and Transjordan, viewing these as un-Islamic compromises. Tensions erupted into the of 1927–1930, led by figures like of the and Sultan ibn Bajad al-Otaibi, who rejected taxation, central authority, and modernization as (innovation) corrupting pure Islam. The rebels conducted cross-border raids, prompting British intervention and forcing to confront his former allies; the decisive defeat at the on March 29, 1929, where Saudi forces employed machine guns and aircraft against traditional Ikhwan cavalry, shattered the uprising. Surviving leaders were handed over by the British and executed, solidifying 's rule but highlighting the inherent volatility of relying on ideologically driven tribal levies for state-building.

Origins and Ideology

Formation and Early Development

The Ikhwan movement emerged in 1912 as an initiative by Abdulaziz Al Saud to transform nomadic tribes into a disciplined, Wahhabi-oriented force loyal to his emerging sultanate in . By promoting sedentarization through the establishment of hujjar—fortified agricultural settlements around oases—Al Saud sought to dismantle entrenched tribal feuds and raiding traditions, replacing them with religious zeal and centralized allegiance. Religious instructors, or mutawa, were dispatched to these colonies to enforce strict Wahhabi tenets, emphasizing against unbelievers and settlement as a pious act akin to the Prophet Muhammad's hijra. The first hujra, al-Artawiyya, was founded in late 1912 or early 1913, primarily comprising members of the tribe under the leadership of Shaykh Faisal al-Duwaysh, a key early proselytizer who had converted to around 1906. This settlement served as a model, attracting other tribes such as the Harb and Utaybah through incentives like land grants, tax exemptions, and promises of plunder from sanctioned raids. By 1914, several additional hujjar had been established across , with the Ikhwan population estimated in the thousands, fostering a communal identity as "brethren" (ikhwan) bound by faith rather than blood ties. Early development accelerated amid Al Saud's reconquest of in 1902 and subsequent expansions, with the Ikhwan providing both manpower for campaigns and a mechanism for ideological consolidation. In November 1913, Ikhwan contingents from al-Artawiyya participated in the pivotal conquest of from Ottoman forces, capturing key ports like and demonstrating their tactical value as mobile infantry supported by camel-mounted lancers. This success spurred further recruitment, though tensions arose from the Ikhwan's puritanical demands for unrestricted expansion, foreshadowing later frictions with Al Saud's pragmatic governance. By 1916, the network of hujjar had proliferated, numbering over a dozen and integrating disparate tribes into a semi-regular estimated at 20,000-30,000 fighters, pivotal to Najd's consolidation before broader Arabian unification efforts.

Settlement Policies and Hujjar

The settlement policies of , founder of the modern Saudi state, involved the systematic sedentarization of nomadic tribes through the establishment of hujjar (singular: hijra), fortified agricultural communities designed to foster loyalty, agricultural development, and military readiness among Wahhabi converts known as the Ikhwan. These policies emerged as a pragmatic response to the challenges of governing restless nomadic populations, transforming them from potential threats into state-building assets by tying them to fixed land, religious discipline, and centralized authority. By inducing tribes to abandon traditional raiding economies for irrigated farming and doctrinal adherence, Ibn Saud aimed to curb intertribal while creating a pool of ideologically committed fighters for unification campaigns. The inaugural hijra was founded in 1912 at al-Artawiyya, near the town of al-Majma'ah in , under the leadership of Faisal al-Dawish of the tribe, who spearheaded the conversion and settlement of hundreds of nomads. This settlement served as a model, featuring mud-brick fortifications, groves, wells for , a central for Wahhabi instruction, and communal structures enforcing strict moral codes against practices like smoking or music deemed un-Islamic. Residents, often former raiders, were allocated plots for subsistence farming, supplemented by state subsidies in grain and tools, which incentivized compliance while binding them economically to Ibn Saud's rule; non-adherence risked expulsion or reprisal. By design, hujjar functioned dually as agrarian outposts and mobilization centers, where sheikhs drilled inhabitants in combat and dispatched raiding parties against rival factions or Ottoman holdouts. Expansion accelerated post-1913, with dozens of hujjar dotting and adjacent regions by the late , accommodating thousands; al-Artawiyya alone grew to several thousand residents, exemplifying the scale. By 1915, over 200 such settlements existed around , swelling Ikhwan ranks to at least 60,000 fighters poised for deployment. Prominent examples included Sajir, inhabited by 'Utaybah tribesmen, and others like al-Ghutghut or Khurma, each led by a local Ikhwan amir who reported to and enforced tawhid-based governance. This proliferation reflected Ibn Saud's causal strategy: sedentarization reduced nomadic autonomy, which historically fueled rebellions, while embedding Wahhabi in hujjar ensured ideological conformity, mitigating the risks of unchecked . However, the policies' rigor—compelling migrations and suppressing customs—generated internal strains, as settlers chafed under surveillance and resource scarcity, foreshadowing later Ikhwan discontent. Empirical outcomes underscored the policies' efficacy in state consolidation: hujjar boosted under cultivation in arid , with estimates of tens of thousands settled by 1930, providing a semi-professional force that outmaneuvered less disciplined opponents. Yet, the militarized ethos of these settlements, prioritizing over pure , amplified expansionist zeal, contributing to overreach in cross-border raids that ultimately provoked the of 1927–1930. Primary accounts from the era, including British diplomatic reports, affirm the hujjar's role as incubators of disciplined , though some observers noted coercive elements in recruitment, with tribes like the or 'Utaybah facing ultimatums to settle or face subjugation.

Wahhabi Religious Framework

The Wahhabi religious framework adopted by the Ikhwan centered on the doctrines of (c. 1703–1792), which emphasized (the absolute oneness of ) as the foundational principle of , rejecting any form of shirk (associating partners with ), such as veneration of saints, pilgrimages to tombs, or votive offerings at sacred sites. This puritanical reform movement, rooted in the of and influenced by scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah, sought to restore to its origins in the and , condemning (religious innovations) including Sufi , Shia mourning rituals, and celebrations like the Prophet's birthday. Adherents, self-identified as muwahhidun (unitarians), interpreted primarily as a defensive or internal struggle to uphold virtue and eradicate polytheistic practices, rather than perpetual offensive warfare, though this evolved into militant expansion under political alliances. For the Ikhwan, composed of settled tribes converted through Wahhabi clerical missions starting around 1912, this framework manifested in fanatical enforcement of moral and social codes derived from a literalist application of . They imposed strict gender segregation, mandatory observance, prohibitions on , shaving beards, and music, and the destruction of graves or shrines perceived as idolatrous, viewing these as essential to purifying from Ottoman-era corruptions and tribal customs. Ikhwan mujahideen acted as self-appointed mutawwi'in (religious police), patrolling settlements to ensure compliance, which fueled their role in Ibn Saud's conquests but also bred internal tensions over perceived dilutions of , such as truces with non-Wahhabi groups. This ideology's emphasis on doctrinal purity over political ultimately contributed to the (1927–1930), as leaders like Faisal al-Dawish accused of compromising Wahhabi principles by halting expansionist jihad and engaging with British-protected states. While Wahhabi texts prioritize as the core mission, the Ikhwan's interpretation weaponized it for territorial and cultural conquests, distinguishing their zeal from the more restrained clerical establishment in .

Military Contributions to Saudi State-Building

Alliance Dynamics with Ibn Saud

The alliance between the Ikhwan and Abdulaziz ibn Saud emerged as a symbiotic arrangement rooted in shared Wahhabi ideology and pragmatic military needs, enabling the unification of much of the Arabian Peninsula. Starting in 1912, Ibn Saud systematically organized nomadic Bedouin tribes—particularly from the Mutayr, Utaybah, and other groups—into the Ikhwan by settling them in hujjar, fortified agricultural villages that served as bases for religious indoctrination and military mobilization. This policy transformed unreliable raiders into a devoted vanguard force, numbering in the tens of thousands by the mid-1910s, which Ibn Saud deployed as an elite corps to extend his control beyond central Najd. In return, the Ikhwan received economic incentives, including land grants and regular stipends (nafaq), which bound them to Ibn Saud's authority while allowing tribal leaders to maintain internal cohesion. Key Ikhwan commanders, such as Faisal al-Duwaysh of the tribe and of the Utaybah, formalized their allegiance through oaths to , integrating their militias into the broader Saudi command structure without fully subordinating tribal autonomy. appointed these leaders as amirs over designated territories, leveraging their influence to enforce Wahhabi orthodoxy and suppress local rivals, while centralizing political loyalty in . This delegation of power facilitated swift campaigns, as Ikhwan units operated with high mobility and zeal, often outpacing regular Saudi troops in frontier operations. However, the arrangement preserved Ikhwan agency, with leaders retaining discretion in tactics and recruitment, which balanced through subsidies and selective patronage to prevent overreach. The partnership's strength lay in its causal alignment: Ibn Saud's vision of state consolidation required the Ikhwan's fanaticism to overcome entrenched tribal and dynastic opposition, while the Ikhwan gained prestige, resources, and a religious mandate for expansion. Between 1917 and 1925, Ikhwan forces under Ibn Saud's nominal oversight contributed decisively to victories in Al-Ahsa (1913), the Hashemi domains in Hijaz (1924–1925), and southern border skirmishes, solidifying Saudi dominance. Yet, underlying frictions—such as Ikhwan demands for unrestricted raiding and doctrinal purity—highlighted the alliance's fragility, as Ibn Saud prioritized diplomatic constraints imposed by British influence and emerging state institutions over unchecked militancy.

Participation in Unification Campaigns

The Ikhwan served as a core component of 's military forces during the , functioning as highly mobile driven by Wahhabi zeal to expand the Najdi state. Their participation began shortly after the movement's formation, providing Ibn Saud with irregular cavalry units that complemented his more structured forces, enabling rapid advances across diverse terrains from oases to coastal regions. Ikhwan fighters, often numbering in the thousands per campaign, were noted for their ferocity and willingness to engage in prolonged raids, which pressured enemy defenses and facilitated territorial consolidation. In the in , Ikhwan contingents supported Ibn Saud's forces in overrunning Ottoman garrisons at key centers like Hufuf, securing the eastern province and its oil-rich potential for the nascent Saudi entity. This operation marked an early demonstration of Ikhwan effectiveness against conventionally armed opponents, with their tribal mobility allowing tactics that led to Ottoman surrender without major pitched battles. By integrating al-Hasa, the campaign expanded Saudi control over vital trade routes and Shia-populated areas, though Ikhwan provoked local resistance. The Ikhwan played a decisive role in the 1921 , the Rashidi emirate's stronghold. Ibn Saud mobilized approximately 10,000 troops, including substantial Ikhwan elements from tribes like the and Utaybah, to besiege and capture the city on November 2, 1921, after the Rashidi ruler Muhammad bin Talal fled. Ikhwan raids had previously softened Rashidi defenses, diverting resources and enabling the final assault that ended Jabal Shammar's independence. This victory neutralized a longstanding rival and incorporated northern territories, with Ikhwan leaders such as Faisal al-Dawish credited for coordinating flanking maneuvers. During the in 1924–1925, Ikhwan forces under commanders like Sultan bin Bajad al-Otaibi and Khalid bin Luwai spearheaded the offensive against Sharif Hussein's Hashemite kingdom. On September 24, 1924, they stormed , overcoming defenses and capturing the city after intense fighting that resulted in significant civilian casualties due to the Ikhwan's uncompromising approach to perceived . This breakthrough prompted Hussein's abdication and facilitated the fall of on October 13, 1924, and by January 1925, completing Hejaz's annexation. Ikhwan contributions, estimated at several thousand warriors, were pivotal in the campaign's speed, though their autonomous raids strained Ibn Saud's diplomatic relations with Britain.

Strategic Conquests and Territorial Gains

The Ikhwan functioned as in Ibn Saud's expansionist campaigns, leveraging their nomadic mobility, tribal cohesion, and Wahhabi fervor to execute swift, decisive assaults on entrenched rivals. Their participation extended Saudi control beyond the arid core of , securing resource-rich peripheries and strategic chokepoints that facilitated further unification. By 1926, these efforts had incorporated approximately 80% of the Arabian Peninsula's core territories under Saudi authority, transforming a fragmented tribal into a centralized . A pivotal early gain occurred in the in May 1913, where Ikhwan contingents from and other settled tribes augmented Ibn Saud's forces in overrunning Ottoman garrisons at Hufuf and . This campaign expelled Turkish control, annexing the eastern oases—spanning over 20,000 square miles of groves and coastal access—providing economic viability through agriculture and trade routes previously dominated by Ottoman proxies. The Ikhwan's role underscored their utility in , combining irregular raids with coordinated assaults to exploit numerical superiority against static defenses. In 1919, during the Battle of Turabah, Ikhwan fighters ambushed and annihilated a 6,000-strong expeditionary force dispatched by Sharif Hussein of , inflicting heavy casualties and disrupting Hussein's southern ambitions. This victory neutralized immediate threats from the Hijaz, allowing to consolidate without dual-front warfare and setting the stage for northern advances. The Ikhwan's dominance was evident in the 1921 , where they spearheaded assaults on the Rashidi stronghold of Jabal , compelling its surrender on November 2 after sieges and tribal defections. This incorporated roughly 40,000 square miles of northern plateaus, eliminating a longstanding rival and linking to Syrian trade paths. Ikhwan leaders like Faisal al-Dawish coordinated with Utaybah and Harb contingents, employing feigned retreats and night raids to shatter Rashidi cohesion. By 1924, Ikhwan shock units captured Ta'if from Hashemite forces, sacking the city and precipitating the fall of and , thereby securing the Hejaz's religious heartlands and denying Sharifian legitimacy. These gains elevated Saudi prestige as custodians of the holy sites, while Ikhwan enforcement of Wahhabi puritanism purged perceived innovations, consolidating ideological control over newly acquired populations.

Organization and Warfare

Tribal Structure and Mobilization

The Ikhwan were primarily drawn from nomadic Bedouin tribes of Najd, including the Mutayr, Utaybah, Subay', Ajman, and Harb, who underwent sedentarization in hujjar settlements to foster Wahhabi indoctrination and military readiness. This process began with the establishment of the first hijra at al-Artawiyya in 1912–1913, primarily by Mutayr tribesmen under Faysal al-Dawish, followed by Utaybah at al-Ghatghat in 1917 and Harb settlements numbering 22 by 1928. The hujjar functioned as fortified agricultural and religious centers, where mutawwi'un (Wahhabi preachers) supplanted traditional tribal allegiances with loyalty to the da'wa and Ibn Saud, though tribal identities persisted within units known as firqa or bayraq. Tribal organization retained hierarchical structures under appointed or emergent Ikhwan amirs, such as Faysal al-Dawish for the (mobilizing 2,000–6,000 fighters per clan), Sultan ibn Bijad ibn Humayd for the Utaybah (up to 6,000 in campaigns), Dhaydan ibn Hithlayn for the , Dharman ibn Faysal Abu Thinayn for the Subay' al-Aridh, and Abdul-Mihsin al-Firm for the Harb. These leaders coordinated with Ibn Saud's court, but autonomy allowed independent actions driven by religious zeal for against perceived unbelievers, often exceeding central directives. Mobilization relied on rapid assembly from hujjar via shaykhly summons, religious exhortations, and incentives like booty and land grants, enabling forces of 2,000–4,000 for targeted raids or up to 40,000 for major conquests such as the 1924–1925 Hijaz campaign. For instance, in May 1919, approximately 2,500 Ikhwan, including 400 Utaybah from al-Ghatghat, reinforced Turabah against Hashimite forces, while 4,000 engaged at al-Jahara in 1920. Assemblies like the 1927 conference, attended by 3,000 shaykhs, reinforced unity, though factional splits—evident in the 1927–1930 revolt by , Utaybah, and dissidents—highlighted tensions between tribal autonomy and Saudi centralization. By 1929, countered rebels with 20,000 loyal Ikhwan at Sabilla, demonstrating the system's capacity for large-scale redeployment.

Armaments and Tactical Approaches

The Ikhwan forces, as irregular tribal warriors, lacked a centralized supply system for armaments and relied predominantly on personally owned traditional and light modern weapons, including swords for close combat, lances for mounted charges, and older-model rifles or muskets for ranged fire. Captured booty from conquests supplemented their arsenal, such as cannons seized during the capture of al-Ta'if in 1924 from Hashemite defenders and machine guns taken in sieges like Jiddah in 1925, though these were not systematically distributed or maintained. This self-equipped approach contrasted with the more structured provisioning of Ibn Saud's regular forces, which by the late 1920s incorporated British-supplied machine guns and vehicles, highlighting the Ikhwan's technological limitations that contributed to their vulnerabilities in sustained engagements. Tactical doctrine centered on the tradition of ghazw (raids), leveraging high mobility via camels—each fighter providing his own mount—for swift, surprise incursions aimed at disrupting enemy lines, seizing resources, and demoralizing foes through numerical superiority and religious fervor, where combatants alternated between fighting and prayer to sustain momentum. Night attacks and strategic encirclements were common, as exemplified in the 1919 assault on Turubah, where Ikhwan forces exploited darkness to overrun Sharifian camps, and the 1920 raid on al-Jahara, employing rapid camel-borne to capture forts. In larger unification campaigns, they functioned as , delivering massed charges to break defenses, while propaganda elements—such as calls to —amplified psychological impact to induce enemy flight without full battle. During sieges, adaptations included digging trenches and sandbag emplacements for cover, as seen in the 1925 Jiddah operation where 40,000 Ikhwan fighters combined positional warfare with probing night raids to compel surrender. However, in the 1929 revolt, their tactics faltered against modernized Saudi opponents; at the Battle of Sabilla on March 29–31, Ikhwan rebels formed defensive arrays and launched countercharges following feigned Saudi withdrawals, but camel-mounted infantry proved ineffective against machine-gun fire, resulting in heavy casualties among an estimated 2,000 dissidents. This reliance on pre-modern mobility and light arms, without integration of automobiles or heavy weapons, underscored causal vulnerabilities in confronting industrialized warfare, leading to their decisive suppression.

Cross-Border Raids and Conflicts

Incursions into Transjordan (1922-1924)

The Ikhwan launched a series of cross-border raids into the , a British mandate territory under Abdullah ibn , beginning in as part of their efforts to plunder resources and extend Wahhabi influence beyond . These incursions targeted encampments and settled villages in the southern regions, reflecting the Ikhwan's view of neighboring areas as legitimate fields for ghazwa (raiding expeditions) to enforce religious conformity and acquire booty. Although sought to restrain such actions to avoid provoking British authorities, Ikhwan leaders operated with significant autonomy, viewing the raids as extensions of against non-Wahhabi polities. In 1922, Ikhwan forces numbering around 1,500 camel-mounted fighters raided settlements south of , clashing with local tribes and disrupting frontier stability. The attackers, drawn primarily from nomadic groups like the Utaybah, inflicted casualties and seized livestock before withdrawing, but the incursion heightened tensions along the undefined border. British officials attributed the raid to Ikhwan zealotry rather than direct Saudi orchestration, prompting diplomatic protests to . The most notable escalation occurred in 1924, when Ikhwan raiders under Sultan bin Bajad al-Otaibi of the tribe attacked the Ziza railway station, approximately 40 kilometers south of , aiming to sever supply lines and challenge Transjordanian authority. This raid involved several hundred fighters and resulted in the destruction of infrastructure, though the attackers faced stiff resistance from combined Transjordanian and British forces, including the . In response, the Royal Air Force deployed aircraft to bomb and pursue the retreating raiders, inflicting significant casualties estimated at over 100 and preventing deeper penetration. These raids, totaling involvement from up to 4,500 Ikhwan over the period, strained Anglo-Saudi relations and underscored the challenges of controlling semi-autonomous tribal militias, ultimately contributing to boundary negotiations like the 1925 Haddah Agreement. Transjordanian defenses, bolstered by British aviation and ground troops, successfully repelled the incursions without territorial losses, though they exacerbated local insecurity and economic disruption. Ibn Saud publicly disavowed the attacks to preserve subsidies and alliances, but the events highlighted growing frictions between his centralizing state and the Ikhwan's expansionist fervor.

Attacks on Iraq and Other British-Protected Areas

Despite the Treaty of signed on May 20, 1927, in which committed to preventing his subjects from conducting raids into territories under British protection, including the Mandate of and the Sheikhdom of Kuwait, Ikhwan tribesmen persisted in cross-border incursions driven by their expansionist zeal and dissatisfaction with Ibn Saud's diplomatic restraints. These attacks targeted settled populations and frontier outposts, often involving the seizure of and clashes with local forces, exacerbating regional instability and prompting British countermeasures. A pivotal incident occurred on November 5, 1927, when , paramount shaykh of the , led an Ikhwan force in a raid on the frontier post at Busayya in southern , where they massacred personnel constructing a fort and triggered retaliatory actions from and British authorities. This violation of the recent treaty drew sharp protests from Britain to , who professed inability to fully control the Ikhwan, while the raid highlighted the tribesmen's defiance of centralized authority in favor of independent jihadist forays. Further escalating tensions, on , 1928, al-Duwaish directed another raiding party that penetrated approximately 10 miles into territory to assault a local , resulting in additional casualties and thefts.) Parallel raids targeted , with Ikhwan elements launching incursions in January 1928 that involved plunder of camels and sheep, met by Kuwaiti defenses bolstered by British intervention, including bombings of raider concentrations to deter further aggression. These operations, numbering several in 1928 and into 1929, strained Ibn Saud's relations with Britain, as the Ikhwan's actions undermined his pledges and fueled accusations of inadequate enforcement, ultimately contributing to the broader rupture between the tribes and Saudi leadership. British archival records document repeated diplomatic exchanges highlighting Ibn Saud's challenges in reining in the and other Ikhwan factions, whose raids reflected a purist Wahhabi imperative to propagate faith through conquest irrespective of geopolitical boundaries.

Ideological Tensions and Revolt

Doctrinal Disputes with the Saudi Leadership

The Ikhwan's doctrinal disputes with the Saudi leadership arose from irreconcilable interpretations of Wahhabi orthodoxy, with the Ikhwan demanding an unyielding, expansionist application of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teachings that prioritized perpetual , rejection of non-Muslim alliances, and eradication of perceived innovations (). Ibn Saud, after consolidating control over the by 1926, prioritized state-building through pragmatic governance, including treaties with Britain that curtailed cross-border raids and introduced administrative centralization, which Ikhwan leaders like branded as capitulation to kufr and dilution of Islamic purity. Central to the rift was Ibn Saud's moderation following the of the , where Ikhwan fighters expected wholesale destruction of Shia shrines and graves as acts of enforcement, but the leadership instead preserved sites to maintain stability among diverse sects and pilgrims, actions decried as religious leniency compromising core Wahhabi . Ikhwan grievances extended to Ibn Saud's cessation of against neighboring mandates like and Transjordan after the 1922- unification campaigns, viewing peace accords—such as the Treaty of Hadda with Britain—as betrayal of the divine mandate for until all submitted under a single . Technological and administrative changes further fueled accusations of , including the deployment of telegraphs for governance in 1920s and automobiles for military logistics, which Ikhwan sheikhs condemned as Western corruptions alien to nomadic and Sharia-compliant life. In November 1926, Ikhwan delegates from tribes like the and convened at Ghatghat to formalize these charges, presenting with demands for stricter enforcement, abolition of police forts symbolizing state over tribal authority, and resumption of raids—framing non-compliance as warranting . Saudi-aligned ulema, including figures from the Hanbali , countered by issuing fatwas in affirming Ibn Saud's role as legitimate guardian of the faith, arguing that pragmatic rule preserved Wahhabism's longevity against internal threats like Ikhwan extremism, which targeted even fellow Sunnis deemed insufficiently pious. This clash underscored the Ikhwan's transformation from allied to ideological rivals, prioritizing doctrinal absolutism over political realism, ultimately precipitating their 1927-1930 .

Escalation to Armed Rebellion (1927-1930)

The Ikhwan's dissatisfaction with Abdulaziz Ibn Saud's post-unification policies intensified after the signing of the Treaty of Jeddah on May 20, 1927, which secured British recognition of Saudi sovereignty in exchange for commitments to respect international borders and halt cross-border raids into protectorates like Iraq and Transjordan. Ikhwan leaders, viewing unrestricted jihad and expansion as core to their Wahhabi mission, perceived these restraints as a betrayal of the faith for which they had fought, compounded by Ibn Saud's introduction of modern technologies such as automobiles and telegraphs, which they condemned as un-Islamic innovations. Primary figures driving the escalation included Faisal bin Sultan al-Dawish of the Mutair tribe and Sultan bin Bajad al-Otaibi of the Ajman tribe, whose nomadic warriors prioritized raiding for spoils and prestige over centralized taxation and settlement policies imposed by Riyadh. Defying Ibn Saud's directives, Ikhwan forces under al-Dawish conducted a major raid into southern Iraq in November 1927, targeting Shia villages and prompting British aerial reprisals that killed dozens of raiders and heightened internal frictions. This was followed by incursions into Kuwait in January 1928, looting livestock and further undermining Ibn Saud's diplomatic efforts to stabilize relations with Britain. By mid-1928, doctrinal rifts deepened as Ikhwan amirs accused Saudi ulama of diluting puritanical Wahhabism through pragmatic accommodations, leading to sporadic clashes with loyalist forces over control of grazing lands and zakat collection in Najd. In response, convened a tribal in October 1928 at al-Khurba, where assembled shaykhs formally deposed al-Dawish, Nayef bin Hithlayn of the , and other defiant leaders, stripping them of authority and branding their actions as sedition against the ummah's unity. This decree provoked open defiance, culminating in the Ikhwan's declaration of rebellion in December 1928, as al-Dawish and bin Bajad rallied approximately 10,000-15,000 tribesmen from Mutair, , and segments of Utaybah to reject Riyadh's suzerainty and prepare for holy war against perceived apostates. Initial armed engagements in late 1928 and early 1929 involved Ikhwan ambushes on Saudi supply lines and patrols in the Jafura desert, marking the transition from raiding defiance to coordinated insurgency aimed at unseating 's regime. By mid-1929, the revolt had mobilized broader tribal networks, with Ikhwan forces fortifying positions and launching probes toward al-Ahsa, setting the stage for decisive confrontations while British mediation efforts failed to avert full-scale .

Defeat and Suppression

Battle of Sabilla (1929)

The , occurring on 29 March 1929 near the Sabilla oasis in northern Arabia, represented the pivotal clash of the against ibn Saud's consolidation of power. Rebel Ikhwan contingents, drawn primarily from Mutair and allied tribes disillusioned with Saudi restrictions on raiding and modernization efforts, sought to challenge loyalist forces amid escalating doctrinal and territorial disputes. Commanded by Faisal al-Dawish, a prominent Mutair shaykh and former Ikhwan vanguard in earlier conquests, the attackers aimed to disrupt Saudi supply lines and assert autonomy, but encountered a numerically inferior yet better-equipped Saudi detachment. Saudi troops, recruited from settled Najdi elements and reinforced with emerging mechanized elements including automobiles for mobility, repelled the Ikhwan assault through defensive positioning and rapid counterattacks. The engagement unfolded over intense fighting, with Ikhwan warriors employing traditional camel-mounted charges but suffering from superior firepower and tactical by the defenders. Key outcomes included severe wounds to al-Dawish, forcing his temporary withdrawal, and the of Ibn Humayd, a co-commander whose loss fragmented Ikhwan coordination. This Saudi triumph, leveraging 's alliances with British-protected zones and internal tribal levies, inflicted heavy casualties on the —estimated in the hundreds—while minimizing loyalist losses, thereby shattering the revolt's momentum. The battle underscored the Ikhwan's vulnerability to centralized state forces transitioning from tribal warfare, hastening the rebellion's collapse and enabling Abdulaziz to reassert control over refractory factions by mid-1930.

Execution of Leaders and Tribal Reintegration

Following the decisive defeat at the in March 1929 and the subsequent collapse of the Ikhwan rebellion, systematically eliminated key rebel leaders to dismantle the movement's command structure. Sultan bin Bajad al-Otaibi, a principal Ikhwan from the tribe, was pursued and killed during Saudi operations in Al-Artawiyyah in 1931. Didan bin Hithlayn, another leader, was executed in 1929 at the camp of Fahd bin Jiluwi, 's governor in , under the pretext of resolving tribal disputes. These executions were authorized after issued fatwas deeming the rebels as having deviated into , justifying their punishment as necessary for state stability. Faisal al-Duwayish, the paramount shaykh and de facto head of the revolt, evaded immediate capture after being wounded at Sabilla but surrendered to British authorities in in October 1929 alongside other leaders including Nayef bin Hithlayn. Extradited to Saudi custody in January 1930, he was imprisoned in , where he died on 3 October 1931, officially from a heart condition but amid suspicions of execution given the political context. The decapitation of leadership—through battlefield deaths, targeted killings, and custody fatalities—effectively neutralized Ikhwan resistance by mid-1930, with remaining fighters scattering or submitting. Tribal reintegration proceeded through coercion and selective clemency, as offered pardons to surrendering tribesmen who pledged loyalty and ceased raiding, allowing them to rejoin the Saudi tribal order under centralized oversight. Rebel hujras (Ikhwan settlements) were disbanded, nomadic groups compelled to pay and provide levies, while the , , and tribes—core to the uprising—lost autonomous political influence and were subordinated to Riyadh's administration. This process centralized authority, transforming formerly militant elements into subjects of the nascent Saudi state, though without formal programs; persistent defiance met further suppression. Surviving loyalist Ikhwan frameworks later contributed to state units, but rebellious tribes faced ongoing to prevent resurgence.

Enduring Impact

Reorganization into the National Guard

Following the decisive defeat of the at the on March 29, 1929, and the subsequent surrender of key leaders in 1930, King al Saud disbanded the rebellious factions while integrating surviving loyal Ikhwan fighters into a restructured unit to maintain their military utility under stricter royal oversight. This reorganization curtailed the Ikhwan's autonomy, which had enabled cross-border raids and ideological challenges, by subordinating tribal emirs to central command and prohibiting unauthorized expansions. The reformed force, drawing from recruits committed to Wahhabi principles, became known as the for its members' traditional robes and red headcloths, distinguishing it from Western-uniformed regular troops. The functioned as a parallel security apparatus, numbering several thousand by the early 1930s, tasked with internal stabilization and border defense while fostering loyalty to the Al Saud through stipends and settled allotments rather than plunder. This integration preserved the Ikhwan's combat ethos—emphasizing tactics, religious zeal, and tribal cohesion—but aligned it with state interests, preventing recurrence of the 1927–1930 uprising that had involved approximately 20,000–30,000 rebels. By 1932, coinciding with the , the White Army had solidified as the kingdom's primary tribal levy, evolving into the through mid-century modernization that added motorized units and training while retaining core Ikhwan-derived recruitment from nomadic groups like the and Utaybah. This transformation exemplified Abdulaziz's strategy of co-opting militant religious networks: the National Guard's as regime protector and ideological enforcer stemmed directly from Ikhwan precedents, with tribal subunits (fasa'il) commanded by Al Saud kin to balance independence against monarchical control. Unlike the Ministry of Defense's conscript , the Guard's emphasis on Wahhabi and ensured it remained a bulwark against coups or external threats, a structure that persisted into later decades despite equipment upgrades.

Role in Shaping Saudi Wahhabism

The Ikhwan, formed through the establishment of hijra settlements beginning with al-Artawiyya in 1912, functioned as a dedicated apparatus for propagating Wahhabi doctrine among traditionally nomadic Bedouin tribes, severing their prior allegiances and subjecting them to intensive religious reeducation. These colonies emphasized unwavering adherence to the principles of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, including the absolute oneness of God (tawhid), rejection of polytheistic practices (shirk), and elimination of religious innovations (bid'ah), thereby militarizing and embedding Wahhabism as a unifying force across disparate tribal groups. As the vanguard of ibn Saud's conquests, the Ikhwan extended Wahhabi influence through campaigns such as the seizure of al-Hasa in 1913, the subjugation of Khurma and Turaba in 1919, the defeat of Jabal Shammar in 1921, and the occupation of the Hijaz in 1924–1925, where they imposed doctrinal purity by demolishing venerated shrines, prohibiting tobacco use, and curtailing non-conforming rituals like music and saint intercession. Their proselytizing efforts, including violent enforcement against Shiite communities in and Hufuf in 1919 and "purification" drives in the Hijaz in 1926—such as assaults on Egyptian pilgrim convoys for perceived deviations—intensified Wahhabism's rigor, transforming it from a Najdi into the of the expanding Saudi domains. The Ikhwan's unyielding commitment to perpetual against perceived unbelievers, even within Muslim polities, and their opposition to state accommodations like telegraph lines, automobiles, and border treaties, positioned them as self-appointed custodians of authentic , pressuring the Saudi leadership toward absolutist enforcement. Their 1927–1930 revolt and subsequent defeat at the on March 10, 1929, compelled to centralize religious authority, rechanneling Ikhwan elements into the while curtailing militant expansionism; this recalibration domesticated into a royally patronized , preserving its puritanical core but aligning it with monarchical stability and governance needs over unchecked doctrinal militancy.

Connections to Later Militant Events

The suppression of the Ikhwan in 1930 did not eradicate their militant ethos, which resurfaced in later challenges to Saudi authority rooted in similar doctrinal puritanism and rejection of state compromises with modernity and foreign powers. A prominent example occurred during the 1979 in , led by , whose Utaybah tribe had been central to the . Juhayman, drawing on Wahhabi revivalism akin to Ikhwan teachings, condemned the Al Saud for (innovations) like television, Western alliances, and halting expansionist , proclaiming his brother-in-law Muhammad al-Qahtani as the to restore unadulterated through armed purification. The militants, numbering around 200-400 including former members (the reorganized Ikhwan force), held the mosque for two weeks, resulting in hundreds of deaths before Saudi forces, aided by French commandos, reclaimed it on , 1979. This event echoed Ikhwan grievances over Ibn Saud's 1920s treaties limiting jihad against British-protected territories, framing the Saudi state as murtadd (apostate) for prioritizing stability over religious duty. Juhayman's millenarian rhetoric and takfiri tendencies—excommunicating rulers for insufficient zeal—mirrored Ikhwan leaders' insistence on perpetual ghazwa (raids) against perceived unbelievers, including Shia and non-Wahhabi Sunnis. While Juhayman's group lacked the Ikhwan's tribal scale, it demonstrated how suppressed radical Wahhabism could inspire urban, ideologically driven militancy, prompting Saudi reforms like increased religious policing to co-opt such impulses. Ideologically, the Ikhwan's unrestrained enforcement of doctrinal purity prefigured elements of modern Salafi-jihadism, where offensive and against Muslim regimes feature prominently. Groups like , while diverging from state-aligned by rejecting Saudi legitimacy, inherited the Ikhwan's causal logic: that compromise with kufr (unbelief) necessitates violent overthrow to revive salaf al-salih (righteous ancestors') practices. This linkage is evident in jihadist critiques of Saudi "hypocrisy" for exporting abroad while suppressing domestic zealots, akin to Ibn Saud's post-1930 reintegration of tribes under centralized control. However, direct operational ties remain unverified, with Salafi-jihadism synthesizing Ikhwan-style militancy with later influences like Qutbist .

References

  1. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1472/1/1472.pdf
  2. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/0b776751-d076-439f-817f-ff9c1cb66e82/download
  3. https://kyleorton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/joseph-kostiner-1985-ikhwan-of-najd-and-the-saudi-state.pdf
  4. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095957396
  5. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21534764.2025.2502730
  6. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/ikhwan
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21534764.2025.2502730
  8. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/the-ikhwan-medieval-warriors-in-twentieth-century-arabia
  9. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/master/frd/frdcstdy/sa/saudiarabiacount00metz_0/saudiarabiacount00metz_0.pdf
  10. https://academic.oup.com/book/39303/chapter/338896773
  11. https://www.foreignexchanges.news/p/subscriber-essay-the-ikhwan-and-the
  12. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EI3O/COM-32395.xml
  13. https://countrystudies.us/saudi-arabia/27.htm
  14. https://www.mei.edu/publications/tawhid-or-jihad-what-wahhabism-and-not
  15. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ikhwan
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48599855
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4283777
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00263208508700631
  19. https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/the-ikhwan-medieval-warriors-in-twentieth-century-arabia
  20. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/ikhwan.htm
  21. https://www.foreignexchanges.news/p/subscriber-essay-saudi-arabia-and
  22. https://countrystudies.us/saudi-arabia/9.htm
  23. https://jsou.edu/Home/OpenFile?path=https://jsouapplicationstorage.blob.core.windows.net/press/188/15-3.pdf
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4283498
  25. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/1816/viewcontent/kennett_thesis.pdf
  26. https://uca.edu/politicalscience/home/research-projects/dadm-project/middle-eastnorth-africapersian-gulf-region/kingdom-of-nadj-hijaz-1916-1932/
  27. https://treaties.fcdo.gov.uk/data/Library2/pdf/1927-TS0025.pdf
  28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4283073
  29. https://omniatlas.com/maps/southern-asia/19290329/
  30. https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100037551467.0x0000b6
  31. https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100043803120.0x000066
  32. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/isnt-saudi-arabias-first-isis-problem-17265
  33. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/mbs-political-religious-authority-saudi-arabia
  34. https://www.onwar.com/data/ikhwan1927.html
  35. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Sultan_bin_Bajad_Al-Otaibi
  36. https://history-maps.com/story/History-of-Saudi-Arabia/event/Ikhwan-Revolt
  37. https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/single/en_king_Abdul_Aziz.pdf
  38. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/sang.htm
  39. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1848
  40. https://www.adhrb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2015.07.28_MSS-Ch-5-SANG-Draft_Final.pdf
  41. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/saudi-arabia-new-national-guard-new-king
  42. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/downloads/q811km91m.pdf
  43. https://www.newstatesman.com/long-reads/2014/11/wahhabism-isis-how-saudi-arabia-exported-main-source-global-terrorism
  44. https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03461987v1/document
  45. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saud/themes/backgrounder.pdf
  46. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141215_Chapter6_Alterman_McCants_ReligiousRadicalism.pdf
  47. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-salafi-jihad-as-a-religious-ideology/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.