Hubbry Logo
IodometryIodometryMain
Open search
Iodometry
Community hub
Iodometry
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Iodometry
Iodometry
Iodometry
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Iodometry, known as iodometric titration, is a method of volumetric chemical analysis, a redox titration where the appearance or disappearance of elementary iodine indicates the end point.

Note that iodometry involves indirect titration of iodine liberated by reaction with the analyte, whereas iodimetry involves direct titration using iodine as the titrant.

Redox titration using sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3 (usually) as a reducing agent is known as iodometric titration since it is used specifically to titrate iodine. The iodometric titration is a general method to determine the concentration of an oxidising agent in solution. In an iodometric titration, a starch solution is used as an indicator since it can absorb the I2 that is released, visually indicating a positive iodine-starch test with a deep blue hue. This absorption will cause the solution to change its colour from deep blue to light yellow when titrated with standardized thiosulfate solution. This indicates the end point of the titration. Iodometry is commonly used to analyze the concentration of oxidizing agents in water samples, such as oxygen saturation in ecological studies or active chlorine in swimming pool water analysis.

Color of iodometric titration mixture before (left) and after (right) the end point

Basic principles

[edit]
Dilute solutions containing iodine–starch complex. Using starch as an indicator can help create a sharper color change at the endpoint (dark blue to colorless). The color above can be seen just before the endpoint is reached.

To a known volume of sample, an excess but known amount of I− is added, which the oxidizing agent then oxidizes to I2. I2 dissolves in the iodide-containing solution to give triiodide ions (I3−), which have a dark brown color. The triiodide ion solution is then titrated against standard thiosulfate solution to give iodide again using starch indicator:

I−3 + 2 e− ⇌ 3 I− (E0 = +0.54 V)

Together with reduction potential of thiosulfate:[1]

S4O2−6 + 2 e− ⇌ 2 S2O2−3 (E0 = +0.08 V)

The overall reaction is thus:

I−3 + 2 S2O2−3 → S4O2−6 + 3 I− (Ereaction = +0.46 V)

For simplicity, the equations will usually be written in terms of aqueous molecular iodine rather than the triiodide ion, as the iodide ion did not participate in the reaction in terms of mole ratio analysis. The disappearance of the deep blue color is, due to the decomposition of the iodine-starch clathrate, marks the end point.

The reducing agent used does not necessarily need to be thiosulfate; stannous chloride, sulfites, sulfides, arsenic(III), and antimony(III) salts are commonly used alternatives[2] at pH above 8.

At low pH, the following reaction might occur with thiosulfate:

S2O2−3 + 2 H+ → SO2 + S + H2O

Some reactions involving certain reductants are reversible at certain pH, thus the pH of the sample solution should be carefully adjusted before performing the analysis. For example, the reaction:

H3AsO3 + I2 + H2O → H3AsO4 + 2 H+ + 2 I−

is reversible at pH below 4.

The volatility of iodine is also a source of error for the titration, this can be effectively prevented by ensuring an excess iodide is present and cooling the titration mixture. Strong light, nitrite and copper ions catalyse the conversion of iodide to iodine, so these should be removed prior to the addition of iodide to the sample.

For prolonged titrations, it is advised to add dry ice to the titration mixture to displace air from the Erlenmeyer flask so as to prevent the aerial oxidation of iodide to iodine. Standard iodine solution is prepared from potassium iodate and potassium iodide, which are both primary standards:

IO−3 + 8 I− + 6 H+ → 3 I−3 + 3 H2O

Iodine in organic solvents, such as diethyl ether and carbon tetrachloride, may be titrated against sodium thiosulfate dissolved in acetone.[clarification needed]

Iodine standard solution, sealed in an ampoule for iodometric analysis.

Applications

[edit]

Iodometry in its many variations is extremely useful in volumetric analysis. Examples include the determination of copper(II), chlorate, hydrogen peroxide, and dissolved oxygen:

2 Cu2+ + 4 I− → 2 CuI + I2
6 H+ + ClO−3 + 6 I− → 3 I2 + Cl− + 3 H2O
2 H+ + H2O2 + 2 I− → I2 + 2 H2O
2 H2O + 4 Mn(OH)2 + O2 → 4 Mn(OH)3
2 Mn3+ + 2 I− → I2 + 2 Mn2+

Available chlorine refers to chlorine liberated by the action of dilute acids on hypochlorite. Iodometry is commonly employed to determine the active amount of hypochlorite in bleach responsible for the bleaching action. In this method, excess but known amount of iodide is added to known volume of sample, in which only the active (electrophilic) can oxidize iodide to iodine. The iodine content and thus the active chlorine content can be determined with iodometry.[3]

The determination of arsenic(VI) compounds is the reverse of the standardization of iodine solution with sodium arsenite, where a known and excess amount of iodide is added to the sample:

As2O5 + 4 H+ + 4 I− ⇌ As2O3 + 2 I2 + 2 H2O

For analysis of antimony(V) compounds, some tartaric acid is added to solubilize the antimony(III) product.[2]

Determination of hydrogensulfites and sulfites

[edit]

Sulfites and hydrogensulfites reduce iodine readily in acidic medium to iodide. Thus when a diluted but excess amount of standard iodine solution is added to known volume of sample, the sulfurous acid and sulfites present reduces iodine quantitatively:

SO2−3 + I2 + H2O → SO2−4 + 2 H+ + 2 I−
HSO−3 + I2 + H2O → SO2−4 + 3 H+ + 2 I−

(This application is used for iodimetry titration because here iodine is directly used)

Determination of sulfides and hydrogensulfides

[edit]

Although the sulfide content in sample can be determined straight forwardly as described for sulfites, the results are often poor and inaccurate. A better, alternative method with higher accuracy is available, which involves the addition of excess but known volume of standard sodium arsenite solution to the sample, during which arsenic trisulfide is precipitated:

As2O3 + 3 H2S → As2S3 + 3 H2O

The excess arsenic trioxide is then determined by titrating against standard iodine solution using starch indicator. Note that for the best results, the sulfide solution must be dilute with the sulfide concentration not greater than 0.01 M.[2]

Determination of hexacyanoferrate(III)

[edit]

When iodide is added to a solution of hexacyanoferrate(III), the following equilibrium exists:

2 [Fe(CN)6]3− + 2 I− ⇌ 2 [Fe(CN)6]4− + I2

Under strongly acidic solution, the above equilibrium lies far to the right hand side, but is reversed in almost neutral solution. This makes analysis of hexacyanoferrate(III) troublesome as the iodide and thiosulfate decomposes in strongly acidic medium. To drive the reaction to completion, an excess amount of zinc salt can be added to the reaction mixture containing potassium ions, which precipitates the hexacyanoferrate(II) ion quantitatively:

2 [Fe(CN)6]3− + 2 I− + 2 K+ + 2 Zn2+ → 2 KZn[Fe(CN)6]− + I2

The precipitation occurs in slightly acidic medium, thus avoids the problem of decomposition of iodide and thiosulfate in strongly acidic medium, and the hexacyanoferrate(III) can be determined by iodometry as usual.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Iodometry

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Iodometry is an indirect technique in used to determine the concentration of oxidizing agents, in which the oxidizes excess ions to liberate iodine, and the resulting iodine is then titrated with a standard solution using as an indicator. This method relies on the chemistry of iodine species, where (I⁻) acts as a that is oxidized to iodine (I₂) by the , followed by the reduction of I₂ back to I⁻ during the step. The fundamental principle of iodometry involves two sequential redox reactions: first, the oxidizing analyte reacts with iodide in an acidic medium to produce I₂, as exemplified by the determination of copper(II) ions via the reaction 2Cu²⁺ + 4I⁻ → 2CuI + I₂; second, the liberated I₂ is titrated according to I₂ + 2S₂O₃²⁻ → 2I⁻ + S₄O₆²⁻, where the endpoint is detected by the disappearance of the blue-black starch-iodine complex. This indirect approach is particularly suitable for strong oxidizing agents with standard electrode potentials greater than 0.54 V, such as permanganate, dichromate, hydrogen peroxide, or hypochlorite, which can quantitatively oxidize I⁻ without interference from weaker oxidants. Unlike iodimetry, which is a direct titration using iodine as the titrant for reducing agents like ascorbic acid, iodometry requires the intermediate generation of I₂ and is thus specific for oxidants. Applications of iodometry are widespread in quantitative analysis, including the determination of content in ores, alloys, wires, and solutions, as well as the measurement of dissolved oxygen in via the Winkler method or active in bleaching agents. It is valued for its high precision, sensitivity at low concentrations (down to parts per million), and the sharp visual endpoint provided by , though care must be taken to avoid air oxidation of or interference from reducing substances. Historically, iodometric methods have been integral to industrial and since the early 20th century, building on foundational volumetric techniques developed in the .

Overview and History

Definition and Scope

Iodometry is an indirect technique employed in for the quantitative determination of s. In this method, the analyte, which is a strong , reacts with an excess of ions (I⁻) in an acidic medium to liberate free iodine (I₂). The generated iodine is then titrated with a of (Na₂S₂O₃), serving as the . The scope of iodometry encompasses the analysis of various strong oxidizing agents, including (MnO₄⁻), dichromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻), (Cl₂), (OCl⁻), and (H₂O₂), as well as certain metal ions like copper(II) (Cu²⁺). Unlike direct titrations, where the analyte reacts stoichiometrically with the titrant to reach the endpoint, iodometry involves a two-step process: first, the liberation of iodine from , followed by its separate , which enhances precision for analytes that do not directly interact with . This technique assumes a foundational understanding of chemistry, where drives the reactions, and volumetric principles, such as endpoint detection and . Iodometry's development as a sensitive approach stems from the sharp, visible color change in the iodine-starch complex, enabling detection of trace-level oxidants with high accuracy even at low concentrations.

Historical Development

The discovery of iodine in 1811 by French chemist Bernard Courtois, who isolated the element from ash during the production of saltpeter, laid the groundwork for subsequent analytical applications. Courtois observed the violet vapors and dark crystals produced when the ash reacted with , marking the first recognition of iodine as a distinct substance. In 1814, Jean-Jacques Colin and Henri-François Gaultier de Claubry independently discovered the blue color formed by the iodine-starch complex, providing a sensitive visual indicator for trace iodine that would become essential for iodometric endpoints. The first use of iodine in volumetry came in 1825, when Houtou de Labillardière proposed a method to estimate content in by liberating iodine from , representing an early application of iodometry to industrial analysis of bleaching agents. This approach shifted from qualitative observations to semi-quantitative analysis, building on volumetric techniques refined by in the 1820s. By the 1830s, the method saw systematic application in evaluating in bleaching agents, facilitating industrial . Significant advancements occurred in the mid-19th century, with Mathurin-Joseph Fordos and Amédée Gélis demonstrating in 1843 that iodine quantitatively oxidizes , establishing the core reaction for and enabling more precise measurements of oxidizing agents. Robert Bunsen further systematized iodometry in 1853, describing its application to a wide range of oxidants through liberation of iodine from , which solidified its role in quantitative . Back-titration variants were refined in the late 19th century, allowing indirect determinations when direct endpoints were challenging and enhancing versatility. By the late , iodometry gained widespread adoption for water analysis, notably through Lajos Winkler's 1888 Winkler method for dissolved oxygen, which relied on iodometric of liberated iodine. Integration into pharmacopeia standards occurred in the early , standardizing assays for pharmaceuticals and oxidants. Distinct from iodimetry, which involves direct with iodine solutions and gained prominence as a complementary technique in the , iodometry emphasized indirect iodine liberation for broader analytical scope.

Chemical Principles

Key Redox Reactions

Iodometry relies on the oxidation of ions (I⁻) by an to liberate iodine (I₂), which serves as the intermediate in the analytical process. The general reaction can be represented as 2I⁻ + Oxidant → I₂ + Reduced form, where the oxidant accepts electrons from . A classic example is the reaction with gas: Cl2+2I−→I2+2Cl−\text{Cl}_2 + 2\text{I}^- \rightarrow \text{I}_2 + 2\text{Cl}^- This two-electron transfer process oxidizes to iodine while reducing to , with one mole of Cl₂ producing one mole of I₂. The liberated iodine is then titrated with a standard solution of sodium thiosulfate (Na₂S₂O₃), which acts as a reducing agent in the back-titration step. The balanced redox reaction is: I2+2S2O32−→2I−+S4O62−\text{I}_2 + 2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3^{2-} \rightarrow 2\text{I}^- + \text{S}_4\text{O}_6^{2-} Here, each thiosulfate ion is oxidized to tetrathionate (S₄O₆²⁻) by losing one electron, resulting in a 1:2 molar ratio between I₂ and S₂O₃²⁻. This reaction ensures the complete reduction of iodine back to iodide at the equivalence point. The reactions are typically conducted in an acidic medium, such as dilute (HCl) or acetic acid, to suppress the of iodine (I₂ + H₂O ⇌ HOI + I⁻ + H⁺), which could otherwise lead to inaccuracies by consuming . Excess (KI) is added to shift the equilibrium toward the formation of the (I₃⁻) via: I2+I−⇌I3−\text{I}_2 + \text{I}^- \rightleftharpoons \text{I}_3^- with an equilibrium constant of approximately 700, enhancing the of iodine in and stabilizing it for accurate . The is the predominant species titrated, as it reacts equivalently to I₂ in the reduction: I3−+2S2O32−→3I−+S4O62−\text{I}_3^- + 2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3^{2-} \rightarrow 3\text{I}^- + \text{S}_4\text{O}_6^{2-} Stoichiometric calculations in iodometry are based on the electron transfer equivalents at the equivalence point. The moles of thiosulfate consumed equal twice the moles of I₂ (or I₃⁻) present, since each I₂ corresponds to a two-electron reduction (I₂ + 2e⁻ → 2I⁻). For the original oxidant, the moles are determined by dividing the moles of thiosulfate by the number of electrons transferred (n) in the liberation step; for instance, in the chlorine example, n = 2, so moles of Cl₂ = (moles of Na₂S₂O₃)/2. This allows precise quantification of the oxidant's concentration from the titration volume and thiosulfate molarity.

Role of Iodine Species and Thiosulfate

In iodometry, elemental iodine (I2I_2) serves as the key oxidizing agent, but its low solubility in water—approximately 0.33 g/L at 25°C—limits direct use in aqueous titrations. Solutions of I2I_2 appear brown in water due to partial hydrolysis and complexation, whereas in non-aqueous solvents like chloroform or carbon tetrachloride, they exhibit a characteristic violet color. The volatility of I2I_2, which readily sublimes at room temperature to form a purple vapor, and its sensitivity to light—accelerating decomposition—necessitate storage in dark, well-sealed bottles to maintain stability. To enhance solubility in aqueous media, I2I_2 forms the triiodide complex (I3−I_3^-) with excess iodide ions via the equilibrium I2+I−⇌I3−I_2 + I^- \rightleftharpoons I_3^-, characterized by a formation constant Kf≈700K_f \approx 700 at 25°C. This complex imparts a to reddish-brown hue and significantly increases iodine's effective concentration in solution, enabling precise stoichiometric control in reactions. The stability of I3−I_3^- ensures minimal loss during , though shifts in or temperature can alter the equilibrium. Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3Na_2S_2O_3), the standard reducing titrant, features the anion (S2O32−S_2O_3^{2-}) with a tetrahedral where one sulfur is central and bonded to three oxygens and another . Its reducing capability stems from the standard of the / couple, E∘=+0.080E^\circ = +0.080 V vs. SHE for S4O62−+2e−⇌2S2O32−S_4O_6^{2-} + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons 2S_2O_3^{2-}. However, S2O32−S_2O_3^{2-} is unstable in acidic conditions, decomposing via S2O32−+2H+→S↓+[SO2](/page/Sulfurdioxide)↑+H2OS_2O_3^{2-} + 2H^+ \rightarrow S \downarrow + [SO_2](/page/Sulfur_dioxide) \uparrow + H_2O (or proportionally to under oxidative conditions), which produces colloidal and gaseous . To mitigate this, thiosulfate solutions are prepared and stored in neutral or slightly alkaline media, often as the stable pentahydrate. Common interferences in iodometric procedures arise from the air oxidation of to I2I_2 (4I−+O2+4H+→2I2+2H2O4I^- + O_2 + 4H^+ \rightarrow 2I_2 + 2H_2O), which introduces extraneous oxidant and is minimized by deaerating solutions or adding excess promptly. Additionally, profoundly influences reaction kinetics: acidic conditions ( 1–4) promote rapid liberation of I2I_2 from the and , while the subsequent back-titration with occurs in near-neutral to preserve reagent integrity. A distinctive aspect of thiosulfate's role is its oxidation to (S4O62−S_4O_6^{2-}), formed as a stable dimer from two S2O32−S_2O_3^{2-} units via a precise 2-electron transfer, which inherently prevents over-reduction of iodine beyond the 1:2 . This product stability ensures sharp endpoints without secondary reactions that could consume additional oxidant.

Laboratory Procedures

Reagents Preparation and Standardization

The preparation of solution for iodometric titrations typically involves creating a 0.1 M solution by weighing out approximately 25 g of Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O and 0.1 g of Na₂CO₃, dissolving them in about 800 mL of freshly boiled and cooled , and then diluting to 1 L in a . The boiling step removes dissolved oxygen and eliminates microorganisms that could catalyze decomposition, while the Na₂CO₃ serves as a stabilizer by maintaining a slightly alkaline around 9 to enhance stability. A 10% (w/v) solution is prepared separately by dissolving 10 g of KI in and diluting to 100 mL; this solution must be made fresh to prevent aerial oxidation of to iodine, which would introduce errors. Solid iodine may be prepared for occasional calibration checks but is not used as the primary titrant, as iodometry relies on generation of iodine for by . Standardization of the sodium thiosulfate solution is essential due to its instability and is commonly performed against primary standards like (KIO₃) or (K₂Cr₂O₇) in acidic medium. For KIO₃, about 0.12 g of the dried salt (previously dried at 110°C for 1 hour) is dissolved in 75 mL of water in an , followed by the addition of 2 g of KI and 10 mL of 1 M HCl to liberate iodine through the reaction IO₃⁻ + 8 I⁻ + 6 H⁺ → 3 I₃⁻ + 3 H₂O; the solution is then titrated with thiosulfate to the starch end point. As an alternative, K₂Cr₂O₇ standardization involves adding excess KI to a known volume of standard dichromate solution in acidic conditions, liberating I₂ via Cr₂O₇²⁻ + 14 H⁺ + 6 I⁻ → 2 Cr³⁺ + 3 I₂ + 7 H₂O, and titrating the iodine with thiosulfate. The normality of the thiosulfate is determined using the formula: Nthiosulfate=Noxidant×VoxidantVthiosulfateN_{\text{thiosulfate}} = \frac{N_{\text{oxidant}} \times V_{\text{oxidant}}}{V_{\text{thiosulfate}}} where NoxidantN_{\text{oxidant}} and VoxidantV_{\text{oxidant}} are the normality and volume of the standard oxidant solution, and VthiosulfateV_{\text{thiosulfate}} is the volume of thiosulfate used in the titration (all volumes in mL). Proper storage is critical to maintain reagent integrity, as sodium thiosulfate can decompose via bacterial action or light exposure, and its instability in neutral or acidic conditions necessitates careful handling. The solution should be stored in amber or dark glass bottles at 4°C in a refrigerator to minimize photodecomposition and microbial growth. Potassium iodide solutions or solids must be kept fresh and protected from air and light to avoid oxidation.

Titration Protocol

The general procedure for an iodometric titration begins with dissolving the sample in an excess of (KI) solution, which is acidified if necessary to facilitate the liberation of iodine (I₂) from the reaction with the . The mixture is then allowed to stand for 5-10 minutes in a dark place to ensure complete I₂ formation, after which it is titrated with a standardized (Na₂S₂O₃) solution using a indicator to detect the endpoint. Key precautions include protecting the reaction mixture from light and air exposure, as light can decompose iodine species and air can cause oxidation of to iodine, leading to inaccurate results; solutions should be stored in bottles and flasks covered during standing. A is used for precise delivery of the titrant, and the sample size is selected based on the expected concentration, typically 0.1-1 g for a 0.1 N solution to yield a titration volume of 10-30 mL. The liberated I₂ is directly titrated with thiosulfate. To ensure complete reaction, the flask is shaken or swirled vigorously after each addition of titrant, with careful observation of the initial yellow color of free I₂ fading to pale yellow before adding the indicator. The solution should be standardized prior to use, as referenced in preparation protocols.

Indicators and Detection

Starch Indicator Usage

Starch serves as the primary indicator in iodometric titrations due to its ability to form a deep blue inclusion complex with polyiodide species (such as I₃⁻ and I₅⁻) derived from molecular iodine (I₂) and iodide ions (I⁻), particularly at low concentrations. This complex arises when iodine molecules and polyiodides insert into the helical structure of , a linear component of , creating a supramolecular assembly often described as a repetitive I₂-I₅⁻-I₂ unit within the hydrophobic cavity of the amylose . The resulting blue color, with an absorption maximum around 600–620 nm, results from charge-transfer interactions between the polyiodide species and the starch , enabling visual detection of iodine presence. At the titration endpoint, depletion of free I₂ causes the complex to dissociate, leading to a sharp color disappearance from deep blue to colorless. In practice, the starch indicator is added as a 1% solution (typically 1–2 mL) near the endpoint, after the pale yellow color from I₃⁻ has faded, to ensure the iodine concentration is sufficiently low for optimal complex formation without interference. The solution is prepared fresh by forming a paste with soluble and a small volume of cold water, then dispersing it in to solubilize the component, followed by cooling to ; this step prevents aggregation and enhances the indicator's responsiveness. The addition timing minimizes overconsumption of iodine by the and provides a clear, reversible endpoint signal in the of against liberated iodine. Optimal conditions for starch indicator use include an acidic medium with 4–5, which maintains the stability of the complex while supporting the overall iodometric reaction; strongly acidic conditions (below 4) can hydrolyze the , reducing sensitivity. Temperatures should be kept below 20°C during the final stages to avoid bleaching of the complex, as excess disrupts the supramolecular interactions and fades the color prematurely. This indicator exhibits high sensitivity, detecting iodine concentrations as low as 10^{-5} M, making it suitable for precise endpoint determination in analytical procedures.

Alternative End Point Methods

In cases where the starch indicator is unsuitable due to sample coloration or other interferences, alternative methods for detecting the iodometric endpoint offer reliable detection through instrumental or chemical means. employs a indicator and a saturated to track the abrupt potential rise corresponding to the I₂/I⁻ couple, with a standard potential of +0.54 V versus the , signaling the . This approach enables precise, automated endpoint determination without relying on visual cues and is widely used in pharmaceutical and analytical laboratories for its objectivity and reproducibility./11%3A_Electrochemical_Methods/11.02%3A_Potentiometric_Methods) Colorimetric detection without starch involves observing the natural yellow-to-colorless transition of free iodine as it is reduced to colorless by , providing a simple visual endpoint suitable for higher concentration analyses where sensitivity is not critical. This method circumvents starch-related issues, such as adsorption errors in acidic conditions, but requires careful and is less effective for trace levels due to the faint yellow hue of dilute iodine. Back-titration serves as a chemical alternative, particularly for analytes that react slowly with , by adding excess standard iodine to the sample and then titrating the unreacted iodine with to a visual or endpoint, allowing indirect quantification of the original oxidant. For trace determination, historical colorimetric methods using o-tolidine formed a yellow-colored oxidation product upon reaction with ; however, due to its carcinogenicity, o-tolidine has been discontinued since the and replaced by safer alternatives like N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD). Amperometric detection, introduced in the 1950s for enhanced sensitivity, monitors current variations at a polarized (typically or ) during , detecting the diffusion-limited reduction or oxidation of iodine to identify the endpoint in continuous flow systems. This technique excels in applications, such as assessing residual disinfectants in , offering detection limits below 0.01 mg/L and automation compatibility without chemical indicators.

Applications

Inorganic Oxidants and Reductants

Iodometry is widely applied to quantify inorganic oxidants through their reaction with excess iodide to liberate iodine, which is then titrated with thiosulfate. For chlorine determination in water, the oxidant reacts with potassium iodide in acidic medium according to Cl₂ + 2KI → 2KCl + I₂, enabling accurate measurement of concentrations above 1 mg/L using starch as an indicator. This method follows the general titration protocol, with sample acidification to pH 3-4 to prevent interference. Permanganate can be determined iodometrically in neutral medium to minimize interference from its strong oxidizing nature in acid, where MnO₄⁻ oxidizes I⁻ to I₂ while being reduced to MnO₂. Procedure adaptations include buffering the solution to 7 and adding excess KI, followed by titration of the liberated iodine. Dichromate determination involves adding excess KI to the Cr₂O₇²⁻ sample in acidic medium, producing I₂ via Cr₂O₇²⁻ + 14H⁺ + 6I⁻ → 2Cr³⁺ + 3I₂ + 7H₂O, with back-titration after any necessary reduction step to ensure complete reaction. For inorganic reductants such as sulfites and sulfides, iodimetric titration (distinct from iodometry) is used, involving addition of excess iodine followed by back-titration of unreacted iodine with . Hexacyanoferrate(III), [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ + I⁻ → [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ + ½I₂, is determined by direct oxidation of excess in neutral or slightly acidic conditions, with the iodine titrated using (an iodometric application for this oxidant). Iodometry extends to specific inorganic species like in alloys, where Cu²⁺ + 2I⁻ → CuI + ½I₂ in acidic medium after sample dissolution, allowing quantification in via of the iodine. A unique application is the determination of (BrO₃⁻) in additives or , where the sample is extracted in acidic medium with excess KI, liberating I₂ via BrO₃⁻ + 6I⁻ + 6H⁺ → Br⁻ + 3I₂ + 3H₂O, and the iodine is titrated with standardized . The percentage is calculated as % = (V_thios × N × eq wt) / sample mass, where V_thios is the thiosulfate volume (mL), N is its normality, and eq wt is the of (27.83 g/eq for KBrO₃). This method ensures detection of residual levels post-baking, adhering to regulatory limits.

Organic and Environmental Analyses

Iodometry plays a significant role in the quantitative analysis of organic compounds, particularly through reactions involving iodine species. In chemistry, iodometry is essential for assessing the in fats and oils via the Wijs method, a standard procedure established by of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). In this approach, a sample is treated with excess (ICl), which adds across carbon-carbon double bonds; the unreacted halogen is then back-titrated iodometrically with . The , expressed as centigrams of iodine absorbed per gram of sample, provides a measure of unsaturation, aiding quality control in edible oils and . Recent validations confirm its reliability, with values for common oils like typically ranging from 100 to 130 g I₂/100 g. For the determination of ascorbic acid (), an iodimetric titration is used (distinct from iodometry), where excess iodine is added and the compound reduces it to in an acidic medium, following the reaction: \ceC6H8O6+I2−>C6H6O6+2HI\ce{C6H8O6 + I2 -> C6H6O6 + 2HI} The unreacted iodine is then back-titrated with a standard solution of using as an indicator, enabling precise measurement of ascorbic acid concentrations in fruits, juices, and pharmaceutical formulations. This method is widely adopted in analytical laboratories due to its simplicity and accuracy, with detection limits suitable for nutritional assessments. Environmental monitoring leverages iodometry for detecting key pollutants in water and air. The Winkler method, a cornerstone for measuring dissolved oxygen (DO) in aquatic systems, involves the oxidation of Mn²⁺ to MnO₂ by DO in alkaline conditions, followed by the liberation of iodine from iodide upon acidification, which is titrated with thiosulfate. This technique is integral to assessing water quality, with modifications like the azide variant minimizing interferences from nitrites and is standardized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for wastewater and surface waters. Similarly, ozone in air or water is quantified by its reaction with potassium iodide to produce iodine, which is titrated iodometrically; this method supports atmospheric studies and water treatment evaluations, achieving detection limits around 0.01 mg/L. In wastewater analysis, iodometry underpins the (BOD) test, where initial and final DO levels are determined via Winkler after a 5-day incubation at 20°C, estimating biodegradable organic load; this has been an EPA-approved standard since the 1970s for effluent limitations. For (COD), alternative iodometric procedures involve refluxing samples with excess oxidant like , followed by iodometric back- of residual oxidant, providing rapid organic pollution indices in industrial effluents such as cheese production waste. Post-2000 advancements include iodometric assays for peroxides in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), where oxidizes to iodine in acidic media, titrated to detect trace levels (0.6–90 ppm) and ensure drug stability per pharmacopeial guidelines. These applications highlight iodometry's versatility in bridging organic analysis and environmental compliance.

Advantages and Limitations

Key Benefits

Iodometry offers high sensitivity and accuracy in quantitative analysis, capable of detecting analytes at concentrations as low as parts per million (ppm) levels due to the sharp color change at the endpoint facilitated by the starch-iodine complex. This visual indicator produces a distinct blue-black color that disappears abruptly upon titration with thiosulfate, allowing for precise determination of low analyte amounts, such as dissolved oxygen in water at trace levels. The method's stoichiometry, involving the one-to-one equivalence between iodine liberated and electrons transferred (I₂ + 2e⁻ → 2I⁻), enables accurate electron counting and reliable quantification without the need for complex instrumentation. The cost-effectiveness of iodometry stems from its reliance on inexpensive and readily available reagents, such as (KI) and (Na₂S₂O₃), which are stable and easy to prepare in standard settings. Unlike methods requiring expensive oxidants or specialized , iodometry uses simple visual detection, making it accessible for routine analyses in educational and industrial labs without significant investment in apparatus beyond basic glassware and burettes. This economic advantage is particularly pronounced when compared to gravimetric techniques, which are more labor-intensive and time-consuming. Iodometry demonstrates versatility across diverse sample matrices, including aqueous solutions and certain organic systems, where it can be applied to a wide range of oxidants and reductants without destroying the sample matrix in many cases. For instance, it accommodates analyses in acidic, neutral, or mildly alkaline conditions by adjusting to control iodine liberation, broadening its utility for both inorganic and environmental samples. Additionally, the method provides high selectivity for oxidizing agents even in the presence of interfering species, as the in-situ generation of iodine minimizes side reactions and enhances specificity over direct iodimetric titrations, which suffer from the instability of pre-formed iodine solutions.

Common Sources of Error

One major chemical source of error in iodometry arises from the decomposition of , the primary titrant, which occurs upon exposure to acids or elevated temperatures, resulting in the formation of , , and , thereby reducing the effective concentration of the . This instability is exacerbated by even trace amounts of acid from atmospheric absorption, leading to low titration results if aged solutions are used. To minimize this error, freshly prepared thiosulfate solutions should be employed, and storage in neutral or slightly basic conditions with boiled, cooled is recommended. Another chemical issue stems from the volatility of iodine, which can evaporate from solution, particularly under exposure to air, light, or higher temperatures, causing a loss of analyte and systematically low results in the back-titration step. This loss is more pronounced in open vessels or during prolonged titrations, as iodine's low water solubility facilitates sublimation. Mitigation involves performing titrations in covered setups, maintaining cool conditions, and ensuring excess iodide is present to form the less volatile triiodide complex. Indicator-related errors often involve the -iodine complex, which can fade prematurely in strongly acidic media due to destabilization of the complex, leading to ambiguous end points and potential under-titration. Additionally, adding too early in the process can result in over-titration, as the intense blue complex tightly binds iodine, making subtle color changes difficult to detect until excess is added. To address these, should be introduced late in the , near the when the solution is pale yellow and acidity is lower. Interferences from extraneous reducing agents, such as ascorbate or , can consume liberated iodine prematurely before , yielding erroneously low oxidant concentrations. In certain cases, these can be masked by adding protective colloids like to prevent direct reaction with iodine. For samples with inherent color that obscures the visual end point, potentiometric detection using and reference electrodes provides a reliable alternative by monitoring potential changes at the . A specific storage-related error involves bacterial decomposition of sodium thiosulfate solutions, where sulfur-oxidizing metabolize the , decreasing its over time, especially in warm or contaminated environments. To prevent this, adding a small amount of , such as 1-2 mL of 6 N NaOH per liter, can slow bacterial decomposition. In trace-level analyses, impurities such as in commercial can oxidize to iodine during the reaction, introducing a positive in blank corrections and affecting low-concentration determinations; this concern has been noted in post-2000 studies on reagent purity for sensitive iodometric methods. Using high-purity, analyzed KI or performing rigorous blanks mitigates this issue.

References

  1. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/11562/1/BarreiroNaves2007Stds.pdf
  2. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/11562/2/BarreiroNaves2007Teachs.pdf
  3. https://vlab.amrita.edu/index.php?sub=2&brch=193&sim=352&cnt=1
  4. https://www1.udel.edu/chem/beebe/Chem120/Chem120LAB%203HypochloriteinBleach.pdf
  5. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Laboratory_Experiments/Wet_Lab_Experiments/Analytical_Chemistry_Labs/Iodometric_Determination_of_Cu_in_Brass
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329310961_From_the_early_history_of_iodometric_methods_From_its_inception_to_Robert_Bunsen
  7. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111350127-006/html
  8. https://waves-vagues.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/147556.pdf
  9. https://more.juniata.edu/academics-classes/science-in-motion/labs-and-equipment/media/chemistry-files/Oxidizing%20Power%20of%20Laundry%20Bleach.pdf
  10. http://www1.lasalle.edu/~prushan/Experiment8-redox%20titration.pdf
  11. https://chemcollective.oli.cmu.edu/chem/ubc/exp09/
  12. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Iodine
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402307620X
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226933388_Triiodide_ion_formation_equilibrium_and_activity_coefficient_in_aqueous_solution
  15. https://www.flinnsci.com/globalassets/flinn-scientific/all-free-pdfs/dc91860.pdf
  16. https://www.chemicalbook.com/article/sodium-thiosulfate-an-essential-compound-in-chemistry-and-industry.htm
  17. https://usptechnologies.com/iodometric-titration/
  18. https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=109150
  19. https://www.kbcc.cuny.edu/academicdepartments/physci/documents/chemistry/Chem11_Lab5_BleachTitration_V4_03-04-2022.pdf
  20. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-310-laboratory-chemistry-fall-2019/b45b441482cb2fe3bfa5afe515c23622_MIT5_310F19_Lab2.pdf
  21. https://www.academia.edu/39874707/Standardization_of_Sodium_Thiosulphate_Na2S2O3_solution_with_a_Potassium_Dichromate_K2Cr2O7_solution
  22. https://www.sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Iodometry
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856212/
  24. https://www.riccachemical.com/pages/tech-tips/starch
  25. https://support.hach.com/myhach/s/article/KA-en-US-TE11226-1025284
  26. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/supportive_content/ana_chem_applications/titration/M876.html
  27. https://cdn.hach.com/7FYZVWYB/at/ng7p8vmgk56p4tp53kx38xm/LIT7019.pdf
  28. http://edgeanalytical.com/wp-content/uploads/Waste_SM4500-Cl.pdf
  29. https://www.nemi.gov/methods/method_summary/7429/
  30. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/14108/ccb70b0754c74d73954a14218f52cb25/ISO-7393-3-1990.pdf
  31. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/i560126a011
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anoop-Srivastava/post/what_is_iodometric_titration/attachment/5a7051d04cde266d588760c0/AS%253A588456690479104%25401517310416472/download/Iodometry.pdf
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267000896804
  34. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/1987/an/an9871200137
  35. https://corn.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/H-32.pdf
  36. https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol16no2/wijs-potassium-iodate-and-aocs-official-method-to-determine-the-iodine-value-iv-of-fat-and-oil/
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18961774/
  38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1444526
  39. https://www.nemi.gov/methods/method_summary/5253/
  40. https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/archive/arc0001/9900162/2.2/data/0-data/jgofscd/Files/protocols/chap6.html
  41. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=9100GBOO.TXT
  42. http://maineenvironmentallaboratory.com/wp-content/uploads/C-992_3.pdf
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362948785_Analysis_of_COD_Chemical_Oxygen_Demand_on_Liquid_Waste_of_Cheese_Production_in_PT_XYZ_Yogyakarta_with_Iodometric_Titration_Method
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378517309001719
  45. https://chem.hbcse.tifr.res.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/vogels-textbook-of-quantitative-chemical-analysis-5th-edition.pdf
  46. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Laboratory_Experiments/Wet_Lab_Experiments/MIT_Labs/Lab_6%253A_Charles_River_Water_Quantification/2.1%253A_Day_1_Procedures_-_Standardization_of_Sodium_Thiosulfate
  47. http://www.titrations.info/iodometric-titration
  48. https://www.echemi.com/community/how-is-the-starch-indicator-used-in-the-experiment-of-standardization-of-iodine-and-sodium-thiosulfate-to-indicate-the-endpoint_mjart2204111684_360.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.