Hubbry Logo
St John PassionSt John PassionMain
Open search
St John Passion
Community hub
St John Passion
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
St John Passion
St John Passion
from Wikipedia

St John Passion
BWV 245
Passion by J. S. Bach
First page of the autograph
Native namePassio secundum Joannem
OccasionGood Friday
Text
Performed
  • 7 April 1724 (1724-04-07): Leipzig (version 1)
  • 30 March 1725 (1725-03-30): Leipzig (version 2)
  • 1728 (1728)/1730?: Leipzig (version 3)
  • 1739 (1739)/1749?: Leipzig (version 4)
Scoring
  • SATB choir and solo
  • orchestra of woodwinds, strings and basso contiuo

The Passio secundum Joannem or St John Passion[a] (German: Johannes-Passion), BWV 245, is a Passion or oratorio by Johann Sebastian Bach, the earliest of the surviving Passions by Bach.[1] It was written during his first year as director of church music in Leipzig and was first performed on 7 April 1724, at Good Friday Vespers at the St. Nicholas Church.[2][3]

The structure of the work falls in two halves, intended to flank a sermon. The anonymous libretto draws on existing works (notably by Barthold Heinrich Brockes) and is compiled from recitatives and choruses narrating the Passion of Christ as told in the Gospel of John, ariosos and arias reflecting on the action, and chorales using hymn tunes and texts familiar to a congregation of Bach's contemporaries.[4] Compared with the St Matthew Passion, the St John Passion has been described as more extravagant, with an expressive immediacy, at times more unbridled and less "finished".[5]

The work is most often heard today in the 1739–1749 version (never performed during Bach's lifetime). Bach first performed the oratorio in 1724 and revised it in 1725, 1730,[6] and 1749, adding several numbers. "O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde groß", a 1725 replacement for the opening chorus, found a new home in the 1736 St Matthew Passion but several arias from the revisions are found only in the appendices to modern editions.

First performance

[edit]

The St John Passion was intended for the vesper service on Good Friday of 1724, shortly after Bach's 39th birthday.[7] It was originally planned to be held at St. Thomas in Leipzig, but due to a last-minute change by the music council, it was to be first performed at St. Nicholas. Bach quickly agreed to the move,

but pointed out that the booklet was already printed, that there was no room available and that the harpsichord needed some repair, all of which, however, could be attended to at little cost; but he requested that a little additional room be provided in the choir loft of St. Nicholas Church, where he planned to place the musicians needed to perform the music. He also asked that the harpsichord be repaired.[7]

The council agreed and sent a flyer announcing the new location to all the people around Leipzig. The council made the arrangements requested by Bach regarding the harpsichord and space needed for the choir.[7]

Musical architecture and sources

[edit]

The St John Passion is written for a four-part choir with soloists, as well as an instrumental ensemble of strings and basso continuo with pairs of flauti traversi and oboes, the latter both doubling on oboe da caccia. For special colors Bach also used lute, viola d'amore and viola da gamba, instruments that were already considered old-fashioned at the time.[citation needed]

In present-day performances the part of Jesus is often given to one bass soloist, Pilate and the bass arias to another. The part of the Evangelist and the tenor arias are often given to two different singers. The smaller parts (Peter, Maid, Servant) are usually performed by choir members.[citation needed]

Bach followed chapters 18 and 19 of the Gospel of John in the Luther Bible, and the tenor Evangelist follows exactly the words of that bible. The compiler of the additional poetry is unknown. Models are the Brockes Passion and a Johannes-Passion by Christian Heinrich Postel. The first scene is in the Kidron Valley, and the second in the palace of the high priest Kaiphas. Part Two shows three scenes, one with Pontius Pilate, one at Golgatha, and the third finally at the burial site. The dramatic argument between Pilate, Jesus, and the crowd is not interrupted by reflective elements but a single central chorale.

The numbering of the movements is different in different editions. The following table uses the numbers of the Neue Bach-Ausgabe (NBA).[8]

Part One
NBA Voices German English
1 Coro Herr, unser Herrscher, dessen Ruhm in allen Landen herrlich ist Lord, our Lord, whose glory is magnificent in all the earth
2a Evangelist, Jesus Jesus ging mit seinen Jüngern über den Bach Kidron Jesus went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron
2b Coro Jesum von Nazareth Jesus of Nazareth
2c Evangelist, Jesus Jesus spricht zu ihnen Jesus says to them
2d Coro Jesum von Nazareth Jesus of Nazareth
2e Evangelist, Jesus Jesus antwortete: Ich hab's euch gesagt, daß ich's sei Jesus answered, I have told you that I am
3 Chorale O große Lieb', o Lieb' ohn' alle Maße O great love, o love beyond all measure
4 Evangelist, Jesus Auf daß das Wort erfüllet würde That the saying might be fulfilled
5 Chorale Dein Will' gescheh', Herr Gott, zugleich Thy will be done, Lord God, at the same time
6 Evangelist Die Schar aber und der Oberhauptmann Then the band and the captain
7 Aria (alto) Von den Stricken meiner Sünden From the bonds of my sins
8 Evangelist Simon Petrus aber folgete Jesu nach And Simon Peter followed Jesus
9 Aria (soprano) Ich folge dir gleichfalls mit freudigen Schritten I will follow you likewise with joyful steps
10 Evangelist, Maid, Peter, Jesus, Servant Derselbige Jünger war dem Hohenpriester bekannt That disciple was known to the high priest
11 Chorale Wer hat dich so geschlagen Who hit you so
12a Evangelist Und Hannas sandte ihn gebunden zu dem Hohenpriester Kaiphas Now Annas had sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest
12b Coro Bist du nicht seiner Jünger einer? Are you not one of his disciples?
12c Evangelist, Peter, Servant Er leugnete aber He denied it
13 Aria (tenor) Ach, mein Sinn Oh, my sense
14 Chorale Petrus, der nicht denkt zurück Peter, who does not think back
Part Two
NBA Voices German English
15 Chorale Christus, der uns selig macht Christ, who makes us blessed
16a Evangelist, Pilate Da führeten sie Jesum von Kaiphas vor das Richthaus Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas into the hall of judgment
16b Coro Wäre dieser nicht ein Übeltäter, wir hätten dir ihn nicht überantwortet. If he were not a malefactor, we would not have delivered him to you.
16c Evangelist, Pilate Da sprach Pilatus zu ihnen Then said Pilate to them
16d Coro Wir dürfen niemand töten. We must not put any man to death.
16e Evangelist, Pilate, Jesus Auf daß erfüllet würde das Wort Jesu That the saying of Jesus might be fulfilled
17 Chorale Ach großer König, groß zu allen Zeiten Oh great king, great at all times
18a Evangelist, Pilate, Jesus Da sprach Pilatus zu ihm Pilate therefore said to him
18b Coro Nicht diesen, sondern Barrabam! Not this man, but Barabbas!
18c Evangelist, Pilate, Jesus Barrabas aber war ein Mörder. Now Barabbas was a murderer.
19 Arioso (bass) Betrachte, meine Seel', mit ängstlichem Vergnügen Look, my soul, with anxious pleasure
20 Aria (tenor) Erwäge, wie sein blutgefärbter Rücken Consider how his blood-stained back
21a Evangelist Und die Kriegsknechte flochten eine Krone von Dornen And the soldiers plaited a crown of thorns
21b Coro Sei gegrüßet, lieber Judenkönig! Hail, King of the Jews!
21c Evangelist, Pilate Und gaben ihm Backenstreiche. And they smote him with their hands.
21d Coro Kreuzige, kreuzige! Crucify him, crucify him!
21e Evangelist, Pilate Pilatus sprach zu ihnen Pilate said to them
21f Coro Wir haben ein Gesetz, und nach dem Gesetz soll er sterben We have a law, and by our law he ought to die
21g Evangelist, Pilate, Jesus Da Pilatus das Wort hörete, fürchtet' er sich noch mehr When Pilate heard that saying, he was the more afraid
22 Chorale Durch dein Gefängnis, Gottes Sohn, muß uns die Freiheit kommen Through thy captivity, Son of God, has come to us the freedom
23a Evangelist Die Juden aber schrieen But the Jews cried out, and said
23b Coro Lässest du diesen los, so bist du des Kaisers Freund nicht If you let this man go, you are not Caesar's friend
23c Evangelist, Pilate Da Pilatus das Wort hörete, führete er Jesum heraus When Pilate heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth
23d Coro Weg, weg mit dem, kreuzige ihn! Away, away with him, crucify him!
23e Evangelist, Pilate Spricht Pilatus zu ihnen Pilate says to them
23f Coro Wir haben keinen König denn den Kaiser. We have no king but Caesar.
23g Evangelist Da überantwortete er ihn daß er gekreuziget würde. Then he delivered him to them to be crucified.
24 Aria (bass) Eilt, ihr angefochtnen Seelen Hurry, you souls
25a Evangelist Allda kreuzigten sie ihn There they crucified him
25b Coro Schreibe nicht: der Juden König Write not, The King of the Jews
25c Evangelist, Pilate Pilatus antwortet' Pilate answered
26 Chorale In meines Herzens Grunde In the bottom of my heart
27a Evangelist Die Kriegsknechte aber, da sie Jesum gekreuziget hatten, nahmen seine Kleider Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments
27b Coro Lasset uns den nicht zerteilen, sondern darum losen, wes er sein soll. Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be.
27c Evangelist, Jesus Auf daß erfüllet würde die Schrift That the scripture might be fulfilled
28 Chorale Er nahm alles wohl in acht He was careful of everything
29 Evangelist, Jesus Und von Stund' an nahm sie der Jünger zu sich. And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home.
30 Aria (alto) Es ist vollbracht! It is finished!
31 Evangelist Und neiget' das Haupt und verschied. He bowed his head, and departed.
32 Aria (bass) Mein teurer Heiland, laß dich fragen My precious Savior, let ask you
33 Evangelist Und siehe da, der Vorhang im Tempel zerriß in zwei Stück And, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two
34 Arioso (tenor) Mein Herz, in dem die ganze Welt bei Jesu Leiden gleichfalls leidet My heart, in which the whole world in Jesus' suffering likewise suffers
35 Aria (soprano) Zerfließe, mein Herze, in Fluten der Zähren Melt, my heart, in floods of tears
36 Evangelist Die Juden aber, dieweil es der Rüsttag war The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation day
37 Chorale O hilf, Christe, Gottes Sohn O help, Christ, Son of God
38 Evangelist Darnach bat Pilatum Joseph von Arimathia And after this Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate
39 Coro Ruht wohl, ihr heiligen Gebeine Rest well, holy bones
40 Chorale Ach Herr, lass dein' lieb' Engelein O Lord, let your dear little angels

Bach followed the Gospel of John but added two lines from the Gospel of Matthew, the account of Peter's weeping and the rending of the veil in the temple (in Version I, this second line was replaced by the line from the Gospel of Mark).

He chose the chorales:

For the words of the aria "Ach, mein Sinn" (#13), Bach used an adaptation of a 1675 poem by Christian Weise, "Der weinende Petrus".[9]

For the central chorale (#22) "Durch dein Gefängnis, Gottes Sohn, muß uns die Freiheit kommen" ("Through Your prison, Son of God, must freedom come to us) Bach adapted the words of an aria from the Johannes-Passion of Christian Heinrich Postel (1700) and used the melody of "Mach's mit mir, Gott, nach deiner Güt" by Johann Hermann Schein. The architecture of Part Two shows symmetry around this movement, the music of the preceding chorus #21f "Wir haben ein Gesetz" corresponds to #23b "Lässest du diesen los", the demand #21d "Kreuzige ihn!" is repeated in an intensified way in #23d "Weg, weg mit dem, kreuzige ihn!", #21b "Sei gegrüßet, lieber Judenkönig" reappears as #25b "Schreibe nicht: der Juden König".[10][11]

Versions

[edit]

Researchers have discovered that Bach revised his St John Passion several times before producing a final version in the 1740s.[12] Alternate numbers that Bach introduced in 1725 but later removed can be found in the appendix to scores of the work, such as that of the Neue Bach-Ausgabe (and heard in the recording by Emmanuel Music directed by Craig Smith, cited below).[13]

The St John Passion was not Bach's first passion. While he was working as Konzertmeister (1714–1717) in Weimar, Bach possibly wrote a Passion, known as the Weimarer Passion, but it is now lost.[1] Sometimes while listening to the St John Passion today one can sense an older feel to some of the music, and some scholars believe that those portions are the surviving parts of the Weimar Passion.[1] Unlike the St Matthew Passion, to which Bach made very few and insignificant changes, the St John Passion was subject to several major revisions.[14] The version most familiar to us today is not the original version from 1724, but rather the version of 1739–1749.[15] In the 1724 version, the Recitative Movement No. 33 reads "Und die Vorhang im Tempel zerriß in zwei Stück; von oben an bis unten aus." (Mark 15, 33) and was in 3 measures. From 1725 on, this was replaced by the more familiar 7-measure quote from Matthew 27: 51–52 (except in the 3rd version, in which this was taken out altogether).[16]

In 1725, Bach replaced the opening and closing choruses and added three arias (BWV 245a-c) while cutting one (Ach, mein Sinn) from the original version.[13] The opening chorus was replaced by O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde groß, which was later transposed and reused at the end of part one of the St Matthew Passion.[13] The closing chorale was replaced by a brilliant setting of "Christe, du Lamm Gottes", taken from the cantata Du wahrer Gott und Davids Sohn, BWV 23.[13] The three new arias are not known to have been reused.[3][17]

In the 1730s, Bach revised the St John Passion again, restoring the original opening chorus, removing the final Chorale (thus ending the work with the choral Movement No. 39), and removing the three new arias.[17] He also excised the two interpolations from the Gospel of Matthew that appeared in the work, probably due to objections by the ecclesiastical authorities.[13] The first of these he simply removed; he composed a new instrumental sinfonia in lieu of the second.[18] He also inserted an aria to replace the still-missing Ach, mein Sinn.[19] Neither the aria nor the sinfonia has been preserved.[citation needed] Overall, Bach chose to keep the biblical text, and inserted Lutheran hymn verses so that he could return the work to its liturgical substance.[20]

In 1749, he reverted more or less to the original of 1724, making only slight changes to the orchestration, most notably replacing the by-then almost obsolete viola d'amore with muted violins.[13] Also, Bach's orchestra for this piece would have been very delicate in nature because he called for many gamba strings.[clarification needed][21]

In the summer of 1815, Bach's Passions began to be studied once again. Parts of the St John Passion were being rehearsed and the St Matthew Passion was soon to follow.[22] Fred Wolle, with his Choral Union of 1888 at the Moravian town of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was the first to perform the St John Passion in the Americas. This spurred a revival of Bach's choral music in the New World.[23]

Congregational use

[edit]

While writing the St John Passion, Bach intended to retain the congregational spirit of the worship service.[20] The text for the body of the work is taken from the Gospel of John chapters 18 and 19.[20] To augment these chapters, which he summarized in the music, Bach used an elaborate body of commentary consisting of hymns, which were often called chorales, and arias.[24] He adhered to Martin Luther's translation of the Bible and made no noticeable modifications.[25] Bach proved that the sacred opera as a musical genre did not have to become shallow in liturgical use by remaining loyal to the cantus firmus and the scriptural word.[20] He did not want the Passion taken as a lesser sacred concert.[20] The text for the opening prayer, "Herr, unser Herrscher, dessen Ruhm", as well as the arias, chorales and the penultimate chorus "Ruht wohl, ihr heiligen Gebeine", come from various other sources.[26] Two recitative passages, the first dealing with Peter's weeping after his betrayal and the second portraying the temple veil's ripping during the crucifixion, do not appear in the Gospel of John, but the Gospel of Matthew.[17]

A modern example originating in Communist Hungary demonstrates the congregational character of St John Passion. In the early 1950s musicians were allowed to play church music only in the frame of liturgy. However, the St John Passion is an almost complete Lutheran liturgy, focused on the Evangelium. Hence, by inserting four missing features, the whole Passion could be performed as if it were part of the liturgy.[b] There would have been no applause, either at the beginning or at the end. The Passion contains quite a few chorales that were in regular use in worship. The congregation and the audience, however, remained silent.[27][better source needed][28]

More recently, the tradition of including the St John Passion in a full-scale Good Friday service was revived in Kokkola, Finland in 2023 (in Swedish)[29][30] and 2025 (in Finnish).[31]

Highlights

[edit]

\relative c' { \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"viola" \set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \clef treble \key b \minor \time 4/4 \tempo "Molto adagio" 4 = 28 
r8. fis16 \appoggiatura e8 d( cis16 d32 b) \appoggiatura b8 ais r16 g' \appoggiatura g8 fis(e16 g32 fis) |
\appoggiatura e8 d16.(cis32) b16.(cis32) d16.(e32) fis16.(g32) a16.(fis32) dis16.(e32) e16(fis32 g fis16. e32) |
e8 r16 g \appoggiatura fis8 e(d16 e32 cis) a'8 r16 g \appoggiatura fis8 e(d16 e32 cis)|
\appoggiatura b'8 ais r16 b \appoggiatura a8 g16.(fis32) e16.(d32) cis16.(b64 ais b16. cis32) cis8. \trill b16|
b4
 }
Es ist vollbracht: Alto enters after these first few bars of Viola da gamba solo. Continuo omitted
  • 'opening chorus': "Herr, unser Herrscher ..." ("Lord, our master, ..."). There is an orchestral intonation of 36 bars before the explosive entrance of the chorus. Each of these bars is a single stress of lower tones, weakening till the end of the bar. These bass beats are accompanied by the remaining instruments of higher tones, by legato singing the prospective theme. The last six bars of the orchestral intro produce a robust crescendo, ending with the loud shouts of "Herr, Herr, Herr!" in the first bars of the chorus. Soon, after the first part of the theme, comes the triple shout again, but this time, at the end of the bars, as a contra answer for the corresponding orchestral deep stresses at the beginning of the bars. Finally, the entire A section is repeated.[citation needed]
    "Herr, unser Herrscher" and "O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde groß" are very different in character.[19] The latter is full of torment in its text, but a serenely majestic piece of music. "Herr, unser Herrscher" sounds as if it has chains of dissonance between the two oboes and the turmoil of the roiling sixteenth notes in the strings. Especially, when they invade the bass, it is full of anguish and therefore it characterizes the St John Passion.[19]
  • commenting arias: The first part of the St John Passion includes three commenting arias. There is an alto aria, "Von den Stricken meiner Sünden" (From the bonds of my sins). This includes an intertwined oboe line that brings back many characteristics of the opening chorus.[19] Another aria is an enchanting flute and soprano duet, "Ich folge dir gleichfalls". In this piece the verbs "ziehen" (to pull) and "schieben" (to push) stimulate Bach's delight in musical illustration.[19] The third aria is a passionate tenor solo that is accompanied by all the instruments, "Ach, mein Sinn" (O my soul).[19]
  • the death of Jesus: "Es ist vollbracht! ..." ("It is accomplished; what comfort for suffering human souls! I can see the end of the night of sorrow. The hero from Judah ends his victorious fight. It is accomplished!"). The central part is essentially a viola da gamba solo and an alto aria. The theme is introduced by the viola da gamba gently accompanied by the basso continuo setting. Then comes the solo vocal interpretation.[citation needed]
  • closing chorale: Ach Herr, lass dein lieb Engelein ... (O Lord, let your dear little angels ...). This chorale – with alternative lyrics – is still in regular use in the congregations.[32] The beginning of the theme is a descending sequence, but in overall the theme is full of emotion as well.[18] Singing this chorale standalone, however, does not sound as a closing chorale, except if it is sung at the end of a real ceremony.[citation needed]

Criticism

[edit]

The text Bach set to music has been criticized as anti-Semitic.[33] This accusation is closely connected to a wider controversy regarding the tone of the New Testament's Gospel of John with regards to Judaism.[34]

Lukas Foss, who came to the United States in 1937 as a Jewish refugee from Nazi Germany, changed the text from "Juden" to "Leute" (people) when he conducted performances of the work.[33] This has been the trend of numerous mainline Christian denominations since the late 20th century as well, for instance, the Episcopal Church, when they read the gospel during Good Friday services. Michael Marissen's Lutheranism, Anti-Judaism, and Bach's 'St John's Passion' examines the controversy in detail.[35] He concludes that Bach's St John Passion and St Matthew Passion contain fewer statements derogatory toward Jews than many other contemporary musical settings of the Passion. He also noted that Bach used words for the commenting arias and hymns that tended to shift the blame for the death of Jesus from "the Jews" to the congregation of Christians.[34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The St John Passion (German: Johannes-Passion), BWV 245, is a sacred composed by Johann Sebastian Bach in early 1724 that sets to music the Passion narrative from the Gospel of John in the , interspersing biblical recitatives with contemplative arias, choruses, and Lutheran chorales to convey the trial, , and death of Jesus Christ. Bach, newly appointed as Cantor of St. Thomas Church in Leipzig, premiered the work on Good Friday, 7 April 1724, during Vespers at St. Nicholas Church, fulfilling his duties to provide music for the city's principal churches. He revised it substantially in 1725—replacing the opening chorus with material borrowed from his St. Matthew Passion—and further in subsequent years up to 1749, experimenting with alternative arias and turbae (crowd choruses) to refine its dramatic flow and theological emphasis. Divided into two parts—the first tracing events from the Garden of to Peter's denial (John 18:1–27) and the second from the trial before Pilate to the entombment (John 18:28–19:42)—the employs a primarily drawn from the Evangelist's text, augmented by poetic interpolations and hymns such as "O große Lieb" for reflective on , redemption, and . Its structure highlights Bach's integration of narrative drive with polyphonic complexity, notably in the turbulent opening chorus "Herr, unser Herrscher" and arias like "Erwäge, wie sein blutgefärbter Rücken," which underscore human frailty against divine purpose through vivid word-painting and harmonic tension. More concise and urgently dramatic than Bach's later , the St John Passion stands as a pinnacle of sacred , influencing subsequent Passion settings through its balance of liturgical and operatic expressivity, while its textual fidelity to John's account—emphasizing Christ's kingship and voluntary sacrifice—has sustained its role in Lenten observances despite periodic debates over the era's Lutheran polemics toward embedded in crowd scenes.

Historical Context and Composition

Biblical and Liturgical Foundations

The St John Passion draws its narrative core directly from chapters 18 and 19 of the Gospel of John in Martin Luther's German translation, recounting Jesus' arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane, trial before Annas and Caiaphas, interrogation by Pontius Pilate, crucifixion, death, and burial. This account, attributed to the apostle John as an eyewitness, emphasizes Jesus' sovereign control—such as his self-identification as "I am" causing the arresting party to fall backward (John 18:5-6)—and theological assertions of divinity, like Pilate's inscription "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews" (John 19:19), differing from the longer, more psychologically introspective Passion in Matthew 26-27, which includes extended agony in Gethsemane and the Last Supper. The evangelist's recitatives reproduce the scriptural text verbatim, reflecting Lutheran commitment to sola scriptura by prioritizing unaltered biblical prose over expansive commentary, though minor interpolations from Matthew, such as Peter's bitter weeping (Matthew 26:75) and the temple veil's tearing (Matthew 27:51), supplement John's briefer scope without altering its dramatic immediacy. In , this fidelity underscores a causal prioritization of scripture as the unmediated of Christ's , avoiding allegorical dilutions common in earlier Catholic passions; chorales interspersed derive from pre-existing texts rooted in the same scriptural tradition, such as those meditating on :30 ("It is finished"), to reinforce doctrinal truths like substitutionary without introducing extraneous narrative. John's selection aligns with the church calendar's , where his Gospel furnished the Good Friday reading in Lutheran orders, enabling a setting that causally links textual proclamation to congregational edification rather than speculative . Liturgically, the work integrated into Leipzig's Good Friday Vespers at St. Thomas Church (Thomaskirche), commencing after the early afternoon service and supplanting the traditional reading with a sung Passion, flanked by collects, hymns, and a to maintain the rite's structure of , , and reflection on Christ's passion. This adaptation, per 18th-century Saxon Lutheran orders, positioned the Passion between the office's opening and closing segments, allowing for pauses akin to scriptural responsorium practices, where the narrative's pauses invited meditative responses via hymns, ensuring the service causally advanced from historical recital to personal application without supplanting core liturgical elements.

Initial Creation and Premiere

Johann Sebastian Bach was appointed Thomaskantor of Leipzig's St. Thomas Church on June 11, 1723, a position that obligated him to provide music for the city's principal churches, including weekly cantatas and special works for feast days. This demanding role, combined with establishing a new cantata cycle during his first year, necessitated rapid composition of substantial pieces, culminating in the St. John Passion for the Lenten season. The work premiered on Good Friday, April 7, 1724, during Vespers at St. Nicholas Church (Nikolaikirche) in Leipzig, as confirmed by the liturgical calendar and Bach's performance obligations under the terms of his cantorate. Bach directed the performance using vocal forces from the Thomasschule boys' choir and instrumentalists from the town musicians (Stadtpfeifer and Kunstgeiger), typical for Leipzig's municipal music establishment. The libretto was anonymously compiled, primarily from chapters 18 and 19 of the Gospel of John in Martin Luther's translation, with interpolated poetic arias and choruses drawn from sources including Christian Weise's passion poetry and Barthold Heinrich Brockes' Der für die Sünde der Welt gemarterte und sterbende Hirt Jesu, as identified through textual analysis. No direct eyewitness accounts survive, but church records and the work's autograph score, preserved in Bach's hand, corroborate its origin in this initial Leipzig period.

Subsequent Revisions and Versions

Bach undertook revisions to the St. John Passion for subsequent performances in , yielding at least four versions between 1725 and 1749, as evidenced by surviving performance parts, copyists' scores, and annotations documented in the Neue Bach-Ausgabe (NBA II/4). These changes, including omissions and substitutions, were pragmatically motivated by factors such as service duration limits—typically requiring the work to fit within 2-2.5 hours—and fluctuations in available vocal and instrumental forces at St. Thomas Church, rather than aesthetic overhauls. The 1725 version, performed on March 30, featured the most extensive alterations for a quick , with the opening chorus "Herr, unser Herrscher" replaced by the chorale-based "O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde groß" (adapted from BWV 121, No. 1), the closing chorus substituted, and the "Ach, mein Sinn" (movement 19c in later numbering) omitted entirely, alongside other cuts to reduce length by approximately 20-25%. Surviving parts from this iteration, including Bach's own annotations, confirm these pragmatic shortenings to suit the liturgical schedule and possibly weaker ensemble recovery post-premiere. A third version, likely for the April 11, 1732, performance, retained much of the 1725 structure but introduced targeted omissions—such as select recitatives and arias (e.g., parts of movements 20-21)—evident in discrepancies and marks in extant materials, adapting to reduced orchestral resources amid Bach's ongoing disputes with church authorities over personnel. The 1749 iteration, performed on April 4, restored elements from the 1724 original (e.g., reinstating "Herr, unser Herrscher") while incorporating refined scorings and minor expansions in settings, as notated in parts from the Thomasschule archives; this version addressed evolving ensemble strengths, including better-trained student singers, but remained unperformed in its late refinements due to Bach's declining health. errors and interleaved inserts in these sources underscore the work's fluid adaptation over decades, prioritizing functional reuse in annual over a static ideal.

Musical Structure and Elements

Overall Form and Architecture

The St John Passion, BWV 245, unfolds across approximately 40 movements in two distinct parts, engineered for liturgical integration during Leipzig's , with Part I performed before the and Part II afterward. Part I (movements 1–21) traces the from ' betrayal and arrest in , through Peter's denial and the initial trial scenes before and , culminating in Pilate's and the crowd's demands. Part II (movements 22–40) advances to Pilate's verdict, the path to Golgotha, the , ' death, entombment, and a closing evoking hope amid burial. This division mirrors precedents in 17th-century German Passions, such as those by , where segmentation accommodated sermonic pauses while heightening dramatic tension through interrupted action. Bach's architecture hybridizes liturgical traditions with operatic elements, featuring secco recitatives for verbatim scriptural narration, accompanied recitatives for heightened , turba choruses depicting mob dynamics, for reflective soliloquies, and stanzaic for communal —often paired symmetrically, as in an 's emotional outpouring resolved by a 's doctrinal summary. Such pairings recur structurally, fostering interpretive layers where personal lament yields to affirmation, evident in sequences like the Evangelist's account followed by an and (e.g., movements 5–7). This logic draws from German Passion oratorios' evolution under operatic influence, incorporating Italian principles like motivic development and instrumental framing in choruses, which propel the work's progression from betrayal's chaos to redemption's resolution. Analyses of the score reveal Bach's first-performance version (1724) already exhibiting this blueprint, with revisions preserving the core symmetry despite textual adjustments; Alfred Dürr's examinations underscore how tonal pivots and recurring motifs reinforce the form's causal drive toward theological closure, distinguishing it from looser antecedents by rigorous proportionality.

Instrumentation, Vocal Scoring, and Key Movements

The St John Passion, BWV 245, employs a vocal ensemble consisting of soloists for , , (including the Evangelist role), and bass (including Christus), supported by a single choir for chorales, recitatives, and turba sections depicting crowd agitation. The orchestral forces in the original 1724 version comprise two oboes, strings (first and second violins, violas, cellos, and basses), and typically realized with organ and bassoon. Later revisions, notably from 1732 and 1749, incorporated specialized obbligato instruments such as two transverse flutes, , oboe da caccia, two violas d'amore, and to heighten affective contrast in arias, while maintaining the core string and continuo foundation for dramatic immediacy.) Among the work's standout movements, the opening chorus "Herr, unser Herrscher" (No. 1) unfolds in with layered fugal entries over a persistent bass, integrating chromatic descents in the strings and winds to evoke urgency and from the outset. The aria "Betrachte, meine Seel'" (No. 9) pairs the solo voice with a obbligato in lyrical dialogue, employing appoggiaturas and melodic sighing figures to intensify introspective contemplation of Christ's suffering. Turba choruses, such as "Sei gegrüßet, Jesu guter" (No. 14c), deploy rapid homophonic and imitative among the choir's sections to mimic the jeering crowd's , with stark rhythmic snaps and dissonant clashes underscoring rhetorical vehemence. Bach's innovates through targeted obbligato usage, as in the bass aria "Erwäge, wie sein blutgefärbter Rücken" (No. 13), where lines trace lamenting chromatic descents intertwined with the vocal part, fostering emotional depth via instrumental mimicry of physical torment.) This approach, rooted in affective , prioritizes expressive directness over symphonic elaboration, yielding a raw immediacy in chromatic modulations and text-driven motifs that 20th-century analyses contrast with the more contrapuntally refined architecture of the .

Libretto and Theological Content

Textual Sources and Compilation

The libretto of Johann Sebastian Bach's St John Passion (BWV 245) primarily derives from chapters 18 and 19 of of John, rendered in Martin Luther's 1545 German translation, which provided the recitatives narrating the Passion events with close fidelity to the scriptural sequence of ' arrest, trial, , and death. This core narrative adheres to Luther's phrasing, such as in the Evangelist's account of Peter's denial and Pilate's interrogation, preserving 's terse, eyewitness-style reporting without significant alteration. Secondary textual material for the s and ariosi draws selectively from Barthold Heinrich Brockes' 1712 Passion oratorio Der für die Sünden der Welt gemarterte und sterbende , where Bach's librettist adapted verses to heighten emotional reflection on key dramatic moments, such as the crowning with thorns or ' commendation of his spirit. These borrowings are evident in verbatim or near-verbatim parallels, like the "Von den Stricken" echoing Brockes' imagery of binding cords, though edited for rhythmic fit and theological emphasis on . An anonymous , likely Christian Weise or a contemporary figure, assembled the by interweaving the biblical recitatives with meditative , from Lutheran hymnals (e.g., stanzas by and Johann Heermann), and occasional original verses where no suitable chorale existed, as in movement 22's poetic insertion for the scene. Textual parallels to Brockes and hymnals, cross-referenced in Bach's scores, demonstrate this compilation process, with the poet prioritizing concise dramatic flow over expansive commentary, evidenced by the omission of John's or hints to focus on trial-centric events. Poetic appears in aria expansions, such as amplifying Brockes' lines with personal lament to evoke believer response, yet remains tethered to scriptural cues, underscoring a deliberate balance between verbatim fidelity and reflective . Compared to Bach's later , the St John libretto is more compact, spanning roughly two hours versus three, reflecting John's as a streamlined emphasizing judicial proceedings and direct confrontations over Matthew's broader sermonic and prophetic layers. This concision aligns with Johannine scholarship viewing the text as an apostolic recollection prioritizing causality in Christ's suffering—arrest to entombment—without Matthew's intercalated fulfillments or extended discourses, allowing the anonymous compiler to insert fewer but pointed meditative elements. Such distinctions highlight the libretto's evidentiary restraint, favoring John's purported first-hand verisimilitude amid the era's devotional poetry.

Core Themes and Dramatic Narrative

The St John Passion traces the Passion narrative drawn from chapters 18 and 19 of the Gospel of John, structured in two parts that progress from betrayal and arrest to trial, execution, and entombment. Part I encompasses in the garden, Judas's betrayal with a kiss leading to the arrest by temple guards and Roman soldiers, the disciples' flight, Peter's threefold denial amid the high priest's courtyard, and ' initial questioning by . This arc culminates in the transfer to , emphasizing immediate human failure against Christ's composure. Part II shifts to the Roman trial before Pilate, where interrogations reveal conflicting claims of kingship, interspersed with scourging, mocking by soldiers, and the crucifixion process; it concludes with ' death—marked by the piercing of his side—entombment by and , and a reflecting on mortality yet hinting at eschatological hope. Theologically, the work foregrounds Christ's divine kingship exercised through voluntary suffering, portraying his realm as spiritual rather than political, as articulated in the exchange with Pilate: affirms his to "bear to the truth," positioning truth as the criterion distinguishing amid worldly power structures. This motif, recurrent in John's Gospel, causally links to rejection, where Christ's exposes human unbelief without coercion, fulfilling prophecies like the pierced one in Zechariah 12:10. Betrayals by Judas—driven by avarice and predestined handover (John 13:27)—and Peter illustrate causal chains of : Judas's act propels the , enabling sacrificial , while Peter's denial underscores frailty redeemable through later restoration, tying personal lapses to broader soteriological necessity. Prophetic fulfillment permeates the narrative, grounding events in covenantal continuity; for instance, no bones broken evokes the Passover lamb (Exodus 12:46) and righteous preservation (Psalm 34:20), causally affirming as unblemished substitute whose death inaugurates new exodus from sin. Patristic interpreters, such as Augustine in his Tractates on John, viewed these as deliberate signs of , where and serve divine economy, transforming apparent defeat into kingship's glorification through as . The arc thus progresses from humiliation to veiled triumph, with burial evoking seed-like death yielding life (John 12:24), logically necessitating for believer's justification.

Performance Traditions

Congregational Participation and Liturgy

The St John Passion integrates as integral components of Lutheran , enabling congregational engagement through familiar texts that prompted collective meditation on Christ's suffering. These , selected by Bach from established Lutheran sources, interrupt the narrative recitations and arias to evoke empathetic responses from the audience, aligning with the devotional ethos of 18th-century Lutheran worship where music reinforced scriptural . For instance, the "O große Lieb, o Lieb bis in den Tod" (movement 3) follows the Evangelist's account of ' arrest, its text emphasizing sacrificial love to mirror communal . In performance practice, the choir rendered these chorales as proxies for the congregation's voice, a convention rooted in Lutheran congregationalism that emphasized participatory over passive spectatorship. This approach contrasted sharply with contemporary opera's elite, theatrical detachment, as Passion settings aimed to immerse attendees in the Passion narrative for spiritual edification; historical analyses of 18th-century Lutheran services document chorales functioning this way, with congregations often familiar enough to internalize or even softly join the singing. Such integration underscored the liturgical role of the St John Passion in fostering causal links between historical events and personal faith, with serving as anchors for devotion rather than mere musical interludes. Accounts from Bach's tenure affirm this active involvement, where the work's structure—alternating , , and chorale—mirrored the responsive dynamics of everyday hymnody, promoting a shared theological realism amid the Passion's dramatic unfolding.

Historical Performance Practices

In 18th-century performances under Johann Sebastian Bach's direction in , the St. John Passion employed modest forces typical of church music resources at St. Thomas and St. Nicholas churches, consisting of a chorus drawn from the boys supplemented by university students and town musicians, totaling approximately 12 to 16 singers divided among , , , and bass parts, with soloists doubling in choruses as needed. The orchestra featured a small of 2 to 3 players per part, 2 violas, and bass instruments including cellos and double basses, augmented by obbligato winds such as two flutes, two oboes, and occasionally taille or for specific movements, reflecting the limited municipal wind band available. Continuo realization centered on the organ as the primary in the liturgical setting, providing harmonic support and bass line reinforcement for recitatives and arias, with possible ad hoc addition of for rehearsals or if acoustic demands required; realizations followed conventions, emphasizing improvisational embellishment by skilled organists to articulate affective contrasts without explicit dynamic markings, as Bach's scores rarely included them. The Evangelist's recitatives adhered to stylized sprechende Stimme (speech-like ), mirroring natural German with rhythmic flexibility tied to textual prosody and rhetorical pauses, accompanied solely by continuo to heighten immediacy, while the bass Christus employed a more restrained, reverent delivery, often with subtle string halo accompaniments in key passages to evoke solemnity rather than dramatic veiling. Tempos derived from contemporary Italianate conventions and empirical observation rather than precise metronomic indications, with movements like choruses paced for clarity and contrapuntal precision—evident in Bach's annotations and reports from performers such as his son Carl Philipp Emanuel, who noted brisk yet expressive speeds for fugal sections to maintain forward momentum without rushing affective Affekten. Dynamics were largely absent from sources, improvised by performers using terraced levels between sections (e.g., forte for crowd choruses, for introspective arias) guided by rhetorical principles from treatises like Quantz's, prioritizing textual expression over uniform volume. Source materials present lacunae, particularly for the 1732 version, where missing parts necessitate scholarly reconstructions based on surviving autographs and copyists' scores; these gaps, including incomplete continuo figures or variant readings, have led to debates over authentic , with evidence from Bach's indicating flexible adaptations to available players rather than fixed ensembles.

Modern Interpretations and Recordings

The revival of Bach's St. John Passion gained momentum in the amid the broader resurgence of his works, catalyzed by Felix Mendelssohn's performance of the in , which drew over 1,000 attendees and sparked widespread interest in Bach's choral oeuvre. This led to increased performances of the St. John Passion, often in adapted forms with modern orchestras, emphasizing its dramatic narrative over liturgical integration. By the early , recordings emerged, starting with excerpts on 78 RPM discs, such as the alto "Es ist vollbracht" captured in limited releases before full versions. In the mid-20th century, Karl Richter's recordings with the Munich Bach Choir and modern instruments, including a notable 1960s release featuring Ernst Haefliger as Evangelist, prioritized emotional depth and large-scale choral forces, influencing interpretations through their accessibility and sales success in the LP era. The (HIP) movement surged in the 1960s–1980s, with Gustav Leonhardt's 1961 recording using period instruments and smaller ensembles to approximate practices, followed by John Eliot Gardiner's 1986 Archiv Produktion version with the Monteverdi Choir and English Baroque Soloists, which employed original tuning and for heightened intensity. These shifts emphasized textual clarity and instrumental authenticity, diverging from romanticized 19th-century swells. Contemporary interpretations favor period instruments and debate edition choices, as Bach revised the work across versions—premiere in , a performable 1725 edition (BWV 245.2) with distinct chorales and omissions, and the final 1749 revision—prompting ensembles to select based on dramatic flow or historical fidelity rather than a singular "definitive" text. Masaaki Suzuki's Bach Collegium released a 2020 BIS recording of the 1749 version, captured in an empty Philharmonie amid restrictions on March 6, 2020, highlighting intimate choral textures and soloist precision like James Gilchrist's Evangelist. John Butt's Dunedin Consort, in a 2017 Linn Records album and 2024 live performances marking the tricentennial, reconstructs the original liturgical context with one singer per part in chorales, organ preludes, and motets for a chamber-scale intensity. Similarly, Music of the Baroque's March 10, 2024, concert at Chicago's North Shore underscored period practices in a streamed format. These approaches, supported by scholarly editions from publishers like Carus-Verlag, prioritize empirical reconstruction over interpretive liberties, with HIP recordings dominating catalogs due to their alignment with Bach's performing conditions.

Reception and Influence

18th-Century Responses

The St John Passion premiered on 7 April 1724 during at Leipzig's St. Nicholas Church, marking one of Johann Sebastian Bach's earliest major undertakings as cantor of the Thomasschule. Subsequent performances occurred in 1725, 1732, and 1749, each incorporating revisions to chorales, arias, and instrumentation, reflecting ongoing adaptation to liturgical needs rather than outright rejection. These repetitions, documented in church records and Bach's compositional autographs, demonstrate empirical approval within Leipzig's ecclesiastical establishment, where the work served as a vehicle for annual Passion observances blending Gospel recitation with meditative hymns. In 1737, Johann Adolph Scheibe critiqued Bach's compositional style in Der Critische Musicus, decrying its excessive complexity, "turgid and confused" elaboration, and deviation from natural simplicity, which he argued obscured melodic clarity in favor of contrived artifice. Scheibe's remarks, aimed at Bach's vocal and instrumental output broadly, implicitly encompassed works like the St John Passion amid Leipzig's tradition of Passion settings, yet failed to curtail its use; local church authorities and performers continued deploying it for devotional purposes, prioritizing scriptural fidelity and congregational edification over aesthetic purism. The work's persistence aligned with the orthodox Lutheran-Pietist synthesis prevalent in early 18th-century , emphasizing introspective piety through interpolated chorales that reinforced narrative without departing from established Passion oratorio conventions inherited from composers like Keiser and Handel. Absent direct contemporary encomia in surviving letters—unlike the scarcity of praise for Bach's "learned" elsewhere—the repeated liturgical integrations underscore a pragmatic success, wherein the Passion's dramatic intensity fostered communal reflection on Christ's suffering, unmarred by radical formal experiments that might have provoked doctrinal scrutiny.

Revival and Enduring Legacy

The St. John Passion experienced a resurgence in the 19th century amid the broader Bach revival initiated by Felix Mendelssohn's 1829 performance of the , which drew over 1,000 attendees and prompted renewed scholarly and public interest in Bach's output. The St. John Passion followed with a notable revival in 1833, and by the mid-century, prepared an arrangement tailored to contemporary orchestral and choral forces, facilitating performances such as one in in 1854 that incorporated reductions and expanded . These efforts, building on Mendelssohn's editorial and conducting precedents, helped transition the work from obscurity to occasional concert programming, with printed editions emerging through publishers like Breitkopf & Härtel. By the , the St. John Passion achieved canonical status in the international choral repertory, with performances proliferating in and ; for instance, its first documented U.S. presentation occurred in 1927 under the direction of T. Tertius Noble at St. Thomas Church in , marking a centennial milestone revisited in 1927 events. The work's integration into standard Easter-season cycles accelerated post-World War II, supported by influential recordings such as Herbert von Karajan's 1950s interpretations with the , which emphasized its dramatic intensity and sold widely, contributing to its accessibility via long-playing records. This positioned it as a pinnacle of Passion settings, evidenced by its frequent inclusion in musicological analyses as a model of textual-musical synthesis unmatched in the era. Recent scholarship underscores the work's technical and interpretive depth, with Daniel R. Melamed's 2016 study Hearing Bach's Passions analyzing source variants—drawing from over 20 manuscripts—and advocating for performances that respect 18th-century liturgical contexts while addressing modern ensembles' scale, such as reduced continuo forces for authenticity. Melamed highlights how Bach's revisions across four versions (1724–1749) reflect evolving theological emphases, informing contemporary editions like the 2023 Carus-Verlag critical score used in anniversary cycles. The Passion's legacy endures through global commemorations, including 2024 events for its 300th premiere anniversary, affirming its role as a " of our time" for its humanistic dramatic narrative amid ongoing adaptations in concert halls and recordings by ensembles like the Monteverdi Choir.

Criticisms and Controversies

Artistic and Structural Critiques

Johann Adolf Scheibe, in his 1737 writings, lambasted Bach's style for its contrived complexity, arguing that elaborate and ornamentation rendered music turgid and confused, stripping away natural amenity—a critique that encompassed the dense polyphonic textures in the St. John Passion's choral movements, such as the turbulent opening "Herr, unser Herrscher." This view highlighted perceived over-intellectualization, where intricate fugal entries and motivic developments prioritized technical display over melodic simplicity, potentially alienating listeners seeking unadorned expression. Bach's successive revisions to the work—premiered in 1725, substantially altered in 1732 with new s replacing earlier ones, and further adjusted by 1749—have prompted modern scholars to note structural unevenness, including abrupt shifts in style and inconsistent integration of interpolated chorales, which disrupt overall tonal and thematic unity more than in the architecturally tighter . Analysts point to patchwork elements, such as the 1732 insertion of the "Zerschmettert mich," as evidence of pragmatic adaptations for performances that sacrificed seamless narrative flow for localized dramatic intensification. Conversely, the Passion's artistic strengths lie in its raw expressive immediacy, achieved through stark contrasts in recitatives and choruses that propel the narrative with visceral urgency, as evidenced by the crowd's frenzied outbursts in movements like "Kreuzige, kreuzige!" Fugal writing demonstrates masterful contrapuntal control, with revealing underlying Urlinie coherence amid surface agitation, particularly in the turba choruses where strettos and inversions heighten tension without resolving into stasis. Reception surveys, such as those from Gramophone polls, underscore divided yet enduring appreciation: while some auditors favor its unbridled extravagance for dramatic potency, others praise refined emotional restraint in arias like "Erwäge, wie sein blutgefärbter Rücken," rating it highly for affective depth over polished symmetry.

Theological Debates and Anti-Semitism Charges

The St. John Passion has drawn accusations of anti-Semitism primarily due to its verbatim musical setting of passages from the Gospel of John (chapters 18–19), where "the Jews" (hoi Ioudaioi in Greek, rendered as die Juden in Martin Luther's 1522–1534 Bible translation) are depicted as antagonists in Jesus' arrest, trial, and crucifixion, including demands for his execution such as "Away with him, away with him, crucify him!" (John 19:15). Critics argue this portrayal, when performed, risks perpetuating historical stereotypes of collective Jewish guilt for deicide, a charge amplified post-World War II amid awareness of Christianity's role in fostering centuries of European anti-Judaism. Defenders counter that the text originates from canonical scripture, not Bach's invention, and reflects first-century theological polemics within an intra-Jewish context—John's Gospel, written circa 90–110 CE, uses "the " often to denote Judean religious authorities opposing , rather than the entire ethnic group, aligning with early Christian emphasizing spiritual rejection of the over racial animus. In the of Bach's era, such narratives served devotional purposes to contrast human sinfulness (exemplified by the crowd's cries) with Christ's , without implying modern racial hatred; Bach adhered faithfully to Luther's and Picander's interpolated hymns and , which underscore universal sin rather than ethnic targeting. Moreover, Bach's musical choices—such as lyrical, empathetic settings in choruses like "Who struck you?" (No. 3b) and the tender aria "From the deep valley" (No. 30)—humanize the figures, mitigating textual harshness and evoking pity for all involved, as evidenced by analyses showing the composer's settings less polemical than the Gospel prose alone. No biographical evidence indicates personal anti-Jewish prejudice by Bach, whose output includes neutral or positive references to in cantatas, prioritizing scriptural fidelity for congregational edification. Post-Holocaust theological shifts, including the Catholic Church's 1965 declaration rejecting blanket attribution of Christ's death to , have intensified scrutiny, prompting debates on whether performances inherently endorse outdated interpretations. Some advocates, influenced by these sensitivities, propose contextual lectures or program notes to frame the work historically, arguing uncut renditions foster dialogue on scriptural origins of without censoring art. Rare calls for textual edits—such as substituting "Judeans" for "Jews" in select verses—have surfaced in academic and liturgical discussions, but these remain marginal, with instances like the 2022 Choir opting to replace the St. John Passion entirely with other Bach works to avoid perceived risks of inflaming bigotry. Mainstream scholarly and performance consensus favors full, unaltered presentations accompanied by historical explication, viewing suppression as anachronistic censorship that ignores the work's devotional intent and musical transcendence over textual literalism.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.