Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Kepler-160
View on Wikipedia| Observation data Epoch J2000 Equinox J2000 | |
|---|---|
| Constellation | Lyra[1] |
| Right ascension | 19h 11m 05.6526s[2] |
| Declination | +42° 52′ 09.473″[2] |
| Apparent magnitude (V) | 13.101 |
| Characteristics | |
| Evolutionary stage | G2V |
| J−H color index | 0.359 |
| J−K color index | 0.408 |
| Variable type | ROT, Planetary transit |
| Astrometry | |
| Proper motion (μ) | RA: 3.477(16) mas/yr[2] Dec.: −5.233(19) mas/yr[2] |
| Parallax (π) | 1.0644±0.0154 mas[2] |
| Distance | 3,060 ± 40 ly (940 ± 10 pc) |
| Details | |
| Radius | 1.118+0.015 −0.045[3] R☉ |
| Luminosity | 1.01±0.05[3] L☉ |
| Surface gravity (log g) | 4.515[4] cgs |
| Temperature | 5471+115 −37[3] K |
| Metallicity [Fe/H] | -0.361 dex |
| Other designations | |
| Gaia DR3 2102587087846067712, KOI-456, KIC 7269974, 2MASS J19110565+4252094[5] | |
| Database references | |
| SIMBAD | data |
| KIC | data |
Kepler-160 is a main-sequence star approximately the width of our Galactic arm away in the constellation Lyra, first studied in detail by the Kepler Mission, a NASA-led operation tasked with discovering terrestrial planets. The star, which is very similar to the Sun in mass and radius,[4][3] has three confirmed planets and one unconfirmed planet orbiting it.
Characteristics
[edit]The star Kepler-160 is rather old, having no detectable circumstellar disk.[6] The star's metallicity is unknown, with conflicting values of either 40% or 160% of solar metallicity reported.[7][8]
Despite having at least one potentially Earth-like planet (KOI-456.04), the Breakthrough Listen search for extraterrestrial intelligence found no potential technosignatures.[9]
Planetary system
[edit]The two planetary candidates in the Kepler-160 system were discovered in 2010, published in early 2011[10] and confirmed in 2014.[11] The planets Kepler-160b and Kepler-160c are not in orbital resonance despite their orbital periods ratio being close to 1:3.[12]
An additional rocky transiting planet candidate KOI-456.04, located in the habitable zone, was detected in 2020,[3] and more non-transiting planets are suspected due to residuals in the solution for the transit timing variations. From what researchers can tell, KOI-456.04 looks to be less than twice the size of Earth and is apparently orbiting Kepler-160 at about the same distance from Earth to the sun (one complete orbit is 378 days). Perhaps most important, it receives about 93% as much light as Earth gets from the sun.[13] Nontransiting planet candidate Kepler-160d has a mass between about 1 and 100 Earth masses and an orbital period between about 7 and 50 d.[3]
| Companion (in order from star) |
Mass | Semimajor axis (AU) |
Orbital period (days) |
Eccentricity | Inclination | Radius |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | — | 0.05511+0.0019 −0.0037 |
4.309397+0.000013 −0.000012 |
0 | — | 1.715+0.061 −0.047 R🜨 |
| c | — | 0.1192+0.004 −0.008 |
13.699429±0.000018 | 0 | — | 3.76+0.23 −0.09 R🜨 |
| d | 1—100 M🜨 | — | 7—50 | — | — | — |
| e (unconfirmed) | — | 1.089+0.037 −0.073 |
378.417+0.028 −0.025 |
0 | — | 1.91+0.17 −0.14 R🜨 |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Roman, Nancy G. (1987). "Identification of a constellation from a position". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 99 (617): 695. Bibcode:1987PASP...99..695R. doi:10.1086/132034. Constellation record for this object at VizieR.
- ^ a b c d Vallenari, A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (2023). "Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 674: A1. arXiv:2208.00211. Bibcode:2023A&A...674A...1G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940. S2CID 244398875. Gaia DR3 record for this source at VizieR.
- ^ a b c d e f g Heller, René; Hippke, Michael; Freudenthal, Jantje; Rodenbeck, Kai; Batalha, Natalie M.; Bryson, Steve (2020). "Transit least-squares survey". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 638: A10. arXiv:2006.02123. Bibcode:2020A&A...638A..10H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936929. S2CID 219260293.
- ^ a b Borucki, William J.; Koch, David G.; Basri, Gibor; Batalha, Natalie; Boss, Alan; Brown, Timothy M.; Caldwell, Douglas; Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jørgen; Cochran, William D.; Devore, Edna; Dunham, Edward W.; Dupree, Andrea K.; Gautier Iii, Thomas N.; Geary, John C.; Gilliland, Ronald; Gould, Alan; Howell, Steve B.; Jenkins, Jon M.; Kjeldsen, Hans; Latham, David W.; Lissauer, Jack J.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Monet, David G.; Sasselov, Dimitar; Tarter, Jill; Charbonneau, David; Doyle, Laurance; Ford, Eric B.; Fortney, Jonathan; et al. (2011). "Characteristics Ofkeplerplanetary Candidates Based on the First Data Set". The Astrophysical Journal. 728 (2): 117. arXiv:1006.2799. Bibcode:2011ApJ...728..117B. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/117. S2CID 93116.
- ^ "Kepler-160". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2024-05-08.
- ^ Lawler, S. M.; Gladman, B. (2012). "Debris Disks Inkeplerexoplanet Systems". The Astrophysical Journal. 752 (1): 53. arXiv:1112.0368. Bibcode:2012ApJ...752...53L. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/53. S2CID 119215667.
- ^ Rowe, Jason F.; Bryson, Stephen T.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Lissauer, Jack J.; Jontof-Hutter, Daniel; Mullally, Fergal; Gilliland, Ronald L.; Issacson, Howard; Ford, Eric; Howell, Steve B.; Borucki, William J.; Haas, Michael; Huber, Daniel; Steffen, Jason H.; Thompson, Susan E.; Quintana, Elisa; Barclay, Thomas; Still, Martin; Fortney, Jonathan; Gautier, T. N.; Hunter, Roger; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Ciardi, David R.; Devore, Edna; Cochran, William; Jenkins, Jon; Agol, Eric; Carter, Joshua A.; Geary, John (2014). "Validation Ofkepler's Multiple Planet Candidates. III. Light Curve Analysis and Announcement of Hundreds of New Multi-Planet Systems". The Astrophysical Journal. 784 (1): 45. arXiv:1402.6534. Bibcode:2014ApJ...784...45R. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/45. S2CID 119118620.
- ^ Petigura, Erik A.; Howard, Andrew W.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Johnson, John Asher; Isaacson, Howard; Cargile, Phillip A.; Hebb, Leslie; Fulton, Benjamin J.; Weiss, Lauren M.; Morton, Timothy D.; Winn, Joshua N.; Rogers, Leslie A.; Sinukoff, Evan; Hirsch, Lea A.; Crossfield, Ian J. M. (2017). "The California-Kepler Survey. I. High-resolution Spectroscopy of 1305 Stars HostingKepler Transiting Planets". The Astronomical Journal. 154 (3): 107. arXiv:1703.10400. Bibcode:2017AJ....154..107P. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa80de. S2CID 55183141.
- ^ Perez, Karen; Brzycki, Bryan; Gajjar, Vishal; Isaacson, Howard; Siemion, Andrew; Croft, Steve; DeBoer, David; Lebofsky, Matt; MacMahon, David H. E.; Price, Danny C.; Sheikh, Sofia; Drew, Jamie; Pete Worden, S. (2020), "Breakthrough Listen Search for Technosignatures Towards the Kepler-160System", Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4 (6): 97, arXiv:2006.13789, Bibcode:2020RNAAS...4...97P, doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab9f36, S2CID 220042074
- ^ Lissauer, Jack J.; Ragozzine, Darin; Fabrycky, Daniel C.; Steffen, Jason H.; Ford, Eric B.; Jenkins, Jon M.; Shporer, Avi; Holman, Matthew J.; Rowe, Jason F.; Quintana, Elisa V.; Batalha, Natalie M.; Borucki, William J.; Bryson, Stephen T.; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Carter, Joshua A.; Ciardi, David; Dunham, Edward W.; Fortney, Jonathan J.; Gautier, Iii, Thomas N.; Howell, Steve B.; Koch, David G.; Latham, David W.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Morehead, Robert C.; Sasselov, Dimitar (2011). "Architecture and Dynamics of Kepler 's Candidate Multiple Transiting Planet Systems". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 197 (1): 8. arXiv:1102.0543. Bibcode:2011ApJS..197....8L. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/8. S2CID 43095783.
- ^ Planet Kepler-160 b on exoplanet.eu
- ^ Veras, Dimitri; Ford, Eric B. (2012). "Identifying non-resonant Kepler planetary systems". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 420 (1): L23 – L27. arXiv:1111.0299. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.420L..23V. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01185.x. S2CID 55625425.
- ^ Patel, Neel V. (2020-06-05). "Astronomers have found a planet like Earth orbiting a star like the sun". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2020-06-07.
Kepler-160
View on GrokipediaStellar properties
Physical parameters
Kepler-160 is a G-type main-sequence star, closely resembling the Sun in its fundamental characteristics.[4] It is located in the constellation Lyra at a distance of 3,060 ± 40 light-years (940 ± 12 pc) from Earth, as determined from Gaia DR3 parallax measurements.[3] The star has a radius of , an effective temperature of , and a luminosity of .[5] Its mass is , derived from spectral analysis and stellar evolution models. The surface gravity is (in cgs units), consistent with a main-sequence dwarf.[3] A photometric analysis of Kepler light curves reveals a stellar rotation period of approximately 22 days, indicated by the dominant peak in the Lomb-Scargle periodogram.[5] These parameters position Kepler-160 as a solar analog, with properties enabling detailed comparisons to the Sun in studies of planetary systems.[4]Age and activity
Kepler-160 is estimated to be older than the Sun, with spectroscopic analyses placing its age at billion years, indicating a mature main-sequence G-type star.[5] Other gyrochronological and isochrone-based estimates vary, ranging from approximately 1.6 Gyr to 6.0 Gyr, reflecting uncertainties in stellar evolution models for solar analogs.[3] This advanced evolutionary stage suggests the absence of a detectable circumstellar disk, as protoplanetary disks typically dissipate within a few hundred million years, consistent with the star's maturity. Measurements of Kepler-160's metallicity show discrepancies across spectroscopic surveys. Some analyses report near-solar abundances with [Fe/H] ≈ 0.14 ± 0.04 dex or 0.20 ± 0.04 dex, corresponding to roughly 140–160% of solar metallicity.[3] In contrast, other determinations yield lower values, such as [Fe/H] ≈ -0.01 dex or even -0.36 dex, implying 40% or less solar abundance; these differences likely arise from variations in spectral line modeling and data quality in the California-Kepler Survey.[3] Resolving these inconsistencies would refine models of the star's formation and planetary system evolution. The star exhibits low levels of chromospheric activity, typical of a mature G-type main-sequence star, with no prominent flares or starspots detected in the Kepler light curves after detrending for instrumental effects.[5] Photometric variability is dominated by low-frequency signals (periods ≳ 10 days), consistent with subdued convection in an aged solar analog.[5] Lomb-Scargle periodogram analysis of the light curve reveals a potential rotation period of approximately 22 days, aligning with expectations for a middle-aged G dwarf similar to the Sun's 25-day equatorial rotation.[5] This quiescent activity profile supports long-term orbital stability for inner planets, potentially enhancing habitability prospects in the system's habitable zone.Discovery and characterization
Kepler Space Telescope observations
The Kepler Space Telescope, launched in 2009, conducted high-precision photometric observations of the Kepler-160 field from May 2009 to September 2013, monitoring the star's brightness to detect periodic dips indicative of planetary transits. Kepler-160, designated KOI-456 in the Kepler Object of Interest catalog, was first identified as hosting transiting planet candidates during the analysis of early mission data collected in quarters Q1 through Q2 (2009–2010). These initial candidates, KOI-456.01 and KOI-456.02, were announced in the first Kepler planet candidate catalog, which reported 1,235 potential transiting exoplanets based on transit searches in the pre-processed light curves. The detection relied on the transit method, where the planets pass in front of the star from the observer's perspective, causing measurable reductions in stellar flux. For Kepler-160, the light curves revealed two distinct periodic signals corresponding to the inner planets. Kepler-160 b (KOI-456.01) exhibits an orbital period of 4.309397 ± 0.000013 days, while Kepler-160 c (KOI-456.02) has an orbital period of 13.699429 ± 0.000018 days, both derived from phase-folding the Kepler long-cadence photometry and fitting transit models to the data.[4] These periods place the planets in close orbits, with b completing a full revolution in approximately 4.3 days and c in about 13.7 days, as confirmed through statistical validation of the multi-planet system in 2014.[2] Further analysis of Kepler data from quarters Q1–Q12 validated the candidates as bona fide planets, ruling out false positives such as eclipsing binaries through centroid offsets, secondary eclipse searches, and pixel-level contrast tests. The 2014 validation effort incorporated statistical false positive probabilities below 1% for both planets, establishing Kepler-160 b and c as the first confirmed members of the system.[2]Validation and follow-up studies
The initial validation of Kepler-160 b and c occurred in 2014 through statistical analysis of Kepler light curves from quarters Q1–Q12, which assessed false positive probabilities for multi-planet candidates and confirmed the planets to better than 99% confidence using light curve modeling and multiplicity statistics.[2] In 2020, Heller et al. reanalyzed the archival Kepler data using the transit least-squares algorithm on pre-processed flux from Data Release 25, identifying and validating a new transiting candidate, KOI-456.04, based on three observed transits with consistent depths and timings.[5] The validation employed the vespa package to compute a false positive probability of 1.81 × 10⁻³ for the three-planet scenario and model-shift tests to rule out instrumental artifacts, achieving approximately 85% reliability for the candidate.[5] Follow-up methods included reprocessing of archival Kepler photometry with detrending via biweight filters and Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting to refine transit parameters, alongside N-body simulations to investigate transit timing variations (TTVs).[5] TTV analysis revealed substantial variations in Kepler-160 c's timings, with amplitudes of about 20 minutes and periods around 879 days, attributed to gravitational perturbations from a non-transiting companion rather than the validated transiting planets.[5] These studies refined key transit parameters for the transiting bodies, including depths averaging 271 ppm for KOI-456.04 with individual measurements of 207 ± 54 ppm, 237 ± 46 ppm, and 370 ± 41 ppm, and updated durations and error bars drawn from the Kepler Object of Interest table in Data Release 25.[5] The results integrated prior Kepler observations into a comprehensive system model, confirming the architecture without requiring new telescopic data.[5]Planetary system
Inner transiting planets
The inner transiting planets of the Kepler-160 system, Kepler-160 b and Kepler-160 c, were identified through photometric observations by the Kepler Space Telescope and validated using transit light curve analysis. These planets orbit close to their Sun-like host star, receiving high levels of stellar insolation that influences their thermal properties. Kepler-160 b is a compact super-Earth-sized world, while Kepler-160 c is a larger body consistent with a mini-Neptune composition. Kepler-160 b has a radius of Earth radii and orbits at a semi-major axis of AU, corresponding to an orbital period of approximately 4.3 days. Its equilibrium temperature, calculated assuming zero albedo and efficient heat redistribution, is about 1134 K, rendering it a hot Venus-like planet with intense surface conditions. Due to the absence of reported radial velocity signals in follow-up observations, the mass of Kepler-160 b remains unconstrained, with upper limits likely below 10 Earth masses. Kepler-160 c is significantly larger, with a radius of Earth radii and a semi-major axis of AU, yielding an orbital period of roughly 13.7 days. This places it in a potential mini-Neptune category, possibly featuring a hydrogen-helium envelope over a rocky core. Its equilibrium temperature is approximately 771 K, still elevated but cooler than that of planet b. Similar to b, no radial velocity detections have constrained the mass of c, implying upper limits below 10 Earth masses. The orbital period ratio between Kepler-160 c and b is close to 3:1 (approximately 3.18), suggesting potential for mean-motion resonance, but detailed transit timing variation (TTV) analysis reveals no significant evidence of resonant interactions or TTV signals attributable to mutual gravitational perturbations between the two planets. Instead, observed TTVs for c are primarily linked to an inner non-transiting companion.| Planet | Radius (R⊕) | Semi-major Axis (AU) | Equilibrium Temperature (K) | Mass Upper Limit (M⊕) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kepler-160 b | ~1134 | <10 | ||
| Kepler-160 c | ~771 | <10 |
