Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Knife legislation
View on Wikipedia
Knife legislation is defined as the body of statutory law or case law promulgated or enacted by a government or other governing jurisdiction that prohibits, criminalizes, or restricts the otherwise legal manufacture, importation, sale, transfer, possession, transport, or use of knives.[1]
Carrying knives in public is forbidden or restricted by law in many countries. Exceptions may be made for hunting knives, pocket knives, and knives used for work-related purposes (chef's knives, etc.), depending upon the laws of a given jurisdiction. In turn, the carrying or possessing of certain types of knives perceived as deadly or offensive weapons, such as switchblade knives and butterfly knives, may be restricted or prohibited. Even where knives may be legally carried on the person generally, this right may not extend to all places and circumstances, and knives of any description may be prohibited at schools, public buildings, courthouses, and public events.
Austria
[edit]Under the Austrian Arms Act of 1996 (Waffengesetz 1996), it is illegal to buy, import, possess, or carry weapons that are disguised as another object or as an object of common use (sword canes, e.g., or knives disguised as ink pens, brush handles, or belt buckles).[2] For ordinary knives, however, there are no restrictions or prohibitions based on blade length or opening or locking mechanism.[3]
The Arms Act defines weapons as "objects that by their very nature are intended to reduce or eliminate the defensive ability of a person through direct impact", specifically including all firearms.[3] Consequently, certain knives are considered "weapons" under this definition. Except for firearms, however, which are heavily regulated, such "weapons", including automatic opening lock-blade knives (switchblades), OTF automatic knives, butterfly knives, and gravity knives[4] are implicitly permitted under the Arms Act, and thus may be bought, possessed and carried by anyone over the age of 18[5] who has not been expressly banned from owning any weapon (Waffenverbot) by the civilian authorities.[6]
Belgium
[edit]Article 3, §1 of the 2006 Weapons Act[7] lists the switchblade or automatic knife (couteaux à cran d'arrêt et à lame jaillissante), as well as butterfly knives, throwing knives, throwing stars, and knives or blades that have the appearance of other objects (i.e. sword canes, belt buckle knives, etc.) as prohibited weapons.[8] In addition to specifically prohibited knives, the police and local jurisdictions have broad authority to prohibit the carrying or possession of a wide variety of knives, to include carriage inside a vehicle, if the owner cannot establish sufficient legal reason (motif légitime) for doing so, particularly in urban areas or at public events.[9] This discretion extends to even folding knives without a locking blade.[7][9]
Bulgaria
[edit]This section contains instructions or advice. (March 2025) |
Bulgarian weapon law is maintained annually. It is called ZOBVVPI (Bulgarian: Закон за оръжията, боеприпасите, взривните вещества и пиротехническите изделия)[10] and it covers ONLY the possession and usage of firearms (including gas and signal ones), and pellet or BB (Bulgarian: сачми) pneumatic guns. A state regulation on melee weapons of any kind does not exist, whether knives, swords, bats, or electric devices. No juridical definition of "melee weapon" or "cold weapon" exists in any Bulgarian law. Hence, it is legal in Bulgaria to possess and carry a knife without providing any reason. Concealed knife carry is OK, anywhere and anytime. Although there are no restrictions on possessing or carrying any type of knife or sword, it is not widely accepted or considered appropriate to carry a knife openly in public places such as streets or public buildings, stores, or restaurants. In urban areas, expect an instant check and hassle if a police officer sees you openly carrying a larger knife, even if you have the legal right to do it. From a societal point of view, the open carry of knives in Bulgaria is justified only in rural areas, when fishing or hunting, or when the knife serves as a tool in work activities, such as gardening. Some places like courts, banks, clubs, bars, etc. will deny you access to any weapon (knives included), and most don't offer a safekeeping option. It is an urban legend in Bulgaria that knives above 10 cm (3.9 in) are illegal to carry on a person, so expect the police to try to convince you to give up the knife voluntarily, even if such a measure is unlawful. You should not give up your knife; instead, state the purpose of "daily needs", "utility usage", or even "self-defense" for carrying, and be clear that you haven't committed any crime. Insist that the policeman cite a law against you carrying a knife in public. Since there is no such law in Bulgaria, the police most likely will let you keep your knife and send you on your way with a "warning". If they insist or are misbehaving, ask them to contact their superior officer before giving up your knife, or else you will not see it again. There are some random city councils which try to limit knife lengths above 10 cm (3.9 in) with issuing acts, but these acts are all illegal and have no compliance force, because the councils serve only administrative functions; they lack the jurisdiction to invent or impose laws of any kind.[11] Remember that although very liberal in terms of knife (weapons) possession and carry, compared to many European countries, Bulgaria is not the place where you can defend yourself with deadly force. If the need for self-defense with a knife arises, consider it carefully. Usually, courts often consider the armed self-defense as "unjustified" based on the Penal Code and the defending side ends up with an effective jail verdict, even if the cause (treat) for initiating self-defense is proven.[12]
Canada
[edit]There is no law banning the carrying in public of knives with sheaths, knives that take both hands to open, and any knife with a fixed blade and certain non-prohibited folding knives, if they are not carried for a purpose that poses a danger to public peace or to commit a criminal offense.[13]
The Canadian Criminal Code criminalizes the possession of knives that open automatically. Section 84(1) defines "a knife that has a blade that opens automatically by gravity or centrifugal force or by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device attached to or in the handle of the knife" as a prohibited weapon.[14] Only persons who have been granted exemption by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police through the Canadian Firearms Program are allowed to possess (but not acquire) prohibited weapons.
If a person is found in unauthorized possession of a prohibited knife by any law enforcement officer, the person is liable to a maximum of 5 years in jail and the weapon being seized. The Crown can then apply to a Provincial Court judge for the weapon to be forfeited and destroyed. The import and export of prohibited weapons is also strictly regulated and enforced by the Canada Border Services Agency.[15]
Examples of prohibited knives include:
- any knife, including a switchblade, or butterfly knife with a blade that opens automatically by gravity or centrifugal force or by hand pressure applied to a button, spring, or other device in or attached to the handle of the knife;
- Constant Companion (belt-buckle knife);
- finger rings with blades or other sharp objects projecting from the surface;
- push daggers.[14][16]
Manually-opened or 'one-handed' opening knives, including spring-assisted knives, that do not fall within the categories listed as prohibited weapons definition are legal to own and use,[17] however importation of many of these items has been banned by the CBSA.[18]
There is no length restriction on carrying knives within the Criminal Code. Still, there is a prohibition against carrying a knife if the possessor intends to carry it for a purpose dangerous to public peace or to commit a criminal offense.[19]
China
[edit]Due to concerns about potential violence at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China began restricting "dangerous knives", requiring that purchasers register with the government when purchasing these knives. Included in the new restrictions are knives with "blood grooves", lockblade knives, knives with blades measuring over 22 cm (8.7 in) in length, and knives with blades over 15 cm (5.9 in) in length also having a point angle of less than 60 degrees.[20]
Czech Republic
[edit]Czech weapon law from the year 2002 concerns firearms only,[21] with no other legislation concerning knives in existence (except the paragraphs of the penal code penalizing the use of any weapons in criminal offenses). This means there are no restrictions on the possession or carrying of any types of knives or swords, whether openly or in a concealed manner.
Denmark
[edit]This section needs to be updated. (May 2017) |
Owning a knife:
Legal knives: In Denmark, folding knives (pocket knives) and fixed-blade knives are legal to own, if the blade is no longer than 12 cm (4.7 in). Blades over this length may only be legally owned if the possessor has a legitimate reason for owning the knife (knives for cooking at home, the knife used as a tool, an especially designed knife for hunting, a butcher's knife, and so on) or a special collector's permit.
Illegal knives: All knives with automatic-opening (switchblades), push daggers, gravity knives, disguised knives (belt-buckle knife, sword cane, etc.), knives with two-parted handles (butterfly knives), knives with ready access by the wearer (neck or belt knives, boot knives, etc.) are illegal to own or possess.[9][22] Owning throwing knives and throwing in private or public is subject to permissions.[23]
Carrying a knife: Generally, you can carry a knife if you have a legitimate reason.
- used for work (artisans' tools)
- used for accepted leisure activities, such as hunting, fishing, hiking, sailing, outdoor picnic, scouting, or other accepted leisure activities.
The knife should be appropriate for the task – a hunting knife only for hunting, and a boy scout cannot carry a butcher's knife – also you have to convincingly prove to the police, that you are on your way to an accepted leisure activity (no good to claim that you are going on a picnic, if you do not carry food, beverage and a blanket for it). The knife should be carried directly to and from the activity.[22][24]
- Carrying a knife is an aggravated illegal activity in nightlife, as a spectator at sports events, during demonstrations, and mass gatherings – such as concerts/festivals, and other situations where you are likely to be drunk/intoxicated or excited. Schools and public transportation are generally no-go, unless you have a legitimate reason.
- Carrying an illegal knife in public is a very severe offence
Sanctions for violating the above-mentioned legislation for carrying a knife in public are usually only fines (normally 3000 DKK or more), but in case of repeated illegal knife carrying or for aggravated illegal knife carrying, you might go to jail (most often 4 months, but the maximum is 2 years). Danish police, army, state authorities, and the Royal Court of the Kingdom of Denmark are exempt from this legislation.[22][25][26]
France
[edit]In France, any knife of any blade length with a fixed blade, or a folding blade with a locking system, falls into unregulated Category D weapon (armes de catégorie D en vente libre).[27] Unregulated category D weapons may be legally purchased if over 18 years of age, but they may not be carried on one's person, unless carried "for good reason", for example, as part of the tools of one's profession. If carried in a vehicle, such knives must be placed in a secure, locked compartment not accessible to the vehicle occupants.[9] In addition, French law provides that authorities may classify any knife as a prohibited item depending upon circumstances and the discretion of the police or judicial authorities. Although "reasonable size" knives are tolerated in most circumstances, authorities may summarily confiscate them.[28] Knives, whether they are fixed-blade or folding with a locking system, are also considered objects that can constitute a dangerous weapon for public safety, including types such as disguised knives, daggers, and knife-daggers.[29]
Regarding sanctions, if an individual is found outside their residence, carrying or transporting a Category D weapon without a legitimate reason, they can incur a fine of up to €15,000 and a prison sentence of one year. If two or more individuals commit the offense, the fine can reach €30,000 with a prison sentence of two years.[30]
Germany
[edit]This section's factual accuracy is disputed. (March 2022) |
German knife law establishes three categories of knives: 1) prohibited knives; 2) knives designated as cutting and thrusting weapons; and 3) other knives. Some knives are additionally classified as restricted-use, in that they may be possessed in the home or business but not carried on the person.[31] In addition, paragraph 42 section 5 of the Weapons Act gives each German state the option in certain areas to enact local regulations prohibiting the carrying of weapons "and any dangerous objects" in so-called "weapons ban" areas for purposes of protecting public safety and order.[31] "Weapons ban" areas have been enacted in Berlin and Hamburg.[31]
Cutting and thrusting weapons
[edit]Knives designated as cutting and thrusting weapons, but not otherwise specifically prohibited, may be possessed by persons 18 years and older. German law defines a cutting and thrusting weapon as any object intended to reduce or eliminate the ability of a person to attack another person or to defend themselves. This includes swords, sabers, daggers, stilettos, and bayonets. For example, a bayonet is a military weapon intended to injure or kill people, and it is regarded as a weapon by criminal law. In contrast, a machete is regarded as a tool to clear dense vegetation. Knives classed as cutting and thrusting weapons are generally restricted to possession and use on private property, and may not be carried in public or at certain public events.
Restricted-use knives
[edit]All knives that are not illegal may be legally purchased, owned, and used by anyone on private property. However, some knives are restricted from being carried in public, which is defined as exercising actual control of a restricted-class knife outside the home, business, or private property.[32]
- All cutting and thrusting weapons such as daggers, swords, or stilettos (see above).
- All folding knives with a one-handed opening mechanism and can be locked with only one hand (whether automatic, assisted-opening, or manual). A knife with only one of these two features may be legal to carry (provided it does not violate the principles below and above).
- All knives with fixed blades over 12.0 cm (4.7 in)[33]
Restricted-use knives may be carried if transported in a locked, sealed container, or if there is a commonly accepted legitimate purpose for carrying them, such as participation in a historical reenactment, sporting use (e.g., hunting), or as a necessary tool in a trade or business.[33] The desire to defend oneself, or to use the knife as a tool without proof of necessity, is ordinarily not considered a legitimate purpose under the law.[33]
Greece
[edit]It is illegal to carry a knife as a weapon in attack or defense. The only general restriction is intended use, not the knife's properties (in particular, there is no restriction on blade length, despite popular belief). However, in practice there will be significant leeway for interpretation for police officers and judges – and much will depend on whether an intended use other than as a weapon can be argued – for which the properties of the knife in question will be very relevant (bad: flick-knife, automated, long blade, neck-knife, tactical). So, carrying a knife with its primary use as a weapon will be illegal. In addition, knives may not be carried in certain places, such as courtrooms, football matches, etc. Carrying knives is generally very unusual in towns, but not in the countryside.
- Law 2168/1993 on weapons, explosives, etc.
"Article 1. Meaning of terms, applicability
...
§ 2. Objects that offer themselves [είναι πρόσφορα] to attack or defense are also considered weapons. In particular:
...
b) Knives of all sorts, except those where ownership is justified by use in the home, profession or education, or art, hunting, fishing, or other similar uses."
The remaining sections refer to: a) sprays and electro-shockers, c) knuckle dusters, clubs, nunchakus, etc., d) flame throwers or chemical sprays, e) fishing spear-guns.
No license is needed to import, trade, or carry knives for these uses (Art 7, 5).
See also the Areopagus' decision 1299/2008[34] where the intended use of the weapon found in the car of two criminals is the point of discussion.
A useful article from a hunting journal (in Greek).[35]
Hong Kong
[edit]Under the Weapons Ordinance (Cap 217), certain knives are designated as 'prohibited weapons' in this special administrative region of China, including:
- Gravity knife
- Knuckleduster, whether spiked or not, and with or without blade
- Any bladed or pointed weapon designed to be used in a fashion whereby the handle is held in a clenched fist and the blade or point protrudes between the fingers of the fist
- Any knife the blade of which is exposed by a spring or other mechanical or electric device
Possession of prohibited weapon is illegal under section 4 of the ordinance and offender is liable to a fine and to imprisonment for 3 years.[36] Any Police officers or Customs officers can seize and detain any prohibited weapon. Once convicted, the weapon is automatically forfeited to the government and can then be disposed of by the Commissioner of Police.[37]
Hungary
[edit]Carrying a knife with a blade length over 8 cm (3.1 in) is prohibited in public places in Hungary unless justified by sport, work, or everyday activity. Automatic knives, throwing stars, and "French knives" are prohibited regardless of blade length and may be sold only to members of the army, law enforcement, and the national security agency. Violation may be punished with a fine up to Ft50,000. Possession at home and transportation in secure wrapping is allowed for everyone.[38]
Italy
[edit]Italians are restricted from buying and owning double-edged knives, automatic (open-assisted) knives, and swords. Carrying knives is permitted only for a 'valid reason', e.g., camping, fishing, etc., usually not in towns, and never for self-defense. Otherwise, only 'transport' is permitted, not 'at hand' but deep in your pack, etc.[39]
There is considerable leeway in practice: police and border guards sometimes confiscate knives if they are 'too long', and some tourist sites have metal detectors that confiscate knives.
Japan
[edit]"Swords" means a sword with a blade of 15 cm (5.9 in) or more requires permission from the prefectural public safety commission to possess. Permission requirements also apply to any sword over 6 cm (2.4 in) (including automatic knives), spears[clarification needed] over 15 cm (5.9 in) in blade length, and Japanese glaves.[40] All knives are prohibited from being carried, under a crime law,[41] with an exception for carrying for duty or other justifiable reasons. Possession is considered a petty crime and is not usually punishable by prison time. However, in cases where assault occurs with a knife, there is a penalty of up to 2 years in prison or up to a ¥300,000 fine.
Following the 2008 Akihabara Knife Incident, Japan's knife laws were revised. Regardless of blade length, all knives are prohibited from carrying, except for lawful purposes. Such purposes include duty, work, or outdoor activities such as hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, etc. Blade length applies only to the illegal carrying of knives. A blade length of over 6 centimetres (2.4 in) becomes a violation of the jutouho 銃刀法 (gun and sword law), whereas under 6 cm (2.4 in) is a violation of the keihanzaihouihan 軽犯罪法案 (minor law violation). The former carries a heavier penalty than the latter. So unlike some other countries, blade length does not establish a right to legal carry. It only establishes the charge and degree of penalty. However, in practice, carrying alone is generally considered a minor crime unless used to carry out a criminal act.
"Swords" are traditional Japanese construction, where the tsuka (handle) and blade/tang can be separated by pushing through the mekugi. If it can not be taken apart, it is defined as a "knife" even if it looks like a tanto. Swords must be registered and carried with its ownership permit at all times. After the 2008 incident, all daggers (double-edged), and knives that have a "tanto" styled blade became prohibited by adding a definition – measurement of a straight line from the upper tip (kissaski) to the center of where the blade meets the guard or handle. If the line goes above the spine, it represents a curve and becomes classified as a sword. Additional knives prohibited are bayonets, butterfly knives, and switchblades/assisted open knives.[citation needed]
Latvia
[edit]Latvian legislation "Law On the Handling of Weapons" defines knives as:
- (1) Cold weapon – an object that has the features of a weapon and that is intended to cause damage utilising human muscle strength or special mechanisms.
and prohibits
- (2) ..to carry non-firearm weapons except the non-firearm weapons necessary for hunters – in hunting and non-firearms necessary to sportsmen for the relevant sport – in competitions or training.[42]
Lithuania
[edit]According to Lithuanian law, possessing and carrying most types of knives is legal. This includes hunting knives, pocket knives, multi-tools, survivor knives, butterfly knives, etc., as knives are not considered weapons. The only exception is switchblades. It is illegal to carry or possess a switchblade if it meets one of the following criteria: the blade is longer than 8.5 cm; the width in the middle of the blade is less than 14% of its total length; the blade is double-sided.[43][44]
Luxembourg
[edit]According to the law of the 2nd of February 2022 on weapons and ammunition,[45] knives that are considered to be bladed weapons are prohibited.[46] No carry permit can be obtained, and carrying a knife can be punished by a fine and/or a prison sentence.
Certain bladed weapons, such as swords or bayonets, can be exempt and are subject to authorisation.[46]
Pocket knives with a safety catch/detent/lock and without a guard are exempt as long as their blade fulfills all the following requirements:[46]
- opens laterally from the handle
- requires two hands to be opened
- only has one cutting edge
- has a maximum length of 9 centimeters
- has a middle width of at least 20% of its length
Multi-tools with a blade that fits within the above parameters are also included, as are knives without a safety catch that fulfill all the other requirements, even if they can be opened one-handed. Knives with a fixed blade are also included as long as they fit the dimensions.
There are also exemptions for bladed and blunt weapons used for martial arts and other sports.[46]
Netherlands
[edit]National law
[edit]As of 2011, Dutch Law prohibits ownership or possession of the following knives:
- stilettos
- switchblades
- throwing knives
- folding knives with more than one cutting edge
- folding knives with an overall length of more than 28 cm (11 in) when deployed
- butterfly knives
- gravity knives
- disguised knives (belt knife, sword cane, etc.) and push daggers.
Local law
[edit]In addition to national laws, every Dutch city and urban district has the right to prohibit carrying any knife that can be used as a weapon in certain "safety risk" areas. Such a "no-go" area could include geographically limited urban areas such as bars, cafés, concerts, and public gatherings, a knife must be transported in such a manner so that it is not directly usable by the owner, such as storing the knife in a locked case for carrying in a backpack, or placing the locked-up knife in a storage area of a vehicle separate from the passenger compartment.
Notes
[edit]Additionally, it is illegal to carry a fixed-blade knife with multiple cutting edges. However, such a knife may be kept at home for collector purposes.
New Zealand
[edit]Under New Zealand law, it is unacceptable to carry or possess a knife in public without a reasonable excuse. Two pieces of legislation restrict the possession of knives. Under the Summary Offences Act (s13A) there is a penalty of up to three months in prison or a fine of up to $2000 for possession, while under the Crimes Act (s202A) the penalty for carrying a knife as an offensive weapon in a public place is up to two years in prison.[47][48] New Zealand law also prohibits importing knives that are considered offensive weapons.[49]
Norway
[edit]According to Norwegian law, one can spend up to 6 months in prison for purposefully bringing a knife or similar sharp tool especially suited for causing bodily harm to a public place, or for helping others do so. The law does not cover knives or other tools worn or used for work, outdoor pursuits, or similar reputable purposes. Note that this includes bringing knives in one's car. It is also illegal to buy, own, or store switchblade knives, butterfly knives, and stilettos.[50]
Poland
[edit]All kinds of knives are regarded as dangerous tools, but are not considered weapons under Polish law,[51] so no restriction related to weapons apply. The exception is a blade hidden in an object that doesn't look like a weapon (a sword in an umbrella, a dagger in a shoe, etc.). It is legal to sell, buy, trade, and possess any knives, and Polish law does not prohibit carrying a knife in a public place. However, certain prohibitions on possessing so-called "dangerous tools" may apply during mass events.[52]
Romania
[edit]A knife (a melee weapon with a blade) is considered illegal to carry in open spaces if it falls under the following conditions:
- The blade is either integral with the handle or equipped with a system which enables it to be joined to its handle;
- Has a double edge along its entire length;
- Its length is more than 15 cm;
- The width is bigger than or equal to 0,4 cm;
- Has a handle with a guard.[53]
In addition to open spaces, knives are also forbidden in the premises of public institutions, meetings, and elections, or around persons of public interest. Offenders can be punished with prison time between one and three years, or a fine.[54]
Russia
[edit]Only certain knives are considered "melee weapons" and regulated in Russia, the others are common tools and are entirely unregulated,[55] however violently using them is considered an "improvised weapon" usage and is an aggravating circumstance when the charges for an aggressive behavior are filed,[56] and the local regulations may prevent bringing of "dangerous objects" to some events or businesses. The key point of knife regulations in Russia lies in determining whether the knife represents a weapon or an unregulated tool, which lies entirely within the opinion of a certified expert or an authorized certification board.[57] In practice this means that there's no legal difference between the knife as a tool and as a weapon, and most given examples may be considered either, the only difference being the certificate issued by an authorized body, and any knife having this certificate being explicitly legal. Certifying the knives as a tool is not difficult, and most producers and importers do this by issuing a copy of a certificate with the knife during the sale for presentation to the police officers in case of an inquiry. However, unauthorized possession, creation, sale and transport of bladed weapons were decriminalized in 2001 and is now only a civil offence, carrying the penalty between 500 and 2000 rubles ($7.5 to $30) and/or a ban on a bladed weapon possession for 6 months to a year. Also, carrying any knife for self-defence (but not for other needs) is prohibited.[58] For the knives considered weapons the law forbids only the throwing knives, and the automatic and gravity knives with the blades longer than 9 cm (3.5 in) (the shorter blades are allowed, providing the owner having the relevant permission).[59]
Serbia
[edit]The "Weapons and Munitions Law", Article 2, lists different types of weapons.[60] It states that: "melee weapons, brass knuckles, dagger, kama, saber, bayonet and other items whose primary purpose is offense" are considered weapons. Most knives are therefore considered tools and technically legal to possess and carry. However, since any knife could be used a melee weapon and the law doesn't differentiate between particular types it is up to the authorities to determine the intent of the individual in possession of the knife and whether there is a "good reason" to do so. Thus, fixed-blade knives are considered appropriate for particular professions or when hunting and fishing, but will likely be treated as a weapon in an urban environment. Switchblades, butterfly knives, and blades concealed in everyday objects are usually treated as weapons, and assisted-opening knives may also fall into that category. The appearance of the knife (how aggressive it appears), the length (although there is no legal limit on length), the location where it was carried (large gatherings, schools, public buildings etc.) and the demeanor of the person carrying the knife all factor into the decision on whether the law has been broken. Purchase, possession and carry of a melee weapon is classified as a misdemeanor, subject to a fine of up to 10,000 dinars or up to 60 days imprisonment ("Weapons and Munitions law", article 35.[61] In practice the less akin to a weapon the knife appears, and if carried and used with "good judgment" the lesser the likelihood of legal consequences.
Slovakia
[edit]Carrying a knife in Slovakia is not explicitly prohibited, nor are there any prohibited types of knives. However, Act No. 372/1990 Offences Act[62] states in paragraph 47 that carrying of a "cold weapon" such as a knife, dagger, or sabre in public places is a non-criminal offense to public safety if, from the circumstances of the case or the behaviour of the person, it can be concluded that these weapons can be used for violence or threats of violence. It is up to the individual to assess any single situation by a police officer and whether carrying such a weapon can lead to violence. This offense can be penalized with a fine as high as €500. An example of such a situation is visibly carrying a knife in crowded public places, public meetings, etc.
Spain
[edit]In Spain, there are stringent laws proscribing the carrying of armas blancas, or fighting knives, and prohibiting the manufacture, sale, possession, or use of certain knives classified as prohibited.[63][64] Armas blancas and other sharp-bladed instruments or cutting tools may be freely purchased and owned provided they are not on the list of prohibited weapons, are not purchased or possessed by minors, are kept at home for the exclusive purpose of a collection, and are not transported on the public roads.[63] It is against the law generally to carry, display, or use any kind of knife in public, especially knives with pointed blades, unless one is on one's property or is working or engaged in a legitimate sporting activity requiring the use of such a knife.[64]
The list of prohibited weapons is found in Anexo I – Armas prohibidas of the Real Decreto 137/1993 Por El Que Se Aprueba EL Reglamento de Armas, which prohibits the manufacture, importation, distribution, sale, possession and use of sword canes, automatic knives (switchblades), as well as daggers of any type.[64] Knives with a double-edged, pointed-tip blade 11 cm (4.3 in) or less in length (measured from the forward end of the handle to the tip of the blade) are considered to be armas blancas, which may be owned, but not carried in public.[64] The law also prohibits the marketing, advertising, sale, possession, and use of folding knives with a blade length exceeding 11 cm (4.3 in), measured from the bolster or top of the handle to the tip of the blade.[64] Certain exceptions to the list of prohibited knives exist for legitimate knife collections and historical artifacts registered with the Guardia Civil for possession exclusively at one's home.[64]
Civilians are prohibited from possessing knives, machetes, and other bladed weapons officially issued to the police, military, and other official authorities without a special license.[64] Sale of such weapons requires presenting an official arms license duly certifying the identity and status of the person entitled to possess such weapons.[64]
Sweden
[edit]Swedish law prohibits carrying knives in public areas, including schools and vehicles in these areas, unless the carrier has a legitimate purpose for carrying a knife. Examples of legitimate purposes include artisans who use a knife at work, soldiers in uniform carrying a knife, or the normal use of a pocket knife. The same law also regulates some other objects made to thrust, cut, or otherwise intended for crime against life and health. Furthermore, objects that are "particularly" intended for crime against life and health, such as switchblades, shurikens, and brass knuckles, are not permitted to be owned by, given to, or sold to anyone under the age of 21.[65][66] Carrying a weapon for self-defence does not count as a legitimate purpose.[67]
United Kingdom
[edit]
The United Kingdom is a political union of four different countries, with three distinct (different) legal jurisdictions (England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland). As such, the law related to the purchasing and possessing weapons (such as knives) varies depending on which part of the UK a person resides in.
In general, knife crime is one of the leading causes of violent crime in the UK, with 50,510 knife-related offences recorded in England and Wales in the year ending March 2024. Statistics for knife-related crime have increased by 78% (in England and Wales) over the past 10 years, as per statistics recorded by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
A 2019 survey of 2,000 UK parents showed that 72% were worried their child could become a victim of knife crime[68] with one in 13 saying they know of a youngster who has been a victim directly.
Details on legislation (per jurisdiction) can be found in the table below:
England and Wales
In England and Wales, the sale of most knives are legal[note 1], subject to age restrictions, and restrictions on use outside of a domestic setting.
History
Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959
The 1689 Bill of Rights ensured that only Parliament and not the King could restrict the people's right to bear arms. Since 1959, Parliament has enacted a series of increasingly restrictive laws and acts regarding the possession and use of knives and bladed tools.
The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 (amended 1961) (ROWA), prohibits the importation, sale, hire, lending, or gift of certain types of knives in England and Wales, as of 13 June 1959[69][70] under Section 1:
- (1) Any person who manufactures, sells or hires or offers for sale or hire, or exposes or has in his possession for the purpose of sale or hire or lends or gives to any other person—
- (a) any knife which has a blade which opens automatically by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in or attached to the handle of the knife, sometimes known as a flick knife or "flick gun"; or
- (b) any knife which has a blade which is released from the handle or sheath thereof by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force and which, when released, is locked in place by means of a button, spring, lever, or other device, sometimes known as a gravity knife,
- shall be guilty of an offence [...][69][70]
Subsection 2 also makes it illegal to import knives of this type as of 13 June 1959.[69] The above legislation criminalizes the conduct of the original owner or transferor of an automatic-opening or gravity knife, not the new owner or transferee; in addition, the statute does not criminalize possession of such knives other than possession for sale or hire. It is therefore not illegal per se to merely possess such a knife, though the difficulties of acquiring one without violating the statute make it (almost) impossible to obtain one without either committing or abetting an offence.[citation needed]
The above legislation does not apply to assisted-opening knives (a.k.a. semi-auto knives) as two elements to this definition separate them. Firstly, they do not open 'automatically' as they are opened by hand manually and then continue themselves. Secondly, the pressure is applied to a notch in the blade itself, not to a "button, spring or other device in or attached to the handle".[citation needed] As of April 2018, the Home Office have made proposals to update the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to add assisted-opening knives to the increasing list of prohibited items under this act.[71]
Criminal Justice Act 1988
[edit]The Criminal Justice Act 1988 mainly relates to carrying knives in public places, Section 139 being the most important:
- (1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5) below, any person who has an article to which this section applies with them in a public place shall be guilty of an offence.
- (2) Subject to subsection (3) below, this section applies to any article which has a blade or is sharply pointed except a folding pocketknife.
- (3) This section applies to a folding pocketknife if the cutting edge of its blade exceeds 3 inches (7.6 cm).
- (4) It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that he had good reason or lawful authority for having the article with him in a public place.
The definition of "public place" is defined in Section 139(7) Criminal Justice Act 1988 as:
"In this section "public place" includes any place to which at the material time the public have or are permitted access, whether on payment or otherwise."
This can be loosely defined as anywhere the public has a legitimate right to be, whether this access is paid for or not, which could include any populated area within England and Wales, including one's motor vehicle, which is defined by law as a 'public place' unless parked on private property. A public place could include: 1) an organised wilderness gathering or event; 2) a National Park; 3) Forestry Commission land that is held open to the public; 4) public footpaths; 5) bridleways; and 6) any area where an individual does not need to ask specific permission to walk, camp, or travel from a landowner. Non-public places would be a person's residence, the area behind a counter in a shop, a locked building site, etc. – essentially anywhere a person would have to unlawfully commit trespass to gain access to.
The phrase "good reason or lawful authority" in Subsection 4 is intended to allow for "common sense" possession of knives, so that it is legal to carry a knife if there is a bona fide reason to do so. Subsection 5 gives some specific examples of bona fide reasons: a knife for use at work (e.g., a chef's knife), as part of a national costume, or for religious reasons (e.g., a Sikh Kirpan). However, even these specific statutory exceptions have sometimes proven unavailing to knife owners.[72] It is important to note that "good reason or lawful authority" exceptions may be difficult to establish for those not using a knife in the course of their trade or profession, but merely because the knife is needed in case of emergency or for occasional utility use.[73][74]
Although English law insists that it is the prosecution's responsibility to provide evidence proving a crime has been committed, an individual must provide evidence to prove that they had a "good reason or lawful authority" for carrying a knife (if this is the case) upon being detained. While this may appear to be a reversal of the usual burden of proof, technically the prosecution has already proven the case (prima facie) by establishing that a knife was being carried in a public place (see Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 on Knives, etc.; New powers to tackle gun and knife crime)
As the burden of proving "good reason or lawful authority" lies with the defendant, it is likely that an individual detained and searched by the police will need to prove the following (sometimes known as the THIS list): Has THIS person got permission; to use THIS article (knife); for THIS use; on THIS land; and by THIS land owner.[75]
The special exception which exists in the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Sec. 139) for folding knives (pocket knives with non-locking blades) with a cutting edge (not blade) less than 3 inches (7.6 cm) long, is another "common sense" measure accepting that some small knives are carried for general utility; This exemption however only applies to folding knives without a locking mechanism. The wording of the Criminal Justice Act does not mention locking, so the definition of "folding pocket knife" was settled through case law. In the Crown Court appeal of Harris v. DPP (1992)[73] and the Court of Appeal case of R. v Deegan (1998)[76] the ruling that 'folding' was intended to mean 'non-locking' was upheld. As the only higher court in England and Wales to the Court of Appeal is the Supreme Court, the only way the decision in R. v. Deegan could be overturned is by a dissenting ruling by the Supreme Court or by Act of Parliament.[77]
Offensive Weapons Act 1996
[edit]The Offensive Weapons Act 1996 covers the possession of knives within school premises:
- (1) Any person who has an article to which section 139 of this Act applies with him on school premises shall be guilty of an offence.
- (2) Any person who has an offensive weapon within the meaning of section 1 of the M1 Prevention of Crime Act 1953 with him on school premises shall be guilty of an offence.
- (3) It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under subsection (1) or (2) above to prove that he had good reason or lawful authority for having the article or weapon with him on the premises in question.
- (4) (Subsection 4 gives the same specific exceptions as subsection 139(5) with the addition of "for educational purposes". This would appear to imply that all legislation on knives in public applies similarly to school premises, and therefore a folding pocket knife with a cutting edge (not blade) under 3 inches (7.6 cm) in length would be considered legal.[citation needed]
The Offensive Weapons Act 1996 imposes an age restriction of 16 on the sale of knives:
- (1) Any person who sells to a person under the age of sixteen years an article to which this section applies shall be guilty of an offence [...]
- (2) Subject to subsection (3) below, this section applies to—
- (a) any knife, knife blade or razor blade...[78]
The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Exemption) Order 1996[79] states restrictions to sales of knives to those under 16 does not apply to:
- folding pocket-knife if the cutting edge of its blade does not exceed 7.62 cm (3 in)
- razor blades permanently enclosed in a cartridge or housing where less than 2 mm (3⁄32 in) of any blade is exposed beyond the plane which intersects the highest point of the surfaces preceding and following such blades.
These age restrictions in the Criminal Justice Act 1988 were increased to 18, effective from 1 October 2007, by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006.[80]
Knives Act 1997
[edit]The Knives Act 1997 prohibits the sale of combat knives and restricts the marketing of knives as offensive weapons.[81]
Prevention of Crime Act 1953
[edit]The Prevention of Crime Act 1953 prohibits possessing an offensive weapon in any public place without lawful authority or reasonable excuse.[82] The term "offensive weapon" is defined as: "any article made or adapted for use to causing injury to the person, or intended by the person having it with him for such use".
Under the Prevention of Crime Act, otherwise 'exempt' knives carried for "good reason or lawful authority" may still be deemed illegal if authorities conclude the knife is being carried as an "offensive weapon". In recent years, the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 has been reinterpreted by police and public prosecutors, who have persuaded the courts to minimize exceptions to prosecution because the defendant had "lawful authority or reasonable excuse" to apply the Act to various cases. This new approach now includes prosecution of citizens who have admitted carrying a knife for the sole purpose of self-defence (in the eyes of the law, this is presently viewed as an admission that the defendant intends to use the knife as an "offensive weapon", albeit in a defensive manner, and otherwise justifiable circumstances).[83] While the onus lies on the officer to prove offensive intent, prosecutors and courts have in the past taken the appearance and the marketing of a particular brand of knife into account when considering whether an otherwise legal knife was being carried as an offensive weapon. In addition, the Knives Act 1997 now prohibits the sale of combat knives and restricts the marketing of knives as offensive weapons. A knife which is marketed as "tactical", "military", "special ops", etc., could therefore carry an extra liability.
The offense wording under Section 1 of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 refers to 'causing injury to the person'. This opens a separate category for a self-defense tool intended and made for use against animals (e.g., Biteback dog spray) or a tool to be used against a person but not designed, intended, or adapted to cause injury (e.g., a pressure point tool).
Proposals
[edit]In May 2018, Nic Madge, a judge at Luton Crown Court, proposed that kitchen knives sold to or used by members of the public should have rounded rather than pointed ends. Judge Madge said that implementation of the proposal would lead to a "substantial" reduction in the number of life-threatening injuries caused by stabbings.[84] A similar proposal had been made in 2005 by three emergency medicine health professionals from West Middlesex University Hospital.[85]
Case law
[edit]Case law in 2005 stated that even a butter knife can be classed as a bladed article in a public place.[86]
Scotland
[edit]In Scotland, the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 prevents the carrying of offensive weapons as well as pointed or bladed articles in a public place without lawful authority or reasonable excuse. Defences exist to a charge of possessing a bladed or pointed article in a public place when carried for use at work, as part of a national costume, or for religious reasons. As in England and Wales, an exception is allowed for folding pocket knives which have a blade of less than 3 inches (7.6 cm)[87]
Other relevant Scotland knife legislation includes the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons Act) (Scotland) Order 2005,[88] which bans sword canes, push daggers, butterfly knives, throwing stars, knives that can defeat metal detectors, and knives disguised as other objects, and the Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2006, which makes it an offence to sell a knife, knife blade, or bladed or pointed object to a person under eighteen years of age, unless the person is sixteen or older. The knife or blade is "designed for domestic use." In 2007, the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007[89] allowed exemption from criminal liability under section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for selling a prohibited offensive weapon if the sale was made for purposes of theatrical performances and of rehearsals for such performances, the production of films (as defined in section 5B of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988), or the production of television programmes (as defined in section 405(1) of the Communications Act 2003).
Under the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 (in force since 10 September 2007), the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 was amended and it was made compulsory to possess a local authority licence to sell knives, swords and blades (other than those designed for 'domestic use'), or to sell any sharply pointed or bladed object "which is made or adapted for use for causing injury to the person." Any dealer in non-domestic knives will be required to hold a 'knife dealer's licence'.
Northern Ireland
[edit]The laws restricting knife ownership, use, possession and sale are nearly identical to the laws of Scotland and the rest of the UK, though contained in different acts.[90] In 2008, in response to a surge in public concern over knife-related crimes, Northern Ireland doubled the prison sentence for persons convicted of possessing a knife deemed to be an offensive weapon in a public place to four years' imprisonment. It added an evidential presumption in favour of prosecution for knife possession.[91]
United States
[edit]Federal laws
[edit]Under the Switchblade Knife Act of 1958 (amended 1986, codified at 15 U.S.C. §§1241–1245), switchblades and ballistic knives are banned from interstate shipment, sale, or importation, or possession within the following: any territory or possession of the United States, i.e., land belonging to the U.S. federal government; Indian lands (as defined in section 1151 of title 18); and areas within the maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the federal government, except for federal, state law enforcement agencies and the military.[92] Federal laws may prohibit possessing or carrying any knife on certain federal properties such as courthouses or military installations. U.S. federal laws on switchblades do not apply to the possession or sale of switchblade knives within a state's boundaries; the latter is regulated by the laws of that particular state, if any.
Disputes over what constitutes a switchblade knife under federal law have occasionally resulted in U.S. Customs seizures of knives from U.S. importers or manufacturers.[93][94] In one case, the seizure of a shipment of Columbia River Knife & Tool knives resulted in an estimated US$1 million loss to the company before the shipment was released.[95][96][97]
Amendment 1447 to the Switchblade Knife Act (15 U.S.C. §1244), signed into law as part of the FY2010 Homeland Security Appropriations Bill on October 28, 2009, provides that the Act shall not apply to spring-assist or assisted-opening knives (i.e., knives with closure-biased springs that require physical force applied to the blade to assist in opening the knife).[98]
State and local laws
[edit]Each state also has laws that govern the legality of carrying weapons, either concealed or openly, and these laws explicitly or implicitly cover various types of knives. Some states go beyond this and criminalize the mere possession of certain types of knives. Other states prohibit the possession or the concealed carrying of knives that feature blade styles or features sufficient to transform them into "dangerous weapons"[99][100] or "deadly weapons", i.e., knives either optimized for lethality against humans or designed for and readily capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.[99][101] These frequently include knives with specific blade styles with a historical connection to violence or assassination, including thrusting knives such as the dirk, poignard, and stiletto, the bowie knife, and double-edged knives with crossguards designed for knife fighting such as the dagger.[99][102] Some states make the carrying or possession of any dangerous or deadly weapon with intent to unlawfully harm another a crime.[99]
Summaries of every state knife law are available from handgun law websites.[103][104]
Historical origin
[edit]The origin of many knife laws, particularly in the southern states, comes from attempts by early state legislatures to curtail the practice of knife fighting and dueling with large knives such as the bowie knife, which was commonly carried as an item of personal defense before the invention of the revolver.[105] In Alabama,[106] Mississippi,[107] New Mexico,[108][109] and Virginia,[99] the carrying on one's person of large and lengthy fighting knives capable of causing grievous wounds such as the Bowie knife[110] is prohibited by statute,[99][111] Originally, in the interest of controlling or eliminating the then-common practice of dueling, a term which had degenerated from a rarely used social custom into a generalized description for any knife or gun fight between two contestants.[102][112] In many jurisdictions, a local tradition of using knives to settle differences or for self-defense[102][113] resulted in the enactment of statutes that restricted the size and length of the knife and, particularly, the length of its blade.[102]
After the Civil War, many restrictions on knife and even gun ownership were imposed by state, county, and city laws and ordinances that were clearly based on fear of weapon possession by certain racial groups, particularly African-American and Hispanic Americans.[114][115] In some states, so-called "Black Codes" adopted after the Civil War required Black People to obtain a license before carrying or possessing firearms or Bowie knives.[115] The governments of Texas and other former states of the Confederacy, many of which had recognized the right to carry arms such as Bowie knives openly before the Civil War,[116] passed new restrictions on both gun and knife possession and use.[115][117] In some cases, these laws were directed at formerly enslaved people and other minorities; in other cases, by reconstruction legislatures anxious to disarm rebellious militias and groups seeking to disenfranchise African-American and other minorities.[118] The April 12, 1871 law passed by Texas' Reconstruction legislature is typical, and is the ancestor of the present law restricting knife possession and use in Texas:
Any person carrying on or about his person, saddle, or in his saddle-bags, any pistol, dirk, dagger, sling-shot, sword-cane, spear, brass knuckles, bowie knife, or any other kind of knife, manufactured or sold, for offense or defense, unless he has reasonable grounds for fearing an unlawful attack on his person, and that such ground of attack shall be immediate and pressing; or unless having or carrying the same on or about his person for the lawful defense of the State, as a militiaman in actual service, or as a peace officer or policeman, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor..."[118]
While most gun restrictions were eventually repealed, many knife laws remained in effect in the South. In Texas, this was largely explained by the presence of large numbers of Tejanos.[119] By 1870, Texas whites of the day had almost universally and exclusively adopted the revolver for self-defense, while Tejanos, steeped in the blade culture (el legado Andaluz) of Mexico and Spain and generally without the means to purchase handguns, continued to carry knives.[115] Thus, while local and state Texas gun laws and ordinances were gradually relaxed or eliminated during the late 1800s, the old prohibitions against bowie knives, daggers, dirks, and other long-bladed knives remained on the books since they served to disarm and control a minority group viewed as engaging in lawless behaviors and violence without legal justification.[114][119] The Texas law remained on the books for almost 150 years, until modified in 2017 to allow carrying these weapons with some restrictions.[120]
Interpreting current state laws
[edit]Many of today's state criminal codes restricting knife use and ownership have been amended repeatedly over the years rather than rewritten to remove old classifications and definitions that are essentially a historical legacy. This process frequently results in illogical, confusing, and even conflicting provisions. Thus in Arkansas, a state in which knife fights using large, lengthy blades such as the Bowie and Arkansas toothpick were once commonplace,[102][121] a state statute made it illegal for someone to "carry a knife as a weapon",[122] specifying that any knife with a blade 3.5 inches (8.9 cm) or longer constituted prima facie evidence that the knife was being carried as a weapon, yet allowed a complete exemption to the law when "upon a journey".[123]
While Arkansas eventually repealed its archaic criminal knife possession law,[124] other states still periodically amend archaic criminal codes that penalize historical and present-day behavior involving knife use and ownership; these patchwork statutes can result in lengthy legal disputes over legislative intent and definitions.[125][126] As one example, Indiana law makes it illegal to possess a "dagger, dirk, poniard, stiletto, switchblade knife, or gravity knife" on school property, or to possess any knife on school property "capable of being used to inflict cutting, stabbing, or tearing wounds" if that knife "is intended to be used as a weapon", but provides for a criminal penalty only if a person "recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally" possesses such a knife on school property.[127] The statute thus requires 1) an examination of the knife and the legislative history of the statute; 2) expert testimony on the individual characteristics of historic knife designs to determine whether the knife in question fits within one of the six specified categories of a knife; 3) a determination as to whether the blade can cause a "cutting, stabbing, or tearing wound"; 4) a determination as to what degree of injury constitutes a "wound", and 5) two separate determinations of the defendant's intent by the fact finder – before guilt or innocence may be adjudged.[128]
Some states prohibit the possession of a folding knife with a quick-opening mechanism such as a gravity knife, butterfly knife, or switchblade.[99] Other states may impose no restrictions at all,[129] while many allow possession with some restrictions (age, carrying on one's person, carrying concealed, carrying while a convicted felon, prohibited possessor, or while in the commission of a serious offense, etc.)[99]
The continual advent of new knife designs, such as assisted-opening knives, can complicate legality issues, particularly when state laws have not been carefully drafted to clearly define the new design and how it is classified within existing law. This omission has led to cases where state courts have substituted their understanding of knife design to interpret legislative intent when applying statutes criminalizing certain types of knives.[99][130]
In 2014, attention was brought by many newspapers and media outlets to 1950s-era legislation leading to many arrests and convictions for possession of the loosely defined gravity knife.[131] This law was later declared unconstitutionally vague[132] and subsequently repealed.[133]
City, county, and local laws
[edit]City, county, and local jurisdictions (to include sovereign Native American nations located within a state boundary) may enact criminal laws or ordinances in addition to the restrictions contained in state laws, which may be more restrictive than state law.[99] Virtually all states and local jurisdictions have laws that restrict or prohibit the possession or carrying of knives in some form or manner in certain defined areas or places such as schools, public buildings, courthouses, police stations, jails, power plant facilities, airports, or public events.[99]
Local or city ordinances are sometimes drafted to include specific classes of people not covered by the state criminal codes, such as individuals carrying folding knives with locking blades primarily for use as weapons.[99] For example, a San Antonio, Texas city ordinance makes it unlawful for anyone to knowingly carry within city limits "on or about his person" any folding knife with a blade less than 5.5 inches (14 cm) long with a lock mechanism that locks the blade upon opening.[99] This ordinance is designed to work in tandem with the Texas state statute[134] making illegal the carrying of knives with blades longer than 5.5 inches (14 cm).[135] The San Antonio ordinance allows police to charge persons carrying most types of lock blade knives without good cause with a criminal misdemeanor violation, allowing police to remove the knife from the possession of the offender, while providing exemptions from the ordinance designed to protect certain classes of people the city assumes to pose no threat to public order.[136] This ordinance was negated in 2015 when Texas adopted a statewide law preempting any expansion of state knife law by local government entities.[137] Occasionally, city and county ordinances conflict with state law. In one example, the city of Portland, Oregon initially passed a city ordinance banning all pocket knives, [citation needed] until the measure was overturned by the Oregon Supreme Court as conflicting with state criminal statutes.
Constitutional protection
[edit]The constitutional status of knives as being protected arms under the Second Amendment (or state analogs to the Second Amendment) is currently being litigated in light of recent Supreme Court rulings. In the landmark ruling New York Pistol & Rifle Association v. Bruen (2022), an expansive definition is accepted: "Thus, even though the Second Amendment's definition of "arms" is fixed according to its historical understanding, that general definition covers modern instruments that facilitate armed self-defense."
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Commonwealth vs. David E. Canjura (2024)[138] that a ban on carrying a switchblade knife violates the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.[139]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Teter v. Lopez (2023) that banning pocket knives (including butterfly knives) has no historical analog from the founding era and is unconstitutional.[140]
The California Court of Appeal ruled in People v. Mitchell (2012) that prohibiting the concealed carrying of a dirk or dagger is constitutional.[141]
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in State v. DeCiccio (2014) that the Second Amendment protects dirk knives and police batons.[142][143]
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled in Griffin v. State (2012) that carrying a concealed knife in one's home is constitutionally protected.[144]
The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in Lacy v. State (2009) that possession of a knife with an automatic opening blade is not constitutionally protected.[145]
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in State v. Lee (1984) that a statute prohibiting a person who knowingly possesses a weapon other than certain firearms "under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful uses as it may have is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree" is constitutional and that "intent to use for an unlawful purpose" is not an element of the offense;[146] State v. Wright (1984) that being prosecuted for strapping a knife to one's leg was justified;[147] State v. Blaine (1987) that walking in public with a pocket knife in one's pocket is insufficient for conviction;[148] State v. Riley (1997) that carrying, but not displaying or brandishing, a pocket knife is insufficient for conviction;[149] State v. Montalvo (2017) that possession of a machete in the home for self-defense is constitutionally protected.[150]
The New Mexico Court of Appeals ruled in State v. Murillo (2015) that switchblades are not constitutionally protected.[151][152]
The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled in Akron v. Rasdan (1995) that Akron's ordinance prohibiting carrying of a knife with 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) or longer blade to be unconstitutional.[153]
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled in State v. Kessler (1980)[154] and State v. Blocker (1981)[155] that prohibiting the possession of a billy club is unconstitutional; applying the same logic, the court ruled in State v. Delgado (1984) that prohibiting the possession and carrying of switchblades is also unconstitutional;[156] and also applied the same to blackjacks in Barnett v. State (1985).[157]
The Washington Supreme Court ruled in City of Seattle v. Montana and McCullough (1996) that kitchen knives are not constitutionally protected;[158] City of Seattle v. Evans (2015) that some knives may be protected, but paring knives are not.[159][160]
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled in State v. Herrmann (2015) that prohibiting possession of a switchblade in the home is unconstitutional.[161][162]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Certain knives are prohibited under UK law including:
- belt buckle knives
- butterfly knives
- cyclone or spiral knives
- disguised knives
- flick, gravity, switchblade, or automatic knives
- Kyoketsu shoge knives
- push daggers
- swords, swordsticks, stealth knives, and zombie knives).
References
[edit]- ^ Legislation, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, retrieved 20 August 2011
- ^ Waffengesetz 1996 § 17 (1): "Verboten sind der Erwerb, die Einfuhr, der Besitz, und das Führen: 1. von Waffen, deren Form geeignet ist, einen anderen Gegenstand vorzutäuschen, oder die mit Gegenständen des täglichen Gebrauches verkleidet sind."
- ^ a b Waffengesetz (1996)
- ^ Jell, Sonja (Magistra) Weapons Law: Knives in Austria Archived 2017-08-05 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Waffengesetz (1996) § 11. (1) Der Besitz von Waffen, Munition und Knallpatronen ist Menschen unter 18 Jahren verboten.
- ^ Waffengesetz 1996 § 12. (1) Die Behörde hat einem Menschen den Besitz von Waffen und Munition zu verbieten (Waffenverbot), wenn bestimmte Tatsachen die Annahme rechtfertigen, daß dieser Mensch durch mißbräuchliches Verwenden von Waffen Leben, Gesundheit oder Freiheit von Menschen oder fremdes Eigentum gefährden könnte.
- ^ a b L'Article 3 §1 La Loi du 08.06.2006, Service Public Fédéral Justice (2008), retrieved 27 August 2011
- ^ Nouvelle Loi sur les Armes, retrieved 27 August 2011
- ^ a b c d Lang, Oliver, Messer in Europa: Mit Dem Messer Auf Reisen, Übersicht – Messer & Recht im Ausland, Messer Magasin (March 2010)
- ^ "Справочник / Нормативни актове". lex.bg (in Bulgarian). 17 September 2010. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- ^ "Що е то хладно оръжие и има ли почва у нас?". Адвокат Лазар Белев. 3 April 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "Глава Първа Задача, предмет и действие на Наказателния кодекс" (PDF). bmgk-bg.org (in Bulgarian). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 August 2016.
- ^ Fixed Blade & Folding Knife Law in Canada retrieved October 2021.
- ^ a b Branch, Legislative Services. "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Criminal Code". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ Canada Border Services Agency: Importing a Firearm or Weapon Into Canada. Archived 2008-06-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Canada Border Services Agency: Importing a Firearm or Weapon Into Canada – Prohibited Weapons and Devices Archived 2008-06-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Government of Canada, Canada Border Services Agency (23 January 2013). "Memorandum D19-13-2 – Importing and Exporting Firearms, Weapons and Devices". Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ Canada Border Services Agency, Customs Notice 18-01, Notification of Canadian International Trade Tribunal Decision on Centrifugal Opening Knives
- ^ Branch, Legislative Services. "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Criminal Code". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "China strengthens control over deadly knives". Archived from the original on 2009-06-11.
- ^ "§1 zákona 119/2002 Sb., zdroj: SBÍRKA ZÁKONŮ ročník 2002, částka 52, ze dne 09.04.2002 (§1, Law No 119/2002, Collection of Laws vol.2002, sum 52, published 2002-04-09)". Retrieved January 8, 2009.
- ^ a b c "Lov om knive og blankvåben m.v."
- ^ European Throwing Association "Flying Blades", Legal Situation of Knife Throwing in Denmark, retrieved October 2014.
- ^ "Bekendtgørelse om knive og blankvåben m.v."
- ^ "Knivloven".
- ^ "Bliv skarp på knivloven".
- ^ There are two sub-categories within "catégorie D": the unregulated D Category weapons and the regulated D category weapons; see'Arme de catégorie D (en vente libre ou soumise à enregistrement)', www.service-public.fr website, accessed on May 10, 2017 [1]'Loi n° 2012-304 du 6 mars 2012 relative à l’établissement d’un contrôle des armes modernes, simplifié et préventif'
- ^ Loi relative aux couteaux et port d'arme – mise à jour octobre 2013, site www.knivesandtools.fr/, consulté le 11 mai 2017 [2]
- ^ Weapon of Category D (freely available or subject to registration), www.service-public.fr website, accessed on August 23, 2023 [3]
- ^ Knife legislation category D, site www.affutexpress.com/, accessed on August 23, 2023 [4]
- ^ a b c Die Rechtslage – WaffG und Messer Archived 2011-09-02 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 27 August 2011
- ^ OLG Stuttgart · Beschluss vom 14. Juni 2011 · Az. 4 Ss 137/11, retrieved 1 April 2015.
- ^ a b c § 42a Verbot des Führens von Anscheinswaffen und bestimmten tragbaren Gegenständen, retrieved 1 April 2015.
- ^ "ΑΡΕΙΟΣ ΠΑΓΟΣ – ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ 1299/2008 ()". www.areiospagos.gr. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ article from a hunting journal[permanent dead link]
- ^ S.4 Weapons Ordinance
- ^ S.13 Weapons Ordinance
- ^ "175/2003. (X. 28.) Korm. rendelet". net.jogtar.hu (in Hungarian). CompLex. 2003. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
- ^ "Legislazione Italiana sui Coltelli a Farfalla". Couteau Papillon (in Italian). Retrieved 2023-10-15.
- ^ "Double-edged knives may be regulated by law". The Yomiuri Shimbun. July 11, 2008. Retrieved November 16, 2010.
- ^ 銃砲刀剣類所持等取締法 (in Japanese). Archived from the original on 2018-09-26. Retrieved March 10, 2013.
- ^ "Latvian law On the Handling of Weapons law". Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "Peilių civilinės apyvartos teisinis reglamentavimas | knives.lt". knives.lt. 2 January 2010. Retrieved May 27, 2014.
- ^ "Apie asociaciją, peilius ir viską, kas su tuo susiję... | knives.lt". knives.lt. Retrieved May 27, 2014.
- ^ "Loi du 2 février 2022 sur les armes et munitions". Legilux (in French). The government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. 2022-02-02. Article 1 paragraphs 16 to 20. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ a b c d "Bladed weapons - Legislation - Portail de la Police Grand-Ducale - Luxembourg". police.public.lu. The government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. 2022-11-07. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ Hartevelt, John (11 February 2010). "Government to review knife possession laws". Stuff. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
- ^ Chhana, Rajesh (20 April 2010). "Regulatory Impact Statement: Reducing Knife Crime" (PDF). www.justice.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
- ^ "Prohibited offensive weapons". www.police.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Police. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
- ^ "Regjeringen on knives and police conduct in Norwegian; regjeringen.no". regjeringen.no. 6 August 2004. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
- ^ Act of 21 May 1999 on weapons and ammunition Archived 7 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine (Dz.U. 1999 nr 53 poz. 549)
- ^ Act of 20 March 2009 on the safety of the mass events Archived 7 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine (Dz.U. 2009 nr 62 poz. 504)
- ^ "Law 235 from 6th of July 2007". Romanian Chamber of Deputes. 6 July 2007. Retrieved 3 February 2024.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Article 340: Carrying and usage without permission of melee weapons | Penal Code". Indaco lege5. 2004. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
- ^ "Федеральный закон "Об оружии" от 13.12.1996 N 150-ФЗ (последняя редакция) / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ ""Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации" от 13.06.1996 N 63-ФЗ (ред. от 23.04.2018, с изм. от 25.04.2018) / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "Криминалистические требования к холодному, метательному оружию – Библиотека – Все об арбалетах, луках". arbalet.info. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ ""Кодекс Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях" от 30.12.2001 N 195-ФЗ (последняя редакция) (КОАП РФ) / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "Федеральный закон "Об оружии" от 13.12.1996 N 150-ФЗ (последняя редакция) / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "(Serbian version)" (PDF). Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ "Zakona O Oružju I Municiji" (PDF). Informer. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
- ^ S-EPI. "372/1990 Zb. Zákon o priestupkoch – Aktuálne znenie". Zákony pre ľudí. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ a b Reglamentación española de armas, retrieved 31 July 2011
- ^ a b c d e f g h Prohibited Arms Archived 2011-12-17 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 17 December 2011
- ^ Swedish Police: Knivar och andra farliga föremål (in Swedish)
- ^ "Lag (1988:254) om förbud beträffande knivar och andra farliga föremål | Lagen.nu". lagen.nu. Retrieved May 27, 2014.
- ^ "Får en bära runt på en fickkniv i självförsvarssyfte?". Lawline (in Swedish). Retrieved 2023-02-04.
- ^ Francis, Gemma (23 August 2019). "Parents warning children about knife crime from age of 7". The Independent. Independent Digital News & Media. ISSN 0951-9467. OCLC 185201487. Archived from the original on 23 August 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
- ^ a b c "Your Democracy - Restriction of Offensive Weapons Bill (from Lords Debates - 12 May 1959)". New Statesman. 12 May 1959. Archived from the original on 2 April 2012.
- ^ a b Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959: Short title, commencement, and extent, retrieved 30 October 2011
- ^ Rudd, Amber (8 April 2018). "Home Office announces plans for Offensive Weapons Bill to tackle serious violence". gov.uk (Press release). Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- ^ Dil, Neiyyar (8 April 2009). "Sikhs protest against knife rules". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 April 2009. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
- ^ a b Samengo-Turner, Nicky (27 November 2004). "The policeman found my penknife. 'You're going down, mate,' he said". The Daily Telegraph. United Kingdom. ISSN 0307-1235. OCLC 49632006. Archived from the original on 2 May 2009.
- ^ Baton Charge Racing Boss Cleared: In 2004, a businessman and ex-military officer, Nicholas Samengo-Turner, was stopped at a mass search checkpoint in London and arrested for possessing a small Swiss Army multitool with two short locking blades (2+15⁄16 inches or 7.5 centimetres and 2+5⁄8 inches or 6.7 centimetres) in the locked boot of his car. While eventually cleared, the arrest cost Samengo-Turner a multi-million-pound business deal and thousands of pounds in court costs.
- ^ chris (17 January 2011). "UK Knife Law" (blog). Chris Hughes Multi Activity Services.
- ^ "Offence of having article with blade or point in public place". Wikicrimeline. Archived from the original on 1 December 2010.
- ^ Harris v. DPP, 1 All ER 562, [1993] 1 WLR 82, 96 Cr App Rep 235, 157 JP 205 (1992)
- ^ The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Exemption) Order 1996:Under (2)(b), safety razor blades are exempted from this section, so that only straight razors are affected.
- ^ "The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Exemption) Order 1996". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ "Criminal Justice Act 1988 (1988 c. 33) Part XI, Articles with blades or..., Section 141A". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 7 February 2019. Word in s. 141A(1) substituted (E.W.) (1.10.2007) by Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 (c. 38), ss. 43(2), 66(2); S.I. 2007/2180, art. 3(j)
- ^ "Knives Act 1997".
- ^ Bryan v. Mott, 62 Cr App R 71 (1976): 'Lawful authority' means those occasions where people from time to time are required to carry weapons as a matter of governmental duty, such as police officers or members of the armed forces, not private persons.
- ^ DirectGov, Crime and Violence: Knife crime, DirectGov UK Government Information Service, England & Wales: "If you carry a knife to protect yourself or make yourself feel safer but don't intend to use it then you are committing a crime."
- ^ Khan, Shehab (28 May 2018). "Judge calls for kitchen knives to be blunted amid crime wave". The Independent. ISSN 0951-9467. OCLC 185201487. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 29 May 2018.
- ^ Hern, Emma; Glazebrook, Will; Beckett, Mike (26 May 2005). "Reducing knife crime". The BMJ. 330 (7502): 1221–1222. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7502.1221. ISSN 0959-8138. JSTOR 09598138. LCCN 97640199. OCLC 32595642. PMC 558080. PMID 15920107.
- ^ Gardham, Duncan (14 April 2005). "Butter knife 'an offensive weapon'". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. OCLC 49632006. Archived from the original on 19 June 2016. Retrieved 28 September 2018.
- ^ "Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995, section 49". www.legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
- ^ "The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Scotland) Order 2005". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- ^ "Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- ^ Knives and the Law Archived 2011-08-29 at the Wayback Machine, NIdirect Government Services, retrieved 25 July 2011
- ^ "Sentence doubled for knife possession in Northern Ireland". The Belfast Telegraph. 16 July 2008. ISSN 0307-5664. Retrieved 25 July 2011.
- ^ United States Code, Title 15, Chapter 29, Sections 1241–1245
- ^ Precise Imports v. Kelly, 378 F.2d 1014 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 973, 88 S.Ct. 472, 19 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967)
- ^ United States v. Murphree, 783 F.2d 605, 609–10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 142, 93 L.Ed.2d 84 (1986)
- ^ BERNARD LEVINE. "STATE KNIFE LAWS". Archived from the original on 2006-08-20. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
- ^ "United States Code TITLE 15 CHAPTER 29 – MANUFACTURE, TRANSPORTATION, OR DISTRIBUTION OF AUTOMATIC KNIVES".
- ^ David D. Kowalski. "Pocketknives are Tools Used by Millions". Archived from the original on 2008-05-14.
- ^ Amendment 1447 to 15 U.S.C. §1244 adds a fifth exception to the definition of a switchblade knife: "Sections 1242 and 1243 of this title shall not apply to: 5) a knife that contains a spring, detent, or other mechanism designed to create a bias toward closure of the blade and that requires exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure to assist in opening the knife."
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Wong, David, Knife Laws of the Fifty States: A Guide for the Law-Abiding Traveler, AuthorHouse, ISBN 1-4259-5092-2, ISBN 978-1-4259-5092-7 (2006)
- ^ Wong, p. 134: Dangerous weapon, i.e., a knife capable of being transformed by circumstances of its threatened, attempted, or actual use into a weapon capable of causing death
- ^ Ohin v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 622 S.E. 2d 784, 47 Va App. 194 (Va Ct. App. 2005): (Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for concealed carry of folding knife with 3.5-inch (8.9 cm) locking blade, crossguard, and oversized handle, based on 'catchall' provision in Virginia Code § 18.2-308(A)(v) prohibiting concealed carry of 'any weapon of like kind'.
- ^ a b c d e Cassidy, William L., The Complete Book Of Knife Fighting, ISBN 0-87364-029-2, ISBN 978-0-87364-029-9 (1997), pp. 9–18, 27–36
- ^ Slider, Gary; Aikens, Steve (November 16, 2018). "Laws For Folder Type Knives, Part 1" (PDF). Handgunlaw.us. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
- ^ Slider, Gary; Aikens, Steve (June 7, 2019). "Laws For Folder Type Knives, Part 2" (PDF). Handgunlaw.us. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
- ^ See Ala. Code 1975, §13-6-120, Sec. 13A-11-50: "Carrying concealed weapons. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a person who carries concealed about his person a bowie knife or knife or instrument of like kind or description or a pistol or firearm of any other kind or an air gun shall, on conviction, be fined not less than $50.00 nor more than $500.00, and may also be imprisoned in the county jail or sentenced to hard labor for the county for not more than six months." A companion statute allows the jury to mitigate punishment if the accused can prove that he was reasonably afraid of being attacked while carrying the concealed knife.
- ^ Ala. Code 1975
- ^ Mississippi Code, Crimes § 97-37-1: Deadly weapons; carrying while concealed; use or attempt to use; penalties: "(1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 45-9-101, any person who carries, concealed in whole or in part, any bowie knife, dirk knife, butcher knife, switchblade knife...shall upon conviction be punished" by a fine or imprisonment.
- ^ New Mexico, Criminal Offenses – 30-1-12 (B), Definitions..."deadly weapon" means any... weapon which is capable of producing death or great bodily harm, including but not restricted to any types of daggers, ...bowie knives, poniards, butcher knives, dirk knives.."
- ^ New Mexico, Criminal Offenses – 30-7-2: "Unlawful carrying of a deadly weapon... consists of carrying a concealed...deadly weapon anywhere, except in the following cases: own residence or property; private automobile, or other means of conveyance."
- ^ Walker, Greg, Battle Blades: A Professional's Guide to Combat/Fighting Knives, ISBN 0-87364-732-7 (1993), p. 210: The effectiveness of the Bowie knife can be seen in one of Col. James (Jim) Bowie's early fights in which he defended himself against three knife and gun-wielding attackers. At the end of the fight, all three of Bowie's assailants were dead; one man was nearly decapitated, the second was disemboweled, and the third had his skull split open.
- ^ Virginia Code § 18.2-308(A): The Virginia statute prohibits only the concealed carrying of a Bowie knife upon one's person, while Texas prohibits the carrying of such a knife whether concealed or not.
- ^ Virginia Code § 18.2-308(A)
- ^ Cassidy, p. 10: In some states the popularity of certain knives such as the Bowie and Arkansas Toothpick was such that schools were established to teach their use in knife fighting, further popularizing such knives and compelling authorities to pass legislation severely restricting such schools.
- ^ a b Cramer, Clayton, Concealed Weapon Laws of the Early Republic: Dueling, Southern Violence, and Moral Reform, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 978-0-275-96615-7 (1999), p. 118
- ^ a b c d Cramer, Clayton E., The Racist Roots of Gun Control, (1993)
- ^ Cockrum v. State, Texas Supreme Court (1859)
- ^ Cockrum v. State, id.
- ^ a b Halbrook, Stephen P., The Right to Bear Arms in Texas: The Intent of the Framers of the Bill of Rights, Baylor Law Review, 41 Baylor L. Rev., pp. 629–688 (1989)
- ^ a b McDonald, Jason, Racial Dynamics in Early Twentieth-Century Austin, Texas, Lexington Books, ISBN 9780739170977 (2012), p. 48: The typical Tejano heritage was commonly portrayed as displaying a proclivity for "knife play" frequently culminating in a fatality.
- ^ McPhate, Christian (June 19, 2017). "Five Key Takeaways From Texas' New Laws On Carrying Knives". Dallas Observer. Retrieved 4 September 2017.
- ^ The Wilson-Anthony Fight Archived 2011-09-28 at the Wayback Machine, Department of Arkansas-Heritage, retrieved 1 August 2011: In 1836 a knife fight broke out between the Speaker of the Arkansas House of Representatives, John Wilson, and Rep. Joseph Anthony in the middle of a contentious legislative session; Anthony was killed, while Wilson was expelled from office and later indicted for murder.
- ^ Arkansas Criminal Statute Section 5-73-121: Punishable except when "upon a journey or upon [one's] own premises", this statute was clearly designed to enable prosecution of persons carrying knives without good cause in towns and cities, while exempting farmers and others carrying knives on their own property or when traveling to and from their local communities.
- ^ Section 5-73-121, Arkansas Criminal Code (2006)
- ^ Arkansas Repeals Anti-Knife Statute: Section 5-73-121 of the Arkansas criminal code was repealed in its entirety in 2007.
- ^ End Knife Control, The Washington Times, 22 May 2012
- ^ Levine, Bernard, Oppressive Knife Laws in America: What They Are, What You Can Do About Them, and the Anti-Knifer Mindset, Blade Magazine (July 1998)
- ^ "Information Maintained by the Office of Code Revision Indiana Legislative Services Agency".
- ^ Indiana Criminal Code IC 35-47-5-2.5, Possession of a knife on school property: The statute is silent on the question of whether the slightest cut or puncture constitutes a "wound" (thus effectively banning all knives of any type) or if a de minimis rule applies, a dilemma that forces the trial court to make further inquiries into the statute's legislative history as well as prior appellate court determinations, if any.
- ^ "Georgia Knife Laws". Retrieved June 5, 2013.
- ^ State of Florida v. Darynani, So.2d (Fla. 4th DCA 2000): In State of Florida v. Darynani, a Florida appellate court held that a poorly written state criminal knife statute (Sec. 790.225) that had been hurriedly drafted in 1985 to prohibit the ballistic knife must be interpreted to prohibit switchblade knives as well, despite the lack of any specific evidence that the legislative branch intended to prohibit switchblades when drafting the ballistic knife provision. The court's error was finally corrected by the Florida Legislature in 2003 with the passage of HB 1227 (2003) (see HB 1227 (2003).
- ^ "How a '50s-Era New York Knife Law Has Landed Thousands in Jail | Village Voice". Archived from the original on 2014-10-08. Retrieved 2014-10-09.
- ^ "Federal Judge Rules New York's Dumb 'Gravity Knife' Law Is Unconstitutionally Vague". Reason.com. 2019-03-28. Retrieved 2019-06-08.
- ^ McKinley, Jesse (2019-05-31). "The 'Gravity Knife' Led to Thousands of Questionable Arrests. Now It's Legal". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-06-08.
- ^ Texas Criminal Code Sec. 46.01(6)(A)
- ^ Ordinance Chapter 21, Sec. 21-17, Part II, Code of Ordinances of San Antonio, Texas
- ^ Ordinance Chapter 21, Sec. 21-17, Part II, Code of Ordinances of San Antonio, Texas: Sec. 21-17 contains an exemption from prosecution for law enforcement and corrections officers, for members of the armed forces, for persons carrying the knife on their own premises or while traveling, for persons engaged in a lawful sporting activity (hunting, fishing), or for those using the knife in connection with a lawful occupation.
- ^ "Knife Rights' Texas Knife Law Preemption Takes Effect Sept. 1". Knife Rights. March 14, 2015. Retrieved February 7, 2019.
- ^ https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/supreme-court/2024/sjc-13432.html [bare URL]
- ^ Dwyer, Dialynn. "SJC rules that carrying a switchblade in Mass. isn't a crime". www.boston.com. Retrieved 2025-03-24.
- ^ "Ninth Circuit Holds Hawaii's Butterfly Knife Ban Unconstitutional! – Knife Rights". 2023-08-08. Retrieved 2023-09-13.
- ^ "FindLaw's California Court of Appeal case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "FindLaw's Supreme Court of Connecticut case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
- ^ Volokh, Eugene. "Second Amendment protects dirk knives and police batons". Washington Post.
- ^ "Griffin v. State". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "Lacy v. State, 903 N.E.2d 486 | Casetext". casetext.com. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
- ^ "State v. Lee". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Wright". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Blaine". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "FindLaw's Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "FindLaw's Supreme Court of New Jersey case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "FindLaw's Court of Appeals of New Mexico case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ Volokh, Eugene. "N.M. court upholds ban on switchblades, suggests broader knife bans might be constitutional, too". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2015-01-24. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
- ^ "Akron v. Rasdan, 105 Ohio App. 3d 164 | Casetext". casetext.com. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Kessler". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Blocker". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Delgado". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "Barnett v. State of Oregon". Justia Law. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ City of Seattle v. Montana, vol. 919, p. 1218, retrieved 2019-10-25
- ^ Volokh, Eugene. "Washington state top court: some knives are likely constitutionally protected 'arms,' but paring knives aren't". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2016-01-01.
- ^ "City of Seattle v. Evans, 366 P.3d 906 | Casetext". casetext.com. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "Statute prohibiting switchblades doesn't apply to possession by a person at home". www.wisconsinappeals.net. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
- ^ "State v. Herrmann" (PDF).
External links
[edit]Knife legislation
View on GrokipediaHistorical Development
Origins in Common Law and Early Statutes
In English common law, knives were primarily viewed as essential tools for everyday tasks such as eating, working, and self-provisioning, with carrying them presumed lawful absent intent to commit breach of the peace or terrorize others.[2] The Statute of Northampton (1328) prohibited individuals from "going armed to the terror of the country," targeting disruptive or menacing displays of weaponry but exempting routine tools like knives used for peaceful, utilitarian ends.[9] This framework emphasized context and purpose over blanket restrictions, allowing freemen to bear arms—including edged tools—for defense or labor so long as they did not alarm the public.[10] American jurisprudence inherited these common law principles, treating knives as legitimate "arms" under self-defense doctrines while permitting carry for practical needs like hunting, farming, or craftsmanship.[11] In the 19th century, amid frontier violence involving Bowie knives—a large, fixed-blade design popularized in the 1830s—courts upheld the tool-like status of knives when used lawfully. For instance, in Cockrum v. State (1859), the Texas Supreme Court affirmed that "a Bowie knife is not an unlawful weapon per se" and that "the right to carry a bowie-knife for lawful defense is secured," rejecting elevated penalties solely based on the implement absent murderous intent.[12] Similarly, State v. Chandler (1850) in Louisiana recognized Bowie knives as bearable arms for protection, though it permitted regulation of concealed carry to prevent surprise attacks.[13] Early statutes in both jurisdictions responded to localized threats without imposing comprehensive bans, focusing instead on misuse or concealment. In the United States, states like Mississippi enacted the first Bowie knife restriction in 1837, prohibiting concealed carry of such blades alongside other "deadly weapons" to curb duels and brawls, yet exempting open carry for evident utility.[14] In England, pre-20th-century laws such as the Vagrancy Act (1824) addressed "suspected persons" with concealed dirks or razors but spared ordinary folding or working knives, reflecting a tradition of deference to knives' role as indispensable implements rather than presumptive weapons.[15] These measures balanced public order with practical freedoms, predating broader prohibitions by prioritizing evidentiary intent over categorical ownership limits.[16]20th-Century Shifts Toward Restriction
In the post-World War II era, the United States saw escalating concerns over juvenile delinquency and urban gang activity, fueled by media reports and films depicting switchblades as symbols of youth violence.[17][18] Several states, including New York and California, passed restrictions on automatic knives in the early 1950s, portraying them as tools of criminal subcultures rather than everyday implements.[17] These measures reflected broader moral panics about rising urban crime rates, which had climbed from 1.6 homicides per 100,000 in 1946 to 4.6 by 1957, though evidence tying switchblades specifically to this trend was anecdotal and media-driven rather than data-based.[18] This culminated in the Federal Switchblade Act of August 12, 1958 (Public Law 85-623), which banned the manufacture for sale, transportation across state lines, and importation of switchblades into interstate commerce, with exemptions for military and law enforcement use.[17][19] The act's proponents, including Senator Roman Hruska, argued it would curb gang armament, but congressional hearings revealed no comprehensive statistics demonstrating switchblades' disproportionate role in crime compared to other blades.[18] Instead, the push aligned with cultural anxieties amplified by Hollywood portrayals in films like Rebel Without a Cause (1955), which sensationalized automatic knives without reflecting their rarity in actual offenses.[17] In Europe, similar shifts occurred amid Cold War-era security preoccupations and urban unrest. Germany's Waffengesetz (Weapons Act) of 1972 classified knives into prohibited categories (e.g., certain automatic and throwing knives), restricted carrying of fixed blades over 12 cm or one-handed locking folders, and required permits for others deemed "cutting and thrusting weapons."[20][21] Enacted during a period of domestic terrorism by groups like the Red Army Faction and general fears of public disorder, the law prioritized preventive controls over empirical assessments of knife-specific threats.[20] Early evaluations indicated these restrictions did not measurably reduce blade-involved violence, as criminals substituted readily available alternatives, underscoring the bans' roots in precautionary policy rather than causal evidence of efficacy.[22]Post-2000 Global Trends in Bans and Reforms
In the United Kingdom, legislative responses to rising knife-enabled offenses intensified after 2000, with expansions targeting specific blade types amid urban violence spikes. The Offensive Weapons Act 2019 initially prohibited certain large knives, but further reforms addressed loopholes; from September 24, 2024, zombie-style knives and machetes—defined as blades over 8 inches with a plain cutting edge, sharp point, and non-utilitarian features—became illegal to possess, sell, or manufacture under amendments to the Criminal Justice Act 1988.[23] An amnesty and compensation scheme ran from August 26 to September 23, 2024, encouraging voluntary surrenders before enforcement.[24] By July 2025, the Crime and Policing Bill proposed additional curbs on online marketing of banned weapons like zombie knives, aiming to close promotional gaps exploited by sellers.[25] Contrasting European tightening, the United States exhibited trends toward deregulation and preemption post-2000, prioritizing interstate commerce and individual rights over fragmented local bans. Several states, including Florida in 2023 and others via uniform acts, enacted preemption statutes overriding municipal knife restrictions to standardize carry and ownership rules.[26] Federally, H.R. 60, the Knife Owners' Protection Act of 2025, introduced on January 3, 2025, sought to shield law-abiding travelers from state-specific prohibitions during interstate transport, allowing unloaded knives in locked containers or baggage regardless of destination laws.[27] The bill advanced through House markup in March 2025, reflecting advocacy for uniform protections against patchwork regulations.[26] Australia pursued stricter possession and storage mandates in response to youth violence, with South Australia exemplifying 2025 reforms. A three-month surrender period from July 1 to September 30, 2025, targeted prohibited swords and machetes, yielding over 3,000 weapons voluntarily handed in by October.[28] Retailers face mandatory secure storage or tethering of dangerous knives starting July 1, 2026, under expanded Summary Offences Act provisions, with penalties up to $20,000 or two years' imprisonment for violations.[29] Japan upheld rigorous carry restrictions under the 1958 Swords and Firearms Control Law, amended post-2000 to emphasize public safety, prohibiting blades exceeding 6 cm in public without demonstrated necessity, such as occupational use.[30] Dagger-like designs remain broadly banned, yet cultural reverence for artisanal kitchen knives permits ownership and domestic utility, with low enforcement incidents tied to overall crime rarity.[31] These patterns illustrate a global divergence: escalation of categorical bans in high-density urban contexts versus rights-based reforms favoring portability in federal systems.Rationales for Legislation
Public Safety and Crime Reduction Claims
Proponents of restrictive knife legislation, particularly in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, assert that prohibiting the public carry of blades exceeding certain lengths or deemed threatening—such as those over 3 inches or with locking mechanisms—serves as a deterrent to stabbings by limiting immediate access during altercations.[32] This rationale underpins measures like the UK's Offensive Weapons Act 2019, which expanded bans on items like zombie knives, with official claims citing correlations to reduced hospital admissions for sharp-object assaults; for example, NHS provisional data for England and Wales showed ongoing declines in such admissions post-implementation, dropping to levels supporting arguments for policy efficacy in curbing injury severity.[32] These claims rest on the assumption that legal restrictions foster compliance among potential offenders, thereby diminishing the weapon's role in spontaneous violence. In contexts of urban youth violence, where knife offenses disproportionately involve individuals under 25, policymakers advocate for carry prohibitions to interrupt cycles of impulsive retaliation and gang-related escalations, positing that removing knives from circulation prevents their use as equalizers in disputes.[3] UK government strategies, including enhanced stop-and-search powers and sales restrictions, are framed as targeting this demographic's access, with assertions that such interventions correlate with localized reductions in youth-involved knife crimes, as seen in Scotland's public health approach yielding zero youth knife deaths in 2017 after multifaceted restrictions.[33] The underlying premise here is that preempting possession among at-risk groups, often in high-deprivation areas, averts preventable injuries without relying solely on post-incident enforcement. Internationally, Japan's stringent knife laws—requiring permits for blades over 6 centimeters and prohibiting concealed carry— are invoked by advocates as exemplars where restrictions, alongside cultural emphases on conformity, contribute to minimal knife violence rates, with intentional homicides at just 0.2 per 100,000 population.[34] Officials attribute this to reduced availability deterring misuse, assuming broad societal adherence translates legislative limits into practical scarcity of weapons in public spaces.[35] Such examples bolster global arguments for bans, emphasizing that compliance-driven scarcity can mitigate risks even in tool-prevalent societies.Balancing Tool Utility with Weapon Potential
Knives function primarily as versatile tools essential for professional, recreational, and survival activities, with their weaponization representing a statistically marginal deviation from normative use. In culinary professions alone, the global market for commercial kitchen knives reached USD 874.3 million in 2023, underscoring the dependence of millions of chefs and food service workers on blades for precise cutting tasks integral to daily operations.[36] Similarly, agricultural workers, numbering over 1 billion globally, routinely deploy fixed-blade knives for harvesting, pruning, and animal husbandry, while construction trades utilize utility knives for material scoring and preparation.[37] These applications dwarf criminal instances, as legitimate knife possession for work and household purposes—estimated in the billions worldwide—far exceeds documented misuse, with knife-involved crimes comprising just 1.86% of total offenses in analyzed datasets.[38] Regulatory approaches frequently incorporate exemptions to preserve tool utility, allowing possession and carry of specific knives tied to justified needs such as occupational tasks, hunting, or emergency response. For example, provisions in German law permit fixed-blade knives exceeding certain lengths when carried for professional utility, forestry work, or sporting activities like hunting, reflecting recognition of context-dependent legitimacy.[39] Hunting and fishing licenses often grant exemptions from broader restrictions on automatic or large blades during licensed pursuits, while rescue tools with specialized features like seatbelt cutters receive carve-outs in multiple jurisdictions to facilitate first-responder duties without criminal liability.[40] Such measures prioritize functional intent over blanket prohibitions, accommodating the practical demands of trades and outdoor pursuits. From a causal standpoint, knife-related violence correlates more closely with perpetrator motivation than with availability, as pervasive access for benign purposes yields low incidence of lethal outcomes. Globally, knives accounted for 97,183 homicides in 2017 amid ubiquitous tool ownership, equating to a fraction of total interpersonal violence where intent drives selection over opportunity.[41] In areas permitting broad utility carry, baseline knife homicide rates remain subdued; for instance, sharp instruments featured in 41% of England's 2022/23 homicides but at an overall rate of under 1 per 100,000 population, indicating misuse rarity absent predisposing factors like criminal disposition.[3] This disparity—legitimate uses by orders of magnitude outpacing harms—highlights that policy equilibrium hinges on targeting behavioral antecedents rather than ubiquity of a multi-purpose implement.Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors Driving Policy
Knife crime in the United Kingdom disproportionately occurs in socio-economically deprived urban areas, where indices of multiple deprivation correlate strongly with higher rates of violence involving blades. Studies indicate that young males in these locales face elevated risks due to factors such as unemployment, family instability, and limited access to education or legitimate opportunities, which foster environments conducive to territorial disputes and retaliatory attacks.[42] [43] Gang involvement exacerbates this pattern, with approximately 15% of knife offenses linked to gang-related fights or attacks, often rooted in drug trafficking networks like county lines that exploit vulnerable youth from impoverished backgrounds.[44] [45] Cultural attitudes toward edged tools vary significantly across regions, influencing policy responses beyond mere availability. In rural United States communities, where knives serve practical roles in hunting, farming, and self-reliance, permissive carrying norms coexist with low incidences of misuse, reflecting a cultural emphasis on personal responsibility and defensive utility amid sparse population densities that reduce interpersonal conflicts.[46] Conversely, dense urban European settings, particularly in the UK, exhibit heightened public apprehension toward knives as symbols of threat, amplified by multicultural dynamics and eroded social cohesion in high-immigration enclaves, prompting blanket restrictions that overlook contextual differences in tool versus weapon perception.[47] Media coverage has played a pivotal role in shaping knife legislation, often magnifying episodic violence to evoke widespread alarm and drive reactive measures. In the UK during the late 2010s and early 2020s, intensified reporting and social media dissemination of knife incidents correlated with policy shifts like expanded stop-and-search powers and sales bans, despite underlying violence drivers remaining tied to inequality rather than instrument proliferation.[48] [49] This amplification, while rooted in genuine concern, has prioritized symptomatic controls over addressing causal socio-economic incentives, as evidenced by persistent hotspots in deprived districts unresponsive to tool-focused interventions.[50]Empirical Evidence and Effectiveness
Studies on Knife Availability and Violent Crime
Empirical studies examining the relationship between knife availability restrictions and violent crime rates have generally found weak or inconclusive evidence of significant crime reductions attributable to bans. A 2022 systematic review of knife crime interventions, including legislative restrictions on possession and sales, concluded that robust evaluations are scarce, with most studies suffering from methodological limitations such as small sample sizes and failure to isolate causal effects from confounding factors like policing changes or socioeconomic trends.[51] Similarly, analyses of UK knife legislation, including the 2010 Offensive Weapons Act and subsequent amendments, show no clear post-ban declines in knife-enabled violence; recorded knife offences in England and Wales rose from approximately 28,000 in 2010/11 to over 45,000 by 2022/23, amid ongoing restrictions on carry and sales.[3] These patterns suggest potential substitution effects, where offenders shift to unregulated or smuggled blades rather than ceasing violent acts, as compliance among high-risk groups remains low.[8] In the United States, state-level liberalizations of knife carry laws provide comparative data indicating no corresponding spikes in knife-related homicides. Texas's 2017 House Bill 1935, which removed restrictions on blade length and types like daggers and switchblades for lawful carry, coincided with stable or declining overall violent crime rates; FBI data show knife-involved homicides as a proportion of total homicides held steady around 13-15% nationally from 2010 to 2020, with no detectable uptick post-reform in affected states.[52] Cross-state comparisons, such as between permissive jurisdictions (e.g., Vermont, with minimal restrictions) and stricter ones, reveal no strong inverse correlation between carry ease and knife violence per capita, controlling for urban density and demographics.[39] International contrasts further highlight null or weak associations. Switzerland, where pocket knives are culturally ubiquitous and carry is permitted for utility purposes without broad bans (barring automatic blades over 5 cm), maintains low overall homicide rates—6.65 per million in recent data—compared to the UK's 11.68 per million, despite the latter's stringent public carry prohibitions since the 1950s.[53] Knife misuse remains rare in Switzerland, with no reliable statistics linking high ownership to elevated violence, attributing low rates instead to factors like mandatory military training emphasizing discipline.[54] These observations underscore that availability alone does not drive knife crime prevalence, with cultural, enforcement, and offender motivation variables exerting stronger influences than legislative curbs on legal access.[55]Critiques of Bans: Substitution Effects and Non-Compliance
Critics of knife bans contend that such measures exhibit limited deterrent effects on offenders, who demonstrate high rates of non-compliance with carry prohibitions. In the United Kingdom, knife-related offenses persisted and escalated following the Criminal Justice Act 1988, which banned certain blades, and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019, which expanded restrictions; police-recorded knife crimes increased from 21,107 in 2008/09 to 40,397 in 2017/18, with no attributable decline linked to the legislation.[56] Systematic reviews of interventions, including knife amnesties and enhanced stop-and-search operations, have found no statistically significant reductions in knife crime incidence, underscoring offenders' disregard for legal barriers.[7] Substitution effects further undermine bans' efficacy, as prohibitions on specific knives prompt criminals to adopt readily available alternatives like screwdrivers, broken glass, or improvised sharp tools, maintaining or shifting the pattern of violence without curtailing overall assault rates. Empirical analyses of weapon restrictions indicate that such substitutions modify injury types—potentially increasing lethality from blunt trauma—but fail to decrease the volume of criminal offenses.[57] In jurisdictions with stringent controls, such as Australia's state-level regulations prohibiting sales to minors under 16 and banning certain blades outright, black-market persistence enables evasion; illicit diversion from legal stocks and darknet trafficking sustain offender access to edged weapons, mirroring dynamics observed in broader prohibited goods markets.[58][59] These patterns reveal a core causal limitation: bans disproportionately constrain compliant populations while leaving non-compliant actors undeterred, fostering underground economies that neutralize regulatory intent without yielding measurable harm reduction. Data from offender surveys and crime statistics consistently show elevated knife possession among arrested individuals in banned environments, with carriage rates unaffected by heightened penalties.[60][61]Data on Self-Defense Uses Versus Criminal Misuse
In the United States, knives account for approximately 10.6% of known homicides where the weapon type is specified, with 1,476 such incidents reported in 2019 out of 13,927 total cases.[62] This contrasts with their involvement in justifiable homicides, where knives comprise a smaller share, typically under 5% of civilian cases based on FBI Supplementary Homicide Reports, as most reported defensive killings involve firearms or personal weapons like hands and feet.[63] However, this metric undercaptures self-defense broadly, as many knife uses succeed in deterring threats without fatality; victim resistance studies indicate armed defenses, including with edged tools, reduce injury risk compared to unarmed responses, with knives enabling causal interruption of assaults when drawn as everyday carry items.[64] Documented non-lethal examples highlight knives' utility in de-escalation: in one analyzed incident, a civilian used a folding knife to slash an intruder's arm during a home invasion, prompting retreat without police intervention or further harm.[65] Similar cases, drawn from law enforcement records and victim accounts, show knives repelling unarmed or edged threats in close-quarters scenarios where firearms are absent or impractical, often ending confrontations via display or minimal contact rather than lethal force.[66] Internationally, particularly in Europe under restrictive regimes, defensive knife uses face evidentiary gaps due to underreporting. In the United Kingdom, where carrying a knife with intent for self-protection constitutes an offense under the Criminal Justice Act 1988, victims risk prosecution for possession, discouraging disclosure of successful defenses. This legal deterrent, compounded by cultural stigma against armed resistance, results in sparse data; official tallies focus on criminal misuse, with rare admissions of defensive applications in court records or police logs, potentially masking knives' preservative role against non-firearm aggressions.[67]Key Debates and Controversies
Infringement on Self-Defense Rights
Critics of knife legislation argue that such laws infringe on the inherent right to self-defense, a principle rooted in natural law traditions that recognize an individual's duty and liberty to protect life against aggression. This right, extending to the possession of common tools like knives for lawful purposes, predates modern statutes and aligns with first-principles reasoning that disarmament of the law-abiding heightens vulnerability to those who disregard laws. Empirical observations of historical disarmament policies, such as those preceding mass victimizations, underscore risks where prohibitions on defensive implements leave individuals exposed without recourse, violating causal chains of self-preservation.[68][69] In the United States, advocacy groups like Knife Rights extend Second Amendment protections—affirmed in the 2008 Supreme Court decision District of Columbia v. Heller, which upheld an individual right to bear arms for self-defense—to include knives as "arms" typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful ends, including protection. The Heller ruling emphasized that the Amendment covers weapons in common use, a category encompassing pocket knives and similar edged tools, rather than limiting safeguards to firearms alone. Challenges to state-level bans, such as California's restrictions on switchblades, invoke this framework, contending that prohibiting carry for self-defense equates to presuming criminal intent among carriers while ignoring non-compliance by actual threats.[70][71][72] European knife bans create tensions with human rights frameworks, such as those under the European Convention on Human Rights, by effectively presuming guilt on anyone carrying a blade, even utilitarian ones, and disqualifying self-defense as a valid justification for possession. In the United Kingdom, legislation like the Offensive Weapons Act presumes offensive intent for knives over three inches unless proven otherwise for work-related reasons, explicitly rejecting self-protection as a defense, which critics say shifts the burden onto victims and exacerbates disparities between compliant citizens and criminals. Cases illustrate overreach, such as routine stop-and-search yielding prosecutions for innocuous pocket knives carried amid rising urban threats, where law-abiding individuals face penalties that deter preparedness without addressing assailant armament. This approach ignores data on defensive uses, prioritizing state control over individual agency in the face of persistent violence.[73][74][68]Disproportionate Impact on Law-Abiding Citizens
Knife possession laws in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom criminalize carrying bladed articles in public without a demonstrated "good reason," exposing law-abiding individuals—such as tradespeople, anglers, or hikers—to arrest and prosecution for routine tool use, even without evidence of criminal intent.[74] For example, reports document arrests of individuals for keeping Swiss Army knives in vehicle glove compartments or transporting locking folders to work sites, where proving lawful authority post-arrest often requires legal defense amid strict interpretations of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.[75] In year ending March 2023, police issued or secured convictions for approximately 18,500 such possession offences, many stemming from stop-and-search encounters rather than active crime scenes.[74] These restrictions impose practical opportunity costs, particularly for rural and self-reliant populations reliant on knives for maintenance, fishing, or land management. In predominantly rural areas, knife-enabled offences stood at just 49 per 100,000 population in 2023/24—60 fewer per 100,000 than urban averages—indicating lower baseline risks yet uniform national bans that complicate compliant carry for legitimate tasks without risking non-compliance penalties.[76] Compliance demands, such as surrendering multi-tools during amnesties or altering work routines to avoid public transport with gear, divert resources from productive activities while offering scant public safety gains in low-crime locales.[77] Broad "offensive weapon" definitions under laws like the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 amplify enforcement disparities, with stop-and-search powers yielding disproportionate possession findings among ethnic minorities. Black men and boys, for instance, face elevated search rates, contributing to higher charge volumes despite debates over whether this reflects policing bias or elevated community risks—official data notes Black Londoners as both disproportionate victims (perpetrators in related violence).[74][78] Critics argue such outcomes penalize peripheral or precautionary carry in high-tension areas, fostering distrust without proportionally curbing determined offenders who bypass restrictions via illegal sourcing.[79] A 2025 case saw a 25-year-old man fined for home possession post-search, illustrating how expansive interpretations extend liability to private spheres for non-criminal holders.[80]Evidence Gaps in Mainstream Narratives
Mainstream narratives on knife legislation often portray unrestricted access to knives as a primary driver of urban violence, equating them to more lethal firearms in terms of policy urgency, despite global homicide data indicating sharp instruments account for approximately 20-30% of killings in regions without widespread gun availability, while unarmed assaults and blunt-force methods contribute significantly but attract minimal regulatory focus.[81] This framing overlooks United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) analyses showing that knife-related homicides are outnumbered by other interpersonal violence forms in aggregate, with lethality rates lower than firearms where the latter predominate, yet knife controls proliferate amid media amplification of isolated incidents over comprehensive causal patterns.[82] Policy advocacy for bans frequently ignores post-implementation persistence of knife offenses, as evidenced in Scotland where, despite longstanding prohibitions under the Criminal Justice Act, crimes involving offensive weapons climbed to a recorded high of 11,249 in the 2024/25 period, reflecting no sustained downward trajectory attributable to availability restrictions alone.[83] Such outcomes highlight evidentiary voids in causal claims linking possession laws directly to crime reduction, with substitution to alternative weapons or non-compliance undermining asserted efficacy, a dynamic downplayed in pro-restriction discourse that prioritizes legislative optics over longitudinal trend scrutiny. Systematic reviews further expose gaps by demonstrating limited impact from availability-focused measures like amnesties and intensified searches, which fail to yield statistically significant declines in knife carrying or use, contrasted with stronger outcomes from targeted community and educational programs addressing behavioral motivators such as gang involvement and risk perception.[7][8] Mainstream emphasis on supply-side controls thus sidesteps empirical support for demand-side interventions, perpetuating narratives that undervalue root-cause remediation in favor of symbolically restrictive policies whose marginal benefits remain unsubstantiated by independent evaluations.Legislation by Region
Europe
Knife legislation in Europe generally imposes restrictions on the public carrying of knives, classifying many as potential weapons under national security laws, with prohibitions on carry absent a legitimate reason such as professional use or outdoor activities. Automatic knives, switchblades, and certain folding mechanisms are often banned outright across member states, reflecting harmonized EU directives on prohibited goods but implemented variably at the national level. Possession for personal or household use is typically permitted, but public transport or display incurs penalties including fines up to €10,000 or imprisonment, depending on the jurisdiction and blade type.[84][85] These laws stem from concerns over urban violence and terrorism, yet enforcement focuses on intent and context rather than blanket ownership bans, allowing exceptions for tools like Swiss Army knives under size limits in some countries. Variations arise from federal structures and cultural attitudes toward edged tools, with northern nations often more permissive for fixed blades in rural settings compared to urban-centric southern policies.[84][86]United Kingdom
Core Bans and Acts
The United Kingdom prohibits carrying any bladed article in a public place without good reason under section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, defining "good reason" narrowly as religious, work-related, or national costume purposes, with penalties up to 4 years' imprisonment. The Prevention of Crime Act 1953 deems knives offensive weapons if carried with intent to commit an offence, while the Offensive Weapons Act 1996 bans sales to under-18s and possession of items like butterfly knives.[87][88][89] Fixed-blade knives and locking folders are restricted, with no minimum blade length exemption for carry, though non-locking pocket knives under 3 inches may qualify as tools in limited contexts. Police powers under the Knives and Offensive Weapons guidance allow stop-and-search in designated areas, emphasizing possession as prima facie evidence of criminality absent justification.[73][90]Recent Reforms (Post-2020)
The Offensive Weapons Act 2019 extended bans to private possession of "zombie knives" (bladed articles with a plain cutting edge, pointed tip, and violent imagery) and "death star" knuckle-dusters, effective from July 2022, alongside stricter online sales verification for under-18s.[91][92] This act also criminalized possession of corrosive substances in public, linking knife controls to broader anti-violence measures, with guidance updated in 2022 to include defensive sprays. No major statutory changes occurred by October 2025, though sentencing guidelines emphasize mandatory minimums for repeat offenders.[92][87]Germany
Germany's Weapons Act (Waffengesetz) permits ownership of most knives but prohibits public carrying of one-handed opening folders with locking blades, fixed blades exceeding 12 cm, or butterfly knives without a "recognized legitimate interest" like hunting or craftsmanship. Automatic knives and disguised blades are fully banned under section 42a, with violations fined up to €10,000 as of amendments effective 2023.[86][93][94] Transport requires the knife to be inaccessible, such as in locked luggage, and urban areas enforce stricter interpretations, though rural carry for forestry work is tolerated. A 2023 update clarified "immediate availability" as prohibited carry, targeting pocketed knives, while sales of restricted types demand age verification over 18.[86][94]France
Under Article L315-1 of the Internal Security Code (Code de la Sécurité Intérieure), knives fall into Category D weapons, freely purchasable and possessable by adults but prohibited from public carry without a legitimate reason, such as professional necessity, with penalties of up to one year imprisonment and €15,000 fine. Switchblades and automatic knives are restricted, while non-locking folders under 8 cm may be justified as tools, though judicial discretion assesses intent.[95][96][97] Transport in vehicles must secure the knife from access, and urban patrols target unexplained possession, with no blade length exemption for folders. Reforms in 2022 reinforced sales controls for minors, aligning with EU standards on prohibited mechanisms.[95][97]Other European Nations
In Spain, the Royal Legislative Decree 137/1993 bans carrying automatic, semi-automatic, and flipper knives in public, with fixed blades permitted only for justified activities like fishing, and penalties up to 6 months detention. Switzerland maintains relative leniency, allowing folders under 5 cm blade without permit and fixed blades for work, though cantonal laws may add restrictions in cities. Italy's public security laws require a valid motive for any edged tool over 4 inches, prohibiting switchblades nationally under Law 110/1975, with fines or confiscation for non-compliance. Other nations like the Netherlands mirror EU bans on autos but allow small non-locking pockets with reason, varying enforcement by locale.[84][84][84]United Kingdom
Core Bans and Acts
The foundational legislation prohibiting the carrying of knives in public places is contained in the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, which makes it an offence to have with a person in a public place any article made or adapted for causing injury to a person.[87] This act targets offensive weapons, including knives adapted for harm, with penalties including up to 2 years' imprisonment.[87] Subsequent laws built on this through the Criminal Justice Act 1988, specifically sections 139 and 139A, which criminalize the possession of any bladed article or pointed article in a public place without lawful authority or good reason, such as for work, religious reasons, or national sporting events.[74] [89] A "good reason" defence requires the carrier to prove necessity, and folding pocket knives are exempt only if the blade length does not exceed 3 inches (76 mm) and lacks a locking mechanism.[89] [98] Violations carry maximum penalties of 4 years' custody for adults.[74] The Knives Act 1997 introduced offences related to the unlawful marketing of knives, including advertisements that promote them as weapons or for self-defence, and restricts possession or supply of certain combat knives.[99] Additionally, the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 bans flick knives and gravity knives, prohibiting their manufacture, sale, or importation.[25] The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 further specifies prohibited items, such as butterfly knives and disguised knives.[100] [101] Sales restrictions apply universally: it is illegal to sell knives to persons under 18, with the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 enhancing enforcement by requiring age verification and prohibiting delivery to residential addresses unless by a person over 18.[92]Recent Reforms (Post-2020)
The Offensive Weapons Act 2019, with key provisions effective from 2021, extended bans on certain offensive weapons—including zombie knives, knuckledusters, and cyclone knives—to private possession, making it illegal to own them even at home without a defence like historical collection or religious use.[90] [102] This reform closed prior loopholes allowing private storage, with possession offences punishable by up to 6 months' imprisonment or a fine.[92] In September 2024, amendments to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 via the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Amendment, Surrender and Compensation) Order 2024 banned all zombie-style knives and machetes—defined as bladed articles over 8 inches with a plain cutting edge, sharp point, and a serrated edge—making possession, sale, or supply illegal across the UK, with a surrender scheme for owners.[23] [103] This followed earlier partial bans and aimed to address evolving weapon designs.[104] By March 2025, "ninja swords"—large, fixed-blade swords often over 20 inches—were added to the prohibited list under updates to offensive weapons controls, targeting their use in serious violence. Ronan's Law, enacted in early 2025 and named after victim Ronan Kanda, introduced stricter online sales oversight, mandating retailers to report bulk knife purchases to police and verify buyer identities more rigorously, alongside increased penalties for possession in public (up to 4 years remaining but with enhanced enforcement).[106] [107] Knife Crime Prevention Orders, expanded under the 2019 Act, now apply from age 12, allowing courts to restrict at-risk individuals' access to knives with breaches punishable by up to 2 years' custody.[108] In May 2025, legislation targeted online promotion of illegal knives, requiring platforms to remove content advertising banned weapons, with fines for non-compliance.[109] These measures reflect ongoing responses to persistent knife-related offences, though enforcement relies on police discretion for "good reason" defences.[98]Core Bans and Acts
The Prevention of Crime Act 1953 established the offence of carrying an offensive weapon in public, defining such a weapon as any article made or adapted for causing injury to a person, or intended by the possessor for that purpose, with a maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment.[89] This act laid foundational restrictions on knives adapted for harm, such as those modified for combat.[73] The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 specifically prohibited the manufacture, sale, hire, or importation of flick knives (which open automatically by gravity or hand pressure) and other similar gravity-operated blades, responding to concerns over their ease of concealment and deployment.[110] These bans targeted weapons deemed inherently dangerous due to their automatic action, with possession in public falling under the broader offensive weapons prohibition. Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 created the core modern offence of possessing any bladed article or pointed article in a public place without good reason or lawful authority, punishable by up to four years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.[111] This applies to folding pocket knives with blades exceeding 3 inches (76 mm) unless non-locking, and any fixed-blade knife regardless of size without justification such as work or religious purposes; "good reason" defences are narrowly interpreted by courts, excluding general self-defense.[74] Section 139A extended similar prohibitions to bladed articles on school premises.[73] The Knives Act 1997 criminalized the unlawful marketing of knives in ways that encourage violent use, such as advertisements depicting them as weapons, and banned sales of certain combat knives to those under 18, with powers for police to search premises suspected of storing prohibited items.[112] It also prohibited publications like magazines primarily promoting knives for harm.[73] Subsequent amendments, including under the Offensive Weapons Act 2019, banned possession of specific large blades like "zombie knives" (over 8 inches with a plain edge, serrated edge, and multiple holes) even in private dwellings from July 2021, and imposed stricter online sales verification for knives to under-18s. A further prohibition on zombie-style knives and machetes took effect on 24 September 2024, criminalizing their possession, sale, or supply across the UK.[104] These acts collectively form a layered regime prioritizing public carry restrictions, with escalating penalties for repeat offences reaching mandatory minimum sentences under later sentencing guidelines.[87]Recent Reforms (Post-2020)
In 2021, amendments to the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 extended possession bans to private residences, making it illegal from July 29 to own certain prohibited items such as knuckledusters, swordsticks, and certain bladed weapons without a lawful purpose, regardless of location.[114] This change closed a prior loophole allowing private storage of banned items not intended for immediate use.[73] The Sentencing Act 2020, effective December 1, introduced mandatory minimum custodial sentences for repeat possession of bladed articles or offensive weapons—six months for adults on a second conviction—and for threats with such items, aiming to deter habitual offenders amid rising knife-related offences.[115] Courts must impose at least four months' custody for threatening offences unless exceptional circumstances apply.[116] In 2024, the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order expanded prohibitions to include "zombie-style" knives—bladed articles over 8 inches with a plain cutting edge, serrated edge, or multiple holes—and machetes designed for harm rather than utility, effective September 24.[117][118] Possession, sale, manufacture, or importation now carries up to four years' imprisonment, with a surrender scheme running from August 25 to September 23, 2024, to facilitate compliance; legitimate agricultural machetes remain exempt if used for work.[98] Ronan's Law, enacted in 2025 and named after teenager Ronan Kanda murdered in 2022, imposed stricter online sales controls from February 19, requiring retailers and platforms to verify ages, report bulk or suspicious knife purchases to police, and face up to two years' imprisonment for sales to under-18s—doubling prior maxima.[119] Its final phase banned "ninja swords" (curved single-edged blades over 20 inches) from August 1, 2025, prohibiting possession, sale, or import without defence exemptions, following a surrender of over 1,000 weapons.[120][121] These measures target importation loopholes, with police noting over 18,500 possession convictions or cautions in the year to March 2023, disproportionately involving juveniles.[74] The Criminal Justice Bill's knife provisions, advanced in 2023-2024, created a new offence of possessing a bladed article with intent to commit unlawful violence (maximum four years) and empowered police to seize and destroy knives on private premises during lawful visits if violence is suspected, with owner appeals to magistrates.[122] Penalties for manufacturing or selling prohibited weapons rose to two years from six months.[122] As of October 2025, the ongoing Crime and Policing Bill proposes further enhancements, including regulated online sales verification and intent-based possession offences, pending parliamentary progress.[74]Germany
Germany's knife legislation is governed by the federal Waffengesetz (Weapons Act), which permits unrestricted possession of knives for adults aged 18 and older in private settings, regardless of blade length or type.[20] [123] Public carrying, however, is strictly limited under §42a to prevent misuse, prohibiting fixed-blade knives exceeding 12 cm in length, one-handed opening folders with locking blades, and cutting or thrusting weapons (e.g., daggers) without a recognized justification such as professional, sporting, or hunting needs.[20] [86] Fixed-blade knives under 12 cm are allowable for public carry, either openly or concealed, reflecting practical tolerances for everyday utility while curbing potential weapons.[86] [93] Folding knives without one-handed opening or locking mechanisms—requiring two hands to deploy—are generally permitted in public, enabling common pocket tools for non-weapon purposes.[93] [124] One-handed lockable folders, however, face a public carry ban to mitigate rapid deployment risks, though their private possession remains legal.[125] [21] Amendments effective October 31, 2024, extended prohibitions to the purchase and possession of all switchblades (automatic knives), including those under 8.5 cm, eliminating prior length-based exceptions.[126] Utility and rescue knives, often featuring fixed blades under 12 cm or compliant folding designs with tools like seatbelt cutters, are not categorically banned and align with allowances for professional or emergency use, as affirmed in legal interpretations through 2023–2025.[123] [127] Such items must still adhere to §42a parameters to avoid classification as prohibited carry items. The framework ensures federal consistency, but local authorities enforce variances, including designated weapon-free zones in urban areas (e.g., Stuttgart's city center since 2025), where blades over 4 cm may be restricted alongside broader public transport bans on immediately accessible knives.[93] [128] Proposals in August 2024 to halve the fixed-blade carry limit to 6 cm amid rising attacks remained under debate without enactment by October 2025.[129] [86]France
In France, knives are primarily classified as Category D weapons under Article R. 311-1 of the Code de la Sécurité Intérieure, encompassing folding knives with locking blades, fixed-blade knives, automatic knives, daggers, and similar implements, while non-locking small pocket knives may sometimes be treated as everyday tools depending on judicial context. Possession of Category D weapons requires no authorization for adults aged 18 and over, but their acquisition is restricted to those without criminal prohibitions, and sales must be recorded by dealers.[95] [97] Public carriage or transport of any Category D knife is strictly prohibited without a legitimate reason, defined narrowly as professional necessity (e.g., for butchers, farmers, hunters, or anglers), sporting events, or exhibitions, with self-defense explicitly disallowed as justification. Violations constitute a contravention, punishable by fines up to €1,500, though fixed fines of €500 may apply in minor cases, and knives may be confiscated. Automatic knives, while also Category D, face additional scrutiny due to their rapid deployment mechanism, often leading to classification as offensive weapons in enforcement.[95] [130] [131] Exceptions permit carriage for authorized professionals, including law enforcement, military personnel, and private security agents with valid credentials, who must still adhere to operational protocols. Following the 2015 terrorist attacks and subsequent security measures, enforcement has emphasized these prohibitions, with recent 2024 guidelines reinforcing bans on dagger-style and combat-oriented blades as Category D items to curb urban violence, though the foundational framework dates to 1995 decrees without major statutory overhauls tied directly to terrorism.[95] [131]Other European Nations
In Sweden, carrying knives in public places, including vehicles and areas near schools, is prohibited unless justified by legitimate purposes such as occupational use, fishing, or other recreation. Switchblades and stilettos are restricted for individuals under 21, who may not own, borrow, or use them under any circumstances.[132] The Netherlands imposes national prohibitions on Category I weapons, including stilettos and certain automatic knives, while allowing ownership of folding knives with single-edged blades under 28 cm; however, carrying any knife deemed usable as a weapon is subject to local municipal bans, creating variations across cities.[133][134] Italy treats switchblades as offensive weapons (armi bianche), banning their public carry without a specific justification; folding knives with blades under 10 cm and no double edges or snap-locks may be owned as tools but require a valid reason for transport or use outside the home.[135] Denmark permits unrestricted ownership and carry of knives with blades up to 12 cm, but blades exceeding this length demand a lawful purpose, such as hunting, fishing, sports, or professional needs, with daggers always requiring justification.[136] Across these nations, common patterns include exceptions for functional utility in work or leisure, alongside stringent public carry restrictions to curb misuse, without overarching EU harmonization that would standardize rules.[84]North America
United States
Federal Framework
Federal knife legislation in the United States primarily targets switchblade knives through the Federal Switchblade Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. §§ 1241–1245), which prohibits their manufacture for sale, interstate transportation, and importation if the blade opens automatically by hand pressure on a button, spring, or device in the handle.[137] Possession of switchblades by individuals is not federally criminalized outside of commerce restrictions, allowing legal ownership in states permitting it.[138] U.S. Customs and Border Protection enforces these import bans, with exceptions limited to one-armed individuals.[138] The act does not restrict intrastate possession, ownership, or sale of switchblades within state boundaries, nor does it apply to knives that require manual force to open fully, such as assisted-opening folders or one-hand manual openers.[139] Federal law similarly lacks prohibitions on most other knife types, including fixed blades, folding knives, or balisongs, absent specific contexts like aviation security under Transportation Security Administration rules.[138]State Variations and Preemption
Knife laws vary significantly across U.S. states, with some restricting concealed carry of specific types like automatic knives, dirks, daggers, or those exceeding certain blade lengths, while others permit open or concealed carry of most folding and fixed-blade knives without length limits.[140] For instance, states like Vermont legalized ownership and sale of automatic knives effective July 2, 2025, regardless of blade length.[141] Statewide preemption laws, enacted in over 40 states, prevent local governments from imposing stricter regulations than state law, ensuring uniformity and reducing confusion for carriers.[142] [143] Violations can range from misdemeanors to felonies depending on the state and knife type.[39] State knife laws diverge significantly, with restrictions on blade length (often 3-5 inches for concealed carry), automatic knives, and categories like dirks, daggers, or balisong (butterfly) knives. For instance, California Penal Code § 21510 prohibits concealed carry of dirks or daggers without length limits on open carry, while New York limits concealed carry to small pocket knives that fold and do not lock, banning ballistic knives and gravity knives statewide, though reforms in 2019 legalized most automatic knives.[39][140] In New York, even otherwise legal knives become illegal if possessed with intent to use unlawfully against another person; courts often view carrying a knife for protection or self-defense as evidence of unlawful intent under Penal Law § 265.01.[144][145] Texas, post-2017 reforms, permits open or concealed carry of blades over 5.5 inches, classifying them as legal weapons. As of 2025, automatic knives remain restricted or banned in states including California, Hawaii, New York, and Massachusetts, often as felonies, whereas they are fully legal in states like Arizona and Florida.[39][140] Preemption laws, enacted in states such as Texas (2017), Idaho (Knife Law Preemption, signed into law), and West Virginia, designate state statutes as supreme, nullifying local ordinances stricter than statewide rules to prevent a "crazy quilt" of regulations. By 2025, at least 15 states enforce such preemption, advocated by organizations like Knife Rights to protect lawful carriers from municipal overreach.[142][146][147]Recent Federal Proposals
The Knife Owners' Protection Act of 2025 (S. 346 and H.R. 60), reintroduced in January 2025 by Senator Mike Lee, permits interstate transportation of knives between jurisdictions where possession and carry are legal, provided the transporter is not federally prohibited from owning firearms or knives.[148] [149] The bill aims to protect lawful travelers from prosecution during transit through restrictive areas, with no estimated federal cost impact per Congressional Budget Office analysis.[150] Knife Rights has also filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of portions of the Federal Switchblade Act.[137]Canada
Under section 84(1) of the Criminal Code, prohibited weapons include knives that open automatically by gravity, centrifugal force, or hand pressure on a button, spring, or device attached to the handle, such as switchblades and certain balisongs. Possession of these is a criminal offense, punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment.[151] Fixed-blade, folding, and hunting knives are generally legal for ownership and carry if used for lawful purposes like work or recreation, but concealment without justification can classify them as concealed weapons under the Code, leading to charges.[152] [153] Carrying any knife with intent for self-defense is prohibited, as it constitutes possession for a purpose dangerous to public peace.[154] No federal blade length restrictions apply to non-prohibited knives, but provincial variations may influence enforcement, emphasizing purpose over size.[155] As of 2025, Transport Canada and CATSA ban all knives in carry-on luggage, aligning with Criminal Code prohibitions on disguised or automatic types.[156] Knife legislation in Canada is primarily governed by the federal Criminal Code, which prohibits the concealed carrying of any weapon, including knives, under Section 90, defining this as an offence punishable by up to five years imprisonment unless authorized for a lawful purpose such as employment or recreation.[157] Knives are classified as weapons when carried with intent to use for assault or defense, but exceptions apply for tools like pocket knives used in trades or outdoor activities, provided they are not concealed and the purpose is demonstrably peaceful.[158] There are no federal restrictions on blade length for non-prohibited types, emphasizing context and intent over size.[152] Certain knives are explicitly prohibited nationwide under Section 84(1) of the Criminal Code, including automatic-opening knives (switchblades), centrifugal-force knives (balisongs or butterfly knives), push daggers, and disguised blades like those hidden in belts or lipstick tubes, due to their design facilitating rapid deployment.[152] Importing or possessing these is illegal, enforced by the Canada Border Services Agency, with seizures common at borders.[159] Lawful alternatives include fixed-blade or manual-folding knives for utility, but carrying any knife openly in public requires justification to avoid charges under weapons trafficking or possession provisions.[160] Provincial and municipal laws supplement federal rules without overriding them, focusing on age limits or local restrictions; for instance, Ontario requires individuals under 19 to avoid knives exceeding 30 cm in length for certain sales, though enforcement aligns with federal intent-based prohibitions.[155] Quebec and British Columbia maintain similar frameworks, with occasional bylaws in urban areas restricting knives in schools or public parks, but no widespread blade-length bans.[152]Asia-Pacific
Knife legislation in the Asia-Pacific region generally imposes stringent restrictions on the public carry and possession of knives, prioritizing public safety amid concerns over crime and terrorism, though enforcement and specifics differ by jurisdiction. Countries like Japan and Australia prohibit carrying blades exceeding certain lengths without a legitimate purpose, such as occupational use, while China enforces real-name registration and physical restraints on household knives in select areas to prevent misuse. Hong Kong designates specific knife types as prohibited weapons under ordinance law. These measures reflect a causal link between reduced knife access and lower incidence of edged-weapon violence, as evidenced by low per capita knife crime rates in regulated environments, though data on causal efficacy remains debated due to confounding factors like cultural norms and overall crime trends.Japan
Japan regulates knives and swords primarily through the Firearm and Sword Possession Control Law enacted in 1958, which requires registration for swords and restricts possession of blades intended as weapons.[161] Carrying any knife with a blade longer than 6 cm in public is prohibited without a valid reason, such as transporting it for work, cooking, or repair; valid reasons must be demonstrable to authorities.[162] Folding knives with blades exceeding 5.5 cm or locking mechanisms are illegal to carry, as are double-edged daggers over 5.5 cm following a 2009 revision to the law aimed at curbing potential weaponization.[163] Ownership of traditional swords, including katanas, necessitates prefectural registration to verify non-weapon intent, with unregistered possession punishable by fines or imprisonment.[164] These rules stem from post-World War II disarmament efforts and have contributed to Japan's homicide rate by sharp instruments remaining below 0.3 per 100,000 population annually, per United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime data, though attribution to legislation alone overlooks broader societal factors like low violent crime baselines.Australia
Australian knife laws are enacted at the state and territory level, uniformly prohibiting public possession or carry of any knife without a "lawful excuse," defined as genuine needs like employment, recreation, or religious observance; self-defense does not qualify as an excuse across jurisdictions.[165] Prohibited categories include automatic knives like switchblades and ballistic knives nationwide, with additional bans on concealed carry devices. In Queensland, amendments effective September 1, 2024, classify most knives as controlled items, barring sales to minors under 18 and requiring record-keeping for transactions to combat youth violence.[166] New South Wales and Victoria impose similar restrictions, with penalties up to 2 years imprisonment for unlicensed carry; for instance, Victoria's Summary Offences Act 1966 deems possession in public a summary offense unless excused. States like South Australia allow limited carry of small folding knives under 7.62 cm for utility but enforce strict scrutiny. These decentralized laws have reduced knife-related offenses, with Australian Institute of Criminology reporting a 20% drop in armed robberies involving blades post-2010 harmonization efforts, though urban-rural disparities persist.China and Hong Kong
In mainland China, knife controls intensified following the 2014 Kunming railway station attack, which killed 31 and prompted nationwide restrictions on sales and public carry; most knives require real-name registration at purchase, and carrying any edged tool in public spaces like stations triggers confiscation at security checkpoints.[167] Household kitchen knives face physical restraints, such as chains or locks, in regions like Xinjiang, where a 2017 policy mandates QR code stamping for traceability to deter domestic unrest.[168] Broader enforcement under public security regulations prohibits possession of blades usable as weapons without permits, with violations carrying penalties up to 10 years under Criminal Law Article 284 for endangering public safety. Hong Kong, under the Weapons Ordinance (Cap. 217), prohibits possession of specific knives including flick knives, gravity knives, and spring-loaded blades, with offenses punishable by fines up to HK$10,000 and 3 years imprisonment regardless of intent.[169] Chief Executive John Lee affirmed in June 2023 that these restrictions remain in force, balancing utility against security risks.[170] Empirical outcomes include near-zero mass knife attacks post-reforms in China, per state media reports, though independent verification is limited by data opacity.Japan
In Japan, knife and blade legislation is primarily regulated under the Firearms and Swords Control Law (銃砲刀剣類所持等取締法), enacted on May 29, 1958, which distinguishes between possession—often permitted with registration—and carrying, which is broadly prohibited in public without a justifiable purpose or permit.[171] Traditional swords, such as katana, qualify as "swords" under the law if they meet criteria like a curved blade over 15 cm or specific historical designs; ownership requires registration with prefectural public safety commissions, treating them as cultural artifacts rather than weapons, with over 100,000 registered nihontō (authentic Japanese swords) as of recent estimates.[161] However, carrying any sword outside designated transport (e.g., in a locked case for exhibitions or repairs) incurs penalties of up to two years imprisonment or a ¥300,000 fine.[172] For non-sword knives, the Minor Offenses Act supplements the 1958 law by prohibiting public carrying of blades exceeding 6 cm in length (measured from the handle base) without valid reason, such as occupational needs for chefs or artisans; small folding pocket knives under this threshold, without locking mechanisms, are generally tolerated for everyday utility.[30] Artisanal exceptions allow licensed craftsmen to possess and transport specialized blades for production, provided they demonstrate professional intent to authorities. These restrictions trace to post-World War II demilitarization efforts under the 1947 Constitution's pacifist framework, aiming to curb weapon proliferation amid broader societal emphasis on peace, though the specific blade controls predate modern knife crime spikes. Japan's stringent carrying bans have coincided with minimal knife misuse, with violent offenses (including those involving blades) comprising just 3.5% of reported crimes in recent national statistics—1,392 homicides and 5,988 robberies annually, far below global peers—attributable less to enforcement alone than to entrenched cultural norms of collectivism, shame-based deterrence, and social homogeneity fostering self-control and group harmony.[173] Reforms following the June 8, 2008, Akihabara truck-and-knife attack, which killed seven, reinforced purpose-based exemptions but did not alter core possession tolerances, underscoring a legal philosophy balancing historical reverence for blades (e.g., samurai heritage) with public safety.[30]Australia
Knife legislation in Australia is enacted at the state and territory levels, with no comprehensive federal framework specifically governing knives, though customs laws restrict imports of certain prohibited types such as automatic or ballistic knives. Across all jurisdictions, carrying a knife in a public place without a lawful excuse—typically limited to occupational purposes, such as work by chefs or tradespeople, or recreational uses like camping or fishing—is an offense punishable by fines or imprisonment. This prohibition applies regardless of blade length in most cases, emphasizing intent and context over size, though definitions of "knife" exclude common tools like butter knives when not used as weapons. Prohibited varieties, including switchblades, butterfly knives, and star knives, are uniformly banned from possession, sale, or manufacture without permits.[174][175] Sales of knives face strict curbs to prevent access by minors, with penalties for sellers including fines up to AUD 2,500 in some states. In New South Wales, knives cannot be sold to those under 16, requiring retailers to display warning signs. Queensland and Western Australia prohibit sales to under-18s, mandating age verification and staff training. Victoria requires secure storage of knives out of public view in retail settings, with theft reporting obligations. These measures aim to reduce youth involvement in knife-related incidents, though enforcement varies by jurisdiction.[59][166][176] In 2025, South Australia implemented significant reforms via the Summary Offences (Knives and Other Weapons) Amendment Act, effective July 1, classifying machetes and swords as prohibited weapons absent exemptions for cultural or collectible items. A three-month anonymous surrender amnesty from July 1 to October 1 collected over 3,500 weapons, including knives and edged tools. Sales of sharp knives to under-18s were banned outright, with retailers required to display prohibition notices. From July 1, 2026, mandatory secure storage for knives in retail premises will apply, building on earlier phases targeting youth supply. Similar machete-focused amnesties occurred in Victoria from September to November 2025, yielding over 1,300 surrenders. These state-level updates reflect a post-1996 Port Arthur-era emphasis on coordinated weapons controls, though knives remain decentralized unlike national firearms laws.[177][29][178]China and Hong Kong
In mainland China, the purchase of "controlled knives"—defined to include daggers, switchblades, knives with blood grooves, and those with blade lengths exceeding approximately 22 cm—requires real-name registration with authorities, as mandated by regulations dating to at least 2008. Public carry of such knives is prohibited without a legitimate purpose, such as professional use or travel to remote areas with permits, with violations punishable by fines or confiscation. On railway transport, passengers are prohibited from carrying day-use knives (e.g., kitchen knives, fruit knives, scissors, utility knives, carving knives, paper cutters) with blade lengths exceeding 60 mm in carry-on, though these may be checked; blades of 60 mm or less are permitted in carry-on. Controlled knives (e.g., daggers, triangular knives, spring knives, or those exceeding GA/T 1335 standards) are prohibited from both carry-on and checked luggage.[179] Regional policies intensify controls; for instance, in Xinjiang since January 2017, residents must engrave their names and ID numbers on all household knives, including kitchen tools, paying a fee per item, to facilitate tracking during security inspections. These measures extend beyond high-risk areas, with provinces adopting chained kitchen knives and sales restrictions to preempt misuse. Such legislation emphasizes administrative prevention of social unrest over data-driven correlations between knife access and crime rates, often implemented reactively after mass stabbing incidents, like the 2014 Kunming attack that killed 31, prompting nationwide tightening for "social stability." Enforcement prioritizes potential threats from ethnic minorities or dissent, as seen in Beijing's temporary sales bans ahead of political events in 2012, reflecting causal priorities on regime security rather than broad empirical evidence of knife-driven violence. Hong Kong maintains distinct regulations under the Weapons Ordinance (Cap. 217), prohibiting possession of specific knife types—including gravity knives, spring-loaded blades, and fist-held bladed weapons—with strict liability offenses carrying fines up to HK$10,000 and up to three years' imprisonment, irrespective of intent. Ordinary folding or fixed-blade knives lack a statutory length limit but fall under the Theft Ordinance (Cap. 210, s. 17) as "offensive weapons" if carried in public with intent to commit an unlawful act, such as injury, allowing prosecutorial discretion based on context like concealment or association with violence. This intent-based approach permits utility knives for lawful purposes, contrasting mainland China's categorical restrictions, though enforcement has political dimensions, as in the 2022 sentencing of a journalist to 15 months for possessing a multipurpose knife deemed offensive. Hong Kong's framework, rooted in pre-handover common law, permits partial civilian allowances while prohibiting import or carry of controlled types at borders.Other Regions
Russia
In Russia, knife regulation is governed by the Federal Law "On Weapons" No. 150-FZ, enacted on December 13, 1996, which categorizes certain edged tools as "cold weapons" (холодное оружие) subject to licensing for acquisition, storage, and carry.[180] Knives qualify as cold weapons if they meet technical criteria outlined in state standards (GOST R 51215-98), including a blade length exceeding 90 mm, sufficient thickness for penetration (at least 2.6 mm at the narrowest point), a sharpened edge capable of cutting 8 mm thick pine wood to a depth of 5 mm in one stroke, and a handle design ensuring firm grip without slipping.[181] Blades under 90 mm generally do not qualify unless designed for throwing or with automatic mechanisms that enhance combat utility, such as spring-loaded ejection.[181] Ownership of cold weapons requires a permit from internal affairs authorities, valid for five years and renewable, with carry permits issued only for specific purposes like hunting or sport, prohibiting concealed carry in populated areas without justification.[181] Non-cold knives, treated as household tools, face no licensing but carry in public may draw scrutiny if perceived as intended for harm, potentially leading to administrative penalties under Article 20.8 of the Code of Administrative Offenses for illegal weapon handling.[181] Prohibited categories include ballistic knives, disguised blades, and those exceeding parameters for civilian turnover, with importation restricted to certified models not qualifying as cold weapons.[181] Enforcement emphasizes expert forensic examination to determine classification, as visual inspection alone is insufficient, resulting in many commercial knives avoiding cold weapon status through design modifications like blunted tips or ergonomic handles.[182]New Zealand
New Zealand's knife laws prohibit possession of any knife in a public place without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, as stipulated in section 13A of the Summary Offences Act 1981, punishable by up to three months' imprisonment or a NZ$2,000 fine.[183] Reasonable excuses include occupational needs (e.g., tradespersons carrying tools), recreational activities like fishing or camping, or immediate use in food preparation, but self-defense alone does not qualify, with police discretion applied based on context and intent.[184] Section 202A of the Crimes Act 1961 extends this to "offensive weapons," encompassing knives alongside items like clubs or chains, with penalties escalating to three years' imprisonment for possession with intent to commit an offense. Certain knife types are outright prohibited under the Customs Import Prohibition (Offensive Weapons) Order 2021, including flick knives (automatic opening by button or spring), butterfly knives (balisongs), double-edged daggers, and swordsticks, banning their importation, sale, or possession without permits issued rarely for collectors or museums.[185][186] No universal blade length restriction applies to non-prohibited knives, allowing fixed-blade or folding models for justified carry, though aviation rules limit carry-on blades over 6 cm, permitting checked baggage.[187] Repeat convictions within two years under these provisions trigger mandatory sentencing considerations, reflecting efforts to curb knife-related offenses amid rising urban crime concerns, though data from Police reports indicate enforcement focuses on contextual misuse rather than blanket bans.[184]Russia
In Russia, knife ownership is governed primarily by Federal Law No. 150-FZ "On Weapons," enacted on December 13, 1996, and subsequent amendments, which permit unrestricted possession of knives classified as household or utilitarian tools while regulating those deemed "cold weapons" (холодное оружие).[180] Cold weapons require a license for acquisition, storage, and carry, with unlicensed public carry constituting an administrative offense punishable by fines up to 2,000 rubles or confiscation under Article 20.8 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.[181] Classification as a cold weapon depends on technical conformity to GOST R 51215-98 standards, requiring all five criteria: blade length over 90 mm, blade butt thickness of 2.6–6 mm, blade tip angle under 70 degrees, handle design for secure combat grip, and overall construction enabling effective striking or thrusting.[182][188] Folding knives with blades under 90 mm typically fail to meet these thresholds and are thus exempt from licensing, allowing everyday carry for practical purposes without legal issue.[189] Fixed-blade knives, often used for hunting or fieldwork, are similarly permissible if not qualifying as cold weapons or if carried with a hunting license, which authorizes transport to and from designated areas.[190] Automatic knives (switchblades) with blades up to 90 mm are legal if they evade cold weapon status, though those exceeding parameters necessitate certification or licensing.[189] Post-Soviet reforms liberalized knife regulations by decriminalizing unauthorized carry of edged items—shifting it from criminal to administrative liability—and emphasizing intent over mere possession, contrasting with the USSR's blanket prohibitions on non-state-approved blades.[182] Enforcement remains discretionary and low-priority for evident tools like pocket folders or utility blades, particularly in rural contexts where knives aid labor or recreation, though urban areas impose heightened scrutiny during security checks at events, transport, or amid public disturbances to curb misuse.[191] Local ordinances in cities like Moscow may further restrict bladed items in crowded venues, but federal law prevails absent cold weapon designation.[192]New Zealand
In New Zealand, knife legislation distinguishes between prohibited types, which are banned outright or restricted for import and possession, and general carry rules that emphasize intent and purpose. The Customs Import Prohibition (Offensive Weapons) Order 2021 prohibits importing specific knives deemed offensive, including flick knives (automatic-opening blades via button or spring), butterfly knives (balisongs), and any knife with a double-edged blade longer than 200 mm or designed for throwing.[185] Possession of these prohibited variants is illegal nationwide, with enforcement by New Zealand Police treating them as offensive weapons under broader criminal provisions.[184] Unlike firearms regulated by the Arms Act 1983, knives fall primarily under the Summary Offences Act 1981 for domestic possession and use, without extensions from post-2019 gun reforms that targeted semi-automatic weapons following the Christchurch mosque attacks.[193] Public carry of non-prohibited knives is restricted by section 13A of the Summary Offences Act 1981, which criminalizes possession in any public place without a "lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose."[193] Violations carry penalties of up to three months' imprisonment or a NZ$2,000 fine, with police discretion applied to determine offensive intent—carrying solely for self-defense qualifies as unlawful, as knives must not be possessed with the purpose of wounding or injuring.[184] Lawful purposes include occupational needs (e.g., tradespeople carrying utility knives), recreational activities like fishing or hiking, or culinary preparation, provided the knife aligns directly with the activity and is not concealed in a manner suggesting concealment for harm.[184] Exceptions are more permissive in rural and outdoor contexts, where knives support legitimate land-based pursuits such as farming, hunting, or bushcraft, reflecting practical tolerances absent in urban enforcement.[184] No blade length limits apply universally to non-prohibited knives, though police may seize items based on context, such as oversized blades without evident purpose. Post-2019 public safety initiatives, including enhanced border controls on weapons, have indirectly reinforced import scrutiny but introduced no knife-specific domestic tightenings akin to firearm buybacks or licensing expansions.[186] Enforcement prioritizes evidence of misuse, with data from Police indicating seizures often tied to gang or violent contexts rather than routine carry.[184]References
- https://commonslibrary.[parliament](/page/Parliament).uk/research-briefings/sn00330/
- https://www.[gov.uk](/page/Gov.uk)/government/publications/the-offensive-weapons-act-2019/statutory-guidance-offensive-weapons-act-2019-accessible-version