Hubbry Logo
Manufacturing process managementManufacturing process managementMain
Open search
Manufacturing process management
Community hub
Manufacturing process management
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Manufacturing process management
Manufacturing process management
Manufacturing process management
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Manufacturing process management (MPM) is a collection of technologies and methods used to define how products are to be manufactured. MPM differs from ERP/MRP which is used to plan the ordering of materials and other resources, set manufacturing schedules, and compile cost data.[1]

A cornerstone of MPM is the central repository for the integration of all these tools and activities aids in the exploration of alternative production line scenarios; making assembly lines more efficient with the aim of reduced lead time to product launch, shorter product times and reduced work in progress (WIP) inventories as well as allowing rapid response to product or product changes.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Manufacturing process management

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Manufacturing process management (MPM) is a discipline that encompasses the planning, execution, and control of manufacturing processes to transform raw materials into finished products while ensuring alignment with design specifications, cost targets, and quality standards across the product lifecycle. It integrates technologies and methodologies to bridge engineering design with shop-floor production, facilitating the creation, validation, and optimization of manufacturing plans in a collaborative environment. Core to MPM is the application of business process management principles to factory operations and supply chains, enabling efficient resource allocation, waste reduction, and adaptability to production demands. Key components of MPM include , (such as equipment, personnel, and facilities), and digital tools like manufacturing execution systems (MES) and to monitor and refine operations in real time. It emphasizes producible design, where decisions early in development account for feasibility to minimize changes and risks during production. Integration with product lifecycle management () systems captures product data, while connections to () ensure accurate material and scheduling information flows to the plant floor. Benefits include reduced time-to-market by 25-50% through automated , improved production efficiency via lean principles like just-in-time inventory, and enhanced using statistical process monitoring. Historically, MPM evolved from manual process planning in the mid-20th century to digital systems in the 1990s, driven by advancements in CAD/CAM and the need for concurrent engineering in complex industries like aerospace and automotive. Today, it supports sustainable manufacturing by incorporating environmental impact assessments. It also incorporates Industry 4.0 technologies such as IoT sensors for predictive maintenance, fostering resilience in global supply chains. Standards like SAE AS6500 guide its implementation, promoting timely development and support of systems through structured risk assessments and maturity evaluations, such as Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs).

Overview

Definition

Manufacturing process management (MPM) is a discipline within product lifecycle management () that focuses on defining, implementing, and maintaining the processes required to manufacture a product from its design phase through to production. It encompasses a collection of technologies and methods used to specify how products are to be manufactured, ensuring alignment between engineering designs and operational capabilities across multiple sites. As a subset of , MPM integrates product data to create structured manufacturing plans, enabling traceability and controlled changes throughout the lifecycle. Key elements of MPM include , which involves creating detailed representations of manufacturing workflows to simulate and validate operations; , which optimizes the distribution of materials, tools, personnel, and equipment; and workflow orchestration, which coordinates tasks and sequences to ensure efficient execution. Additionally, MPM emphasizes compliance with quality standards such as ISO 9001, which requires organizations to plan, implement, and control processes to achieve consistent product quality and . These elements collectively support the and of manufacturing procedures to minimize variations and risks. Unlike broader manufacturing execution systems (MES), which handle real-time shop floor control, monitoring, and adjustments during production, MPM prioritizes pre-production planning and design to establish robust, repeatable processes before fabrication begins. For example, MPM bridges from (CAD) tools to actual fabrication by transforming engineering bills of materials (EBOMs) into manufacturing bills of materials (MBOMs), incorporating site-specific details like tooling and assembly sequences to guide production setup. This integration facilitates , reducing errors and accelerating time-to-market.

Importance in Manufacturing

Manufacturing process management (MPM) plays a pivotal role in enhancing within environments by streamlining workflows and minimizing , which directly contributes to cost reductions of 10-20% through optimized and reduced inefficiencies. Industry benchmarks indicate that effective MPM , particularly via digital tools, can lower production costs by improving throughput and labor , allowing manufacturers to allocate resources more precisely and avoid . Beyond cost savings, MPM significantly bolsters and by embedding standardized checks throughout the production lifecycle, thereby reducing defect rates and preventing costly product recalls. This systematic approach ensures full of materials and processes, enabling rapid identification and resolution of issues while adhering to industry standards such as ISO 9001, which helps maintain and avoids penalties associated with non-compliance. Furthermore, MPM facilitates seamless integration by synchronizing production schedules with supplier deliveries, enabling just-in-time () manufacturing that minimizes inventory holding costs and enhances responsiveness to fluctuating market demands. In sectors like automotive, adoption of MPM practices correlates with up to 20% higher through improved output and operational agility, as evidenced by recent industry surveys. This adaptability not only shortens lead times but also strengthens overall competitiveness in dynamic global markets.

Historical Development

Origins in Industrial Engineering

The foundations of manufacturing process management (MPM) trace back to the early 20th-century principles of , particularly Frederick Winslow Taylor's , which emphasized systematic analysis of work processes to enhance efficiency. In his 1911 monograph , Taylor advocated for replacing rule-of-thumb methods with scientifically derived procedures, including time studies to measure and optimize worker motions and tasks. These time-motion studies formed a core method for dissecting manufacturing operations into elemental steps, enabling managers to standardize processes, reduce waste, and improve productivity by aligning human effort with mechanical tools. Taylor's approach shifted manufacturing from artisanal practices to a disciplined framework where processes were planned, timed, and controlled, laying the groundwork for modern MPM by prioritizing efficiency through data-driven . Building on Taylor's ideas, Henry Ford's implementation of the moving in revolutionized process sequencing in , formalizing the linear flow of tasks across specialized workstations. At the Highland Park plant in , Ford's team introduced a conveyor-driven system for assembling the Model T automobile, reducing the assembly time from over 12 hours per vehicle to about 93 minutes. This innovation standardized sequential operations, where parts moved continuously to workers performing repetitive, predefined tasks, which minimized variability and scaled production dramatically—Ford produced 202,667 vehicles in 1914 compared to 170,211 the prior year. The assembly line exemplified early MPM by integrating process planning with execution, influencing global manufacturing to adopt sequenced workflows for high-volume output. Complementing these advancements, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth developed process charts in the early 1910s as visual tools for analyzing and improving manufacturing workflows, further embedding graphical representation into . In their 1921 presentation to the , Frank Gilbreth introduced standardized symbols for operations, inspections, transports, delays, and storages to map processes holistically, allowing engineers to identify inefficiencies without disrupting ongoing work. The Gilbreths' charts, rooted in their motion study research since 1908, visualized the entire sequence of activities in a production cycle, such as bricklaying or assembly, to eliminate unnecessary movements and streamline flows— for instance, their (Gilbreth spelled backward) analysis broke tasks into 17 basic motions for optimization. This methodology provided a foundational technique for MPM by enabling systematic documentation and refinement of process structures, influencing later standards like flow process charts. The post-World War II manufacturing boom accelerated the transition from predominantly manual processes to mechanized systems, solidifying industrial engineering's role in MPM amid rapid economic expansion. Following the war, U.S. factories shifted from wartime production to consumer goods, with — including automated machinery and conveyor integrations— boosting output; for example, industrial production rose 96% from 1945 to 1953, driven by investments in equipment that reduced reliance on manual labor. This era saw widespread adoption of Taylorist and Fordist principles in mechanized lines, such as in the automotive and appliance sectors, where processes became more integrated and scalable, handling increased demand without proportional labor growth. The boom underscored MPM's evolution by emphasizing mechanized process control to sustain efficiency during growth, setting precedents for ongoing optimization in industrial operations.

Evolution with Digital Technologies

The integration of digital technologies into manufacturing process management (MPM) marked a pivotal shift from manual and theoretical approaches to automated, data-driven methodologies, beginning prominently in the with the emergence of (CAPP). CAPP systems were developed to bridge the gap between design and by automating the creation of process plans, reducing reliance on skilled planners and minimizing errors in production routing. Early implementations focused on variant process planning, which retrieved and adapted existing plans for similar parts, and generative approaches, which algorithmically created new plans based on part features and manufacturing rules. Seminal work in this era, such as Richard Wysk's 1977 dissertation on the Automated Process Planning and Selection (APPAS) system, demonstrated the feasibility of generative CAPP for detailed process selection in metal removal operations. By the 1990s, MPM evolved further through its incorporation into (ERP) systems, which expanded process management beyond isolated planning to holistic enterprise integration, including inventory, scheduling, and quality control. This period saw the transition from (MRP) and (MRP II) to full ERP frameworks, enabling standardized MPM modules that synchronized production processes with broader business operations. SAP's R/3 release in 1992 exemplified this shift, introducing client-server architecture with robust production planning (PP) modules that supported detailed process scheduling, , and repetitive manufacturing workflows, thereby improving in complex supply chains. The 2000s brought advanced simulation tools into MPM, particularly finite element analysis (FEA), which facilitated virtual process validation by modeling physical behaviors such as stress, deformation, and thermal effects under manufacturing conditions. This integration allowed for predictive testing of processes like , , and in digital environments, reducing prototyping costs and time-to-market. Influential developments included the widespread adoption of FEA within (CAE) software, where it supported iterative optimization of process parameters before physical implementation, as highlighted in comprehensive reviews of manufacturing simulation advancements. Post-2010 developments under the Industry 4.0 paradigm have transformed MPM through the infusion of (IoT) technologies, enabling real-time data acquisition from sensors embedded in machinery and production lines for continuous process monitoring and adaptive control. Coined at the 2011 Hannover Messe, Industry 4.0 emphasized cyber-physical systems where IoT facilitates seamless data flow, , and dynamic adjustments to manufacturing processes based on live analytics. This has led to enhanced responsiveness, with IoT-driven platforms collecting vast datasets on variables like machine performance and environmental factors to optimize MPM in smart factories.

Core Processes

Process Planning and Design

Process planning and design forms the foundational stage in manufacturing process management, where the sequence of operations, resources, and constraints are defined to transform raw materials into finished products efficiently. This phase involves systematically analyzing product specifications and production goals to create a blueprint that ensures feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and quality. By establishing clear parameters upfront, manufacturers can minimize errors during later execution and align processes with overall objectives, such as reducing waste and meeting demand forecasts. Requirements analysis initiates the process planning by gathering and evaluating data, including dimensions, tolerances, materials, and functional requirements, to determine viable methods. This step involves interpreting drawings and specifications to identify critical features that influence process selection, such as surface finishes or assembly tolerances, ensuring the plan accommodates all technical and economic constraints. Techniques like stakeholder interviews and feasibility studies are employed to prioritize requirements, bridging the gap between design intent and production capabilities. For instance, in complex assemblies, requirements analysis quantifies volume dependencies and lead times to prevent downstream mismatches. Following requirements analysis, process mapping visually represents the workflow using standardized notations like IDEF (Integrated Definition) or BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) to decompose activities into functional blocks and sequences. IDEF0, a core IDEF method, models manufacturing processes as hierarchical functions with inputs, outputs, controls, and mechanisms, facilitating the identification of interdependencies in production flows such as material handling and quality checks. BPMN complements this by providing a graphical notation for event-driven processes, including gateways for decision points and pools for resource roles, which is particularly useful for modeling dynamic manufacturing scenarios like order-based routing. These tools enable planners to simulate process logic without physical implementation, ensuring logical consistency and scalability. Resource identification during planning entails allocating machines, materials, and labor based on capacity assessments to match production demands without overcommitment. calculates available output by evaluating equipment uptime, workforce availability, and material throughput, often using formulas to predict operational loads. A key metric is cycle time, defined as setup time plus run time, where setup time covers preparation activities like tool changes and run time denotes the active processing duration per unit; this formula helps estimate total production duration for a batch as cycle time multiplied by units produced. For example, in high-volume , planners allocate CNC machines by dividing forecasted demand by this cycle time to determine required shifts or additional labor. Such allocations ensure balanced utilization, typically targeting 80-85% capacity to buffer variability. Risk assessment integrates simulation models, such as (DES), to detect potential bottlenecks and quantify uncertainties like delays or resource shortages before finalizing the design. DES models manufacturing as a series of timestamped events—e.g., machine starts, queue formations, or material arrivals—allowing probabilistic analysis of scenarios via methods to measure metrics like idle time or overflow risks. In practice, flow graph representations of processes reveal constraints, such as a station backlog impacting downstream assembly, enabling adjustments like parallel tooling. This approach provides data-driven confidence in the design. The output of process planning and design is a comprehensive set of documents, including the bill of process (BOP) and detailed work instructions, which serve as the executable for production. The BOP outlines the sequential operations, specifying machinery, tooling, fixtures, processing parameters, and times, often structured as routing sheets that link to the bill of materials for integrated planning. Work instructions derive from the BOP, providing step-by-step guidance for operators—e.g., values or points—to ensure and compliance with standards. In applications like electronics assembly, these outputs facilitate transitions from prototypes to full-scale by embedding iterative refinements.

Process Execution and Monitoring

Process execution in manufacturing process management involves the real-time implementation of predefined production plans on the , where work orders are dispatched to initiate operations and ensure sequential processing of tasks. Dispatching typically occurs through execution systems (MES) that release work orders based on production schedules, prioritizing jobs according to criteria such as s, resource availability, and customer requirements. Sequencing operations follows established rules, such as shortest processing time or earliest , to optimize throughput while adhering to the derived from prior outputs. This phase interfaces directly with systems, including programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs), to coordinate machinery, labor, and materials in a synchronized manner. Monitoring during execution focuses on tracking operational through key performance indicators (KPIs) to maintain alignment with planned targets and identify immediate issues. A primary KPI is (OEE), which quantifies productive time relative to planned production and is calculated as the product of three factors: (ratio of operating time to planned time), (ratio of actual speed to ideal speed), and (ratio of good parts to total parts produced), expressed as: OEE=Availability×Performance×Quality\text{OEE} = \text{Availability} \times \text{Performance} \times \text{Quality} This metric provides a holistic view of equipment utilization, with world-class benchmarks often exceeding 85%. Other supporting KPIs include cycle time (duration per unit) and downtime frequency, enabling supervisors to assess real-time deviations from standards. Data capture underpins monitoring by collecting granular information from production activities to ensure and enable . Sensors embedded in machinery, such as probes and monitors, feed data into supervisory control and (SCADA) systems, which aggregate and timestamp inputs for historical logging. SCADA facilitates by linking data streams to specific work orders, allowing reconstruction of production histories for compliance and quality audits. For , SCADA analyzes patterns in real-time streams to flag irregularities, such as unexpected pressure drops, using threshold-based alerts or basic statistical models. Corrective actions during execution rely on closed-loop feedback mechanisms to address deviations promptly without halting production. When KPIs indicate variances, such as reduced from slowdowns, feedback loops compare actual outputs against setpoints and trigger adjustments, like recalibrating machine speeds or reallocating resources mid-operation. These loops, often implemented via or MES interfaces, prioritize root-cause containment to minimize scrap and delays, ensuring the process remains within acceptable tolerances until the run completes.

Process Optimization and Improvement

Process optimization and improvement in manufacturing process management refine existing workflows using historical performance to drive continuous enhancement, focusing on elimination, defect minimization, and elevation. These efforts build on insights from process execution and monitoring to identify bottlenecks and variances retrospectively. By applying structured methodologies, organizations achieve sustained gains in and without overhauling initial designs. Key techniques include principles, which prioritize the identification and removal of non-value-adding activities such as excess inventory, overproduction, and unnecessary motion to streamline production flows. Complementing this, the cycle offers a data-driven framework for defect reduction, progressing through define (problem identification), measure (), analyze (root cause determination), improve (solution implementation), and control (sustained monitoring) phases to reduce process variation and achieve near-perfect output quality. Data-driven analysis underpins these techniques via (SPC) charts, which plot process metrics over time to distinguish variations from special causes signaling instability, enabling proactive corrections. Regression models further support this by quantifying relationships between input variables and outputs, such as correlating machine speed with defect rates to pinpoint optimal operating parameters and isolate variances. Advanced methods leverage for , where algorithms process sensor data from equipment to forecast failures and schedule interventions preemptively, yielding efficiency gains of 20-30% through reduced downtime and extended asset life. Implementation typically involves events—intensive, team-based workshops lasting days to weeks that target specific processes for incremental refinements—and , which radically redesigns end-to-end workflows to eliminate redundancies.

Technologies and Tools

Software Platforms for MPM

Software platforms for manufacturing process management (MPM) encompass a range of dedicated tools designed to streamline the planning, execution, and optimization of production processes. These platforms typically fall into two main types: standalone MPM tools that focus exclusively on process-specific functionalities, and modules integrated within broader product lifecycle management () suites that provide end-to-end support from design to . Standalone tools offer specialized capabilities for targeted process handling, while PLM-integrated modules ensure seamless data flow across product development stages, enhancing overall efficiency in complex environments. Core features of MPM software platforms include to validate time, cost, and feasibility before deployment; creation for real-time visualization and optimization of manufacturing operations; and collaborative editing tools that enable multi-user environments for authoring and sharing work instructions with 2D/3D visualizations and (AR) integration. For instance, in these platforms allows estimation of operation times using standards like (MTM) and line balancing to meet targets. extend beyond static models to support dynamic monitoring of resources, such as CNC machines and robots, while collaborative features facilitate secure, instant sharing across teams, including external stakeholders via cloud-based extensions. Prominent examples illustrate these capabilities in practice. Teamcenter, a module within its suite, supports planning through a manufacturing resource library (MRL) integrated with NX CAM for digital and electronic work instructions. ' DELMIA platform excels in simulation via its Smart Connected Worker tools, leveraging AI and virtual twins to assess worker and , alongside variant generation for adapting production sequences to different product configurations. Similarly, PTC Windchill's MPM features enable bi-directional engineering bill of materials (EBOM) to (MBOM) transformation with , incorporating factory digital twins for validation and 3D visualization of structures. The evolution of MPM software has seen a shift toward cloud-based platforms since around , driven by the need for , reduced IT overhead, and faster deployment. These cloud solutions, such as Siemens' Teamcenter X—a SaaS offering of the full Teamcenter portfolio—provide preconfigured best practices, automatic updates, and elastic scaling to accommodate growing user bases and data volumes without on-premises infrastructure. This transition aligns with broader digital technology advancements, enabling remote access and enhanced in distributed manufacturing setups.

Integration with Enterprise Systems

Manufacturing process management (MPM) systems integrate with (ERP) systems to synchronize levels, production scheduling, and resource allocation, enabling seamless data flow from high-level planning to operational execution. For instance, MPM platforms exchange process plans and material requirements with ERP modules using standardized APIs such as SAP IDocs, which facilitate the transfer of production orders and updates between systems like and manufacturing execution systems (MES). This integration ensures that changes in production processes are reflected in real-time enterprise-wide planning, reducing discrepancies in material forecasting and . MPM also interfaces directly with MES for execution, where detailed instructions from MPM are deployed to control machinery, track work-in-progress, and capture execution data for feedback loops. Through bidirectional data exchange, MES provides MPM with real-time performance metrics, such as cycle times and defect rates, allowing for dynamic adjustments in models. This connectivity bridges the gap between intent and actual production, supporting closed-loop manufacturing where execution data informs future process refinements. Standardization is crucial for these integrations, with (STEP) serving as a key protocol for exchanging product and process data across heterogeneous systems, ensuring neutral, unambiguous representation of manufacturing geometries, tolerances, and sequences. STEP enables MPM to share detailed process models with and MES without loss of fidelity, facilitating in complex supply chains. The primary benefits of MPM integration with enterprise systems include real-time data synchronization, which enhances visibility and decision-making across the organization. According to , such integrations provide live updates on production and , helping to optimize operations and respond swiftly to disruptions. By automating data flows, these connections reduce manual entry errors and improve accuracy. Despite these advantages, challenges persist, particularly data silos that hinder complete visibility when legacy or MES systems lack modern interfaces. Compatibility issues in older infrastructures often require custom or extensive mapping efforts, increasing implementation costs and timelines. Organizational resistance to changes further complicates integration, as noted by in discussions of obstacles.

Benefits and Challenges

Key Advantages

Manufacturing process management (MPM) delivers significant efficiency gains by automating planning and execution, enabling reduced lead times and accelerated time-to-market. For instance, in electronics manufacturing, implementation of integrated MPM solutions has resulted in 30% faster time-to-market through optimized scheduling and resource allocation. Cost savings are another core advantage, achieved through precise resource utilization that minimizes waste and operational inefficiencies. MPM enhances scalability, particularly in complex sectors like , where it supports by standardizing processes while accommodating variant production demands. This allows manufacturers to handle high-mix, low-volume orders without proportional increases in complexity or overhead. From a sustainability perspective, MPM optimizes processes to lower .

Common Limitations

To address the high costs associated with implementing manufacturing process management (MPM) systems, organizations often adopt mitigation approaches such as phased implementation and pilot testing. Phased implementation involves breaking down the deployment into distinct stages—typically focusing on foundational , operational scaling, and full optimization—which aligns investments with achievable milestones and minimizes financial risks. from MIT Sloan Management Review indicates that this structured approach increases the success rate of digital transformations in manufacturing by ensuring metrics like are applied appropriately at each stage, avoiding the pitfalls of premature full-scale rollout that can lead to significant capital waste. Similarly, pilot testing serves as a low-risk validation method, where small-scale trials of MPM processes are conducted to identify inefficiencies or integration hurdles before broader application, thereby controlling costs and enabling iterative refinements. In manufacturing contexts, such pilots have been shown to reduce production risks by up to 75% through early detection of issues, as evidenced in (MES) deployments. Best practices for overcoming MPM challenges emphasize employee training programs and established frameworks to foster adoption and minimize resistance. Comprehensive training equips workers with the skills needed to operate MPM tools, often delivered through role-specific modules that cover system navigation, data interpretation, and troubleshooting. The ADKAR model, a cornerstone framework from Prosci, structures this by building Awareness of the need for change, Desire through inclusive communication, Knowledge via targeted education, Ability with hands-on practice and support, and Reinforcement to embed new behaviors long-term. In manufacturing, Prosci's application of ADKAR has proven effective in sectors like production, where it integrates with the three-phase change process—preparation, management, and sustainment—to achieve higher project outcomes, including sustained productivity gains post-implementation. For instance, companies like have used ADKAR-aligned training to equip project managers and teams, resulting in smoother transitions during MPM upgrades and reduced downtime from employee adaptation issues. Future trends point to AI-assisted automation as a transformative solution for simplifying customizations in MPM, addressing persistent complexities in process configuration and adaptability. By leveraging for real-time adjustments and predictive modeling, AI reduces the manual effort required for tailoring MPM systems to specific production lines, enabling faster iterations without extensive reprogramming. McKinsey Global Institute forecasts that AI adoption could automate up to 30% of manufacturing work hours by 2030, particularly in optimization tasks, thereby resolving a substantial portion of current operational complexities related to variability and . This shift is expected to enhance overall system flexibility, with generative AI further streamlining custom workflows in areas like and synchronization. A practical case example of adapting MPM to overcome integration challenges is Toyota's evolution of its system. Facing difficulties in merging traditional lean principles—such as just-in-time production—with emerging digital MPM tools for assembly, Toyota implemented regional empowerment models and AI-enhanced digital platforms in 2025 to bridge data silos and improve real-time process visibility. This adaptation resolved integration issues by decentralizing while centralizing digital oversight, resulting in leaner operations with reduced waste and faster adaptation to market demands, as detailed in Automotive Manufacturing Solutions.

References

  1. https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/Migrated/ToolAttachments/Defense-Manufacturing-Management-Guide-for-PMs.pdf
  2. https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/Images/11753_tcm1023-46603.pdf
  3. https://productiondigitalthread.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PPM-Introduction-and-Overview-short-version-2-23.pdf
  4. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/business-and-management/process-management-manufacturing
  5. https://www.proplanner.com/media/cms/MPM_Whitepaper_PDF_8E5EE351A21A4.pdf
  6. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/industry-4-0
  7. https://www.sae.org/standards/as6500-manufacturing-management-program
  8. https://kalypso.com/viewpoints/entry/manufacturing-process-management-within-plm
  9. https://www.ptc.com/en/technologies/plm/manufacturing-process-management
  10. https://www.imse.iastate.edu/files/2023/05/Kirpes_iastate_0097E_20489.pdf
  11. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/capturing-the-true-value-of-industry-four-point-zero
  12. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/transforming-advanced-manufacturing-through-industry-4-0
  13. https://www.ptc.com/en/blogs/plm/quality-control-in-manufacturing
  14. https://www.machinemetrics.com/blog/quality-control-in-manufacturing
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925527320302358
  16. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/2025-smart-manufacturing-survey.html
  17. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/blogs/business-operations-room/smart-manufacturing-in-automotive-industry.html
  18. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/6435/pg6435-images.html
  19. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/gilded/progress/text3/taylor.pdf
  20. https://corporate.ford.com/articles/history/moving-assembly-line.html
  21. https://www.mtfca.com/encyclo/fdprod.htm
  22. https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/October/Ford
  23. https://archive.org/details/processcharts00gilb
  24. https://www.thegilbreths.com/resources/Gilbreth-Process-Charts-1921.pdf
  25. https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF-Gen/Process_Charts_Gilbreth.pdf
  26. https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/how-did-mass-production-and-mass-consumption-take-after-world-war-ii
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236649325_Computer_Aided_Process_Planning_The_State-of-the-Art_Survey
  28. https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/erp/erp-history.shtml
  29. https://www.sap.com/about/company/history/1991-2000.html
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007850607625372
  31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-022-09740-9
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345223000275
  33. https://www.nist.gov/publications/requirements-analysis-process-plan-specification-workstation-level
  34. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/IR/nistir6364.pdf
  35. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-9e7a37a3c9119d0c1d820864143fd55c/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-9e7a37a3c9119d0c1d820864143fd55c.pdf
  36. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=926942
  37. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8727651/
  38. https://www.nist.gov/publications/new-capabilities-process-and-interaction-modeling-bpmn-2
  39. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-07/Module_2A.pdf
  40. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/126914/1191623969-MIT.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  41. https://www.machinemetrics.com/blog/cycle-time
  42. https://www.scitepress.org/papers/2016/57524/57524.pdf
  43. https://www.sap.com/products/scm/digital-manufacturing/what-is-mes.html
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036083522400127X
  45. https://www.sw.siemens.com/en-US/technology/shop-floor-control/
  46. https://www.oee.com/calculating-oee/
  47. https://new.abb.com/industrial-software/digital/oee-overall-equipment-effectiveness/oee-meaning---oee-as-a-performance-kpi
  48. https://inductiveautomation.com/resources/article/what-is-scada
  49. https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-022-00252-1
  50. https://www.innorobix.com/how-ignition-scada-improves-traceability-in-automotive-manufacturing/
  51. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/56081/
  52. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2506&context=open_access_theses
  53. https://www.fda.gov/files/Guide-to-Inspections-of-Quality-Systems.pdf
  54. https://asq.org/quality-resources/lean
  55. https://goleansixsigma.com/dmaic-five-basic-phases-of-lean-six-sigma/
  56. https://asq.org/quality-resources/statistical-process-control
  57. https://www.mingosmartfactory.com/spc-statistical-process-control-manufacturing-explained/
  58. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/manufacturing-analytics-unleashes-productivity-and-profitability
  59. https://www.leanproduction.com/kaizen/
  60. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/business-process-reengineering
  61. https://plm.sw.siemens.com/en-US/teamcenter/solutions/manufacturing-process-planning-data-management/
  62. https://www.3ds.com/products/delmia
  63. https://plm.sw.siemens.com/en-US/teamcenter/teamcenter-x-cloud-plm/
  64. https://beyondplm.com/2023/10/22/cloud-technology-and-plm-in-2023-navigating-the-future/
  65. https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_S4HANA_ON-PREMISE/9c4986bda35f4840ae438960ffbef64d/475d38e42c9045579d95d321e64753f6.html
  66. https://kalypso.com/viewpoints/entry/manufacturing-process-management
  67. https://www.ibaset.com/solutions/manufacturing-execution-system/manufacturing-process-management/
  68. https://www.dckap.com/blog/erp-and-mes-integration/
  69. https://www.gartner.com/en/digital-markets/insights/stand-out-in-manufacturing
  70. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/6-key-actions-for-a-successful-smart-manufacturing-strategy
  71. https://www.sw.siemens.com/en-US/digital-thread/smart-manufacturing/electronics-manufacturing/
  72. https://www.pre-scient.com/autonomous-ai-agents-vs-traditional-automation-boosting-manufacturing-roi-with-ai/
  73. https://kalypso.com/viewpoints/entry/how-manufacturing-process-management-is-transforming-aerospace-manufacturing
  74. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-manufacturers-need-a-phased-approach-to-digital-transformation/
  75. https://shoplogix.com/phased-mes-implementation-approach/
  76. https://www.prosci.com/methodology/adkar
  77. https://www.prosci.com/manufacturing-change-management
  78. https://www.prosci.com/resources/success-stories/oshkosh
  79. https://www.automotivemanufacturingsolutions.com/editors-pick/inside-toyotas-2025-leaner-manufacturing-system/645325
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.