Hubbry Logo
Simulation softwareSimulation softwareMain
Open search
Simulation software
Community hub
Simulation software
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Simulation software
Simulation software
Simulation software
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Simulation software is based on the process of modeling a real phenomenon with a set of mathematical formulas. It is, essentially, a program that allows the user to observe an operation through simulation without actually performing that operation. Simulation software is used widely to design equipment so that the final product will be as close to design specs as possible without expensive in process modification. Simulation software with real-time response is often used in gaming, but it also has important industrial applications. When the penalty for improper operation is costly, such as airplane pilots, nuclear power plant operators, or chemical plant operators, a mock up of the actual control panel is connected to a real-time simulation of the physical response, giving valuable training experience without fear of a disastrous outcome.

Advanced computer programs can simulate power system behavior,[1] weather conditions, electronic circuits, chemical reactions, mechatronics,[2] heat pumps, feedback control systems, atomic reactions, light, daylight even complex biological processes. In theory, any phenomena that can be reduced to mathematical data and equations can be simulated on a computer. Simulation can be difficult because most natural phenomena are subject to an almost infinite number of influences or unknown source of cause, for example, rainfall. One of the tricks to developing useful simulations is to determine which are the most important factors that affect the goals of the simulation.

In addition to imitating processes to see how they behave under different conditions, simulations are also used to test new theories. After creating a theory of causal relationships, the theorist can codify the relationships in the form of a computer program. If the program then behaves in the same way as the real process, there is a good chance that the proposed relationships are correct.

General simulation

[edit]

General simulation packages fall into two categories: discrete event and continuous simulation. Discrete event simulations are used to model statistical events such as customers arriving in queues at a bank. By properly correlating arrival probabilities with observed behavior, a model can determine optimal queue count to keep queue wait times at a specified level. Continuous simulators are used to model a wide variety of physical phenomena like ballistic trajectories, human respiration, electric motor response, radio frequency data communication, steam turbine power generation etc. Simulations are used in initial system design to optimize component selection and controller gains, as well as in Model Based Design systems to generate embedded control code. Real-time operation of continuous simulation is used for operator training and off-line controller tuning.

There are four main renowned simulation approaches: Event-Scheduling method, Activity Scanning, Process- Interaction, and Three-Phase approach, in comparison, the following can be noted:

The Event-Scheduling method is simpler and only has two phases so there is no Cs and Bs, this allow the program to run faster since there are no scanning for the conditional events. All these advantages also tells us something about the disadvantages of the method since there are only two phase then all events are mixed (no Bs and Cs) then the method is not parsimony, which means it is very hard to enhance (Pidd, 1998). The Activity Scanning approach is also simpler than the Three-Phase method since it has no calendar, and it support the parsimonious modeling. However this approach is much slower than Three-Phase since it treats all activities are treated as conditional. On the other hand, the executive has two phases. Usually this approach is confused with the Three-Phase method (Pidd, 1998). The Process- Interaction “share two common advantages first; they avoid programs that are slow to run. Second, they avoid the need to think through all possible logical consequences of an event” (Pidd, 1998). Yet, as (Pidd, 1998) claims this approach suffers from DEADLOCK problem, but this approach is very attractive for novice modelers. Although, (Schriber et al, 2003). Says “process interaction was understood only by an elite group of individuals and was beyond the reach of ordinary programmers”. In fact (Schriber et al, 2003).adds “. Multi- threaded applications were talked about in computer science classes, but rarely used in the broader community”. Which indicates that the implementation of Process-Interaction was very difficult to implement. The obvious contradiction, in the previous quote is due to the mix up between the Process Interaction approach and the Transaction-flow approach. To see the complete idea of the origins of Transaction-Flow best stated by (Schriber et al, 2003): This was the primordial soup out of which the Gordon Simulator arose. Gordon’s transaction flow world-view was a cleverly disguised form of process interaction that put the process interaction approach within the grasp of ordinary users. . Gordon did one of the great packaging jobs of all time. He devised a set of building blocks that could be put together to build a flowchart that graphically depicted the operation of a system. Under this modeling paradigm, the flow of elements through a system was readily visible, because that was the focus of the whole approach. The Three-Phase approach allows to “simulate parallelism, whilst avoiding deadlock” (Pidd and Cassel, 1998). Yet, Three-Phase has to scan through the schedule for bound activities, and then scans through all conditional activities which slow it down. Yet many forgo the time spent in return for solving the deadlock problem. In fact, Three-Phase is used in distributed systems whether talking about operating systems, databases, etc, under different names among them Three-Phase commit see (Tanenbaum and Steen, 2002).[3]

Electronics

[edit]

Electronics simulation software utilizes mathematical models to replicate the behaviour of an actual electronic device or circuit. Essentially, it is a computer program that converts a computer into a fully functioning electronics laboratory. Electronics simulators integrate a schematic editor, SPICE simulator and onscreen waveforms and make “what-if” scenarios easy and instant. By simulating a circuit’s behaviour before actually building it greatly improves efficiency and provides insights into the behavior and stability of electronics circuit designs. Most simulators use a SPICE engine that simulates analog, digital and mixed A/D circuits for exceptional power and accuracy. They also typically contain extensive model and device libraries. While these simulators typically have printed circuit board (PCB) export capabilities, they are not essential for design and testing of circuits, which is the primary application of electronic circuit simulation.

While there are strictly analog[4] electronics circuit simulators include both analog and event-driven digital simulation[5] capabilities, and are known as mixed-mode simulators.[6] This means that any simulation may contain components that are analog, event driven (digital or sampled-data), or a combination of both. An entire mixed signal analysis can be driven from one integrated schematic. All the digital models in mixed-mode simulators provide accurate specification of propagation time and rise/fall time delays.

The event driven algorithm provided by mixed-mode simulators is general purpose and supports non-digital types of data. For example, elements can use real or integer values to simulate DSP functions or sampled data filters. Because the event driven algorithm is faster than the standard SPICE matrix solution simulation time is greatly reduced for circuits that use event driven models in place of analog models.[7]

Mixed-mode simulation is handled on three levels; (a) with primitive digital elements that use timing models and the built-in 12 or 16 state digital logic simulator, (b) with subcircuit models that use the actual transistor topology of the integrated circuit, and finally, (c) with In-line Boolean logic expressions.

Exact representations are used mainly in the analysis of transmission line and signal integrity problems where a close inspection of an IC’s I/O characteristics is needed. Boolean logic expressions are delay-less functions that are used to provide efficient logic signal processing in an analog environment. These two modeling techniques use SPICE to solve a problem while the third method, digital primitives, use mixed mode capability. Each of these methods has its merits and target applications. In fact, many simulations (particularly those which use A/D technology) call for the combination of all three approaches. No one approach alone is sufficient.

Programmable logic controllers

[edit]

In order to properly understand the operation of a programmable logic controller (PLC), it is necessary to spend considerable time programming, testing, and debugging PLC programs. PLC systems are inherently expensive, and down-time is often very costly. In addition, if a PLC is programmed incorrectly it can result in lost productivity and dangerous conditions. PLC simulation software is a valuable tool in the understanding and learning of PLCs and to keep this knowledge refreshed and up to date.[8] PLC simulation provides users with the ability to write, edit and debug programs written using a tag-based format. Many of the most popular PLCs use tags, which are a powerful method of programming PLCs but also more complex. PLC simulation integrates tag-based ladder logic programs with 3D interactive animations to enhance the user’s learning experience.[9] These interactive animations include traffic lights, batch processing, and bottling lines.[10]

By using PLC simulation, PLC programmers have the freedom to try all the "what-if" scenarios changing ladder logic instructions and programs, then re-running the simulation to see how changes affect the PLC's operation and performance. This type of testing is often not feasible using hardwired operating PLCs that control processes often worth hundreds of thousands – or millions of dollars.[11]

Sheet metal forming

[edit]

Sheet metal forming simulation software utilizes mathematical models to replicate the behavior of an actual metal sheet manufacturing process.[citation needed] Essentially, it is a computer program that converts a computer into a fully functioning metal manufacturing prediction unit. Sheet metal forming simulation prevents metal factories from defects in their production lines and reduces testing and expensive mistakes improving efficiency in the metal forming process.[citation needed]

Metal casting

[edit]

Metal casting simulation is currently performed by Finite Element Method simulation software designed as a defect-prediction tool for the foundry engineer, in order to correct and/or improve his/her casting process, even before prototype trials are produced. The idea is to use information to analyze and predict results in a simple and effective manner to simulate processes such as:

  • Gravity sand casting
  • Gravity die casting
  • Gravity tilt pouring
  • Low pressure die casting

The software would normally have the following specifications:

  • Graphical interface and mesh tools
  • Mould filling solver
  • Solidification and cooling solver: Thermal and thermo-mechanical (Casting shrinkage).

Network protocols

[edit]

The interaction between the network entities is defined by various communication protocols. Network simulation software simulates behavior of networks on a protocol level. Network Protocol Simulation software can be used to develop test scenarios, understand the network behavior against certain protocol messages, compliance of new protocol stack implementation, Protocol Stack Testing. These simulators are based on telecommunications protocol architecture specifications developed by international standards body such as the ITU-T, IEEE, and so on. The output of protocol simulation software can be detailed packet traces, events logs etc.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Simulation software

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Simulation software refers to computer programs designed to model, imitate, and analyze the behavior of real-world systems or processes by replicating their operations under various conditions, enabling users to predict outcomes, test scenarios, and optimize performance without physical experimentation. Developed to address the limitations of using general-purpose programming languages like or C for complex modeling—such as lengthy development times, poor system representation, and error-prone changes—this software provides specialized tools for building, executing, and validating s efficiently. Key types include , which models systems where state changes occur at specific points in time (e.g., customer arrivals in a queue), and continuous simulation, which tracks smooth variations over time (e.g., in a ), with hybrid approaches combining both for multifaceted applications. Widely used across industries such as , healthcare, , and , simulation software supports "what-if" analyses to evaluate design alternatives, identify bottlenecks, and assess policy impacts, often incorporating features like for visualization, statistical for validation, and integration with optimization algorithms. Popular examples include for discrete event modeling and for multimethod , with selection criteria emphasizing compatibility with specific processes, execution speed, input/output capabilities, and cost, typically ranging from several thousand dollars for basic licenses to over $100,000 for advanced enterprise solutions. By facilitating the study of and dynamic systems through techniques like methods, this software has become essential for decision-making in complex environments where analytical solutions are infeasible.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Simulation software refers to computational tools designed to imitate the operation of real-world or theoretical systems over time, enabling users to predict outcomes, evaluate scenarios, and optimize processes without physical experimentation. This approach constructs digital replicas that capture system behaviors through mathematical and algorithmic representations, facilitating analysis in controlled virtual environments. At its core, simulation software operates on foundational principles of , modeling, and validation. Abstraction simplifies complex by focusing on essential features while omitting irrelevant details, allowing manageable representations of intricate dynamics. Modeling involves creating mathematical or logical structures that depict system components and their interactions, often starting with basic forms and iteratively refining them for accuracy. Validation ensures the model's fidelity to real-world data through comparative testing and statistical methods, building credibility for reliable predictions. Key components of simulation software include input parameters that define initial conditions and variables, a engine that executes algorithms for advancing the model through time—such as time-stepping for continuous changes or event handling for discrete occurrences—and output visualization tools that present results via graphs, animations, or statistical summaries. Unlike static modeling tools like CAD, which primarily support and visualization without temporal , simulation software emphasizes dynamic progression to explore how systems respond to varying inputs over time. For simple systems, a simulation model can be expressed in the general form
y(t)=f(x(t),θ)y(t) = f(x(t), \theta)
where y(t)y(t) represents the output state at time tt, x(t)x(t) denotes the input or state variables, θ\theta are fixed parameters, and ff encapsulates the system's governing function, often solved iteratively or analytically. These elements underpin 's utility across fields like and , where they enable and process improvement prior to real-world .

Historical Development

The origins of simulation software trace back to the mid-20th century, when computational methods were developed to model complex probabilistic systems. In the 1940s, during efforts at , mathematicians and pioneered the to simulate neutron diffusion in processes, addressing challenges that analytical solutions could not handle efficiently. This approach, inspired by random sampling akin to casino games, marked the first use of statistical simulations on early computers like the in 1948, laying foundational techniques for handling uncertainty in physical systems. The 1960s saw the emergence of general-purpose simulation languages, enabling broader application beyond specialized nuclear work. IBM released the General Purpose Simulation System () in 1961, a discrete-event language designed for modeling queueing and logistics systems, which became widely adopted for its block-diagram syntax that abstracted complex event scheduling. Concurrently, in , and developed Simula I (1961) and Simula 67 (1967) at the Norwegian Computing Center, introducing class-based structures for simulation of dynamic processes like and production lines, influencing later object-oriented paradigms. By the , continuous simulation gained traction with IBM's Continuous System Modeling Program (CSMP), first introduced in 1968 and refined in CSMP III by 1972, which facilitated solving for models using a FORTRAN-based interpreter. The 1970s and 1980s brought hardware advancements like minicomputers and early personal computers, democratizing simulation beyond mainframes and spurring language evolution. Tools like extended into general programming, while the decade's shift toward visual interfaces began with block-oriented environments, reducing the need for low-level coding in simulations. In the and , graphical user interfaces and object-oriented designs proliferated, exemplified by the integration of drag-and-drop modeling in commercial packages; open-source contributions emerged prominently with ns-2, a network simulator released in 1996 by the , supporting protocol evaluations through extensible C++ and Tcl scripting. From the 2010s onward, simulation software has increasingly incorporated cloud computing for scalable execution and AI for enhanced predictive capabilities, addressing real-time and data-intensive needs. The Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI) standard, adopted in 2010 for co-simulation and updated to version 2.0 in 2014, enabled interoperable model exchange across tools via XML and C code, fostering collaborative simulations in automotive and aerospace domains. By the 2020s, post-COVID-19 disruptions accelerated the adoption of digital twins—virtual replicas integrating real-time data with simulations—for virtual testing and supply chain optimization, as seen in manufacturing where they reduced physical prototyping by enabling remote scenario analysis. AI enhancements, such as machine learning surrogates in tools like Ansys 2025 R2, now automate parameter tuning and uncertainty quantification, allowing faster iterations in cloud environments without high-end local hardware.

Types of Simulation

Discrete-Event Simulation

(DES) models the operation of a as a discrete sequence of events occurring at specific instants in time, where the simulation clock advances directly to the occurrence of the next event rather than progressing in fixed time increments. This approach is particularly suited for exhibiting sporadic state changes, such as arrivals or failures, and relies on an event queue to store and manage pending events, typically implemented with priority queues to ensure the earliest-scheduled event is processed first. The core mechanism involves maintaining a list of future events ordered by , allowing the simulator to efficiently skip periods of inactivity between events. A key algorithm in DES is the next-event time advance, which updates the current simulation time tcurrentt_{\text{current}} to the scheduled time of the imminent event by computing tnext=min⁡(ti)t_{\text{next}} = \min(t_i) for all pending events ii in the queue. Upon advancing time, the event is executed, updating system state variables, and any resulting future events are scheduled or canceled as needed. Entity-flow modeling extends this by representing dynamic entities, such as parts or customers, that traverse a network of processes, with events triggering movements and interactions, commonly applied to lines where entities flow through stations like queues and machines. Prominent software tools for DES include , a commercial platform from that supports hierarchical modeling for complex entity flows; , which integrates DES modules with multimethod capabilities for versatile simulations; and Simul8, an early intuitive tool launched in that popularized accessible DES for non-experts. DES finds extensive use in queueing systems, such as call centers where customer arrivals and service completions are modeled; operations, including warehouse picking and shipping processes; and like healthcare for flow . In these domains, the event scheduling equation tnext=min⁡(ti)t_{\text{next}} = \min(t_i) ensures precise timing of interactions, enabling evaluation of performance metrics like wait times. The primary advantages of DES stem from its efficiency in handling sparse event occurrences, avoiding unnecessary computations during idle periods and thus scaling well for long-duration simulations. Model validation typically involves statistical analysis of replicated runs to compute confidence intervals on key outputs, such as throughput, providing bounds on estimates like mean production rates with 95% confidence levels. This contrasts with continuous , which is better for systems requiring modeling of smooth, ongoing dynamics.

Continuous Simulation

Continuous simulation involves modeling dynamic systems where state variables evolve smoothly over time, typically represented by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) or partial differential equations (PDEs) that describe continuous changes in physical or engineered processes. This approach contrasts with discrete methods by focusing on the fluid progression of system states without abrupt jumps, using numerical integration to approximate solutions on digital computers despite their inherent discreteness. The core method entails discretizing time into fixed or variable steps and iteratively solving the governing equations, enabling predictions of system behavior under varying inputs and parameters. Key numerical techniques for continuous simulation include explicit methods like the , which approximates the next state using a simple forward step, and higher-order variants such as Runge-Kutta methods, which improve accuracy by evaluating derivatives multiple times within each step. For non-stiff systems, these explicit integrators suffice, but stiff equations—characterized by widely varying timescales requiring tiny steps for stability—demand implicit solvers, such as backward differentiation formulas or implicit Runge-Kutta, to maintain efficiency and without excessive computation. A fundamental representation is the initial-value problem: dydt=f(y,t,u),y(t0)=y0\frac{dy}{dt} = f(y, t, u), \quad y(t_0) = y_0 where yy denotes state variables, tt is time, uu represents inputs, and the equation is solved iteratively from initial conditions y0y_0. Accuracy is controlled through parameters like local error tolerances, which adapt step sizes to balance precision and speed, often achieving relative errors below 10−610^{-6} in well-conditioned problems. Prominent software for continuous simulation includes /, which supports block-diagram-based modeling and integration of ODEs/PDEs, and , a Modelica-based tool for multi-domain physical systems. These tools facilitate applications in physical processes, such as via Navier-Stokes PDEs for flow simulation or modeled by reaction-rate ODEs. Challenges arise from the computational intensity of high-fidelity integrations, particularly for real-time applications where latency must remain under milliseconds, limiting without advanced hardware. As of 2025, advancements in GPU acceleration have addressed these limitations for large-scale PDEs, with tools like Fluent 2025 R1 enabling up to 14x faster solve times for simulations using the FGM model and 13x for simulations using the VOF method on eight A100 GPUs compared to CPU baselines (released February 20, 2025), enhancing real-time capabilities.

Agent-Based and Hybrid Simulation

Agent-based simulation involves modeling systems as collections of autonomous agents that interact according to simple rules, leading to complex emergent behaviors at the macro level. In this approach, each agent operates independently, making decisions based on local information and interactions with neighbors, without centralized control. This bottom-up methodology contrasts with top-down equation-based models by emphasizing decentralized dynamics and heterogeneity among agents. Seminal work in this area includes the Sugarscape model, which demonstrates how social phenomena like wealth distribution and cultural transmission arise from individual agent behaviors in a resource-scarce environment. A classic example of emergence in agent-based models is flocking behavior, where simple rules for alignment, cohesion, and separation among agents produce coordinated group motion. Craig Reynolds' model, introduced in 1987, simulates bird flocking through these three steering behaviors, illustrating how global patterns emerge from local interactions without explicit programming of the collective outcome. Similarly, the from 1995 captures phase transitions in self-propelled particle systems, where alignment rules lead to ordered flocking above a critical threshold, highlighting the role of elements in tipping between disordered and coherent states. Popular software tools for implementing such models include , a multi-agent programming language designed for educational and exploratory simulations of emergent phenomena, and Repast, an extensible Java-based toolkit for large-scale agent-based modeling. Key concepts in agent-based modeling include stochastic decision-making and interaction rules that drive . Agents often employ maximization to evaluate options, where the for agent ii is computed as a weighted sum over neighboring states, such as ui=∑jrij⋅stateju_i = \sum_j r_{ij} \cdot \text{state}_j, with rijr_{ij} representing interaction rewards or preferences between agents ii and jj. This formulation, akin to random models, incorporates randomness via noise terms to reflect and variability in choices. elements, such as probabilistic transitions in agent states, further enable the of and heterogeneity, allowing models to capture diverse agent attributes like varying tolerances or mobility patterns. Hybrid simulation extends agent-based approaches by integrating discrete-event and continuous-time dynamics, enabling more realistic representations of systems with both abrupt changes and smooth evolutions. In hybrid models, discrete events—such as agent decisions or triggers—can continuous flows, like physical processes governed by differential equations. The (FMI) standard facilitates this co-simulation by defining interfaces for exchanging models across tools, supporting both model exchange for continuous solvers and co-simulation for mixed discrete-continuous execution. For instance, FMI allows event-driven agent interactions to synchronize with continuous plant models in cyber-physical systems, improving accuracy in scenarios involving feedback loops. Recent extensions to FMI address step revision and time-event hybrid driving to handle non-linear interactions more robustly. Applications of agent-based and hybrid simulations are prominent in social systems and , where heterogeneity among agents is crucial for realistic outcomes. In social modeling, agent-based frameworks simulate segregation, cooperation, or economic disparities emerging from individual preferences and networks, as seen in extensions of the Sugarscape for and conflict dynamics. For , these models track spread through heterogeneous populations, incorporating factors like mobility, compliance, and social contacts to predict intervention impacts; for example, simulations have shown how amplifies outbreak scales in urban settings. Hybrid approaches enhance these by coupling agent behaviors with continuous transmission dynamics, offering advantages in handling diverse agent types and events that traditional compartmental models overlook. In the 2020s, agent-based simulations have increasingly integrated , particularly (MARL), to enable adaptive agent behaviors. MARL frameworks allow agents to learn optimal policies through trial-and-error interactions in simulated environments, improving emergence in dynamic scenarios like or epidemic control. Surveys highlight how large language models further empower agent-based modeling by generating realistic interaction rules or scaling simulations for complex social inference tasks. These developments expand hybrid simulations to include learned continuous controllers, fostering applications in adaptive systems where agents evolve strategies in real-time.

Engineering Applications

Electronics and Circuit Simulation

Electronics and circuit simulation software primarily focuses on modeling the behavior of electrical circuits, including analog, digital, and mixed-signal systems, to predict performance without physical prototyping. At its core, this domain relies on SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis), a foundational tool developed at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1970 by Laurence Nagel under the direction of Donald Pederson. SPICE enables detailed analysis of circuit responses to various stimuli, emphasizing integrated circuit design but applicable to broader electronics. It supports key analysis types such as nonlinear DC operating point analysis, small-signal AC analysis for frequency-domain behavior, and nonlinear transient analysis for time-domain dynamics, allowing engineers to simulate voltage, current, and power under steady-state or dynamic conditions. The fundamental method in SPICE-based simulators is the node-voltage formulation, derived from Kirchhoff's current law (KCL), which expresses circuit equations in matrix form. This approach divides the circuit into nodes and solves for unknown node voltages by balancing currents at each node, leading to a represented as Gv=iG \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{i}, where GG is the conductance matrix encapsulating element admittances, v\mathbf{v} is the vector of node voltages, and i\mathbf{i} is the vector of independent current sources. For nonlinear elements like diodes or transistors, the equations are solved iteratively using techniques such as Newton-Raphson, updating the conductance matrix at each step to handle device models accurately. Transient simulations advance time in discrete steps, integrating differential equations from capacitor and inductor behaviors, while AC analysis linearizes the circuit around an operating point to compute frequency responses via complex arithmetic. Prominent software implementations include , a free SPICE-compatible simulator from optimized for analog circuit analysis, featuring schematic capture, waveform viewing, and built-in models for transient, AC, noise, and digital simulations. , developed by , integrates PSpice for advanced analog and mixed-signal simulation within a PCB design environment, supporting transient, AC, and DC analyses alongside and worst-case evaluations to assess variability. These tools facilitate applications such as PCB design verification, where simulations confirm signal routing and power distribution integrity, and RF signal simulation, modeling high-frequency behaviors like and effects in wireless systems. A major challenge in high-speed simulation arises from parasitic effects, such as unintended capacitances and inductances in PCB traces and interconnects, which degrade by introducing , reflections, and delays at frequencies above 1 GHz. Accurate modeling requires extracting these parasitics post-layout using field solvers integrated into simulators, as they become dominant in designs like modules or high-speed data interfaces, often necessitating iterative refinement to meet timing and noise margins. As of 2025, trends in simulation extend to modeling, with tools like IBM's incorporating extensions such as Aer for high-fidelity of quantum gates and noisy behaviors, enabling verification of hybrid classical-quantum for emerging applications in and optimization. 's statevector and simulators support up to 44 qubits on GPU clusters, bridging classical methods with quantum device physics to address scalability in superconducting or ion-trap circuits.

Mechanical and Manufacturing Simulation

Mechanical and manufacturing simulation software employs finite element analysis (FEA) to model stress and strain in mechanical systems, enabling engineers to predict material behavior under various loads during manufacturing processes. In forming, these tools simulate deformation to forecast phenomena like springback, where parts rebound elastically after unloading, allowing for design adjustments to minimize deviations from intended shapes. For , simulations analyze fluid flow of molten metal into molds and subsequent solidification, helping to identify potential issues such as incomplete filling or thermal gradients that could lead to structural weaknesses. Key methods in these simulations include Lagrangian formulations, where the follows material points for tracking deformation in solids, and Eulerian formulations, which use a fixed to handle large fluid-like flows, often combined in arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approaches for hybrid scenarios like forming processes. In elastic regimes, stress-strain relationships are governed by , expressed as σ=Eε\sigma = E \varepsilon, where σ\sigma is stress, EE is Young's modulus, and ε\varepsilon is strain, providing a foundational for initial FEA computations before incorporating nonlinear effects. Prominent software includes , which excels in explicit dynamics for crash testing and forming by simulating high-speed impacts and plastic deformations with high fidelity. For casting, MAGMAsoft optimizes process parameters by modeling filling, solidification, and cooling to reduce defects like . These tools integrate seamlessly with CAD systems, importing geometric models to streamline workflows from design to simulation without data loss. Applications focus on defect prediction, such as wrinkling or tearing in stamping operations, where simulations guide tool geometry modifications to enhance part quality. In molds, porosity simulations predict gas entrapment or shrinkage voids during solidification, validated against physical prototypes through techniques like inspection to confirm model accuracy. By 2025, advances in real-time simulation for additive , including simulation-in-the-loop FEA and physics-informed , enable in-process monitoring of thermal stresses and distortions, improving build quality without halting production.

Computing and Control Applications

Network and Protocol Simulation

Network and protocol simulation software models the behavior of computer networks at the packet level, enabling the analysis of protocol interactions, data transmission, and system performance without physical hardware. These tools simulate core elements such as TCP/IP stacks, where packets are generated, routed, and processed according to protocol rules, including congestion avoidance mechanisms like window scaling and retransmission timeouts. simulations replicate algorithms such as OSPF or BGP, allowing evaluation of path selection, load balancing, and in dynamic topologies. Queueing models are integral for studying congestion, representing buffers at routers or switches where arriving packets wait if the queue is full, leading to delays or drops. A primary method in these simulations is , which advances time only when a packet-related event occurs, such as arrival, transmission, or acknowledgment, making it efficient for modeling asynchronous network traffic. This approach handles packet events by maintaining an event queue ordered by timestamp, processing each in sequence to update network states like link utilization or buffer occupancy. For queue analysis, provides a foundational relationship, stating that the average number of items in a queueing system LL equals the arrival rate λ\lambda times the average time spent in the system WW, or L=λWL = \lambda W This equation, derived from steady-state assumptions, quantifies congestion impacts on throughput and delay in simulated networks. In , for instance, it helps predict buffer lengths under varying loads, informing algorithm tuning like those in Reno or Cubic variants. Early network simulations in the supported the design and evaluation of foundational infrastructures such as the NSFNET, an academic backbone using TCP/IP protocols that succeeded , with models assessing scalability and reliability under growing traffic. Prominent open-source examples today include ns-3, a discrete-event simulator written in C++ that supports detailed TCP/IP and protocol modeling for research, and OMNeT++, a modular framework extensible for custom network components via its NED topology language. Both tools facilitate packet-level tracing, enabling visualization of flows and error conditions. Applications span wireless optimization, such as simulating channel access under standards to minimize interference and improve spatial reuse, and testing / architectures, including mmWave and network slicing for ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Key performance metrics evaluated include end-to-end latency, measuring packet delay from source to destination, and throughput, quantifying sustained data rates in Mbps under load, often revealing trade-offs like increased latency during congestion peaks. For example, ns-3 has been used in simulations of networks, including virtualized RAN setups, to evaluate performance metrics such as latency and throughput in high-mobility scenarios. As of 2025, advancements incorporate simulations, modeling distributed processing at network peripheries to reduce core latency, and AI-driven techniques, where optimizes routing or predicts traffic patterns within simulators like extended ns-3 modules. These integrations enable reinforcement learning-based resource allocation for , simulating AI agents that adapt to dynamic edge environments for enhanced efficiency.

PLC and Automation Simulation

Simulation software for programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and industrial primarily emulates the hardware and software behaviors of PLC systems to test inputs/outputs (I/O), timers, and counters without physical hardware, enabling safe and cost-effective verification of control logic. This emulation replicates real-world PLC operations, allowing engineers to simulate , signals, and responses in virtual environments. Such tools support programming, a graphical standard for industrial control, facilitating the design and debugging of automation sequences. Core methods in PLC simulation revolve around the scan cycle, a repetitive process where the simulator reads inputs, executes the user-defined program (processing logic like timers and counters), and updates outputs to mimic real-time control. For complex sequences, state machines are employed, modeling control flows as finite states with transitions triggered by conditions, which enhances modularity and error handling in implementations. These approaches often integrate techniques for modeling process steps, such as conveyor activations or machine interlocks. Prominent examples include S7-PLCSIM Advanced, which provides precise emulation for testing full PLC functions, and Factory I/O, a 3D factory simulator that connects to various PLC brands for immersive training and validation. Integration with human-machine interfaces (HMIs) is common, allowing simulated PLCs to interface with virtual HMIs for operator interaction testing, as supported in tools like TIA Portal simulations. Applications of PLC and automation simulation focus on factory floor validation, where virtual commissioning verifies system performance before deployment, reducing downtime and commissioning costs in industrial settings. Fault diagnosis is another key use, with simulators enabling the injection of errors to test diagnostic routines and pinpoint issues in control logic, improving reliability in automated processes. These tools adhere to standards like , which defines programming languages such as and function block diagrams to ensure portability and consistency across PLC vendors. By 2025, advancements in cyber-physical simulations have advanced Industry 4.0 integration, incorporating digital twins and exchange for and adaptive in .

Specialized Applications

Biological and Medical Simulation

Biological and medical simulation software enables the modeling of complex , from cellular processes to population-level health dynamics, aiding in , , and clinical . These tools integrate mathematical frameworks to replicate physiological phenomena, incorporating variability inherent in biological systems to predict outcomes under diverse conditions. By simulating scenarios that are ethically or practically challenging to study , such software accelerates discoveries in areas like and . Compartmental models form a cornerstone for simulating kinetics, dividing the body into interconnected compartments to track absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination () processes. For instance, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models use organ-specific compartments linked by blood flow to forecast concentrations over time, supporting personalized dosing strategies. Agent-based models, in contrast, simulate spread by representing individuals as autonomous agents interacting within virtual environments, capturing heterogeneous behaviors and spatial effects that drive epidemics. To account for stochastic variability in biological processes, such as random molecular collisions or events, methods employing differential equations (SDEs) are widely adopted; these extend deterministic models by incorporating terms, enabling simulations of probabilistic outcomes in cellular signaling or . A seminal example is the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model for epidemiological forecasting, governed by the for the susceptible : dSdt=−βSIN\frac{dS}{dt} = -\beta \frac{SI}{N} where SS is the number of susceptible individuals, II the infected, NN the total population, and β\beta the transmission rate; this framework, originally developed in 1927, underpins many modern outbreak simulations. Historically, the 1925–1926 Lotka-Volterra predator-prey equations laid foundational principles for ecological modeling in biology, describing oscillatory dynamics between species through coupled differential equations that influenced subsequent medical applications like host-pathogen interactions. Representative software includes CellBlender, a Blender add-on for stochastic reaction-diffusion simulations in 3D cellular environments, facilitating models of biochemical pathways and molecular crowding. OpenSim supports biomechanical simulations by modeling musculoskeletal systems to analyze movement and tissue mechanics, aiding rehabilitation and prosthetics design. In applications, virtual clinical trials leverage these tools to test interventions on synthetic patient cohorts, reducing costs and ethical risks; as of 2025, integrations with , including AlphaFold3 for multi-molecule predictions, enhance simulations of drug-target interactions, enabling rapid screening of in therapeutic contexts. A key challenge in simulations involving data is ensuring , as and techniques are essential to protect sensitive health information while allowing model training across distributed datasets. Agent-based approaches briefly reference in these contexts, modeling individual-level variations without delving into general methodologies.

Financial and Economic Simulation

Financial and economic simulation software enables the modeling of complex monetary systems, market interactions, and to support , scenario analysis, and in and . These tools simulate probabilistic outcomes for asset prices, portfolio performance, and economic indicators, allowing users to evaluate potential impacts of variables like interest rates, volatility, and policy changes under various conditions. By incorporating elements, such simulations provide quantitative insights into market dynamics, helping institutions mitigate risks and optimize strategies. A core application of simulation in is methods for portfolio , which generate thousands of random scenarios based on input distributions to estimate metrics like (VaR) and . This approach accounts for correlations across assets and non-linear effects, offering a robust way to quantify tail risks in diversified portfolios. Agent-based modeling complements this by simulating heterogeneous market participants—such as traders, institutions, and regulators—with individual behaviors and interactions to capture emergent phenomena like bubbles, crashes, and liquidity shocks in financial markets. Key methods in these simulations rely on to model asset price evolution, with serving as a foundational model assuming log-normal returns. The for is given by dS=μS dt+σS dWdS = \mu S \, dt + \sigma S \, dW where SS is the asset price, μ\mu is the drift rate, σ\sigma is the volatility, dtdt is the time increment, and dWdW is the increment. This process underpins simulations for option pricing and path-dependent derivatives, enabling the projection of future price paths through techniques like Euler-Maruyama discretization. Prominent software tools include @Risk, an Excel add-in that integrates simulation for risk analysis in spreadsheets, supporting distributions for variables like returns and correlations to model portfolio VaR. QuantLib, an open-source C++ library, provides extensible classes for pricing instruments and simulating stochastic processes, including implementations of for derivatives and . Historically, the Black-Scholes model revolutionized option pricing with its closed-form solution under assumptions, later extended through simulations to handle path-dependent features like American options via least-squares methods. Applications of these simulations span stress testing, where banks model extreme scenarios such as recessions or market shocks to assess capital adequacy, as required under regulatory frameworks. In , platforms simulate execution strategies on historical and synthetic data to optimize latency-sensitive trades and backtest performance. For emerging areas like cryptocurrencies and (DeFi) in 2025, simulations using agent-based and methods model volatile token prices, liquidity pools, and risks, aiding in yield farming optimization and protocol stress analysis. regulations mandate such simulations for banks, requiring quantitative projections of credit, market, and operational risks to ensure sufficient capital buffers during adverse conditions, with annual stress tests integrated into supervisory reporting.

References

  1. https://ors.od.nih.gov/OD/OQM/cms/Pages/default.aspx
  2. https://uh.edu/~lcr3600/simulation/guide.html
  3. http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/simulation/sim.htm
  4. https://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/top-10-simulation-software-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comparison/
  5. https://www.simul8.com/software/pricing
  6. https://secwww.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/content/techdigest/pdf/V16-N01/16-01-Menner.pdf
  7. https://www.utrgv.edu/nsfmbse/resources/modeling--simulation-workshop-v1-pdf.pdf
  8. https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~hv/classes/MS/MSconcepts.pdf
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/simulation-system
  10. https://www.simscale.com/blog/difference-between-cad-and-cae/
  11. https://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/books/AM08/pdf/am08-modeling_28Sep12.pdf
  12. https://www.computer.org/resources/software-engineering-models
  13. https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/actinide-research-quarterly/1123-hitting-the-jackpot-the-birth-of-the-monte-carlo-method
  14. https://uh.edu/~lcr3600/simulation/historical.html
  15. https://www.cs.fsu.edu/~mascagni/MC_Basics.pdf
  16. https://eprints.cs.vt.edu/archive/00000363/01/TR-93-21.pdf
  17. https://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/about/ole-johan-dahl/bibliography/the-birth-of-object-orientation-the-simula-languages.pdf
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378475474800030
  19. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1099&context=eecs
  20. https://fmi-standard.org/assets/releases/FMI_for_ModelExchange_and_CoSimulation_v2.0.pdf
  21. https://www.simio.com/optimizing-manufacturing-capacity-using-digital-twin-technology-post-covid-19/
  22. https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/public//Views/Secured/corp/v252/en/pdf/Methods_for_Parametric_Design_Optimization.pdf
  23. https://www.cs.wm.edu/~esmirni/Teaching/cs526/section5.1.pdf
  24. https://www.dmi.unict.it/messina/didat/DES_17_18/leemis_chapter5.pdf
  25. https://huichen-cs.github.io/course/CSCI570/notes/lecture10_nes.pdf
  26. https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~hv/classes/MS/discreteEvent.pdf
  27. https://www.simul8.com/discrete-event-simulation
  28. https://www.anylogic.com/use-of-simulation/discrete-event-simulation/
  29. https://www.simul8.com/about/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221525182_Applications_of_Discrete-Event_Simulation_to_Support_Manufacturing_Logistics_Decision-Making_A_Survey
  31. https://calhoun.nps.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/c0b1a6ec-36ae-42ce-aa55-c8dfc068aefa/content
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14737167.2016.1165608
  33. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA248170.pdf
  34. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~ee368/Spring-2018-files/simulation.pdf
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122272404000186
  36. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/84738
  37. https://www.mathworks.com/help/simscape/ug/making-optimal-solver-choices-for-physical-simulation.html
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B012227240400160X
  39. https://www.ansys.com/blog/whats-new-ansys-fluent-2025-r1
  40. https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2503/Growing-Artificial-SocietiesSocial-Science-from
  41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0526%28199905/06%294:5%253C41::AID-CPLX9%253E3.0.CO%3B2-F
  42. https://www.red3d.com/cwr/papers/1987/SIGGRAPH87.pdf
  43. https://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/netlogo-iccs2004.pdf
  44. https://repast.github.io/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5391997/
  46. https://fmi-standard.org/docs/3.0.2/
  47. https://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/wetter/download/2015-BromanEtAl_HybridCosimulation_HSCC.pdf
  48. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7385981
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8490969/
  50. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2016/15_0561.htm
  51. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03611-3
  52. https://ethw.org/Milestones:SPICE_%28Simulation_Program_with_Integrated_Circuit_Emphasis%29%2C_1969-1970
  53. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1973/22871.html
  54. https://spinningnumbers.org/a/node-voltage.html
  55. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-circuit-analysis-topic/ee-dc-circuit-analysis/a/ee-node-voltage-method
  56. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/design-tools-and-calculators/ltspice-simulator.html
  57. https://www.cadence.com/en_US/home/tools/pcb-design-and-analysis/orcad.html
  58. https://www.allpcb.com/blog/pcb-design/pcb-design-software-for-rf-applications-what-features-are-essential.html
  59. https://resources.pcb.cadence.com/blog/2019-a-rf-circuit-analysis-simulation-across-frequency-spectrums
  60. https://www.ansys.com/blog/parasitic-extraction-high-speed-chip-design
  61. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6756518/
  62. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.12245
  63. https://fiqci.fi/publications/2025-04-01-LUMI-quantum-simulations-qiskit-aer
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395829/
  65. https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-forming
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978919312193
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0045782593901068
  68. https://www.finiteelements.org/hookeslaw.html
  69. https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-ls-dyna
  70. https://www.magmasoft.com/en/solutions/magmasoft/
  71. https://plm.sw.siemens.com/en-US/nx/cad-online/mcad-software/cad-simulation/
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785320315728
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785424002114
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214860424006778
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-025-00501-7
  76. https://www.nsnam.org/docs/ns-3-overview.pdf
  77. https://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~htk/publication/2002-cnj-wang-kung.pdf
  78. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/2/263
  79. https://www.merit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Merit-Network_NSFNET-A-Partnership-for-High-Speed-Networking.pdf
  80. https://www.nsnam.org/about/what-is-ns-3/
  81. https://omnetpp.org/
  82. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.08281
  83. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6959222/
  84. https://free5gc.org/blog/20251008/20251008/
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389128623003791
  86. https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/plc-simulation.html
  87. https://www.famictech.com/en/Products/Automation-Studio/Educational-Edition/Technologies/PLC-Simulation
  88. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/4552
  89. https://instrumentationtools.com/understanding-the-scan-cycle-of-siemens-plc/
  90. https://control.com/technical-articles/state-machine-programming-in-ladder-logic/
  91. https://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/195493/195493.pdf
  92. https://www.siemens.com/global/en/products/automation/systems/industrial/plc/s7-plcsim-advanced.html
  93. https://factoryio.com/
  94. https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/109748099/109748099_HMI_PLCSIM_DOC_en.pdf
  95. https://www.visualcomponents.com/blog/plc-validation-manufacturing/
  96. https://www.empoweredautomation.com/automation-plc-how-it-transforms-industrial-processes
  97. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0951192X.2025.2563261
  98. https://control.com/technical-articles/factory-i-o-a-modern-plc-simulation-tool-to-learn-the-fundamentals/
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4397580/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5125732/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6300276/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5493609/
  103. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
  104. https://mcell.org/
  105. https://simtk.org/projects/opensim
  106. https://mmsholdings.com/ai-technology/keruscloud-clinical-trial-simulation/
  107. https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/
  108. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07487-w
  109. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.12.675912v1
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565529/
  111. https://www.columbia.edu/~mh2078/QRM/MC_RiskManage.pdf
  112. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/VAR.pdf
  113. https://www.financialresearch.gov/working-papers/files/OFRwp2014-05_BookstaberPaddrikTivnan_Agent-basedModelforFinancialVulnerability_revised.pdf
  114. https://sie.scholasticahq.com/article/4598-geometric-brownian-motion-option-pricing-and-simulation-some-spreadsheet-based-exercises-in-financial-modeling.pdf
  115. https://lumivero.com/product/risk/
  116. https://www.quantlib.org/
  117. https://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2010/REUPapers/Turner.pdf
  118. https://www.sas.com/en_gb/insights/articles/risk-fraud/stress-test-scenarios-for-banks.html
  119. https://www.quantconnect.com/
  120. https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/basel-III.html
  121. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/basel3.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.