Hubbry Logo
Mark BaumMark BaumMain
Open search
Mark Baum
Community hub
Mark Baum
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mark Baum
Mark Baum
Mark Baum
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mark Baum (1903–1997) was a Polish-born American painter known initially for his self-taught landscapes and cityscapes who later developed a unique non-objective painting style focused on a single, unique glyph he called "the element." Baum's early work had considerable success in New York in the late 1920s through the early 1940s, with a number of solo shows and museum placements at the Whitney Museum and the Frick, but following World War II, Baum withdrew from the New York art scene to Cape Neddick, Maine, where he lived and painted in relative obscurity from the mid-1950s until his death.[1]

Key Information

Childhood

[edit]

Mark Baum (Marek in the Polish, Munyok at home) was born January 2, 1903, in Sanok, a town that is now part of Poland, but at the time was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, near modern-day Ukraine. His parents divorced when he was a young child, a highly unusual event in his Conservative Jewish community. His mother, having few options in her native land, emigrated to the United States with Mark's older sister. Mark was left with his maternal grandparents who lived in Frysztak in the Carpathian Mountains.[2] Mark had very little contact with his mother and father from that point on.[3]

Eventually Mark moved with his family to the larger town of Rzeszów, and when Mark was of schooling age, he defied his grandfather and took the test to attend the German gymnasium. The test was held on Saturdays in order to discourage Jews from applying. He got in and attended the gymnasium as well as Hebrew school, and was multilingual from a young age, speaking Yiddish at home, Hebrew in the temple, Polish on the streets, and German at school.[3]

World War I and immigration to the United States

[edit]

During World War I, Mark worked in the summers at his grandfather's farm outside of the city. Mark recalled that in the summer of 1917 a few Russian prisoners of war were assigned to the farm. They were Bolsheviks and through them, Mark received an entire political education. They escaped one morning in October, having heard of the coming revolution in Russia, but not before telling Mark, then 14 years old, goodbye.

At the end of the War, Mark decided to leave home and emigrate to the United States. He took trains to the end of German territory, arriving at the Danish border. At this point, having no passport, he was able to literally run through the check point and was sheltered by a family who was able to get him to Copenhagen. There, through family connections, he was able to obtain passage to New York City, where he arrived in late 1919.[3]

New York City and the turn toward art

[edit]

In New York, he got a job in the garment district at a furrier's shop. He reunited with his mother, whom he found to be very materialistic and the two of them did not have much contact after that. In the early 1920s, Mark was on the subway one day going home from work, having just been paid his week's wages in cash, that he looked down at the money in his hand and asked himself: "Did I really just come all this way for this?" He sought out painting as more reflective of his humanity and spirit.[4]

Baum briefly attended classes at the Academy of Design in 1924 or 1925, then in the summer of 1926 he studied at the Cape Cod School of Art in Provincetown, Massachusetts under Charles Hawthorne. From then on he painted on his own. He fell into a rhythm of working half the year as a furrier and painting the other half, in the off season.[5]

Artistic style and beginnings of success

[edit]

From the beginning, Baum's artistic style was distinctive. He often worked in hatched marks, with flattened perspective, emphasizing the collapsing angles of buildings and landscapes instead of trying to provide lifelike spatial structure or perspective. Initially he worked in watercolors, and his first solo exhibition featured a selection of watercolor landscapes and took place at the Whitney Galleries in 1929, with a few works bought by prominent collector Julianna Force who donated them eventually to the Whitney Museum of American Art. The following year, Baum approached famed photographer and gallerist Alfred Stieglitz, who bought one of his watercolors. In the early 1930s, Baum switched to working in oil paint, and Marie and Averil Harriman became ardent supporters of his work, with another solo show at the Marie Harriman Gallery in 1931.[6] He was also part of a group show at the Brooklyn Museum in 1932.[7] Through these connections and shows Mark found a healthy collector base in the early 1930s.

During this period, and much to Baum's chagrin, his work was classified as "primitive," which was at the time a shorthand way of grouping it in with a nostalgic Americana (ironically given that he was Polish born) that stood in opposition to European modernism.[8] Mark rejected the word primitive outright, but also for its implications, writing in a personal statement: "Again the terms 'naive' and 'primitive' appeared in the reviews. Naive I never was. But although I was not a primitive painter, I did stand in a certain relationship to painting. Indeed, every reviewer when describing my work was forced to present certain modifications to the term 'primitive'. And when Harriet and Sidney Janis, knowing my work, then at work on a book of primitive painters, came to see me, they, too, realized this and later stated in their book that I was too advanced for a primitive painter."[9] He felt very influenced by modernist painters, among them Kandinsky, Klee, Picasso, Cézanne, and Mondrian, the latter two of whom he had a particular affinity. Mark had almost no art education before coming to the United States, and it was in New York's museums and contemporary art galleries that he educated himself.[10]

Personal life, the depression, and World War II

[edit]

In 1935 Mark married Celia Frank, a woman from Schenectady, New York. Their son Paul was born the following year, and another son, William, was born in 1939. The Baums first lived in Sunnyside, Queens, and then on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Mark became a WPA artist, which along with his job at the furrier, which he had maintained since the early 1920s, supported the family.

Mark and Celia were both active in the New York Communist party, and in 1936 Mark ran for New York State Senate on the Communist ticket. The couple had an active social life that was filled with bohemians from their political affiliations as well as artists, actors, and free thinkers.[11]

During World War II, Baum had a two-person show at Perls Galleries, and then solo shows in 1947 at the St. Etienne Gallery and in 1948 at the Laurel Gallery. He also was part of an International exhibition organized by the State Department. Yet following the War a crisis of faith descended. He wrote: "The World War came, the W.P.A. came to an end. Years of uncertainty. The World War ended. Then news of the Holocaust. All members of my family murdered by the Nazis, all the playmates of my childhood, all my boyhood friends and schoolmates killed by the Nazis. All this and a number of other factors contributed to the awareness: an era has ended, we were living in a new different world. I could no longer paint as of old, and sank into a depression."[12]

Coal mines and aspirational staircase

[edit]

Baum's long crisis in painting was caused by the news from the war, but also simultaneously within the New York art scene he experienced the collective rush toward Abstract Expressionism and rejected it. "Painting seemed worthless. Many factors produced this crisis, among them was Abstract expressionism which was at the forefront of American painting; and to which I was bitter and antagonistic, not to its originators but to the imposters who practiced this solely for their own reward. I watched them cling to it."[13]

In the late 1940s to early 1950s, Baum spent about three years, off and on, living in Pennsylvania, painting at the company towns of an enormous anthracite coal operation. In 1953 Baum had a solo exhibition at the Harry Salpeter Gallery, with work drawn primarily from the Pennsylvania series.[14] A year later Baum would appear in Life Magazine, as part of an article about artists finding life-work balance in New York.[15]

About three or four years later, Baum was looking back at a 1948 work that had been included in the Salpeter show called Aspirational Staircase and had a revelation: "What a wonderful diagonal this staircase. It carries the eye upward from the bottom of the canvas to the top, and the steps of the staircase are units of the diagon and are functioning like a steady beat in music. The staircase, a physical object, becomes in painting an element, and--losing its physicality--becomes a diagonal upward movement; and further along becomes a generalized directional movement and ultimately becomes a formative element in a style of painting."[16]

Spirituality and "The Element"

[edit]

Simultaneously with this revelation, in the mid-1950s Baum had begun to turn his attention more fully to his spiritual life. He found in this quest an antidote to the formalist emphasis of Abstract Expressionism as well as a reason for him to continue in an artistic practice at all. For this he returned to the notion of faith, drawing on his Jewish background, though in abstracted ways and through secular-subjects. As one author noted: "Baum seems to be growing closer to spirituality through the study of secular things, such as the staircases, traffic lights, plants, and light-bearing architecture.... Triads of subjects begin to appear in Baum's work." This study of the trinity references not only the three patriarchs of Judaism, but the three pillars of the Kabbalist Tree of Life, the Christian Holy Trinity, the three Trikaya practice of Buddhism.[17]

What Baum was proposing by this turn toward spirituality in painting he saw as a continuum with man's past, writing later:

For centuries there existed a symbiotic relationship between religion and painting. This relationship came to an end with the rise of the age of reason. Though religion declined drastically, our spiritual needs survived. And now with the help of high technology we are exploring outer space and all of the universe. We are all the more aware of its vastness, its endlessness and its greatness. Our sense of awe is reawakened and our spiritual life rekindled. This form of spirituality is worth of being subject matter in painting.

[18]

At this point, Baum took a radical step in his painting: in 1958 he turned completely to the non-objective and began crafting a single glyph that he called "the element," which was based on his revelation about the staircase. He developed this glyph over a period of ten years, from 1958 to 1968, at which point he arrived at its final form. Lutz describes this transition: "a long 5-pronged shape, similar to a pine needle cluster... a wide curved element appears similar to the silhouette of a bird in flight... the final element, which almost has the appearance of a head in profile appears in 1967."[19] From that time on, he would use the element, in varying combinations and colors, as the exclusive mark in his paintings' compositions. Lutz describes that, "When Baum starts using the element the micro and the macro converge in what can only be described as a type of cosmic order."[19]

Maine and non-objective work

[edit]

This shift in his painting's orientation corresponded also to a move to Cape Neddick, Maine, where he painted in a converted barn and lived in an adjacent farmhouse. He wrote that, "There...I can live with greater intensity, absorbing the greenness of spring and the whiteness of winter, the fullness of summer and all the colors of autumn. Absorbing this richness of the life about me into myself, I can give the best of me to my painting."[5]

The work in this non-objective period falls into three distinct periods: early development of the "element" or early non-objective (1959–1967); middle non-objective (from approximately 1968–1978), where the compositions of the element are in often jewel-like groupings against many different colored backgrounds spanning the spectrum from bright turquoises and pale lavenders to darker mauves and deep forest greens. The final body of work from the late 1970s until just before his death around 1995 when he was forced by his health to stop painting is considered the "late nonobjective." These works are on solid, mostly black backgrounds (some early works from this period are on dark green or brown), with no groupings of the elements, except in lines and waves. Baum used stencils for his elements, tracing out the element compositions in pencil and then hand painting each one.[20]

All of his non-objective work reflects highly refined color relationships, with darker colors being "heavier" and often on the bottom of the canvases rising toward lighter, brighter colors and indicating a coming to faith or a sense of fruition. He was very influenced by Manet in this regard, citing a particular painting of Christ and angels at the Metropolitan Museum of Art that he had studied closely and found inspiration in Manet's "emphasis on color relationships."[21]

During the more than 30 years that Baum lived full-time in Maine, he had very few public exhibitions. He had a solo show at the Bleecker Gallery in East Hampton, NY, in June 1962; a solo show at the Rose Fried Gallery, New York, in 1963; and a large exhibition of his non-objective works at the Ogunquit Gallery, in Ogunquit, Maine, in 1969, which did not find a particularly receptive audience. But his continued faith in his paintings, and the faith that they restored to him, provided an ongoing impetus to keep working. Baum also had an extensive garden and by this time many grandchildren who lived nearby. He also maintained a constant interest in science and technology, subscribing to numerous scholarly scientific journals. Baum also had a collection of early circuit boards, which were visually and philosophically important to his work.

In 1983 the Metropolitan Museum of Art purchased two early works that they felt were missing part of their collection. This fact was very gratifying to Baum and gave him hope that his work would eventually be recognized again by a larger audience.[22]

Baum actively painted until the fall of 1996, and died on February 8, 1997, at his home in Cape Neddick, Maine.

Recent developments

[edit]

Since his death a number of museums have collected Baum's work including the Fogg Museum at Harvard; the Mead Gallery at Amherst, the Ogunquit Museum, the University of New England (where they were part of a "Selections" show in 2009); the Berkeley Art Museum; and the Bowdoin College Museum of Art. One of his works in the Metropolitan Museum was reproduced in book for children published by the museum, called Go In and Out the Window.[23]

In 2016 a solo exhibition was held at Krowswork Gallery in Oakland, California, for which a catalogue was also produced.[24]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mark Baum

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mark Baum is a fictional character in the 2015 film , portrayed by as the acerbic leader of a hedge fund team at who shorts collateralized debt obligations tied to subprime mortgages, profiting from the 2008 housing market collapse. The character draws directly from real-life investor , whose empirical analysis of lax lending standards, fraudulent loan practices, and overleveraged financial instruments led his firm to purchase credit default swaps that yielded substantial returns—estimated in the hundreds of millions—when defaults surged and CDO values plummeted. Baum's portrayal emphasizes a causal chain of incentives fostering , where banks originated and securitized high-risk loans to low-credit borrowers while offloading risk to investors, ultimately exposing systemic vulnerabilities that regulators and institutions overlooked. Depicted with a combative demeanor shaped by personal loss—his brother's , a fictionalized element amplifying Eisman's real-world skepticism toward financial elites—Baum embodies principled dissent against industry complacency, traveling to to verify subprime firsthand and confronting CDO managers over their denial of risks. His defining achievement lies in the trade's prescience, vindicating first-principles of asset valuations amid widespread , though it sparked over profiting from economic devastation, with Eisman himself later reflecting on the trade's unintended exposure of broader market failures without remorse for the causal it enforced. Post-crisis, the real Eisman continued managing funds focused on financials, adapting to new distortions like , underscoring Baum's archetype as a persistent skeptic of over-optimism in leveraged systems.

Early Life and Immigration

Childhood in Poland

Mark Baum was born in 1903 in , a town in the (present-day southeastern Poland, near the Ukrainian border), into a conservative Jewish family. Shortly after his birth, his family relocated to , approximately 100 kilometers northeast, where he spent much of his early years. In 1907, Baum's parents divorced, prompting his mother to emigrate to the ; he remained in Poland under the care of his grandfather. This arrangement reflected the disruptions common in Eastern European Jewish families amid economic pressures and familial instability during the late imperial period. By 1913, at age ten, Baum entered gymnasium () in , defying his grandfather's opposition, which likely stemmed from traditionalist preferences for religious or vocational paths over secular education. These formative experiences in a culturally insular Jewish shaped his early , though specific details on daily life or influences prior to adolescence remain sparse in records.

World War I Experiences

During , Mark Baum, then a teenager residing in in the (present-day ), encountered the war's disruptions in the Galicia region, which had been a major theater of conflict since 1914, including brutal battles and occupations by Russian forces until their retreat in 1917. In the summer of 1917, at age 14, he labored on the family farm alongside Bolshevik prisoners of war held by Austrian authorities, an ordeal that exposed him to ideological discussions and human suffering, profoundly shaping his emerging philosophical and political perspectives. The war's aftermath in , marked by economic collapse, territorial flux, and rising ethnic tensions—including anti-Semitic pogroms amid the Polish-Soviet conflict—intensified hardships for Jewish families like Baum's, though his direct involvement remained limited to civilian survival amid scarcity and displacement. These formative years instilled a resilience evident in his later self-reliant artistic pursuits, but primary accounts emphasize the 1917 farm labor as the pivotal wartime memory influencing his .

Immigration to the United States

In 1919, at the age of 16, Mark Baum left his home in , , following the end of , to emigrate to the alone. His decision came amid the post-war instability in the region, after his mother had already departed for America in 1907 following her divorce from Baum's father, leaving him in the care of his grandfather. Baum's journey involved traveling across Poland and through German-occupied territories to reach , , before continuing by sea to ; parts of the route were undertaken on foot, rendering the emigration harrowing due to the war-torn landscape and his youth. No records indicate assistance from family or organized migration groups during this solo trek, which spanned unstable border regions recently affected by conflict. Upon arriving in in 1919, Baum settled in the immigrant-heavy and secured employment as a furrier to support himself, marking the beginning of his adaptation to urban American life without formal education or immediate artistic pursuits. This entry aligned with the broader wave of Eastern European Jewish to the U.S. in the immediate post-war period, though Baum's path was notably independent and perilous compared to many who arrived via established ports like with kin.

New York Period and Artistic Initiation

Settlement and Adaptation in

Baum arrived in in 1919 at the age of 16, having traveled alone across and occupied to before emigrating to the . Upon settlement, he immediately secured employment as a furrier in the city's garment industry, a common occupation for Eastern European immigrants requiring manual skill in cutting and processing furs. This job provided essential economic stability during his early years, as he navigated the demands of urban immigrant life without familial support initially documented in his trajectory. Throughout the 1920s, Baum balanced long hours in fur coat cutting—a trade he maintained into the mid-1950s—with nascent artistic interests, reflecting a pragmatic adaptation to financial necessities while fostering creative development. He enrolled in courses at the Educational Alliance Art School, an institution serving immigrant communities with accessible instruction, and attended the , though his training remained limited enough to characterize him as largely self-taught. Summers were spent painting watercolors in , allowing exposure to an emerging artist colony and outdoor practice amid New York's industrial rhythm. This phase of dual labor and education underscored Baum's resilience, as he transitioned from wartime displacement in Poland to the competitive environment of American metropolis, laying groundwork for his representational landscapes and cityscapes by the decade's end. His first solo exhibition at Whitney Galleries in , featuring watercolors, evidenced successful integration into local art circles despite origins as an unskilled immigrant worker.

Shift Toward Art and Self-Training

In the early 1920s, after securing employment as a furrier in to support himself, Baum resolved to pursue as a vocation, marking a decisive departure from manual labor toward artistic self-development. This transition occurred amid economic pressures and personal determination, with Baum supplementing sporadic formal instruction—such as classes at the Academy of Design and the Educational Alliance—through intensive independent study and practice. His approach emphasized direct observation of urban and natural environments, honing skills in watercolor to capture cityscapes and landscapes without reliance on structured academies, which he attended only intermittently. Baum's self-training regimen involved summer painting sessions in , from the early 1920s until the early 1930s, where he refined techniques through repeated work and experimentation with composition and color. By the mid-1920s, this methodical self-education yielded proficiency, as evidenced by his production of watercolors that demonstrated a primitive yet assured style, derived from personal trial rather than pedagogical dogma. Critics later noted his outsider status, attributing his raw vitality to this autodidactic path, which prioritized empirical rendering over theoretical abstraction. This phase culminated in Baum's first solo exhibition of watercolors at the Whitney Galleries in 1929, validating his self-directed evolution into a recognized painter of New York's evolving skyline and surrounding vistas. The success underscored the efficacy of his unorthodox training, blending limited institutional exposure with relentless personal discipline, and positioned him for broader acclaim in the ensuing decade.

Early Experiments in Painting

Baum's transition to painting occurred in the 1920s following his settlement in , where he initially supported himself through manual labor at a furrier. Largely self-taught despite brief attendance at the Academy of Design, he began experimenting with artistic techniques as a means of personal expression amid urban adaptation. His early efforts centered on watercolors, which allowed for portable and economical exploration of form and color without formal instruction. These initial works captured New York cityscapes and nascent landscapes, reflecting a representational style influenced by direct observation rather than academic dogma. Summers spent painting in , from the early 1920s until the early 1930s provided outdoor practice grounds, honing his ability to render light and atmosphere through plein air methods. By 1929, Baum's experiments culminated in his first solo exhibition at the Whitney Galleries, showcasing watercolors that demonstrated growing technical assurance in depicting urban and natural motifs. Critics noted the primitive or naïve quality of these pieces, attributing it to his autodidactic approach, though Baum himself emphasized persistent practice over innate . This period laid the groundwork for his later mastery, prioritizing empirical observation of surroundings—such as streets and coastal scenes—over theoretical abstraction.

Development of Artistic Style and Initial Recognition

Characteristics of Landscapes and Cityscapes

Baum's early landscapes and cityscapes, produced primarily from through the , featured a self-taught primitive style characterized by flattened perspectives and simplified forms that eschewed traditional modeling and . These works often employed hatched marks to build texture, emphasizing collapsing angles in buildings and natural elements rather than realistic depth or atmospheric effects. The compositions integrated industrial motifs with rural or urban natural scenes, presenting a patterned totality that highlighted juxtapositions between human-made structures and organic forms. This naive, childlike approach resulted in loose, cartoony depictions with unpretentious quirks, such as mismatched scales between foreground trees and background architecture, evoking a fresh charm unburdened by academic conventions. For instance, in (1944), Baum rendered two white houses amid a flower-flecked yard and incongruously proportioned trees, flattening the scene into planar shapes without coherent linear perspective. Similarly, (1948) portrayed the and bridge as a single flat plane, prioritizing bold outlines and elemental contrasts over illusionistic space. By the mid-1950s, subtle spiritual undertones emerged, as seen in Garden of the Guarded Tree (1955), where symbolic elements hinted at Baum's evolving metaphysical interests within the representational framework. The style's precision in patterning and deliberate avoidance of photorealism distinguished Baum from contemporaneous regionalists, aligning instead with traditions while reflecting his immigrant perspective on American urban-rural transitions. These paintings, often executed in or board, demonstrated technical self-mastery through vibrant yet restrained color palettes and geometric underpinnings that prefigured his later abstractions. This phase culminated around 1958, when Baum transitioned to non-objective forms, marking a deliberate shift from these grounded, site-specific visions.

Emergence of Success in the 1930s

In the early , Mark Baum transitioned from watercolors to oil paintings, marking a pivotal shift that enhanced the depth and visibility of his self-taught landscapes and cityscapes. This change coincided with an exhibition of his oils at the Marie Harriman Gallery in 1930, following his initial solo show at the Whitney Studio Galleries in 1929, which built momentum for broader recognition amid the economic constraints of the . The Harriman venue, known for promoting emerging American artists, provided crucial exposure, with patrons Marie and Averil Harriman offering ardent support that sustained his productivity during a period when many artists struggled for . That same year, Baum visited at his An American Place gallery, receiving encouragement from the influential photographer and dealer, who acquired one of Baum's paintings for his personal collection. Stieglitz's endorsement, rooted in his advocacy for authentic, individualistic expression over academic conventions, validated Baum's primitive style—characterized by flattened perspectives, bold juxtapositions, and direct representational depictions of urban and natural scenes—which diverged from prevailing modernist trends. This validation propelled further opportunities, including a two-person exhibition at the Marie Harriman Gallery in 1931 and a group show titled "3 Painters: Baum, Botkin, Schultz" at the Downtown Gallery in 1932. Baum's 1930s works, often featuring robust city architectural views and rural landscapes painted during summer stays in Provincetown until the early part of the decade, gained traction for their unpretentious vigor and avoidance of stylistic affectation. Group inclusions, such as the 1930 show at G.R.D. Studios alongside contemporaries like Jon Corbino, underscored his rising status among New York circles valuing raw, observational realism over . These exhibitions collectively established Baum as a viable professional artist, with sales and critical notices affirming the market for his outsider perspective in an era dominated by economic hardship and artistic experimentation.

Technical Innovations and Self-Taught Mastery

Baum's self-taught approach to painting emphasized intuitive experimentation over formal academic training, allowing him to forge a representational style marked by flattened perspectives that eschewed conventional depth and vanishing points in favor of compressed spatial arrangements. This technique, evident in his early cityscapes and landscapes from the late , created a sense of immediacy and within realistic subjects, distinguishing his work from prevailing regionalist tendencies that prioritized detailed naturalism. Complementing this spatial innovation, Baum applied paint in flat, solid blocks of color, avoiding blended gradients or textured to achieve a bold, unmodulated surface that evoked a primitive directness. Critics noted this method's departure from refined European traditions, often labeling it naïve or primitive upon his debut exhibitions, yet it reflected his mastery of essential form through relentless self-practice, honed during odd jobs and urban sketching in New York. Such techniques enabled compositional juxtapositions—stacking architectural elements or natural forms in unexpected scales—that infused mundane scenes with symbolic tension, earning acquisition by institutions like the by the early 1930s. Despite limited instruction at venues like the Provincetown art colony, Baum's autodidactic discipline culminated in technical proficiency that secured his first solo show at the Whitney Studio Galleries on December 16, 1929, where twelve oils demonstrated his command of these self-devised methods without reliance on atelier conventions. This recognition affirmed the viability of his innovations, as his unorthodox perspective and color blocking captured the dynamism of American urban and rural motifs with unpretentious vigor, free from the distortions of photographic realism.

Personal Life Amid Economic and Global Turmoil

Family Dynamics and Relationships

Mark Baum's early family life was marked by disruption. His parents divorced in 1907, after which his mother emigrated to the , leaving the four-year-old Baum in the care of his grandfather in . Raised amid the uncertainties of pre-World War I , Baum worked on the during summers, including alongside Bolshevik prisoners of war in 1917, an experience that influenced his later philosophical outlook but strained familial ties due to the era's political upheavals. In 1919, at age 16, Baum emigrated alone to , likely to reunite with his mother, though records indicate he arrived independently and immediately sought employment at a furrier to establish financial stability without direct familial support. This self-reliant immigration underscored a pattern of independence from extended family, as Baum navigated urban adaptation without the immediate structure of a nuclear household. Baum married Celia Frank, a teacher from , in 1935. Their union produced two sons: Paul in 1936 and William in 1939. Celia Baum continued her education, eventually earning a Ph.D., while Mark sustained the family through his longstanding furrier job—held since the early 1920s—and commissions from the (WPA), reflecting a pragmatic division of responsibilities amid the Great Depression's economic pressures. This arrangement highlighted Baum's role as primary breadwinner, balancing artistic pursuits with familial obligations, though no records detail interpersonal conflicts or emotional dynamics within the household. The family's stability during the 1930s and 1940s relied on Baum's dual income streams, as his WPA artwork provided supplemental earnings to cover living expenses in . William Baum, the younger son, later served as executor of his father's estate, indicating a close posthumous connection, while Paul Baum's role in family narratives remains less documented. Overall, Baum's relationships emphasized resilience and mutual support, with his and fatherhood coinciding with his artistic maturation, though his self-taught, introspective nature may have fostered a dynamic of quiet provider rather than overt emotional expressiveness.

Impacts of the Great Depression

The , beginning in 1929, severely disrupted Mark Baum's established pattern of supplementing his artistic pursuits with seasonal employment in New York's , where he had worked half the year since the early to sustain his painting. With the collapse of demand in the garment industry, Baum lost this income source entirely, as he later recounted: "when the came, there was no work in the ." This economic upheaval forced him to seek alternative means of support while continuing his self-directed artistic development, amid widespread that affected millions in urban centers like , where Baum resided. From 1935 to 1939, Baum secured employment as an artist through the (WPA), a federal program established in to provide jobs for out-of-work creatives and alleviate Depression-era hardship by funding public art projects. This role enabled him to produce work professionally, including murals and easel paintings, but constrained his personal output due to bureaucratic demands and his methodical pace: "I was given work by the WPA, and during that time worked almost exclusively for them. Since I am a slow painter, I was not able to accumulate any appreciable number of paintings for myself." The WPA income helped sustain his growing family—marrying Celia Frank in 1935, with sons Paul born in 1936 and William in 1939—though it reflected broader reliance on government relief amid private sector collapse. The era's socioeconomic distress also influenced Baum's political engagement; in 1936, he ran for New York State Senate on the Communist Party ticket, aligning with radical responses to capitalist failures observed in labor unrest and inequality. Despite these challenges, Baum persisted with exhibitions, such as his 1931 show at the Marie Harriman Gallery, and produced Depression-period cityscapes like Seventh Avenue and 16th Street, New York (1932), capturing urban grit without direct thematic protest. His resilience through WPA involvement marked a transition toward fuller artistic commitment, unmarred by formal training dependencies that faltered for many contemporaries.

World War II and Personal Resilience

During , Mark Baum resided in with his wife, Celia Frank, whom he had married in 1935, and their two young sons, Paul (born 1936) and William (born 1939). As a Polish-Jewish immigrant who had arrived in the United States in 1919, Baum maintained ties to his homeland, where extended family remained amid the escalating conflict in Europe. The in 1939 and subsequent occupation exposed his birthplace and kin to systematic persecution, including , though Baum himself, secure in America, focused on sustaining his family and artistic output during wartime rationing and uncertainties. The war profoundly affected Baum psychologically, as revelations at its conclusion in 1945 disclosed the devastation wrought upon Poland and his family there, likely including losses to and destruction. This personal tragedy compounded the era's global turmoil, yet Baum demonstrated resilience by persisting in his representational painting of urban and natural scenes, refusing to abandon his self-developed style amid shifting artistic trends influenced by the conflict's aftermath. His commitment to daily practice and family provision—drawing on prior experience from the 1930s—reflected a stoic adaptability forged from earlier immigrations and economic hardships, enabling him to weather the emotional toll without documented interruption to his productivity. Baum's postwar introspection, marked by disillusionment with New York City's art scene and a gradual pivot toward symbolic abstraction, underscored his inner fortitude; rather than succumbing to despair, he channeled trauma into philosophical inquiry through art, viewing creation as a defiant affirmation of human spirit against annihilation. This resilience aligned with his self-taught ethos, prioritizing uncompromised vision over commercial or ideological conformity, even as gained prominence in the late 1940s.

Mid-Career Explorations and Labor Influences

Employment in Coal Mines

In 1950, while returning from a summer trip to , Mark Baum's car broke down near a coal-mining town in , prompting him to explore the surrounding industrial landscape. This incident sparked a three-year period of regular visits to the region's mining areas from 1950 to 1953, during which he painted scenes depicting the harsh environmental and human impacts of extraction. His works from this time, such as Strip Mining (1953, oil on canvas, 22 x 30 inches), captured the scarred terrain and machinery of open-pit operations, reflecting a growing fascination with labor and industrial decay amid his mid-career artistic crisis. Baum's engagement with Pennsylvania's coal country was not as a but as an observer and seeking raw subject matter to revitalize his representational style, which had stalled after earlier landscapes and cityscapes. He documented the desolate countryside and mining operations, viewing them as symbols of human struggle and exploitation, though he maintained his New York-based livelihood cutting furs until 1955. These paintings were exhibited at the Salpeter Gallery in New York in , but the show received limited attention and failed to generate significant sales or acclaim, contributing to Baum's sense of exhaustion with the theme by mid-decade. This phase aligned with broader mid-20th-century artistic interests in proletarian subjects, influenced by Baum's earlier WPA mural work in , yet his approach remained self-directed and experiential rather than politically programmatic. The coal region sojourns provided motifs of aspiration amid adversity—foreshadowing later symbolic developments—but ultimately marked a transitional dead end, as Baum shifted toward more abstract explorations post-1953. No records indicate formal employment in the mines themselves; his immersion was artistic, focused on on-site sketching and painting to confront themes of toil and transformation.

Creation of the Aspirational Staircase Motif

In 1948, Mark Baum developed the aspirational motif as a symbolic representation of upward spiritual and emotional progression, debuting it in his oil-on-canvas painting Aspirational (24 x 30 inches), which features a prominent diagonal with the underlying largely omitted to emphasize directional movement. This innovation emerged amid Baum's mid-career artistic crisis, influenced by his labor experiences in coal mines during the 1940s and the psychological impacts of news, prompting a shift from representational landscapes toward abstracted forms capable of conveying inner states. Baum described the motif as inspired by staircases and banisters, using a consistent geometric unit to create patterns of diagonal or horizontal movement that mirrored human emotional flow and aspirational sensations. The motif's creation involved experimenting with repeated small marks—resembling bird tracks or ants—and zigzagging lines that appeared to emanate light, often set against cloud-like background forms, marking an early precursor to Baum's later "element" geometry. By 1949, Baum expanded the series into abstract and geometric compositions, where the staircase symbolized divine architecture and upliftment, allowing expression of diverse emotional and spiritual conditions through variations in color, space, and movement length. Examples include Brown Landscape with Diagonal Staircase (1954, 24 x 30 inches), integrating the motif into transitional landscapes, reflecting Baum's self-taught evolution toward non-objective abstraction without reliance on prevailing New York art trends. Baum's writings from circa 1963 articulate the motif's purpose: by channeling an "aspirational sensation through a ," he could depict religious concepts like and , using patterned movements to evoke spiritual enrichment beyond literal depiction. This self-directed innovation, unaligned with contemporaneous movements like , underscored Baum's commitment to personal symbolism derived from lived hardship and introspection, producing a series that bridged his labor-influenced realism with emerging philosophical .

Initial Spiritual Inquiries

Following the exhaustion of his coal mine series around 1953, Baum initiated explorations into spiritual dimensions of human experience, describing this shift as an unconscious search for deeper meaning in painting. He began incorporating symbolic elements like directional movements and staircases—initially developed in a 1948 work—to represent emotional ascent toward ideals of perfection, omniscience, and religious fulfillment, viewing these as parallels to spiritual progression. Baum's inquiries emphasized painting as a medium for evoking awe and rekindling spiritual awareness, positing that the vastness of the universe, as revealed by scientific advances, warranted depiction as subject matter to foster human reverence. This phase marked a departure from representational labor themes toward abstract emotional flows, where organized units of color, space, and density conveyed inner spiritual states rather than external realities. By the mid-1950s, works such as Three Paths and Levels (both 1956) exemplified this nascent , using path-like forms and layered structures to symbolize quests for transcendence amid personal and societal turmoil. Baum's self-reflective writings indicate these efforts stemmed from a need to address existential voids left by earlier motifs, prioritizing undiluted aesthetic-spiritual expression over commercial viability.

Philosophical and Symbolic Evolution

Deepening Spirituality

Baum's engagement with intensified during the post-World War II era, as he sought to transcend the material hardships of his earlier life through artistic expression aimed at universal truths. Influenced by personal resilience amid global turmoil, he began framing as a conduit for metaphysical exploration, moving beyond initial inquiries into more profound symbolic representations of human awe and existential renewal. This shift marked a departure from his earlier representational styles, incorporating motifs that evoked spiritual reawakening and the rekindling of innate wonder in the face of modernity's secular drift. By the 1950s, Baum's works increasingly reflected this deepened , with paintings like Garden of the Guarded Tree (circa 1950s) blending elements with allegorical symbolism to convey guarded mysteries and inner transcendence. His positioned as a worthy medium for depicting non-denominational spiritual experiences, asserting that such themes merited depiction to counteract the era's emphasis on devoid of deeper meaning: "Our sense of is reawakened and our spiritual life rekindled. This form of human is worthy of being subject matter in ." This conviction drove his experimentation with forms that abstracted emotional and states, prioritizing causal links between human and cosmic order over stylistic trends. The relocation to , in 1961 further amplified this trajectory, providing solitude that facilitated introspective work unburdened by urban influences. There, Baum's practice evolved toward non-objective by 1958 onward, viewing the canvas as a space for spiritual algorithms—structured explorations of form and color that mirrored life's adventurous quest for . This phase rejected contemporaneous movements' focus on irony or detachment, instead emphasizing empirical observation of inner realities as a path to authentic in and creation.

Invention and Significance of "The Element"

In the late 1950s, Mark Baum transitioned decisively to non-objective painting, developing a unique abstract form he termed "the element" following a personal revelation that inspired its creation. This glyph emerged from his earlier abstract experiments with staircase motifs, which he progressively simplified into a singular, non-representational symbol. By 1958, Baum had formalized the element as the core marking for his compositions, refining it over the subsequent decade to reach its final iteration in the late 1960s. The element consists of a minimalist —often described as a curved form with a straight extension, evoking profiles like a bust or —that Baum repeated in clustered arrangements across canvases, predominantly black. He employed stenciling techniques to precisely position these forms, creating rhythmic patterns that filled the picture plane without additional representational content. This methodical repetition emphasized uniformity and multiplicity, transforming the canvas into a field of identical units varying only in subtle orientation or . The element held profound significance in Baum's artistic and philosophical evolution, serving as the exclusive compositional device in approximately 400 paintings produced from the late 1950s until his death in 1997. It encapsulated his deepening spiritual inquiries, influenced by mystical traditions such as and precedents in non-objective art like Kazimir Malevich's , symbolizing energized forms within infinite space and a quest for universal essence. Critics have noted its prescient quality, akin to a "spiritual " anticipating digital patterns through iterative form, underscoring Baum's pursuit of over individual narrative. This invention marked his rejection of figurative traditions, prioritizing symbolic abstraction as a vehicle for metaphysical exploration amid mid-20th-century artistic shifts.

Critique of Contemporary Art Movements

Baum's critique of contemporary art movements centered on their perceived lack of substantive content and spiritual depth, particularly as exemplified by in the post-World War II era. While acknowledging the movement's originators, he expressed antagonism toward its "opportunists and imposters" who adopted it primarily for personal gain rather than artistic integrity, viewing this as a moral failing that undermined painting's value. This disillusionment intensified around 1948–1949, prompting Baum to reject the trend's dominance in the New York art world, which he saw as prioritizing superficial innovation over meaningful emotional or philosophical expression. In his 1963 artist statement, Baum explicitly distanced himself from formalism inherent in many contemporary practices, stating he was "neither satisfied with balance—symmetrical or asymmetrical; nor... impressed with ingenious innovations or manipulations," instead insisting on "content, or to be more exact, substance." He contrasted this with Abstract Expressionism's emphasis on gestural spontaneity and painterly effects, which he found lacking in the structured, symbolic organization he pursued to parallel "the flow of human emotional life" and draw from "spiritual-aesthetic life enriched by religious thinking." This rejection was not absolute toward the movement's core but targeted its commercialization and the influx of insincere practitioners, which he believed diluted art's aspirational potential. Baum's relocation to , in 1961 further underscored his divergence from urban-centered contemporary trends, including the emerging influences of and . In a converted 19th-century barn studio, he developed his signature "element"—a geometric motif repeated meticulously to evoke universal symbolism—eschewing the consumerist irony of Pop or Minimalism's reduction to pure form without depth. His work critiqued these movements implicitly by prioritizing meditative, repetitive patterns that invoked spiritual awakening over ephemeral cultural commentary or formal austerity, reflecting a commitment to as a tool for transcending trend-driven ephemerality. This philosophical stance positioned Baum as an outsider, favoring personal moralism and symbolic universality against the art world's shift toward market-oriented abstraction and detachment from human spiritual concerns.

Later Years in Maine and Non-Objective Art

Relocation to Maine

In 1961, Mark Baum left New York City for Cape Neddick, Maine, motivated by dissatisfaction with the dominant trends and commercial pressures of the New York art world. This move marked a deliberate withdrawal from urban galleries and social networks, allowing him to prioritize independent creative work over external validation. Baum established residence in a rural farmhouse in Cape Neddick, a coastal area near the artist colony of Ogunquit, where he converted a spacious barn into a dedicated studio for full-time painting. He resided there continuously until his death in 1997, maintaining a low profile that contrasted sharply with his earlier urban engagements. This relocation facilitated a period of sustained isolation and focus, free from the interruptions of city life.

Transition to Non-Objective Abstraction

In the mid-1950s, Mark Baum began transitioning from representational landscapes and cityscapes to abstract forms, incorporating geometric motifs such as staircases that symbolized aspiration and progression. This shift was driven by his disillusionment with the New York art world's embrace of , which he viewed as increasingly superficial amid its proliferation among numerous artists, prompting a search for a more personal, symbolic language. By 1957, Baum decisively abandoned objective representation, creating his first fully non-objective works in 1958 and developing a singular known as "the element"—a reduced, non-representational form derived from the staircase motif, repeated across monochrome canvases, often in black. This element emerged from a personal revelation tied to deepening spiritual inquiries, influenced by Kazimir Malevich's non-objective theories, including his 1927 "Theory of the Additional Element in Art," and Baum's interest in Kabbalistic mysticism, which infused the forms with metaphysical significance beyond mere aesthetics. The transition marked a rejection of external influences in favor of internal vision, prioritizing purity over or emotional immediacy, as Baum sought to distill universal truths through repetitive, elemental rather than the gestural of prevailing movements. This evolution, completed before his 1961 relocation to , laid the groundwork for his mature phase, where isolation from urban art scenes allowed uncompromised refinement of these forms.

Mature Works and Personal Philosophy

In the 1970s and , Baum's mature works evolved into expansive non-objective abstractions dominated by iterative deployments of "The Element," a distilled geometric unit resembling a stylized rung or chevron, arranged in grid-like or flowing sequences across large . These acrylic paintings, typically measuring over 50 inches in dimension, employed modulated color planes—often in primaries and earth tones—to create illusions of depth and movement, simulating spiritual ascent without reliance on figuration. Key examples include Guiding Principles (1981, acrylic on , 52 x 70 inches), featuring rhythmic vertical progressions of the element suggesting hierarchical order, and (1983, 72 x 56 inches), which layers the motif in contemplative clusters evoking introspective harmony. Baum produced dozens of such works in his Cape Neddick studio, refining the element's proportions through empirical trial to achieve perceptual balance, as documented in his estate archives. Baum's methodology for these pieces involved an algorithmic construction, wherein "The Element" served as the irreducible building block, multiplied and varied to generate emergent complexity akin to natural growth patterns, a process he initiated post-1958 transition but perfected in isolation. This late phase rejected gestural abstraction prevalent in contemporaneous movements, prioritizing precision and repetition to embody metaphysical principles over aesthetic novelty; canvases like those from the series demonstrate over 1,000 elemental instances per composition, calibrated for optical resonance. His output diminished in the due to age, yet maintained fidelity to this system until his death on February 8, 1997. Underpinning these works was Baum's philosophy of art as a conduit for human , positing that abstract forms could rekindle innate by distilling visual experience to primal —simple units yielding transcendent wholes. He contended that "this form of human spirituality is worthy of being subject matter in ," arguing it bypassed materialist distractions to address eternal aspirations, a view crystallized in his circa-1987 personal statement critiquing urban art scenes for diluting such pursuits. Relocating to in 1961 from New York, Baum sought autonomy from market influences, viewing seclusion as essential for unadulterated inquiry into the soul's progression, informed by his earlier coal mine labors and staircase motifs symbolizing laborious . This worldview emphasized empirical reduction over ideological trends, with Baum attributing "The Element's" efficacy to its revelation during 1950s reverie, where staircase abstractions coalesced into a singular capable of infinite recombination for meditative effect. He dismissed contemporary abstractions as derivative, favoring his system's causal logic—each element causally implying the next—to mirror spiritual , as evidenced in estate-held sketches logging proportional experiments from 1960 onward. Such principles aligned with his self-taught , privileging verifiable perceptual outcomes over institutional validation, though they contributed to his postwar obscurity amid dominant formalist paradigms.

Legacy, Reception, and Posthumous Developments

Critical Assessments and Achievements

Mark Baum's early career garnered positive assessments for his self-taught primitive style in landscapes and cityscapes, achieving notable success in New York from the late 1920s through the early 1940s, including solo exhibitions at Perls Gallery in 1941, St. Etienne Gallery in 1947, and Laurel Gallery in 1948, as well as acquisitions by institutions such as the of American Art starting in 1931. Critics at the time valued his unrefined yet evocative depictions of urban and natural scenes, which secured museum placements including at the . His transition to non-objective art in the late 1950s, culminating in the exclusive use of "the element" , received limited contemporary critical attention due to his withdrawal from the New York art scene and relocation to in , where he prioritized personal spiritual exploration over market engagement. This self-imposed obscurity contrasted with his earlier visibility, as Baum critiqued prevailing art movements for lacking depth, leading to over 400 paintings produced in isolation until his death in 1997. Posthumous evaluations have highlighted the and symbolic rigor of this phase, with reviewers noting the glyph's evolution as a presaging form of algorithmic and its capacity to evoke through repetitive . Recent exhibitions have elevated appraisals of Baum's oeuvre, portraying his bifurcated career—representational primitives yielding to mystical non-objectivity—as a deliberate pursuit of universal symbolism over commercial trends. The 2019 "Faith Regained" show at the Maine Jewish Museum was deemed "excellent and entertaining," effectively conveying in abstract form and bridging his stylistic divide. Similarly, the 2020 "" at the Arts Center marked the first comprehensive museum survey of his work, praising its intentionality and spiritual palpability. Achievements include the Whitney's holdings of three works, the sustained output of element-based canvases as a unique contribution to modernist abstraction, and estate-driven retrospectives such as the 2016 West Coast debut at Krowswork and the 2022 International Show, which underscore his enduring, if niche, influence on explorations of form and transcendence.

Controversies in Artistic Obscurity

Baum's relocation to Cape Neddick, Maine, in 1961 marked a deliberate withdrawal from the New York art world, which he viewed as dominated by trends like abstract expressionism that conflicted with his emerging spiritual and non-objective vision. This move, undertaken after he had already begun developing his signature "element" form in 1957, led to decades of working in relative isolation in a converted barn studio, with minimal exhibitions—such as a single show at Bleecker Gallery in 1962—furthering his marginalization from mainstream circuits. Critics have noted that this self-exile prioritized uncompromised personal revelation over networking and promotion, resulting in virtual obscurity from the mid-1950s until his death on October 10, 1997, despite early associations with figures like Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko. The circumstances of Baum's obscurity have prompted retrospective questioning among reviewers about the art establishment's role in sidelining artists who rejected urban commercial dynamics for rural introspection during the rise of and in the 1960s and 1970s. Exhibitions like "Faith Regained" at the Maine Jewish Museum in 2019 highlighted his bifurcated career—from primitive cityscapes to mystical abstractions—but underscored how his divergence from market-favored styles may have contributed to oversight, rather than inherent flaws in his rigorous, glyph-based compositions inspired by Kabbalistic and geometric insights. Some assessments suggest that Baum's faith in his visionary path, undiluted by gallery pressures, exemplified a principled resistance to commodification, yet this stance arguably amplified his exclusion from canonical narratives. Posthumous efforts by his estate, including shows at Krowswork in Oakland in 2016 and the John Michael Kohler Arts Center in 2020, have sought to address this neglect, drawing praise for the "powerful and mystical" quality of mature works like those from the 1980s, which echo and without direct imitation. However, the persistence of Baum's niche status—no major institutional acquisitions documented—has fueled discourse on whether rediscovery hinges more on curatorial advocacy than intrinsic value, or if his obscurity reflects a broader pattern of undervaluing self-taught innovators outside elite networks. These developments contrast with Baum's own conviction in the enduring significance of his "element," produced amid isolation, raising pointed questions about the interplay between artistic integrity and recognition in twentieth-century modernism.

Posthumous Exhibitions and Estate Activities

Following Mark Baum's death on October 10, 1997, his estate has actively promoted his oeuvre through retrospectives and institutional shows, drawing attention to his evolution from primitive realism to non-objective abstraction. A 2013 retrospective at Pace Galleries in Fryeburg Academy showcased his paintings, highlighting works from his period. In 2016, Krowswork in , presented "Mark Baum: Elements of the Spirit," the first West Coast exhibition of his visionary paintings, featuring pieces that emphasized his spiritual and elemental motifs. Subsequent exhibitions expanded his recognition in museum settings. The John Michael Kohler Arts Center hosted "Collective Consciousness: Mark Baum" from March 3 to September 1, 2019, described as the first comprehensive museum survey of his career, including early primitive works alongside mature abstractions to illustrate his philosophical progression. Concurrently, the Jewish Museum mounted a solo show titled "Faith Regained" in 2019, focusing on Baum's later mystical abstractions and their ties to personal . A appeared at the International Show, held at the Center for the Arts from October 20 to 23, 2022, featuring estate-held works. The Mark Baum Estate, based at his former Cape Neddick, Maine property, manages preservation, private viewings by appointment, and sales to collectors and institutions. In summer 2021, it launched an artist residency program utilizing Baum's historic barn studio to support emerging creators aligned with his visionary ethos, continuing annually to sustain his isolated, introspective legacy amid Ogunquit's artistic heritage. Estate-led events, such as the October 22, 2022, talk "Rediscovering Mark Baum" with the director and curators, have further contextualized his obscurity and rediscovery. These efforts coincide with acquisitions by institutions like the Fogg Museum at , bolstering scholarly access to his archive.

References

  1. https://people.com/awards/big-shorts-real-life-bankers-where-are-they-now/
  2. https://www.nb.com/handlers/documents.ashx?id=93b25aad-f7d6-48b9-9c9-6b01c79ebb45
  3. https://www.hedgethink.com/mark-baum/
  4. https://www.bustle.com/articles/127589-what-does-the-real-mark-think-of-the-big-short-steve-carells-character-helped-out-the
  5. https://www.antoinebuteau.com/lessons-from-steve-eisman/
  6. https://fortune.com/2025/10/08/big-short-investor-steve-eisman-ai-us-gdp-growth-consumer/
  7. https://markbaumestate.com/life/bio
  8. https://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/mark-baum-papers-6022/biographical-note
  9. https://markbaumestate.com/life/timeline
  10. https://www.meer.com/en/56751-mark-baum
  11. https://theseenjournal.org/collective-consciousness/
  12. https://krowswork.com/markbaum.html
  13. https://www.askart.com/artist/Mark_Baum/109050/Mark_Baum.aspx
  14. https://www.whitney.org/artists/72
  15. https://www.squarecylinder.com/2016/03/mark-baum-krowswork/
  16. https://markbaumestate.com/media/3221/about-my-paintings.pdf
  17. https://www.pressherald.com/2019/09/29/art-review-mark-baums-bifurcated-career-on-view-at-maine-jewish-museum/
  18. https://www.invaluable.com/artist/baum-mark-opp2xgw0r6/sold-at-auction-prices/
  19. https://markbaumestate.com/exhibitions
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/1930/10/26/archives/american-art-at-the-morton-galleries-at-the-grd-studios-at-the-art.html
  21. https://www.sfaq.us/2016/03/mark-baum-passion-to-proceed/
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/1931/12/19/archives/art-a-christmas-exhibition-art-merger-in-the-village-small-works-on.html
  23. https://www.askart.com/artist/marc_baum/109050/marc_baum.aspx
  24. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/482625
  25. https://whitney.org/artists/72
  26. https://markbaumestate.com/paintings/representational
  27. https://markbaumestate.com/paintings/transitional
  28. https://sova.si.edu/record/AAA.baummark
  29. https://markbaumestate.com/
  30. https://www.thebostoncalendar.com/events/rediscovering-mark-baum
  31. https://markbaumestate.com/paintings/late-work
  32. https://www.pressherald.com/2013/04/03/art-and-theater_2013-04-04/
  33. https://www.pressherald.com/?p=3259019
  34. https://markbaumestate.com/estate
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.