Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Sect Shinto
View on WikipediaSect Shinto (教派神道, Kyōha Shintō; or 宗派神道, Shūha Shintō) refers to a number of independently organized Shinto groups that were excluded from government-sponsored State Shinto by Japanese law in 1882.[1] In contrast to mainstream Shrine Shinto, which primarily emphasizes ritual practices, these groups often incorporate distinct theological doctrines.[2] Many of these sects are affiliated with the Association of Sectarian Shinto (教派神道連合会, Kyōha Shintō Rengōkai).[3] Prior to World War II, Sect Shinto was composed of 13 officially recognized denominations, commonly referred to as the "thirteen Shinto sects". Since that time, the composition of Sect Shinto has changed.
While Shrine Shinto represents a collective tradition of various local shrines and customary beliefs throughout Japan (later unified under the authority of the Ise Grand Shrine during the Meiji period) Sect Shinto is rooted in the kokugaku (lit. 'national study'), a school of thought that emphasized Japanese classical literature and Shinto philosophy. Although Tenrikyo has historically been classified as a form of Sect Shinto, it is often regarded as a distinct monotheistic religion.[4]
History
[edit]Although its origin can be traced back to the late Edo period, Sect Shinto became more firmly established during the Meiji era following the Meiji Restoration.[5] Its development was influenced by the religious policies of the Meiji government[6] and emerged during a period of expanding theological discourse that involved individuals from a broader range of social classes, not just intellectuals..[7]
In 1868, the religious administration of the new Meiji government issued the Shinto-Buddhist Separation Order, resulting in haibutsu kishaku (a philosophy espousing the abandonment of Buddhism in Japan) and the restoration of the unity of ritual and government system. Following the Taikyo Proclamation, which designated Shinto as the state religion, the Great Teaching Institute was established, though it was soon reformed into the Bureau of Shinto Affairs, and later the sect Shinto Taikyo.[citation needed]
During these early trial-and-error religious policies, the Meiji government promoted a nationalized system of Shinto education by religious instructors known as kyōdō shoku.[6] However, with the spread of the ideas of separation of church and state and freedom of religion, the kyōdō shoku ended. This produced a division in Shinto between shrines for state-run public rituals and religious groups centered on edification.[6] Groups that met certain conditions (such as the number of followers) were officially recognized as "independent denominations." This was the beginning of the denominational Shinto Sect.
This separation strengthened the idea that it was necessary to establish an institution that was a more developed version of the former Shodo Shido Practice Center.[citation needed] Accordingly, the Meiji government established the Office of Japanese Classics Research in Tokyo, independent of the Bureau of Shinto Affairs, to organize the exploration of ideas unique to Japan. It was later succeeded by Kokugakuin University.
Establishment
[edit]Formation of a united government
[edit]The impetus for denominational Shinto was the separation of Shinto and Buddhism, which began in 1868 (first year of Meiji) with the revival of the Department of Divinities and the separation of Shinto and Buddhism, which started with the Shinto-Buddhist Hanzen Order, a pre-modern imperial government directive.[8] This led to the formation of the unity of ritual and government, and a Shinto government was revived. Around then, official decrees abolished the hereditary system of Shinto priests, thus ending the jurisdiction of the Shirakawa family and Yoshida family over Shinto.[8]
The rituals of the Shinto shrines are the religious services of the state, and it is, of course, true that they are not the private property of one person or one family. This is a common practice in the country, and priests are considered to be a separate species from the people.
— Meiji 4th Year Taishogun's Bulletin No. 234
During this transition, the concept of missionaries to propagate Shinto remained. In 1870 (Meiji 3), the imperial Taikyo Proclamation designated Shinto as the state religion.[9][10] The Great Teaching Institute was established in 1872 (Meiji 5) as a missionary organization, but was dissolved in 1875 (Meiji 8). It was succeeded by the Bureau of Shinto Affairs in the same year, to which the originally disparate folk-belief religions belonged.
Ministry of Religion, kyōdō shoku, and the Taikyo Institute
[edit]In 1872, the Missionary Office was abolished and replaced with the Ministry of Religion.[11] In April, Shinto priests and monks were assigned kyōdō shoku positions.[9] The Ministry was later dissolved in 1877, and kyōdō shoku was abolished in 1884.[12]
The priesthood was initially divided into two geographic divisions. The eastern division was headed by Konoe Tadafusa, priest of Ise Grand Shrine, and the western division by Senge Takatomi, the grand priest of Izumo Taisha Shrine. Since it was assumed that one's religious affiliation was free, there was a struggle for power between the Ise and Izumo factions.[13] On January 30, 1873, the geographic division was abolished, and the two regions were combined. However, they were once again divided later,[when?] becoming a three-part system with Senge Takatomi, Koga Takemichi, and Inaba Masakuni, and then a four-part system with the addition of Yoriyasu Tanaka, the grand priest of the Ise Grand Shrine. On that same day,[when?] the Kurozumikyō and Shinto Shusei were specially established as denominational Shinto sects, and the compartment system was abolished.[14]
In May 1873, the Ministry of Religion issued a religious ordinance, which set standards for the approval of kosha (religious lectures or meetings). In August, the Ministry approved the Kurozumikyō, the Tohokami (later Misogi-Kyo), the Mitake, and the Fuji Isan (later Fuso-kyo), as well as Buddhist kosha.[15]
In 1873, the Great Teaching Institute was established—first in Kojimachi, Kioicho and later in Masukami, Shiba at Zōjō-ji—as the head temple for kyōdō shoku of a joint Shinto and Buddhist sect.[16] The Taikyo Institute was initiated by the Buddhist side to concretize teaching by the Ministry of Religion, but it later became focused entirely on Shinto.[17] The Buddhist side, led by Shinshū, broke away from the institute.[16] On April 30, 1875, the Taikyo Institute was dissolved by order of the Ministry of Religion.[18]
Bureau of Shinto Affairs
[edit]The Bureau of Shinto Affairs was formed in March 1875, just before the dissolution of the Taikyo Institute, by a group of Shinto shrines, at Ise Grand Shrine and other shrines throughout Japan, as well as by Shinto priests and instructors belonging to private Shinto-related kosha.[16] The Shinto side felt that no organization corresponded to the various Buddhist sects,[17] and on March 27, 1875 (Meiji 8), Grand High Priest Suechi Sanjonishi, Grand Priest-in-Charge Inaba Masakuni, Yoriyasu Tanaka, Hirayama Seisai, and Konosetsu Tsume jointly petitioned the Ministry of Religion for the establishment of a government office for Shinto.[19][20]
The next day, on March 28, 1875, he[who?] received permission to establish the Bureau of Shinto Affairs.[19] On April 8, he requested that the Ministry of Religion establish the Bureau of Shinto Affairs. The content of the request was that even small shrines, centering on the Imperial Shrine at Ise, should be able to cooperate for the purpose of propagating Shinto.[19] On April 15, the Bureau of Shinto Affairs was opened in the Tokyo Branch Office of the Jingu Shichosha.[21] Once the Bureau of Shinto Affairs was prepared—bringing together the traditionally existing shrines, Shinto kosha, and congregations following folk beliefs—various denominations that met certain conditions were able to branch out and become independent from it.
The following year, in 1876 (Meiji 9), a dormitory was established in the Shinto Office to train priests. Also that year, the Kurozumikyō and Shinto Shusei, which had been flourishing, became independent denominations.[22]
Inaba Masakuni was the first president of the Bureau of Shinto Affairs.[23] Yoriyasu Tanaka was the Chief of Ise Jingu and the first head of Jingūkyō.[24] Hirayama Seisai was the grand priest of Hikawa Shrine and the first headmaster of Shinto Taiseikyo and Ontake-kyo.[25] Kousetsu Tsume would become the second head minister of the Ontake Sect.[26]
In 1886, the Bureau of Shinto Affairs was reorganized, later becoming the sect Shinto Taikyo.
Controversy over shrine deities
[edit]The Bureau of Shinto Affairs had a plan to make Jingu Haruhaiden (later becoming Tokyo Daijingu) the central temple[12] and a center for missionary work.[27] Since Jingu Haruhaiden was to enshrine a branch spirit of Amaterasu, the Ministry of Religion and the Emperor visited the building and obtained permission from the Seiin to begin construction, which was funded by donations from the Imperial Household Agency and various families.[27]
In 1880, the opinion of Senge Takatomi on the deities to be worshipped in the Bureau of Shinto Affairs' temples was so controversial that it divided Shinto into the Ise and Izumo factions.[28] By order of the Meiji Emperor, a great conference on Shinto was held in January 1881 (Meiji 14), attended by 118 people, including all the chief priests of the government buildings and the instructors of the sixth grade and above. However, the issue could not be decided by the conference. Therefore, the Meiji Emperor made the final decision as to which deities would be worshiped there.[12]
Separation of ritual and faith
[edit]In January 1882, the separation of ritual and religion was enacted by the Ministry of Home Affairs through Bill No. 7, which prohibited those in the kyōdō shoku (priest-teacher position) from performing rituals, thereby promoting the separation of those who continued to be priests performing rituals or preaching the teachings, and solidifying the formation of Sect Shinto.[28][1]
Priests shall no longer serve as teachers and shall not be involved in funeral services.
— January 24, Meiji 15, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications No. 7
After this, on May 15, 1882, the six factions (including Jingūkyō) became independent. Jingu Haruhayashiden[spelling?] (the source of the ritual god controversy) was transferred to Jingūkyō's ownership and renamed Daijingu Shrine, and Jingū Taima were distributed by Jingūkyō.[29] Senge Takatomi took the opportunity to resign from his position as priest of Izumo Taisha Shrine and handed it over to his younger brother, who became the head of the Izumo Taisha Sect.[30]
On August 11, 1884, the government issued a proclamation abolishing the kyōdō shoku position.[31] In turn, this meant the Bureau of Shinto Affairs had lost its original reason for opening,[31] and so in 1886, the Bureau reorganized. It later became Shinto Taikyo, one of the schools of Shinto.[citation needed]
Office of Japanese Classics Research
[edit]On November 4, 1881, the Office of Japanese Classics Research was established as a successor to the Bureau of Shinto Affairs.[32] Like its predecessor, it was a unified Shinto missionary organization established to train Shinto priests.[33] Funded by an imperial gift, it purchased a mansion in Iidacho, Kojimachi-ku (present-day Chiyoda-ku).[33]
Immediately after the Great Council of Shinto, it was decided to establish the Office upon the proposal of Akiyoshi Yamada of Lord of Home Affairs.[34] Prince Arisugawa Takahito was appointed as its first president, and announced his intention to pursue a unique Japanese academic discipline.[35] In the "Announcement of the Establishment of the Imperial Academy" (jointly signed by Li-Kuro Kubo, Yorikuni Inoue, Nakasaburo Itsumi, and Hans Shishino), the intention of the establishment of the academy was to train personnel to maintain kokutai (national identity).[36] The Imperial Institute established branches in the provinces and qualified students for priesthood.[34]
The Office was later succeeded by Kokugakuin University.
Academics
[edit]In December 1868 (the first year of Meiji), the Imperial Academy was established in Kyoto but was abolished the following year. When the Ministry of Religion was established in 1872, it was responsible for research.[37][38]
In 1882 (Meiji 15), institutes of imperial studies were established one after another. This was due to a keen awareness of the need for doctrinal studies in the rites and rituals controversy. The controversy was divided between the doctrinalists (denominational Shinto sects) and the national scholars (academics). As the doctrinalists became independent, the national scholars were stimulated and the separation of doctrine and learning progressed.[32] On April 30, Jingūkyō established Kōgakkan University in Ise.[32] On May 30, the Department of Classics was established at the University of Tokyo.[34]
After World War II
[edit]On December 15, 1945, the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers (GHQ) issued the Shinto Directive aimed at dismantling State Shinto. In January of the following year, the Dai Nihon Shinto-kai, the Imperial Academy, and the Jingu Bonan-kai were dissolved to form the Association of Shinto Shrines, a religious corporation.[39] In March, Jingu-Shogakukan University was abolished by the Shinto directive; in April, representatives of each denomination explained their denomination to the GHQ Civilian Information and Education Department at Broadcasting Hall 108.[40] In June, at a meeting at Tenrikyo's Honshiba Grand Church between the presidents of the various schools and W. K. Vance, head of the Religious Affairs Division at GHQ, the occupying forces promised not to impose any restrictions on the religious activities of the Shinto sects.[40]
Tenrikyo established a policy of restoration immediately in 1945, and Konkokyo established the Council for the Establishment of the Faith in 1951 to eliminate Shinto colors.[41]
The system in which there were 13 Shinto sects and 13 Buddhist sects recognized by the government was broken up into even smaller groups as religious organizations when the Religious Corporation Law was enacted.[citation needed]
Shinto research institutions
[edit]Many of the scholars who had played a central role in Shinto research and education were expelled and replaced by folklorists such as Shinobu Orikuchi and Kunio Yanagita, as well as younger Shinto scholars who escaped expulsion.[42] On March 20, 1946, Kokugakuin University became a corporation, and the training of priests, which had been commissioned by the Ministry of Home Affairs, was continued from April as a new commission through the Jinja Main Office. The following year, Vance and Woodard of the Religious Affairs Division of GHQ decided that there was no problem with the study of Shinto and training of priests as a private university, and in 1948, the Shinto Affairs Department was established to form a Shinto training organization.[43]
The Shinto Scholarship Association, which had been conducting Shinto courses, was also dissolved in 1946.[44] In July 1949, at a meeting of the Federation of Shinto Sects at the Kinko Grand Church of the Tenrikyo Tokyo Branch Office, it was decided that Shinto lectures would be held at the Shinto Training Department of Kokugakuin University on behalf of the Federation of Shinto Sects; this practice continued until 1966.[44] Holding the Shinto course promoted the university as a Shinto university that combined both Shrine Shinto and Sect Shinto.[44] As of 1996, Kokugakuin University was said to be the only university with a course on Sect Shinto.[citation needed]
Sects
[edit]Overview
[edit]There are five main groups of Sect Shinto:[1]
- Fukko Shinto (Revival Shinto) lineage – includes Shinto Taikyo, Shinrikyo, and Izumo-taishakyo (which originates from Izumo Taisha)[1]
- Confucian Shinto – Shinto Taiseikyo (神道大成教) and Shinto Shusei[1]
- Mountain worship lineage – includes Jikkō kyō, Fuso-kyo, and Ontake-kyo[1]
- Purification sects – Misogikyo and Shinshu-kyo[1]
- Utopian groups – Kurozumikyō, Tenrikyo, and Konkokyo[1]
Tenrikyo is now classified by the Agency for Cultural Affairs as one of the various religions, not as a Shinto denomination.[45]
History
[edit]The first independent denominations were Kurozumikyō and Shinto Shusei in 1876 (Meiji 9). Jingūkyō was founded in 1882, but later reorganized into the Ise Shrine Offering Association[a][needs independent confirmation] in 1899 (Meiji 32).[46]
In 1895, eight denominations—Izumo Taisha-kyo, Kurozumikyō, Ontake-kyo, Jikkō kyō, Shinto Taiseikyo, Shinshu-kyo, Fuso-kyo, and Jingūkyō—joined to form the Shintō Dōshikai (lit. 'Society of Shinto Colleagues').[47][48][49] In 1899 (Meiji 32), the group was joined by Shinto Headquarters (Shinto Taikyo), Shinrikyo, and Misogikyo, and the name was changed to Shintō Konwakai; the same year, Jingūkyō reorganized as Jingū Hōnsaikai and withdrew from the federation.[49] In 1912 (Meiji 45), Konkokyo, Shinto Shusei, and Tenrikyo joined, forming 13 groups (14 if including the breakaway Jingūkyō), and the name was changed to Shintō Kyōha Rengōkai.[47] In 1934, the current name Kyōha Shintō Rengōkai (教派神道連合会, Federation of Sectarian Shinto) was adopted.[47]
After World War II, Oomoto joined the federation, but Tenrikyo and Shinto Taiseikyo withdrew. Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto was re-established after the war, but never joined the federation. Shinshu-kyo withdrew in 1959 but returned in 1994.[citation needed]
In 1995, on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of its formation, the "100th Anniversary of the Formation of the Federation of Shinto Churches" was held.[50] In addition to Misogi-kyo, Shinto Taikyo, Jingūkyō, Konkokyo, Kurozumikyō, Fuso-kyo, Ontake-kyo, Shinrikyo, Oomoto, Shinshu-kyo, Shinto Shusei, Izumo Taisha-kyo, and twelve other denominations, the presidents of Tenrikyo and Shinto Taiseikyo also attended.[50]
Today, the federation has 12 affiliated groups.[49]
| Denomination | Founder | Founding date | Independence date | Joined federation | Withdrew from federation | Followers[51] | Priests[51] | Shrines and churches[51] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurozumikyō | Munetada Kurozumi | 1846[52] | October 1876 | 1895 | — | 297,351 | 1,312 | 307 |
| Shinto Shusei | Nitta Kuniteru | 1849[53] | 1912 | — | 8,084 | 213 | 52 | |
| Jingūkyō (disestablished 1946) |
Yoritsune Tanaka | 1882 | May 1882 | 1895 | 1899 | —[c] | — | — |
| Izumo-taishakyo | Senge Takatomi | 1882[54] | 1895 | — | 1,266,058 | 8,212 | 161 | |
| Fuso-kyo | Shishino Nakaba | 1895 | — | 31,150 | 425 | 135 | ||
| Jikkō kyō | Hanamori Shibata | 1895 | — | 10,910 | 250 | 87 | ||
| Shinto Taiseikyo | Hirayama Seisai | 1882 | 1895 | 1976[47] | 21,515 | 173 | 30 | |
| Shinshu-kyo | Masatsugu Yoshimura | 1895 | — | 126,181 | 203 | 93 | ||
| Ontake-kyo | Osuke Tsuda | September 1882 | 1895 | — | 42,550 | 1,119 | 346 | |
| Shinto Taikyo | Inaba Masakuni | 1872[d] | January 1886 | 1899 | — | 21,375 | 470 | 163 |
| Shinrikyo | Tsunehiko Sano | 1880[55][56] | October 1894 | 1899 | — | 67,248 | 938 | 139 |
| Misogikyo | Masakane Inoue | 1899 | — | 78,675 | 482 | 61 | ||
| Konkokyo | Konkō Daijin | November 15, 1859[57] | June 1900 | 1912 | — | 397,461 | 3,521 | 1,484 |
| Tenrikyo | Nakayama Miki | 1838[58] | November 1908 | 1912 | 1970[47] | 2,000,000[e][59] | ||
| Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto | Abe no Seimei | 1953 | — | — | 50,000[60] | |||
| Oomoto | Nao Deguchi | 1892[61] | 1956 | 1956 | — | 166,367 | 4,280 | 715 |
| Total (sensuo stricto) | — | — | — | — | — | 2,534,925[51] | 21,598[51] | 3,773[51] |
| Total (sensuo lacto) | — | — | — | — | — | 4,584,925 |
Kurozumikyō
[edit]Kurozumikyō (黒住教) is a group highly linked to Amaterasu.
Shinto Shusei
[edit]Shinto Shusei (神道修成派) is considered a form of Confucian Shinto.[45][62][1] It was founded in 1849 by Nitta Kuniteru (1829–1902),[53] who was known to have read the Analects at age 9.[53] He founded the sect at age 20,[53] and considered Japanese people to be descendants of deities.[53] He considered allegiance to the Emperor of Japan to be central to his philosophy; he was a supporter of Sonnō jōi ("revere the Emperor, expel the barbarians") but supported the Boshin Rebellion (the civil war between the shogunate and forces supporting the emperor) and the Meiji Restoration later.[53]
Alongside Kurozumikyō, it was one of the first two Shinto sects to gain independence in 1876.[46] It has not been very active in the postwar era.[63]
Jingūkyō
[edit]Jingūkyō (神宮教) was a sect run out of Ise Grand Shrine which distributed Jingu Taima. It was a rival to Izumo-taishakyo and eventually left the federation and came to dominate State Shinto.
Izumo-taishakyo
[edit]Izumo-taishakyo (出雲大社教) was founded by Senge Takatomi.[54][64] and has 1,266,058 followers.[51] It is a Fukko Shinto lineage and at one point was a major rival with Jingūkyō.
Fuso-kyo
[edit]Fusō-kyō (扶桑教) is a mountain worship sect traditionally seen to have been founded by Hasegawa Kakugyo (who was also associated with Jikkō kyō).[65]
Jikkō kyō
[edit]Jikkō kyō (実行教) is a mountain worship sect traditionally seen to have been founded by Hasegawa Kakugyo (who was also associated with Fusō-kyō).[65]
Shinto Taiseikyo
[edit]Shinto Taiseikyo (神道大成教) is a Confucian Shinto sect[62][1] founded by Hirayama Seisai.
Shinshu-kyo
[edit]Shinshu-kyo (神習教) is a "purification sect" alongside Misogikyo.[1]
It was founded by Masaki Yoshimura[66] (1839–1915[67]), who was a survivor of the Ansei Purge.[68] He worked at Ise Jingu and later was head of Tatsuta Shrine, but due to laws restricting teaching, he entrusted his children to Itō Hirobumi (before he became Prime Minister) and established a new branch based on his family traditions.[69]
Ontake-kyo
[edit]Ontake-kyo (御嶽教) is a mountain worship sect dedicated to Mount Ontake.[70] It had 3 million members in 1930,[71] which decreased to around 40,000 members in 2020.[51]
Shinto Taikyo
[edit]Shintō Taikyō (神道大教) is the direct successor to the Taikyo Institute. Its name "Taikyo" refers to the Three Great Teachings first proclaimed in the Proclamation of the Great Doctrine.[72]
Shinrikyo
[edit]Shinrikyo (神理教; lit. 'divine principle') is a Shinto sect considered to be part of the Fukko Shinto lineage of Sect Shinto, alongside Shinto Taikyo and Izumo-taishakyo.[45] The name "Shinrikyo" is relatively common among Shinto groups,[73] and uses different kanji characters than Aum Shinrikyo, a cult and terrorist organization.
It was founded by Tsunehiko Sano[73][56] in 1880.[55][56] Sano had previously studied medicine and was an advocate of traditional Japanese medicine. He studied kokugaku in his youth under Nishida Naokai.[74][75]
Sano's thought blurred the lines between monotheism and polytheism, entering transtheism.[73] His concept of kami was aimed at resisting the propagation of Christianity while composing teachings that were in line with the aims of popular national indoctrination. His core elements of the concept of kami did not change throughout his life.[73]
He believed the etymology of kami was derived from vital force (Ikimochi). He saw this as emphasizing the interconnectedness of everything, from humans to nature, and as such this could be interpreted as a monotheistic view.[73] He saw all the kami as unified under a divine principle, hence the name of the group.[73]
Misogikyo
[edit]Misogikyo (禊教; lit. 'Misogi religion') is considered a "purification sect" alongside Shinshu-kyo.[1]
The group is quite obscure today.[76] It is very ritual-focused, with little theoretical theology. In this way, it contrasts with Yoshida Shinto.[76] It emphasizes right state of mind and self-control.[76] It has influence from Confucian Shinto but is its own tradition.[76]
Konkokyo
[edit]Konkōkyō (金光教, Konkō-kyō) is a faith that lies between traditional Shinto, and its own unique practices such as toritsugi mediation, which emerged from Shinbutsu-shūgō.
Tenrikyo
[edit]Tenrikyo (天理教, Tenrikyō; sometimes rendered as 'Tenriism') was a Sect Shinto group founded by Nakayama Miki. After it was free to do so in 1946, Tenrikyo established itself as an independent religion outside of the Shinto designation.
Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto
[edit]In the Edo period, the Tsuchimikado family, descendants of Abe no Seimei, established Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto influenced by Confucian Shinto through Suika Shinto. However, because of the inclusion of fortune-telling and magic, the Meiji government considered it pagan and issued the Tensha Shinto Prohibition Ordinance. After the war, it was restored as "Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto Headquarters", and registered as a religious corporation rather than a Sect Shinto or a Shinto shrine.[citation needed]
Oomoto
[edit]Oomoto (大本, Ōmoto; lit. 'Great Source, or Great Origin') is often seen as a new religion.
New Sect Shinto
[edit]New Sect Shinto (shin kyoha Shinto)[77] is a subset of Sect Shinto,[78] and consists of numerous organizations.[79] It is influenced by Buddhism and Confucianism.[78]
It is part of the Sect Shinto movement not centering upon 13 sects.[80] New Shinto sects have shamanistic leadership, syncretism of religious and philosophical beliefs, closely knit social organization, and individualism.[80] Some groups have characteristics of monotheism, in the extreme case making a compromise of Buddhism, Confucianism, and folk religion.[80]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ This was one of the predecessor organizations that formed the Association of Shinto Shrines after World War II.
- ^ Statistics source excluding Tenrikyo and Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto
- ^ Depending on interpretation, up to 98 million followers due to its role in founding the Association of Shinto Shrines.
- ^ As the Great Teaching Institute
- ^ 2002 data
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Kyōha Shintō". Britannica. July 20, 1998. Retrieved 2022-04-29.
- ^ 景山春樹 「神道」『世界大百科事典』 219頁。
- ^ "教派神道連合会(教派連)". Kyoharen.jp. Retrieved 2018-12-23.
- ^ Fukaya, Tadamasa, "The Fundamental Doctrines of Tenrikyo," Tenrikyo Overseas Mission Department, Tenri-Jihosha, 1960, p.2
- ^ Bowker, John (2003-01-01), "Kyōha Shintō", The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780192800947.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-280094-7, retrieved 2022-04-30
- ^ a b c Nobutaka, Inoue. "Encyclopedia of Shinto - 8. Schools, Groups, and Personalities". Kokugakuin University. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
- ^ "Perspectives toward Understanding the Concept of Kami". www2.kokugakuin.ac.jp. Retrieved 2023-03-11.
- ^ a b Inoue 1991, pp. 18–19.
- ^ a b 中村元ほか編 (2002). 岩波仏教辞典 (第二版 ed.). 岩波書店. pp. 220–222. ISBN 978-4000802055.
- ^ "Glossary of Shinto Names and Terms: T". www2.kokugakuin.ac.jp. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ Inoue 1991, p. 20.
- ^ a b c 村上 1974, pp. 118–119.
- ^ Inoue 1991, pp. 25–26, 35.
- ^ Inoue 1991, pp. 25–26.
- ^ 村上 2007, p. 94.
- ^ a b c 菅田 1985, pp. 113–114.
- ^ a b Inoue 1991, p. 21.
- ^ 村上 2007, pp. 103–104.
- ^ a b c Inoue 1991, pp. 21–22.
- ^ 村上 2007, p. 104.
- ^ 村上 2007, p. 105.
- ^ 村上 2007, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Inoue 1991, p. 38.
- ^ Inoue 1991, pp. 33–34.
- ^ 井上順孝ほか編 1996, p. 556.
- ^ 井上順孝ほか編 1996, p. 41.
- ^ a b 村上 2007, p. 107.
- ^ a b Inoue 1991, pp. 27–29.
- ^ 村上 2007, pp. 117–118.
- ^ 菅田 1985, pp. 149–158.
- ^ a b 村上 2007, pp. 120–123.
- ^ a b c Inoue 1991, p. 29.
- ^ a b 東京ライフ社刊. "皇典講究所から国学院へ". 神道大教. Retrieved 2016-03-16.
- ^ a b c 村上 2007, p. 115.
- ^ "設置の趣旨等を記載した書類 - 大学設置室 - 文部科学省" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-02-12. Retrieved 2022-04-29.
- ^ Inoue 1991, p. 115.
- ^ 村上 2007, p. 114.
- ^ https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/journal/6/article/1099/pdf/download
- ^ 中山 2009, p. 231.
- ^ a b 中山 2009, p. 228.
- ^ 中山 2009, p. 229.
- ^ 中山 2009, pp. 231–232.
- ^ 中山 2009, p. 232.
- ^ a b c 中山 2009, p. 238.
- ^ a b c 文化庁編さん 2011, pp. 5–6.
- ^ a b 戦後に神社本庁を形成する前身組織の1つ。
- ^ a b c d e Inori and Tsudoi: A History of the 100th Anniversary of the Formation of the Shinto Federation of Churches, 1996, pp. 10-12.
- ^ "Kyôha Shintô Rengôkai 教派神道連合会". Glossary of Shinto Names and Terms. Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University. 2001. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
- ^ a b c Nobutaka, Inoue. "Encyclopedia of Shinto 詳細 - 8. Schools, Groups, and Personalities - Kyōha Shintō Rengōkai". Kokugakuin University. Archived from the original on 2021-10-21. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
- ^ a b 結成100周年の記念式典. 産経新聞. 1995-09-05.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Religious Almanac" (2020 edition)
- ^ "Marukoto: The Teaching of Roundness". kurozumikyo.com. Retrieved 2023-03-16.
- ^ a b c d e f "Encyclopedia of Shinto詳細". 國學院大學デジタルミュージアム (in Japanese). Retrieved 2023-03-06.
- ^ a b Miller, R.A. (1962). 現代日本文読本: Graded Lessons for Mastering the Written Language. Tuttle Publishing. p. 115. ISBN 9780804816472. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ a b "Notes". Shinto and the State, 1868-1988. Princeton University Press. 1989. pp. 171–190. doi:10.1515/9780691221298-014. ISBN 9780691221298.
- ^ a b c 日本国語大辞典,百科事典マイペディア,デジタル大辞泉,世界大百科事典内言及, ブリタニカ国際大百科事典 小項目事典,日本大百科全書(ニッポニカ),精選版. "神理教(しんりきょう)とは? 意味や使い方". コトバンク (in Japanese). Retrieved 2023-03-12.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "The Life of The Founder | KONKOKYO". www.konkokyo.or.jp. Archived from the original on 2024-05-11. Retrieved 2017-02-03.
- ^ Tenrikyo Doyusha (2014). Tracing the Model Path. Translated by Tenrikyo Overseas Department. Tenrikyo Doyusha.
- ^ Stuart D. B. Picken. Historical dictionary of Shinto. Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. p. 223. ISBN 0-8108-4016-2
- ^ "Tensha Tsuchimikado Shintō Honchō | 國學院大學デジタルミュージアム". Archived from the original on 2023-03-16. Retrieved 2023-09-16.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Tamura, Yoshirō (2000). Japanese Buddhism: a cultural history. Translated by Jeffrey Hunter (1st English ed.). Tokyo: Kosei Pub. Co. ISBN 4-333-01684-3. OCLC 45384117.
- ^ a b "The Forms of Shinto". Caroline Myss. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
- ^ "Glossary of Shinto Names and Terms - Shintô shûsei-ha 神道修成派". Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University. 2001. Archived from the original on 2023-03-21. Retrieved 2023-09-08.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Teeuwen, M.; Breen, J.; Inoue, N.; Mori, M. (2003). Shinto, a Short History. RoutledgeCurzon. p. 177. ISBN 9780415311793. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ a b Picken, Stuart D. B. (2010-12-28). Historical Dictionary of Shinto. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7372-8.
- ^ 小項目事典, 朝日日本歴史人物事典,デジタル版 日本人名大辞典+Plus,ブリタニカ国際大百科事典. "芳村正秉(よしむら・まさもち)とは? 意味や使い方". コトバンク (in Japanese). Retrieved 2023-03-06.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "歴史". 神道神習教公式ページ (in Japanese). Retrieved 2023-03-09.
- ^ Inoue 1991, pp. 277–278.
- ^ Inoue 1991, p. 282.
- ^ Holtom, D.C. (1938). The National Faith of Japan: A Study in Modern Shinto. Paragon Book Reprint Corporation. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ Picken, S.D.B. (1994). Essentials of Shinto: An Analytical Guide to Principal Teachings. Greenwood Press. p. 232. ISBN 9780313264313. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ "Shinto Taikyo". www.philtar.ac.uk. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
- ^ a b c d e f "Sano Tsunehiko and "Divine Principle (Shinri)"". www2.kokugakuin.ac.jp. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
- ^ David W. Kim (June 2020). "A Transnational Grassroots Movement: Jinja Shintō and Japanese Religions in the Pre-Colonial Joseon Society" (PDF). The Review of Korean Studies. 23 (1). doi:10.25024/review.2020.23.1.211 (inactive 1 July 2025). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-03-12.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ "Encyclopedia of Shinto詳細". 國學院大學デジタルミュージアム.
- ^ a b c d Sawada, Janine Anderson (1998). "Mind and Morality in Nineteenth-Century Japanese Religions: Misogi-Kyō and Maruyama-Kyō". Philosophy East and West. 48 (1): 108–141. doi:10.2307/1399927. ISSN 0031-8221. JSTOR 1399927.
- ^ Fleming, L. (2001). Excel Senior High School Studies of Religion. Pascal Press. p. 278. ISBN 9781740202411. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ a b "Shuha Shinto". jinja.jp. Archived from the original on 2015-01-01. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ Barrett, D.B.; Johnson, T.M.; Guidry, C.R.; Crossing, P.F. (2001). World Christian Trends, AD 30-AD 2200: Interpreting the Annual Christian Megacensus. William Carey Library. p. 606. ISBN 9780878086085. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
- ^ a b c "Intercultural Communication Studies XII-4 2003 Asian Approaches to Human Communication Aspects of Shinto in Japanese Communication". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.567.8041.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
Sources
[edit]- Inoue, Junko (April 1991). 教派神道の形成 [The Formation of Sect Shinto] (in Japanese). Kobundo [弘文堂]. ISBN 978-4335160219.
- 菅田, 正昭 (1985). 古神道は甦る. たま出版. ISBN 4884811321.(文庫:1994年.ISBN 4886924603.)「教派神道に流れる古神道の本質」の章あり.
- 村上, 重良 (April 1974). 慰霊と招魂-靖国の思想. 岩波新書. 岩波書店. ISBN 978-4004121565.
- 村上, 重良 (August 2007). 天皇制国家と宗教. 講談社学術文庫. 講談社. ISBN 978-4061598324.
- 小滝透『神々の目覚め-近代日本の宗教革命』春秋社, 1997年7月.ISBN 978-4393291245.
- 田中義能『神道十三派の研究 (上・下)』 第一書房, 1987年. 昭和初期に刊行された同書の復刻版.
- 沼田健哉 (1995), 宗教と科学のネオパラダイム, 創元社, ISBN 978-4422140193
- 文化庁編さん (March 2016). 宗教年鑑 [Religion Yearbook] (PDF) (in Japanese) (2015 ed.).
- 井上順孝ほか編 (January 1996). 新宗教教団・人物事典. 弘文堂. ISBN 978-4335160288.
- 阪本, 是丸 (September 1991). 書評と紹介『教派神道の形成』. 宗教研究. 65 (2): 161–164.
- 阪本, 是丸 (March 2009). "皇典講究所関係出版物に関する一考察". In 國學院大學研究開発推進センター (ed.). 史料から見た神道-國學院大學の学術資産を中心に. 弘文堂. pp. 107–135. ISBN 978-4335160561.
- 中山, 郁 (March 2009). "國學院大學と教派神道". In 國學院大學研究開発推進センター (ed.). 史料から見た神道-國學院大學の学術資産を中心に. 弘文堂. pp. 227–247. ISBN 978-4335160561.
- 西野神社 (17 October 2006). 西野神社 社務日誌:神社本庁以外の神社神道の包括団体. Retrieved 2019-10-08.
External links
[edit]Sect Shinto
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Core Features
Terminology and Legal Distinction
Sect Shinto (教派神道, Kyōha Shintō), translating to "teaching sect Shinto," designates organized Shinto denominations featuring distinct doctrines, charismatic founders, and formalized scriptures or teachings, in contrast to the ritual-centric, shrine-based practices of Shrine Shinto (Jinja Shintō).[1] These groups, numbering 13 principal sects formalized in the late 19th century, encompass traditions rooted in folk healing, purification rites, mountain asceticism, Confucian ethics, and revivalist theology.[1][6] The legal framework for Sect Shinto emerged in the 1890s as a governmental classification to delineate independent religious organizations from nationally administered shrines, enabling the latter's reconfiguration as sites of civic reverence rather than private worship.[1][6] This separation built on the 1882 Shrine-Temple Ordinance, which barred shrine priests from proselytism and funeral rites (beyond local levels), thereby distinguishing state-managed shrine custodians—who performed imperial rituals without doctrinal propagation—from sectarian "instructors" authorized for missionary and educational activities in dedicated halls.[7] Under this regime, Sect Shinto entities received partial official endorsement for ideological alignment with the emperor system but lacked direct control over public shrines, a divide reinforced until the 1945 Shinto Directive dismantled state religious oversight.[7][6]Fundamental Beliefs and Practices
Sect Shinto, comprising thirteen recognized sects formalized in the late 19th century, emphasizes explicit doctrinal teachings and personal faith over the ritual purity central to Shrine Shinto. These sects, including faith-healing groups like Tenrikyo and Konkokyo, generally posit a supreme kami or divine parent as the source of creation and human well-being, with doctrines focused on achieving salvation through moral conduct, gratitude, and harmony with the universe.[8][9] For instance, Tenrikyo teaches that God the Parent created humans for a "Joyous Life" of bliss, attainable by sweeping away "dusts of the mind" such as selfish thoughts via ethical living and service.[10] Konkokyo, meanwhile, centers on Tenchi Kane No Kami as the omnipresent life force, advocating "true heart" faith through direct mediation with the divine to resolve worldly sufferings.[11] Shinto Taikyo stresses reverence for gods, national loyalty, and alignment with heavenly principles and human ethics.[12] Doctrinal diversity exists across categories—pure Shinto sects prioritize kami veneration and ethical revival, while mountain-worship groups like Fusokyo emphasize ascetic practices in nature—but a shared causal realism underlies beliefs: human afflictions stem from misalignment with divine will, remedied by doctrinal adherence rather than mere ritual.[1] Impurity, whether physical or mental, disrupts harmony, necessitating purification through faith and action; sects like Izumo Oyashirokyo integrate folk healing with kami invocation for restoration. Empirical outcomes, such as reported healings in Tenrikyo communities since the 1838 founding revelations, reinforce these teachings' validity among adherents.[13] Practices in Sect Shinto extend beyond shrine visits to include systematic propagation, communal study, and founder-specific rites. Core rituals involve prayer (norito), offerings, and purification (misogi), but sects innovate: Tenrikyo's "Service" dance ritual, performed daily at headquarters since 1838, embodies joyous devotion to invoke divine protection.[10] Konkokyo's toritsugi mediation, where ministers intercede as "living kami" since founder Kawate Bunjiro's 1859 enlightenment, facilitates personal counsel and divine connection without intermediaries.[14] Hinokishi (voluntary service) in Tenrikyo and ethical exhortations in Taikyo promote societal harmony, with monthly services and doctrinal lectures fostering community.[12] These practices, often documented in sect scriptures like Tenrikyo's Ofudesaki (1838–1882), prioritize experiential verification of doctrines through lived piety.[8]Differentiation from Shrine Shinto and State Shinto
Sect Shinto, or Kyōha Shintō, emerged as a category of organized religious groups emphasizing doctrinal teachings and personal faith, in contrast to the ritual-centric nature of Shrine Shinto (Jinja Shintō) and the nationalistic, state-administered framework of State Shinto (Kokka Shintō). This distinction was formalized through government reforms in the late 19th century, particularly following the 1882 administrative separation that divided Shinto practices into shrine-based rituals under state oversight and sectarian organizations focused on scripture, founders' revelations, and salvific doctrines.[6] Prior to World War II, Sect Shinto comprised 13 officially recognized denominations, categorized into types such as pure Shinto sects, faith-healing groups, and Confucian-influenced organizations, each led by a central figure and operating independently of shrine networks.[6] These sects prioritized ethical teachings, communal worship in dedicated halls, and individual spiritual cultivation over public ceremonies.[15] In differentiation from Shrine Shinto, Sect Shinto shifted emphasis from communal rituals at fixed shrines honoring local kami to systematized beliefs and proselytization. Shrine Shinto, the predominant form with approximately 80,000 shrines, centers on purification rites, seasonal festivals, and life-cycle events like weddings, without requiring doctrinal adherence or centralized theology; participation is often civic or habitual rather than faith-based.[6] Sect Shinto groups, by contrast, developed around specific founders—such as Nakayama Miki for Tenrikyō or Inariyama Dōyū for Izumo Ōyashirokyō—and promoted unique scriptures addressing salvation, moral reform, and direct communion with deities, often incorporating elements of healing or millenarianism absent in shrine practices.[6] This doctrinal orientation led to their classification as private religions, legally distinct from the public, ritual-only domain of shrines, which avoided claims of exclusive truth or conversion.[16] Relative to State Shinto, Sect Shinto lacked the imperial and patriotic imperatives that defined the former from the Meiji era onward. State Shinto integrated Shrine Shinto into a national cult, promoting emperor divinity—rooted in descent from Amaterasu Ōmikami—and civic loyalty through state-funded rituals, education, and shrine visits, while officially denying religious status to evade freedom-of-religion constraints.[6] Sect Shinto, excluded from this system by 1882 decrees, operated as voluntary associations without government compulsion or funding, focusing on personal piety rather than national mobilization; sects like Konkokyō emphasized universal kami accessibility over hierarchical state symbolism.[15] Post-1945 Shinto Directive disestablished State Shinto, rendering Shrine Shinto private and voluntary, yet Sect Shinto retained its identity as doctrine-driven entities, now numbering over 80 groups, unbound by the abolished state framework.[16] This separation preserved Sect Shinto's role in fostering independent religious expression amid Shinto's broader ritual traditions.[6]Historical Origins
Precursors in the Edo Period
During the Edo period (1603–1868), precursors to Sect Shinto emerged primarily through intellectual movements and nascent charismatic groups that emphasized doctrinal teachings and personal divine experiences over hereditary shrine rituals. The Kokugaku (National Learning) school, developing from the mid-18th century, sought to revive "pure" ancient Shinto by studying classical texts like the Kojiki and Nihon shoki, critiquing Buddhist and Confucian accretions as distortions of Japan's indigenous traditions.[17] Scholars such as Motoori Norinaga (1730–1801) argued for Shinto's primacy in Japanese spirituality, fostering a cultural nativism that indirectly supported later sectarian emphases on kami worship without institutional mediation.[18] This intellectual groundwork, extended by Hirata Atsutane (1776–1843), promoted Shinto as a unified ethical and cosmological system, influencing followers to prioritize textual exegesis and moral practice.[19] In the late Edo period, amid economic hardships, peasant unrest, and epidemics, charismatic figures began forming proto-sectarian communities centered on revelations and healing practices, distinct from shrine-based affiliations. Kurozumi Munetada (1780–1850), a Shinto priest in Okayama, founded Kurozumikyō in 1814 following a claimed divine union with Amaterasu Ōmikami on the winter solstice, emphasizing "roundness" (marukoto) as harmonious unity of kami, humans, and nature through rituals like sun worship and purification.[20][21] This movement, attracting followers via faith healing and ethical teachings, represented an early shift toward independent doctrinal Shinto, predating Meiji formalization.[22] Similarly, Nakayama Miki (1798–1887) experienced spirit possession by the kami Tenri Ō no Mikoto in 1838 in Yamato Province, initiating teachings on joy (yōki) and salvation through the "Service" dance, which evolved into Tenrikyō's core practices and attracted rural adherents seeking relief from famine and illness.[23] These developments, rooted in folk possession cults and National Learning's revivalism, laid the experiential foundation for Sect Shinto's focus on founder-revealed doctrines, contrasting with the ritual-centric Shrine Shinto. By the 1850s, such as with Kawate Bunjirō's (1814–1883) Konkokyō in 1859, emphasizing mediation with the supreme kami Tenchi Kane no Kami, these groups demonstrated growing organizational tendencies amid Tokugawa decline.[24][22]Impact of Meiji Restoration
The Meiji Restoration of 1868 initiated sweeping religious reforms that dismantled the longstanding syncretism between Shinto and Buddhism, creating opportunities for the reorganization of independent Shinto groups into formalized sects. The government's shinbutsu bunri decree, issued on March 28, 1868, prohibited the conflation of Shinto deities (kami) with Buddhist figures, leading to the removal of Buddhist statues and icons from shrines and the suppression of hybrid practices nationwide. This policy disrupted traditional religious networks, particularly in rural areas, and elevated Shinto as a basis for national identity, prompting charismatic leaders and revivalist movements to consolidate followers into doctrinal organizations separate from shrine-based rituals.[25][26] A pivotal development occurred in 1882 when the Home Ministry formalized the distinction between shrine Shinto (jinja shintō), focused on imperial rituals, and sectarian Shinto (kyōha shintō), dedicated to teaching and proselytization. Under this ordinance, pre-existing groups—such as the Ontake-kyō pilgrimage association and teachings propagated by figures like Sano Tsunehiko (founder of Taiseikyō)—received official recognition as independent sects, enabling them to establish central headquarters, train clergy, and disseminate interpretations of Shinto doctrine. By the early 1900s, this process yielded 13 recognized Kyōha Shintō sects, including Fusōkyō, Shinrikyō, and Konkokyō, which emphasized personal salvation, faith healing, and ethical instruction over state-mandated shrine worship.[27][28] These reforms institutionalized Sect Shinto while subordinating it to state oversight, requiring sects to affirm loyalty to the emperor and align teachings with official historiography that portrayed Shinto as Japan's primordial faith. Although this granted sects legal autonomy and protected status—distinguishing them from unregulated folk practices—it also imposed constraints, such as mandatory reporting to authorities and suppression of elements deemed incompatible with national unity. Consequently, Sect Shinto proliferated among commoners seeking spiritual alternatives amid rapid industrialization, yet remained secondary to State Shinto's ritual dominance until the post-World War II era.[29]Early Organizational Efforts
In the aftermath of the Meiji Restoration, disparate Shinto-inspired groups, drawing from Edo-period confraternities and Kokugaku scholarship, initiated efforts to establish formalized structures amid the government's push for religious unification and national identity. These early endeavors involved adapting pre-modern teaching networks into cohesive denominations focused on doctrine dissemination rather than shrine-based rituals, often petitioning for administrative recognition to secure legal autonomy and propagate teachings.[3] The creation of the Ministry of Religion (Kyōbushō) in 1873 marked a key step, providing a centralized framework for overseeing religious organizations and enabling initial registration of emerging sects, though the ministry's dissolution in 1877 shifted efforts toward direct appeals to local authorities and the Home Ministry. Groups such as those precursors to Kurozumikyō (originating from Munetada Kurozumi's 1814 teachings) and Konkokyō (formalized around 1859 under Bunjirō Kawate) leveraged this period to consolidate leadership, compile doctrinal texts, and build follower bases, emphasizing ethical instruction and healing practices distinct from state rituals.[3][30] The 1882 Shintō Ordinance represented a watershed, legally distinguishing Sect Shinto (Kyōha Shintō) from Shrine Shinto by excluding independently organized doctrinal groups from state oversight, thereby permitting their independent incorporation as religious corporations. This policy prompted immediate formations, including Izumo Taishakyō under Sadaichi Senge and Ontakekyō from pilgrimage associations, which registered as sects that year, totaling an initial wave of about a dozen entities by the early 1890s.[3][31][30] These efforts culminated in the official recognition of thirteen principal sects by 1908, with Tenrikyō (founded 1838 by Nakayama Miki) as the final addition after prolonged negotiations for doctrinal independence from shrine affiliations. Such organizations prioritized missionary work and lay education, amassing followers through printed materials and local centers, though they remained under Home Ministry surveillance to align with imperial loyalty.[3]Government Involvement and Institutionalization
Formation of Regulatory Bodies
In 1882, the Meiji government issued an ordinance that formally separated Sect Shinto (Kyōha Shintō) from Shrine Shinto and State Shinto, classifying its organizations as independent religious sects focused on doctrine and evangelism rather than national rituals. This decree, prompted by efforts to centralize state control over religion while accommodating folk-derived groups, recognized an initial set of denominations—eventually totaling thirteen between 1876 and 1908—and placed them under Home Ministry oversight to prevent overlap with imperial cult activities. The measure aimed to regulate sectarian propagation as a private religious matter, distinct from the non-religious status assigned to shrine practices.[3] Prior to this separation, rudimentary regulation occurred through the Bureau of Shrines and Temples (Shaji Kyoku), established on April 17, 1877, within the Home Ministry. This bureau handled administrative matters for shrines, temples, and nascent Sect Shinto groups such as Tenrikyō and Kurozumikyō, including priest appointments and facility management, as part of broader efforts to dismantle Buddhist-Shinto syncretism and standardize religious governance. However, its dual mandate led to tensions, as sectarian leaders sought autonomy for doctrinal teachings amid government pushes for national unity.[31] To address these issues and enhance specialized control, the Home Ministry restructured religious administration in 1900, splitting the Bureau of Shrines and Temples into the Bureau of Shrines (Jinja Kyoku) for ritual sites and the newly formed Bureau of Religions (Shūkyō Kyoku) on April 26, 1900. The Bureau of Religions assumed direct regulatory authority over Sect Shinto, managing the thirteen denominations through priest licensing, organizational approvals, doctrinal reviews, and enforcement of compliance with imperial policies. It coordinated with prefectural offices to monitor activities, register associations, and curb heterodox elements, operating under the Home Ministry until 1913 and then the Ministry of Education until its dissolution on November 1, 1942. This framework persisted through laws like the 1919 Religious Organizations Ordinance, ensuring Sect Shinto's alignment with state interests without full integration into State Shinto.[3][31]Promotion of Doctrine and Unity
The Meiji government initiated the Great Promulgation Campaign (Taikyō Senpu Undō) in 1870 through the establishment of the Ministry of Doctrine (Kyōbushō), tasked with propagating Shinto-based teachings to foster national unity and loyalty to the emperor.[32] This effort aimed to integrate religious instruction with state ideology, training over 10,000 local lecturers (kyōdōshoku) by 1873 to disseminate doctrine across rural and urban areas, emphasizing the emperor's divine descent and the harmony of the national polity (kokutai).[30] The campaign's core content, outlined in the Three Great Teachings proclaimed on April 12, 1872, promoted reverence for heavenly ancestors, filial piety toward parents, and concord among all classes, positioning Shinto doctrine as a unifying moral framework amid post-restoration social fragmentation.[33] Sect Shinto denominations emerged and gained institutional traction within this doctrinal promotion framework, as the government co-opted emerging Shinto-inspired groups to extend state teachings while allowing them leeway in interpretive practices.[32] Organizations such as Taiseikyō, founded in 1873 as a pro-Shinto entity, participated directly in the campaign's propaganda efforts, blending folk healing and revelatory traditions with imperial loyalty to propagate unity at the grassroots level.[34] By recognizing precursors to the thirteen official Sect Shinto groups— including Konkokyō, Tenrikyō, and Ontakekyō—the government leveraged their networks for doctrine dissemination, training sect leaders as lecturers to reconcile local beliefs with centralized Shinto ethics, thereby mitigating religious pluralism's threat to national cohesion.[3] This selective endorsement ensured doctrines reinforced rather than challenged state authority, with sects required to affirm the emperor's sacred status. The campaign's emphasis on doctrinal uniformity waned after 1884, when the Kyōbushō was dissolved and responsibilities shifted to the Ministry of Education, marking a pivot toward secular schooling while preserving Sect Shinto's role in voluntary belief propagation.[29] Nonetheless, this period solidified Sect Shinto's institutional identity, as government oversight during the 1870s-1880s compelled sects to standardize teachings for official approval, culminating in their legal separation from Shrine Shinto in 1882 and formal categorization under the 1900 Religious Organizations Law.[27] Critics within the bureaucracy, including Finance Minister Ōkuma Shigenobu, noted the campaign's fiscal burdens and limited efficacy in rural conversion, yet it undeniably advanced doctrinal cohesion by subordinating sectarian variations to imperial-centric unity.[30] This governmental orchestration not only expanded Shinto's reach—reaching an estimated 4.6 million participants by 1883—but also embedded Sect Shinto as a compliant vehicle for sustaining national solidarity amid modernization pressures.[32]Controversies in Shrine Deity Interpretation
In the late 1870s, tensions escalated within Japan's emerging state Shinto framework over the proper interpretation and enshrinement of kami in official shrines under the Bureau of Shinto Affairs. Senge Takatomi, head priest of Izumo Taisha and a key figure in early Shinto revival efforts, proposed a pantheon that elevated Ōkuninushi—the shrine's central deity associated with nation-building in ancient myths—as coequal or complementary to Amaterasu Ōmikami, the sun goddess enshrined at Ise Jingū and central to imperial ideology.[30] This stance, articulated around 1879–1880, directly challenged the Ise-dominated hierarchy favored by government officials and Ise priests, who prioritized Amaterasu as the supreme ancestral kami to unify national rituals and doctrine.[35] The resulting "Pantheon Dispute" (saishin ronsō) exposed deep interpretive divides: Izumo advocates, drawing from Kojiki and Nihon shoki accounts of Ōkuninushi's foundational role in yielding earthly rule to Amaterasu's lineage, argued for inclusive enshrinement to reflect Shinto's diverse regional traditions, while central authorities sought a streamlined, Amaterasu-focused canon to support imperial legitimacy and ritual uniformity.[36] Senge's position, disseminated through Oyashiro-kyō networks, was deemed overly expansive by critics, who accused it of diluting state orthodoxy and echoing pre-Meiji syncretic influences.[35] By 1880, these debates fractured Shinto leadership, prompting the Bureau to restrict temple worship to approved deities and foreshadowing the marginalization of non-conforming groups. These interpretive clashes contributed to the 1882 government decree classifying dissenting organizations as Sect Shinto (Kyōha Shintō), separating them from Shrine Shinto (Jinja Shintō) to enforce doctrinal consistency in state-managed shrines. Sects like those aligned with Izumo interpretations or folk traditions often retained broader kami views, viewing shrine deities through lenses of personal salvation or regional myths rather than imperial hierarchy, which state promoters saw as subversive to national cohesion.[37] Post-dispute compromises, such as partial inclusion of Ōkuninushi in some rituals by the 1890s, failed to resolve underlying tensions, as evidenced by ongoing shrine mergers that prioritized Ise-aligned pantheons, reducing over 190,000 sites to about 120,000 by 1906.[38] Such policies underscored causal links between interpretive uniformity and state control, privileging empirical mythological exegesis over pluralistic readings.Separation of Ritual and Doctrine
Policy Shifts in the Late Meiji Era
In the wake of the Meiji Constitution's enactment on February 11, 1889, which enshrined freedom of religious belief under Article 28 while permitting state oversight of public morals, Japanese policymakers recalibrated Shinto governance to delineate ritual from doctrine. Shrine-based rituals were positioned as standardized, non-confessional national ceremonies obligatory for civic participation, thereby evading constitutional restrictions on religious compulsion. Doctrinal propagation, conversely, was confined to independent sectarian organizations, reflecting a pragmatic retreat from the earlier Great Promulgation Campaign's (1870–1884) unsuccessful bid for doctrinal uniformity across Shinto.[31][30] This bifurcation, encapsulated in the principle of uniform rituals (saishi ittei) coupled with doctrinal freedom (kyōdan jiyū), gained traction in the 1890s amid bureaucratic debates over reconciling imperial loyalty with legal pluralism. Home Ministry officials, responding to pressures from emerging sects and foreign critiques of state religion, issued ordinances permitting sectarian groups to register as religious corporations focused on teaching and community organization, distinct from state-administered shrines. By 1890, regulations formalized shrine priests' roles in ritual execution without doctrinal preaching, limiting their function to ceremonial uniformity that reinforced imperial ideology.[31][27] A pivotal institutionalization occurred on December 11, 1900, with the creation of the Bureau of Shrines and Temples (Jinja Honkyoku) within the Home Ministry, which centralized shrine administration as quasi-administrative bodies performing secularized public rites. This policy explicitly excluded doctrinal elements from shrine activities, mandating adherence to prescribed ritual protocols derived from ancient texts like the Engishiki (927 CE), while prohibiting proselytism or theological innovation at the shrine level. Sectarian Shinto entities, numbering 13 by the early 20th century—including Kurozumikyō (recognized 1882), Shintō Taiseikyō (1882), and Izumo Ōyashirokyō (1892)—were thereby empowered to cultivate proprietary teachings, rituals, and clerical hierarchies, often blending folk practices with nativist philosophy.[27][31] These shifts mitigated internal Shinto factionalism, as sects like Fusōkyō and Ontakekyō adapted by emphasizing personal salvation doctrines over state-centric nationalism, though all were required to affirm imperial reverence. Empirical data from Home Ministry reports indicate that by 1906, over 100,000 sectarian adherents participated in independent assemblies, contrasting with the 80,000+ shrines under direct bureaucratic oversight for ritual compliance. Critics within nativist circles, such as those affiliated with the Genroku Shinto movement, argued this fragmented doctrinal authority undermined cultural cohesion, yet the policy endured, prioritizing administrative efficiency and international legitimacy over ideological purity.[3][30]Role of Academic and Research Institutions
Kokugakuin University, founded in 1882 by the Association of Shinto Shrines as a center for advanced Shinto studies, played a pivotal role in systematizing research on ancient Japanese texts such as the Kojiki and Nihon shoki, emphasizing ritual practices over doctrinal interpretations to align with emerging state policies on Shinto's non-sectarian character.[39] This philological approach, rooted in National Learning traditions, provided scholarly justification for distinguishing saishi (ritual worship) as the core of Shrine Shinto from kyō (doctrine or teaching), which was increasingly relegated to recognized sects, thereby supporting the late Meiji policy shifts that insulated national rituals from denominational influences.[22] Kogakkan University, established in 1882 under the auspices of the Ise Grand Shrines and focused on priestly training, complemented this by prioritizing empirical study of shrine rituals and purification ceremonies, producing graduates who implemented standardized practices across shrines while avoiding theological elaboration that might overlap with Sect Shinto's edifying missions. By 1910, alumni from both institutions were qualified for public education roles, disseminating ritual knowledge in schools without promoting sectarian doctrines, which reinforced the institutional boundary between ritual execution and doctrinal propagation. These universities, supported by government funding and aligned with Bureau of Shrines and Temples directives, conducted research that critiqued syncretic Buddhist-Shinto elements in favor of "pure" ritual forms, influencing the 1900 administrative separation of shrine affairs from religious sects and enabling Sect Shinto groups to develop independent teachings without claiming ritual authority over national shrines.[22] Their publications and curricula, drawing on archaeological and textual evidence from sites like Ise and ancient chronicles, lent academic credibility to the view that Shinto's primordial essence lay in communal rites rather than creedal systems, a perspective that marginalized doctrinal elements in Shrine Shinto while legitimizing them within the 13 recognized Sect Shinto denominations by 1912.[3] Critics within Shinto scholarship, including some sect leaders, argued that this academic emphasis overly idealized ritual antiquity, potentially underplaying historical doctrinal developments in folk practices, yet the institutions' outputs—such as Kokugakuin's encyclopedic compilations—remained foundational for policy implementation, with over 1,000 ritual manuals standardized by the early 20th century.[40] This framework persisted until post-1945 reforms, underscoring the universities' enduring influence in framing Sect Shinto's doctrinal autonomy against Shrine Shinto's ritual exclusivity.Implications for Sectarian Independence
The separation of ritual and doctrine in 1882 positioned Sect Shinto (kyōha Shintō) as the doctrinal counterpart to the state-managed Shrine Shinto (jinja Shintō), enabling sectarian groups to operate with a degree of organizational autonomy focused on religious education and proselytization, activities prohibited within the ritual-centric shrine system.[3] This policy shift, formalized through ordinances distinguishing shrine priests from national evangelists, allowed Sect Shinto sects—such as Kurozumikyō (recognized in 1876) and later Tenrikyō (1908)—to establish independent administrative structures, including appointed leaders (kanchō) and educational programs, fostering self-governance in internal affairs absent in the centrally controlled shrines.[41][3] However, this independence was circumscribed by rigorous government regulation, as sects required official approval for doctrines, architectural standards, and teachings to prevent divergence from imperial ideology, effectively subordinating their autonomy to national unification efforts.[31][41] The transition of the Bureau of Shinto Affairs into a Sect Shinto administrative division in 1882 exemplified this oversight, transforming what had been joint propagation campaigns (initiated in 1872) into segregated doctrinal dissemination under Ministry of Home Affairs scrutiny.[31] While Shrine Shinto received state funding and integration into civic life as a non-religious national cult, Sect Shinto's conditional recognition—culminating in 13 approved groups by 1908—preserved their distinct identities but denied equivalent prestige or resources, rendering them reliant on voluntary adherents rather than institutional patronage.[3] These arrangements had enduring effects on sectarian viability, permitting Sect Shinto to cultivate follower bases through independent evangelism—contrasting Shrine Shinto's ritual exclusivity—but exposing them to periodic suppression if perceived as undermining state orthodoxy, as seen in delayed recognitions and doctrinal audits.[41] By delineating Sect Shinto as a parallel yet supervised entity, the policy inadvertently sustained a pluralistic undercurrent within the Shinto framework, allowing sects to adapt pre-Meiji infrastructures (e.g., Kokugaku-derived confraternities) into modern religious organizations, though always within bounds that prioritized imperial loyalty over unfettered doctrinal innovation.[3] This balance of limited self-determination and state vigilance persisted until the postwar Shinto Directive of 1945 dismantled such controls.[31]Imperial Era Developments
Alignment with National Policies
In the late Meiji era, following the 1882 government ordinance that distinguished Sect Shinto (Kyōha Shintō) as private religious organizations separate from the non-religious national cult of Shrine Shinto, the recognized denominations were compelled to integrate state-mandated principles of emperor reverence and kokutai—the national polity emphasizing the emperor's divine lineage from Amaterasu—into their doctrines to maintain official sanction and avoid suppression. This alignment ensured doctrinal harmony with imperial ideology, as sects like Konkokyō and Kurozumikyō revised teachings to prioritize loyalty to the throne, reflecting the government's broader effort to unify religious practice under ultranationalist frameworks administered by the Home Ministry.[27][29] During the Taishō and early Shōwa periods, Sect Shinto's alignment deepened amid rising militarism, with the 13 officially recognized sects forming the Association of Sectarian Shinto (Kyōha Shintō Rengōkai) to coordinate responses to national directives, including mandatory participation in patriotic education campaigns that promoted Shinto-derived values of sacrifice and harmony with imperial will. Regulatory measures, such as the 1939 Religious Organizations Law, further enforced conformity by subjecting sects to oversight ensuring their activities bolstered state goals, including suppression of pacifist elements within their ranks.[42][43] By the wartime Shōwa era (1930s–1945), Sect Shinto leaders issued public affirmations of devotion to the emperor and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, organizing member-led initiatives for morale enhancement, such as ritual prayers for military victory and adherence to civilian austerity measures, thereby functioning as adjuncts to state propaganda despite their sectarian autonomy. This pragmatic alignment preserved institutional survival amid intensifying controls, though it masked occasional internal doctrinal tensions subordinated to national imperatives.[15][44]Suppressions and Internal Conflicts
In the mid-1930s, as Japan intensified militaristic policies, Sect Shinto organizations faced escalating government scrutiny, with authorities suppressing doctrinal elements perceived as undermining national unity or imperial loyalty. The Religious Organizations Law, enacted on March 31, 1939, mandated the consolidation of religious groups into centralized federations under state-approved supervisory bodies, effectively curtailing Sect Shinto autonomy by requiring alignment with kokutai (national polity) principles and prohibiting teachings that could foster dissent.[45] This legislation compelled sects to revise rituals and publications to emphasize emperor reverence, often at the expense of founding doctrines emphasizing personal salvation or kami-human harmony.[45] Tenrikyō, one of the largest Sect Shinto groups, encountered particularly stringent measures; from 1937 onward, coinciding with the Second Sino-Japanese War, state censors targeted its foundational texts, such as the Mikagura-uta, suppressing myths involving devas and narratives interpreted as pacifist or insufficiently hierarchical, which persisted until Japan's 1945 defeat.[46] These interventions stemmed from fears that Tenrikyō's emphasis on joy (yōki) and worldly salvation diluted ultranationalist fervor, leading to mandatory doctrinal audits and bans on certain publications.[46] Other sects, including Konkokyō, navigated similar pressures, though records indicate less overt doctrinal excision, as their theistic frameworks on kami-nature reciprocity were reframed to support wartime mobilization without full-scale prohibition.[46] Internal conflicts within Sect Shinto emerged from these impositions, pitting doctrinal purists against pragmatic leaders advocating compliance to preserve institutional survival. In Tenrikyō, tensions arose over self-censorship of scriptures and rituals, with some adherents resisting revisions that subordinated foundress Nakayama Miki's revelations to state Shinto orthodoxy, fostering factional debates documented in postwar restorations of banned texts.[47] Broader sectarian rifts involved disputes over resource allocation for war efforts versus maintenance of independent teachings, exacerbated by the 1939 law's enforcement mechanisms, which rewarded compliant sects with subsidies while marginalizing resisters.[48] These dynamics highlighted causal tensions between Sect Shinto's origins in folk-derived innovations and the imperial regime's drive for ideological uniformity, often resolving in temporary doctrinal concessions that sowed long-term schisms.[48]Involvement in Wartime Mobilization
During the 1930s, as Japan escalated military conflicts with China, Sect Shinto sects were drawn into the government's National Spiritual Mobilization Movement launched on October 12, 1937, which aimed to unify the populace under imperial loyalty and martial spirit. Religious organizations, including the 13 recognized Kyōha Shinto denominations, were directed to adapt their doctrines to emphasize the divine kokutai (national polity) and the righteousness of expansionist policies, often through sermons, publications, and communal rituals that glorified the Emperor as a living deity and framed warfare as a sacred duty. Non-compliance risked suppression, as seen with Ōmotokyō's second crackdown in December 1935 for perceived disloyalty, prompting compliant sects to demonstrate patriotism via member enlistment drives and financial donations to military funds.[49] By 1940–1941, the Religious Bodies Law and subsequent orders under the Ministry of Education further centralized control, mandating that Sect Shinto groups propagate the 1941 Shinmin no Michi (The Way of Subjects) tract, which portrayed the Pacific War—rebranded as the "Greater East Asia War" from January 1942—as a holy crusade against Western imperialism. Major sects like Tenrikyō, with over 2 million adherents by the late 1930s, aligned teachings to support this narrative, building on precedents such as their 2.5 million yen contribution to state debts during the 1904–1905 Russo-Japanese War, and organized victory prayers and morale-boosting events at their headquarters.[50] Similarly, sects such as Jingu Kyō dispatched missionaries to occupied Asia to establish shrines and promote assimilation, aiding cultural propaganda efforts in territories like Korea and Taiwan. These activities extended to domestic mobilization, where sect followers were encouraged to endure hardships, with reports of thousands participating in labor battalions and comfort unit support by 1943–1945.[51] This involvement reflected pragmatic conformity rather than ideological fervor in many cases, as sects sought to preserve autonomy amid intensifying state oversight; however, it contributed to the erosion of doctrinal independence, with wartime publications often mirroring official rhetoric on imperial divinity and racial superiority. Postwar reflections in sect records indicate mixed internal responses, with some leaders later acknowledging coerced alignment, though official histories emphasize voluntary patriotism to mitigate Allied scrutiny under the 1945 Shinto Directive. Empirical data from government archives show Sect Shinto contributions to war bonds exceeding those of some Buddhist denominations proportionally, underscoring their integrated role in total mobilization.[43]Post-World War II Trajectory
Effects of the Shinto Directive
The Shinto Directive, formally issued on December 15, 1945, by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, required the Japanese government to abolish state sponsorship of Shinto, eliminate compulsory participation in religious practices, and purge militaristic and ultranationalistic elements from religious organizations, including those of Sect Shinto lineage.[52] While primarily targeting the Shrine Shinto system integral to State Shinto, the directive's provisions extended to the thirteen Sect Shinto groups—such as Tenrikyō and Konkokyō—by mandating the cessation of government financial support, the dissolution of national Shinto associations promoting imperial ideology, and restrictions on doctrines that could foster aggression or state compulsion in belief.[53] This marked a abrupt end to prewar subsidies and regulatory privileges that had tied Sect Shinto to national policies, compelling sects to reframe their teachings away from emperor-centered nationalism toward private, voluntary faith practices.[54] In response, Sect Shinto organizations underwent immediate administrative and doctrinal adjustments to comply with occupation oversight, including leadership screenings to remove wartime collaborators and revisions to foundational texts that had incorporated state-sanctioned patriotism.[52] The directive's emphasis on religious freedom, however, relieved Sect Shinto from prior state interference in internal affairs, enabling the sects to register as independent entities under the provisional Religious Corporations Ordinance of December 28, 1945, which classified them alongside Buddhist and Christian groups as private religious bodies.[53] Unlike Shrine Shinto, which faced more direct scrutiny for its public ritual role, Sect Shinto's prewar status as doctrinally oriented "religions" (kyōha) positioned it for quicker adaptation, though compliance reports submitted to occupation authorities revealed tensions over purging imperial reverence without alienating adherents.[54] Longer-term, the directive catalyzed a diversification of Sect Shinto by fostering competition in a democratized religious marketplace, contributing to membership fluctuations: for instance, Tenrikyō reported sustained organizational stability into the late 1940s, while others like Konkokyō experienced stagnation amid economic hardships and the need to rebuild without state backing.[55] By severing ties to governmental authority, it laid groundwork for the Religious Corporations Law of 1951, which granted legal autonomy to sects but imposed ongoing requirements for financial transparency and non-political activity, ultimately reinforcing Sect Shinto's identity as distinct from both State Shinto's remnants and emergent postwar groups.[53] These changes, while initially disruptive, aligned Sect Shinto with constitutional guarantees of belief freedom under Article 20 of Japan's 1947 Constitution, though some sects retained subtle cultural ties to nationalism that persisted beyond occupation rule.[52]Resurgence and Legal Reforms
Following the Shinto Directive issued on December 15, 1945, which mandated the separation of religion from state functions and treated Sect Shinto as an ordinary faith equivalent to other religions without privileges, the thirteen prewar sects faced initial disruptions but quickly adapted to the new constitutional framework of religious freedom under Article 20 of Japan's 1947 Constitution.[53] This directive effectively ended mandatory alignments with national policies, allowing sects to purge wartime ideological elements and refocus on doctrinal independence, though some, like Tenrikyō, actively declassified themselves from Shinto categorization to emphasize their unique theologies and avoid residual state associations.[56] By late 1945, groups such as Tenrikyō resumed core rituals, including the monthly Service, signaling an early resurgence amid postwar societal shifts toward personal spirituality during reconstruction.[57] The enactment of the Religious Corporations Law on December 2, 1951, marked a pivotal legal reform, enabling Sect Shinto organizations to register as religious juridical persons with corporate status, thereby securing rights to own property, enter contracts, and receive tax exemptions on religious activities—privileges denied under prewar controls.[58] This legislation, administered by the Ministry of Education (later Culture), required disclosure of assets and adherence to nonprofit principles, fostering administrative stability for sects like Konkokyō and Kurozumikyō, which restructured under its provisions to manage facilities and expand outreach without state subsidies.[59] Unlike the pre-1945 system that subordinated sects to Bureau of Shinto Affairs oversight, the 1951 law promoted autonomy, though it imposed government certification to prevent fraud, a measure later tightened after incidents involving unrelated groups.[60] Resurgence accelerated in the 1950s–1960s economic boom, as urbanization and secularization drove membership growth in doctrinal sects offering communal support; Tenrikyō, for instance, reported sustained expansion, leveraging its prewar base of over 2 million adherents to establish overseas missions and build infrastructure like the Tenri University complex by the 1960s.[57] Similarly, Ōmoto and derivative groups like PL Kyōdan evolved into major entities, with adherents exceeding hundreds of thousands by mid-century, attributing vitality to restored teachings unencumbered by nationalism.[5] While not all thirteen sects achieved uniform scale—some smaller Fukko Shintō lineages stagnated—collective adherence stabilized around doctrinal purity, with legal protections shielding them from suppression and enabling adaptation to modern challenges like declining rural participation.[22] This era solidified Sect Shinto's independence, though critics noted uneven enforcement of the law's transparency requirements across groups.[61]Modern Challenges and Adaptations
In the postwar period, Sect Shinto organizations have confronted significant challenges stemming from Japan's secularization and demographic shifts. Active religious participation has declined across Japanese traditions, with surveys indicating that only a small fraction of the population engages regularly in sectarian practices, exacerbated by urbanization, low birth rates, and an aging membership base.[62] For instance, while historical membership in groups like Tenrikyō peaked at over 3 million adherents in the late 19th century, contemporary figures reflect stagnation or gradual erosion amid broader societal indifference to organized religion.[63] These sects also navigate tensions with Shrine Shinto institutions and the legacy of state disestablishment, which diminished their national symbolic role while increasing competition for cultural relevance.[46] To adapt, Sect Shinto groups have emphasized social welfare and community service as core extensions of their teachings. Tenrikyō, for example, has broadened its activities to include disaster relief, elder care, and youth programs, operating facilities that address modern societal needs like mental health support and hinokishin (voluntary service) initiatives.[64] Similarly, Konkokyō maintains mediation halls focused on interpersonal harmony and spiritual counseling, with recent leadership transitions underscoring efforts to sustain ministerial training amid evolving pastoral demands.[65] Ōmotokyō has pursued cultural diplomacy through arts, international exchanges, and advocacy for global peace, drawing on its prewar suppression to foster resilience and universalist outreach.[66] Globalization presents both opportunity and strain, prompting adaptations like overseas missions and doctrinal localization. Tenrikyō has developed distinct cultural expressions in regions such as North America and Brazil, incorporating local languages and customs while preserving core rituals like the Service of Thanksgiving.[67] Konkokyō churches in North America emphasize accessible spiritual guidance, adapting traditional toritsugi (mediation) to contemporary life challenges without rigid exclusivity. These efforts reflect a strategic pivot toward ethical living and communal utility over esoteric practices, enabling survival in a pluralistic, low-religiosity environment.Sectarian Composition
Overview of Recognized Sects
Sect Shinto, formally designated as Kyōha Shintō, encompasses thirteen major denominations officially recognized by the Japanese government prior to 1945, established through legislative separation from State Shinto in 1882. These sects originated primarily during the late Tokugawa and early Meiji periods (roughly 1814–1892), founded by charismatic individuals who developed independent doctrines emphasizing personal faith, kami veneration, and practices such as faith healing or ritual purification, often diverging from the ritual-focused Shrine Shinto. Unlike State Shinto's emphasis on imperial loyalty and national rituals, these groups prioritized doctrinal teachings and congregational organization, attracting followers through revelations or healing experiences reported by founders.[68][69] The thirteen sects are typically grouped into five categories based on their foundational emphases: shrine-based sects like Jingūkyō (1887), Daijingu Gyo (1882), and Jimon Kyō (1881), which maintained ties to specific shrines; faith-healing sects including Tenrikyō (1838), Konkokyō (1859), and Kurozumikyō (1814), centered on divine intervention for health and prosperity; revivalist sects such as Izumo Ōyashiro Kyō (1882) and Ontakekyō (1892), reviving ancient or regional kami worship; purification sects like Shinshūkyō (1891) and Misogikyō (1882), focused on ritual cleansing; and utopian or broader cults exemplified by Ōmotokyō (1892). This diversity allowed the sects to address social needs amid modernization, with membership collectively numbering in the millions by the early 20th century, though exact figures varied due to overlapping affiliations with Shrine Shinto.[68] Post-1945, the U.S.-led Shinto Directive of December 15, 1945, dismantled State Shinto's governmental structures, granting these sects full religious independence under the 1947 Constitution's separation of religion and state. This led to sustained operations for the original thirteen, alongside the emergence of postwar groups adapting Sect Shinto elements to contemporary issues like spiritual fulfillment in urban society, though recognition shifted toward self-governance rather than state approval. Core sects like Tenrikyō expanded internationally, reporting over 1.5 million adherents by the 21st century, underscoring their resilience amid secularization.[69][68]Pre-1945 Thirteen Sects
Prior to 1945, the Japanese government officially recognized thirteen sects under the umbrella of Kyōha Shintō (Sect Shintō), distinguishing them from ritual-focused Shrine Shintō (Jinja Shintō) as entities emphasizing doctrinal teachings, personal devotion, and organizational structures for lay followers. These sects arose largely between the late Edo period (Bakumatsu era, 1853–1868) and the early Meiji era (1868–1912), often as revitalization movements amid socioeconomic disruptions like famines, peasant unrest, and the transition from feudalism to modernization. Government ordinances in 1876 and 1882 formalized their separation, granting legal status while subordinating them to imperial loyalty and requiring alignment with State Shintō's ultranationalist framework, including promotion of the emperor as divine descendant of Amaterasu. By the 1930s, membership across the sects exceeded 10 million adherents, reflecting their appeal through faith healing, communal ethics, and promises of worldly salvation, though empirical records indicate varying efficacy in health claims, with some sects relying on anecdotal testimonies rather than verifiable outcomes.[68][5] The sects were broadly classified into five categories based on foundational emphases: shrine-derived groups adapting public rituals for private faith; revivalist sects restoring ancient practices; philosophical or Confucian-influenced groups integrating moral teachings; purification-focused sects stressing ritual cleansing; and faith-healing or utopian cults promising divine intervention in daily life. This classification, formalized in Meiji administrative reviews, facilitated oversight but masked internal diversity, as many sects incorporated pre-Meiji folk elements like mountain worship or oracle consultations, which state policies tolerated only insofar as they reinforced national unity.[69][5]| Category | Sect Name (Japanese) | Year Founded | Founder/Key Figure | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shrine-derived | Fusōkyō (扶桑教) | 1882 | Shishino Nakaba | Emphasized ethical living and shrine loyalty, drawing from Ise Jingū traditions; focused on moral education for laity.[69] |
| Shrine-derived | Taiseikyō (大成教) | 1882 | Inoue Masakane | Promoted practical ethics and self-cultivation, integrating shrine rituals with everyday discipline; appealed to urban professionals.[68] |
| Shrine-derived | Jikkōkyō (実践教) | 1882 | Nishimoto Tetsuzō | Stressed action-oriented faith and community service, rooted in local shrine practices; emphasized verifiable moral conduct over mysticism.[69] |
| Revivalist | Izumo Ōyashirokyō (出雲大社教, also Taishakyō) | 1882 | Senge Takatomi | Centered on Izumo Taisha's kami Ōkuninushi; advocated kami mediation for prosperity, reviving pre-imperial myths amid Meiji centralization.[69] |
| Revivalist | Shintōtaikyō (神道大教) | 1882 | Sano Tsunemitsu | Focused on restoring "pure" ancient Shinto lore, opposing Buddhist syncretism; promoted textual study of Kojiki and Nihon Shoki.[68] |
| Revivalist | Shinrikyō (神理教) | 1882 | Sano Tsunemitsu (initially) | Highlighted divine principles (shinri) for ethical reform; grew from peasant movements, claiming revelations for social harmony.[69] |
| Philosophical/Confucian | Shintōshūseiha (神道修成派) | 1876 | Hirata Atsutane followers | Integrated Confucian virtues with Shinto cosmology; emphasized filial piety and imperial reverence as causal paths to societal order.[5] |
| Philosophical/Confucian | Ontakekyō (御嶽教) | 1882 | Tajima Yasumaro | Drew from Ontake mountain ascetics; blended Shinto with ascetic discipline and Confucian self-perfection, focusing on endurance rituals.[68] |
| Purification | Shinshūkyō (神習教) | 1882 | Gotō Shimpei | Centered on habitual divine learning and ablutions; viewed purification as empirical means to align human actions with kami will.[69] |
| Purification | Misogikyō (みそぎ教) | 1882 | Inoue Sawichirō | Specialized in water-based exorcisms and cold ablutions; claimed causal removal of spiritual impurities to avert misfortune, with practices traceable to pre-Meiji folk rites.[68] |
| Faith-healing/Utopian | Kurozumikyō (黒住教) | 1876 | Kurozumi Munetada (d. 1851) | Based on founder's direct kami possession; promoted unity of human and divine, offering healing through prayer and ethical living; documented over 100,000 followers by 1900.[69] |
| Faith-healing/Utopian | Konkokyō (金光教) | 1882 | Konkō Daijin (Wakasa Tomisaburō, d. 1883) | Emphasized kami as mediator in human affairs; focused on toritsugi (divine consultation) for resolving grievances, appealing to rural discontent.[68] |
| Faith-healing/Utopian | Tenrikyō (天理教) | 1838 (recognized 1882) | Nakayama Miki (d. 1887) | Centered on joyous life (yokigurashi) to eliminate "dust" (spiritual sediment); largest sect with 2 million members by 1940, integrating dance rituals and communal aid, though suppressed intermittently for perceived millenarianism.[23][5] |
