Hubbry Logo
Modified starchModified starchMain
Open search
Modified starch
Community hub
Modified starch
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Modified starch
Modified starch
Modified starch
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pack of modified food starch, a food additive which is prepared by treating starch or starch granules.

Modified starch, also called starch derivatives, is prepared by physically, enzymatically, or chemically treating native starch to change its properties.[1] Modified starches are used in practically all starch applications, such as in food products as a thickening agent, stabilizer or emulsifier; in pharmaceuticals as a disintegrant; or as binder in coated paper. They are also used in many other applications.[2]

Starches are modified to enhance their performance in different applications and are one of the components of UPFs (Ultra Processed Foods). Starches may be modified to increase their stability against excessive heat, acid, shear, time, cooling, or freezing, to change their texture, to decrease or increase their viscosity, to lengthen or shorten gelatinization time or to increase their visco-stability.

Modification methods

[edit]
starch acetate
hydroxypropylated starch
cationic starch
carboxymethylated starch

An ancient way of modifying starch is malting grain, which humans have done for thousands of years. The plant's own enzymes modify the grain's starches. The effects can be modulated by varying the duration and the ambient conditions of the process. However, malting alone is not a limitless or optimized tool for every desirable end product. In recent centuries, humans have expanded their repertoire of starch-modifying methods by learning how to use simple substances such as acids, alkalis, and enzymes from nature to modify starches in tailored ways.

Acid-treated starch (INS 1401),[3] also called thin boiling starch, is prepared by treating starch or starch granules with inorganic acids, e.g. hydrochloric acid (equivalent to stomach acid), breaking down the starch molecule and thus reducing the viscosity.

Other treatments producing modified starch (with different INS and E-numbers) are:

and combined modifications such as

Modified starch may also be a cold-water-soluble, pregelatinized or instant starch which thickens and gels without heat, or a cook-up starch which must be cooked like regular starch. Drying methods to make starches cold-water-soluble are extrusion, drum drying, spray drying or dextrinization.

Other starch derivatives, the starch sugars, like glucose, high fructose syrup, glucose syrups, maltodextrins, starch degraded with amylase enzyme are mainly sold as liquid syrup to make a sweetener.

Examples of use and functionality of modified starch

[edit]

Pre-gelatinized starch is used to thicken instant desserts, allowing the food to thicken with the addition of cold water or milk.[citation needed] Similarly, cheese sauce granules such as in Macaroni and Cheese, lasagna, or gravy granules may be thickened with boiling water without the product going lumpy. Commercial pizza toppings containing modified starch will thicken when heated in the oven, keeping them on top of the pizza, and then become runny when cooled.[4]

A suitably modified starch is used as a fat substitute for low-fat versions of traditionally fatty foods,[5] e.g. industrial milk-based desserts like yogurt[6] or reduced-fat hard salami[7] having about 1/3 the usual fat content. For the latter type of uses, it is an alternative to the product Olestra.

Modified starch is added to frozen products to prevent them from dripping when defrosted. Modified starch, bonded with phosphate, allows the starch to absorb more water and keeps the ingredients together.[8] Modified starch acts as an emulsifier for French dressing by enveloping oil droplets and suspending them in the water. Acid-treated starch forms the shell of jelly beans. Oxidized starch increases the stickiness of batter.

Carboxymethylated starches are used as a wallpaper adhesive, as textile printing thickener, as tablet disintegrants and excipients in the pharmaceutical industry.

Cationic starch is used as wet end sizing agent in paper manufacturing.

Genetically modified starch

[edit]

Modified starch should not be confused with genetically modified starch, which refers to starch from genetically engineered plants, such as those that have been genetically modified to produce novel fatty acids or carbohydrates which might not occur in the plant species being harvested. In Europe the term "Genetically Modified Organism" is used solely where "the genetic material has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally through fertilisation and/or natural recombination".[9] The modification in "genetically modified" refers to the genetic engineering of the plant DNA, whereas in the term "Modified Starch" seen on mandatory ingredient labels it refers to the later processing or treatment of the starch or starch granules.

Genetically modified starch is of interest in the manufacture of biodegradable polymers and noncellulose feedstock in the paper industry, as well as the creation of new food additives. For example, researchers aim to alter the enzymes within living plants to create starches with desirable modified properties, and thus eliminate the need for enzymatic processing after starch is extracted from the plant.[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Suggested reading

[edit]
  • Ridgwell, Jenny (2001). GCSE food technology for OCR (2nd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-435-41951-6.
  • Revise for OCR GCSE Food Technology, Alison Winson. 2003.
  • Degradable Polymers, Recycling, and Plastics Waste Management. S Huang, Ann-Christine Albertsson. 1995.
  • Modified Starch, Jenny Ridgwell, Ridgwell Press, 2001, ISBN 978-1-901151-07-7
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Modified starch

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Modified starch is a derivative of native starch—typically sourced from corn, wheat, potato, or tapioca—that has been physically, enzymatically, or chemically altered to improve or tailor its functional properties, such as , , stability, and gel formation, for use in various industries. These modifications address limitations of native starch, including poor shear resistance, thermal , and tendency to retrograde, making it suitable as a thickener, stabilizer, or emulsifier. In the food sector, modified starches are regulated by the U.S. (FDA) as food additives under 21 CFR 172.892, requiring labeling as food starch-modified and limiting their use to safe conditions to ensure they function primarily as stabilizers or thickeners. The primary methods of modification include physical treatments, such as pregelatinization (heating in water to create instant ), heat-moisture treatment (exposing to elevated temperatures and limited moisture to enhance stability), and (high-pressure to improve digestibility and texture); chemical modifications, like cross-linking (using agents such as phosphorus oxychloride to increase resistance to heat and acid), esterification (e.g., with for better freeze-thaw stability), oxidation (with to boost clarity and ), and etherification (e.g., hydroxypropylation to reduce retrogradation); and enzymatic modifications, involving enzymes like α-amylase or pullulanase to hydrolyze chains, producing syrups or resistant starches with controlled digestibility. Each method yields distinct types, such as distarch (cross-linked for high-viscosity applications) or hydroxypropyl distarch (etherified for improved texture in frozen foods), with the degree of substitution typically kept low (under 0.2) to maintain safety and functionality. In applications, modified starches are extensively used in the to enhance texture in products like sauces, dressings, yogurts, and low-fat formulations (e.g., as fat replacers or to prevent syneresis in pies), comprising over 50% of global starch market demand due to their versatility. Beyond food, they serve in pharmaceuticals as binders and drug release agents, paper manufacturing as agents for improved printability, and other sectors like adhesives, textiles, and biodegradable plastics, where modifications confer water resistance or biodegradability. Their production is globally significant, with corn-based varieties dominating, and ongoing research focuses on sustainable, enzyme-based methods to reduce chemical use while meeting demands for clean-label ingredients.

Fundamentals

Structure of Native Starch

Starch is a naturally occurring polysaccharide primarily composed of two glucose polymers: amylose and amylopectin. Amylose constitutes 15-30% of most native starches and consists of linear chains of α-D-glucose units linked by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, typically ranging from 250 to several thousand glucose residues in length. Amylopectin, making up the remaining 70-85%, is highly branched with α-1,4 linked glucose chains connected by α-1,6 glycosidic bonds at branch points approximately every 24-30 glucose units, forming a highly organized, tree-like structure. These components are synthesized and stored in plant amyloplasts as discrete granules, providing an energy reserve. Native starch granules exhibit a semi-crystalline organization, characterized by alternating amorphous and crystalline regions that form concentric layers or growth rings around a central hilum. The crystalline regions, comprising about 15-45% of the granule, arise from the radial alignment of amylopectin double helices packed into lamellae approximately 9 nm thick, while amorphous regions contain branch points and amylose molecules. Granule sizes vary widely from less than 1 μm to over 100 μm, influencing functional properties such as swelling and enzymatic susceptibility. For example, corn starch granules are typically polygonal and range from 5-25 μm, potato starch granules are often oval or spherical with sizes of 10-100 μm, and wheat starch shows a bimodal distribution with large lenticular granules (15-45 μm) and small spherical ones (2-10 μm). Botanical sources lead to distinct variations in amylose-to-amylopectin ratios, which affect granule architecture and overall starch behavior. Normal has an amylose content of about 25%, while waxy varieties contain nearly 0% and nearly 100% , resulting in smoother, more uniform granules. High-amylose corn or starches can reach up to 70% amylose, leading to elongated or irregular granule shapes and increased crystallinity. typically features 20-25% amylose, contributing to its large granule size and high swelling capacity. Native starch possesses inherent properties stemming from its molecular and granular structure, including strong hydrophilicity due to abundant hydroxyl groups on glucose units that form bonds with . This results in insolubility in cold but significant swelling upon heating. The tendency for retrogradation, where gelatinized starch molecules realign into ordered crystalline structures during cooling or storage, is prominent in high- starches and leads to texture firming in applications. Gelatinization, the process of granule disruption and leaching of upon heating in , occurs over a range of 50-80°C, varying by botanical source and influenced by factors like content and granule size.

Reasons for Modification

Native starch, composed primarily of and , exhibits several inherent limitations that restrict its direct use in industrial applications. These include poor in cold water, tendency to undergo retrogradation—which leads to firming and in processed foods—and syneresis, where water separates from the gelled structure during storage or freeze-thaw cycles. Additionally, native starch is highly sensitive to environmental factors such as extremes, elevated temperatures, and mechanical shear, often resulting in granule rupture, viscosity breakdown, and loss of thickening power during processing. Shear thinning behavior further complicates its handling, as the paste decreases rapidly under agitation, making it unsuitable for high-shear operations common in . To address these shortcomings, starch modification aims to enhance functional properties tailored to industrial demands. Key objectives include improving thermal, acid, and shear stability to withstand rigorous processing conditions without structural breakdown. Modifications also seek to provide better viscosity control, maintaining consistent thickening over time and reducing unwanted changes like retrogradation or syneresis. Furthermore, alterations can reduce digestibility by creating fractions that resist enzymatic breakdown in the gut, supporting nutritional goals such as lower glycemic responses. Tailoring textural attributes, such as gelation strength and emulsification capacity, enables to mimic or improve upon the functionalities of more expensive ingredients in formulations. Economic and functional drivers further underscore the necessity of modification. serves as a cost-effective alternative to synthetic hydrocolloids and gums due to its abundance from renewable sources like corn and potatoes, offering similar thickening and stabilizing effects at lower prices. In response to consumer demand for clean-label products, modifications—particularly physical and enzymatic methods—provide natural alternatives to chemical additives, aligning with regulatory and market preferences for minimally processed ingredients. The recognition of native starch's limitations dates to the early , as industrial expanded. By the and , challenges in and highlighted issues like rapid from retrogradation and instability in heated mixtures, prompting initial derivatization efforts to improve paste properties for commercial viability.

Modification Techniques

Chemical Modifications

Chemical modifications of starch involve covalent alterations to its molecular structure, primarily targeting the hydroxyl groups on the anhydroglucose units of and , to enhance functional properties such as , stability, and . These modifications are achieved through like esterification, etherification, oxidation, and cross-linking, which introduce functional groups or form intermolecular bridges, typically with a degree of substitution (DS) ranging from 0.01 to 0.2. This low DS ensures minimal disruption to the native granule while imparting targeted improvements, such as increased hydrophobicity or resistance to shear. Esterification substitutes hydroxyl groups with ester linkages, commonly via using under alkaline conditions to produce acetylated starch (E1420), where acetyl groups constitute less than 2.5% dry weight basis. Another variant is octenyl succinylation with octenyl succinic anhydride, yielding octenyl succinate starch (E1450) with octenyl succinyl groups below 3% dry weight basis, which introduces amphiphilic properties due to the hydrophobic octenyl chain. These reactions occur preferentially at the C6 primary hydroxyl, followed by C3 and C2 positions, reducing inter- and intramolecular , thereby lowering gelatinization and enhancing . Etherification introduces linkages, exemplified by hydroxypropylation with in the presence of an alkaline , resulting in hydroxypropyl starch (E1440) with hydroxypropyl groups up to 7% dry weight basis. This substitution, also targeting hydroxyl groups (primarily C6), sterically hinders alignment, improving paste clarity, freeze-thaw stability, and while maintaining granule integrity at DS levels of 0.01-0.2. The process disrupts retrogradation by interrupting formation in the crystalline regions. Oxidation converts hydroxyl groups into carbonyl or carboxyl functionalities using oxidizing agents like or , producing oxidized starch (E1404) with carboxyl content limited to 1.1% dry weight basis. This depolymerizes the chains partially, increasing hydrophilicity, , and paste clarity while reducing and granule integrity through chain scission and crystallinity loss. For instance, oxidation at pH 9-10 introduces and carboxyl groups mainly at C6 and C3, facilitating applications like paper where enhanced film-forming properties are needed. Cross-linking forms covalent bridges between chains to reinforce granule structure, using agents such as oxychloride or adipic anhydride, yielding cross-linked products like distarch (E1412). These reactions create intra- or intermolecular or bonds under controlled conditions, preserving granule integrity against heat, acid, and shear while reducing swelling and compared to native . The low DS (0.01-0.2) ensures stability without excessive rigidity; for example, cross-linked resists breakdown in high-temperature processing like canned foods. These modifications are typically performed via the wet process, starting with starch slurried in (30-40% solids) through wet milling, followed by pH adjustment to 4-10 (often alkaline with NaOH for esterification and etherification), reaction at 30-50°C for 0.5-24 hours with catalysts if needed, neutralization, , to remove byproducts, and to 10-15% . Reaction conditions are optimized to control DS and avoid over-substitution, which could lead to excessive loss or granule disruption.

Physical Modifications

Physical modifications of starch involve non-chemical treatments that alter the granular structure and physicochemical properties through mechanical, thermal, or radiative means, without introducing new molecular bonds or functional groups. These methods reorganize the crystalline domains within starch granules, leading to changes such as modified pasting viscosity and amylose leaching behavior, while maintaining the "clean-label" status desirable in food applications. Unlike chemical or enzymatic approaches, physical modifications rely solely on physical forces, offering advantages like the absence of reagents and broad applicability for enhancing starch functionality in various industries. Heat- treatment (HMT) is a hydrothermal conducted at temperatures of 90–120°C with limited levels of 10–30% for durations ranging from 1 to 16 hours. This treatment induces reorganization of the crystalline and amorphous regions in granules, resulting in reduced leaching during gelatinization and lowered pasting , without forming new functional groups. HMT improves the freeze-thaw stability of -based products by restricting water mobility and syneresis, making it particularly useful for frozen foods. As a reagent-free method, HMT aligns with clean-label preferences and is often applied to and starches to enhance stability. Annealing involves controlled hydration of at temperatures below its gelatinization point, typically 40–60°C with excess (over 40% moisture) for extended periods of 24–72 hours. The process promotes molecular rearrangement within the granule, increasing crystallinity and perfection of existing crystalline domains while avoiding granule disruption. This leads to reduced retrogradation upon cooling, as the more ordered structure resists amylose recrystallization, and alters pasting properties by elevating the gelatinization temperature. Annealing provides a simple, non-chemical way to improve stability in hydrated systems, such as gels and puddings, without introducing additives. Pregelatinization disrupts granules through thermal-mechanical processes like drum drying or , where is exposed to and shear, often at 120–180°C in high-moisture conditions followed by rapid drying. Drum drying gelatinizes on heated rollers before , while uses high-temperature short-time (HTST) processing under pressure to shear and expand the material. These methods fragment hydrogen bonds and partially degrade granules, increasing cold-water and without creating new chemical groups, thus producing instant or cold-swell starches suitable for quick-cooking products. The clean-label appeal and efficiency of make it a preferred technique for ready-to-eat foods like instant cereals. Irradiation employs , such as gamma rays from sources or electron beams, at doses typically ranging from 5 to 50 kGy to modify structure. This treatment causes by breaking glycosidic bonds in and chains, reducing molecular weight and crystallinity while avoiding the formation of new functional groups. The resulting changes include decreased pasting and increased solubility, which enhance digestibility and reduce retrogradation in processed starches. offers a reagent-free, scalable method for improving starch functionality in non-food applications like adhesives, though it requires controlled dosing to prevent excessive degradation.

Enzymatic Modifications

Enzymatic modifications of involve the use of specific biocatalysts to hydrolyze glycosidic bonds or rearrange chains, enabling precise control over molecular structure and functionality without harsh chemical treatments. These modifications enhance properties such as , , and digestibility, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications while maintaining biodegradability. Key enzymes include α-amylase, which performs endohydrolysis of α-1,4 glycosidic bonds to shorten and chains randomly; β-amylase, an exo-enzyme that cleaves α-1,4 bonds from non-reducing ends to produce units; and glucoamylase, which hydrolyzes both α-1,4 and α-1,6 bonds sequentially to yield glucose monomers. Branching enzymes, such as starch branching enzyme II (SBE2), introduce α-1,6 branches by transferring segments, remodeling structure to increase short-chain content. Transglucosidases, including glycosyltransferase (CGTase), facilitate the transfer of glucosyl units to form new bonds or cyclic structures. Hydrolysis processes primarily utilize α-amylase to produce maltodextrins, which are low-molecular-weight carbohydrates with (DE) values of 3-20, achieved through controlled partial breakdown of granules. production employs CGTase to cyclize α-1,4-glucan chains from liquefied , forming cyclic oligosaccharides like α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrins that serve as inclusion complexes in pharmaceuticals and . β-Cyclodextrin, designated as E459 in the , is manufactured via initial α-amylase liquefaction followed by CGTase action, yielding ring structures with six to eight glucose units for enhanced stability and flavor masking. Dual enzyme systems, such as α-amylase combined with pullulanase or amylopullulanase and amyloglucosidase, promote formation by hydrolyzing specific bonds to favor retrogradation into indigestible structures, increasing resistant starch content up to 80% in treated flours. These modifications typically occur under mild conditions to preserve enzyme activity, with optimal pH ranging from 4 to 7 and temperatures of 40-60°C, allowing time-controlled reactions for partial versus complete . For instance, immobilized α-amylase systems operate effectively at pH 4.5-6.5 and 40-50°C, enhancing reusability and process efficiency in continuous industrial setups. Enzymatic alternatives to acid thinning reduce granule size and viscosity similarly but with greater specificity, avoiding non-specific degradation. Overall, these biocatalytic approaches offer eco-friendly, targeted enhancements to native starch's linear and branched components.

Applications and Properties

Functional Enhancements

Modified are engineered to overcome limitations of native , such as retrogradation, which leads to undesirable texture changes upon cooling. One primary enhancement is increased shear stability, achieved through cross-linking that introduces covalent bonds between molecules, preventing viscosity breakdown during mechanical processing. This modification maintains consistent paste under high shear conditions, unlike native which experiences significant thinning. For instance, cross-linked starches exhibit higher storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G'') in rheological tests, indicating improved strength. Acid and heat tolerance is another key improvement from esterification, where hydroxyl groups on are substituted with linkages, enhancing resistance to degradation in low or elevated environments. ified starches show thermal degradation onset around 370°C, compared to 320°C for native forms, allowing better performance in acidic or hot processing. This substitution disrupts hydrogen bonding and reduces crystallinity, contributing to overall stability. Emulsifying capacity is notably boosted by modifications such as octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA) esterification, which introduces hydrophobic octenyl groups to the surface, enabling effective stabilization of oil-in-water emulsions. OSA-modified starch adsorbs at interfaces to form Pickering emulsions with steric stabilization, resulting in smaller droplet sizes (e.g., 76–110 μm) and higher emulsification indices (0.77–0.78) than native (0.60). Digestibility control is enhanced through strategies that promote resistant starch formation, such as retrogradation, which creates crystalline amylose structures resistant to enzymatic breakdown, or enzymatic branching to increase amylose content and linear glucans. These modifications reduce rapidly digestible starch while elevating slowly digestible and resistant fractions, supporting applications requiring controlled glycemic response. Modified starches are classified by their functional profiles, including thin-boiling types that exhibit low for easy dispersion, thick-boiling variants with high gel strength for firm textures, and stabilized forms that resist retrogradation and syneresis. Thin-boiling starches, often from acid hydrolysis, provide clarity and reduced paste thickness, while thick-boiling ones maintain integrity under stress, and stabilized types ensure consistent performance over time. These enhancements are quantified using techniques like to assess curves under shear, (DSC) to measure gelatinization and thermal transitions, and /swelling indices to evaluate water interaction. Rheological analysis reveals stable profiles in modified starches, DSC shows shifts in peak temperatures, and swelling power indicates controlled granule expansion.
PropertyNative Starch ExampleModified Starch Example
Gelatinization Temperature60–70°C (e.g., )Instant solubility (pregelatinized) or elevated to 69–80°C (cross-linked/annealed)
Viscosity under ShearSignificant drop during processingStable, minimal breakdown (cross-linked)
SolubilityLow at High (thin-boiling or pregelatinized)
Emulsification Index~0.60 (poor stabilization)0.77–0.78 (OSA-modified)
Thermal StabilityDegradation ~320°C~370°C (esterified)

Food Industry Applications

Modified starches play a crucial role in the by enhancing texture, stability, and in various products. As thickeners, cross-linked starches are commonly used in sauces and gravies to provide and resistance to breakdown under or shear, maintaining consistent consistency during cooking and storage. Hydroxypropylated starches serve as stabilizers in frozen foods, such as ice creams and ready-to-eat meals, by preventing syneresis—the separation of during freeze-thaw cycles—thus preserving product integrity and sensory qualities. Additionally, modified starches act as bulking agents in low-fat formulations, like reduced-calorie dressings and dairy alternatives, by mimicking the volume and creaminess of fats without adding significant calories. Specific applications highlight the versatility of these modifications. Pregelatinized starches enable instant thickening in cold preparations, such as instant puddings, where they hydrate rapidly to form smooth gels without requiring heat. In salad dressings, octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA)-modified starches function as emulsifiers, stabilizing oil-in-water emulsions to prevent and ensure a texture over . Oxidized starches contribute to crispness in baked goods, like cookies and coatings for oven-baked items, by promoting even browning and a firm, crunchy exterior during processing. Regulatory labeling identifies modified starches by E-numbers in the and similar codes elsewhere, facilitating transparency for consumers. For instance, oxidized starch is designated as E1404, while acetylated distarch adipate is E1422, both approved for use as thickeners and stabilizers in a wide range of foods. Amid growing demand for "clean label" products—those with minimal processing and recognizable ingredients—industry trends favor physically modified (e.g., pregelatinized via heat-moisture treatment) and enzymatically modified starches over chemical ones, as these align with natural perceptions while delivering comparable functionality. The sector dominates modified starch consumption, accounting for approximately 55% of total usage due to its essential role in processed and convenience foods. Global production of modified starch reached about 14 million tons annually as of 2023 estimates (approximately 20% of total starch production exceeding 70 million tons), underscoring its scale in supporting and .

Non-Food Industrial Uses

Modified starches are extensively utilized in the and board industry as agents to enhance mechanical strength, retention, and surface characteristics. Cationic starches, typically produced via etherification with quaternary ammonium compounds, improve wet-end retention and dry strength by binding fibers more effectively, leading to higher printability and reduced material costs. Oxidized starches, modified through treatment, are applied in surface and coatings to seal paper pores, thereby increasing tensile, folding, and bursting strength. The sector consumes approximately 25% of global , with modified variants playing a pivotal role in these processes. In the textiles and adhesives sectors, modified starches function as thickeners, sizing agents, and bonding materials. For textiles, etherified starches like carboxymethyl starch provide in printing pastes and solutions, enhancing adhesion and fabric smoothness, while oxidized starches form rigid films for finishing to boost durability. Dextrins, derived from acid or enzymatic , serve as key components in glues and adhesives, offering improved tackiness and water resistance; starch-based adhesives account for approximately 60% of the natural adhesives market as of the 1990s and are widely used in corrugated board production and assembly. Pharmaceutical formulations benefit from the and controlled functionality of modified starches. Pregelatinized starches, physically altered by and , act as binders in tablets to maintain structural integrity during compression. Cross-linked starches, such as those treated with , form stable matrices for sustained drug release, while carboxymethyl starch functions as a superdisintegrant to facilitate rapid tablet dissolution. These modifications enable precise performance in systems. Beyond these core areas, modified starches support emerging non-food applications in bioplastics, water treatment, and environmental sectors, leveraging their biodegradability as alternatives to petroleum-derived polymers. High-amylose or thermoplastic starches (TPS), achieved through chemical plasticization or grafting, are processed into flexible films for biodegradable packaging, with the modified starch market valued at 2.7 times that of native starch due to these sustainable uses. As of 2024, the global modified starch market was valued at USD 14.4 billion, reflecting growth in bioplastics and other sustainable uses, projected to reach USD 15.2 billion in 2025. In water treatment, grafted starches like starch-acrylamide copolymers act as flocculants to aggregate and remove pollutants efficiently. Such innovations underscore the adaptability of starch modifications for eco-friendly industrial solutions.

Genetic Engineering

Methods of Genetic Modification

Genetic modification of involves biotechnological techniques to alter the expression of genes encoding enzymes in the pathway directly within , enabling tailored compositions without post-extraction processing. Key methods include (RNAi) for silencing genes, overexpression of specific synthases, and precise using /Cas9. These approaches target enzymes such as granule-bound synthase (GBSS), which synthesizes , and branching enzymes (SBEs), which determine structure, to modify the -to- ratio and other properties like phosphate content. CRISPR/Cas9 editing has emerged as a powerful tool for targeted modifications, such as knocking out the GBSS gene to reduce amylose content and produce waxy starch varieties with nearly 100% amylopectin, as demonstrated in potato and rice. This method involves designing guide RNAs to direct the Cas9 nuclease to specific loci in starch synthase genes, inducing insertions or deletions that disrupt enzyme function and alter starch granule structure. Similarly, RNAi employs double-stranded RNA constructs to silence branching enzyme genes like SBEI and SBEII, reducing branch points in amylopectin and increasing amylose levels, which has been applied in barley and potato to fine-tune starch viscosity and digestibility. Overexpression strategies, such as introducing additional copies of the GBSS gene under strong promoters, aim to boost amylose synthesis, though results vary due to regulatory feedbacks in the pathway. To increase phosphate content, which enhances starch viscosity and paste clarity, genes like glucan water dikinase (GWD) are targeted for upregulation via overexpression or reduced silencing, as shown in engineered potato lines with elevated phosphorus levels. The process typically begins with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, where T-DNA vectors carrying the modification constructs are delivered into cells, followed by selection and regeneration of transgenic lines. Subsequent field trials assess stability across generations, often incorporating to maintain desirable traits while minimizing off-target effects. Early examples from the , such as antisense inhibition of GBSS in tubers, achieved up to 100% reduction in , paving the way for these advanced techniques. Compared to post-harvest chemical modifications, genetic approaches offer reduced processing costs by producing inherently modified starch in planta, yielding a more "natural" product free from chemical residues and environmental hazards associated with treatments like etherification or oxidation.

Commercial Examples and Crops

One prominent commercial example of genetically modified starch crops is waxy corn, developed by DuPont Pioneer (now part of Corteva Agriscience), which features nearly 100% amylopectin and 0% amylose through CRISPR-Cas9 editing of the granule-bound starch synthase gene. This trait enhances starch functionality for processed foods and industrial applications, with commercial hybrids entering the U.S. market around 2021 after regulatory clearance as a non-GM equivalent due to the absence of foreign DNA. In potatoes, Plant Science's Amflora variety represents an early industrial GM starch crop, engineered via to silence the granule-bound starch synthase gene, resulting in 100% starch for paper, adhesives, and textile uses. Approved by the for food and feed in 2010 and cultivation in 2011, Amflora faced market challenges and was withdrawn by in 2012 amid regulatory hurdles and limited consumer demand. Similarly, research on GM high-amylose potatoes, such as those developed through suppression of starch branching enzymes, aims to increase content for lower applications, though no large-scale commercial releases have occurred. High-amylose wheat, pioneered by Australia's using RNAi to downregulate starch branching enzyme IIa and IIb genes, achieves up to 85% content, boosting levels over 20 times higher than conventional wheat for health benefits like improved gut health. Licensed to Arista Cereal Technologies, this trait reached key commercial milestones in 2018, with the first commercial release (HAW1) in 2020 and subsequent expansions including exports to in 2023; as of 2025, HAW2 is being prepared for broader planting, amid ongoing patent developments supporting global market entry. In rice, genetic modifications targeting structure, such as editing of genes, have produced experimental lines with altered profiles for enhanced , but commercial adoption remains limited. Starch modification traits constitute a niche segment of GM crops, primarily focused on industrial and nutritional enhancements rather than broad-acre pest or herbicide resistance. Notable market impacts include Syngenta's Enogen corn, genetically engineered to express thermostable alpha-amylase, which increases yields by 5-7% through more efficient , supporting over 50 plants in the U.S. since its 2011 commercialization. These traits offer economic benefits, such as reduced processing costs in bioenergy, while high-amylose varieties in and corn promote intake without altering consumption habits. As of 2025, Enogen adoption has expanded to sustainable applications, including scaling by to lower in beef production. Despite these advancements, commercial deployment faces challenges including public skepticism toward GM technologies, which contributed to Amflora's through boycotts and labeling demands. Cross-contamination risks, where GM pollen transfers traits to non-GM fields via or , pose segregation issues for identity-preserved crops, necessitating buffer zones and monitoring protocols.

Safety and Regulations

Health and Safety Assessments

Modified starches, particularly those altered through chemical or physical means, have been evaluated for toxicological and are (GRAS) by the U.S. (FDA) under 21 CFR 172.892, with the GRAS framework established in 1959 for substances like food starch-modified that meet criteria for direct use in food. The (EFSA) has similarly re-evaluated common modified starches, such as oxidized starch (E 1404) and monostarch phosphate (E 1410), concluding no concerns at typical use levels for the general , based on repeated-dose studies and absence of . Regarding allergenicity, modified starches do not introduce new proteinaceous components and exhibit no greater potential for allergic reactions than native starches, as confirmed in comprehensive assessments showing no homology to known allergens. In Japan, modified starch (加工デンプン) is designated as an existing food additive under the Food Sanitation Act, with its safety evaluated by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). No adverse health effects have been confirmed at normal food usage levels, and there are no reports of serious health damage. While some types may cause minor digestive issues such as indigestion or increased intestinal gas, there are no scientifically substantiated serious risks, such as carcinogenicity, and it is generally considered safe. Nutritionally, certain modifications, especially those producing resistant starches (types 3 through 5), offer health benefits by acting as prebiotics that ferment in the colon to support and short-chain production. These resistant forms, including retrograded (type 3) and chemically/enzymatically modified variants (types 4 and 5), reduce glycemic response by lowering digestibility and postprandial blood glucose spikes compared to native starch, potentially aiding in without adverse nutritional impacts. Overall, such modifications maintain or enhance the nutritional profile of starch, with no evidence of nutrient deficiencies in human consumption patterns. For genetically modified (GM) starches, safety assessments rely on the principle of substantial equivalence, where GM variants are compared to conventional counterparts for compositional and agronomic similarity. In the case of the Amflora GM (EH92-527-1), engineered for high-amylopectin , EFSA reviewed 90-day rodent feeding studies showing no adverse toxicological effects, such as changes in organ weights, , or clinical parameters, beyond natural variability. These studies, involving diets up to 33% GM potato material, confirmed nutritional equivalence and absence of unintended effects. Potential risks include formation during high-temperature processing (above 120°C) of starch-rich products, where modified starches can contribute to byproducts if reducing sugars are present, though levels are comparable to those in native starch-based foods and mitigated by processing controls. reactions to modified starches are rare, typically limited to isolated cases of contact urticaria or in excipient use (e.g., starch in medications), without evidence of widespread IgE-mediated beyond native starch sensitivities.

Regulatory Frameworks

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees the regulation of modified starches through its voluntary Plant Biotechnology Consultation Program for genetically modified (GM) varieties, where developers submit safety data prior to market entry to ensure compliance with food safety standards. For chemically or physically modified starches used as food additives, the FDA authorizes their use under 21 CFR 172.892, which specifies safe modification methods such as acid treatment, oxidation, and esterification, with no numerical limits but requirements for purity and labeling as "food starch-modified." Oxidized starch (E1404), a common modified form, falls under these provisions and is generally recognized as safe for direct addition to food without specified quantitative restrictions beyond general good manufacturing practices. In the , the (EFSA) conducts risk assessments for GM crops, leading to approvals by the ; for instance, the GM Amflora potato, engineered for high-amylose , was initially authorized for cultivation and industrial processing in 2010 following EFSA's favorable scientific opinion but annulled by the EU General Court in 2013, with the project discontinued by in 2012. Chemically modified starches are regulated as food additives under Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, requiring EFSA evaluation and authorization, with strict labeling mandates: if used as an additive exceeding 2% in a compound ingredient, they must be declared by name (e.g., "modified starch") or (e.g., E1404 for oxidized starch) in the ingredients . GM starches additionally require and labeling under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 if detectable above 0.9% thresholds. Internationally, the Commission establishes standards for modified starches as food additives under the General Standard for Food Additives (Codex STAN 192-1995), permitting their use in various categories with specifications for purity, such as limits on residual reagents and , to harmonize global trade practices. In , the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (formerly under the Ministry of Health oversight) approves GM starch imports through safety certificate processes; recent expansions include approvals for multiple GM corn and soybean varieties in 2024, enabling starch-derived imports while requiring labeling and risk assessments for food use. In Japan, modified starch (加工デンプン) is recognized as an existing food additive under the Food Sanitation Act, with its safety evaluated by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). At typical food usage levels, no adverse health effects have been confirmed, and no reports of serious health damage exist. While some types may potentially cause minor digestive issues such as indigestion or increased intestinal gas, no serious risks (including carcinogenicity) have been established based on scientific evidence, and modified starch is generally considered safe. Post-2020 developments include deregulatory shifts for CRISPR-edited starches in the and : the FDA issued guidance in 2024 streamlining voluntary consultations for gene-edited plants without novel traits, treating them akin to conventional varieties if no foreign DNA is introduced. In the , the Precision Breeding Act 2023 exempts such non-transgenic edits from GM regulations, subject to for marketed products. In the , negotiations on new genomic techniques (NGT) continue as of 2025, with a proposed partial for certain gene-edited plants exempt from traditional GMO requirements if comparable to conventional varieties, contrasting with ongoing EU mandates under Directive 2001/18/EC for all conventional GM-derived materials. These changes contrast with ongoing EU mandates under Directive 2001/18/EC for all GM-derived materials. Trade implications arise from divergent frameworks, such as 's 2023 decree banning GM corn for use (including starch processing), prompting a USMCA dispute that ruled against the ban in December 2024; suspended the restrictions in February 2025, resolving the issue without major disruption to exports valued at over $5 billion annually in corn products. Similarly, import restrictions on unapproved GM starches have historically limited agricultural exports, with recent approvals for specific events easing some barriers through WTO agreements but still requiring segregated supply chains for compliance.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459083/
  2. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/agns/pdf/jecfa/2015_02_22_Modified_Starches.pdf
  3. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cpg-sec-578100-starches-common-or-usual-names
  4. https://talcottlab.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2019/01/Modification-of-Starch.pdf
  5. https://market.us/report/global-starch-market/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6400748/
  7. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/7/3/56
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19476337.2018.1518343
  9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34704861/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/starch-granule
  11. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68437
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144861720304665
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666893921000074
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861720305245
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395633/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861721010523
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394570849_Functionality_and_Modifications_of_Food_Hydrocolloids_An_Approach_to_Starch
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7847421/
  19. https://college.agrilife.org/talcottlab/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2019/01/100-Years-of-Carbs-in-the-US.pdf
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10672975/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6331858/
  22. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015552
  23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.064
  24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.084
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10534100/
  26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.067
  27. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173562
  28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0261-5
  29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10942912.2024.2318427
  30. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/gc/d0gc00681e
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3967754/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3823506/
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6209/5/3/40
  34. https://www.beneo.com/human-nutrition/human-nutrition-products/specialty-rice-ingredients/rice-starches
  35. https://www.cargill.com/food-bev/emea/texturizers/pregelatinized-starches
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214799317300371
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24754843/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009865/
  39. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/modified-starch-market
  40. https://www.industryresearch.biz/market-reports/modified-starch-market-106124
  41. https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=150545
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861722004957
  43. https://talcottlab.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2021/01/Modified-Starch.pdf
  44. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/modified-starch-market
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526621000133
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11182577/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6801948/
  48. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83462-z
  49. https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2229-12-223
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7898444/
  51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00019490
  52. https://biovox.eu/dupont-pioneer-rsquo-s-next-generation-of-waxy-corn-shows-the-gr/
  53. https://cban.ca/wp-content/uploads/GM-Waxy-Corn-Corteva-product-profile-CBAN.pdf
  54. http://www.agripressworld.com/_STUDIOEMMA_UPLOADS/downloads/VIB_dossier_amflora_EN.pdf
  55. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/basf-drops-gm-potato-projects/5872.article
  56. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00342/full
  57. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0510737103
  58. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/arista-cereal-technologies-achieves-major-commercial-milestones-for-its-high-amylose-wheat-300629710.html
  59. https://www.graincentral.com/markets/high-amylose-wheat-sets-sail-for-japan/
  60. https://www.thewaite.org/article-business-fights-against-csiro-seed-patents-on-high-fibre-wheat-technology/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5339335/
  62. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/12/business/12corn.html
  63. https://www.csiro.au/en/research/plants/crops/grains/high-amylose-wheat
  64. https://www.agtechnavigator.com/Article/2025/01/03/fast-food-giant-scaling-use-of-syngentas-enogen-corn-as-feed/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3791249/
  66. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2023/04/13/gmos-contamination-and-coexistence-challenging-the-misuse-of-concepts-and-wrongheaded-regulation-of-agriculture-and-food/
  67. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-172/subpart-I/section-172.892
  68. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/17/2016-19164/substances-generally-recognized-as-safe
  69. https://www.ffcr.or.jp/en/tenka/list-of-existing-additives/list-of-existing-additives.html
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756464622001645
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10085630/
  72. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/323
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925045/
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694/mja2.52201
  75. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-new-plant-varieties/programs-food-new-plant-varieties
  76. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/LDM_BRI%282010%29100028
  77. https://www.foodagriculturerequirements.com/en/news/modified-starch-or-thickener-e1442-on-the-labeling-of-additives-the-word-to-the-lawyer-dario-dongo/
  78. https://www.alcpo.org.ly/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GENERAL-STANDARD-FOR-FOOD-ADDITIVES-CODEX-STAN-192-1995.pdf
  79. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/china-approves-more-gm-crops-boost-yields-ensure-food-security-2024-12-31/
  80. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/foodadditive/index.html
  81. https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2024/12/17/fdas-guidance-introduces-pre-market-process-for-genome-edited-plants/
  82. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/gene-edited-crops-set-to-arrive-in-england-but-eu-remains-divided-on-them/4021687.article
  83. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48083
  84. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R48083.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.