Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Myrmicinae
View on Wikipedia
| Myrmicinae Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| Atta cephalotes | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Hymenoptera |
| Family: | Formicidae |
| Subfamily: | Myrmicinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835 |
| Type genus | |
| Myrmica Latreiile, 1804
| |
| Diversity[1] | |
| 142 genera | |
Myrmicinae is a subfamily of ants, with about 140 extant genera;[1] their distribution is cosmopolitan. The pupae lack cocoons. Some species retain a functional sting. The petioles of Myrmicinae consist of two nodes. The nests are permanent and in soil, rotting wood, under stones, or in trees.[2] All species of Cephalotes (within the tribe Attini) are gliding ants.
Identification
[edit]Myrmicine worker ants have a distinct postpetiole, i.e., abdominal segment III is notably smaller than segment IV and set off from it by a well-developed constriction; the pronotum is inflexibly fused to the rest of the mesosoma, such that the promesonotal suture is weakly impressed or absent, and a functional sting is usually present. The clypeus is well-developed; as a result, the antennal sockets are well separated from the anterior margin of the head. Most myrmicine genera possess well-developed eyes and frontal lobes that partly conceal the antennal insertions.[3]
Tribes
[edit]Recently, the number of tribes was reduced from 25 to six:[4]
- Attini Smith, 1858
- Crematogastrini Forel, 1893
- Myrmicini Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835
- Pogonomyrmecini Ward, Brady, Fisher & Schultz, 2015
- Solenopsidini Forel, 1893
- Stenammini Ashmead, 1905
Genera
[edit]In 2014, most genera were placed into different tribes or moved to other subfamilies. Below is an updated list:[1][4]
- Attini Smith, 1858
- Acanthognathus Mayr, 1887
- Acromyrmex Mayr, 1865
- Allomerus Mayr, 1878
- Amoimyrmex Cristiano, Cardoso & Sandoval, 2020
- Apterostigma Mayr, 1865
- Atta Fabricius, 1804
- †Attaichnus Laza, 1982
- Basiceros Schulz, 1906
- Blepharidatta Wheeler, 1915
- Cephalotes Latreille, 1802
- Chimaeridris Wilson, 1989
- Colobostruma Wheeler, 1927
- Cyatta Sosa-Calvo et al., 2013
- Cyphomyrmex Mayr, 1862
- Daceton Perty, 1833
- Diaphoromyrma Fernández, Delabie & Nascimento, 2009
- Epopostruma Forel, 1895
- Eurhopalothrix Brown & Kempf, 1961
- Ishakidris Bolton, 1984
- Kalathomyrmex Klingenberg & Brandão, 2009
- Lachnomyrmex Wheeler, 1910
- Lenomyrmex Fernández & Palacio, 1999
- Mesostruma Brown, 1948
- Microdaceton Santschi, 1913
- Mycetagroicus Brandão & Mayhé-Nunes, 2001
- Mycetarotes Emery, 1913
- Mycetophylax Emery, 1913
- Mycetosoritis Wheeler, 1907
- Mycocepurus Forel, 1893
- Myrmicocrypta Smith, 1860
- Ochetomyrmex Mayr, 1878
- Octostruma Forel, 1912
- Orectognathus Smith, 1853
- Paramycetophylax Kusnezov, 1956
- Phalacromyrmex Kempf, 1960
- Pheidole Westwood, 1839
- Pilotrochus Brown, 1978
- Procryptocerus Emery, 1887
- Protalaridris Brown, 1980
- Pseudoatta Gallardo, 1916
- Rhopalothrix Mayr, 1870
- Sericomyrmex Mayr, 1865
- Strumigenys Smith, 1860
- Talaridris Weber, 1941
- Trachymyrmex Forel, 1893
- Tranopelta Mayr, 1866
- Wasmannia Forel, 1893
- Crematogastrini Forel, 1893
- Acanthomyrmex Emery, 1893
- Adlerzia Forel, 1902
- Ancyridris Wheeler, 1935
- Atopomyrmex André, 1889
- Calyptomyrmex Emery, 1887
- Cardiocondyla Emery, 1869
- Carebara Westwood, 1840
- Cataulacus Smith, 1853
- Crematogaster Lund, 1831
- Cyphoidris Weber, 1952
- Dacatria Rigato, 1994
- Dacetinops Brown & Wilson, 1957
- Dicroaspis Emery, 1908
- Dilobocondyla Santschi, 1910
- Diplomorium Mayr, 1901
- †Enneamerus Mayr, 1868
- †Eocenomyrma Dlussky & Radchenko, 2006
- Eutetramorium Emery, 1899
- Formicoxenus Mayr, 1855
- Formosimyrma Terayama, 2009
- Gauromyrmex Menozzi, 1933
- Gaoligongidris Xu, 2012
- Harpagoxenus Forel, 1893
- Huberia Forel, 1890
- †Hypopomyrmex Emery, 1891
- Indomyrma Brown, 1986
- Kartidris Bolton, 1991
- Lasiomyrma Terayama & Yamane, 2000
- Leptothorax Mayr, 1855
- Liomyrmex Mayr, 1865
- †Lonchomyrmex Mayr, 1867
- Lophomyrmex Emery, 1892
- Lordomyrma Emery, 1897
- Malagidris Bolton & Fisher, 2014
- Mayriella Forel, 1902
- Melissotarsus Emery, 1877
- Meranoplus Smith, 1853
- Metapone Forel, 1911
- Myrmecina Curtis, 1829
- Myrmisaraka Bolton & Fisher, 2014
- Nesomyrmex Wheeler, 1910
- Ocymyrmex Emery, 1886
- †Oxyidris Wilson, 1985
- †Parameranoplus Wheeler, 1915
- Paratopula Wheeler, 1919
- Perissomyrmex Smith, 1947
- Peronomyrmex Viehmeyer, 1922
- Podomyrma Smith, 1859
- Poecilomyrma Mann, 1921
- Pristomyrmex Mayr, 1866
- Proatta Forel, 1912
- Propodilobus Branstetter, 2009
- Recurvidris Bolton, 1992
- Rhopalomastix Forel, 1900
- Romblonella Wheeler, 1935
- Rostromyrmex Rosciszewski, 1994
- Rotastruma Bolton, 1991
- Royidris Bolton & Fisher, 2014
- Secostruma Bolton, 1988
- Stereomyrmex Emery, 1901
- †Stigmomyrmex Mayr, 1868
- †Stiphromyrmex Wheeler, 1915
- Strongylognathus Mayr, 1853
- Temnothorax Mayr, 1861
- Terataner Emery, 1912
- Tetheamyrma Bolton, 1991
- Tetramorium Mayr, 1855
- Trichomyrmex Mayr, 1865
- Vitsika Bolton & Fisher, 2014
- Vollenhovia Mayr, 1865
- Vombisidris Bolton, 1991
- Xenomyrmex Forel, 1885
- Myrmicini Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835
- Manica Jurine, 1807
- Myrmica Latreille, 1804
- †Plesiomyrmex Dlussky & Radchenko, 2009
- †Protomyrmica Dlussky & Radchenko, 2009
- Pogonomyrmecini Ward, Brady, Fisher & Schultz, 2014
- Hylomyrma Forel, 1912
- Pogonomyrmex Mayr, 1868
- Solenopsidini Forel, 1893
- Adelomyrmex Emery, 1897
- Anillomyrma Emery, 1913
- Austromorium Shattuck, 2009
- Baracidris Bolton, 1981
- Bariamyrma Lattke, 1990
- Bondroitia Forel, 1911
- Cryptomyrmex Fernández, 2004
- Dolopomyrmex Cover & Deyrup, 2007
- Epelysidris Bolton, 1987
- Kempfidris Fernández, Feitosa & Lattke, 2014
- Megalomyrmex Forel, 1885
- Monomorium Mayr, 1855
- Myrmicaria Saunders, 1842
- Oxyepoecus Santschi, 1926
- Rogeria Emery, 1894
- Solenopsis Westwood, 1840
- Stegomyrmex Emery, 1912
- Syllophopsis Santschi, 1915
- Tropidomyrmex Silva, Feitosa, Brandão & Diniz, 2009
- Tyrannomyrmex Fernández, 2003
- Stenammini Ashmead, 1905
- Aphaenogaster Mayr, 1853
- Goniomma Emery, 1895
- Messor Forel, 1890
- Novomessor Emery, 1915
- Oxyopomyrmex André, 1881
- †Paraphaenogaster Dlussky, 1981
- Stenamma Westwood, 1839
- Veromessor Forel, 1917
- incertae sedis
- †Afromyrma Dlussky, Brothers & Rasnitsyn, 2004
- †Agastomyrma Dlussky, Rasnitsyn & Perfilieva, 2015
- †Bilobomyrma Radchenko & Dlussky, 2013
- †Biamomyrma Dlussky, Rasnitsyn & Perfilieva, 2015
- †Boltonidris Radchenko & Dlussky, 2012
- †Brachytarsites Hong, 2002
- †Cephalomyrmex Carpenter, 1930
- †Clavipetiola Hong, 2002
- †Electromyrmex Wheeler, 1910
- †Eocenidris Wilson, 1985
- †Eomyrmex Hong, 1974
- †Fallomyrma Dlussky & Radchenko, 2006
- †Fushunomyrmex Hong, 2002
- †Ilemomyrmex Wilson, 1985
- †Miosolenopsis Zhang, 1989
- †Myrmecites Dlussky & Rasnitsyn, 2003
- †Orbigastrula Hong, 2002
- †Quadrulicapito Hong, 2002
- †Quineangulicapito Hong, 2002
- †Sinomyrmex Hong, 2002
- †Solenopsites Dlussky & Rasnitsyn, 2003
- †Sphaerogasterites Hong, 2002
- †Wumyrmex Hong, 2002
- †Zhangidris Bolton, 2003
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Bolton, B. (2014). "Myrmicinae". AntCat. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
- ^ Goulet, H & Huber, JT (eds.) (1993) Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Agriculture Canada. p. 224
- ^ "Subfamily: Myrmicinae". antweb.org. AntWeb. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
- ^ a b Ward, Philip S.; Brady, Sean G.; Fisher, Brian L.; Schultz, Ted R. (July 2014). "The evolution of myrmicine ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Systematic Entomology. 40 (1): 61–81. doi:10.1111/syen.12090. ISSN 1365-3113. S2CID 83986771.
This article incorporates text from a scholarly publication published under a copyright license that allows anyone to reuse, revise, remix and redistribute the materials in any form for any purpose: "Subfamily: Myrmicinae". antweb.org. AntWeb. Retrieved 21 September 2013. Please check the source for the exact licensing terms.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Myrmicinae at Wikimedia Commons
Data related to Myrmicinae at Wikispecies
Myrmicinae
View on GrokipediaDescription and Identification
Physical Characteristics
Myrmicinae ants exhibit the typical hymenopteran body plan, consisting of three main tagmata: the head, mesosoma (which includes the thorax and first abdominal segment), and gaster (the remaining abdominal segments).[5] The waist between the mesosoma and gaster is characteristically two-segmented, formed by a petiole and a postpetiole, which distinguishes this subfamily morphologically.[6][1] Workers in Myrmicinae typically possess 12-segmented antennae featuring an elbowed base and a three-segmented apical club, aiding in sensory functions such as foraging and communication.[7] Pupae are naked and exposed, lacking the protective cocoons found in some other ant subfamilies, which exposes them to environmental conditions and nestmate care during development.[8] A functional sting is present in most genera, serving primarily for defense against predators and competitors, as well as subduing prey.[6][9] Worker size varies widely across the subfamily, ranging from approximately 1 mm to 14 mm in length, with differences influenced by genus and environmental factors.[6][1] Sexual dimorphism is pronounced, with queens generally larger than workers and equipped with functional wings for nuptial flights, large compound eyes, and ocelli, while males are often smaller overall, featuring reduced head size relative to body proportions and also possessing wings.[10] Tribal variations in morphology, such as spine development or body sculpturing, further diversify these general features.[6]Diagnostic Features
Myrmicinae ants are distinguished from other ant subfamilies primarily by their two-segmented waist, consisting of a petiole and a distinct postpetiole that is node-like and separate from the gaster, rather than fused directly to it.[6] This postpetiole is a key apomorphy, present in all myrmicines and rare outside the subfamily, providing a reliable identifier even in highly modified species.[1] The petiole itself exhibits complete tergosternal fusion, further characterizing the waist structure.[6] In workers, the pronotum is fused with the mesonotum to form a single promesonotal plate, with the suture weakly impressed or absent, contributing to the rigid mesosoma typical of the subfamily.[6] The clypeus is well-developed and carinate, often with its median portion projecting posteriorly between the antennal sockets, effectively concealing the antennal insertions beneath well-formed frontal lobes.[6] Antennal sockets are typically not strongly lateralized, and the antennae themselves are geniculate with a three-segmented club in most species.[6] Eyes are present and conspicuous in the majority of workers, usually positioned anteriorly on the head sides with multiple ommatidia, though reduced or absent in a few subterranean or specialized taxa.[6] Mandibles are generally triangular in shape, armed with 4-6 teeth along the masticatory margin, though elongate and edentate forms occur in certain genera without inner margin teeth.[6] The propodeum commonly bears spines, teeth, or rounded lobes, often paired and directed posteriorly, adding to the subfamily's morphological diversity.[6] Identification of Myrmicinae can sometimes overlap with Dolichoderinae in tropical forms where the petiole appears constricted, but this is resolved by confirming the presence of a true postpetiole in myrmicines versus a single, non-segmented petiolar node in dolichoderines.[11]Taxonomy and Phylogeny
Classification History
The subfamily Myrmicinae was first established by Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau in 1835 within the family Formicidae, encompassing a broad array of ant species characterized by morphological features such as the structure of the petiole and postpetiole.[12] In the 1840s, John Obadiah Westwood advanced early classifications by describing key genera like Carebara and integrating them into the subfamily, laying foundational work for subsequent taxonomic efforts based on limited morphological data.[13] During the 20th century, classifications expanded significantly, with Carlo Emery's seminal work in 1921 recognizing 25 tribes within Myrmicinae, relying heavily on morphological traits such as antennal segmentation and mandibular structure to delineate groups.[12] This system, refined in Emery's 1922 publication, dominated for decades but often resulted in artificial groupings due to convergent evolution in unrelated lineages.[14] A major shift occurred in 2014 when Ward et al. utilized molecular phylogenetic analyses of 11 nuclear genes across 251 species to revise the subfamily, reducing the number of tribes to six—Myrmicini, Pogonomyrmecini, Stenammini, Solenopsidini, Attini, and Crematogastrini—by consolidating smaller, polyphyletic groups into monophyletic ones.[12] This revision highlighted the limitations of prior morphology-based systems, which had overemphasized superficial traits and led to numerous non-monophyletic tribes, such as those splitting convergent foraging forms.[12] Barry Bolton's ongoing catalogs further documented the growing diversity, listing approximately 100 genera in Myrmicinae in his 1994 identification guide and expanding to over 140 by 2024 through descriptions of new taxa and synonymies, reflecting continued morphological and molecular refinements.[15] These updates underscored persistent gaps in pre-molecular taxonomy, where polyphyletic assemblages persisted until integrative approaches resolved longstanding ambiguities.[12]Current Tribes
As of 2025, the subfamily Myrmicinae is classified into six tribes, a framework supported by phylogenomic analyses that provide robust molecular evidence for their monophyly, though relationships among some tribes remain sensitive to sampling density.[3] This classification reflects a consolidation from earlier, more fragmented tribal arrangements.[4] The tribe Attini, comprising approximately 250 species across 20 genera, is characterized by its obligate fungus-culturing behavior, including well-known leaf-cutter ants in genera such as Atta and Acromyrmex; it is exclusively distributed in the New World, with a focus on Neotropical regions.[16][3] Crematogastrini is the most species-rich tribe, with over 2,000 species in roughly 60 genera, encompassing a wide array of forms from arboreal nesters like Crematogaster to ground-dwelling generalists; its members exhibit cosmopolitan distributions and diverse nesting strategies.[17][3] The tribe Myrmicini, containing around 220 species primarily in genera such as Myrmica and Manica, features ants with reduced eyes and temperate adaptations; recent 2025 phylogenomic work has clarified internal relationships within this predominantly Holarctic group.[3] Pogonomyrmecini, with approximately 100 species in several genera including Pogonomyrmex, consists of seed-harvesting specialists often equipped with powerful mandibles, some exhibiting trap-jaw mechanisms; this tribe is largely confined to Asian and American arid zones.[3] Solenopsidini includes about 1,000 species across 20+ genera, notably the fire ants of Solenopsis, known for their aggressive stings and invasive potential; the tribe has a cosmopolitan range, with significant diversity in tropical and subtropical areas.[18][3] Finally, Stenammini, encompassing roughly 500 species in 7 genera like Stenamma and Messor, is adapted to arid environments with seed-collecting habits; it shows a strong focus on the Old World, particularly Mediterranean and African regions.[19][3]Genera
Myrmicinae encompasses 155 extant genera and 42 fossil genera, reflecting its status as the most diverse ant subfamily according to Barry Bolton's comprehensive catalog.[6][20] These genera are distributed across six recognized tribes, with tribal affiliations providing key taxonomic structure as outlined in recent phylogenetic analyses.[21] The distribution of genera varies markedly by tribe, with Crematogastrini exhibiting the highest diversity at over 65 genera, encompassing a wide array of ecological roles from arboreal to soil-dwelling forms.[17] In contrast, Pogonomyrmecini represents the least diverse tribe, containing only 5 genera primarily adapted to arid environments.[4] Among the notable genera, Atta stands out for its leaf-cutting behavior, comprising 15 species that cultivate symbiotic fungi in Neotropical forests. Solenopsis, known as fire ants, includes over 200 species renowned for their invasive potential and stinging defense.[22] Tetramorium is a widespread genus with more than 600 species, occupying diverse habitats from temperate grasslands to tropical soils.[23] Similarly, Myrmica features around 200 species, predominantly in temperate regions where they form aggressive colonies in leaf litter and soil. Despite these advances, coverage remains incomplete, particularly in tropical regions where an estimated 20% more Myrmicinae genera await description due to ongoing discoveries in biodiverse hotspots like Southeast Asia and the Neotropics.[24][25]Distribution and Biogeography
Global Range
Myrmicinae represents one of the most widespread ant subfamilies, occurring on all continents except Antarctica and spanning diverse habitats from tropical rainforests to temperate zones. With approximately 7,138 valid extant species across 155 genera, the subfamily achieves its highest diversity in tropical regions, where environmental conditions favor speciation and ecological specialization.[3] This cosmopolitan distribution underscores Myrmicinae's adaptability, though polar extremes remain uninhabited due to physiological constraints on cold tolerance.[6] Regionally, the Neotropics host the greatest concentration of Myrmicinae species, accounting for a substantial portion of global diversity—approximately 51% of all ant species in the region belong to this subfamily, driven by hyperdiverse tribes like Attini. The Afrotropics follow with significant richness, exemplified by high genus counts in countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where Myrmicinae contributes prominently to the 736 recorded ant species. The Oriental and Australasian realms, along with the Palearctic and Nearctic regions, exhibit lower diversity due to reduced tropical influence. These patterns reflect historical biogeographic processes, with Paleotropical diversification dominating much of the evolutionary history.[26][4] Several Myrmicinae species have become highly invasive through human-mediated introductions, expanding beyond native ranges and altering local ecosystems. A prominent example is Solenopsis invicta, the red imported fire ant, native to South America's Pantanal region but now established in the southern United States, Australia, and parts of Asia and Europe, where it forms dense populations in disturbed areas.[27][28] Biogeographic analyses reveal distinct origins for major tribes: the Attini, a basal group with over 250 species of fungus-farming ants, traces to Neotropical (Gondwanan) lineages, while the Myrmicini exhibit Laurasian (Holarctic) roots, with subsequent radiations into temperate zones. By 2025, ongoing range expansions are evident, particularly for invasive species, as warming climates enable poleward shifts and human transport vectors like shipping continue to bridge biogeographic barriers, potentially increasing overlap between realms.[4][29][30]Habitat Preferences
Myrmicinae ants exhibit a wide range of habitat preferences, reflecting the subfamily's ecological versatility across diverse environments. The majority of genera construct nests in soil, often comprising around 70% of known taxa, with colonies excavating chambers beneath stones, logs, or in open ground to access stable microclimates. Other common nest sites include rotten wood, leaf litter accumulations, and arboreal locations such as tree hollows or branches, particularly among tribes like Crematogastrini, where species such as Crematogaster have adapted to canopy living through specialized clinging behaviors and carton nests built from plant fibers. These varied nesting strategies allow Myrmicinae to exploit both terrestrial and vertical habitats, from ground level to forest canopies.[1][2][31] Microhabitat selection within Myrmicinae is tribe-specific and tied to climatic conditions. For instance, the tribe Attini, including leaf-cutter ants like Atta and Acromyrmex, predominates in humid tropical forests of the Neotropics, where deep soil nests support extensive fungal gardens requiring consistent moisture and temperature. In contrast, species in the tribe Stenammini, such as Stenamma, favor mesic forest habitats in temperate and subtropical regions, nesting in leaf litter or shallow soil to maintain humidity in cooler, wooded environments. Temperate grasslands host genera like Myrmica, which nest in soil mounds or under vegetation, benefiting from open, grassy areas with moderate rainfall and seasonal temperature fluctuations. Arid and semi-arid deserts are occupied by tribes such as Pogonomyrmecini, exemplified by Pogonomyrmex harvester ants, which construct large soil mounds in exposed, dry landscapes to capture sparse resources.[32][33][34] Adaptations to these habitats enhance survival in challenging conditions. In desert species like those in Pogonomyrmecini and Solenopsidini, worker polymorphism—featuring major and minor castes—facilitates efficient resource handling; larger majors process seeds indoors to minimize water loss, while smaller minors forage quickly during brief activity windows, conserving energy and moisture in hot, dry environments. Temperate Myrmicinae, such as Myrmica, exhibit seasonal nesting shifts, deepening soil chambers in winter for insulation against frost and relocating brood to warmer surface layers in spring to optimize development under varying temperatures. Urban adaptation is evident in genera like Monomorium, where species such as the pharaoh ant (M. pharaonis) thrive in human-modified settings by nesting in wall voids, insulation, or moist indoor areas, exploiting stable warmth and food availability.[35][36][37] Habitat loss poses significant threats to Myrmicinae diversity, particularly in tropical regions where deforestation fragments forest habitats critical for arboreal and fungus-farming tribes like Attini and Crematogastrini, contributing to declines in species richness. However, some genera demonstrate resilience, with urban-tolerant species like Monomorium expanding into cities, potentially offsetting local extinctions in natural habitats.[38]Ecology and Behavior
Social Structure and Nesting
Myrmicinae ants display a eusocial caste system consisting of reproductive queens, sterile female workers responsible for foraging, nest maintenance, and defense, and winged males primarily involved in mating. In many species, workers exhibit monomorphism, but polymorphism is common in advanced tribes, featuring distinct subcastes such as minors for nursing and majors or soldiers for defense; for instance, in the Attini tribe, soldier workers in genera like Atta are specialized for cutting vegetation and protecting the colony.[39] Colony sizes in Myrmicinae vary widely, from dozens of individuals in primitive species with simple social organization, such as certain Myrmecina, to millions of workers in highly advanced forms like Atta leaf-cutter ants, which form expansive supercolonies. Nesting behaviors typically involve excavating multi-chambered structures with interconnected galleries in soil, wood, or leaf litter to house brood and resources; in the Attini, nests are elaborate subterranean complexes centered on fungus gardens, where workers cultivate symbiotic fungi using fresh plant material as substrate, with waste chambers for refuse management. Some species in the Crematogastrini tribe, such as Crematogaster, exhibit polydomy, occupying multiple interconnected nests to expand territory and enhance foraging efficiency.[40][39][41] Reproduction in Myrmicinae generally occurs via synchronized nuptial flights, during which virgin queens mate with multiple males mid-air before shedding wings and founding new colonies claustrally—sealing themselves in a small chamber to provision the first brood from bodily reserves without external foraging. Slave-making behaviors are rare but notable in certain genera like Harpagoxenus, where queens conduct raids on host colonies (often other Myrmicinae) to capture brood, which develops into enslaved workers essential for the parasite's colony survival and reproduction. Recent molecular studies from 2025 on invasive species such as Solenopsis invicta have revealed genetic supergenes controlling queen-worker dimorphism and social polymorphism, highlighting how environmental cues and gene expression influence caste differentiation and colony organization in non-native ranges.[42][43][44]Foraging and Interactions
Myrmicinae ants display a broad range of dietary preferences, reflecting their ecological versatility, with many species exhibiting omnivorous habits that include arthropod prey, seeds, nectar, and honeydew from hemipterans. Predatory foraging is prevalent in numerous genera, where workers capture and subdue live insects and other small invertebrates, often using mandibular strikes or chemical immobilization to secure food for the colony. In contrast, seed-harvesting specialists like those in the genus Pogonomyrmex focus primarily on collecting and milling seeds, which serve as a staple resource, supplemented by opportunistic predation on insects during foraging bouts. The tribe Attini represents a specialized dietary adaptation, where colonies cultivate symbiotic fungi (Leucoagaricus spp.) as their main food source; foragers gather fresh plant material, such as leaves or flowers, to fertilize and propagate these fungal gardens, creating a highly efficient agricultural system unique among ants. Foraging strategies within Myrmicinae vary from solitary individual searches to coordinated group efforts, enabling efficient resource exploitation across diverse habitats. Solitary foraging predominates in many species, such as Pogonomyrmex workers that venture out independently to locate seeds within defined territories, returning to the nest with single loads while marking paths with trail pheromones to guide future trips. Trail pheromones, typically produced by the Dufour's or poison glands, play a crucial role in mass recruitment for genera like Atta and Acromyrmex, where initial scouts deposit chemical cues upon discovering rich food patches, prompting rapid influxes of workers to strip vegetation or harvest nectar. Group raiding, reminiscent of army ant tactics, occurs in swarm-raiding species such as Pheidologeton diversus, where thousands of workers form expansive, fan-shaped columns to overwhelm and capture large prey or usurp resources from competitors, allowing colonies to harvest ephemeral food sources before rivals arrive. Ecological interactions among Myrmicinae are multifaceted, encompassing mutualisms, predation, and intense competition that shape community dynamics. Mutualistic relationships are exemplified by the obligate symbiosis between Attini ants and their cultivated fungi, where ants provide substrate and protection in exchange for nutrient-rich fungal tissue, a partnership that has evolved to include antibiotic-producing bacteria (Pseudonocardia spp.) to defend gardens against pathogens. Some species, including Leptothorax, engage in facultative mutualism with aphids, tending colonies for honeydew secretions while shielding them from predators, thereby securing a carbohydrate-rich diet. Predatory interactions extend to intra- and interspecific competition, as seen in Pogonomyrmex colonies that aggressively defend foraging trails against intruders, leading to territorial exclusion and reduced overlap in resource use. Defense mechanisms bolster these interactions; Solenopsidini ants, such as the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), deploy potent stings delivering piperidine alkaloids to repel threats or subdue prey during raids, while Myrmicini species like Myrmica rely on formic acid sprays from the poison gland for chemical deterrence against predators and competitors. Myrmicinae foraging has notable economic implications, balancing pest pressures with ecological services. Invasive fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) inflict substantial agricultural damage by preying on crop pests and seedlings, disrupting livestock operations, and causing infrastructure failures through nesting, with annual U.S. costs exceeding $8 billion (as of 2025) in control and losses across infested regions.[45] Conversely, seed-harvesting Myrmicinae contribute beneficially by aiding plant propagation; Pogonomyrmex species inadvertently disperse viable seeds through granary storage, where some germinate post-milling, enhancing seedling establishment and soil nutrient cycling in arid ecosystems, while broader ant predation reduces herbivore populations to support crop yields in natural settings.Evolution and Diversity
Fossil Record
The fossil record of Myrmicinae begins in the Eocene epoch, with the earliest definitive representatives appearing around 50 million years ago (MYA) in amber deposits from northern Europe and North America. Primitive myrmicines, such as those assigned to early genera like Eocenidris, are preserved in Middle Eocene sediments from Arkansas and Baltic amber, showcasing basic morphological features like reduced wing venation and a sting apparatus typical of the subfamily.[46][47] A significant diversification of Myrmicinae occurred during the Eocene (~56–34 MYA), coinciding with the radiation of angiosperm-dominated forests that provided new ecological niches for ant foraging and nesting. This "Eocene explosion" is evidenced by diverse amber inclusions from Baltic, Rovno, and Saxonian sources, where myrmicines comprise a notable portion of ant fossils, reflecting adaptations to humid, forested environments. Numerous fossil species have been described from these deposits, with over 200 Myrmicinae fossil species known in total across various deposits, spanning both modern and extinct lineages.[48][47][6] Key fossils highlight specific evolutionary insights, such as Miocene specimens of the Attini tribe from Dominican amber (~15–20 MYA), including early species of Apterostigma like A. electropilosum, which confirm the New World origins of fungus-growing ants and their symbiotic associations predating modern forms. These inclusions preserve workers with fungal pellets, illustrating ancient agricultural behaviors.[49] The fossil record of Myrmicinae remains patchy, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere, where Mesozoic and early Cenozoic deposits yield few myrmicine remains compared to the abundant Northern Hemisphere ambers. Recent studies in 2025 have employed micro-CT scans on amber inclusions to non-destructively analyze rare specimens, such as those in the Strumigenys group, revealing fine morphological details and addressing preservation gaps without physical dissection.[50][51] Approximately 36 extinct genera have been described within Myrmicinae, including Lelejus from late Eocene Rovno amber and others like Tyrannomyrmex from Paleogene sites, many exhibiting morphological stasis in traits such as mandibular structure and body sclerotization relative to extant relatives.[52][53][54]Species Diversity and Adaptations
The subfamily Myrmicinae stands out for its extraordinary species diversity, encompassing over 6,700 valid species and subspecies as documented in recent taxonomic catalogs. This accounts for nearly half of all described ant species worldwide, underscoring the subfamilys dominance within the Formicidae. Diversity peaks in tropical regions, where habitat heterogeneity and stable climates promote speciation and coexistence.[6][55][56] Several key evolutionary adaptations have fueled this biodiversity and ecological success. Within the tribe Attini, the development of fungivory represents a pivotal innovation, with advanced agricultural systems—characterized by the cultivation of fungus gardens using fresh vegetation—emerging approximately 25 million years ago, enabling these ants to exploit stable, nutrient-rich food sources independent of fluctuating insect prey availability. In contrast, species of the genus Solenopsis, such as the red imported fire ant (S. invicta), exhibit heightened invasiveness through the formation of expansive supercolonies comprising billions of individuals across hundreds of square kilometers, facilitating aggressive territorial expansion and resource monopolization in disturbed habitats.[57][58] Underlying these traits are broader drivers of diversification, including morphological plasticity that allows for extreme variations in body size (ranging from 1 mm to over 10 mm) and defensive structures like propodeal spines, which enhance survival in competitive environments. Complementing this is sophisticated chemical ecology, where pheromones mediate complex social behaviors such as trail-following and alarm signaling, while venom alkaloids provide potent tools for predation, defense, and microbial inhibition.[6][59][60] Conservation challenges persist amid this richness, with 141 taxa classified as threatened on the IUCN Red List, representing roughly 1% of all described ant species (as of 2025), a figure that includes numerous Myrmicinae due to their prevalence in human-modified landscapes. Undescribed diversity remains substantial, with estimates suggesting over 10,000 total species in the subfamily when accounting for cryptic forms in undersampled tropical areas. Recent phylogenomic analyses conducted in 2025 affirm that this hyperdiversity arose from rapid radiations in the aftermath of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction, capitalizing on newly available ecological niches, with studies resolving tribal relationships such as the Paleotropical origins of Myrmicini.[61][24][62]References
- https://antwiki.org/wiki/Myrmicinae
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Attini
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Crematogastrini
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Solenopsidini
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Stenammini
- https://antwiki.org/wiki/Phylogeny_of_Myrmicinae
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Solenopsis
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Tetramorium
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Solenopsis_invicta
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Monomorium_pharaonis
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Conservation_status