Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fungus-growing ants
View on Wikipedia
| Attini | |
|---|---|
| Atta mexicana workers carrying a leaf section | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Hymenoptera |
| Family: | Formicidae |
| Subfamily: | Myrmicinae |
| Tribe: | Attini Smith, 1858 |
| Type genus | |
| Atta Fabricius, 1804
| |
| Genera | |
|
See text | |
| Diversity[1] | |
| 46 genera | |
Fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) comprise all the known fungus-growing ant species participating in ant–fungus mutualism. They are known for cutting grasses and leaves, carrying them to their colonies' nests, and using them to grow fungus on which they later feed.
Their farming habits typically have large effects on their surrounding ecosystem. Many species farm large areas surrounding their colonies and leave walking trails that compress the soil, which can no longer grow plants. Attine colonies commonly have millions of individuals, though some species only house a few hundred.[2]
They are the sister group to the subtribe Dacetina.[3] Leafcutter ants, including Atta and Acromyrmex, make up two of the genera.[4] Their cultivars mostly come from the fungal tribe Leucocoprineae[3] of family Agaricaceae.
Attine gut microbiota are often not diverse due to their primarily monotonous diets, leaving them at a higher risk than other beings for certain illnesses. They are especially at risk of death if their colony's fungus garden is affected by disease, as it is most often the only food source used for developing larvae. Many species of ants, including several Megalomyrmex, invade fungus-growing ant colonies and either steal from and destroy these fungus gardens, or they live in the nest and take food from the species.[2]
Fungus-growing ants are only found in the Western Hemisphere. Some species stretch as far north as the pine barrens in New Jersey, USA (Trachymyrmex septentrionalis) and as far south as the cold deserts in Argentina (several species of Acromyrmex).[2] This New World ant clade is thought to have originated about 60 million years ago in the South American rainforest. This is disputed, though, as they could have possibly evolved in a drier habitat while still evolving to domesticate their crops.[3]
Evolution
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2019) |
Early ancestors of attine ants were probably insect predators. They likely began foraging for leaf sections, but then converted their primary food source to the fungus these leaf cuts grew.[5][6][7] Higher attines, such as Acromyrmex and Atta, are believed to have evolved in Central and North America about 20 million years ago (Mya), starting with Trachymyrmex cornetzi. While the fungal cultivars of the 'lower' attine ants can survive outside an ant colony, those of 'higher' attine ants are obligate mutualists, meaning they cannot exist without one another.[3]
Generalized fungus farming in ants appears to have evolved about 55–60 Mya, but early 25 Mya ants seemed to have domesticated a single fungal lineage with gongylidia to feed colonies. This evolution of using gongylidia appears to have developed in the dry habitats of South America, away from the rainforests where fungus-farming evolved.[3] About 10 million years later, leaf-cutting ants likely arose as active herbivores and began industrial-scaled farming.[5][8][9][10][11][12][13] The fungus the ants grew,[clarification needed] their cultivars eventually became reproductively isolated and co-evolved with the ants. These fungi gradually began decomposing more nutritious material like fresh plants.[5][8][11][12][14]
Shortly after attine ants began keeping their fungus gardens in dense aggregations, their farms likely began suffering from a specialized genus of Escovopsis mycopathogens.[9][15][16][17][18] The ants evolved cuticular cultures of Actinomycetota that suppress Escovopsis and possibly other bacteria.[9][19][20][21][22][23] These cuticular cultures are both antibiotics and antifungals.[20][23][24][25][26] The mature worker ants wear these cultures on their chest plates and sometimes on their surrounding thoraces and legs as a biofilm.[9]
Behavior
[edit]Mating
[edit]
Typically, one queen lives per colony. Every year after the colony is about three years old, the queen lays eggs of female and male alates, the reproductive ants that will pass on the genes of the queens. Before leaving the nest, queens stuff some of the fungus' mycelia in her cibarium. These winged males and queens then take their nuptial flights to mate high in the air. In some areas, species flights are synchronized with all local colonies' virgin royalty flying at the same time on the same day, such as Atta sexdens and Atta texana.[2]
Some species' queens mate with only one male, as in Seriomyrmex and Trachymyrmex, while some are known to mate with as many as eight or 10, such as Atta sexdens and many Acromyrmex spp. After mating, all males die, but their sperm stays alive and usable for a long time in the spermatheca, or sperm bank, of their mate, meaning that many ants father offspring years after their death.[2]
Colony foundation
[edit]After their mating flights, queens cast off their wings and begin their descent into the ground. After creating a narrow entrance and digging 20–30 cm (7.9–11.8 in) straight down, she creates a small 6 cm (2.4 in) chamber. In here, she spits on a small wad of fungus and starts her colony's garden.[2] After about three days, fresh mycelia are growing out of the fungus wad and the queen has lain three to six eggs. In a month, the colony has eggs, larvae, and often pupae surrounding the ever-growing garden.[27]
Until the first workers are grown, the queen is the sole worker. She grows the garden, fertilizing it with her fecal liquid, but does not eat from it. Instead, she gains energy from eating 90% of the eggs she lays, in addition to catabolizing her wing muscles and fat reserves.[2]
Though the first larvae feed on the eggs of the queen, the first workers begin growing and eating from the garden. Workers feed malformed eggs to the hungry larvae while the garden is still fragile. After about a week of this underground growth, workers open the closed entrance and begin foraging, staying close to the nest. The fungus begins growing at a much faster rate [13 μm (0.00051 in)] an hour. From this point on, the only work the queen does is egg-laying.[2]
Colonies grow slowly for the first two years of existence, but then accelerate for the next three years. After around five years, growth levels out and the colony begins to produce winged males and queens.[2]
The founding of a nest by these queens is highly difficult, and successful cases are not likely. After three months, newly founded colonies of Atta capiguara and Atta sexdens are 0.09% and 2.53% likely to still exist, respectively. Some species have better odds, such as Atta cephalotes, which are 10% likely to survive a few months.[28]
Caste system
[edit]Attines have seven castes performing roughly 20–30 tasks, meaning the potential exists for development of more specialized castes performing individual tasks for Atta's future.[2] For now, a reproductive caste, made of male drones and female queens, and a worker class, that vary greatly in size, are known.[29] Queens have much larger ovaries than females in the working castes.[2] Since their needs are constantly taken care of, queens rarely move from a single location, which is typically in a centralized fungal garden. Workers take their eggs and move them to other fungal gardens.[2] Differences in size between worker castes begin to develop after a colony is well established.

Workers
[edit]Description
[edit]Lower attines have very minor polymorphism within the minor workers, though higher attines commonly have very different sizes of worker ants.[2] In the higher attines, though, head width varies eight-fold and dry weight 200-fold between different castes of workers. The size differences in workers is nearly nonexistent in newly founded colonies.[2]
Due to the variety of tasks needed to be performed by a colony, the widths of workers heads are important and good measures of what jobs workers are likely to perform. Those with the heads about 0.8–1.0 mm (0.031–0.039 in) wide tend to work as gardeners, although many with heads 0.8–1.6 mm (0.031–0.063 in) wide participate in brood care.[2]
Workers need heads only about 0.8 mm wide to do the work of caring for the very delicate hyphae of the fungus, which they care for by stroking with their antennae and moving with their mouths. These tiny workers are the smallest and most abundant and are called minim. Ants of 1.6 mm (0.063 in) appear to be the smallest workers that cut vegetation, but they cannot cut very hard or thick leaves. Most foragers have heads around 2.0–2.2 mm (0.079–0.087 in) wide.[2]
Attines, particularly the workers that cut leaves and grass, have large mandibles powered by strong muscles. On average, 50% of worker ants' head mass and 25% of their full body mass is the mandibular muscles alone.[30]

Behavior
[edit]Though all castes defend their nests in the event of invasion, a true soldier caste, with individuals called majors, exists. They are larger than other workers, and use their large, sharp mandibles, powered by huge adductor muscles, to defend their colonies from large enemies, such as vertebrates. When a foraging area is threatened by conspecific or interspecific ant competitor, the majority of respondents are smaller workers from other castes, since they are more numerous, and therefore better suited for territorial combat.[2]
Tasks are divided not only by size, but by the age of individuals workers, as well. Young workers of most subcastes tend to work inside the nest, but many older workers take on tasks outside. Minims, which are too small to cut or carry leaf fragments, are commonly found at foraging sites. They often ride from the foraging site to the nest by climbing onto the fragments carried by other workers. Most likely, they are older workers that defend carriers from parasitic phorid flies that attempt to lay eggs on the backs of the foragers.[2][31][32]

All size groups defend their colonies from invaders, but older workers have been found to attack and defend territories most often.[2] At least three of four physical castes of A. sexdens change their behavior based on their age.[2][29]
Habitat
[edit]Lower attines mostly live in inconspicuous nests with 100–1000 individuals and relatively small fungus gardens in them. Higher attines, in contrast, live in colonies made of 5–10 million ants that live and work within hundreds of interconnected fungus-bearing chambers in huge subterranean nests.[2][33] Some colonies are so large, they can be seen from satellite photos, measuring up to 600 m3 (21,000 cu ft).[33]
Farming
[edit]
The majority of fungi that are farmed by attine ants come from the family Agaricaceae, mostly from the genera Leucoagaricus and Leucocoprinus,[2][34] though variance occurs within the tribe. Some species in the genus Apterostigma have changed their food source to fungi in the family Tricholomataceae.[35][36] Some species cultivate yeast, such as Cyphomyrmex rimosus.[2]
Some fungi that have supposedly been vertically transmitted are believed to be millions of years old.[37] It was previously assumed that the cultures are always transmitted vertically from colony to young queen, but some lower attines have been found to be growing recently domesticated Lepiotaceae.[38] Some species transfer cultures laterally, such as Cyphomyrmex and occasionally some species of Acromyrmex, whether by joining a neighboring tribe, stealing, or invading another colony's garden.[2][39]

Lower attines do not use leaves for the majority of the substrate for their gardens, and instead prefer dead vegetation, seeds, fruits, insect feces, and corpses.[40] The lower attine ant species Mycocepurus goeldii has been found to farm Leucocoprinus attinorum whilst the sand dwelling Mycetophylax morschi farms the closely related species Leucocoprinus dunensis.[41] Apterostigma dentigerum cultivates Myrmecopterula velohortorum in veiled hanging gardens whereas Apterostigma manni cultivates Myrmecopterula nudihortorum in spongelike masses in cavities in the ground or under logs.[42]
Worker recruitment
[edit]The number of ants that are recruited to cut varies greatly based on the leaf quality available in addition to the species and location of the colony. Leaf quality is complex to measure because many variables exist, including "leaf tenderness, nutrient composition, and the presence and quantity of secondary plant chemicals" such as sugar.[2][43][44][45]
Early studies found the pheromones used to mark foraging trails come from poison gland sacs.[46] Studies suggest there are two purposes for marking the trails this way: worker recruitment and orientation cues.[29][47] The trail recruitment pheromone methyl-4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate (MMPC), was the first whose chemical structure was identified.[48] It is also the main trail recruitment pheromone in all Atta species except Atta sexdens, which uses 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine.[49]
MMPC is incredibly potent and effective at attracting ants. One milligram is theoretically powerful enough to create a path that A. texana and A. cephalotes would follow three times the Earth's circumference [74,703 miles (120,223 km)][50] and that 50% of A. vollenweideri foragers would follow 60 times around the Earth [1,494,060 miles (2,404,460 km)].[51]
Harvesting vegetation
[edit]Most harvesting sites are in tree canopies or patches of savanna grasses.[2]
After following the pheromone trail to vegetation, ants climb onto leaves or grass and begin cutting off sections. To do this, they place one mandible, called the fixed mandible, onto a leaf and anchor it. Then they open the other, called the motile mandible, and place it on the leaf tissue. The ant moves the motile jaw and pulls the fixed jaw behind it by closing them together until the fragment detaches. Which jaw is fixed and which is motile varies depending on the direction in which the ant chooses to cut a fragment.[52]

The sizes of leaf fragments have been found in some studies to vary based on the size of ants due to the ants' anchoring of their hind legs while cutting,[45][53] though other studies have not found correlations.[54] This is likely because many factors affect how ants cut leaves, including neck flexibility, body axis location, and leg length.[2] Load sizes that do not impact the running speed of the collecting ants are favored.[55][56][57]
Often, ants stridulate while cutting vegetation by raising and lowering their gasters in a way that makes a cuticular file on the first gastric tergite and a scraper on the postpetiole rub together.[58] This makes a noise, audible by people with great hearing sitting very close to them and visible using laser-Doppler vibrometry.[2] It also causes the mandibles to move like a vibratome and cut through tender leaf tissue more smoothly.[59]
The metabolic rate of the ants while and after cutting vegetation is above standard. Their aerobic scope is in the range of flying insects, which are among the most metabolically active animals.[2]
The behavior of the foragers that bring the material back to the nest varies greatly among species. In some species, especially those that harvest close to their nests, the harvesters bring the litter back to their colony themselves. Species such as A. colombica have one or more cache sites along a trail for foragers to grab litter. Other species, such as A. vollenweideri, that carry leaves as far as 150 m (490 ft), have two to five carriers per leaf. The first carrier takes the segment a short distance toward the nest and then drops it. Another picks it up and drops it, and this repeats until the last carrier brings it the greatest distance until reaching the nest.[60][61] Data does not show that this behavior maximizes load transportation,[62][63][64][65] so scientists have explained this behavior in other ways, though the data are still inconclusive. One theory is that this type of task partitioning increases the efficiency of individual workers as they become specialists.[66] Another is that the chains accelerate communication between ants about the quality and species of the plants being cut, recruits more workers, and reinforces territorial claims by reinforcing the scent markings.[2][60][61][67]
Gardening process
[edit]First, foragers bring in to and drop leaf fragments on the nest's chamber floor. Workers that are usually slightly smaller clip these pieces into segments that are about 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) across. Smaller ants then crush these fragments and mold them into damp pellets by adding fecal droplets and kneading them. They add the pellets into a larger pile of other prill.[2]
Smaller workers then pluck loose strands of fungus from dense patches and plant them on the surface of the freshly made pile. The smallest workers, the minim, move around and keep up the garden by delicately prodding the piles with their antennae, licking the surfaces, and plucking out the spores and hyphae of unwanted mold species.[2]
Nutrition
[edit]Higher attine fungi grow gongylidia, which form clusters called staphylae. The staphylae are rich in carbohydrates and lipids. Though workers can also eat the hyphae of the fungi, which is richer in protein, they prefer staphylae and appear to live longer while eating them.[35][68][69]
Cellulose has been found to be poorly degraded and assimilated by fungus, if at all, meaning that the ants that eat the fungus do not get much energy from the cellulose in plants. Xylan, starch, maltose, sucrose, laminarin, and glycoside apparently play the important roles in ant nutrition.[70][71][72] It is not known yet how ants can digest laminarin, but myrmecologists E.O. Wilson and Bert Hölldobler hypothesize that fungal enzymes may occur in the ants' guts, as evidenced by the enzymes found in larval extract.[2]
In a laboratory experiment, only 5% of workers' energy needs were met by fungal staphylae, and the ants also feed on tree sap as they collect greens.[73] Larvae seem to grow on all or nearly all fungi, whereas queens obtain their energy from the eggs nonqueen females lay and workers feed to them.[2]
Bacterial symbionts
[edit]The actinomycete bacterium Pseudonocardia is acquired by pupae from the workers that care for them two days after pupae eclose for metamorphosis. Within 14 days, the ants are covered in the bacteria, where they are stored in crypts and cavities found in the exoskeletons. The bacteria produce small molecules that can prevent the growth of a specialized fungus garden pathogen.[33]
Attine ants have very specialized diets, which seem to reduce their microbiotic diversity.[74][75][76][77]
Impact of farming
[edit]The scale of the farming done by fungus-farming ants can be compared to human's industrialized farming.[5][11][78][79] A colony can "[defoliate] a mature eucalyptus tree overnight".[33] The cutting of leaves to grow fungus to feed millions of ants per colony has a large ecological impact in the subtropical areas in which they reside.[7]
Genera
[edit]- Acanthognathus Mayr, 1887
- Acromyrmex Mayr, 1865
- Allomerus Mayr, 1878
- Amoimyrmex Cristiano, Cardoso & Sandoval, 2020
- Apterostigma Mayr, 1865
- Atta Fabricius, 1804
- †Attaichnus Laza, 1982 (trace fossil)
- Basiceros Schulz, 1906
- Blepharidatta Wheeler, 1915
- Cephalotes Latreille, 1802
- Chimaeridris Wilson, 1989
- Colobostruma Wheeler, 1927
- Cyatta Sosa-Calvo et al., 2013
- Cyphomyrmex Mayr, 1862
- Daceton Perty, 1833
- Diaphoromyrma Fernández, Delabie & Nascimento, 2009
- Epopostruma Forel, 1895
- Eurhopalothrix Brown & Kempf, 1961
- Ishakidris Bolton, 1984
- Kalathomyrmex Klingenberg & Brandão, 2009
- Lachnomyrmex Wheeler, 1910
- Lenomyrmex Fernández & Palacio, 1999
- Mesostruma Brown, 1948
- Microdaceton Santschi, 1913
- Mycetagroicus Brandão & Mayhé-Nunes, 2001
- Mycetarotes Emery, 1913
- Mycetomoellerius Solomon et al., 2019
- Mycetophylax Emery, 1913
- Mycetosoritis Wheeler, 1907
- Mycocepurus Forel, 1893
- Myrmicocrypta Smith, 1860
- Ochetomyrmex Mayr, 1878
- Octostruma Forel, 1912
- Orectognathus Smith, 1853
- Paramycetophylax Kusnezov, 1956
- Phalacromyrmex Kempf, 1960
- Pheidole Westwood, 1839
- Pilotrochus Brown, 1978
- Procryptocerus Emery, 1887
- Protalaridris Brown, 1980
- Pseudoatta Gallardo, 1916
- Rhopalothrix Mayr, 1870
- Sericomyrmex Mayr, 1865
- Strumigenys Smith, 1860
- Talaridris Weber, 1941
- Trachymyrmex Forel, 1893
- Tranopelta Mayr, 1866
- Wasmannia Forel, 1893
- Xerolitor Sosa-Calvo et al., 2018
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Bolton, B. (2015). "Attini". AntCat. Retrieved 18 August 2015.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah Hölldobler, Bert; Holldobler, Foundation Professor of Biology Bert; Wilson, Honorary Curator in Entomology and University Research Professor Emeritus Edward O.; Wilson, Edward O. (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-06704-0.
- ^ a b c d e Branstetter, M. G.; Ješovnik, A.; Sosa-Calvo, J.; Lloyd, M. W.; Faircloth, B. C.; Brady, S. G.; Schultz, T. R. (2017-04-12). "Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1852) 20170095. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0095. PMC 5394666. PMID 28404776.
- ^ Weber, N.A. (1966). "Fungus-Growing Ants". Science. 153 (3736): 587–604. Bibcode:1966Sci...153..587W. doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.587. PMID 17757227. S2CID 31919824.
- ^ a b c d Brady, Seán G.; Schultz, Ted R. (2008-04-08). "Major evolutionary transitions in ant agriculture". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (14): 5435–5440. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.5435S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711024105. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 2291119. PMID 18362345.
- ^ Branstetter, Michael G.; Ješovnik, Ana; Sosa-Calvo, Jeffrey; Lloyd, Michael W.; Faircloth, Brant C.; Brady, Seán G.; Schultz, Ted R. (2017-04-12). "Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1852) 20170095. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0095. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 5394666. PMID 28404776.
- ^ a b Gerardo, Nicole; Mueller, Ulrich G. (2002-11-26). "Fungus-farming insects: Multiple origins and diverse evolutionary histories". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (24): 15247–15249. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9915247M. doi:10.1073/pnas.242594799. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 137700. PMID 12438688.
- ^ a b Kooij, P. W.; Aanen, D. K.; Schiøtt, M.; Boomsma, J. J. (November 2015). "Evolutionarily advanced ant farmers rear polyploid fungal crops". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 28 (11): 1911–1924. doi:10.1111/jeb.12718. ISSN 1420-9101. PMC 5014177. PMID 26265100.
- ^ a b c d Currie, Cameron R.; Poulsen, Michael; Mendenhall, John; Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Billen, Johan (2006-01-06). "Coevolved crypts and exocrine glands support mutualistic bacteria in fungus-growing ants". Science. 311 (5757): 81–83. Bibcode:2006Sci...311...81C. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.186.9613. doi:10.1126/science.1119744. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 16400148. S2CID 8135139.
- ^ Schultz, Ted R.; Rehner, Stephen A.; Mueller, Ulrich G. (1998-09-25). "The Evolution of Agriculture in Ants". Science. 281 (5385): 2034–2038. Bibcode:1998Sci...281.2034M. doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2034. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 9748164.
- ^ a b c Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Zhang, Guojie; Schultz, Ted R.; Brady, Seán G.; Wcislo, William T.; Nash, David R.; Rabeling, Christian; Dikow, Rebecca B.; Deng, Yuan (2016-07-20). "Reciprocal genomic evolution in the ant–fungus agricultural symbiosis". Nature Communications. 7 12233. Bibcode:2016NatCo...712233N. doi:10.1038/ncomms12233. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 4961791. PMID 27436133.
- ^ a b Shik, Jonathan Z.; Gomez, Ernesto B.; Kooij, Pepijn W.; Santos, Juan C.; Wcislo, William T.; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (September 6, 2016). "Nutrition mediates the expression of cultivar-farmer conflict in a fungus-growing ant". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113 (36): 10121–10126. Bibcode:2016PNAS..11310121S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1606128113. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 5018747. PMID 27551065.
- ^ Villesen, Palle; Murakami, Takahiro; Schultz, Ted R.; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2002-08-07). "Identifying the transition between single and multiple mating of queens in fungus-growing ants". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 269 (1500): 1541–1548. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2044. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 1691065. PMID 12184823.
- ^ Licht, Henrik H. De Fine; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2010). "Forage collection, substrate preparation, and diet composition in fungus-growing ants". Ecological Entomology. 35 (3): 259–269. Bibcode:2010EcoEn..35..259D. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01193.x. ISSN 1365-2311. S2CID 83602010.
- ^ de Man, Tom J. B.; Stajich, Jason E.; Kubicek, Christian P.; Teiling, Clotilde; Chenthamara, Komal; Atanasova, Lea; Druzhinina, Irina S.; Levenkova, Natasha; Birnbaum, Stephanie S. L. (2016-03-29). "Small genome of the fungus Escovopsis weberi, a specialized disease agent of ant agriculture". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113 (13): 3567–3572. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.3567D. doi:10.1073/pnas.1518501113. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 4822581. PMID 26976598.
- ^ Gerardo, Nicole M; Jacobs, Sarah R; Currie, Cameron R; Mueller, Ulrich G (August 2006). "Ancient Host–Pathogen Associations Maintained by Specificity of Chemotaxis and Antibiosis". PLOS Biology. 4 (8) e235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040235. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 1489191. PMID 16805647.
- ^ Poulsen, Michael; Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Yek, Sze Huei (2012). "Towards a Better Understanding of the Evolution of Specialized Parasites of Fungus-Growing Ant Crops". Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 2012: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2012/239392.
- ^ Currie, C. R. (2001). "A community of ants, fungi, and bacteria: a multilateral approach to studying symbiosis" (PDF). Annual Review of Microbiology. 55: 357–380. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.357. hdl:1808/835. ISSN 0066-4227. PMID 11544360.
- ^ Malloch, David; Summerbell, Richard C.; Scott, James A.; Currie, Cameron R. (April 1999). "Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites". Nature. 398 (6729): 701–704. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..701C. doi:10.1038/19519. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4411217.
- ^ a b Barke, Jörg; Seipke, Ryan F.; Grüschow, Sabine; Heavens, Darren; Drou, Nizar; Bibb, Mervyn J.; Goss, Rebecca JM; Yu, Douglas W.; Hutchings, Matthew I. (2010-08-26). "A mixed community of actinomycetes produce multiple antibiotics for the fungus farming ant Acromyrmex octospinosus". BMC Biology. 8 (1): 109. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-109. ISSN 1741-7007. PMC 2942817. PMID 20796277.
- ^ Haeder, Susanne; Wirth, Rainer; Herz, Hubert; Spiteller, Dieter (2009-03-24). "Candicidin-producing Streptomyces support leaf-cutting ants to protect their fungus garden against the pathogenic fungus Escovopsis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (12): 4742–4746. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.4742H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812082106. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 2660719. PMID 19270078.
- ^ Mattoso, Thalles C.; Moreira, Denise D. O.; Samuels, Richard I. (2012-06-23). "Symbiotic bacteria on the cuticle of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus protect workers from attack by entomopathogenic fungi". Biology Letters. 8 (3): 461–464. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0963. ISSN 1744-957X. PMC 3367728. PMID 22130174.
- ^ a b Hutchings, Matthew I.; Goss, Rebecca J. M.; Yu, Douglas W.; Hill, Lionel; Brearley, Charles; Barke, Jörg; Seipke, Ryan F. (2011-08-03). "A Single Streptomyces Symbiont Makes Multiple Antifungals to Support the Fungus Farming Ant Acromyrmex octospinosus". PLOS ONE. 6 (8) e22028. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622028S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022028. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3153929. PMID 21857911.
- ^ Holmes, Neil A.; Innocent, Tabitha M.; Heine, Daniel; Bassam, Mahmoud Al; Worsley, Sarah F.; Trottmann, Felix; Patrick, Elaine H.; Yu, Douglas W.; Murrell, J. C. (2016-12-26). "Genome Analysis of Two Pseudonocardia Phylotypes Associated with Acromyrmex Leafcutter Ants Reveals Their Biosynthetic Potential". Frontiers in Microbiology. 7: 2073. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02073. ISSN 1664-302X. PMC 5183585. PMID 28082956.
- ^ Oh, Dong-Chan; Poulsen, Michael; Currie, Cameron R.; Clardy, Jon (July 2009). "Dentigerumycin: a bacterial mediator of an ant-fungus symbiosis". Nature Chemical Biology. 5 (6): 391–393. doi:10.1038/nchembio.159. ISSN 1552-4469. PMC 2748230. PMID 19330011.
- ^ Seipke, Ryan F.; Grüschow, Sabine; Goss, Rebecca J. M.; Hutchings, Matthew I. (2012). "Isolating Antifungals from Fungus-Growing Ant Symbionts Using a Genome-Guided Chemistry Approach". Natural Product Biosynthesis by Microorganisms and Plants, Part C. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 517. pp. 47–70. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-404634-4.00003-6. ISBN 978-0-12-404634-4. ISSN 1557-7988. PMID 23084933.
- ^ Autuori (1956). "La fondation des sociétés chez les fourmis champignonnistes du genre Atta (Hym. Formicidae)". L'Instinct dans le Comportement des Animaux et de l'homme. pp. 77–104.
- ^ Saes, N. B.; Forti, L. C.; Pereira-da-Silva, V.; Fowler, H. G. (1986). "Population dynamics of leaf-cutting ants: A brief review".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ a b c Hölldobler, Bert; Wilson, Edward O. (1990). The Ants. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-52092-4.
- ^ John R. B. Lighten; Roces, Flavio (February 1995). "Larger bites of leaf-cutting ants". Nature. 373 (6513): 392. Bibcode:1995Natur.373..392R. doi:10.1038/373392a0. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4340622.
- ^ Feener, Donald H.; Moss, Karen A. G. (1990). "Defense against Parasites by Hitchhikers in Leaf-Cutting Ants: A Quantitative Assessment". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 26 (1): 17–29. Bibcode:1990BEcoS..26...17F. doi:10.1007/bf00174021. ISSN 0340-5443. JSTOR 4600370. S2CID 39526172.
- ^ Irenäus; Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Eleonore (1967). "Das Parasitenabwehren der Minima-Arbeiterinnen der Blattschneider-Ameise (Atta cephalotes)". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 24 (3): 278–281. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1967.tb00579.x. ISSN 1439-0310.
- ^ a b c d Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats (2012). The Social Biology of Microbial Communities: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). ISBN 978-0-309-26432-7. PMID 24027805.
- ^ Schultz, Ted R.; Meier, Rudolf (1995). "A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae". Systematic Entomology. 20 (4): 337–370. Bibcode:1995SysEn..20..337S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.1995.tb00100.x. ISSN 1365-3113. S2CID 86455302.
- ^ a b Mueller, U. G.; Schultz, T. R.; Currie, C. R.; Adams, R. M.; Malloch, D. (June 2001). "The origin of the attine ant-fungus mutualism". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 76 (2): 169–197. doi:10.1086/393867. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 11409051. S2CID 19465007.
- ^ Villesen, Palle; Mueller, Ulrich G.; Schultz, Ted R.; Adams, Rachelle M. M.; Bouck, Amy C. (October 2004). "Evolution of ant-cultivar specialization and cultivar switching in Apterostigma fungus-growing ants". Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 58 (10): 2252–2265. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01601.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 15562688. S2CID 202842261.
- ^ Chapela, I. H.; Rehner, S. A.; Schultz, T. R.; Mueller, U. G. (1994-12-09). "Evolutionary history of the symbiosis between fungus-growing ants and their fungi". Science. 266 (5191): 1691–1694. Bibcode:1994Sci...266.1691C. doi:10.1126/science.266.5191.1691. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17775630. S2CID 22831839.
- ^ Schultz, Ted R.; Rehner, Stephen A.; Mueller, Ulrich G. (1998-09-25). "The Evolution of Agriculture in Ants". Science. 281 (5385): 2034–2038. Bibcode:1998Sci...281.2034M. doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2034. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 9748164.
- ^ Bot, A. N.; Rehner, S. A.; Boomsma, J. J. (October 2001). "Partial incompatibility between ants and symbiotic fungi in two sympatric species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants". Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 55 (10): 1980–1991. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01315.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 11761059. S2CID 25817643.
- ^ Leal, I.R.; Oliveira, P.S. (2000-11-01). "Foraging ecology of attine ants in a Neotropical savanna: seasonal use of fungal substrate in the cerrado vegetation of Brazil". Insectes Sociaux. 47 (4): 376–382. doi:10.1007/PL00001734. ISSN 1420-9098. S2CID 44692368.
- ^ Urrea-Valencia, Salomé; Júnior, Rodolfo Bizarria; Kooij, Pepijn W.; Montoya, Quimi Vidaurre; Rodrigues, Andre (2023-08-26). "Unraveling fungal species cultivated by lower attine ants". Mycological Progress. 22 (9): 66. Bibcode:2023MycPr..22...66U. doi:10.1007/s11557-023-01912-6. ISSN 1861-8952.
- ^ Leal-Dutra, Caio A.; Griffith, Gareth W.; Neves, Maria Alice; McLaughlin, David J.; McLaughlin, Esther G.; Clasen, Lina A.; Dentinger, Bryn T. M. (December 2020). "Reclassification of Pterulaceae Corner (Basidiomycota: Agaricales) introducing the ant-associated genus Myrmecopterula gen. nov., Phaeopterula Henn. and the corticioid Radulomycetaceae fam. nov". IMA Fungus. 11 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/s43008-019-0022-6. ISSN 2210-6359. PMC 7325140. PMID 32617254.
- ^ Howard, Jerome J. (1988). "Leafcutting and Diet Selection: Relative Influence of Leaf Chemistry and Physical Features". Ecology. 69 (1): 250–260. Bibcode:1988Ecol...69..250H. doi:10.2307/1943180. ISSN 0012-9658. JSTOR 1943180.
- ^ Nichols-Orians, Colin M.; Schultz, Jack C. (1990). "Interactions among leaf toughness, chemistry, and harvesting by attine ants". Ecological Entomology. 15 (3): 311–320. Bibcode:1990EcoEn..15..311N. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1990.tb00813.x. ISSN 1365-2311. S2CID 84589876.
- ^ a b Wirth, Rainer; Herz, Hubert; Ryel, Ronald J.; Beyschlag, Wolfram; Hölldobler, Bert (2003). Herbivory of Leaf-Cutting Ants: A Case Study on Atta colombica in the Tropical Rainforest of Panama. Ecological Studies. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-43896-0.
- ^ Blum, Murray S.; Moser, John C. (1963-06-14). "Trail Marking Substance of the Texas Leaf-Cutting Ant: Source and Potency". Science. 140 (3572): 1228–31. Bibcode:1963Sci...140.1228M. doi:10.1126/science.140.3572.1228. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 14014717. S2CID 83895656.
- ^ Jaffe, K.; Howse, P. E. (1979-08-01). "The mass recruitment system of the leaf cutting ant, Atta cephalotes (L.)". Animal Behaviour. 27: 930–939. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90031-9. ISSN 0003-3472. S2CID 53186670.
- ^ Ruth, J. M.; Brownlee, R. G.; Moser, J. C.; Silverstein, R. M.; Tumlinson, J. H. (December 1971). "Identification of the Trail Pheromone of a Leaf-cutting Ant, Atta texana". Nature. 234 (5328): 348–349. Bibcode:1971Natur.234..348T. doi:10.1038/234348b0. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 4944485. S2CID 4202763.
- ^ Cross, John H.; Byler, Russell C.; Ravid, Uzi; Silverstein, Robert M.; Robinson, Stephen W.; Baker, Paul M.; De Oliveira, João Sabino; Jutsum, Alan R.; Cherrett, J. Malcolm (1979-03-01). "The major component of the trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant, Atta sexdens rubropilosa forel". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 5 (2): 187–203. Bibcode:1979JCEco...5..187C. doi:10.1007/BF00988234. ISSN 1573-1561. S2CID 44215787.
- ^ Riley, R. G.; Silverstein, R. M.; Carroll, B.; Carroll, R. (April 1974). "Methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate: a volatile trail pheromone from the leaf-cutting ant, tatta cephalotes". Journal of Insect Physiology. 20 (4): 651–654. Bibcode:1974JInsP..20..651R. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(74)90186-3. ISSN 0022-1910. PMID 4833350.
- ^ al, Kleineidam CJ, et (2007). "Perceptual differences in trail-following leaf-cutting ants relate to body size". Journal of Insect Physiology. 53 (12): 1233–41. Bibcode:2007JInsP..53.1233K. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.015. PMID 17716686.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Hölldobler, Bert; Wilson, Edward O. (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-06704-0.
- ^ Nichols-Orians, Colin M.; Schultz, Jack C. (1989). "Leaf Toughness Affects Leaf Harvesting by the Leaf Cutter Ant, Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Biotropica. 21 (1): 80–83. Bibcode:1989Biotr..21...80N. doi:10.2307/2388446. ISSN 0006-3606. JSTOR 2388446.
- ^ van Breda, J. M.; Stradling, D. J. (1994-12-01). "Mechanisms affecting load size determination inAtta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)". Insectes Sociaux. 41 (4): 423–435. doi:10.1007/BF01240645. ISSN 1420-9098. S2CID 28382866.
- ^ Burd, Martin (1995-09-01). "Variable load size-ant size matching in leaf-cutting ants, Atta colombica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Journal of Insect Behavior. 8 (5): 715–722. Bibcode:1995JIBeh...8..715B. doi:10.1007/BF01997240. ISSN 1572-8889. S2CID 35300866.
- ^ Burd, Martin (1996-10-01). "Server System and Queuing Models of Leaf Harvesting by Leaf-Cutting Ants". The American Naturalist. 148 (4): 613–629. doi:10.1086/285943. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 84634128.
- ^ Burd, Martin (1996-10-01). "Foraging Performance by Atta colombica, a Leaf-Cutting Ant". The American Naturalist. 148 (4): 597–612. doi:10.1086/285942. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 85162835.
- ^ Markl, H. (1965-09-17). "Stridulation in Leaf-Cutting Ants". Science. 149 (3690): 1392–1393. Bibcode:1965Sci...149.1392M. doi:10.1126/science.149.3690.1392. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17741924. S2CID 38784032.
- ^ Tautz, J.; Roces, F.; Hölldobler, B. (1995-01-06). "Use of a sound-based vibratome by leaf-cutting ants". Science. 267 (5194): 84–87. Bibcode:1995Sci...267...84T. doi:10.1126/science.267.5194.84. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17840064. S2CID 24022580.
- ^ a b Röschard, Jacqueline; Roces, Flavio (2002-04-01). "The effect of load length, width and mass on transport rate in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri". Oecologia. 131 (2): 319–324. Bibcode:2002Oecol.131..319R. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0882-z. ISSN 1432-1939. PMID 28547700. S2CID 10796655.
- ^ a b Röschard, J.; Roces, F. (2003-08-01). "Cutters, carriers and transport chains: Distance-dependent foraging strategies in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri". Insectes Sociaux. 50 (3): 237–244. doi:10.1007/s00040-003-0663-7. ISSN 1420-9098. S2CID 28562863.
- ^ Stephen P., Hubbell; Johnson, Leslie K.; Stanislav, Eileen; Wilson, Berry; Fowler, Harry (1980). "Foraging by Bucket-Brigade in Leaf-Cutter Ants". Biotropica. 12 (3). Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation: 210. Bibcode:1980Biotr..12..210H. doi:10.2307/2387973. JSTOR 2387973. Retrieved 2019-06-06.
- ^ Fowler, Harold G.; Robinson, S. W. (1979). "Foraging by Atta sexdens (Formicidae: Attini): seasonal patterns, caste and efficiency". Ecological Entomology. 4 (3): 239–247. Bibcode:1979EcoEn...4..239F. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1979.tb00581.x. ISSN 1365-2311. S2CID 85209179.
- ^ Anderson, Carl; Ratnieks, Francis L. W. (November 1999). "Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency" (PDF). The American Naturalist. 154 (5): 521–535. doi:10.1086/303255. ISSN 1537-5323. PMID 10561125. S2CID 4351075.
- ^ Hart, Adam G.; Ratnieks, Francis L. W. (2001-08-01). "Leaf caching in the leafcutting ant Atta colombica: organizational shift, task partitioning and making the best of a bad job". Animal Behaviour. 62 (2): 227–234. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1743. ISSN 0003-3472. S2CID 38397259.
- ^ Anderson, C.; Boomsma, J.J.; Bartholdi, III, J.J. (2002-05-01). "Task partitioning in insect societies: bucket brigades". Insectes Sociaux. 49 (2): 171–180. doi:10.1007/s00040-002-8298-7. ISSN 1420-9098. S2CID 9239932.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Roces, Flavio (June 2002). "Individual complexity and self-organization in foraging by leaf-cutting ants". The Biological Bulletin. 202 (3): 306–313. doi:10.2307/1543483. ISSN 0006-3185. JSTOR 1543483. PMID 12087004. S2CID 11954207.
- ^ Bass, M.; Cherrett, J. M. (1995). "Fungal hyphae as a source of nutrients for the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens". Physiological Entomology. 20 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1995.tb00793.x. ISSN 1365-3032. S2CID 86617827.
- ^ Meurant, Gerard (2012-12-02). "The mutualism between leaf-cutting ants and their fungus". Insect-Fungus Interactions. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-08-098453-7.
- ^ Gomes De Siqueira, Célia; Bacci, Maurício; Pagnocca, Fernando Carlos; Bueno, Odair Correa; Hebling, Maria José Aparecida (December 1998). "Metabolism of Plant Polysaccharides by Leucoagaricus gongylophorus, the Symbiotic Fungus of the Leaf-Cutting Ant Atta sexdens L." Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64 (12): 4820–4822. Bibcode:1998ApEnM..64.4820G. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.12.4820-4822.1998. ISSN 0099-2240. PMC 90928. PMID 9835568.
- ^ Abril, Adriana B.; Bucher, Enrique H. (2002). "Evidence that the fungus cultured by leaf-cutting ants does not metabolize cellulose". Ecology Letters. 5 (3): 325–328. Bibcode:2002EcolL...5..325A. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00327.x. ISSN 1461-0248.
- ^ D'Ettorre, P.; Mora, P.; Dibangou, V.; Rouland, C.; Errard, C. (February 2002). "The role of the symbiotic fungus in the digestive metabolism of two species of fungus-growing ants". Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 172 (2): 169–176. doi:10.1007/s00360-001-0241-0. ISSN 0174-1578. PMID 11916111. S2CID 19813993.
- ^ Quinlan, R. J.; Cherrett, J. M. (1979). "The role of fungus in the diet of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.)". Ecological Entomology. 4 (2): 151–160. Bibcode:1979EcoEn...4..151Q. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1979.tb00570.x. ISSN 1365-2311. S2CID 84148628.
- ^ Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Schiøtt, Morten; Sørensen, Søren J.; Hansen, Lars H.; Zhukova, Mariya; Sapountzis, Panagiotis (2015-08-15). "Acromyrmex Leaf-Cutting Ants Have Simple Gut Microbiota with Nitrogen-Fixing Potential". Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 (16): 5527–5537. Bibcode:2015ApEnM..81.5527S. doi:10.1128/AEM.00961-15. ISSN 1098-5336. PMC 4510174. PMID 26048932.
- ^ Anderson, Kirk E.; Russell, Jacob A.; Moreau, Corrie S.; Kautz, Stefanie; Sullam, Karen E.; Hu, Yi; Basinger, Ursula; Mott, Brendon M.; Buck, Norman (May 2012). "Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species". Molecular Ecology. 21 (9): 2282–2296. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.2282A. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05464.x. ISSN 1365-294X. PMID 22276952. S2CID 32534515.
- ^ Bae, Jin-Woo; Lee, Won-Jae; Kim, Sung-Hee; Shin, Na-Ri; Kim, Joon-Yong; Choi, Jung-Hye; Kim, Yun-Ji; Nam, Young-Do; Yoon, Changmann (2014-09-01). "Insect Gut Bacterial Diversity Determined by Environmental Habitat, Diet, Developmental Stage, and Phylogeny of Host". Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80 (17): 5254–5264. Bibcode:2014ApEnM..80.5254Y. doi:10.1128/AEM.01226-14. ISSN 1098-5336. PMC 4136111. PMID 24928884.
- ^ Colman, D. R.; Toolson, E. C.; Takacs-Vesbach, C. D. (October 2012). "Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?". Molecular Ecology. 21 (20): 5124–5137. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.5124C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05752.x. ISSN 1365-294X. PMID 22978555. S2CID 23740875.
- ^ Sapountzis, Panagiotis; Nash, David R.; Schiøtt, Morten; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2018). "The evolution of abdominal microbiomes in fungus-growing ants". Molecular Ecology. 28 (4): 879–899. doi:10.1111/mec.14931. ISSN 1365-294X. PMC 6446810. PMID 30411820.
- ^ Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Rosendahl, Søren; Guldberg-Frøslev, Tobias; Rouland-Lefèvre, Corinne; Eggleton, Paul; Aanen, Duur K. (2002-11-12). "The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (23): 14887–14892. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9914887A. doi:10.1073/pnas.222313099. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 137514. PMID 12386341.
Cited texts
[edit]- Hölldobler, Bert and Wilson, EO. (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 9780393067040
External links
[edit]
Media related to Attini at Wikimedia Commons
Fungus-growing ants
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy and Diversity
Genera and Species
Fungus-growing ants, known as attine ants, form the monophyletic tribe Attini within the subfamily Myrmicinae of the family Formicidae.[7] This tribe is exclusively New World in distribution, ranging from the southern United States to northern Argentina, and consists of approximately 245 described species that obligately cultivate fungi as their primary food source.[8] The attines comprise around 19 extant genera in the subtribe Attina, divided into Paleoattina (3 genera) and Neoattina (16 genera).[8] Key genera include Apterostigma, Mycetophylax, Mycocepurus, Myrmicocrypta, Cyphomyrmex, Mycospor, Aparcula, Trachymyrmex, Sericomyrmex, Atta, and Acromyrmex, among others. These genera exhibit varying levels of diversity; for example, Acromyrmex includes about 35 species and Atta about 20 species (totaling around 55 leaf-cutting species), while genera like Trachymyrmex and Sericomyrmex each have 20–40 species.[9][10] Attine ants are classified into four principal agricultural systems based on fungal symbionts and foraging strategies, reflecting evolutionary specialization.[3] Lower agriculture, practiced by basal genera such as Apterostigma and Mycetophylax (about 85 species), involves cultivating diverse, free-living fungi from the Agaricaceae family using organic debris like insect frass, seeds, and decaying plant material. Yeast agriculture, seen in genera like Cyphomyrmex and Mycospor (around 19 species), relies on yeast-like fungi for rapid garden growth in small colonies. Coral agriculture, utilized by Aparcula and related genera (approximately 30 species), features upright-growing fungi from the Pterulaceae family fertilized with seeds and flowers. The most derived higher agriculture, including the leaf-cutting ants of genera Atta and Acromyrmex (over 110 species total for higher attines, with 55 leaf-cutters), involves domesticated fungi like Leucoagaricus gongylophorus grown on fresh vegetation, acting as dominant herbivores in Neotropical ecosystems.[3][2]Phylogenetic Relationships
Fungus-growing ants, belonging to the tribe Attini, form a monophyletic clade within the subfamily Myrmicinae of the family Formicidae.[11] This placement is supported by extensive molecular phylogenies that confirm the Attini's distinct evolutionary lineage, characterized by their obligate mutualism with fungal cultivars.[11] The tribe's origin traces back to approximately 66 million years ago, marking a key divergence within Myrmicinae following the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event.[3] Within the Attini, phylogenetic analyses reveal a basal position for the genus Apterostigma, which represents the earliest diverging lineage and cultivates more ancestral fungal forms.[11] In contrast, the leaf-cutting genera Atta and Acromyrmex occupy a derived position within the higher attines, which emerged around 27 million years ago, with the leaf-cutters themselves diversifying approximately 8–12 million years ago, alongside genera like Sericomyrmex and Trachymyrmex.[3][7] These relationships have been reconstructed using multilocus and phylogenomic data, including mitochondrial DNA and nuclear genes, demonstrating consistent branching patterns across studies.[11] The phylogenetic structure of Attini underscores a tight co-evolution with their fungal partners, primarily in the subfamily Leucocoprineae.[3] This symbiosis originated around 66 million years ago, with ants transitioning to specialized cultivation of fungi for nutrition.[3] A hallmark of this co-evolutionary dynamic is the development of gongylidia—swollen, nutrient-rich hyphal tips produced by the fungi—evolving approximately 27 million years ago in higher attine cultivars like Leucoagaricus gongylophorus.[3] These structures are unique to the attine-fungus mutualism, enabling efficient trophallaxis where ants harvest and feed the gongylidia to colony members, reinforcing the phylogenetic congruence between ant and fungal lineages.[3]Evolutionary History
Origins and Timeline
The evolutionary origins of fungus-growing ants, known as attines, trace back to the immediate aftermath of the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event approximately 66 million years ago. Molecular phylogenomic analyses indicate that the divergence of attine ants from their ancestral ant lineages occurred around 66.65 ± 13.28 million years ago, coinciding with the global disruption caused by the asteroid impact that eliminated non-avian dinosaurs and temporarily halted photosynthesis. This timing suggests that the initial shift from herbivory or other foraging strategies to fungivory emerged as an adaptive response to the post-extinction ecological vacuum, allowing early attine colonies to cultivate fungi as a reliable food source amid scarce plant resources.[3] The fossil record for attine ants remains sparse, with no direct evidence predating the Miocene, though molecular clocks provide the primary timeline for deeper history. The earliest known attine fossils, including proto-attine forms from genera such as Apterostigma, have been recovered from Dominican amber dated to 15-20 million years ago, preserving workers and queens that exhibit early traits of fungal cultivation. These Miocene specimens confirm the presence of fungus-farming behavior in the New World tropics by the middle Cenozoic, bridging the gap between molecular estimates and observable morphology. Prior to these fossils, the lack of amber or sedimentary records from the Paleocene-Eocene limits direct paleontological insights, but genomic data supports a gradual establishment of attine-fungus mutualism over tens of millions of years.[7][12] Key transitions in attine evolution include the domestication of specialized fungal cultivars in the higher attines, which occurred approximately 27 million years ago during the Oligocene-Miocene boundary. This shift involved ants cultivating Leucoagaricus fungi, such as L. gongylophorus, in enclosed garden systems, marking a leap from lower attine generalized farming to more efficient, crop-specific agriculture. The leaf-cutting adaptations in genera like Atta and Acromyrmex arose later, around 8-12 million years ago, enabling these ants to become dominant herbivores by harvesting fresh vegetation to fertilize their fungal gardens.[3][7] Climatic fluctuations profoundly influenced these milestones, particularly the Terminal Eocene Event around 34 million years ago and subsequent Miocene cooling, which expanded seasonally dry habitats across South America. These environmental changes isolated fungal populations, promoting co-speciation and strengthening the ant-fungus symbiosis, while favoring traits like leaf-cutting for efficient resource use in cooler, more variable conditions. The Miocene's global cooling, from about 23 to 5 million years ago, further spurred diversification by opening new ecological niches, though attines remained largely confined to the Neotropics.[3][13]Adaptive Radiations
The diversification of fungus-growing ants, or attine ants, encompasses two major adaptive radiations that shaped their evolutionary trajectory, driven by symbiotic innovations and ecological opportunities in the Neotropics. The lower attines, comprising approximately 85 species that cultivate less specialized fungi in the family Agaricaceae, underwent an initial radiation originating around 66 million years ago following the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction, with significant diversification occurring in the humid tropical forests of South America during the Eocene to Oligocene periods (approximately 45–30 million years ago). This early expansion was facilitated by the adoption of proto-agricultural fungus cultivation, allowing these ants to exploit nutrient-poor substrates in stable, moist environments where free-living fungi were abundant. Comparative phylogenetic analyses reveal that this radiation produced a diverse array of small-colony species adapted to leaf litter and insect frass as substrates, with hotspots of endemism in the Amazonian and Andean regions.[3][14][7] A second, more pronounced adaptive radiation occurred among the higher attines starting around 27–31 million years ago in the late Oligocene, post-dating the Terminal Eocene Event and coinciding with climatic shifts toward drier habitats. This event, involving approximately 113 species including the 52 leaf-cutting species in genera Atta and Acromyrmex, was marked by the domestication of specialized fungal cultivars in the tribe Leucocoprineae that produce nutrient-rich gongylidia, enabling efficient processing of fresh vegetation. Phylogenetic reconstructions indicate a rapid speciation burst in the Miocene to Pliocene (approximately 23–3 million years ago), particularly for leaf-cutters, which radiated across the Neotropics following the uplift of the Andes and the closure of the Isthmus of Panama, leading to biogeographic isolation and niche partitioning. Key innovations during this radiation included the emergence of worker polymorphism—ranging from minor workers for gardening to large soldiers for defense—which enhanced colony efficiency and foraging capacity, alongside fungal specialization that reduced escape and promoted co-speciation.[3][13][14][15] These radiations were propelled by parallel evolutionary processes, such as the independent domestication of similar fungal lineages across attine clades, evidenced by genomic shifts in both ants and fungi that mirror agricultural intensification. For instance, higher attines show reciprocal adaptations in enzyme profiles for substrate degradation, while lower attines retain more generalized symbioses, driving speciation through habitat-specific fungal fidelity and reduced gene flow. Overall, comparative phylogenetics across ~250 extant species underscores the Neotropics as the primary cradle of attine diversity, with over 90% of lineages concentrated in tropical South America, where ecological pressures like pathogen pressure and resource variability further accelerated trait evolution.[16][7][3][17]Morphology and Castes
Queen Morphology and Role
Queens in fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) are morphologically specialized for reproduction and colony establishment, differing markedly from workers in size and structure. Prior to mating, they exist in an alate form, featuring fully developed wings for nuptial flights and a robust body equipped with large, mature ovaries to support future egg production. In the genus Atta, queens attain a substantial body length of approximately 30 mm, enabling them to store sufficient energy reserves for independent colony founding.[18][19] Following mating during nuptial flights, queens undergo dealation, voluntarily shedding their wings to transition into the gyne stage, characterized by a markedly swollen abdomen optimized for prolific egg-laying. This post-mating morphology supports their extended lifespan, which can reach 10–20 years or more in species like Atta cephalotes, allowing sustained reproduction over the colony's duration.[18][19] The queen's primary role centers on initiating and perpetuating the colony, with founding strategies varying by phylogenetic position: derived higher attines like Atta and Acromyrmex employ claustral founding, where the queen excavates a small chamber in the soil, deposits a fungal pellet carried from her natal colony in her infrabuccal pocket to seed the initial fungus garden, and seals herself inside to lay and rear the first brood of workers using her bodily reserves, while basal and lower attines typically use semiclaustral founding, foraging externally to supplement resources.[20][19] This solitary phase in claustral species lasts until the emergence of the first workers, after which the queen focuses exclusively on oviposition, potentially producing millions of eggs over her lifetime.[20] Morphological traits vary across attine genera, reflecting phylogenetic divergence and ecological adaptations; for instance, queens in basal ("lower") attine genera such as Apterostigma and Mycetophylax exhibit relatively smaller body sizes compared to the larger, more polymorphic forms in derived ("higher") genera like Atta and Acromyrmex.[19]Worker Morphology and Role
Worker ants in fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) display marked polymorphism, with body sizes typically ranging from 1.5 to 16 mm depending on the species and caste.[21] Minor workers, the smallest caste (head width ~0.8–1.2 mm), are specialized for intricate tasks within the nest, featuring elongated mandibles suited for precise manipulation without heavy wear.[22] In contrast, larger media and major workers (head width up to ~3.3 mm or more) possess robust, serrated or blade-like mandibles adapted for cutting vegetation, with 7–10 teeth and lengths of 0.4–1.6 mm, enabling efficient foraging in higher attine genera like Atta and Acromyrmex.[22] These ants also bear specialized exocrine glands, including mandibular glands that secrete alarm pheromones for communication and metapleural glands that produce antimicrobial compounds to inhibit fungal pathogens in the colony.[23][24] The primary roles of workers revolve around colony maintenance, including fungus tending by inoculating and grooming the symbiotic fungus garden, waste management through removal of refuse to prevent contamination, and brood care such as feeding and transporting larvae.[25] In higher attines, task allocation is strongly influenced by worker size, with smaller minors focusing on internal nest activities like gardening and brood care, while larger workers handle external foraging and substrate collection to support the fungus.[25] This size-based division enhances efficiency in large colonies, where worker size variation correlates positively with overall colony size (β = 0.392 across 19 species).[25] Workers exhibit behavioral plasticity, allowing them to adjust tasks based on colony needs, such as shifting from gardening to foraging during resource shortages.[25] Age-based polyethism further structures their roles, with young workers performing inside-nest duties like brood care and fungus maintenance, while older individuals transition to foraging and external tasks, a pattern observed in leaf-cutting ants like Atta species.[26] In some cases, workers overlap with soldiers in basic defense, patrolling nest entrances against intruders.[25]Soldier Morphology and Role
Soldier ants in fungus-growing species, particularly within the higher attines such as Atta and Acromyrmex, represent a specialized subcaste characterized by pronounced morphological adaptations for defense and heavy labor. These individuals exhibit large body sizes, reaching up to 16 mm in length in species like Atta laevigata, with head widths exceeding 6 mm in Atta cephalotes soldiers. Their mandibles are powerfully developed and often reinforced with zinc, enabling effective cutting and combat, while their heads display exaggerated shapes with broad capsules to accommodate robust musculature. In Acromyrmex echinatior, major workers (soldiers) average 6.4 mm in body length and feature a high-magnesium calcite biomineral armor layer approximately 2.3 µm thick overlaying the exoskeleton, which increases cuticle hardness from 0.73 GPa to 1.55 GPa, enhancing resilience against physical damage and pathogens.[27][28] This soldier subcaste is predominantly found in higher attine genera like Atta and Acromyrmex, where worker polymorphism is extensive, with size variation spanning orders of magnitude (e.g., head widths from 0.6 mm to 6.1 mm in Atta cephalotes). In contrast, lower attine ants exhibit minimal polymorphism and lack or have greatly reduced major worker castes, correlating with their smaller colony sizes (typically under 10,000 workers) and simpler social structures. Colony size positively predicts the degree of worker size variation and thus the presence of soldiers, as larger societies in higher attines demand specialized roles for efficiency.[25][28] Soldiers primarily function in colony protection, patrolling and defending foraging trails and nest entrances against intruders such as other ants or vertebrates, using their formidable mandibles to seize and incapacitate threats. They also contribute to foraging by cutting large leaf or fruit fragments—often pieces weighing up to 28.5 mg—due to their superior mandibular strength, though this task is partitioned with smaller workers handling transport. Additionally, soldiers deploy chemical defenses via metapleural gland secretions, including phenylacetic acid, which provide antimicrobial protection against parasites and pathogens affecting both the ants and their fungal gardens.[27][29][30] Evolutionarily, soldiers in higher attines originated as an elaboration of the major worker subcaste, driven by the demands of large-scale fungus agriculture that emerged around 20–50 million years ago. Caste differentiation, including the development of soldiers, has a genetic foundation involving pathways like insulin signaling, which responds to nutritional cues during larval stages to determine body size and morphology, alongside genes such as RhoA GTPase influencing cytoskeletal changes. This system allows flexible subcaste production based on colony needs, enhancing overall social complexity without altering the underlying worker genotype.[27][28]Reproductive Behavior
Mating Strategies
Fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) reproduce through synchronized nuptial flights that typically occur during the rainy season in their Neotropical habitats, often triggered by moderate to heavy rainfall followed by warm, humid conditions with temperatures above 26°C. These flights are highly synchronous across multiple colonies, enhancing outbreeding and reducing predation risk through predator satiation, as seen in species like Atta vollenweideri where swarms initiate in the late afternoon after cumulative precipitation exceeds 64 mm over 30 days. During these events, winged queens (gynes) and males emerge from mature colonies, with males aggregating first on nest mounds before takeoff, followed shortly by gynes, leading to aerial swarms where mating takes place. Mating in attine ants varies phylogenetically, with queens in basal (lower) genera such as Apterostigma, Cyphomyrmex, and Myrmicocrypta typically engaging in monogamous mating with a single male, while queens in derived (higher) genera like Atta and Acromyrmex exhibit obligate polyandry, mating with 3–5 or more males on average.[31] This transition to multiple mating evolved once in the common ancestor of the leaf-cutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex), correlating with larger colony sizes and specialized fungus cultivation on fresh vegetation.[31] Queens store the received sperm in their spermatheca for lifelong use, producing all subsequent offspring without remating, which supports the genetic diversity benefits of polyandry in higher attines.[32] Following mating, queens disperse from the swarm, land, and voluntarily shed their wings by chewing them off, then seek suitable soil sites to excavate initial nest chambers and establish fungus gardens using inocula carried from their natal colonies.[33] Males, having fulfilled their reproductive role, die shortly after copulation, as their sole function is to fertilize queens during the nuptial flight.[32] This dispersal phase sets the stage for independent colony founding by the inseminated queen.[33]Colony Founding
Colony founding in fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) typically occurs through independent haplometrotic strategies, where a single newly mated queen establishes a new nest without assistance from workers. Following the nuptial flight, the queen dealates, excavates a small subterranean chamber using her mandibles, and initiates the fungus garden by regurgitating a fungal inoculum—a small pellet of mycelium—carried from the parental colony in her infrabuccal pocket. This pellet, clonally propagated across generations, serves as the foundational substrate for the symbiotic fungus, on which the queen lays her first batch of eggs; she then tends both the emerging brood and the nascent garden by grooming and adding fecal material to promote fungal growth.[15][19] The process is energetically demanding, with queens relying on stored fat reserves (ranging from 11% in lower attine species like Cyphomyrmex rimosus to 25% in higher attines like Trachymyrmex septentrionalis) to provision the initial brood without external food intake in claustral species. In claustral founding, characteristic of the most derived higher attines such as Atta leafcutters, the queen seals the chamber immediately after planting the inoculum, remaining isolated and subsisting solely on her body lipids until the first workers eclose, which minimizes predation risk but limits garden expansion. By contrast, most other attines, including lower attines and basal higher attines like Acromyrmex and Trachymyrmex, employ semi-claustral founding, where queens periodically forage outside the nest for additional plant material or detritus to bolster the fungus garden, balancing nutritional needs against heightened exposure to predators and environmental hazards.[19][34][35] Colony establishment faces extremely high mortality, with approximately 90% of founding queens failing due to starvation, predation, desiccation, or fungal garden collapse within the first few months. For instance, in the leafcutter ant Atta texana, only 16.3% of queens survive to produce workers after 90 days, while in Acromyrmex octospinosus, monthly nest failure rates hover around 50%, leading to half of incipient colonies perishing within 2.7 months. The timeline to eclosion of the first workers varies by clade but generally spans 4–10 weeks; in Trachymyrmex septentrionalis, workers emerge about one month post-founding, enabling the queen to cease foraging and transition to full-time reproduction as the workforce expands the garden.[36][35][19] These variations reflect adaptations to ecological pressures, with claustral and semi-claustral modes in higher attines supporting larger, more specialized colonies compared to the smaller, short-lived nests of lower attines.Social Organization
Division of Labor
In fungus-growing ants of the tribe Attini, division of labor is structured around distinct castes that specialize in complementary roles to support colony function and fungus cultivation. Queens are primarily reproductive, laying eggs and ensuring colony perpetuation, while sterile female workers perform the majority of non-reproductive tasks, including foraging for substrate, tending the fungal garden, brood care, and nest maintenance. Soldiers, often the largest workers in polymorphic species, focus on defense against predators and intruders, patrolling trails and colony entrances. This caste-based specialization enhances overall colony efficiency by allocating tasks according to morphological adaptations suited to each role.[37] Workers further exhibit temporal polyethism, an age-related progression of tasks that optimizes labor allocation within the colony. Young workers remain inside the nest, engaging in delicate activities such as cleaning the queen, feeding larvae, and grooming the fungal garden to remove debris and pathogens. As they age, typically after 20–30 days in species like Atta sexdens, workers transition to external duties, including foraging for leaves or other substrates and waste management outside the nest. This shift is accompanied by physiological changes, such as increased mandibular strength and altered sensory processing, allowing older workers to handle more physically demanding or hazardous tasks. Temporal polyethism ensures a steady supply of fresh workers for intracolonial needs while reserving experienced individuals for high-risk activities.[38] In polymorphic attine species, such as the leaf-cutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex), size-based task partitioning adds another layer of specialization, creating an assembly-line efficiency in labor. Minor workers (smallest size class) specialize in fungus gardening, precisely pruning nutrient-rich gongylidia from the symbiotic fungus and distributing them to brood and queen. Media workers, of intermediate size, handle transportation, carrying leaf fragments along foraging trails and assessing substrate quality to avoid toxic plants. Major and supermajor workers, the largest castes, are dedicated to leaf cutting—using powerful jaws to excise plant material—and colony defense, where their size provides an advantage in combat. This size polymorphism correlates with colony scale, as larger colonies exhibit greater worker size variation (coefficient of variation up to 64%), enabling finer task subdivision and higher productivity.[39][25] Task allocation and switching are regulated by pheromones, which provide chemical cues for coordination and flexibility. Trail pheromones deposited by foragers guide recruits to active sites and stimulate task engagement, while alarm pheromones trigger rapid shifts, such as reallocating workers from gardening to defense during threats. This pheromonal system allows dynamic adjustments under colony stress, such as resource shortages or parasite invasions, where workers can revert to younger-task behaviors or reprioritize foraging to maintain fungal garden health. Such responsiveness ensures colony resilience without rigid hierarchies.[40]Communication and Defense
Fungus-growing ants, or attine ants, primarily rely on chemical pheromones for coordinating foraging and responding to threats. Trail pheromones, secreted from the poison gland, guide workers to food sources and establish foraging routes, with the concentration modulating recruitment intensity and the signal fading within about one hour to allow route adjustments.[41] Alarm pheromones, released from mandibular glands during disturbances, trigger defensive behaviors such as mandible opening and aggressive posturing; for instance, in Atta species like A. cephalotes, 4-methyl-3-heptanone elicits rapid threat responses, while Acromyrmex species such as A. echinatior respond strongly to 3-octanol.[23] These pheromones vary across attine clades, with derived species like Trachymyrmex cornetzi using compounds such as 2-dodecenal, enabling species-specific alarm propagation that mobilizes colony defense without excessive panic.[23] In addition to chemical signals, attine ants employ tactile and vibrational methods for close-range coordination during nest maintenance. Workers use antennation—touching antennae to one another—to assess tasks and exchange information, facilitating efficient labor distribution within the nest.[42] Stridulation, produced by rubbing body parts to generate substrate vibrations, serves as a short-range signal; in leaf-cutting ants like Atta cephalotes, workers stridulate while excavating tunnels, prompting nearby nestmates to dig in proximity and accelerate nest expansion.[43] These vibrational cues complement pheromones by providing immediate, localized communication that enhances colony cohesion without relying on volatile chemicals.[44] For physical defense, attine ants deploy specialized castes and behaviors to counter predators and intruders. Soldiers, characterized by enlarged mandibles, patrol foraging trails to intercept threats, biting with forceful jaws to deter invaders such as army ants; in interactions with Eciton species, attine workers and soldiers form defensive lines, using bites to disrupt raids. Many attines, including Atta and Acromyrmex, possess stings derived from their ancestral myrmicine lineage, injecting venom to immobilize attackers, though biting remains the primary mechanism in larger species.[45] Colony-level protections include structured waste disposal, where workers transport refuse to isolated external dumps, reducing pathogen accumulation and infection risk within the nest.[46] Ventilation is maintained through nest architecture, such as thatched turrets in Atta vollenweideri colonies, which promote airflow to expel carbon dioxide and excess humidity, thereby minimizing respiratory stress and microbial growth.[47]Fungus Cultivation
Substrate Collection
Fungus-growing ants, collectively known as attine ants, display specialized foraging behaviors to gather substrates essential for cultivating their symbiotic fungus. Higher attine ants, particularly leaf-cutters in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex, focus on fresh vegetation as their primary substrate. Atta species predominantly harvest green leaves, which constitute up to two-thirds of their collected material, while Acromyrmex foragers target a broader range including flowers, seeds, fruits, berries, and leaf fragments.[48][49][50] In contrast, non-leaf-cutting attine ants, such as those in Cyphomyrmex, Trachymyrmex, and Apterostigma, adopt opportunistic strategies, collecting diverse substrates like insect frass, seeds, dry plant debris, flowers, and occasionally insect carcasses or detritus. These ants shift foraging preferences seasonally, favoring insect frass and dry materials during drier periods.[48][51] Foraging efficiency in higher attines relies on pheromone-marked trail systems that form clear "highways" extending up to 100 meters or more from the nest, enabling coordinated transport and traffic regulation among workers. These trails, reinforced by pheromones from the ants' poison glands, guide foragers and laden workers back to the colony while minimizing energy expenditure.[48][52][53] Mature Atta colonies demonstrate remarkable harvesting capacity, with estimates of annual biomass collection ranging from 88 to 509 kg per colony, underscoring their role as dominant herbivores in tropical ecosystems.[54] To circumvent plant defenses, leaf-cutting ants selectively target non-toxic species and employ a gustatory feedback mechanism, rejecting substrates that prove unsuitable for fungal growth after initial acceptance. This behavior ensures that only viable materials are incorporated into gardens, reducing the risk of chemical inhibition.[55][56][57]Fungus Gardening Techniques
Fungus gardens in attine ants vary across the four agricultural systems, but in higher attine ants they consist of a multi-layered, compost-like structure formed by layering substrate—such as leaf fragments or other organic matter—which is inoculated with fungal hyphae and enriched with gongylidia—swollen, nutrient-rich hyphal tips produced by the symbiotic fungus.[58] In lower agriculture (Apterostigma, Mycetophylax), gardens are simpler, using organic debris inoculated with free-living fungal mycelium from Agaricaceae without gongylidia. Yeast agriculture (Cyphomyrmex, Mycospor) features loose clusters of yeast-like fungal cells rather than hyphae. Coral agriculture (Aparcula and related genera) involves upright-growing fungi fertilized with seeds and flowers. This stratification in higher attines creates distinct zones: new substrate is added to the top layer where fungal growth is sparse, the central productive section supports optimal mycelial development, and the depleted bottom layers are discarded as refuse by the ants.[58] The gongylidia, typically around 48 μm in diameter, cluster into bundles called staphylae that serve as the primary food source for the ants, maintaining the mutualistic balance within the garden.[58] Workers perform daily maintenance to propagate and sustain the garden, including pruning overgrown fungal sections to stimulate new staphylae formation and removing senescent or unproductive material to prevent decay.[58] They inoculate incoming substrate with fecal droplets containing fungal spores and enzymes, which facilitate decomposition and integration into the existing hyphal network, ensuring continuous garden expansion.[58] This meticulous tending mimics agricultural practices, with ants actively shaping the garden's architecture to optimize fungal productivity.[20] Fungal propagation occurs primarily through vertical transmission, where founding queens carry a small pellet of fungal inoculum from their natal colony to establish new gardens, ensuring genetic continuity of the cultivar across generations.[20] Horizontal transmission via spores can supplement this in established colonies, allowing limited gene flow between fungal lineages when vertical transfer is disrupted.[58] As colonies mature, garden size scales proportionally with worker population, reaching volumes of several cubic meters in large Atta species nests, which may span underground chambers exceeding 20 cubic meters in total.[59]Symbiotic Bacteria and Nutrition
Fungus-growing ants, particularly those in the tribe Attini, maintain symbiotic relationships with actinobacteria of the genus Pseudonocardia, which reside on the ants' integument and produce antifungal compounds to protect the cultivated fungus from specialized pathogens such as Escovopsis. These bacteria synthesize antibiotics, including the cyclic depsipeptide dentigerumycin, which selectively inhibits Escovopsis growth while sparing the ant's fungal cultivar. This mutualism enhances colony hygiene by suppressing infections that could devastate the fungus garden, a critical resource for the ants.[60][61][62] The nutritional symbiosis between the ants and their fungal cultivar involves a specialized cycle where the fungus processes plant material into digestible forms. Ants harvest leaves or other substrates, which the fungus decomposes using enzymes to break down complex plant celluloses into simpler compounds. In return, the fungus produces swollen hyphal structures called gongylidia, which are enriched with lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates, serving as the primary food source for the ants. This trophic exchange allows the ants to derive sustenance from otherwise indigestible vegetation.[58][63][64] Over evolutionary time, Pseudonocardia symbionts and Escovopsis pathogens have engaged in a co-evolutionary arms race, driving the diversification of antibiotic defenses and pathogen resistance mechanisms within attine ant colonies. This dynamic selection pressure has led to specialized adaptations, such as varying antibiotic profiles across ant populations, which bolster overall colony immunity against fungal invasions. Such interactions underscore the role of bacterial symbionts in maintaining the stability of the ant-fungus mutualism.[61][62][65] The fungal cultivar complements the nutritional limitations of the ants' leaf-based foraging by synthesizing essential amino acids, such as phenylalanine and tyrosine, which are scarce or absent in fresh plant material. This provisioning ensures a balanced diet for ant development and reproduction, highlighting the evolutionary innovation of fungus farming as a means to access otherwise unavailable nutrients.[58]Ecology and Distribution
Habitats and Range
Fungus-growing ants (tribe Attini) are exclusively distributed across the Neotropics, extending from the southern United States to northern Argentina. This range encompasses a broad latitudinal span in the New World, where the ants have radiated since their evolutionary origins in the region. Species diversity peaks in the Amazon basin, where wet forest habitats support the highest concentrations of attine taxa, reflecting the clade's adaptation to humid tropical conditions. These ants occupy varied habitats, including tropical rainforests and Neotropical savannas such as the Brazilian Cerrado. Nesting occurs primarily in soil, where colonies excavate subterranean chambers; many species also utilize leaf litter or cavities under dead wood for nest initiation and smaller colonies. Such flexibility in nesting substrates allows attines to exploit both forested understories and open grassy areas.[66][67][68] Attines thrive across an elevational gradient from sea level to approximately 2000 meters, with some species documented up to 3500 meters in Andean cloud forests. In regions with pronounced dry seasons, such as savannas, colonies construct deep nests—often exceeding several meters—to maintain stable microclimates for fungus gardens, accessing groundwater and shielding against desiccation.[69][70] While predominantly native to continental Neotropics, they are also found on some Caribbean islands, including Trinidad and Barbados, where populations remain limited in scope and have not established widespread distributions beyond the islands.[71]Environmental Interactions
Fungus-growing ants, particularly species in the tribe Attini such as leaf-cutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex), function as ecosystem engineers by modifying soil structure and chemistry through nest construction and waste management. Their extensive nest systems, which can extend several meters deep and displace large volumes of soil, enhance aeration by reducing soil density and increasing porosity, thereby improving gas exchange and water infiltration in otherwise compacted tropical soils.[72] This bioturbation mixes nutrient-poor subsurface layers with organic-rich surface materials, creating heterogeneous soil profiles that support microbial activity and root penetration.[73] Nutrient cycling is amplified by the ants' deposition of fungal refuse and waste, which forms nutrient hotspots around nests. Refuse chambers and external dumps concentrate elements like nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium—often 20-50 times higher than surrounding soils—accelerating decomposition and organic matter accumulation via symbiotic fungal breakdown of harvested plant material.[74] These "fertility islands" propagate nutrients upward through soil profiles and food webs, fostering long-term soil enrichment that persists even after nest abandonment.[75] Seed dispersal occurs incidentally during foraging, as ants harvest and discard viable seeds in refuse piles, where conditions like reduced competition and enriched substrates promote germination rates higher than in undisturbed areas; for instance, Atta cephalotes aids dispersal of species like Schinus fasciculatus by breaking seed dormancy.[76][77] Interactions with plants are dominated by selective herbivory, where fungus-growing ants preferentially target young, nutrient-rich foliage high in nitrogen and minerals but low in defenses like tannins, influencing plant community composition by suppressing palatable species and indirectly promoting resilient or less preferred flora.[73] This foraging pressure, which can remove 10–15% of leaf area in some Neotropical forests, creates canopy gaps that alter light regimes and facilitate succession toward disturbance-tolerant plants, while nest soils' enhanced fertility boosts growth of nearby vegetation, including fine roots and mycorrhizae.[72] Although primarily herbivorous, some attine species engage in indirect mutualisms by dispersing seeds of co-occurring plants, enhancing overall floral diversity without direct anti-herbivore protection.[78] Fungus-growing ants exhibit sensitivity to climatic perturbations, particularly deforestation and drought, which disrupt foraging efficiency and nest maintenance. Deforestation fragments habitats, reducing access to diverse leaf substrates and increasing vulnerability to edge effects, while prolonged droughts like the 2015-2016 El Niño event lower soil moisture, impairing fungal garden viability and microbial symbionts critical for ant nutrition.[79][80] For example, leafcutter ants in Costa Rica experienced challenges to colony health during the 2015–2016 El Niño due to desiccation stress on their moisture-dependent cultivar fungi.[80] In North America, species like Trachymyrmex septentrionalis showed contracted distributions and reduced colony survival during the severe 2005–2007 drought.[81] Despite this, nests can buffer local drought impacts by retaining moisture and stabilizing microbial communities, though broader habitat loss amplifies risks to population persistence.[80] As keystone species in Neotropical ecosystems, fungus-growing ants sustain biodiversity by engineering resource hotspots that support decomposers and secondary consumers. Their nests harbor elevated microbial diversity and attract soil biota, creating refugia that enhance overall habitat heterogeneity and facilitate trophic cascades, such as increased fine root biomass and plant establishment around refuse sites.[77] In mature forests, species like Atta cephalotes indicate high ecosystem integrity, while their activities promote succession and sustain understory decomposer communities, underscoring their disproportionate influence relative to biomass.[74]Ecological and Human Impacts
Parasites and Pathogens
Fungus-growing ants, or attine ants, face significant threats from specialized fungal pathogens, particularly those in the genus Escovopsis, which are mycoparasites uniquely adapted to exploit the ants' cultivated fungal gardens. These pathogens target the symbiotic fungus (Leucoagaricus gongylophorus in higher attines), using hyphal hooks for physical invasion and chemicals like shearinines for enzymatic degradation, potentially overrunning gardens within 72 hours if unchecked.[82] Escovopsis infections are prevalent, occurring in 33–52% of colonies across eight attine genera and comprising about 26% of all garden contaminants sampled.[15] In experimental settings with Atta colombica, exposure to Escovopsis led to garden devastation and colony collapse in 38% of cases (6 out of 16 subcolonies).[15] Prevalence varies by ant lineage and age, with higher rates (up to 70%) in Acromyrmex species compared to Atta (around 49%), and lower infection in mature colonies (approximately 20% in those over five years old).[83] Infected colonies exhibit reduced garden biomass and fewer workers, larvae, and pupae, impairing overall growth and survival.[83] Attine ants mitigate Escovopsis threats through symbiotic Actinobacteria (Pseudonocardia and Streptomyces species) that produce antifungal compounds such as dentigerumycin A and candicidin D, suppressing pathogen growth in gardens.[82] These bacteria, referenced in the context of broader symbiotic defenses, form a protective microbiome on ant cuticles.[82] In addition to fungal pathogens, attine colonies are invaded by parasitic arthropods and nematodes that disrupt nest integrity. Phorid flies in the genus Apocephalus (family Phoridae) are key parasitoids, laying eggs on foraging ants and inducing behavioral changes; larvae develop inside the host, often decapitating it and emerging to pupate outside the nest.[84] These flies reduce foraging efficiency by up to 50% in leaf-cutting ants due to heightened worker vigilance.[85] Mites, while not always directly pathogenic, act as vectors for fungal propagules, facilitating pathogen spread within and between colonies.[15] Parasitic nematodes from families like Mermithidae and Allantonematidae infect attine workers, altering morphology or behavior and contributing to nest invasion, though specific prevalence in attines remains understudied.[86] External predators further compound risks, targeting foragers and vulnerable colony stages. Mammals such as tamanduas (Tamandua spp.) and giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) raid nests for ants, consuming thousands daily and disturbing extensive underground systems.[87] Birds, including nocturnal species like motmots and woodcreepers, prey on dispersing queens and surface foragers, exploiting the nutrient-rich gasters of reproductives.[18] Phorid flies also serve a predatory role beyond parasitism, with adults occasionally consuming ant tissues during oviposition.[88] Garden infections by Escovopsis and cumulative parasite pressures contribute to colony collapse risks.[83]Agricultural and Economic Relevance
Fungus-growing ants, particularly leaf-cutter species in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex, pose significant challenges to agriculture in the Neotropics by defoliating crops and forestry plantations, leading to substantial yield reductions. In South American agricultural systems, these ants can remove 20-30% of leaf area from crops such as fruit trees, cocoa, and vegetables, resulting in direct productivity losses. For instance, in citrus orchards in Trinidad, attacks by Atta species caused 30% mortality among newly planted trees. Similarly, a single colony can harvest up to three tons of sugarcane annually, exacerbating damage in major export regions like Brazil.[89][90][91] Management of these pests relies on integrated approaches, including chemical pesticides and biological agents. Synthetic insecticides such as sulfluramid and fipronil are commonly applied as baits to target colonies, effectively reducing foraging activity and nest viability in affected plantations. Biological controls, notably the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana, have shown promise in field trials, achieving up to 62.5% colony mortality when applied as spore mixtures or baits, offering a more environmentally sustainable alternative to broad-spectrum chemicals.[92][93][94][95] The economic toll of fungus-growing ants is profound, with annual damages estimated in the billions of dollars across Neotropical agriculture and forestry. In Brazil alone, losses to sugarcane, citrus, and eucalyptus plantations run into hundreds of millions, driven by the ants' capacity to defoliate vast areas and kill seedlings at rates up to 30% in forestry settings. Indigenous communities in South America have long incorporated traditional pest management practices, such as using plant-derived repellents, into their agricultural strategies, highlighting the cultural dimension of mitigating ant impacts on staple crops.[91][96][97] Beyond their pest status, fungus-growing ants offer potential benefits to human endeavors. Their symbiotic bacterial associates, such as Pseudonocardia species, produce antifungal compounds that suppress garden parasites, and these antibiotics have been studied for possible applications in medicine and agriculture due to their broad-spectrum efficacy against fungal pathogens. Additionally, attine ants serve as bioindicators of ecosystem health in tropical forests, with shifts in their abundance and diversity signaling disturbances like soil degradation or pollution in Neotropical habitats.[98][99][62][100] Conservation efforts for fungus-growing ants are challenged by habitat loss from agricultural expansion and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots like the Amazon and Atlantic Forest. These threats reduce colony viability and genetic diversity, prompting inclusion in protected areas such as Brazilian national parks, where monitoring programs aim to balance pest control with preservation of their ecological roles.[91][101]References
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Acromyrmex
- https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Atta